HomeMy WebLinkAboutFMC 2011S WRCB, January 2002
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Page of
Thisjornr is inletrdedjor use by contractors perforating periodic testing of USTsecondary eomabmteni sysieems. U.re the
appropriate pager o% thisjornr to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedjornr, written test procedures, and
priwoutsfrom tests ffopplicable). should be provided to thefacility owner /aperntorfo• Submittal to the local regulatory agency.
I. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: HP Go Go Date of Testing: 7/1112011
Facility Address: 3699 Wilson Road, Bakersfield, CA 93309
Facility Contact: Alondra Hernandez I Phone: 661 -835 -8043
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : 6/28/2011
Name of Local Agency Inspector (i% presenl during iectingl: Esier Estrada
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Confidence UST Services
Pass Fail
fechnician Conducting Test: Bryan A Self
Repairs
Made Component
Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor x SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
Not
Tested
License Type: CSI-13
Reg. Annular
License Number:804904
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
Franklin Fueling TS -STS 1 -06 -2013
UST Service
technician
1CC 7 -5 -2013
Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N. A.
UDC 3 -4 X
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component PASS Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
Reg. Annular X UDC 1 -2 X
Reg. Middle Annular X fI r l UDC 3 -4 X I I
Super Annular X 1 UDC 5 -6 I 'I X C I t l
Reg. Product Line I X f L; UDC 7 -8 f' X
Reg. Middle Product Line X Waste Oil Fill Sump X
Super Product Line i i X Waste Oil Annular X
Reg. Fill Sump U X L I
Reg. Middle Dill Sump X U 1 D
Super Fill Super X
Reg. STP Sump X
Reg. Middle STP Stunp U X
Super STP Sump X I :i I I CI Ll
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE F R CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of tiy, Anowledge, furls staled in lhiti docia)teit re ur and infull cornpliance with legal requireinews
Technician's Signature: Date: 7/1 1/201 1 _
t
SWRCB, January 2002
4. TANK ANNULAR TFSTFNG
Page of_
Test Method Developed By: U Tank Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
Other (Specrh)
Test Method Used: _ Pressure x Vacuum U Hydrostatic
1 Other (Specify)
Pest Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Tank ff Reg. Tank # Reg. Middle Tank # Super Tank #Waste Oil
Is Tank I-xempt From Testing ?' U Yes x No Yes x No i I Yes x No I Yes X. No
Tank Capacity: 12.000 12.,000 12.000 1000
Tank Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Tank Manufacturer: Xeries Xeries Xeries Unknown
Product Stored: Regular Regular Super Waste Oil
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting tesf:
5 min. 5 min. 5 min. 5 min
Test Start Time: 1 1:08am 11:08atn 11:08am 2:35 pm
Initial Reading (Ri): 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI
Test End Time: 12:08ptn 12:08pnt 12:08pm 3:35 pm
Final Reading (RF): 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI 5 00 PSI
Test Duration: I hour I hour I hour I hour
Change in Reading (Rt: -Rt): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Test Result: x Pass 0 Fail x Pass 0 Fail x Pass 0 Fail x Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing'? x Yes D No I NA x Yes i ) No IJ NA x Yes C! No I I NA x Yes I No u NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after tcstin " x Yes 7 No Fi NA x Yes I' No U NA x Yes U No ^ NA x Yes ! ; No U NA
Comments — (include itformation on repairs made prior to testing, and recorrruiended,%l(o +v -nhforfurled lests)
Secondary contaimnent systems where the continuous monitoring autornaticaily monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
tes(ing. {California Code of Regulations. Title 23, Section 2637(ax6))
SWRCB, January 2002
5. SFCONDARV PTPF. TF.STiN(:
Page _ _ _ of --
Pest Method Developed By: '-I Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard 3 Professional Engineer
1 Other (SpeciA,)
Test Method Used: x Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
Other (Speclfv)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gagcs Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Piping Run # Reg. Piping Run 4 Reg. Middle Piping Rung Super Piping Run 11
Piping Material: F-10 FRP FRP
Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Smith
Piping Diameter: 3.00" 3.00" 3.00"
Length of Piping Run: 100.00' 100.00' 100.00'
Product Stored: Regular Regular Super
Method and location of
piping-run isolation: Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum /wa(er and
starting test:
5 min. 5 min. 5 min.
Pest Start Time: 11:40am 11:40am 1 1:40am
Initial Reading (R)): 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI 5.00" PSI
Test End 'Time: 12:00pm 12:00pm 12:00pm
Final Reading (RF): 2.50" PSI 3.00" PSI 4.00" PSI
Test Duration: 20 min. 20 min. 20 min.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 2.50" PSI 2.00" PSI 1.00" PSI
Pass[Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Test Result: 0 Pass x Fail 0 Pass x Fail 0 Pass x Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail
Comments — (include information on repeirs made prior to iewing, and recoinniendedfollow -ripforfoiled iesis)
SWRCB, January 2002
6. PTPING SUMP TESTING
Page of _
Test Method Developed I3y: 1 Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard li Professional Engineer
i I Other ( Specfh )
Test Method Used: I Pressure J Vacuum x Hydrostatic
1 Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
Sump # Reg. Sump 4 Res. Middle Sump # Super Sump #
Sump Diameter: 42.00" 42.00" 44.00"
Sump Depth: 55.50" 55.50" 56.00"
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP
Height from 'rank Top to Top of
Highest Pi in Penetration: 38.00" 33.00" 13.00"
Height from 'rank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 34.50" 30.00" 30.00"
Condition of sump prior to testing: Dirty Dirty Dirty
Portion of Sump Tested' Pipe penetration Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?*
1: Yes No x NA Yes " No x NA J Yes _) No x NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA
Is system programmed for fail -safe
shutdown?
Yes I No x NA D Yes I No x NA J Yes ) No x NA Yes .-No "1 NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
I I Yes 11 No x NA U Yes U No x NA f 1 Yes No x NA I 1 Yes 17 No IJ NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and starting
test:
Visual Fail Visual Fail 5 Min
Test Stan Time:
Initial Reading (Rj):
Test End Time:
Final Reading; (Rr):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (Rr-R,):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: U Pass x Fail 0 Pass x Fail x Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? x Yes Ll No f] NA x Yes ',I No NA x Yes i i No 1 1 NA 1 Yes No f7 NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? x Yes 11 No [1 NA x Yes I i No 7 NA x Yes U No I J NA Yes U No '1 NA
Comments — (include itybrmation on repairs made prior to testing, at+d rrecontatelidedfollow -rtpforfoiled rests)
Both Ref?ular unleaded STP sumo were leaking from the clam shell and were
Visual Fails.
If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to atJy ofthc questions indicated with an
asterisk (d) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
SWRCB. January 2002
7. UNDER- DISPENSFR CONTATNM ENT (IIDCI TRfiTIN1-
Page of
Pest Method Developed By: !j UDC Manul"tcturer x Industry Standard i Professional Engineer
1 Other (Sped )
Test Method Used: ; Pressure " Vacuum x Hydrostatic
1 Other (Specr )
Tcst Equipment Used: Ts -sts Fquiptnent Resolution:
UDC a 1 -2 UDC it 3 -4 1) DC 9 5 -6 UDC t17 -8
UDC' Manufacturer: Wayne Wayne Wayne Wayne
1)DC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 23.00" 23.00" 23.00" 23.00-
1 leight from UDC Bottom to Top
of 1•lighest Pipir% )enetrdtion:
10.00" 9.501, 9.50" 1
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
6.50" 6.50" 6.00" 7.00"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Dirty Dirty Dirty Dirty
Portion of UDC'I'esled Pipe Penetration Pie Penetration Pie Penetration Pipe Penetration
Dues turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?'
x Yes 0 No 0 NA x Yes 0 No 13 NA x Yes 12 No 0 NA x Yes 'j No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 8 Seconds 8 Seconds 8 Seconds 8 Seconds
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown ? -
x Yes 7 No J NA x Yes I No 0 NA x Yes 11 No n NA I x Yes --No : NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
x Yes :- No J NA x Yes I No . NA x Yes No NA x Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressurelvacuum /wafer and
slatting test
Test Stan 'rime:
5 Min 5 Min 5 Min I 5 Min
S
I
Initial Reading (Kt):
Test End Time:
Final Readin (Rt -):
rest Duration:
Change in Reading, (Rr-R,):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass X Fail 0 Pass X Fail
WiLS sensor removed for testing? X Yes CJ No f l NA X Yes I I Nu I I NA X Yes I I No I I NA X Yes FI No i I NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified Functional aher testing? X Yes I No NA X Yes 'I No L NA X Yes : No NA X Yes ..i No ' NA
Comments — tincluder information on repairs made prior to testing, andreconuneridedfolloiv -trpfor %iled tests)
If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. I('the answer to yjny of the questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ". the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRC13 L,(:i- 160)
SWRCB, January 2002
K. FILL RISER rON"I'AINIb1FNT CIM1 -V ThtTINf_
Page _ of __ _
Facility is Not liquipped With Dill Riser Containment Sumps
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed Fay: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard ? Professional 1=ngineer
3 Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: _3 Pressure I Vacuum x Hydrostatic
3 Other (Speci-j
Pest Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Fill Sump N Reg. Fill Stimp a Reg. Middle Fill Sump H Super Fill Sump 0 W.0
Sump Diame(er: 36.00" 36.00" 36.00" 34.00"
Sump Depth: _ 53.00" 60.00" 58.00"
17.00"
42.00"
N.A. Height Crum 'Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penctrolion:
30.50" 17.00"
Height from 'Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
33.50" 19.00" 12.00" I- 15"
Condition ofsump prior to
testing;:
Dirty Dirty Dirty Dirty
Pipe PenetrationPortionofSum) Tested Pipe Penetration Pie Penetration Pipe Penetrdtion
Sum Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test:
5 min. 5 min. 5 min. 5 min.
rest Stan Time:
Initial Reading (R,):
II1G:
Final Reading (RI ):
rest Duration:
Chancc in Reading (RF -Ri):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: 0 Pass x Fail x Pass '0 Fail 0 Pass x Fail x Pass 0 Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? x Yes l No x Yes "I No x Yes U No x Yes :1 No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is
detected'?
x Yes 0 No 0 NA x Yes 0 No 0 NA x Yes 0 No C NA x Yes 0 No 0 NA
Was sensor removed for testing'? x Yes I I Nu CI NA x Yes I I No 11 NA _+ x Yes 0 No 0 NA x Yes i No I I NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin g?
x Yes I i No i NA x YT's .! No J NA x Yes No C NA x Yes i_ No' NA
C0M nit nts — (include inforn)(1177)t on repairs made prior to lesring and recommendedjnllriw -npforfoiled ley y
The regular and the super tanks were visual fails. When 1 out the water in the tank
1 went over the pipina penetration by the dine I put my probes in the tank the
water had dropped under the penetration.
S WRCf3. January 2002
9. SPILL/OVERFILLCONTAINMVINT ROYFC
Page_ -Of --
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes
SpillrOvertill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested
test Method Developed By.- Spill Bucket Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Sped &l
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipmem Used: Ts -sts _ I- quipment Resolution:
Spill Box k Spill Box Al Spill Box a Spill liox b
Bucket Diameter:
Bucket Depth:
1
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /wafer and
stanin test:
Test Stan Time: _
Initial Reading (R,):
Test End 'Time:
Final Reading (KF):
V
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (R,: -R,):
Pass/Fail •I•hreshold or
Criteria:
Test Regult: Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail Pass 0 Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to +est /ng, and recommended lolloin -upforfailed testsl
Spill buckets were -just completed with the annual monitor certification
N; GO 63
3634 61lml RD
MKERSFIELU rF, 53309
661 -0-6044
IM /OICE 27134
07/20/2011 1:33 Pt
WT LE' R.EFUT
SWP GIL -F;,. 3.556 P1
t4' GO ;:D
i x41' b:,.SC"I RD
RMERSFiEtu Er+ uiuj
651 - 635 -8045
INVOICE 27134
0712012011 1:54 FM
SrP LEA+ Tt t tT
Cl. -41L
TEST STARTED 1:3.1 P,l
EST START[[, 0712012011
@ Slit LEVEL 3.5551 it;
E'w -II'E 1:5 Fl
Etw DATE 07/20/2011
IJO LKI. 3.5549 Ill
LEAK THRESHOLD 0, O;Q IN
TEST RESAT PASSED
F? GO GO K GO GO
3598 VILSO'+ RD 3699 dILSOII RD
SA•:ERSFIELD CA 93309 U,+KER;FIELO CA 3s3N
681- 835 -EDa5 651- &355-&045
INVOICE 27130 11i'MiCE 27134
01/11/2011 2:i3 P' 07/11/2011 4:29 P.4
SIMP LEVEL REPORT S11HP LEAK TEST REPORT
07/11/2011
ux 1 -2
S4":' 87'0•IL 5.705 IN
SW E1 -STP 2.81E IN IEST STARTES 4:13 P8
TEST STARTED 07/11 /2011
BEGPI I.EVFI. 5.. 3)40 it)
LID I IME 6:29 PM
90 DATE 07/11/2011
E1:4 LEVEL 3070 IN
LEAN IMMO 0. ,'-M 1!i
TEST RESULT F41LEO
UDC 3 -4
1tP GO LA
3639 VILSM RD TEES, STARTED t :13 PN
BAt.EkSFIELD CA E3M i_Sr STARTED 0711112011
661 -835 -6045 E-t-GIN LEIVEL 5.9071 1":
INVOICE 27134 Eli) fire 6:29 P",
END DATE 07/11/2011
07/11/2011 2:29 PM ENO LE.VFI 5.3042 111'
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
SJ7U' LEAK TES? REPORI TEST RESULT FAILED
81 *IL
LOC 5 -6
TEST STARTED 2:13 PM
TEST STARTED 07/11/2011 TEST SIARTEO 4:13 PM
UE•GIN LEVEL 5.1050 111 TEST STARTED 07/11/2011
END TIIl 2:28 PM Bi:GTtI LEVEL 615278 1N
EIIU WE 07/11/2011 En TIME 4:29 Pr,
END LEVEL 5.7064 IN END DATE 07111/2011
LEAF( THRESHOLD 0.002 IN Eta) LEVEL 6.5238 NI
TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK Tlf,%Wl 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT FAILED
91 -STP
UD: 7 -8
TEST STARTED 2:13 PN
TEST STARTED 07/11 /2011 TEST STARTED 4:13 PM
BEGIN LEVEL 2.8187 it: TEST STARIED 07/1112011
ENO TIKE 2 :2b Pil BEGIN LEV-i. 5. %T5 IN
END DATE 07111/2011 END TIPS 4:29 Pr
END LEVEL 2.8161 1411 FIM DATE 07/11/2011
LEAs IHRESHOLO 0.002 111 END LEVEL C. 1612 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK TKKSttlr0 0.002 IN
TEST RES' -LT I`AILEO
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages ofthisform to report results for all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: HP Go Go Date of Testing: 9/26/11
Facility Address: 3699 Wilson Rd
Facility Contact: Alondra Hernandez Phone: 661- 835 -8044
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing
Name of Local Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Ester(BFD)
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Confidence UST Services
Pass Fail
Technician Conducting Test: Frank Landa
Repairs
Made Component
Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor x SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
Not
Tested
License Type: CSLB
87 #1SEC
License Number:804904
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
Franklin Fueling TS -STS 9 -20 -2012
UST Service
technician
ICC 2 -2 -2013
Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A.
91 SEC
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
87 #1SEC X
87 #2 SEC X
91 SEC X
87#1 STP X
87 #2 STP X
UDC # 1 -2 X
UDC #3 -4 X
UDC #5 -6 X
UDC #7 -8 X
REG #1 FILL SUMP X
91 FILL SUMP X
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Water was out back into test trailer and waste drum
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the hest ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: Date: 9/28/11
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
S. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: x Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Piping Run 87 #1 Piping Run #87 #2 Piping Run #91 Piping Run #
Piping Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
Piping Manufacturer: SMITH SMITH SMITH
Piping Diameter: 4" 4" 4"
Length of Piping Run: 150' 150' 150'
Product Stored: REGULAR REGULAR SUPER
Method and location of
piping-run isolation:
CLAMSHELL IN
STP
CLAMSHELL IN
STP
CLAMSHELL IN
STP
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
5MIN 5M1N 5MIN
Test Start Time: 1:OOAM 1:OOAM 1:00
Initial Reading (R,): 5PSI 5PSI 5PSI
Test End Time: 2:OOAM 2:OOAM 2:OOAM
Final Reading (RF): 5PSI 5PSI 5PSI
Test Duration: 1HR 1 HR 1 HR
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0 0 0
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0 0 0
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
In 87 #2(middle tank) had to repair clam shell° resealed with smith fibery-lass slue
SWRCB, January 2002
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
Sump #87 #1 Sump #87 #2 Sump # Sump #
Sump Diameter: 42" 42"
Sump Depth: 55.5" 55.50"
Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration: 38" 33"
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 34.50" 30"
Condition of sump prior to testing: CLEAN/DRY CLEAN/DRY
Portion of Sump Tested' 40" 35"
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 8 Seconds 8 Seconds
Is system programmed for fail -safe
shutdown?
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and starting
test:
15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R,):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF -Rj):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Teat Result: X Pass Fail X Pass 0 Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Commeints — (include information on repairs madeprior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
In 87# 1 stn had to fiberelass lank coller.
In 87 #2 stn had to seal hole in sumo wall from sensor holder screw. applied
Volcom to seal pipinp- penetrations in sumps
Ifthe entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. Ifthe answer to any ofthe questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
j- ^ • ... •._:w..• Wv.Wt9arcmeix mrn.yru;rsrgj
see,
baLnc,- i -C1WM _`,.'Q4't.- i..l1,wFlin.nY7 •VS G3a KD{ .
SWRCB, January 2002
7. UNDER - DISPENSER CONTA1101ENT (UDC) TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
UDC # 1 -2 UDC # 3-4 UDC # 5-6 UDC #7-8
UDC Manufacturer: Unknown1 Unknown Unknown Unknown
UDC Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
UDC Depth: 23" 23" 23" 23"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
10" 9.5" 9.5" 11"
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
6.5" 6.5" 6" 7"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean clean
Portion of UDC Tested Hi Penetration High Penetration High Penetration High Penetration
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 8 Seconds 8 Seconds 8 Seconds 8 Seconds
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown ?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational ?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test
5 min 5 min 5 min 5min
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R1):
Test End Time: e
Final Reading F : Reis u itsTestDuration:
Change in Reading (Rr-R,):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Zest Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
C®MMe nts — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Had to tighten some clamps to get sec to pass, no repairs made to dsp's
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
all y -ae"
SWRCB, January 2002
8. MILL, RISER C®NTAIINWNT SUMP TESTING
Page of
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Fill Sump #R 1 Fill Sump #91 Fill Sump # Fill Sump#
Sump Diameter: 36" 36"
Sump Depth: 53" 58"
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Pi in Penetration:
30.5" IT,
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
33.5 19"
Condition of sump prior to
testing:
Clean Clean
Portion of Sump Tested Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration
Sump Material: Fiber lass Fiberglass
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
5Min 5Min
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (Rj):
Test End Time:
Final Reading F
Test Duration;
Change in Reading (RF -R,):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes No X Yes No Yes No Yes No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is
detected?
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No L No NA Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Had to seal electrical box with volcom,sealed all threads with volcom
Water was leaking into box and settina sensor off,
i , i 1 .
HPGOGO
WILSON
BACKERSFIELD
27872
09/26/2011 11:01 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
DSP1 -2
TEST STARTED 10:45 AM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5.2361 IN
END TIME 11:00 AM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 5.2362 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSP3 -4
TEST STARTED 10:45 AM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4,3891 IN
END TIME 11 :00 AM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 4,3891 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
1
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
OSP1 -2
TEST STARTED 10:03 AM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5,2370 IN
END TIME 10:18 AM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END -LEVEL 5.2365 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSP3 -4
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
BEGIN LEVEL
END TIME
END DATE
END LEVEL
LEAK THRESHOI
TEST RESULT
10:03 AM
09/26/2011
4.3904 IN
10:18 AM
09/26/2011
4.3896 IN
D 0, 002 IN
PASSED
DSP5 -6
TEST STARTED 10:03 AM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4.3262 IN
END TIME 10:18 AM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 4.3255 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
OSP7 -8
TEST STARTED 10 :03 AM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5.4861 IN
END TIME 10:18 AM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 5.4852 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
871STP
TEST STARTED 2:00 PM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5.0846 IN
NO TIME 2:16 PM
NO DATE 09/28/2011
NO LEVEL 5.0846 IN
EAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
EST RESULT PASSED
871STP
TEST STARTED 2:16 PM
TEST STARTED 0912812011BEGINLEVEL5,0848 INENDTIME2:31 PMENDOATE09/28/2011ANDLEVEL5.0846 IN
1AK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
EST RESULT PASSED
872STP
LEST STARTED 12:17 PM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 3.6030 IN
END TIME 12:32 PM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 3,6025 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED_--- -
32 F 12'• 1
gTPR EO
00+
26120
602N IPM
O
91FILL
TEST STARTED 1:11 PM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 3.1287 IN
END TIME 1:26 PM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 3.1284 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
97FILL
TEST STARTED 1 :27 PM
TEST STARTED 0912612011BEGINLEVEL3.1283 INENDTIME1:42 PMENDDATE09/26/2011ENDLEVEL3, 1282 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 INTESTRESULTPASSED
DSP-5 -6 _
TEST STARTED 11:08 AM
i TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4.3172 IN
END TIME 11:23 AM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 4.3152 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSP7 -8
EST STARTED
ST STARTED
SIN LEVEL
TIME
tND DATE
END LEVEL
LEAK THRESHOI
TEST RESULT
11
11:08 AM
09/26/2011
473-IN--- 5.9
11:23 AM
09/26/2011
5.4728 IN
D 0.002 IN
PASSED
HPGOGO
3699 WILSON RD
BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
661 - 835 -8044
27895
09/26/2011 12:48 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
871FILL
TEST STARTED 12:32 PM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 3,5462 IN
END TIME 12:48 PM
END DATE 09/26/2011
END LEVEL 3.5461 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
HPGDGO
3699 VILSON RD
BAKERSFIELD CA 93309
661- 835 -8044
27895
04/26/2071 12:32 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
871FILL
TEST STARTED 12 :17 PM
TEST STARTED 09/26/2011BEGINLEVEL3.5468 INENDTIME12 :32 PMENDDATE0912612011ENDLEVEL3,5453 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED