Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/04/2008� B A K E R S F I E L D Ci�y Manager's Office Memorandum A� TO: Honorable or and City Council n FROM: Alan Tand , ity Ma an ger SUBJECT: Generallnformation 1. Enclosed is a letter from Kern County Waste Management Department rE presentation to the County Board of Supervisors on April 8th of proposed incre Land Use Fee, Gate Fee and Bin Fee. A request for a public hearing on May 13tr these increases will be made at that time as well. 2. First 5 Kern approved a$20,000 grant which will provide free swim lessons and o� Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Jefferson pools this summer. The grant targets cr 0 to 5 and their parents who bring them. Last year, MLK pool saw an increase in of over 130%, due to the First 5 grant. With the addition of Jefferson pool thi hoped more pre-schoolers will learn how to swim. We anticipate an agreement wi to finalize the grant on May 1St 3. Flyers are attached for the Spring Festival to be held April 5th and 6th at The P; Walk. 4. I will not be able to attend the Council Meeting of April 9th due to a personal co Stinson will fill in for me at what should be a very quick and easy session. 5. The Redevelopment Agency this week authorized submittal of a grant application for Proposition 1 C funds in the amount of $14 million. Prop 1 C is a very targeted provide infrastructure for housing projects. If received, the funds would be used the Mill Creek project. Decisions are expected by summer. 6. The Budget and Finance Committee voted (2-1) this week to authorize a study of recycling proposals including one from the haulers, one from BARC and others. Board of Supervisors will be hearing a parallel issue next Tuesday. The pack Committee meeting is included for your information. 7. Beginning April 17th, PG&E will be removing trees on Calloway Road, between H� Tuscarora. A total of 44 trees will be removed and replaced by PG&E as part Traa in thP Rinht PIar.P nrnnram Alan Tandy, City Manager City of Bakersfieid 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Tandy: March 31, 2008 KERN COU�TY WASTE MANAGI DaF SUBJECT: Adjustment to Land Use Fee and Gate Fee BaN http://� �"4 �_ l�,_- f tj �. �--- -_-�._' -� � ; ' �', °f � U � 200 �.--�-----_-_ l crv r R�, ^,.F o.r; �r�,�. ,� On April 8, 2008, the Waste Management Department intends to preser Kern County Board of Supervisors a request to set a public hearing for 2008 to approve a proposed increase in the Land Use Fee from the curren to $72.31 per unit per year for one to four unit parcels, and from $56.00 tc per unit per year for a five or more unit parcel, based on the 3.3% pe� increase of the annual average Consumer Price Index (CPI). In addition, a request to set a public hearing for May 13th to increase the C from $38.25 per ton to $39.50 and increase the Bin Fee from $2.00/cubic $2.05 will also be presented. It is recommended that fees be adjuste� manner to ensure rates remain equivalent for the three fees based proportional share of system costs. The Waste Management Department continues to conduct analysis of the c revenue needs to operate the County's solid waste system. System-wide projections for a ten year period were made as part of a report to the I Supervisors presented February 12, 2008. This updated a report presentE Board on August 22, 2006. The main revenue sources for the solid waste system are Land Use Fees, I and Gate Fees. The Land Use Fee is charged on the tax roll for re properties in the County. As a result of this fee, there is no additional ch� landfill or transfer station for disposal or recycling of normal household tra Gate Fee is charged on a per ton of waste basis at landfills or transfer statio non-residential waste and other chargeable items (such as tires, dead . .. . . .. . . . . . . , . . Fee Adjustments Pa�e 2 March based on the CPI are needed to operate the waste management system v continual budget shortfall. A reduction in non-residentiaf waste dispc resulted in a significant reduction in Gate Fee revenues. The reduced dispo not translate into a commensurately longer landfill life. In fact, higher con: costs due to higher fuel costs and greater costs for liner made from pE products adds to the need for a fee increase. The new fees, if approved at the hearing on May 13th, will take effect or 2008. Therefore, it will be necessary for you to adjust the rate on wh monthly payment to the County for your commercial accounts is calculated. If you have questions concerning this proposal, please feel free to conta� (661) 862-8900. Sincerely, � �� � /�- �✓ Daphne B. Harley Director I:\CLERICAL\LETTERS�2008108-21 TFM rsl.doc cc: Public Works Director Kevin Barnes, Sofid Waste Director ADM-CITY-BAK Th e Park at River Wal • t�h th ...�z�� . ,�.�. „ -,- _ Sat�rday, Ap�il. 5� 10 am - 9:30 p� 10 am - Noon Bakersfield Pregnancy Center "Walk for 10 am - 7 pm Artisan Guild's Craft Show 11 am - 5 pm Arts Council of Kern "Gallery on the Gre 11 am & 1 pm Artists Workshops �R�� 11 am - 5 pm Children's Activities �tt�� 11 am - 5 pm 5 pm - 9:30 pm 10 am Bike Bakersfield Bike Games Mobile Stage Entertainment ���� ���� Bright House Networks Amphitheatre � 5:00 pm Hayes Field 6:15 pm Lost Ocean 7:30 pm Honky Tonk Truckers 8:45 pm Right Cross sund.a.y, April 6� lo a�m - 4 pm Ladies Active 20/30 Club "Quackers for Kids" Rubber Duck Race 10 am - 4 pm Artisan Guild's Craft Show 11 am - 4 pm Arts Council of Kern "Gallery on the GrF 11 am & 1 pm Artists Workshops �R�� � � . r^r�-'�J---��_ ♦ _�•--_a._._._ ��.,-�- Staff: John W. Stinson Rick Kirkwood 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. � B A K E R S F I E L D Ken Weir, Ch Sue Benham Irma Carson BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE o# the City Council - City of Bakersfield Monday, March 31, 2008 --12:(30 p.m. City Manager's Conference Room, Suite 201 Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA A G E N D A ROLL CALL AD�PT FEBRUARY 25, 2008 AGENDA SUMMARY PUBLIC STATEMENTS NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion regarding Recycling Issues — Tandy / Rojas COMMITTEE COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Staff: John W. Stinson Rick Kirkwood 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. � B A K E I� S F I E L D Ken Weir, Ci� Sue Benham Irma Carson BUDGET AND FiNANCE C4MMITTEE of the City Gouncil - City of Bakersfield Monday, March 31, 2008 —12:00 p.m. City Manager`s Conference Room, Suite 201 Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA A G E N D A ROLL CALL ADOPT FEBRUARY 25, 2008 AGENDA SUMMARY Pt�BLIC STATEMENTS NEW BUSlNESS A. Discussion regarding Recycling Issues — Tandy / Rojas COMMITTEE C4MMENTS ADJOURNMENT BUDGET AND FINANCE C4MMfTTEE Recycling Consideration Pro osals received: ■ Hauler proposal ■ BARC proposal ■ Other interest statements ■ Staff summary of other ways to reduce air pollution and/or increase recyclinc such as: ■ Full transfer station ■ Detachable unit or direct transfer station ■ Convenience stations — self haul ■ Dual collection ■ Apartment programs ■ Blue cart expansion / mandatory or marketing improvements ■ Conversion to clean air refuse trucks ■ Expansion of existing programs Future Sessions � Committee review and narrowing of options, requests for more in-depth infor ■ Rate impacts ■ Landfill fee impacts ■ Legal issues ■ Cost ■ Measurements of impact on air, recycling quantities ■ Procedural and bidding requirements, etc. ■ Committee forwards "preferred" ideas to full City Council ■ Fu1i Council reviews in greater depth, depending an options selected, co� may be needed. ➢ County is invited as an active participant in the entire process. Liaison is m� with County for poten#ial joint action. � B A K E R S F I E L D ,�— John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager For: Alan Tandy, City Manager Rick Kirkwood, Management Assistant Ken Weir, Chai Sue Benham Irma Carson AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT REGULAR MEETING OF THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Monday, February 25, 2008 —12:0� p.m. City Manager's Conference Room — Suite 241 City Hal�, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA The meeting was called to order at 12:03:52 PM 1. ROLL CALL Committee members present: Committee members absent: Councilmember Ken Weir, Chair Councilmember lrma Carson Councilmember Sue Benham Staff qresent: Alan Tandy, City Manager; John Stinson, Assist� Manager; Rick Kirkwood, Managemen# Assistant; Steven Teglia, Admir Analyst III; Joshua Rudnick, Deputy City Attorney II; Nelson Smith, Direc#or; Donna Kunz, EDCD Director; Rhonda Barnhard, Assistan Director; Toni Crosby, EDCD Business Manager; Vince Zaragoza Principal Planner Others present: Dr. David Goh, Garden Pathways; Karen Goh, Pathways, Bob Prater, The Garden Community Center; James Bakersfield Californian. AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, January 28, 2008 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion regarding CDBG, HOME, and ESG Action Plan FY Donna Kunz Economic Development Direct Donna Kunz, summarized thE Entitlements received by the City through the U. S. Department of and Urban Development (HUD). These entitlements hefp to im� quality of li#e in low #o moderate income neighborhoods. T Community Development Block Grant Program {CDBG), Investment Partnership (HOME) and Emergency Shelter Grai entitfements for FY 2008-09 were allocated, reflecting a decre $5,144,518 to $4,981,250. Staff is projecting program income f in the amount of $20,000 and $150,000 for HOME. The total budget for CDBG, Home, ESG for FY 2008-09 is $5,151,250. CDBG Pro osed FY 2408-09: The total resources avaiiable for FY 2008-09 are $3,324,5E amount includes the CDBG Entitlement of $3,304,560 and tr program income of $20,0�0. The total resources are allocated a: • Total Administration — 20% CAP: $664,912. • Long Term Obliga#ions: $402,317. These on-going, I obliga#ions are repayments of Section 148 Loans. • Public Services: $315,000. Services include graffiti r� HUD eligible areas, the Bakersfield Senior Center, Housing. • CDBG Home Owner Rehabilitat+on: $400,000 — Mc Stockdale Sewer Assessment Grant Project. • Low-Mod Benefit - 70% of Entitlement: $40,000 — Boys Ciub of Kern County. • Housing and Sium and Blight Activities: $50,000 Net resources available for Capital fmprovement Projects .n. ..,� .,.,, n+,.0 .,. ,�...,":++�.� +Ha fnlln�Arinrr nrnnncarl ( AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, January 28, 2008 • MLK Jr. Center — Roof Replacement: $300,000 • Q Street Streetscape - 24tn Street to Truxtun — Phase 277,331 Donna Kunz provided a brief overview of the applications receivE 2008-09. Twelve applications totaling $4,430,000 were received City Proposals for CDBG Assistance. Seven applications $g67,978 were received from nonprofit and private entities rE ass+stance from various HUD Programs. Staff is recommending c assistance to two nonprofit organizations, the Bakersfield Senic #or operating costs, and the Boys and Girls Club for facility repair: internal capital improvements obligations currently underway, does not have the financiaf resources to cons+der large expenditi o#her nonprofit organizations. Ms. Kunz suggests that for ne budget, nonpro#it organizations should consider requesting contributions over a two year period. Home Investment Partnershi �,H�ME : The total funding avaiiable for FY 2008-09 is $1,680,027. Thi includes the H�ME Entitlement of $1,520,921; $150,000 af program income; and $9,106 from the American Dreams Dowi Initiative (ADDI). Pro osed Housin Pro rams: Staff estimates the tota! Program/Project Costs ($1,630,027) � Delivery ($50,000} for FY2008-09 to be $1,630,427. This amoun $� .0 million in new construction for affordable housing in the redevelopment project area; $218,829 in SEPA, DT & 4TK Dow Assistance; $235,000 in HUD mandated Community Development Organization {CHDO) sponsored projects; and $9,� Emergencv She!#er Grant (ESG : Staff proposes $146,663 in ESG to fund the Bakersfield Rescue ($62,000); Bethany Homeless Shelter ($62,000}; and Alliance Ac Familv Violence ($15.330). Also incfuded is #he 5% Administrati� AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, January 28, 2008 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:27:34 P.M. cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council S:\Council Comm+ttees12008\08 Budget and Finance\February\February 25 Agenda Summary.doc � B A K E R S F I E L D CITY �F BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Raul Rojas, Pubiic Works Director DATE: March 28, 2048 SUBJECT: Budget and Finance Gommittee Report Regarding Recycling and Air Poltution Reduction Program Issues In response to Council Member Scrivner's referral of this subject to the Budget and Fina Committee, staff has prepared the attached report. This report is intended to also respo the prior request for a comprehensive solid waste plan made by Budget and Finance Cc Chairman Weir. The report briefly addresses a number of issues and presents alternati� consideration. It is summarized below: 1. The City has implemented numerous projects, complying with recycling and clea mandates, with fee increases not exceeding overall inflation. 2. The state may increase mandates, but is struggling with choices over what to rec We can best respond to mandates only if they are clearly set. 3. In the meantime, there is some social interest for doing more sooner. If this is io done, goals and cost limits must be identified. 4. The contract refuse haulers have proposed to build and operate a multi-million d recycling facility, which seems premature and may or may not address future m� It would burden ratepayers by sharply increasing County disposal fees. 5. Significant fee increases for projects of this type tend to drive waste and revenuE from the system. Other counties have experienced spiraling fees as a result of � projects. 6. A project, such as the one proposed, wouid require a bid process if built on City and backed by City fees through a contract for service. . . . . . ., , --- Page 1 of 3 Recycling and Air Polfution Reduction Future Program Issues California has various mandates for recycling and air pollution reduction. Histor the City Council has had a philosophy of compiying with mandates while keepin trash fees to a minimum. The City has a track record of successful compliance, implementing several clean air and recycling programs with fee increases not exceeding the rate of inflation. New state imposed mandates seem iikely, but it yet clear what form these mandates will take. The�-e is current debate in the ca� over 3 different recycling strategies, such as: 1. Not allowing cities to dispose of more than their 2006 level of trash. 2. Requiring 75% recycling by 2020. 3. Requiring specific programs, or banning disposal of specific materia regardless of the recycling percentage. While we wait for the legislature to determine new goals, there are possibilities � increased recycling and air pollution reduction. The question is how much sho� attempt to do before the new mandates, and at what cost? Should we choose � direction now, or wai# for new rules to guide our efforts? It is important to note t new mandates usually allow cities a few years to develop and implement new programs, facilities, etc. One option that has been proposed is #he development of a material recovery f� {MRF} to sort out recyclables from the trash. A MRF could be combined with a refuse transfer station, as a way to reduce both trash and air pollution. HowevE current proposal would ultimately place a large #inancial burden on the rate pay and has the potential to significantly increase County disposal fees. The currer proposal is limited to general information on cost estimates. Until new mandatE established, it is risky to plan a multi-million dollar MRF. Therefore, we have presented below some possible interim steps to achieve air pollution and recycl goals. Further study is needed to estimate the full cost of a MRF versus other options. Air PollutEOn Reduction There are two ways to reduce air pollution from trucks that haul trash. One wa� convert to cleaner engines. State law is already requiring cleaner engines for a trash trucks by 2010. The other way is to combine trash into larger loads at a Page 2 of 3 The City and County applied for a$20 million air district grant to build a transfer station, but funds were not available. A transfer station could be built without gr funds, but it would increase disposal fees about 30%. Higher disposal fees ma� trigger more illegal dumping. Fortunately, there are some lower cost a�ternative large central transfer station that could help reduce air pollution. These include 1. Residential trash trucks that can swap trailers and transport two load� once (Figure 1}. These could phase in as old trucks are replaced. 2. Direct truck-to-truck transfer systems that require minimal capital improvemen#s (Figure 2}. These could be used at hauler yards. 3. Low cost "convenience stations" for self-hauiers (Figure 3). These cc be established around town (perhaps at home improvement centers). While these options would obtain only part of the air pollution reduction compar� a major transfer station, they may be more affordable. They may also be used interim steps to reduce air pollution. Transferring refuse or combining loads fro western side of the metropofitan area would save the most mileage at the least since it is farthest from the landfill. Therefore, costs can be minimized by using options only in areas farthest from the iandfill. Since grant funds are not availa the major transfer station, a study of altematives is needed. Recycling There are various options to increase recycling. Basically, trash can be recycie ei#her by sorting out the trash at a central facifity, or by separate collec#ion of recyciables. There are trade-offs. Sorting out the trash avoids extra collection routes, but tends to be very costly. Also, recyclables sorted from raw garbage f lower value. Most major MRFs do not actually sort the raw household trash, be i# is unproductive. On the other hand, separate collection makes cleaner recyc� but may require extra collection routes. However, there are ways to recycle wit minimal number of extra routes. 1. Commercial and apartment trash bins can be converted to a tan and system like the curbside recycling program. By changing some of th regular trash bins to blue recycling, some of the trash routes can be changed to recycling routes. Thus separate collections can be madE without doubling the number of routes. The $1.5 million grant fundec equipment for curbside recycling can be used to sort the mixed recyclables from apartments and some businesses. Page 3 of 3 In addition to possible new recycling programs, expansion of current ones shou! be overlooked. There are two ways to reduce self-haul truck trips and increase recycling with existing infrastructure: 1. Restrict disposal of construction and demolition (C&D) materials at the la A simpie ordinance could direct self-haul away from landfills to facilities C as the hauiers' existing C&D facility. 2. Restrict disposal of greenwaste at the landfi{l. Currently, residentia! wasi admitted to the landfiil free, paid for by the residential land use fee. Man� commercial gardeners abuse this, enjoying free admission to the landfilf claiming their loads are from residential sources. Eliminating this loopho woufd induce greate�- use of the existing greenwaste facility. Recommendations With so many considerations for a total solid waste system, a full study of optioi would be complex, especially as the new rules begin to come out of the state c� Therefore, a consultant study is recommended. The City and County jointly fun the recent transfer station study. The prior work could easily be expanded to pr a complete MRF feasibility study. Continuing to work joEntly with the County wo more efficient in addressing metropof�tan area issues. Both staffs were preparii do so when the County Board of Supervisors instead directed staff to develop � plan in coordination with the iocal hauiers. The locai haulers have since proposed that they be excEusively given a con#raci handle the entire project. This would need to go through a bidding process bec 1. It would be a project on publicly owned land, ultimately paid for by rates City Council, making it a Publ�c Works project. 2. Several other vendors have requested the opportunity to bid on waste ai recycling projects. The list ranges from local to large corporate organiza A key consideration is that large fee increases to support a MRF have the potei increase illegal dumping, and more importantfy, drive waste out of #he countywi system. This would in turn require additional fee increases to maintain revenuE debt service and operation of the MRF. Therefore, it is prudent to avoid fee increases that exceed other disposal options around the state. Until the new mandates are set, no one is sure how much the averaae fees will increase. Refuse Transfec and Recycling Op#ions For the Solid Waste System Following the bad news that the Metropolitan Area Transfer/Recycling Station dic receive grant funding from the air district, this �s to list alternative ways the solid v system can po#ential(y reduce air pollution through re�use transfer or increase thE of recycling at minimal cost to the cornmunity. I# should be noted that, in the air emissions study, most of the available emission reductions are from transferring haul foads. Refuse trucks are already regulated to minimize air emissions by 20' under state ruies, and therefore offer less opportunity for emission reductions. Refuse Transfer Options 1. Direct Transfer From Routes -- Refuse trucks can transfer waste directly transport trailers in fin►o different ways, without the cost of a large centra! ti station: a. Direct transfer trailers at yard docks (see Figure 1}. b. Detachable packer trailers (see Figure 2). These options may be practical for transferring foads from the west Metro which is the furthest from #he landfill. East Metro Area loads can still be h shorter distance directly to the landfill. 2. Convenience Stations #or Setf Haulers - Drop off sites with large contai trailers can accept small loads from the self-hauling public, with minima# s development cost (see Figure 3}. Recycling Options 1. Makin Curbside Rec clin Cost Less — Universal curbside recycling n less with a method cailed dual collection, in which finro types of carts are c into separate sides of a callection truck on one trip. A previous pilot progi dual collection of tan and green carts showed the system works. HowevE not expanded because a trans#er station was not available. A new consic would be dual coliection of blue and green carts, so that a transfer station needed. Staff recommends a pilot program for this. 2. Exaandina Btue Cart Recvclina to Apartments — Blue cart recycling dc need to be limited to single family homes. Small and medium apartment complexes can also use them. There are a few such complexes already voluntary program. Figure 1 _� �, _ � � ., �� t '�. , ' � � �, �� - i �. � � - _a f � .� �� ` .� "-+�!r ' _ . _. , � . ,�, _.i .,. i�� �� t.{. ,, .. - � ;; ., ., � , . � ` #- ��_ ,� '� � �: � K�',1 • � . •�,•- -- , � � r � � .a�'�r� J9 �� :" �'T 1 �1P,%�•�,o . � ' ' . � A- �%r f��••� ir ~�� �i.� r^ t f T 4— t 4 Z'► ° � ��'�� �,,"�� �'. ';�'x-�'�ai; ; ��. ;• „ ��"'i �� � � r^ '�,.-'� . �±,��/ �� ' t� .; • �,'�j, � ��, . , ���• �" Mt • _ �',*�'F,'�:.,ry �; ��+,�'.� � i'f ` `4�', 4''{�'��+�'"�]i"a _ �� ��JI�." . ��C: t� � i��' 1 � ; � i6 , _�"S ��. ♦. . . •� �t ��l� i��� ��.�.a.f � t r '�• ,,,,_ � l r " tt� �_9, ��'1 i ��.1 ,�� . . � ; �1 't -Y •� ,�:.1�� -.. ' f ,a' �.:m�L.. ` ��y '�. �' _r ., '~ � , ^y '�' �� .� �� �.� �f �� ��� I • . • ', . . tT� .. . I , � S ' _'�i 1 � � , . � . � a� , i � ° •. . i .�. f s.,��....�l.Jd •; - �.. �;"'� "°"' - � �'�i�t�� � - -: � _ � i �f"" . � � �' ."' r.r , � � ,� � :� '�'�;�,i� � _ . � � ,j' � -�: . ,. . . . . t 1 � -:,� � , �;. __ � y.. _, �. , , . . r ' .ya � . .. _ „ . : . _ , ' s' � �' �+ � �.. + ti � • �' " � . a � . r � . r. 1 , �i.a� � � r ' wa"`...�,a' ,..: z . - • ' � i _ s � ' 'i r � �: �� , _ - � � �� T� r � � � � ' �, ��� ,. � ��,^ � � .� ..,�,�,�„��' � �.. �.;s,,s as ;� f ° ; . ! • . � , A j .� _., ,� : t - , - � .,. z , . . . � � .`-� . . G � s •u , _ � e� r _ " . n r�d" �,�' � .�'+c'� - � r. R Y . � t � �" .- .'li� ' Jv ...c "i'. '� i',�1M�Y '� ��i "' �.',.;�'—,,, � ,.,�. '"_ . , . '_ , . : �� ti ,_.�i li�. ".R� "'"d�, - _ � , - . ., . � . ., . . , . �. '' � . 't' ' 7 �� ` r« d.7. �s,_ .. ' y ,. � ���• .. _, .:u � _ '_ •%�7�lS :�'�► .' � Figure 2— Direct Transfer Trailer f • � �'' �•1.�r � � � � �' r � � W� � � � � � " � � � �!^ _ ��' , * r �. _. .. }.f!�.. �= r fr,a '�i S.' _ _ r. ,• ;lw . i... . .� �. r����� � . * � � : - � � _� r.. . . ... _. __�..:. n sa. .C� � r' •� _ _ ,__. �. �� ^ 'l: 't .`_ � � : . �'r� G %�..f��i4 . Figure 3- Convenience Station for Self Haulers � � . '� � �ii� — ,� � • ��' . '�.t � _�i 1 �� � .'y� '4 BARC Blue Barrel Recycling - Material Recovery Facility Blue Barrel Recyclables Stream $1.5 Million DOC Grant BARC's Proposal: 7.7 Acres at Union and White Lane 20,000 sq ft building designed for MRF operations 70' Scale and scale house Loading Docks Name Recognition/Community Support 30 Years Recycling Experience Long standing relationships with markets Ability to receive more grants to fund future growth (DOC, CIWMB, Private Foundations) Ability to attract recyclable materials from smaller cities in Kern County 1) Use City's $1.5 million DOC grant to purchase sorting equipment 2) Install sorting equipment in BARC's new building a) City retains ownership and control of sorting equipment b) BARC provides facility, labor and recovered material marketing 3) City delivers blue barrel materials a) City retains control of recyclable material flow b) City retains option to change programs if conditions require it 4) BARC and City share profits of sorting operation a) BARC to provide full transparency of P&L financial information b) City to have ability to audit c) Profit sharing based on agreed negotiated formula d) City included in decision making process Advantages: 1) City retains control and flexibility (does not require a 25 year commitment) 2) No capital outlay by the City (grant is not a City cost) and investment in additional sorting can grow incrementally as material volume increases justify the investment 3) No operating cost to the City (requires a minimum material volume) 4) Does not require a mandatory blue barrel program (incentives and marketing program are ; recommended to increase material volume, shared profits increase as volume increases) �ti�:_ _;;� . ;� � . ;, . ;.= j , ; ,. , . -' :r. :•:, .= •,� . �, 1 L �Y�' 4- w� ;u �� ! . }� !, �N . ���. w� � � r � • iV.` .•1, � �� �' iMr: JYi Q _-�! : .� �:� o . ��J ��; �:_ i � �� ��<< � i! y► ` � � ' �' : j�r ; : � �} M �., ' • yY "� � . � ,� ,-. .� ` r,'•_ ..� . � � � tl� � � tL� .r._.. .._ — C� � � � � � i i�L?.-- - . . � ;....� R�.sr�.'�._�s>�_--�..:: . is�:�. . . . .. . K �.�� � a� � � � � � U . cts� �C � � s� � a� t� � i i, , ••�. , `� . '^f' !�,- i�� � ��: . � : . .' .. . � � � • `1 . .. . . ..�_ .. _ , � _ . � � . � � � � �Q� _ , ; �:- _'' � �� ,�� a.: t �Y� _, � �� c; ,. -r v � �' . �.L . �` "_ ...1..A..��. � �� r� _ � a� � �ti��'�, ' ' �✓� �=r4�' S. t :; i`�; � : ;ct•"• : i��,5����•_- . i-,<��,: _ ���j Y' �IIfV��L , : -'t � � ' � .. ' �.._�.. . d + r�• '_:<'; ?i ^ k "'; '� ;' c.l':, � .'�.�j�..l � . T a�.�s . S i'�,., � -��� � ��n'�;� zr;i`��tr;�'^,• �.: = . _ 1 �, .. , �..;>�. � . �:���- - _ z,. :_ • : � �.S ti +:� ,� t � s as'��G•-1`�,, ' � �z''� �l� ,�''-�1 j i. _. ry,2a�� .`` � r y z *� .. tltr. y. .. � ,t , ��.,-�� � . i.� � .r'7. ` . . , . � . .. � _ • ! 71 � _ �.. J_' *a. _ C O �/�� •V L /O� i.i. L � U � V � V � � O Q O L �A' W � 0 w U � � a� X O � � ca J � � � � a�i Q�i � � � � 4� .r � m � � cu � ` c� � � '"' Z � U C � O L � '} t r � W —' � � � . � � � � � �_ L a � � a� � Y � � � � � � � � g U � � � � �`. Q � � � � U O � .V U w ` a� � , _ •` � T � � � � c � _ N - :n � � Z ;a W _ �� � � � � � � � � O � � CI; � c�� � ,� � � +-� � T � � � r � � T � (L � G � V � `. � a� � .0 ,� � `�' � a c� � . c ` �s • �U—, � � V C U � ' L W C � W � � ca .� �U � � Q `�^• x vJ W � p) � •� � O � � Li Q � ;. k f_ �., , i i . ;� ;^�. . I � tii � L C�.... V � � � - �'� � � � � a� �U � � � 0 � �. � � � � � � � .� � � �� �• .-� � m � � � v�� �Y,. �t - � •�J. � 1 '� ! �~ r �= , ti' • � + ` � P r.. � • �.�_ -, `.y 4 ..- -_ •-Z.Y: � , . . �_. 1 � • �1O• , 4, � r� �'� } +�,� � . Y o � � _ � � . s� -�� .� , � � �•" , � � � � � • � ,� _ � • � +� ,.�; c'"''„� : aa � V c� ; r 4� �� ��. � a p� � v� �,� •� �� � � �. � � .� � aA ���� ,� � ��'�•.' .. .� �,.,� J O i ~�� � � � � N� � � '� �+ � .,� � e� � � ,o U .� � � a � _. .� r� C � � � . �a � �t � � � � .,..� � � 0 � � � � -i� � yfi �_�� � �.= ���. ; ��::� �� r r , . �� � 1{ ��- •h�, � I . . 1� - � � , ' ;1 � � 1 1 �, � " . '�%�E`' ';. . �, . � '�.3 .� � � t/� � � � c� � � � � . ..� �� � � 0 �... -��+ � � ;: '�'%,rs: `" �.� •- yy1yf�i ' �74�" �a _ .. -r •,-i � t�..,�,- t.i,.• � ` � �,� z.+� y . x, - - �r��. L��� �. 'i ,!' _.'_� �'.Rj'1^ 6 ��- .F� .''`t,' { .� !S. ti��•.4� ' — t ' �` � � � � ] � w � � Q• � � . _ _ � .,..� � a� , �.� � � �. �� � � � � � �'� ��a o ��.�• �,� � .� � w ��� �- � � ��� �z �� � � a �� � .s� �o��c �� �w� a�c� �a � � � � � 1 • � � � � � � rJ � �1'y � •� �� c � �� � �� �.� �� �, � � � o� � . 3 � , f.' � �� �. ��/111/ � � � ^ ' � � � W, � V � • � '. � � � �� � � :�-� � , � ' � � V � � �� � � � � r� '' � � _ `..� � � � � '��o,xo • � � °' _ � z�� � � � � - �` p ''� � o �"�,�,• ,� a►� •r �'p � �^ � � � ~ w� � : � � � [ 71 1 � A l •i.� �F� . y,i� �, vl T �,_ � y: ( � �,i ���. : . � i � j_ i"` - . � � ' 'n�t :y . 's "•n ._ r'=' . . � - � �� . - . . . .f . �. . . � �L � � W 4� � ._ .-± �' tl� a � � � � {Y � hs .� �f; 7, � � � � � +�-� r�7�-. ..T; ��� � .'"U{lliM�a4 il � i� b � tr .'F�'' yr 7i.'`Cl�i 'L� - ..J.-i -t'- "._ '.` _�''Jh � ! �'S' .:�� ��!��' ���t. �t � � . ,, L , a�f,r ,'N�1 :7�.i� :1� �= �?�_"d'_?Y'�,c�. :'_�i � Bi , `'.._ � � � � c tiaT_�.. .. i _.... � �.. � F � .71 � � ,� � 1 � K- -�.�► � �A . .,� . ,� � ;, � � a yi o -� � � .,, � � c� , � � : � � � � -+-' �� a� :l � � �-' .�� o � __ � _ � � � � O Q� 43 � � � . � � o � � � • � o � � � �- � ,�-- _ ; . ��` � � � � �. Q� � � � � .�� � � � {� � � � a� � . � � �� � ��ccs � o ���� � ,� • � � r--+ o .�.� � �. c,,C� . �..� � � ,N: �+ o �� � 'z� � � : c� � � � �� �.�' �•� O � � _ � .....��1 T� r�� � �. . ss , �ti '�l Y, . �� �. _ �':.'��' • h � � � � 0 � �s� f� � � "�3 � � � � � ..,_. � t� ...... W w � � � � � � 0 .� � .� � a� � � � a� � � . �..,, b� � . �.., � � � � � � � � C�S � � � � � � � 0 c� � Q� � 4 � � � � � � O .� � � � � �� o � •� � � � . � a� �����. . . �_ _ . wSi ._.+_._ . .. , _ .� � O . �..{ � .,� � c�► � �� � � -i�� � � � � A •.� a� � . �, � � � � � . ,..� � � t� a� � •� � �' -'� U v .� �.,,�� � � � � .,� � A�� ��, � � � � �� � � � a� � � c� . �..� � � � � � •�en..�,M11C."f ="i�; _ 'I�{'- . ; i1P� � .�n' - Cl�(=.L Ii .� - � ti - '. ' �-'' -.. ' i�_. _. . . _ . . . �ti o.� ct� � V � � Q � '� � � �� � �. .,. � � � o � ...� �� � • �-1 r�1 �y j� � � `� � � � � � � � � � �., ; � � �� c� � �- � �.� o• � � � :� o� . �..�: � � � �, � a� � � � o �o . ,..., � � �, 1 � '� ��i7 }l � ..'� , ' +{t���~} � - ,� x �. _ i�:i. ''-{`.-i . Y •� . . ` . � �.. 7- � ;7 . I' •.� r "r._. � . � ' � � +( �." '�" ,' Y i'7iti r = '. :.'� �.�,� ; _ � ':i . . Ny: �r 1� '` ,, - . - �ya . �t�,i.; :.:. , J � �h4 �' ^ = ' L ' �i i�t�* �'., �. � ��� �.r ��ya` �:. •j . -'•` . t� �Y �'�+! -+L?�t ,�y- +t"�� _';'��.� �-k`.. � �>yr � C1� ij � �� .y.�^ f� � -� �',�'J:L _.,,,, � � � ��."-�..!�r�. , _. :� .:. �� �� • i 1 � �' � �r � � 1 � � � �; � . ��r� , .._•.Rw.� -•t., w � � ,~ t � l �� y'y,1 �.1 ..�� �?W � : i% -rr <� � ... �, 1 i4�-/.'_ ; '._ S ; I- f �.; �;: g ,i. f.. � - ' • �. " - .'�� � y � . - w :� �.� _7. ' � - -1�'. . i1� -, yy tt •.s..' � F- � r y ���1 +�. ::�'�:�Rr .j� � �l�� � ,� '�l A,�� � .�#� Y.,:C � . ' �i.•,. s. �y i: v -i� +�.��' r' j�.�� �,y� .� � , � � - �. . �-�,^ • _-';,r . . . a �;.� ' • •`f N � � o �� � L� � � � � i � , � i � 1 � L,�. � - "� � . ., y � i�; •" M` . � � � � � � � i `� � �i � � :� � '� O - � �� { !' � � x,� ' � .� � �,: � � " � � � 4 � � � ` �� a �� �• ; �, - - �� � `�, !�� LR•�,'• � �� L• ` ` - � ., ' ; r _; ��. � t � � � � O •� �t '.�.� :4. �, � c� �. � Q � U{� � a � :r � v � �� � � : ,� � � �'' A) � r _ . . -::: - � .�..� � � � � � � Q � _��� c� � ��� 0 . . `�� � � a � ,� �. ��� � � .� ,... . � � m• � �, ? � ; . ���a� ! w � •,� �'' I a �c�� � , �g � �,�� �� �3 � �q��• i �� a �j � � � � ��� � . � ���� �#� . . a � m �� � �� �� a � � .� �� � � � • o � '� b a� � � �� � � �. � �� , m� -��� � '� � � �' � b ` � R' � � ���� � o � a 1�+ � �. �?� �, � w� 3 .� � � �� � . �_�, �m_ �� � :� ;� ,�� � �o Fa �z � � � a � t� � `� � .� �� U � � .� �� .� ��' '�� � ��. * � aw a� t� - � � �� � � .'� � .��. r� � • �'�� �, o �-,���� ,�'" - �,��a mp A � � ��a,o � m� � � � � . a� �� '� !� e� �''� +°� � � m °� U t�-°� �� � �"�� m a� � L3 � m � o�`� �, 9 a k .� } � � y � ��. 7 �� f, � < c�. •. 5 r . A , ..,. . : �,': .� �. � � � li � � � V � .O � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ri � � � a� � w � � � � � � � 1� � � � .�.� • ,••� � � o � � � � � 0 � U -i-3 � V „� � Q � •� Cl1 � Ct� � � � � � �""i � � ,#�j � � V 1 r: : �i. ; {,� . ,4 f .. ►: � � � � � � a� � � � � � � � �* � � , � • � T � � :` O _ � � � . c� ° ��� 6!� � *"'�; . � � O �' � � .� � f.;,�,,,� � • Z1Q . � � _ � � Q �� , � v �_ � � O • � F"'� � r� � ,� � '' '' - . �+-� � .� � � � � � �'�.�:� ���„o y� . r.., _ � A\ A W .� :w ;� � � � r- f .,- } - �. .: .,�.. i. :3' �;" y. " f»-i , � �'.: � ��, F�"_ -� �► , ` �':'y �:� ;: � •i � � � � .,..,. � � W � � • + � 5.... � � � � � � �`.r � � � C� � � � ri--+ � � f"� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � T O � � � `� � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � � ^ �^ O •� c�c°�iA 11 �� � � �� t�, v e� �. � � � � y •� . � 1 � � �; � - � . � � . ,, � � `�':, c� .•.o ...�.A �`: t'�' ` � . . Q� .� , � � w���k: .. .�; , ,�!''_ � v� . . 1� _ . C� .. 4�. � _t- =��fi - �"� .� � � � 4_� �. ?iS:T-`cf'.��}:,?�"" ' r ` . J��. iN . � � . _ �'l�,•: �� t-T ; �_ '3��.�, ��;r�•,�. ..�.r_� .�; CQ � � � � . � .� :� _ +�� � �: ,� ., . .. .. : 7 �� a � ;�. � s: � a � •lr .� � - ;..�; • �:, �� 1 1� � F �� • ' •`' , _ ^ i '. � , A'� . . �� � ;---_, < �`�! �,�.�1 �:h:., ''lr.,� ; �- � � � � 0 � .._ � c�s .. . a � � � � � ...... �� . � � c�s � L. �� � � ..�.� �� � ��r-�.,., -• - , '.,,� �� � �� �,,.. � � h~ � � � • � �!. � � • -� :k� `� � >, �� o � � � (.� � �i . _� �� �, � . � �� � � � �-� ��.�� � ,,..,, "�'� as a:�. - �� ,� � � �.� . : . � •� �+ ;� "' ;� � as � � �. -� ss; - t' �; �:�� � w � � � � � � �•�' ,� � Z � � � � 9 . , . � � � -��, a �� � U '"� ' � � R� t� � "� � . � � GD � � ' � � � •� �`�' � o � ° � o0 � � . a � 0 � � � �� ° o N L� r_a C � .. ,...,. - _ - - ,:• � _ t - { `. 1��,� � � _ � �, � -�;,���! .. � f � -./����` � j . a • �� �iii. ��_aa r'a�1 V �� b � � � � - � zs _. � °� � •Q o° � ^ °- y ,� � o M l � �� � � � � . � y.G .� �. � � ,�,, � O t i ���� �� � � Cw � �� ..�.r� . �_ � �-��� H� :� .�-:; � r. � `' . � �� � � � � � � . � �� �� � �' � � �� � C�r • �+ � -- �.. � �� � ;� ` � � _r ;!I � ;� •1 y r . - ,.. ,, , �. �. _ ,,. � : � � � - ,`. ` , . �` ;.. � ' ri�_`` �-i '�}�, ��_ �� �`::�-�'+��, _ ' . 0�:. __s:ir_ i � .� � , � � � � � � � a C� L [i.. � Ll- � �! n u J ..� � _. �r.�. �,; . '?�t e Y o f...�+ �•�j!�'�� Y�-Y 7 1 'j���l . �^�. • . • �r j�� � �. �, ...��1�,,-=. �:�t'� F`.�, . � � r =.`� �� •,s -_ , : _„.- : .�. .. r • ,� -:�, ��1�� g:�;�', � cr��=�;. . � S��'�' � , 41� T� r �� ;�y � i�l -�, �'�,�',s-j,�«� .-t, r �\�� �r--�` '�' �+. _ i. t� . C_ 'Yy'-lP ��k s%. . .t�.� ''�� .�tar�'3'+0 . . . _. .:_,i•.s�i="-- -- - - - - - .� . i •� • � �'� � �-' . 1 � ��.�. � � � - .,�� - r15 � �'� 4-'�;�i .'t�T�`. ; ls ;�t ; i �� - ► -a 'k _�,�, ' � �tr N'' a . � � , •.. 1.�,, :�'�� - � -i � �j_ • ❑ . •. : =v„� .� � �,. .>�. �- =' k__•. � '. �ir+ : : �,� , �;�: 1 _ . , _ _ .._. - . -.� _ -- � , ��:' � Vl � � •� o � . �, � � � � � � � � � � � � a� � a� • � � � � � � � � 0 � � �� � �: o ��� � � � o ;� �-�� � � � � � c� __ � � Q � � � � 0 ._ � � 4� � � � �� � ,M. � � T' �, � � r �3 � � :� � 1V�ETROP�ILITAN RECYCLING C4RPORA TIQ1� P.O. Box 27�6 Bakersfield, CA 93303 661. 631-1171 TRANS'FER/REC�'C'LING PROPOSI4L FOR THE 1V�� UNT VERNON F14CILITY INTROD UCTION: Planning for solid waste management facilities in the City of Bakersfield and Kerr County is at a critical juncture. Legislators in Sacramento are actively and aggres� pursuing new legislation that will likely mandate a 75% diversion rate and new recycling programs in the immediate future. If the city and county are to reach the aggressive legislative mandates, new and innovative facilities must be sited and operatrortal in the next three years. In order to accomplish this, Kern Refuse Disposal (S,RD) through Metropolitan Recycling Corporatron (MRC) proposes tn plan and develop a comprehensive state the art solid waste complex This complex, complete with a Multi-Stream Material Recovery Facility and transfer station, will bring the metropolitan Bakersfield are� into complYance with 2l�` century solid waste mandates, reduce hazardous vehrcle emissior�s, reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions, and save valuable resources for fut�u generations. BENEFITS T4 T�IE DEVEL�PMENT OF�4 SOLID WASTE COMPLEX Benefts to the solid waste mana�ement svstem. The development of this complex benefits the local sotid waste system in a variety � ways. This complex will allow us to meet new legislatrve mandates that have or wil� signed i�to law in the immediate future. It will also positiot� the City of Bakersfeld Kern County to process a�d recover large volumes of waste that will extend landfil and enhance the ability to manage and transport waste more efficiently. It is anticipated that legislation mandating new diversion programs, including mul family and commercial recycling, will take effect establishing aggressive diversion mandates for all cities and counties in Californir� The most e�cient and cost effec method to meeting these mandates is by commingling materials and separating the a Multi-Stream MRF. In addition if these diversiort rates are to be realized, conver, technology will have to be employed Drafts of the legislation for this technology require that all possible recyclables be extracted from the entire waste stream befo� conversion technolo�y ca� be implementea� The Multi-Stream MRF allows the bes option for the recovery of materials from residential, commercial, and industrial �etterator� If the citv and cnuntv are tn .ctav cmm�liant w;th �,.rront nnd fi.t,.ro l.,u Air Qualitv Bene�ts. Transfer statiar�s are an efficient way to reduce the nu�nber of long trips to local landfclls by "carpooling" materials from smaller vehicles to larger vehicles. Trip reductivn in cvmmercial rolloff vehicles can be as great as 5-1 and by transferring haul residential or commercial generators t�ie number can be 50 —1. This trip reduciion generates large emission savings in NO� PM10, CO, VOCs, and SO� AB 32 was signed into law on September 27, �006 and this legislation mandates th reduction of Greenhouse Gases to 199Q levels by the year 202� By recycling mate� like glass, aluminum, paper , etc �nstead of producing them from virgin materials, Greenhouse gas emission savings are realized These emission savings will be criti local governments are ta reach the legislative mandates outlined in AB32. PLANNING, D�VELUPING AND IMPLEMENTING A NEW SYSTEM Siting the comple� The Nfount Vernon Transfer and Processing facility is the site that meets all the necessary criteria for the establishment of the solid waste comple� A recent report Shaw Environmental InG evaluated a series of sites in Metropolitan Bakersfield ai supported this conclusion based on the foltowing criteria: 1. Greatest reduction in vehicle miles traveled 2. Lowest capital cvstper ton of emissions reducet� 3. Lowest capital cost per vehicle mile reduced 4. Best balance of cost to level of service. Additional benefits are as follows: 1. The site could be completely permitted for operations in a short period of ti� 2. Suf�eient acreage e.�cists to site the complex on KRD lease property. 3. Some infrastructure for operations already exists (scales, loaders, etG} 4. This site is already recogniZed by the public as a solid waste facility. 5. ,Site managers with experience in managing the public and solid waste facil MRC has 12 acres available at Mount Vernon as a part of a lease agreement wrth t City of Bakersfield This lease is part of a 20 year agreement signed in 1999 with t� intent to develop this property into solid waste facilities to help the City meet staie diversian mandates. This property is perfectly situated for a solid waste compCex a� MRC developed the existing C&D operations with the intent of burlding this type o� facility. This property was intended for this type of facility and now is the time to proceed with the projec� FUNDING CAPITAL AND OPERA TIONAL COSTS The funding of the capital and yearly operationaC costs of a solid waste eomplex is Cf/1000M1Hd /)H/I %1 /fI/jC n �s�ns:ninl l�rir�ns� ns� }�n isss�:r .. ..............:f.. iTDn ... �.._.�_....!. 25 year e.xtensions of the existing contracts between both the City of Bakersfteld a� the County of Kern to insure a guaranteed waste stream for debt retiremen� Specifically the contracts requiring 25 year extensions are the f'ranchise hauling agreements between Zone 2 haulers and Kern Count,�, the franchise hauling agreements between the City of BakersfreCd and Kern Refuse Disposal, and the tea agreement between MRC and the City of Bakersfreld on property at the Mount Ve� Recycling Facility. In addition a new Independent Contractor Agreement for a ter, 25 years between the City of BakersfieCd and Metropolitan Recycling Corporation would need to be developed to encompass al! solid waste management activities rel to this project The funding of the on going operational costs for this complex and related progra� must also be addresser� Residents, businesses, and owners of multifamily units mi shoulder the�nancial burden of funding both operat�onal and capital costs of this facility: This can be accomplished by establishing recycling fees✓surcharges that pl per resident or per ton fees based on the waste processed from each of those generators 7'his is a common practice in many municipalitie,s/counties and is a practice already established in the Zone 3 region of Kern County where residents G businesses are being charged on a per resident and/ar per ton basis 7'HE MUL TI-STRE.�4 M NfA TERIAL RECO VER Y FA CILIT'Y (MSMRF) New technology in the materia! recovery industry has recently been developed that provides add�tional options for the recovery of material� Due to new state recyclin, mandates, new recovery technologies, and the costs to imptement the technologies, important to evaluate available systems in an atternpt to decide which approach ha, best opportunity to successfully reach local and state goals �ilthough, these optiot wiCl cost residents, commercial businesses, and the industrial sector, these ��recyclii surcharges" already exist in the Zone 3 region of Kern County where residents pa} $3. 08 per month, � 83 per cubic yard, and �12.67 per ton. The development of new and innovative technolo�y has improved the abilrty of Mu Stream Material Recovery Facilities to recycle additiorral material� This new technology, and aggressive anticipated mandates gives a MSMRF inany beneficial advantages over a traditional Single Stream MRF. This new technology utitizes existing refuse contarners, enclosures, and collection vehicles. This system atso eliminates difficult and costly changes at Commercial and Mu1tr-Family facilities where there is no room for recycling containers. All Residential, Commercial, and Industria! refuse is coClected in the tradiiiona! rnanner and depasited at the Multi Stream MRF. This material is then sorted into cardboard, glass, paper, plastics, aluminum, steel, tin, greenwaste, wood, etG, with ..,,..,.�E ..... ......:.r..,.� ...���.. �..---_ �_ •� - �---��-ii m�_ �_ _•_ -- - - - _.. _ . . C 0 � '�^ V/ � � _ L h 1� � � � ` •rr � .� � � � Q. O V � i ._ V c.i � � � .� w 0 Q 0 � � � N � N C W � d �cac•�0000c000a �r��.n000000000 �Op�Ci000CCOOCC CpOCpo0000O�AtY)O OOCDOCONO00lA� O �ON O��OOOCbl� O � M C�O N N�(�D O 11� � 0�0 Q t� (V N P- e= N � +r N N � � � � � L U y U � � � c o 0 J O O � S3 w. m O O ti aa� m � � � C7 H 1-- fn � O � C V �. � � � � � � V °�j Gl. � �` � � �U � � �. y J c� a c a +' � Q i � � � � Q � V m oaEi���mm � ��m�N� � cc — �� .. .. .c m C 'V � .� � tA O��iO��U ooac0000c000°o 0000000000000 000a0000a000 oc00000a000c°o 0000u�ou�000cao 0 0�n o ti o t� �n �n o��n �r � �s �ci � ��� a � ���� GH � � � .� L � � � � � �m W � .� � � .� o �o M N � N � u'i � N � � 0 W � } p wZ �� zz 00 �� N� ,� 1 .,� V � � � � .� � 0 U � c N O m m C� � LL U� b a c � o� N � ('7 T t,H 69 � � .` �y t d - � 0 U i� c �� m � Q � O C m � � � U� � � U �- � a? � U � O C�0 � 6�9 l V � � 0 U i� c � o cv mm � O L � U � � 0 c�D N cM � o� N� M � 6H 69 � Q � � � � � 0 m > � � N m A �3 � 0 U m � �� � ; o °? m �O � � � m � °oc °on N � (7 EF. 69 �� ~ N m� �` _� W � ,�1 1.� � MEMBERS ASSOCIATION OF CITIES Ed Grimes City of Tehaci�api BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL Councilman Zack Scrivner COUNTY QF KERN Supervisor pon Maben COUNTY OF KERN Supervisor Michael Rubio FRANCHISE HAULERS, METRO-BAKERSFIELD Larry Maxiey (Chairman� FRANGHISE HAULERS, NON-METRO BAKERSFIELD Paul Benz � ,�ER Dennis Lynch P U BLI C-AT-LARGE, UNIVERSAL COLLECTION AREA Patricia DeMond �ce•Chair) PUBLIC-AT-LARGE, NON-UNIVERSAL COLLECTION AREA Michael Geyer AL TERNA TE MEMBERS COUNTY OF KERN Supervisor Jon McQuiston ASSOCIATIQN O� CITIES {Not Designated} BAKERSFlELD CITY COUNCIL Councilman Harold Hanson SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND LOCA February 6, 2008 COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TA' and 1 2 � KERN COUNTY S�LID WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY C01 SPECIAL MEETING Date: Friday, February '[ 5, 2008 Time: 9:00 A.M. Place: Kern County Public Services Building 2700 "M" Street, First Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 AGENDA Me#ro Transfer Station/MRF �` Public Comments Committee Member Comments • Indicates Task Force item * Indicates Attachment/Ha ■ ■ ■ y Bakersfield Association for Retarded Citizens (BARC) Presentation Handout for City of Bakersfield Budget and Finance Committee Meeting Date: March 31, 2008 On August 10, 2007, BARC responded to City of Bakersfield RFP NO. 06-07-114, Annual C� Processing Of Materials From The Commingled Curbside Recycling Program. The table summary of BARC's proposal and the MRC proposal now before the City of Bakersfield and Kern. Up Front Capital Cost To Bakersfield Taxpayers Annual Operating Cost To Bakersfield Tax Payers Curbside Recycling Profit Sharing Type Of Recycling Service Rate Increases For Garbage Collection Implementation Impact On Public Future Mandates to $0.00 No Citv Or Countv Out-Of-Pocket Dollars Bakersfield Already Received $1.5Million Grant Citv Retains Control of Grant Funded Equipment $O.00/Year Operating Costs Will Be Paid By Revenue From Recycling (Assumes City delivers a minimum amount of material) 50% of Actual Net Profit To Be Paid to City City Could Receive Millions Of Dollars/Year, Depending On Recycling Volume and Markets Voluntary Continues Current Program Not Needed Voluntary Curbside Rates Would Continue As-Is Incremental BARC Proposes to Increase The Size Of The Program Gradually, Using Industry Best Practices None Continues Voluntary Blue Barrel Program As Is, If Program Needs To Change In Future, City of Bakersfield Controls Decision Can RPCnnnrl I� Alno.�ls.�l $50 Million Requires Favorable Lo� and Fee Subsidies Fron Public Sources That H Yet Been Fully Discl MRC Controls Ass Purchased With Public $42 Million/Yea PLUS Guaranteed Ann Increases No Profit Sharin MRC Keeps ALL P� Mandated Everyone Pays Thrc Garbage Rate Incre Required Large Rate Increases 1 Required and Impact H _ Been Fully Calculal Everything Required MRC Proposes To Spen Sums of Public Money � Un-proven "NEW' Rec Technology It Has P Demonstrated or F� Described Major Cost Increa: Commits Public To Pay Expensive Program Decades To ComE • 1. Has an independent study been done? 1.1. If so, is the study availabie to the public� 1.2. If not, why not? 2. Why did the San Joaquin Valley Regional Air Pollution Contr District relect MRC's efforts to obtain grants for this project? 2.1. Does the San Joaquin Valley Regional Air Quality Contrc District know that it has other projects that will have a greater on air quality for less cost? 2.2. Was the Hauler proposal too costly per ton of pollution s� 3. How was it determined that MRC's proposal is the most cost beneficia! air pollution reduction program for Bakersfield? 3.1. What other potential projects were evaluated? 3.1.1. How many project proposals were received? 3.1.2. What was the proposed cost for each project? 3.1.3. What was the cost/ton of pollution saved for each project? 3.1.4. How were potential projects ranked? 3.1.5. Who evaluated them? 3.2. Has an independent study been done? 3.2.1. If so, is the study available to the public? 3.2.2. If not, why not? 4. What regulations has the San Joaquin Valley Regional Air Q� Control District imposed that would require this project? 5. If MRC can get the City and County to pay for this project witl public money, wouldn't MRC avoid havinq to pav their own required costs of cleanina up the pollution from their own tru ! � ' �i�, ; � ��� :;�,.;r;, ��, � !�T � / � 7ti � ��� _ ;�: .^, *� -�� _-� �. .� ��_5 ` T-- ' r . `1 ' - - � �_,�� �ti 1 � �-" �`_ . � � �' � .� ?• � .. . � =ti � i � �, ,. F�.--��,� �� . , ���.+��� _�: _� .�.J ;��� �'_ "��=". i►� _ � � a� i ►F � �.�� � � � � � � � ��1 � � � �� � � � :� � - � � � � � � 0 `. � c� l..�. � � � O � � � � � C c� � � � � � � ' � � D �� � o � � � � � co � m� x � � � m � � �. �n' � � �m� � � � � c �;� c� �� a� �' �' s� C° a c < °� � � o a. Q � o � � � � 0 � � � (D O � � CD O � v � � �� o < � �. � �O c� Z� v — 3 � � � � v � Q � cn � Z c' m � � N O � � � � O C � N � � n l� �D � � -� � �p Q. n � �� � N. � � CQ � � � � � � �� n sv' � �. 3 � � �' cQ 0 0 � � fl: a �' � m �' v� � �•�'� � � � c� `� � � mo n.� � �� �• �- �� m � �� � N 0° m 2 � � � ._. O � d � � � 0 � � � � � � 0 � a� � a �rn o � � < � �. �� Z � � � � r' �� �� � � o � C� c m� � �� � . �, � � c� ca � � �' 0 0. co � c� � m� o `< � � � �. � � � � � � � � X � � C� m O � cfl � � O � O — _. � 3 � � n �� � n 0 � 0 � �. O � GJ � N C3� � N O � m < �� � � � � � � c� 0 � � � �•,r-_- - +r � � � � �. � � 0 � � C � � 0 � � � c� � � � � � .�. � c� � �D. � � • n � -a -- � � — c� 0 � � � � � � cfl cfl � 0 �. cfl � o' � • v <' � � o' � rn � �� � � • � c� � � � = � � � � c� � �. = � � • � ov c� � � _. �— �� _� _'� �� cQ � �� c� � �, o �� �� c� �t . � O � c� � 0 � � � O '� - O � �n .F.�,r�°� � � � � � �� � � � v v�' � � � ov c� � � _. � � � 0 � � cfl � .�.�. 0 � 0 � � � � � � � h � �. � O � � � � � !� � w � N C3� N O 00 � �� � � � � � � � � 0 � � � � � � � � � � � � �0 c� � � � _. � cQ � cfl � v �. C � � c� � � 0 � - � � � � — — � n �. O � c� � 0 � � � 0 � 0 • _ � � �ii cD � 0 — � _ � N � � .�. � � _ G� � � � � .�. _. 0 � � 0 � �. O � � � � � � cQ � n _ 0 � c� � v _. � � 0 � � • � � �. � c� � — — _ c� cQ � v � � �, � cQ � } ►� . � ��v � c� a- � _ _ � � �v �D o n a� o �� �� � �. _. 0 • � � � � r 0 � � — � O � � �n � o � � � c� � -- � � � � _. -� � �` O o � cQ �, � � � � • rn � � � � r � � � =; - - r _. � . � � � _. c� rn � � � �'. _. 0 � � :7 - � n � � � c� �o c� c� � n _. � cQ rn � �. � � _. 0 � � n �v � c� �� �� c� c� � _. � z� � -� � � v� c°Q � �, � � • n � � � � c� � n _. � � c� � � c� � . n � _. — _. � � 0 n � � � 0 � W � N C37 N O O 00 � < �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �- t'D � � � a� _ _. � � � � �� .� � � � u rn � � � � c� c� � � .� � � � c� � � � � � � �. G7 � 0 � � � � 0 � CQ cfl � = 0 � C7 _ � � � 0 < c� � � � � � _. � � _ 0 � � � � � 0 � cQ � � c� �. v _. C � � � _. 0 � • r � � � =; _ _ r _. � rn � � c� � �. � � � � � 0 � ct� � _ � � � c� � • n _ �D � � cfl � D _. � � 0 � � � c� n 0 � � � � _. � � --� � O � � . C � � � 0 � � � n _. _ _. � � � C�J � N C3� N O O O� � < �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � • � � o �, o� � � v� �. �� _� =� � _. � o � -- �, �� -� o � _ � � rA � � � � -� =; �- � - _ �� _. � � �� �- � _. -�, o � � � � � c� � �� �o � �� o _ • � � � _. � 0 � � � � � � � � 0 � � ■ � z 0 � � O �t � n 0 .. • �, � o� � �. o � �� o � �o �� � _. c� � �� �� �� �, _. �� =< � � �v �_ �� _� _ � � � � � . � � _. 0 � � • �- v o _. � � � � � � �� � �� � �. �� � _. 00 �� �� o � �� � � � �� -- o �� �� �� �� �� �_ c� _ � =� o� <� c� _. �� • 0 < cfl � a� _ c� � _. � �. 0 � � � c� � � � _ � � t � � �. . �: - �i ?l . �, 4 �i - i. �;: :� l N O .r tJ tJ O W N O � � � � � C �... Ui tJ O � N O �� J 2J O OC N d ►.. �O 0 O '� � c o° o 0 � � � � `/ Z � �/ \ r . 'b �. � O � rD ■e .., � _ � / / . , � � 0 � w N O � � .C+ � � O �... � N O � N C r+ N O ... OC N C � � c o °�, � � ❑ � Z� Z v o c�''i� o .'�i o 0 0 o a o 0 1 / / � � C �,�,��- �-- . N O �+ W ;- N �•� � O r.+ �. - � � N �a Q � Vl N 0 � � N O � ' :,-;„= � N C �.. 00 N C � � _ -.� . ;,,,. -�, _ . ;� . _. � . �_ .� . v . . w -�� O C � Q O C C O � � ����� �=� � ���� 1 � L � � :r '�'`� � � No Proj ti �� o w/Proj w � No Proj tv C � , � vP/Proj .�. � ._._ � lYo Proj t.� - o ...r. w/Proj V�, � No Proj N � o'� . wlProj � No Pro,j N O w/Proj j No Proj N C � w/Proj 00 No Proj N C � w/Proj �p �.� �/ W � N C3� N O 00 �/ \ O• � � � �. � � 0 � � � � � � � � � ,..� :� nC rn� �� c� � .� o � � �� �' o � �.. � �D � � � � � � o� �� �� � �. _ _. _ � �: �;. � c� � �� o� �Q N� �� � ��� = 0 �� � � � O �,• < _ c� �� �� c� o � � � � � 0 � � � _. � �. O � � � � � 0 � cfl c�. � ` sv � � N 0 N � � � Q �o o� �. � c� � �� c� � �= _. o �� � O S� �� �� � �. �< �� �.. O � �o �n �. �� � � n �� �o . _ �o V � N n■ O � � ,— � � � w � � ci Q �O <� �� — � �� �. o � -. �� • � � �■ V � N �;. o� o� �o � � _ G� � � _. � �. 0 � � � � � _. 0 � � , � � _� �o �� �� � �, `� �Q � �, �o V � � O � co � 0 � � � _ — c� � 0 � cn. c� �. � � � � � 0 � � � � � � � � � � _. � � �� O � N O � � � � N 0 N 0 a- � � c� � 0 � � C� CO 0 c� � _. � �� � � � �' � — � � � � _. � � � 0 _ � � 0 � � � C� � O -�, N O O � � • � � � � � � � � c� � = O � � � � � � � �■ �o �� � � _. � �. � � tD � �' � � � � �. � � � -. � � r � � � � � C\ N CJ1 � N O 0 � � C �• � � :9 � �� � � �,,,* -: � �' (Q e � ' •' � 0 � �� � � � > � � V � � � .� ri �..} � I V/ .. ,� j .� � � a �4 i1 � �� +� ; :� " �s; n � � � •�� . . ; � �' _- � :, � • . r ■ � e+ � ..,, _ , � � J +� � _...s.. . � _ _,s t �_ .� r, W � N � � N 0 � rn < 0 � � �--� iii � c� � O � _ � � � � � � • r 0 � � � � n 0 � � O � � 0 � O C � � �� � a .7 r 0 � c� � � n 0 � � O � � 0 � � � � !�� 0 � O —,, rn � . � � . 0 � � � < • � � � � � c� � r-� o� � � = � � � � CD � � '� �� � �. � �: �. ;- � � ;, � n 0 � �. . � �` _# �� � `� 1 1 i �� � � � _ .� , � �. � � ; � �„ �_ � �, �_ ��-��:� ,� �: �.�=�; . � �L � - , � ; ;, , . � . : � ;I` c. � I' r �� �� I � s � . W � N C3� � 0 o°o rn < 0 � � � � � cQ � C� 0 � � � � n� � � � � � • y ' �� •l Q � • • � � • • v r �� v� C� r � n � � � rn � � � ,� �..�' _ � � � � � � � — � � � � � C c� � � �, � v� � �: � � ,� �D � � - � � � � cD —• �D � � � � � = � � � CQ� . � � � � _. — � � .. . "� _. � � � _. _. � � =; � � � � CD � � , � � �� � _. � � � r W N C3� � N O O 00 � �' � � � N CQ � C� 0 � � �- � � cn � n . �p�,av .�. r + � �D < p'�� � c_D � � �D O O �t�/��'a -y, � � n �p'� � _'_� � �p� � � � � _. ��c°Q. �� � � .-r "17 � a'� n � �O �Q � � � � � r'* �D � �G � �, =y � C� � Q� � �n� �.0 ,n- n �' .�- � n � � . � -� r —r Z � � � rnrn �N v� - rnZ n C v rn � . �� n� � �C�i ��� . � _ � � �; � � V�' � �.c�D �-cD c=n � � � � �D ;-� � o � v �� oo'� �o'��v°� O� ��-� � � � � N�� p�, OcD� � � � � . � �n N�� `� � sy � � 0, �v . �rn� rnn� z�� � V^ � � " � ��rn ��� rnrnrn Z � 'rl C'� � =z� rn�� TOrn _ � . �� � �� � � _. � � �� � � � �+, O � � � �D �� v � �. � o � � � t�D Q � � �-r n � C'� � �G . � � � � ���� �OCQ n ���� O � � � � .-t � � � �o�' � N� ��C'� .t/« N �' �D — � � �D � _ < _• � c�D O � � � � O �� f . � c��-���c�� c��.CQ��� �� � � � � � O � � � _ � � � � � � � ,� -. o�o��,� ��� �� -.-��� �_. o �,c� _ 0����� cD .-t � � O � � � n ���000 �D D � � 'a !-�����, � � � _ < c� — �D � n ��� p � O � S� � `°�� a� c� �c� � � c� �, � �. � Q �D � �� O� -z � � C7 � � cp —. = . o��� � � � n -� �p �D C� �. � �, � �' _ � � � � O � �<� a� �-� �.a' --a��� �wNO ���0 v��-•- — �� �� c� _ .� � � � � � � � � � � � � GJ � N C3� N O 00 � �• � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �. � � :� � � O � � � CQ � � �- N �� � � 0 �� � : � � � � � � n �. � — �� � 0 c� � � � � � � � � � �. � � � � � — �� � N � 0 � 0 .�. � t� � � .; .;� • � � � �. rF �. � � � � � O � � � � O � � � � � � � � -� � • � � � � � O � � �'i � � O � � c� 0 � � ii -� � 0 � • O �f � � �. rF � � � � � � � � n � � � � � 0 � � � �� � � tr � C: � � � �■ � �■ � � � � � � � C� � O � � 0 � � �i � w � � w N � N O � � �� � � � � � � � � � � � f'�• � I/��` V� ♦ / � W N � ■ . . ■ � � !�� � � � � � � � � � � � � rF � � � � � � , � �. "'�`�` � i, � � - � �_,�,• � �� . � �� � �o � �. ��� . . . rn , � � � � � c� � � � � � � � � � _ r � � _ � � � � � � � ■ � � � v _. < � � � _. O � � � � � � � � � � c� v N � � � 0 r� �rt � � � � .�� '� �� � - � . � � � �■ ,� � 'a� � � � c� � c� _ � �. �� N 0 0 .. � � O � O � � � � 0 � � � � � � � � O � � D � � c� -� � � �. �� � a� 00 V � � � � O � � � � � � � � � � � � � 0 � � � � � � w � N C37 � N O O 00 � < o� � � � � � � � 0 � � �. � � � t� n s � Q _. = � � � � �' � � O • � � � CQ _ � n -- .-�► '��'. O� n � � � � �D � _. N _. ,-'3 �� • 0 p � �� � �' � � c� �, —. �� � � -• W O O � O � O O Q. � • � � � � � � �� � n O �- � W � � �� . �. � n O — c'� � O — � ��_ ��� _. � �' �' Q � - Q �� � � _. C� � n ty -. _ � � /A n O � O C� � '� � n C � v • � n O � � "� C�. � — � � � � _. . � � — � • � � �. � � � C'� � � 1� � 0 � 0 • O O O 0 .�- O � � � n � n � � � � �� � � !■■�` � � � C � ■ � • • b -■ N � � /^ o `i.i n O n O O ? O C'� �� �o — � �= � _. . _. � �� �� �� �� _. -. _ � �G - � � �G � C� C� � � � � = � O �- W O 0 w � N C3� N O O OO m � < �� � � � �--r � � 0 � �. � � � � � :� r }. ,� �, • rn � � � � � � 0 `. CD �n _� � � � � � • � 0 � � � � _. � �C � CD � � = �� � � � n _ � � � c� � rn � C _. � O � � � � �� �� . C � � � 0 � � � � � 0 `.. c� � � _ _. cQ � _ _. tQ � . � w � N � � N O O� m < 0 � \/ � � � � � � � rrt � � r'Af V, ^� l / � �i � � d � � � � � � � � � � ,�:� iL O � i � � I � 4 � .` 1 � � � � � � � � � � � - � � � � � � � � O � �� � � � O � � � � ■ � � � � � � � � � � - ■ � � � �■■� �. 0 � � � � � � � � Paqe 1 of 2 STREETS DIVISION — WORK SCHEDULE WEEK OF APRIL 7— APRIL 11, 2008 Resurfacinc�/Reconstructinq streets in the following areas: Preparing streets for reconstruction, by City crew, in the area between PI Road & White Lane, east of Stine Road. Resurfacing in the area between Ming Ave & N. Laurelgeln from Gosford Scarlet Oak Reconstructing streets (Annual Contractor) in the area between White Ln N.Halfmoom Dr, west of Wilson Road. Preparing streets for reconstruction, by (Annual Contractor), in the area t Ming Ave & Sundale, east of Ashe Road. Miscellaneous Streets Division proiects currently in progress: Fire Station #5 project. Calloway Median Island Project Jastro Park Wet Play Area Paqe 2 of 2 STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULE Monday, April 7, 20U8 Area befi+veen Oak Street and "F" Street, 16th Street and Golden State A� Area between Bernard Street and Niles Street, No. Chester Avenue and Vista Drive. Area between Jenkins Road and Allen Road, Rosedale Highway and Pa Avenue. Area between Brimhall Road and Rowland Avenue, Rugger Street and Road. Area between Allen Road and Jewetta Avenue from Stockdale Highway, the canal. Tuesdav, April 8, 2008 Streets within the City Limit between Brundage Lane and Ming Avenue, 1 Lane to Union Avenue Area between Ming Avenue and White Lane, Wible Road to So. "H" Stre� Between Hughes Lane and So. "H" Street, White Lane to Pacheco Road Wednesday, April 9, 2008 Between Stine Road and So. "H" Street, Pacheco Road to Panama Lane Between 99 Highway and So. Union Avenue, Panama Lane to Berkshire Thursdav, April 10, 2008 Between Ashe Road and New Stine/California Extension, Ming Avenue t� Cochran Drive. Between California Extension and Stockdale Highway, New Stine Road t Highway. Between Wible Road and Stine Road, Hosking Road to McKee Road.