The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 2011SWRCB, January ?002 Page 1. Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intendedfor use by contractors perform ingperiodic testing of USTsecondary containment systems. Use the appropriatepages ofthis form to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedform, written testprocedures, and printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: SAYEGH GROUP INC. Date of Testing: 06/03/2011 Facility Address: 2800 PANAMA LANE , BAKERSFIELD, CA, 93313 Facility Contact: MARK SATER Phone: (6 61) 835-0643 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 05/16/2011 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): ERNIE 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY , INC. Pass Technician Conducting Test: DANIEL VISSER Repairs Made Credentials: Pass CSLB Licensed Contractor Not Tested SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester Piping Sump 1 UNL License Type: A License Number: 743160 0 Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s) Date Training Expires INCON TS -STS 06/01/2012 0 Piping Sump 1 UNL x 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repair MadL Piping Sump 1 UNL E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Piping Sump 1 UNL x Piping Sump 2 UNL E] El Piping Sump 2 UNL x Piping Sump 3 UNL 1:1 El Piping Sump 3 UNL El Piping Sump 4 PRE El Piping Sump 4 PRE 1:1 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: WATER WAS REUSED. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts state //d in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: CDC4 u-1 Lu '` Date: 06/03/2011 SWRCB, January 2002 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Page 2. Test Method Developed By: F-1 El Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard F-1 Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON Equipment Resolution: +- . 0020 Sump # 1 UNL Sump # 1 UNL Sump # 2 UNL Sump # 2 UNL Sump Diameter: 4811 4811 4811 4811 Sump Depth: 55" 55" 56" 56" Sump Material: FIBERG FIBERG FIBERG FIBERG Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Pentration: 24" 24" 24" 24" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Pentration: 24 If 2411 2 4 " 24 " Condition of sump prior to testing: CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN Portion of Sump Tested: 2 "ABOVE 2 "ABOVE 2 "ABOVE 2 "ABOVE Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water) ?* E]Yes E]No[EN F]Yes NoaN F]Yes Noah Yes No Turbine shutdown response time: 0 0 0 0 Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?* Yes N X N Y r--1 es N N Yes N Na Yes r--N No Was fail -safe verified to be operational ?* r___1YesNN N X NYes N X NYes No XYes Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Test Start Time: 850 907 832 850 Initial Reading (RI ): 5.9147 5.9147 S.5693 5.5196 Test End Time: 905 922 847 905 Final Reading (RF ): 5.9146 5.9144 5.5682 5.5194 Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Reading (R F - RI ): 0001 0003 0 011 0002 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0020 0020 0020 0020 Test Result: a Pass El Fail a Pass Fail a Pass Fail a Pass El Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes N N ayes N N X Yes N N E Yes No Was sensor properly replaced and verifed functional after testing? X Ye N NA X e NA Ye N NA yes N `1__N Comments - (include information on repairs madeprior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) SWRCB, January 2002 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Page 3 . Test Method Developed By: F-1 0 Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard F-1 Professional Engineer Other (Spec) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON Equipment Resolution: +- . 0 02 0 Sump # 3 UNL Sump # 3 UNL Sump # 4 PRE Sump # 4 PRE Sump Diameter: 4811 4811 4811 4811 Sump Depth: 58" 58" 60" 60" Sump Material: FIBERG FIBERG FIBERG FIBERG Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Pentration: 2411 2 4 " 24 If 24 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Pentration: 2411 2411 2411 2411 Condition of sump prior to testing: CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN Portion of Sump Tested: 1 2 "ABOVE 2 "ABOVE 2 "ABOVE 211ABVE Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water) ?* yes No N Yes No N Yes ENo N Yes No XNT Turbine shutdown response time: 0 0 0 0 Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?* Yes N X N Yes N X N Yes N X N Yes No X Was fail -safe verified to be operational ?* Yes N X N Yes N X N Yes N X N No XYes Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Test Start Time: 1019 1034 1019 1034 Initial Reading (RI ): 4.5447 4 . 5458 4.9893 4 .49893 Test End Time: 1034 1049 1034 1049 Final Reading (RF ): 4.54S5 4 . 5462 4.9890 4 . 9894 Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN Change in Reading (RF- RI ): 0008 0004 0003 0001 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0020 0 0 2 0 0020 0 0 2 0 Test Result: J Pass - Fail 1 Pass Fail, 0 PasS Fal Pass D Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes N N X Yes N N X Yes N N X Yes No Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? YeC] Nc[:] NA X Ye N NA YesDN NA Yes N Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) Ifthe entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any-of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) 41-0 Tbn 8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 512) 451 -6334 FAX (512) 459 -1459 TEST DATE:06 /03/11 WORK ORDER NUMBER3183963. CLIENT: SAYEGH GROUP INC. SITE: SAYEGH GROUP INC. COMMENTS Finish SB -989 Testing - All STP Sumps. Replaced (5) 3 inch caps. PARTS REPLACED QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 5 13 inch caps HELIUM PINPOINT TEST RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE) ITEMS TESTED HELIUM PINPOINT LEAK TEST RESULTS Printed 06/17/2011 07:28 MTUTTLE SITE DIAGRAM Tanknobgy 8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 512) 451 -6334 FAX (512) 459 -1459 TEST DATE: 06/03/11 WORK ORDER NUMBER3183961 CLIENT: SAYEGH GROUP INC. SITE: SAYEGH GROUP INC. AIR/ VR/ INCON H2O C- STORE z w 7 #3 o_ 8 #4 > STP REG F V STP REG j 5 #1 6 #2 *-REG STP PREM I Printed 06/17/2011 07:28 MTUTTLE Work Order: 3183961 87SYSTP TEST STARTED 0.32 AM TEST STARTED TEST STARTED 06/03•12011 5.9147 IN BEGIN LEVEL 5.5693 IN r,YEGH ARCO END TIME 8:47 AM 313961 END MATE END LEVEL 06/03/2011 5.5682 IN 201). 10."74 AiM LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN SUMP LEAK TES? REPORTTESTRESULTPASSED 7SSTP TEST STARTED 10:19 AMTESTSTARTED06/03/2011BEGINLEVEL4.5447 INENDTIME10:34 HNENDDATE06/03/2011END ;_FUEL 4.:.7455 i;` LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN SAY;GH ARCO TEST RESULT PASSED 3133961 06/03/2011 9:05 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT a71^.STP TEST STARTED 8:50 AM TEST STARTED 06/03/2011BEGINLEVEL5.9147 IN END TIME 9 :05 AM END DATE 06/03/2011 END ;LEVEL 5.9146 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT ASSED 87SYSTP TEST STARTED 8:50 AM TEST STARTED 06/03 /2011 BEGIN LEVEL 5.5196 IN END TIME 9:05 AM END DATE 06/033/2011 END LEVEL 5.5194 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED 91STP I t_.7 STARTED i 0: i 9 ArMTESTSTARTED06103/201! EGIN LEVEL 4.9893 INENDTIME10:34 AMENDDATE06103/2011ENDLEVEL4,9890 Ir4LEAKTHRESHOLD19.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED X16 'F 3/201' 1=1:50 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT TEST STARTED 10:34 AM TEST STARTED 06/03/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 4.545' IN END TTM.E 10:49 AM END DATE 06/03!2011 END `_EUEL 4.5462 Ii LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 I.v SAYE;H ARCO TEST RESULT PASSED 31c3961 07/03/2011 9:22 Ail SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 7P1STP TEST STARTED 9 :07 AM TEST STARTED 06/03/2011 BEGIN LEVE: 5.9147 IN END TIME 9 :22 API END DATE 06/03/2011 END :.EVEI_ 9144 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESUL7 AS'3ED 91STP TEST STARTED 10:34 AM TEST STARTED 06/03/2011 SEG1N EUEL 4.9893 IN END TIME 10:49 AM END DATE 06/03/2011 END LEVEL 4.9894 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.902 IN TEST RESULT PASSED Tanknology Inc. 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78759 1PP Tanknology 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: (512) 451 -6334 Fax: (512) 459 -1459 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR CRAIG PERKINS 1501 TRUXTUN AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Test Date: 06/03/2011 Order Number: 3183961 Dear Regulator, Date Printed and Mailed: 06/17/2011 Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: SAYEGH GROUP INC. 2800 PANAMA LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93313 Testing performed: Secondary Containment Turbine Sump Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting