Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFMC RESULTS 2015LEAK DETECTOR MONITOR CERTIFICATION SPILL BUCKET TEST 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 Date Printed and Mailed: 1/4/2016 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR ERNIE MEDINA 1501 TRUXTUN AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Test Date: 12/4/2015 Order Number: 3427876 Dear Regulator, Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: PENSKE CA-094 (CA-094/0198-10) 2929 E. BRUNDAGE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Testing performed: Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting LDT 5000 Field Test Apparatus Line Leak Detector Test Page 1 of 1 Work Order:3427876 Date:12/4/2015 Site Name / ID:PENSKE CA-094 / CA-094/0198-10 Address:2929 E. BRUNDAGE City:BAKERSFIELD State:CA Zip:93307 Tank ID Product Product Line Tested From Existing/New Mechanical/Electronic Manufacturer/Model Serial No. Pump Operating Pressure (psi) Calibrated Leak (ml/min) Calibrated Leak (gph) Holding PSI *N/A for Electronic LD's Resiliency (ml) *N/A for Electronic LD's Metering PSI *N/A for Electronic LD's Opening Time (sec) *N/A for Electronic LD's Test Results T1 Diesel 1 2 Existing Mechanical Red Jacket FX1DV 60055-8628 33.00 189.0 3.00 20.00 350.00 12 10 Pass Technician Comments: Technician Name:Franscico Castro Certification #:64037 Technician Signature:Expire Date:1/26/2017 Environmental Compliance for Petroleum Systems © 2016 Tanknology Inc., Austin, TX.    All rights reserved.    tanknology.com Appendix VI (Copies of Monitoring System Certification form and UST Monitoring Plot Plan available at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov.) MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION For Use By All Jurisdictions Within the State of California Authority Cited: Chapter 6.7, Health and Safety Code; Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23, California Code of Regulations This form must be used to document testing and servicing of monitoring equipment. A separate certification or report must be prepared for each monitoring system control panel by the technician who performs the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank system owner/operator. The owner/operator must submit a copy of this form to the local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date. A. General Information Facility Name:PENSKE CA-094 Bldg. No.: Site Address:2929 E. BRUNDAGE City:BAKERSFIELD Zip:93307 Facility Contact Person:JOE Contact Phone No.:661-322-2600 Make/Model of Monitoring System:Veeder Root TLS 350 Date of Testing/Servicing:12/4/2015 B. Inventory of Equipment Tested/Certified Check the appropriate boxes to indicate specific equipment inspected/serviced: Tank ID:T1 - Diesel In-Tank Gauging Probe.Model:MAG PROBE Annular Space or Vault Sensor.Model:301 Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).Model:352 Fill Sump Sensor(s).Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector.Model:Red Jacket FX1DV Electronic Line Leak Detector.Model: Tank Overfill / High-Level Sensor.Model:FLAPPER Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2). Tank ID:T2 - Diesel In-Tank Gauging Probe.Model:MAG PROBE Annular Space or Vault Sensor.Model:301 Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).Model:352 Fill Sump Sensor(s).Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector.Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector.Model: Tank Overfill / High-Level Sensor.Model:FLAPPER Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2). Tank ID: In-Tank Gauging Probe.Model: Annular Space or Vault Sensor.Model: Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).Model: Fill Sump Sensor(s).Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector.Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector.Model: Tank Overfill / High-Level Sensor.Model: Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2). Tank ID: In-Tank Gauging Probe.Model: Annular Space or Vault Sensor.Model: Piping Sump / Trench Sensor(s).Model: Fill Sump Sensor(s).Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector.Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector.Model: Tank Overfill / High-Level Sensor.Model: Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on Page 2). Dispenser ID:1/2 Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).Model:352 Shear Valve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID:1 Sat Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).Model:322 Shear Valve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID:2 Sat Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).Model:322 Shear Valve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).Model: Shear Valve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).Model: Shear Valve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: Dispenser Containment Sensor(s).Model: Shear Valve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). *If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility. C. Certification- I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected/serviced in accordance with the manufacturers’ guidelines. Attached to this Certification is information (e.g. manufacturers' checklists) necessary to verify that this information is correct and a Plot Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached a copy of the report; (check all that apply): System set- up Alarm history report Technician Name (print):Franscico Castro Signature: Certification No.: B37663 License. No.:743160 Class 'A' Testing Company Name:Tanknology Phone No.:(800) 800-4633 Testing Company Address:11000 N. MoPac Expressway Suite 500 Date of Testing/Servicing:12/4/2015 Monitoring System Certification Page 1 of 3 12/07 D. Results of Testing/Servicing Software Version Installed:123.01 Complete the following checklist: Yes No*Is the audible alarm operational? Yes No*Is the visual alarm operational? Yes No*Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? Yes No*Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper operation? Yes No* N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? Yes No* N/A For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) Sump/Trench Sensors; Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Yes; No Yes No* N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % Yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. Yes* No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) Product; Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. Yes No*Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable Yes No*Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? * In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. E. Comments: Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 3 12/07 F. In-Tank Gauging / SIR Equipment: Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. Complete the following checklist: Yes No*Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? Yes No*Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? Yes No*Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? Yes No*Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? Yes No*Were all probes reinstalled properly? Yes No*Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed? * In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD): Check this box if LLDs are not installed. Complete the following checklist: Yes No* N/A For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: 3 g.p.h.; 0.1 g.p.h; 0.2 g.p.h. Yes No*Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? Yes No*Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? Yes No* N/A For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? Yes No* N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? Yes No* N/A For electronic LLDs that are programmed for positive shut down, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? Yes No* N/A For electronic LLDs that are programmed for positive shut down, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? Yes No* N/A For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? Yes No*Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed? * In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. H.Comments: Page 3 of 3 12/07 SWRCB, January 2006 Spill Bucket Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completed form and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: PENSKE CA-094 Date of Testing: 12/4/2015 Facility Address: 2929 E. BRUNDAGE , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: JOE Phone: 661-322-2600 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 11/17/2015 Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Franscico Castro Credentials1: CSLB Contractor ICC Service Tech. SWRCB Tank Tester Other (Specify) License Number(s): 743160 / 8026747 3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic Vacuum Other Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank Number, Stored Product, etc.) Bucket Installation Type: Bucket Diameter: Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying vacuum/water and start of test Test Start Time (TI): Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time(TF): Final Reading (RF): Test Duration(TF–TI): Change in Reading (RF–RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Spill Box # Tank T1 Diesel - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 09:20:00 0.2009 in. 09:35:00 0.20 in. 15 min 0.00 in. +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box # Tank T2 Diesel - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 15 min 09:20:00 0.3432 in. 09:35:00 0.3430 in. 15 min 0.00 in. +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box # Tank T1 Diesel - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 1 min 09:36:00 0.20 in. 09:51:00 0.1985 in. 15 min 0.00 in. +/- 0.0020 Pass Spill Box # Tank T2 Diesel - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade level Direct Bury Contained in Sump 11.00 14.00 1 min 09:36:00 0.3430 in. 09:51:00 0.3425 in. 15 min 0.00 in. +/- 0.0020 Pass Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements. Technician's Signature:Date:12/4/2015 1State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent. WO: 3427876 Site Diagram (This site diagram is for reference only and is not drawn to scale) Work Order:3427876 Site ID / Name:CA-094/0198-10 / PENSKE CA-094 Address:2929 E. BRUNDAGE City:BAKERSFIELD State:CA Zip:93307 W.O.# SC1-3427876 W.O.# SC1-3427876