HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 RESULTSSWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intendedfor use by contractors pe1jorming periodic testing of UST secondwy containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages ofthis.form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and
printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility ownerloperatorfor submittal to the local regulato1y agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: #3360 Farrell's Fastrip I Date of Testing: 9/5/2013
Facility Address: 6401 White Lane, Bakersfield, CA 93309
Facility Contact: Omero Garcia, Craig Lincoln I Phone: 661-399-7000
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: N/A
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing):
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Confidence UST Services
Techni cian Conducting Test: Frank Landa
Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor x SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: CSLB I License Number:804904 ICC# 8180171180 18524
Manufacturer Training
Manufacturer Component(s) Date Trainin g Expires
UST 11 /22/2013
Installaton/Retro fit
UST Service ICC 1-28-2015
technician
Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A.
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs
Tested Made Tested Made
DSL Annular 0 0 X 0 91 STP X 0 0 0
87 Annular 0 0 X 0 UDC #1-2 X 0 0 0
91 Annular 0 0 X 0 UDC #3 -4 X 0 0 0
DSL Secondary X 0 0 0 UDC #5-6 X 0 0 0
DSL Vent Secondary X 0 0 0 UDC #7-8 X 0 0 0
87 Second ary X 0 0 0 DSL Fill Sump X 0 0 0
87 Vent Secondary X 0 0 0 87 Fill Sump X 0 0 0
91 Secondary X 0 0 0 91 Fill Sump X 0 0 0
91 Vent Secondary X 0 0 0 87 Vapor Bucket X 0 0 0
Vapor Return Secondary X 0 0 0 91 Vapor Bucket X 0 0 0
DSL STP X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
87 STP X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum
RESPONSffiLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowled e, t ocument are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signa ture: __ --'---'---'-''fl£--'c::~,~!<'-'14.1L-==..---------"D'-"a""te::.:.: -"-9'-'/ 5:.:.:/2=..:0"-'1'""3-
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
4 TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: x Tank Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum x Hydrostatic
0 Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:
Tank# DSL Tank# 87 Tank# 91 Tank#
Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 X Yes O No X Yes DNo X Yes DNo D Yes D No
Tank Capacity:
Tank Material:
Tank Manufacturer:
Product Stored:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (Rr):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (Rr-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? D Yes D No DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and D Yes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo CNA verified functional after testing?
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-upforfailed tests)
Tanks have wet Annulars.
1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {Cali fornia Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)}
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: x Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
0 Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Piping Run # DSL Piping Run # DSL Piping Run #87 Piping Run #87 Vent Vent
Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Smith Smith
Piping Diameter: 3" 3" 3" 3"
Length of Piping Run: 100' 150' 100' 150'
Product Stored: DSL Vent Regular Vent
Method and location of Boot in STP Boot in Fill Sump Boot in STP Boot in Fill Sump _l)iQing:run isolation:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min
starting test:
Test Start Time: 9:00am 9:00am 9:00am 9:00am
Initial Reading (RJ): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI
Test End Time: 10:00 am 10:00 am 10:00 am 10:00 am
Final Reading (RF): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI
Test Duration: I Hour I Hour I Hour I Hour
Change in Reading (RF-RJ): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail X Pass 0 Fail X Pass 0 Fail X Pass OFail
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: x Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
0 Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
""
Piping Run # 91 Piping Run# 91 Vent Piping Run #Vapor Piping Run# Return
Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Smith
Piping Diameter: ..,, 3" ..,,
.) .)
Length of Piping Run: 100' 150' 80'
Product Stored: Premium Vent Vapor Return
Method and location of Boot in STP Boot in STP Boot in 87 STP piping-run isolation:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min
starting test:
Test Start Time: 9:00am 9:00am 9:00am
Initial Reading (R1): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI
Test End Time: 10:00 am 10:00 am 10:00 am
Final Reading (RF): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI
Test Duration: I Hour 1 Hour 1 Hour
Change in Reading (RF-R1): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass OFail X Pass 0 Fail X Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass OFail
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
I
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
D Other (SpecifY)
Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum x Hydrostatic
D Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
*
II Sump #DSL I Sump#87 I Sump# 91 I Sump#
Sump Diameter: 36" 36" 36"
Sump Depth: 63" 63" 63"
Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
Height from Tank Top to Top of 32" 23" 32" Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest 12" 12" 12" Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean
Portion of Sump Tested 1 34" 25" 34"
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both D Yes DNo XNA D Yes DNoXNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes DNo D NA
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA
Is system programmed for fail-safe
shutdown?* D Yes DNo XNA D Yes DNoXNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes DNo D NA
Was fail-safe verified to be D Yes D No XNA D Yes DNoXNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes DNo D NA operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting 5Min 5Min 5Min
test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1): ~--IILI"-• •-
Test End Time: "'~~ 1111'-'VI' ~ -Final Reading (RF): t(eSUitS
Test Duration: -
Change in Reading (RF-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass DFail X Pass D Fail X Pass DFail D Pass D Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes DNo DNA X Yes D No DNA X Yes D No DNA D Yes DNo D NA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes DNo DNA X Yes D No DNA X Yes DNo DNA DYes DNo D NA verified functional after testing?
Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for .failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to illlY of the questions indicated with an
asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
I
I
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: D UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
D Other (Sp ecifY)
Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum x Hydrostatic
D Other (SpecifY)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
1-2 UDC # 3-4 UDC #5-6 UDC #7-8
UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
UDC Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
UDC Depth: 34" 34" 34" 34"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top 16" 16" 16" 16"
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to 12" 12" 12" 12"
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of UDC prior to Clean Clean Clean Clean
testing:
Portion ofUDC Tested 1 18" 18" 18" 18"
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D No XNA
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA NA
Is system programmed for fail-D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D No X NA D Yes DNo XNA D Yes DNo XNA safe shutdown?*
Was fail-safe verified to be D Yes DNo XNA D Yes D NoXNA D Yes DNo XNA D Yes DNo XNA operational?*
Wait time between applying 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time: .,. .. ,., ..... ., ... -.... ~ .. ·~
Initial Reading (R1): c,.,.. ~· (" f'\ I\ I ~oo I
Test End Time: ---. ... --·· -. ' ; ·~ -Final Reading (RF): Ke~ i)UitS I ~e~
Test Duration: M C Jl! •4 ... l .,
Change in Reading (RF-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass D Fail X Pass D Fail X Pass DFail X Pass D Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No DNA X Yes D No DNA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes D No D NA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA verified functional after testing?
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. lfthe answer to ill!Y of the questions indicated with an
asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
8 FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING .
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps D
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested D
Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer D Industry Standard D Professional Engineer
D Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum D Hydrostatic
D Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Fill Sump #DSL Fill Sump #87 Fill Sump #91 Fill Sump#
Sump Diameter: 38" 38" 38"
Sump Depth: 70" 70" 70"
Height from Tank Top to Top of 17'' 24" 17"
Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest 16" 24" 16"
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to Clean Clean Clean
testing:
Portion of Sump Tested 19" 26" 19"
Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
Wait time between applying 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1): -. -. Test End Time: ~ee IN~ 'N
Final Reading (RF): D ~',HI!• I .......
Test Duration: • '"'"""" ...... I."'
Change in Reading (RF-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail X Pass DFail · X Pass DFail D Pass DFail
Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes DNo X Yes D No X Yes D No X Yes D No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is D Yes D No XNA DYes DNo XNA DYes DNo XNA DYes DNo XNA
detected?
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes DNo o NA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes DNo D NA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA verified functional after testing?
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __
9 SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
II Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0
II Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested 0
Test Method Developed By: 0 Spill Bucket Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: 0 Pressure 0 Vacuum x Hydrostatic
0 Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution:
''"
I Spill Box #87 Vapor I Spill Box #91 Vapor I Spill Box# I Spill Box# I
Bucket Diameter: 12" 12"
Bucket Depth: 10" 10"
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min 5 Min
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1):
Test End Time: ~"" 1~1 f"nM
Final Reading (RF): """"'"' II,. --·· -. I .L
Test Duration: l't:~:H Jl L::.
Change in Reading (RF-R1):
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass 0 Fail X Pass o Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail
Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-upfor.failed tests)
3350 FARRELLS
3360 FARKELLS 6a01 IJH!iE LN
6~01 \iH!TE LN BAKERSFIELD CA I.
BAKERSFIELD CA 661-393-7000
661-383-7000 li031371
11031371
08/05/2013 1!37 PM
09/05/2013 1: 11 P~1
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
SU!1P LEAK TEST REPORT
UDC1-2 lJDCl-2 UDC1-2
TEST STARTED 12:56 f'H TEST STARTED 1:18 PM TEST STARTED 1:22 PH
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013 TEST STARTED 09/05/2013 TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGiN LEVEL 1. 3216 JN BEGIN LEVEL 1, 0957 iN BEGIN LEVEL 1. 321£1 IN
END TIME 1:11 PM END TIME 1:33 PM END TIME 1:37PM
EUO DATE 09/05/2013 END DATE 09/05/2013 END DATE 09/05/2013
END LEVEL 1, 3214 iN END LEVEL 1. 09Q3 lN END LEVEL 1, 3213 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 iN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0. 002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED TEST ~ESULT PASSED
UDC3-Ll UDC3-Il UDC3~a
TEST STARTED 12:56 PH TEST STARTED
TESi STARTED 09/05/20 13
1:22 PM TEST STARTED U8 PM
BEGHJ LEVEL 3.9288 lN
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013 TESi STARTED 09/05/2013
END TIME 1:11 PM
BEGiN LEVEL 3,9290 IN BEGiN LEVEL 5,826il IN
END DATE 09/05/2013
END TlME 1:37 PM END TIME 2:03 PM
END LEVEL 3,9289 IN
END DATE 09/05/2013 END DATE 09/05/2013
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 IN
END LEVEL 3,9280 IN EflO LEVEL 6. 8252 It1
TEST RESULT PASSED
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD o. 002 w
TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASS EO
3360 F.~RRELLS
6401 WHITE LN
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
WD31371
09/05/2013 2:21 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
UDCS-6
TEST STARTED 2:05 PM
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL /l,O/l56 IN
END TIME 2:21 PM
END DATE 09/05/2013
EtJO LEVEL /l, Oll55 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 II·J
TEST RESULT PASSED
UDC7-8
TEST STARTED 12:58 PM
TEST STARTED 08/05/2013
BEGW LEVEL 5, 1588 IN
END TIME 1:14 P11
END DATE 09/05/2013
am LEVEL 5. 1587 JIJ
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
3360 FARRELLS
6/l01 WHITE LN
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
WD31371
08/05/2013
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
UOC5-6
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
BEGW LEVEL
END fiNE
END DATE
END LEVEL
2:25 P~l
08/05/2013
n.oa55 IN
2:/lO PM
08/05/2013
a.0457 IN
LEPK THRESHOLD
TEST RESULT
o. 002 w
PASSED
UOC7-8
TEST STARTED 1:18PM
TEST STARTED 08/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5. 1584 HJ
am TIME 1:33 PM
END DATE 09/05/2013
Hm LEVEL s. 155a w
LEAK THRESHOLD 0. 002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87VAP 87VAP
TEST STARTED 2:25 D~\ TEST STARTED 2:05 PM
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013 TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEl 5. 6828 IN BEGIN LEVEL 5. 6832 ltJ
EIJD T li1E 2: DO PM Elm T!ME 2:21 PM
END DATE 09/05/2013 END DATE 09/05/2013
Er/D LFVEL 5. 6828 ltJ EIJD LEVEL 5, 5830 HJ
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LFAK THRESI-IOLO 0. 002 JJJ
TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED
91VAP 91VAP
lEST STARTED 2:25 Pr1 TESI STARTED 2:05 PM
TEST s-ARTEO 08/05/2013 TEST STARTED 08/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL Q, 1907 It~ BEGiN LEVEL D, 1903 W
Etm TH1F 2:no PH EtlO TIME 2:21 Pf1
END DATE 09/05/2013 Etm DATE 09/05/2013
EtlD LEVEL a. 1910 Hl EtiO LEVEL a, 1906 w
LEAK THRESHOLD 0. 002 Itl LEAK THRESHOLD o. 002 ill
TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED
33GO FARRf:LLS
sao 1 liH JTF LN
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
1/031371
09/05/?013 9:13 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
OSLSTP
TEST STAR-eD 8:58 AM
fEST STARTED 08/05/2013
m:r-: LrVEL 2. 7903 IN
•• ~tJ TIHr fl: 13 AM
END DATE 09/05/2013
[t;Q LEVEL 2. 7896 IN
l FAK THRESHOLD O. 002 IN
ll-.Si RESUL I PASSED
91STP
TEST STARTED 10:16 AM
TEST STARTED 09/05/20 13
BEGIN LEVEL 5.0675 IN
END TIME io:31 AM
END DATE 09/05/2013
END LEVEL 5.0676 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
I 87STP
TEST START EO 8:58 ~M
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 1.2n28 iN
END TIME l~; 13 AM
END DATE 09/05/201 3
EtJU LEVEL 1. 2aao IN
LEAK T~PESHDLO 0. 002 :N
TEST RESULT PASSED
3360 FARRELL$
6401 ~HI TE LN
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
\1031371
09/05/2013 9:29 AM
SUMP LEPK lEST f<EPORl
OSLSTP
TEST STARTEil 9: ld AM
TEST STARn=D 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 2, 7895 IN
END TIME 9:29 AM
EtlD DATE 09/05/?013
END LEVEL 2. 7892 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 IU
TEST RESULT PASSED
91STP
TEST STARTED 9: lli AM
TEST STARTED 09/05/20 13
BEGIN LEVEL 3, 0962 IN
END TIME 9:29 AN
END DATE 09/05/?013
E~JD LEVEL 3, 0976 HI
LEAK THRESHOLD 0. 002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSEO
87SiP
TEST STARTED 9:10 /\M
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGitl LEVEL 1. 2~37 IN
END TIME 9:29 A~
END DATE 09!05/20~3
END LEVEL 1, 2635 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD o. 002 :tJ
fEST RESULT PASSED
3360 FARRELLS
6/lO 1 WH lTE l.N
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
W031371
09/05/2013 12:07 PM
SUrlP LEAK TEST REPORT
DSLFILL
TEST STARTED 11:51 Al1
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3, 7555 IN
EtJO TIME 12:06 PM
Etm DATE 09/05/2013
END LEVEL 3. 7560 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD o. oo2 m
rEST RESULT PASSED
87FILL
TEST STARTED 11:51 AM
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL s, ooas HI
EtiD Tl ME 12:06 PM
EtJO DATE 09/05/2013
END LEVEL 5,00118 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91FILL
TEST STARTED 11:51 AM
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 4,51511 IN
END TIME 12:06 PM
END DATE 09/05/2013
END LEVEL 4,5150 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 W
TEST RESULT PASSED
3360 FARRELLS
6401 IIHJTE LN
BAKERSFIELD CA
661-393-7000
\·1031371
09/05/2013 12:li2 Pi1
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
DSLFILL
TEST STARTED 12:26 PM
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGiN LEIJEL 3, 7558 IN
GW TI ME 12:1l2 PM
END DATE 09/05/2013
END LEVEL 3, 7556 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0. 002 w
TEST RESULT F'ASSED
87FILL
TEST STARTED 12:26 PM
TEST STARTED 09/05/2013
BEGW LEVEL 5,001l6 IN
END TI ME 12:112 PM
END DATE 09/05/2013
EtlD LEVEL 5,ooa7 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, 002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91F!LL
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
BEGIN LEVEL
END TI ME
END DATE
12:26 PM
09/05/2013
a. ms it~
12:42 PM
09/05/2013
END LEVEL ~.51aLJ IN
LW THRESHOLD 0, 002 W
TEST RESULT PASSED