The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 2012 (2)k s, ogy 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR CRAIG PERKINS 1501 TRUXTUN AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Test Date: 11/7/2012 Order Number: 3408230 Dear Regulator, Date Printed and Mailed: 11/28/2012 Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 1701 PACHECO ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Testing performed: DISPENSER SUMP TEST LINE ANNULAR TEST SPILL BUCKET TEST STP SUMP TEST Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting SWRCB, January 2002 Page t of 1 FI: 11U= � 1 11 This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondar n systems. t ,y contai ment sy ems. Use he appropriate pages of th isform to report results jbr all components tested. The comp leredform, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility ownerloperalorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency. L FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN '"16329, MKT 2308 jDate of Testing: 1117/2012 Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: Manager- "Fri et" jPhone: 834-1350 jDate Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 10/29/2012 [Narne of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): AU=MW C2e&Ig hdco-2A2A 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: ROBERT ALLEN Credentials: W CSLB Licensed Contractor r— SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: A/UT License Number: 743160/5238715 Manufacturer Trainin Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires Incon STS 5/2312013 -3- !91TMMARV OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Repairs Component Pass Fail Not Repairs ested Made Tested Made Tank Annular# I X Tank Annular# 2 X Tank Annularfl 3 X STP Containment for Tank I nil 2 - I X STP Containment for Tank I rul 2 - I X UDC # 1;2 X Spill Box T3 PUL put fill X Spill Box T3 PUL put fill X Spill Box T3 PUL put vapor X Spill Box T3 PUL put vapor X t. L If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Test water -removed from site. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING TMS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: lxz� Date: 11/7/2012 WO: 3408230 SWRCB, January 2002 Page I of 1 Test Method Developed By: �" Tank Manufacturer ro Industry Standard Professional Engineer r Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: r Pressure 'r. vacuum r Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4' 6iq it d a[ ag_e Equipment Resolution: F0- 15h,.,ca Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' 'rank Capacity. Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change In Reading (RF• RI) Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Resulat Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? i Tank# 1 Yes Eo No 9600 Steel unknown RUL 2 60 min 11:00:00 - 10.00000 in. HG 12:00:00 - 10.00000 In. HG 1 hr 0.00000 in. HG +f- 0.00000 Pass r Yes r No r NA r Yes r No Co' NA Comments? include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests Tank# 2 ryes t No 9600 Steel unknown RUL 60 min 11:00:00 - 10.00000 in. HG 12:00:00 - 10.00000 in. HG 1 hr 0.00000 in. HG +f- 0.00000 Pass r Yes (*- No r NA +C` Yes r No to NA Tank# 3 r Yes f+' No 9600 Steel unknowm PUL 60 min 11 :00:00 - 10.00000 in. HG 12:00 :00 - 10.00000 in. HG 1 hr 0.00000 in. HG +�- 0.00000 'Pass- r Yes t* Nor NA r Yes r Nor* NA Tank. (-Yes r No min +f- Y e S r No r NA r Yes r Nor NA I Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automarica °°y moll°doi-s uOLn La,e pi- °rr°mry di °u bua.Vlluai y containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. SWRCB, January 2002 Page I of 1 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: -rank Manufacturer 14-0 Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specij,�) Test Method Lased By: Pressure r— Vacuum W Hydrostatic Other (Spect&) Test Equipment Used: INCON Equipment Resolution: 0.002 in. STP Containment for Tank I rul2-1 STP Containment for Tank I rul 2- I 'Sump Diameter/Dimensions: 44 in. 44 in. in. in Sump Depth: 41.00 in. 41.00 in. in. in. Sump Material. Polyethylene Polyethylene Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 13.00 13.00 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 8.00 8.00 Condition of sump prior to testing: good good Portion of Sump Tested' 15 15 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes r No NA r Yes r No NA r Ys r N. r NA r Yesr Nor NA Turbine shutdown response time sec see sec see Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* r Yes r Nor* NA r Yes r No r-o NA r Ycsr Nor NA r Yes Nor NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* r Yes rNor NA r Yes Nor* NA r Yes Nor NA r Yes r Nor NA Wait time between applying f prCsSure/vacuumAvater and starting test 15 min 15 min min min Test Start Time; 11:54.00 12.11:00 Initial Reading (RI): 5.60380 in. H2O 5.50810 in. H2O Test End Time: 12:10:00 12:27:00 Final Reading (RF): 5.59170 in. H2O 5.55130 in. H2O Test Duration: 15 min 15 min I Change in Reading (RP -RI} : -0.01210 in. H2O 0.04320 in. H2O Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.00200 +/-0.00200 Test Reialt: Fail Fail Was sensor removed for testing? ro Yes r Nor NA ro Yes r No r NA r Yes Nor NA r Yes Nor NA Was sensor properly replaced, and verified functional after este- ro Yes r Nor NA r. Yes Nor NA I r Yes Nor NA r Yes Nor NA Camments ? (include information on repairs noade prior to testing, and reco?7imended.follow-up foy-.failed tests) I if lie entire depth of the sump is not tested. specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicaled with an asterisk (I is "NO" or "NA". the entire sump must be tested. SWRC3, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 Test Method Developed By: (' UDC Manufacturer ro Industry Standard Professional Engineer r Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: r Pressure r vacuum re Hydrostatic r Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: rL_1KC7_ :N::j Equipment Resolution: E010 �9�_l K.- 41 IUDC UDC #112 UDC UDC Manufacturer: unknown UDC Material. Fiberglass i UDC Depth: 31.00 Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 9.00 Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest EfWrical Penetration. i Condition of LIDC prior to testing, 00 9. Good Portion of vDc -rested' Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?• r Yes r No 0 NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes No r NA Turbine shutdown response time sec E sec sec sec Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?- r Yes r No r* NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes r No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* r Yes r No 0 NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes r Nor NA r Yes r Nor NA Wait time between applying pre ssurelvacluunWwater and starting test i 15 min min min min Test Start Time: 11:54:00 Initial Reading (R3): 2,55840 in. H2O 12:10:00 Test End Tgme! Final Reading (RF): 2.55800 in. H2O Test Duration: 15 min Change in Reading (P.F-RI) -0.00040 In. H2O Pass/Fall Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.00200 Test ResLilti Was sensor removed for testing? ''Pass ro Yes r Nor NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes r Nor NA r Yes r No r NA Was surisor property replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes r No r NA r Yes r Nor NA r Yes r No r NA r Yes r Nor NA Comments ? (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) 3 IF the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, speciFy how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions Indicated with an asterisk (1) is ?NO? or ?NA?, the entire UDC must be tested. Page I of 1 SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps F Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested F Test Method Developed By: r Spill Bucket Manufacturerro Industry Standard r Professional Engineer r Other (Specify) : Test Method Used By: r Pressure r Vacuum r* Hydrostatic r Other (Specify) : Test Equipment Used, N: =Q0 =Nj Equipment Resolution: 0.002 in. Bucket Diameter: Spill Box # Tank T3 PUL PUL Fill - Direct 11.00 Spill Box # Tank T3 PUL PUL Fill - Direct 11.00 Spill Box Tank T3 PUL PUL I Vapor - Direct 11.00 Spill Box # Tank T3 PUL PUL Vapor - Direct' 11.00 Bucket Depth: 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 Walt time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time. 11:54,00 12:11:00 11:54:00 12:11,00 Initial Readings, }: 5.6858 in. H2O 5,6851 in, H2O 7.1436 in. H2O 7.1436 in. H2O Test End Time., 12:10:00 12:27:00 12:10:00 12:27:00 Final Reading ap- Test Duration: 5.6851 in. H2O 15 min 5.6845 in. H2O 15 min 7.1437 In. H2O 15 min 7.1437 in. H2O 15 min Change In Reading c,4,-K,) 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/ 0.0020 0.0020 0,0020 0.0020 Test Result: Pass: Pass Pass Pass Comments ? (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) WO, 3408230 O O GA O dJ in in 0: WRAM 9-d E 0 rn 1-41 (U 4.J N (A 7-11 J6329 1701 PACHECO RD 16329 RAKERSFIELD 1701 PACHECO RD CAL IFORM16 aAKERSFIELD 3408230 CALIFORNIA 3408230 1107/2012 12:10 Pm 11/07/2012 !2:27 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT UDGI-2 UDW-2 TEST STARTED 11:54 AM TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 TEST STARTED 12:11 PM BEGIN LEVEL 2.5584 IN TEST STARTED 11/07/2812 END TIME 12:10 PM BEGIN LEVEL 2.5565 IN END DATE 11/07/2012 END TIME 12:27 PM END LEVEL 2.5580 IN END DOTE 11/G7/2012 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 2.5558 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED 87SYSUM 87SYSUM TEST STARTED L1154 AM. TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 TEST STARTED 12:11 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.6038 IN TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 END TIME 12:10 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.5801 IN END DATE 11/07/2012 END TIME 1027 PM END LEVEL 5.5917 IN END DATE 11/07/2012 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 5,5513 IN TEST RESULT FAILED LEW THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT FAILED 91SPILL 91SPILL TEST STARTED 1054 AM TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 TEST STARTED 12:11 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.6858 IN TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 END TIME 12:10 PM BEGIN LEVEL 5.6851 IN END DATE 11/07/2012 END TIME 12:27 PM END LEVEL 5.6851 IN END DATE 11/07/2012 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN ESD LEVEL 5.6845 ih TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED 91VAP 91VAP TEST STARTED 11:54 AM TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 TEST WARTED 12:11 PM BEGIN LEVEL 7.1436 IN TEST STARTED 11/07/2012 END TIME 12:10 P'll BEGIN LEVEL 7.1436 IN END DATE 111002012 END TIME 12:27 PM EMD LEVEL 7.1437 IN END DATE 11/07/2012 LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 7.1437 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED