The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHP GO GO 3301 Wible Rd. SB-989SWRCB. January 2002 Pagc __ of Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Thi:; form is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing(~( UST second(II:J> containment systems. u,·e the appropriate pages of this(omr to report results for all components tested. The completed(onn, written test procedures, and printoutsfrom tests ([(applicable), should be prcwided to thefacility ownerloperatorfor submittal to the local regrtlato1~' agency. I. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: liP Go Go I Date ofTesting: 10/28/2013 Facility Address: 330 I Wible Road, Bakersfield. CA 93304 Facility Contact: Alondra Hernandez I Phone: 66_1-_8_3_5-_8_0_04 __________ -4 Date Local Agency Was Notified ofTesting: 10/21/2013 Name of Local Agency Inspector ([(present during testing): Ernie Media ~--~~----------------------------------------------~ 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION r---··-Company Name: Confidence UST Services Technician Conducting Test: Frank Landa Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: CSLB I License Number:804904 ICC# 818524/8180171 -·· Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Corn2onent(s) Date Training Expires UST 11/22/2013 I nsta !laton/Retrofit UST Service ICC 1-28-2015 technician Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A. 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fnil Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made 87 #I Secondary [] X 0 II 87 #2 Vapor SB X f I u 87 #2 Secondary r 1 X r [l 91 Vapor SB X J c [ J 91 Secondary X r• ~ ( J .. J d 87 #I STP X . ' I ' -87 #2 STp X 0 l I ~ I - 91 STP X [] u ~) [ I J n l UDC 1-2 [I X l J n -f I [ J I' [ UDC 3-4 X [ r I [I r ., ·' 87 #I Fill Sump X [ :I [I l' ., ' 87 #2 Fill Sump X :I (] ' 91 Fill Sump u X D f I r 1 I 0 I 1-87 #I Vapor SB X r 1 [l LJ ll I r If hydrostatic testing was perforn1cd, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To tlte be.\1 of my k11rmjft. •e l is docume11t are accurate ami;, full complia11ce witlt legal requirements Technician's Signature(-Date: I 0/28/2013 SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __ 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Spec[(y) Test Method Used: II Pressure [I Vacuum U Hydrostatic Other (Spec[(y) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625" -·- Tank# 87-1 Tank# 87-2 Tank# 91 Tank# Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 I l Yes X No UYes X No Yes X No Yes Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (R1-R1): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass OFail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass Was sensor removed for testing? r Yes '~No NA CYcs liNo DNA IIYes ONo NA I Yes Was sensor properly replaced and Yes No l NA CYcs No NA Yes ~No NA Yes verified functional aftcrl<.!~ingl__ '- Comments -(include information 011 repairs made prior to testing, and recommellded.fo/low-up fbr (ailed tests) SINGLE WALL TANKS I No OFail No . NA No -NA 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that arc hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations. Title 23. Section 2637(a)(6)l - SWRCB. January 2002 Page __ of __ 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING -Test Method Developed By: ' Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard fl Professional Engineer Other (Spec[M - Test Method Used: x Pressure Vacuum llydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages I Equipment Resolution:0.0625" ~ ~---·----~ Piping Run# 87-1 Piping Run# 87-2 Piping Run # 91 Piping Run # ~ Piping Material: 1- Plastic Plastic Plastic Piping Manufacturer: Franklin APT Franklin APT franklin APT ~ Piping Diameter: 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" -Length of Piping Run: 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' Product Stored: Regular Regular Premium Method and location of Boot in STP Boot in STP Boot in STP piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5 min. 5 min. 5 min. starting test: Test Start Time: I 0:30am I 0:30am I 0:30am Initial Reading (R1): 5 psi 5 psi 5 psi Test End Time: I 0:35am !1:30am I 0:35am Final Reading (!4): 0 psi 5 psi 0 psi --Test Duration: 5 min. I hour 5 min. Change in Reading(~-~): 5 psi 0.00" 5 psi Pass/Failll1reshold or - Criteria: 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Test Result: 0 Pass X Fail X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail - Comments -(include i'!formation on repairs made prior to testing. and recommended.fol!oll'-llflfor.failed tests) 87-1. 87-2 bad jumpers in UDC #1-2. Need to replace jumpers. SWRCB, January 2002 Page_ of_ 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (SpectM Test Method Used: I l Pressure 1 Vacuum x Jlydrostatic I J Other (Spec[[y) Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts I Equipment Resol~tion: -~-Sump# 87-1 Sump# 87-2 Sump# 91 Sump# Sump Diameter: 36.00" 36.00" 36.00" Sump Depth: 46.00" 46.00" 46.00" Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of 15.00' 16.00' 17.00' Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 21.00" 23.00" 23.00" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean Portion of Sump Tested1 19.00" 20.00" 21.00" Docs turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)'?' l I Yes nNo X NA J Yes llNoXNA l I Yes CNoX NA UYes II No rNA Turbine shutdown response time NA NA ~A Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?' Yes ONo X NA DYes flNoXNA Yes ~No X NA ::::; Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be II Yes r No X NA ll Yes ' NoXNA II Yes nNoX NA 0 Yes l No lNA O_l)erational?' Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting SMin 5Min SMin test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (Rf-R1): Pass/Fail TI1reshold or Criteria: Test Result: 0 Pass X Fail X Pass 0 Fail X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes fJNo [INA X Yes liNo nNA X Yes n No r NA n Yes l l No NA Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes r·No [INA X Yes No-NA X Yes r No NA ~Yes No "NA verified functional after testing? Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfol/ow-upforfai/ed tests) 87-1 STP fail, possible problem with piping penetration need to replace and retest. 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to !!..!!Y of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA". the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) I I i I I I i i SWRCB. January 2002 Page_ of_ 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: r UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard ~Professional Engineer L Other (Specf(y) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x I Iydrostatic ~ Other (Spec{(y) Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution: ---------· - UDC # 1-2 UDC #3-4 UDC# UDC# UDC Manufacturer: Total Con. Total Con. 7Dt Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass UDC Depth: 36.00" 36.00" Height from UDC Bottom to Top 16.00" 16.00" of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to 12.00" 12.00" Lowest Electrical Penetration: t-cO'ndition ofUDC prior to Clean Clean testing: Portion ofUDC Tested 20.00" 20.00" Docs turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both . Yes fiNo X NA UYes fJNoXNA Yes I No JNA r I Yes ClNo INA product and water)?' -Turbine shutdown response time NA NA Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?' ~Yes No XNA ...... Yes NoXNA Yes No~ NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be Yes No XNA Yes I NoXNA IJYes No lNA Yes No NA operational?' Wait time between applying 5 Min 5 Min pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End rime: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R1): Pass/Failll1reshold or Criteria: Test Result: 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass OFaiJ 0 Pass 0 Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No -NA Yes No ~NA Yes No NA 1----Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes 11 No tiNA X Yes lNo "NA Yes 1 No DNA I Yes No INA ~ed nmetional after testing? Comments-(include il!fbrmation on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended.fol!oll'-up .for .failed tests) Both UDC's faiL pQssible problem with Vapor Electrical Penetration. 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to a_llY of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (Sec SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page_ of 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present. but were Not Tested 1--lndus1ry Standard Professional Engineer Test Method Developed By: 1 Sump Manufacturer I-- n Other (Specf{l) Test Method Used: . Pressure I I Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic 0 Other (Specifj;) - Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: ~------~4t, ·• -~· . .. . . ~'~;J._ · .. _ Fill Sump# 87-1 Fill Sump# 87-2 Fill Sump # 91 Fill Sump# Sump Diameter: 36.00" 36.00" 36.00" Sump Depth: 46.00" 46.00" 46.00" llcight from Tank Top to Top of 0.00" Ilighcsl PiQing Penetration: 0.00" 0.00" I Height from Tank Top to Lowest 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to Clean Clean Clean test in[ I--. 8.00" Portion of Sump Tested 8.00" 8.00'' Sump Material: Fiberglass f-iberglass Fiberglass Wait time between applying 5 min. 5 min. 5 min. pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading {R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R!}: Pass/Fail ·ntreshold or Criteria: Test Result: 0 Pass X Fail X Pass OFail 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? UYcs X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes No Docs the sensor alarm when either product or water is 0 Yes I I No XNA I I Yes 0 No X NA fJYes I No XNA liVes ONo LINA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? =Yes No XNA Yes No XNA Yes No XNA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and Yes No XNA Yes No XNA Yes No XNA Yes No NA verified functional after testing? -- Comments -(include il!formcaion on repairs made priorlo testing, and recommendedj(JI!ow-up for.fai/ed tesls) ..,.2 _____ _ No_sensor tested, tank collar onl .. Both sumps need collar fiberglassed. No sensor/piping in sumps. SWRCB, January 2002 Page of 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present. but were Not Tested I Test Method Developed By: Spill Buckel Manufacturer x Industry Standard l Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure [ Vacuum x llydro~tatic Oth cr (Spec i/.l ~ . Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution: -- -------~ Spill Box #87-1 Vapor Spill Box#87-2 Vapor Spill Box# 91 Vapor Spill Box# Bucket Diameter: 12.00" 12.00" 12.00" -Bucket Depth: 12.00" 12.00" 12.00'' Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5 min. 5 min. 5 min. starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading {R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (~-R1): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: -Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail X Pass OFail XO Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass OFail - Comments-(include in(onnation on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended.follow-up.for.failed tests) V aoor Buckets Only. HPGOGO 330\ IIIBLE BACKERSFIELD 10/28/2013 11:08 Al1 SUNP LEAK TEST REPORT 871STP TEST STARTED 10:53 AM TEST S~PRTED 10/28/2013 BFG ftl LEVEL 5, a 172 W E:;!l liME 11:08 AH END DATE 10/28/2013 n:o lEVEL 5. 11129 It/ LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESU~T FAilED 872STP TEST STARTED 10:53 AM lEST STARTED 10/28/2013 BEGIH LEVEL a. 11656 W END mE ll :08 Al1 EMJ DATE 10/28/2013 Etl:l LE'JEL II, 115116 It; LEAK lHRESt10LO 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSEC 91STP TEST STARTED 10:53 AM TEST STARTED 10/28/2013 Bf.Gitl LEVEL 3, 7733 W El.D TIME 11:08 AH EIIO DATE 10/28/2013 WO LEVEL 3, 7729 HJ LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASS:O HPGUGO 3301 I/16LE BACKERSfiELO 10/28/2013 11:26 Al1 SUXP LEAK TEST REPORT 871STP TEST STARTED 11:10 ~~ TEST STARTED 10/28/2013 BEG IN LEVEL 5. a 127 IU EtlO TIM£ 11:26 AM EIIO OATE 10/28/2013 EtlO LEVEL 5. LI082 W LEA'< THRESHOlD 0, 002 IN TEST RESULT FAILED 872SlP lEST STARTED 11:10 ~~ TEST STARTED 10/28/2013 Bf.GHI LEVEL Q, 0618 Ill END TIME 11:26 At1 EUD DATE 10/28/2013 Et!O LEVEL Q,D611l IN LEAK THRESHC1.D 0, 002 II~ TEST RESULT PASSED 91STP TEST ST~~TED 11:10 ~~ TEST STARTED 10/28/2013 BEGIN LEVEL 3, 7730 ltl END TIME 11:26 AM EtiO DATE iC/28/2013 END LEVEL 3. 7728 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 ill TEST RESULT PASSED l-PG~GO 3301 IIIBLE BACKERSFIELU .~ ·10/2d/2013 12:26 PH lsUNP l:AK TEST REPCRT j l UOC1-2 EST STARTED 12:11 PH tEST STARTED 10/28/2013 !EGIN LEVEl 2. 1613 ltl NO TIME 12:26 PH NO DATE 10/28/2013 NO LEVEL 2. 11611 Irl (EAI( TrRESHOLO 0. 002 Ill TEST RESJLT fAILED UOC3-4 TEST STARTED 12:11 PH tEST STARTED 10/28/2013 BEGJtl LEVEL 3, 9055 Ill !NO TIME 12:26 PH tiD DATE 10/28/2013 NO LEVEL 3, 8767 Ill LEAK ThRESHOLD 0. 002 1t1 TEST RESuLT fAILED 871FILL 1EST s-ARlED 12:11 P~ lEST STARTED 10/28/2013 EGHI LEVEL a. 5730 IN NO TIME 12:26 PH ~tiD on 10/28/2013 ~uo mEL a. 365t: 111 4EAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT FAILED :. •tPGOGJ 3301 IIIBLE BACKERSFIELO 0/28/2013 12:02 P'1 st;l'f LEAK -EST R£PffiT UOC1-2 EST STARTED 12:27 PH EST STAR-EO 10/28/2013 BEGJU LEVeL 2. 1111 w ~tlD TIME 12:112 PH END DATE 10/28/2013 Et!O LEVEL 2, 0700 Ill tEA\ ThRESHOLD 0, 002 ltl TEST RES~~T FPI~EO UOCH tEST s-ARTEO '2:27 PM tEs-s-ARTED 10/28/2013 ~EGIN LEVEL 3. 8578 iN HlD TIME 12:112 PM lt/0 DATE 10/28/2013 &uD LEIJ[L 3. 8385 r ~~ lEAK T'IRESHJLO 0. 002 ltl TEST RESUL-FAILED 871FILL TES-s-~RTEO 12:27 •M res-s-ARTEo 10/28/2013 BEG HI LEVEL ll, 33110 IN fNO TI HE 12: D2 PI~ EtlO CATE 10/28/2013 END .. EVEL a, 131Q ·•. ~EM< T~RESHOLO 0. 002 Hl TEST RESULT FAILED HPGOGO 3301 WIBLE BACI<ERSF; ELO 10/28/2013 1:13PM ISUi~p LEAK TEST REPORT 91FiLL TEST STARTED 12:58 PM TEST STAR1EO 10/23/2013 ~GiN LEVEl 3. 5123 ltl EtlO TII'IE 1: 13 Pf'l lt;D DATE 10/28/2013 NO L~VEL 3,4515 IN EAK ·~RESHOLO 0, 002 ill fEST RESULT FAILED 872FILL TEST STARTED 12:58 PM ~EST STARTED 10/28/2013 . EGIN LEVEL 2. 8977 Itl r) TIME 1:13PM flO DATE 10/28/2013 ,NO LEVEL 2.8968 IN tEAK TIIRESHOLD 0. 002 IN EST RESULT PASSED ~ iiPGOGO 3301 WIBLE BACKERSFIELD 10/28/2013 1:31 PH 1 SUHP LEAK TESi REPORT I 91FILL }EST STARTCO 1:16 PH lEST STARTED 10/28/2013 BEG ltl LEVEL 3. C533 ltl END TIME 1:31 P"' END DATE 10/21!,'~013 END LEVEL ::!. 2929 Ill LEAK THRESKt.J 0, 002 W TEST RESULT FAILED 872FILL TEST STARTED i: 16 PH TEST STARTED 10/28/2013 BEG ltl LEVEL 2. 8953 w Et.D TIME 1:31PM END DATE 10/28/2013 END LEVEL 2. 8963 1tl LE~K THRESHOLD 0, 002 I~ TEST RESLLT PASSED iiJ/2~/2013 0 3301 li!Bl.E BAC~ERSt:IELD 10/2d/2013 1:55 PH SUMP LeAK 'ESl REPORl t-fGGG 91VAP ' iEs-·~~kTED l:G r~ 10/2"72013 872VAP TEST STARTED TEST s-ARTED BEG ill LEVEL Etil li"E EIID DATE EI~O LEVtl LEAK ii:RES·c·· iEST ~ESI.ll 1:40 PH 10/26/2013 B. 1323 Jt, 1:~ FM 10/28/2013 6. 1326 IN 0.002 l'! PASSED .r' TEST STARTED 1:40PM -Es ST~RT£0 '0/2&/2013 BEGHI LEVEL 6, 869n HI EIIO TIMe 1:55 P~ Ell~ .. ATE i0/28/2013 Erm LEVEL 6, 8689 Ill LEAK TH.~ESHOl.C 0. 002 )r; TEST RESU...T PASS£0 91VfiP TEST STARTEu 1:ao PH TEST STARTFC 10/28/2013 5EG 1:1 LEIJEL 7, 1!808 ltJ END TIHE 1:55 PM f';D DATE 10/2o/2013 El,J LE'JEL 7, ll82a l'l LEAK THRESHOl.u 0. 002 It/ TEsr RESULT PASSED HPGCG~ 330' ''IBLE BM tLD 10/28/2013 91VAP ~: 11 PM i:~t, f·M • ,/' ,/2(•13 ' ,I':E Ef::il 1:56 ?11 10/28/2013 ~E e•;: 872VAP TEST STARTED 1:56 PH ltST STARTED 10/28/2012 B£GW LEVEL 6. 1325 irl E~D TIME 2:11 P~ Er.O DATE i0/28/2013 Et.O LEVEL 6. 1328 IU LEAV ThREsuc:..o 0.002 ;u TEST RESULT PASSED 871VAP TEST STAqTED 1:56 FH TEST STARTfO 10/2~/2013 BEGIN LEV'-6, .::6~ JrJ Ell9 TINE 2: 11 P!1 EUD OATE i0/25/2013 EfiD LEVEL 6, 8583 IN L(A!\ ; rl~ESHilLD 0, 002 W TEST R£SUL T f'4SSEO 91VAP TEST STARTED 1:56 PH TEST STA~~EO 10/2'-/2013 fiEGHl LEVEL 7, 1!826 W FNO TIME 2:11PM El.ll !:ATE 10/2t/2013 EI.O LEvEl. 7. 1l~6 ltl LEAK ThRESH" ') 1), 002 HI TEST REStJLT F'ASStO