Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 RESULTSSWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: ARCO Date of Testing: 1/21/2014 Facility Address: 1701 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, Ca. Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Advanced Compliance Technician Conducting Test: Bruce W. Hinsley Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor  SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: C61/D40 License Number: 971259 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires Incon TS-STS 9/17/2014 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Tank #1 STP Sump X    87 UL Main Product Line X    Tank #2 STP Sump X    91 UL Product Line X    Tank #3 STP Sump X    Product Line Tanks 1 to 2 X    Tank #4 STP Sump X    Product Line Tanks 2 to 3 X    Tank #1 Fill Sump X    UDC #1-2 X    Tank #2 Fill Sump X    UDC #3-4 X    Tank #3 Fill Sump X    UDC #5-6 X    Tank #4 Fill Sump X    UDC #7-8 X    Tank #1 Fill Bucket X    UDC #9-10 X    Tank #2 Fill Bucket X    UDC #11-12 X    Tank #3 Fill Bucket X    Tank #1 Annular Space X    Tank #4 Fill Bucket X    Tank #2 Annular Space X    If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Containments were clean, water was removed from site and be used in future testing. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date: 1/21/2014 SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 4. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: ARCO Date of Testing: 1/21/2014 Facility Address: 1701 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, Ca. Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): 5. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Advanced Compliance Technician Conducting Test: Bruce W. Hinsley Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor  SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: C61/D40 License Number: 971259 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires Incon TS-STS 9/17/2014 6. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Tank #3 Annular Space X        Tank #4 Annular Space X        Siphon Line Tanks 1 to 2 X        Siphon Line Tanks 2 to 3 X                                                                        If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Containments were clean, water was removed from site and be used in future testing. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date: 1/21/2014 SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 7. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By:  Tank Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used:  Pressure X Vacuum  Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Tank # 1 Tank # 2 Tank # 3 Tank # 4 Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1  Yes x No  Yes x No  Yes x No  Yes x No Tank Capacity: 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Tank Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP Tank Manufacturer: Xerxes Xerxes Xerxes Xerxes Product Stored: 87 UL 87 UL 87 UL 87 UL Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 13:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 Initial Reading (RI): 10” Hg. 10” Hg. 10” Hg. 10” Hg. Test End Time: 14:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 Final Reading (RF): 10” Hg. 10” Hg. 10” Hg. 10” Hg. Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0” Hg. 0” Hg. 0” Hg. 0” Hg. Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 2.0” Hg. 2.0” Hg. 2.0” Hg. 2.0” Hg. Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)} SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 8. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By:  Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used: X Pressure  Vacuum  Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen / Pressure Gauge Equipment Resolution: Piping Run # 87 UL Piping Run # 91 UL Piping Run # Tank 1 to 2 Piping Run # Tank 2 to 3 Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: A/O Smith A/O Smith A/O Smith A/O Smith Piping Diameter: 3” 3” 3” 3” Length of Piping Run: 65’ 65’ 14’ 14’ Product Stored: 87 UL 91 UL 87 UL 87 UL Method and location of piping-run isolation: Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 11:30 11:30 11:30 11:30 Initial Reading (RI): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. Test End Time: 12:30 12:30 12:30 12:30 Final Reading (RF): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi. Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 9. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By:  Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used: X Pressure  Vacuum  Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen / Pressure Gauge Equipment Resolution: Piping Run # Tank 2 to 1 Piping Run # Tank 3 to 2 Piping Run # Piping Run # Tank 2 to 3 Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: A/O Smith A/O Smith Piping Diameter: 3” 3” Length of Piping Run: 14’ 14’ Product Stored: 87 UL 87 UL Method and location of piping-run isolation: Test Boot Test Boot Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 13:30 13:30 Initial Reading (RI): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. Test End Time: 14:30 14:30 Final Reading (RF): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi. Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail  Pass  Fail  Pass  Fail C – Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 10. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By:  Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used:  Pressure  Vacuum X Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002 Sump # 1 Sump # 2 Sump # 3 Sump # 4 Sump Diameter: 48” 48” 48” 48” Sump Depth: 66” 67” 67” 68” Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 31” 30” 30” 28” Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 15” 15” 14” 16” Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean Clean Portion of Sump Tested1 50% 50% 50% 50% Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Turbine shutdown response time 3 Sec. 3 Sec. 3 Sec. 3 Sec. Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 15:02/15:18 12:24/12:41 10:57/11:13 10:57/11:13 Initial Reading (RI): 7.1921 /7.1918 5.6551/5.6552 6.3028/6.3027 6.1048/6.1045 Test End Time: 15:17/15:33 12:39/12:56 11:13/11:29 11:13/11:29 Final Reading (RF): 7.1922 /7.1911 5.6551/5.6558 6.3027/6.3028 6.1045/6.1045 Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0001/0.0007 0.0000/0.0006 0.0001/0.0001 0.0005/0.0000 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 11. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By:  UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used:  Pressure  Vacuum X Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002 UDC # 1-2 UDC # 3-4 UDC # 5-6 UDC # 7-8 UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown UDC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP UDC Depth: 35” 35” 35” 35” Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 15” 15” 15” 15” Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 12” 12” 12” 12” Condition of UDC prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean Clean Portion of UDC Tested1 50% 50% 50% 50% Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Turbine shutdown response time 3 Seconds 3 Seconds 3 Seconds 3 Seconds Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 10:30/10:47 10:30/10:47 10:14/10:30 10:14/10:30 Initial Reading (RI): 5.2758/5.2770 7.6780/7.6765 5.1555/5.1555 7.7494/7.7485 Test End Time: 10:46/11:02 10:46/11:02 10:29/10:46 10:29/10:46 Final Reading (RF): 5.2758/5.2753 7.6762/7.6783 5.1556/5.1558 7.7485/7.7480 Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0000/0.0017 0.0018/0.0003 0.0001/0.0003 0.0009/0.0005 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 12. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By:  UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used:  Pressure  Vacuum X Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002 UDC # 9-10 UDC # 11-12 UDC # UDC # UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown UDC Material: FRP FRP UDC Depth: 35” 35” Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 15” 15” Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 12” 12” Condition of UDC prior to testing: Clean Clean Portion of UDC Tested1 50% 50% Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA Turbine shutdown response time 3 Seconds 3 Seconds Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 12:11/12:26 12:11/12:26 Initial Reading (RI): 7.0380/7.0378 7.0722/7.0735 Test End Time: 12:26/12:42 12:26/12:42 Final Reading (RF): 7.0377/7.0377 7.0732/7.0735 Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0003/0.0001 0.0009/0.0000 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail  Pass  Fail  Pass  Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA  Yes  No  NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps  Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested  Test Method Developed By:  Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used:  Pressure  Vacuum X Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002 Fill Sump # 1 Fill Sump # 2 Fill Sump # 3 Fill Sump # 4 Sump Diameter: 42” 42” 42” 42” Sump Depth: 63” 65” 65” 64” Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: N/A N/A N/A N/A Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 14” 14” 14” 14” Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean Clean Portion of Sump Tested 35% 35% 35% 35% Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 16:28/16:45 16:28/16:45 14:03/14:19 12:24/12:41 Initial Reading (RI): 2.3875/0.5230 4.0683/4.0682 4.9289/4.9297 6.9877/6.9876 Test End Time: 16:44/17:00 12:26/12:42 14:19/14:35 12:39/12:56 Final Reading (RF): 2.3880/0.5232 4.0685/4.0680 4.9297/4.9294 6.9876/6.9880 Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0005/0.0002 0.0002/0.0002 0.0009/0.0003 0.0001/0.0004 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes  No X Yes  No X Yes  No X Yes  No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA X Yes  No  NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 13. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes  Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested  Test Method Developed By:  Spill Bucket Manufacturer X Industry Standard  Professional Engineer  Other (Specify) Test Method Used:  Pressure  Vacuum X Hydrostatic  Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002 Spill Box # 1 Spill Box # 2 Spill Box # 3 Spill Box # 4 Bucket Diameter: 12” 12” 12” 12” Bucket Depth: 12” 12” 12” 12” Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. Test Start Time: 16:28/16:45 14:03/14:19 16:28/16:45 14:03/14:19 Initial Reading (RI): 4.6006/4.6015 4.9908/4.9888 2.3875/0.5230 4.3579/4.3584 Test End Time: 16:44/17:00 14:18/14:35 16:44/17:00 14:18/14:35 Final Reading (RF): 4.6001/4.6015 4.9904/4.9872 2.3880/0.5232 4.3583/4.3583 Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0005/0.0002 0.0004/0.0016 0.0005/0.0002 0.0004/0.0001 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Test Result: X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail X Pass  Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)