Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB989 6/7/12rar SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7- ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Date of Testing: 6/7/2012 Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: Manager Phone: 834 -1350 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 6/l/2012 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): None Present 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Pass Technician Conducting Test: Alan Evans Not Tested Credentials: r CSLB Licensed Contractor R SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: License Number: 04 -1669 Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s) Date Training Expires Incon STS 4/1/2014 .: X Spill Box TI RUL SIPHON rul 2 fill X i. i 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ' Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repair Made (Tank I - rul 2) STP Containment 1 to 1/2 X Spill Box TI RUL SIPHON rul 2 fill X (Tank 2 - rul) STP Containment I to STP Containment 2 X Spill Box T1 RUL SIPHON rul 2 vapor X STP Containment for Tank I rul 2 - 1 . X Spill Box T1 RUL SIPHON rut 2 vapor X STP Containment for Tank I rul 2 - 1 X Spill Box T2 RUL MAIN rul fill X STP Containment for Tank 2 rul - 1 X Spilt Box T2 RUL MAIN rul fill X STP Containment for Tank 2 rul - I X Spill Box T2 RUL MAIN rul vapor X STP Containment for Tank 3 put - 1 X Spill Box T2 RUL MAIN rul vapor X STP Containment for Tank 3 put - 1 X Spill Box T3 PUL put fill X UDC # 1/2 X Spill Box T3 PUL put vapor X UDC # 3/4 X UDC # 3/4 X Spill Box TI RUL SIPHON rul 2 fill X If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Test water pumped out and removed by Nieto CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal ',requirements Technician's Signature: A Date: 012012 i WO: 3402382 SWRCB, January 2002 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Page 1 of 1 Test Method Developed By: r--J Piping Manufacturer [ Industry Standard r Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: r Pressure r-- Vacuum r Hydrostatic r7 Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" oil filled au a Equipment Resolution: 0 4m „s (Tank 1 jrul2) CI ) (:aE ci Cont me 1'to STP A., wnContamment ft Piping Material: Poly Poly Piping Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Piping Diameter: 2 in. 2 in. in. in. Length of Piping Run: 10 ft. 10 ft. ft. ft. Product Stored: RUL 2 RUL Method and location of Booted Booted piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and 15 min 15 min min min starting test: Test Start Time: 09:30:00 Initial Reading (Rl): 5.10000 PSI Test End Time: 10:30:00 Final Reading (RF): - 3.10000 PSI Test Duration: 15 hr Change in Reading (RF -Rl): - 8.20000 PSI Pass/Fail Threshold or +/-0.00000 +/- Criteria: 8ik Ti Test Result �t � C:n ti, rt .� r �j R k E a �a tw , { 1 t n a� '.� R� s-r kT ua: A '" r.. ..�- ...i € i. Sw� �" _a11 +. +a /+ FF ..yy,��FF......�� ail" li. k..�,'.v �,it.t iy s N.Ch �h� Gk'h �t a.. ...N, yn k ,rw'k.' 4; Comments- (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) 87 syphon line from tank 1 -2 is TCI white bone colored single wall Flex piping. 87 main 3x2 test boot blew apart when line was being pressured up, boot dried out and brittle. 91 product line did not seem to have secondary or access to it, no test boot and entry fitting looked to be standard 2" entry not 3" with secondary. Bostik all over fittings inside sumps. i i 1 J t I I. I ; i I I SWRC13, January 2002 Page 1 of 2 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer r Industry Standard r_! Professional, Engineer r- Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure r Vacuum R_ Hydrostatic' rl Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON Equipment Resolution: 0.002 in, STP Containment for STP Containment for STP Containment for STP Containment for Tank I rul 2 - I Tank 1 rul 2 - 1 Tank 2 rul - I Tank 2 rul - 1 Sump Diameter: 42.00 in. 42.00 in. 42.00 in. 42.00 in. Sump Depth: 43.00 in. 43.00 in. 43.00 in. 43.00 in. Sump Material: Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 10.00 10.00 16.00 16.00 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Condition of sump prior to testing: OK OK OK OK Portion of Sump Tested' 18 18 18 18 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both 0- Yes C9 No r NA !w Yes r No r NA r Yes re No M NA r Yes r Nor NA product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time sec sec sec sec Is system programmed for fail -safe ra Yes r No r NA r5 Yes r% No r NA r Yes r Nor NA r' Yes M No C NA shutdown ?* Was fail -safe verified to be , Yes ;r1 Nor NA C-' Yes r-1 Nor NA 01 Yes r No r- NA % .Yes r No r. NA operational?* t Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min test Test Start Time: 12:21:00 12:41:00 11:42:00 11:58:00 Initial Reading (RI): 5.15530 in. 5.15560 in. 5.31520 in. 5.31580 in. Test End Time: 12:37:00 12:56:00 11:57:00 12:13:00 Final Reading (RF): 5.15550 in. 5.15560 in. 5.31570 in. 5.31580 in. Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF -RI) : 0.00020 in. 0.00000 in. 0.00050 in. i 0.00000 in. Pass/fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.00200 +/-0.00200 +/-0.00200 +/-'0.00200 �. }.; xra i° �:� } :• FL 5ht SS r •:,. yar „G x - r. ;.< ,r'r - t Nt +-,F .dfi :..,uBCx3k.'.y"1tt. ca {i'r r. .. . k 3�:..;a. ,Pase,t� Was sensor removed for testing? r Yes r No r NA r Yes r No r- NA t~ Yes r No M NA C Yes C No 0 NA Was sensor properly replaced and •0 Yes r No 0 NA r Yes r No T NA r Yes r No C NA 04 Yes (Z7 No r NA verified functional after testing? i Comments ? (include information on repairs made prior to leaving, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) T2 87 main tank STP sump not tested due to bad test boot. Note: bostik all over fittings inside all sumps. if the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 2 of 2 6- PIPING .qI MP TF.CTTNG Test Method Developed By: r7 Tank Manufacturer 110� Industry Standard Professional, Engineer F'� Other (Specify). Test Method Used By: r Pressure r Vacuum r Hydrostatic r:' Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON Equipment Resolution: 0.002 in. STP Containment for STP Containment for d C Mg Tank 3 pul - 1 Tank 3 pul - 1 Sump Diameter: 42.00 in. 42.00 in. in. in. Sump Depth: 43.00 in. 43.00 in. in. in. Sump Material: Polyethylene Polyethylene Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 10.00 10.00 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 6.00 6.00 Condition of sump prior to testing: OK OK Portion of Sump Tested' 18 18 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both C Yes C ? No !? NA C Yes Co No (. NA r Yes M No 0 NA 0 Yes' GO No r NA product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time sec sec sec sec Is system programmed for fail -safe C Yes r No is NA (T Yes(? No G NA Cw Yes r-1 No C NA ro ;Yes r No C NA shutdown ?* Was fail -safe verified to be` (' Yes C No is NA r Yes 0 No C NA (` Yes C No Cam° NA % Yes r No 0 NA operational?* Wait time between applying , pressure /vacuum/water and starting 15 min 15 min min min test Test Start Time: 11:42:00 11:58:00 Initial Reading (RI): 6.22760 in. 6.22810 in. Test End Time: 11:57:00 12:13:00 Final Reading (RF): 6.22810 in. 6.22730 in. Test Duration: 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF -RD : 0.00050 in. - 0.00080 in. Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.00200 +/-0.00200 +/_ +/- "p CestResult 'sa"� �wJ4� s' ;�i'�ws K� �..,VA. 4, t y • : : Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes C No C NA C Yes C No (:, NA r Yes r No (x NA 0 Yes Q No r NA Was sensor properly replaced and (? Yes r No 0 NA (m Yes % No C NA % Yes G No C NA - C;a .Yes Q No C NA verified functional after testing? Comments 7 (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) T2 87 main tank STP sump not tested due to bad test boot. Note: bostik all over fittings inside all sumps. j 1 If the entire depth oft I he sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. SWRCB, January 2002 7. UNDER - DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: r UDC Manufacturer r Industry Standard r Professional Engineer M Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: r Pressure r vacuum M Hydrostatic Ca Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: IN N Equipment Resolution: UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Testedt Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)? - Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fall -safe shutdown?- Was fall -safe verified to be operational?- Walt time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change In Reading (RF-RI) Pass /Fail Threshold or Crlterla: Test Result �`F��' {qty. Was sensor removed for testing? was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Unknown Polyethylene 30.00 12.00 8.00 OK 15 r Yes Ca' No r?- NA sec r Yes r No f: NA (r! Yes f^ No r NA 15 min 10:34:00 5.34860 in. 10:49:00 5.28070 in. 15 min 0.06790 In. +/- 0.00200 C.'r Yes M No Cp NA r• Yes r No Cns NA Unknown Polyethylene 30.00 12.00 8.00 OK 15 r Yes r Nor NA sec C Yes r No r NA r Yes r No r NA 15 min 10:15:00 4.55820 in. 10:30:00 4.55810 In. 15 min - 0.00010 In. +/- 0.00200 r For yi) Pasx rs Yes r No r NA % Yes r Nor NA #3/4 bi r,`u of Unknown Polyethylene 30.00 12.00 8.00 OK 15 r Yes r No C., NA sec r Yes r No r• NA r, Yes r, No ro, NA 15 min 10:49:00 4.55580 In. 10:49:00 4.55610 in. 15 min 0.00030 In. +/- 0.00200 '�- -%= a Passq r Yes r No 01 NA r Yes r No r NA Comments 7 (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) ' Page 1 of 1 I rw Yes f+ No r NA sec 0 Yes % Nor NA ( Yes r No r NA min r.Yes C No r NA r= Yes C0 No C7 NA UDC 1/2 failed multiple tests. Note: bostik all over all fittings inside udc's. _— - ---- -- . .............. ! t If the entire depth of the UDC Is not tested. snerifv how much was tested. If the answer to anv of the nuestlnns indicated with an asterisk f *) Is ?NO? or 7NA7. the entire UDC must be tested. I i. t Page 1 of 3 SPILL /OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps P Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested r.1 Test Method Developed By: r Spill Bucket Manufacturer r" Industry Standard r Professional Engineer r Other (Specify): Test Method Used By: ry Pressure r Vacuum C Hydrostatic r7 Other (Specify): Test Equipment Used: INC N Equipment Resolution: 0.002 ln. "12 Gyl rat'': Tank'S1 �RULSIPHON: >RUl 2` &'j., - >.` hFlll `Dlrect�� TTank Tl`RUL SIPHON RUt 2i +� FII1Dlrect" an T1�RULrSIPHONRUC tL4'{" 'Y+Y4t"�! Vii:; �Uapor�Dlcectrn Tank,ssTn1�IRU�L,SIPHON,RUL 2 �� Vapora �Dlrect, Bucket Diameter: 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Bucket Depth: 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Wait time between t ap plying Pressure /vacuum /water 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min and starting test Test start Time: 09:34:00 09:54:00 09:34:00 09:54:00 Initial Reading oy: 4.0538 in. 4.0523 In. 5.6649 In. 5.6636 In. Test End Time: 09:49:00 10:10:00 09:49:00 10:10:00 Final Reading (Rd: 4.0525 In. 4.0520 in. 5.6638 In. 5.6632 In. Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Change in Reading pyn,7 0.00 in. 0,00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 In. Pass /Fall Threshold or Criteria: 0.0020 +/- 0.0020 +/- 0.0020 +/ 0.0020 Test Result ` Z t # Passe r k1 Pass r�� Pass t .. " ",w�,.�. .,r.nm �. �..te!vv o ,.�w'- n;.a it �, .un �r.e. k', �, PBSS i�z Comments 7 (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for, fall led tests) W0: 3402382 Page 2 of 3 SPILL /OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps R Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested r Test Method Developed By: !" Spill Bucket Manufacturer r'. Industry Standard f' Professional Engineer Other (Specify): Test Method Used By: f" Pressure r vacuum ry Hydrostatic C Other (Specify): est'E ul ment Used: I INCON Equipment Resolution: 0.002 in ,#. T �; -:i I i L r'i ti `RULINl1IN ;SNZIi �;', Box # .`I'• . k� I il$pII iii �+�v.7' RULE 4'i - S�ilvl. Fill Directs ,fank;T2.kRULMAINRUL. ¢ .Sit .- •--s R '. FilleDirect,- TanklT2 RUL MAIN RU , vT,. M 'Tl .S J §C4 R R Vapory Dire�etvaryy{orpirect ,ank2aRUL:MAIN RUI r� -' k. '�'i "K h ks ', y 9y,gI 7�� , Bucket Diameter: 12.00 12.00 12.00 I 12.00 Bucket Depth: 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Walt time between applying Pressure/vacuum/water and 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min starting test Test Start Time: 11:01:00 11:17:00 11:01:00 11:17:00 Initial Reading ryy 5.2925 in. 5.2923 in. 6.6104 in. 6.6101 in. Test End Time: 11:16:00 11:32:00 11:16:00 11:32:00 Final Reading P,): 5.2924 In. 5.2926 in. 6.6104 In. 6.6103 In. Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min .15 min Change In Reading sA): 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 In. 0.00 In. Pass Fall Threshold or Criteria: +/- 0.0020 +/- 0.0020 +/- 0.0020 +/- 0.0020 L i �, Result�r� ,a�� Pass{ pasjsl`�Passi� _ aSS� ,fin i „St C �..I. a. s, :�... i Comments ? (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Page 3 of 3 SPILL /OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps �+ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested r Test Method Developed By: r Spill Bucket Manufacturer r Industry Standard Q, Professional Engineer r Other (Specify): Test Method Used By: r Pressure r vacuum M, Hydrostatic r` Other (Specify): Test Equipment Used: INCON Equipment Resolution: 0.002 In —x v iu b t u ir � d Y ' M 1/ SIll B € i B9J x #�� III PUL' PUL Tank�T3 PUL�PUL, �I Spill Box #� Spi1lBox # i, t t� a �,�r tTankT3 Fill�'�Direct ,r �` Vapor Direct a s_ p FIBM , Bucket Diameter: 12.00 12.00 Bucket Depth: 14.00 14.00 i Walt time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and 15 min 15 min min min starting test I Test Start Tlme: 12:41:00 12:41:00 Initial Reading (y): 5.0486 in. 4,1687 in. Test End Time: 12:56:00 12:56:00 Final Reading (Ft,): 4.9901 In. 4.1295 In. Test Duration: 15 min 15 min Change In Reading n Si: -0.06 In. -0.04 in. Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/- 0.0020 +/- 0.0020 TestResult �i� ~Fall"' wv G� Fanj�� 4`r r � xr ��" mom `" Comments 7 (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) 91 fill and vapor buckets failed multiple tests WO: 3402382