HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 062-16RESOLUTION NO. 062- 1 6
RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF THE
METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 178, GENERALLY WEST OF
MORNING DRIVE. (GPA /ZC NO. 15- 0507).
WHEREAS, Dirk Poeschel for Rio Bravo Medical Campus, LLC, filed an application
with the City of Bakersfield Community Development Department requesting an
amendment to the land use map designation of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General
Plan from LR Low Density Residential) and HMR (High Medium Density Residential) to
GC (General Commercial) on 10.8 acres located on the south side of State Route 178,
generally west of Morning Drive (the "Project "); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Negative Declaration with mitigation
measures for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 3, 2016 and
approved Resolution No. 12 -16, which recommended that the City Council approve
the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 5:15 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the
time and place for a public hearing before the City Council to consider the approval of
the amendment as required by Government Code Section 65355, and notice of the
public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal
Code;and
WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony,
and evidence concerning the staff report, Negative Declaration and the Planning
Commission's deliberation, and action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:
1. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 12 -16 are
hereby adopted.
2. The Project is subject to mitigation measures found within the adopted
Negative Declaration for the Project.
3. The Project is hereby approved subject to the conditions of approval in
Exhibit A and located on the map as shown in Exhibit B, both of which are
incorporated herein.
4. The Project approved herein is hereby made part of the 2nd amendment to
the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan for
calendar year 2013 in accordance with Government Code Section 65358
(b) . o� 6AKF9N
- ____000 - -_ > ;
� o
Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on
APR 2 0 2016 by the following vote:
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
L COUNCILMEMBER: RIVERA, MAXWELL, WEIR, SMITH, HANSON, PARLIER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
AIN: COUNCILMEMBER: N
ABS COUNCILMEMBER:
^ ROGAFCMC
CV" CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED APR 2 0 2016
.R�
Harold Harold Hanson
Vice -Mayor
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Atto y
By
ANDREW HEGLUND
Deputy City Attorney
Exhibits: A Conditions of Approval
B General Plan Amendment Map
By:DL \S: \GPAs \GPA 2nd 2016 \15 -0507 \Res Ord \CC Res GPA 15 -0507.docx
Page 2 of 2
of OAKFPm
U O^
ORIGINAL
Exhiblt A
Conditions of Approval
General Plan Amendment No. 15 -0507
Public Works:
1. Along with the submittal of any development plan, prior to approval of improvement plans,
or with the application for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger, the following shall occur (If
a tentative subdivision map over the entire GPA /ZC area is submitted, than these conditions
can be met with the map):
a. This GPA /ZC area is within the Shalimar Planned Drainage Area. Submit a
comprehensive drainage study of the entire drainage area, to be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer. The study shall show the development's proportionate
share of the necessary ultimate storm drainage facilities.
b. Sewer service must be provided to the GPA /ZC area, which is within the East Niles
Community Services District service area. Please contact said District for more
information.
c. Developer is responsible for the construction of all infrastructure, both public and
private, within the boundary of the GPA /ZC area. This includes the construction of any
and all boundary streets to the centerline of the street, unless otherwise specified. The
developer is also responsible for the construction of any off site infrastructure required
to support this development, as identified in these conditions. The phasing of the
construction all infrastructure will be addressed at the subdivision map stage.
For orderly development.
2. The entire area covered by this General Plan Amendment shall be included in the
Consolidated Maintenance District. The applicant shall pay all fees for inclusion in the
Consolidated Maintenance District with submittal of any development plan, tentative
subdivision map, Site Plan Review, or application for a lot line adjustment for any portion of
this GPA area. If the parcel is already within a consolidated maintenance district, the
owner shall update the maintenance district documents, including the Proposition 218
ballot and the Covenant. The ballot and covenant shall be signed and notarized.
For orderly development.
3. Per Resolution 035 -13, the area within the GPA /ZC shall implement and comply with the
"complete streets" policy.
For orderly development.
4. The developer shall pay their proportionate share of the Morning Drive Major Bridge and
Thoroughfare District.
For orderly development.
5. The development is required to pay into the adopted Regional Traffic Impact Fee fixed
rate program.
For orderly development.
Plannina:
6. Prior to recordation of each residential subdivision or prior to approval of each Site Plan
Review for commercial /industrial uses within the project site, the project proponent shall
submit to the Planning Director a focused Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions ReipeMKF
a 9
Page t of 2 " o
ORIGINAL
Conditions of Approval
GPA /ZC 15 -0507
Page 2
prepared by a qualified consultant. The report shall include the following and any
additional information required by the Planning Director:
a. An explanation that the project will comply with all current state and local applicable
GHG emission control and reduction regulations, as they are adopted or amended
over time.
b. A signed statement by the project applicant that the project will construct and
operate the project in accordance with factors /mitigation measures utilized in the
calculation of CO2e (GHG) emissions and reductions as shown in the air quality study
for this project.
c. Identification of the measures that the project will implement to reduce operational
CO2e emissions by 29 percent over BAU; which would be the project's proportionate
share of tons per the above- referenced Air Study. Reduction of 29 percent over BAU
CO2e (GHG) emissions is the current threshold adopted by SJVAPCD. These measures
may include, but are not limited to: implementation of specific Best Performance
Standards for GHG reduction, acquisition of offset credits, inclusion in an Emission
Reduction Agreement approved by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
(SJVAPCD), or other approved GHG reduction strategies.
d. A copy of the ISR application to the SJVAPCD listing the mitigation measures utilized to
reduce the GHG emissions for the project.
Any mitigation program reduction of GHG adopted by the SJVAPCD or the City of
Bakersfield that can be implemented for the specific project site may be utilized as a
replacement for the requirements of this mitigation measure, if it provides equal or
more effective mitigation than this mitigation measure.
For orderly development.
City Attorney:
7. In consideration by the City of Bakersfield for land use entitlements, including but not limited
to related environmental approvals related to or arising from this project, the applicant,
and /or property owner and /or subdivider ( "Applicant" herein) agrees to indemnify, defend,
and hold harmless the City of Bakersfield, its officers, agents, employees, departments,
commissioners and boards ( "City" herein) against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes
of action or demands whatsoever against them, or any of them, before administrative or
judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of
this application, including without limitation any CEQA approval or any related
development approvals or conditions whether imposed by the City, or not, except for City's
sole active negligence or willful misconduct.
This indemnification condition does not prevent the Applicant from challenging any
decision by the City related to this project and the obligations of this condition apply
regardless of whether any other permits or entitlements are issued.
The City will promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, falling under
this condition within thirty (30) days of actually receiving such claim. The City, in its sole
discretion, shall be allowed to choose the attorney or outside law firm to defend the City at
the sole cost and expense of the Applicant and the City is not obligated to use any law firm
or attorney chosen by another entity or party.
OAKF
S:\GPAS\GPA2nd2Ol6\15-0507\Conditions 15-0507.docx
U O
Page 2 of 2 ORIGINAL
g o
e F f s
2 J j v ¢a6 58�F 2 3a €P 10 Byy
w 2 _ ill � 6 3gA� €gap s $syEe aE E€
CIft
J i g R�3 i2��iSaBSyF @ #z @$$gEegs' �i
C9 «aa�r' "s��s`a vy aaa�o aRp was e # o
.� w e og„�'i Y„�ds� «socks 0000� pFr�
g
�tl3ors� rc
Op
v J it
K
NA
NO ONINtlow ¢
S
ELpEP
91
rc
o�T
0
ORIGINAL
y
m
n i
W
O
t
LL
MF
X�
W
0
�w
Lh OR]
ELpEP
91
rc
o�T
0
ORIGINAL