HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 RESULTSHOODS ALARMS SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SPRAY BOOTH oOTH AST UST
Permit No. Permit No. Permit No. Permit No. Permit No. Permit No.
6)a7go-
File Number: Address:
_ Bakersfiel
Date Received: (9 - 5 -' i3
Business Name: C�!
r (e-c-
, CA 933
Comments:
1
2.
3.
4,
INSPECTION LOG
Date Time
Signature
SYSTEM:
r BUILDING SQUARE FEET:
New
Mod.
❑
❑
Commercial Hood System Building Sq. Feet:
❑
❑
Fire Alarm System Calculation Bldg. Sq. Ft:
❑
❑
Fire Sprinkler System
❑
❑
SpPa'y finish System
❑
❑
Aboveground Storage Tank
❑
❑
Underground Storage Tank
minor
modification
Underground Storage Tank
removal
Underground Storage Tank
r
❑
Other. r— (Z--
Comments:
1
2.
3.
4,
INSPECTION LOG
Date Time
Signature
BILLING & PERMIT STATEMENT
PERMIT NO.:
' BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPT.
• g s P r D Prevention Services
FIR
##FA // 1600 Truxtun Ave Ste 401
F f f
Bakersfield CA 93301
Tel.: (661) 326 -3979 • Fax: (661) 852 -2171
All permits must be reviewed, stamped, and approved PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON THAT PROJECT. ■ •
■ •
FA
❑
PERM IT TYPE
Alarms - New & Modifications - (Minimum Charge)
SITE INFORMATION
TOTAI TREASURY
DUE ACCT
■ •
■ 98
LOCATION OF PROJECT
PROPERTY OWNER
Sq. Ft. x.028 = Permit fee
■
■
STARTING DATE
OMPLETI
NAME/'+
PROJECT NAME
$280.00
/ (1
` � 1- ` `
ADDRE O (2
PHONE NO.
PROJECT ADDRESS � \
U
CITY STATE
ZIP CODE
CONTRACTOR
INFORMATION
98
CONTRACTOR NAME CA LICENSE NO.
J Pm1�-:S
TYPE OF LICENSE. EXPIRATION DATE
PHONE NO.
SO SO
1 �4c�gNA 30 20l
g 2 —$
CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME
FAX NO.
i c Div v
- 80
ADDRESS
CITY
ZIP wue
Additional Hoods
c_
■
■
All permits must be reviewed, stamped, and approved PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON THAT PROJECT. ■ •
■ •
FA
❑
PERM IT TYPE
Alarms - New & Modifications - (Minimum Charge)
FEE CALCULATION
$280.00
TOTAI TREASURY
DUE ACCT
■ •
■ 98
❑
Over 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft. x.028 = Permit fee
■
■
84
98
❑
Sprinklers - New & Modifications - (Minimum Charge)
$280.00
■
■
84
98
❑
Over 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft x.028 = Permit fee
84
98
❑
Minor Sprinkler Modifications (< 10 heads)
$ 96.00 [Inspection Only]
'
■
84
98
❑
Commercial Hoods — New & Modifications
$ 470.00
■
84
98
❑
Additional Hoods
$ 58.00
■
■
84
98
❑
Spray Booths - New & Modifications
$470.00
■
•
84
98
❑
Aboveground Storage Tanks (Instal /afibrdinsp. -1g Time)
$180.00
'
82
❑
Additional Tanks
$ 96.00
;
82
❑
Aboveground Storage Tanks (RemovaYinspection)
$109.00
:
82
❑
Underground Storage Tanks (Installation✓Inspection)
$878.00 (per tank)
■
82
❑
Underground Storage Tanks (Modification)
$878.00 (per site)
■
82
❑
Underground Storage Tanks (Minor Modification)
$167.00
■
82
❑
Underground Storage Tanks (Removal)
$573.00 (per tank)
'
84
❑
Oilwell (Installation)
$ 96.00
;
84
6
Mandated Leak Detection (Testin / Fuel Mon CerUSB989.
Note: $96.00 for each type of test 1 fte (eve ' scheduled
at the same time)
$9869-(persite,� f n
■
■
■
82
❑
Tents
$ 96.00 (per tend
'
84
❑
Pyrotechnic - (Per event, Plus Insp. Fee re? $96 per hour)
$ 96.00 + (5 hrs. min. standby fee Anspedon)= $576..00
;
64
❑
After hours inspection fee
$121.00
M
84
•
RE- INSPECTIONS) /FOLL OW-UP /NSPECTION(S)
$ 96.00 (per hour)
■
B4
•
Portable LPG (Propane): NO. OF CAGES? _
$ 96.00
■
84
•
Explosive Storage
$266.00
'
B4
•
Copying & File Research (File Research Fee $50.00 per hr)
250 per page
;
84
•
Miscellaneous
84
FD 2021 (Rev. 06/07)
1 - ORIGINAL WHITE (to Treasury) 1- YELLOW (to File) 1-1PINK (to customer)
P -,
BILLING & PERMIT STATEMENT
PERMIT NO.:
f� BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPT.
B F Prevention Services
*jeep FIRE 1600 TnuctLm Ave Ste 401
�R r r s
Bakersfield CA 93301
Tel.: 661 326 -3979 • Fax: 661) 852 -2171
All permits must be reviewed, stamped, and approved PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON THAT PROJECT.
❑ 1 Alarms - New & Modffications - (Minimum Charge) 1$280.00
Ft. x.028 = Permit fee
98
= RICH ENVIRONMENTAL'.
SITE INFORMATION
LOCATION OF PROJECT
e &t-� a�a� Dam
PROPERTY OWNEA
STARTING DATE -�, OMPLETI
NAME UD�A�
PROJECT NAME
W6�Ao(- N
ADORE h
PHONE NO.
PROJECTADDRESS r �„\ �.�
�"�(�✓n U
CITY STATE
ZIPCODE
• •
CONTRACTOR NAME CA LICENSE NO.
J As't'1'1�c.S R �C
INFORMATION
TYPE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE
PHONE NO.
CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME
tV
FAX NQ
- O�
ADDRESS �� � p -
CITY
ZlPwut 9 ?3 c)
All permits must be reviewed, stamped, and approved PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON THAT PROJECT.
❑ 1 Alarms - New & Modffications - (Minimum Charge) 1$280.00
Ft. x.028 = Permit fee
98
FD 2021 (Rev. 06/07)
1 - ORIGINAL WHITE (to Treasury) 1- YELLOW (to File) 1 -PINK (to Customer)
= RICH ENVIRONMENTAL'.
.
SERVICE STATION SERVICES
90- 7162/3222 ' 4'224
LIC. #809850
.: 5643 BROOKS CT
- y
BAKERSFIELD, ,CA. 93308. -3708
' Z
DATE I
(661) 392 -8687
PA1' TO THE
ORDER OF
-7—r.
7.
�xX
a.
w
la :DOLLARS 8
d�
r'� CHASE
w.0
JP Morgan Chase Barik, N A��3�
Bakersfield, CA 93308
9f
y FOR
C /1
.AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
1100 4 22 i,Ih 'i; 3 2 2 2 7 L.6 2 7�: 308
3 50 400 ?II'
$167.00
y
In
11
Underground Storage Tanks (Minor Modification)
•
Underground Storage Tanks (Removal)
$573.00 (per tank)
'
84
•
Oilwell (Installation)
$ 96.00
:
84
Mandated Leak Detection (Tesdn /Fuel Mon Cert/SB989.
9 ,� n
■
■
62
Note: $96.00 for each type of test / Ite eve scheduled
at the same time)
■
❑
Tents
$ 96.00 (per tens
'
84
❑
Pyrotechnic - (Per event, Plus Insp. Fee 0 $96 per hour)
$ 96.00 + (5 hrs. min. standby fee Anspection)4576..00
�
84
❑
After hours inspection fee
$121.00
:
84
❑
RE4NSPECTION(S) / FOLLOW-UP /NSPECTION(S)
$ 96.00 (per hour)
■
84
❑
Portable LPG (Propane): NO. OF CAGES? —
$ 96.00
■
84
❑
Explosive Storage
$266.00
'
84
❑
Copying &File Research (File Research Fee $50.00 per hr)
25o per page
;
84
❑
Miscellaneous
84
FD 2021 (Rev. 06/07)
1 - ORIGINAL WHITE (to Treasury) 1- YELLOW (to File) 1 -PINK (to Customer)
i
i r
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
v.�iACf4d;:
APPLICATION :r
TO PERFORM END /LINE TESTING /:
S8989 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
I ES I NG/TANK TIGHTNESS TEST AND
FUEL MONITORING CERTIFICATION
(Plawn note that these are separate
Mcilvkk al tests and will be charved per
separate type test accordingly.)
PERMIT
PINE
At!
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Prevention Services
a101 tt s-mF_F_T
Bakerstleld, CA 93301
Phone: 661-326-3979 • Fax: 661 -852 -2171
Page 1 Of 1
❑ ENHANCED LEAK DETECTION ❑ LINE TESTING ❑ Ss-989 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
❑ TANK TIGHTNESS EL MONITORING FICATION
SITED. 0WMATI
FACIlI7Y
NAME 8z PHONE 3 OF CONTACT PERSON
ADDRESS L l O
L4 C)
OWNER NAME
sS 1 -<�ry t
OPERATOR MANE
PERMIT TO OPERATE t
0 OF TANKS TO BE TESTED:
IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED? ❑ YES ❑ NO
TANK
VOLUME
CONTENTS
TANK TMTZ" COMPANY
TESTING COMPANY tJV ��DN
i
NAME & PHONE a OF CONTACT PERSON
MAILING ADDRESS
LA -3 16C{,o0\K_% CT. — F3AcKEIE2SFlE� -D.C%E 9330
NAME & PHONE OF TESTER OR SPECIAL INSPECTOR
r..
CERTIFICATION 8 �+`
8O Q 9 Vsv
i DATE & TIME TEST VO K CONOUCTEO
ICC A
TEST METHOD
APPLICANT SI RE
DATE
I
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
DATE
FD2095 (Rev 03/08)
BAKERSFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT - INSPECTION RECORD
Post this Card at the Job Site and DO NOT Remove for Duration of Work
Inspection Request Phone No. (661) 326 -3979
UST NEW
INSTALL
DESCRIPTION
DATE
SIGNATURE
BACKFILL
PRIMARY PIPE
SECONDARY PIPE
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
SENSORS
AUTHORIZATION FOR FUEL
ELECTRICAL SEAK -OFF
tr, *TANK`TESTING"...:�....�.,.._,
UST REMOVAL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
AST NEW INSTALL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
MODIFICATIONS MINOR / MAJOR I
AST REMOVAL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
EVR UPGRADE
PRIOR 'T0-OPERATION OF ANY SYSTEM,
ALL -UST AND/OR AST SYSTEMS SHALL BE
' INSTALL, COMPLETE AND ACCEPTED BY
MISC. ACTIVITY THE BAKERSFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT.
FIRE DEPARTMENT (FINAL)
REMARKS:
BUILDING ADDRESS: �-
JOQ DESCRIPTION:
OCCUPANCY TYPE:
OWNER: T
PERMIT NO. 1-3`4 -? %Z.
CONTRACTOR: c c PHONE # 3�2- R69
FD 1743
MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
For Use By All Jurisdictions Within the State of California
Authority Cited: Chapter 6.7, Health and Safety Code; Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23, California Code of Regulations
This form must be used to document testing and servicing of monitoring equipment. A separate certification or report must be prepared for each
monitorine system control panel by the technician who performs the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank system owner /operator.
The owner /operator must submit a copy of this form to the local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date.
A. General Information
Facility Name: ORANGE BELT STAGES Bldg. No.:
Site Address: 3640 SILLECT AVE City: BAKERSFIELD Zip: 93308
Facility Contact Person: MATT Contact Phone No.: )
Make/Model of Monitoring System: Date of Testing/Servicing: 6/25/2012
B. Inventory of Equipment Tested/Certified
Check the anorooriate boxes to indicate soecific equipment insnected/serviced:
Tank ID: DIESEL.
Tank ID:
® In -Tank Gauging Probe.
Model: MAGI
❑ In -Tank Gauging Probe.
Model:
® Annular Space or Vault Sensor.
Model: TRANSDUCER
❑ Annular Space or Vault Sensor_
Model:
® Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).
Model: 208
❑ Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).
Model:
El Fill Sump Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Fill Sump Sensor(s).
Model:
® Mechanical Line Leak Detector.
Model: FX1 DV
❑ Mechanical Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Electronic Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Electronic Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Tank Overfill / High -Level Sensor.
Model:
❑ Tank Overfill / High -Level Sensor.
Model:
❑ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2).
❑ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2).
Tank ID:
Tank ID:
❑ In -Tank Gauging Probe.
Model:
❑ In -Tank Gauging Probe.
Model:
❑ Annular Space or Vault Sensor.
Model:
❑ Annular Space or Vault Sensor.
Model:
❑ Piping Sump /Trench Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Fill Sump Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Fill Sump Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Mechanical Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Mechanical Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Electronic Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Electronic Line Leak Detector.
Model:
❑ Tank Overfill / High -Level Sensor.
Model:
❑ Tank Overfill / High -Level Sensor.
Model:
❑ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2).
❑ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2).
Dispenser ID: 1
Dispenser ID:
® Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).
Model: 001- STAND ALONE
❑ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).
Model:
® Shear Valve(s).
❑ Shear Valve(s).
❑ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
❑ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
Dispenser ID:
Dispenser ID:
❑ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Shear Valve(s).
❑ Shear Valve(s).
❑ Dispenser Containment Floats) and Chain(s).
❑ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
Dispenser ID:
Dispenser ID:
❑ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).
Model:
❑ Shear Valve(s).
❑ Shear Valve(s).
❑ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
❑ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
*If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility.
C. Certification - I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected /serviced in accordance with the manufacturers'
guidelines. Attached to this Certification is information (e.g. manufacturers' checklists) necessary to verify that this information is
correct and a Plot Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also
attached a copy of the report; (check ail that apply): ® System set -up ® AlarM history report
Technician Name (print): JAMES RICH Signature: V
Certification No.: A2963611064166 -UT License. No C611 D40 09850
Testing Company Name: RICH ENVIRONMENTAL Phone No.: (661) 392 -8687
Testing Company Address: 6643 BROOKS CT. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Date of Testing/Servicing: 6/25/2012
Page 1 of 5
UN -036 —1/4 www.unidocs.org Rev. 01/17/08
Monitoring System Certification
I D. Results of Testing/Servicing
Software Version Installed: 6.01
Complete the following checklist:
46`W 1
® Yes
❑ No*
Is the audible alarm operational?
® Yes
❑ No*
Is the visual alarm operational?
® Yes
❑ No*
Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational?
® Yes
❑ No*
Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will
not interfere with their proper operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No*
If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem)
® N/A
operational?
® Yes
❑ No*
For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment
❑ N/A
monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate
positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors.
Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑ No.
❑ Yes
❑ No*
For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no
® N/A
mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank
fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? %
❑ Yes*
® No
Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced
and fist the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below.
❑ Yes*
® No
Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply)
❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below.
® Yes
❑ No*
Was monitoring system set -up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable
® Yes
❑ No*
Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications?
* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected.
E. Comments:
Page 2 of 5
UN -036 — 2/4 www.unidomorg Rev. 01/17/08
Monitoring System Certification
F. In -Tank Gauging / SIR Equipment:
® Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control.
❑ Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed
This section must be completed if in -tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring.
Complete the following checklist:
❑ Yes
❑ No*
Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults?
❑ Yes
❑ No*
Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup.)
❑ Yes
❑ No*
Was accuracy of system product level readings tested?
❑ Yes
❑ No*
Was accuracy of system water level readings tested?
Yes
❑ No*
Were all probes reinstalled properly?
[[01
Yes
❑ No*
Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed?
* In Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected.
G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD):
Complete the following checklist:
❑ Check this box if LLDs are not installed.
® Yes
❑ No*
For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance?
❑ N/A
(Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate; ® 3 g.p.h.; ❑ 0.1 g.p.h ; ❑ 0.2 g.p.h.
® Yes
❑ No*
Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements?
19 Yes
❑ No*
Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated?
® Yes
❑ No*
For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak?
❑ N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No*
For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak?
® N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No*
For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled
® N/A
or disconnected?
❑ Yes
❑ No*
For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions
® N/A
or fails a test?
❑ Yes
❑ No*
For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected?
® N/A
® Yes
❑ No*
Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed?
* In Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected.
FL Comments:
UN -036 — 3/4
Page 3 of 5
www.unidoca.org
Rev. 01/17/08
Monitoring System Certification Form: Addendum for Vacuum/Pressure Interstitial Sensors
I. Results of Vacuum/Pressure Monitoring Equipment Testing
This page should be used to document testing and servicing of vacuum and pressure interstitial sensors. A copy of
this form must be included with the Monitoring System Certification Form, which must be provided to the tank
system owner /operator. The owner /operator must submit a copy of the Monitoring System Certification Form to the
local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date.
Manufacturer: MORRISON BROS Model: TRANSDUCER System Type: ❑ Pressure; ® Vacuum
Sensor ID
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor: DIESEL ANNULAR
L ;2
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ® Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ® Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: [] Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
Component(s) Monitored by this Sensor:
Sensor Functionality Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail Interstitial Communication Test Result: ❑ Pass; ❑ Fail
How was interstitial communication verified?
❑ Leak Introduced at Far End of Interstitial Space;' ❑ Gauge; ® Visual Inspection; ❑ Other (Describe in Sec. J, below)
Was vacuum/pressure restored to operating levels in all interstitial spaces? ® Yes ❑ No (If no, describe in Sec. J, below)
J. Comments:
Page 4 of 5
If the sensor successfully detects a simulated vacuum/pressure leak introduced in the interstitial space at the furthest point from the
sensor, vacuum/pressure has been demonstrated to be communicating throughout the interstice.
UN-MA -1/1 www.unidoes.org Rev. 01/26/06
ring $ystem Certification
UST Monitoring Site Plan
site Address; ..3.640 SILLECT AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
0
Date map was drawn! 6/2812010.
Instructions
P'' you already have a diagram that shows all required information, you may include iL rather -than this page. with your !vloniuni!.1-
System Certification. On your site plan. show the general layout of tanks and piping. Clearly identify lucations o!' the Following
cquip+tnent- if installed: monitoring system control panels; sensors monitoring tank annular spaces, sumps. dispcnser pees. spii:
containers. or other secondary containment areas, mechanical or electronic line leak detectors; and in -tank liquid level probes (il'uae:i
liar leak detection). In the space provided. note the. date this Site Alan was prepared.
Page S of 5
t:\- Rib -V4 »� + ».uniducaur� tnAI t O,
RICH ENVIRONMENTAL
3305 BRITTAN ST. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308
OFFICE (661)326 -8402 FAX (661)326 -8934
PRODUCT LINE LEAK DETECTOR TEST
WORK SHEET
W /0#:
FACILITY NAME: ORANGE BELT STAGES
FACILITY ADDRESS: 3640 SILLECT AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD
PRODUCT LINE TYPE: PRESSURE
PRODUCT
LEAK DETECTOR TYPE
TEST
TRIP
PASS
BELOW
P.S.I.
OR
SERIAL NUMBER
3 G.P.H.
FAIL
DIESEL
L/D TYPE: RED JACKET
YES
10
PASS
SERIAL # 6857
LID TYPE: -
PASS
YES
SERIAL #
FAIL
L/D TYPE: i
PASS
YES
SERIAL #
FAIL
L/D TYPE:
PASS
YES
SERIAL #
FAIL
I CERTIFY THE ABOVE TESTS WERE CONDUCTED ON THIS DATE ACCORDING TO RED
JACKET PUMPS FIELD TEST APPARATUS TESTING PROCEDURE AND LIMITATIONS.
THE MECHANICAL LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS / FAIL 1S DETERMINED BY USING A
LOW FLOW THRESHOLD TRIP RATE OF 3 GALLONS PER HOUR OR LESS AT 10 P.S.I. I
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ALL DATA COLLECTED IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
TECHNICIAN: JAMES J RICH
SIGNATURE: DATE: 6125/12
g0L.M
SWRCB, January 2006
Spill Bucket Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and
printouts from tests (f applicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
Facility Name: ORANGE BELT STAGES
Date of Testing: 6/25/12
Facility Address: 3640 SILLECT AVE, BAKERSFIELD
Facility Contact: MATT
Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency Inspector (fpresent during testing):
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: RICH ENVIRONMENTAL
Technician Conducting Test: JAMES J RICH
Credentials': D CSLB Contractor X ICC Service Tech. ❑ SWRCB Tank Tester 0 Other (Specs )
License Number(s): 1064166 -UT
3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION
Test Method Used: X Hydrostatic ❑ Vacuum ❑ Other
Test Equipment Used: VISUAL
Equipment Resolution: 0
Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank
Number, Stored Product, etc
1 DIESEL
2
3
4
Bucket Installation Type:
X Direct Bury
❑ Contained in Sump
❑ Direct Bury
❑ Contained in Sump
❑ Direct Bury
❑ Contained in Sump
❑ Direct Bury
❑ Contained in Sum
Bucket Diameter:
12"
Bucket Depth:
14"
Wait time between applying
vacuum/water and start of test:
30 MIN
Test Start Time (T,):
11:33 11:49
Initial Reading (R,):
2298 2.298
Test End Time (TF):
11:48 12:04
Final Reading (RF):
2.298 2.298
Test Duration (TF — TO:
60MIN 60MIN
Change in Reading (RF - Ri):
-.000 -.000
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
-.002 -.002
Test Results
X Pass ❑ Fail
❑ Pass ❑ Fail
D Pass ❑ Fail
❑ Pass ❑ Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up for failed tests)
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements.
Technician's
Date: 6/25/12
State laws and regulations'do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements
may be more stringent.
ALARM HISTORY REPORT
LEAK TEST METHOD COMMUNICATIONS SETUP - - - -- SENSOR ALARM - - - --
- - _ _ - _ L 1:DIESEL STP SUMP
TEST ON DATE ALL TANK STP SUMP
MAR 30, 2006 PORT SETTINGS: FUEL ALARM
START TIME : DISABLED JUN 25. 2012 9:09 AM
TEST RATE :0.20 GAL/HR NONE FQUIVD
DURATION : 2 HOURS JUN 27,0201ALA9M15 AM RS -232 SECURITY
CODE : 000000 FUEL ALARM
JUN 27, 2011 9:05 AM
RS -232 END OF MESSAGE
ALARM HISTORY REPORT
- - - -- SENSOR ALARM - - --
L 3: -
OTHER SENSORS
DISABLED
OUTPUT RELAY SETUP
R 1:POSITIVE SHUTDOWN
ALARM HISTORY REPORT
LIQUID SENSOR SETUP
TYPE:
STANDARD
- - - -- SENSOR ALARM - - - --
- _ _
- - -
NORMALLY CLOSED
L 2:DIESEL ANNULAR
ANNULAR SPACE
L I'DIESEL STP SUMP
FUEL ALARM
TRI-STATE
LIQUID SENSOR ALMS
JUN 27, 2011 9:15 AM
CATEGORY : STP SUMP
L 1:FUEL ALARM
FUEL ALARM
L 2:FUEL ALARM
JUN 27. 2011 9:08 AM
L 2:DIESEL ANNULAR
ALL:SENSOR OUT ALARIh
NORMALLY CLOSED
FUEL ALARM
CATEGORY : ANNULAR SPACE
JUN 28. 2010 8:52 AM
- - - -- SENSOR ALARM - - - --
L I:DIESEL STP SUMP
STP SUMP
FUEL ALARM
JUN 25. 2012 9:09 AM
ALARM HISTORY REPORT
- - - -- SENSOR ALARM - - --
L 3: -
OTHER SENSORS
r
SYSTEM SETUP
JUN 25, 2012 9:08 AM
SYSTEM UNITS
Ahm LANGUAGE
ENGLISH.
ORANGE BELT STAGES
3640 SILLECT AVE
BAKERSFIELD. CA
SHIFT TIME I DISABLED
SHIFT TIME 2
SHIFT TIME 3 DISABLED
PERIODIC TEST WARNINGSS
DISABLED
ANNUAL TEST WARNINGS
DISABLED
CODEE 000000TY
IN -TANK SETUP
T 1:DIEBEL
PRODUCT CODE
1
THERMAL COEFF :.000450•
TANK DIAMETER
95.00
TANK PROFILE
1 PT
FULL VOL :
11783
FLOAT SIZE: 4.0 INCHES
WATER WARNING
2.0
HIGH WATER LIMIT:
3.0
MASS OR. .LABEL VOL:
11783
OVERFILL LIMIT
90%
-HIGH PRODU(:"P-
10604
..:
-
11193
DELIVERY LA MIT.
5%
.
589
LOW PRODUCT
1000
LEAK ALARM LIMIT:
99
SUDDEN LOSS LIMIT:
99
TANK TILT
0.00
MANIFOLDED TANKS
TO: NONE
PERIODIC TEST TYPE
STANDARD
PERIODIC TEST FAIL
ALARM DISABLED
GROSS TEST FAIL
. ALARM DISABLED
PER TEST AVERAGING:
OFF
TANK TEST NOTIFY:
OFF
TNK TST SIPHON BREAK:OFF
DELIVERY DELAY .
1 MIN
r
MONITOR CERT. FAILURE REPORT
SITE NAME: ORANGE BELT STAGES DATE : 6125/12
THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED/REPAIRED TO COMPLETE
TESTING.
REPAIRS • NONE
LABOR: NONE
PARTS INSTALLED: NONE
NAME: TITLE
SIGNATURE :
THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON TAKES FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING
THE APPROPRIATE PARTY TO HAVE CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO REPAIR
THE ABOVE LISTED PROBLEMS AND NOTIFYING RICH ENVIRONMENTAL FOR
ANY NEEDED RETESTING. THIS ALSO RELEASES RICH ENVIRONMENTAL OF
ANY FINES OR PENALTIES OCCURING FROM NON - COMPLIANCE.
A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN LEFT ON -SITE FOR YOUR
CONVIENENCE.