HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 RESULTSSWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate
pages ofthisform to report results for all components tested. The completedfarm, written test procedures, andprintoutsfrom tests (if
applicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
FacilityName: 7- ELEVEN # 16329, MKT 2368 jDate ofTesting: 5/21/2015
Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Facility Contact: Preet Phone: 661 -549 -1711
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 5/12/2015
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Shane Gardner
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC.
Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo
Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor r- SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: A -UT ILicense Number: 743160 - 8199847
Manufacturer Training
Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires
volt /secondary contaiment Sump tester 4/7/2016
3- SUMMARY OF TF,ST RF.SIILTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
Tank Annular# I X STP Containment for Tank T1 RUL SIPHON rul
2 -1 X
Tank Annular# 2 X UDC # 1/2 X
Tank Annular# 3 X UDC # 3/4 X
Secondary Pipe Test (Tank T2 RUL MAIN - rul) X UDC # 1/2 X
Secondary Pipe Test (Tank T2 RUL MAIN - rul) X UDC # 3/4 X
STP Containment for Tank T3 PUL pul - 1 X
STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 1 X
STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 2 X
STP Containment for Tank T1 RUL SIPHON rul
2 -1 X
STP Containment for Tank T3 PUL pul - 1 X
STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 1 X
STP Containment for Tank T2 RUL MAIN rul - 2 X
Ifhydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Replaced 87 Main secondary Product line, re -test pass. H2O removed from site by Nieto and Sons.All test pass.
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: %" Date: 5/21/2015
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: r Tank Manufacturer i* Industry Standard r Professional Engineer
r Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: r Pressure r+ Vacuum r Hydrostatic
r Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Vacuum Equipment Resolution: O loss
Tank# 1 RUL 2 Tank# 2 RUL Tank# 3 PUL" Tank#
Is TankExempt From Testing?' r Yes t* No r Yes r+ No r Yes ro No r Yes r No
Tank Capacity: 9600 9600 9600
Tank Material: Steel Steel Steel
Tank Manufacturer: unknown unknown unknown
Product Stored: RUL 2 RUL PUL
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and starting
test:
15 min 15 min 15 min min
Test Start Time: 10:00:00 10:00:00 10:00:00
Initial Reading (RI): 10.00000 in. HG 10.00000 in. HG 10.00000 in. HG
Test End Time: 11:00:00 11:00:00 11:00:00
Final Reading (RF): 10.00000 in. HG 10.00000 in. HG 10.00000 in. HG
Test Duration: 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr
Change in Reading (RF -RI) : 0.00000 in. HG 0.00000 in. HG 0.00000 in. HG
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Test Result: Pass' Pass Pass
Was sensor removed for testing? r+ Yes r Nor NA 4+ Yes r No r NA i* Yes r Nor NA r Yes r Nor NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
r` Yes r Nor NA t+ Yes r No r NA i+ Yes r Nor NA r Yes r Nor NA
Comments ? (include information on repairs madeprior to testing, andrecommended ollow -u or ailed tests
All annular pass.
I Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as
systems that arehydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard r Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: F47 Pressure r' Vacuum r Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: gauge 1 -15psi Equipment Resolution: 0 loss
Tank T2 RUL MAIN- Tank T2 RUL MAIN -
RUL) STP RUL) STP
Containment 1 to STP
Containment 2
Containment 1 to STP
Containment 2PipingMaterial:
Piping Manufacturer: frg frg
Piping Diameter: frg frg in in
Length of Piping Run: 2.5 in. 2.5 in. ft
Product Stored: 100 ft. 100 ft.
Method and location of RUL RUL
boot bootpiping-run isolation:
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and min min
starting test: 15 min 15 min
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI): 09:30:00 10:45:00
Test End Time: 5.00000 PSI 5.00000 PSI
Final Reading (RF): 10:30:00 10:45:00
Test Duration: 0.00000 PSI 5.00000 PSI
Change in Reading (RF -RI): 1 hr 1 hr
Pass/Fail Threshold or 5.00000 PSI 0.00000 PSI
0.00000 0.00000Criteria:
Test. Result:
Fail Pass
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
87 Syphon and 91 product line are single wall pipe. Replaced 87 main secondary product line due to damaged boot, re -test pass.
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of2
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: F Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard F Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure F Vacuum P Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
STP Containment for Tank
T3 PUL PUL - 1
STP Containment for Tank
T2 RUL MAIN RUL - 1
STP Containment for Tank
T2 RUL MAIN RUL - 2
STP Containment for Tank
TI RUL SIPHON RUL 2 -1
Sump Diameter/Dimensions: 46 in. 46 in. 46 in. 46 in.
Sump Depth: 37.00 in. 37.00 in. 37.00 in. 37.00 in.
Sump Material: Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration: 800 8.00 8.00 8.00
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Condition of sump prior to testing: good good good good
Portion ofSump Tested' T ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING TABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Z ABOVE HIGHESTPIPING T ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?*
r Yes r Nor` NA r Yes r Nor. NA r Yes " No C: NA r Yes r Nor NA
Turbine shutdown response time 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec
Is system programmed for fail -safe
shutdown ?*
r Yes r No t- NA r Yes r No % NA r Yes r Nor. NA r Yes r Nor. NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
r Yes r Nor* NA r Yes r No Go NA r Yes r Nor- NA r Yes r No t* NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test
15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Test Start Time: 09:11:00 09:11:00 09:11:00 09:11:00
Initial Reading (RI): 0.20830 in. H2O 0.67200 in. H2O 0.57250 in. H2O 0.26380 in. H2O
Test End Time: 09:26:00 09:26:00 09:26:00 09:26:00
Final Reading (RF): 0.20950 in. H2O 0.67150 in. H2O 0.57220 in. H2O 0.26380 in. H2O
Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Change in Reading (RF -RI) : 0.00120 in. H2O 0.00050 in. H2O 0.00030 in. H2O 0.00000 in. H2O
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00200 0.00200 0.00200 0.00200
TestResul . Pass Pass Pass Pass,.
Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes r Nor NA ro Yes r Nor NA d' Yes r Nor NA r+ Yes r Nor NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
r. Yes r Nor NA is Yes r No r NA t"+ Yes r Nor NA 0 Yes r No r NA
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
i Ifthe entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. Ifthe answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ",
the entire sump must be tested.
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2002
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Page 2 of 2
Test Method Developed By: F Tank Manufacturer FF Industry Standard Professional Engineer
F. Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
STP Containment for STP Containment for STP Containment for STP Containment for
Tank T3 PUL PUL -1 Tank T2 RUL MAIN Tank T2 RUL MAIN Tank TI RUL SIPHON
RUL -1 RUL -2 RUL2 -1
Sump Diameter/Dimensions: 46 in. 46 in. 46 in. 46 in.
Sump Depth: 37.00 in. 37.00 in. 37.00 in. 37.00 in.
Sump Material: Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene
Height from Tank Top to Top of 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00HighestPipingPenetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Condition of sump prior to testing: good good good good
Portion of Sump Tested' 2 inch above T above 2' above 2' above highest piping
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both r Yes r No d* NA r Yes r No d* NA r Yes r No dw NA r Yes r No 1 NA
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec
Is system programmed for fail -safe r yes r No d NA r Yes r No d': NA r Yes r No d* NA d"? Yes r Nor. NA
shutdown ?*
Was fail -safe verified to be r yes r No r* NA r Yes d"` Nod* NA r Yes r Nod NA r Yes d"' Nor* NA
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and starting 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
test
Test Start Time: 09:28:00 09:28:00 09:28:00 09:28:00
Initial Reading (RI): 0.20960 in. H2O 0.67150 in. H2O 0.57220 in. H2O 0.26380 in. H2O
Test End Time: 09:43:00 09:43:00 09:43:00 09:43:00
Final Reading (RF): 0.20970 in. H2O 0.67130 in. H2O 0.57210 in. H2O 0.26380 in. H2O
Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Change in Reading (RF -RI) : 0.00010 in. H2O 0.00020 in. H2O 0.00010 in. H2O 0.00000 in. H2O
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00200 0.00200 0.00200 0.00200
Test R6sWt: Pass Pass Pass Pass .
Was sensor removed for testing? d+ Yes r No d"' NA lt' Yes r Nor NA d+ Yes r Nor NA dt Yes r No r NA
Was sensor properly replaced and r; yes r No d"` NA Yes r Nod"" NA d* Yes d"' No r NA Yes ` No d" NAverifiedfunctionalaftertestin ?
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
1 Ifthe entire depth ofthe sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any ofthe questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested.
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
7. UNDER - DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify
Test Method Used By: 17 Pressure r7 Vacuum P7 Hydrostatic
Other (Specify
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
UDC #1/2 UDC #3/4 UDC #1/2 UDC #3/4
UDC Manufacturer: Polly Polly Polly Polly
UDC Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
UDC Depth: 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
ofHighest Piping Penetration: 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration: 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
good good good good
Portion of UDC Tested' X ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING T ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Z ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING T ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
r Yes fNo i* NA r Yes r Nor* NA r Yes r No d* NA r Yes r Nor NA
Turbine shutdown response time 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec 00:00:00 sec
Is system programmed for fail -
safe shutdown ?*
r Yes r No C+ NA r Yes r No G NA r Yes r Nor- NA r Yes r Nor* NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
r Yes r Nor NA r Yes r No C NA r Yes r Nor NA r Yes r Nor* NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test
15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Test Start Time: 10:34:00 10:39:00 10:58:00 10:58:00
Initial Reading (Rj): 0.06210 in. H2O 0.28980 in. H2O 0.06100 in. H2O 0.28890 in. H2O
Test End Time: 10:49:00 10:49:00 11:13:00 11:13:00
Final Reading (RF): 0.06100 in. H2O 0.28900 in. H2O 0.06100 in. H2O 0.28880 in. H2O
Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Change in Reading (RF -RI) : 0.00110 in. H2O 0.00080 in. H2O 0.00000 in. H2O 0.00010 in. H2O
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0,00200 0.00200 0.00200 0.00200
Test Result: Pass Pass Pass Pass
Was sensor removed for testing? 1 * Yes r Nor NA 0 Yes r Nor NA ro Yes r Nor NA fo Yes r Nor NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
Yes r Nor NA ro Yes r Nor NA C* Yes r Nor NA r Yes r Nor NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
1 Ifthe entire depth ofthe UDC is nottested, specify how much was tested. Ifthe answer to any ofthe questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested.
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2006
Spill Bucket Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing annual testing of USTspill containment structures. The completedform and
printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
CompanyName: TANKNOLOGY INC.
Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo
Credentialsi: CSLB Contractor We, ICC Service Tech. SWRCB Tank Tester Other (Specify)
License Number(s):743160- 8199847
3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION
Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic 17 Vacuum Other
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank
Number, Stored Product, etc.)
Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL
MAIN RUL - Vapor 1-
Direct - Grade level
Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL
MAIN RUL - Fill 1 - Direct -
Grade level
Spill Box #Tank T1 RUL
SIPHON RUL 2 - Vapor 1-
Direct - Grade level
Spill Box #Tank TI RUL
SIPHON RUL 2 - Fill 1-
Direct - Grade level
Bucket Installation Type: Direct Bury
r+ Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
l* Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
r Contained in Sump
Direct Bury
r* Contained in Sump
Bucket Diameter: 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Bucket Depth: 14.00 13.50 14.00 13.50
Wait time between applying
vacuum /water and start of test 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Test Start Time (TI): 09:50:00 09:50:00 09:50:00 09:50:00
Initial Reading (RI): 0.5231 in. H2O 0.7964 in. H2O 0.0075 in. H2O 0.7318 in. H2O
Test End Time(TF): 10:05:00 10:05:00 10:05:00 10:05:00
Final Reading (RF): 0.5232 in. H2O 0.7961 in. H2O 0.0077 in. H2O 0.7315 in. H2O
Test Duration(TF —TI): 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Change in Reading (RF —RI) : 0.00 in:. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Test.Resi lt: Pass Pass Pass Pass
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements.
Technician's Signature: Date: 5/21/2015
1 State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent.
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2006
Spill Bucket Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing annual testing of USTspill containment structures. The completedform and
printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: 7- ELEVEN # 16329, MKT 2368 Date ofTesting: 5/21/2015
Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Facility Contact: Preet Phone: 661 -549 -1711
Date Local Agency Was Notified ofTesting: 5/12/2015
Name ofLocal Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Shane Gardner(Bakersfield fire)
Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic r' Vacuum Other
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank
Number, Stored Product, etc.)
Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL
MAIN RUL - Vapor 1-
Direct - Grade level
Spill Box #Tank T2 RUL
MAIN RUL - Fill 1 - Direct -
Grade level
Spill Box #Tank T1 RUL
SIPHON RUL 2 - Vapor 1-
Direct - Grade level
Spill Box #Tank TI RUL
SIPHON RUL 2 - Fill 1-
Direct - Grade level
Bucket Installation Type: Direct Bury
Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
0 Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
t* Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
t* Contained in Sump
Bucket Diameter: 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Bucket Depth: 14.00 13.50 14.00 13.50
Wait time between applying
vacuum /water and start oftest 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Test Start Time (TI): 10:10:00 10:10:00 10:10:00 10:10:00
Initial Reading (RI): 0.5232 in. H2O 0.7961 in. H2O 0.0077 in. H2O 0.7315 in. H2O
Test End Time(TF): 10:25:00 10:25:00 10:25:00 10:25:00
Final Reading (RF): 0.5234 in. H2O 0.7951 in. H2O 0.0079 in. H2O 0.7315 in. H2O
Test Duration(TF —Tl): 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Change in Reading (RF —RI) : 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Test Result! Pass Pass Pass Pass
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and infull compliance with legal requirements.
Technician's Signature: Date: 5/21/2015
State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent.
WO: 3424792
SWRCB, January 2006
Spill Bucket Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completedform and
printouts from tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: 7- ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368 Date of Testing: 5/21/2015
Facility Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307
Facility Contact: Preet Phone: 661- 549 -1711
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 5/12/2015
Name ofLocal Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Shane Gardner(Bakersfield fire)
Test Method Used By: Hydrostatic Vacuum Other
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank
Number, Stored Product, etc.)
Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL
PUL - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade
level
Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL
PUL - Vapor 1 - Direct -
Grade level
Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL
PUL - Fill 1 - Direct - Grade
level
Spill Box #Tank T3 PUL
PUL - Vapor 1 - Direct -
Grade level
Bucket Installation Type:
d"" Direct Bury
ro Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
i* Contained in Sump
r Direct Bury
t* Contained in Sump
Direct Bury
co Contained in Sump
Bucket Diameter: 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Bucket Depth: 13.50 14.00 13.50 14.00
Wait time between applying
vacuum /water and start of test
15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Test Start Time (TI): 09:30:00 09:30:00 09:52:00 09:52:00
Initial Reading (RI): 0.7368 in. H2O 0.57 in. H2O 0.7361 in. H2O 0.5691 in. H2O
Test End Time(TF): 09:45:00 09:45:00 10:07:00 10:07:00
Final Reading (RF): 0.7361 in. H2O 0.5691 in. H2O 0.7362 in. H2O 0.5691 in. H2O
Test Duration(TF —TI): 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min
Change in Reading (RF —RI) : 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O 0.00 in. H2O
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Test Results Pass Pass Pass Pass
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THISTESTING
I hereby certify that allthe information contained in this report is true, accurate, and infull compliance with legal requirements.
Technician's Signature: Date: 5/21/2015
1State laws and regulations do not currently require testing to be performed by a qualified contractor. However, local requirements may be more stringent.
WO: 3424792
7- Eleven Test Water Log
Work Order: 3424792 Date: 5/21/2015
Site Name /ID: 7- ELEVEN #16329, MKT 2368
Address: 1701 PACHECO ROAD
City: BAKERSFIELD State: CA Zip: 93307
Work Performed: Disp Sump, Line Interstitials, SB's, STP Sump, Tank
Interstitials
Yes
Was Test Water left on site? Test Fluid Transported Off Site by Tanknology
FF Transported off Site by Other Company
r— No Water used
If Yes describe how much water and how contained?
If Yes who and when did you contactfrom site to report the water?
If Transported OffSite by Tanknology how much was hauled?
If Transported OffSite by Other Company what company and how much water ?H20 pump out by
Nieto and sons and its about 500 -700 gallons.
Technician Signature:
WO: 3424792
Date: 5/21/2015