Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB989 RESULTS 2011yet a3 SWRCB, January 2002 Page of t Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing ofUST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages ofthisform to report resultsfor all components tested The.completedform, written test procedures, and printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should beprovided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: SHELL Date of Testing- 5/11/11 Facility Address: 2600 WHITE LANE, BAKERSFIELD Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 4/12/1.1 Name of Local Agency Inspector (rfpresent during testing):. 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Rich Environmental Pass Technician Conducting Test: RICH PHILLIPS Not Tested Credentials: X CSLB Licensed. Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: C61/1340 A HAZ Manufacturer Manufacturer License Number: 809850 Trainine Component(s ) Date Training Expires INCON TS -STS 6/11/2012 UNL87 ANNULAR X DSL STP SUMP 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made UNL87 ANNULAR X DSL STP SUMP X PREM91 ANNULAR X UDC #1/2 X DIESEL ANNULAR X UDC 103/4 X UNL87 SECONDARY PIPE X UDC #5/6 X1 PREM91 SEC. PIPE X UDC #7/8 xi DIESEL SEC PIPE X UDC #9/10 X VR SECONDARY PIPE X UNL87 FILL SUMP X UNL87 VENT SEC PIPE X 1 PREM91 FILL SUMP X PREM91 VENT SEC PIPE X DIESEL FILL SUMP X DSL VENT SEC PIPE X UNL87 SPILL BOX p X UNL87 STP SUMP X UNL87 VPR BOX X PREM91 STP SUMP X PREM91 SPILL BOX X Ifhydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TEC IAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts st ibis document are accurate and in Jull compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: Date: 5111/11 SWRCB, January 2002 Page Z— of Secondary Containment Testing Report Form « f Thisform is intendedfor use by contractorsperformingperiodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages ofthisform to report resultsfor all components tested The completedform, written testprocedures, and printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should beprovided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the localregulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Date of Testing: Facility. Address: Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified ofTesting: Name ofLocal Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Rich Environmental Technician Conducting Test: RICH PHILLIPS Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: C61/1340 A HAZ Manufacturer License Number: 809850 Manufacturer Training Component(s) Date Training E ires INCON TS -STS 6/11/2012 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS If hydrostatic testing was, performed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNIC SPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the fads stated ' document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: J rr. Date. 5 /11 11 man on o anon aoo nnoo an a oo 0n. nnn© oaoo a oo onoo o000 noon i o 0000, oaoo 0000 n ors nao© If hydrostatic testing was, performed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNIC SPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the fads stated ' document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: J rr. Date. 5 /11 11 SWRCB, January 2002 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING t4124 3 Page '5 Of \\ Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer X Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other (Spec) Test Method.Used: Pressure X Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: 4" DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: Is Tank Exempt From Testing ?' Tank #87 Tank #91 Tank #DSL Tank # X Yes No X Yes 0N X Yes No Yes 0 No Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer. Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 30MIN 30MIN 30MIId 30MIN Test Start Time: Initial Reading (Ri): Test End Time: Final Reading Test Duration: 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN 60MIN Change in Reading (RF-RO: Pass/F4il Threshold or Criteria: rt {{ 1 tt oq f W110'' 1. 3 { 111V-11t:. Yes ' No NA Yes 0 No NA Yes 0 No: NA CWWI 0 Yes. 0No NAWassensorremovedfortesting? Was sensor property replaced and verified functional after testin ? Yes 0 No NA Yes No NA 0 Yes No DNA Yes No DNA Comments — (include information on repairs madeprior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) NOT TESTED — WET ANNULARS Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)1 SWRCB, January 2002 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING L4V Page 4 of Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard 'Professional Engineer Other (Spec) Test Method Used: X Pressure . Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic Other (Sped) Test Equipment Used: 4" DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: .5% OEM= Piping Material: Piping Run #87 Piping Run #91 Piping Run #DSL Piping Run #VR FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Piping Manufacturer: SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH Piping Diameter. 3" 3" 3" 4" Length of Piping Run: 200' 200' 200' 225' Product Stored: UNL87 PREM91 DIESEL VAPOR Method and location of piping-run isolation: BOOT IN SUMP BOOT IN SUMP BOOT IN SUMP BOOT IN SUMP Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN. 30 MN Test Start 11:15 11:15 1.1 :15 2:00 Initial Reading (R,): 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 Test End Time: 12:15 12:15 12:15 3:00 Final Reading (RF): 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 Test Duration: 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0 0 0 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI 51 Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING 121a Page t of Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer X Industry- Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other (Spec) Test Method Used: X Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic 0 Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: 4" DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: .5% Piping Material: Piping Run #87 VENT Piping Run #91 VENT Piping Run #DSL Piping Run # FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Piping Manufacturer: SMITH SMITH SMITH Piping Diameter. 3" 3" 3" Length of Piping Run: 20' 30'. 40' Product Stored: UNL87 PREM91 DIESEL Method and location of piping-run isolation: BOOT IN SUMP BOOT IN SUMP BOOT IN SUMP Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN Test Start. Time: 9:30 9:30 9:30 Initial Reading (R,): 6.0 5.5 6.0 Test End Time: 10:30 10:30 10:30 Final Reading (RF): 6.0 5.5 6.0 Test Duration: 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN Change in Reading (Rr -R,); 0 0 0 Pass/Fail 'Threshold or Criteria: 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI i Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING qZio3 Page ofo Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS-STS Equipment Resolution: Sump Diameter. HEMBREE Sump #87 Sump #91 Sump #DSL Sump #VENT BOX 46" 46" 46" 30" Sump Depth: 87" 87" 87" 24" Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 13" 13" 13" 12" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 17" 17" 17" 12" Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean Clean Portion of Sump Tested' 15" 15" 15" 14" Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both roduct and water)?* Yes No X NA, Yes No X NA Yes No XNA Yes No X NA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?* Yes No X NA Yes No X NA El Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Was fail -safe verified to be o rational ?' Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN. 30 MIN Test Start Time: 12:08 12:27 1:03 1:30 11:10 11:26 10:04 10:21 Initial Reading (Rj): 2.789 2.791 3.479 3.481 4.644 4.643 2.123 2.123 Test End Time: 12:24 12:42 1:18 1:45 11:25 11:41 10:19 10:36 Final Reading (RF): 2.791 2.791 3.480 1 3.482 4.6344 1 4.642 2.123 2.123 Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MINS 15MIN 15MIN 15NUN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Reading (RF -R;): 002 -.000 001 001 000 001 000 000 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 -.002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X'Yes No NA X Yes No NA u Was sensor property replaced and verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing; and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) . If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much waitested. If the answer to M ofthe questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) SWRCB, January 2002 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING H 2JG Page V\ of Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution: UDC Manufacturer: UDC #1/2 UDC43 /4 UDC #5/6 UDC #7/8 BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO UDC Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS UDC Depth: 36" 36" 36" 36" Height from UDC Bottom to Top ofHighest Piping Penetration: 18" 18" 18" I8" Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: N/A N/A N/A N/A Condition ofUDC prior to testing: CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN Portion ofUDC Tested 20" 20" 20" 20" Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)? Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No '.XNA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown ?* Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No XNA Yes No X NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?' Yes No X NA Yes No XNA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN Test Starf Time: 3:22 3:4.1 2:28 2:44 2:28 2:44 2:22 3:41. Initial Reading 4.671 4.669 2.719 2.701 3.504 3.505 5.275 5171 Test End Time: 3:38 3:56 2:44 3:00 2:44, 3:00 3:38 3:56 Final Reading 4.670 4.668 2.720 2.720 3.505 3.505 5.273 5.269 Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Reading R,): 001 -:OOI 001 000 001 000 002 -.002 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 .002 002 002 002 002 002 -.002 Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes 11 No NA X Yes No NA 1 X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) a If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to py of the questions indicated with an asterisk (•) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) SWRCB, January 2002 7. . UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT fUDCI TESTING X12! o Page 9 of Test Method Developed By: 0 UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer 0 Other (Sped) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS . Equipment Resolution: UDC #9/10 UDC # UDC # UDC # UDC Manufacturer: BRAVO UDC Material: FIBERGLASS UDC Depth: 30" Height from UDC Bottom to Top 18" of Hi hest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to N/A Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to CLEAN testing: Portion of UDC Tested 20" Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both 0 Yes 0 No X NA Yes 0 No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA roduct and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time 1s system for fail- dprogrammed shuthutdown? soafe 0 Yes 0 No X NA Yes No NA 0 Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail -safe verified to be yes D No X NA Yes No NA Yes D No NA Yes No 0 NAorational ?' Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and 30MIN 30MIN 30NUN 30MIN starting test Test Start Tune: 2:28 2:44 Initial Reading (R): 2.696 2.692 Test End Time: 2:44 3:00 Final Reading (RF): 2.695 2.691 Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN I 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Reading (RF-R,): 001 001 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 002 Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No NA Yes No DNA Yes No NA Yes No DNA Was sensor property replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes No DNA Yes No NA Yes 0 No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information. on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) Ifthe entire depth ofthe UDC is not tested, specify how:much. was tested. If.the answer to any ofthe questions indicated with an asterisk M is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) SWRCB, January 2002 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING g2-103 P of tPage Facility is Not Eqmpped With Fill Riser,Containment Sums Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were.Not Tested .0 Test Method Developed By: 0 Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer 0 Other (Sped) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure . 0 Vacuum X Hydrostatic 0 Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS Fill SumE #87 Fill. Sump #91 Sump Diameter: 36" 36" Equipment Resolution: .000" Fill Sump #DSL Fill Sump # 36" Sump Depth: 86" 86" 86" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 28" 28" 28" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 22" 22" 22" Condition ofsump prior to testis CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN Portion of Sump Tested 30" 30" 24" Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS. Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum /water and starting test: 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN Test Start Time: 11:10 11:26 11:10 11:26 11:10 11:26 Initial Reading 111): 2356 2.357 4.6I9 4.619 4.644 4.643 Test End Time: 11:25 11:41 11:25 11:41 11:25 11:41 Final Reading F): 2.357 2.357 4.619 4.619 4.644 4.642 Test Duration: 15MIN ISMIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Readin F-Ri): 001 .000 000 000 000 001 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 .002 002 002 002 002 Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes 0 No X Yes Q No X Yes 0 No Yes 0 No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? 0 Yes No X NA Yes 0 No XNA D Yes 0 No X NA 0 Yes 0No p NA Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes 0 No 0 NA X Yes No NA X Yes No DNA D Yes 0No 0 NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testis ? X Yes 0 No 0 NA X Yes ONo DNA X Yes D No DNA D.Yes 0 No DNA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, midrecommendedfollow -upfor. failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 9. SPILIJOVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Lf Zdv Page \O ofAl Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Spec) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Egwpment Used: INCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution: Spilt Box #87 SPILL Spill Bog #87 VTR Spill Box #91 SPILL Spill Box #91 VPRrmeter. 12" 12" 12" 12" th: 16" 16" 16" 16" Wat tme etween applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN Test Start Tune: 11:10 11:26 10:04 10:21 Initial Reading (RI): 6.014 6.015 3.600 3.600 Test End Tune: 11:25 11:41 10:19 10:36 Final Reading (Rr): 6.015 6.015 3.601 3.600 Test Duration: 15MIN 15M1N 15MIN 15M1N 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Reading (Rr -R,): 001 000 001. -.000 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 002 002 .002 NAM" i 111k 1% ' I r r I Comments — (include information on repairs madeprior to testing; and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) FILL SPILL BUCKETS NOT TESTED SWRCB, January 2002 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES qu63 Page k\ of \\ Facility is Not Equipped With S ill/Overfill Containment Boxes Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer X Industry. Standard 1i Professional Engineer Other (Spec) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution: MEMSpill Box #DSL SPILL Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Bucket Diameter: 12" Bucket Depth: 16" Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30MfN 30M1N 30MIN 30MIN Test StartTime: Initial Reading (R,): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15M1N 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15M1N Change in Reading (RF -1Q: Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 7... i L.Ilp ° Comihents — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) FILL SPILL BUCKETS NOT TESTED 91UPR SHELL TEST STARTED 10:04 AM AKERS IEL ! N BAKE FIEtD CATEST 'STARTED 0,5/11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 10019 9 IN AM 05/11/2011 11:25 AID END TIME 05/11/2011ENDDATE3,6010 IN SUMP LEAK TEST REPOK END LEVELLEAKTHRESHOLD 0.002 I 87UPR SHELL TEST RESULT 4FiEL LN TEST STARTED I1:10 AM 9600 CA DSLFILS TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 6:0149 IN AYERSIELD 05/11/2011 11:41 AM 7EST STARTED 10004 AM 05/11/2011 END TIME 11:25 AM END DATE 05/11/2011 SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT TEST STARTED 2.8081 END LEVEL 6.0155 IN BEGIN LEVEL 188 9 RN10:19 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN 27UPR END TIME 05/11/2011 TEST RESULT PASSED END DATE 2.8061 IN TEST STARTED 11:26 RM END LEVE. LEAK THRESHOLD 0'002 IN 91FILS TEST STARTED 6,015 IN6.0156 IN TEST RESULT I BEGIN LEVEL TIME 11:41 AM TEST STARTED 11 :I0 AM END END DATE 05/11/2011 VENTt3X TEST STARTED 05/ 11/2011 END LEVEL 6.0155 IN INBEGINLEVEL_ 4.6190 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 TEST STARTED 10:04 AM 05/11,'2011 END END DATE 05/1 4E 11:25 1/2011 RM TEST RESULT PASSED TEST STARTED 2.1235 IN NO LEVEL 4,6195 IN BEGI.N.LEVEL 10:19 AM LEAK_ THRESHOLD 0.002.IN 91FILS END TIME END DATE 05/11/2811 TEST RESULT PASSED 11026 AM END LEVEL 2.1235 IN THRESHOLD O.002 I TEST STARTED TEST STARTED 05/11/2011LEAK TEST RESULT PASSED DSLSTP BEGIN LEUEL 4.6146 AM TEST STARTED 1.1:10 AM END TIME END DATE 05/11/2011 TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 4,6196 IN' BEGIN LEVEL 4.6449 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 43.002 IN 91UPR END TIME 11:25 AM TEST RESULT PASSED END DATE 0S /11/2011 TEST STARTED 10:21 AM"; END LEVEL 4.6443 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN DSLSTPTESTSTARTED05/11r2011 BEGIN LEVEL 3.6008 IN TEST RESULT PASSED END TIME 10:36 AM TARTED STARTED 11:26 AM 05/11/201.1ENDDATE05/11/2011 END LEVEL 3.6008 IN. 87FILS Fsc 1N LEVEL 4.68432 IN 11:41 AMLEAKTHRESHRI-D 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PAID TEST STARTED 11:10 AM END TIME END DATE 05/11/2011 TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 4.6420 IN BEGIN LEVEL 2.3567 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN DSLFILS END TIME 11:25 AM TEST RESULT PASSED HD DATE 05/11/2811 DTESTSTARTED10:21 AM LEUEL 2.3573 IN TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 LEAK. THRESHOLD 0.802 IN 87FILS BEGIN LEVEL 2.8056 IN TEST RESULT PASSED END TIME 10:36 AM END DATE &9/11/2011 TEST 05/11/2911 END LEVEL 2.8041 IN STARTED BEGIN LEVEL M 211041 AMLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN END TIME Og/11/20TESTRESULTPASSEDENDDATE END LE14EL 2:3576 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IDTESTRESULTPASSED TEST STARTED 10:21 AM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011. BEGIN LEVEL 2.1232 IN SHELL END TIME 10:36 AM 22h00 WHITE Lh' END DATE 05/11/2011 ERSFITE CA END LEVEL 2.1231 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.802 IN 05/11/2011 12:24 PM TEST RESULT PASSED SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 87STP TEST STARTED 12:06 PM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 BEG7.N. '_EVEL 2.7894 IN END TIME 12 :24 PM END DATE 05/2122011 END LEVEL 2.7910 IN LT-AK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSEF) qz(G, 1srP TEST STARTED 1:03 PMTESTSTARTED05/11/2011BEGINLEVEL3.4798 INENDTIME1:18 PMENDDATE05/11/20/1ENOLEVEL3.4806 INLEAK. THRESHOLD 0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED SHELL 2600 WHITE LN BAKERSFIELD CA 05/11/2011 12:42 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 87STP TEST STARTED 12:27 PMTESTSTARTED05/11/2011BEGINLEVEL2,7913 INENDTIMEI2 :42 PMENDDATE05'1f/2011ENDLEVEL2.7914 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED 91STP TEST STARTED TEST STARTED BEGIN LEVEL END TIME END DATE END LEVEL LEAK THRESHOL TEST RESULT 1:30 PM 05/11/2011 3:4$1`8 IN 1:45 PM 05/11/2011 3.4826 IN D 0.002 IN PASSED SHELL 2600 WHITE LMBrIl "ERSFIELD 'CA . 0S1f1/2g11 3.38 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT DSP7 -8 TEST STARTED 3:22.PMTESTSTARTED0511/2011BEGIN .LEVEL 5.2758 INENDTIME3:3P PMENDDATE05/11 0I1ENDLEVEL5.2735 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 INTESTRESULT J D.ISPI -2 TF_ST STARTED 3:22 PMTESTSTARTED05/11/1021BEGINLEVEL4.6711 INENDTIME3:35 PMENDDATE05/11.12011ENDLEVEL4.6709 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED SHELL _ 2600 WHITE LN BAKERSFIELD CA 05/11/2011 2:44 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT DSP9 -10 TEST STARTED 2:28 PM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 2.6966 IN END TIME 2:44 PM END-DATE 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 2.6955 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002.IN TEST RESULT PASSED DISP5 -6 TEST STARTED 2 :28 PM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 3.5047 IN END TIME 2:44 PM END DATE 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 3.5051 Iii LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED DISP3 -4 TEST STARTED 2:28 PM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 2.7194 IN END TIME 2:44 PM END DATE 05/11 /2011 END LEVEL 2.7202 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED SHELL 2600 WHITE LN BAKERSFIELD CA 05/11/2011 3:57 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT DSP7 -8 TEST STARTED 3:41 PMTESTSTARTED05/11/2011BEGINLEVEL5.2719 INENDTIME3:56 Pr; END DATE 05/11/2011ENDLEVEL5.2697 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0,082 INTESTRESULT DISP1 -2 TEST STARTED 3:41 PMTESTSTARTED05/11/2011BEGINLEVEL4,6690 INENDTIME3:56 PMEND .DATE 05/11/2011ENDLEVEL4.6686 INLEAKTHRESHOLD8:002 INTESTRESULTPASSED SHELL 2600. WHITE LN BAKERSFIELD CA 05/11/2011 3:00 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 0_*f&" TEST STARTED 2:44 PM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 . BEGIN LEVEL 2.6926 IN END TIME 3:00 PM END DATE 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 2.6912 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED DISP5 -6 TEST STARTED 2:44 PM TEST 'STARTED 05 /11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 3,5052 IN END TIME 3:00 PM END DATE 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 3.5053 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.602 IN TEST RESULT PASSED DISP3- -4 TEST STARTED 2:44 PM TEST STARTED 05/11/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 2.7203 IN END TIME 3:00 PM END DATE 05/11/2011 END LEVEL 2.7206 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.082 IN TEST RESULT PASSED gZlo- YZI a 3 SB989 TESTING FAILURE REPORT SITE NAME: SHELL DATE: 5111 /11 THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED/REPAIRED TO COMPLETE TESTING. REPAIRS: LABOR: PARTS INSTALLED: dal NAME: TITLE: SIGNATURE: THE ABOVE NAMED. PERSON TAKES FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING THE APPROPRIATE PARTY TO HAVE CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO REPAIR THE ABOVE LISTED PROBLEMS AND NOTIFYING RICH ENVIRONMANTAL FOR ANY NEEDED RETESTING. THIS ALSO RELEASES RICH ENVIRONMENTAL OF ANY FINES OR PENALTIES OCCURING FROM NON - COMPLIANCE. A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN LEFT ON -SITE FOR YOUR CONVIENENCE.