The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 2016TAIT A 9 217�1 -5 RMNa'ro THI� c9ALIAN6E p:T1 4!56018222 VV W W. 0': C0 Mi. September 8, 2016 V/A FED EX. 77718090 9046 Bakersfield Fire Department 2101 H Street Bakersfield CA 93301 Re: Secondary Containment Testing Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California 3221 S. H STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA GEOPAR: SA098 To Whom it May Concern: Enclosed are the results for the following tests completed on August 31, 2016: ■ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Carlos E. Cardenas Program Manager CA llc# 588098 AZ lic# 095984 j NV 11,,# 0049666 TX !:<-# 'R000004 I SWRCB, January 2002 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (f applicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facili ID: SA098 Client Name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co dba ATT California Date of Testing: 8/31/2016 Facility Address: 3221 S. H St. City: Bakersfield State: CA Zip Code: 93304 Facility Contact: Grant Armstrong Phone: (661) 327 -6903 ❑ Initial ❑ Repair Test Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 8/12/2016 ❑ 6 Month FX-1 Other Name of Local Agency Inspector (f present during testing): No One Present FRI Triennial 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TAIT Environmental Services Pass Technician Conducting Test: Adolfo Aguilar Not Tested Repairs Made Credentials: ❑X CSLB Licensed Contractor ❑ SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester ❑X ICC UST Service Technician License Type: A B ASB C -10 HAZ License Number: 588098 SA098UO01 Annular Space Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s) Date Training Expires ICC Technician 5238610 6/9/2018 Franklin Fueling / Incon Unit 1007483708 7/13/2018 SA0980001 Supply Sec. Line ❑ ❑X ❑ ❑ SA0980001 Supply Sec. Line 3_ STTMMARV OF TF,ST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made SA098UO01 Annular Space ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SA0980001 Supply Sec. Line ❑ ❑X ❑ ❑ SA0980001 Supply Sec. Line 0 ❑ ❑ ❑X SA0980001 Return Sec. Line ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SA0980001 Return Sec. Line ❑❑ ❑ ❑ SA0980001 Vent Sec. Line ❑ ❑❑ ❑ SA0980001 Vent Sec. Line ❑X ❑ ❑ ❑X SA0980001 Piping Sump ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SA0980001 Fill Sump ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Took Non -Haz. Test Water To TAIT Shop. For any equipment capable of generating a print out of test results, you must attach a copy of the test report to this certification. EX-1 System printout attached. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: 14400 14Gpd= Date: 8/31/2016 SWRCB, January 2002 Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Re- Installed Sensor To Lowest Point But Not Tested. ' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)1 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer 21 Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other (Spec) Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" Dial Gauge Equipment Resolution: .2" SA098U001 Annular Is Tank Exempt From Testing ? ❑Yes ONo ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Yes F-1 No ❑ Yes ❑ No Tank Capacity: 6,016 Gallons Tank Material: Steel Clad Tank Manufacturer: Modern Welding Product Stored: Diesel Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and 15 Minutes starting test: Test Start Time: 9:30 AM Initial Reading (RI): - 10.0" HG Test End Time: 10:30 AM Final Reading (RF): 10.0" HG Test Duration: 1 Hour Change in Reading (RF -RI): 0.0" HG Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.0" HG Test Result: ❑X Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ''❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Was sensor removed for testing? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA F-1 Yes F-1 No El NA 1:1 Yes 0 N El NA El Yes ❑No ❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑Yes 0No DNA ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA verified functional after testing? Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Re- Installed Sensor To Lowest Point But Not Tested. ' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)1 SWRCB, January 2002 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: ❑ Piping Manufacturer FX-1 Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other (Specify) Test Method Used: FX--1 Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic ❑ Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" Dial Pressure Equipment Resolution:.1" EMEM SA0980001 Vent Sec. SA0980001 Vent Sec. Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: A.O. Smith A.O. Smith Piping Diameter: 3" 3" Length of Piping Run: 35' 35' Product Stored: Diesel Diesel Method and location of Test Boot / Piping Sump Test Boot / Piping Sump piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and Visual Failure 15 Minutes starting test: Test Start Time: 11:20 AM Initial Reading (R,): 5 PSI Test End Time: 12:20 PM Final Reading (RF): 5 PSI Test Duration: 1 Hour Change in Reading (RF -RI): 0.0 PSI Pass/Fail Threshold or 0.0 PSI 0.0 PSI Criteria: Test Result: ❑ Pass 0 Fail -. E Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass El Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Replaced Vent Sec. Line Test Boot In Piping Sump, After Repairs Tested & Passed. SWRCB, January 2002 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other (Spec) Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic ❑ Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: .0006" SA0980001 Piping Sump Diameter: 48" Sump Depth: 51" Sump Material: Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 2211 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 15" Condition of sump prior to testing: Poor Portion of Sump Tested' Visual Failure Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water) ?* 0Yes [--]No LENA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Turbine shutdown response time N/A Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?* ❑Yes ❑No QNA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational ?* ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA Dyes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No DNA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: Visual Failure Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF -R,): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: ❑ Pass 0 Fail F-1 Pass ❑ Fail ❑Pass " ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail Was sensor removed for testing? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Visual Failure: Piping Sump Penetration Termination Boots (Sump Cuff Boots) Are Torn On Vent and Supply /Return, Repairs Needed. ' If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to anX of the questions indicated with an asterisk (") is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) SWRCB, January 2002 S. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other (Specify) Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic ❑ Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: .0006" SA0980001 Fill Sump Diameter: _ 48" Sump Depth: 50" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: N/A Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 12" Condition of sump prior to testing: Good Portion of Sump Tested 2" Above Highest Pentr Sump Material: Fiberglass Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 15 Minutes Test Start Time: 9:18 AM 9:33 AM Initial Reading (RI): 3.5636" 3.5635" Test End Time: 9:33 AM 9:48 AM Final Reading (RF): 3.5634" 3.5635" Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. Change in Reading (RF -RI): .0002" .0000" Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .002" .002" Test Result: El Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass: ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? [Z]Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No NA ❑ Yes ❑ ❑No ❑NA Was sensor removed for testing? ❑ Yes [—]No ❑NA ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ �'es ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA Dyes ❑No ❑NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Re- Installed Sensor To Lowest Point But Not Tested. AT -T SA098 3221 S. H ST, BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL 0'3! /31/ 2016 9: 33 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT FILL TEST STARTED 9 :18 AM TEST STARTED 08/31/2016 BEGIN LEVEL 3,5636 IN END TIME 9 :33 AM END DATE 08/31/2016 END LEVEL 3.5634 IN LEAK: 'THRESHOLD 0, 002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED AT -T SA098 3221 S. H ST, BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL 08/31/2016 9 :48 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT FILL TEST STARTED 9 :33 AM TEST STARTED 08 /31/2016 EEGIN LEVEL 3,5635 IN END TIME 9 :48 AM END DATE 08 /31/2016 END LEVEL 3.5635 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED AT &T, SA098 3221 S. H Street, Bakersfield, CA 8/31/2016 Page 1 of 1