HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB989 2011SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Deport Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performingperiodic testing of USTsecondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages ofthisform to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedform, written testprocedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: Shell Date ofTesting: 9/8/2011
Facility Address: 4700 Coffee Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308
Facility Contact: Matt Jeffries I Phone: 661 - 496 -7006
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 7/26/2011
Name ofLocal Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Ester Duran
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Confidence UST Services
Pass Fail
Technician Conducting Test: Bryan A Self
Repairs
Made Component
Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor x SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
Not
Tested
License Type: CSLB
DSL Fill
License Number: 804904
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
Franklin Fueling TS -STS 1 -06 -2013
UST Service
technician
ICC 7 -5 -2013
Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A.
Reg. #1 PL X
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
DSL Fill X DSL PL X
Reg. #1 Fill X Reg. #1 PL X
Reg. #2 Fill X Reg. #2 PL X
Super Fill X Super PL X
DSL STP X Disp. 1 -2 X
Reg. #1 STP X Disp. 3 -4 X
Reg. #2 STP X Disp. 5 -6 X
Super STP X Disp. 7 -8 X
DSL Annular X
Reg. #1 Annular X
Reg. #2 Annular X
Super Annular X
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests:
Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best ofmy knowledge, the facts stated in this document qre accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: ,. "j >Avi
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specie)
Test Method Used: Pressure x Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Tank #DSL Tank # Reg. #1 Tank # Reg. #2 Tank # Super
Is Tank Exempt From Testing ?' Yes x No Yes x No Yes x No Yes x No
Tank Capacity: 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Tank Material: Steel Steel Steel Steel
Tank Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
Product Stored: DSL Reg. Reg. Super
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test:
5 min. 5 min. 5 min. 5 min.
Test Start Time: 9:15am 9:15am 9:15am 9:15am
Initial Reading (R,): 10 Hg 10 Hg 10 Hg 10 Hg
Test End Time: 10:15am 10:15am 10:15am 10:15a n
Final Reading (RF): 10 Hg 10 Hg 10 Hg 10 Hg
Test Duration: 1 hour 1 hour I hour 1 hour
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes []No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6))
SWRCB, January 2002
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: x Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specie)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Piping Run # DSL Piping Run # Reg. #1 Piping Run# Reg. #2 Piping Run # Super
Piping Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Piping Manufacturer: Total Containment Total Containment Total Containment Total Containment
Piping Diameter: 2.00" 2.00" 2.00" 2.00"
Length of Piping Run: 150' 155' 150' 155'
Product Stored: Diesel Secondary 87 Secondary 87 Secondary 91 Secondary
Method and location of
piping -run isolation:
Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test:
5 min. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Test Start Time: 1 1:30am
Initial Reading (Ri): 5" psi
Test End Time: 12:30pm
Final Reading (RF): 5" psi
Test Duration: I hour
Change in Reading (RF -111): 0.00"
Pass /Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0.00"
Test Result: X Pass Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
There are three boots with hole's in them, Both regulars Lines are leakiny- in
Disp. #5 -6. The Super Line is leaking in Disp. #3 -4. The secondary's are leaking
Just as fast as I was flowing in so there was no test ran.
SWRCB, January 2002
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
Sump # DSL Sump # Reg. #1 Sump # Reg. #2 Sump # Super
Sump Diameter: 40.00" 40.00" 40.00" 40.00"
Sump Depth: 44.00" 46.00" 44.00" 44.00"
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration: 4.50" 9.50" 5.00" 8.00"
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 2.00" 3.00" 5.00" 2.00"
Condition of sump prior to testing: Dry Dry Dry Dry
Portion of Sump Tested' Not Tested Not Tested Not Tested Not Tested
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?*
Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA NA
Is system programmed for fail -safe
shutdown ?`
X Yes No X NA X Yes No X NA X Yes No X NA X Yes No X NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational ?*
X Yes No X NA X Yes No X NA X Yes No X NA X Yes No X NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and starting
test:
NA NA NA NA
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (Rj):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF -Ri):
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: Pass X Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to as of the questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
SWRCB, January 2002
7. UNDER - DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
UDC # 1 -2 UDC # 3 -4 UDC # 5 -6 UDC # 7 -8
UDC Manufacturer: GBCO GBCO GBCO GBCO
UDC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 27.00" 27.00" 27.00" 27.00"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
12.00" 12.00" 12.00" 12.00"
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
0.00" 0.00" 0.00" 0.00"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry
Portion of UDC Tested Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?*
Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA NA
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?*
Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test
5 Minuets 5 Minuets 5 Minuets 5 Minuets
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R,):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF -R,):
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA Yes X No NA Yes X No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Both UDC #34 and #5 -6 were visual fails.
If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
SWRCB, January 2002
8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
Page of
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
r Developed By: Sump Manufacturer El Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specie)
Test Equipment Used: I Equipment Resolution:
Fill Sump # DSL Fill Sump # Reg. #1 Fill Sump # Reg. #2 Fill Sump # Super
Sump Diameter: 37.00" 37.00" 37.00" 37.00"
Sump Depth: 44.00" 43.00" 44.00" 43.00"
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
FRP FRP FRP FRP
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
6.50" 8.00" 7.00" 8.00"
Condition of sump prior to
testing:
0.50" 0.50" 0.50" 0.50"
Portion of Surnp Tested Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test:
5 Minuets 5 Minuets 5 Minuets 5 Minuets
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R,): See 1NG01PTestEndTime:
Final Reading (RF): Kesults
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (R,: -Ri):
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is
detected?
X Yes []No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes []No NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include informalion on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
i
y.,, {.
N,aC
U
T.:.o,.n
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
9. SPILL /OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes
Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested X
Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box #
Bucket Diameter:
Bucket Depth:
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R,):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF -R,):
Pass /Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up for failed tests)
SHELL
4700 COFFIE RD
BACKERSFIELD CA 93308
661 -06 -7006
27331
09/08/2011 10:24 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
OS FILL
TEST STARTED 10:08 AM
TEST STARTED 09/08/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4.9901 IN
END TIME 10:23 AM
END DATE 09 /08/2011
END LEVEL 4.9900 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87 1F IL
TEST STARTED 10:08 AM
TEST STARTED 09/08/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 6.1584 IN
END TIME 10:23 AM
END DATE 09/08/2011
END LEVEL 6,1586 1N
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87 2FIL
TEST STARTED 10:08 AM
TEST STARTED 09 /08/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5.0355 IN
EN) TIME 10:23 AM
END DATE 09/08/2011
END LEVEL 5.0350 1N
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91 FILL
TEST STARTED 10:08 AM
TEST STARTED 09 /08/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5.7557 IN
940 TIME 10:23 AM
END DATE 09 /08/2011
END LEVEL 5.7556 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
SHELL
4700 COFFIE RD
BAKERSFIELD CA 93303
661 - 495-7006
27331
09/08/2011 12:38 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
DIS 7 -8
TEST STARTED 12:23 PM
TEST STARTED 09/08/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 1,0283 IN
END TIME 12:38 PM
END DATE 09/08/.2011
END LEVEL 1,0283 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
s
SHELL
4700 COFFIE RD
BAKERSFIELD CA 93308
661- 495 -7006
27331
09/08/2011 1.04 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
DIS 7 -8
TEST STARTED 12:49 PM
TEST STARTED 09/08/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5.4585 IN
END TIME 1:04 PM
END DATE 09 /08/2011
END LEVEL 5,4584 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 114
TEST RESULT PASSED
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages of thisform to report results for all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (if applicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: Shell Date of Testing: 9/28/11
Facility Address: 4700 Coffee Rd
Facility Contact: Matt Jeffries Phone: 661496 -7006
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Ester(BFD)
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Confidence UST Services
Pass Fail
Technician Conducting Test: Frank Landa
Repairs
Made Component
Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor x SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
Not
Tested
License Type: CSLB
87 #1 SEC
License Number:804904
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
Franklin Fueling TS -STS 9 -20 -2012
UST Service
technician
ICC 2 -2 -2013
Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A.
91 SEC
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
87 #1 SEC X
87 #2 SEC X
91 SEC X
8791 STP X
87 #2 STP X
91 STP X
DSL STP X I 1
UDC #3 -4 X
UDC #5 -6 X
1 I
1
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Water was out back into test trailer and waste drum
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To lite best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated i s document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: Date: 9/28/11
SWRCB, January 2002
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: x Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625"
Piping Run 87 #1 Piping Run #87 #2 Piping Run #91 Piping Run #
Piping Material: PLASTIC PLASTIC PLASTIC
Piping Manufacturer:
TOTAL
CONTAINMENT
TOTAL
CONTAINMENT
TOTAL
CONTAINMENT
Piping Diameter: 2" 2" 2"
Length of Piping Run: 100, 100' 100,
Product Stored: REGULAR REGULAR REGULAR
Method and location of
piping-run isolation:
BOOT IN STP BOOT IN STP BOOT IN STP
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test:
5MIN 5MIN 5MIN
Test Start Time: I O:00AM I O:OOAM 10:00
Initial Reading (Ri): 5PSI 5PSI 5PSI
Test End Time: 11:OOAM 1 1:OOAM 1 1:OOAM
Final Reading (RF): 5PSI 5PSI 5PSI
Test Duration: 1 HR I HR 1 HR
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0 0 0
Pass /Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
0 0 0
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
Replaced test boots in 603 -4 (2)
Replaced test boots in dsp #5 -6 (2)
Replaced ilamaers in both dSD's
SWRCB, January 2002
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
Sump #87 #1 Sump #87 #2 Sump #91 Sump #DSL
Sump Diameter: 40" 40" 40" 40"
Sump Depth: 44" 44" 44" 44"
Sump Material: PLASTIC PLASTIC PLASTIC PLASTIC
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration: 9.5" 5" 8" 4.5"
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 3" 5" 2" 2"
Condition of sump prior to testing: CLEAN /DRY CLEAN /DRY CLEAN /DRY CLEAN /DRY
Portion of Sump Tested' 13" 8" 10" 7"
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?*
Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 8 Seconds 8 Seconds 8 SECONDS 8 SECONDS
Is system programmed for fail -safe
shutdown ?*
X Yes []No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and starting
test:
15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (R,):
Test End Time: Sea
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF -R,):
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail. X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
FW-as sensor properly replaced and
rified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Replaced pipiny_ penetrations in all stp's
Replaced with 3950DW Diversivied product,
If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. Ifthe answer to a of the questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
7. UNDER - DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specie)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution:
UDC # 3 -4 UDC # 5 -6 UDC # UDC # 7 -8
UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown
UDC Material: Plastic Plastic
UDC Depth: 27" 27"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
12" 12"
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
0" 10"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean
Portion of UDC Tested 14" 14"
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?"
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 8 Seconds 8 Seconds
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown ?"
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
o erational ?"
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (Rj):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF -Rj):
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Replaced test boots in dsv #34, and 5 -6
If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
VA 0 3 0 X92
4700'COFFEE
BAKERSFIELD CA 93308
27895
09/19/2011 11:08 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
DSP3 -4
TEST STARTED 10:52 AM
TEST STARTED 09/19/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4,8010 IN
END TIME 11:08 AM
END DATE 09/19/2011
END LEVEL 4,8011 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSP5 -6
TEST STARTED 10:52 AM
TEST STARTED 09/19/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 2,6539 IN
END TIME 11:08 AM
END DATE 09/19/2011
END LEVEL 2,6537 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
4700 COFFEE
BAKERSFIELD CA 93308
27895
09/19/2011 11 :24 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
DSP3 -4
TEST STARTED 11 :09 AM
TEST STARTED 09/19/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4,8011 IN
END TIME 11:24 AM
END DATE 09/19/2011
END LEVEL 4,8009 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSP5 -6
TEST STARTED 11 :09 AM
TEST STARTED 09/19/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 2,6537 IN
END TIME 11:24 AM
END DATE 09/19/2011
END LEVEL 2,6536 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
BROOKSIDE
BACKERSFIELD
09/28/2011 10:34 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
872STP
TEST STARTED 10:19 AM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 3,3418 IN
END TIME 10:34 AM
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 3, 3415 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
871STP
TEST STARTED 10:19 AM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4,8083 IN
END TIME 10:34 AM
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 4,8081 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSLSTP
TEST STARTED . 10:53 AM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5,6021 IN
END TIME 11:08 AM
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 5,6021 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91STP
IEST STARTE4 9:29. AM
TEST STARTED 092/28/2011
7 IN
BEGIN LEVEL 9:44 AMENDTIME
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 2,7216 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT
PASSED
BROOKSIDE
BACKERSFIELD
09/28/2011 10:51 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
872STP
TEST STARTED 10:36 AM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 3,3415 IN
END TIME 10:51 AM
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 3,3414 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
871STP
TEST STARTED 10:36 AM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 4,8081 IN
END TIME 10:51 AM
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 4.8080 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DSLSTP
TEST STARTED 10:36 AM
TEST STARTED 09/28/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 5,6018 IN
END TIME 10:51 AM
END DATE 09/28/2011
END LEVEL 5.6022 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91STP
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
BEGIN LEVEL
END TIME
END DATE
END LEVEL
LEAK THRESH(
TEST RESULT
8:59-. AM
09/28/2011
2, 7261 IN
9 :14 AM
09/28/2011
2 7242 IN
ILD 0, 002 IN
PASSED