The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 023-14RESOLUTION NO. 023- 14 RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATED BETWEEN HIGHWAY 178 AND HIGHLAND KNOLLS DRIVE, WEST OF MORNING DRIVE (GPA /ZC NO. 13- 0251). WHEREAS, McIntosh & Associatesfor Mt. Vernon Properties, LLC, filed an application with the City of Bakersfield Community Development Department requesting an amendmentto the land use map designation of theMetropolitan Bakersfield General Plan from LR (Low Density Residential) and HMR (High Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and OC (Office Commercial) and to change the zone districtfrom R -1 (One Family Dwelling) to CO (Professional and Administrative Office) and C -2 (Regional Commercial) on 56.66 acres located between Highway 178 and Highland Knolls Drive, west of Morning Drive (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of a Negative Declaration with mitigation measuresfor the Project; and WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before the City Council to consider the proposed Negative Declaration as required by Government Code Section 65355 and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the staff report, Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission's deliberation, and action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDby the Bakersfield City Council as follows: The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 54 -13 are hereby adopted. 2. The Negative Declaration for the Project is hereby adopted subject to the mitigation measures in Exhibit A for the Project located on the map as shown in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein. ---- - - - -- 000 -- - - - - -- Page 1 of 2 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on FEB 12 1014 by the following vote: CAa COUNCILMEMBER RIVERA, MAXWELL, SMITH, HANSON, SULLY AN, JOHNSON NOES: COUNCILMEMBER t4 cry*_ COUNCILMEMBER X&jelIf COUNCILMEMBER_ "On' ROBERTA GAFFORD, CM CITY CLERK and Ex Offici lerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED FEB 1 '& '01 HARVEY L. HALL MAYOR of the City of Bak APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attq%y M ANDREW HEGLUND Deputy City Attorney Exhibits: A Mitigation Measures B Location Map By: DL \ S: \GPAs \GPA 1st 2014\1 3-0251 \Res Ord \RES ENV CC Resolution 13, 0251.doc Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A Mitigation Measures Exhibit A Mitigation Measures from Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment /Zone Change No. 13 -0251 Air Quality and Green House Gas Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project will have air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction and use of the project site. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Planning Department that they will /have met all air quality control measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts. 2. To ensure that project emissions are minimized, the applicant will implement and comply with a number of mitigation measures. The following measures either have been applied to the project through the CaIEEMOD model and will be incorporated into the project by design or will be implemented in conjunction with SJVAPCD rules: Required PM 10 Mitigation Measures As the project will be completed in compliance with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII, dust control measures will be taken to ensure compliance specifically during grading and construction phases. The mitigation measures to be taken are as follows: a. Water previously exposed surfaces (soil) whenever visible dust is capable of drifting from the site or approaches 20% opacity. b. Water all unpaved haul roads a minimum of three - times /day or whenever visible dust from such roads is capable of drifting from the site or approaches 20% opacity. c. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 miles per hour. d. Install and maintain a track out control device that meets the specifications of SJVAPCD Rule 8041 if the site exceeds 150 vehicle trips per day or more than 20 vehicle trips per day by vehicles with three or more axles. e. Stabilize all disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for production purposes using water, chemical stabilizers or by covering with a tarp or other suitable cover. f. Control fugitive dust emissions during land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, leveling, grading, or cut and fill operations with application of water or by presoaking. g. When transporting materials offsite, maintain a freeboard limit of at least 6 inches and cover or effectively wet to limit visible dust emissions. h. Limit and remove the accumulation of mud and /or dirt from adjacent public roadways at the end of each workday. (Use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited except when preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit visible dust emissions and use of blowers is expressly forbidden). i. Stabilize the surface of storage piles following the addition or removal of materials using water or chemical stabilizer /suppressants. j. Remove visible track -out from the site at the end of each workday. k. Cease grading or other activities that cause excessive (greater than 20% opacity) dust formation during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph over a one -hour period). Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts. 3. Measures to Reduce Equipment Exhaust The GAMAQI guidance document lists the following measures as approved 8�` recommended for construction activities. These measures are recommended. Page 1 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 a. Maintain all construction equipment as recommended by manufacturer manuals. b. Shut down equipment when not in use for extended periods. c. Construction equipment shall operate no longer than eight (8) cumulative hours per day. d. Use electric equipment for construction whenever possible in lieu of diesel or gasoline powered equipment. e. Curtail use of high- emitting construction equipment during periods of high or excessive ambient pollutant concentrations. f. All construction vehicles shall be equipped with proper emissions control equipment and kept in good and proper running order to substantially reduce NOx emissions. g. On -Road and Off -Road diesel equipment shall use diesel particulate filters if permitted under manufacturer's guidelines. h. On -Road and Off -Road diesel equipment shall use cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) if permitted under manufacturer's guidelines. i. All construction workers shall be encouraged to shuttle (car -pool) to retail establishments or to remain on -site during lunch breaks. j. All construction activities within the project area shall be discontinued during the first stage smog alerts. k. Construction and grading activities shall not be allowed during first stage ozone alerts. First stage ozone alerts are declared when the ozone level exceeds 0.20 ppm (1 -hour average). Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts. 4. The following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce the potential for long- term emissions from the project. These measures are required as a matter of regulatory compliance to ensure that the proposed project emissions are not exceeded. a. The project design shall comply with applicable standards set forth in Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code to minimize total consumption of energy. b. Applicants shall be required to comply with applicable mitigation measures in the Air Quality Attainment Plan, District Rules, Traffic Control Measures, Regulation V111 and Indirect Source Rules for the SJVAPCD. c. The developer shall comply with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 4601 - Architectural Coatings, during the construction of all buildings and facilities. Application of architectural coatings shall be completed in a manner that poses the least emissions impacts whenever such application is deemed proficient. d. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 4641 during the construction and pavement of all roads and parking areas within the project area. Specifically, the applicant shall not allow the use of: i. Rapid cure cutback asphalt; ii. Medium cure cutback asphalt; iii. Slow cure cutback asphalt (as specified in SJVAPCD Rule 4641, Section 5.1.3); or Emulsified asphalt (as specified in SJVAPCD Rule 4641, Section 5.1.4). iv. The developer shall comply with applicable provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review). Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts. Biological Imcact Mitigation Measures 5. The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703 -711). The MBTA makes it unlawfpk4Q. c7` Page 2 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 C.F.R. 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws generally requires that project - related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of the nesting cycle (March 1 - August 15, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and /or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and /or imprisonment. Mitigation for Biological Resource impacts. 6. The current MBHCP expires in year 2014. Projects may be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or building permit and pay fees prior to the 2014 expiration date under the current MBHCP. As determined by the City of Bakersfield, only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval or building permit) before the 2014 expiration date will be eligible to pay fees under the current MBHCP. Early payment or pre - payment of MBHCP fees shall not be allowed. The ability of the City to issue urban development permits is governed by the terms of the MBHCP. Urban development permits issued after the 2014 expiration date may be subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation Plan, if approved, or be required to comply directly with requests of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Department. Mitigation for Biological Resource impacts. Mitigation Measures contained in the Biological Resources Assessment (Rincon Consultants, November 7,2013): 7. A pre- construction clearance survey for burrowing owls, American badger, and San Joaquin kit fox shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to ground disturbance activities. The survey should include the entire project site plus at least a 100 foot buffer. The results of the survey should be summarized in a report that includes the methods, timing, results and personnel involved, and photos should be included if appropriate. The applicant shall submit documentation to the Planning Director of the biologist report and findings. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resources. If any of these species are detected, the following additional measures are recommended: 8. Burrowing Owl: • A no- disturbance buffer shall be established around occupied burrows under the guidance of a qualified biologist with knowledge of the biology of the species, in accordance with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protocol. The buffer size should range from 150 feet to 650 feet depending on the time of year and level of construction activity (refer to CDFW, 2012). The qualified biologist shall monitor any occupied burrow to ensure the no- disturbance buffer is maintained and observed, and to determine when the burrow is no longer occupied and the no- disturbance buffer can be removed. Page 3 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 • In the event that burrowing owls are present and resulting in delays to construction, burrowing owls can be evicted from burrows after development of an exclusion plan is approved by the CDFW. Mitigation for potential Impacts to Biological Resources. 9. American Badger: • If a suitable burrow is located, a qualified biologist shall determine if it is occupied by a badger through non - invasive means such as a trail camera or tracking medium. Unoccupied burrows should be collapsed by hand with a shovel to prevent badgers from reusing them. • If an occupied burrow is located on -site, and it is determined to potentially be a natal burrow, a 100 -foot protective buffer shall be established around the burrow until a qualified biologist determines that the burrow is no longer occupied. If it is a non -natal occupied burrow, the qualified biologist may discourage use by badgers by partially blocking burrow entrances with sticks, debris, and soil. Once the burrow is no longer occupied, the burrow may be collapsed by hand by the qualified biologist. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resources. 10. San Joaquin Kit Fox: • If an occupied San Joaquin kit fox den is detected during the survey effort, and the den is not a natal den (i.e., currently being used to rear pups), the den may be slowly excavated under the direction of a qualified biologist holding a valid scientific collecting permit to encourage the San Joaquin kit fox to leave the den and relocate on its own. • If the den is a natal den, a no- disturbance buffer should be established under the guidance of a qualified biologist and in consultation with the USFWS. The no- disturbance buffer should be maintained until the qualified biologist has determined that the natal den is no longer occupied by kit foxes. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resources. 11. The developer shall implement the following Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to minimize impacts to the San Joaquin kit fox and other wildlife: All project related vehicles should observe a 20 mile - per -hour speed limit in all project areas. • Where practical, construction activities should be confined to daylight hours. • All excavated, steep - walled holes or trenches more than two feet deep should be covered at the close of each work day or should be provided with an earthen or wooden escape ramp. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they should be thoroughly inspected for San Joaquin kit fox or other animals. If a San Joaquin kit fox or other animal is found in a hole or trench, the animal should be allowed to leave on its own without interference. • All pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four inches or greater should be inspected for animals prior to burying, capping, or moving. If a San Joaquin kit fox or other animal is found in any structure, the animal should be allowed to leave on its own without interference. The USFWS and CDFW may be consulted if the animal remains and is disrupting construction activities. Page 4 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 • All food - related trash shall be kept in closed containers and should be removed from the site at least once per week. • No firearms or pets are allowed on the project site. • Use of rodenticides and herbicides in project areas should be prohibited without consultation with the USFWS. • An employee education program should be administered by a qualified biologist knowledgeable of San Joaquin kit fox biology prior to initiation of construction activities. • A qualified biologist should be retained to periodically inspect the project site to ensure compliance with the above measures and to be available to answer questions that employees may have. • If a sick, injured or dead San Joaquin kit fox is found on -site, all construction activities should cease and the CDFW shall be contacted immediately. The USFWS should be notified in writing within three days of the incident. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resource. 12. Blunt -Nosed Leopard Lizard: • Protocol level blunt -nosed leopard lizard surveys shall be conducted for 12 days over the course of the 90 -day adult optimal survey period (April 15 to July 15), with a maximum of 4 survey days per week and 8 days within any 30 -day time period. At least one survey session should be conducted for 4 consecutive days, weather permitting. In addition, 5 more survey days are required during the hatchling optimal survey period for a total of 17 survey days overall. • If present, an avoidance and monitoring plan for blunt -nosed leopard lizard may need to be prepared and implemented, typically in close coordination with CDFW and USFWS staff as the plan will likely need to be approved by these agencies prior to implementation. For a project activity to be deemed as completely avoiding impacts to this species, a buffer up to 22 acres surrounding the location of a detected individual may be required as per the maximum home range size. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resource. 13. Nesting Birds: • To avoid take of nesting birds and raptors, vegetation removal and initial ground disturbance should occur outside the nesting bird breeding season, which is approximately February 1 through August 31. If construction must begin within the bird breeding season, then no more than two weeks prior to initiation of ground disturbance and /or vegetation removal, a nesting bird and raptor preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within the disturbance footprint plus a 300 -foot buffer. If the project is phased, a subsequent pre- construction nesting bird and raptor survey shall be required prior to each phase of construction within the project site. If no nests are observed no further action is required. • If nests are found, their locations shall be flagged and then mapped onto an aerial photograph of the project site at a scale no less than 1 " =200' and /or recorded with the use of a GPS unit. An appropriate avoidance buffer (size of buffer depending upon the species and the proposed work activity) should be determined and demarcated by a qualif'O biologist. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resources. Page 5 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 14. Jurisdictional waters and Wetlands: • Prior to issuance of a grading permit, applicant /developer shall provide a copy of a Stream Bed Alteration Agreement (SAA) with CDFW, and if required, a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit with RWQB for impacts to on -site drainage features. Mitigation for potential impacts to Biological Resources. Cultural impact Mitigation Measures 15. If paleontological resources are encountered during construction, work will cease in the area of the find and a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer to evaluate the significance of the resources and formulate a mitigation program if necessary. The paleontologist shall coordinate with the City of Bakersfield Planning Department. Mitigation for Cultural Resource impacts. 16. If archaeological resources encountered during the course of construction, work will cease in the area of the find and the developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist for further evaluation and formulate a mitigation program if necessary. The archaeologist shall coordinate with the City of Bakersfield Planning Department. Mitigation for Cultural Resource impacts. 17. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, work would cease in the area of the find pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resource Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the remains) and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately. Mitigation for Cultural Resource impacts. 18. Prior to ground- disturbance activities associated with this project, personnel associates with the grading effort shall be informed of the importance of the potential cultural and archaeological resources (i.e. archaeological sites, artifacts, features, burials, human remains, etc.) that may be encountered during site preparation activities, how to identify those resources in the field, and of the regulatory protections afforded to those resources. This training shall be conducted by representatives from the Tejon Indian Tribe. The personnel shall be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of archaeological remains during grading activities and cautioned to avoid archaeological finds with equipment and not collect artifacts. The applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Community Development Department - Planning Division that they have met this requirement prior to commencement of ground disturbance activities. This documentation should include information on the date(s) of training activities, the individual(s) that conducted the training, a description of the training, and a list of names of those who were trained. Should cultural remains be uncovered, the on -site supervisor shall immediately notify a qualified archaeologist and the Tejon Indian Tribe. The developer shall provide the Tejon Indian Tribe information on excavation depth of the construction site. Mitigation for Cultural Resource impacts. Page 6 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures 19. Intersection and roadway segments needed to maintain or improve operational level of service in the years 2020 and 2035 are shown below. It is assumed that the improvements required for the roadway facilities at Existing, 2020 Future, and 2035 Future traffic will be in place prior to the addition of the project generated traffic at full build out. The Project's share of costs for improvements to mitigate their impacts to the transportation facilities within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Program shall be paid by the project through its contribution to the fee program. Required future improvements to local facilities not included in the RTIF shall be paid for by the project proponent based on the pro - rata share of project related traffic. Both the "local" and "regional" fees will be paid at time of issuance of the various related building permits for the project. The subject intersections and segment improvements with proposed mitigation measures are described in Table 1 & Table 6 of the traffic study (shown below). Mitigation Measures: 1) Signalization - Year 2020: Provide signal (Morning Drive & Highland Knolls Drive) 2) Intersection Mitigation - (detailed on Table 6 below) • Paladino Drive & Masterson Street (Year 2035) • Panorama Drive & Masterson Street (Year 2035) • Highland Knolls Drive & Kirkcaldy Drive (Year 2035) • Project entrance #4 & Kirkcaldy Drive (Year 2035) • Project entrance #2 & Highland Knolls Drive (Year 2035) • Morning Drive & Highland Knolls Drive (Year 2035) • Morning Drive & Niles street /SR 184 (Year 2035) 3) Segment Mitigation - (detailed on Traffic Study Table 1 below) Traffic Study - Table 1 Se ment Miti otion Year 2020 with Project Improvement /Mitigation Measure level of Significance After Year Improvements Improvement/Mitigation Kirkcaldy Drive - Highland Drive to Construct 2 -lane Collector Not Significant Project Entrance #4 Year 2035 with Pro ect Future by RTIF or Highland Knolls Drive - Fairfax to Improve to 4 -lane Arterial Not Significant Kirkcaldy Drive other funding Highland Knolls Drive - Kirkcaldy to Improve to 4 -lane Collector Not Significant Morning Drive PHV Traffic Study -Table 6 - Intersection Improvements /Pro -Rata Share Page 7 of 19 Existing Total Year Improvements Intersection /Mitigation4 Commercial 2035 not Covered Project Traffic @ Future by RTIF or Year 2035 Traffic + other funding Project sources PHV PHV %1.2 PHV Page 7 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Paladino Dr & Morning Dr -Am Peak 7 2020: Intersection not expected to be built prior to Year 2020 2020 + Proj: Intersection not expected to be built prior to Year 2020 0 30 0.93% 3238 - 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Paladino Dr & Morning Dr -PM Peak 7 2020: Intersection not expected to be built prior to Year 2020 2020 + Proj: Intersection not expected to be built prior to Year 2020 0 77 1.96% 3928 - 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Paladino Dr & Vineland Rd -AM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 96 26 1.63% 966 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with project Paladino Dr & Vineland Rd -PM Peak 5,7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic j j 1 73 4.56% 1 120 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with project Paladino Dr & Masterson St -AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 30 8 0,50% 1613 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add NR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Paladino Dr & Masterson St -PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 44 50 2.35% 2127 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add SR 2035 + Proj: Add ER Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Columbus St & University Dr -AM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 886 18 1.13% 1520 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj : No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Columbus St & University Dr -PM Peak 5,7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 927 49 3.06% 1431 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Panorama Dr & University Dr -AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 691 33 1.52% 2175 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add NL 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Page 8 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Panorama Dr & University Dr -PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 +Prof: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 557 52 2.87% 1810 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add NL 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Fairfax Rd & Panorama Dr - AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1589 58 2.00% 2894 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Panorama Dr - PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1567 112 3.50% 3203 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Mornina Dr & Panorama Dr - AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 220 68 1.81% 3747 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add ER, WR, 2NL, 1 NT, SL, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Mornina Dr & Panorama Dr - PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 361 153 3.25% 4701 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add ER, WR, 2NL, ,2NT, SL, 2ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Vineland Rd & Panorama Dr -AM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 51 58 3.63% 1451 - 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Vineland Rd & Panorama Dr -PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 66 115 6.42% 1790 - 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without project Panorama Dr & Masterson St -AM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 66 27 1.69% 1391 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with project Panorama Dr & Masterson St -PM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 53 53 3.31% 1421 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: Add NT Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with project t� Page 9 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Oswell St & Columbus St - AM Peaks• 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 845 13 0.81% 946 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & Columbus St - PM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 +Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 089 38 2.38% 1 260 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Auburn St & Columbus St- AM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 815 21 1.31% 1 121 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Auburn St & Columbus St - PM Peak 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 890 50 3.13% 1242 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & Auburn St - AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2408 35 1.25% 2802 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & Auburn St - PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2724 92 2.90% 3174 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Auburn St - AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2227 74 1.49% 4958 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Auburn St - PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 +Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2131 133 2.87% 4634 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Auburn St & SR 178 WB Ramps- AM Peak 1, 5,7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 521 0 0.00% 1024 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: Warrant 3 Satisfied at Year 2035 with Project Auburn St & SR 178 WB Ramps- PM Peak_], 5, 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 496 53 4.80% 919 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: No Warrants satisfied at Year 2035 with Project r, Page 10 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Morning Dr & Auburn St -AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 532 78 2.55% 3054 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add NL, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Morning Dr & Auburn St- PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 390 198 8.20% 2414 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add NL, NT, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Oswell St & SR 178 WE Ramps- AM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 772 25 2.37% 2828 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & SR 178 WB Ramps- PM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2614 69 9.54% 3337 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & SR 178 EB Ramps- AM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1853 30 31.25% 1949 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & SR 178 EB Ramps -PM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2803 15 4.09% 3170 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & SR 178 EB Ramps- AM Peak 1 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2157 71 14.88% 2634 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & SR 178 EB Ramps- PM Peak 1 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2219 173 23.99% 2940 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Morning Dr & SR 178 WB Ramps- AM Peak 7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange expected to be constructed by Year 2020 1776 224 9.18% 2440 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Morning Dr & SR 178 WB Ramps- PM Peak? (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange expected to be constructed by Year 2020 1648 315 10.59% 2975 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases r t 4 C.1 r{r Page 1 1 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Morning Dr & SR 178 EB Ramps- AM Peak 1.7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange expected to be constructed by Year 2020 0 294 10.21% 2880 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2020 without Project Morning Dr & SR 178 EB Ramps- PM Peak 1.7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange expected to be constructed by Year 2020 0 442 12.46% 3546 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: ] & 3 Satisfied @ 2020 without Project Vineland Rd & SR 178 WB Ramps- AM Peak], 5,7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 0 10 0.63% 1283 - 2020 + Proj: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 2035: Interchange assumed to be built by 2035 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Vineland Rd & SR 178 WB Ramps- PM Peak 1.7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 0 72 4.49% 1602 - 2020 + Proj: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 2035: Interchange assumed to be built by 2035 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: ] & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Vineland Rd & SR 178 EB Ramps- AM Peak] -7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 0 30 1.75% 1716 - 2020 + Proj: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 2035: Interchange assumed to be built by 2035 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Vineland Rd & SR 178 EB Ramps- PM Peak 1.7 (Future Intersection) 2020: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 0 102 4.80% 2126 - 2020 + Proj: Interchange not expected to be built by Year 2020 2035: Interchange assumed to be built by 2035 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project SR 178 & Canteria Rd /Bedford Green Rd- AM Peak 1, 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 1551 98 50.52% 1745 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: N/A - Will not exist after construction of Vineland Interchange 2035 + Proj: N/A - Will not exist after construction of Vineland Interchange SR 178 & Canteria Rd /Bedford Green Rd- PM Peak 1 -7 2020: Add WT 1714 164 51.74% 2031 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic> Page 12 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 2035: N/A - Will not exist after construction of Vineland Interchange 2035 + Proj: N /A- Will not exist after construction of Vineland Interchange SR 178 & Kern Canyon Rd(SR184)- AM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1260 98 3.24% 4283 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project SR 178 & Kern Canyon Rd (SRI 84)- PM Peak L7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1333 163 4.72% 4790 - 2035: Add 2ET, WT & NR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project SR 178 & Masterson St- AM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 084 116 3.50% 4402 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add EL, ET, ER, WL, 2WT, NR, & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project SR 178 & Masterson St -PM Peak t- 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1286 188 4,88% 5141 - 2035: Provide Signal, Add 2ET, WL & WT 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: None SR 178 & Alfred Harrell Hy/Comanche Rd -AM Peak 1.7 2020: Add WT 1258 86 2.39% 4859 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: Add EL, 2ET, WL, WT, NL, NT, NR, SL, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic SR 178 & Alfred Harrell Hy /Comanche Rd- PM Peak 1, 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 1096 120 3.56% 4465 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: Add EL, 2ET, WL, WT, NL & NT 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic SR 178 & Miramonte Dr - AM Peak 1.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 704 57 2.19% 3307 NL 2035: Add EL, 2ET, 2WT & NL 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic SR 178 & Miramonte Dr - PM Peak 1, 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 751 54 1.70% 3925 - 2035: Add EL, 2ET & WT 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Highland Knolls Dr- AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1774 136 6.06% 2244 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic n Page 13 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Fairfax Rd & Highland Knolls Dr- PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1641 373 15.59% 2392 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Hiahland Knolls Dr & Kirkaldy Dr- AM Peak (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 361 16.74% 2156 See PM 2020 + Proj: Construct North Leg of intersection with Project 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: Add NL Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Hiahland Knolls Dr & Kirkaldy Dr -PM Peak (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 749 26.26% 2852 Signal, NL 2020 + Proj: Construct North Leg of intersection with Project 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: Add NL Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Kirkaldy Dr & Proiect Entrance 4- AM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 353 100.00% 353 - 2020 + Proj: Construct Intersection with 1 ET /R, 1 WT /L & 1 NUR 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: None Kirkaldy Dr & Proiect Entrance 4- PM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 668 100.00% 668 - 2020 + Proj: Construct Intersection with 1 ET /R, 1 WT /L & IN -/R 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: Add NR Warrants Satisfied: 1 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Highland Knolls Dr & Proiect Entrance 3- AM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 333 25.73% 1294 - 2020 + Proj: Construct Intersection with 1 ET /L, 1 WT /R & 1 SL /R 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: None Highland Knolls Dr & Proiect Entrance 3- PM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 619 35.01% 1768 - 2020+ Proj: Construct Intersection with IET /L, 1WT /R& 1SL/R 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Highland Knolls Dr & Proiect Entrance 2- AM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 409 28.17% 1452 - 2020 + Proj: Construct Intersection with 1 ET /L, 1 WT /R & 1 SL /R 2035: Project created intersection 2035 +Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic h. .� Warrants Satisfied: None Page 14 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Highland Knolls Dr & Proiect Entrance 2- PM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 790 40.74% 1939 - 2020 + Proj: Construct Intersection with IET /L, 1 WT /R & 1SUR 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: Add EL & WR Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Morning Dr & Proiect Entrance 1- AM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 360 16.57% 2173 - 2020+ Proj: Construct Intersection with IER, INIT, 1ST& 1ST /R 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: None Morning Dr & Project Entrance 1 - PM Peak 6 (Future Intersection) 2020: Project created intersection 0 754 25.48% 2959 - 2020+ Proj: Construct Intersection with IER, 1NT, 1ST& 1ST /R 2035: Project created intersection 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Morning Dr & Highland Knolls Dr- AM Peak 7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 430 15.70% 2738 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: Provide Signal, Add ER, WR, NL, NR, SL, & SR 2035 + Proj: Add SL Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Mornina Dr & Highland Knolls Dr- PM Peak 7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 858 23.64% 3630 - 2020 + Proj: Provide Signal 2035: Provide Signal, Add ET, ER, WT, WR, NL, NT, NR, 2SL, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: Add EL, Revise 1 WT to WT /R Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2020 with Project & 2035 without Project Vineland Rd & Highland Knolls Dr -AM Peak 7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 49 3.78% 1298 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: Add NT (Not regd with signal provided for PM Improvements) Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Vineland Rd & Hiahland Knolls Dr -PM Peak 7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 109 6.78% 1 607 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Mt Vernon Ave & Colleae Ave- AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2062 13 0.51% 2531 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases r, Page 15 of 19 0 to EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Mt Vernon Ave & College Ave- PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2087 29 1.13% 2574 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & College Ave- AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 872 32 1.42% 2249 NR & SR 2035: Add NR & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & Colleae Ave- PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2257 90 3.36% 2677 See AM 2035: Add NR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Colleae Ave - AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 791 48 1.69% 2835 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & College Ave - PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1860 197 6.17% 3195 SR & Rev 2035: Add SR, Revise phasing and laneage to provide protected EL & WL Phasing 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Kirkaldy Dr & College Ave- AM Peak 5 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 26 1.63% 411 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrant Satisfied: None Kirkaldy Dr & College Ave- PM Peak 5 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 35 2.19% 517 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrant Satisfied: None Mornina Dr & College Ave- AM Peak 5,7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 153 9.56% 1 141 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrant Satisfied: None Morning Dr & College Ave- PM Peak 5,7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 199 12.44% 1386 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied ® 2035 with Project t f, n Page 16 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Mt Vernon Ave & Niles St- AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1639 27 1.28% 2116 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Mt Vernon Ave & Niles St- PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 4086 42 0.84% 5013 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & Niles St -AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 21 1 1 48 1.83% 2630 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Oswell St & Niles St - PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 3170 59 1.49% 3958 NR & SR 2035: Add NR & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Niles St - AM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2554 79 2.15% 3681 See PM 2035: Add ER, NR & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Niles St - PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2506 129 3.48% 3704 ER, NR & SR 2035: Add ER, NR & SR2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Morning Dr & Niles St/ SR 184 - AM Peak 7 2020: Add NL 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1941 122 2.44% 4996 ST, SR & ER 2035: Add WL, WT, WR, 2NT, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: Add ER Morning Dr & Niles St /SR 184 - PM Peak 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1293 161 5.07% 3173 - 2035: Add WL, WT, WR, NL & NT 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Vineland Rd & Kern Canyon Rd /SR 184 -AM Peak 1-7 (Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 12 0.55% 2182 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: Provide Signal 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Vineland Rd & Kern Canyon Rd /SR 184 -PM Peak 1. 7 ( Future Intersection) 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 0 84 3.12% 2692 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: Provide Signal, Add ET 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without Project Page 17 of 19 �t EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 Kern Canyon Rd /SR 184 & Bedford Green Rd - AM Peak i, 5,7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 725 7 0,80% 1295 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 with Project Kern Canyon Rd /SR 184 & Bedford Green Rd - PM Peak t- 5.7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 561 58 5.58% 1 1 15 - 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project trafficWarrants Satisfied: None Fairfax Rd & Pioneer Dr - AM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1782 32 1.20% 2660 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Fairfax Rd & Pioneer Dr - PM Peak 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1918 48 1.67% 2873 - 2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic increases 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Morning Dr & Pioneer Dr- AM Peak t• 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1142 45 2.91% 2690 - 2035: Add NT, NR, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Morning Dr & Pioneer Dr - PM Peak i- 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 188 73 4,27% 2896 - 2035: Add NT, NR, ST & SR 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic _Morning Dr & Breckenridge Rd -AM Peak i -7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1 228 27 1.76% 2766 - 2035: Add WL,NL, NT & ST 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic Morning Dr & Breckenridge Rd - PM Peak i• 7 2020: No improvements required for future 2020 traffic increases 2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic 1218 39 2.32% 2896 - 2035: Add WL & NT 2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of project traffic PHV = Peak Hour Volume NIL = Northbound Left Lane, NT = Northbound Through Lane, NR = Northbound Right Lane EL = Eastbound Left Lane, ET = Eastbound Through lane, ER = Eastbound Right Lane SL = Southbound Left Lane, ST = Southbound Through Lane, SR = Southbound Right Lane WL = Westbound Left Lane, WT = Westbound Through Lane, WR = Westbound Right lane LOS = Level of Service, Byd Std. = Beyond City of Bakersfield Standard Detail T -4 RTIF = Regional Transportation Impact Fee, s/v = seconds per vehicle in delay Percentages based on Cal -Trans Formula: Project Volume /(Future Volume - Existing Volume) For all non- Caltrans Facilities, Percentages Based on COB Formula: Project Volume/ (Future Volume. Project percentage of future traffic is shown in this column regardless of mitigation requirements. Page 18 of 19 EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures GPA /ZC No. 13 -0251 4 Additional lanes required as shown are with reference to existing lanes at time of study survey. Since laneage configurations may have changed since time of survey, intersection analysis printouts contained in the appendix should be referred to for actual total laneage configurations required for mitigation. 5 Percentage share at this intersection is based on the project's contribution to the minimum threshold for signalization at this intersection ( 1280vph for 1 lane by 1 lane Approaches, 1440vph for 2 lane by 1 lane Approaches, and 1600vph for 2 lane by 2 lane Approaches). 6 Project created intersection. Developer shall be responsible for all improvement costs related to this intersection. 7 Improvements to this intersection are included in the Phase IV Metropolitan Bakersfield Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program and therefore paid for by the project's contribution to that fee program. Mitigation for Traffic Impacts. S: \GPAs \GPA 1 st 2014\ 13 -0251 \Admin Staff Reports \Mitigation Measures revised bio.doc Page 19 of 19 Exhibit B Location Map I- LO C\l C) 6 Z LU Z LU Z n rr LU Z LLI 0 LU R Cl) GO W OD CM cr co 0) , P E5 8 OD C °I LU co 0 04 F- .'i i LL cm C14