The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB-989 Repairs report 2014SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing ofUSTsecondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: #3362 Fastrip #633 I Date of Testing: 3/2112014 Facility Address: 6401 South H St Bakersfield, CA 93304 Facility Contact: Omero Garcia ·1 Phone: (661)393-7000 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 3/19/2014 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Ernie Medina 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Confidence UST Services Technician Conducting Test: Bryan A Self Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor X SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: CSLB I License Number:804904 ICC# 8022804-UT TT#11-1756 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires UST 1012112015 Installaton!Retrofi t UST Service ICC 1-28-2015 technician Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A. 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made Vapor Return Secondary X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 Vent Secondary X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 STP Sump X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diesel Fill Spill Bucket X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum To tile best of my knowledg e and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature~:~-~4~~~p_:::::::;:.._~~~~~~~b:::...._ _ _1D~a~te;_;_: Q032J../~2.!.!11~2.\L01li4 SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __ 5 SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other (Specify) Test Method Used: x Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic 0 Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolurion:0.0625" Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # 87 Vent Vapor Return Piping Material: FRP FRP Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Piping Diameter: 3.00" 4.00" Length of Piping Run: !50' 170' Product Stored: 87 Vent Secondary Vapor Return Secondary Method and location of Test Boot Test Boot piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min 5 Min starting test: Test Start Time: I 0:15AM I 0:1 5AM Initial Reading (R1): 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI Test End Time: !1 :15AM !1 :15AM Final Reading (RF): 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI Test Duration: I Hour I Hour Change in Reading (RF-R1): 0.00" 0.00" Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.00" 0.00" Criteria: Test Result: X Pass D Fail X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for .failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __ 6 PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer D Other (Specify) Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum x Hydrostatic D Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution: Sump # 87 Sump # Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: 36.00" Sump Depth: 50.00" Sump Material: FRP Height from Tank Top to Top of 28.00" Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 15.00" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean &Dry Portion of Sump Tested1 NA Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?• D Yes D No XNA D Yes DNo D NA D Yes D No D NA D Yes DNo D NA Turbine shutdown response time NA Is system programmed for fai l-safe shutdownf D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D No DNA DYes DNo D NA D Yes D No DNA Was fail -safe verified to be D Yes D No XNA D Yes D NoD NA DYes DNo D NA operational?' D Yes D No DNA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting NA test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (Rr): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R1): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail Was sensor removed for testing? D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D No D NA D Yes DNo DNA D Yes DNo D NA Was sensor properly replaced and D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D No D NA D Yes DNo DNA D Yes DNo D NA verified functional after testing? Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing. and recommended.fol/ow-upfor failed tests) 1 if the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. Tfthe answer to~ of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __ 9 SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES . Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0 SpilVOverfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested 0 Test Method Developed By: 0 Spill Bucket Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other (SpecifY) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum x Hydrostatic 0 Other (SpecifY) Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts I Equipment Resolution: Spill Box # Diesel Fill Spill Box# Spill Box# Spill Box# Bucket Diameter: 12.00" Bucket Depth: 12.00" Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min. starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R1): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass OFail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail Comments -(include if!formation on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for.failed tests) / stlliP 87 STP 0,795 Ill SUMP OS FSB 6, 380 Ill 3362 FASiRIP 6401 SOUTH H ST BAKERSFIB.D CA 93304 03/21/2014 to:o4 A!1 SU11P LEAK TEST REPORT 87 STP TEST STARTED !1:49 At!. TEST STARTED 03/i'l/20111 I BEGIII LEVa 0, i9Q3 Ill Elll TillE 10:011 Al1 DD DATE 03/21/20111 EJI) l£VEl. 0, 7901 Ill . lEAK ~0 0,002 Ill TEST REStA.T FAilED ..,.___. -. -~._....._~ --_, . OSF.SS TEST STARTED·'' 9jq9 Al1 TEST STARTEO 03/21/20111 BEGIIILEVa \6,3803 Ill EIIO TIHE · 10:04 Al1 EIIO DATE • 03/21/20111 EJIO ~-~ j .~. 379"4 m L£AI( lliRESHOLDi~ 0, 002 Ill TEST REStl.T \~.~EO 3362 FASTRIP 6401 SOUTH H ST BAKERSFIELD CA 93304 03/21/2014 10:20 AH SUH? LEAK TEST REPORT 87 STP TEST STARTED 10:05 AH TEST STARTED 03/21/2014 BEGitl lEVEl tl, 7889 JU EJIO TIHE 10:20 AH 810 DATE 03/21/2014 810 LEVEL 4, 7874 IU LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IU TEST RESULT PASSED OS FSB TEST STARTED 10:05 AH TEST ST.f\~T;D,_ OV.21/201~ BEGUHEVB.. 5;3793 IU 810 TIHE 10:20 AH 810 DATE 03/21/2014 810 LEVEL 6, 3793 IU LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 IU TEST RESULT PASSED 3362 FASTRIP 6401 SOUTH H ST BAKERSFIELD CA 93304 03/21/2014 10:57 At1 SUHP LEAK TEST REPORT 87 STP TEST STARTED 10:42 At1 TEST STARTED 03/21/2014 BEGIU lEVEL 4.8701 W EtiO TIME 10:57 AH EliO DATE 03/21/2014 EliD LEVEL 4. 8708 W lEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 Ill TEST RESULT PASSED OS FSB TEST STARTED 10:42 AH TEST STARTED 03/21/2014 BEGW LEVEL 6. 3789 W EllD TIHE 10:57 AH EliO DATE 03/21/2014 EtlO LEVEL 6. 3788 W lEAK THRESHOLD o. 002 W TEST RESULT PASSED . . . . 3362 FASTRIP 6401 SOUTH H ST BAKERSFIELD CA 93304 03/21/2014 10:39 AH SUHP LEAK TEST REPORT OS FSB TEST STARTED 10:23 AH TEST STARTED 03/21/2014 BEG Ill LEVa 6, 3791 Ill EtlO TIME 10:39 AH EtlO OATE 03/21/201/l EllD lEVEl 6, 3788 Ill lEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 W TEST RESULT PASSED