HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/04/2008�
B A K E R S F I E L D
Ci�y Manager's Office
Memorandum
A�
TO: Honorable or and City Council
n
FROM: Alan Tand , ity Ma an ger
SUBJECT: Generallnformation
1. Enclosed is a letter from Kern County Waste Management Department rE
presentation to the County Board of Supervisors on April 8th of proposed incre
Land Use Fee, Gate Fee and Bin Fee. A request for a public hearing on May 13tr
these increases will be made at that time as well.
2. First 5 Kern approved a$20,000 grant which will provide free swim lessons and o�
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Jefferson pools this summer. The grant targets cr
0 to 5 and their parents who bring them. Last year, MLK pool saw an increase in
of over 130%, due to the First 5 grant. With the addition of Jefferson pool thi
hoped more pre-schoolers will learn how to swim. We anticipate an agreement wi
to finalize the grant on May 1St
3. Flyers are attached for the Spring Festival to be held April 5th and 6th at The P;
Walk.
4. I will not be able to attend the Council Meeting of April 9th due to a personal co
Stinson will fill in for me at what should be a very quick and easy session.
5. The Redevelopment Agency this week authorized submittal of a grant application
for Proposition 1 C funds in the amount of $14 million. Prop 1 C is a very targeted
provide infrastructure for housing projects. If received, the funds would be used
the Mill Creek project. Decisions are expected by summer.
6. The Budget and Finance Committee voted (2-1) this week to authorize a study of
recycling proposals including one from the haulers, one from BARC and others.
Board of Supervisors will be hearing a parallel issue next Tuesday. The pack
Committee meeting is included for your information.
7. Beginning April 17th, PG&E will be removing trees on Calloway Road, between H�
Tuscarora. A total of 44 trees will be removed and replaced by PG&E as part
Traa in thP Rinht PIar.P nrnnram
Alan Tandy, City Manager
City of Bakersfieid
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Mr. Tandy:
March 31, 2008
KERN COU�TY WASTE MANAGI
DaF
SUBJECT: Adjustment to Land Use Fee and Gate Fee
BaN
http://�
�"4 �_ l�,_- f tj �.
�--- -_-�._' -� �
;
' �', °f � U � 200
�.--�-----_-_
l crv r R�, ^,.F o.r; �r�,�. ,�
On April 8, 2008, the Waste Management Department intends to preser
Kern County Board of Supervisors a request to set a public hearing for
2008 to approve a proposed increase in the Land Use Fee from the curren
to $72.31 per unit per year for one to four unit parcels, and from $56.00 tc
per unit per year for a five or more unit parcel, based on the 3.3% pe�
increase of the annual average Consumer Price Index (CPI).
In addition, a request to set a public hearing for May 13th to increase the C
from $38.25 per ton to $39.50 and increase the Bin Fee from $2.00/cubic
$2.05 will also be presented. It is recommended that fees be adjuste�
manner to ensure rates remain equivalent for the three fees based
proportional share of system costs.
The Waste Management Department continues to conduct analysis of the c
revenue needs to operate the County's solid waste system. System-wide
projections for a ten year period were made as part of a report to the I
Supervisors presented February 12, 2008. This updated a report presentE
Board on August 22, 2006.
The main revenue sources for the solid waste system are Land Use Fees, I
and Gate Fees. The Land Use Fee is charged on the tax roll for re
properties in the County. As a result of this fee, there is no additional ch�
landfill or transfer station for disposal or recycling of normal household tra
Gate Fee is charged on a per ton of waste basis at landfills or transfer statio
non-residential waste and other chargeable items (such as tires, dead
. .. . . .. . . . . . . , . .
Fee Adjustments Pa�e 2 March
based on the CPI are needed to operate the waste management system v
continual budget shortfall. A reduction in non-residentiaf waste dispc
resulted in a significant reduction in Gate Fee revenues. The reduced dispo
not translate into a commensurately longer landfill life. In fact, higher con:
costs due to higher fuel costs and greater costs for liner made from pE
products adds to the need for a fee increase.
The new fees, if approved at the hearing on May 13th, will take effect or
2008. Therefore, it will be necessary for you to adjust the rate on wh
monthly payment to the County for your commercial accounts is calculated.
If you have questions concerning this proposal, please feel free to conta�
(661) 862-8900.
Sincerely,
� ��
�
/�- �✓
Daphne B. Harley
Director
I:\CLERICAL\LETTERS�2008108-21 TFM rsl.doc
cc: Public Works Director
Kevin Barnes, Sofid Waste Director
ADM-CITY-BAK
Th
e Park at River Wal
• t�h th
...�z�� . ,�.�. „ -,- _
Sat�rday, Ap�il. 5� 10 am - 9:30 p�
10 am - Noon Bakersfield Pregnancy Center "Walk for
10 am - 7 pm Artisan Guild's Craft Show
11 am - 5 pm Arts Council of Kern "Gallery on the Gre
11 am & 1 pm Artists Workshops �R��
11 am - 5 pm Children's Activities �tt��
11 am - 5 pm
5 pm - 9:30 pm
10 am
Bike Bakersfield Bike Games
Mobile Stage Entertainment
����
����
Bright House Networks Amphitheatre �
5:00 pm Hayes Field
6:15 pm Lost Ocean
7:30 pm Honky Tonk Truckers
8:45 pm Right Cross
sund.a.y, April 6� lo a�m - 4 pm
Ladies Active 20/30 Club
"Quackers for Kids" Rubber Duck Race
10 am - 4 pm Artisan Guild's Craft Show
11 am - 4 pm Arts Council of Kern "Gallery on the GrF
11 am & 1 pm Artists Workshops �R��
� � . r^r�-'�J---��_ ♦ _�•--_a._._._ ��.,-�-
Staff: John W. Stinson
Rick Kirkwood
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
Ken Weir, Ch
Sue Benham
Irma Carson
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
o# the City Council - City of Bakersfield
Monday, March 31, 2008 --12:(30 p.m.
City Manager's Conference Room, Suite 201
Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
A G E N D A
ROLL CALL
AD�PT FEBRUARY 25, 2008 AGENDA SUMMARY
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion regarding Recycling Issues — Tandy / Rojas
COMMITTEE COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
Staff: John W. Stinson
Rick Kirkwood
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
�
B A K E I� S F I E L D
Ken Weir, Ci�
Sue Benham
Irma Carson
BUDGET AND FiNANCE C4MMITTEE
of the City Gouncil - City of Bakersfield
Monday, March 31, 2008 —12:00 p.m.
City Manager`s Conference Room, Suite 201
Second Floor - City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
A G E N D A
ROLL CALL
ADOPT FEBRUARY 25, 2008 AGENDA SUMMARY
Pt�BLIC STATEMENTS
NEW BUSlNESS
A. Discussion regarding Recycling Issues — Tandy / Rojas
COMMITTEE C4MMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
BUDGET AND FINANCE C4MMfTTEE
Recycling Consideration
Pro osals received:
■ Hauler proposal
■ BARC proposal
■ Other interest statements
■ Staff summary of other ways to reduce air pollution and/or increase recyclinc
such as:
■ Full transfer station
■ Detachable unit or direct transfer station
■ Convenience stations — self haul
■ Dual collection
■ Apartment programs
■ Blue cart expansion / mandatory or marketing improvements
■ Conversion to clean air refuse trucks
■ Expansion of existing programs
Future Sessions
� Committee review and narrowing of options, requests for more in-depth infor
■ Rate impacts
■ Landfill fee impacts
■ Legal issues
■ Cost
■ Measurements of impact on air, recycling quantities
■ Procedural and bidding requirements, etc.
■ Committee forwards "preferred" ideas to full City Council
■ Fu1i Council reviews in greater depth, depending an options selected, co�
may be needed.
➢ County is invited as an active participant in the entire process. Liaison is m�
with County for poten#ial joint action.
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
,�—
John W. Stinson, Assistant City Manager
For: Alan Tandy, City Manager
Rick Kirkwood, Management Assistant
Ken Weir, Chai
Sue Benham
Irma Carson
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BUDGET
AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
Monday, February 25, 2008 —12:0� p.m.
City Manager's Conference Room — Suite 241
City Hal�, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
The meeting was called to order at 12:03:52 PM
1. ROLL CALL
Committee members present:
Committee members absent:
Councilmember Ken Weir, Chair
Councilmember lrma Carson
Councilmember Sue Benham
Staff qresent: Alan Tandy, City Manager; John Stinson, Assist�
Manager; Rick Kirkwood, Managemen# Assistant; Steven Teglia, Admir
Analyst III; Joshua Rudnick, Deputy City Attorney II; Nelson Smith,
Direc#or; Donna Kunz, EDCD Director; Rhonda Barnhard, Assistan
Director; Toni Crosby, EDCD Business Manager; Vince Zaragoza
Principal Planner
Others present: Dr. David Goh, Garden Pathways; Karen Goh,
Pathways, Bob Prater, The Garden Community Center; James
Bakersfield Californian.
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, January 28, 2008
4. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion regarding CDBG, HOME, and ESG Action Plan FY
Donna Kunz
Economic Development Direct Donna Kunz, summarized thE
Entitlements received by the City through the U. S. Department of
and Urban Development (HUD). These entitlements hefp to im�
quality of li#e in low #o moderate income neighborhoods. T
Community Development Block Grant Program {CDBG),
Investment Partnership (HOME) and Emergency Shelter Grai
entitfements for FY 2008-09 were allocated, reflecting a decre
$5,144,518 to $4,981,250. Staff is projecting program income f
in the amount of $20,000 and $150,000 for HOME. The total
budget for CDBG, Home, ESG for FY 2008-09 is $5,151,250.
CDBG Pro osed FY 2408-09:
The total resources avaiiable for FY 2008-09 are $3,324,5E
amount includes the CDBG Entitlement of $3,304,560 and tr
program income of $20,0�0. The total resources are allocated a:
• Total Administration — 20% CAP: $664,912.
• Long Term Obliga#ions: $402,317. These on-going, I
obliga#ions are repayments of Section 148 Loans.
• Public Services: $315,000. Services include graffiti r�
HUD eligible areas, the Bakersfield Senior Center,
Housing.
• CDBG Home Owner Rehabilitat+on: $400,000 — Mc
Stockdale Sewer Assessment Grant Project.
• Low-Mod Benefit - 70% of Entitlement: $40,000 — Boys
Ciub of Kern County.
• Housing and Sium and Blight Activities: $50,000
Net resources available for Capital fmprovement Projects
.n. ..,� .,.,, n+,.0 .,. ,�...,":++�.� +Ha fnlln�Arinrr nrnnncarl (
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, January 28, 2008
• MLK Jr. Center — Roof Replacement: $300,000
• Q Street Streetscape - 24tn Street to Truxtun — Phase
277,331
Donna Kunz provided a brief overview of the applications receivE
2008-09. Twelve applications totaling $4,430,000 were received
City Proposals for CDBG Assistance. Seven applications
$g67,978 were received from nonprofit and private entities rE
ass+stance from various HUD Programs. Staff is recommending c
assistance to two nonprofit organizations, the Bakersfield Senic
#or operating costs, and the Boys and Girls Club for facility repair:
internal capital improvements obligations currently underway,
does not have the financiaf resources to cons+der large expenditi
o#her nonprofit organizations. Ms. Kunz suggests that for ne
budget, nonpro#it organizations should consider requesting
contributions over a two year period.
Home Investment Partnershi �,H�ME :
The total funding avaiiable for FY 2008-09 is $1,680,027. Thi
includes the H�ME Entitlement of $1,520,921; $150,000 af
program income; and $9,106 from the American Dreams Dowi
Initiative (ADDI).
Pro osed Housin Pro rams:
Staff estimates the tota! Program/Project Costs ($1,630,027) �
Delivery ($50,000} for FY2008-09 to be $1,630,427. This amoun
$� .0 million in new construction for affordable housing in the
redevelopment project area; $218,829 in SEPA, DT & 4TK Dow
Assistance; $235,000 in HUD mandated Community
Development Organization {CHDO) sponsored projects; and $9,�
Emergencv She!#er Grant (ESG :
Staff proposes $146,663 in ESG to fund the Bakersfield Rescue
($62,000); Bethany Homeless Shelter ($62,000}; and Alliance Ac
Familv Violence ($15.330). Also incfuded is #he 5% Administrati�
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, January 28, 2008
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 12:27:34 P.M.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council
S:\Council Comm+ttees12008\08 Budget and Finance\February\February 25 Agenda Summary.doc
�
B A K E R S F I E L D
CITY �F BAKERSFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Raul Rojas, Pubiic Works Director
DATE: March 28, 2048
SUBJECT: Budget and Finance Gommittee Report Regarding
Recycling and Air Poltution Reduction Program Issues
In response to Council Member Scrivner's referral of this subject to the Budget and Fina
Committee, staff has prepared the attached report. This report is intended to also respo
the prior request for a comprehensive solid waste plan made by Budget and Finance Cc
Chairman Weir. The report briefly addresses a number of issues and presents alternati�
consideration. It is summarized below:
1. The City has implemented numerous projects, complying with recycling and clea
mandates, with fee increases not exceeding overall inflation.
2. The state may increase mandates, but is struggling with choices over what to rec
We can best respond to mandates only if they are clearly set.
3. In the meantime, there is some social interest for doing more sooner. If this is io
done, goals and cost limits must be identified.
4. The contract refuse haulers have proposed to build and operate a multi-million d
recycling facility, which seems premature and may or may not address future m�
It would burden ratepayers by sharply increasing County disposal fees.
5. Significant fee increases for projects of this type tend to drive waste and revenuE
from the system. Other counties have experienced spiraling fees as a result of �
projects.
6. A project, such as the one proposed, wouid require a bid process if built on City
and backed by City fees through a contract for service.
. . . . . ., , ---
Page 1 of 3
Recycling and Air Polfution Reduction
Future Program Issues
California has various mandates for recycling and air pollution reduction. Histor
the City Council has had a philosophy of compiying with mandates while keepin
trash fees to a minimum. The City has a track record of successful compliance,
implementing several clean air and recycling programs with fee increases not
exceeding the rate of inflation. New state imposed mandates seem iikely, but it
yet clear what form these mandates will take. The�-e is current debate in the ca�
over 3 different recycling strategies, such as:
1. Not allowing cities to dispose of more than their 2006 level of trash.
2. Requiring 75% recycling by 2020.
3. Requiring specific programs, or banning disposal of specific materia
regardless of the recycling percentage.
While we wait for the legislature to determine new goals, there are possibilities �
increased recycling and air pollution reduction. The question is how much sho�
attempt to do before the new mandates, and at what cost? Should we choose �
direction now, or wai# for new rules to guide our efforts? It is important to note t
new mandates usually allow cities a few years to develop and implement new
programs, facilities, etc.
One option that has been proposed is #he development of a material recovery f�
{MRF} to sort out recyclables from the trash. A MRF could be combined with a
refuse transfer station, as a way to reduce both trash and air pollution. HowevE
current proposal would ultimately place a large #inancial burden on the rate pay
and has the potential to significantly increase County disposal fees. The currer
proposal is limited to general information on cost estimates. Until new mandatE
established, it is risky to plan a multi-million dollar MRF. Therefore, we have
presented below some possible interim steps to achieve air pollution and recycl
goals. Further study is needed to estimate the full cost of a MRF versus other
options.
Air PollutEOn Reduction
There are two ways to reduce air pollution from trucks that haul trash. One wa�
convert to cleaner engines. State law is already requiring cleaner engines for a
trash trucks by 2010. The other way is to combine trash into larger loads at a
Page 2 of 3
The City and County applied for a$20 million air district grant to build a transfer
station, but funds were not available. A transfer station could be built without gr
funds, but it would increase disposal fees about 30%. Higher disposal fees ma�
trigger more illegal dumping. Fortunately, there are some lower cost a�ternative
large central transfer station that could help reduce air pollution. These include
1. Residential trash trucks that can swap trailers and transport two load�
once (Figure 1}. These could phase in as old trucks are replaced.
2. Direct truck-to-truck transfer systems that require minimal capital
improvemen#s (Figure 2}. These could be used at hauler yards.
3. Low cost "convenience stations" for self-hauiers (Figure 3). These cc
be established around town (perhaps at home improvement centers).
While these options would obtain only part of the air pollution reduction compar�
a major transfer station, they may be more affordable. They may also be used
interim steps to reduce air pollution. Transferring refuse or combining loads fro
western side of the metropofitan area would save the most mileage at the least
since it is farthest from the landfill. Therefore, costs can be minimized by using
options only in areas farthest from the iandfill. Since grant funds are not availa
the major transfer station, a study of altematives is needed.
Recycling
There are various options to increase recycling. Basically, trash can be recycie
ei#her by sorting out the trash at a central facifity, or by separate collec#ion of
recyciables. There are trade-offs. Sorting out the trash avoids extra collection
routes, but tends to be very costly. Also, recyclables sorted from raw garbage f
lower value. Most major MRFs do not actually sort the raw household trash, be
i# is unproductive. On the other hand, separate collection makes cleaner recyc�
but may require extra collection routes. However, there are ways to recycle wit
minimal number of extra routes.
1. Commercial and apartment trash bins can be converted to a tan and
system like the curbside recycling program. By changing some of th
regular trash bins to blue recycling, some of the trash routes can be
changed to recycling routes. Thus separate collections can be madE
without doubling the number of routes. The $1.5 million grant fundec
equipment for curbside recycling can be used to sort the mixed
recyclables from apartments and some businesses.
Page 3 of 3
In addition to possible new recycling programs, expansion of current ones shou!
be overlooked. There are two ways to reduce self-haul truck trips and increase
recycling with existing infrastructure:
1. Restrict disposal of construction and demolition (C&D) materials at the la
A simpie ordinance could direct self-haul away from landfills to facilities C
as the hauiers' existing C&D facility.
2. Restrict disposal of greenwaste at the landfi{l. Currently, residentia! wasi
admitted to the landfiil free, paid for by the residential land use fee. Man�
commercial gardeners abuse this, enjoying free admission to the landfilf
claiming their loads are from residential sources. Eliminating this loopho
woufd induce greate�- use of the existing greenwaste facility.
Recommendations
With so many considerations for a total solid waste system, a full study of optioi
would be complex, especially as the new rules begin to come out of the state c�
Therefore, a consultant study is recommended. The City and County jointly fun
the recent transfer station study. The prior work could easily be expanded to pr
a complete MRF feasibility study. Continuing to work joEntly with the County wo
more efficient in addressing metropof�tan area issues. Both staffs were preparii
do so when the County Board of Supervisors instead directed staff to develop �
plan in coordination with the iocal hauiers.
The locai haulers have since proposed that they be excEusively given a con#raci
handle the entire project. This would need to go through a bidding process bec
1. It would be a project on publicly owned land, ultimately paid for by rates
City Council, making it a Publ�c Works project.
2. Several other vendors have requested the opportunity to bid on waste ai
recycling projects. The list ranges from local to large corporate organiza
A key consideration is that large fee increases to support a MRF have the potei
increase illegal dumping, and more importantfy, drive waste out of #he countywi
system. This would in turn require additional fee increases to maintain revenuE
debt service and operation of the MRF. Therefore, it is prudent to avoid fee
increases that exceed other disposal options around the state. Until the new
mandates are set, no one is sure how much the averaae fees will increase.
Refuse Transfec and Recycling Op#ions
For the Solid Waste System
Following the bad news that the Metropolitan Area Transfer/Recycling Station dic
receive grant funding from the air district, this �s to list alternative ways the solid v
system can po#ential(y reduce air pollution through re�use transfer or increase thE
of recycling at minimal cost to the cornmunity. I# should be noted that, in the air
emissions study, most of the available emission reductions are from transferring
haul foads. Refuse trucks are already regulated to minimize air emissions by 20'
under state ruies, and therefore offer less opportunity for emission reductions.
Refuse Transfer Options
1. Direct Transfer From Routes -- Refuse trucks can transfer waste directly
transport trailers in fin►o different ways, without the cost of a large centra! ti
station:
a. Direct transfer trailers at yard docks (see Figure 1}.
b. Detachable packer trailers (see Figure 2).
These options may be practical for transferring foads from the west Metro
which is the furthest from #he landfill. East Metro Area loads can still be h
shorter distance directly to the landfill.
2. Convenience Stations #or Setf Haulers - Drop off sites with large contai
trailers can accept small loads from the self-hauling public, with minima# s
development cost (see Figure 3}.
Recycling Options
1. Makin Curbside Rec clin Cost Less — Universal curbside recycling n
less with a method cailed dual collection, in which finro types of carts are c
into separate sides of a callection truck on one trip. A previous pilot progi
dual collection of tan and green carts showed the system works. HowevE
not expanded because a trans#er station was not available. A new consic
would be dual coliection of blue and green carts, so that a transfer station
needed. Staff recommends a pilot program for this.
2. Exaandina Btue Cart Recvclina to Apartments — Blue cart recycling dc
need to be limited to single family homes. Small and medium apartment
complexes can also use them. There are a few such complexes already
voluntary program.
Figure 1
_�
�, _ �
�
.,
��
t
'�.
,
' � � �, �� -
i �. � � - _a
f � .�
�� ` .�
"-+�!r ' _ . _.
,
�
.
,�, _.i
.,.
i�� ��
t.{. ,, .. -
� ;; ., .,
�
, . � ` #- ��_
,� '� � �:
�
K�',1 • � .
•�,•- --
, � � r
� � .a�'�r� J9 �� :" �'T 1 �1P,%�•�,o . � ' ' .
� A- �%r f��••� ir ~�� �i.� r^ t f T 4— t 4 Z'►
° � ��'�� �,,"�� �'. ';�'x-�'�ai; ; ��. ;• „ ��"'i
�� � � r^ '�,.-'� . �±,��/ �� ' t� .; • �,'�j, � ��, . , ���•
�" Mt • _ �',*�'F,'�:.,ry �; ��+,�'.� � i'f ` `4�', 4''{�'��+�'"�]i"a
_ �� ��JI�." . ��C: t� � i��' 1 � ; � i6
, _�"S ��. ♦. . . •�
�t
��l�
i���
��.�.a.f
� t
r '�•
,,,,_ �
l r " tt� �_9, ��'1
i
��.1 ,�� .
. �
; �1 't -Y •�
,�:.1�� -..
' f ,a' �.:m�L.. ` ��y '�.
�' _r ., '~ � , ^y
'�' �� .� �� �.� �f �� ���
I • . • ',
. . tT� .. . I , � S ' _'�i 1
� � , . �
. � a� , i � ° •. . i .�. f s.,��....�l.Jd •;
- �.. �;"'� "°"' - � �'�i�t�� � - -: � _
� i �f"" . � � �' ."' r.r ,
� �
,� � :� '�'�;�,i� � _ . � � ,j' �
-�: . ,. . . . . t 1 � -:,�
� , �;.
__ � y.. _, �. , , . . r ' .ya � . .. _ „ . : . _ , ' s' �
�' �+ � �.. + ti � • �' " � . a � . r
� . r. 1 , �i.a� � � r ' wa"`...�,a' ,..: z . - • ' � i _
s �
' 'i r � �: �� , _ - � � �� T� r � � � � '
�, ���
,.
� ��,^ � �
.� ..,�,�,�„��'
� �..
�.;s,,s as
;� f ° ;
. ! • .
� , A j .�
_., ,� :
t - , -
� .,. z , . . .
� � .`-� . .
G
�
s •u , _
� e� r _ "
. n r�d" �,�' � .�'+c'� - � r. R Y . � t � �" .- .'li� ' Jv ...c "i'. '� i',�1M�Y
'� ��i "' �.',.;�'—,,, �
,.,�. '"_ . , . '_ ,
. : �� ti ,_.�i li�. ".R� "'"d�,
- _ � , - . ., . � . ., . . , . �. ''
� . 't' '
7 �� ` r«
d.7. �s,_ .. ' y ,.
� ���• .. _, .:u � _ '_ •%�7�lS
:�'�► .'
�
Figure 2— Direct Transfer Trailer
f • � �''
�•1.�r
� � � � �'
r � � W�
�
�
� �
� " � �
�
�!^ _
��' , * r �. _. .. }.f!�.. �= r
fr,a '�i S.' _ _ r. ,• ;lw . i... . .� �.
r����� �
. *
� �
: - �
� _�
r.. . . ... _. __�..:. n sa. .C�
� r' •� _ _ ,__.
�. �� ^
'l: 't .`_ � � : .
�'r�
G
%�..f��i4 .
Figure 3- Convenience Station for Self Haulers
� �
. '� �
�ii� —
,� � •
��' .
'�.t �
_�i
1
��
�
.'y�
'4
BARC
Blue Barrel Recycling - Material Recovery Facility
Blue Barrel Recyclables Stream
$1.5 Million DOC Grant
BARC's Proposal:
7.7 Acres at Union and White Lane
20,000 sq ft building designed for MRF
operations
70' Scale and scale house
Loading Docks
Name Recognition/Community Support
30 Years Recycling Experience
Long standing relationships with markets
Ability to receive more grants to fund future
growth (DOC, CIWMB, Private Foundations)
Ability to attract recyclable materials from
smaller cities in Kern County
1) Use City's $1.5 million DOC grant to purchase sorting equipment
2) Install sorting equipment in BARC's new building
a) City retains ownership and control of sorting equipment
b) BARC provides facility, labor and recovered material marketing
3) City delivers blue barrel materials
a) City retains control of recyclable material flow
b) City retains option to change programs if conditions require it
4) BARC and City share profits of sorting operation
a) BARC to provide full transparency of P&L financial information
b) City to have ability to audit
c) Profit sharing based on agreed negotiated formula
d) City included in decision making process
Advantages:
1) City retains control and flexibility (does not require a 25 year commitment)
2) No capital outlay by the City (grant is not a City cost) and investment in additional sorting
can grow incrementally as material volume increases justify the investment
3) No operating cost to the City (requires a minimum material volume)
4) Does not require a mandatory blue barrel program (incentives and marketing program are ;
recommended to increase material volume, shared profits increase as volume increases)
�ti�:_ _;;� . ;� �
. ;, .
;.= j
, ; ,. , .
-' :r.
:•:, .=
•,� .
�,
1 L
�Y�'
4- w�
;u
�� ! .
}� !, �N .
���. w�
�
� r � •
iV.`
.•1, � ��
�'
iMr:
JYi
Q _-�! : .�
�:� o .
��J
��;
�:_
i �
�� ��<< � i! y► ` � � '
�' :
j�r ; : � �} M �.,
' •
yY "� � .
� ,� ,-. .� ` r,'•_
..�
. �
�
�
tl�
�
�
tL�
.r._..
.._
—
C�
�
�
�
�
�
i i�L?.-- - . .
�
;....� R�.sr�.'�._�s>�_--�..:: . is�:�. .
. . .. . K �.��
� a�
�
�
�
�
�
U
. cts� �C
�
�
s� �
a� t�
�
i i,
, ••�.
, `� .
'^f'
!�,-
i��
�
��: .
� : . .' .. . � � �
• `1 . .. . . ..�_ ..
_ , � _ .
� � .
� �
�
� �Q� _ , ; �:-
_'' �
�� ,��
a.:
t
�Y�
_,
�
��
c; ,.
-r
v
�
�' . �.L .
�` "_ ...1..A..��.
� �� r�
_ � a�
� �ti��'�, '
' �✓� �=r4�' S. t
:;
i`�; � : ;ct•"• :
i��,5����•_- .
i-,<��,: _
���j Y'
�IIfV��L ,
: -'t � �
' �
.. '
�.._�.. .
d
+ r�• '_:<'; ?i ^ k "'; '� ;' c.l':, � .'�.�j�..l
� . T a�.�s . S i'�,.,
� -��� � ��n'�;� zr;i`��tr;�'^,•
�.: = .
_ 1 �,
.. , �..;>�.
� . �:���- - _
z,. :_ • : � �.S
ti +:�
,�
t � s as'��G•-1`�,,
' � �z''� �l� ,�''-�1
j i. _. ry,2a�� .`` � r y
z *�
.. tltr. y. .. � ,t
, ��.,-�� � . i.� � .r'7. `
. . , . � . .. � _ • ! 71 � _ �.. J_' *a.
_ C
O
�/��
•V
L
/O�
i.i.
L
�
U
�
V
�
V
�
�
O
Q
O
L
�A'
W
�
0
w
U
�
�
a�
X
O
�
�
ca
J
� �
� �
a�i Q�i
� �
�
�
4�
.r
�
m �
� cu
� `
c� �
�
'"' Z
� U
C �
O
L �
'} t
r �
W —'
�
� � .
� � �
� � �_ L a
� �
a� �
Y � � �
� �
� � � g
U
� � � �
�`. Q � �
� � U
O � .V
U w
`
a�
� ,
_ •` �
T � � �
� c �
_ N -
:n � � Z
;a W _
�� � �
� �
� � � �
O � �
CI; �
c�� � ,�
� �
+-� � T
� � �
r � � T
� (L � G
� V � `.
� a� �
.0 ,� � `�'
� a
c� � . c
`
�s • �U—, �
� V C
U � '
L W C
� W
�
�
ca .�
�U �
� Q
`�^• x
vJ W
� p)
� •�
� O
� �
Li
Q
�
;.
k
f_
�., ,
i
i
. ;�
;^�. .
I
�
tii
�
L
C�....
V
�
�
� -
�'�
�
�
�
�
a�
�U
�
�
�
0
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.�
�
�
��
�• .-�
�
m �
� �
v��
�Y,.
�t - �
•�J. �
1
'� !
�~
r �=
, ti'
• �
+ ` � P
r.. � •
�.�_ -, `.y 4
..- -_ •-Z.Y: �
, . . �_. 1
� •
�1O• , 4, �
r� �'�
} +�,�
� . Y
o �
� _ �
� .
s� -��
.� ,
� �
�•" ,
�
� �
� �
• � ,� _
� • � +�
,.�; c'"''„� : aa
� V c� ; r 4�
�� ��. �
a p� � v�
�,� •�
�� �
�
�.
� � .� �
aA ���� ,� � ��'�•.'
..
.� �,.,� J O
i ~�� � �
� � N� �
� '� �+
� .,� � e�
�
�
,o
U
.�
� �
a
� _.
.�
r�
C
�
�
�
.
�a
�
�t
�
�
�
�
.,..�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
-i�
�
yfi
�_��
� �.=
���.
;
��::�
��
r r , .
��
�
1{ ��- •h�, �
I . . 1� -
� � , ' ;1 �
� 1 1
�, � "
. '�%�E`' ';.
.
�, . �
'�.3
.�
�
�
t/�
�
�
�
c�
�
�
�
�
. ..�
��
�
�
0
�...
-��+
�
�
;: '�'%,rs:
`" �.� •-
yy1yf�i '
�74�" �a _ ..
-r •,-i � t�..,�,- t.i,.•
� ` �
�,� z.+�
y . x, - - �r��.
L��� �. 'i ,!' _.'_�
�'.Rj'1^
6
��-
.F�
.''`t,'
{ .�
!S.
ti��•.4� '
— t '
�` � �
� � ] �
w
� � Q• � �
. _ _ � .,..� � a�
, �.� � � �.
�� � �
�
� �
�'� ��a o
��.�• �,�
�
.� � w
��� �- �
� ��� �z
�� �
� a �� �
.s� �o��c
��
�w� a�c� �a
� � �
�
�
1 •
�
�
�
�
�
�
rJ �
�1'y �
•�
��
c �
��
�
��
�.�
��
�, �
� �
o�
� .
3 � ,
f.'
�
�� �.
��/111/
� � �
^ ' � �
� W, �
V � • � '.
� � � �� �
� :�-� � , � ' �
� V � � �� � �
� � r� '' � � _ `..� � �
� � '��o,xo
• � � °' _ � z��
� � �
� - �` p ''�
� o �"�,�,• ,� a►�
•r �'p � �^ � �
� ~ w� � : � � � [ 71 1 � A l •i.�
�F�
. y,i�
�, vl T
�,_ � y:
( �
�,i
���. :
. �
i � j_
i"` - .
� � '
'n�t :y .
's
"•n
._ r'='
. . � - � �� . - . . . .f . �. . .
�
�L
�
�
W
4�
�
._
.-± �'
tl�
a
�
�
�
�
{Y � hs
.� �f; 7,
�
�
�
�
�
+�-� r�7�-. ..T; ��� �
.'"U{lliM�a4 il � i� b � tr
.'F�'' yr 7i.'`Cl�i 'L� -
..J.-i -t'- "._ '.` _�''Jh
� ! �'S' .:�� ��!��' ���t. �t � � .
,, L , a�f,r ,'N�1
:7�.i� :1� �= �?�_"d'_?Y'�,c�. :'_�i
�
Bi
, `'.._ �
� �
�
c
tiaT_�.. .. i _.... � �..
� F � .71
� � ,�
� 1 � K-
-�.�► � �A . .,�
. ,� � ;,
� � a yi
o -�
� � .,,
� � c� ,
� � :
� � �
� -+-' �� a� :l
� � �-' .��
o � __ � _
� � �
� O
Q� 43
� �
�
. �
� o
�
�
� •
�
o �
� �
�- �
,�--
_ ; . ��` �
� �
� �.
Q� �
� � � .��
� � � {�
� �
�
a� � . �
� ��
� ��ccs
� o ����
�
,� • � �
r--+ o .�.� �
�. c,,C�
. �..� � � ,N:
�+ o �� �
'z� � � : c� �
� � �� �.�'
�•� O � �
_ �
.....��1 T� r��
� �.
. ss
, �ti '�l
Y, .
��
�. _
�':.'��'
• h
�
�
�
�
0
�
�s�
f�
�
�
"�3
�
�
�
�
�
..,_.
�
t�
......
W
w
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
.�
�
.�
�
a�
�
�
�
a�
�
�
. �..,,
b�
�
. �..,
�
�
� �
� �
� �
C�S
�
� �
�
�
�
�
0
c�
�
Q�
�
4
�
�
�
�
�
� O
.�
�
�
�
�
��
o �
•� �
� �
. � a�
�����. . . �_ _ .
wSi ._.+_._ . .. , _
.�
�
O
. �..{
�
.,�
�
c�►
� ��
�
�
-i��
� �
� �
A •.�
a�
�
. �,
�
�
�
�
�
. ,..�
� � t�
a� � •�
� �' -'� U
v .�
�.,,�� �
� � �
.,� �
A��
��,
�
�
�
�
��
�
�
�
a�
�
�
c�
. �..�
�
�
�
�
�
•�en..�,M11C."f ="i�; _ 'I�{'- . ; i1P�
� .�n' - Cl�(=.L Ii .�
- �
ti - '. ' �-'' -.. ' i�_. _. . . _ . . . �ti
o.�
ct� �
V
� �
Q � '�
� � �� � �.
.,.
� �
� o
� ...�
��
� • �-1
r�1 �y j�
� �
`�
�
� �
� � �
� �
� �., ;
� � ��
c� � �-
� �.�
o•
�
�
� :�
o�
. �..�: �
� � �,
� a�
� �
� o
�o
. ,..., �
� �,
1 �
'� ��i7
}l
�
..'� , '
+{t���~} � - ,� x
�. _
i�:i.
''-{`.-i . Y •� . .
` . � �..
7- �
;7 .
I' •.�
r
"r._. � .
� ' � � +( �." '�" ,' Y i'7iti r = '.
:.'� �.�,� ; _ � ':i
. . Ny: �r 1� '` ,, - . -
�ya .
�t�,i.; :.:. ,
J
� �h4 �' ^ = ' L '
�i i�t�* �'., �. � ���
�.r ��ya` �:. •j . -'•` .
t� �Y �'�+! -+L?�t ,�y-
+t"�� _';'��.� �-k`.. � �>yr � C1�
ij
�
��
.y.�^ f� �
-� �',�'J:L _.,,,,
� � �
��."-�..!�r�.
, _. :� .:.
��
�� • i 1
� �'
� �r � �
1 � � � �; � .
��r�
, .._•.Rw.�
-•t., w � �
,~ t � l
�� y'y,1
�.1 ..�� �?W
� : i%
-rr
<�
� ...
�, 1
i4�-/.'_
; '._
S ; I-
f �.;
�;:
g ,i.
f..
� - ' • �. " - .'��
� y � . - w :� �.�
_7. ' � - -1�'.
. i1� -, yy tt •.s..'
� F- � r y
���1 +�.
::�'�:�Rr .j�
� �l�� �
,� '�l A,��
� .�#� Y.,:C � .
' �i.•,. s. �y
i: v -i�
+�.��' r' j�.�� �,y�
.�
� , �
� - �. . �-�,^
• _-';,r . . . a
�;.� ' • •`f N
� �
o ��
�
L�
�
�
�
�
i
�
,
�
i �
1 �
L,�.
�
- "�
�
. .,
y �
i�; •"
M` .
�
�
� � �
�
�
i `� � �i
� �
:� � '�
O -
� �� {
!' � � x,�
' � .�
� �,: �
� "
� �
� 4
� � �
` �� a
��
�•
; �,
- - �� � `�, !��
LR•�,'• � ��
L• ` ` - �
., ' ;
r
_;
��.
� t � �
� �
O •�
�t
'.�.� :4. �, �
c� �. � Q
� U{� �
a �
:r � v �
�� � � :
,� � �
�'' A)
� r
_ . . -::: -
�
.�..�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Q
�
_���
c� �
���
0
. . `�� �
� a
� ,� �.
��� � �
.�
,... . �
�
m• �
�, ? � ;
. ���a� !
w � •,� �'' I
a �c�� � ,
�g � �,�� ��
�3 � �q��• i
�� a �j
� � �
� ��� �
. �
���� �#�
. .
a �
m
�� � ��
��
a � � .�
�� � �
� • o � '�
b a� �
� ��
� � �.
� �� ,
m� -��� �
'� � � �' � b ` �
R'
� � ���� �
o � a 1�+ � �.
�?� �, � w� 3
.� � �
�� � .
�_�, �m_ ��
�
:�
;�
,��
�
�o
Fa
�z
�
�
�
a
� t�
� `�
� .�
�� U
� � .�
�� .�
��'
'�� �
��. * � aw
a�
t�
- � �
�� � �
.'�
� .��.
r� � • �'�� �,
o �-,����
,�'" - �,��a mp
A � � ��a,o
� m� � � � �
. a� �� '� !� e� �''� +°�
� � m °� U
t�-°� �� � �"�� m
a� � L3 � m � o�`�
�,
9
a
k .�
} � �
y � ��.
7
��
f, �
<
c�. •.
5
r .
A
,
..,. . : �,':
.�
�.
�
�
�
li
�
�
�
V
�
.O
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
ri
�
�
�
a�
�
w
� �
� �
� �
�
1� �
� �
.�.� • ,••�
� �
o �
� �
� �
0
� U
-i-3 �
V „�
� Q
� •�
Cl1 �
Ct� �
� �
� �
�""i �
� ,#�j
� �
V 1
r:
: �i.
; {,�
. ,4
f ..
►:
�
� � �
� �
a� �
� � �
� � �
�* � � ,
�
• �
T �
� :` O _ � � �
.
c� ° ���
6!� � *"'�; .
�
�
O �'
� � .� �
f.;,�,,,� � • Z1Q
. � � _ � �
Q �� , �
v �_ � �
O
• � F"'�
� r� � ,� �
'' '' - . �+-� � .�
� � � � �
�'�.�:� ���„o
y� . r..,
_ � A\ A W
.�
:w
;�
�
�
� r-
f
.,-
} - �. .: .,�..
i.
:3'
�;"
y. "
f»-i ,
�
�'.: �
��, F�"_ -� �►
, ` �':'y �:�
;:
�
•i
�
�
�
�
.,..,.
�
�
W
�
�
• +
�
5....
�
�
�
�
�
�
�`.r
�
�
�
C�
�
�
�
ri--+
�
�
f"�
�
�
� �
� �
� �
� �
� �
�
� T
O �
� �
`� �
� � �
� �
� � �
� � '�
� � �
^
�^
O •�
c�c°�iA
11 ��
� �
��
t�, v
e� �.
� � �
� y
•� .
�
1
�
� �;
� -
�
.
�
� . ,, �
� `�':, c�
.•.o ...�.A �`: t'�' ` � .
. Q� .� ,
� � w���k: ..
.�; , ,�!''_ � v�
. . 1� _ . C�
.. 4�. � _t- =��fi - �"� .�
� � � 4_� �.
?iS:T-`cf'.��}:,?�"" ' r `
. J��. iN . �
� . _
�'l�,•: �� t-T ; �_
'3��.�, ��;r�•,�. ..�.r_�
.�;
CQ
�
�
�
�
.
�
.�
:�
_ +��
�
�:
,�
.,
.
.. ..
: 7
��
a
�
;�.
�
s:
�
a
�
•lr
.�
�
- ;..�;
• �:,
�� 1
1� � F
��
• ' •`' , _ ^ i '. � ,
A'� . .
�� �
;---_, <
�`�!
�,�.�1
�:h:.,
''lr.,�
;
�-
�
�
�
�
0
�
.._
�
c�s
.. .
a
�
�
�
�
�
......
��
.
�
�
c�s
�
L.
��
�
�
..�.�
��
�
��r-�.,., -• - , '.,,� �� � ��
�,,..
� � h~
� � � • � �!.
� � • -� :k�
`� � >, ��
o �
�
� (.� � �i
. _� �� �, �
. � �� � �
� �-� ��.��
� ,,..,, "�'� as a:�.
- �� ,� � � �.�
. : . � •� �+ ;� "' ;�
�
as � � �. -� ss; -
t'
�; �:�� �
w � �
� � � �
�•�' ,� � Z � �
� �
9
. , . �
�
� -��,
a
�� �
U '"� '
� � R�
t� � "� � .
� �
GD �
� ' �
�
� •� �`�' �
o � ° � o0
� � .
a �
0
� �
� �� ° o
N L� r_a C � ..
,...,. - _
- - ,:• �
_ t - { `. 1��,� � �
_ � �, � -�;,���!
.. � f � -./����` � j .
a • �� �iii. ��_aa r'a�1
V ��
b � �
� �
- � zs
_. � °�
� •Q o°
� ^ °-
y ,� � o
M
l � �� �
� � �
.
� y.G
.� �. � �
,�,, � O t i
����
��
�
�
Cw
� ��
..�.r�
.
�_
� �-���
H�
:�
.�-:;
� r.
� `' .
�
�� � �
� � � �
. �
�� ��
� �' � �
�� �
C�r • �+ �
-- �.. �
��
�
;�
`
�
�
_r
;!I
�
;�
•1 y
r . - ,..
,, ,
�.
�. _ ,,. � : �
� � -
,`. ` , .
�` ;.. � ' ri�_``
�-i '�}�,
��_ �� �`::�-�'+��, _ ' .
0�:. __s:ir_ i � .� � ,
� �
�
�
� �
� a
C� L
[i..
� Ll-
� �!
n
u
J
..� � _. �r.�. �,; .
'?�t e Y o
f...�+ �•�j!�'�� Y�-Y 7 1 'j���l . �^�. • . • �r
j�� � �. �,
...��1�,,-=. �:�t'� F`.�, .
� � r =.`� �� •,s -_
, : _„.- : .�. ..
r • ,� -:�, ��1�� g:�;�', � cr��=�;.
. � S��'�' � , 41� T� r
�� ;�y � i�l -�, �'�,�',s-j,�«�
.-t, r �\�� �r--�` '�' �+. _
i. t� . C_ 'Yy'-lP ��k s%. .
.t�.� ''�� .�tar�'3'+0
. . . _. .:_,i•.s�i="-- -- - - - - - .� .
i
•�
•
�
�'� � �-' . 1
� ��.�. � � � -
.,��
- r15 � �'� 4-'�;�i .'t�T�`.
; ls ;�t ; i �� -
► -a 'k _�,�, '
� �tr N'' a .
� � , •..
1.�,, :�'�� -
� -i
� �j_
•
❑
. •.
: =v„� .�
� �,.
.>�.
�- ='
k__•.
� '.
�ir+ :
: �,�
, �;�: 1 _ . , _ _ .._. - . -.� _ --
� ,
��:'
� Vl
� �
•� o
� . �,
� �
�
�
�
�
� �
� �
� �
a� �
a�
• � �
� �
� �
� �
0
� �
��
� �:
o ���
� �
�
o ;�
�-��
� �
�
� �
c� __
�
�
Q
�
�
�
�
0
._
�
�
4�
�
�
�
��
�
,M.
�
�
T'
�,
�
�
r
�3
�
�
:�
�
1V�ETROP�ILITAN RECYCLING C4RPORA TIQ1�
P.O. Box 27�6
Bakersfield, CA 93303
661. 631-1171
TRANS'FER/REC�'C'LING PROPOSI4L
FOR THE 1V�� UNT VERNON F14CILITY
INTROD UCTION:
Planning for solid waste management facilities in the City of Bakersfield and Kerr
County is at a critical juncture. Legislators in Sacramento are actively and aggres�
pursuing new legislation that will likely mandate a 75% diversion rate and new
recycling programs in the immediate future. If the city and county are to reach the
aggressive legislative mandates, new and innovative facilities must be sited and
operatrortal in the next three years.
In order to accomplish this, Kern Refuse Disposal (S,RD) through Metropolitan
Recycling Corporatron (MRC) proposes tn plan and develop a comprehensive state
the art solid waste complex This complex, complete with a Multi-Stream Material
Recovery Facility and transfer station, will bring the metropolitan Bakersfield are�
into complYance with 2l�` century solid waste mandates, reduce hazardous vehrcle
emissior�s, reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions, and save valuable resources for fut�u
generations.
BENEFITS T4 T�IE DEVEL�PMENT OF�4 SOLID WASTE COMPLEX
Benefts to the solid waste mana�ement svstem.
The development of this complex benefits the local sotid waste system in a variety �
ways. This complex will allow us to meet new legislatrve mandates that have or wil�
signed i�to law in the immediate future. It will also positiot� the City of Bakersfeld
Kern County to process a�d recover large volumes of waste that will extend landfil
and enhance the ability to manage and transport waste more efficiently.
It is anticipated that legislation mandating new diversion programs, including mul
family and commercial recycling, will take effect establishing aggressive diversion
mandates for all cities and counties in Californir� The most e�cient and cost effec
method to meeting these mandates is by commingling materials and separating the
a Multi-Stream MRF. In addition if these diversiort rates are to be realized, conver,
technology will have to be employed Drafts of the legislation for this technology
require that all possible recyclables be extracted from the entire waste stream befo�
conversion technolo�y ca� be implementea� The Multi-Stream MRF allows the bes
option for the recovery of materials from residential, commercial, and industrial
�etterator� If the citv and cnuntv are tn .ctav cmm�liant w;th �,.rront nnd fi.t,.ro l.,u
Air Qualitv Bene�ts.
Transfer statiar�s are an efficient way to reduce the nu�nber of long trips to local
landfclls by "carpooling" materials from smaller vehicles to larger vehicles. Trip
reductivn in cvmmercial rolloff vehicles can be as great as 5-1 and by transferring
haul residential or commercial generators t�ie number can be 50 —1. This trip
reduciion generates large emission savings in NO� PM10, CO, VOCs, and SO�
AB 32 was signed into law on September 27, �006 and this legislation mandates th
reduction of Greenhouse Gases to 199Q levels by the year 202� By recycling mate�
like glass, aluminum, paper , etc �nstead of producing them from virgin materials,
Greenhouse gas emission savings are realized These emission savings will be criti
local governments are ta reach the legislative mandates outlined in AB32.
PLANNING, D�VELUPING AND IMPLEMENTING A NEW SYSTEM
Siting the comple�
The Nfount Vernon Transfer and Processing facility is the site that meets all the
necessary criteria for the establishment of the solid waste comple� A recent report
Shaw Environmental InG evaluated a series of sites in Metropolitan Bakersfield ai
supported this conclusion based on the foltowing criteria:
1. Greatest reduction in vehicle miles traveled
2. Lowest capital cvstper ton of emissions reducet�
3. Lowest capital cost per vehicle mile reduced
4. Best balance of cost to level of service.
Additional benefits are as follows:
1. The site could be completely permitted for operations in a short period of ti�
2. Suf�eient acreage e.�cists to site the complex on KRD lease property.
3. Some infrastructure for operations already exists (scales, loaders, etG}
4. This site is already recogniZed by the public as a solid waste facility.
5. ,Site managers with experience in managing the public and solid waste facil
MRC has 12 acres available at Mount Vernon as a part of a lease agreement wrth t
City of Bakersfield This lease is part of a 20 year agreement signed in 1999 with t�
intent to develop this property into solid waste facilities to help the City meet staie
diversian mandates. This property is perfectly situated for a solid waste compCex a�
MRC developed the existing C&D operations with the intent of burlding this type o�
facility. This property was intended for this type of facility and now is the time to
proceed with the projec�
FUNDING CAPITAL AND OPERA TIONAL COSTS
The funding of the capital and yearly operationaC costs of a solid waste eomplex is
Cf/1000M1Hd /)H/I %1 /fI/jC n �s�ns:ninl l�rir�ns� ns� }�n isss�:r .. ..............:f.. iTDn ... �.._.�_....!.
25 year e.xtensions of the existing contracts between both the City of Bakersfteld a�
the County of Kern to insure a guaranteed waste stream for debt retiremen�
Specifically the contracts requiring 25 year extensions are the f'ranchise hauling
agreements between Zone 2 haulers and Kern Count,�, the franchise hauling
agreements between the City of BakersfreCd and Kern Refuse Disposal, and the tea
agreement between MRC and the City of Bakersfreld on property at the Mount Ve�
Recycling Facility. In addition a new Independent Contractor Agreement for a ter,
25 years between the City of BakersfieCd and Metropolitan Recycling Corporation
would need to be developed to encompass al! solid waste management activities rel
to this project
The funding of the on going operational costs for this complex and related progra�
must also be addresser� Residents, businesses, and owners of multifamily units mi
shoulder the�nancial burden of funding both operat�onal and capital costs of this
facility: This can be accomplished by establishing recycling fees✓surcharges that pl
per resident or per ton fees based on the waste processed from each of those
generators 7'his is a common practice in many municipalitie,s/counties and is a
practice already established in the Zone 3 region of Kern County where residents G
businesses are being charged on a per resident and/ar per ton basis
7'HE MUL TI-STRE.�4 M NfA TERIAL RECO VER Y FA CILIT'Y (MSMRF)
New technology in the materia! recovery industry has recently been developed that
provides add�tional options for the recovery of material� Due to new state recyclin,
mandates, new recovery technologies, and the costs to imptement the technologies,
important to evaluate available systems in an atternpt to decide which approach ha,
best opportunity to successfully reach local and state goals �ilthough, these optiot
wiCl cost residents, commercial businesses, and the industrial sector, these ��recyclii
surcharges" already exist in the Zone 3 region of Kern County where residents pa}
$3. 08 per month, � 83 per cubic yard, and �12.67 per ton.
The development of new and innovative technolo�y has improved the abilrty of Mu
Stream Material Recovery Facilities to recycle additiorral material� This new
technology, and aggressive anticipated mandates gives a MSMRF inany beneficial
advantages over a traditional Single Stream MRF. This new technology utitizes
existing refuse contarners, enclosures, and collection vehicles. This system atso
eliminates difficult and costly changes at Commercial and Mu1tr-Family facilities
where there is no room for recycling containers.
All Residential, Commercial, and Industria! refuse is coClected in the tradiiiona!
rnanner and depasited at the Multi Stream MRF. This material is then sorted into
cardboard, glass, paper, plastics, aluminum, steel, tin, greenwaste, wood, etG, with
..,,..,.�E ..... ......:.r..,.� ...���.. �..---_ �_ •� - �---��-ii m�_ �_ _•_ -- - - - _.. _ . .
C
0
�
'�^
V/
�
�
_
L
h
1�
�
�
�
`
•rr
�
.�
�
�
�
Q.
O
V
�
i
._
V
c.i
�
�
�
.�
w
0
Q
0
�
�
�
N
�
N
C
W
�
d
�cac•�0000c000a
�r��.n000000000
�Op�Ci000CCOOCC
CpOCpo0000O�AtY)O
OOCDOCONO00lA� O
�ON O��OOOCbl� O
� M C�O N N�(�D O 11� � 0�0 Q
t� (V N P- e= N � +r N N
�
�
�
�
�
L U
y U
� � �
c o 0
J O O
� S3 w.
m O O
ti aa�
m � � �
C7 H 1-- fn
�
O
�
C V
�. �
� �
� �
�
V °�j Gl. � �`
� � �U � �
�. y
J c� a c a
+' � Q i � �
� � Q � V m
oaEi���mm
� ��m�N�
� cc — �� .. .. .c
m C 'V � .� � tA
O��iO��U
ooac0000c000°o
0000000000000
000a0000a000
oc00000a000c°o
0000u�ou�000cao
0 0�n o ti o t� �n �n o��n
�r � �s �ci
� ��� a � ����
GH
�
�
�
.�
L
�
�
�
�
�
�m
W
�
.�
�
�
.�
o �o
M N �
N
�
u'i
�
N
�
�
0
W �
} p
wZ
��
zz
00
��
N�
,�
1
.,�
V
�
�
�
�
.�
�
0
U
�
c
N O
m m
C�
� LL
U�
b
a
c �
o�
N �
('7 T
t,H 69
�
�
.`
�y
t
d -
�
0
U
i�
c
��
m �
Q
� O
C
m �
� �
U�
�
�
U
�-
� a?
�
U �
O C�0
� 6�9
l V
�
�
0
U
i�
c
� o
cv mm
� O
L �
U �
�
0
c�D
N
cM
�
o�
N�
M �
6H 69
�
Q
�
�
�
�
�
0
m
>
�
�
N
m
A
�3
�
0
U
m �
�� �
; o
°? m
�O
� �
�
m �
°oc
°on
N �
(7 EF.
69
�� ~
N
m�
�`
_�
W �
,�1
1.� �
MEMBERS
ASSOCIATION OF CITIES
Ed Grimes
City of Tehaci�api
BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
Councilman Zack Scrivner
COUNTY QF KERN
Supervisor pon Maben
COUNTY OF KERN
Supervisor Michael Rubio
FRANCHISE HAULERS,
METRO-BAKERSFIELD
Larry Maxiey (Chairman�
FRANGHISE HAULERS,
NON-METRO BAKERSFIELD
Paul Benz
� ,�ER
Dennis Lynch
P U BLI C-AT-LARGE,
UNIVERSAL COLLECTION AREA
Patricia DeMond �ce•Chair)
PUBLIC-AT-LARGE,
NON-UNIVERSAL COLLECTION AREA
Michael Geyer
AL TERNA TE MEMBERS
COUNTY OF KERN
Supervisor Jon McQuiston
ASSOCIATIQN O� CITIES
{Not Designated}
BAKERSFlELD CITY COUNCIL
Councilman Harold Hanson
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND LOCA
February 6, 2008
COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TA'
and
1
2
�
KERN COUNTY S�LID WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY C01
SPECIAL MEETING
Date: Friday, February '[ 5, 2008
Time: 9:00 A.M.
Place: Kern County Public Services Building
2700 "M" Street, First Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
AGENDA
Me#ro Transfer Station/MRF �`
Public Comments
Committee Member Comments
• Indicates Task Force item * Indicates Attachment/Ha
■
■ ■
y
Bakersfield Association for Retarded Citizens (BARC)
Presentation Handout for City of Bakersfield Budget and Finance Committee
Meeting Date: March 31, 2008
On August 10, 2007, BARC responded to City of Bakersfield RFP NO. 06-07-114, Annual C�
Processing Of Materials From The Commingled Curbside Recycling Program. The table
summary of BARC's proposal and the MRC proposal now before the City of Bakersfield and
Kern.
Up Front Capital
Cost To Bakersfield
Taxpayers
Annual Operating
Cost To Bakersfield
Tax Payers
Curbside Recycling
Profit Sharing
Type Of Recycling
Service
Rate Increases For
Garbage Collection
Implementation
Impact On Public
Future Mandates to
$0.00
No Citv Or Countv
Out-Of-Pocket Dollars
Bakersfield Already Received
$1.5Million Grant
Citv Retains Control of Grant
Funded Equipment
$O.00/Year
Operating Costs Will Be Paid By
Revenue From Recycling
(Assumes City delivers a minimum
amount of material)
50% of Actual Net Profit
To Be Paid to City
City Could Receive Millions Of
Dollars/Year, Depending On
Recycling Volume and Markets
Voluntary
Continues Current Program
Not Needed
Voluntary Curbside Rates Would
Continue As-Is
Incremental
BARC Proposes to Increase The
Size Of The Program Gradually,
Using Industry Best Practices
None
Continues Voluntary Blue Barrel
Program As Is, If Program Needs
To Change In Future, City of
Bakersfield Controls Decision
Can RPCnnnrl I� Alno.�ls.�l
$50 Million
Requires Favorable Lo�
and Fee Subsidies Fron
Public Sources That H
Yet Been Fully Discl
MRC Controls Ass
Purchased With Public
$42 Million/Yea
PLUS Guaranteed Ann
Increases
No Profit Sharin
MRC Keeps ALL P�
Mandated
Everyone Pays Thrc
Garbage Rate Incre
Required
Large Rate Increases 1
Required and Impact H
_ Been Fully Calculal
Everything Required
MRC Proposes To Spen
Sums of Public Money �
Un-proven "NEW' Rec
Technology It Has P
Demonstrated or F�
Described
Major Cost Increa:
Commits Public To Pay
Expensive Program
Decades To ComE
•
1. Has an independent study been done?
1.1. If so, is the study availabie to the public�
1.2. If not, why not?
2. Why did the San Joaquin Valley Regional Air Pollution Contr
District relect MRC's efforts to obtain grants for this project?
2.1. Does the San Joaquin Valley Regional Air Quality Contrc
District know that it has other projects that will have a greater
on air quality for less cost?
2.2. Was the Hauler proposal too costly per ton of pollution s�
3. How was it determined that MRC's proposal is the most cost
beneficia! air pollution reduction program for Bakersfield?
3.1. What other potential projects were evaluated?
3.1.1. How many project proposals were received?
3.1.2. What was the proposed cost for each project?
3.1.3. What was the cost/ton of pollution saved for each project?
3.1.4. How were potential projects ranked?
3.1.5. Who evaluated them?
3.2. Has an independent study been done?
3.2.1. If so, is the study available to the public?
3.2.2. If not, why not?
4. What regulations has the San Joaquin Valley Regional Air Q�
Control District imposed that would require this project?
5. If MRC can get the City and County to pay for this project witl
public money, wouldn't MRC avoid havinq to pav their own
required costs of cleanina up the pollution from their own tru
!
� ' �i�,
; �
���
:;�,.;r;, ��, � !�T
�
/
� 7ti �
��� _ ;�:
.^,
*�
-��
_-�
�.
.�
��_5 ` T-- ' r . `1 ' - -
�
�_,�� �ti 1
�
�-"
�`_ .
�
� �'
�
.�
?•
�
..
.
�
=ti
�
i � �,
,.
F�.--��,� �� . , ���.+��� _�: _�
.�.J
;��� �'_ "��=".
i►� _
�
�
a�
i
►F
�
�.��
� �
�
�
�
� �
��1
� �
� ��
�
�
�
:�
� -
�
� �
� �
�
0
`.
�
c�
l..�.
�
� �
O �
�
�
� �
C
c�
� �
� �
�
� '
�
�
D
��
�
o �
� �
� �
co �
m�
x �
� �
m �
� �.
�n'
�
�
�m�
�
�
� � c
�;�
c� �� a�
�' �' s�
C° a
c
< °�
�
� o
a. Q �
o �
�
� �
0
�
�
�
(D
O
�
�
CD
O
�
v
�
�
��
o <
� �.
�
�O
c�
Z�
v —
3 �
�
� �
v �
Q
�
cn
�
Z
c'
m
� �
N O
� �
� �
O
C �
N
� �
n l�
�D �
� -�
� �p
Q. n
� ��
� N.
� �
CQ
�
�
� �
� �
��
n
sv' �
�. 3
� �
�'
cQ
0 0
� � fl:
a �' �
m �'
v� �
�•�'�
� � �
c� `�
�
�
mo
n.�
�
��
�• �-
��
m �
��
� N
0° m
2 �
� �
._.
O
�
d
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
a�
�
a
�rn
o �
� <
� �.
��
Z �
� �
� r'
��
��
�
� o
�
C� c
m�
�
��
�
. �,
�
�
c�
ca
�
� �'
0 0.
co �
c� �
m�
o `<
� �
� �.
� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
X
�
�
C�
m
O
�
cfl
�
�
O
�
O
—
_.
�
3
�
�
n
��
�
n
0
�
0
�
�.
O
�
GJ
�
N
C3�
�
N
O
�
m
<
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
c�
0
�
�
�
�•,r-_- - +r � �
�
� �.
�
�
0
�
�
C
�
�
0
�
�
�
c�
�
�
�
�
�
.�.
�
c�
�
�D.
� �
•
n
�
-a
--
�
�
—
c�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
cfl
cfl
�
0
�.
cfl
�
o'
�
•
v
<'
�
�
o'
�
rn
�
��
�
�
•
�
c�
�
�
�
=
�
�
�
�
c�
�
�.
=
�
�
•
� ov
c� �
� _.
�—
��
_�
_'�
��
cQ �
��
c� �
�, o
��
��
c�
�t
.
�
O
�
c�
�
0
�
�
�
O
'�
- O
� �n .F.�,r�°�
�
�
�
�
�
��
�
�
�
v
v�'
�
�
�
ov
c�
�
�
_.
�
�
�
0
�
�
cfl
�
.�.�.
0
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
h
�
�.
�
O
�
�
�
�
�
!�
�
w
�
N
C3�
N
O
00
�
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�0
c�
�
�
�
_.
�
cQ
�
cfl
�
v
�.
C
�
�
c�
�
�
0
�
-
�
�
�
�
—
—
�
n
�.
O
�
c�
�
0
�
�
�
0
�
0
•
_
�
�
�ii
cD
�
0
—
�
_
�
N
�
�
.�.
�
�
_
G�
�
�
�
�
.�.
_.
0
�
�
0
�
�.
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
cQ
�
n
_
0
�
c�
�
v
_.
�
�
0
�
�
•
�
�
�.
�
c�
�
—
—
_
c�
cQ
�
v
�
�
�,
�
cQ
�
}
►�
.
� ��v
� c�
a- �
_ _
� �
�v �D
o n
a� o
��
��
�
�.
_.
0
•
�
�
�
�
r
0
�
�
—
�
O
�
�
�n
� o
� �
�
c� �
-- �
� �
� _.
-�
�
�` O
o �
cQ �,
� �
� �
•
rn
�
�
�
�
r
�
�
�
=;
-
-
r
_.
�
.
�
�
�
_.
c�
rn
�
�
�
�'.
_.
0
�
�
:7
-
�
n
�
�
�
c�
�o
c�
c�
�
n
_.
�
cQ
rn
�
�.
�
�
_.
0
�
�
n �v
� c�
��
��
c� c�
� _.
�
z�
� -�
� �
v� c°Q
� �,
� �
•
n
�
�
�
�
c�
�
n
_.
�
�
c�
�
�
c�
�
.
n
�
_.
—
_.
�
�
0
n
�
�
�
0
�
W
�
N
C37
N
O
O
00
�
<
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�-
t'D
�
�
�
a�
_
_.
�
�
�
�
��
.�
�
�
�
u
rn
�
�
�
�
c�
c�
�
�
.�
�
�
�
c�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
G7
�
0
�
�
�
�
0
�
CQ
cfl
�
=
0
�
C7
_
�
�
�
0
<
c�
�
�
�
�
�
_.
�
�
_
0
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
cQ
�
�
c�
�.
v
_.
C
�
�
�
_.
0
�
•
r
�
�
�
=;
_
_
r
_.
�
rn
�
�
c�
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
ct�
�
_
�
�
�
c�
�
•
n
_
�D
�
�
cfl
�
D
_.
�
�
0
�
�
�
c�
n
0
�
�
�
�
_.
�
�
--�
�
O
�
�
.
C
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
n
_.
_
_.
�
�
�
C�J
�
N
C3�
N
O
O
O�
�
<
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
•
� �
o �,
o�
� �
v� �.
��
_�
=�
� _.
� o
�
-- �,
��
-� o
�
_
�
� rA �
� �
� -� =;
�- � -
_
��
_. �
� ��
�-
�
_. -�,
o �
� �
� �
c� �
��
�o
�
��
o _
•
�
�
�
_.
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
� ■
�
z
0
�
�
O
�t
�
n
0
..
•
�, �
o�
� �.
o �
��
o �
�o
��
� _.
c� �
��
��
��
�, _.
��
=<
� �
�v
�_
��
_�
_
�
�
�
�
�
.
�
�
_.
0
�
�
•
�- v
o _.
� �
� �
� �
��
�
��
� �.
��
� _.
00
��
��
o �
��
�
� �
��
-- o
��
��
��
��
��
�_
c� _
� =�
o�
<�
c� _.
��
•
0
<
cfl
�
a�
_
c�
�
_.
�
�.
0
�
�
�
c�
�
�
�
_
�
�
t
�
�
�. .
�: -
�i ?l .
�, 4
�i -
i.
�;: :�
l
N
O
.r
tJ
tJ
O
W
N
O
� �
�
�
� C
�...
Ui
tJ
O
�
N
O
��
J
2J
O
OC
N
d
►..
�O
0
O '� � c o° o 0
� �
� � `/ Z � �/
\ r .
'b �. � O � rD
■e .., � _ �
/
/
.
,
�
�
0
�
w
N
O
� �
.C+
�
� O
�...
�
N
O
�
N
C
r+
N
O
...
OC
N
C
�
�
c o °�,
�
� ❑
� Z� Z
v o c�''i� o .'�i o
0 0 o a o 0
1
/
/
�
�
C
�,�,��- �--
. N
O
�+
W
;- N
�•� � O
r.+
�.
- �
� N
�a Q
�
Vl
N
0
�
�
N
O
�
' :,-;„= �
N
C
�..
00
N
C
�
�
_ -.� . ;,,,. -�, _ . ;� . _. � . �_ .� . v . . w -��
O C � Q O C C O
� �
�����
�=� �
����
1
�
L
�
�
:r
'�'`� � � No Proj ti
�� o
w/Proj w
� No Proj tv
C
�
, � vP/Proj .�.
�
._._ � lYo Proj t.�
- o
...r.
w/Proj V�,
� No Proj N
� o'�
. wlProj �
No Pro,j N
O
w/Proj j
No Proj N
C
�
w/Proj 00
No Proj N
C
�
w/Proj �p
�.�
�/
W
�
N
C3�
N
O
00
�/
\
O•
�
�
�
�.
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
� �
,..� :�
nC
rn�
��
c� �
.� o
� �
��
�' o
� �..
� �D
� �
� �
� �
o�
��
��
�
�. _
_. _
� �:
�;. �
c� �
��
o�
�Q
N�
�� �
��� =
0
��
� �
� O
�,• <
_ c�
��
��
c� o
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
_.
�
�.
O
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
cfl
c�.
�
`
sv
�
�
N
0
N
� �
� Q
�o
o�
�. �
c� �
��
c� �
�=
_. o
��
� O
S�
��
��
� �.
�<
��
�..
O �
�o
�n �.
��
� �
n
��
�o
. _
�o
V �
N n■
O
� �
,—
�
�
�
w
� �
ci Q
�O
<�
��
—
�
��
�. o
� -.
��
• �
� �■
V �
N �;.
o�
o�
�o
�
�
_
G�
�
�
_.
�
�.
0
�
�
�
�
�
_.
0
�
�
,
� �
_�
�o
��
��
� �,
`�
�Q
� �,
�o
V �
�
O �
co �
0
�
�
�
_
—
c�
�
0
�
cn.
c�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
_.
�
�
��
O
�
N
O
�
�
�
�
N
0
N
0
a-
�
�
c�
�
0
�
�
C�
CO
0
c�
�
_.
�
��
�
�
�
�'
�
—
�
�
�
�
_.
�
�
�
0
_
�
�
0
�
�
�
C�
�
O
-�,
N
O
O
�
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
�
� �
c� �
=
O �
�
� �
� �
� �■
�o
��
�
� _.
�
�. �
�
tD
�
�'
� �
� �
�. �
�
� -.
� �
r �
�
� �
�
C\
N
CJ1
�
N
O
0
�
�
C
�•
�
� :9
� ��
� �
�,,,* -:
� �'
(Q e
� ' •' �
0
� ��
� �
� > �
� V
� �
� .�
ri
�..} � I
V/
.. ,� j
.� � � a �4 i1
� �� +� ; :� " �s;
n � � � •�� . . ; � �' _- �
:, � • .
r
■
�
e+
�
..,, _ ,
�
� J
+� � _...s.. . � _ _,s
t �_
.�
r,
W
�
N
�
�
N
0
�
rn
<
0
�
�
�--�
iii
�
c�
�
O
�
_
�
�
�
�
�
�
•
r
0
�
�
�
�
n
0
�
�
O
�
�
0
�
O
C
�
�
��
�
a
.7
r
0
�
c�
�
�
n
0
�
�
O
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
!��
0
�
O
—,,
rn
�
.
�
�
.
0
�
�
�
<
•
�
�
�
�
�
c�
�
r-�
o�
�
�
=
�
�
�
�
CD
�
�
'� �� �
�.
� �:
�. ;-
�
� ;,
�
n
0
�
�. .
� �`
_#
��
�
`� 1
1 i
�� �
�
�
_ .�
, �
�.
� �
; � �„ �_
� �, �_
��-��:�
,� �: �.�=�;
. �
�L
� - ,
�
;
;, , .
� . : � ;I` c.
�
I' r
��
��
I
�
s
�
.
W
�
N
C3�
�
0
o°o
rn
<
0
�
�
�
�
�
cQ
�
C�
0
�
�
�
�
n�
�
�
�
�
�
• y ' �� •l
Q
�
• • � � • •
v r �� v� C� r
� n � � � rn �
� � ,� �..�' _ �
� � � � � �
—
� � � � � C
c� � � �, � v�
� �: � � ,� �D
� � - � �
� � cD —• �D
� � � � �
= � �
� CQ�
. � � �
� _.
— � �
.. . "� _.
� � �
_.
_.
� � =;
� � � �
CD � �
, � �
�� �
_.
� �
�
r
W
N
C3�
�
N
O
O
00
�
�'
�
�
�
N
CQ
�
C�
0
�
�
�-
�
�
cn
�
n
.
�p�,av
.�. r + � �D <
p'�� � c_D
� � �D O O
�t�/��'a
-y, �
�
n �p'� �
_'_� �
�p� � � �
� _.
��c°Q.
�� � �
.-r
"17 � a'�
n �
�O �Q
� � � �
� r'* �D �
�G �
�, =y � C�
� Q� �
�n�
�.0 ,n-
n
�'
.�-
�
n �
�
. �
-� r
—r
Z �
� �
rnrn
�N
v� -
rnZ
n
C
v
rn
�
.
�� n� �
�C�i ���
. �
_ �
�
�; � � V�' �
�.c�D �-cD c=n
� � � � �D
;-� � o � v
�� oo'�
�o'��v°�
O� ��-�
� �
� � N��
p�, OcD�
� � � � .
�
�n N��
`� � sy
� �
0, �v
.
�rn�
rnn�
z��
� V^ �
� " �
��rn
���
rnrnrn
Z
�
'rl C'� �
=z�
rn��
TOrn
_ �
.
�� �
�� �
� _. �
�
�� �
� �
�+, O �
� � �D
�� v
� �.
� o
�
� �
t�D Q
� �
�-r n
�
C'�
�
�G
.
� � � �
����
�OCQ n
����
O � �
� � .-t
� � �
�o�'
� N�
��C'�
.t/« N �'
�D —
� �
�D �
_ <
_• �
c�D O
� �
� �
O
��
f
.
�
c��-���c��
c��.CQ���
�� � � � �
� O � � � _
� � � � � �
� ,� -.
o�o��,�
��� ��
-.-��� �_.
o �,c� _
0�����
cD
.-t � � O � �
� n
���000
�D D � � 'a
!-�����,
� � �
_ < c�
—
�D
� n
���
p � O
�
S� �
`°��
a�
c�
�c� �
� c� �,
� �.
� Q
�D �
��
O�
-z �
� C7
� �
cp —.
=
.
o���
� � � n
-� �p �D
C� �. � �,
� �' _ �
�
� � O �
�<�
a�
�-� �.a'
--a���
�wNO
���0
v��-•-
—
�� ��
c� _ .�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
GJ
�
N
C3�
N
O
00
�
�•
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
�
�
:�
�
�
O
�
�
�
CQ
�
�
�-
N
��
�
�
0
�� �
:
�
�
�
�
�
�
n
�.
�
—
��
�
0
c�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
—
��
�
N
�
0
�
0
.�.
�
t�
�
�
.;
.;�
•
�
�
�
�.
rF
�.
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
-�
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
�'i
�
�
O
�
�
c�
0
�
�
ii
-�
�
0
�
•
O
�f
�
�
�.
rF
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
n
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
��
�
�
tr
�
C:
�
�
�
�■
�
�■
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
C�
�
O
�
�
0
�
�
�i
�
w
�
�
w
N
�
N
O
�
�
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
f'�•
�
I/��`
V�
♦ /
� W N �
■ . . ■
�
�
!��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
rF
�
�
�
�
�
� ,
� �.
"'�`�` � i, � � - �
�_,�,•
� �� .
�
�� �
�o
�
�.
���
. . .
rn
,
�
�
�
�
�
c�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
_
r
�
�
_
�
�
�
�
�
�
� ■
�
�
�
v
_.
<
�
�
�
_.
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
c�
v
N
� �
� 0
r� �rt
� �
� �
.�� '� ��
� - �
. � �
� �■
,� �
'a� �
�
�
c�
�
c�
_
�
�.
��
N
0
0
..
�
�
O
�
O
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
D
�
�
c�
-�
�
�
�.
��
�
a�
00
V
�
�
�
�
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
w
�
N
C37
�
N
O
O
00
�
<
o�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�.
�
�
�
t�
n
s
�
Q
_.
=
�
�
�
�
�'
�
�
O
•
� �
� CQ
_ �
n --
.-�► '��'.
O� n
� �
� �
�D
�
_.
N
_.
,-'3
��
•
0 p �
�� �
�' � �
c� �, —.
�� �
� -•
W O
O �
O �
O
O
Q.
�
•
� �
� �
�
�
��
�
n
O
�-
�
W
�
�
��
. �.
� n O
— c'�
� O —
�
��_
���
_.
� �' �'
Q � -
Q ��
� �
_. C�
� n
ty -.
_ �
� /A
n
O
�
O
C�
�
'�
�
n
C
�
v
•
�
n
O
�
�
"�
C�.
�
—
�
�
�
�
_.
.
�
�
—
�
•
�
�
�.
�
�
�
C'�
�
�
1�
�
0
�
0
•
O
O
O
0
.�-
O
�
�
�
n
�
n
�
�
�
�
��
�
�
!■■�`
�
�
�
C
�
■
�
• • b -■
N �
� /^
o `i.i
n O n O
O ? O C'�
�� �o
— �
�= �
_. . _. �
�� ��
�� ��
_. -.
_ �
�G -
� �
�G �
C� C�
�
�
�
�
=
�
O
�-
W
O
0
w
�
N
C3�
N
O
O
OO
m
�
<
��
�
�
�
�--r
�
�
0
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
:�
r
}.
,�
�,
•
rn
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
`.
CD
�n
_�
�
�
�
�
�
•
�
0
�
�
�
�
_.
�
�C
�
CD
�
�
=
��
�
�
�
n
_
�
�
�
c�
�
rn
�
C
_.
�
O
�
�
�
�
��
��
.
C
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
0
`..
c�
�
�
_
_.
cQ
�
_
_.
tQ
�
.
�
w
�
N
�
�
N
O
O�
m
<
0
�
\/ �
�
�
�
�
�
�
rrt
�
�
r'Af
V,
^�
l /
�
�i
�
�
d
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
,�:�
iL O
�
i
� �
I �
4 �
.`
1
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
- �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
��
�
�
�
O
�
�
�
� ■
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
- ■
�
�
�
�■■�
�.
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Paqe 1 of 2
STREETS DIVISION — WORK SCHEDULE
WEEK OF APRIL 7— APRIL 11, 2008
Resurfacinc�/Reconstructinq streets in the following areas:
Preparing streets for reconstruction, by City crew, in the area between PI
Road & White Lane, east of Stine Road.
Resurfacing in the area between Ming Ave & N. Laurelgeln from Gosford
Scarlet Oak
Reconstructing streets (Annual Contractor) in the area between White Ln
N.Halfmoom Dr, west of Wilson Road.
Preparing streets for reconstruction, by (Annual Contractor), in the area t
Ming Ave & Sundale, east of Ashe Road.
Miscellaneous Streets Division proiects currently in progress:
Fire Station #5 project.
Calloway Median Island Project
Jastro Park Wet Play Area
Paqe 2 of 2
STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULE
Monday, April 7, 20U8
Area befi+veen Oak Street and "F" Street, 16th Street and Golden State A�
Area between Bernard Street and Niles Street, No. Chester Avenue and
Vista Drive.
Area between Jenkins Road and Allen Road, Rosedale Highway and Pa
Avenue.
Area between Brimhall Road and Rowland Avenue, Rugger Street and
Road.
Area between Allen Road and Jewetta Avenue from Stockdale Highway,
the canal.
Tuesdav, April 8, 2008
Streets within the City Limit between Brundage Lane and Ming Avenue, 1
Lane to Union Avenue
Area between Ming Avenue and White Lane, Wible Road to So. "H" Stre�
Between Hughes Lane and So. "H" Street, White Lane to Pacheco Road
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Between Stine Road and So. "H" Street, Pacheco Road to Panama Lane
Between 99 Highway and So. Union Avenue, Panama Lane to Berkshire
Thursdav, April 10, 2008
Between Ashe Road and New Stine/California Extension, Ming Avenue t�
Cochran Drive.
Between California Extension and Stockdale Highway, New Stine Road t
Highway.
Between Wible Road and Stine Road, Hosking Road to McKee Road.