The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 5/21/15DISPENSER SUMP TEST LINE ANNULAR TEST SPILL BUCKET TEST STP SUMP TEST TANK ANNULAR TEST 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 Date Printed and Mailed: 6/1/2015 7-Eleven UST Report P.O. Box 711 Dallas, TX 75221 Test Date: 5/21/2015 Order Number: 3424792 Dear Regulator, Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 1701 PACHECO ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Testing performed: Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Date of Testing: 5/21/2015 Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: Preet Phone: 661-549-1711 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 5/12/2015 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Shane Gardner 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: A-UT License Number: 743160-8199847 Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s)Date Training Expires vplt/secondary contaiment Sump tester 4/7/2016 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Tank Annular# 1 X Tank Annular# 2 X Tank Annular# 3 X Secondary Pipe Test (Tank T2 RUL MAIN - rul) X Secondary Pipe Test (Tank T2 RUL MAIN - rul) X STP Containment for Tank T3 PUL pul - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 2 X STP Containment for Tank T1 RUL SIPHON rul 2 - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T3 PUL pul - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 2 X Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made STP Containment for Tank T1 RUL SIPHON rul 2 - 1 X UDC # 1/2 X UDC # 3/4 X UDC # 1/2 X UDC # 3/4 X If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature:Date:5/21/2015 WO: 3424792 Replaced 87 Main secondary Product line, re-test pass. H20 removed from site by Nieto and Sons.All test pass. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Vacuum Equipment Resolution: 0 loss Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Tank# 1 RUL 2 Yes No 9600 Steel unknown RUL 2 15 min 10:00:00 -10.00000 in. HG 11:00:00 -10.00000 in. HG 1 hr 0.00000 in. HG +/- 0.00000 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# 2 RUL Yes No 9600 Steel unknown RUL 15 min 10:00:00 -10.00000 in. HG 11:00:00 -10.00000 in. HG 1 hr 0.00000 in. HG +/- 0.00000 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# 3 PUL Yes No 9600 Steel unknown PUL 15 min 10:00:00 -10.00000 in. HG 11:00:00 -10.00000 in. HG 1 hr 0.00000 in. HG +/- 0.00000 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# Yes No min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments ? (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) All annular pass. 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: gauge 1-15psi Equipment Resolution: 0 loss Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: Length of Piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: (Tank T2 RUL MAIN - RUL) STP Containment 1 to STP Containment 2 frg frg 2.5 in. 100 ft. RUL boot 15 min 09:30:00 5.00000 PSI 10:30:00 0.00000 PSI 1 hr -5.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Fail (Tank T2 RUL MAIN - RUL) STP Containment 1 to STP Containment 2 frg frg 2.5 in. 100 ft. RUL boot 15 min 10:45:00 5.00000 PSI 10:45:00 5.00000 PSI 1 hr 0.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Pass in. ft. min +/- in. ft. min +/- Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) WO: 3424792 87 Syphon and 91 product line are single wall pipe. Replaced 87 main secondary product line due to damaged boot, re-test pass. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 2 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Sump Diameter/Dimensions: Sump Depth: Sump Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested1 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? STP Containment for Tank T3 PUL PUL - 1 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:11:00 0.20830 in. H20 09:26:00 0.20950 in. H20 15 min 0.00120 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - 1 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:11:00 0.67200 in. H20 09:26:00 0.67150 in. H20 15 min -0.00050 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - 2 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:11:00 0.57250 in. H20 09:26:00 0.57220 in. H20 15 min -0.00030 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T1 RUL SIPHON RUL 2 - 1 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:11:00 0.26380 in. H20 09:26:00 0.26380 in. H20 15 min 0.00000 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. WO: 3424792 SWRCB, January 2002 Page 2 of 2 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Sump Diameter/Dimensions: Sump Depth: Sump Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested1 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? STP Containment for Tank T3 PUL PUL - 1 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2 inch above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:28:00 0.20960 in. H20 09:43:00 0.20970 in. H20 15 min 0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - 1 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:28:00 0.67150 in. H20 09:43:00 0.67130 in. H20 15 min -0.00020 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - 2 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:28:00 0.57220 in. H20 09:43:00 0.57210 in. H20 15 min -0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T1 RUL SIPHON RUL 2 - 1 46 in. 37.00 in. Polyethylene 8.00 5.00 good 2' above highest piping Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:28:00 0.26380 in. H20 09:43:00 0.26380 in. H20 15 min 0.00000 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. WO: 3424792 SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #1/2 polly Fiberglass 30.00 12.00 8.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:34:00 0.06210 in. H20 10:49:00 0.06100 in. H20 15 min -0.00110 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #3/4 polly Fiberglass 30.00 12.00 8.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:39:00 0.28980 in. H20 10:49:00 0.28900 in. H20 15 min -0.00080 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #1/2 polly Fiberglass 30.00 12.00 8.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:58:00 0.06100 in. H20 11:13:00 0.06100 in. H20 15 min 0.00000 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #3/4 polly Fiberglass 30.00 12.00 8.00 good 2' ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:58:00 0.28890 in. H20 11:13:00 0.28880 in. H20 15 min -0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3424792 SWRCB, January 2006 Spill Bucket Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Date of Testing:5/21/2015 Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact:Preet Phone: 661-549-1711 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:5/12/2015 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing):Shane Gardner(Bakersfield fire) 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo Credentials1: CSLB Contractor ICC Service Tech. SWRCB Tank Tester Other (Specify) License Number(s):743160-8199847 3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic Vacuum Other Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank Number, Stored Product, etc.) Bucket Installation Type: Bucket Diameter: Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying vacuum/water and start of test Test Start Time (TI): Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time(TF): Final Reading (RF): Test Duration(TF–TI): Change in Reading (RF–RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - Vapor 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 09:50:00 0.5231 in. H20 10:05:00 0.5232 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 13.50 15 min 09:50:00 0.7964 in. H20 10:05:00 0.7961 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T1 RUL SIPHON RUL 2 - Vapor 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 09:50:00 0.0075 in. H20 10:05:00 0.0077 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T1 RUL SIPHON RUL 2 - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 13.50 15 min 09:50:00 0.7318 in. H20 10:05:00 0.7315 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements. Technician's Signature:Date:5/21/2015 1State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent. WO: 3424792 SWRCB, January 2006 Spill Bucket Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Date of Testing: 5/21/2015 Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: Preet Phone: 661-549-1711 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 5/12/2015 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Shane Gardner(Bakersfield fire) 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo Credentials: CSLB Contractor ICC Service Tech. SWRCB Tank Tester Other (Specify) License Number(s): 743160-8199847 3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic Vacuum Other Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank Number, Stored Product, etc.) Bucket Installation Type: Bucket Diameter: Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying vacuum/water and start of test Test Start Time (TI): Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time(TF): Final Reading (RF): Test Duration(TF–TI): Change in Reading (RF–RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - Vapor 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 10:10:00 0.5232 in. H20 10:25:00 0.5234 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL MAIN RUL - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 13.50 15 min 10:10:00 0.7961 in. H20 10:25:00 0.7951 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T1 RUL SIPHON RUL 2 - Vapor 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 10:10:00 0.0077 in. H20 10:25:00 0.0079 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T1 RUL SIPHON RUL 2 - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 13.50 15 min 10:10:00 0.7315 in. H20 10:25:00 0.7315 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements. Technician's Signature:Date:5/21/2015 1State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent. WO: 3424792 SWRCB, January 2006 Spill Bucket Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Date of Testing: 5/21/2015 Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: Preet Phone: 661-549-1711 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 5/12/2015 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Shane Gardner(Bakersfield fire) 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo Credentials: CSLB Contractor ICC Service Tech. SWRCB Tank Tester Other (Specify) License Number(s): 743160-8199847 3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic Vacuum Other Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank Number, Stored Product, etc.) Bucket Installation Type: Bucket Diameter: Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying vacuum/water and start of test Test Start Time (TI): Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time(TF): Final Reading (RF): Test Duration(TF–TI): Change in Reading (RF–RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL PUL - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 13.50 15 min 09:30:00 0.7368 in. H20 09:45:00 0.7361 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL PUL - Vapor 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 09:30:00 0.57 in. H20 09:45:00 0.5691 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL PUL - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 13.50 15 min 09:52:00 0.7361 in. H20 10:07:00 0.7362 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL PUL - Vapor 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 09:52:00 0.5691 in. H20 10:07:00 0.5691 in. H20 15 min 0.00 in. H20 +/- 0.0020 Pass Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements. Technician's Signature:Date:5/21/2015 1State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent. WO: 3424792 7-Eleven Test Water Log Work Order: Site Name/ID: Address: City: 3424792 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 1701 PACHECO ROAD BAKERSFIELD Date: 5/21/2015 State: CA Zip: 93307 Work Performed:Disp Sump, Line Interstitials, SB's, STP Sump, Tank Interstitials Was Test Water left on site? Yes Test Fluid Transported Off Site by Tanknology Transported off Site by Other Company No Water used If Yes describe how much water and how contained? If Yes who and when did you contact from site to report the water? If Transported Off Site by Tanknology how much was hauled? If Transported Off Site by Other Company what company and how much water?H20 pump out by Nieto and sons and its about 500-700 gallons. Technician Signature: Date: 5/21/2015 WO: 3424792 Site Diagram (This site diagram is for reference only and is not drawn to scale) Work Order:3424792 Site ID / Name:16329 / 7-ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Address:1701 PACHECO ROAD City:BAKERSFIELD State:CA Zip:93307