HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB-989 Results 4-21-2016SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and
printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1.FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: Date of Testing:
Facility Address:
Facility Contact: Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing :
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing):
2.TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name:
Technician Conducting Test:
Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: License Number:
Manufacturer Training
ManufacturerComponent(s)Date TrainingExpires
3.SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
ComponentPassFail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made ComponentPassFail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date:_________________________
$POGJEFODF6454FSWJDFT
*OD
")B[
$%
14
PaciifcCoastSightseeing&Charters 04/21/2016
1800 Golden Atate Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301
Haney Hana(714) 507-3101
04/20/2016
Kris Karns
Frank Landa
✔
ICC/CA UST Service Technician 01/26/2017
ICC/ UST Installation/Retro-fitting 10/19/2017
Incon Sump Tester/TS-STS 03/25/2018
Dsl Annular ✔
Dsl Secondary ✔
Dsl STP ✔
Dsl Udc# 1 ✔
Dsl Udc# 2 ✔
04/21/2016
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
4.TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Tank # Tank # Tank # Tank #
Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Tank Capacity:
Tank Material:
Tank Manufacturer:
ProductStored:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
TestDuration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)}
24
✔
✔
Calibrated Gauges .00001
DSL
✔
12,000 gal.
Steel
Joor
DSL
5 min.
0.00"
1 hour
10 HG
10:40 am
10 HG
9:40 am
0.00"
✔
✔
✔
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
5.SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run #
PipingMaterial:
Piping Manufacturer:
PipingDiameter:
Length of Piping Run:
ProductStored:
Method and location of
piping-run isolation:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
TestDuration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI):
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
34
✔
✔
Calibrated gauges .00001
DSL
Fiberglass
Smith
3"
120'
DSL
Clamshell in STP
5 min
9:15 am
5 psi
10:15 am
5 psi
1 Hr
0.00"
0.00"
✔
Line communicates to end run
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
6.PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Sump # Sump # Sump #Sump #
Sump Diameter:
Sump Depth:
Sump Material:
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to testing:
Portion of Sump Tested1
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-safe
shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting
test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI):
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
See Incon Results
4 4
✔
✔
Incon Sump Tester .002"
DSL
36"
47"
Fiberglass
12"
4"
Clean
Piping Penetration
✔
NA
✔
✔
5 min
✔
✔
✔
No repairs needed at this time.