The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 RESULTS 2014SWRCB, January 2002 Page of Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary conlainmenl systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completedform, wrillen test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulato1y agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Bill Wright Toyota -, Date ofTesting: 7/11/2014 Facility Address: 5100 Gasoline Alley Dr Bakersfield, CA 93313 Facility Contact: Summer I Phone: 661-398-8697 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 6/26/2014 Name of Local Agency Inspector (ifpresenl during testing): · Shane Gardner 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Confidence UST Services Technician Conducting Test: Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor X SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: CSLB I License Number:804904 ICC# 8022804 TT# 11-1756 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires UST ICC 05/12/2016 lnstallaton/Retrofit UST Service ICC l-28-2015 technician Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A. 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Tested Made Tested Made 87 Annular X u 0 0 0 u 0 87 Secondary X 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-, LJ 87 STP X 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 UDC 1 X 0 0 0 u u 0 0 87 Fill Spill Bucket X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (] 0 0 [l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::J 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0 r 0 0 0 u ,...., 0 0 0 c ,...., 0 0 0 ..J If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Water was Eut back into test trailer and waste drum P NSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To tile best of my kllowledge, tare accurate a11d ill full complia11ce witll legal requirements Technician's Signature: .r-:; Date: 7/11/2014 I SWRCB, January 2002 Page of 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: D Tank Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer D Other (Specify) Test Method Used: D Pressure x Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic 0 Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625" Tank# Tank# Tank# Tank# Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Yes X No DYes ONo DYes DNo DYes CNo Tank Capacity: 10,000 Tank Material: Steel Tank Manufacturer: Unknown Product Stored: 87 Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min starting test: Test Start Time: 9:30am Initial Reading (R1): -10.00 Hg Test End Time: 10:30 am Final Reading (RF): -10.00 Hg Test Duration: I !lour Change in Reading (Rr-R1): 0.00" Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00" Test Result: X Pass DFail D Pass DFail D Pass 0 Fail D Pass DFail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No .... NA DYes ;]No DNA DYes 8No :='NA Yes 1No DNA Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes ONo DNA Yes DNo CNA DYes DNo JNA ;JYes LJNo DNA verified functional after testing? Comments-{include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-upfor.failed tests) 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)} SWRCB, January 2002 Page_ of_ 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer []Other (Specify) Test Method Used: x Pressure 0 Vacuum [] Hydrostatic :J Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625" Piping Run# I Piping Run# Piping Run# Piping Run# Piping Material: FRP Piping Manufacturer: Smith Piping Diameter: 3.00" Length of Piping Run: 80' Product Stored: 87 Method and location of Test Boot piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 5 Min starting test: Test Start Time: 9:30am Initial Reading (R1): 5.00" PSI Test End Time: 10:30 am Final Reading (RF): 5.00" PSI Test Duration: I Hour Change in Reading CRF-R1): 0.00" Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.00" Criteria: Test Result: X Pass OFail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail -----------------------··----··---·-·- Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page _of_ 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: IJ Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer D Other (Specify) Test Method Used: .J Pressure Ll Vacuum x Hydrostatic '1 Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution: Sump# 87 Sump# Sump# Sump# Sump Diameter: 38.00" Sump Depth: 60.00" Sump Material: FRP Height from Tank Top to Top of 14.00" Hi~hest Pipin~ Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 17.00" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean & Dry Portion of Sump Tested 1 Pipe Penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?• DYes DNo X NA 0 Yes DNoXNA DYes DNoXNA DYes DNo DNA Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?· DYes DNo XNA DYes DNoXNA DYes DNoXNA DYes ~""~No DNA Was fail-safe verified to be C Yes 1No XNA DYes DNoXNA operational?• DYes CNoX NA U Yes DNo :=NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting 5 Min 5 Min 5Min test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-Rr): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA 0 Yes DNo DNA Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes DNo DNA OYesDNo DNA DYes DNo DNA 0 Yes DNo DNA verified functional after testing? Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up[or[ailed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to ill!Y of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page __ of __ . --. -----. ~---- Test Method Developed By: D UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard D Professional Engineer D Other (Specify) Test Method Used: DPressure D Vacuum x Hydrostatic D Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Ts-sts Equipment Resolution: UDC#l UDC# UDC# UDC# UDC Manufacturer: Western UDC Material: FRP UDC Depth: 30.00" Height from UDC Bottom to Top 9.00" of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to 4.00" Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition ofUDC prior to Clean & Dry testing: Portion ofUDC Tested Pipe Penetration Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* DYes DNo XNA DYes DNoXNA DYes DNo XNA DYes DNo XNA Turbine shutdown response time NA NA NA NA Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?· DYes DNo XNA DYes DNoXNA DYes DNo XNA DYes DNo XNA Was fail-safe verified to be DYes DNo XNA DYes DNoX NA DYes DNo XNA DYes DNo XNA operational?• Wait time between applying 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min 5 Min pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R1): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass DFail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail Was sensor removed for testing? XYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA Was sensor properly replaced and XYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes D No DNA verified functional after testing? - Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up.forfailed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to~ of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page_ of_ 8. FlLL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps X I Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested '-' ! ' Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard D Professional Engineer . D Other (Specify) j Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum D Hydrostatic ! D Other (Specify) I Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: I Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: i Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R1): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-R1): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: D Pass D Fail D Pass D Fail D Pass DFail D Pass DFail Is there a sensor in the sump? DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is DYes ONo DNA DYes ONo DNA DYes DNo DNA DYes DNo DNA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? DYes UNo "NA CYes DNo DNA DYes DNo :JNA DYes CNo _,NA Was sensor properly replaced and DYes DNo DNA DYes wNo DNA u Yes DNo DNA L Yes :JNo :JNA verified functional after testing? Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfol/ow-upfor failed tests)