HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/07/15 CC AGENDA PACKET
BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 2015
Council Chambers, City Hall,1501 Truxtun Avenue
Regular Meeting 3:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING
- 3:30 PM
1.ROLL CALL
2.PUBLIC STATEMENTS
3.WORKSHOPS
4.CLOSED SESSION
a.Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation; Closed Session
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2),( e)(1) (one matter).
b.Public Employee Performance Evaluation - City Attorney; Closed Session
pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) / 5 4957.6.
5.CLOSED SESSION ACTION
6.ADJOURNMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Closed Session 4. a.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Virginia Gennaro, City Attorney
DATE:
11/25/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation; Closed Session
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2),( e)(1) (one matter).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Closed Session 4. b.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Virginia Gennaro, City Attorney
DATE:
11/25/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Public Employee Performance Evaluation - City Attorney; Closed
Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b )(1) / 54957.6.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 2015
Council Chambers, City Hall,1501 Truxtun Avenue
Regular Meeting 5:15 PM
REGULAR MEETING
- 5:15 PM
1.ROLL CALL
2.INVOCATION
by Rabbi Schlanger, Chabad of Bakersfield.
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
by Erick Soto, 5th grade student at Stella Hills
Elementary School.
4.PRESENTATIONS
a. Presentation by Mayor Hall of a Certificate of Appr eciation
to Mary Jo Connor, Assistant Vice President Branch Operations
Manager, Pacific Western Bank, honoring that
institution's sponsorship supporting the cooperativ e effort by the
City, Keep Bakersfield Beautiful, and the Bakersfie ld Homeless
Center to remove litter along freeway frontages.
b. Presentation by Mayor Hall of a picture plaque to R oger Perez,
Executive Director, Kern County Museum, honoring
the museum's beautification efforts.
5.PUBLIC STATEMENTS
6.WORKSHOPS
(deferred
a.Thomas Roads Improvement Program (TRIP) Update.
from the 12/10/14 meeting)
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
7.APPOINTMENTS
a. One appointment to the Golden Empire Transit Distri ct Board, due to
the expiration of term of Cindy Parra, whose term e xpired January 6,
2015.
Staff recommends Council determination.
Ward(s)1, 3, 4, 7
b. Appointments of four (4) Regular Committee Members and four (4)
Alternate Committee Members to the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful
Committee, due to the expiration of terms of Anna C . Smith and Isaiah
Crompton; Jenifer Pitcher and Ray Scott; Brenda Rat liff and Brooks
Douglas; and Brian Wargo and Chris Parlier.
Staff recommends Council determination.
c. Appointments to City Council Committees and other s pecial
Committees and Boards by Vice-Mayor Hanson for 2015 -16.
To be determined by Vice-Mayor and ratified by Coun cil.
8.CONSENT CALENDAR
.
Minutes:
a. Approval of minutes of the December 10, 2014, Regul ar City
Council Meeting and December 16, 2014, Special City Council
Meeting.
Payments:
b. Receive and file department payments from November 25, 2014
to December 18, 2014 in the amount of $27,329,104.6 7 Self
Insurance payments from November 25, 2014 to Decemb er 18,
2014 in the amount of $586,776.72 totaling $27,915, 881.39.
Ordinances:
c. First Reading of Ordinance amending Municipal Code Section
13.12.030 to include NACTO Guidelines.
Ward5
d.Adoption of Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year
2015- 2016 and following Fiscal Years solely within and r elating to
the City Police and Fire Services Community Facilit ies District
(FR 12/10/14)
No. 2014-1 (Old River Ranch Development).
Ward6
e. Adoption of Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map in Title
17 of the Municipal Code by changing the zone distr ict from R- 1
(One-Family Dwelling) to R-1-4.5 (Small Lot One- Family
Dwelling) on 28.0 acres located at the southeast co rner of
Panama Lane and Reliance Drive. (ZC #14-0267 - Panama Lane
Properties, LLC, McIntosh & Associates representing Panama
(FR 12/10/14)
Lane Properties).
Resolutions:
f. Resolution confirming approval by the City Manager designee of
the Chief Code Enforcement Officer s report regarding
assessments of certain properties in the City for w hich structures
have been secured against entry or for the abatemen t of certain
weeds, debris and waste matter and authorizing coll ection of the
assessments by the Kern County Tax Collector.
g. Resolution determining that Holmatro rescue equipme nt cannot
be reasonably obtained through the usual bidding pr ocedures
and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense wi th bidding
therefore, not to exceed $69,500.
h. Resolution approving and adopting the 2014 Sanitary Sewer
Management Plan update and authorize staff to re- certify the
plan with the State Water Resources Control Board ( SWRCB).
Ward2
i. Sewer connection and construction fees assessment f or 18 N.
Stine Road:
1. Resolution confirming assessments for sewer connect ion
and construction and authorizing the collection of
assessments by the Kern County Tax Collector.
2. Agreement with Barbara Williams to pay sewer connec tion
and construction fess through the Kern County Tax
Collector.
Ward(s)1, 7
j. Resolutions of Intention (ROI) to add the following territories to
the Consolidated Maintenance District and prelimina rily
approving, confirming, and adopting the Public Work s Director s
Report for each:
1. ROI No.1828 to add Area 5-76 (2000 White Lane)
2. ROI No.1829 to add Area 5-75 (575 Panama Lane)
Agreements:
Ward1
k. Agreement with Covanta Delano, Inc. for the sale of wood chips
from the Mount Vernon Recycling Facility (Anticipat ed Annual
Revenue to City is Estimated at $60,200).
l.Labor Management Agreements for Workers Compensation
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program:
1.Agreement with Bakersfield Police Officers Associ ation.
2. Agreement with Bakersfield Professional Firefighter s Local
246.
Ward6
m. Final Map and Improvement Agreement with Lennar Fre sno Inc.
for Tract 6757 Phase 3 located south of McKee Road and west of
Mountain Ridge Drive.
Ward5
n. Final Map and Improvement Agreement with Lennar Hom es of
California for Tract Map 6916 Phase 1 located nort h of Berkshire
Road and east of Mountain Vista Drive.
o. Americans with Disability Act:
1. Agreement with Disability Access Consultants (not t o
exceed $57,780) to update the Citys Self- Evaluation and
Transition Plan related to the Americans with Disab ility Act.
2. Transfer and Appropriate $57,780 from the Capital O utlay
Fund Balance to the Non- Departmental Operating Budget
within the General Fund.
Ward(s)1, 2, 6, 7
p.Beltway Operational Improvements Project (TRIP):
1. Consultant Agreement with NV 5 (not to exceed
$9,429,589.31; 80% federally funded and 20% locally
funded with Transportation Development Funds and Co unty
Contribution) for construction management services.
2.Amendment No. 4 to Agreement 11- 100 with Parsons
Transportation Group ($544,665.00, 80% federally fu nded
and 20% locally funded with Transportation Developm ent
Funds and County Contribution; revised not to excee d
$44,054,941.00) for design support during construct ion of
the Beltway Operational Improvements Project.
Ward(s)3, 4
q.Rosedale Highway Widening Project (TRIP):
1. Accept bid and award contract to A. Teichert & Son, Inc.
dba Teichert Construction ($16,014,592.40; funded w ith
federal, local, and domestic water enterprise funds ), to
construct the Project.
2.Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 12- 095 with Mark
Thomas & Company, Inc. ($221,604.56; revised not to
exceed $3,305,253.02; 88.53% federally and 11.47%
locally funded), for design support services during
construction of the Project.
3. Appropriate $325,215 Federal Earmark funds and
Appropriate $1,615,000 Local County TRIP funds to t he
Public Works Capital Improvement Budgets in the
respective Federal and Local funds for the Rosedale
Widening Project.
r.Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14- 305 with Vulcan
Materials Company ($83,393; revised not to exceed $ 997,403),
to the contract for the supply of HUD funded street materials.
s.Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14- 139 with Kutak Rock
LLP ($175,000; revised not to exceed $285,000), to provide
outside legal services in the matter of City of Bak ersfield v. All
Persons Interested in the Matter, etc., et al.
Ward7
t. Contract Change Order Nos. 12, 14, 15, and 20 to A greement
No. 12- 165 with Security Paving Company, Inc. (net increas e of
$60,477.34; revised not to exceed $29,780,842.05; c hange
orders funded with Traffic Development Funds), for the
construction of the Westside Parkway Phase 6C Proje ct.
Ward2
u.Contract Change Order No. 2 to Agreement No. 14- 073 with
Zim's Integrated Mechanical Services, Inc. ($10,68 1.48; revised
not to exceed $670,383.16), for the project known a s HVAC
Replacement/Upgrade: Development Services Building.
Ward6
v.Contract Change Order No. 2 to Agreement No. 14- 071 with
Smith Construction Company, Inc. ($71,473.02; revis ed not to
exceed $795,432.04), for the project known as Baker sfield Waste
Water Treatment Plant 3 Primary Clarifier Rehabilit ation.
Ward2
w.Contract Change Order No. 1 to Agreement No. 14- 205
with Angelus Waterproofing & Restoration, Inc. ($15 ,600.00;
revised not to exceed $59,205.00), for the Communit y
Development Parking Deck Ramp Expansion and Recoati ng
Project.
Property Acquisition Agreements - TRIP:
Ward2
x. Agreement with Samuel and Debra Borland ($290,000) to
purchase real property located at 4400 La Mirada Dr ive for the
Centennial Corridor Project.
Bids:
y. Extend bid from Lehr Auto Electric, ($56,855.82) fo r fourteen
Panasonic Toughbook Laptops for the Police Departme nt.
z. Accept bid from Bakersfield Truck Center ($173,162. 38) for a
replacement three axle dump truck for use by the Pu blic Works
Department, Streets Division.
aa. Accept bid from Bakersfield Truck Center ($248,256. 50) for a
replacement 3,000 gallon liquid asphalt distributor (oil truck) for
the Public Works Department, Streets Division.
ab. Award bids from Wastequip Mfg. Co. ($53,847.57), fo r 98 steel 3
yard containers and 49 lid locks and award bid from Toter, LLC,
($37,840.00) for 64 plastic 3 yard containers for t he Public Works
Department, Solid Waste Division. Total bid $91,687 .57.
ac.Accept bid and approve contract to Cen- Cal Construction (not to
exceed $181,475) for the annual contract for canal liner repair.
Miscellaneous:
ad. Appropriate $46,002.70 State grant revenues to the Police
Operating Budget within the S.L.E.S.F. Fund.
ae.Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Park Impact Fees prepared in accordance
with California Government Code 66006.
Ward(s)3, 5, 6
af.Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Bridge Crossing and Major Tho roughfare
Fees prepared in accordance with California Governm ent Code
66006.
Ward(s)1, 3, 4, 5
ag.Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Planned Drainage Area Fees pr epared in
accordance with California Government Code 66006.
ah.Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Planned Sewer Area Fees prepa red in
accordance with California Government Code 66006.
ai.Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Transportation Impact Fees pr epared in
accordance with California Government Code 66006.
aj.Audit Reports to be referred to Budget and Finan ce Committee:
1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for th e
fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.
2. Agreed Upon Conditions Report for the fiscal year e nded
June 30, 2014.
3. Post (SAS 114) Audit Findings and Compliance Report for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.
4.Independent Auditors Report Compliance with
Contractual Requirements relative to the Bakersfiel d
Subregional Wastewater Management Plan for the year
ended June 30, 2014.
5. Independent Auditors Report on Appropriations Limit
Worksheet (GANN Limit) of the City of Bakersfield f or the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.
Successor Agency Business:
ak. Receive and file Successor Agency payments from Nov ember
25, 2014 to December 18, 2014 in the amount of $560 ,830.72.
9.CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS
10.HEARINGS
a. Public hearing to consider resolution making findin gs and updating
the Capital Improvement Plan for the existing Metro politan
Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan. A finding th at the project is
exempt from CEQA will also be considered.
Staff recommends adoption of resolution.
11.REPORTS
12.DEFERRED BUSINESS
13.NEW BUSINESS
14.COUNCIL AND MAYOR STATEMENTS
15.ADJOURNMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Presentations 4. a.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Mayor Harvey L. Hall
DATE:
12/4/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Presentation by Mayor Hall of a Certificate of Appr eciation to Mary Jo
Connor, Assistant Vice President Branch Operations Manager, Pacific
Western Bank, honoring that institution's sponsors hip supporting the
cooperative effort by the City, Keep Bakersfield Be autiful, and the
Bakersfield Homeless Center to remove litter along freeway frontages.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Presentations 4. b.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Mayor Harvey L. Hall
DATE:
12/10/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Presentation by Mayor Hall of a picture plaque to R oger Perez,
Executive Director, Kern County Museum, honoring th e museum's
beautification efforts.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 WORKSHOPS 6. a.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
11/17/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT: (deferred from
Thomas Roads Improvement Program (TRIP) Update.
the 12/10/14 meeting)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
BACKGROUND:
Staff will provide a brief update on the TRIP proje cts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
PowerPoint Presentation
2015-2016
COUNCIL COMMITTEES AND APPOINTMENTS
BUDGET AND FINANCE
Chair Rivera
Parlier
Weir
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Chair Sullivan
Smith
Rivera
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Chair Smith
Weir
Hanson
SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS
Chair Parlier
Rivera
Sullivan
LEGISLATIVE AND LITIGATION
Chair Maxwell
Sullivan
Parlier
PERSONNEL
Chair Weir
Maxwell
Hanson
WATER
Chair Hanson
Smith
Maxwell
1 /5/15
SOLID WASTE MGT ADVISORY CMTE
Appointee Weir
Alternate Maxwell
LAFCO
Appointee Rivera
Alternate Parlier
KERN COG
Appointee
Hanson (through March 31, 2015
Appointee
Smith (effective April 1, 2015)
Alternate
Smith (through March 31, 2015)
Alternate
Hanson (effective April 1, 2015)
PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON
Appointee Smith
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD SPECIAL CITY SELECTION
COMMITTEE
Appointee Sullivan
Alternate Maxwell
KERN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Appointee Parlier
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Appointments 7. a.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Roberta Gafford, City Clerk
DATE:
9/5/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
One appointment to the Golden Empire Transit Distri ct Board, due to the
expiration of term of Cindy Parra, whose term expir ed January 6, 2015.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council determination.
BACKGROUND:
An appointment to the Golden Empire Transit Distric t Board due to the experation of term of
Board Member Cindy Parra, whose term expired Januar y 6, 2015. The news release for this
recruitment was posted on November 20, 2014.
Two applications were received from the following:
Cindy Parra
l
Mary Wilson
l
The Golden Empire Transit District Board supervises and regulates transit facilities owned,
operated or controlled by the district, including e stablishment of rates, rentals, charges and
classifications, enforcement of regulations, contra cts, practices and schedules. City
representatives are nominated and appointed by the full Council and must be residents of the
City of Bakersfield throughout their term.
Meetings are held the first and third Tuesdays of e ach month at 5:30 p.m. in the District Board
Room at 1830 Golden State Avenue.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Cindy Parra Application Backup Material
Mary Wilson Application Backup Material
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Appointments 7. b.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Roberta Gafford, City Clerk
DATE:
12/1/2014
WARD:
Ward(s) 1, 3, 4, 7
SUBJECT:
Appointments of four (4) Regular Committee Members and four (4)
Alternate Committee Members to the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful
Committee, due to the expiration of terms of Anna C . Smith and Isaiah
Crompton; Jenifer Pitcher and Ray Scott; Brenda Rat liff and Brooks
Douglas; and Brian Wargo and Chris Parlier.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council determination.
BACKGROUND:
Currently there are a total of eight (8) vacancies on the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee
(KBBC) which consist of four (4) Regular Committee positions and four (4) Alternate Committee
positions, whose terms have expired. Regular Commi ttee members whose terms have expired
are: Anna C. Smith (Ward 1); Jenifer Pitcher (Ward 3); Brenda Ratliff (Ward 4); and, Brian
Wargo (Ward 7).
Alternate Committee Members whose terms have expire d are: Isaiah Crompton (Ward 1); Ray
Scott (Ward 3); Brooks Douglass (Ward 4); and Chris Parlier (Ward 7). Since the Clerk's Office
has not received an adequate number of applications for the Alternate positions, a recruitment is
currently ongoing for Wards 1, 4 and 7. Appointmen ts to these three positions are tentatively
schedule for the January 21, 2015 City Council meet ing.
Nominations are approved by a majority vote of the entire Council. Members must be City
residents throughout their term. Terms for these C ommittee positions run concurrent with the
term of the nominating Mayor/Councilmember; however , it is not necessary for the
Mayor/Councilmember to nominate a resident from his or her ward. Applications for appointment
to the Regular and/or Alternate positions have been received from the following five (5) citizens:
The Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee was formed on June 28, 2000. The Committee is
comprised of eight (8) Mayor/Council- appointed members, who take on the responsibility o f
decision making for the beautification program. On July 30, 2009, the City Council adopted
Ordinance 4520 which allows each Councilmember and the Mayor to appoint one Alternate
member to the KBBC. Each Alternate is allowed to v ote in the place of their corresponding
appointed Regular Committee members when absent.
The duties of the KBBC are to recommend policies an d specific programs to the City Council
which promote the Mission Statement of the KBBC, as reflected in its Bylaws on file with the City
Clerk. In addition, the KBBC shall actively partic ipate in the implementation of various programs
and projects to achieve the KBBC Mission Statement. The Committee Coordinator of the KBBC
will be the liaison between KBBC and the City Counc il, and shall provide the Council, upon
request, written reports on the activities of the K BBC. The news releases for this recruitment
were posted on October 31, 2014.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Anna Smith Application Backup Material
Jennifer Pitcher Application Backup Material
Brooks Douglass Application Backup Material
Paul Yanez Application Backup Material
Raymon Scott Application Backup Material
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Appointments 7. c.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Roberta Gafford, City Clerk
DATE:
11/17/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Appointments to City Council Committees and other s pecial Committees
and Boards by Vice-Mayor Hanson for 2015-16.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To be determined by Vice-Mayor and ratified by Coun cil.
BACKGROUND:
Following a Council election, and in accordance wit h City Charter, Council shall elect one of its
members to serve as Vice-Mayor.
At the December 10, 2014 Council meeting, Coucilmem ber Hanson was elected Vice -Mayor.
Accordingly, recommendations for appointments will be made for the following standing Council
Committees and other committee and board appointmen ts:
Standing Committees :
Budget and Finance Planning and Development
Community ServicesLegislative and Litigation
PersonnelSafe Neighborhoods and Community Relations
Water Resources (members serve on Joint City-Count y Standing
Committee to Combat Gang Violence)
Other Vice - Mayor Appointments :
Kern Council of Governments
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District C ity Selection Committee
Kern Economic Development Corporation
Planning Commission Liaison
Local Agency Formation Commission
Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Minutes a.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Roberta Gafford, City Clerk
DATE:
12/8/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Approval of minutes of the December 10, 2014, Regul ar City Council
Meeting and December 16, 2014, Special City Council Meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
BACKGROUND:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
December 10 Minutes Backup Material
December 16 Special Meeting Minutes Backup Material
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Payments b.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/18/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Receive and file department payments from November 25, 2014 to
December 18, 2014 in the amount of $27,329,104.67 S elf Insurance
payments from November 25, 2014 to December 18, 201 4 in the amount
of $586,776.72 totaling $27,915,881.39.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends report be received and filed.
BACKGROUND:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
1-AP Check Register Admin 1-07-14 Backup Material
2-EPay Check Register Admin 1-07-14 Backup Material
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 1
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605493 28 A C ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/26/2014 910.00
605494 537 A T & T 11/26/2014 752.96
605495 26503 ABSOLUTE ACCURACY INC 11/26/2014 992.38
605496 25208 ACCESS CONTROLS 11/26/2014 75.00
605497 19496 ALL PRO CLEANING SERVICE 11/26/2014 840.00
605498 160 ALL THAT LETTERING SIGN COMPNY 11/26/2014 185.00
605499 25863 ALLIED WEED CONTROL INC 11/26/2014 10,500.00
605500 10037 AMBER BITTNER 11/26/2014 200.00
605501 212 AMERICAN DATAVAULT INC 11/26/2014 152.00
605502 27366 AMERICAN MESSAGING 11/26/2014 184.55
605503 347 AMREP INC 11/26/2014 36.20
605504 28003 ELENA ANDRADE 11/26/2014 65.00
605505 1049 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES 11/26/2014 31,800.80
605506 12277 ASSOCIATION OF COMPOST PRODUCERS 11/26/2014 416.67
605507 18417 ATTORNEYS CERTIFIED SERVICES 11/26/2014 83.25
605508 24888 AUTOMATED POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/26/2014 4,763.40
605509 652 B A C S CO 11/26/2014 104.68
605510 25940 ANTHONY BACA 11/26/2014 180.00
605511 16927 BABETTE BAIER 11/26/2014 65.00
605512 13544 BAKERSFIELD ARC 11/26/2014 247,865.33
605513 10320 BAKERSFIELD HOMELESS CENTER 11/26/2014 40,489.20
605514 971 BAKERSFIELD PLUMBING CO INC 11/26/2014 1,367.25
605515 10674 BAKERSFIELD RETAIL SYSTEMS 11/26/2014 64.29
605516 875 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTER 11/26/2014 523.77
605517 910 WILLIAM J BALLARD 11/26/2014 180.00
605518 11248 BANKS PEST CONTROL 11/26/2014 1,500.00
605519 557 BARC 11/26/2014 22.00
605520 13424 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 11/26/2014 122.32
605521 945 BARNETT'S TOWING SERVICE INC 11/26/2014 70.00
605522 27775 BASF CORPORATION 11/26/2014 7,605.95
605523 21172 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/26/2014 26.88
605524 26219 BLOORE K9 TRAINING & CONSULTING 11/26/2014 1,800.00
605525 1175 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 11/26/2014 100.00
605526 22817 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 11/26/2014 2,413.59
605527 19303 BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS 11/26/2014 1,075.81
605528 22054 BROKEN DRUM INSULATION BAKERSFIELD 11/26/2014 500.00
605529 1292 BROWN ARMSTRONG 11/26/2014 13,500.00
605530 24464 CLAUDE BROWN 11/26/2014 120.00
605531 613 BSK & ASSOCIATES 11/26/2014 174.00
605532 10267 BUDGET BOLT INC 11/26/2014 261.21
605533 15292 JEFFREY BURDICK 11/26/2014 160.00
605534 23090 BURTONS FIRE INC 11/26/2014 2,878.50
605535 27294 C S C D A 11/26/2014 2,510.25
605536 1477 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 11/26/2014 345.09
605537 1695 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 11/26/2014 550,236.15
605538 20982 CBA LIGHTING & CONTROLS INC 11/26/2014 136.98
605539 1888 CHAMPION HARDWARE 11/26/2014 184.55
605540 14931 CHEM PRO LABORATORY 11/26/2014 364.00
605541 1978 CITY BODY WORKS 11/26/2014 300.00
605542 2016 CLARK PEST CONTROL 11/26/2014 48.00
605543 22175 CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE 11/26/2014 6,747.00
605544 609 COLES BRAKE AND WHEEL 11/26/2014 357.00
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 2
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605545 23203 CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR PUBLIC OFF 11/26/2014 150.84
605546 27509 CONTRERAS, ANGEL 11/26/2014 120.00
605547 17891 CONTROLLED MOTION SOLUTIONS INC 11/26/2014 239.45
605548 2203 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC 11/26/2014 1,192.50
605549 2245 CROCKER JANITORIAL SUPPLY CO 11/26/2014 625.22
605550 20911 CROWN AWARDS 11/26/2014 1,015.50
605551 2253 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 11/26/2014 512.89
605552 27218 CUMMINS PACIFIC LLC 11/26/2014 1,549.71
605553 19185 CYCLE GEAR #24 11/26/2014 827.37
605554 14414 DALTILE DISTRIBUTION INC 11/26/2014 248.00
605555 25063 ALBERTO DANIEL JR 11/26/2014 40.00
605556 25337 DAVES FLEET MAINT & TOWING 11/26/2014 110.00
605557 4140 DAVID JANES COMPANY 11/26/2014 392.89
605558 26895 DE LAGE LANDEN 11/26/2014 617.05
605559 2442 DELANEY & AHLF DIESEL SERVICE 11/26/2014 47.89
605560 2469 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 11/26/2014 923.00
605561 25742 DISCOUNT RADIATOR CENTER 11/26/2014 523.43
605562 14723 DONNOE & ASSOCIATES 11/26/2014 1,007.50
605563 2769 EL POPULAR CALIFORNIA 11/26/2014 472.00
605564 2752 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING 11/26/2014 208.52
605565 18730 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 11/26/2014 1,484.00
605566 13520 ENDERS & ASSOCIATES 11/26/2014 54,190.59
605567 2811 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 11/26/2014 686.75
605568 26951 EQUARIUS WATERWORKS 11/26/2014 1,069.71
605569 12943 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS 11/26/2014 1,367.00
605570 16624 FASTENAL COMPANY 11/26/2014 238.63
605571 2901 FEDEX 11/26/2014 7.55
605572 19657 FIRST CHOICE 11/26/2014 537.48
605573 25339 FLEET SERVICES TOWING INC 11/26/2014 35.00
605574 26311 MARTY J. FLOWERS 11/26/2014 120.00
605575 3028 FLOYDS GENERAL STORE 11/26/2014 169.92
605576 19591 FORK LIFT SPECIALTIES INC 11/26/2014 3,995.35
605577 19119 GARVEY EQUIPMENT CO 11/26/2014 174.57
605578 3358 GILLIAM & SONS INC 11/26/2014 42,702.20
605579 1347 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS 11/26/2014 20,937.00
605580 26862 JOSE G GONZALEZ 11/26/2014 61.60
605581 3450 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2014 244,145.05
605582 3466 GREATER BAKERSFIELD CHAMBER OF 11/26/2014 30.00
605583 26280 GRINDER WEAR PARTS 11/26/2014 3,248.48
605584 12439 GUNDLACHS 11/26/2014 495.57
605585 3569 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 11/26/2014 185.00
605586 27449 SALLY HAMLIN 11/26/2014 2,500.00
605587 3661 TYLER HARTLEY 11/26/2014 135.00
605588 20491 BRIAN HOLCOMBE 11/26/2014 65.00
605589 25660 HORIZON WATER & ENVIRONMENT LLC 11/26/2014 5,953.75
605590 14717 HUDLOW CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSOC 11/26/2014 880.00
605591 20621 ICFJONES & STOKES INC 11/26/2014 15,010.69
605592 20795 IPC USA INC 11/26/2014 45,630.77
605593 25015 J & S CONSTRUCTION 11/26/2014 392.00
605594 27639 J P TRANSPORTATION SVC INC 11/26/2014 1,000.00
605595 147 JIM ALFTER CEMENT CONTRACTOR 11/26/2014 153,427.51
605596 22379 KEMIRA WATER SOLUTIONS INC 11/26/2014 730.55
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 3
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605597 4435 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2014 300.00
605598 16285 KERN COUNTY PLANNING DEPT 11/26/2014 150.00
605599 4528 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH SERV 11/26/2014 55.00
605600 4439 KERN COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT 11/26/2014 171,121.24
605601 4577 KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT 11/26/2014 910.11
605602 4698 KERN SANITATION AUTHORITY 11/26/2014 33,531.47
605603 23434 KINNEY, STEVEN P 11/26/2014 1,323.00
605604 26949 JOHN KLAWIKOWSKI 11/26/2014 180.00
605605 4277 KME FIRE APPARATUS 11/26/2014 109.55
605606 14219 L A GRINDING 11/26/2014 35.00
605607 24004 11/26/2014 110.00
605608 27419 LIFEGUARD MASTER 11/26/2014 452.11
605609 23942 LINEAR SYSTEMS 11/26/2014 6,500.00
605610 5133 LOOP ELECTRIC INC 11/26/2014 29,458.00
605611 12627 MARDEROSIAN CERCONE & COHEN 11/26/2014 20,396.81
605612 26427 KARL MARTIN 11/26/2014 250.00
605613 16016 MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES 11/26/2014 18,069.50
605614 5370 MCLELLAN INDUSTRIES INC 11/26/2014 70.44
605615 18731 MCPC 11/26/2014 3,109.55
605616 20156 MEAD & HUNT INC 11/26/2014 18,655.80
605617 14119 METRO RECORD STORAGE 11/26/2014 18.75
605618 18520 METROPOLITAN RECYCLING LLC 11/26/2014 123,822.57
605619 5486 METTLER TOLEDO INC 11/26/2014 747.73
605620 19252 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 11/26/2014 9,326.70
605621 24077 MICHEL AUTO TECH 11/26/2014 309.44
605622 27634 MID VALLEY PUBLISHING 11/26/2014 288.00
605623 25269 MONTELONGO, JOE 11/26/2014 60.00
605624 13903 JEFF MULLICH 11/26/2014 165.00
605625 22058 NET TRANSCRIPTS, INC. 11/26/2014 2,107.70
605626 5923 NORTH KERN WATER STORAGE DIST 11/26/2014 1,445.00
605627 23333 JOE O'GRADY 11/26/2014 680.00
605628 7619 ORION SAFETY PRODUCTS 11/26/2014 5,166.45
605629 6448 P T O SALES 11/26/2014 1,038.44
605630 6122 PACIFIC POWER INC 11/26/2014 42.84
605631 13209 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 11/26/2014 265.78
605632 19231 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF CONST SERVICES 11/26/2014 418,083.59
605633 6076 PB LOADER MANUFACTURING CO 11/26/2014 2,270.02
605634 25177 PENNY LANDSCAPING SERVICES 11/26/2014 55.00
605635 25550 MATTHEW PERRY 11/26/2014 165.00
605636 25424 PET WASTE ELIMINATOR 11/26/2014 1,000.00
605637 27514 CHARLIE PHILLIPS 11/26/2014 120.00
605638 24207 JOSE PILAR 11/26/2014 159.05
605639 15843 PIONEER COVER-ALL 11/26/2014 580.72
605640 17911 PLCS PLUS INTERNATIONAL INC 11/26/2014 1,899.01
605641 26253 POLYGRAPH PROFESSIONALS 11/26/2014 11,250.00
605642 24581 MICHAEL POPICHAK 11/26/2014 120.00
605643 6430 POWER MACHINERY CENTER 11/26/2014 139.52
605644 178 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 11/26/2014 1,180.29
605645 20415 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 11/26/2014 4,335.69
605646 27625 PROTECTION FORCE PRIVATE SECURITY I 11/26/2014 920.00
605647 6682 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS 11/26/2014 285.68
605648 19224 REDFLEX 11/26/2014 40,968.18
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 4
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605649 6727 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIB 11/26/2014 755.21
605650 6799 DONALD E RICHARDSON 11/26/2014 117.68
605651 25932 RODRIGUEZ, PHIL 11/26/2014 60.00
605652 6915 ROUND-UP FEED AND PET SUPPLY 11/26/2014 562.11
605653 13860 RUETTGERS & SCHULER CIVIL ENG 11/26/2014 15,272.00
605654 27515 GREG RULOPH 11/26/2014 60.00
605655 19102 NORI SANCHEZ 11/26/2014 23.52
605656 25220 SANDYS COMMUNICATIONS 11/26/2014 1,918.13
605657 27361 SC FUELS 11/26/2014 9,464.96
605658 22839 SECURITY PAVING CO INC 11/26/2014 1,970,418.47
605659 7283 SEQUOIA PAINT COMPANY 11/26/2014 256.30
605660 21879 NICOLE SHIHRER 11/26/2014 250.00
605661 26203 SIERRA CONST & EXCAVATION INC 11/26/2014 49,149.86
605662 7434 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 11/26/2014 288.50
605663 22473 SOILS ENGINEERING 11/26/2014 3,247.16
605664 23456 VERNON SORENSON MD INC 11/26/2014 409.00
605665 24476 ROBERT SOTO 11/26/2014 160.00
605666 11907 SPARKLETTS/SIERRA SPRINGS 11/26/2014 162.80
605667 26607 SPARKLING IMAGE CAR WASH 11/26/2014 44.99
605668 17986 SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC 11/26/2014 6,213.78
605669 7640 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 11/26/2014 1,632.00
605670 10037 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS 11/26/2014 200.00
605671 12223 TED STURGEON 11/26/2014 339.00
605672 19143 SUZETTE'S CLEANERS 11/26/2014 1,808.10
605673 7637 SWRCB 11/26/2014 2,185.00
605674 276 TAYLOR EQUIPMENT & REPAIR, INC 11/26/2014 3,546.28
605675 25338 TEN EIGHT TOW INC 11/26/2014 70.00
605676 19961 THE HON COMPANY 11/26/2014 379.83
605677 23940 THE SEGAL COMPANY 11/26/2014 4,410.00
605678 7999 THREE-WAY CHEVROLET 11/26/2014 4,454.58
605679 27207 JON TODAHL 11/26/2014 60.00
605680 12235 TOO FAT SANDWICHES 11/26/2014 51.50
605681 245 TURK'S KERN COPY INC 11/26/2014 239.19
605682 96 TYACK'S TIRES INC 11/26/2014 526.01
605683 26622 TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY LLC 11/26/2014 778.56
605684 23301 VALLEY CYCLE & MOTOR SPORTS INC 11/26/2014 677.88
605685 8520 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS, INC 11/26/2014 447.10
605686 20601 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/26/2014 15,782.49
605687 14647 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 11/26/2014 1,761.52
605688 21212 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 11/26/2014 1,096.22
605689 8995 WHOLESALE FUELS 11/26/2014 196.70
605690 9244 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 11/26/2014 352.21
605693 78 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 11/26/2014 6,116.10
605694 12516 AIMS 11/26/2014 7,676.56
605695 1157 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 11/26/2014 461,706.11
605696 16602 ASCE MEMBERSHIP 11/26/2014 280.00
605699 1696 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2014 29,019.25
605701 27074 CEN CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2014 123,520.29
605703 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 11/26/2014 40,000.00
605705 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 11/26/2014 40,000.00
605706 12298 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 11/26/2014 9,548.00
605707 27393 CLARK BROS INC 11/26/2014 36,337.50
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 5
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605708 24344 DUNWOODY, MELANIE 11/26/2014 73.80
605709 10546 ROBERTA GAFFORD 11/26/2014 103.00
605710 7509 GAS COMPANY 11/26/2014 57.32
605711 3996 I A P M O 11/26/2014 300.00
605712 14857 I M S A 11/26/2014 825.00
605713 12857 KAISER PERMANENTE 11/26/2014 32,436.84
605714 4570 KCTTC - JACKIE DENNEY 11/26/2014 193.93
605715 23127 KERN COUNTY TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR 11/26/2014 15,265.52
605716 4677 KERN REFUSE DISPOSAL, INC 11/26/2014 149,808.19
605717 5053 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 11/26/2014 450.00
605718 19466 SUSAN MAGANA 11/26/2014 216.21
605719 10113 MEDICAL EYE SERVICE COMPANY 11/26/2014 261.05
605720 30026 METLIFE 11/26/2014 2,631.88
605721 12273 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 11/26/2014 179.00
605722 23732 NEW GENERATION GRAPHICS 11/26/2014 538.58
605723 28002 O C S D ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS 11/26/2014 802.00
605724 6114 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/26/2014 471.77
605725 10142 PACIFIC UNION DENTAL (UHC) 11/26/2014 5,629.30
605731 6376 PIONEER PAINT 11/26/2014 21,439.54
605734 27911 PORTERVILLE FORD 11/26/2014 4,843.15
605736 10428 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 11/26/2014 892.74
605737 19844 MITCH VAN WYK 11/26/2014 4,876.00
605738 8611 VAUGHN WATER CO INC 11/26/2014 39.95
605739 8811 WAKC 11/26/2014 280.00
605741 26447 WESTCOAST HYDRAULICS 11/26/2014 5,389.30
605742 30006 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS - CAL CARE 11/26/2014 127,697.96
605743 30004 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 11/26/2014 356,536.89
605744 30021 KAISER PERMANENTE 11/26/2014 138,053.26
605745 30002 MEDICAL EYE SERVICE COMPANY 11/26/2014 5,741.66
605746 30026 METLIFE 11/26/2014 39,204.54
605747 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO 11/26/2014 2,963.51
605748 30027 U S BANK - PARS #6746022400 11/26/2014 2,417.10
605749 30003 UNITED HEALTH CARE 11/26/2014 12,820.86
605750 30020 UNUM 11/26/2014 5,541.32
605751 5673 WALTER MORTENSEN INSURANCE 12/2/2014 35,107.20
605752 537 A T & T 12/4/2014 360.87
605753 26886 ELIZABETH AGERTON 12/4/2014 250.00
605754 25863 ALLIED WEED CONTROL INC 12/4/2014 2,075.00
605755 23588 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 12/4/2014 21,186.23
605756 987 AMERICAN FABRICATION 12/4/2014 9,006.35
605757 340 AMERIGAS 12/4/2014 1,386.49
605758 1049 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES 12/4/2014 27,178.46
605759 25610 AUTO DAMAGE APPRAISERS 12/4/2014 80.00
605760 652 B A C S CO 12/4/2014 12.23
605761 25940 ANTHONY BACA 12/4/2014 180.00
605762 646 BOBBY BAKER 12/4/2014 60.00
605763 12135 BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE 12/4/2014 59.00
605764 10200 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN RELIEF ASS 12/4/2014 571.20
605765 877 BAKERSFIELD WELL & PUMP 12/4/2014 5,326.45
605766 13424 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 12/4/2014 671.60
605767 20235 RICHARD BITTLESTON 12/4/2014 115.00
605768 21172 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/4/2014 5,846.87
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 6
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605769 1175 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 12/4/2014 254.20
605770 22817 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 12/4/2014 4,551.98
605771 18692 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 12/4/2014 2,522.05
605772 25983 BONNIE BRADSHAW 12/4/2014 54.70
605773 24464 CLAUDE BROWN 12/4/2014 120.00
605774 10267 BUDGET BOLT INC 12/4/2014 115.78
605775 18159 C W E A 12/4/2014 312.00
605776 1477 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 12/4/2014 125.00
605777 1724 CALPLY LLC 12/4/2014 1,490.60
605778 1803 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 12/4/2014 354.65
605779 23361 CENTRAL VALLEY PRESORT 12/4/2014 363.35
605780 1859 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 12/4/2014 595.34
605781 1888 CHAMPION HARDWARE 12/4/2014 3,084.24
605782 1924 CHESTER AVENUE BRAKE & SUPPLY 12/4/2014 209.50
605783 1978 CITY BODY WORKS 12/4/2014 8,079.61
605785 27509 CONTRERAS, ANGEL 12/4/2014 180.00
605786 2203 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC 12/4/2014 409.75
605787 10517 COX, DAVID 12/4/2014 20.00
605788 10285 CRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC 12/4/2014 398.00
605789 27839 CRITTERS WITHOUT LITTERS 12/4/2014 2,520.00
605790 27218 CUMMINS PACIFIC LLC 12/4/2014 17,168.61
605791 25063 ALBERTO DANIEL JR 12/4/2014 40.00
605792 2321 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 12/4/2014 1,635.95
605793 24854 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 12/4/2014 696.00
605794 25742 DISCOUNT RADIATOR CENTER 12/4/2014 523.63
605795 27412 JULIE DRIMAKIS 12/4/2014 87.00
605796 18911 ECMS INC 12/4/2014 873.88
605797 11380 FARRIS, RANDY 12/4/2014 115.00
605798 2901 FEDEX 12/4/2014 285.07
605799 377 FIRE TECH INSPECTION SERVICE 12/4/2014 920.00
605800 2959 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY 12/4/2014 876.00
605801 19657 FIRST CHOICE 12/4/2014 220.46
605802 17280 LYUDMILA FISHMAN 12/4/2014 140.00
605803 26311 MARTY J. FLOWERS 12/4/2014 180.00
605804 3090 FRANK J ZAMBONI & CO INC 12/4/2014 258.99
605805 21038 JOSE GALVAN 12/4/2014 115.00
605806 23591 GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC 12/4/2014 1,835.00
605807 3403 GOLDEN STATE PETERBILT 12/4/2014 23.31
605808 17779 KENT GREER DBA GREER BANNER AIR 12/4/2014 400.00
605809 24693 JOSH GRUBBS 12/4/2014 60.00
605810 12686 GW SCHOOL SUPPLY 12/4/2014 116.66
605811 3569 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 12/4/2014 1,322.82
605812 3571 H & S HOSE & SUPPLY INC 12/4/2014 401.35
605813 3593 HALL LETTER SHOP 12/4/2014 2,967.82
605814 20621 ICFJONES & STOKES INC 12/4/2014 20,635.86
605815 25159 ID WHOLESALER 12/4/2014 456.00
605816 15312 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ARSON 12/4/2014 225.00
605817 20795 IPC USA INC 12/4/2014 67,870.79
605818 420 JACK C ARBUCKLE COMPANY 12/4/2014 17.05
605819 25528 JAIME & SONS PEST CONTROL CO 12/4/2014 220.00
605820 4243 JORGENSEN & CO 12/4/2014 348.44
605821 25527 JTB SUPPLY CO INC 12/4/2014 2,355.88
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 7
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605822 21945 FELIPE JUAREZ 12/4/2014 180.00
605823 4254 JUDICIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORP 12/4/2014 1,451.88
605824 19554 K & R TOWING 12/4/2014 35.00
605825 4581 KERN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS 12/4/2014 439.22
605826 7492 KERN MACHINERY INC 12/4/2014 4,683.84
605827 26248 KERN PRINT SERVICES 12/4/2014 3,130.05
605828 4680 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT INC 12/4/2014 1,064.15
605829 4700 KERN SECURITY SYSTEMS 12/4/2014 1,728.00
605830 4701 KERN SPRINKLER LANDSCAPING INC 12/4/2014 9,660.40
605831 23434 KINNEY, STEVEN P 12/4/2014 485.00
605832 4861 KISCO SALES INC 12/4/2014 915.01
605833 20194 PAULA KITCHEN 12/4/2014 45.00
605834 26949 JOHN KLAWIKOWSKI 12/4/2014 180.00
605835 4875 KNIGHTS PUMPING & PORTABLE SVC 12/4/2014 158.00
605836 70078 KNIGHTS PUMPING & PORTABLE SVC INC 12/4/2014 107.90
605837 24478 KAROL KOHLER 12/4/2014 265.00
605838 25727 NICHOLAS KOSKIE 12/4/2014 540.00
605839 5018 LARRY & RONS UPHOLSTERY 12/4/2014 688.00
605840 24004 12/4/2014 55.00
605841 28004 MATTHEW LEWIS 12/4/2014 87.00
605842 5133 LOOP ELECTRIC INC 12/4/2014 8,830.00
605843 25105 M & J PLASTERING 12/4/2014 8,500.00
605844 5291 MARTIN & CHAPMAN 12/4/2014 125.22
605845 6855 LINDA MCVICKER 12/4/2014 65.00
605846 18495 MELO'S GAS & GEAR INC 12/4/2014 30.25
605847 7064 MERCHANTS PRINTING & ENVELOPE 12/4/2014 709.51
605848 27971 MERCURY INSURANCE AS 12/4/2014 815.99
605849 18520 METROPOLITAN RECYCLING LLC 12/4/2014 34,132.64
605850 19252 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 12/4/2014 12,144.00
605851 13288 MICHAEL BURGER & ASSOCIATES 12/4/2014 750.00
605852 20908 TIMOTHY MONEY 12/4/2014 115.00
605853 25269 MONTELONGO, JOE 12/4/2014 120.00
605854 5688 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 12/4/2014 145.85
605855 5708 MOTOROLA INC 12/4/2014 670.71
605856 27379 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 12/4/2014 4,602.12
605857 26096 DENA MURPHY 12/4/2014 250.00
605858 22058 NET TRANSCRIPTS, INC. 12/4/2014 508.50
605859 6448 P T O SALES 12/4/2014 213.50
605860 6122 PACIFIC POWER INC 12/4/2014 14.56
605861 24904 ROSANNE PADLEY 12/4/2014 265.00
605862 27624 CATHERINE PALMER 12/4/2014 250.00
605863 20106 PARSONS WATER AND INFRASTRUCTURE 12/4/2014 10,827.00
605864 26829 PATTERSON TRUCK & CRANE INC 12/4/2014 1,334.00
605865 12580 MATTHEW PEERY 12/4/2014 20.00
605866 12600 SONJA PEERY 12/4/2014 115.00
605867 25177 PENNY LANDSCAPING SERVICES 12/4/2014 1,160.00
605868 27514 CHARLIE PHILLIPS 12/4/2014 140.00
605869 22530 GLENN PHIPPEN 12/4/2014 37.00
605870 6357 PICKUP SALVAGE COMPANY 12/4/2014 69.88
605871 24581 MICHAEL POPICHAK 12/4/2014 120.00
605872 27911 PORTERVILLE FORD 12/4/2014 809.10
605873 22461 POWER MANAGEMENT INC 12/4/2014 1,995.37
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 8
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605874 178 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 12/4/2014 132.23
605875 6527 PULL TARPS MFG 12/4/2014 2,434.10
605876 785 PURIFYING SYSTEMS 12/4/2014 838.50
605877 17190 RAMIREZ, RUBEN 12/4/2014 53.73
605878 20713 RANDY'S TOWING 12/4/2014 70.00
605879 3249 RAY GASKIN SERVICE INC 12/4/2014 237.62
605880 6682 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS 12/4/2014 59.67
605881 6727 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIB 12/4/2014 558.92
605882 5681 ROBERT B MOSS JR 12/4/2014 176.30
605883 25932 RODRIGUEZ, PHIL 12/4/2014 120.00
605884 6915 ROUND-UP FEED AND PET SUPPLY 12/4/2014 133.28
605885 27515 GREG RULOPH 12/4/2014 120.00
605886 27361 SC FUELS 12/4/2014 13,154.78
605887 21489 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC 12/4/2014 1,889.21
605888 11090 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 12/4/2014 271.55
605889 21879 NICOLE SHIHRER 12/4/2014 45.00
605890 19670 SIEMENS INDUSTRY 12/4/2014 88,926.19
605891 25586 LUKIOUS SIMS 12/4/2014 180.00
605892 7434 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 12/4/2014 18.73
605893 23428 MITCHELL SMITH 12/4/2014 87.00
605894 11566 SOIL CONTROL LAB INC 12/4/2014 435.00
605895 27951 SOLENIS LLC 12/4/2014 61,511.52
605896 23456 VERNON SORENSON MD INC 12/4/2014 651.77
605897 24476 ROBERT SOTO 12/4/2014 160.00
605898 11907 SPARKLETTS/SIERRA SPRINGS 12/4/2014 682.63
605899 20034 JEFF SPINA 12/4/2014 567.00
605900 17077 STERICYCLE INC 12/4/2014 673.42
605901 13815 STEVE HOLLOWAY PAINTING 12/4/2014 2,480.00
605902 16685 STIERN VETERINARY HOSPITAL 12/4/2014 941.16
605903 3565 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 12/4/2014 181,825.36
605904 15878 SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION 12/4/2014 8,700.00
605905 25338 TEN EIGHT TOW INC 12/4/2014 70.00
605906 19961 THE HON COMPANY 12/4/2014 84.15
605907 739 THE LIGHTHOUSE INC 12/4/2014 156.69
605908 27207 JON TODAHL 12/4/2014 60.00
605909 12235 TOO FAT SANDWICHES 12/4/2014 265.61
605910 13057 TRI-ED DISTRIBUTING 12/4/2014 927.41
605911 96 TYACK'S TIRES INC 12/4/2014 906.88
605912 19599 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 12/4/2014 5.00
605913 10428 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 12/4/2014 553.63
605914 8391 URNERS APPLIANCE CENTER 12/4/2014 1,486.73
605915 8520 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS, INC 12/4/2014 58.86
605916 26512 WEI KOO 12/4/2014 11,980.55
605917 21212 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 12/4/2014 150.29
605918 22383 MARCY WHITE 12/4/2014 37.00
605919 11294 JOHN WILBURN 12/4/2014 180.00
605920 12585 BOBBY WOOLARD 12/4/2014 160.00
605921 24048 ANDREW WYNNE 12/4/2014 131.00
605922 11063 MARISELA ZARAGOZA 12/4/2014 106.95
605923 9244 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 12/4/2014 85.36
605924 22874 ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS 12/4/2014 10,485.00
605925 25486 ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL TODAY 12/4/2014 89.00
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 9
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
605927 78 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 12/4/2014 5,080.85
605928 12516 AIMS 12/4/2014 15,165.55
605929 17585 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERV INC 12/4/2014 1,039.70
605930 17585 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERV INC 12/4/2014 80.00
605931 17718 BUILDING PERMITS LAW BULLETIN 12/4/2014 99.49
605932 18159 C W E A 12/4/2014 485.00
605933 1597 CALIFORNIA POLICE ACTIVITES LEAGUE 12/4/2014 410.00
605936 1696 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 12/4/2014 28,115.34
605937 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/4/2014 40,000.00
605938 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/4/2014 50,000.00
605939 15063 CPRS DISTRICT 15 12/4/2014 1,500.00
605940 26332 D PREP LLC TRAFFIC DIVISION INC 12/4/2014 258.00
605942 3028 FLOYDS GENERAL STORE 12/4/2014 348.31
605944 3213 GALLS / QUARTERMASTER 12/4/2014 11,190.48
605945 7509 GAS COMPANY 12/4/2014 81.52
605947 3358 GILLIAM & SONS INC 12/4/2014 116,652.30
605950 3427 GRAINGER INC, W W 12/4/2014 6,543.79
605954 3450 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 12/4/2014 1,005,009.71
605955 3466 GREATER BAKERSFIELD CHAMBER OF 12/4/2014 90.00
605960 7933 HOME DEPOT 12/4/2014 4,224.49
605961 14857 I M S A 12/4/2014 150.00
605962 4011 I S A MEMBERSHIP 12/4/2014 340.00
605963 14574 KERN COUNTY DEPT OF WEIGHTS 12/4/2014 121.10
605966 4740 KERN TURF SUPPLY 12/4/2014 3,773.85
605972 15624 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT 12/4/2014 4,695.86
605973 27390 HEATHER MAYBERRY 12/4/2014 103.14
605976 24279 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 12/4/2014 984.04
605977 6114 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12/4/2014 5,310.75
605978 15673 PARADISE POINT RESORT 12/4/2014 1,252.08
605979 7096 SJVAPCD 12/4/2014 4,549.00
605980 7636 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 12/4/2014 80.00
605981 26747 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 12/4/2014 30.00
605982 26747 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 12/4/2014 30.00
605983 15212 U.S BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN 12/4/2014 1,131.13
605984 10199 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE 12/4/2014 198,068.00
605985 70102 BAKERSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL CHOIRS 12/5/2014 500.00
605986 27402 CECILIA BARNES 12/5/2014 125.00
605987 10047 BLAND SOLAR 12/5/2014 226.00
605988 28005 MIGUEL CAMERENA 12/5/2014 125.00
605989 27297 GUADALUPE CHAVERRIA 12/5/2014 102.11
605990 10424 CHAVEZ, CONSUELO O 12/5/2014 90.66
605991 10037 CONTINUUM SENIOR CARE MGMT INC 12/5/2014 44.28
605992 14939 NICK CRUZ 12/5/2014 125.00
605993 23425 JOSE LUIS DIAZ 12/5/2014 125.00
605994 11508 MICHAEL DORKIN SR 12/5/2014 48.36
605995 24281 DEBRA DUNN-YONKE 12/5/2014 273.00
605996 17103 ESPARZA, ALEJANDRO 12/5/2014 125.00
605997 70036 GENERAL TREE SERVICE 12/5/2014 42,722.00
605998 18348 PRESTON GEORGE 12/5/2014 125.00
605999 10037 GREAT CASTLE INC 12/5/2014 336.55
606000 16862 HEALTHCOMP INC 12/5/2014 136.29
606001 27981 HENNESSY, LINSEE 12/5/2014 130.00
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 10
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606002 10037 JOSE F RODRIGUEZ 12/5/2014 200.00
606003 4435 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 12/5/2014 200.00
606004 15642 MATTHEW LAWSON 12/5/2014 125.00
606005 25655 MCMURTREY LINCE INC 12/5/2014 1,312.00
606006 5730 MULLENS, JIM 12/5/2014 125.00
606007 10114 LONI O'DONLEY 12/5/2014 78.00
606008 10037 PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING OF BAKE 12/5/2014 505.78
606009 10037 PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING OF BAKE 12/5/2014 524.21
606010 26234 DARREN PARKS 12/5/2014 125.00
606011 21125 YONDER POSADA 12/5/2014 107.13
606012 27085 PROCELL, GENE 12/5/2014 372.75
606013 27363 STEPHEN RAMIREZ 12/5/2014 107.49
606014 19028 MIGUEL ANGEL RAYA 12/5/2014 56.55
606015 26535 LYNETTE REYNOSO 12/5/2014 45.50
606016 10115 KEN ROSSEN 12/5/2014 159.25
606017 28006 SOLOMON SACKETT 12/5/2014 125.00
606018 10047 STANDARD INC 12/5/2014 237.89
606019 21776 MARY STREBEL CHRISTINE 12/5/2014 125.00
606020 10037 STURGEON SERVICES 12/5/2014 400.00
606021 70109 TRUITT OILFIELD 12/5/2014 500.00
606022 10037 VERONICA SANCHEZ 12/5/2014 70.00
606023 25541 WATTS, BOBBY 12/5/2014 32.50
606024 22636 DAVID WEATHERLY 12/5/2014 125.00
606025 4550 KERN COUNTY SUPT OF SCHOOLS 12/5/2014 1,060,106.98
606026 10204 ASSOCIATION BKFD POLICE OFFICER FCU 12/5/2014 13,744.80
606027 10211 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN 12/5/2014 8,491.61
606028 10200 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN RELIEF ASS 12/5/2014 8,274.48
606029 10203 BAKERSFIELD POLICE BENEFIT 12/5/2014 23,372.87
606030 10198 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC EMP ASSOC 12/5/2014 737.10
606031 10205 MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 12/5/2014 2,205.93
606032 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO 12/5/2014 835.73
606033 22324 SEIU LOCAL 521 12/5/2014 20,498.10
606034 28010 ABSOLUTE MITIGATION SERVICES 12/11/2014 225.00
606035 80 ACTION SPORTS 12/11/2014 472.59
606036 28011 AG EXPO MAGAZINE INC 12/11/2014 210.00
606037 12516 AIMS 12/11/2014 31,526.58
606038 26688 AIR EXCHANGE 12/11/2014 1,019.79
606039 22882 ISAAC ALEMAN 12/11/2014 205.00
606040 19496 ALL PRO CLEANING SERVICE 12/11/2014 600.00
606041 176 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT 12/11/2014 1,626.60
606042 22907 OSCAR ALONSO 12/11/2014 40.00
606043 179 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 12/11/2014 51.00
606044 987 AMERICAN FABRICATION 12/11/2014 2,042.50
606045 27366 AMERICAN MESSAGING 12/11/2014 192.44
606046 520 AUTO TINT WEST INC 12/11/2014 651.04
606047 536 AVERY ASSOCIATES 12/11/2014 1,104.57
606048 25940 ANTHONY BACA 12/11/2014 60.00
606049 10320 BAKERSFIELD HOMELESS CENTER 12/11/2014 14,145.33
606050 841 BAKERSFIELD RUBBER STAMP CO 12/11/2014 105.35
606051 850 BAKERSFIELD SENIOR CENTER 12/11/2014 7,508.49
606052 27504 ADRIANA BARBA 12/11/2014 2,987.00
606053 557 BARC 12/11/2014 392.60
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 11
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606054 27132 BASKIN MECHANIAL ENGINEERS INC 12/11/2014 1,875.00
606055 19413 BISHOP COMPANY 12/11/2014 46.53
606056 18692 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 12/11/2014 1,318.05
606057 1249 BRANDCO 12/11/2014 273.59
606058 16565 BTE COMMUNICATIONS LLC 12/11/2014 190.00
606059 10267 BUDGET BOLT INC 12/11/2014 342.74
606060 28012 CLARENCE BUTLER & CATHY 12/11/2014 435.00
606061 1451 C S U B ACCT OFFICE ADM 35 12/11/2014 225.00
606062 1747 PATRICK CAPRIOLI 12/11/2014 180.00
606063 12575 GARY CARRUESCO 12/11/2014 1,852.89
606064 27074 CEN CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 12/11/2014 15,975.00
606065 1859 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 12/11/2014 2,334.43
606066 1888 CHAMPION HARDWARE 12/11/2014 340.74
606067 2050 CLIFFORD & BROWN 12/11/2014 1,368.17
606068 2050 CLIFFORD & BROWN 12/11/2014 8,053.00
606069 801 CLIFFORD & BROWN TRUST 12/11/2014 4,063.07
606070 21034 VERION COLEMAN 12/11/2014 205.00
606071 27984 COMPLETE ICE ARENA SERVICES 12/11/2014 1,259.64
606072 2203 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC 12/11/2014 77.50
606073 27684 COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE 12/11/2014 175.00
606074 10285 CRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC 12/11/2014 4,135.75
606075 27218 CUMMINS PACIFIC LLC 12/11/2014 1,093.93
606076 27796 DANO ENTERPRISES INC 12/11/2014 943.50
606077 4140 DAVID JANES COMPANY 12/11/2014 1,109.21
606078 20060 EVANGELOS DEMESTIHAS 12/11/2014 2,686.00
606079 2469 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 12/11/2014 413.00
606080 2627 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS & PROPERTY O 12/11/2014 150.00
606081 18544 DUANE MORRIS LLP 12/11/2014 93,021.72
606082 27898 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS & INST INC 12/11/2014 5,155.46
606083 2811 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 12/11/2014 267.78
606084 27966 ERGO DESKTOP 12/11/2014 1,174.00
606085 2830 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 12/11/2014 84.16
606086 16624 FASTENAL COMPANY 12/11/2014 135.00
606087 2901 FEDEX 12/11/2014 165.17
606088 19657 FIRST CHOICE 12/11/2014 16.70
606089 26311 MARTY J. FLOWERS 12/11/2014 60.00
606090 3028 FLOYDS GENERAL STORE 12/11/2014 280.99
606091 22966 FORENSIC NURSE SPECIALISTS INC 12/11/2014 3,900.00
606092 28013 JASMIN SUZANNE FOSTER 12/11/2014 319.00
606093 13637 FUTURE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS INC 12/11/2014 2,141.40
606094 3213 GALLS / QUARTERMASTER 12/11/2014 5,953.74
606095 23311 JUAN DURAN GARCIA 12/11/2014 425.00
606096 11861 GC ENVIRONMENTAL 12/11/2014 3,471.00
606097 3333 JOHN GERMANETTI 12/11/2014 127.00
606098 18722 GLOBALSTAR USA 12/11/2014 54.28
606099 27118 GRAY & ASSOCIATES CPAS 12/11/2014 4,106.25
606100 3452 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY 12/11/2014 1,832.97
606101 3466 GREATER BAKERSFIELD CHAMBER OF 12/11/2014 90.00
606102 24693 JOSH GRUBBS 12/11/2014 60.00
606103 19440 HASCO TAG COMPANY 12/11/2014 991.00
606104 24767 HASTY AWARDS 12/11/2014 117.53
606105 3947 IMAGING PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 12/11/2014 182.48
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 12
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606106 14401 INDUSTRIAL REPAIR SERVICE 12/11/2014 1,227.98
606107 3969 INSTANT STORAGE 12/11/2014 100.98
606108 14936 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 12/11/2014 494.21
606109 4089 J & E RESTAURANT SUPPLY INC 12/11/2014 36.98
606110 420 JACK C ARBUCKLE COMPANY 12/11/2014 441.56
606111 13302 MELVIN JOHNSON 12/11/2014 205.00
606112 23350 JTS TRUCK REPAIR INC 12/11/2014 224.40
606113 27250 KARISH INDUSTRIES 12/11/2014 410.30
606114 4581 KERN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS 12/11/2014 1,954.35
606115 4680 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT INC 12/11/2014 267.44
606116 4700 KERN SECURITY SYSTEMS 12/11/2014 864.00
606117 4861 KISCO SALES INC 12/11/2014 146.87
606118 4277 KME FIRE APPARATUS 12/11/2014 92.83
606119 17737 CHRIS KNUTSON 12/11/2014 1,080.00
606120 24478 KAROL KOHLER 12/11/2014 2,977.36
606121 12552 KURB KUT 12/11/2014 399.00
606122 28023 JOHN LARRY 12/11/2014 600.00
606123 28014 SHERI PATRICE LAUGHTON 12/11/2014 3,294.87
606124 5068 LEGISLATIVE INTENT SERVICE 12/11/2014 495.00
606125 19228 MICHAEL LENCIONI 12/11/2014 127.00
606126 25066 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT 12/11/2014 1,190.05
606127 24132 STEVE LOONEY 12/11/2014 425.00
606128 15150 RAUL LOPEZ 12/11/2014 300.00
606129 15624 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT 12/11/2014 1,011.16
606130 25105 M & J PLASTERING 12/11/2014 2,450.00
606131 12627 MARDEROSIAN CERCONE & COHEN 12/11/2014 2,921.44
606132 16605 MARK MAXWELL 12/11/2014 540.00
606133 18495 MELO'S GAS & GEAR INC 12/11/2014 41.20
606134 7064 MERCHANTS PRINTING & ENVELOPE 12/11/2014 755.20
606135 27180 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSOC 12/11/2014 3,935.00
606136 25269 MONTELONGO, JOE 12/11/2014 120.00
606137 17383 LISA MOTON 12/11/2014 51.47
606138 5730 MULLENS, JIM 12/11/2014 25.42
606139 5781 MYRON MFG. CORP. 12/11/2014 309.60
606140 26015 NATIONAL DIAMOND ENTERPRISES LLC 12/11/2014 1,900.00
606141 25752 NISHIKAWA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 12/11/2014 7,451.84
606142 5912 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 12/11/2014 995.07
606143 24167 NOLTE ASSOCIATES INC 12/11/2014 1,497.59
606144 14676 DAVID OJEDA 12/11/2014 425.00
606145 10361 OPEN & SHUT ENTERPRISES 12/11/2014 576.88
606146 6448 P T O SALES 12/11/2014 176.72
606147 14088 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 12/11/2014 2,000.00
606148 6122 PACIFIC POWER INC 12/11/2014 37.04
606149 24029 PAYLESS TOWING 12/11/2014 200.00
606150 6076 PB LOADER MANUFACTURING CO 12/11/2014 1.72
606151 25177 PENNY LANDSCAPING SERVICES 12/11/2014 650.00
606152 27514 CHARLIE PHILLIPS 12/11/2014 120.00
606153 6357 PICKUP SALVAGE COMPANY 12/11/2014 48.38
606154 17911 PLCS PLUS INTERNATIONAL INC 12/11/2014 276.50
606155 24581 MICHAEL POPICHAK 12/11/2014 60.00
606158 27911 PORTERVILLE FORD 12/11/2014 3,420.56
606159 6430 POWER MACHINERY CENTER 12/11/2014 830.57
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 13
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606160 178 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 12/11/2014 220.75
606161 357 PRECISION PUMP AND MACH - KSB INC. 12/11/2014 170.00
606162 27625 PROTECTION FORCE PRIVATE SECURITY I 12/11/2014 1,840.00
606163 6527 PULL TARPS MFG 12/11/2014 1,492.10
606164 26530 R BRUCE WALKER ED D 12/11/2014 1,250.00
606165 6670 MAURICE RANDALL 12/11/2014 152.88
606166 20713 RANDY'S TOWING 12/11/2014 4,970.00
606167 19028 MIGUEL ANGEL RAYA 12/11/2014 371.38
606168 6682 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS 12/11/2014 403.40
606169 24220 RELIABLE MOVING & STORAGE 12/11/2014 1,645.25
606170 26863 RICHARD RIOS 12/11/2014 120.83
606171 14493 JOHN RODRIGUES 12/11/2014 205.00
606172 25932 RODRIGUEZ, PHIL 12/11/2014 60.00
606173 6915 ROUND-UP FEED AND PET SUPPLY 12/11/2014 133.28
606174 17449 RRM DESIGN GROUP 12/11/2014 22,023.42
606175 27515 GREG RULOPH 12/11/2014 60.00
606176 25841 SAFETY CENTER INC 12/11/2014 7.25
606177 18072 SAFETY TEK INDUSTRIES INC 12/11/2014 2,893.13
606178 6995 SAFEWAY SIGN 12/11/2014 11,419.73
606179 10249 SAN JOAQUIN TRACTOR CO 12/11/2014 656.62
606180 12584 JEFFREY SASO 12/11/2014 205.00
606181 10144 SERVICEMASTER OF BAKERSFIELD 12/11/2014 258.75
606182 21879 NICOLE SHIHRER 12/11/2014 205.00
606183 26203 SIERRA CONST & EXCAVATION INC 12/11/2014 106,100.83
606184 23406 SILICONAVE INC 12/11/2014 1,517.85
606185 7434 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 12/11/2014 1,225.89
606186 7459 SNIDER'S INC 12/11/2014 401.10
606187 22473 SOILS ENGINEERING 12/11/2014 10,690.00
606188 27951 SOLENIS LLC 12/11/2014 60,875.10
606189 23456 VERNON SORENSON MD INC 12/11/2014 535.00
606190 24476 ROBERT SOTO 12/11/2014 120.00
606191 7586 SPECIALTY TRIM & AWNING INC 12/11/2014 550.40
606192 22534 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 12/11/2014 50,980.00
606193 7652 STERNDAHL ENTERPRISES 12/11/2014 6,004.51
606194 21606 SUNRISE ENVIRONMENTALSCIENTIFIC 12/11/2014 394.93
606195 15878 SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION 12/11/2014 216,490.77
606196 20708 T & T PAVEMENT MARKINGS 12/11/2014 2,115.63
606197 26369 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL INC 12/11/2014 75,930.83
606198 19995 TASER INTERNATIONAL 12/11/2014 127,579.25
606199 24662 TED'S TURF LANDSCAPING MAINT 12/11/2014 525.00
606200 739 THE LIGHTHOUSE INC 12/11/2014 355.61
606201 27777 TOT TURF 12/11/2014 2,024.45
606202 96 TYACK'S TIRES INC 12/11/2014 3,640.90
606203 8319 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 12/11/2014 9.67
606204 26060 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS 12/11/2014 450.00
606205 21781 WALL STREET IMPRINTABLES 12/11/2014 24.73
606206 26451 MARLON WARD 12/11/2014 1,134.00
606207 14647 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 12/11/2014 377.07
606208 19776 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 12/11/2014 24.81
606209 26447 WESTCOAST HYDRAULICS 12/11/2014 961.59
606210 21212 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 12/11/2014 2,178.59
606211 27642 WINGLES CONSTRUCTION INC 12/11/2014 5,010.00
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 14
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606212 26909 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 12/11/2014 10,274.93
606213 9244 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 12/11/2014 1,169.27
606214 25879 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC. 12/11/2014 2,021.28
606219 78 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 12/11/2014 17,921.37
606220 17708 AMERICAN RIVER COLLEGE 12/11/2014 318.00
606221 19113 DARRIN BRANSON, IMPREST CASH 12/11/2014 4,997.00
606222 18159 C W E A 12/11/2014 235.00
606223 27941 CAL PRIME INC 12/11/2014 197,657.00
606226 1696 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 12/11/2014 50,092.79
606227 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 252,776.20
606228 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 120,218.20
606229 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 241,146.00
606230 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 259,818.20
606231 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 234,712.20
606233 11937 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 12/11/2014 4,942.30
606234 2214 COUNTY OF KERN 12/11/2014 50.00
606235 1782 DEPT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION 12/11/2014 120.00
606236 2714 EAST NILES COMMUNITY SERVICES 12/11/2014 1,177.76
606237 7509 GAS COMPANY 12/11/2014 53.51
606240 3427 GRAINGER INC, W W 12/11/2014 4,462.11
606241 3450 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 12/11/2014 411,199.97
606243 3488 GREENFIELD COUNTY WATER DIST 12/11/2014 1,583.65
606245 7933 HOME DEPOT 12/11/2014 1,577.20
606247 26694 JACOBSEN WEST 12/11/2014 1,093.27
606248 13486 JET ICE LIMITED 12/11/2014 147.78
606249 4435 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 12/11/2014 50.00
606252 4740 KERN TURF SUPPLY 12/11/2014 3,050.32
606253 5133 LOOP ELECTRIC INC 12/11/2014 8,705.20
606254 5700 LISA MOTON 12/11/2014 181.56
606255 6114 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12/11/2014 353.83
606262 6114 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12/11/2014 645,477.75
606263 8785 12/11/2014 101.38
606264 7508 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 12/11/2014 472.44
606265 7636 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 12/11/2014 340.00
606266 26795 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR USERS' 12/11/2014 195.00
606268 10428 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 12/11/2014 1,526.53
606269 24913 UNITED STATES INDOOR SOCCER ASSN 12/11/2014 275.00
606270 8858 CHARLES WEBB 12/11/2014 137.76
606271 24966 GREG WILLIAMSON - PETTY CASH 12/11/2014 545.73
606272 30006 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS - CAL CARE 12/11/2014 127,296.35
606273 30004 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA 12/11/2014 356,536.89
606274 30021 KAISER PERMANENTE 12/11/2014 138,961.63
606275 30002 MEDICAL EYE SERVICE COMPANY 12/11/2014 5,745.03
606276 30026 METLIFE 12/11/2014 39,146.16
606277 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO 12/11/2014 2,965.41
606278 30027 U S BANK - PARS #6746022400 12/11/2014 2,038.04
606279 30003 UNITED HEALTH CARE 12/11/2014 12,883.12
606280 30020 UNUM 12/11/2014 5,537.02
606281 21029 ALEX ADONA 12/12/2014 123.61
606282 70105 BAKERSFIELD HOMELESS CTR 12/12/2014 500.00
606283 24319 ADRIAN BARRERA JR 12/12/2014 125.00
606284 21259 BLUMER CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2014 400.00
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 15
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606285 15478 GUY BOWERS 12/12/2014 125.00
606286 28017 JAMES CAIN 12/12/2014 125.00
606287 28024 CARLS JR 12/12/2014 710.00
606288 14099 ADOLFO CELEDON JR 12/12/2014 53.74
606289 1884 CHAIN COHN STILES 12/12/2014 550.00
606290 10037 CORPSE CLAN PRODUCTIONS 12/12/2014 200.00
606291 10037 DANNY ROBERTS JR 12/12/2014 66.00
606292 10047 DAVID WILLIAMS 12/12/2014 170.83
606293 16234 SEAN DYE 12/12/2014 125.00
606294 3067 FOX THEATER FOUNDATION 12/12/2014 200.00
606295 23680 JOSEPH GALVAN 12/12/2014 118.25
606296 23311 JUAN DURAN GARCIA 12/12/2014 125.00
606297 10037 GARDEN COMMUNITY CHURCH 12/12/2014 200.00
606298 10037 GARY A DORDICK LAW CORP 12/12/2014 780.00
606299 21505 CURTIS HANSEN 12/12/2014 125.00
606300 16862 HEALTHCOMP INC 12/12/2014 133.98
606302 10047 JENNIFER L KRITSCH 12/12/2014 55.00
606303 15783 JOEY JIRON 12/12/2014 125.00
606304 10037 KAISER PERMANENTE 12/12/2014 200.00
606305 10037 KERN COUNTY SUPT OF SCHOOLS 12/12/2014 197.00
606306 10047 LANDSTONE BUILDERS INC 12/12/2014 570.00
606307 10037 LIFESAVERS MINISTRIES 12/12/2014 100.00
606308 15150 RAUL LOPEZ 12/12/2014 125.00
606309 25329 GUSTAVO G. MERJIL 12/12/2014 125.00
606310 12682 JIM MILTON 12/12/2014 125.00
606311 26625 MALCOLM MOORE 12/12/2014 69.87
606312 14676 DAVID OJEDA 12/12/2014 118.23
606313 6026 FELIX G ORONA 12/12/2014 125.00
606314 28019 RAY RAMIREZ 12/12/2014 125.00
606315 10037 RAYMOND YBARRA 12/12/2014 400.00
606316 28020 CHRISTOPHER REYES 12/12/2014 118.23
606317 10037 RICHARD O MIDDLEBROOK APC 12/12/2014 132.80
606318 10037 RIDGEVIEW HIGH MUSIC BOOSTERS 12/12/2014 200.00
606319 19102 NORI SANCHEZ 12/12/2014 124.97
606320 28018 TROY SANDERS 12/12/2014 125.00
606321 27145 JOSE SANDOVAL 12/12/2014 125.00
606322 10037 SET FREE MINISTRIES 12/12/2014 200.00
606323 10037 SHAR YONAN 12/12/2014 100.00
606324 10047 SHARILENE YONAN 12/12/2014 57.53
606325 10047 SHELLY LAWRENCE 12/12/2014 89.35
606326 10047 SIKH TEMPLE 12/12/2014 2,017.94
606327 23940 THE SEGAL COMPANY 12/12/2014 2,865.11
606328 10047 VIVINT SOLAR DEVELOPER 12/12/2014 185.00
606329 10047 A-1 EVENT RENTALS 12/12/2014 496.59
606330 10047 B A R C 12/12/2014 298.96
606331 10047 BIG LOTS - WHITE LN 12/12/2014 1,324.92
606332 10047 BIG RED BOX LLC 12/12/2014 664.30
606333 10047 BRONCO CONCRETE INC 12/12/2014 1,635.00
606334 10047 BURLINGTON HOMES 12/12/2014 663.69
606335 10047 CABO CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2014 562.90
606336 10047 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 12/12/2014 461.57
606337 10047 FANNING CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2014 755.37
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 16
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606338 10047 GEORGE H HERNANDEZ 12/12/2014 545.00
606339 10047 GLENWOOD GARDENS 12/12/2014 513.05
606340 10047 HOME GOODS #518 % REPUBLIC SVC 12/12/2014 473.41
606341 10047 HOUSLEY DEMOLITION CO, INC 12/12/2014 2,070.29
606342 4429 KERN COUNTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 12/12/2014 5,081.50
606343 10047 KERN COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE 12/12/2014 300.37
606344 10047 KS INDUSTRIES 12/12/2014 518.45
606345 10047 LOCATOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 12/12/2014 545.00
606346 10047 MALCOLM DRILLING CO INC 12/12/2014 1,104.15
606347 10047 MATHEW FISHER 12/12/2014 545.00
606348 10047 MBL & SONS 12/12/2014 842.46
606349 10047 MIKE & CAROLYN POLLEY 12/12/2014 472.90
606350 10047 MOTA'S FLOOR COVERING 12/12/2014 111.20
606351 10047 RKV CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2014 1,233.52
606352 10047 SALLY BEAUTY STORE-CALLOWAY DR 12/12/2014 430.66
606353 10047 SALVADOR TEJEDA 12/12/2014 698.14
606354 10047 SMART & FINAL #81326 12/12/2014 355.77
606355 10047 SWINERTON BUILDERS-CHESTER 12/12/2014 443.25
606356 10047 WEATHERFORD 12/12/2014 721.25
606357 10047 ZIM'S INTEGRATED MECHANICAL SVC 12/12/2014 339.64
606358 6129 A T & T 12/18/2014 201.87
606359 26559 A 1 PRECISION BUILDERS 12/18/2014 923.00
606360 27396 ABARAM NETWORK SOLUTIONS 12/18/2014 1,068.00
606361 20576 ACTION GLASS INC 12/18/2014 262.42
606362 15433 ADVANCE MOBILE SECURITY 12/18/2014 380.41
606363 18426 KEVIN ALBERTSON 12/18/2014 180.00
606364 160 ALL THAT LETTERING SIGN COMPNY 12/18/2014 2,150.00
606365 451 ALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY VIOL 12/18/2014 19,254.71
606366 23588 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 12/18/2014 2,967.02
606367 26375 AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE 12/18/2014 529.56
606368 987 AMERICAN FABRICATION 12/18/2014 193.50
606369 27167 ANGELUS WATERPROOFING & RESTORATION 12/18/2014 28,842.00
606370 18201 ANIMAL EMERGENCY & URGENT CARE 12/18/2014 416.00
606371 16235 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 12/18/2014 11,983.86
606372 1049 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES 12/18/2014 9,678.98
606373 455 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 12/18/2014 381.25
606374 18417 ATTORNEYS CERTIFIED SERVICES 12/18/2014 233.50
606375 536 AVERY ASSOCIATES 12/18/2014 3,150.00
606376 25940 ANTHONY BACA 12/18/2014 60.00
606377 19911 BAKERSFIELD HARLEY DAVIDSON INC 12/18/2014 27.85
606378 10320 BAKERSFIELD HOMELESS CENTER 12/18/2014 16,803.45
606379 971 BAKERSFIELD PLUMBING CO INC 12/18/2014 1,847.50
606380 10854 BAKERSFIELD PRAYER BREAKFAST COMM 12/18/2014 500.00
606381 857 BAKERSFIELD S P C A 12/18/2014 60,000.00
606382 875 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTER 12/18/2014 16.61
606383 877 BAKERSFIELD WELL & PUMP 12/18/2014 187,615.03
606384 26027 BANKS & CO CAR WASH SYSTEMS INC 12/18/2014 422.03
606385 11248 BANKS PEST CONTROL 12/18/2014 110.00
606386 557 BARC 12/18/2014 182.90
606387 13424 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 12/18/2014 746.03
606388 945 BARNETT'S TOWING SERVICE INC 12/18/2014 70.00
606389 18398 BATTERY SYSTEMS 12/18/2014 107.50
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 17
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606390 14470 BAUER COMPRESSORS INCORPORATED 12/18/2014 1,044.83
606391 306 BEARCAT MFG INC 12/18/2014 16.85
606392 25869 TONY BERNARD JR. 12/18/2014 425.00
606393 24552 ROBIN BICE 12/18/2014 51.66
606394 23444 MATTHEW BILLINGSLEY 12/18/2014 898.12
606395 1175 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 12/18/2014 900.41
606396 15538 BOLLES NURSERY LANDSCAPE 12/18/2014 118.25
606397 22817 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 12/18/2014 6,586.72
606398 18692 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 12/18/2014 2,040.51
606399 1249 BRANDCO 12/18/2014 162.97
606400 19303 BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS 12/18/2014 165.26
606401 24464 CLAUDE BROWN 12/18/2014 60.00
606402 10267 BUDGET BOLT INC 12/18/2014 513.34
606403 1359 BUDS BRAKE & WHEEL PARTS 12/18/2014 40.14
606404 1367 BUENA VISTA WATER STORAGE DIST 12/18/2014 4,248.42
606405 22565 BURTCH CONSTRUCTION 12/18/2014 1,237.50
606406 16093 C C & M TRUCK SERVICE INC 12/18/2014 4,787.85
606407 1594 C P O A 12/18/2014 220.00
606408 1477 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 12/18/2014 454.02
606409 1695 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 12/18/2014 58,048.00
606410 26499 MIGUIEL CALISTRO 12/18/2014 127.64
606411 1724 CALPLY LLC 12/18/2014 1,506.84
606412 18347 CAROLINA SOFTWARE 12/18/2014 500.00
606413 1888 CHAMPION HARDWARE 12/18/2014 2,236.64
606414 14931 CHEM PRO LABORATORY 12/18/2014 364.00
606415 1924 CHESTER AVENUE BRAKE & SUPPLY 12/18/2014 102.57
606416 20873 CI TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/18/2014 3,000.00
606417 1978 CITY BODY WORKS 12/18/2014 1,045.00
606418 2050 CLIFFORD & BROWN 12/18/2014 8,222.00
606419 21588 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 12/18/2014 685.44
606420 609 COLES BRAKE AND WHEEL 12/18/2014 353.00
606421 25259 COMMERCIAL CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 12/18/2014 3,495.00
606422 27509 CONTRERAS, ANGEL 12/18/2014 120.00
606423 25644 COPS PLUS 12/18/2014 174.90
606424 10285 CRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC 12/18/2014 835.71
606425 18931 TONI CROSBY 12/18/2014 211.92
606426 23132 ADAN CUEVAS 12/18/2014 24.17
606427 27218 CUMMINS PACIFIC LLC 12/18/2014 4,189.97
606428 12161 D O D CONSTRUCTION 12/18/2014 119,905.16
606429 2321 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 12/18/2014 536.42
606430 4140 DAVID JANES COMPANY 12/18/2014 1,843.63
606431 19613 DE SOTO SALES INC 12/18/2014 149.67
606432 25962 DEFINITI HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT 12/18/2014 25.49
606433 2442 DELANEY & AHLF DIESEL SERVICE 12/18/2014 2,361.60
606434 2469 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 12/18/2014 3,264.00
606435 23863 DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL 12/18/2014 139.55
606436 2558 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORP 12/18/2014 827.22
606437 21979 TONY DUCKWORTH 12/18/2014 117.60
606438 2772 E M THARP INC 12/18/2014 122.67
606439 20062 ECOLINE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 12/18/2014 2,483.25
606440 2769 EL POPULAR CALIFORNIA 12/18/2014 393.75
606441 2752 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING 12/18/2014 260.05
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 18
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606442 2811 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 12/18/2014 72.59
606443 16624 FASTENAL COMPANY 12/18/2014 104.87
606444 2901 FEDEX 12/18/2014 103.07
606445 2930 FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES 12/18/2014 232.00
606446 19657 FIRST CHOICE 12/18/2014 355.45
606447 25339 FLEET SERVICES TOWING INC 12/18/2014 105.00
606448 26311 MARTY J. FLOWERS 12/18/2014 60.00
606449 3028 FLOYDS GENERAL STORE 12/18/2014 257.25
606450 19591 FORK LIFT SPECIALTIES INC 12/18/2014 475.96
606451 10546 ROBERTA GAFFORD 12/18/2014 489.48
606452 3213 GALLS / QUARTERMASTER 12/18/2014 932.95
606453 25881 GIC TRANSPORT INC 12/18/2014 740.00
606454 26159 GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE TRAINING LLC 12/18/2014 4,590.00
606455 25172 GOLD COAST ELECTRIC INC 12/18/2014 6,661.00
606456 22074 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 12/18/2014 900.00
606457 3450 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 12/18/2014 11,344.00
606458 27877 GRIJALVA CONTRACTORS INC 12/18/2014 2,250.00
606459 3537 GUNDLACH PLUMBING AIR CONDITIONING 12/18/2014 197.25
606460 12439 GUNDLACHS 12/18/2014 352.50
606461 3569 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 12/18/2014 105.00
606462 13791 MICHAEL HALE 12/18/2014 1,742.00
606463 3675 HAWKINS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLY 12/18/2014 7,464.89
606464 3730 HELM INC 12/18/2014 487.12
606465 3758 HILL THREADED PRODUCTS INC 12/18/2014 43.00
606466 25938 HILTON DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC 12/18/2014 478.80
606467 11911 HOLIDAY INN - BURBANK 12/18/2014 306.36
606468 20795 IPC USA INC 12/18/2014 97,017.45
606469 26694 JACOBSEN WEST 12/18/2014 983.87
606470 23350 JTS TRUCK REPAIR INC 12/18/2014 692.97
606471 19554 K & R TOWING 12/18/2014 35.00
606472 19570 KERN COUNTY RECORDER 12/18/2014 62.00
606473 4439 KERN COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT 12/18/2014 128,950.00
606474 14575 KERN DOOR CO INC 12/18/2014 1,500.00
606475 26644 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DIST 12/18/2014 5,420.00
606476 4677 KERN REFUSE DISPOSAL, INC 12/18/2014 1,159,020.47
606477 4700 KERN SECURITY SYSTEMS 12/18/2014 2,520.00
606478 23434 KINNEY, STEVEN P 12/18/2014 1,645.00
606479 26949 JOHN KLAWIKOWSKI 12/18/2014 60.00
606480 4277 KME FIRE APPARATUS 12/18/2014 777.31
606481 4875 KNIGHTS PUMPING & PORTABLE SVC 12/18/2014 80.90
606482 70078 KNIGHTS PUMPING & PORTABLE SVC INC 12/18/2014 82.90
606483 24478 KAROL KOHLER 12/18/2014 469.53
606484 27302 KRAMES STAYWELL 12/18/2014 119.04
606485 12552 KURB KUT 12/18/2014 220.00
606486 4941 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 12/18/2014 137.63
606487 14219 L A GRINDING 12/18/2014 395.00
606488 23028 LANDTEC NORTH AMERICA 12/18/2014 12,310.87
606489 22408 LEHR AUTO ELECTRIC 12/18/2014 657,902.25
606490 27778 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 12/18/2014 4,655.36
606491 13442 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES 12/18/2014 219.00
606492 25105 M & J PLASTERING 12/18/2014 2,499.00
606493 18492 M & S SECURITY SERVICES 12/18/2014 1,440.00
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 19
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606494 22263 M-B COMPANIES INC 12/18/2014 121.72
606495 19334 DANIEL MALDONADO 12/18/2014 2,312.34
606496 5328 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 12/18/2014 51,672.14
606497 18520 METROPOLITAN RECYCLING LLC 12/18/2014 123,874.05
606498 19252 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 12/18/2014 10,864.30
606499 24077 MICHEL AUTO TECH 12/18/2014 1,496.08
606500 1316 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 12/18/2014 30,895.72
606501 27497 JULIE MISCHKE DVM 12/18/2014 676.00
606502 5708 MOTOROLA INC 12/18/2014 398.90
606503 18888 NIEMEYER & ASSOCIATES P.C. 12/18/2014 5,660.28
606504 24167 NOLTE ASSOCIATES INC 12/18/2014 350,210.51
606505 10361 OPEN & SHUT ENTERPRISES 12/18/2014 85.00
606506 27557 OPUS INSPECTION 12/18/2014 225.00
606507 22301 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER INC 12/18/2014 209,786.63
606508 10495 OWENS, BILLY 12/18/2014 80.64
606509 6448 P T O SALES 12/18/2014 680.00
606510 6122 PACIFIC POWER INC 12/18/2014 241.06
606511 24904 ROSANNE PADLEY 12/18/2014 499.53
606512 26157 PARMA PUBLIC RISK 12/18/2014 75.00
606513 27386 PATRIOT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 12/18/2014 440.00
606514 24029 PAYLESS TOWING 12/18/2014 35.00
606515 21570 PENNEY LAWN SERVICE 12/18/2014 2,200.00
606516 22381 MIGUEL PEREZ 12/18/2014 25.00
606517 17746 PERFECTION STAINLESS FABRICATION 12/18/2014 107.50
606518 27514 CHARLIE PHILLIPS 12/18/2014 60.00
606519 26703 PLUMBERS DEPOT 12/18/2014 241.88
606520 24581 MICHAEL POPICHAK 12/18/2014 60.00
606522 27911 PORTERVILLE FORD 12/18/2014 2,716.56
606523 20415 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 12/18/2014 328.95
606524 26242 QUALITY FIRE TRUCK PARTS 12/18/2014 21.25
606525 26530 R BRUCE WALKER ED D 12/18/2014 9,425.00
606526 3249 RAY GASKIN SERVICE INC 12/18/2014 324.60
606527 19028 MIGUEL ANGEL RAYA 12/18/2014 53.62
606528 28015 RCI SPECIALTIES 12/18/2014 5,830.03
606529 6727 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIB 12/18/2014 175.70
606530 26825 RISE & SHINE LAWN MAINT & YARD SERV 12/18/2014 960.00
606531 6617 RLH FIRE PROTECTION 12/18/2014 1,967.25
606532 6915 ROUND-UP FEED AND PET SUPPLY 12/18/2014 199.93
606533 17449 RRM DESIGN GROUP 12/18/2014 2,172.50
606534 28016 RUBEN SUBIA MASONRY 12/18/2014 8,770.00
606535 28001 SAITECH INC 12/18/2014 13,921.25
606536 10249 SAN JOAQUIN TRACTOR CO 12/18/2014 575.16
606537 19102 NORI SANCHEZ 12/18/2014 20.16
606538 27276 SANPLICITY INC 12/18/2014 11,958.26
606540 27361 SC FUELS 12/18/2014 43,546.74
606541 22839 SECURITY PAVING CO INC 12/18/2014 1,357,591.43
606542 7283 SEQUOIA PAINT COMPANY 12/18/2014 249.26
606543 7434 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 12/18/2014 515.32
606544 23456 VERNON SORENSON MD INC 12/18/2014 634.00
606545 24476 ROBERT SOTO 12/18/2014 120.00
606546 18357 SOUTHWEST VETERINARY HOSPITAL 12/18/2014 60.46
606547 11907 SPARKLETTS/SIERRA SPRINGS 12/18/2014 156.51
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 20
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606548 26833 SPEAR SECURITY & MGMT CO 12/18/2014 6,722.31
606549 17986 SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC 12/18/2014 5,182.55
606550 20708 T & T PAVEMENT MARKINGS 12/18/2014 2,492.94
606551 26369 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL INC 12/18/2014 232,643.41
606552 20630 T-MOBILE USA 12/18/2014 3,000.00
606553 26815 KELSEY TAYLOR 12/18/2014 1,829.49
606554 19961 THE HON COMPANY 12/18/2014 7,983.08
606555 7999 THREE-WAY CHEVROLET 12/18/2014 110.91
606556 17175 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 12/18/2014 3,520.95
606557 24691 TUFF SHED INC 12/18/2014 899.99
606558 24183 KEITHA TURNER 12/18/2014 221.34
606559 96 TYACK'S TIRES INC 12/18/2014 697.42
606560 19599 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 12/18/2014 1,010.32
606561 8319 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 12/18/2014 9.67
606562 10428 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 12/18/2014 250.17
606563 26780 UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND SCREENING INC 12/18/2014 572.65
606564 21501 URBAN RESTORATION 12/18/2014 6,584.70
606565 8391 URNERS APPLIANCE CENTER 12/18/2014 788.83
606566 20247 KYLE URSERY 12/18/2014 138.85
606567 8878 WELLS ACOUSTICS 12/18/2014 752.50
606568 26447 WESTCOAST HYDRAULICS 12/18/2014 647.85
606569 8936 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 12/18/2014 662.00
606570 21212 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 12/18/2014 1,393.85
606571 18790 WINSTON WATER SERVICES 12/18/2014 731.00
606572 11228 WOOD & RANDALL INC 12/18/2014 276.17
606573 26140 WENDY ZIELSDORF 12/18/2014 131.79
606574 27668 ZIMS INTEGRATED MECHANICAL SVS INC 12/18/2014 14,791.81
606580 78 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 12/18/2014 9,598.92
606581 12516 AIMS 12/18/2014 16,388.82
606582 27438 12/18/2014 215.33
606584 21172 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/18/2014 6,167.00
606585 1694 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 12/18/2014 31,812.41
606589 1696 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 12/18/2014 48,829.51
606590 12300 CALM 12/18/2014 20,000.00
606593 27074 CEN CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 12/18/2014 301,045.89
606594 1941 CHEVRON U S A 12/18/2014 1,018.90
606595 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/18/2014 61,372.90
606596 11937 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 12/18/2014 1,003.75
606597 27393 CLARK BROS INC 12/18/2014 379,577.22
606598 2050 CLIFFORD & BROWN 12/18/2014 16,000.00
606599 22670 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & DATA 12/18/2014 70,755.00
606600 11709 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 12/18/2014 230.00
606601 26312 EPIC CARD SERVICES 12/18/2014 585.66
606602 28028 FEMA 12/18/2014 1,238.58
606603 2959 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY 12/18/2014 283,906.00
606604 7509 GAS COMPANY 12/18/2014 479.96
606605 11569 INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSOC 12/18/2014 340.00
606606 4573 KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY 12/18/2014 2,772.00
606607 28030 M E M A C/O CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 12/18/2014 275.00
606608 12627 MARDEROSIAN CERCONE & COHEN 12/18/2014 70,000.00
606609 5700 LISA MOTON 12/18/2014 78.59
606610 18230 OILDALE MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 12/18/2014 40.47
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 21
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
606611 6114 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12/18/2014 1,559.82
606616 6376 PIONEER PAINT 12/18/2014 20,550.25
606617 7096 SJVAPCD 12/18/2014 570.00
606618 27667 SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC 12/18/2014 95,980.18
606619 7631 STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 12/18/2014 2,150.00
606620 15212 U.S BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN 12/18/2014 1,134.98
606621 15648 USDA FOREST SERVICE 12/18/2014 60.31
606622 8611 VAUGHN WATER CO INC 12/18/2014 6,134.36
606626 20601 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/18/2014 9,991.04
606627 10199 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE 12/18/2014 198,238.00
9992690 16703 B A MERCHANT SERVICES INC 11/26/2014 13,050.76
9992692 25603 BANK OF AMERICA 11/26/2014 167,728.62
9992693 27565 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE CO 11/26/2014 103,801.92
9992694 16862 HEALTHCOMP INC 11/26/2014 7,881.70
9992695 30022 IRS / FDRF 11/26/2014 191.00
9992696 10206 STATE OF CALIF - PERS 11/26/2014 1,391,973.68
9992697 8330 U S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 11/26/2014 146,857.94
9992698 11811 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 11/26/2014 117,117.13
9992699 933 BANK OF AMERICA 12/4/2014 7,826.35
9992700 30025 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 12/4/2014 16,384.67
9992701 11811 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 12/4/2014 53,513.14
9992702 24821 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 12/5/2014 1,254.00
9992703 30014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 12/5/2014 202,044.07
9992704 10217 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-303749 12/5/2014 61,818.12
9992705 30010 IRS 12/5/2014 627,421.28
9992706 16863 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS 12/5/2014 87,806.80
9992707 20699 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 12/5/2014 27,241.55
9992708 27565 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE CO 12/11/2014 253,725.00
9992709 10206 STATE OF CALIF - PERS 12/11/2014 1,388,715.92
9992710 11811 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 12/11/2014 150,359.89
9992711 16862 HEALTHCOMP INC 12/12/2014 15,794.29
9992713 25603 BANK OF AMERICA 12/18/2014 705,621.50
9992714 27565 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE CO 12/18/2014 161,265.00
9992715 30025 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 12/18/2014 16,211.80
9992716 11811 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 12/18/2014 43,837.17
1075 26,664,180.58
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 1
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
E-Payable Vendor E-Payable
Number Number Vendor Name Date E-Payable Amount
7772 22346 ABACUS I M T INC 11/26/2014 6,806.61
7773 57 ABATE A WEED 11/26/2014 94.95
7774 63 ACE HYDRAULIC SALES & SERVICE 11/26/2014 94.60
7775 24819 AD WEAR & SPECIALTY OF TX 11/26/2014 1,018.56
7776 152 ALL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION SER 11/26/2014 1,650.00
7777 26538 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL 11/26/2014 10,717.45
7778 576 B & B SURPLUS 11/26/2014 2,549.90
7779 575 B C LABORATORIES 11/26/2014 5,992.00
7780 611 B S & E COMPANY INC 11/26/2014 1,502.32
7781 675 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 11/26/2014 1,189.55
7782 1163 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 11/26/2014 11,860.44
7783 18753 BRIDGEPORT TRUCK MANUFACTURING 11/26/2014 400.90
7784 1765 CARNEYS BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY CTR INC 11/26/2014 2,419.77
7785 20747 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY INC 11/26/2014 312.03
7786 17239 CENTRAL VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL INC 11/26/2014 176.90
7787 29 CENTRAL VALLEY TRUCK CENTER 11/26/2014 2,265.88
7788 5147 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 11/26/2014 1,771.01
7789 2162 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST INC 11/26/2014 1,699.69
7790 2187 CONTROLCO 11/26/2014 478.44
7791 13912 DIRECT SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC 11/26/2014 1,199.02
7792 13088 E J WARD INCORPORATED 11/26/2014 2,975.23
7793 22973 ENNIS PAINT, INCORPORATED 11/26/2014 4,481.67
7794 23720 ERNEST PACKING SOLUTIONS INC 11/26/2014 1,094.11
7795 27459 EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES 11/26/2014 69,855.65
7796 14055 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 11/26/2014 3,052.70
7797 2874 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 11/26/2014 401.74
7798 13278 FS3 INC 11/26/2014 2,562.80
7799 21739 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 11/26/2014 620.00
7800 24247 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 11/26/2014 14,995.62
7801 3570 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 11/26/2014 1,794.31
7802 4171 JERRY & KEITHS INC 11/26/2014 12,558.30
7803 15694 JIMS TOWING INC 11/26/2014 530.00
7804 453 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP INC 11/26/2014 2,273.58
7805 6205 PAVEMENT RECYCLING SYSTEMS INC 11/26/2014 78,890.00
7806 6550 QUAD KNOPF INC 11/26/2014 28,690.40
7807 1279 QUALITY HEAVY DUTY DIESEL ELEC 11/26/2014 6,127.50
7808 6555 QUINN COMPANY INC 11/26/2014 5,660.55
7809 21873 RM INDUSTRIES INC 11/26/2014 2,721.13
7810 12665 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 11/26/2014 41,944.44
7811 19584 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 11/26/2014 794.29
7812 14700 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEHICLE SERV. 11/26/2014 420.37
7813 7670 STEWART ELECTRIC SUPPLY 11/26/2014 57.94
7814 7685 STINSON STATIONERS 11/26/2014 2,824.84
7815 7728 SULLY & SON HYDRAULICS INC 11/26/2014 852.12
7816 15868 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 11/26/2014 274.00
7817 7912 TESCO CONTROLS INC 11/26/2014 711.00
7818 13646 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP 11/26/2014 978.13
7819 18288 VSS EMULTECH INC 11/26/2014 26,967.13
7820 9010 WILLIAMS CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 11/26/2014 134.94
7863 63 ACE HYDRAULIC SALES & SERVICE 12/4/2014 337.95
7864 180 AMBER CHEMICAL INC 12/4/2014 1,945.59
7865 26538 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL 12/4/2014 2,304.14
7866 576 B & B SURPLUS 12/4/2014 1,571.92
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 2
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
E-Payable Vendor E-Payable
Number Number Vendor Name Date E-Payable Amount
7867 611 B S & E COMPANY INC 12/4/2014 2,659.20
7868 675 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 12/4/2014 1,690.32
7869 1037 BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO 12/4/2014 5,375.31
7870 1163 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 12/4/2014 659.72
7871 1558 CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL RUBBER 12/4/2014 1,059.70
7872 20747 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY INC 12/4/2014 57.99
7873 29 CENTRAL VALLEY TRUCK CENTER 12/4/2014 2,433.07
7874 21220 CLEAN ENERGY INC 12/4/2014 504.00
7875 2162 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST INC 12/4/2014 6,554.48
7876 13912 DIRECT SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC 12/4/2014 918.06
7877 13088 E J WARD INCORPORATED 12/4/2014 4,645.25
7878 2757 ELECTRIC MOTOR WORKS INC 12/4/2014 7,410.70
7879 22973 ENNIS PAINT, INCORPORATED 12/4/2014 2,651.76
7880 14055 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 12/4/2014 544.08
7881 2874 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 12/4/2014 1,100.98
7882 13278 FS3 INC 12/4/2014 1,283.55
7883 16838 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CTR. INC 12/4/2014 219.71
7884 21739 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 12/4/2014 860.00
7885 24247 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 12/4/2014 114.20
7886 3570 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 12/4/2014 170.55
7887 18263 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES INC 12/4/2014 1,477.29
7888 4171 JERRY & KEITHS INC 12/4/2014 5,717.42
7889 1390 JIM BURKE FORD 12/4/2014 1,180.06
7890 4178 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 12/4/2014 2,086.82
7891 15694 JIMS TOWING INC 12/4/2014 35.00
7892 2267 L N CURTIS & SONS 12/4/2014 12,086.14
7893 23984 MECHANICAL DRIVES & BELTING INC 12/4/2014 189.20
7894 6555 QUINN COMPANY INC 12/4/2014 6,876.17
7895 19584 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 12/4/2014 416.98
7896 14700 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEHICLE SERV. 12/4/2014 210.76
7897 25504 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS 12/4/2014 1,028.84
7898 7670 STEWART ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/4/2014 1,099.82
7899 7685 STINSON STATIONERS 12/4/2014 9,986.01
7900 7840 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CO INC 12/4/2014 453.38
7901 13646 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP 12/4/2014 3,094.55
7902 9010 WILLIAMS CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 12/4/2014 407.69
7903 5147 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 12/5/2014 539,534.80
8029 180 AMBER CHEMICAL INC 12/11/2014 3,350.58
8030 26538 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL 12/11/2014 1,826.02
8031 576 B & B SURPLUS 12/11/2014 2,459.60
8032 575 B C LABORATORIES 12/11/2014 1,064.00
8033 611 B S & E COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 824.76
8034 675 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 12/11/2014 662.29
8035 1163 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 12/11/2014 1,689.56
8037 18753 BRIDGEPORT TRUCK MANUFACTURING 12/11/2014 147.38
8038 20747 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY INC 12/11/2014 2,533.94
8039 5147 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 12/11/2014 4,964.26
8040 2162 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST INC 12/11/2014 689.86
8041 13912 DIRECT SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC 12/11/2014 532.50
8042 2874 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 12/11/2014 5,580.11
8043 16838 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CTR. INC 12/11/2014 592.98
8044 24247 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 12/11/2014 4,061.24
8045 21871 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS 12/11/2014 917.74
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 3
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
E-Payable Vendor E-Payable
Number Number Vendor Name Date E-Payable Amount
8046 18263 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES INC 12/11/2014 136.53
8047 15694 JIMS TOWING INC 12/11/2014 222.00
8048 2267 L N CURTIS & SONS 12/11/2014 1,299.11
8049 24086 MAR-CO EQUIPMENT CORP 12/11/2014 417.81
8050 5547 MINUTEMAN PRESS 12/11/2014 112.34
8051 453 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP INC 12/11/2014 250.87
8052 25953 NVB EQUIPMENT INC 12/11/2014 144.34
8053 6555 QUINN COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 7,231.92
8054 12665 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 12/11/2014 1,018.40
8055 698 SAN JOAQUIN INTERIORS 12/11/2014 1,068.00
8056 19584 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 12/11/2014 3,471.93
8057 25504 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS 12/11/2014 1,118.54
8058 7685 STINSON STATIONERS 12/11/2014 7,144.97
8059 7728 SULLY & SON HYDRAULICS INC 12/11/2014 484.98
8060 15868 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 12/11/2014 146.00
8061 13646 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP 12/11/2014 7,604.70
8062 675 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 12/12/2014 692.67
8063 22346 ABACUS I M T INC 12/18/2014 581.00
8064 63 ACE HYDRAULIC SALES & SERVICE 12/18/2014 572.58
8065 64 ADAMSON POLICE SUPPLY 12/18/2014 11,825.00
8066 180 AMBER CHEMICAL INC 12/18/2014 1,047.05
8067 26538 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL 12/18/2014 2,920.15
8068 576 B & B SURPLUS 12/18/2014 343.46
8069 575 B C LABORATORIES 12/18/2014 32,475.00
8070 611 B S & E COMPANY INC 12/18/2014 7,376.64
8071 675 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 12/18/2014 3,034.29
8072 1163 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 12/18/2014 1,653.10
8073 18753 BRIDGEPORT TRUCK MANUFACTURING 12/18/2014 1,687.44
8074 1765 CARNEYS BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY CTR INC 12/18/2014 2,558.26
8075 20747 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY INC 12/18/2014 2,823.23
8076 17239 CENTRAL VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL INC 12/18/2014 302.32
8077 17239 CENTRAL VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL INC 12/18/2014 1,500.00
8078 29 CENTRAL VALLEY TRUCK CENTER 12/18/2014 7,049.61
8079 21220 CLEAN ENERGY INC 12/18/2014 9,187.05
8080 5147 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 12/18/2014 990.32
8081 2162 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST INC 12/18/2014 4,651.86
8082 13912 DIRECT SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC 12/18/2014 166.88
8083 13088 E J WARD INCORPORATED 12/18/2014 304.14
8084 23720 ERNEST PACKING SOLUTIONS INC 12/18/2014 2,188.22
8085 26751 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS INC 12/18/2014 16.13
8086 14055 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 12/18/2014 9,316.44
8087 2874 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 12/18/2014 1,277.88
8088 21739 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 12/18/2014 820.00
8089 3458 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT INC 12/18/2014 397.86
8090 24247 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 12/18/2014 574.01
8091 3570 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 12/18/2014 237.27
8092 4171 JERRY & KEITHS INC 12/18/2014 4,437.94
8093 15694 JIMS TOWING INC 12/18/2014 1,770.00
8094 2267 L N CURTIS & SONS 12/18/2014 7,745.40
8095 453 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP INC 12/18/2014 1,076.72
8096 25953 NVB EQUIPMENT INC 12/18/2014 271.41
8097 1279 QUALITY HEAVY DUTY DIESEL ELEC 12/18/2014 179.26
8098 6555 QUINN COMPANY INC 12/18/2014 11,572.74
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - CHECK REGISTER
12/19/2014 PAGE 4
FROM 11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
E-Payable Vendor E-Payable
Number Number Vendor Name Date E-Payable Amount
8099 21873 RM INDUSTRIES INC 12/18/2014 8,400.00
8100 12665 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 12/18/2014 548.54
8101 19584 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 12/18/2014 3,596.90
8102 14700 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEHICLE SERV. 12/18/2014 884.96
8103 25604 STAY GREEN INC 12/18/2014 26,564.00
8104 7670 STEWART ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/18/2014 278.68
8105 7685 STINSON STATIONERS 12/18/2014 4,484.26
8106 7728 SULLY & SON HYDRAULICS INC 12/18/2014 2,142.33
8107 15868 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 12/18/2014 31.00
8108 13646 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP 12/18/2014 2,470.74
8109 9010 WILLIAMS CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 12/18/2014 509.14
170 $1,251,700.81
Disbursement Total
1245 $27,915,881.39
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-2014\
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Ordinances c.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/15/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
First Reading of Ordinance amending Municipal Code Section
13.12.030 to include NACTO Guidelines.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends First Reading of the proposed ordi nance amendment.
BACKGROUND:
In an effort to support the construction of more mu ltimodal local streets and roads, Caltrans has
endorsed the National Association of City Transport ation Officials (NACTO) guidelines. These
guidelines are based on the input from many cities that have developed and have experience
with extensive bicycle and pedestrian networks. Th ey help provide comprehensive state-of-the-
practice solutions that can help create complete streets tha t are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists
and pedestrians. The NACTO documents provide examp les of best practice applications for the
design, striping, and signage of facilities for acc omplishing these goals.
NACTO has developed two documents: Urban Street De sign Guide, and Urban Bikeway
Design Guide. Many topics included in these docu ments are already a part of the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD ). The State has adopted the CA
MUTCD as uniform standards and specifications for a ll official traffic control devices in California,
in accordance with Section 21400 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Caltrans endorsement
of these documents allows agencies to utilize the a pplications without being in conflict with the
CA MUTCD standards. Attached is the press release from Caltrans with endorsement of the
NACTO documents and some examples of new design fea tures that cities could implement. The
documents are part of an ongoing effort at the Stat e and Federal level to integrate a multimodal
and flexible approach to transportation planning an d design.
Since these documents have been endorsed by Caltran s, the applications can already be used
by the City. As with many State approved guideline documents, these documents can be listed
in the Citys Municipal Code section referencing St andards and Specifications. The documents
are not a replacement to existing standards, rather , they provide more options to best facilitate
multimodal goals.
Staff will review the NACTO guidelines for applicat ion on projects where appropriate to improve
multimodal transportation opportunities; the applic ations would be used on a case by case basis.
Staff will evaluate the benefits and support to bik e/pedestrian users for a particular application
and location. This would include the cost effective ness of installing the application, as well as
future maintenance requirements. It would be staff s intention to use these tools in high
pedestrian and bicycling areas.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Ordinance Ordinance
Blue Memo Cover Memo
Press release for Caltrans endorsement of NACTO Backup Material
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Ordinances d.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Virginia Gennaro, City Attorney
DATE:
12/9/2014
WARD:
Ward 5
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Ordinance Levying a Special Tax for the Fiscal Year 2015-
2016 and following Fiscal Years solely within and r elating to the City
Police and Fire Services Community Facilities Distr ict No. 2014- 1 (Old
(FR 12/10/14)
River Ranch Development).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
On December 14, 2005, the City entered into a Devel opment Agreement (#05-431) (the
Agreement) with PB1 Ventures, LLC; PB2 Ventures, LLC; PB3 Ventures, LLC; PB4 Ventures,
LLC, PB6 Ventures, LLC and PB7 Ventures, LLC regard ing the future development of
approximately 1,833 acres of land in west Bakersfie ld, more commonly known as the Old River
Ranch Development area (the Area). Pursuant to prior Council action during the Decembe r 10,
2014, Consent Calendar Public Hearing portion of th e agenda, the Agreement has been
amended as described below.
Under the terms of the Agreement, as amended, a Com munity Facilities District (CFD) must be
formed to facilitate the collection of fees and spe cial taxes regarding the operation and
maintenance of police and fire services, including salary and benefits of personnel, required by
new residential development within the Area. Once the CFD is formed, owners of each
residential unit within the Area will pay, on their property tax bill, $287 per year for the first 10
years after a building permit is pulled for each re sidential unit and then $174 per year for the next
10 years. This special tax will help offset the co st of fire and police protection services required
by new development within the Area.
At its December 10, 2014 meeting, Council conducted a public hearing on the formation of the
CFD. Additionally, the Council adopted several res olutions forming the CFD, calling for a special
mailed-ballot election, and certifying the election results. After the election results were certifie d,
the Council had first reading of an ordinance levyi ng a special tax for the fiscal year 2015-2016
and following fiscal years solely within and relati ng to the City of Bakersfield Police and Fire
Services Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 ( Old River Ranch). This ordinance levies the
special tax and directs the City Manager or designe e to determine the correct special tax to be
assessed pursuant to the Rate and Method of Apporti onment.
This ordinance had first reading on December 10, 20 14.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Ordinance Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. _ ____ _
ORDINANCE LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 201 5 - 1 6 AND FOLLOWING FISCAL YEARS SOLELY
WITHIN AND RELATING TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
POLICE AND FIRE SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2014 - 1 (OLD RIVER RANCH)
by the C ouncil of the C ity of B akersfield as follows :
BE IT ORDAINED
1. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, and in
accordance with the Rate and Method o f Apportionment of Special Tax (the
(the
lution No.
226 - 14
(as defined in the RMA) within the City of Bakersfield Police an
Commun ity Facilities District No. 2014 -
, for the 201 5 - 1 6 fiscal year and for all subsequent fiscal years in
the amount of the maximum authorized tax, provided that this amo
adjusted annually, sub ject to the maximum authorized special tax limit, by
resolution of the City Council.
2. The City Manager of the City of Bakersfield or designee thereof
for each parcel within the Community Facilities District, and without further
action of the City Council, the correct special tax pursuant to
Ordinance; and to prepare the annual special tax roll and to pro
necessary and appropriate information to the K
and timely billing and collection of each special tax on the sec
roll of the County; provided, that as provided in the Resoluti on of Formation and
Section 53340 of the California Government Code, the City has re
right to utilize any method of collecting the special tax which
to time, determine to be in the best interests of the City of Ba e
owners and supplemental billing.
3. The appropriate officers and agents of the City are authorized t
make adjustments to the special tax roll prior to the final post the special
taxes to the County tax roll each fiscal year, as may be necessa
utilized by the County in sending out property tax bills.
4. The City agrees that the County may deduct its reasonable and
agreed charges for collecting the special tax from the amounts c
to remitting the special tax collections to the City.
5. Taxpayers who believe there may be errors in their special tax a
referred t o Section 7 of the RMA and the procedure therein and the CFD
Administrator shall administer the appeal procedure as therein p
6. If for any cause any portion of this ordinance is found to be in
or if the special tax is found inapplicable to a ny particular parcel by a court of
competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance, and the a
the special tax to the remaining parcels, shall not be affected.
7. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after
days from its passage.
-- oo0oo --
that the foregoing Ordinance was first read at a regular
I HEREBY CERTIFY
meeting of the City Council of the City on the 10th day of Decem
was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council he
__ __ th day of ________________ , 2014 , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER RIVERA, MAXWELL, WEIR, SMITH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, P
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER _________________________________________________
ABSTAIN : COUNCIL MEMBER _________________________________________________________
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER__________________________________________________
___________________________________
ROBERTA GAFFORD, CMC
CITY CLERK AND EX OFFICIO of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED _______________________
By________________________________
HARVEY L. HALL
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By________________________________
ANDREW HEGLUND
Deputy City Attorney
AH/vl
S: \ COUNCIL \ Ords \ 14 - 15 \ OldRiverRanch - LevyingSpecial Tax.2d.docx
2
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Ordinances e.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Douglas McIsaac, Community Development Director
DATE:
12/4/2014
WARD:
Ward 6
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map in Title 17 of
the Municipal Code by changing the zone district fr om R-1 (One- Family
Dwelling) to R-1-4.5 (Small Lot One- Family Dwelling) on 28.0 acres
located at the southeast corner of Panama Lane and Reliance Drive.
(ZC #14-0267 - Panama Lane Properties, LLC, McIntosh & Associates
(FR 12/10/14)
representing Panama Lane Properties).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
First reading of the ordinance was given on Wednesd ay, December 10, 2014.
On October 16, 2014, the Planning Commission held a n advertised public hearing on this zone
change request, and recommended adoption by the Cit y Council. The zone change request
consists of changing the zone district from R-1 (On e-Family Dwelling) to R-1-4.5 (Small Lot One-
Family Dwelling) on 28.0 gross acres, to allow futu re single- family residential development of
4,500-square foot minimum lots.
The zone change request is compatible with the exis ting Low Density Residential (LR) land use
designation which allows a maximum residential dens ity of 7.26 dwellings per net acre. The
project area is limited to a maximum lot yield of 1 51 single- family residential lots, upon future
subdivision. It should be noted that in order to ap prove a tract with all of the lots at or near the
4,500-square foot minimum lot size of the R-1- 4.5 zone district, a higher density General Plan
designation of LMR (Low Medium Density Residential maximum density of 10 dwelling units
per net acre) would be required.
In this case, the applicant has not requested such a General Plan change and will retain the LR
(Low Density Residential maximum density of 7.26 dwelling units per net acre ), which is
commensurate with an average lot size of 6,000 squa re feet.
The R-1- 4.5 zoning district has been requested because it w ill allow some lots smaller than 6,000
square feet for design flexibility, but the average lot size will still need to be 6,000 square feet
due to the general plan density requirements noted above. As subdivision design often requires
larger lots on knuckles and cul-de-sacs due to ir regular shape, the R-1- 4.5 zoning district will
allow lots more than 6,000 square feet in size to b e offset by lots less than 6,000 square feet.
The project site is currently vacant and is surroun ded by urban uses. No one spoke in opposition
to the project at the Planning Commission hearing.
Based upon an initial environmental assessment, sta ff has determined the proposed project will
not significantly affect the physical environment o r existing residential development in the area,
therefore a Negative Declaration was prepared and a dvertised.
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Ordinance Approving Zone Change Ordinance
Exhibit A - Zone Change Map Exhibit
Exhibit B - Legal Description Exhibit
General Plan Land Use Designation Map Backup Material
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE DISTRICT LOCATE D
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PANAMA LANE AND RELIANCE
DRIVE. (ZC NO. 14 - 0267).
McIntosh & Associates for Panama Lane Properties, LLC filed an
WHEREAS ,
application with the City of Bakersfield Community Development D
requesting to change the zone district on property generally loc
corner of Panama Lane an d Reliance Drive, as shown in Exhibit B (Project); and
the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 16, 2014 ,
WHEREAS ,
and a pproved Resolution No. 5 7 - 14 , which recommended that the City Council
approve the Project ; and
the City Council has adopted a Negative Declaration with mitigation
WHEREAS,
measures for the Project ; and
the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence
WHEREAS,
concerning the Project , including the staff report, Negative Declaration and the
Planning deliberation , and action ; and
the Project is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan .
WHEREAS,
SECTION 1.
by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED
1. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Res olution No. 5 7 - 14
are hereby adopted.
2. The Project is subject to mitigation measures found in the adopted
Negative Declaration for the Project.
3. The Project is hereby approved and incorporating the change into the
official zoning map as described in Bakersfield Municipal Code S
17.06.020 located on the map as shown in Exhibit A and as specifically
described in Exhibit B , all of which are incorporated herein .
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 2.
This ordinance must be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal
Code and wi ll become effective not less than 30 days from and after the date of its
passage.
--------- o0o ---------
that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted by the
I HEREBY CERTIFY
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on ,
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER RIVERA, MAXWELL, WEIR, SMITH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, PARLIER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER
_______________________________________
ROBERTA GAFFORD, CMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED
_______________________________
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By: ____________________________
ANDREW HEGLUND
Deputy City Attorney
Exhibits: A Zone Change Map
B Legal Description
By: KS \ S: \ ZoneChange \ yr 2014 \ 14 - 0267 \ CC \ 14 - 0267 CC ZC Ordinance Template.docx
Page 2 of 2
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Resolutions f.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Douglas N. McIsaac, Community Development Director
DATE:
12/10/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Resolution confirming approval by the City Manager designee of the
Chief Code Enforcement Officer s report regarding assessments of
certain properties in the City for which structures have been secured
against entry or for the abatement of certain weeds , debris and waste
matter and authorizing collection of the assessment s by the Kern County
Tax Collector.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of resolution.
BACKGROUND:
Assessment hearing was held on December 8, 2014, by the City Manager designee and all
proposed charges were confirmed. The subject prope rties listed below were in violation of
Chapter 8.27 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code whic h prohibits maintaining open and abandoned
dilapidated structures which constitute public nuis ances and prohibits maintaining hazardous
weeds, debris and waste matter. The property owner s were notified and failed to comply with the
notices to abate such public nuisance. After a hea ring duly noticed and held before the Building
Director, the Director issued orders requiring the property owner to abate the public nuisance.
The subject properties are listed as follows:
PROPERTY LOCATION APN COST
Ward 1
1. 820 S. Brown Street 019 - 142 - 04 - 02 - 1 $824.00
2. 208 E. Brundage Lane 139 - 403 - 21 - 00 - 9 $300.00
3. 815 E. Brundage Lane 168-172-26-00-3 $699.00
4. 114 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 018 - 400 - 09 - 00 - 2 $760.00
5. 3512 Hale Street 172 - 052 - 03 - 00 - 2 $670.00
6. 3610 Hale Street 172 - 052 - 09 - 00 - 0 $650.00
7. 417 S. Haley Street 019 - 072 - 12 - 00 - 6 $105.00
8. 3516 Horne Street 172 - 091 - 31 - 00 - 8 $1,125.00
9. 213 Madison Street 168 - 183 - 22 - 00 - 1 $1,420.00
10. 803 Melwood Street 170-141-12-00-3 $300.00
11. 1215 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue 173 - 200 - 09 - 00 - 6 $4,075.00
12. 309 Northrup Street 018 - 300 - 14 - 00 - 7 $800.00
13. 4808 Ohman Court 171-280-30-00-6 $115.00
14. 105 S. Owens Street 018 - 270 - 35 - 00 - 0 $739.00
15. 601 Pacheco Road #53 412 - 053 - 11 - 00 - 1 $724.00
16. 601 Pacheco Road #54 412 - 053 - 12 - 00 - 4 $724.00
17. 601 Pacheco Road #55 412 - 053 - 13 - 00 - 7 $930.00
18. 1819 E. Planz Road 172 - 041 - 10 - 00 - 2 $700.00
19. 1303 S. Robinson Street 018 - 123 - 37 - 00 - 3 $719.00
20. 5311 Tierra Abierta Drive 173-633-04-00-7 $748 .00
21. 424 V Street 009 - 472 - 13 - 00 - 2 $2,220.00
22. 601 Watts Drive 170 - 161 - 18 - 00 - 7 $150.00
th
139-111-05-00-5
$700.00
23. 530 E. 9 Street
Ward 2
24. 2200 Brundage Lane 008-284-25-00-9 $300.00
25. 1800 Forrest Street 007 - 197 - 12 - 00 - 9 $105.00
26. 1228 K Street 006 - 450 - 16 - 00 - 0 $850.00
27. 1018 Miller Street 015 - 400 - 06 - 00 - 2 $300.00
28. 408 Monterey Street 014 - 070 - 19 - 00 - 8 $1,029.00
29. 517 Oregon Street 014 - 040 - 04 - 00 - 5 $2,485.00
30. 1718 Tulare Street 012 - 380 - 22 - 00 - 2 $750.00
31. 2207 Verde Street 008-283-11-00-1 $779.00
Ward 3
32. 4205 Cambridge Drive 146 - 093 - 02 - 00 - 7 $1,384.00
33. 3109 Occidental Street 021-433-23-00-6 $1,430. 00
34. 2688 Oswell Street 130 - 161 - 15 - 00 - 6 $300.00
35. 3112 Pomona Street 021 - 351 - 02 - 00 - 8 $300.00
Ward 4
36. 9903 Cheyenne Drive 526 - 204 - 01 - 00 - 2 $900.00
37. 11718 Harvick Avenue 528 - 301 - 02 - 00 - 7 $959.00
38. 12306 Marshfield Way 409 - 401 - 05 - 00 - 7 $900.00
Ward 5
39. 3908 Boswellia Drive 513 - 242 - 05 - 00 - 8 $105.00
40. 8417 Sargent Way 392 - 051 - 02 - 00 - 6 $1,084.00
Ward 6
41. 4205 Akers Road 404 - 052 - 02 - 00 - 9 $1,185.00
42. 3920 Marilyn Place 441 - 031 - 17 - 00 - 1 $115.00
Ward 7
43. 2502 Blue Mountain Way 405 - 380 - 02 - 00 - 8 $729.00
44. 905 Eubanks Avenue 413 - 121 - 02 - 00 - 8 $105.00
45. 1601 Fremont Street 023 - 141 - 04 - 00 - 7 $105.00
46. 2610 Los Carneros Place 405 - 102 - 05 - 00 - 9 $300.00
47. 2708 Los Carneros Place 405 - 102 - 07 - 00 - 5 $300.00
48. 2802 Los Carneros Place 405 - 102 - 10 - 00 - 3 $300.00
49. 2010 Oscar Avenue 023-164-23-00-9 $105.00
The owners of the above- mentioned properties failed to commence the require d work as ordered
by the Building Director to abate a public nuisance . As permitted under Chapter 8.80 of the
Bakersfield Municipal Code, the public nuisances li sted above were abated under the direction of
the Chief Code Enforcement Officer. The costs incur red by the City can be assessed against the
property as provided for in Chapter 8.80 of the Bak ersfield Municipal Code. Property owners had
been given notice of their right to appear at the h earing on this matter before the City Manager
designee and to object to the correctness of the co sts incurred by the City to remove the public
nuisance. The City Manager designee has approved t he assessments associated with the
above-mentioned properties.
The Council will need to confirm the approval of th e City Manager designee of the costs incurred
by the City for work performed to remove the public nuisance and order that such costs be made
a lien against the property. This will be done by adoption of the attached resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution Resolution
Declaration Backup Material
Exhibit Backup Material
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Resolutions g.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Resolution determining that Holmatro rescue equipme nt cannot
be reasonably obtained through the usual bidding pr ocedures and
authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with b idding therefore, not
to exceed $69,500.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution and approva l of purchase
BACKGROUND:
Holmatro rescue equipment has been used by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department for over
ten years. The equipment has an excellent track re cord and has become the standard for the
Fire Department. Holmatro rescue equipment must be purchased from the exclusive dealer for
Kern County, Fire Service Specification and Supply (FS3). Funds for the purchase are in the FY
2014- 2015 adopted budget within the Equipment Management Fund. The two rescue tools to be
replaced have been used beyond their scheduled repl acement date and are badly worn.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Dispense With Bidding Resolution Resolution
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Resolutions h.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/2/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Resolution approving and adopting the 2014 Sanitary Sewer
Management Plan update and authorize staff to re- certify the plan with
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The SWRCB adopted statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements (GWDR) for publicly
owned sanitary sewer systems in 2006. The GWDR requ ires that agencies develop and
implement a sewer system- specific local Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) that identifies
a comprehensive program for sewer collection system operation, maintenance, repair, and
reporting and responding to Sanitary Sewer Overflow s (SSOs) in the statewide spill reporting
database. The City is required to maintain complian ce with the requirements.
The original SSMP was prepared and implemented in 2 009. The GWDR requires the City to
update the SSMP every five years. The 2014 Sewer Sy stem Management Plan update was
completed by Staff.
The following modifications were made as part of th e update:
SubjectRevisionPage
Added the name and phone # of
Organization 4
responsible official and other key
contacts
Added the names of the 3 agencies 5
Legal Authority
that discharge sewage into the City's
collection system
Reporting of Sewer Added reporting agency names and 9
Outflows phone numbers
Organizational
Appendix A
Chart
Staff recommends approval of the 2014 Sanitary Sewe r Management Plan (SSMP)
update, adoption of the resolution, and authorize s taff to re-certify SSMP with the State Water
Resources Control Board.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Reso Sewer System Mgmnt Plan Update Resolution
Sewer System Management Plan Backup Material
City of Bakersfield
Public Works Department
Sewer System Management Plan
December 2014
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 1
Sewer System Management Plan
Index:
Section 1 – Goals for Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Program…………………3
Section 2 – Organization……………………………………………………………..4
Section 3 – Legal Authority…………………………………………………………..5
Section 4 – Operation & Management Plan……………………………………...6
Section 5 – Design & Performance Provisions……………………………………7
Section 6 – Reporting of Sewer Overflows & Emergency Response Plan...8 - 9
Section 7 – Fats, Oi ls & Grease Plan (FOG)……………………………………...10
Section 8 – System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan……………. ..11
Section 9 – Monitoring & Program Modifications…………………………..12 - 13
Section 10 – Program Audits……………………………………………………….14
Section 11 – Communication Pro gram…………………………………………..15
Appendix A – Organizational Chart … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ... 16
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 2
S EWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Section 1. GOALS for Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Program
The City of Bakersfield ’s goals for its wastewater collection system is as follows:
To reduce and mi tigate sanitary sewer overflows; ens ure adequate capacity for
peak flows; prevent public health hazards and unnecessary damage to public
and private property; perform all operations in a safe manner to avoid personal
injury; monitor and maintain the collection system by use of Closed Circuit
Television (CCTV) equipment and hydro - j etter trucks on a regular basis; maintain
proper documentation and records ; and properly manage all parts of the
wastewater collection system.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 3
Section 2. Organization
Stuar t Patteson, P.E. , Public Works Operations
Legally Responsible Official:
Manager, City of Bakersfield , 661 - 326 - 3781
, 661 - 326 - 3111
Sewer Maintenance Section
(See Appendix A, Streets Division Organizational Chart, for a detail of the
hierarchy within the divisio n . )
, Mike Connor, 661 - 326 - 3111
Street Maintenance Superin tendent
, Brandon Stevens, 661 - 326 - 3111
Sewer Maintenance Supervisor
When a report of a sanitary sewer overflow or potential sanitary sewer overflow is
received, a sewer maintenance crew is dispatched to the location. These staff
members are trained and experienced in identifying and verifying sanitary sewer
overflows. If the report is verified as a sanitary sewer overflow, the Sewer
Maintenance Supervisor is contacted and informed of the overflow. Depending
on the extent and leve l of the overflow, the Sewer Maintenance Supervisor
would contact their supervisor, the Street Maintenance Superintendent.
Depending on the extent and level of the overflow, the Street Maintenance
Superintendent would contact the Operations Manager (Legall y Responsible
Party) and/or the Public Works Director.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 4
Section 3. Legal Authority
The City of Bakersfield has legal authority to operate a wastewater collection
system, with a sewer ordinance that describes how the public can and cannot use the
sewer system. W e h ave service agreements with certain agencies and districts with
satellite collection systems that discharge into our lines. Currently those agencies are:
East Niles Community Services District
Kern Sanitation Authority (KSA) – Formerly Mount Vernon Sanitation District
County Service Area 71 (CSA71)
The City of Bakersfield has legally binding requirements, that new sewer systems
are properly designed and constructed to handle the present and any future growth for
the area. The plans are carefully reviewed by a registered civil engineer before any
construction can begin . Plans are checked to make sure there is adequate access for
cleaning and repair equipment to get to all manholes, cleanouts and lift station s . If the
manholes are on pr ivate property , the property owner must grant the C ity easement
rights , which must be documented and recorded with the proper agency. The City of
Bakersfield does have an ordinance (B akersfield M unicipal C ode 14.12.220 B.9.) , which
provides the legal auth ority to prohi bit discharge of excess Fat s, Oils and Grease (FOG)
that would cause adverse eff ects on the sewer system. The C ity has a written ordinance
(BMC 14.12.) , which allows C ity staff to enforce compliance with the ordinance when
there are violatio ns of illegal dumping into our system . Illegal dumping and FOG
compliance is monitored by our Sewer Maintenance Crews and e nforced by our
Industrial Wastew ater Treatment Plant Inspectors.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 5
Section 4. O peration & M anagement Plan
The City of Bakersf ield keeps up to date sewer maps on hand at various locations ,
including in the sewer maintenance vehicles and sewer cleaning vehicles. Map books
are updated on a regular basis as new and replacement sewer lines are installed. If a
discrepancy is found b y either a hydro - jetting crew or the video inspection crew, it is
given to the Sewer Supervisor who is responsib le for making sure that the map books get
corrected and updated . The Sewer Supervisor also work s with our Geographic
Information System ( GIS ) D ivision on placing the map s and manhole locations on the
C ity’s database . This allows the sewer maintenance crews to locate manholes and
pipelines more quickly , and is a common reference for all Public Works Divisions.
Currently, the City is divided int o five geographical sections with six to eight areas in each
section. There is a hydro - jetter vehicle assigned to each section that cleans l ines on a
daily basis. When an area is completed the hydro - jetter crews move to the next area
and turn in daily lo g s on the lines cleaned that day , noting any problems found.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 6
Section 5. Design & Performance Provisions
The design and construction standards and specifications, as well as the
inspection for the installation of new sanitary systems, pump stations and other
appurtenances; and for the rehabilitation and repair of existing sanitary sewer syste ms
are fully detailed in the City of Bakersfield’s Engineering Subdivision Design Manual in the
Standards for Sanitary Sewers, the Standards for Draina ge, and the Sewer Pump Station
Specification sections.
Links are listed to these sections below:
Standards for Sanitary Sewers:
http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/c ityservices/pubwrks/designman/pdf/1 - sewers - 1.pdf
Standards for Drainage:
http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/cityservices/pubwrks/designman/pdf/2 - drainage - 1.pdf
Appendix A – Sewer Pump Station Specification:
http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/cityservices/pubwrks/designman/pdf/6 - bibapp - 1.pdf
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 7
Section 6. Reporting o f Sewer Overflows & Emergency Response Plan
The City of Bakersfield ’s goals for its wastewater collection system is as follows:
To reduce and mitigate sanitary sewer overflows ; ensure adequate capacity for
peak flows ; prevent public health hazards and unn ecessary damage to public
and private property ; perform all operations in a safe manner to avoid personal
injury ; monitor and maintain the collection system by use of Closed Circuit
Television (CCTV) equipment and hydro - jetter trucks on a regular basis ; ma intain
proper documentation and records ; and properly manage all parts of the
wastewater collection system.
1. During normal wor king hours, which are from 7:00 a . m . to 4:00 p . m .
Monday through Friday, call s go to the Street s Division office at (661) 326 -
3111. These calls can come from the public , Police Department or from
other C ity division s . Once the call comes in, the C lerk Typist send s the call
to the S ewer S upervisor if in the office . I f not, they will contact the sewer
crew working that area by radio. If reports come in after hours, the
recording will direct them to contact the Police D epartment , who has the
proper phone numbers to get the quickest response to correct the
problem.
2. Once the Sewer Supervisor is notified of a sewer o verflow, they are to c all
a two - person crew, respond to the location and evaluate the needs .
Additional crews will be called if needed to quickly and efficiently handle
the situation.
3. Any sewage spill in excess of the 1,000 gallon “reportable quantity”
(California Code of Regul ations, Title 23, Section (a) ) and/or a spill that
reaches a channel, storm drain, or surface water will be reported to the
agencies listed below. A discharge of less than 1,000 gallons must also be
reported if the discharge is (or will be):
To waters of the State (waters of the State include all waters within
the boundaries of the State, whether public or private, whether in
natural or artificial channel and whether surface or subsurface),
To the ground within five feet of groundwater or within 500 feet o f
a surface water, water well, or domestic water supply source,
Causing a pollution or threatened pollution,
Causing a nuisance,
A potential threat to public health.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 8
Agencies to be notified:
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) – (916) 845 -
8911 or (800) 852 - 7550
Kern County Environmental Health (EHS) – (661) 862 - 8740
Kern County Fire Dispatch (24 hrs.) – (661) 861 - 2521
The OES and Kern County EHS must be notified within two hours of sewer
spills that reach surface water or drainage facilities th at reach surface
water. The City of Bakersfield is required to certify, no later than 24 hours,
that the OES and EHS were notified.
4. Once the problem is resolved , the crew leader will fill out a sewer overflow
form with all the vital information and turn it into their supervisor . The
Supervisor then reviews the problem, makes sure everything is filled out
correctly, contacts all agencies as required , and then gives it to the C lerk
Typist to enter the information into the State Water R esources Control
Board Sanitary Sewer Overflow database (SSO).
5. Hydro Cleaning Trucks are to be fueled and water tanks to pped off at the
end of the work shift , so that they are ready to respond quickly to an
emergency call that comes in after normal working hours. The Sewer
Sup ervisor is required to make rand om checks of this equipment to e nsure
this is being done.
6. The Sewer Supervisor is required to train his employees on how to estimate
the amount of spillage and the proper procedure on filling out the sewer
overflow f or m.
7. The Sewer Supervisor is required to instruct and train his crews on the
proper way to clean up a sewer overflow , and to make sure that all
overflows are cleaned and disinfected as instructed.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 9
Section 7. FAT S , OILS & GREASE PLAN (FOG)
The City of Baker sfield currently works with the Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department to distribute a FOG pamphlet when City Waste w ater
Staff conduct s inspection s at food establishments. The Wastew ater Industrial
Inspection Staff has distributed over 500 B MP s (Best Management Practices) to
restaurants over the last years. The goal of the City is to inspect all restaurants
every year. Wastewater Treatment Plant 2 is set up as a receiving station for FOG
disposal.
Bakersfield Municipal Code (BMC) 14.12.22 0 B.9 provides the legal
authority to prohibit discharge of excess FOG that would cause adverse effects
on the sewerage system. The City Building Department enforces and inspects
that all requirements of the uniform plumbing code and C ity standards are
fo llowed for new C ity sewer connections . City Industrial Waste Inspectors
conduct new construction inspections and enforcement per BMC 14.12. Sewer
Maintenance crews report any locations or areas of heavy FOG during routine or
specific cleaning operations. These locations are reported to the Sewer
Maintenance Supervisor who may decide that a CCTV inspection is warranted.
The Supervisor will contact t he Industrial Waste Inspection D ivision for possible
investigation of the dischargers. These locations or areas are placed on a “HOT
SPOT” list that is cleaned on a regular basis until the problem is corrected.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 10
Section 8. System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan
The City of Bakersfield Public Works Design Engineering Division provides
the sewer collection system evaluation and capacity services. The City’s
collection system contains approximately 1,069 miles of sewer main , six inches in
diameter and greater. The system also contains 55 pump and lift stations.
Overflows in the City of Bak ersfield are the result of FOG and other causes of
clogging or plugging of lines. There are no known pipeline capacity problems
that result in sewer overflows.
There are known structural problems with certain sewers. These pipeline or
manhole deficienci es are discovered during Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)
inspections of the sewer lines. Pipelines that are discovered with structural
deficiencies are recommended for repair, rehabilitation, or replacement. These
types of projects are included in the C ity’s 5 - year Capital Improvement Program.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 11
Section 9. Monitoring & Program Modifications
Performance Measures
The indicators that the City will use to measure the performance of its
Wastewater Collection System and the effectiveness of i ts Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP) are:
SSO Rate (SSOs/100 miles/year);
Number of SSOs for each cause (roots, grease, debris, pipe failure,
capacity, lift station failures, etc.);
Average SSO volume (gallons);
Percentage of SSOs greater than 100 gallon s;
Percentage of SSOs reported as Category 1;
Percentage of total spilled sewage discharged to surface water.
Historical and Baseline Performance
The City maintains information relevant to the performance of the
collection system in its records . This hi storical performance data is for the
performance measures described. The City has been reporting SSOs using
California Integrated Water Quality System ( CIWQS ) since 2007. CIWQS data will
be used as the City’s historical performance data.
Performance Moni toring and Program Changes
The City will evaluate the performance of its Wastewater Collection
System annually using the performance measures identified above. The City will
update the data and analysis in this section at the time of the evaluation. The
City may use other performance measures in its evaluation. The City will prioritize
its actions and initiate changes to this SMP and the related programs based on
the results of the evaluation.
SSMP Updates
The City will update its SSMP at least every five years. The City will
determine the need to update its SSMP more frequently based on the results of
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 12
the annual audit and the performance of its Sanitary Sewer System. In the event
that the City decides that an update is warranted, the process to comp lete the
update will be identified at that time. The City will complete the update within
one year following identification of the need for the update.
City staff will seek approval from the City Council for any significant
changes to the SSMP. The auth ority for approval of minor changes such as
employee names, contact information, or minor procedural changes is
delegated to the Public Works Operations Manager.
The City will certify that it has completed the annual audit using CIWQS.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 13
Section 10. Program Audits
This section outlines the auditing method that the City will follow to evaluate the
effectiveness of the SSMP to identify updates that may be needed for a more effective
program.
The City will audit its implementation and com pliance with the provisions of this
SSMP on an annual basis. The audit will be conducted by staff from the Public Works
Department. The audit team may include members from other areas of the City, as
needed. The scope of the audit will cover each of the major sections of the SSMP.
The results of the audit, including the identification of any deficiencies and the
steps taken or planned to correct them, will be included in the SSMP Audit Report. The
SSMP Audit Report will focus on the effectiveness of th e SSMP program, compliance with
the WDR requirements, and identification of any deficiencies in the SSMP. The SSMP
Audit Report will identify revisions that may be needed for a more effective program.
Information collected as part of Section 9 – Monitori ng and Program Modifications will be
used in preparing the audit.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 14
Section 11. Communication Program
Communication with the Public
The Public Works Department website contains Wastewater Collection and
Industrial Waste program i nformation with contact numbers:
http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/cityservices/pubwrks/wastewater/index.htm
As described in this Plan, the City reports SSOs electronically to the C alifornia
Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS). The electronic SSO data, as well as
information regarding regulatory actions is available at:
http://www.water boards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ciwqs/publicreports.shtml .
The website will be updated to include a link for customers to the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Sanitary Sewer Overflow Program (CIWQS) website.
The link to the SWRCB website will enable citizens to review for themselves all the SWRCB
WDR and SSMP requirements that the City is being mandated to develop and
implement.
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 15
Appendix A . Organizational Chart
C: \ Users \ hmayberry \ Desktop \ SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 16
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Resolutions i.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
11/24/2014
WARD:
Ward 2
SUBJECT:
Sewer connection and construction fees assessment f or 18 N. Stine
Road:
1. Resolution confirming assessments for sewer connect ion and
construction and authorizing the collection of asse ssments by the
Kern County Tax Collector.
2. Agreement with Barbara Williams to pay sewer connec tion and
construction fess through the Kern County Tax Colle ctor.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution and approva l of Agreement
BACKGROUND:
The owner of the property at 18 N. Stine Road desir es to connect the property to the City sewer
system. The property owner claims that to pay the s ewer connection and construction fees in one
payment would produce an economic hardship. To assi st in paying the connection and
construction fees, the City has contracted with the property owner to spread the connection and
construction fees over an eight year period to be c ollected with their property taxes in
accordance with Municipal Code Section 14.12.030, 1 4.12.390, and 16.32.060. Ordinance No.
4433 dated May 23, 2007, authorizes the Kern County Tax Collector to collect the connection
and construction fees in eight equal payments over the next eight years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution Resolution
Agreement Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Resolutions j.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/15/2014
WARD:
Ward(s) 1, 7
SUBJECT:
Resolutions of Intention (ROI) to add the following territories to the
Consolidated Maintenance District and preliminarily approving,
confirming, and adopting the Public Works Director s Report for each:
1. ROI No.1828 to add Area 5-76 (2000 White Lane)
2. ROI No.1829 to add Area 5-75 (575 Panama Lane)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adopting the Resolutions of Intent ion.
BACKGROUND:
A written request has been received by the City Eng ineer from the owner(s) of the parcels to be
included into the Consolidated Maintenance District as required by section 13.04.021 of the
Municipal Code. Inclusion in the Consolidated Maint enance District will provide for the
maintenance of a public park and street landscaping . This area will be under the park and
streetscape zones of benefit and will be assigned a ppropriate tier levels when a park has been
constructed and street landscaping has been install ed.
Staff is recommending the new territories be added to the Consolidated Maintenance District at
the next City Council meeting.
The City of Bakersfield has received a letter from the owner(s) of the properties described above
which waives the public hearing concerning inclusio n in the Consolidated Maintenance District.
This allows the City to expedite the maintenance di strict process to satisfy the subdivision
requirement. The owner(s) also have submitted a Pr oposition 218 ballot indicating their consent
to the assessments.
In order to provide future property owners with dis closure regarding the inclusion of land in the
Consolidated Maintenance District and the estimated maximum annual cost per equivalent
dwelling unit, a covenant has been drafted and will be recorded with the Kern County Assessor-
Recorders Office upon approval of this Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
ROI #1828 to add Area 5-76 to the CMD Resolution
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT 1 Exhibit
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT A Exhibit
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT B Exhibit
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT C Exhibit
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT D Exhibit
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT E Exhibit
MD 5-76 EXHIBIT F Exhibit
ROI #1829 to add Area 5-77 to the CMD Resolution
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT 1 Exhibit
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT A Exhibit
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT B Exhibit
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT C Exhibit
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT D Exhibit
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT E Exhibit
MD 5-77 EXHIBIT F Exhibit
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT D
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Agreements k.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/1/2014
WARD:
Ward 1
SUBJECT:
Agreement with Covanta Delano, Inc. for the sale of wood chips from the
Mount Vernon Recycling Facility (Anticipated Annual Revenue to City is
Estimated at $60,200).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Agreement.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the City s recycling program, the Mount Vernon Recycling Fa cility accepts lumber and
wood materials from the public and grinds these mat erials into wood chips. Historically the wood
chips have been sold to two different markets, fuel for power generation companies and bulking
agent for bio-solids composting companies. Sales c ontracts established through competitive
requests for proposals (RFPs) have typically run fo r up to five years at a time. Currently, the City
has no sales contract due to the premature cancella tion by the last buyer in October 2014.
Following this cancellation, staff issued a new RFP for wood chip sales.
Out of 64 requests for proposals mailed out to pros pective buyers, the City received two
proposals, one of which was from Covanta Delano, In c. This proposal will ideally supplement
another proposal which, although having a much high er price per ton, will only allow for the sale
of 13,000 of the 56,000 tons of wood chips produced annually. The Covanta Delano, Inc.
proposal has a price of $1.40 per ton for the remai ning 43,000 tons of wood chips not sold as per
the supplementing Agreement.
Staff estimates the total revenue to be generated f rom the sale of the wood chips for this
Agreement to be $60,200 based on current amounts of incoming material. However, more or
less material coming in from the public will result in corresponding changes in revenue. Revenue
generated from this Agreement offsets operating cos ts of the Recycling Facility.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Blue Memo Cover Memo
Covanta Agreement Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Agreements l.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Jena Covey, Risk Manager
DATE:
11/6/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Labor Management Agreements for Workers Compensati on Alternative
Dispute Resolution Program:
1.Agreement with Bakersfield Police Officers Associ ation.
2.Agreement with Bakersfield Professional Firefight ers Local 246.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the agreements.
BACKGROUND:
Due to the complexity of the workers compensation system in California, an option provid ed through
the Labor Code is to create an Alternative Dispute Resolution program governing disputes between
employees and employers through a collective bargai ning agreement. In order to commence the
process, represented employee groups must obtain pe rmission to negotiate an agreement from the
Department of Industrial Relations.
In early 2014, the Bakersfield Police Officers Asso ciation (BPOA) and the Bakersfield Professional
Firefighters Local 246 (BPF) petitioned the Departm ent of Industrial Relations and obtained
authorization to proceed in negotiating a labor man agement agreement. City staff and representatives
from the BPOA and BPF met multiple times and negoti ated an agreement that benefits both the injured
employee and the City.
The alternative dispute resolution agreement establ ishes an expedited process to resolve disputes that
arise in workers compensation claims, by the use of an exclusive lis t of medical evaluators. This
agreement provides employees with a simplified proc ess that delivers prompt and appropriate medical
treatment in disputed claims, which results in a qu icker return to work from an injury and anticipated
cost savings to the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
BPOA Agreement Agreement
BPFL 246 Agreement Agreement
AGREEMENT NO. __________________
LABOR-MANAGEMENT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT
is made and entered into on _______________________, by
THIS AGREEMENT
and between the a municipal corporation ("CITY" herein),
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,
and ("Local 246" herein).
BAKERSFIELD PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 246
R E C I T A L S
pursuant to Labor Code § 3201. 7, Local 246 has Petitioned the
WHEREAS,
Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Workers’ Compensation
Administrative Director an d received authorization as of February 14, 2014 to
negotiate a Collective Bargaining Agr eement with CITY and enter into an
Alternative Dispute Resolution program; and
Local 246 represents Local 246 has the authority to act and
WHEREAS,
enter into this Agreement on behalf of its members; and
this Agreement is created purs uant to California Labor Code
WHEREAS,
section 3201.7(a)(3)(c); and
nothing in this Agreement dimi nishes the entitlement of a
WHEREAS,
covered employee to compensation paym ents for total or partial permanent
disability, total or partial temporary di sability, Labor Code §4850 benefits, or
medical treatment fully paid by the em ployer and otherwise provided for in
Division 4 of the California Labor Code (“Labor Code”); and
for purposes of this Agreement, “covered employees” includes
WHEREAS,
those members of the Local 246 subject to the collecti ve bargaining agreement
between the CITY and the Local 246 and em ployees defined by section 3.1 of
this Agreement; and
nothing in this Agreement de nies any covered employee the
WHEREAS,
right to representation by counsel at a ll stages during this alternative and
expedited resolution process.
incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and
NOW, THEREFORE,
Local 246 (collectively “Parties”) mutually agree as follows:
The purpose of this Agreement is:
1. PURPOSE.
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 1 of 9 Pages --
To provide covered employees claiming compensable
1.1
injuries under Division 4 of the Califo rnia Labor Code (“Workers’ Compensation
Law”) with an expedited procedure to resolve enumerated disputes in
accordance with sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this Agreement and to facilitate those
employees’ prompt return to work;
To provide covered employees claiming an injury presumed
1.2
to be compensable by Labo r Code § 3212 et seq. with an expedited procedure
to resolve medical disputes in accordance with sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this
Agreement;
To reduce the number and severity of disputes between the
1.3
CITY and covered employees, when those disputes relate to workers’
compensation; and
To provide workers’ compensat ion coverage in a way that
1.4
improves labor management relations, improves orga nizational effectiveness,
and reduces dispute resolution costs and expenses for the CITY; and
These purposes will be achieved by: utilizing an exclusive list
1.5
of medical providers - Independent Medica l Examiner (“IME”) - to be the sole
and exclusive source of medical-legal eval uations for disputed issues in regards
to covered employees in accordance with Labor Code § 3201.7(c).
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION.
The Parties understand that this document governs the
2.1.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement and that it shall become effective
after it is executed by the Parties, submit ted to the Administrative Director of the
State of California, Department of Indust rial Relations, Division of Workers’
Compensation in accordance with Title 8, California Code of Regulations §
10202(d), and accepted by the Administrative Director as evidenced by the
Director’s letter to the Parties indi cating approval of the Agreement.
This Agreement shall be in effect for two years from the date
2.2.
of the Administrative Director ’s letter of acceptance to t he Parties. Thereafter, it
shall continue and remain in force from ye ar to year unless terminated by either
party as provided for herein.
Any claim arising from an industrial injury sustained before the
2.3.
termination of this Agreement shall continue to be covered by the terms of this
Agreement, until all medical issues related to the pend ing claim are resolved by
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 2 of 9 Pages --
way of Stipulations and Award and do not include disputes arising from a timely
Petition to Reopen filed subsequent to a Stipulations and Award settlement.
The Parties reserve the right to terminate this Agreement at
2.4.
any time. The terminating party must give th irty (30) calendar days written notice
to the other party of the intent to terminate. Upon termination of this
Agreement, the Parties shall become fu lly subject to the provisions of the
applicable Labor Code provisions to the same extent as they were prior to the
implementation of this Agreement.
3. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT.
This Agreement applies only to injuries, as defined by
3.1.
Workers’ Compensation Law, claimed by: (1) active fire fighters; (2) active fire
fighters who claim a presumptive injury as defined by Labor Code § 3212 et
seq., including post retirement claims of injury and amendments to existing
claim(s); and (3) active fire fighters wh o file a claim and su bsequently retire
before the claim is resolved. Retirees who filed claims while they were active
employees are covered under this Agreement only for purposes of a petition to
reopen a previously settled claim by wa y of Stipulations and Award alleging
new and further disability, or in the even t of a petition to reduce a prior Award
of permanent disability of a covered employee by the CITY unless covered
under section 2 above. This Agreement applies only to covered employees and
does not apply to any other retired em ployee claiming a La bor Code § 3212 et
seq. presumptive injury(ies) or non-covered employees.
Covered employees who are co vered under this Agreement
3.2.
remain covered during the entire period of active employment, including post
retirement claims outlined above in section 3.1.
Injuries occurring and claims fi led after termination of this
3.3.
Agreement are not covered by this Agreement.
This Agreement is restricted to es tablishing an exclusive list of
3.4.
medical providers to be used for medica l-legal dispute resolution of covered
employees.
This Agreement applies only to in juries claimed on or after the
3.5.
effective date, regardless of the date of in jury. For purposes of this Agreement,
a “claimed injury” is one fo r which either a DWC-1 workers’ compensation claim
form has been filed or where an Applicat ion for Adjudication of Claim has been
filed with the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”).
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 3 of 9 Pages --
4. EXPEDITED MEDICAL-LEGAL PROCESS.
All employees shall utilize the CITY’s Medical Provider Network
4.1.
(“MPN”) for accepted claims or delaye d status claims fo r medical treatment
purposes during the time the CITY mainta ins and utilizes the MPN. The MPN is
governed by Labor Code § 4616 et seq. an d applicable provisions of Title 8 of
the California Code of Regulations (“8 CCR”). Physicians who act as a covered
employee’s Independent Medical Examiner (“IME”) under this Agreement shall
not act as the employee’s Primary Treating Physician (“PTP”) or Secondary
treating physician as defined by 8 CCR § 9785 even if the physician has been
properly pre-designated by the covere d employee pursuant to Labor Code §
4600(d)(1) or 8 CCR § 9767.12 as the employee’s treating physician, unless
otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties.
All employees with a disputed medical issue as described
4.2.
below in section 4.4 must be evaluate d by an approved physician from the
exclusive list of approved medical provid ers. Said approved medial providers
shall serve as the IME. If the IME needs the opinion of a different specialist, the
IME shall advise the Parties who shall then select an approved medical provider
from the list in the manner prescribed to act as the IME in the requested
specialty.
The exclusive list of approved medical providers shall include
4.3.
the specialties as agreed upon by the Parties.
Notwithstanding the Labor Code provisions set forth in §
4.4.
4605, an IME from the list of approved medical providers shall be used for all
medical disputes that arise in connecti on with a workers’ compensation claim
including, but not limited to , determination of causatio n, the nature and extent
of an injury, the nature and ext ent of permanent impairment and
apportionment, work restrictions, ability to return to work, including transitional
duty, future medical care, and resolution of all disputes arising from utilization
review, including need for spinal surgery pursuant to Labor Code § 4062(b). The
Parties agree that the ill or injured employee shall use t he originally selected IME
for all subsequent disputes under this Agr eement. In the event that said IME is no
longer available, the Parties shall utilize t he next specialist on the list pursuant to
section 4.9.4, as set forth herein.
The IME process described above will be triggered when
4.5.
either party gives the other written noti ce of an objection in connection with
any issues including, but not limited to, determination of causation, the nature
and extent of an injury, the nature and extent of permanent impairment and/or
apportionment, work restrictions, ability to return to work, including transitional
duty, future medical care, or resolution of a dispute arising from utilization
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 4 of 9 Pages --
review, including the need for spinal surgery pursuant to Labor Code § 4062(b).
Objections from the CITY shall be sent to the employee with a copy to the
employee’s legal representative if repres ented. Objections from the employee
or employee’s legal representative shall be sent to the employee’s assigned
claims examiner.
Objections shall be sent within thirty (30) calendar days of
4.6.
receipt of a medical report with which one Party disagrees or a utilization review
non-certification or modification addressing any of the issues set forth above.
Decisions to delay a claim based on le gal disputes shall not trigger the IME
process as subsequent acceptance of t he claim and/or resolution of the legal
dispute may eliminate the need for activa tion of the dispute resolution process
set forth in this Agreement.
The exclusive list of approved medical providers shall serve as
4.7.
the exclusive source of medical-legal ev aluations as well as all other disputed
medical issues arising from a claimed injury as described in se ction 4.5 above.
The parties hereby agree that they will meet quarterly to
4.8.
address changes regarding the exclusive li st of approved IMEs. For either party
to propose adding an IME to the exclusiv e list of IMEs, the party must provide
notice, in writing, to the other party of its intent to add a physician to the list.
Absent a written objection to the proposing party within thirty (30) calendar
days of mailing of the written proposal, the addition shall be made at the next
quarterly meeting. A physician may be re moved from the exclusive list of IMEs
for any the following reasons: (1) notice, in writing, to the other party of a party’s
intent to delete a physician from the list. Absent written objection to the
proposing party within thirty (30) calendar days of mailing, the deletion shall be
made at the next quarterly meeting; (2) breach of the terms and conditions of
the contract with the physician; or (3 ) by mutual agreement of the parties.
5. Appointments.
Risk Management or the Third Party Administrator (“TPA”),
5.1.
(Acclamation Insurance Management Services (“AIMS”)), shall make
appointment(s) with the IME within ten (10) calendar days of the date of
receipt of the objection issued by any pa rty subject to the terms and provisions
of this Agreement. The noti ce of the appointment location, date and time shall
be sent to the employee, to his legal repr esentative, if there is one, and/or to
the union representative if the covered employee is unrepresented by an
attorney.
Compensation for medical appointments under this
5.2.
Agreement shall be consistent with CITY policy.
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 5 of 9 Pages --
Mileage reimbursement to cove red employees shall be in
5.3.
accordance with Labor Code § 4600(e)(2), unless transportation is provided by
the CITY.
For purposes of appointments, Risk Management or the TPA
5.4.
shall select the IME by starting with t he first name from the exclusive list of
approved IMEs within the appropriate spec ialty, and continuing down the list, in
order, and until the list is exhausted, at which time Risk Management or the TPA
will resume using the firs t name on the list.
The City is not liable for the cost of any medical examination
5.5.
used to resolve the Parties’ disputes governed by this Ag reement where said
examination is furnished by a medical prov ider that is not authorized by this
Agreement. Medical evalua tions shall not be obtained outside of this
Agreement for disputes covered by this Agreement including those obtained
pursuant to Labor Code § 4605.
Both Parties shall be bo und by the opinions and
5.6.
recommendations of the IME selected in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement.
Either party who receives record s prepared or maintained by
5.7.
the treating physician(s) or records, either medical or nonmedical, that are
relevant to the determination of the me dical issue shall serve those records on
the other party immediately upon receipt, not including personnel records
maintained by the CITY wh ich shall be procured, and will be provided, only
pursuant to a properly executed and served subpoena duces tecum. If one
party objects to the provision of any non- medical records being sent to the IME,
the party shall object within ten (10) ca lendar days from receipt of the records
served by the other party. Objection to the provision of non-medical records
may result in the denial of the claim on the basis that the IME did not have a
complete and accurate history. There sh all be no objection to the provision of
medical records to the IME, subject to the Labor Code.
The CITY or the Third Party Admi nistrator (TPA) shall provide to
5.8.
the IME records prepared or maintained by the employee’s PTP or Secondary
treating physician(s) and medical and non-medical records relevant to the
determination of the medical issue(s). T he CITY shall serve a copy and a listing
of all records provided to the IME on th e employee and/or to his/her attorney of
record.
All communications with the IME shall be in writing and shall
5.9.
be served on the opposing pa rty. This provision does not apply to oral or written
communications by the employee or, if the employee is deceased, the
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 6 of 9 Pages --
employee’s dependent, in the course of the examination or at the request of
the evaluator in connection with the examination.
Ex parte communication with the IME is prohibited. If a party
5.10.
communicates with the IME in violation of section 4.12 above, the aggrieved
party may elect to terminate the medical evaluation and seek a new
evaluation from the next IME chosen from the list pursuant to section 4.9.4. If a
new examination is required, the party making the communication prohibited
by this section shall be liable for the co st of the additional medical evaluation.
If either party disputes a medi cal or medical-le gal finding of
5.11.
the IME, they shall notify the other pa rty of this dispute by way of written
objection within thirty (30) calendar days of actual receipt of the IME’s report.
All disputes of this nature shall be resolved either by way of supplemental
interrogatory and report or by way of deposition. The party objecting to the
IME’s report shall, as part of its object ion, notify the other party of its desired
method of supplemental discovery or other proposed resolution of the medical
treatment or medical-legal finding.
6. DISCOVERY.
Covered employees shall provid e Risk Management or the
6.1.
TPA with fully executed medical, employment and financial releases and any
other documents reasonably necessary for the CITY to conduct discovery or to
resolve the employee’s cl aim, when requested.
The Parties agree to the use of medical release authorizations
6.2.
to be used in discovery under this Agreem ent. If said releases are not provided
to the requesting party or the discov ery being requested causes undue delay
and/or could potentially cause advers e impact to the CITY, Local 246, its
members, or the covered employee, t hen the party requesting the discovery
may request a review of the document (s) causing said undue delay and/or
claimed potential adverse impact. T he Parties shall jointly review the
document(s) in question within thirty (30) calendar days of a party’s request for
review unless protected by a claimed priv ilege or other provision of law which
shall be communicated to the pa rty requesting the discovery.
Covered employees shall cooperat e in providing a written or
6.3.
recorded statement to a CITY investigator, Risk Management or the TPA.
This Agreement does not preclude a formal deposition of a
6.4.
covered employee or an IME when necessary pursuant to the right of discovery
in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Attorney’s fees for depositions
of covered employees shall be paid at the rate of $350.00 per hour, consistent
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 7 of 9 Pages --
with Labor Code § 5710. This rate of reimbursement for attorney’s fees for
depositions of covered employ ees is subject to an annual review to determine if
adjustments to said rate of reimbursement should be made. There shall be no
attorney’s fees for depositions of physicians or IMEs.
7. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
This Agreement sets forth the entire
7.1. Merger and Modification.
agreement between the Parties and supe rsedes all other oral or written
representations. This contract may be modi fied only in writing and signed by all
Parties.
The laws of the State of California will govern
7.2. Governing Law.
the validity of this Agreement, its interpre tation and performance. Any litigation
arising in any way from this Agreement shall be brought in Kern County,
California.
This Agreement, including all attachments and
7.3. Amendments.
exhibits, shall not be amended, nor any pr ovisions waived, except in a writing
signed by the Parties which expre ssly refers to this Agreement.
If any portion of this Agreement is found to be
7.4. Severability.
unenforceable or illegal, the remaining po rtions shall remain in full force and
effect.
This Agreement may be executed
7.5. Counterparts.
simultaneously or in one or more counte rparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original but all of which together constitute one and the same instrument.
All notices relative to th is Agreement shall be given
7.6. Notices.
in writing and shall be personally served or sent by certified or registered mail
and be effective upon actual personal serv ice or depositing in the United States
mail. The Parties shall be addressed as follows, or at any other address
designated by notice:
CITY: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
CITY HALL
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
LOCAL 246: BAKERSFIELD PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS
LOCAL 246
7320 Wible Road
Bakersfield, California 93313
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 8 of 9 Pages --
Each individual signing this Agreement on behalf
6.7 Authority.
of entities represents and warrants that they are, respectively, duly authorized to
sign on behalf of the entitie s and to bind the entities fu lly to each and all of the
obligations set forth in this Agreement.
This Agreement is effective upon execution. It is
6.8 Execution.
the product of negotiation and all Partie s are equally responsible for authorship
of this Agreement. Section 1654 of the Ca lifornia Civil Code shall not apply to
the interpretation of this Agreement.
the Parties hereto have ca used this Agreement to
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
be executed, the day and year first-above written.
"CITY" “LOCAL 246”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BAKERSFIELD PROFESSIONAL
FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 246
By:___________________________ By:________________________________
HARVEY L. HALL
Mayor
Type or Print Name:______________________________
Title:________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:___________________________
JOSHUA H. RUDNICK
Deputy City Attorney
Insurance:____________
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
By:___________________________
DOUGLAS R. GREENER
Fire Chief
COUNTERSIGNED:
By:___________________________
NELSON SMITH
Finance Director
JHRlsc
Attachment: Exhibit A – Approved Medical Providers List
____________________________________
C:\Users\JAR\Desktop\City Labor Management\Final MOUs\BPFL246.Wo
November 12, 2014
-- Page 9 of 9 Pages --
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements m.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/11/2014
WARD:
Ward 6
SUBJECT:
Final Map and Improvement Agreement with Lennar Fre sno Inc. for Tract
6757 Phase 3 located south of McKee Road and west o f Mountain Ridge
Drive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of map and agreement.
BACKGROUND:
Per Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 16, Subdivi sions, Tentative Tract Map 6757 Phase 3 was
conditioned by the Planning Commission to construct certain improvements within and adjacent to the
tentative tract map as are necessary for the genera l use of the owners of those lots created by the fi nal
maps. This Agreement is entered into to secure thes e improvements which include but are not limited
to streets, sewer, walls, and storm drain on or adj acent to the property being subdivided. The term of
this Agreement is one year from the date of the Agr eement. Notices of Completion or final inspections
will not be allowed for any building within the bou nds of this final map until these required improvem ents
are completed and accepted by the City of Bakersfie ld and a Notice of Completion is filed for this
Agreement.
The Developer has submitted its final map for City approval. Approval of this final map is included on
this Administrative Report. An Improvement Agreemen t outlining the Developer s responsibilities for
onsite infrastructure improvements typically accomp anies approval of the final map.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Tract 6757 Phase 3 Map Backup Material
Tract 6757 Phase 3 Improvement Agreement Agreement
Exhibit A - Tract 6757 Phase 3 Exhibit
Exhibit B - Tract 6757 Phase 3 Exhibit
Exhibit C - Tract 6757 Phase 3 Exhibit
Exhibit D - Tract 6757 Phase 3 Exhibit
Exhibit E - Tract 6757 Phase 3 Exhibit
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements n.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
11/19/2014
WARD:
Ward 5
SUBJECT:
Final Map and Improvement Agreement with Lennar Hom es of California for
Tract Map 6916 Phase 1 located north of Berkshire R oad and east of
Mountain Vista Drive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of map and agreement.
BACKGROUND:
Per Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 16, Subdivi sions, Tentative Tract Map 6916 Phase 1 was
conditioned by the Planning Commission to construct certain improvements within and adjacent to the
tentative tract map as are necessary for the genera l use of the owners of those lots created by the fi nal
maps. This Agreement is entered into to secure thes e improvements which include but are not limited
to streets, sewer, walls, and storm drain on or adj acent to the property being subdivided. The term of
this Agreement is one year from the date of the Agr eement. Notices of Completion or final inspections
will not be allowed for any building within the bou nds of this final map until these required improvem ents
are completed and accepted by the City of Bakersfie ld and a Notice of Completion is filed for this
Agreement.
The Developer has submitted its final map for City approval. Approval of this final map is included on
this Administrative Report. An Improvement Agreemen t outlining the Developer s responsibilities for
onsite infrastructure improvements typically accomp anies approval of the final map.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Tract 6916 Phase 1 Map Backup Material
T6916-1 Improvement Agreement Agreement
Exhibit A - T6916-1 Improvement Exhibit
Exhibit B - T6916-1 Improvement Exhibit
Exhibit C - T6916-1 Improvement Exhibit
Exhibit D - T6916-1 Improvement Exhibit
Exhibit E - T6916-1 Improvement Exhibit
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements o.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Alan Tandy, City Manager
DATE:
12/17/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Americans with Disability Act:
1.Agreement with Disability Access Consultants (not to exceed
$57,780) to update the Citys Self-Evaluation and T ransition Plan
related to the Americans with Disability Act.
2.Transfer and Appropriate $57,780 from the Capital Outlay Fund
Balance to the Non-Departmental Operating Budget wi thin the
General Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the agreement and the transfer and appropriation of funds.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA ) of 1990, the City is required to ensure that all
public facilities, services, and information are ac cessible to people with disabilities. In order to
maintain compliance with ADA regulations, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) requires certain
government agencies to have an approved Self- Evaluation Report (Report) and Transition Plan
(Plan). Although the City has an approved Plan, it was last updated in 1993. ADA regulations
have been continually updated over the years, which necessitate the need to update the existing
plan. Updating the Plan will also keep the City eli gible to receive certain Federal and State
funding.
Updating the Plan requires specialized knowledge an d training, therefore staff is proposing to
retain a consultant to develop the new Report and P lan. The consultant will conduct surveys to
identify physical obstacles limiting accessibility to the City s public buildings and will provide
training to City staff from multiple departments to conduct surveys of City facilities, public right o f
way and parks to determine barriers to access. The third component will include the consultant
assisting City staff in conducting a Self-Evaluatio n of the City s programs, activities and services
for ADA requirement compliance.
Upon completion of the various surveys and evaluati ons, the consultant will assist staff in
developing the Plan document, as well as developing a database to facilitate ongoing monitoring
and updating of the Plan by City staff. The Plan wi ll include: identification of barriers, methods to
evaluate the barrier, prioritization of barrier rem ediation, estimated costs associated with the
removal of the barrier, procedures and forms for mo nitoring implementation and procedures and
forms for performing evaluations of additional barr iers. The Plan will serve as a living document,
which will be updated periodically as projects are completed and new barriers are identified. As
identified in the scope of work, the consultant wil l provide additional ongoing support once the
Plan is finalized. The Plan is anticipated to be co mpleted by July 1, 2015.
City Staff solicited proposals to update the Plan f rom nine qualified consultants. Subsequently,
two consultants submitted proposals. Upon an extens ive review and interviews of the two
consultants by staff within the City Manager s Office, Recreation and Parks Department and
Public Works Department, staff recommends an agreem ent be approved with Disability Access
Consultants (DAC) to update the Plan, based on qual ifications and cost. DAC is highly qualified
and has recently completed similar scopes of work f or other California jurisdictions; include the
City of Modesto, County of Kern, City of Newport Be ach, County of Solano, City of San Clemente
and City of Palm Springs.
Staff is recommending the transfer and appropriatio n of $57,780 from the Capital Outlay Fund
Balance for the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
ADA Consultant Agreement Agreement
ADA Transition Plan RFP Backup Material
DAC Proposal for ADA Transition Plan Backup Material
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
AMERICAN WITH DISABILITES ACT SELF EVALUATION AND TRANSTION PLAN
October 10, 2014
City Managers Office
1 600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
City of Bakersfield
REQUEST FOR P ROPOSALS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
A. General Information
B. Scope of Work to be Performed
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
A. Background Information
B. City Contacts
C. Time Requirements
III. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Mandatory Requirements
B. Statement of Qualif ications
C. Cost
IV. EVALUATION PROCESS
A. Review of Proposals
B. Evaluation Criteria
C. Right to Reject Proposals
I. INTRODUCTION
A. General Information
The City of Bakersfield is requesting proposals from qualified consultant s who
are familiar w ith performing ADA self - evaluation and Transition Plans. The City
is updating its Transition Plan which was created in 1993. The City would like the
assistance of a consultant to evaluate the City’s buildings, compile the Self -
evaluation Report, and prepa re the Transition Plan. The City will perform the
self - evaluation for its streets and Public Right - of - Way ( PROW ) ; however, it
would like the consultant to train City Staff on how best to do this.
There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City o f Bakersfield to
reimburse responding firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in
response to this request.
To be considered, three (3 ) copies of a proposal must be addressed to Caleb
RECEIVED
Blaschke and at the City Manager’s Office at 1 6 00 Truxtun Avenue,
by 5:00 p.m. on November 3, 2014 .
Bakersfield, CA 93301 The City of
Bakersfield reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted.
Proposals submitted will be evaluated by City staff with re commendation f r om
the City Council . During the evaluation process, the City Manager’s Office and
the City of Bakersfield reserve s the right, where it may serve the City ’s best
interest, to request additional information or clarifications from propos ing
consultants , or to allow corrections of errors or omissions. At the discretion of the
City of Bakersfield, consultants submitting proposals may be requested to
participate in an interview or make oral presentations as part of the evaluation
process.
The City of Bakersfield reserves the rig ht to retain all proposals submitted and to
use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected.
Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the consultants of the
conditions contained in this request for proposals, unless cle arly and specifically
noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City of
Bakersfield and the consultant selected.
December 1,
It is anticipated the selection of a consultant will be completed by
2014.
B. Scope of Work to b e Performed
i. Training by consultant on Common Issues Found in Field Investigations
- Create presentation & handouts
- Provide 5 hours of training for facilities, parks, and streets for a total of 20
hours of training.
ii. Consultant performs the Self - evaluations and Field Assessment Training at
City Facilities Listed Below.
Facility Square Levels Year Restrooms Parking
Feet Built Spaces
City Hall North 55,000 5 floors plus a 1991 10 120
basement
City Hall South 42,120 2 floors plus a 1953 10 1 25
basement
BPD Downtown 81,750 2 floors plus a 1975 18 161
basement
Community 32,374 3 floors plus a 1948 8 82
Development basement
Fire Administration 28,320 4 floors plus a 1939 6 75
Building basement
Corporation Yard - 8,270 1 floor plus four 1 978 4 & 1 trailer 9
Builidng A trailers
Corporation Yard - 3,006 1 floor 1978 2 5
Building B
Corporation Yard - 20,000 2 floors 1978 4 12
Building C
Corporation Yard - 37,800 2 floors 1978 2 39
Building D
Corporation Yard Parking N/A N/A N/A N/A 260
Silver Creek Recreati on 2,684 1 floor 1993 2 60
Center
Martin Luther King, Jr. 22,554 1 floor 1961 5 45
Rec Center
Convention Center 118,948 1 floor 1961 17 N/A
City Hall South 29,850 2 floors plus a 19 78 10 100
Annex basement
iii. Consultant performs Training Only for Street s and Intersections with high
volume attendance (Total one way streets miles --- 1,255)
iv. Consultant to complete Field Investigation Report, Self - evaluation Report,
and to create a Standard Operating Procedure for Departments to Report
ADA Improvements to AD A Coordinator :
- Compile field investigation data
- Identify & correlate city programs, services and activities with building
- Create executive summaries for each facility
- Analyze PROW data for each facility and map with building data
- Provide ADA Project Repo rting Templates for Departments
- Provide Programs and Services Checklists for Departments
- Compile 100% draft ADA/access compliance report
v. Consultant c reates a Transition Plan :
- Work with Staff on the Creation of the Transition Plan
- Data Base must be user f riendly and a living document
- Creation of a section for PROW that can be updated as the City
completes its surveys of its streets
- Reviews staffs PROW reports for accuracy
- Recommends strategies for C ity staff to evaluate PROW’s ( The City,
like most have lim ited funds, and views recording all the changes
needed as unnecessary until they are capable of accomplishing them.
The City would like recommendations on how to prioritize specific
areas in yearly time frames to identify and correct ) .
vi. Provide s On - going Support to City Staff:
- Provide up to 16 hours of follow - up support to staff on the
following: training in changes in statutes, regulations and case law ,
database updates (free of charge) , meetings to discuss process
vii. Evaluate Construction Details
viii. Review Code Policy: Consultant to send the City Updates or changes to
ADA Code Policy for 10 years .
I I. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
A . Background Information
The City of Bakersfield serves an area of 149 square miles with a population of
approxim ately 360 ,000.
The City of Bakersfield provides the following services to its citizens:
Fire and Police Protection
Streets and Infrastructure Maintenance
Planning and Community Development
Parks and Recreation Services
Water Utility
Municipal Airport – General Aviation
Refuse Collection
Wastewater Treatment
The City of Bakersfield operates under a Council - Manager form of government
and is organized into nine (9) departments and agencies.
B. City Contact: The consultants contact with the City of Bake rsfield will be Caleb
Blaschke , Management Assistant or a designated representative, who will
coordinate the assistance to be provided by the City of Bakersfield to the
consultant . A list of key personnel with their phone numbers is as follows :
LIST OF KE Y PERSONNEL AND TELEPHONE NUMBER
Caleb Blaschke , Management Assistant (661) 326 - 3 745
ADA Coordinator
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Chris Huot, Assistant to the City Manager (661) 326 - 3775
Stuart Patte son , Operations Manager (661 ) 326 - 3105
Mike Connor , Street Maintenance (661) 326 - 3111
C . Time Requirements :
This is a priority of the City Manager’s office. The City requires consultants to
have the Scope of Work completed by the end of the Fiscal Year, July 1, 2015.
Exac t training dates will be decided between the City and Consultant selected.
III. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Mandatory Requirements
November 3, 2014.
i. Submit detailed proposals outlining the following by
ii. Title Page - Identifying the Organization and its contact information
iii. Transmittal Letter - S igned letter of transmittal briefly stating the
proposing consultants under standing of the work to be done; the
commitment to perform the work within the time period; a s tatement why
the firm believes itself to be best qua lified to perform the engagement ;
and the Consultants agreement to successfully complete all tasks outlined
in this document; and an irrevocable offer for one h undred and twenty
days.
iv. Statement of Qualifications - A ll Consultants shall submit a SOQ which
sha ll contain at minimum the information listed under Sta tement of
Qualifications below.
v. Cost - Detailed Cost as outlined below
vi. Contract Documents - Complete and sign indemnity clause
B. Statement of Qualifications: The purpose of the Statement of Qualifications i s to
demonstrate the qualifications, technical ability, competence and capacity of the
consultant .
i. License to Practice in California : An affirmative statement should be
included that the firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly
licensed t o practice in California.
ii. The propos ing consultant should state the location of the office from
which the work on this engagement is to be performed and the number and
nature of the professional staff to be employed in this engagement on a
full - time bas is and the number and nature of the staff to be so employed
on a part - time basis.
iii. Similar Engagements w ith Other Government Entities . List the most
significant engagements performed in the last five years that are similar to
the engagement described in th is request for proposal. These engagements
should be ranked on the basis of total staff hours. Indicate the scope of
work, date, engagement partners, total hours, and the name and telephone
number of the principal client contact. Precedence will be given to
organizations who have worked with local governments. The List should
include at least three different clients and should provide the followi ng
information for each project:
- Project title, location and description including size of the
project;
- Nature of Consultants responsibility ;
- Start and end dates of Consultants involvement in the
project ;
- Names of Consultants key personnel involved in the
project;
- Total dollar amount of Consultants contract;
- Name address and phone number of the project owner ;
- Name and address of Consultants client if different from
the project owner; and
- Name and phone number of contact person at Consultants
clients office.
iv. Experience and q ualifications of Consultant and other key personnel that
will be working with the City of B akersfield
v. Consultant’s o rganizations years of experience performing ADA Self -
evaluations and Transition Plans.
vi. User friendliness of Consultant’s Transition Plan Data Base.
vii. A list of all current projects, including the amount of Consultant ’ s
resources a llocated to these projects and the completion date of
Consultants work at the level of allocations. A statement of Consultant ’ s
approach in designing a project within an approved time schedule and
project budget. Include examples of how this approach was p roven
effective in past projects for the City or other governmental agencies.
viii. A list of Consultant ’ s claims history since January 1, 2010: A list of all
claims, demands for arbitration and/or law suits filed by Consultant
predecessor companies or company officers against project owners or their
agents. This list shall include the following information for each claim.
- Name of project owner;
- Project completion date;
- Basis for claim;
- Claim or suit amount;
- Current status;
- Award or settlement amount
ix. A list of all claims, demands for arbitration and/or law suits filed by
project owners, their agents or sub consultants against Consultant;
predecessor companies, its agents or bonding company in connection with
Consultant, its offers, its agents or bonding company . This list shall
include the following information for each claim:
- Name of project owner;
- Project completion date;
- Basis for claim;
- Claim or suit amount;
- Current status;
- Award or settlement amount
x. A statement of Consultants current insurance coverage si gned by a
company official. The City requires a minimum of One Million Dollars
Professional Inability Insurance, Automobile Liability Insurance, General
Liability Insurance, and Workers Compensation Insurance. If the current
coverage does not meet the City ’s minimum requirements, a statement of
Consultants ability and intent to obtain the require d coverage must be
included. Do not submit a Certificate of insurance in lieu of this statement.
C. Sealed Dollar Cost Bid :
i. Total All - Inclusive Maximum Price
ii. The s ealed dollar cost bid should contain all pricing information relative to
performing the engagement as described in this request for proposal. The
total all - inclusive maximum price to be bid is to contain all direct and
indirect costs including all out - of - pocket expenses.
Prop osals should clearly outline the pr ice difference for Training, th e
iii.
Self - evaluation, and the Transition Plan (priced by building) .
iv. The City of Bakersfield will not be responsible for expen ses incurred in
preparing and submitting the technical proposal or the sealed dollar cost
bid. Such costs should not be included in the proposal.
v. The first page of the sealed dollar cost bid should include the following
information:
- Name of Consultant
- Certification that the person signing the pro posal is entitled to
represent the Consultant , empowered to submit the bid, and
authorized to sign an agreement with the City of Bakersfield.
- A Total All - Inc lusive Maximum Price
vi. Rates by Partner, Specialist, Supervisory and Staff Level Times Hours
Antici pated for Each .
vii. The second page of the sealed dollar cost bid should include a schedule of
professional fees and expenses that supports the total all - inclusive
maximum price such as the ADA Self - evaluation Plan, Transition Plan
(priced by building), and T raining.
viii. Rates for Additional Professional Services : If it should become necessary
for City of Bakersfield to request the consultant to render any additional
services to either supplement the services requested in this RFP or to
perform additional work as a result of the specific recommendations
included in any report issued on this engagement, then such additional
work shall be performed only if set forth in an addendum to the agreement
between City of Bakersfield and the firm. Any such additional work
a greed to between City of Bakersfield and the consultant shall be
performed at the same rates set forth in the schedule of fees and expenses
included in the sealed dollar cost bid.
D. Contract Documents
A sample copy of the City’s Consultant Agreement is in cluded with this RFP .
Please review the agreement carefully. This is the contract the Consultant will be
expected to execute without alteration. If any changes are desired, the consultant
must submit a copy of the requested modifications to the City for ap proval at least
ten (10) calendar days prior to the date that the SOQs are due. If approved, the
City will then issue the changes to all prospective Proposers’ prior to the due date.
As part of its submittal package, an officer of the firm must sign and r eturn a copy
of the sample agreement. The signature indicates that the firm accepts the clauses
of the contract, including the indemnity clause, as stated in the enclosed sample
copy of the City’s agreement and any modifications thereto issued by the City
during this solicitation of SOQs.
An “Acknowledgement Line” which reads as the following will be found below
the signature line of the draft agreement. The officer must review the sample
agreement carefully prior to signing the draft agreement.
“Proposer s Acknowledgement: “I have received and reviewed the sample
Consultants Agreement Contract including the Indemnity clause which was sent
to me with the City’s RFP. My signature below shall signify our firm’s
acceptance of said contract if our firm is sele cted for awarding a contract for the
project as described in said RFP. This acceptance is made with the understanding
that the Compensation and “Time for Completion” clauses will be modified to
contain the amounts and dates established for this contract.
IV. EVALUATION PROCEDURES
A. Evaluation Criteria : Proposals will be evaluated using three sets of criteria. Firms
meeting the mandatory criteria will have their proposals evaluated and scored for
both technical qualifications and price.
i. Proposals submitte d will be evaluated by City Manager’s Office and will
be based on qualifications as well as costs.
ii. A evaluation form will be used to evaluate the Consultant ’ s RFP,
specifically:
- Cost
- Past experience as it relates to local government
- Comments received from the City’s reference checks
- Consultant’s subm ittal and subjective statements
- Experience and qualifications of consultant and key personnel
- Consultants o rganizations experience
- User friendliness of data base for Transition Plan
B. Right to Reject Proposals : Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the
Consultant of the conditions contained in this request for proposal unless clearly
and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract
between the City of Bakersfield and the firm selected.
The City of Bakersfield reserves the right without prejudice to reject any or all
proposals.
AGREEMENT NO. _________________
CONSULTANT’S AGREEMENT
is made and entered into on __________________, by and
THIS AGREEMENT
between the , a municipal corporation (“CITY” herein), and
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
________________________________ (“CONSULTANT” herein).
R E C I T A L S
the CITY issued a Request for Proposals and CONSULTANT has
WHEREAS,
submitted a proposal concerning __________________________; and
CONSULTANT represents CONSULTANT is experienced, well
WHEREAS,
qualified and a specialist in __________________________; and
CONSULTANT is required and does currently have errors and
WHEREAS,
omissions insurance which will protect the City of Bakersfield in the event of
professional errors or omissions by the CONSULTANT; and
the CITY does not have expertise currently on staff to conduct
WHER EAS,
__________________________; and
CONSULTANT is aware that information may come into
WHEREAS,
CONSULTANT’s possession which may impact the CITY’s legal position in the
event such informa tion was released to outside parties .
incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and
NOW, THEREFORE,
CONSULTANT mutually agree as follows:
The scope of work is described as:
.
SCOPE OF WORK
1.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________ . The scope of
work shall include all items contained in CONSULTANT’s Proposal and CITY’s
Request for Proposals. C ONSULTANT’s Proposal and CITY’s Request for Proposals
are incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. CONSULTANT’s
services will include all the procedures necessary to properly complete the task
CONSULTANT has been hired to perform whethe r specifically included in the
scope of work or not.
Compensation for all work, services or products
COMPENSATION .
2.
called for under this Agreement shall consist of a total payment of
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 1 of 11 Pages --
_ _______ ________ Dollars ($__________) which shall be paid as
follows:_ _____________________________________________________________________
___________________________. The compensation set forth in this section shall be
the total compensation under this Agreement including, but not limited to, all
out - of - pocket costs and ta xes. CITY shall pay only the compensation listed
unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties.
CONSULTANT shall be paid for services
PAYMENT PROCEDURE .
3.
rendered after receipt of an itemized invoice for the work completed and
approved by CITY in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Payment by
CITY to CONSULTANT shall be made within thirty (30) days after receipt and
approval by CITY of CONSULTANT’s itemized invoice.
At request of CITY, CONSULTANT shall name all key
KEY PERSONNEL .
4.
person nel to be assigned to the work set forth herein. CONSULTANT shall provide
background for each of the key personnel including, without limitation, resumes
and work experience in the type of work called for herein. CITY reserves the
right to approve key pe rsonnel. Once the key personnel are approved
CONSULTANT shall not change such personnel without the written approval of
CITY.
Any bid documents, including, without
INCLUDED DOCUMENTS .
5.
limitation, special provisions and standard specifications and any Re quest for
Proposals, Request for Qualifications and responses thereto relating to this
Agreement are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth.
CONSULTANT shall not begin work until authorized
STARTING WORK .
6.
to do so in writing by CITY. No wor k will be authorized until the contract has
been fully executed by CONSULTANT and CITY.
All documents, plans and drawings, maps,
TITLE TO DOCUMENTS .
7.
photographs and other papers, or copies thereof prepared by CONSULTANT
pursuant to the terms of this Agre ement shall, upon preparation, become the
property of CITY.
CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in
LICENSES .
8.
effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses,
permits and approvals which are legally required for CONSULTANT to practice its
profession.
During th e term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT
CONFIDENTIALITY .
9.
will be dealing with information of a legal and confidential nature, and such
information could severely damage CITY if disclosed to outside parties.
CONSULTANT will not disclose to any person, directly or indirectly, either during
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 2 of 11 Pages --
the term of this Agreement or at any time thereafter, any such information or use
such information other than as necessary in the course of this Agreement. All
documents CONSULTANT prepares and confidential information given to
CONSULTANT un der this Agreement are the exclusive property of the CITY.
Under no circumstances shall any such information or documents be removed
from the CITY without the CITY’s prior written consent.
All news releases, media interviews,
NEWS RELEASES/INTERVIEWS .
10.
t estimony at hearings and public comments relating to this Agreement by
CONSULTANT shall be prohibited unless authorized by CITY.
The failure of any party to enforce against
NO WAIVER OF DEFAULT .
11.
another party any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of
that party’s right to enforce such a provision at a later time, and shall not serve
to vary the terms of this Agreement.
The laws of the State of California will govern the
GOVERNING LAW .
12.
validity of this Agreement, its interpretation and performance. Any litigation
arising in any way from this Agreement shall be brought in Kern County,
California.
Each party shall execute and deliver such
FURTHER ASSURANCES .
13.
papers, documents and instruments, and perform such acts as are necessary or
appropriate, to implement the terms of this Agreement and the intent of the
parties to this Agreement.
All notices relative to this Agreement shall be given in
NOTICES .
14.
writing and shall be personally served or sent by certified or registered mail and
be effective upon depositing in the United States mail. The parties shall be
addressed as follows, or at any othe r address designated by notice:
CITY: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
City Hall
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
CONSULTANT: _____________________
Neither this Agreement nor any rights, interests,
ASSIGNMENT .
15.
duties, liabil ities, obligations or responsibilities arising out of, concerning or
related in any way to this Agreement (including, but not limited to, accounts,
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 3 of 11 Pages --
actions, causes of action, claims, damages, demands, liabilities, losses,
obligations, or reckonings of any kind or nature whatsoever, for compensatory or
exemplary and punitive damages, or declaratory, equitable or injunctive relief,
whether based on contract, equity, tort or other theories of recovery provided
for by the common or statutory law) may be assigne d or transferred by any
party. Any such assignment is prohibited, and shall be unenforceable and
otherwise null and void without the need for further action by the non - assigning
party or parties.
The rights and obligations of this Agreement shall
.
BINDING EFFECT
16.
inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties to the contract and
their heirs, administrators, executors, personal representatives, successors and
assigns, and whenever the context so require s, the masculine gender includes
the feminine and neuter, and the singular number includes the plural. This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be considered as an original and be effective as such.
In the event of a conflict between the terms, conditions or
EXHIBITS .
17.
specifications set forth in this Agreement and those in exhibits attached hereto,
the terms, conditions or specifications set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. All
exhibits to which refere nce is made in this Agreement are deemed incorporated
in this Agreement, whether or not actually attached.
This contract sets forth the entire
MERGER AND MODIFICATION .
18.
Agreement between the parties and supersedes all other oral or written
representations . This contract may be modified only in a writing approved by
the City Council and signed by all the parties.
CONSULTANT stipulates that corporately, or
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST .
19.
individually, the firm, its employees and subconsultants have no financial int erest
in either the success or failure of any project which is dependent upon the result
of the work prepared pursuant to this Agreement.
Each individual signing this Agreement on
CORPORATE AUTHORITY .
20.
behalf of entities represent s and warrant s that they are, respectively, duly
authorized to sign on behalf of the entities and to bind the entities fully to each
and all of the obligations set forth in this Agreement .
Unless terminated sooner as set forth herein, this Agreement
TERM .
21.
shall terminate on __ _______________(date).
If at any time CITY becomes dissatisfied
TERMINATION FOR CAUSE .
22.
with the performance of CONSULTANT under this Agreement, CITY may
terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days written notice. Written notice shall be
given pursuant to the “Notices” paragraph of this Agreement. In the event of
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 4 of 11 Pages --
early termination, CONSULTANT shall be compensated only for work satisfactorily
completed up to the date of termination and delivered to and accepted by
CITY.
CONSULTAN T shall, at CONSULTANT’s
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS .
23.
sole cost, comply with all of the requirements of Municipal, State and Federal
authorities now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to this
Agreement, and shall faithfully observe in all activities relating to o r growing out
of this Agreement all Municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes, rules
or regulations and permitting requirements now in force or which may hereafter
be in force including, without limitation, obtaining a City of Bakersfield busines s
tax certificate (Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 5.02) where required.
This Agreement calls for the
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR .
24.
performance of the service of CONSULTANT as an independent contractor.
CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY for any purpose and is not
entitled to any of the benefits provided by CITY to its employees. This
Agreem ent shall not be construed as forming a partnership or any other
association with CONSULTANT other than that of an independent contractor.
CONSULTANT retains the right to control or direct the
DIRECTION .
25.
manner in which the services described herein are performed.
CONSULTANT will supply all equipment, tools, materials
EQUIPMENT .
26.
and supplies necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.
In addition to any other insurance or bond required
INSURANCE .
27.
under this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall p rocure and maintain for the
duration of this Agreement the following types and limits of insurance (“basic
insurance requirements” herein):
providing coverage on claims
Professional liability insurance ,
27.1
made basis for errors and omissions with limits of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) aggregate ; and
providing coverage on an
Automobile liability insurance ,
27.2
occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, o f one or more persons,
property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and the policy shall:
Provide coverage for owned, non - owned and hired
27.2.1
autos.
unless
Broad form commercial general liabi lity insurance ,
27.3
otherwise approved by the CITY’s Risk Manager, providing coverage on an
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 5 of 11 Pages --
occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons,
property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and the policy shall:
Provide contractual liability coverage for the terms of
27.3.1
this Agreement .
Contain an additional insured endorsement in favor of
27.3.2
the CITY, its mayor, council, officers, agents,
employees and vol unteers.
All policies shall be written on a first - dollar coverage
27.3.3
basis, or contain a deductible provision. Subject to
advance approval by the CITY, CON SULTANT may
utilize a Self - Insured Retention provided that the policy
shall not contain language, wh ether added by
endorsement or contained in the Policy Conditions,
that prohibits satisfaction of any Self - Insured provision
or requirement by anyone other than the Named
Insured, or by any means including other insurance or
which is intended to defeat the intent or protection of
an Additional Insured.
with statutory limits and
Workers’ compensation insurance
27.4
employer’s liability insurance with limits of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence; and the policy shall contain a waiver of
subrogation in favor of the CITY, its mayor, council, officers, agents, employe es
and volunteers.
Except for professional liability, all policies required of the
27.5
CONSULTANT shall be primary insurance as to the CITY, its mayor, council,
officers, agents, employees or designated volunteers, and any insurance or self -
insurance maintain ed by the CITY, its mayor, council, officers, agents,
employees and designated volunteers shall be excess of the CONSULTANT’s
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Except for workers’ compensation, insurance is to be placed
27.6
with insurers with a Best ’ s rating as approved by CITY’s Risk Manager, but in no
event less than A - :V II . Any deductibles, self - insurance retentions or insurance in
lesser amounts, or lack of certain types of insurance otherwise required by this
Agreement, or insurance rated below Best ’ s A - :V II must be declared prior to
execution of this Agreement and approved by the CITY in writing.
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 6 of 11 Pages --
Unless otherwise approved by CITY’s Risk Manager, all policies
27.7
shall contain an endorsement providing the CITY with thirty (30) days written
notice o f cancellation or material change in policy language or terms. All
policies shall provide that there shall be continuing liability thereon,
notwithstanding any recovery on any policy. Copies of policies shall be
delivered to CITY on demand.
The insuranc e required hereunder shall be maintained until all
27.8
work required to be performed by this Agreement is satisfactorily completed as
evidenced by written acceptance by the CITY.
The C ONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY’s Risk Manager with a
27.9
certificate of insurance and required endorsements evidencing the insurance
required. The CITY may withdraw its offer of contract or cancel this contract if
certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided
prior to the ex ecution of this Agreement.
Full compensation for all premiums which the CONSULTANT is
27.10
required to pay on all the insurance described herein shall be considered as
included in the prices paid for the various items of work to be performed under
this Agreeme nt, and no additional allowance will be made theref or or for
additional premiums which may be required by extensions of the policies of
insurance.
It is further understood and agreed by the CONSULTANT that
27.11
its liability to the CITY shall not in any way be limited to or affected by the
amount of insurance obtained and carried by the CONSULTANT in connection
with this Agreement.
Unless otherwise approved by the CITY, if any part of the work
27.12
under this Agreement is subcontracted, the “basic insurance require ments” set
forth above shall be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if the
CITY has approved lesser insurance requirements for CONSULTANT.
In the case of public works contracts, CITY will
.
THIRD PARTY CLAIMS
28.
timely notify CONSULTANT of third party claims relating to this contract. CITY
shall be allowed to recover from CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT shall pay on
demand, all costs of notification.
INDEMNITY .
29.
CO NSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY,
29.1
its officers, agents and employees against any and all liability, claims, actions,
causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 7 of 11 Pages --
administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, arising out of,
connected with, or caused by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT’s employees, agents,
independent contractors, companies or subcontractors in the performance of,
or in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this Agreement whether or
not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder, except for CITY’s sole
active negligence or willful misconduct.
If the provisions of Civil Code Section 2782.8 are applicable
29.2
to this Agreement , the CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
CITY, its officers, agents and employees against any and all liability, claims,
actions, causes of action or demands, against them, or any of them, before
administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, that only arise out of,
pe rtain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of
CONSULTANT.
This Agreement is effective upon execution. It is the
.
EXECUTION
30.
product of negotiation and all parties are equally responsible for authorship of
this Agreement. Section 1654 of the California Civil Code shall not apply to the
interpretation of this Agreement.
The Contract Administrator for the CITY
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR .
31.
is:
(Name and Title)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, Cali fornia 93301
Telephone (661) ___________
CONSULTANT’s Project Manager shall be:
(Name of Project Manager)
(Title of Project Manager)
(Address)
Telephone (___) _____________
The Contract Administrator and the Project Manager shall be
31.1
the primary contact persons for CITY and CONSULTANT. It is expressly
understood that only the City Council may approve modifications to the
contract, which modifications must be in writing.
CONSULTANT shall maintain accurate
ACCOUNTING RECORDS .
32.
account ing records and other written documentation pertaining to all costs
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 8 of 11 Pages --
incurred in performance of this Agreement. Such records and documentation
shall be kept at CONSULTANT’s office during the term of this Agreement, and for
a period of three years from the date of the final payment hereunder, and said
records shall be made available to CITY representatives upon request at any
time during regular business hours.
TAX NUMBERS .
33.
CONSULTANT’s Federal Tax ID Number ________________________
CONSULTANT is a corporation? Yes __ __ __ No ___ ____
(please check one)
No officer or employee of CITY shall hold any
.
NON - INTEREST
34.
interest in this Agreement (California Government Code section 1090).
All obligations of CITY under the terms of
RESOURCE ALLOCATION .
35.
this Agreement are subject to the appropriation and allocation of resources by
the City Council.
the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
be executed, the day and year first above w ritten.
“CITY” “CONSULTANT”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ________________________
By:_____________________ ____ ____ By:_____________________________ ____
HARVEY L. HALL
Mayor
Print Name:_______________________________________
Title:____ ________________________ ___
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:____________________________
(NAME AND TITLE)
Insurance:________
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 9 of 11 Pages --
Additional Signatures on Following Page
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 10 of 11 Pages --
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
(CITY DEPARTMENT)
By:_____________________________
(DEPT. HEAD NAME AND TITLE)
COUNTERSIGNED:
By:______________________________
NELSON SMITH
Finance Director
Attachments: Certificates of Insurance
________________________________________________________________
CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT
C: \ Users \ cblaschke \ Desktop \ ConsultantAgr.docx
Updated October 18, 2012
-- Page 11 of 11 Pages --
City of Bakersfield
Proposal for Professional Consulting Services
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT SELF - EVALUATION AND
TRANSITION PLAN
October 30 , 2014
Disability Access Consultants
2243 Feather River Blvd
Oroville, CA 95965
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTA L ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 1
STATEMENT OF QUALIFI CATIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 3
S E G E ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4
IMILAR NGAGEMENTS WITH OTHE R OVERNMENT NTITIES
QUALIFICATIONS AND E XPERIENCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 6
PROJECT TEAM ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 9
O Q S C ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 10
THER UALIFICATIONS AND TAFF ERTIFICATIONS
I T , S B P ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 10
NNOVATIVE OOLS TRATEGIES AND EST RACTICES
DACTRAK ACCESSIBILIT Y MANAGEMENT SOFTWAR E ................................ ................................ ................................ 11
SCOPE OF WORK DETAIL ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 14
P A ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 16
ROJECT PPROACH
1. O /P M C P S , S ................................ .................... 16
RIENTATION ROJECT EETING AND LARIFICATION OF ROJECT COPE AND CHEDULE
2. S F - A C A R S T P ................................ . 17
URVEY ACILITIES CCESS OMPLIANCE SSESSMENT EPORTS AND OFTWARE FOR RANSITION LANS
3. C A /T P R I ................................ ................................ ... 19
OMPLIANCE SSESSMENT RANSITION LAN EPORTS AND MPLEMENTATION
4. P R - - W ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 20
UBLIC IGHTS OF AY
SCHEDULE: SCOPE OF S ERVICES SUMMARY BY E STIMATED TIMELINES ................................ ................................ .... 21
APPENDIX ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIA LS
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services ii
Letter of Transmittal
October 30 , 2014
To: Mr. Caleb Blaschke
City of Bakersfield
City Managers Office
1600 Truxt u n Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Americans with Disabilities Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan
Firm Information : Disability Access Consultants (DAC)
2243 Feather River Blvd, Oroville, California 95965
Project Manager: Barbara Thorpe, President
bthorpe@dac - corp.com
Phone: 1 - 800 - 743 - 7067
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal for providing consultant services for an Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan f or the City of Bakersfield .
DAC understands that the City of Bakersfield is seeking a qualif
Transition Plan. It is understood that the City is requesting an evaluation of Ci
activities and compile the Self - evaluatio n Report and prepare a Citywide Transition Plan. DAC also
understands that the chosen consultant will conduct surveys of t cilities listed in the RFP while
providing training to City st aff. DAC understands that it will assist the City to develop a Self - evaluation and
Transition Plan for public rights - of - way (PROW) by providing training for City staff to conduct their own
surveys of City streets and intersections.
DAC has the staff and resources to provide the City of Bakersfie services required in the
Scope of Work on or before the Citys Fiscal Year End of July 1,
updates would continue for as needed for ten years.
DAC is confident that it will meet and exceed the requirements i based on our extensive
experience with City and County governments to develop a compreh - evaluation and Transition
Plans, record for on - time performance within budgets, training programs developed by
DACTrak survey and plan management tool.
DAC has extensive experience in the evaluation of program and fa
continuum of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and accessibi
City of Bakersfield . Founded a s a California corporation and woman owned business in 1998, DAC has
p rovided ser vices for the past 16 years to assist public entities to comply and implement accessib
requirements in accordance with the ADA, Title 24 of the Califor Section 504 and related
federal, state and local disability - related nondiscrimination laws and regulation. DAC has conducte
1 2 ,000 building inspections, surveyed thousands of parks and playg , surveyed thousands of miles of
public rights - of - way , and performed hundreds of programmatic reviews and self - evaluations to study the
accessibility of programs, services, activities, events and rela DAC has a comprehensive
understanding of applicable standards, regulations and requireme s under Title II of the ADA, California
Building Code and related state accessibility standards. DAC has completed hundreds of similar studies for
City and County governments as described in our response to the
DAC was recently awarded a project for the Department of Transportation in Washington, D.C. to develop
pilot study for potential duplication of methodologies in other
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 1 of 22
rights - of - way accessibility reviews by means of a software program to upda manage the ADA public
rights - of - way transition plan. DAC will be providing recommendations for b
for the DOT. In addition, DAC was awarded an additional project
Washington, D.C. to deve lop a model self - evaluation and transition plan for public rights - of - way to be
replicated as a best practice in other areas.
To provide for easy management of the transition plan and docume s, DAC has
developed web based softwar e called DACTrak. DACTrak is a powerful tool to manage and upda
transition plan, project costs , print custom reports and document progress.
This proposal is authorized by Barbara Thorpe, who is empowered
City, and authorized to sign a contract with the City of Bakersfield . There are no conflicts of interest. DAC is
willing to comply with the procedures ide ntified in the Request for Proposal a g r e e s to su cce ss f ul l y c o mpl e te
a ll t a sks outlin e d RFP. DACs offer is i rre vo c a ble and valid f o r one hund re d a nd t w e n t y d a y s.
Respectfully submitted by Barbara Thorpe, President
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 2 of 22
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Disability Access Consultants (DAC) was incorporated by Barbara
owned business. Barbara Thorpe is President and 100% owner. DAC
Company, and is a woman owned small business i ncorporated in the state of California. DAC is fully
licensed and registered in the State of California.
Services will be provided from the California office in Oroville
Disability Access Consultants
2243 Feather River Boulevard
Oroville, CA 95965
Phone : (530) 533 - 3000
Disability Access Consultants also has offices in Arizona, Illin
customers nationwide.
DAC does not use subconsultants, outside consultants , or employ part time staff or independent
contractors . All staff who would be assigned to the City of Bakersfield project are direct full time
employees of DAC. The DAC team has a proven record to provide on - site services in a collaborative and
efficient manner. DAC has experienced team members who have worked with public ent
successful and on time completion of numerous projects. Necessar
CASp certification. A CASp certified Team Leader will be involve and field evaluations.
The project team is organized to provide a representation of ski
objec tives. In addition, teams that have worked together previously will be assigned to the City of
Bakersfield project.
City Contacts
City of Bakersfield
Barbara Thorpe
Project Manager
Michael Boga
Jennie Grover
Srikant Talasila
CASp - 152, ICC
Director of
Director of IT
Operations
Facility Team Leader / Quality
Control
Candice Pursch
Jeff Eubank
Field Inspection Supervisors
Field Inspectors (4 - 6)
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 3 of 22
Similar Engagements with other Government Entities
The following are a few recent references for scopes of work sim
City and County Governments and Park Districts. Numerous additi
Barbara Thorpe is the designated Project Manager and Michael Bog
manager of quality control on all referenced projects.
County of Kern
DAC is currently performing ADA Accessibility surveys of
Kimberly Rufus
County facilities using the DACTrak Accessibility Management
Special Projects Manager
software.
1115 Truxtun Avenue
County staff will use DACTrak to update and implement their
Bakersfield, CA 933 01
Transition Plan.
Phone: (661) 868 - 3049
Contract Date s : July 2014 - Current Project
rufusk@co.kern.ca.us
Contract Amount: $ 91,600
City of Modesto
DAC has trained City staff to use the DACTrak tablet to inspect
Paul Liu
selected City buildings and survey public rights - of - way
Senior Planner
, Transit
DAC staff has provided inspect ions for City Parks
1010 Tenth Street, Suite 300
stops, and public works facilities
Modesto, CA 95354
DAC is assis ting with the development of an ADA Self -
Phone: (209) 577 - 5282
evaluation
pliu@modestogov.com
DAC is assist ing the City with the public input process
Contract Date s : January 2012 - Current Project
Contract Amount: $96,000
County of Shasta
DAC trained County staff to use DACTrak to perform self -
Thomas Forbish
inspections of County facilities and public rights - of - way using
Facilities & Fleet Divisions Manager
the DACTrak Intake inspection software.
Facilities & Fleet Services Division
The County is also using the DACTrak online management
1958 Placer Street
software to update the Countys transition and barri er
Redding, CA 96001
removal plan.
Phone: (530) 225 - 5659
Contract Date s : January 2014 - Current project
tforbish@co.shasta.ca.us
Contract Amount: $25,000
County of Butte DAC is currently working with the County to inspect County
Grant Hunsicker facilities for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Director of General Services Act and California Building Code.
nd
2081 2 Street DAC is also performing a review of County policies, grievance
Oroville, CA 95965 - 3413 procedures and public notices to evaluate their compliance
Phone: (530) 538 - 2511 with the ADA and suggest alternatives if necessary.
Ghunsicker@buttecounty.net DAC is assisting the County in developing their updated
transition plan.
Thomas Cowles
DAC has provided training to County staff on ADA compliance,
Capital Improvement Project
methods for reasonable ac commodations, and effective
Manager
communications with individuals with disabilities.
nd
2081 2 Street
Oroville, CA 95965 - 3413 Contract D ate s : January 2014 - Current Project
Phone: (530) 538 - 6055 Contract Amount: $ 91, 000
TCowles@buttecounty.net
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 4 of 22
City of Newport Beach
ADA Self - evaluation and transition plans of buildings, parks,
Fong Tse
intersections, roadways, sidewalks and public rights - of - way.
Principal Civil Engineer
The City was provided DACTrak Ac cessibility Management
3300 Newport Boulevard
Software to manage the implementation of the plan,
Newport Beach, CA 92663
document resources needed and document progress.
Phone: (949) 644 - 3321
Contract D ate s : March 2012 - April 2013
FTSE @newportbeachca.gov
Contract Amount: $150,000
County of Solano
DAC is currently performing ADA Accessibility surveys of
Rosa Lane , PhD, AIA, LEED AP
County facilities using the DACTrak Accessibility Management
Associate County Architect
software.
Division of Architectural Services
DAC is also assisting the County to perform a Self - Evaluation
675 Texas Street, Suite 2500
of services, policies, programs and practices.
Fairfield, CA 94533
County staff will use DACTrak to up date and implement their
Phone: (707) 784 - 7908
Transition Plan.
rmlane@solanocounty.com
Contract Date s : March 2014 - Current Project
Contract Amount: $260,000
City of La Quinta
ADA Self - evaluation and transition plans of buildings, parks,
Terry Deeringer
intersections, roadways, sidewalks and public rights - of - way.
Human Resources/General Services
The City was provided DACTrak Accessibility Management
Manager
Software to manage the implementation of the plan,
78495 Calle Tampico
document resources needed a nd document progress.
La Quinta, CA 92253
The ADA Self - Evaluation of programs, services and activities to
Phone: (760) 777 - 7041
determine if any were discriminatory for individuals with
Tdeeringer@la - quinta.org
disabilities was completed by DAC.
Contract Date s : July 2011 - February 2012
Contract Amount: $100,000
City of San Clemente
ADA Self - evaluation and transition plans of buildings, parks,
Johanne Thordahl
piers, beach areas, golf course, pools, beach concessions,
Risk Mgmt. Analyst
lifeguard areas, trai ls and public rights - of - way.
100 Avenida Presidio
The City was provided DACTrak Accessibility Management
San Clemente, CA 82672
Software to manage the implementation of the plan,
Phone: (949) 361 - 8203
document resources needed and document progress.
ThordahlJ@san - clemente.org
The ADA Self - Evaluation of programs, services and activities to
determ ine if any were discriminatory for individuals with
Sam Penrod
disabilities was completed by DAC.
Human Resources Manager
DAC also assisted with the resolution of two complaints.
100 Avenida Presidio
Contract D ate s : December 2010 - September 2011
San Clemente, CA 92672
Contract Amount: $70,0 0 0
Phone: (949) 361 - 8313
PenrodS@san - clemente.org
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 5 of 22
City of Fountain Valley
ADA Self - evaluation and transition plans of buildings, parks,
Temo Galvez
intersections, sidewalks and public rights - of - way. The City was
Deputy City Engineer
provided DACTrak Accessibility Management Software to
10200 Slater Avenue
manage the implementation of the plan, document resources
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
needed and documen t progress.
Phone: (714) 593 - 4 517
The ADA Self - Evaluation of programs, services and activities to
Temo.galvez@fountainvalley.org
determine if any were discriminatory for individuals with
disabilities was completed by DAC.
Contract Date s : January 2011 - May 2011 - 1st Contract; additional
2014 work
Contract Amount: $125,000
Fair Oaks Recreation and Park
DAC performed ADA inspections of all District parks, facilities
District
and playgrounds to identify elements that need modification
Maureen Zamarripa
to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
District Administrator
Act and CBC Title 24.
4150 Temescal Street
DAC also performed playground safety assessments to ensure
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
the Districts compliance with the California Playground Safety
Phone: (916) 966 - 1036 - ext. 1 3
Regulations.
mzamarripa@fairoakspark.org
Contract D ate s : April 2011 - June 2012
Contract Amount: $28,500
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
DAC has the extensive knowledge and experience with all Federal
years in business, that includes, but is not limited to the ADA
Americans Disability Act Standards (ADAS), 28 Cod e of Federal Regulation (CFR) 35, Title 24 California
Title II of the ADA, PROWAG, MUTCD, Section 504 and related Fede
Building Standards Code,
State Standards and Regulations.
The DAC team members proposed for the City of Bakersfield projec e worked together on hundreds of
similar projects. A few projects are listed below. References
provided for several of the following recent California projects
City of San Clemente
City of Fountain Valley
City of Modesto
City of La Quinta
City of Newport Beach
City of Claremont
City of Huntington Beach
City of Modesto
City of Manteca
City of Grass Valley
City of Banning
County of Butte
Solano County
City of Palos Verdes Estates
City of Moreno Valley
City of Palm Springs
City of Pismo Beach
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 6 of 22
City of Cypress
City of Lincoln City
Calaveras County
Desert Recreation District
Orangevale Recreation & Park District
Fair Oaks Recreation and Park District
City of Huntington Beach
City of Glendale
City of Oroville
City of Clovis
County of Santa Clara
County of Shasta
Town of Paradise
Since the founding of DAC as a woman owned California Co mpany in 1998, DAC has p rovided services for
the past 16 years to assist public entities to comply and implement accessib
accordance with the ADA, Title 24 of the California Building Cod
and local disability - related nondiscrimination laws and regula t ion. DAC has extensive experience in the
evaluation of program and facility accessibility and provides a
Act (ADA) and accessibility services for public entities, such a City of Bakersfield .
DAC has exten sive knowledge and experience during the past 16 years with muni
entities. Based on our experience and listening to the needs of
enhance ADA projects and streamline the scope of work in a cost fective manner. DACTrak provides an
easy to use web based tool to manage the ADA project and documen
DAC has conducted over 12 ,000 building inspections, surveyed thousands of
parks and playgrounds and performed hundreds of programmatic rev
and self - evaluations to study the accessibility of programs, services,
activities, events and related areas. DAC staff includes certifi
safety inspectors to provide a value added service if requested
As our founder, Barbara Thor pe, worked with a public entity for 19 years as
the ADA Coordinator, 504 Coordinator, and Director of Planning a
Compliance, she has extensive experience working with individual
disabilities and organizations representing individuals with dis ies. In
addition, she has collaborated with individuals with disabilitie
with disabilities in a facilitative manner that has benefited ci
municipalities. Barbara and th e DAC team members have demonstrated the ability to engage and i
with individuals and organizations to assist with the prioritiza
of the ADA plan.
DAC has a team of 1 2 staff, including two CASp certified inspectors, dedicated to assisting public entities,
such as the City of Bakersfield , with ADA compliance. DAC has a comprehensive understanding of
applicable standards, regulations and requirement under Title II
rel ated state accessibility standards.
DAC recently completed similar studies for the City of Newport B
City of Fountain Valley, the City of San Clemente , City of Del Mar, City of Grass Valley , Calaveras County and
t he City of Palm Springs. DAC was also awarded a project to train County of Shasta staff and City of
Modesto staff to complete their own study using our DACTrak ac cessibility management program. DAC is
currently working with Solano County, the City of Pal os Verdes Estates and City of Moreno Valley. DAC has
extensive experience with similar public entity clients.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 7 of 22
DAC has a reputation to being responsive to the clients needs, - time project completion
within budgets. DAC has a proven track recor d for comprehensive experience in conducting ADA Self
Evaluations and Transition Plans, implementation and related ser
DAC was recently awarded a project for the Department of Transpo
pilot study for potential duplication of methodologies in other areas, using tools and sta
rights - of - way accessibility reviews by means of a software program to upda
rights - of - way transition plan. DAC will be providing recommendations f or best practices and technologies
for the DOT. In addition, DAC was awarded an additional project
Washington, D.C. to develop a model self - evaluation and transition plan for public rights - of - way to be
replicated as a best practice in other areas.
Other public entities for which DAC has provided similar service
District, Padre Dam Water District, Hayward Parks and Recreation
s chool di stricts, and several large Joint Power Authorities and insurance
entities.
DAC has been assisting several Joint Power Authorities in Sacramento and El Dorado County since 2000 and
currently provides updates, consultation, plan reviews and exper DAC has worked with
public entities of all sizes, from one site to 506 sites. Membe expert
witnesses to assist public entities to defend their current prac
the side to assist public entities to defend their practices and
against a public entity. Our m ission statement and philosophy embrace the enhancement and assi
our clients to build an ADA acc essibility plan while documenting previous and current compliance methods.
Over the 16 years of serving our clients, DAC has demonstrated financial sta bility, staff stability and has a
no claims insurance record.
DAC provides a full continuum of professional services that incl
Facility inspections
Self - evaluations for ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
Policy review and development
Transition plans
Public rights - of - way surveys
Consultation
Accessibility compliance intake and management software DACTrak
DACTrak training to conduct your own inspections
Expert witness services
Plan reviews
ADA Plan implementatio n assistance and consultation
Outdoor developed and recreational areas (pools, parks, trails,
NPSI playground safety inspections
ADA Playground inspections
DAC utilizes the appropriate standard(s) for the inspection that not limited to:
ADA 2010 Standards
California Building Code
ADA - ABA
UFAS
ANSI
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
Outdoor developed and recreational standards
National Playground Safety Institute (NPSI) standards
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 8 of 22
PROWAG Federal Public Rights - of - way Guidelines
Federal Highway Administrations Manual on Uniform Traffic Contr
Our firm stands out in the public entity arena due to proven per
programmatic and policy reviews, facility inspections, transition plans, consultation, plan reviews and
expert witness services. We excel at providing a comprehensive current status
by preparing a study of all areas related to accessibility in different depar ng
compliance.
Project Team
Disability Access Consultants (DAC) has a dedicated team of twelve professionals with backgrounds in
administrative leadership roles with public entities, constructi The DAC team
includes CASp certified and ICC Accessibility, Usability and Pla DAC is an equal
opportunity employer and our team composition includes minority The team
has worked together on numerous ADA c ompliance projects with City go vernments and public entities.
DAC works with several large JPAs and insurance pools to assist entities with ADA compliance.
Following are descriptions of key team members qualifications and their assigned roles.
Barbara Thorpe, M.Ed., LOT
DAC Project Manager
2243 Feather River Boulevard
Oroville, CA 95965
(530) 533 - 3000
bthorpe@dac - corp.com
As DAC Project Manager, Barbara will coordinate activities and s port to the Director of
Public Works or the Citys designee. Barbara will serve in the leadership role regarding th -
Evaluation of programs, services, activities and events along wi
Barbara brings twenty years of experience in public administrati iding services to individuals
with disabilities to Disability Access Consultants. As an admin
unparalleled understanding of the application of the Americans w
In ad dition to assisting public entities with compliance with the ADA
reviews for the Department of the Interior to audit for complian
Rehabilitation Act and related civil rights laws and regu lations. Barbara has served as an expert witness for
the Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General. Addi
therapist. Barbara serves on the Division of State Architect Ad e vice - chair for
the DSA Access Compliance Committee. Barbara has worked on over
similar to the City of Bakersfield .
Michael Boga, B.A. Education , California Certified Access Specialist, ICC Accessibility, Usa bility and Plans
Examiner
Inspection Team Leader
As manager of the production and the inspection team, Michael br
building industry along with his understanding of individuals with disabilities to the access
Micha el is a certified accessibility specialist through the Internati
certified in Accessibility, Usability and Plans examination and # 152.
Michael has completed the updated DSA courses regarding the 2010 California Building Code. Michael ha
provided numerous staff development sessions to public entities
requested, Michael would provide training, assist with plan revi work completed for
compliance, as requested. Mike has worked on over 260 projects t City of Bakersfield .
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 9 of 22
Srikant Talasila
Director, Information Technology
Srikant brings many years of experience with information technol ent information
services from a large corporation. He has the ability to catego
information regarding public and school facilities into a manage
consultation to our clients in the u se of DACTrak. Srikant would work directly with City of Bakersfield staff
to train and assist with the data entry and management of data.
Jennie Grover
Director of Operations
Jennie draws on her experience in technical writing to provide leadership and management of the
production and technical writing team , organizing the completion of technical reports, as well as managing
production schedules, staff and timelines.
Other Qualifications and Staff Certifications
A qualification that makes DAC unique is the inclusion of Certif
Optional Activity/Optional Staff Playground Safety Inspections
DAC staff includes certified playground safety inspectors to pro ed service if requested by
the City. DAC has a team of 12 staff, including CASp certified inspectors, dedicated to assisti
entities, such as the City of Bakersfield , with ADA compliance.
Certified Playground Inspectors
Ernest Knight and Pat McLau ghlin are CPSIs with more than 30 years of combined experience in
playground layout, design, accessibility and inspection. Having d more than 1000 playground
ins pections , their in - depth knowledge and experience as it relates to playground equip
playground design will insure thorough and comprehensive reports City
play areas.
Pat McLaughlin would be our project leader for the playgro und inspections and would be assisted by Ernest
Knight or one of our other staff DACTrak Certified, CPSIs. Pat holds a current CPSI certificate and a
California Contractors license . Mike Boga, Team Leader (CASp #152), is also a certified playg
inspe ctor for playground safety. Some Park Districts, such as the Desert Recreation District and the Fair
Oaks Recreation and Park Distri ct have added playground safety inspections (in addition to ADA pla
inspections) to their projects.
Innovative Tools , St r ategies and Best Practices
Based on experience and knowledge of the accessibility field and
innovative methodologies, easy to use ADA management tools , and proven, successful strategies for
evaluating programs , services, activities, events, facilities, parks and public rig - of - way. DACTrak was
developed by DAC for the purpose of easy and useful importing an
collected in the field. DACTrak is interactive web based softwar and is not an enhanced excel spread
sheet. The ability to collect, compile, analyze and use report data in a practical format was one of the
driving forces to develop the DACTrak intake and management soft
Our user friendly DAC accessibility management software, DACTrak, provides our clients with a powerful
management tool to document compliance, project costs, print cus record progress .
DACTrak is not an excel spreadsheet, but actual software that has been d oped by our company to assist
with the implementation and documentation of the Citys ADA plan and provides photographs of as - is site
conditions, which has proved to be valuable documentation. Findings and recommendations, in addition to
other data are pr eloaded into the DACTrak software. As DAC owns and licenses the DACTrak software, we
can make custom modifications for our clients.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 10 of 22
DACTrak Accessibility Management Software
As an additional value at no cost, DAC provides at least one pho noncompliant accessible
item or element, a record number for reference, estimated costs
implementation of the Transition Plan. To provide for easy management of the transition plan and
documentation of compliance effo rts , DAC has developed web - based software called DACTrak. DACTrak is
a powerful tool to mana ge and update the accessibility plan, project costs and document progress. Custom
reports can be easily prepared, printed and saved in a variety of formats.
Disab ility Access Consultants (DAC) includes the following additions
Noncompliant findings and recommendations are included in the DA
One or more photographs of each noncompliant finding are include
Additional photographs can be viewed of the noncompliant item by one click
DACTrak provides a method to schedule and track the barrier remo
Documentation of progress and compliance using the progress repo
Priorities can be established and f urther refined using DACTrak
DACTrak provides for an organized input method that captures all
site inspections with photographs for each noncompliant finding.
captured in a web - based software package and provides for green data collection
pencil checklists and unorganized photographs. DACTrak can also
facilities and update compliance assessments and transition plan
D AC has also found that having usable software and not just a d
easily manage and update the transition plan. Our extensive expe
easy to manage and update plan was the catalyst f or DAC to develop our DACTrak software for use by our
clients. Thus, other critical issues include:
Software to update and manage your Transition Plan
The ability to document progress and barrier removal
The ability to print custom reports
The ability to update the plan automatically when codes change without re - inspecting sites
The ability to project costs
The ability to add or delete facilities
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 11 of 22
DACs collection of actual measurements of as - is conditions and GIS information for public rights - of - way is
another value added item. The collection of an as - is condition is a valuable asset to allow the user to make
an informed decision based on an actua l measurement. For example, if a yes or no approach is util
to indicate if an item is compliant, the user may not know what
would not be able to set a priority or severity rating. If code rmation collected can be
reprocess without the need to re - inspect, thus providing longevity of the plan and internal capac
City in a cost effective manner.
The accessibility management software is included at no cost to the City of a period of t wo years. If the
City decides to continue with the use of the web based managemen
no cost, a small licensure fee is charged for unlimited City use
of the City data.
Catego ries can be customized and findings organized as demonstrated in
software included in our response to the City RFP.
DAC Value Added Items
DAC has found through its experience of working with City and Co d Joint Power
Authorities, that certain other items enhance the level of succe
Plans and Self - Evaluations by public entities. Considering our experience, DAC
Accessibility Management Software, whi ch is used by our staff to conduct accessibility surveys, and is
available for license by the City to perform their own surveys. Following training by DAC, City and County
governments have used DACTrak to conduct their own inspections a lans current.
The use of DACTrak by City staff to conduct surveys for public rights - of - way , process reports and manage
the information to implement and document the plan will assist t
achieve the Citys stated Pro ject Objectives and will provide longevity to the plan.
DAC has several current projects to develop comprehensive ADA Se - evaluations and Transition Plans.
Most projects include training either to staff. Some projects in rak
accessibility intake and management software to complete their o
projects listed include clients that have requested additional s -
evaluation and transition plans to maintain and implement their projects.
DACs proven approach is described in detail in the methodology
DACs on time and within budget performance. For example, the a
project are clearly defined at the initial kick - off meeting. Timelines and deliverables are confirmed. This
approach, in addition to training and the use of our DACTrak acc
software has proven to be successful for many similar City and g ental projects.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 12 of 22
Current DAC Clients and Projects
Final Stages of Completion:
County of Kern
City of Modesto (ongoing contract for additional activities)
County of Butte
County of Solano
City of Palm Springs
City of Moreno Valley
Iowa State Fair
City of Palos Verdes Estates
City of Pismo Beach
City of Santa Fe Springs
Department of Transportation, Washington DC
Ongoing Consultation and Training for Public Entities:
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
Office of the Independent Monitor
School Insurance Authority
Ventura Harbor District
City of Lincoln City
District of Columbia Housing Authority
County of Tehama
City of Tustin
North Bay School Insurance Authority
Current Projects :
City of Los Alamitos
City of Waterford
City of Red Bluff
City of Shafter
City of Fremont
DACTrak Licensure Agreements for the use of DACTrak to complete :
Shasta County
Chicago City Colleges
Clark County Parks and Recreation
San Juan Unified School District
S chools I nsurance G roup
S chools I nsurance A uthority
Consultant Claims History
Disability Access Consultants has no history of claims filed aga
also never been subject to a claim or demand for arbitration by
subconsultants.
Insuranc e Coverage
Disability Access Consultants carries all the required insurance coverage, such as general liability,
automobile liability, workers compensation and employers liabi
malpractice liability insurance. DAC carries a minimum of one million dollars on all policies.
Statement of insurance signed by Barbara Thorpe, President
_________________________
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 13 of 22
Contract Documents
I have received and reviewed the sample Consultants Agreement Co emnity clause
which was sent to me with the Citys RFP. My signature below sh
contract if our firm is selected for awarding a contract for the
acceptance is made with the unde rstanding that the Compensation and Time for Completion clause
be modified to contain the amounts and dates established for thi
___________________________
SCOPE OF WORK DETAIL
In order to successfully complete the project activities in a timely manner, DAC will work closely and
collaboratively with the City of Bakersfield without imposing un
staff. During the past 16 years, Barbara Thorpe and her team ha
relationship s with City and County governments and have worked diligently to
communication. Prior to starting DAC, Barbara worked for a publi
follow - up consultation for our clients to assist with implementatio n of the plan and to answer ongoing
questions at no additional charge.
The scope of work will include, but is not limited to :
i. Training on common issues found in field investigations
a. DAC will create and provide presentations and handouts
b. DAC will provide 20 hours of training for facilities, parks and streets
ii. DAC will perform the self - evaluations and field assessment training at the city facilities
the RFP
a. DAC will develop and administer the procedure and forms to review Ci
services, a nd policies related to accessibility, in order to identify issue
discriminat ory to people with disabilities;
b. Survey buildings listed in the RFP to identify all physical barriers (interior and exterior) at
each site in accordance with Title 24 of the California Building Code and the ADA Standards
(previously referred to as ADAAG);
c. Develop a Transition Plan which will identify a nd prioritize current barriers, provide a
schedule for barrier removal, as well as establish procedures fo f uture
accessibility issues;
d. Identify potential risk management issues by the analysis of dat
management profiles;
e. Provide photographs, findings, recommendations, code references,
priority settings (in addition to prioritized report) in accessibility software, not just an ex
spreadsheet, for accessibility management;
f. Identify actual as - is conditions with photographs (not just compliant or noncomplia
notation);
g. DAC will summarize the findings of their review and provide recommended actions to
provide legally required accessibility in City programs, service
iii. DAC will perform ADA survey training only for City Streets and I
attendance
iv. DAC will complete a field investigation and self - evaluation report, and create Standard Operating
Procedures for departments to report ADA improvements to the ADA
a. Compi lation of field survey data and identification of City services provided at the
b. Analysis of p ublic - rights - of - way data for each facility
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 14 of 22
c. Creation of ADA project reporting templates and Programs and Ser
Departments
d. Compilation of draft ADA Access compliance report
v. Creation of a Transition Plan
a. DAC will assist the City in the creation of the Transition Plan
b. DAC will provide the City with DACTrak, an intuitive web - based software that is interactive
and allows for the City staff to update progress and add inspect
c. DAC will perform as needed reviews of City performed PROW surveys to ensure accuracy
d. DAC will provide advisement to the City for prioritizing the eva - of -
way
e. DAC will also provide advisement to the City to prioritize the t
f. Develop, in collaboration with the City, a comprehensive ADA Sel - Evaluation and
Transition Plan for facilities, buildings, parks and public righ - of - way;
g. Develop a transition plan with the required items to be included
four (4 ) requirements will be included in the Citys plan, in addition
below:
the noncompliant finding
o
recommended method for barrier removal
o
projected schedule for barrier removal
o
the identity of the person that is responsible for the implement
o
h. The ADA Transition Plan prepared for the City will also include:
Identification of the actual, as - is barrier
o
Method of evaluation of the barrier
o
Prioritization for removal o f barriers
o
Estimated costs
o
Procedures, forms, methodology and technology for monitoring imp
o
plan
Documentation of barrier removal
o
Procedures, forms, methodology and technology for performing add
o
of barriers (future sites or sites remodeled or the function changed)
i. Provide management, monitoring, and web based tracking tools tha
manage current and future accessibility issues, update the defic
reports to show progress in meetin g the Transition Plan requirements;
R eports will include, but are not limited to the following:
1. Executive summary
2. As - built dimensions as related to ADA access
3. Relative level of impact to access for all identified barriers
4. Reference to code defining the barrier to access
5. Proposed solution(s) to eliminate each barrier
6. Digital photograph(s) of each barrier to access
7. Reference diagrams/drawings/maps showing the location of the bar
vi. Provide on - going support to City staff
a. DAC will provide up to 16 hours of follow up support for the City staff regarding changes in
statutes, regulations and case law, and meetings to discuss prog
vii. Evaluate Construction Details
a. DAC can provide plan reviews for ADA compliance of construction documents
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 15 of 22
viii. Review Code Policy
a. DAC will provide the City with notification of federal and state ADA
updates for ten years.
City Staff Training
DAC has conducted n umerous staff training sessions for public entities and Joint Po Based
on our experience, DAC recommends two types of training sessions
supervisors, and one for facilities, maintenance, engineering an
training sessions and observation and interacting by City staff with DAC inspection staff will provide
ongoing educational experience to empower City Staff.
DAC will p rovide training for City staff as requested on general ADA compl
they are knowledgeable and empowered to understand the accessibility requirements (more inf
provided in the training portion of the proposal), and to preven
barriers being built. Training will also include project overvie ensure that all new
construction, alterations and additions meet current accessibili
maintained by building the internal capacity of the City, includ
compliant new work and mai ntenance of accessible standards.
One session will be for City administrators and supervisors rega
governments regarding compliance with the Americans with Disabil
standards an d guidelines. The session will discuss methods to accommodate p
acceptable terminology, disability etiquette, required notices,
formats, accessible communication, accessible events and other a cessibility related topics.
The second session is designed for facilities, engineering, publ
regarding the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Ac
Building Code. This session will focus on the code requirements for existing an
rights - of - way (PROW, CAMUTCD) and will include the new 2010 ADA standards
environment.
DAC can provide up to two training sessions for C ity staff regarding:
a) Applicable CBC, ADA Standards, PROWAG, CAMUTCD and other applica
regulations and statutes;
b) Performing field inspections and the appropriate tools to use;
c) Preparation of ADA compliance reports (Note: if the City decide to use the DACTrak tablet to
conduct their own field inspections or update inspections, DAC w
staff regarding the use of DACTrak to collect field data in a re
d) Using the DACTrak accessibility manageme nt system;
e) Monitoring and updating the ADA plan and documenting progress;
f) Preparing custom reports using the DACTrak system
g) Providing training for administrative staff regarding the requir
public notices, accessible formats, communication, emergency evacuation, auxiliary aids,
grievance procedures and other related items to document access
programs, services, activities and special events.
Project Approach
Activities will include, but are not limited t o the following:
1. Orientation/Project Meeting and Clarification of Project Scope , and Schedule
DAC will conduct an initial project kick - off meeting with selected City of Bakersfield staff to establish
roles and lines of communication, refine project goals, review the overall project schedule, schedule
surveys of City of Bakersfield facilities and identify key City of Bakersfield pe rsonnel related to the
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 16 of 22
project scope . Initial self - evaluation activities will be completed during this step. More specific activi ties
will include:
I nformation that is needed will be clarified at the initial orien
meeting will also clarify proposed activities and provide a coll
project strategies. DAC has found that at leas t one orientation meeting is needed to prepar e a
strategic project work plan for a coordinated and seamless effor The project methodology is
generally designed to develop a comprehensive plan without placi
impact upon City of Bakersfield staff.
Barbara Thorpe of DAC will be designated as the project manager and will serve as the point of
contact to the City of Bakersfield . The CASp designated team member that will coordinate the
inspection team during the facility reviews will be Mike Boga. Mike will be directly involved in
the project and field evaluations . Other roles and responsibilities of key team members are
indicated in the organizational chart and in the description of
Barbara will m eet with the designated City of Bakersfield officials to discuss the project scope,
deliverables currently needed by the City of Bakersfield , deliverables that may be needed by
the City of Bakersfield in the near future, discuss projected schedules and tim elines, discuss
cost saving methods, and review
alternatives for compliance by the City
of Bakersfield .
Specific methodologies and data
collection will be clarified. Timelines
and benchmarks will be developed.
Operational and procedural
requirements wil l be reviewed, such as
coordination of schedules, access to
facilities , project dates and other
relevant information. DAC staff
members wear DAC uniform shirts and
have DAC identification badges.
The initial orientation meeting should
include an assessm ent of previous
complianc e activities and areas of
current or potential litigation. The
review of compliance activities and high priority areas will assist with the development of an
overall project plan. The review and documentation of prior initiatives will also build a more
defensible plan if the City is challenged by litigation.
Project objectives will be clarified and elements that may be un
for the City of Bakersfield will be discussed. Items such as community input a nd staff needs will
be confirmed.
H ours of operation, schedules and City of Bakersfield activities by location will be discussed .
2. Survey Facilities - Access Compliance Assessment Reports and Software for Transition Plans
DAC will survey the facility locations listed in the RFP and confirmed at the time of contracting
or at the kick off meeting. Areas open to the public are required to be accessible. Areas t
are staff only and do not have access by the public can be ass essed and prioritized differently.
As required by the ADA, the 2010 ADA Standards will be compared
the California Building Code) and the standard that provides the
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 17 of 22
utilized. As DAC collects as - i s field conditions and records all information, data can be
reprocessed if codes change without conducting a re - inspection, thus resulting in a significant
savings when codes change and the plan needs to be updated. I tems and areas in the DAC site
surveys may include, but are not limited to the following:
Parking
Parking garages
Curbs
Curb ramps
Entrances
Passenger Loading Zones
Crosswalks
Paths of Travel
Ramps
Handrails
Elevators
Platform Lifts
Stairs
Doors
Door hardware
Telecommunications Devices (TDD/TTY)
Signage - Permanent and Directional
Visual & Audible Communications and Alarms
Restrooms
Drinking Fountains
Common use areas
Employee break areas
Meeting and conference rooms
Locker Rooms
Stadiums
Playgrounds and outdoor areas
Areas of Rescue Assistance
Trails
Recreational areas
Outdoor Developed Areas
Consultation regarding public rights - of - way:
Sidewalks
o
Curb ramps
o
Intersections
o
Transit stops
o
Street Furniture
o
Assessments and reports will include a high degree of detail wit
references, and cost estimates. The DACTrak software and report
specifics, such as as - built dimensions, progress reports, additional prioritizatio ns, preset
reporting features and other custom reports. Reports will be del
and reports will also be available using DACTrak. The inclusion -
is condition has proven to be valuable assistance to cl ients in the formulation of the decisions
regarding barrier removal priorities. The DACTrak software provi
management platform that exceeds the ability to manage the plan
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 18 of 22
The assessment report of each facility will include cost estimates to correct deficiencie
accordance with the ADA, Title 24 of the California Building Cod
Barriers are identified by building, floor, or location and give
number (UIN) to assist wi th navigation in the accessibility software and location of the
and recommendation by area and site. Estimated applicable costs w ill be given by item and
element in accordance with industry standards. Costs can be easily adjusted to adhere to any
c ost estimates the City of Bakersfield may utilize.
Physical access problems that require structural solutions will Compliance
Assessment/ Transition Plan. The proposed method for removal will be provid
plan will ide ntify physical barriers that may limit accessibility of the City of Bakersfield programs,
services or activities for individuals with disabilities. The s
appropriate timelines will be developed in consultation with the C ity of Bakersfield .
Identified barriers and obstacles will be prioritized as discuss
the DACTrak software will provide the City of Bakersfield with a
items depending upon the unique and ongo ing needs of the City of Bakersfield and public
comments during the public input process. Public and nonpublic a
requested. Employee only areas, for example, as usually given a
removal.
Detailed find ings, inspection intake records and digital photos are utilized
process. Findings are incorporated into the transition/barrier r
collected during the survey process is preloaded by DAC into our ity
management software.
DAC team members from the Oroville, California office will condu - site inspections on our
DACTrak pc tablets or slates and export the on - site field conditions for processing by our
servers the same day of the inspection while located in Bakersfield . Th us, the draft report is
ready the same day or at the end of the inspection of the partic
then refined by Michael Boga, Inspection Team Leader, in collabo
City has utilized particular cost estimates for standard nonaccessible items or elements, then
the Citys cost is entered into the DACTrak program. The on - site facility team leader conducts a
quality assurance review and contacts the field inspector regard
may need further investigation. The on - site facility team leader completes any necessary edits
and the final quality control editor is notified that the repor t is ready for the final edit.
3. Compliance Assessment/Transition Plan Reports and Implementation
The draft Transition will be submitted to City staff for review and approv
be presented to City staff and, if requested, a Q &A session or
Following approval by the City, DAC will present the transition ings by
demonstrating the use of the DACTrak Accessibility Management so
providing a training session. The City will have use of the DAC
years at no cost to update and manage their information and prin rogress reports and other
custom report formats.
The draft plan shall describe the methods that will be used to m
outline a strategy over time. It is recommended that the schedu
by the City of Bakersfield in collaboration with DAC. It is not recommended th
unilaterally place dates in the plan that the City of Bakersfiel
not want to inadvertently commit the City of Bakersfield to date ic or
inappropriate. The projected schedule for barrier removal is req
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 19 of 22
development and implementation of the required transition plan.
would opt for a phased implementation plan with a timeline of a inimum of five years.
Cost estimates will be provided when available for the specific
easily be adjusted in the DACTrak software to utilize any specif
Bakersfield.
The phased implementation plan is best developed in collaboratio City of Bakersfield .
DAC will recommend a prioritized plan that can be modified and u
It is not recommended, nor is it required that the ADA Self - Evaluation be approved by City
Council. Projected dates that are incorporated into the plan ma
dates are not met. The plan is intended to be a working, ongoin
flexibility.
4. Public Rights - of - Way
Public Rights - of - Way : The review of public rights - of - way (PROW) is a requirement for ADA
compliance. DAC understands that the City of Bakersfield is requesting that
consultant will train City staff to conduct their own assessments of public - of - way .
DACTrak currently provides geographical information (latitude and longit
identified exterior barrier in the public right - of - way that can be incorporated into the Citys
Geographical Information System (GIS). DAC incorporate d the map - linked GIS featu re based on
the needs of many of our City and County clients.
Public rights - of - way elements that have GIS information and photographs incorporated into
DACTrak include , but are not limited to the following:
Sidewalks
Width
Cross Slope
Running slope
Cha nges in elevation greater than 1/4 inch and changes in elevatio
beveled up to ½ inch
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 20 of 22
Any obstructions in the sidewalk that obstruct or narrow the pat
protruding objects and items that narrow the required width
Street furni ture
Intersections
Street furniture
Crosswalks
Pedestrian ramps - curb ramps; width, slope, side flares, grooved borders, truncate
domes, alignment with the crosswalk
Accessible pedestrian signals
Traffic stop bars
DAC Trak offers a comprehensive approach to inspecting public rights - of - way (PROW). In order
to conduct an assessment of all the requirements in the PROW, ma the
field conditions are enter ed into our DACTrak program using a pc tablet in the field. D AC has
found that the use of automated equipment for running slopes on - light
profilers, do not provide an actual measurement, but only provid
some cases, if a change in level is greater than ½ inch, no actual quantifiable information is
reported of how much greater , or of the severity. In order to get the actual measurements for
the sidewalks and intersections, the use of a profiler does no
needed for items such as automated pedestrian signals and street furniture .
SCHEDULE: SCOPE OF SERVICES SUMMARY BY ESTIMATED TIMELINES
Based upon experience, a project milestone chart is provided in months . It is estimated that the project
duration will be 5 - 6 months.
Scope of Service Act ivity or Task 1 2 3 4 5 6
DAC Team Meeting with City of Bakersfield ; kick - off meeting ; survey
methodologies, deliverables and schedule confirmation
Project planning, scheduling, procedures review
Review of policies, procedures and practices; analysis of existing plan
Field inspection data compiled (compiled on a daily basis and av
for review throughout the inspection process)
Training ongoing to be scheduled by request of the City
Presentation to selected City staff
Solicit and record feedback from the City
Final Draft
Deliverables completed
Cost Control/Quality Control/Schedules
a) DAC has cost control procedures in place due to experience, plan scheduling and use of DAC
staff. DAC has never exceeded the established value of a contrac
hourly rate. Due to the established and proven approaches and p
established approach to project s and has met contract completion dates or completed the study
early. A recent example is our work in Butte County.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 21 of 22
b) Quality control procedures are incorporated and integrated throu
senior accessibility specialist and CASp certified team member has provided quality control services
and training for DAC staff during the past 16 years of service w
intake software provides for a daily review of inspections, the
revie w of data collection. In addition, the City of Bakersfield can review the progress daily.
Resources and Stability
Over the 16 years of serving our clients, DAC has demonstrated f
no claims insurance record.
DAC has the resources and has incorporated into the schedule the
throughout and after the duration of the project in order to res
meetings with County staff and members of the public.
Conflict of Interest Statement
DAC does not have any fi n ancial, business o r other relationship with the Ci t y that may h a v e an impact
upon the outcome o f this contract and does not have any current clients that may have a f
in the outcome of this contract. Disability Access Consultants has no conflict of interest with t City of
Bakersfield , any associates, representative, consultants, sub consultants,
DAC does not have any conditions that would affect our ability t services described in the
RFP. DAC does not have any previous, pending or current litigat
suspended or declared ineligible to contract with any federal st
or president is no t in the Federal Excluded parties List System (EPLS) for Ineligi
Debarred Contractors.
DAC has the financial, operational and staff stability to comple
time. DAC has no adverse conditions.
Mi nority Utilization and Affirmative Action
DAC is an equal opportunity employer and has recruited minorities and v DACs quality control
team leader is a Vietnam veteran with a disability.
Background Checks and Fingerprinting
All employees of Disability Access Consultants have been fingerp DAC
has FBI and DOJ fingerprint clearances on file for DAC staff. W
districts, state and local governments, the Federal G overnment, Judicial Chambers and Correctional
Institutions that require background checks. DAC has found that
especially in situations where inspection staff may be working n
situatio ns.
Disability Access Consultants has never been removed from a proj
project.
Supplemental Materials
Actual screen shots from the DACTrak accessibility management so and
the Fair Oaks Recreation and Park District are also included.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Page 22 of 22
APPENDIX
Sample DACTrak Screen Shots and Information
These samples are generated from the DACTrak Accessibility Manag - based software program.
The following screen shots are recent examples of the DACTrak Management software prepared for several
public entity clients.
Upon logging in to
the secure DACTrak
website, you are able
to choose the facility
you would like to
view and manage.
These two screen
shots are examples of
facility lists for two
recent public entity
transition plan
projects.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
After choosing a
facility, you are
ab le to use Reports
drop down menu
to choose which
report style to
view. You may
also choose to
view multiple
facilities in one
report.
This screenshot is
an example of the
home page for a
Basic Photo
Report. The sort
and filter panel
allows users to
quickly run reports
that generate
findings for
specified locations
or categories, or by
progress, priority
or resolution
status.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
These two screenshot s
are example s of a
finding page in a Basic
Photo Report. This
type of report shows
the user the f inding ,
with accompanying
recommendation to
correct the non -
compliant item , the
associated photo, code
reference(s), estimated
cost to remove the
barrier , and any
progress that has been
added to update the
transition plan.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
This screenshot is
an example of a
finding page in a
Dual Photo Report.
This type of report
shows the user two
findings per page ,
with accompanying
recommendation s
to correct the non -
compliant item , the
associated photo,
code reference(s),
and estimated c ost
to remove the
barrier .
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
The Dual Photo and Basic Photo Reports may be exported to an Exc
transition plan data. The Excel workbook exports into a pre - formatted table with the filter function atop
each data column. The report is a fully functioning Excel sprea
manipulated by the user. The column for Picture identification
second tab of the workbook which contains report photos. Clicking the cell for a particular repo
bring up the associated picture on the Photos tab.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
Users can update
progress using the
Tools drop down
menu.
Record Manager
allows each record
to be updated
individually.
Global Progress
Editor allows many
records to be
updated at once
with identical
information.
Priority Manager
allows many
records to be
updated at once
with unique
information.
Record Manager
allows the user
to choose which
record to update
individually.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
Once a record is
chosen in Record
Manager, the user
can set the priority,
select the status of
progress, add
projected and actual
dates of completion
and also document
any notes regarding
the record.
T his screen shot
represent s an example
of a record with
progress, updates and
comments added .
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
Record Manager gives an Administrator the most
options to examine, manage and update the
transition plan for the selected site.
By clicking on the photo number, the
Administrator can view more than one
photo within the same screen.
All comments saved using the Update
command are shown under the finding.
All new comments that are added will
also be listed in this area.
An Administrator is able to view
findings related to the same element
by using the advance controls, also
located under the tool bar at the top of
the page.
A priority level of 1 through 7 can be
assigned to the element.
Projected and actual dates of
completion are entered here. The
Administrator can also add the actual
cost of bringing the element into
compliance for budgeting and expense
reporting.
New Comments can be added here and
saved using the Update command.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
This is an example of
Global Progress E ditor,
where the user may
select many records to
update at one time. In
this example, the
category has been
filtered to Passenger
Loading Zones using the
Categories drop down
menu.
This is an example of
Priority Manager , where
the user may select
many records to updat e
with unique information
from one screen. The
user may select
progress information
from the drop down
menus and enter dates
for each line item. All
information is updated
with one click of the
Submit button. In this
example, the category
has been filte red to
Sinks using the
Categories drop down
menu.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
When GPS information is recorded for the location of an outdoor
Map Overlay report is available to view on DACTrak. This report the area where the survey
was performed, and pinpoints the location of the finding. Click
finding, recommendation to bring the item into compliance, a pho
references.
Disability Access Consultants Proposal to the City of Bakersfield for Accessibility Services Supplemental Materials
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements p.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
10/28/2014
WARD:
Ward(s) 1, 2, 6, 7
SUBJECT:
Beltway Operational Improvements Project (TRIP):
1. Consultant Agreement with NV 5 (not to exceed $9,42 9,589.31;
80% federally funded and 20% locally funded with Tr ansportation
Development Funds and County Contribution) for cons truction
management services.
2.Amendment No. 4 to Agreement 11- 100 with Parsons
Transportation Group ($544,665.00, 80% federally fu nded and
20% locally funded with Transportation Development Funds and
County Contribution; revised not to exceed $44,054, 941.00) for
design support during construction of the Beltway O perational
Improvements Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Agreement and Amendmen t.
BACKGROUND:
The Beltway Operational Improvements Project is par t of the Thomas Roads Improvement
Program (TRIP) and is generally located on SR-58 fr om SR-99 to Cottonwood Road and on SR-
99 from Wilson Road to SR-58. The project includes braiding of the ramp from southbound SR-
99 to eastbound SR- 58, auxiliary lanes, retaining and sound walls, and reconstruction and
realignment of on- and off-ramps in the area.
The construction contract for the Beltway Operation al Improvements Project was awarded by the
City Council to Security Paving Inc. on October 22, 2014. This Administrative Report proposes to
award the consultant agreement for construction man agement services to NV 5 and to amend
Agreement No. 11 - 100 with Parsons Transportation Group for design su pport during the
construction phase. Normally, agreements for these services are approved at the time the
construction contract is awarded by the City Counci l. However, Federal Regulations require that
new federally funded consultant agreements undergo a review by Caltrans' Audit and
Investigations Section before the agreement can be executed. This review had not been
completed by Caltrans for the NV 5 Agreement at the time of the October 22nd City Council
meeting, and so these items had to be pulled from t hat agenda. The Caltrans review has now
been received, any deficiencies identified have bee n corrected, and the items are ready for
approval.
Item No. 1 (Construction Management Services):
Public Works TRIP staff issued a Request for Qualif ications/Request for Proposals (RFQ/RFP)
th
for construction management services for the 24 Street Improvements, SR- 99/Hosking Avenue
Interchange, Beltway Operational Improvements, SR- 178 Widening, and the Westside Parkway
Operational Improvements Projects.
The following seven firms responded to this RFP:
Caltrop (Fresno, CA)
Hill International (Ontario, CA)
Mendoza and Associates (Fresno, CA)
MNS Engineering (Santa Barbara, CA)
NV 5 (Bakersfield, CA)
Parsons Brinkerhoff (Sacramento, CA)
Prescience Corp. (Santa Ana, CA)
Based on a review of their proposals, the selection committee invited the following firms to
interview with the committee: Mendoza and Associate s, NV 5, and Parsons Brinkerhoff. Based
on the rankings of the proposals and the interviews , NV 5 was selected as the most qualified to
provide construction management services for the Be ltway Operational Improvements Project.
After NV 5 was selected, their cost for providing t hese services was then negotiated by Public
Works TRIP staff. Staff recommends approval of the construction management contract with NV5
in the amount of $9,429,589.31.
Item No. 2 (Design Support Services):
This Amendment provides compensation for design sup port during construction by the Project
design consultant (Parsons) for the Beltway Operati onal Improvements Project. The City typically
negotiates the cost for these services with the des ign consultant and amends the design contract
at the time the construction contract is awarded. C onstruction activities are expected to begin in
mid to late January of 2015, and submittals and req uests for information will have to be
addressed by Parsons prior to the start of construc tion activities. Staff recommends approval of
the amendment to Agreement 11- 100 for design support during construction services in the
amount of $544,664.97.
There is no General Fund impact associated with the Beltway Operational Improvement Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
NV5 Agreement Agreement
11-100 (4) Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Agreements q.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/18/2014
WARD:
Ward(s) 3, 4
SUBJECT:
Rosedale Highway Widening Project (TRIP):
1.Accept bid and award contract to A. Teichert & So n, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction ($16,014,592.40; funded with federal, local,
and domestic water enterprise funds), to construct the Project.
2.Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 12-095 with Mark Thomas &
Company, Inc. ($221,604.56; revised not to exceed $ 3,305,253.02;
88.53% federally and 11.47% locally funded), for de sign support
services during construction of the Project.
3.Appropriate $325,215 Federal Earmark funds and Ap propriate
$1,615,000 Local County TRIP funds to the Public Wo rks Capital
Improvement Budgets in the respective Federal and L ocal funds
for the Rosedale Widening Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of bid and award of con struction contract, approval of
amendment, and approval of appropriations.
BACKGROUND:
The Rosedale Highway Widening Project includes the construction of two additional lanes (one in
each direction) along State Route 58 (Rosedale High way) from Calloway Drive to 700 east of
Gibson Street. Operational improvements at all sig nalized intersections, and modification of lane
striping and medians throughout the corridor will b e completed to accommodate the additional 2-
lanes. As a result, Rosedale Highway will be widen ed from a four-lane highway to a six-lane
highway. The project also includes the installatio n of a 16-inch water mainline extension from
Mohawk Street to Wedding Lane along the south side of Rosedale Highway. This water main
extension will complete a loop of the Citys domest ic water system in the area,
providing improved water flow and pressure. Domest ic water enterprise funds have been
previously budgeted to fund the water main extensio n.
Item #1:
th
On December 17 , 2014, a total of three bids were received, all of which are acceptable. Those
bids are as follows:
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba Teichert Bid: $ 16,014,592.40
Construction
5771 S. Toyota Avenue
Fresno, California 93725
Griffith Company Bid: $ 17,180,149.90
1128 Carrier Parkway Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93306
Granite Construction Bid: $ 17,431,985.50
3005 James Road
Bakersfield, California 93308
Staff recommends awarding this construction contrac t to A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba Teichert
Construction, in the amount of $16,014,592.40 for t he construction of the Rosedale Highway
Widening Project.
Item #2:
Amendment #4 to Agreement No. 12 -095 for Mark Thomas & Company provides compensatio n
for design support services during project bidding and construction. The City typically negotiates
the cost for these support services with the design consultant and amends the design contract at
the time the construction contract is awarded. Cons truction activities are expected to begin in mid
to late February of 2015. Submittals and requests f or information will have to be addressed by
Mark Thomas & Company prior to and during construct ion activities. Staff recommends approval
of the amendment to Agreement 12-095 in the amount of $221,604.56.
Item #3:
Staff recommends the appropriation of $325,215 Fede ral Earmark funds and $1,615,000 Local
County TRIP funds to the Public Works Capital Impro vement Budgets in the respective Federal
and Local funds, for construction of and potential contingencies for the Rosedale Highway
Widening Project. During the balancing of funds, i t was identified that additional Federal Funds
were available for construction, and those funds al ong with the Local County TRIP funds need to
be appropriated to the proper accounts to enable th eir expenditure.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Teichert Contract Agreement
Mark Thomas Amendment 12-095 (4) Agreement
Mark Thomas Amendment 12-095 (4) Attachment I Exhibit
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements r.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/17/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14 - 305 with Vulcan Materials
Company ($83,393; revised not to exceed $997,403), to the contract for
the supply of HUD funded street materials.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of amendment.
BACKGROUND:
On November 19, 2014, Council approved a contract t o supply HUD funded street materials with
Vulcan Materials Company, in the amount of $914,010 .
Funds in the amount of $83,393 have been realized t hrough cumulative project savings and
unobligated funds specific to the project areas eli gible for HUD curb, gutter and sidewalks. Staff
requests these savings be applied to the contract f or HUD funded street materials.
If approved, Amendment No. 1 will add $83,393 for a revised not to exceed amount of $997,403.
Increasing the contract will allow the Public Works Streets Division to continue with street
maintenance in project areas qualified for HUD fund ing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Amendment No. 1 Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14-
139 with Kutak Rock, LLP s.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Virginia Gennaro, City Attorney
DATE:
12/15/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14 -139 with Kutak Rock LLP
($175,000; revised not to exceed $285,000), to pro vide outside legal
services in the matter of City of Bakersfield v. Al l Persons Interested in
the Matter, etc., et al.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the A greement.
BACKGROUND:
On January 29, 2014, the City entered into Agreemen t No. CA14-001 with Kutak Rock LLP, for
legal representation in matter of City of Bakersfield v. All Persons Interested in th e Matter , et al.,
Kern County Superior Court case number S-1500-CV-28 0593-NFT.
West Park Home Owners Association and Friends filed an answer to contest the lawsuit,
requiring the need to increase the original contrac t amount, which was amended on July 16,
2014, to increase the compensation to $175,000.
At this time, the City Attorney s Office requests that we amend the contract to ad d additional
compensation. This Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No . 14-139 will result in a total Not to
Exceed amount of $285,000 in order for outside coun sel to continue representation. There are
adequate funds in the TRIP budget to cover the lega l fees.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Agreement 14-139(1) Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent t.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/3/2014
WARD:
Ward 7
SUBJECT:
Contract Change Order Nos. 12, 14, 15, and 20 to A greement No. 12-
165 with Security Paving Company, Inc. (net increas e of $60,477.34;
revised not to exceed $29,780,842.05; change orders funded with Traffic
Development Funds), for the construction of the Wes tside Parkway
Phase 6C Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Contract Change Orders .
BACKGROUND:
The Westside Parkway Phase 6C Project consists of c onstructing four lanes of freeway (two in
each direction) between Allen Road and the Stockdal e Highway/Heath Road intersection,
building approximately three miles of sound walls, as well as completing all ramp tie- ins to the
Allen Road interchange. The Project will also buil d a bridge for Renfro Road to cross over the
Westside Parkway. The Westside Parkway will ultima tely be an eight mile long, east west
freeway extending from Truxtun Avenue west to Stock dale Highway/Heath Road with
interchanges at Mohawk Street, Coffee Road, Callowa y Drive, and Allen Road.
Change Order No. 12 provides for the construction o f an Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pad to support
the AC curbing that is along the outside edges of t he pavement. The contract documents
specified for the AC curb to be installed directly over the original ground per Caltrans standards.
However, the very sandy and uncohesive nature of th e existing soil along the project does not
provide a very stable support base for this AC curb ing, therefore, the engineer is recommending
to install an initial 2 AC pad which will provide a stable, sound surface f or the AC curb to be
placed upon. This change order results in an estima ted increase of $51,574.85.
Change Order No. 14 provides compensation to the co ntractor for additional work related to
changes in the electrical plans. At the time of bid ding, the plans showed approximate locations
for new electrical service point connections for st reet lights, traffic signals, and pump stations.
However, final locations for transformers, electric al pull boxes, enclosures, etc. are not
determined until PG&E completes their final design work. As a result, additional conduits,
conductors, pull boxes, and transformer pads are re quired from the original design. This change
order also provides for modifications to the design of the Stockdale Highway and Westside
Parkway intersection; this intersection and traffic signal was modified to provide a safer crossing
for pedestrians and bicyclists. This change order r esults in an estimated increase of
$100,358.06.
Change Order No. 15 provides a credit to the City f or modifications made to the pavement joint
seals. As recommended by the engineer, the origina lly specified compression seal was modified
to a liquid joint seal that costs less and is easie r to maintain. This change order results in an
estimated decrease of $26,455.57.
Change Order No. 20 provides a credit to the City f or the deletion of footing retrofit work for
retaining wall No. 202 at the eastbound Allen Road off- ramp. This work had originally
been included as part of Change Order No. 16 approv ed by the City Council on August 13, 2014.
However, after a more detailed review by the design er, this footing retrofit work was found to
be not needed. This change order results in an esti mated decrease of $65,000.
Staff recommends approval of Contract Change Order Nos. 12, 14, 15, and 20. All change
orders combined to date, including these Change Ord ers, result in a 0.7 % decrease over the
original Agreement as illustrated below:
Original Contract Amount = $29,982,222.42
Previous Change Orders = $ -261,857.71
Current Change Orders No. 12, 14, 15, and
= $ 60,477.34
20
Amended Contract Agreement after Change
= $29,780,842.05
Order
Net Increase to date = $ -201,380.37
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
WSP 6C CCOs 12, 14, 15, & 20 Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements u.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/12/2014
WARD:
Ward 2
SUBJECT:
Contract Change Order No. 2 to Agreement No. 14- 073 with Zim's
Integrated Mechanical Services, Inc. ($10,681.48; revised not to exceed
$670,383.16), for the project known as HVAC Replace ment/Upgrade:
Development Services Building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Contract Change Order.
BACKGROUND:
The project to remove and replace the existing HVAC system at the Community Development
building was awarded at the May 7, 2014, Council me eting. As background, the current HVAC
unit had several operational problems. The existing unit was deteriorated and repairs to the unit
were no longer effective. The unit was original to the building and had been in service since the
mid-1960s. Therefore, staff recommended a major re furbishment of the existing unit, which
would be accomplished by salvaging and reusing viab le components and integrating new
components when necessary.
Generally, this project included:
Removing and salvaging the two existing air conditi oning compressors, the electric motor
l
for the compressors, and the electrical switch gear for the motor;
Removing and disposing of the other existing HVAC c omponents;
l
Supplying and installing all of the new equipment, valves, piping, tubing, controls as stated
l
on the plans;
Furnishing and installing a control system; and
l
Calibrating and testing the new system
l
During the course of the project, it was found that the existing electrical wiring from the main
breaker to the distribution panel would not accommo date the electrical loads for the new
equipment installed with this project. This require d that the electrical engineer provide a wiring
schematic to provide for the rewiring necessary bet ween the main breaker switch-gear and the
new distribution panel being installed with this pr oject. This requires the Contractor to temporarily
remove the main breaker switch-gear to allow for th e additional wiring beyond that which was
originally called for in the project plans. The Con tractor has agreed to rewire the electrical gear
per the provided schematic drawing for a total cost of $10,681.48.
The net cost increase of Contract Change Order No. 2 is $10,681.48. The sum of all change
orders to date on this project reflects a total cos t increase of $24,066.16 (which results in a 3.7%
increase of the original contract amount) as illust rated below:
Original Contract Amount=$646,317.00
Amended Contract Agreement after Change Orders=$670 ,383.16
Net Increase to date =$ 24,066.16
Sufficient funds are budgeted to fund this Change O rder. Capital Outlay Funds provide the
funding source for this project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
HVAC CCO #2 - Sheet 1 of 2 Agreement
Electrical Schematic - Sheet 2 of 2 Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements v.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/12/2014
WARD:
Ward 6
SUBJECT:
Contract Change Order No. 2 to Agreement No. 14- 071 with Smith
Construction Company, Inc. ($71,473.02; revised not to exceed
$795,432.04), for the project known as Bakersfield Waste Water
Treatment Plant 3 Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Contract Change Order.
BACKGROUND:
The project to rehabilitate the four existing clari fiers at Wastewater Treatment Plant 3 was
awarded at the May 7, 2014 Council meeting. As back ground, the four clarifier units had been
inoperative for several years. The existing units w ere deteriorated with one clarifier drive unit
needing total replacement as repairs to the unit we re no longer effective, with all four clarifiers
requiring repair of deteriorated concrete and metal surfaces due to the corrosive
environment typical of exposure to raw sewage. Ther efore, staff recommended a rehabilitation of
the existing clarifiers, which would be accomplishe d by repairing and recoating all exposed
surfaces and the replacement of one clarifier drive unit.
During the course of the project, and upon inspecti on by the drive unit manufacturer, it was found
that the drive unit on clarifier No. 2 is inoperabl e and is not repairable due to excessive corrosion
of the metal surfaces. Due to this condition, the drive unit on clarifier no. 2 will need to
be replaced order to make the clarifier operational . The Contractor has agreed to provide and
install the new drive unit for a total cost of $71, 473.02.
The net cost increase of Contract Change Order No. 2 is $71,473.02. The sum of all change
orders to date on this project reflects a total cos t increase of $78,437.87 (which results in a
10.9% increase of the original contract amount) as illustrated below:
Original Contract Amount=$716,994.17
Amended Contract Agreement after Change
=$795,432.04
Orders
Net Increase to date =$ 78,437.87
Sufficient funds are budgeted to fund this Change O rder. Sewer Enterprise Funds provide the
funding source for this project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CCO#2 out for signature Agreement
COPY DISTRIBUTION:
ORIGINAL-CITY CLERK, WHITE-CONTRACTOR, BLUE-CONSTRUCTION, GREEN-CONTRACTOR'S INFO, YELLOW-CALTRANS, PINK ENGR., GOLD-PURCHASING
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
14-071 144113
2
CONTRACT NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. P. O. NO.
Bakersfield Waste Water treatment Plant 3 1 1
PROJECT: SHEET OF
Primary Clarifiers Rehabilitation
Smith Construction Company, Inc. N/A
CONTRACTOR:
2139 N. Briarwood Ave.
ADDRESS: FEDERAL NO. (S)
Fresno, CA 93705
YOU ARE HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAKE THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CHANGES FROM THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OR DO THE FOLLOWING WORK DESCRIBED NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS CONTRACT.
NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by City Council or City Engineer
Description of work to be done, estimate of quantities, and prices to be paid. Segregate between additional work of contract price, agreed price and force account.
Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time.
R. MILLWEE R. MILLWEE December 16, 2014
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: DATE:
Construction Superintendent Construction Superintendent
EXTRA WORK AT AGREED LUMP SUM PRICE
Remove and dispose of existing clarifier #2 drive unit and furni = $71,473.02
The contractor agrees to accept a lump sum price of $71,473.02 a
including all markups, for performing the above mentioned work.
ESTIMATED COST:
412-4071-812-8021-E3K201
ACCOUNT NO (S)
$71,473.02
INCREASE
DECREASE
XX
City Council Approval Required YES
By reason of this order the time of
14 calendar days
NO
completion will be adjusted as follows:
Approved As to Form: CITY ATTORNEY Approved by the Council of City of Bakersfield
Approval Recommended: City Engineer Mayor
Countersigned: Finance Director Date
We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all
equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as
full payment therefor the prices shown above.
Accepted, Date: Contractor: Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Agreements w.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/12/2014
WARD:
Ward 2
SUBJECT:
Contract Change Order No. 1 to Agreement No. 14- 205 with Angelus
Waterproofing & Restoration, Inc. ($15,600.00; revi sed not to exceed
$59,205.00), for the Community Development Parking Deck Ramp
Expansion and Recoating Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Contract Change Order.
BACKGROUND:
This project consists of emergency improvements req uired to be performed on the rooftop
parking deck of the Community Development building. Improvements include re-sloping,
recoating, and sealing portions of the rooftop park ing deck for safety purposes and for the
structural integrity of the building.
During emergency repair of the parking deck beam (w hich is a separate project), it was
necessary to remove the Emseal expansion joint mate rial to facilitate repair of the beam.
However, in order to maintain the roofing warranty for the parking deck recoating project,
this expansion joint seal must be replaced between the parking structure and the building rooftop
parking area. The contractor has agreed to accept a lump sum price of $15,600 as full
compensation for the procurement and installation o f this Emseal expansion joint material.
This is the first change order to be submitted for this project. This change order will increase the
project total by $15 ,600 (which results in a 35.8% increase of the orig inal contract amount) as
illustrated below:
Original Contract Amount = $43,605.00
Amended Contract Agreement after Change Orders = $ 59,205.00
Net Increase to date = $15,600.00
Sufficient funds are budgeted to cover the cost of this change order. Facility Reserve funds
provide the funding source for this project. The Fa cility Reserve Fund are funds set aside for
major renovations and repairs to City Facilities.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Original CCO #1 out for Signature Agreement
COPY DISTRIBUTION:
ORIGINAL-CITY CLERK, WHITE-CONTRACTOR, BLUE-CONSTRUCTION, GREEN-CONTRACTOR'S INFO, YELLOW-CALTRANS, PINK ENGR., GOLD-PURCHASING
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
14 - 205
CONTRACT NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 P. O. NO. 151959
PROJECT: Community Development Services Parking SHEET 1 OF 1
Deck Ramp Expansion and Recoating Project.
CONTRACTOR: Angelus Waterproofing & Restoration, Inc. N/A
ADDRESS: 5731 McFadden Avenue, Suite B FEDERAL NO. (S)
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
YOU ARE HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAKE THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CHANGES FROM THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OR DO THE FOLLOWING WORK DESCRIBED NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS CONTRACT.
NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by City Council or City Engineer
Description of work to be done, estimate of quantities, and prices to be paid. Segregate between additional work of contract price, agreed price and force account.
Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time.
R. MILLWEE R. MILLWEE December 12, 2014
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: DATE:
Construction Superintendent Construction Superintendent
EXTRA WORK AT AGREED LUMP SUM PRICE
$15,600.00
Furnish and install EMSEAL expansion joint material between the =
top deck of the Community Development Parking Structure.
The Contractor agrees to accept a lump sum price of $15,600.00 a
all markups, for performing the above mentioned work.
ACCOUNT NO (S) ESTIMATED COST:
311-4051-831-8021-P5K224
$15,600.00
INCREASE
DECREASE
City Council Approval Required YES XX
By reason of this order the time of
None
NO
completion will be adjusted as follows:
Approved As to Form: CITY ATTORNEY Approved by the Council of City of Bakersfield
Approval Recommended: City Engineer Mayor
Countersigned: Finance Director Date
We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all
equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as
full payment therefor the prices shown above.
Accepted, Date: Contractor: Title:
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Property Acquisition
Agreements - TRIP x.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
Ward 2
SUBJECT:
Agreement with Samuel and Debra Borland ($290,000) to purchase real
property located at 4400 La Mirada Drive for the Ce ntennial Corridor
Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Agreement.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the Thomas Road Improvement Program (TRI P), the City of Bakersfield is acquiring
properties to construct the Centennial Corridor Pro ject. The Centennial Corridor will connect the
existing State Route 58 at South Real Road and Stat e Route 99 to the Westside Parkway north
of Truxtun Avenue. The property being purchased con sists of a single family residence. The
purchase price of $290,000 is the property s fair market value as established by an appraisal
prepared by Merriman Hurst and Associates, an indep endent appraisal company.
In addition to the purchase price the City will be paying for relocation assistance in accordance
with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Pro perty Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
(Uniform Act). The Uniform Act provides important p rotections and assistance for people affected
by Federally funded projects. All parties displaced by the TRIP projects will be provided all
applicable relocation benefits pursuant to the requ irements set forth in the Uniform Act. These
benefits may include a purchase price differential payment, a mortgage differential payment, and
the actual, reasonable and necessary costs to reloc ate their personal and/or business property.
Every property is unique and the benefits will refl ect their individual circumstances.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report has been prepared encompassing all
properties required for the widening project during the State required Environmental Document
process. The Planning Division completed a General Plan Review (65402) and found this
acquisition consistent with the Metropolitan Bakers field 2010 General Plan.
Funding for this purchase is budgeted in the Centen nial Corridor Federal Transportation Fund
and is part of the $165 million authorized by CalTr ans and appropriated by the City Council on
March 5, 2014 for right of way acquisitions. Purcha ses under the early acquisition program were
approved by CalTrans at 100% federal funding with n o local match requirement for this phase of
the project. This concept is termed by CalTrans as toll credits. The term toll credit is a little
confusing, because it does not refer to a toll that might be paid for crossing a bridge. It refers to
an alternate definition of the word that means to lead or attract to a desired point. Offering of toll
credits allows the City to accelerate the spending of Federal dollars sooner and gets the project
further along with less need of local dollars. As a result, the future construction phase of the
Centennial project will carry a higher local match percentage than it would have without the toll
credits being approved. The end result is that we w ill still spend the same amount of Federal and
local dollars to project completion as we would hav e without toll credits, but using toll credits
allows us to spend the Federal money first and the local dollars later.
The Centennial Corridor Project has 199 single fami ly residential properties. This is the 72nd of
the 199 single family residential properties to be acquired.
Information on the progress of the right of way pha se of each TRIP project and the costs
associated therewith will be contained in a quarter ly report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Purchase Agreement Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Bids y.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/10/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Extend bid from Lehr Auto Electric, ($56,855.82) fo r fourteen Panasonic
Toughbook Laptops for the Police Department.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends extension of bid.
BACKGROUND:
On November 5, 2014, Council accepted the bid from Lehr Auto Electric, Sacramento, California
for the purchase of 162 Panasonic Toughbooks. Lehr Auto Electric has indicated their approval
to extend the unit cost of $4,061.13 for fourteen a dditional Panasonic Toughbook laptops for a
total of $56,855.82.
These laptops will be issued to additional personne l hired as part of the International Association
of Chiefs of Police (IACP) study implementation pla n. Funding for fourteen Panasonic
Toughbook laptops will be provided by Board of Stat e and Community Corrections (BSCC) Trust
Funds.
Staff recommends extension of bid and authorization to purchase fourteen additional Panasonic
Toughbook laptops for the Police Department for a t otal purchase amount of $56,855.82.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Bids z.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
11/18/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Accept bid from Bakersfield Truck Center ($173,162. 38) for a
replacement three axle dump truck for use by the Pu blic Works Department,
Streets Division.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the bid.
BACKGROUND:
Bids were solicited for a three axle dump truck. T wo bids were received in response to solicitation.
The unit to be replaced has high mileage and is in need of major suspension repairs. This purchase
will replace it with a cleaner burning, more fuel e fficient vehicle with an improved dump body.
The second bidder is within the City limits and is eligible for consideration of the 3% local preferen ce
Council Policy; however, after application of the 3 % differential they were not the lowest bid. The
results are listed below.
The two bids received are as follows:
3% LOCAL PREFERENCE
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
ADJUSTED BID AMOUNT
Bakersfield Truck Center
$173,162.38 Not applicable
Bakersfield, CA (County)
Golden State Peterbilt
$207,115.70 $200,902.23
Bakersfield, CA (City)
Funds are budgeted in the Equipment Management Fund for the purchase of a replacement dump
truck for the Public Works Streets Division.
Staff finds the bid submitted by Bakersfield Truck Center to be acceptable.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Bids aa.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/18/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Accept bid from Bakersfield Truck Center ($248,256. 50) for a replacement
3,000 gallon liquid asphalt distributor (oil truck) for the Public Works
Department, Streets Division.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the bid.
BACKGROUND:
Bids were solicited for a 3,000 gallon liquid aspha lt distributor (oil truck). Four bids were receive d in
response to solicitation.
The City has historically operated two Oil Trucks a s part of its street maintenance operation. Howeve r,
one of these trucks has been unavailable since earl y 2014 and is in need of extensive, costly repair. Due
to the age of the truck and the cost involved with its repair, this truck was budgeted for replacement in the
current fiscal year. Having only one truck availab le results in delays to this part of the street mai ntenance
operation; and when the one operating truck is down , no oil placement for street maintenance occurs.
Purchasing of the replacement truck will provide fo r a continued level of street oiling maintenance
operations consistent with past efforts.
The four bids received are as follows:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
Bakersfield Truck Center
$248,256.50
Bakersfield, CA
Nixon-Egli Equipment Co.
$254,824.75
Ontario, CA
Bear Cat Mfg., Inc.
$265,303.13
Wickenburg, AZ
Golden State Peterbilt
$308,315.13
Bakersfield, CA
Funds are available in the Equipment Management Fun d for the purchase of a replacement oil truck for
the Public Works Streets Division.
Staff finds the bid submitted by Bakersfield Truck Center to be acceptable.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Bids ab.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/19/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Award bids from Wastequip Mfg. Co. ($53,847.57), fo r 98 steel 3 yard
containers and 49 lid locks and award bid from Tote r, LLC, ($37,840.00)
for 64 plastic 3 yard containers for the Public Wor ks Department, Solid
Waste Division. Total bid $91,687.57.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the bids.
BACKGROUND:
Bids were solicited for steel and plastic 3 yard co ntainers. Eight bids were received in response
to solicitation.
The Solid Waste Division provides 3 yard blue and t an steel containers and 3 yard green plastic
containers to commercial businesses for compliance with City and State recycling mandates.
The specifications require bidders to include freig ht in their unit prices and to provide their truck
load quantity amounts. The City intends to place o rders by truck load to the bidder submitting
the lowest unit cost per container. A bid received from Consolidated Fabricators was not
completed in accordance with the bid parameters and therefore cannot be compared to the other
bids. Staff recommends declaring the bid from Cons olidated Fabricators non-responsive.
Seven bidders submitted partial or complete bids in accordance with the bid specifications. The
table below reflects the unit prices bid for the st eel and plastic containers.
STEEL MANUAL LID STEEL PLASTIC
CONTAINER, LOCK CONTAINER, CONTAINER,
BIDDER
MEDIUM BLUE INSTALLED ON TAN GREEN
Price Per Unit
3 YARD BLUE 3 YARD 3 YARD
CAPACITY* CONTAINERS* CAPACITY CAPACITY
Wastequip Mfg.
$530.65 $37.63 $530.65
No Bid
**
Bryant Fuel$2,015.63 $161.25 $2,015.63 $1,478.13
Dale Brisco, Inc.$2,833.44 $21.50 $2,833.44 No Bid
Toter, LLC *** $591.25
No Bid No Bid No Bid
Rehrig Pacific
No Bid No Bid No Bid $665.80
Co.
Waste &
No Bid No Bid No Bid $682.63
Recycling
OTTO
No Bid No Bid No Bid $923.52
Environmental
Items must be ordered together **Wastequip 49 units per truck load ***Toter, LLC
*
64 units per truck load
Staff recommends purchasing truck load quantities o f blue and tan steel containers from
Wastequip in the amount of $53,847.57 ($530.65 x 49 units for blue containers, $37.63 x 49 units
for lid locks, $530.65 x 49 units for tan container s); and green plastic containers from Toter, LLC
in the amount of $37,840 ($591.25 x 64 units) for a total cost to the City of $91,687.57.
Funds are budgeted in the Refuse Enterprise Fund fo r this purchase.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Bids ac.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Accept bid and approve contract to Cen - Cal Construction (not to exceed
$181,475) for the annual contract for canal liner r epair.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of bid and approval of contract.
BACKGROUND:
Invitations to Bid were solicited for the Annual Co ntract for canal liner repair. Two (2) bids were
received in response to solicitation. The bids sol icited were based on a list of canal concrete
paneling and associated services with estimated qua ntities. In this case, where the City does not
intend to split the bid award, the City determines the lowest overall bidder by multiplying the
suppliers unit price for each of the items by the estimated number of units for each item.
Funds are available in the Water Resources Departme nt operating account for this contract. The
contract award is for a one year period; renewable annually for four consecutive one-year
periods at the Citys option and upon mutually agre eable terms.
The two (2) bids received are listed below.
BIDDER AMOUNT
Cen-Cal Construction
$181,475
Bakersfield, CA
Jim Alfter Cement
$188,000
Bakersfield, CA
Staff finds the low bid submitted by Cen-Cal Constr uction to be acceptable and recommends
approval of the contract in the amount of $181,475. There is no General Fund impact associated
with this contract.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Agreement Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Miscellaneous ad.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Greg Williamson, Police Chief
DATE:
12/12/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Appropriate $46,002.70 State grant revenues to the Police Operating
Budget within the S.L.E.S.F. Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of appropriation.
BACKGROUND:
Since the passage of Assembly Bill (AB3229) Citizen s Option for Public Safety in FY1996-97,
the City of Bakersfield Police Department (BPD) has received an annual sum from the States
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF). The program was designed to provide
State funds to local law enforcement agencies for t he purpose of addressing current front line law
enforcement needs.
Per CA Government Code 30062, monies allocated fro m a Supplemental Law Enforcement
Services Fund (SLESF) to a recipient entity shall b e expended exclusively to provide front line
law enforcement services. These monies shall suppl ement existing services, and shall not be
used to supplant any existing funding for law enfor cement services provided by that entity.
SLESF funding is allocated on a fiscal year basis, distributed quarterly, and must be expended or
th
encumbered by June 30 of the following fiscal year.
The estimated SLESF allocation of $573,136.00 was a ppropriated by the City Council into the
Police Operating Budget within the SLESF Fund for F Y2014-15. Since the adoption of the
budget, the BPD continued to receive quarterly SLES F distributions from the State Department of
Finance. The cumulative total of funds received fr om the State SLESF allocation is $619,138.70
or $46,002.70 over the original estimate.
The BPD requests Councils approval to appropriate the additional $46,002.70 into the Police
Operating Budget within the SLESF Fund to provide o vertime to maintain the School Resource
Officer Program through June 30, 2015.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Consent - Miscellaneous ae.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Dianne Hoover, Director of Recreation and Parks
DATE:
12/15/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Park Impact Fees prepared in accordance with
California Government Code 66006.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the City s annual compliance report for Park Impact Fees fo r the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2014 prepared in accordance with Californi a Government Code 66006.
On November 7, 1990, Council adopted a park develop ment and improvement fee program for
the purposes of developing and improving parks and recreational facilities serving the residential
development within the City of Bakersfield. Fees ar e collected based on the development s share
of cost to develop, improve, construct or enhance a public park.
On April 19, 1995, Council established an orderly p rocess for the dedication, reservation and
acquisition of park land within the city for the pu rpose of supplying public parks and recreation
facilities. The sub divider shall dedicate, reserve land, pay a fee in-lieu, or a combination thereof,
at the option of the Advisory Agency, for park or r ecreational purposes.
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the loc al agency shall, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public specific information as outlined in this
Code Section. The attached Annual Compliance Repor t provides this information.
The Annual Compliance Report was made available to the public on December 10, 2014.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Annual Park Impact Fee Report Backup Material
Page
1
2
·
·
·
·
·
3
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
4
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Miscellaneous af.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
Ward(s) 3, 5, 6
SUBJECT:
Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Bridge Crossing and Major Tho roughfare Fees
prepared in accordance with California Government C ode 66006.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the City s annual compliance report for Bridge Crossing and Major Thoroughfare
Fees for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 prepar ed in accordance with California Government
Code 66006.
A local ordinance may require the payment of a fee as a condition of approval of a final map or
as a condition of issuing a building permit for pur poses of defraying the actual or estimated cost
of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, f reeways, and canyons, or constructing major
thoroughfares (GC 66484).
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the loc al agency shall, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public specific information as outlined in this
Code Section. The attached Annual Compliance Report was made available to the public on
December 11, 2014.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, a local agency shall review the information made
available to the public at the next regularly sched uled public meeting but not less than 15 days
after this information is made available to the pub lic.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Annual Compliance Report for Bridge Crossing and Ma jor
Backup Material
Thoroughfare Fees
1
2
·
·
·
·
·
3
3
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
2
4
·
5
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Miscellaneous ag.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
Ward(s) 1, 3, 4, 5
SUBJECT:
Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Planned Drainage Area Fees pr epared in
accordance with California Government Code 66006.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the City s annual compliance report for Planned Drainage Ar ea Fees for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2014 prepared in accordance wit h California Government Code 66006.
There may be imposed by local ordinance a requireme nt for the payment of fees for purposes of
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned drainage facilities for the removal
of surface and storm waters from local or neighborh ood drainage areas (GC 66483).
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the loc al agency shall, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public specific information as outlined in this
Code Section. The attached Annual Compliance Report was made available to the public on
December 11, 2014.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, a local agency shall review the information made
available to the public at the next regularly sched uled public meeting but not less than 15 days
after this information is made available to the pub lic.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Annual Compliance Report for Planned Drainage Area Fees Backup Material
1
2
3
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
4
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
5
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
2
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
3
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
4
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
2
5
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
6
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
7
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Miscellaneous ah.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Planned Sewer Area Fees prepa red in
accordance with California Government Code 66006.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the City s annual compliance report for Planned Sewer Area Fees for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2014 prepared in accordance with Cal ifornia Government Code 66006.
There may be imposed by local ordinance a requireme nt for the payment of fees for purposes of
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewer facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas (GC 66483).
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the loc al agency shall, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public specific information as outlined in this
Code Section. The attached Annual Compliance Report was made available to the public on
December 11, 2014.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, a local agency shall review the information made
available to the public at the next regularly sched uled public meeting but not less than 15 days
after this information is made available to the pub lic.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Annual Compliance Report for PSA Fees Backup Material
CIT Y Y OF B B AKE RSFI E E LD
FISC AL YE AR 2 13-2 14
0 0 0 0
ANN AL OMP IAN E RE ORT OR
U U C C L L C C P P F F
LAN ED S WER REA FEES
P P N N E E A A
Prep red in a corda ce with aliforni Gover ment C de §66 06
a a c c n C C a a n n o o 0 0
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR
PLANNED SEWER AREA FEES
FY 2013 – 14
City Council
Harvey L. Hall ……………………………………………………………………………………Mayor
Willie Rivera ………………………………………………………………………...Member/Ward 1
Terry Maxwell ………………………………………………………………………Member/Ward 2
Ken Weir ………………………………………………………………………...Vice Mayor/Ward 3
Bob Smith …………………………………………………………………………..Member/Ward 4
Harold W. Hanson ………………………………………………………………...Member/Ward 5
Jacquie Sullivan …………………………………………………………………..Member/Ward 6
Russell Johnson ……………………………………………………………………Member/Ward 7
Administrative Personnel
Alan Tandy …………………………………………………………………………….City Manager
Virginia Gennaro ………………………………………………………………………City Attorney
Douglas McIsaac ………………………………………….Community Development Director
Nelson K. Smith …………………………………………………………………….Finance Director
Doug Greener ………………………………………………………………………………Fire Chief
Greg Williamson …………………………………………………………………….......Police Chief
Nick Fidler ........... .................... ...................... .................. .................. ......Public Works Directo r
Dianne Hoover ………………………………………………………Directo r Recreation & Parks
Art Chianello ………………………………………………………….Water Resources Manager
Annual Compliance Report for
Planned Sewer Area Fees
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………... 1-2
Annual reporting requirements …………………………………………………… 3
Allen Road planned sewer area …………………………………………………. 4
Allen Road II planned sewer area ……………………………………………….. 5
Brimhall planned sewer area ……………………………………………………… 6
Curnow planned sewer area ……………………………………………………... 7
Hooper Avenue & Kimberly Avenue planned sewer area …………………. 8
McAllister Ranch planned sewer area ………………………………………….. 9
Panama & Monitor planned sewer area ……………………………………….. 10
Pierce & Oak planned sewer area ………………………………………………. 11
Introduction
There may be imposed by local ordinance a requirement for the payment of fees for
purposes of defraying the actual or estima ted costs of constructing planned drainage
facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from local or neighborhood drainage
areas and of constructing planned sanitary sewe r facilities for local sanitary sewer areas.
(GC §66483)
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the local agency shall, within 180 days after
the last day of each fiscal ye ar, make available to the publ ic specific information. The
specific information to be made available to the public is summarized on Page 3 of this
Report.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, af ter the information contained in the Report
is made available to the public, the Council sha ll review the information in the Report at the
next regularly scheduled public meeting. Howe ver, the public meeting must occur not less
than 15 days after the information contained in the Report is made available to the public
.
There are currently eight planned sewer areas within the metropolitan Bakersfield area
subject to Government Code Section 66006:
1. Allen Road Planned Sewer Area (Wards 4 & 5) – This PSA is in Coun ty Service Area 71 and
was formed in association with Assessment Dist rict No. 96-2 with the intention of funding a
sewer trunk line on Allen Road from White Lane north to a point ¼ mile south of Rosedale
Highway. The City funded its portion of t he work with Sewer Enterprise Funds and bond
proceeds from the Assessment District.
2. Allen Road II Planned Sewer Area (Ward 4) – This PSA is in County Service Area 71 and was
formed to repay the Sewer Enterprise Fund fo r the fronting cost of extending the Allen
Road Trunk Line from Rosedale Highway to Noriega Road.
3. Brimhall Planned Sewer Area (Ward 4) – This PSA is in County Se rvice Area 71 and was
formed to reimburse the City for the construc tion of a sewer trunk line on Brimhall Road
extending west from Allen Road about ¾ mile. Sewer Enterprise funds were used for this
construction.
4. Curnow Planned Sewer Area (Wards 6 & 7) – This PSA was formed in response to the
growth being experienced in so uthwest and south Bakersfield at the time. This PSA will
fund the construction of a large sewer trunk line extending from Plant 3 along
Curnow/Romero Road to Cottonwood Road. It is expected that portions of the line
would be constructed by developers, with the resultant reimbursement agreements, as
well as Assessment Districts or Community Facilities Districts.
5. Hooper Avenue and Kimberly Avenue Pla nned Sewer Area (Ward 3) – This PSA was
formed to reimburse the City fo r the construction of a sanita ry sewer line in the area of
Kimberly Avenue and Hooper Avenue. In 2008 and 2009, two areas were annexed to the
1
City. The City and neighborhood residents desired sewer faciliti es in these areas. The City
has constructed and is contin uing to construct sanitary sewer lines to accommodate
those residents who desire to connect to the City’s sewer system.
6. McAllister Ranch Planned Sewer Area (War d 5) – This PSA was formed to fund the
construction of a sewer trunk line in Pana ma Lane from Buena Vista Road to a point
approximately 2 miles west of that intersec tion. The actual cons truction is to be
completed as development occurs and would be subject to reimbursement agreements.
7. Panama & Monitor Planned Sewer Area (Wards 1 and 7) – This PSA was formed to pay for
the construction of a sewer trun k line in Monitor Street from Fairview to Panama Lane and
in Panama lane from Monitor to approximately Parsons Way.
8. Pierce & Oak Planned Sewer Area (Wards 2 an d 3) – This PSA was formed to pay for the
construction of sewer lines to serve an industrial area between Buck Owens Boulevard
(then Pierce Road) and Oak Street/the Kern Rive r and from SR 204 to the Standard Pacific
Railroad. These sewer lines will be construc ted by the City as we accumulate enough
funds to pay for them.
The above planned sewer areas (PSA’s) are separated into individual accounts in
accordance with California Government Code §66483 and Bakersfield Municipal Code
§16.32.060(D).
Each PSA’s fiscal year activity will be reported separately.
2
Annual Reporting Requirements
Government Code Section 66006 (b) (1) sets forth the annual compliance reporting
requirements as:
For each separate account or fund establis hed pursuant to subdivision (a), the local
agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available
to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
(B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balanc e of the account or fund.
(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.
(E) An identification of each public improvement on wh ich fees were expended
and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total
percentage of the cost of the public im provement that was funded with fees.
(F) An identification of an approximate da te by which the construction of the
public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that
sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete
public improvement, as identified in para graph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section
66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete.
(G) A description of each inter-fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and, in the case of an inter-fund loan, the date on which the loan
will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on
the loan.
(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and
any allocations pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
Items A through H listed above are reproduc ed on each report to ensure accuracy,
understanding, and compliance.
3
ALLEN ROAD PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B) Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by the number of
equivalent dwelling units within the PSA boundaries :
1
2013 - $919.22 per equivalent dwelling unit
2014 - $992.76 per equivalent dwelling unit
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Allen Road planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $732,445.36
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $1,122,955.96
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $384,662.91
Interest Earned $5,847.69
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 103-98(1) available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=8719
4
ALLEN ROAD II PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B) Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by the number of
equivalent dwelling units within the PSA boundaries :
1
2013 - $918.58 per equivalent dwelling unit
2014 - $946.14 per equivalent dwelling unit
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Allen Road II planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $324,421.96
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $517,799.61
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $190,836.66
Interest Earned $2,540.99
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 084-07 available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=624165
5
BRIMHALL PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B) Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by the number of
equivalent single family dwelling units within the PSA boundaries :
1
2013 - $129.20 per equivalent dwelling unit
2014 - $133.08 per equivalent dwelling unit
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Brimhall planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $43,940.48
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $48,937.95
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $4,685.50
Interest Earned $311.97
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 202-03 available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=235135
6
CURNOW PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B) Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by both the number
of acres and the number of dwelling units within the PSA boundaries :
1
2013 - $1,866 per equivalent dwelling unit / $7,465 per acre
2014 - $1,997 per equivalent dwelling unit / $7,987 per acre
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Curnow planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $214,574.12
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $555,145.39
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $338,162.80
Interest Earned $2,408.47
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 213-07 is available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=642261
7
HOOPER AVENUE & KIMBERLY AVENUE PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B)
Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by the number of
dwelling units within the PSA boundaries :
1
2013 - $10,560.72 per equivalent dwelling unit
2014 - $10,877.54 per equivalent dwelling unit
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Hooper Avenue & Kimberly Avenue planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $0
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $0
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $0
Interest Earned $0
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 069-11(1) is available at: http://www .bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/0/doc/962718/Page1.aspx
8
McALLISTER RANCH PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B) Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by the number of
acres within the PSA boundaries for commercial property and by the number of equivalent
single family dwelling units for residential :
1
2013 - $382.02 per equivalent dwelling unit / $7,185.45 per acre
2014 - $382.02 per equivalent dwelling unit / $7,623.04 per acre
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
McAllister planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $15,587.90
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $15,908.78
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $0
Interest Earned $320.88
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 170-06 available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=541898
9
PANAMA & MONITOR PLANNED SEWER AREA
1
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(C) Amount of fee
N/A – fee no longer charged
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Panama & Monitor planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $2,229.41
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $2,244.35
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $0
Interest Earned $14.94
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 94-84 available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=7875
10
PIERCE & OAK PLANNED SEWER AREA
(A) Description of fee
Prior to approval of any development entitlement including, but not limited to, any general plan
land use designation amendment, rezoning, the filing of any final map or parcel map, the
granting of a conditional use permit, or after the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract within
an assessment district, the subdivider/property ow ner shall pay or cause to be paid any fees for
defraying the actual or estimated costs of construc ting planned sanitary sewers facilities for local
sanitary sewer areas pursuant to sanitary sewer plans adopted by the council, or connection to
sanitary sewer facilities therefore in accordance wi th Article 5 of Chapter 4 of Division 2 of Title 7
of the California Government Code (Section 66483 et seq.) BMC §16.32.060(E)
(B) Amount of fee
The fee is calculated by dividing the construction costs of the improvements by the number of
acres within the PSA boundaries :
1
Benefit Area 1 fee = $605 per acre
Benefit Area 2 fee = $1,365 per acre
(C) Beginning and ending balance
Pierce Road – Oak Street planned sewer area
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/13 $49,205.30
Ending Balance @ 6/30/14 $49,535.72
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
PSA fees $0
Interest Earned $330.42
(E) Public Improvements
N/A
(F) Timing of projects
N/A
(G) Interfund transfers/loans
N/A
(H) Refunds
N/A
1
Resolution No. 73-84 is available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=7855
11
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Miscellaneous ai.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
DATE:
12/16/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Review and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 Annual
Compliance Report for Transportation Impact Fees pr epared in
accordance with California Government Code 66006.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the City s annual compliance report for Transportation Impac t Fees for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2014 prepared in accordance with Cal ifornia Government Code 66006.
In April 1992, Council adopted a transportation imp act fee program to fund improvements to the
Metropolitan Bakersfield transportation system nece ssary to accommodate future growth. In
January 1997, Council adopted Phase II of this prog ram, which was designed to fund more
projects and eliminate the need for developers to p rovide transportation impact studies for most
projects. In September 2003, Council adopted Phase III of this program with the intent of
updating the program and encouraging in-fill develo pment by creating a Core and Non- Core area
within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan li mits including individual fee structures for the
respective areas. In July 2009, Council approved Ph ase IV of this program which adopted a
regional program and projects development through 2 035.
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the loc al agency shall, within 180 days after the
last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public specific information as outlined in this
Code Section. The attached Annual Compliance Report was made available to the public on
December 11, 2014.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, a local agency shall review the information made
available to the public at the next regularly sched uled public meeting but not less than 15 days
after this information is made available to the pub lic.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Annual Compliance Report for Transportation Impact Fees Backup Material
Annual Compliance Report Attachment A Exhibit
Annual Compliance Report Attachment B Exhibit
Annual Compliance Report Attachment C Exhibit
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
FISCAL YEAR 2013 - 2014
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPO RT FOR
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
Prepared in accordance with California Government Code §66006
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
FY 20 13 - 14
City Council
Harvey L. Hall ……………………………………………………………………………………Mayor
Willie Rivera ………………………………………………………………………...Member/Ward 1
Terry Maxwell ………………………………………………………………………Member/Ward 2
Ken Weir ………………………………………………………………………...Vice Mayor/Ward 3
Bob Smith …………………………………………………………………………..Member/Ward 4
Harold W. Hanson ………………………………………………………………...Member/Ward 5
Jacquie Sullivan …………………………………………………………………..Member/Ward 6
Russell Johnson ……………………………………………… ……………………Member/Ward 7
Administrative Personnel
Alan Tandy …………………………………………………………………………….City Manager
Virginia Gennaro ………………………………………………………………………City Attorney
Douglas McIsaac ………………………………………….Community Development Director
Nelson K. Smith …………………………………………………………………….Finance Director
Doug Greener ………………………………………………………………………………Fire Chief
Greg Williamson …………………………………………………………………….......Police Chief
Nick Fidler ...............................................................................................Public Works Director
Dianne Hoover ………………………………………………………Director Recreation & Parks
Art Chianello ………………………………………………………….Water Resources Manager
Annual Compliance Report for
Transportation Impact Fees
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction… …………………………………………………………………………….. 1
Summary of FY 2013 - 14 fisca l activity………………………………………………… 1
Annual reporting requir ements……………………………..…………………………. 2
Description of fee………………………………….....…………………………… …….. 3
Amount of fee…… …………………………………..…………………………………… 3 - 4
Beginning and ending fun d balance………………………………………………... 4
Fees collected and inter est earned………………………………………………….. 4
Public improvem ents…………………………………………………………………….. 5
Estimated timing of p rojects……………………………………………………………. 5
Interfund transfers/l oans………………………………………………………………… 5
Refunds………… ………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Public improvem ents…………………………………………………………………….. Attachment A
Estimated timing of projects… …………………………………………………………. Attachment B
Project narratives for expenditures equal to or e xceeding $500,000………… .. Attachment C
Introduction
In April 1992, Council adopted a transportation impact fee program to fund improvements
to the Metropolitan Bakersfield transportation system necessary to accommodate future
growth. In January 1997, Council adopted Phase II of this program, which was designed to
fund more projects and eliminate the need for developers to provide transportation impact
studies for most projects. In September 2003, Council adopted Phase III of this program with
th e intent of updating the program and encouraging in - fill development by creating a Core
and Non - Core area within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan limits including
individual fee structures for the respective areas. In July 2009, Council approved P hase IV of
this program which adopted a regional program and projects development through 2035.
Government Code Section 66006 requires that the local agency shall, within 180 days after
the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public spec ific information. The
specific information to be made available to the public is summarized on Page 2 of this
Report.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, after the information contained in the Report
is made available to the public, the Council shall review the information in the Report at the
next regularly scheduled public meeting. However, the public meeting must occur not less
than 15 days after the information contained in the Report is made available to the public.
Summary of FY 2013 - 14 Fiscal Activity
Transportation Development Fund
F und Balance – Beginning 7/1/20 1 3 $ 41,442,105
Revenues
Traffic Impact Fees 21,273,301
Charges for Services 182,660
Interest Income 1 93,153
Change in Fair Value of Investments 118,243
Developer Share of Projects 400,000
Prior Year Reimbursements 9,695
SLTPP Reimbursements 1,462,671
Total Revenues $ 23,639,723
Expenditures
General and Administrative 1, 398,926
Capital Projects 20,789,510
Total Expenditures $ 22,188,436
Fund Balance – Ending 6/30/201 4 $ 42,893,393
1
Annual Reporting Requirements
Government C ode Section 66006 (b) (1) sets forth the annual compliance reporting
requirements as:
For each separate account or fund established pursuant to subdivision (a), the local
agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available
to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
(A) A bri ef description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
(B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
(D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.
(E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended
and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total
percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.
(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the
public imp rovement will commence if the local agency determines that
sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete
public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section
66001, and the public improvement remain s incomplete.
(G) A description of each inter - fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and, in the case of an inter - fund loan, the date on which the loan
wi ll be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on
the loan.
(H) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and
any allocations pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
2
(A) Description of fee
Any person who applies to the city for the issuance of a building permit to make
an improvement to land for one of the uses which is specified in the current
resolution adopting the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, and which will
generate or att ract additional traffic, shall be required to pay a transportation
impact fee. (BMC 15.84.040)
Funds collected from transportation impact fees shall be used for the purpose of
capital improvements to transportation facilities associated with the “Regional
Transportation Facilities List.” Such improvements shall be of the type as are
made necessary by the new development. No funds shall be used for periodic
or routine maintenance. Funds shall be used exclusively for capital
improvements within the city or f or projects outside the city but within the
Bakersfield Metropolitan General Plan area which are a direct benefit to the
city. (BMC 15.84.070)
(B) Amount of fee
Phase III Transportation Impact Fee*:
Non - Core
Core Area Area
Residential – per living unit
Single Family Residence $3, 661 $7, 343
Multi - Family Residence $1, 757 $3, 524
Non - Residential per ADT**
Heavy/Light Industrial $ 92 $18 7
Office Commercial
Under 100,000 sq. ft. $6 8 $13 6
100,000 – 199,999 sq. ft. $ 80 $161
200,000 sq. ft. & over $ 90 $181
Retail Commercial
Under 10,000 sq. ft. $3 4 $ 70
10,000 – 49,999 sq. ft. $5 5 $1 10
50,000 – 99,999 sq. ft. $7 8 $1 55
100,000 sq. ft. & over
Individual study Individual study
*Resolution No. 218 - 08 (available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/weblink7/DocView.aspx?id=780751 )
**Average Daily Trip
3
(B) Amount of fee – continued
Phase IV Transportation Impact Fee * :
Non - Core
Core Area Area
Residential – per living unit
Single Family Residence $7,747 $ 12,870
Multi - Family Residence $3,740 $6,213
Non - Residential per ADT**
Heavy/Service Industrial $112 $186
Office Commercial
Under 100,000 sq. ft. $86 $1 4 3
100,000 – 199,999 sq. ft. $98 $163
200,000 sq. ft. & over $106 $175
$95 $157
Public/Government
Retail Commercial
Under 10,000 sq. ft. $47 $78
10,000 – 49,999 sq. ft. $66 $110
50,000 – 99,999 sq. ft. $101 $167
100,000 – 199,999 sq. ft. $107 $178
200,000 – 299,999 sq. ft. $130 $216
300,000 – 399,999 sq. ft. $141 $233
400,000 – 499,999 sq. ft. $141 $233
500,000 – 999,999 sq. ft. $142 $236
1,000,000 sq. ft. & over $142 $236
* Resolution No. 084 - 09 (available at: http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/ WEBLINK7/0/doc/836230 /Page1.aspx )
**Average Daily Trip
(C) Beginning and ending fund balance
Transportation Development Fund
Beginning Balance @ 7/1/1 3 $ 41,442,105
Ending Balance @ 6/30/1 4 $ 42,893,393
(D) Fees collected and interest earned
Tra ffic Impact Fees $
21,273,301
Interest Earned (fund wide) $
193,243
4
(E) Public Improvements
See "Attachment A ”
(F) Timing of projects
See "Attachment B "
(G) I nter fund transfers/loans
There were no interfund transfers during the fiscal year.
(H) Refunds
No refunds were made during the fiscal year under this code section.
5
Attachment C
(Description of projects with expenditures over $500K)
T3K204 Street improvements Hosking Road
This project calls for the addition of four lanes to Hosking Avenue between Wible Road
and Hughes Lane. This is a multi-year project initially budgeted in FY 12/13.
T3K232 Street improvements Mohawk
This project is for the addition of four lanes to Mohawk Street from Siena to Hageman
Road, including a traffic signal at the intersection of Mohawk and Hageman. This is a
multi-year project with design and right-of-way budgeted in FY 13/14 and construction
in FY 14/15.
VARIOUS New Signal Construction
There are multiple projects for the construction of new signals, either new this fiscal year
or as carryovers from prior years. These are for intersections that meet warrants for
installation of a traffic signal as established by federal and state requirements. The
signal installations provide right-of-way for the safe, orderly flow of public traffic and are
capable of future coordination. Present funding levels do not allow for budgeting all
warranted signals in one fiscal year. Warranted signals are prioritized based on
accident history along with ot her factors including traffic volumes, speed, delays, etc.
TRIP Projects
There are multiple projects that are a part of the Thomas Roads Improvement Program
(TRIP). These projects are primarily funded with federal earmark dollars but require a
non-federal match to these earmarked funds. Transportation Impact Fee funds are
used for this non-federal match.
Three projects are in construction:
The SR-58 Gap Closure, which widens the SR-58 freeway from 4 lanes to 6 lanes
between SR-99 and Cottonwood Road, will be completed by early 2015.
The SR-178 and Morning Drive Interchange, which includes extending the SR-178
freeway one mile to the east, from east of Fairfax Road to Canteria Drive. Also
included in this project is the construction of a new bridge along Morning Drive
over SR-178. The expected completion da te for this project is July 2015.
The Beltway Operational Improvements Pr oject design, which improves elements
of SR-99 and SR-58 in advance of the Centennial Corridor Project, was
completed in July 2014. The bid for this project opened October 15, 2014,
awarded October 22nd, 2014 and construction should start January 2015.
In addition, there are two projects that are approaching final design, right-of-way
acquisition, and getting ready to go to bid:
The Rosedale Highway Widening between SR-99 and Allen Road began design
in July, 2012 and the design/right-of-way was completed in October 2014. This
Page of
1 2
Attachment C
(Description of projects with expenditures over $500K)
project is to be bid November 2014 and the expected construction start is March
2015.
The SR-178 Widening Project between Canteria Drive and Miramonte Drive
began design in September 2012 and de sign/right-of-way will be completed in
December 2014. This project is to be bid January 2014 with construction activities
to begin in May 2015.
There is one project that is in the beginning of design:
The 24th Street Improvements Project betw een SR-99 and just east of M Street
obtained Environmental Clearance and began design in May 2014.
Design/right-of-way is anticipated to be completed by early 2016.
There is also one project in the envi ronmental clearance phase of project
development.
The Centennial Corridor will connect the SR-58 freeway west of SR-99 with the
newly completed Westside Parkway freeway west of SR-99. The draft
environmental document for this project was circulated for public comment in
June 2014.
STIP Funded Projects
The Westside Parkway projects are primar ily funded by the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), but there are also some Transportation Impact Fee funds
used to augment the STIP funding. Phase 1, which includes Mohawk Street between
Rosedale Highway and Truxtun Avenue, is completed. Phase 2, 4, and 6B were also
completed and opened to traffic in August of 2013. These phases of the Westside
Parkway included the mainline freeway between Truxtun Avenue and Allen Road, the
interchanges at Mohawk Street, Coffee Road, Calloway Drive, and a partial
interchange/Overpass at Allen Road. The co nstruction contract for Phase 6C of the
Westside Parkway, which will finish the final westerly two miles of the Westside Parkway
from Allen Road to Stockdale Highway/Heath Road, was awarded in December of
2012 and is scheduled to be completed in early 2015.
Page of
2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Miscellaneous aj.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/19/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Audit Reports to be referred to Budget and Finance Committee:
1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for th e fiscal year
ended June 30, 2014.
2.Agreed Upon Conditions Report for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2014.
3.Post (SAS 114) Audit Findings and Compliance Repo rt for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.
4.Independent Auditors Report Compliance with Con tractual
Requirements relative to the Bakersfield Subregiona l Wastewater
Management Plan for the year ended June 30, 2014.
5.Independent Auditors Report on Appropriations Lim it Worksheet
(GANN Limit) of the City of Bakersfield for the fis cal year ended
June 30, 2014.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends referral to the Budget and Finance Committee.
BACKGROUND:
1. The Citys Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), commonly referred to as the
Annual Audit Report, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 will be provided to the City Council
as a separate document prior to the council meeting . A copy of the report will also be on file in
the City Clerks office for public review. The CAFR represents the Citys financial statements as
of June 30, 2014, which are audited by the accounti ng firm of Brown Armstrong Accountancy
Corporation. The current year audit opinion issued by the outside auditors indicates that the City
complied, in all material respects, with accounting principals generally accepted in the United
States of America.
2. The Agreed Upon Conditions Report is designed to increase efficiency, internal controls and/or
financial reporting and includes any reportable con ditions noted during the Audit. The current
report, issued by the outside auditors, is attached for your review and indicates there were no
reportable conditions identified during the current audit period.
3. The Post SAS 114 Audit Findings and Compliance Report is a required disclosure report in
accordance with auditing standards. This report id entifies any issues or problems the auditors
encountered during their audit work. The report al so highlights any accounting adjustments
made during the audit period. The current report, issued by the outside auditors, is attached for
your review and indicates that all significant tran sactions have been recognized in the financial
statements in the proper period.
4. Contract requirements contained in City of Baker sfield Agreement 76-153 as amended by
Agreements 76 -153(5), 76-153(4), 77-44, 85-197 and 92-106 apply to operations of the
Bakersfield Sub-regional Wastewater management Plan . The Citys compliance with contract
requirements is audited on an annual basis. The cur rent Compliance Report, issued by the
outside auditors, is attached for your review and i ndicates that there were no audit findings.
5. Attached is a letter from the Citys independent auditors Brown Armstrong Accountancy
Corporation indicating they have completed their an nual review of the Appropriations Limit
Worksheet prepared by the City in accordance with S ection 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution (GANN Limit). This annual review is pe rformed by the auditors as part of their
contract to provide auditing services to the City o f Bakersfield. The agreed upon review
procedures are substantially less in scope than an audit and therefore no audit opinion is
expressed regarding the calculation.
Staff is recommending that these documents be refer red to the Budget and Finance committee
for further review and discussion, to be returned t o the full Council for acceptance at a future
Council meeting date.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Independent Auditors Opinion Letter for CAFR Backup Material
Agreed Upon Conditions Report Backup Material
Post SAS 114 Letter Backup Material
Wastewater Agreed Upon Procedures Backup Material
GANN Appropriations Limit Backup Material
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
Bakersfield, California
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial st atements of the governmental activities, the
business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate rem
City of Bakersfield, California, (the City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2014, and the
related notes to the financial st atements, which collectively comprise the Citys basic financial
statements as listed in t he table of contents.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparatio n and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and fair presentation of fi nancial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express opinions on t hese financial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
Government
States of America and the st andards applicable to financial audits contained in
Auditing Standards
, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obt ain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free fr om material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence
disclosures in the financial st atements. The procedures se lected depend on the auditors
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the ent itys preparation and fa ir presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expr essing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Citys internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as
presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtai ned is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinions.
Opinions
In our opinion, the financial stat ements referred to above present fairly, in all material respect
the respective financial position of the governme ntal activities, the business-type activities,
each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fu nd information of the City, as of June 30,
2014, and the respective changes in financial position and, wher
the year then ended in accordance with accountin g principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
1
Emphasis of Matter
As disclosed in the Note 1 to the fin ancial statements, the City of Bakersfield implemen ted GASB Statement No. 66,
Technical Corrections - 2012 – an amendm ent of GASB Statements No. 10 and No 62,
GASB Statement No. 67,
Financial Reporting for Pension Plans – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 25, Accounting and
and No. 70,
Financial Reporting for Nonexchange Financial Guarantees,
during the fiscal year 2014. There was no significant
impact over the City of Bakersfields financial statements.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the managements discussion
and analysis and budgetary comparison information on page s 3 through 17 and 96 through 97 as well as schedules
of funding progress on pages 98 through 99 be presented to supplement the bas ic financial statements. Such
information, although not a part of the basic financial st atements, is required by th e Governmental Accounting
Standards Board (GASB), who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the b
statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures
to the required supplementary information in accordance with aud
States of America, which co nsisted of inquiries of mana gement about the methods of preparing the information and
comparing the information for consistency with management s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial
statements, and other knowledge we obta ined during our audit of the basic financ ial statements. We do not express
an opinion or provide any assurance on the informati on because the limited procedure s do not provide us with
sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assuran
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise
the Citys basic financial statements. The introductory sect ion, combining and individual major and nonmajor fund
financial statements and schedules as well as schedules of long-term debt recorded in private purpose trust fund on
pages 104 through 135, and statistical section, are pres ented for purposes of additio nal analysis and are not a
required part of the basic financial statements.
The combining and individual major and nonmajor fund financial s
long-term debt recorded in private purpose trust fund on pa ges 104 through 135 are the responsibility of management
and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying acco
financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic
financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such informatio
to the underlying accounting and other records used to pre pare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial
statements themselves, and other addition al procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally ac
the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual major and nonmajor fund f
statements and schedules as well as sch edules of long-term debt recorded in private purpose trust fund on pages
104 through 135 are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory and statistical sections have not been subject ed to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the
basic financial statements and, accord ingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on
Other Reporting Required by
Government Auditing Standards
Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with , we have also issued our report dated December 15, 2014, on
our consideration of the Citys internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreem ents and other matters. The purpose of that report is to
describe the scope of our testing of inte rnal control over financial reporting an d compliance and the results of that
testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control ov er financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an
Government Auditing Standards
integral part of an audit performed in accordance with in considering Citys internal
control over financial reporting and compliance.
BROWN ARMSTRONG
ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
Bakersfield, California
December 15, 2014
2
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
REPORT TO MANAGEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
AGREED-UPON CONDITIONS REPO RT DESIGNED TO INCREASE
EFFICIENCY, INTERNAL CONTROLS AND/OR FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
Bakersfield, California
We have audited the basic financial statements of the City of Bakersfield, California,
(the City) for the year ended June 30, 2014, and have issued our report thereon
dated December 15, 2014. In planning and performing our audit of
statements of the City, we considered its internal control structure in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
financial statements and not to provide assu rance on the internal control structure.
As a result of our audit, we noted no agreed-upon condition invo
control structure and its operat ion. Please see attached fo r status of prior year
agreed-upon-conditions and recommendations.
This report is intended solely for the in formation and use of the Budget and Finance
Committee, Mayor, City Council, management of the City, others within the City, and
the regulatory agencies, and is not intended to be, and should n
anyone other than these specified parties.
BROWN ARMSTRONG
ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
Bakersfield, California
December 15, 2014
Current Year Agreed-Upon Conditions and Recommendations
None.
Status of Prior Year Agreed-Upon Conditions and Recommendations
Agreed-Upon Condition 2013-1
Condition
During our audit, we noted that the finance departm ent does not send out a list of assets to other
departments asking them to verify whet her or not capital assets are still there, are in working condit
obsolete, etc. As a result, the capital assets listi ng might not be up-to-date. Other departments might
have disposed of capital assets but the finance department was not informed.
Recommendation
We recommend that management send asset certificat ion lists to the departments on an annual basis.
Management Response
The City agreed and management will send annual as set certification letters to departments.
Current Year Status
Implemented.
Agreed-Upon Condition 2013-2 – IT User Access Control
Condition
During our IT general computing controls testing on the te rminated employees IT user access control, we
noted that 4 out of 5 selected termi nated employees access to the Ci tys IT network was not disabled
within a timely manner. There was a lag of five business days or more between the employees
termination date and the access cancellation date.
Recommendation
We recommend that a formal policy and procedure be es tablished to ensure that terminated employees'
user accounts to access City's information assets to be disabled or deleted from the systems within a
reasonable timeframe. The terminated employees' IT user accounts should be reviewed to ensure the
proper user access control to the critic al financial data and other information assets.
Management Response
Due to an oversight in this current year budgeting, we were not able to procure the HR Module for our
SunGard system. IT believes with the module and a formal policy and procedure, that the proper
timeliness can be achieved. Currently, when IT receives a termination request we disable the employees
account on the date designated. As of that date, th e individual employee no longer has access to City
systems. This system ensures the departing employee cannot access any thing nor sign on to the network.
This also ensures that City data is secure.
With the purchase of the HR Module, Finance, HR and IT will be able to create a written set of Policies
and Procedures which details procedures, timelin es and most importantly, how these should be
documented for both the iSeries and Active Directory environments.
Current Year Status
Implemented.
To the Budget and Finance Committee
City of Bakersfield, California
Bakersfield, California
We have audited the financial statement s of the governmental activities, the
business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate rem
information of the City of Bakersfield, Calif ornia (the City), for the year ended June 30,
2014. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our
responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, Government Auditing Standards, and OMB Circular A-133, as well as
certain information related to the planned scope and timing of o
communicated such information in our letter to you dated May 12,
standards also require that we communicate to you the following
to our audit.
Significant Audit Findings
Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropria
policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1
to the financial statements. The City adopted Governmental Accounting Standards
Board (GASB) Statements No. 66, Technical Corrections – 2012 – an amendment of
GASB Statements No. 10 and No. 62; GASB Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting
for Pension Plans – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 25; and GASB
Statement No. 70, Accounting and Financial Reporting for nonexchange Financial
Guarantees during fiscal year 2014. We noted no transactions entered into b
City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative
All significant transactions have been recogni zed in the financial statements in the
proper period.
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial st atements prepared by
management and are based on managements knowledge and experienc
past and current events and assumptions about future events. Cer
estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significan
statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the Citys
financial statements were:
Managements estimate of the net Other Post-Employment Benefits
(OPEB) obligation and managements es timate over self-insurance
claims liabilities. We evaluated t he key factors and assumptions used
to develop these estimates in deter mining that it is reasonable in
relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial
statement users. The most sensitive disclosu res affecting the financial statements were:
Note 12 Pledged Revenue
Note 13 Deferred Inflow of Resources
Note 16 Employee Retirement Benefits
Note 17 Other Post-Emp loyment Benefits (OPEB)
Note 19 Risk Assessment
Note 20 Commitments and Contingencies
Note 23 Prior Period Adjustments
Note 24 Extraordinary Items
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and
Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit
We encountered no significant difficulties in deali ng with management in performing and completing our
audit.
Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and li
audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, an d communicate them to the appropriate level of
management. Management has corrected all such misstatements. The
the corrected and uncorrected adjustments of the fin ancial statements. Management has determined that
their effects are immaterial, both individually and in th e aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a
whole.
Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with m anagement is a financial accounting, reporting, or
auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisf action, that could be significant to the financial
statements or the auditors report. We are pleased to report that no su ch disagreements arose during the
course of our audit.
Management Representations
We have requested certain representations from management that a
representation letter dated December 15, 2014.
Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting
matters, similar to obtaining a second opinion on certain situ
of an accounting principle to the Citys financial st atements or a determination of the type of auditors
opinion that may be expressed on th ose statements, our professional standards require the consulting
accountant to check with us to determine that the c onsultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge,
there were no such consultations with other accountants.
Other Audit Findings or Issues
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the applica
standards, with management each year prior to ret ention as the Citys auditors. However, these
discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional re
condition to our retention.
Other Matters
We applied certain limited procedures to Managem ents Discussions and Analysis and Budgetary
Comparison Schedules, which are required supplementary informati
financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of
preparing the information and comparing the information for cons
our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and ot her knowledge we obtained during our audit of the
basic financial statements. We did not audit t he RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any
assurance on the RSI.
We were engaged to report on Schedule of Expenditure s of Federal Awards and Combining Statement
and Schedules and other supplementary information, which accompany the finan cial statements but are
not RSI. With respect to this supplementary informat ion, we made certain inquiries of management and
evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing t he information to determine that the information
complies with accounting principles generally accept ed in the United States of America, the method of
preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in
relation to our audit of the financial statement s. We compared and reconciled the supplementary
information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the
financial statements themselves.
We were not engaged to report on Introductory Sect ion and Statistical Section, which accompany the
financial statements but are not RSI. We did not audi t or perform other procedures on this other
information and we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
Restriction on Use
This information is intended solely for the use of Budget and Finance Committee, Mayor, City Council,
and management of the City and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than
these specified parties.
BROWN ARMSTRONG
ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
Bakersfield, California
December 15, 2014
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 CONSENT - Successor Agency
Business ak.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director
DATE:
12/18/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Receive and file Successor Agency payments from Nov ember 25, 2014
to December 18, 2014 in the amount of $560,830.72.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends report be received and filed.
BACKGROUND:
The City administers payment of Successor Agency en forceable obligation payments as
authorized by the State Department of Finance (DOF) to further the dissolution of the former
Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency. The Successor Age ncy submits a Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule (ROPS) to the Bakersfield Oversigh t Board and the DOF every six (6) months
for approval. All payments of the Successor Agency must be on this approved listing in order to
be valid and authorized payments of the Successor A gency.
A check register is provided which summarizes the t ransactions processed during the above
referenced period. Additional details are provided below for each transaction.
Check #605702 to Chicago Title Company for $41,000. 00 is a payment for the Creekview Villas
Down Payment Assistance. Payment approved as ROPS 1 4-15A, line item #41.
Check #605704 to Chicago Title Company Inc. for $10 ,000.00 is a payment for the Creekview
Villas Down Payment Assistance. Payment approved as ROPS 14 -15A, line item #41.
Check #606232 to Chicago Title Company Inc. for $35 ,000.00 is a payment for the Parkview
Cottages Down Payment Assistance. Payment approved as ROPS 14-15A, line item #22.
Check #606238 to Golden Empire Affordable Housing f or $474,830.72 is for the Park 20th Senior
Housing Project Payment. Payment approved as ROPS 1 4-15A, line item #24.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
SA Check Register Admin 1-07-14 Backup Material
AP - CHECK REGISTER - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
12/19/2014 PAGE 1
FROM
11/25/2014 TO 12/18/2014
Check Vendor
Number Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Total
605702 10421 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 11/26/2014 41,000.00
605704 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 11/26/2014 10,000.00
606232 1944 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY INC 12/11/2014 35,000.00
606238 14923 GOLDEN EMPIRE AFFORDABLE HOUSING 12/11/2014 474,830.72
4 $560,830.72
E-Payables Vendor E-Payable E-Payables
Number Number Vendor Name Date Amount
0.00
0 $0.00
Disbursement Total
4 $560,830.72
S:\Accounting\Dawn T\Admin - Council\2014\COUNCIL-ADMIN-SA-2014\
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE:
1/7/2015 Hearings 10. a.
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Douglas N. McIsaac, Community Development Director
DATE:
12/11/2014
WARD:
SUBJECT:
Public hearing to consider resolution making findin gs and updating the
Capital Improvement Plan for the existing Metropoli tan Bakersfield
Habitat Conservation Plan. A finding that the proje ct is exempt from
CEQA will also be considered.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of resolution.
BACKGROUND:
This report constitutes the annual review and updat e of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for
the existing Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conse rvation Plan (MBHCP) in accordance with
California Government Code Section 66002.
The MBHCP is a joint- administered plan by both the City and the County o f Kern. The City
Council initially approved the MBHCP on August 25, 1993. Following final approval by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the MBHCP
became operational in August 1994. The original ta ke permit expired on August 24, 2014. On
August 25, 2014, the new Metropolitan Bakersfield I ncidental Take Permit took affect and allows
for the continued implementation of the MBHCP. The new permit is set to expire on September
1, 2019.
The preparation of the MBHCP and the protection aff orded by it was undertaken to provide a
means for individuals and developers in the metropo litan Bakersfield area to avoid costly project-
specific mitigation in complying with State and Fed eral Endangered Species Acts and to facilitate
connected conservation efforts. The plan describes the estimated costs of the program and
indicates the extent and types of facilities (land) to be acquired with the funding source. It also
serves as the CIP for the MBHCP. The program is se lf- supporting and requires no support funds
from the City or County.
Developers currently pay a $2,145 per acre mitigati on fee at grading plan approval to
compensate for direct and indirect impacts on endan gered species habitat from urban
development. These funds are used to purchase and manage habitat lands consistent with the
City s implementing agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wil dlife Service and California Department
of Fish and Wildlife. This fee also covers program administration, endowments for fencing, and
maintenance that are tied to the automatic cost-of- living increases by the State.
The MBHCP is administered by the MBHCP Implementati on Trust Group under a joint powers
agreement between the City and Kern County. The MB HCP Implementation Trust Group is
comprised of representatives from both the City and County, advisory members from the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and includes
an at-large public member.
The CIP, under the Trust Group's administration, ha s operated successfully in meeting the
program s obligations under the terms of the agreement with the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . Over 23,787 acres of endangered species
habitat land have been credited to implementation o f the MBHCP. The program has acted to
acquire approximately 1,533 acres of habitat mitiga tion land in 2014 and the total acreage
acquired currently meets the 1:1 ratio requirement that for every one acre of development on
open land, one acre of habitat land must be acquire d. This places the program ahead of the
take as required by Federal and State law, and the agree ment. Therefore, no changes to the
CIP are recommended and this update is a confirmati on of the present plan. Staff will continue
to monitor the adequacy of the CIP to ensure that t he program meets its legal obligations.
Staff has determined that the annual update of the MBHCP CIP is categorically exempt from the
requirement for preparation of environmental docume nts pursuant to Section 15308 of the State
CEQA Guidelines since the MBHCP assures the protect ion of the environment to comply with the
State and Federal Endangered Species Acts. Staff r ecommends adoption of the resolution
updating the CIP for the MBHCP.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution Updating MBHCP CIP Resolution
Exhibit A - Project Area Map Exhibit
E x h i b i t A : P r o j e c t A r e a
C I T Y O F W A S C O
D R E S S E R A V
C I T Y O F S H A F T E R
O i l d a l e
U N I V E R S I T Y A V
R o s e d a l e
G r e e n a c r e s C O L L E G E A V
N I L E S S T
P I O N E E R D R
O l d R i v e r
P u m p k i n C e n t e r
G r e e n f i e l d
L a m o n t
W e e d p a t c h
C I T Y O F A R V I N
B e a r V a l l e y
B U R K E T T B L V D
H E R R I N G R D
M e t t l e r
±
L E G E N D
M B H C P B O U N D A R Y
0 2 . 5 5 1 0
B a k e r s f i e l d C i t y L i m i t s
M i l e s