HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 046-15RESOLUTION NO 046- 1 5
RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
MAP DESIGNATION OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL
PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA
FE WAY, NORTH OF AUSTIN CREEK AVENUE (GPA /ZC NO. 14-
0480).
WHEREAS, Rosedale Land & Development, Inc., representing Bryan & Marie
Batey Family Trust„ filed an application with the City of Bakersfield Community
Development Department requesting an amendment to the land use map designation
of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan from R -IA (Resource- Intensive Agriculture)
and SR (Suburban Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 87.41 acres and LI
(Light Industrial) on 7.94 acres and an amendment to Title 17 of the Bakersfield
Municipal Code to change the Zone District from A (Agriculture) and E (Estate) to R -1
(One Family Dwelling) on 82.41 acres, M -1 (Light Manufacturing) on 7.94 acres and DI
(Drilling Island) on 5.0 acres located on the west side of Santa Fe Way, north of Austin
Creek Avenue (the "Project "); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of a Negative
Declaration with mitigation measures for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 5:15 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the
time and place for a public hearing before the City Council to consider the proposed
Negative Declaration as required by Government Code Section 65355, and notice of
the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony,
and evidence concerning the staff report, Negative Declaration and the Planning
Commission's deliberation, and action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:
1. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 17 -15 are
hereby adopted.
2. The Negative Declaration for the Project is hereby adopted subject to the
mitigation measures in Exhibit A for the Project located on the map as shown
in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein.
--- - - - - -- 000 -- - - - - --
Page 1 of 2 11gAK4 9
o 1p,
� m
� r
v o
()RIQINAL
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of AYt O he City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on
M 6 2015 , by the following vote:
NO
AB
ABSENT:
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
COUNCILMEMBER: RIVERA, MAXWELL, WEIR, HANSON,SULLIVAN, PARLIER
COUNCILMEMBER: N
COUNCILMEMBER: SMA
COUNCILMEMBER:
II AV n n nn—
ROBERTA GAFFORD, C
CITY CLERK and Ex Offilcio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:
ANDREW HEGLUND
Deputy City Attorney
Exhibits: A Mitigation Measures
B Location Map
By: DL \S: \GPAs \GPA 2nd 2015 \14 - 0480 \Res Ord \RES CC ENV 14- 0480.docx
Page 2 of 2 o��AKF9s�
> m
F— r
'v
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Mitigation Measures from Negative Declaration
General Plan Amendment /Zone Change No. 14 -0480
Air Quality and Green House Gas Mitigation Measures
1. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant /developer of the project site shall submit
documentation to the Planning Division that they will /have met all air quality control
measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts.
Project Related Mitigation Measures
2. Use of Tier 3 equipment and standard dust control methods are required for construction
mitigation measures; and use of ISR measures (increased diversity, increased street
connections, improved distance to central Bakersfield) are required for operational
mitigation measures.
Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts.
Required PM10 Reduction Measures
3. As the project would be completed in compliance with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII, dust
control measures shall be taken to ensure compliance specifically during grading and
construction phases. The required Regulation VII measures are as follows:
a. Water previously exposed surfaces (soil) whenever visible dust is capable of drifting
from the site or approaches 20% opacity.
b. Water all unpaved haul roads a minimum of three - times /day or whenever visible dust
from such roads is capable of drifting from the site or approaches 20% opacity.
c. Reduce vehicle speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 miles per hour.
d. Install and maintain a track out control device that meets the specifications of
SJVAPCD Rule 8041 if the site exceeds 150 vehicle trips per day or more than 20
vehicle trips per day by vehicles with three or more axles.
e. Stabilize all disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively
utilized for production purposes using water, chemical stabilizers or by covering with
a tarp or other suitable cover.
f. Control fugitive dust emissions during land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation,
leveling, grading, or cut and fill operations with application of water or by
presoaking.
g. When transporting materials offsite, maintain a freeboard limit of at least 6 inches
and cover or effectively wet to limit visible dust emissions.
h. Limit and remove the accumulation of mud and /or dirt from adjacent public
roadways at the end of each workday. (Use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited
except when preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit visible dust
emissions and use of blowers is expressly forbidden).
i. Stabilize the surface of storage piles following the addition or removal of materials
using water or chemical stabilizer /suppressants.
j. Remove visible track -out from the site at the end of each workday.
k. Cease grading or other activities that cause excessive (greater than 20% opacity)
dust formation during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph over a one -hour
period).
Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts.
s�
� r
v
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 2
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Equipment Exhaust
4. In addition, the GAMAQI guidance document lists the following measures as approved and
recommended for construction activities. These measures are required:
a. Maintain all construction equipment as recommended by manufacturer manuals.
b. Shut down equipment when not in use for extended periods.
c. Construction equipment shall operate no longer than eight (8) cumulative hours per
day.
d. Use electric equipment for construction whenever possible in lieu of diesel or gasoline
powered equipment.
e. Curtail use of high- emitting construction equipment during periods of high or
excessive ambient pollutant concentrations.
f. All construction vehicles shall be equipped with proper emissions control equipment
and kept in good and proper running order to substantially reduce NOX emissions.
g. On -Road and Off -Road diesel equipment shall use diesel particulate filters if
permitted under manufacturer's guidelines.
h. On -Road and Off -Road diesel equipment shall use cooled exhaust gas recirculation
(EGR) if permitted under manufacturer's guidelines.
i. All construction workers shall be encouraged to shuttle (car -pool) to retail
establishments or to remain on -site during lunch breaks.
j. All construction activities within the project area shall be discontinued during the first
stage smog alerts.
k. Construction and grading activities shall not be allowed during first stage Os alerts.
First stage Os alerts are declared when the Os level exceeds 0.20 ppm (1 -hour
average).
Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts.
Other Measures to Reduce Project Impacts
5. The following measures are recommended to further reduce the potential for long -term
emissions from the project. These measures are required as a matter of regulatory
compliance to ensure that the proposed project emissions are not exceeded:
a. The project design shall comply with applicable standards set forth in Title 24 of the
Uniform Building Code to minimize total consumption of energy.
b. Applicants shall be required to comply with applicable mitigation measures in the
AQAP, SJVAPCD Rules, Traffic Control Measures, Regulation VIII and Indirect Source
Rules for the SJVAPCD.
c. The developer shall comply with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 4601 - Architectural
Coatings, during the construction of all buildings and facilities. Application of
architectural coatings shall be completed in a manner that poses the least emissions
impacts whenever such application is deemed proficient.
d. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 4641 during the
construction and pavement of all roads and parking areas within the project area.
Specifically, the applicant shall not allow the use of:
i Rapid cure cutback asphalt;
ii Medium cure cutback asphalt;
iii low cure cutback asphalt (as specified in SJVAPCD Rule 4641, Section 5.1.3);
or Emulsified asphalt (as specified in SJVAPCD Rule 4641, Section 5.1.4).
iv The developer shall comply with applicable provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 9510
(Indirect Source Review). KF9
Mitigation for Air Quality and GHG impacts. o ��
v c�
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 3
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
6. The project shall comply with the requirements of state and /or federal legislation and /or
regulation to reduce or eliminate production of Greenhouse Gasses.
Mitigation for GHG impacts.
Agricultural Conversion Impact Mitigation Measures:
7. Prior to recordation of the final tract map and parcel maps for urban development or
support facilities, the applicant shall mitigate the loss of agricultural lands with agricultural
lands of equal of higher agricultural quality as specified by the California Department of
Conservation, on a one -to -one basis by selecting one of the items described below. The
applicant shall submit written verification of the applicant's compliance with this mitigation
measure to the Planning Director's satisfaction. Compliance with this condition may be
phased as the project is developed. The amount of agricultural land to be mitigated shall
be equal to the amount of land being developed as each phase is constructed.
a. Funding and /or purchase of agricultural conservation easements on qualifying
agricultural land within the San Joaquin Valley. Such easements shall be accepted
or purchased and monitored and enforced by a land trust, or another appropriate
entity that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission or similar
accrediting agency. Funds may be used for easement purchases, ongoing
monitoring and enforcement, transaction costs, and reasonable administrative costs.
b. The developer shall record irrevocable conservation easements on qualifying
agricultural land within the San Joaquin Valley.
c. Contribution of agricultural land or equivalent funding to an organization that
provides for the preservation of farmland in California. Funds may be used for
purchases, ongoing monitoring and enforcement, transaction costs, and reasonable
administrative costs.
d. Purchase of credits from an established agricultural farmland mitigation bank
approved by the City of Bakersfield.
e. During the life of the project, if the City of Bakersfield or other responsible agency
adopts an agricultural land mitigation program that provides equal or more effective
mitigation than measures listed above, the applicant may choose to participate in
that alternative program to mitigate the loss of agricultural land impacts. Prior to
participation in the alternative program, the applicant shall obtain written approval
from the City of Bakersfield agreeing to the participation, and the applicant shall
submit written verification of compliance with the alternate program at the same
time described above in the first paragraph.
Mitigation for Agricultural Conversion impacts.
(Completion of the selected mitigation measure, or with the Planning Director's
approval, a combination of the selected mitigation measures, can be on qualifying
agricultural land within the San Joaquin Valley (San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced,
Fresno, Madera, Kings, Tulare, Kern), or outside the San Joaquin Valley with written
evidence that the same or equivalent crops can be produced on the mitigated land).
Biological Impacts Mitigation Measures
8. Prior to ground disturbance, the developer shall have a qualified biologist survey the
location for species covered under the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan
incidental take permit for urban development (Tipton kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, S
Joaquin antelope squirrel, & Bakersfield cactus) and comply with the mitigation measw#es ofi 9s�
the permit. Survey protocol shall be that recommended by the California Department�bf
G o
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 4
Fish and Wildlife. Developer shall be subject to additional mitigation measures
recommended by the qualified biologist. A copy of the survey shall be provided to the
Community Development Department and wildlife agencies no more than 30 days prior to
ground disturbance.
The current MBHCP urban development incidental take permit expires on September 1,
2019. Projects may be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or
building permit and pay fees prior to the September expiration date. As determined by the
City of Bakersfield, only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading
plan approval or building permit before the expiration date will be eligible to pay fees
under the current MBHCP incidental take permit. Early payment or pre - payment of MBHCP
fees shall not be allowed. The ability of the City to issue urban development permits is
governed by the terms of the MBHCP incidental take permit. Urban development permits
issued after the expiration date may be subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation
Plan, if approved, or be required to comply directly with requests of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Agency and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts.
9. The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703 -711). The MBTA makes it unlawful to
take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10,
including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by
implementing regulations (50 C.F.R. 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California
Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds,
their nests or eggs. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws generally requires
that project - related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated
during critical phases of the nesting cycle (March 1 - August 15, annually). Disturbance that
causes nest abandonment and /or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment
of eggs or young) may be considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and /or
imprisonment.
a. To avoid impacts to burrowing owl, prior to ground disturbance, a focused survey
shall be submitted to California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) by the
Project applicant of a subdivision or site plan review, following the survey
methodology developed by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC, 1993).
A copy of the survey shall also be submitted to the City of Bakersfield, Planning
Division.
b. If the survey results the presence of burrowing owl nests, prior to grading; including
staging, clearing, and grubbing, surveys for active nests shall be conducted by a
qualified wildlife biologist no more than 30 days prior to the start of the of the Project
commencing and that the surveys be conducted in a sufficient area around the
work site to identify any nests that are present and to determine their status. A
sufficient area means any nest within an area that could potentially be affected by
the Project. In addition to direct impacts, such as nest destruction, nests might be
affected by noise, vibration, odors, and movement of workers or equipment. If the
Project applicant identifies active nests, the CDFW shall be notified and
recommended protocols for mitigation shall be followed and a copy submitted to
City of Bakersfield, Planning Division.
s
� r-
r_7 O
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 5
c. If any ground disturbing activities will occur during the burrowing owl nesting season
(approximately February 1 through August 31), and potential burrowing owl burrows
are present within the Project footprint, implementation of avoidance measures are
warranted. In the event that burrowing owls are found, the applicant must follow
CDFW protocol for mitigation and comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711). If the Project applicant proposes to evict
burrowing owls that may be present, the CDFW recommends passive relocation
during the non - breeding season.
Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts.
Mitigation Measures for Biological Impact from the Biological Reconnaissance Survey
10. Pre - construction surveys shall be conducted at no more than 30 days prior to initial ground
disturbance to detect special- status wildlife species that may occupy the site, prior to
initial ground disturbance. Avoidance buffers shall be consistent with the USFWS and
CDFW standards for individual species as discussed below.
a. If ground disturbing activities are planned during the potential nesting season for
migratory birds that may nest on or near the site (generally February 1 through
August 31), nesting bird surveys are recommended no more than one week prior to
the commencement of ground disturbance for project activities. If nesting birds
are present, no new construction or ground disturbance should occur within an
appropriate avoidance area for that species until young have fledged.
Appropriate avoidance should be determined by a qualified biologist. In general,
minimum avoidance zones for active nests should be implemented as follows: 1)
ground or low shrub nesting non - raptors -300 feet (91 meters); 2)burrowing owl -600
feet (183 meters), see Recommendation #c) for additional measures regarding
burrowing owl; 3) sensitive raptors (e.g. Prairie falcon, golden eagle) -0.5 (0.8
kilometers); 4) other raptors -500 feet (153 meters).
b. If San Joaquin kit Fox (SJKF) dens (potential, known, or suspected natal /pupping)
are observed during subsequent surveys, including the 30 -day pre - activity survey,
the recommendations contained in the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for
Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground
Disturbance shall be implemented ( USFWS 2011). If any known kit fox dens for
which the recommended avoidance of 100 feet (30.5 meters) cannot be
maintained or suspected natal /pupping dens are discovered, the USFWS and the
CDFW should be contacted for further guidance.
c. If burrows that show evidence of occupation by burrowing owl are discovered
during subsequent surveys, including the 30 -day pre- activity survey, the procedures
for monitoring a potential owl burrow, contained in the CDFW Staff Report on
Burrowing Owl Mitigation, should be implemented (CDFG 2012).
d. During the project, all pipe and culverts should be inspected prior to moving or
welding to prevent injury or entrapment of wildlife. Pipe which cannot be
inspected (due to bends, etc.) should be capped, or otherwise covered. If any
special- species wildlife is found entrapped in a pipe section, the pipe should be
avoided and the animal(s) left to leave of its own accord, except as otherwise
authorized by the USFWS and the CDFW.
e. All steep - walled trenches or excavations should include escape ramps. At least
one escape ramp should be provided in any on -site trenches or excavations at no
more than a 2:1 slope. Such trenches or excavations should be inspected for
wildlife immediately prior to backfilling. o�c�AKF9
s1
� r
U Q
ORIGINAL_
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 6
f. A 20 mile - per -hour (32 kilometer - per -hour) speed limit shall be implemented on any
nonpublic roads during construction, operation, and maintenance activities. Extra
caution shall be required at night as SJKF are primarily nocturnal.
g. Prior to conducting work on -site, all employees and contractors shall be trained to
be aware of listed species that may be resent and how to avoid impacts to them.
h. Firearms and pets shall be prohibited for the project site.
Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts.
Cultural Impact Mitigation Measures
11. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, work shall
cease in the area of the find pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and
Safety Code. If human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the
location of the find and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section
7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California
Public Resource Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the
remains) and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately.
Mitigation for Cultural Resource impacts.
12. Prior to ground- disturbance activities associated with this project, personnel associates
with the grading effort shall be informed of the importance of the potential cultural and
archaeological resources (i.e. archaeological sites, artifacts, features, burials, human
remains, etc.) that may be encountered during site preparation activities, how to identify
those resources in the field, and of the regulatory protections afforded to those resources.
This training shall be conducted by representatives from the Tejon Indian Tribe or qualified
archaeologist. The personnel shall be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of
archaeological remains during grading activities and cautioned to avoid archaeological
finds with equipment and not collect artifacts. The applicant /developer of the project site
shall submit documentation to the Planning Department that they have met this
requirement prior to commencement of ground disturbance activities. This
documentation should include information on the date(s) of training activities, the
individual(s) that conducted the training, a description of the training, and a list of names
of those who were trained. Should cultural remains be uncovered, the on -site supervisor
shall immediately notify a qualified archaeologist and the Tejon Indian Tribe. The
developer shall provide the Tejon Indian Tribe information on excavation depth of the
construction of the site.
Mitigation for Cultural Resource impacts.
Noise Impact Mitigation Measures
13. The following mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the proposed project design
to comply with the exterior and interior noise level requirements of the Metropolitan
Bakersfield General Plan -Noise Element.
a. A six (6) foot -high masonry sound wall, relative to the closest building pad
elevation, shall be constructed along the eastern boundary of the R -1 development
area to reduce traffic and railroad noise exposure within the backyards of the
closest residential lots. The sound wall shall be turned westward along Renfro
Road to acoustically shield the northern side of lots located closer than 425 feet
from the center of the railroad track.
b. An eight (8) foot -high masonry sound wall, relative to the closest building pad
elevation, shall be constructed along the Santa Fe Way frontage to reduce traffic
and railroad noise exposure within the proposed R -2 development area. T he sounoaJ ®AKF9�
� m
r
v c�
ORIGINA,t,
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 7
wall shall be turned westward along the northern and southern boundaries of the
R -2 development area. The height of those sections of the sound wall may be
reduced to six feet relative to the closest building pad elevations.
c. If second -floor receivers are planned for the R -2 development area, a detailed
analysis of the construction shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant
to determine if the proposed construction may need to incorporate additional noise
mitigation measures.
d. Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation is required for R -1 and R -2 residential uses
so that windows and doors may be closed for sound insulation purposes.
e. Attic vent baffles shall be installed in all gable vents facing Santa Fe Way and
the railroad in the R -2 development area. An example of a suitable attic vent baffle
is shown in Appendix B below.
AWE M8
MMYLE Of AMC �'P MAME CON %TRVMON
W"
f. A 12 foot -high masonry sound wall, relative to the closest building pad elevation,
shall be constructed around the KPAG -1 oil well site unless the proposed minimum
building setback from the well is increased beyond 50 feet or quieter - technology
pumping equipment (i.e. electric motor, etc.) is installed at the well.
g. An 11 foot -high masonry sound wall, relative to the closest building pad elevation,
shall be constructed along the west and north sides of the designated "drill site"
where oil wells ARCO -35X and ARCO -36X are located. An 8 foot -high masonry
sound wall shall be constructed along the eastern side of the drill site. Required
sound wall heights could be reduced to 6 feet high if quieter - technology pumping
equipment is installed at the wells.
h. Noise mitigation measures must be considered when specific uses within the M -1
area are proposed. Mitigation measures could include equipment enclosures, the
use of buildings or other structures to acoustically shield nearby R -1 uses or the
construction of masonry sound walls higher than required for traffic and railroad
noise mitigation between the M -1 and R -1 uses.
Mitigation for Noise impacts.
Traffic Impacts Mitigation Measures
14. Intersection and roadway improvements needed by the year 3035 to maintain or improve,tw. �,
operational level of service of the street system in the vicinity of the project are shown in T*Ies n,
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 8
6 & 7 below. The Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Program imposes fees on new
development and contains a Regional Transportation Facilities List and a Transportation Impact
Fee Schedule. The Facilities list includes many of the facilities needed to maintain the Level of
Service (LOS) C or better for new growth or to prevent the degradation of facilities which are
currently operating below LOS C as shown in the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan
Circulation Element. The Fee Schedule sets forth the fees to be collected from new
development to mitigate the need for the facilities. Tables 6 & 7 also identify local mitigation
improvements not covered by the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program.
Table 6
Future Intersection Improvements and Lecni Mitinnfinn
#
Intersection
Total Improvements
Local Mitigation
Project %
Required by 2035
(Improvements not
Share for Local
covered by RTIF or
Mitigation
adjacent
development)
1
Santa Fe Way &
Install Signal - 2 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 EBR, 2 WBL, 1 WBT,
Install Signal
1.64%
Kratzmeyer Rd
1 WBR, 2 NBL, 1 NBT, 2 SBL, 1 SBT
2
Allen Rd &
1 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 WBL, 2 WBT, 1 NBT, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
1 NBT1
1.75%
Olive Dr
3
Santa Fe Way &
Install Signal - 1 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 SBT
-
-
Reina Rd
5
Allen Rd &
Install Signal - 1 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 EBR, 1 WBL, 1 WBT,
-
Reina Rd
1 WBR, 1 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 NBR, 1 SBL, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
8
Renfro Rd &
Install Signal - 1 NBT, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
Install Signal
8.43%
Noriega Rd
7
Santa Fe Way &
Grade Separation
-
Renfro Rd
9
Allen Rd &
Install Signal - 1 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 EBR, 1 WBL, 1 WBT,
Noriega Rd
1 WBR, 2 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 NBR, 2 SBL, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
10
Renfro Rd &
Install Signal - 2 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 EBR, 2 WBL, 1 WBT,
-
Hageman Rd
2 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 NBR, 2 SBL, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
16
Renfro Rd &
Install Signal - 2 EBL, 1 EBT, 1 EBR, 2 WBL, 1 WBT,
Meacham Rd
1 WBR, 2 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 NBR, 2 SBL, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
17
Allen Rd &
Install Signal - 2 EBL, 1 EBT, 2 WBL, 1 WBT, 1 WBR,
-
-
Meacham Rd
1 NBL, 1 NBT, 1 NBR, 1 SBL, 1 SBT, 1 SBL
18
Renfro Rd &
1 EBL, 2 EBT, 1 EBR, 1 WBL, 2 WBT, 1 WBR, 2 NBL,
-
Rosedale Hwy
2 NBT, 1 NBR, 2 SBL, 2 SBT, 1 SBR
19
Allen Rd &
1 EBL, 1 WBL, i WBT, 1 NBL, 1 NBT,
Rosedale Hn I
1 SBL, 1 SBT, 1 SBR
Notes: NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L = Left -Turn Lane, WB = Westbound, T = Through Lane, EB = Eastbound,
R = Right -Turn Lane
I Striping Only
o``pAKF9�
0 o
ORICaiNAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA /ZC 14 -0481
Page 9
Table 7
Future Roadway Improvements and Local Mitiaation
Roadway
Total Improvements Required
local Mitigation
Project Share of
by 2035
(Improvements not covered
Local Mitigation
by RTIF or Adjacent
Development)
Allen Rd:
Add 2 lanes
Reina Rd - Ha eman Rd
Allen Rd:
Add 1 lane
Hageman Rd - Rosedale Hwy
Add median
Rosedale Hwy (SR 58):
Add 2 lanes
Renfro Rd - Allen Rd
Renfro Rd:
Add 2 lanes
_
Santa Fe Wa y - Ha eman Rd
Santa Fe Way:
Add 2 lanes
_
Kratzme er Rd - Renfro Rd
Santa Fe Way:
Add 2 lanes
_
Renfro Rd - Ha eman Rd
Santa Fe Way:
Add median
Ha eman Rd - Allen Rd
Mitigation for Traffic Impacts.
DL: S: \GPAs \GPA 2nd 2015\ 1 4-0480\Mitigation Measures 14 -0480 3_26_15.docx
KF9J'
T
� m
r
U O
ORIGINAL
v
`o O
Q a w u m E m w CD CN
c �' N a
co) a u H 0 $
J W ° M w a w
pC� H N A 10 E O C_ A > d- d C \
�Z J 3 a m 0 c y .� c 0 a�' .� E E u u o m y r LL v w« n W n E m O N o
uj V O m `u m c c J v 9c1 d rn aai a c c U �j Eo E° > 10 D aNhXi m E u Z LL M�rt Z
JZ Z N Ymi C C VI N Q 3 N 41 OI j �L J a t O� u X C T IL 3 U o c 0 o E E E 0 C V 3
ZW w o(o �'ca imv O1vm my mkgt Z >m `-' >?N nw N� a� m mtr r
6 S 20 O ci rn N N a a 0am a mu a < m u mu
C3
(o U o U 1mx^ N N N N W 0
U i 0i `
nNxwwww 000 w' w' _- w' U)
N Q\oW 00�
'' AVH NOOW z X22 .• — N
a ,t4� J •� A M
y �' dtlO AONVS
= AV 1s "fib •�
zi lIVdHV1S� � ��Ob :•,
V
aN
a
J
V'
J
00 ��
J
J J�a.� Q, �oQ, •��•
�9y /y
0
J
C) W
W W en
w
W
o'<
O
}
H
V
J
�l
3
lr_
1�
Q
1
� J
� Q
0 H
Q
N
a
J
U � w
_ a
W J w �
J Q' J j
v V` 0 °
LU a 3 K
z
HO 3SnVHN Q i
Z
3 Z o
1S 830N3683W rn
J h
° w
m a 1S Sf1H Vd
10 301tl
1S o
vAvnDF5
y U C
0� NIHd
1S N3NIl ('f1
J
a
w
U (n
0�
U
U
L
�•�P
a
o
--------------
U -cu
OH SNINN3f
C f0
a
J
00
LL
NI N3380 AHO
to
z
a
w w
U
Z
°
(A a
N
Nl NOIH1Vd
N
J
I.fi
O
AVMH3A00
li./
C O
WVHLLNOO'd
/
pw
a
L
V)
w
y
a!
a
a
w
U
_
a� ObzIN3b
U � w
_ a
W J w �
J Q' J j
v V` 0 °
LU a 3 K
z
HO 3SnVHN Q i
Z
3 Z o
1S 830N3683W rn
J h
° w
m a 1S Sf1H Vd
10 301tl
1S o
vAvnDF5
y U C
0� NIHd
1S N3NIl ('f1