HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/12/00 AGENDA
REGULAR PRE-MEETING OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Council Chamber, City Hall
Monday, June 12, 2000
12:15 p.m..
1. ROLL CALL
MICHAEL DHANENS, Chairman
STEPHEN BOYLE, Vice Chairman
MA THEW BRAD Y
MARTI MUNIS-KEMPER
TOM MCGINNIS
RON SPRAGUE
JEFFREY TKAC
NOTE:
Agendas may be amended up to 72 hours prior to the Planning Commission
meeting. A final agenda may be obtained from the Planning Department 72
hours prior to the meeting.
Items listed on this agenda will be continued to 5:30 p.m. on the Thursday
following the date listed on this agenda.
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
ANY PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON THE AGENDA OR WISHES TO SPEAK
REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING NEED NOT FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S CARD. ALL
OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK BEFORE' THE COMMISSION MAY FILL O0T A
SPEAKER'S CARD AND PRESENT IT TO THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Planning CommiSsion decisions on Zone Changes, Parcel Maps and Tentative
Subdivision maps are subject to appeal by any person aggrieved. No permit shall be
issued for any use involved in an application until after the final acceptance date of
appeal.
Such appeal must be filed in writing within 10 days from date of hearing, addressed to
the City-Council, c/o Office of the City Clerk, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
93301. A $334 non-refundable filing fee must be included with filing of the initial
appeal for those appeals filed by the applicant or any person outside the notice area.
All appeals filed on land divisions will require a $334 non-refundable filing fee. If all
appeals are withdrawn prior to the City Council hearing, it will not be conducted and the
decision of the Planning Commission will stand.
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000 Page 2
If no appeal is received within the specified time period or if all appeals filed are
withdrawn, the action of the Planning Commission shall become final.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - (marked by asterisk (*)
These items will be acted on as a group without individual staff presentations if no member of
the Planning Commission or audience wishes to comment or ask questions, on a case. The
items are recommended for approval by staff. The applicant has been informed of any special
conditions and has signed an agreement to conditions of approval and requested to be placed on
the consent agenda.
If anyone wishes to discuss or testify on any of the consent items the item(s) will be taken off
consent and will be considered in the order oh the agenda. If not, the public hearing will be
opened and the items acted on as a group.
3.'1)
3.2)
Agenda Item 6.1 - Consistency Finding for acquisitiOn of 23 acres
Agenda Item 6.2 - Consistency. Finding for acquisition of V2 acre
4. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE
Amendment to the text of Title 16 (Subdivisions Ordinance) of the Bakersfield
Municipal Code (City of Bakersfield) Update the subdivision ordinance to reflect
changes in the Subdivision Map Act and formalization of local implementation policy.
(Exempt from CEQA) (Continued from June 1, 2000)
(All Wards)
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
Roll Call Vote.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - Kyle Carter
Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council certify the Final
EIR for General Plan Amendment/Zone Change P99-0482 which has been completed
in compliance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines and the City of Bakersfield CEQA
Implementation Procedures.
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION:
Roll call vote.
Approve and Adopt resolution making findings and
recommend certification of-the Final EIR to the City.
Council.
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000 Page 3
PUBLIC HEARINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, ASSOCIATED REZONINGS,
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS, AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS:
6.1.a) General Plan Amendment/Circulation Element Amendment File No. P99-
(Ward 4)
0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyle Carter has proposed to
amend the Land Use designations from LI (Light Industrial), SI (Service
Industrial) and HI (Heavy Industrial) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 64.58
acres, LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) on 91.84 acres and GC (General
Commercial) on 14.48 acres. Also, to amend the Circulation Element by
deleting Mohawk Street as an arterial north of Hageman Road to Olive Drive,
change Hageman Road from a collector to.an arterial between Mohawk Street
and Knudsen Drive, along with modifying the alignment by swinging it to the
north a few hundred feet, and to establish a collector segment for Hageman
Road between Knudsen Drive to State Route 99/State Route 204, generally
bounded by Olive Drive on the north, State Route 99 on the east, Fruitvale
Avenue on the west and Downing Road on the south. The approval of this
project shall supercede any previous approvals done in the County, including
any specific plan line alignments. (EIR on file)'
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
6.t .b)
(Ward 4)
Zone Change P99-0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyle
Carter has requested a change in zoning from an M-1 (Light Manufacturing)
zone, M-2 (General Manufacturing) zone and an M-3 (Heavy Industrial) zone to
an R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone, R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone
and a C-2 (Regional Commercial) zone on 170.9 acres, generally bounded by
Olive Drive on the north, State Route 99 on the east, Fruitvale Avenue on the
west and Downing Road on the south. (EIR on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
6.2.a)
(Ward 6)
General Plan Amendment P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed
to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium Density
Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 25.41 acres, located at the
northwest corner of~ Ashe Road and Panama Lane. (Negative Declaration on
file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000
Page 4
6.2.b)
(Wa~ ~
Zone Change P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA INC has requested a change in
zoning from an R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone to an R-1 (One
Family Dwelling) zone on 25.41 acres, located at the northwest corner of Ashe
Road and Panama Lane. !Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
6.3.a)
(Wa~
e.3.b)
General Plan Amendment P00-0235 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed
to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium Density
Residential) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 8.62 acres, generally located
south of Campus Park Drive and west of Old River Road. (Negative Declaration
on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
Zone Chanqe No. P00-0235 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. has proposed a
change in zoning from a PUD (Planned Unit Development) zone to an R-1 (One
Family Dwelling) zone on 65.44 acres, located south of Campus Park Drive and
west of Old River Road to Mountain Vista Drive. (Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
6.4.a)
(Wards 2 & 5)
6.4. b)
(Wards 2 & 5)
General Plan Amendment P00-0236 - Halferty Development Company LLC
has proposed to change the land use designation from HMR (High Medium
Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) on 5.14 acres, located along
the south side of Ming Avenue between Canter Way and Raintree Court.
(Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
Zone Change No. P00-0236 - Halferty Development Company LLC has
proposed a change in zoning from an R-1 CH (One Family Dwelling-Church)
and R-3 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone to a PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone on 5.14 acres, located along the south side of Ming Avenue
between Canter Way and Raintree Court. (Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000
Page
6.5.a)
(Ward 4)
6.5.b)
(Ward 4)
General Plan Amendment P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate has proposed to
change the land use designation from GC (General Commercial) and SIR
(Suburban Residential) to LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) on 3.6 +/-
acres, generally located along the north side of Brimhall Road approximately
600 feet east of Jewetta Avenue. (Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
Zone Change No. P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate has proposed a change in
zoning from a C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone and an E (Estate) zone to
an R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone on 3.6 +/- acres, generally
located along the north side of Brimhall Road approximately 600 feet east of
Jewetta Avenue. (Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
6.6.a)
(Ward 4)
General Plan Amendment P00-0253 - DeWalt Corp has proposed tp change
the land use designation from LR (Low Density Residential) to GC (General
Commercial) on 3.93 gross acres, located on the northwest corner of Calloway
Drive and Meacham Road. (Negative Declaration on file)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
Roll call vote.
6.6.b) Zone Change No. P00-0253 - Dewalt Corp. has proposed a change in zoning
from an R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zone to a PCD (Planned Commercial
Development) zone on 3.93 gross acres, located at the northwest corner of
Calloway Drive and Meacham Road. (Negative Declaration on file)
(Ward 4)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve
Roll call vote.
PUBLIC HEARING - Revised PCD Zone Change P99-0911(Cornerstone Engineering)
Change in land use zoning from a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone to a
Revised PCD (Planned Commercial Development) zone on 10.1 acres for the
Bakersfield Heart Hospital to allow a helicopter landing pad (helistop); revised footprint
of the two-story, 40,000 square foot hospital wing; and a three-story, 38,416 square
foot medical office building. Located at 3001 Sillect Avenue (south side of Sillect
Avenue, east of Buck Owens Blvd.). (Negative Declaration on file) (Continued from
June '1, 2000)
Agenda, PC, Monday - June 12, 2000
Page 6
(Ward 5)
RECOMMENDATION:
Roll call vote.
Approve
(Ward 3)
(Ward 2)
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
8.1)
General Plan Consistency Finding for the acquisition of approximately 23 acres
of land by the City of Bakersfield for a fire station, park site and future Paladino
Drive right-of-way, located generally south of Paladino Drive, east of Morning
Drive. (Exempt from CEQA)
RECOMMENDATION:
Make Finding
Group Vote.
8.2)
General. Plan COnsistency Finding for the acquisition of % acre of land by the
City of Bakersfield for Joshua Park, located generally north of State Route 178,
east of San Dimas Street. (Exempt from CEQA)
RECOMMENDATION: Make Finding
Group Vote.
COMMUNICATIONS
A) Written
B) Verbal
10.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
A) Committees
11.
June 2, 2000
ADJOURNMENT
Planning Director
Held
June t2, 2000
12:15 p.m.
City.Council Chamber, City Hall
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS:
Present:
MICHAEL DHANENS, Chairperson
STEPHEN BOYLE, Vice Chairperson
TOM MCGINNIS
MARTI MUNIS-KEMPER
RON SPRAGUE
Absent:
MATHEW BRADY
JEFFREY TKAC
ADVISORY MEMBERS:
Present:
CARL HERNANDEZ, Deputy City Attorney
JACK LEONARD, Assistant Building Director
MARIAN SHAW, Engineer IV
STAFF:
Present: .
STANLEY GRADY, Planning Director
MARC GAUTHIER, Principal Planner
JIM MOVIUS, Principal Planner
PAM TOWNSEND, Recording Secretary
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
None
Chairman Tkac read the Notice of the Right to Appeal
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
3.1)
3.2)
Agenda Item 8.'1 - Consistency Finding for acquisition of 23 acres
Agenda Item 8.2 - Consistency Finding for acquisition of % acre
These items will be voted on Thursday, June 15, 2000.
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCF
Amendment to the text of Title 16 (Subdivisions Ordinance) of the Bakersfield
' Municipal Code (City of Bakersfield) (Exempt from CEQA) (Continued from June 1,
2000) (All Wards). -
Staff report recommending approving the proposed wording as shown in the June 8
memo from the Planning Department.
Commissioner Sprague asked Ms. Shaw if she had received his message regarding an
addition to the paragraph and asked if it was acceptable. Ms. Shaw said "yes" that she
had turned it over to Mr. Grady. Mr. Grady said that staff did have his language and
that if he looked at 16.16.020 paragraph "A" it says "that a tentative map shall be
submitted on paper or other acceptable mediums such as a velum or Mylar."
Paragraph B of 16.16.030 (which is the one Commissioner Sprague submitted
language on) says "that at the option of the applicant; electronic data may be submitted
and/or written, printed -or reproduced on acceptable mediums." Mr. Grady said that It
sounds like in that paragraph by adding the sentence that you would have the option of
submitting one or the other or both but not that you would be required to submit it. Mr.
Grady said that the ordinance is talking about two different opportunities as far as the
presentation of the material. If paragraph "F" is providing that much confusion as to.our
intent which is to make it an option for the applicant to submit electronic data then our
preference is rather than confuse it by adding more language to it, we would prefer to
delete it. Commissioner Sprague said that just for the rest of the Commissioner's
information, he was asking to add "and/or written, printed or reproduced on an
acceptable medium such as vellum or Mylar" so there was no confusion.
. Commissioner Sprague said if that is the case, he would support deleting it.
Commissioner Dhanens said at the last public hearing Mr. Mclntosh is the one that had
some concerns about the language and wondered if the language had been
transmitted to him? Mr. Grady said the did not think it had been transmitted to him.
There were no more Commissioner comments. This item was moved until Thursday,
jUne 15, 2000.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - Kyle Carter
Commissioner Dhanens declared a conflict of interest on thiS item as well as Agenda
Items 6.1.a and 6.1.b. The chairman duties were turned over to Vice Chairman Boyle.
Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council certify.the Final
EIR for General Plan Amendment/Zone Change P99-0482 whiCh has been completed
in compliance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines and the City of Bakersfield CEQA
Implementation Procedures. (Ward 4)
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000 Page 3
Staff report given for this item and Agenda Items 6.1.a and 6.1 .b.
Ralph Huey, Director of the City's Environmental Services for the Fire Department, said
they reviewed the chemicals being stored, the storage type containers, capacity of
those containers, the locations and the risks associated with chemicals with five
different facilities in the project area. Three of them are adjacent to this area and two
which are in close proximity to the area. They did this study in conjunction with Kern
County Fire because these facilities are located in the County as well as
representatives from the five industries, a couple of their environmental consultants and
specifically with an environmental consultant at "Inside Environmental Engineering."
· They evaluated the "end points" (the extent of damage that would result from a couple
different scenarios) and used the "worst plausible case scenario." What they found
was that there were only two materials that outweighed as far as distances all the
others. That was the propane from Coast Gas which was calculated at .47 miles which
means beyond that .47 miles from an explosion people would not get second degree
burns. Aisc, a vapor cloud explosion from the naphtha at the Equilon Facility was
calculated at a one pound over pressure and that was at .45 miles. The setback
information drawn on the chart are based on those calculations.
Marian Shaw spoke about the Knudsen alignment. Ms. Shaw showed a xerox of the
Circulation Element demonstrating to the Commission where the streets are located
and wanted the Commission to be aware that the Knudsen alignment has not been
changed by Kyle Carter's application.
Staff is recommending approval of the project.
Commissioner Sprague stated that he still has concerns about Landco Drive. One of
the concerns is what happens to Landco Drive if this development does through? Does
Landco Drive go through the proposed C-2 site that Mr. Carter is trying to develop as
set forth in Zone Change P99-04827 Ms. Shaw said that particular roadway is not
shown on the Circulation Element as being either an arterial or a collector. Portions of
it are an existing street. Ms. Shaw said there is no roadway on the east side of the C-2
space..Commissioner Sprague said that on zoning map 102-15 it shows Landco going
through the easterly portion of the C-2 and wanted to know if it remained if the C-2
were approved? Ms. Shaw said this would be a local road and our Circulation Element
does not address those. Commissioner Sprague asked if an answer could be provided
for Thursday night about the C~2 plans and whether or not there is an easement there?
Ms. Shaw said "yes." ·
Commissioner Sprague said that in Policy 79, the EIR says that this EIR is consistent
with industrial use adjacent to it. Commissioner Sprague does not agree with that and
said he will be doing some more research on it before Thursday night.
Commissioner Sprague asked staff about the original traffic study and whether' or not it
was done on the' original 500 acres and if it was not done on the smaller acreage don't
we need a new traffic study to set forth the traffic circulation element on this as
proposed by deleting Mohawk? Ms. Shaw said she would reply to this on Thursday.
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000
Page 4
=
Commissioner Sprague asked if there is a code requirement for setback of homes for
the towers and whether or not these towers are collapsible in the event of an
earthquake. Mr. Grady said that there is a requirement on railroad tracks but he does
not think there is one for utility easements. Mr. Grady said they would find out by
Thursday night.
Commissioner.Boyle asked what the plan for Mohawk was for going south to Rosedale
Highway and eventually over the Kern River prior to this project? Ms. Shaw said there
were plans at least prior to the annexation to construct Mohawk from where it is at
Truxtun, north across the river to the city limits. Ms. Shaw said that this project would
not affect it significantly going south.
Item continued until Thursday night.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, ASSOCIATED R~XONINGS,
AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS-
6.1.a)
General Plan Amendment/Circulation Element Amendment File No. P99
0482 - North of the RiVer Sanitation District and Kyle Carter (Ward 4)
Combined with Agenda Items 5 and 6.1 .b.
6.1.b)
Zone Change P99-0482 - North of the River Sanitation District and Kyl~
Carter (EIR on file) (Ward 4)
Combined with Agenda Items 5 and 6. la.
6.2.a)
General Plan Amendment P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc.(Negative
Declaration on file) (Ward 6)
Combined with Agenda Item 6.2.b below.
6.2.b)
Zone Change P00-0234 - Castle & Cooke, CA INC-(Negative Declaration on
file) (Ward 6)
Staff report given recommending approval
There were no Commission comments or questions.
Item continued until Thursday night.
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000
Page 5
6.3.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0235 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. (Ward 4)
Combined with Agenda Item 6.3.b below
6.3.b)
6.4.a)
Zone Change No. P00-0235 - Castle & Cooke, CA Inc. (Ward 4)
Staff report given recommending approval
Commissioner Sprague asked staff if it' is correct that you cannot build over a
canal? Mr. Grady said that is right. Commissioner Sprague asked if there is a
Setback or can you build right up to where the canal is covered? Ms. Shaw
said that the canal in question will not be covered. It will be relocated and will
be an open canal,
Commissioner Boyle asked staff why this was zoned in the past as a PUD? Mr.
Grady said the aPplicant at that time was planning to do a gated residential
subdivision and the applicant requested the zoning. Now the project is
changing and the applicant desires to go back to single family residential.
Item continued until Thursday night.
General Plan Amendment P00-0236 - Halferty Development Company LLC
(Wards 2 & 5)
Combined with Agenda Item 6.4.b below
6.4. b)
Zone Change No. P00-0236 - Halferty Development Company LLC
Staff report given recommending approval
Commissioner McGinnis asked if the restaurants are going _to be sit down or fast
food? Mr. Gauthier said that he wasn't sure.
Commissioner Sprague asked if since this was a PCD plan if it would come
back to us at a later date and if they were just approving the zone change now?
Mr. Grady said "no" that all of it would be approved at this time. The plan was
displayed on the board. Commissioner Sprague said that he has concerns
about the landscape on the south side and he would like staff to consider 36"
trees and 24' on the south side against the residential as a mitigation for what's
provided for in Exhibit "A." He also said he was concerned about the
landscaping on the entrances to the project and the noise element on the corner
with the restaurant pad.
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000 Page 6
Commissioner Dhanens asked about the site plan and landscape plan diSplayed
on. the board. He said they were different and wanted to know if one of them
were changed? Mr. Gauthier said the site plan was the correct one and he left
the landscape plan up to show how it would look with trees. There wasn't time
to do a new color landscape plan to match the new site plan.
Commissioner Dhanens asked if there was a proposed list of tenants? Mr.
Gauthier said he should ask the applicant as he wasn't sure.
Commissioner Dhanens asked about the removal of the four, four-plex units and
'wondered why the other four-plexes were not involved. Mr. Gauthier said that
they only bought so many so that they would have access to a local street.
There were only so many the owners wished to sell.
Commissioner Dhanens also asked if more details could be given Thursday
night for ADP levels and whether or not it would be suitable to use local streets
for truck's egress and ingress. He also wanted to know if a traffic study had
been done for the project.
Commissioner SPrague said that he would also like to know Thursday night
what the radius turns for the trucks are going around the corners and coming
back on Canter Way?
Commissioner McGinnis asked where the access would be for commercial
vehicles to service the center? Mr.' Gauthier showed him on the slide that they
were adjacent to the four-plexes that were remaining.
Commissioner Sprague asked if the truck ramp on major A was recessed and if
itis how is the noise shielded to the residences on the south? An answer would
be given on Thursday night.
Item continued until Thursday night.
6.5.a) General Plan Amendment P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate (Ward
Combined with Agenda Item 6.5.b below.
6.5.b)
Zone' Change No. P00-0238 - Karpe Real Estate (Ward 4)
Staff report given recommending approval.
There were no Commission comments or questions.
Item continued until Thursday night.
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000
Page 7
6.6.a)
General Plan Amendment P00-0253 - DeWalt Corp.
Combined with Agenda Item 6.6.b below.
(Ward 4)
6.6.b)
Zone Change No. P00-0253 - Dewalt Corp. (Ward 4)
Staff report given recommending approval as long as the parking shortage
· could be worked out on Thursday night.
Commissioner McGinnis asked how many mailings were sent out on this project
and What kind of response has staff received? Mr. Gauthier said they have had
minimal response and he would have to check the numbers.
Commissioner Kemper asked if any of the existing trees will be retained? Mr.
Gauthier said that all of the trees will be retained. They will bUild around them.
Item continued until Thursday night.
PUBLIC HEARING - Revised PCD Zone Change P99-0911(Cornerstone Engineering)
(Ward 5)
At the request of staff; this item has been continued until the Planning Commission
meeting of July 6, 2000.
There were no Commissioner comments or questions.
The request will be voted on Thursday evening.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
8.1)
General Plan Consistency Finding for the acquisition of approximately 23 acres
of land by the City of Bakersfield for a fire station, park site and future Paladino
Drive right-of-way, located generally south of Paladino Drive, east of Morning
Drive. (Exempt from CEQA) (Ward3)
Staff report given recommending approval.
There were no Commission comments or questions.
Item will be voted on the Consent Agenda on Thursday night.
Minutes, PC, June 12, 2000 Page 8
8.2)
General Plan Consistency Finding for the acquisition of ~ acre of land by the
City of Bakersfield for Joshua Park, located generally north of State Route 178,
east of San Dimas Street. (Exempt from CEQA) (Ward 2)
Staff report given recommending approval.
There were no Commission comments or questions.
Item will be voted on the Consent Agenda on Thursday night.
COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Grady announced to the Commission that we would be going live on television on
July 6, 2000 and Mr. Grady passed out a memo explaining aboUt the broadcast.
1¸0.
11.
June 29 2000
COMMISSION COMMENTS
None
ADJOURNMENT '
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned at 1:41 p.m.
Rocording Secretary