Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 110-15RESOLUTION NO. 1 1 0- 15 R4S.J` v 92+H A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD VACATING RESOLUTION NO. 029 -14, WHICH CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2008041070) AND APPROVED THE 24TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, on February 12, 2014, the City Council of the City of Bakersfield ( "City ") adopted Resolution No. 029 -14, which certified Final Environmental Impact Report SCH #2008041070 ( "Final EIR "), adopted, subject to mitigation measures, a Statement of Facts and Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program, and approved the 24th Street Widening Project with the selection of Alternative 1 (widening to the north) as the preferred project alternative (collectively, "Project Approval "); and WHEREAS, the adequacy of the Final EIR and the validity of the Project Approval were challenged in a lawsuit entitled Citizens Against the 24th Street Widening Project v. City of Bakersfield, et al, Kern County Superior Court Case No. S- 1500 -CV- 281556, KCT; and WHEREAS, the Kern County Superior Court will be issuing a Peremptory Writ of Mandate requiring the City to set aside and void its certification of the Final EIR and the Project Approval ('Writ of Mandate ") and ordering that City provide additional information and analysis in the environmental document that clearly discloses the reasons for selecting potentially - feasible alternatives, adequately analyzes and discusses whether or not each of the potentially - feasible alternatives satisfies at least one of the four threshold criteria under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, and analyzes the additional cul -de -sacs requested by the public as a part of the project, including a description of any new impacts on visual and historic resources; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Writ of Mandate, City wishes to vacate and void Resolution No. 029 -14. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows: The above recitals are true and correct. 2. Resolution No. 029 -14, which certified the Final EIR and adopted the Project Approval, is hereby vacated and declared void as required by the Writ of Mandate. - Page 1 of 2 Pages - Oi UNAL I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on SEP 0 2 1015 , by the following vote: ' COUNCIL MEMBER RIVERA, MAXWELL, WEIR, SMITH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, PA� YE S ER NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER NOM. ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER bfbn0- ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER tgbmU ROBERTA GAFFORD, PrAc CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED SEP 0 2 2015 APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Attorney By ANDREW HEG6&D Deputy City Attorney AHAII svcarvcnw�,visiaw«o vaPoiro xw ms -uvm s.oa. o4P' t'4� Page 2 of 2 Pages -