HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/30/2013
Staff: Committee members: Steven Teglia, Assistant to the City Manager Willie Rivera, Chair
Ken Weir Terry Maxwell SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
of the City Council - City of Bakersfield
Friday, August 30, 2013
12:00 p.m.
City Hall North
1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301
First Floor, Conference Room A
A G E N D A
1. ROLL CALL
2. ADOPT JULY 29, 2013 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
4. DEFERRED BUSINESS
A. Discussion Regarding Funding for TRIP Projects – Smith / Tandy
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion Regarding a Possible Ballot Measure – Tandy
6. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
7. ADJOURNMENT
Committee Members:
Staff: Steven Teglia Willie Rivera, Chair
Assistant to the City Manager Ken Weir
Terry Maxwell
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, July 29, 2013
12:00 p.m.
City Hall North – Conference Room A
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
The meeting was called to order at 12:00 PM
1. ROLL CALL
Committee members present: Councilmember Willie Rivera, Chair
Councilmember Ken Weir
Councilmember Terry Maxwell
Staff present:
Alan Tandy, City Manager Ginny Gennaro, City Attorney
Rhonda Smiley, Asst. to the City Manager Josh Rudnick, Deputy City Attorney
Steven Teglia, Asst. to the City Manager Raul Rojas, Public Works Director
Nelson Smith, Finance Director Nick Fidler, Asst. Public Works Director
Don Anderson, Property Manager Ted Wright, TRIP Manager
Kristina Budak, TRIP Engineer Tera Ortiz, TRIP Accountant
Others present:
Bill Knoetgen, Parsons Program Manager Greg Gharib, Parsons Consultant
Ahron Hakimi, Kern COG Director Theo Douglas, Bakersfield Californian
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Budget and Finance Committee Meeting
Monday, July 29, 2013
Page 2
2. ADOPT FEBRUARY 25, 2012 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Adopted as submitted.
3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
None
4. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion Regarding Funding for TRIP Projects – Smith / Tandy
City Manager Tandy stated Vice Mayor Weir requested the Committee discuss the
issue of funding for the balance of road projects such as TRIP.
Finance Director Smith started a workshop presentation which included the review of
the following:
Estimated costs and funding for TRIP projects
Four potential projects needing financing:
- State Route 178 Widening: $30 million needed;
- Hosking Interchange: $31 million needed;
- 24th Street Improvement Project: $28 million needed; and
- The Centennial Corridor Project: $317 million needed.
The total estimated funding cost for the projects is $867 million. There is currently $442
million of federal and state funding allocated for the projects and $18 million local
funding. An additional $407 million local funding is needed.
The basis for the estimated borrowing amount
After contributions from the County of Kern and Kern Council of Governments, an
approximate $348 million of City funding is needed. Long term borrowing is expected
to occur in 2017, considering the annual cash flow of the next four years of
approximately $19.5 million, the estimated local long term borrowing need is $270
million.
The financing plan is to pursue a federal TIFIA loan. There are three specific revenue
sources planned to be pledged for repayment purposes: Gas Tax, Transportation
Development Fees, and Utility Surcharge/Franchise Fees. The estimated annual debt
service payment is $14 million per year.
Costs estimating practices and guidelines
City Manager Tandy stated the engineer’s estimating policy, established in the
Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual (CPDPM), updates unit pricing
twice a year, and is validated annually by the Federal Highway Administration. At
various stages of project development, safety contingencies that range from 5% to
50% of the cost estimates are required to be included. The right-of-way cost
estimating, also established by CPDPM, requires safety contingency ranging from
20% to 25% with an additional 3% per year for project delays. Traditional cost for
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Budget and Finance Committee Meeting
Monday, July 29, 2013
Page 3
projects include environmental phase items, Right-of-way items, design/engineering
items, and construction items.
Recent actual bid results for two projects
An analysis of recent projects indicates that CPDPM’s required estimate contingency
is higher than the actual bid document requirements. As a result, savings are greater.
Recent bids received for the State Route 178 Project and the State Route 58 project
were approximately 19% and 6% below the engineer’s estimate.
Committee member Maxwell asked what local benefits are associated with the
construction of the Westside Parkway and the Centennial Corridor. He also
requested staff provide commuter usage estimates at the next meeting.
City Manager Tandy stated several benefits include relief of traffic on Rosedale
Highway; reduction in pollution issues, as regional traffic will move through faster
reducing pollution; safety improvements connecting Rosedale Highway with State
Route 58; and reduction of traffic congestion on Rosedale Highway, Stockdale
Highway, Coffee Road, Gosford Road, and Brimhall Road. Public Works Director
Rojas added that several of the previously mentioned streets will see a significant
improvement to traffic flow during high commuter hours.
Kern COG director Hakimi stated there would be great improvement to the air
quality. Kern County consistently does not meet several requirements of the Clean
Air Act; the Centennial Corridor project will reduce the lengths of trips for all residents
in Kern County. Funding options are lost when it cannot be collectively
demonstrated that efforts are being made to comply with the air quality rules. The
project also improves the level service of State Route 99 by removing trucks from the
state route and providing a more direct alternate which also reduces the length and
time of travel, therefore, reducing the impact to the air quality.
Committee member Maxwell asked if any funding is lost if the modeling was
inaccurate and commuter usage habits do not change or improve.
Kern COG director Hakimi responded it was possible if traffic continued to be
congested and there were a significant increase to air pollution. It can take several
years to be able to adequately make this kind of determination.
Committee member Maxwell also inquired if the County had provided the City any
kind of documentation committing them to their contribution of $57 million.
City Manager Tandy stated the Board of Supervisors had recently voted
recommitting a $60 million contribution and requested their staff provide them an
estimated timeline for when they would need to bond. No formal documentation
has been received.
Committee member Maxwell asked for additional information regarding the
validation action process.
City Attorney Gennaro stated the corporation is in the formation process. After a
response is received from the Secretary of State, the corporation would then need to
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
Budget and Finance Committee Meeting
Monday, July 29, 2013
Page 4
adopt bylaws. This is expected to be done at the first Council meeting in September.
The City Council would then move to approve the form of the loan documents and
direct staff to move forward with the validation action. This is expected to be
presented to Council no earlier than the second meeting of September.
Committee Chair Rivera asked why a TIFIA loan is preferred over an alternative
funding source.
Finance Director Smith stated a TIFIA loan is preferred due to its flexible as well as
being less expensive.
Committee Chair Rivera also asked why there are three specific revenue sources
planned for pledging and what is the estimate annual repayment amount per year.
City Manager Tandy stated both, public and private sector funding sources require
an entity to identify revenue sources in order to analyze the ability to repay. The City
can spend the pledged revenue sources annually when not needed for the bond
repayment. Finance Director Smith stated the estimated annual repayment amount
will total approximately $14 million.
Committee Chair Rivera asked how pledging the three revenue sources affect
regular street maintenance, curbs and gutters, resurfacing, etc. within the City limits.
Chair Rivera also asked if any money from the General Fund is utilized to pay for TRIP
projects.
City Manager Tandy stated funding for street maintenance, curbs and gutters,
resurfacing, etc. mainly comes from Federal grants, Capital Outlay funds, and the
General Fund. Public Works Director Rojas stated revenues from the Transportation
Development Fees and Utility Surcharge Franchise have been utilized since 2006-
2007 and 2008-2009 respectively to pay for the TRIP projects.
Committee Chair Rivera asked staff to research previous practices to implement a
Council contingency to assure future funding will be available for all street
maintenance and improvements needs and report back to the Committee.
5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
None
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 1:25 PM
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DOCUMENTS HANDED
OUT AT THE
COMMITTEE MEETING