HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 074-16RESOLUTION NO. 074— 1 6
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSING
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO.
662 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CASTRO
LANE AND KINGSLEY LANE. (WARD 7)
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to
wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter - described territory,
pursuant to Section 56654 of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is within and consistent with the City
of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield agrees to annex the territory located at the
northwest corner of Castro Lane and Kingsley Lane; and
WHEREAS, the City agrees to serve the territory upon annexation; and
WHEREAS, the property owners of the territory have consented to annexation;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it
hereby finds and determines as follows:
1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct
2. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the tenitory in Exhibit "A" and shown on map marked Exhibit
"B" for the project attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as
though fully set forth herein, located at the northwest corner of Castro
Lane and Kingsley Lane.
3. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the
proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653
of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C ", attached hereto and
made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made
pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000, and it is requested that proceedings be
authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organization are that the
owners of the affected territory desire to receive municipal services from
the City of Bakersfield and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
6. That this proposed annexation territory and the prezoning therefore was
adopted by the City Council and a Negative Declaration for then' NNK4 �,:
annexation is determined to be adequate for the annexation proposal.
O ^,IGN.4!
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the preparation of a Negative
Declaration as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act have
been duly followed.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to be uninhabited pursuant to Section 56046 of the
Government Code.
9. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been
determined to have 100% property owners consenting to annexation.
10. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein is within the
City of Bakersfield Sphere of Influence boundary.
11. That the Local Agency Formation Commission waive the protest hearing
proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000 of the
Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
12. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be
furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be
given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are:
Roberta Gafford
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Alan Tandy
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Virginia Gennaro
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
13. That the appropriate City officials shall file the (10) copies of this
Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation Commission of Kern County at 5300 Lennox Street, Suite 303,
Bakersfield, and CA 93309.
1212121r.l�
0
o
CP1C7JAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on
MAY 18 2016 , by the following vote:
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ r ✓
VE COUNCILMEMBER: RNERA, MAXWELL, WEIR, SMITH, HANSON, SULLIVAN, PARLIER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: OhU
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER:, ""XQ -
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:,N Pr
V
ROBERTA GAFFORD, CN)
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED MAY 1 8 2016
HARVEY L. HALL
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:
ANDREW HEGLUND
Deputy City Attorney
EXHIBITS: A - Legal Description
B - Map
C - Plan for Services
DLS: \Annexation \Res of Applic \Admins 2015 \ROA 662.docx
OPI(�
o'
0
RIMAL
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ANNEXATION NO. 662
RESOLUTION NO.
CASTRO NO. 6
CSA 43
DETACHMENT "I"
REORGANIZATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEING THAT PORTION OF WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 30 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 1, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE
INTERSECTION OF MING AVENUE AND CASTRO LANE; THENCE NORTH 00 °07'18" EAST,
ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF CASTRO LANE AND THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 885.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF KINGSLEY LANE AND THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CORPORATE BOUNDARY PER THAT
CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ANNEXATION NO. 385
RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NO. 0195134417, OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE FOLLOWING
TWELVE (12) COURSES:
1) DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE AND SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 89 °59'32" WEST,
ALONG SAID PROLONGATION, THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF
KINGSLEY LANE AND SAID CITY CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF
179.76 FEET; THENCE
2) DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE AND SAID CITY CORPORATE
BOUNDARY LINE, NORTH 14 °00'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 95.00 FEET; THENCE
3) NORTH 40 °35'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE
4) NORTH 61 °51'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 196.40 FEET; THENCE
5) NORTH 31 °09'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 226.89 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE
6) SOUTH 89 °59'34" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 147.06 FEET;
THENCE
7) DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 00 °07'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 110.07
FEET; THENCE
8) SOUTH 89 °5934" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 426.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT -
OF -WAY LINE OF CASTRO LANE; THENCE
K�
P: �PRQIECTS114055.DbDELFIN01LE0 LS\14WMNNEX.000X v4g t��,`
. _,.IG...',
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ANNEXATION NO. 662
RESOLUTION NO.
CASTRO NO.6
CSA 43
DETACHMENT "I"
REORGANIZATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
9) SOUTH 00 °07'33" WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE AND THE
SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 110.13 FEET TO THE
CENTERLINE OF LA FRANCE DRIVE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF CASTRO LANE;
THENCE
10)SOUTH 00 °07'18" WEST, ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND THE EASTERLY
RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF CASTRO LANE, A DISTANCE OF 375.56 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID CITY CORPORATE BOUNDARY; THENCE
11)CONTINUING SOUTH 00 °07'18" WEST, ALONG SAID CITY CORPORATE
BOUNDARY LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 60.20 FEET; THENCE
12)DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, SOUTH 89 °5932" WEST,
CONTINUING ALONG SAID CITY CORPORATE BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF
30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4.96 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
♦ =Mx 7a"
661 - 834-4814.661 -8340972
2001 Wheelan Court • Bakersfield, CA 93309
CHOCKED by,
'ERN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFEE?
Dift 3 a9 �G
P. WROJECTS\ 140fi5. 06DElFINOLLEGALS \74065ANNE%.DOCX
m
� n
CRIGINAI_
�
/
|q \! ]: .
)
»
�
|
2 \ �
,
§
q ^
, _{
;(
B2
/�
,
§(6\,
{G(
'
§_
!
§)
\22
/§§
§
..
E1.1 u
,�
/u
@m;
(§ »
r
)
»
�
|
2 \ �
,
§
q ^
, _{
;(
$§
'!
§
q
q
�
Js
,
!
q�
..
$§
'!
§
q
q
�
Js
zw
)0
. a)
[ k
\ )
LU
§
)
\
)5®
D
))
2
�/
§
))(
§§§
\}
\
/\
1.
;,
«■
«`
/k
\j))
§
®
/
@§@
ff
#7)=
www
t)\�
[000
0
o
&
)
\
\
}
�
\
�
!»&\
!
\\\\
§
)
(\\
\
\
2
®
-
`
>
\k
})!)}
$
\
\\k$$
-�
-��
\
cU
T G
v wm
U > y
v a and
nv ° E
m T v
m u ww
d �j c
•d
D�•h � m
a$A 0
£ y'a
nyc av
a
V
3
U
0
0
ti
°m
U
.R
O V
C �
d
w FS W
C a
E °
o 0 y
OL `°
1p D
v o
> c
0 o m n
am o a.
vua -
m�E �
a
b
v
9
ca AKr.o
0
n
0,1'.Gi ^IAL
�
vDt°d
M
m
a
Lo.A
o
a
v
C
U
n° _
y
Y
L
a
a
d
� G
3
d O
O D=
O
N
V
v
a
d 1'j y
o
d
c J
E
m
a
C
m�
W
v �
> V
d
O
m m
0
o
m
Qn
°"oc
0m
`W
E
m
vvc
a
d
T
n ,..
M C O
£ U
G
a
«
n
n
=
O s
a
d
.a
c °
a
Y
'n
Lu
�LLm
o�v
mn
ro
°
o
v
a5=
�moo
0 oy,
Tf
c
'dad
m
ro
w
m
o
%�
%
u
y Q!3
v
v
`
t
Z
v°
E
U
W O
'x
W L
N W
LL m
L M
W T
m
D
C N y T
Z
T
T
n
T
O
L
«
' > O
ro m m r
a
d
°V m
2
-002
T$
0
3
a U
E
L
5E
o
Dm
a
U
O
c
F r
v
.'-'
m� edi$
«
Z
$i.
D
i
f/I
T
E d
E J
C o ..-, ,.,
a D
> D
O
v
H
a
m
Q
N d
o
F K
i+
q
V
3 c
v
c
c
7 d
E 0
T
I- W
(fi N
N
� U
C
nv
w2
v WE
°w
3
o
`v mO-
X001
°m
Z U Ddt
mo
m D
n`
w
m
C
O d
dL d
`O o c
C m
m a o
d
W
W V C
3 v m
L
m e
ro
y- m w
T
L
c
L_
L11
D
v E m
W
m
114 C
U E "n
D
v
F m
E
o
v
d
y
C°
W
m
Bm
O C
3
y« O C
F
O
O d
X
. =
Q d Z
Q a
o
V a
= m F
M' W E
WW-
a
U D— o
N
O
o
d n N
U
Z d .d.
W
N°
n
n�`o
�cUm
OxJ
Q
1''N
V'��yr
t
tL-t0
K�
o
Q a
d
2 mLE
W w
Qttld
i
m Z
O dd�v
Km
F
w
`m
d
a
W 0
viii
y
C2
m
« c
n y c Q
N o Dy
W w y
y c n 2 p
W
w W d
W w
m
Klo dm
m
H-auiL
Ompom
WI
QI»
Olmv
QL`v
aUm
=
Mcd
Unr u'
N-
OICJ
a��
ILe�
b
v
9
ca AKr.o
0
n
0,1'.Gi ^IAL