HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/09/2011OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Septembei
��
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Co c'
FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Generallnformation
High Speed Rail News
♦ The Rail Authority responded to staff's concerns over the draft
containing detailed information on impacts to East Bakersfield. A
letter was sent by my office this week strongly disagreeing v
Authority's position. Both letters are enclosed.
♦ The enclosed article from this week's Los Angeles Times paints a �
picture of the High Speed Rail project and the potential long ter
impacts it could have on the State.
♦ We also learned today that a congressional panel reduced the
Railroad Administration (FRA) budget yesterday by $7 billion. To
perspective, the Obama Administration had requested $8 bi
budgeted for the FRA - much of which was for high speed rail
around the country, including California. The article is enclosed.
Miscellaneous News
• As a reminder, the Safe Neighborhoods Committee meeting will b
place out in the community next Thursday, September 15tn
gymnasium at the newly opened Friendship House located
Cottonwood Rd.
• A project that will construct the outside lanes of Ming Avenue �
Stine Road and Hughes Lane will begin on Tuesday, Septemk
Traffic will be reduced down to one lane in each direction
construction. In addition, access to side streets and driveway�
Honorable Mayor and City Council
General Information
September 9, 201 1
Page 2
• Normally, after Labor Day, spray parks open on weekends only
the end of September from noon to 7 p.m. With recent high tempE
four spray parks will also be open Monday - Friday, 2 p.m. to 7�
spray parks are located in the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Greystone
and Planz Parks. All eight spray parks will continue to be open
weekends from noon to 7 p.m. through September.
Event Schedule
There are public events scheduled for the next week at City facilities:
❖ September l btn:
❖ September 17th:
Gnomeo & Juliet
Bright House Networks Amphitheatre
7 p.m.
Free
Alejandro Fernandez
Rabobank Arena
7 p.m.
Tickets: $45 - � 150
Reports
For your information, we enclose the following information:
:= The Streets Division work schedule for the week beginning Septem
and
:- The Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Update
AT:rs:ch
cc: Department Heads
Roberta Gafford, City Clerk
_ �;:� �
B�� E R. S� I� L�
�'lian ianL �� • t:it�� �9a���?er
September 7, 201 1
Dan Leavitt
Deputy Director, Planning/Environmental
California High-Speed Rail Authority
770 L Street, Suite 800
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Mr. Leavitt:
I am in receipt of your letter of Avgust 31, 201 1 regarding your concerns a
recent media stories reporting that the Draft EIS/EIR for the Fresno-Bakersfield
Speed Rail segmenf did not discuss potential impacts within the East Baker�
area. I would concu* that it is important that citizens with businesses and prope
the East Bakersfield area review and provide comments on the EIR. In fact, I�
encourage all citizens in the Bakersfield area to do so since this project will im
the entire community, not just those along or within the rail footprint. Howe
respectfully disagree with your other comments that East Bakersfie(d has i
properly evaluated in the EIR.
An EIR is supposed to be an informational document fio inform p�blic ag
decision makers and the public of significant environmental effects of the prc
identify possible ways To minimize those significant effects, and describe reasor
alternatives to the project. It should be written in plain English and be arrangE
that infiormation can be easily found and understood.
The decision to terminafie the study just past the station is illogical. It divide
community under two different review processes (and timelines} even thoug
impacts across the entire urban area share common elements. It diffuses con
since the EIR through East Bakersfield is not anticipated to be available for rE
for possibly a year or more. Therefore, the public has no way to compare
evaluate impacts west and east of the station. Furthermore, decisions made
�f thP st�stion reaardina an alternate selection will predetermine the selection t
High Speed Rail Aut
September 7,
Concerning the levei of analysis for East Bakersfield, the current document incl
chapters that discuss specific environmental effects, such as transportatior
quality, noise, visual, etc. Within those chapters are sections generally dedicafiE
specific rail alternatives. For example, if a person was interested in only
Allensworth Bypass Alfiernative, they can find that section within each chapter
be able to review the specific environmental issues.
However, for East Bakersfield, the Authority poinfis out fhat all of the spE
environmental issues are addressed in just one chapter, which is
"Socioeconomics, Communities and Environmental Justice". First, by title alonE
provides no clue to a reader that all of the environmental impacts in
Bakersfield are located in this one chapter. Secondfy, this is inconsistent with hc
other environmenta! discussion is assembled. If one were to logically follov�
environmental analysis of a specific alignment based on the document's c�
format, each chapter would discuss impacts to the entire city, not just the area
of the station. To somehow assume, as the Authority notes in fheir letter, that
fihe environmental issues for East Bakersfield are addressed elsewhere, is conf
and disingenuous.
Although it is firue that some information is provided in Chapter 3.12 rega
properties east of the station area, the level of detail regarding environm
impacts is not at fihe same level contained in other chapters. What may also c
further confusion to a reader attempting to be informed about East Baker
issues, the EIR references this area as Northeast Bakersfield, which doe�
characterize the correct geographic area of the city.
Lastly, there ore no detailed maps depicting affected properties or rail alignr
beyond Baker Street. The Authority notes impacts to East Bakersfield are disc�
but provides no plans such as those provided west of fihe station. This ma
impossible for anyone to fully understand the precise impacts to public fac
homes and businesses as the rail contin�es east through the urban area.
omission severely limits any meaningfu! review of the project in the East Bakei
area.
Sincerely, �
�7 �----- , ,
�� �'�
1 ��
f `�n
// c,�— f G�%
Alan Tandy ;�
City Manager '
���-` ?,�,�r'��_rs:
Thomas J. Umberq
�-,� . .
Lynn Schenk
:"i:e +�h�3:�;:�
Thamas Richares
.,.:� . . �:.
Robert 6aiqencrr!;
Russell Burns
Jim Hartnett
Oan Richard
Mirhaet Ross+
-- �ALi��Ri�IA
High-Speed Rai� Authority
August 31, 2011
Mr. Alan Tandy
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Mr. Tandy,
� �-. �� �,�._ �-�
�:t��,.� �a�������-fw �
Recent media stories inaccurately state that the Draft Environmental Impact
Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Fresno to Bakersfield high-speed
rail segment (FB Draft EIR/EIS) does not discuss the potential impacts of the train
project in East Bakersfield.
The FB Draft EIR/EIS does cover East Bakersfield. The evaluation is consolidated
into Chapter 3, Section 12: Socioeconomics, Communities, and Environmental
lustice.
t.i.w;;. .,,,. T...rn�.1,n
-� � �� We are very concerned that citizens of East Bakersfield could be misled by the
inaccurate information in these news stories and that they may therefore not read
�O^�rf �I�^ .=�: �S
� and comment on the FB Draft EIR/EIS. They may be left unaware of — an may no
provide us feedback regarding — the project's potential for environmental impacts
in East Bakersfield and the measures proposed to mitigate those impacts.
� 'VF=. .
..., . ��
� '� ��.
,
(l� Sa - ' #�s�+yi�Y
.� " ..`�� -. �:�%
For the purpose of the EIR/EIS, East Bakersfield was defined as the community east
of the proposed downtown Bakersfield station locations, running approximately
three miles from Union Avenue to Oswell Street. As required by state and federal
law, the environmental document must address a project with logical termini. For
the Fresno to Bakersfield Section, those termini are the northern end of the statior
tracks in the city of Fresno and the southern end of the station tracks in the city of
Bakersfield, which end at approximately Baker Street. Although most of the East
Bakersfield community lies outside of these project limits, it was included in the FE
Draft EIR/EIS because decisions made on the alternative station locations will
determine the train alignment east of the station to Oswell Street.
East Bakersfield is evaluated in the FB Draft EIR/EIS for construction and operation
activities that could cause community disruption and division, property acquisition
and disproportionate effects to low-income and minority communities. The
analysis of community disruption and division considered project effects on
transportation, aesthetics and visual resources, noise and vibration, air quality, an�
__t_�.. __�, ,.,......;�., .., ���+ R��or�f�A�� (r,aaPC �_12-49 to 3.12-54). Property
Page 2
August 31, 2011
electromagnetic fields, public utilities and energy, hazardous materiais and wastes,
safety and security, socioeconomics, land use, parks, recreation, and open space,
aesthetics and visual resources, and cultural and paleontological resources (pages
3.12-77 to 3.12-82).
We strongly encourage citizens of East Bakersfield to review the Draft EIR/EIS
document, including the pages referenced above, and provide us their feedback.
The formal comment period closes October 13, 2011. The document and detailed
instructions for providing comments are available at
http://www.cahighspeedrail.�a.gov/draft-eir-f-b.aspx. The document is also
available at the Beale Memorial Library branch of the Kern County Library at 701
Truxtun Avenue in Bakersfield. We also invite you to attend a public hearing
September 22, 2011, at the same location, at which you will be able to provide oral
comment on the FB Draft EIR/EIS. (Written comments also will be accepted.) The
hearing will be from 3-8 p.m•
Please contact the Fresno to Bakersfield team directly,
fresno bakersfield@hsr.ca.gov, if you have questions about the upcoming hearing.
Sincerely,
`t .: � .i � .� f� J ,,` _
Dan Leavitt
Deputy Director, Planning/Environmental
California High-Speed Rail Authority
Bulk of high-speed rail costs could fall to state - latimes.com http:!'www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-hibt
latimes.com/news/locaUla-me-high-specd-20110908,0,6797228. story
latimes.com
Bulk of high-speed rail costs could fall to state
The huge project hinges on a massive infusion of federal funds, but the po
backing for that is fading fast. Brown will have to decide whether to start '
it anyway.
By Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times
September 8, 2011
As California prepares to commit tens of billions of
dollars to an ambitious high-speed rail line from San
Francisco to Southern Calilornia, Congress' political
will to provide the bulk of the funding is disappcaring,
leaving the possibility that the state could end up stuck
with a crushing financial burden.
State voters havc agrecd to issue more than $9 billion
in bonds to build the system, but that's a fraction of
the $43 billion projected tab for thc initial phase. And
those costs could swell to $65 billion or more, by some
estimates.
Should federal funds dry up aftcr the scheduled start
of construction next year, the state could be left with
no more than an unfultilled dream and some tracks in the Central Ualley.
advertisement
"If the federal governmcnt and private investors are not going to provide funds, and Califor
broke, why would it take on an enormous new commitment?" asked Martin Wachs, a Rand
transportation expert and former director of UC Berkeley's Institute of '1'ransportation Studi
In coming months, C'rov. .lerry Brown will decide whether to issue the bonds to launch the p
a time when the nation and state are attempting to control mounting public dcbt that has alr
damaged both thcir credit ratings.
Bulk of high-speed rail costs could fall to state - latimes.com
programs.
http:l/ww�v.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-higt�
Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield), the majority whip whose district would be served by
line, said he doubted that any spending mcasure that contains funding for high-speed rail in
or anywhere else would pass thc House.
"I don't know how anybody can come to the conclusion that the California high-speed rail i:
investment in the financial times we are in," McCarthy said. "When California has the defic
it has now, hov�� can it cnvision finishing this?"
Kep. Jerry Lewis (R-Redlands), California's scnior representative on the I-Iouse Appropriati�
Committee, added, "I f-rankly don't see ii. The pressure is on to reduce spending, not increas
spending."
I,ewis said he docs not believe the rail project evcn ranks as a high priority in the Senate, w:
Democratic majority provides a friendlier venue.
Democratic backers of bullet trains see them as promoting future economic growth, creatin�
improving the environment.
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), chairwoman of the Senate panel that funds transportation, la:
cuts to high-specd rail proposed by House Republicans at a hearing earlier this year.
"We are at a pivotal moment in our national transportation policy," Murray said. "But thc re
in Congress on budget cuts has created a racc to the bottom that makes it diff'icult to contin
investments."
"I11e upcoming decisions on the high-speed rail system represent one of the ultimate philoso:
clashes in public spending. The sheer sire and scope of the rail system makes it one of the n
ambitious programs ever undertaken by a state known for gutsy projects.
"111e system would connect the two centers of gavity in California by a 1 UO-foot-wide ribbc
where bullet trains would shoot by at 220 mph as often as evcry five minutes, and move pe�
Los Angeles to San Francisco in less time than a typical baseball game.
In scope and cost, it would eclipse any of the state's dams, office buildings, canals, highway
government structures, including the Golden Gate Bridge.
Even if there are no cost overruns, it would be twice as expensive as the State Water Projec
1960s-era system that transports northern Sierra water to Southern California. A study this
estimated the current cost to replace that system of dams and canals at $18 billion.
F3ulk of hibh-speed rail costs could fall to state - latimes.com
Sacramento, Riverside and San Diego.)
http://www.latimes.com/news/l ocal/la-me-hi�l
The state now has the lowest bond rating in the nation, according to siate 1'reasurer Bill Loc
Democrat who remains concerned about the rail investment. "I have some worries about thf
plan, the cost of construction and operating expenses," Lockyer said. "A lot of those questic
been adequately answered."
Proponents are arguing for the state to not worry about future funding and launch the rail pi
with $6.3 billion the authority can immediately use, $3.5 billion of it from prior federal gran
billion from the state bonds approved in 2008. That's enough money to start construction ne
an initial 140-mile segment from south of Chowchilla to north of Bakcrsfield. California is r
spend the federal money by 2017, meaning construction would have to start in 2012.
"I�he decision facing Brown is whether to issue some of the bonds and start building the syst�
knowing that the current Republican-controlled House will block future appropriations necc
complete the project. Powerful people are pushing Brown to forge ahead.
U.S. 1'ransportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a Republican in the Obama administration, has
with Brown three times in recent months and urged him to stick with the project, part of a$
administration proposal for passenger rail.
The California �-Iigh Spced Rail Authority argucs the project will never get built if the state �
have a guaranteed source of funding for the entire system before construction begins.
"Building a project of this magnitude will always carry risk," said Roelof van Ark, the authc
cxecutive, who noted that high-speed rail systems around the world were built without a trc
guarantce.
"If you don't get money for one or two years that is not the end of the world," Van Ark said
moncy runs out and the system is only partially built, it would leave in place a cornerstone �
children or my grandchildren can continue to build to San Francisco or in a southerly direct
I,.A."
Such a vision may be farsighted, but it doesn't quite fit into modern political reality. Brown
appointed two financial experts to the rail authority's board and charged them with conduct
examination.
A Brown advisor, speaking on condition that he not be identified, said a"stcep crosion in c�
in the authority has led io concerns about the project. The authority had planned to issue a
business plan in October to support the upcoming bond issue, but that plan may be delayed
Brown's review, he said.
Bulk of high-speed rail costs could fall to state - latimes.com http:/,'www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-hi�J
to do something big like this, you have to live w�ith the fact that there is going to be uncertai
future."
ralph. vurtahediur��a�lutimes. corn
Copyright �O 2011, I.,os Angeles �I"imcs
California bullet train fundin� slashed by House panel - latimes.com
�o� ��� � .�1�� ��i��t��
�
L.�1. NOW
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA -- THIS JUST IN
http://latimesblogs. (atimes.com/lanow/2011 I091
LOCAL
California bullet train funding slashed by House panel
Sepiem6er 8, 2ot1 � 7:1�) pm
�
, �
=iy.
� �.�� � rj� • � f � ��?{��/ � / . r � -. �
�`f�'mT ,+j�,4 y�; /�J` � 'ti. i .+�.:
;��1_.,� ' � Y . i k- � ' �� � .' ' .�' , a
�p S�'F�e�#�?7 � t. .� S� i��'. ��, .cy Lw� . ti„�}
� �„�"P .�..� li�•
9 . `�J {r.. �. � �/ � F - . . .�. ` F
;.;� .,f �, y ; � . ,.
�'' A'�.,,' -- .1^`s..,: � ��!n j: � 3 _.
�. �, " , �� ^a ±ec � --r:. `C Y�[� = 7. {lr' f �(� � �+�; ! '
f ` : � u�...," t� �.�� r��;t( 1'1 r ,...�.�,.��
' § i'� r:, •
. � s '�w�1�`'t �"""'-Y. ;� ty�j
� . . �
�l�i � •- . ���)� _��A --..t_;_
� . <. � _,,r'� : _ ,"�MI� � °» ' , " . .
` � . _ _ • �,,.
� �`��` ' ' ' � - . ! , j
��� � "' �� • _
��;. � ����~���:.°'`� ��. �' _
� �� i�
—� „ �',
s =.. . �
� �.
. -�.*
The fortunes of California's high-speed rail project, �vhich ��rould connect Southern California to the Bay Arc;a �+1th a 2zomph train, took a big �
Thursday afternoon, �vhen a congressional panel slashed the Federal Railroad Aciministratian budget.
1'he Obama admini.,tration had asked for S� billion for fiscal 2oi2 for high-speed rail projects, including the one in California, as well as othei
programs around the country.
But thc Housc Appropriations suUcommittec on'Transportation, Housing and Urban Devclopment on Thursday cut the request by ncarly S� t
money only to operate Amtrak �nd some smaller programs.
House Republican leaders had signaled bcfore the session that thcy would not support an}� rcques�t for additional high-speed rail outlays. They
cut spending and argued such projects don't make economic sense.
Rep. Ua��id Yrice (l)-N.C.) proposed an amendment to fund the high-speed rail program with S� billion, but it was voted down.'I'he funding bi
be approved by thc entirc Appropriations Committce and the full Housc. Thc Senatc has not yct taken up rail funding.
'I'hc C:alifornia l Iigh Spced Rail Aiithority, the srtatc organiaation that is building the system, can use about S6.;; billion in prior federal grants ;
from an initiul bond offcring that statc taxpaycrs appro��ed in 2008. 13ut before that step is taken, Gov. Jerry Brow�n must �i��e his appro�al to
and prioritize it for tre state treasurer.
The available money is a small fraction of the S43 billion estimated cost for just the first phase of the project--and that figure is sui�stantially 1
esKimates of .vhat the first San Franciscato-Anaheim section is likely to cost. Without additional federal funding, California could be at risk of
money to complcte the system. A new official cost projection is supposed to bc released next month.
In rccent «�eeks, Bro�m has signaled that he �+�ants a comprehensive re�ie�v of the entire project before he agrees to issue the Uoncis.
California bullet train funding slashed by House panel - latimes.com
a.� t:,?llion ��itEirnit po�:ci; ��Icti�;r:�:ih ,iiat r�ot bc ftill}'r��,tured until Frida��
http://latimesblogs.latimes.corr�lanow/201 l /09i
--Ralph Vartabedian
Phoio: Shown is an artist's conceptinn oJthe San Jose siop on the Californta high-speed rail system. Credit: Californiu Iligh-Speed Rai/Auth�
Btn• C:alifnrnia Jlt�tii Boe��fc
.'Uamo Capital specialues in tax- free muniapal bonds.
ww�+•.ala mocapital. com
:Vnc�in�cs'� ar lsrmontia?
Lcarn the important differenccs bcrivicen :11T.kiei.-ncr's & I�mentia.
�+�+tiv.J ohnsHopldnsHealthAlerts.com
Comments ()
Terms o( Service � Privacy Policy i�s Angcles Times, 202 �Yes[ ist Street, l.os Angeles, Cali`ornia, 9oot2 � Copyright 2oii
A Tribune Web site
Page 1 of 2
STREETS DIVISION -- WORK SCHEDULE
Week of Sept. 12, 2011 — Sept. 16, 2011
Resurfacinq/Reconstructinq streets in the followinq areas:
Sealing streets in the area between Stine Rd & Wible Rd north of Panama Ln
Reconstructing Streets in the area North of Harris and West of Wible
(CDBG funded area)Resurfacing street in the area between Brundage Ln and 4th St ea:
Ave
Blade Sealing Panama Ln between Mt. Vista and Stine
Blade Sealing in the area north of Brundage between Oak St and "A" St
Miscellaneous Streets Division pro�ects:
(CDBG funded area) Installing & Repairing curb, gutter & sidewalks in the area east c
north of Niles St and preparing streets for resurfacing
Video inspection of City owned Sewer & Storm lines to evaluate condition of pipes
Installing catch basin, storm line and curb & gutter on 22"d St between "B" St & Elm in
resurfacing the street in the area south of 24th and north of 21 St
Repairing Curb & Gutters on Ming Ave in preparation for street repairs
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Paqe2of2
STREETS SWEEPING SCHEDULE
Monday, Sept. 12, 2011
Between So. "H" St. & Union Avenue — Pacheco Rd. & Hosking Rd.
Befinreen Stockdale Hwy. & Truxtun Ave. (ext.) — Coffee Rd & Partridge Ave.
Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2011
Between 99 Hwy. & So. "H" St. — Ming Ave. & Panama Ln.
Cul-De-Sacs on the north side of Magdelena Ave., west of So. "H" St.
Wednesdav, Sept. 14, 2011
City areas between Brundage Ln. & Ming Ave. — So. "H" St. & Union Ave.
City areas between Wilson Rd. & Pacheco Rd. — So. "H" St. & Union Ave.
Between Casa Loma Dr. & Planz Rd. — Madison Ave. & Cottonwood Dr.
Between Planz Rd. & Brook St. — Madison Ave. & Hale St.
Thursdav, Sept. 15, 2011
City areas between Stockdale Hwy. & Ming Ave. — Ashe Rd. & Gosford Rd.
Between EI Portal/Laurelglen Blvd. & Ashe Rd. — Ming Ave. & So. Halfmoon/Olympia D
Between Ashe Rd. & Stine Rd. — Ming Ave. & So. Halfmoon/Edgemount Dr.
Between Coffee Rd. & Wilson Rd. (ext.) — White Ln. & So. Halfmoon/Olympia Dr.
Fridav, Sept. 16, 2011
Between Stockdale Hwy. & Ming Ave. — Allen Rd. & Old River Rd.
Between Old River Rd. & Coffee Rd. — Ming Ave. & Ridge Oak/Westwold Dr.
Between Ridge OakMlestwold Dr. & White Ln. — Old River Rd., east to the PG&E ease
Between White Ln. & Asperata Dr. — Gosford Rd„ west to the PG&E easement.
Between White Ln. & Cederwood Dr. -- Stine Rd. & Wilson Rd. (ext.)
•
B A K E R S F I E L D
Economic and Community Development Department
M E M Q R A N D U M
September 7, 2
TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager
FROM: Rhonda W. Barnhard, Assistant Economic Development Director �
SUBJECT: Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Update
Attached is the HPRP Progress Report. Among the highlights:
• Our local expenditures remain far ahead of what the program guideline
Rules from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban development (F
required that 60% of funds be spent by August 18, 2011 and 100% by ,
2012. Bakersfield's efforts have far exceeded that, with 87.98% spent
August 31. This is an increase of 5°/a over last month's figures.
.
.
Homeless Prevention services have assisted about 2,370 individuals in
households.
Rapid Rehousing services have assisted about 1550 individuals in 741
households.
T
T
NI
T
�
+�
�
�
�
7
Q
�
0
Q.
�
�
�
y
�
i
�.
O
L
a
a
a
_
a�
> M
c� �
t �
� �
a� .
U �
� (C
� �
c >
N o a
� C C
.�., � O
N �
� M
d N
� �
� O
� � �
� � O
� �
� � �
2 (a i
0>
U
C
�
�
m
O
�
0� y
'� l�C
C ,�
d
i�.
x
W
d
�
'a
�
m
a�
N
O
a
�
a
�
�
�
cfl
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
C7
�
c0
N
N
n
�
�
�
O
O
N
�
�
T'^
W
c�i
�
c
� � � � ._..
O �
� N V � N
� _ �` � � � � 'D
«
Q 'p ' � � � p V RS
-p � � p � � cLS �
�� � � o� � Q a�
� ��� v�a� a����
O N O-j O� N��
cu �
���o•-�n�,��
cn � � .i� � ca c� m
� � � C � p � � Q
� cn a�
a� c�i � 2 a� v� a�
a� � a� � � � c Y
C 'C � � � � V � O
j .0 V �, � � 'p � �
� � � � O T � �; �
� V/
Q � •(n � O C � U
cv u�
a� a ._ a� •
��n �nE�
• V � ctf � � � N � �
0 — � � U .0 � � i
C � C �- � � � � � fl.
� �
ii > � � .c u�i (4 a� � N
a
�
�
.�
�
c�
�
> �
co ,�
L ^
`� c
a� .
U �
� Cf3
� �
� �
� �>
C �
� C
L � �
� � O
� T- L
� � �
� o �
� � �
M
O
CD
�
�
�
�
�
C'�
O
�'
�
N
�
�
O
O
N
�
�
'T^
W
t� �
� � U �
� � '� C �
� � « � � � U
c0 � cn � � � U �
� � � O � •� cB tn
L E�' ��� � aU
� " p� Q p c0 -p .
O � O •� � _ � � �
"' p„ > O � f� �
� � � E � � °_ � o�
� � � vi N � � � '�
Q`n �� c � � � v�i a�i
E�a�����Y
V � � E �. CT .� �C
� � � � � C � O
c� N a U � cLf O.a
'� � � .� � � � � N
� � 1r
Q � � � � Q � (� 'V
�� v�i Y o� � E�
'V i (� . � � � U �
� � (SS p � U � � i
(6 .. N � � c� (Q
U �
LL > � "� � � .� � � �
� � � o
� r N �
M � O�
N �
e-
U/i
ln I� 1A O
N � � O
�t N � M
� T CM O
C�7 � � r
T
r
�
V
�
�
�
r
�
O
O
�
�
�
�
t1�
O
O
�
N
ch
0
ca
M
�
�
O
O
c7
N
O
N
T
�
O `+
C cn � p)
� � X p �
� � F� a ai
(n � � � O
'� � � a
� � �
O � � � O
C _ � Cn .._.
o c � a �
� � � � �
� .� O � O
w � N � �
-o L "v�
� � CO � 'C
� U .�
� � . O �V >
a�i � °� c� � N c�u
o � � v, � � :° u,
U c� � 'c p c� � '�
� � � �� T � � �
O
� u�i � Q Q a fA Q