Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUSINESS PLAN 6/30/2014TRITON CONSTRUCTION 2560 Soquel Avenue, Suite 202 Santa Cruz, California 95062 TEL: 831 .475.8141 FAX: 831.475.8249 July 30, 2014 City of Bakersfield Fire Prevention Attn: Shane Gardner 2101 H Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Corner Store 3074 3225 Buck Owcns .Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 Dear Inspector: Enclosed are the test results for the above listed sites. Please contact us at (831) 475- 8141 ext. 205 should you have any questions or concerns regarding the enclosed documents. Sine , Mary-Roc-he Administrative Dept. CC: Sandy Huff, CST CA Stations, Inc. UNIFIED PROGRAM CONSOLIDATED FORM TANKS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS - INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (one page per tank) Page _ of I. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION BUSINESS NAME (Saine as FACILITY NAME or DBA — Doing Business As) 3 ADDRESS (For local use only) 476 FACILITY ID# 1 TANK ID # 477 II. INSTALLATION (Check all that apply) 478 ❑ The installer has been trained and certified by the tank and piping manufacturers. ❑ The installation has been inspected and certified by a registered professional engineer having education and experience 479 with underground storage tank installations. 480 ❑ The installation has been inspected and approved by the Unified Program Agency. 481 ❑ All work listed on the manufacturer's installation checklist has been completed. 482 ❑ The installer has been certified or licensed by the Contractors' State License Board. ❑ The underground storage tank, any primary piping, and secondary containment was installed according to applicable 483 voluntary consensus standards and written manufacturer's installation procedures. Description of work being certified: III. TANK OWNER/AGENT SIGNATURE I certify that the information provided herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF TANK OWNER/AGENT DATE 484 NAME OF TANK OWNER/AGENT (print) 485 TITLE OF TANK OWNER/AGENT 486 UPCF (1/99 revised) 14 Formerly SWRCB Form C 2560 Soquel Avenue Ste 202 Santa Cruz CA 95062 ` ` A T: 831.475.8141, ' 1 F: 831.475.8249 CA Lic# 693 807 A -HAZ B -HIC CONSTR CTION! Secondary Containment Testing Report Form 1 Fariiity Ynfnrm�tinn Facility Name: Corner Store 3074 Date of Testing: 05/29/2014 Facility Address: 3225 Buck Owens Blvd, Bakersfield, CA 93308 Testing completed 7/18/2014 Facility Contact: Phone: 661 - 324 -9481 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: — Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Shane Gardner ? Taetinty f'nntrat►tnr Tnfnrmntinn Company Name: Triton Construction 831 - 475 -8141 ext. 205 Technician Conducting Test: James Bohnet License Information: California Contractor's State License Board CSLB #693807 A HAZ B ASB Manufacturer Certifications L— Component ICC — Certification # 8205858 Expiration Date: 7/09/2015 INCON/ TS -STS Certification # 174953705 Expiration Date 8/15/2015 CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated i his document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: Date: 07/18/2014 Technician's Name: jamog _ a6hnet 3. Summary of Test Results Is this a retest of previously failed components? 0 YES L— Component P F �NT �RM I Component �— �— P NT RM] Annulars (All) - FZ ❑ ❑ El El 1-71 _ ❑ Secondaries (91 &DSL) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Piping Sumps (87 & 91) FE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ U DCs (All) [] ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Fill Sumps (All) - -__ --- � ❑ ❑ - � - - - -- -_._ _ —_ - - - - - -- – --- - - - -.- - ____— ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - - -- Spill Boxes (All) ❑ ❑ ❑ — – ❑ ❑ ❑_ Secondary (87) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Piping Sump (DSL) ❑ ❑ FX ,E71 El—. 1:1 - ❑ - CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated i his document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: Date: 07/18/2014 Technician's Name: jamog _ a6hnet 4. Tank Annular Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure Test Equipment Used: Vacuum Gauges/Pump N vacuum ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Hvdrostatic Equipment Resolution: Comments: Tank annulars passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014. Tank # 87 Tank # 91 Tank# DSL --Tank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes No 0 Yes No 0 Yes (0 No Tank Capacity: 16,000 gal. 10,000 gal. 20,000 gal. Tank Material: Composite Composite Composite Tank Manufacturer: Trusco, Trusco Trusco, Product Stored: UL 87 Gas UL 91 Gas Diesel Wait time: 16 min 16 min 15 min Test Start Time: 8:40 8:10 12:16 Initial Reading (inHG) 10 in. 10 in. 10 in. Test End Time: 9:40 9:10 13:16 Final Reading (inHG) : 10 in. 10 in. 10 in. Test Duration (hh:mm) 1 hour 1 hour 1 hour Change in Reading (inHG) : 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 0 0 Test Result C. d. Pass Q Fail Pass .0 F il Fail Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA *Yes ONo ONA Q Yes 0 No 0 NA #Yes 0 No 0 NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No * NA Comments: Tank annulars passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014. 5. Secondary Pipe Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer Test Method Used: N Pressure Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen /Gauges 0 Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hvdrostatic Equipment Resolution: Comments: Testing for piping- runs; 91, DSL to Filters, Filters to Trans Sump & Trans Sump to Diesel UDCS passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014 Piping run 87 was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/14. Piping Run # 87 Piping Run # 91 Piping Run # DSL to Filters piping Run # Filters to Trans Sump Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Smith Smith Piping Diameter: 311/23$ 301/211 311/271 311/213 Length of Piping RunA 65' 80' 100" 5' Product Stored: UL 87, Gas UL 91, Gas Diesel Diesel .. Method and location of piping -run isolation: Pressurized at Turbine Sump Pressurized at Turbine Sump Pressurized at Turbine Sump Pressurized at Trans Sump Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time 12:23 8:20 11:40 12:15 Initial Reading (psi): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI Test End Time: 13:23 9:20 12:40 13:15 Final Reading (psi): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI Test Duration (hh:mm) : 1 hour 1 hour 1 hour 1 hour Change in Reading (psi): 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 0 0 'I'st Reswt Pass; O Fail O pass O Fail . O Pass:, O Earl Pass O Earl .' Comments: Testing for piping- runs; 91, DSL to Filters, Filters to Trans Sump & Trans Sump to Diesel UDCS passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014 Piping run 87 was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/14. 5. Secondary Pipe Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer FX-1 Industry Standard Test Method Used: 0 Pressure Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen /Gauges El vacuum ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Hvdrostatic Equipment Resolution: Comments: Testing for piping- runs; 91, DSL to Filters, Filters to Trans Sump & Trans Sump to Diesel UDCS passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014 Piping run 87 was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/14. Piping Run # Trans Sump to DSL UDCs Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Material: Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: Smith Piping Diameter: 4"131' Length of Piping RunA 9 p 9 80, Product Stored: Diesel Method and location of piping -run isolation: Pressurized at Trans Sump Pressurized at Turbine Sump Pressurized at Turbine Sump Pressurized at Turbine Sump Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time 14:45 Initial Reading (psi): 5 PSI Test End Time: 15:45 Final Reading (psi): 5 PSI Test Duration (hh:mm) : 1 hour Change in Reading (psi): 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 0 0 TestResult O` Pass O Fa.l. Pass .`O Fai'I © Ras O t=ail O Pass O Fail Comments: Testing for piping- runs; 91, DSL to Filters, Filters to Trans Sump & Trans Sump to Diesel UDCS passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014 Piping run 87 was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/14. 6. Piping Sump Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Leak Detector Industry Standard ❑ Professional Enqineer ❑ Vacuum RX Hvdrostatic Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 Comments: Product 87, 91 and Transition Sumps passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/14. Diesel sump was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/2014. Sump # 87 Sump # 91 Sump # DSL Sump # Transition Sump Sump Diameter: 42" 42" 48" 42" Sump Depth: 40" 42" 50" 26" Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass eight from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 18„ 16" 14" 9" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 25 19" 18 == = 12 == Condition of sump prior to testing: ok ok Ok Ok Portion of Sump Tested 21" 19" 18" 12" Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both ._product and water)? O Yes O No NA O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A NIA N/A Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?' O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational ?' O Yes ONO O NA O Yes ONO *NA O Yes ONO O NA O Yes O No 0 NA Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min st Start Time: 10:16 9:00 2:18 13:43 Initial Reading: 1.1337 2.5926 1.2451 1.7379 Test End Time 10:31 9:15 2:33 13:58 Final Reading: 1.1338 2.5921 1.2447 1.7383 Test Duration (hh:mm) : 00:15 00:15 00:15 00:15 Change in Reading: 0.0001 - 0.0005 - 0.0004 0.0004 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 4 l Test Result 0`Pass' O Fail 0 Pass 'O Farl O:Pass Fail Pass O>=ail Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes ONO O NA Yes O No O NA 0 Yes ONO O NA 0 Yes O No O NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA O Yes O No 0 NA Comments: Product 87, 91 and Transition Sumps passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/14. Diesel sump was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/2014. 6. Piping Sump Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer ❑X Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ vacuum R Hvdrostatic Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Leak Detector Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 Comments: Comments: Product 87, 91 and Transition Sumps passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/14. Diesel sump was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/2014. Per inspector requirements, the retest of Diesel was duplicated on 7/18/2014 with a passing result as indicated above. Sump # DSL Sump # Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: 48" Sump Depth: 50" Sump Material: Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 14" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 18" Condition of sump prior to testing: ok ok Ok Ok Portion of Sump Tested 18" Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA Turbine shutdown response time N/A NIA NIA N/A Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?' 0 Yes 0 No 0. NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0. Yes 0 No 0 NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational ? ' 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min st Start Time: 2:33 Initial Reading: 1.2448 Test End Time 2:48 Final Reading: 1.2447 Test Duration (hh:mm) : 00:15 00:15 00:15 00:00 Change in Reading: - 0.0001 0.0000 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 Test Result D Passi 0 Fail OD Bass O Earl DO Pass;: 0 Fail0 Pass {�, Fail Was sensor removed for testing? *Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA Comments: Comments: Product 87, 91 and Transition Sumps passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/14. Diesel sump was repaired and retested with a passing result on 7/18/2014. Per inspector requirements, the retest of Diesel was duplicated on 7/18/2014 with a passing result as indicated above. 7. UDC Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum 0 Hvdrostatic Test Equipment Used: {neon TS STS Leak Detector Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of.UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid? Turbine shutdown response time: Is system programmed for fail - safe shutdown? Was fail -safe verified to be operational? Wait time: Test Start Time: Initial Reading: Test End Time: Final Reading: Test Duration (hh:mm) : Change in Reading: Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: �t'est Etesult <s Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC # 1 -2 UDC # 3-4 UDC # 5 -6 UDC # 7 -8 Bravo Bravo Bravo Bravo Steel Steel Steel Steel V 931 V 991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OK OK OK OK 100% 100% 100% 100% O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No OO NA O Yes ONO O NA N/A N/A N/A N/A O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes ONO *NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No NA 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min 11:05 11:05 11:05 10:16 1.0578 2.1533 1.8897 1.8066 11:20 11:20 11:20 10:31 1.0573 2.1528 1.8894 1.8081 00:15 00:15 00:15 00:15 - 0.0005 - 0.0005 - 0.0003 0.0015 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 O Pass O Fa rl O Pass ( Fai {. :. OO 'Pass ;° O Fell :O Pass Q Fail O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No OO NA O Yes ONO O NA O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No OO NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No O NA Comments: UDCs passed during secondary containment testing on 512912014. 7. UDC Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer FX-1 Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum Q Hvdrostatic Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Leak Detector Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 Comments: UDCs passed during secondary containment testing on 512912014. UDC #9 UDC # 9 -10 UDC # 10 -11 UDC # 11 -12 UDC Manufacturer: Bravo Bravo Bravo Bravo UDC Material: Steel Steel Steel Steel UDC Depth: 9" 9" 9" 9" Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 0 0 0 0 Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 0 0 0 0 Condition of UDC prior to testing: OK _ OK OK OK Portion of UDC Tested 100% 100% 100% 100% Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid? Turbine shutdown response time: O Yes i 0 No N/A 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No © NA 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA N/A N/A N/A Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown? - 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No * NA 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational? 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No * NA 0 Yes 0 No NA Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time: 3:18 3:18 3:18 2:02 Initial Reading: 2.2768 1.9831 1.4368 1.2925 Test End Time: 3:33 3:33 3:33 2:17 Final Reading: 2.2771 1.9832 1.4362 1.2923 Test Duration (hh:mm) : 00:15 00:15 00:15 00:15 Change in Reading: 0.0003 0.0001 - 0.0006 - 0.0002 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 Test I7esult Pass O Fail O Pass O Fait O Pass O Fail *-Piss O Fail Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No (P NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? 0 Yes O No *NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No * NA Comments: UDCs passed during secondary containment testing on 512912014. 7. UDC Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer Q Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum Hydrostatic Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Leak Detector Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 Comments: UDCs passed during secondary containment testing on 512912014 UDC # 12 -13 UDC # 13 UDC # UDC # UDC Manufacturer: Bravo Bravo UDC Material: Steel Steel UDC Depth: 9" 9" Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 0 0 Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 0 0 Condition of UDC prior to testing: OK OK Portion of UDC Tested 100% 100% Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid? 0 Yes O No (0 NA O Yes O No # NA O Yes O No * NA O Yes O No 0 NA Turbine shutdown response time: N/A N/A NIA N/A Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown? O Yes O No * NA O Yes O No 0 NA 0 Yes O No * NA O Yes O No * NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational? O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No # NA O Yes O No O NA O Yes O No NA Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time: 2:02 2:28 Initial Reading: 1.0423 2.1800 Test End Time: 2:17 2:43 Final Reading: 1.0423 2.1802 Test Duration (hh:mm) : 00:15 00:15 00:00 00:00 Change in Reading: 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 Test Rest��tt :0 Pass O Fai'I: O Pass 0 Fail UO Pass 0 ', OO Pass O <ail Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA 0 Yes 0 No O NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? 0 Yes O No (0 NA 0 Yes 0 No (0 NA 0 Yes O No 0 NA O Yes 0 No O NA Comments: UDCs passed during secondary containment testing on 512912014 S. Fill Riser Containment Sump Testing Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Leak Detector xQ Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ vacuum FE Hvdrostatic Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 Comments:Fill risers passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014. Fill Sump # 87 Fill Sump # 91 Fill Sump # DSL Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: 42" 42" 48" Sump Depth 54" 5571 52" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 0 0 0 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 16" 18" 17" Condition of sump prior to testing: OK OK OK Portion of Sump Tested: 20" 21" 20" Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time: 9:49 9:00 12:27 Initial Reading: 1.3040 2.0081 4.4082 Test End Time 10:04 9:15 12:42 Final Reading: 1.3044 2.0079 4.4079 Test Duration (hh:mm) : 00:15 00:15 00:15 00:00 Change in Reading: 0.0004 - 0.0002 - 0.0003 0.0000 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: ±0.002 ±0.002 #0.002 ±0.002 Test Resutt.: O Pass; O fail OO Pass O Fail OO .Pass 0 Fail O Pass O:Fail: Is there a sensor in the sump? No Yes Yes Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? N/A N/A N/A Was sensor removed for testing? Q Yes 0 No 0 NA * Yes 0 No 0 NA *Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? 0 Yes 0 No * NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA Comments:Fill risers passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014. Test Method Developed By: Test Method Used: 9. Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes ❑ Tank Manufacturer ❑ Pressure Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Leak Detector x❑ Industry Standard ❑ Professional Enaineer ❑ vacuum x❑ Hvdrostatic Equipment Resolution: ±0.002 Comments: Spill buckets passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014. Spill Box # 87 Spill Box # 91 Spill Box # DSL Spill Box # Bucket Diameter: 13" 13" 13" Bucket Depth: 11" 11" 11" Wait time: 15 min 15 min 15 min Test Start Time: 8:32 8:32 12:27 Initial Reading: 5.8090 5.4658 5.2246 Test End Time: 8:47 8:47 12:42 Final Reading: 5.8084 5.4647 5.2242 Test Duration (hh:mm) : 00 :15 00:15 00:15 00:00 Change in Reading: - 0.0006 - 0.0011 - 0.0002 0.0000 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002 Test Result:. U:;`Pass O Fail. © Pass C� Fail O' Pass.. O .Fail O Pass Q rail Comments: Spill buckets passed during secondary containment testing on 5/29/2014. "o c < -q m txl co < a -q Xhl -:z p o r- o --3 — z m D r-o R r, r, — tri 2> c < D — x r1k.) i rd Ln 0, M c z r < ct- m < C-_ r"l t", rd M z -A CL) " ED td C. 22> In < i o a I. P26 rm_ m C) 23> m z cz 7. 0 ul m of 3> rvf if cri �A o z, - moo L71 -113 0 NJ -113 CAD W 0 —"M--zm cr". 4L 4�1, -Pl. M lo 0 123 -12, -110 _Q TQ m Im X> z MMZLm— OOC)--ZMCzM "o cr', 0 .0 I'D all M Ul ro M 0 NO — I--OOU1m--Z—jx 0 wm--zoo �o ZL CAD td '0-0C)00 z D z I> 3> D. Z> 0 C— 0 — 0 0 0 0 r r� r" Z 3ZT22> 3 z 3> z 1-> X1 0 0 r 0 r"q I- r14 r oco < 15 "I )r M ED rD m m m w --i r m M m m n C /3 cn 3> M cf) C/) :3> ND --q P< C= 00 r\D M Ul M --- 4 M 3> cl) co") m = - --4 =c r- --j ---I m N) C> 0) ;v 0) cn M 3> Cn ;,o rrl M m M 3> 3> m r- Cz ;:a :;a 3> ;X-- -n = r- -4 C--) M -q = r- m M C/3 --4 c", m ;:a IND r- C=) r- 1:6 :�-- CA) cn r- C/3 co m m C:;p J=, 3> =: -,J j --j m 00 C/) CiD ro .p 00 MM Oo - "..- _0 M L$3 loo w r- . b ,� CL71 -A 3> C> S. cn N- -J La N) 00 A-- C> 00 C:) m C> --.j r— m m m m --j m m m m C> COO EM LO cn 3> K= r--) m m cl�l 3> ND ---4 M 3> cn cn --I --A Oo r- rQ ;31- rQ m Ul cn ;;o m = -C --4 r- W ;;a M M M M 3> 3> m 3> cr) C/3 C33 3> --A -n = = m r �c ;;a ;v ---I ---I r- too m r- m M --q cn ;I_- 0-4 C-13 m m ;X,- :;a q = cm CD CD I m r- C) C) C:) C> cn C/3 -- C) LA.) m m -1- 00 cn X=b -A M.) -0 C::, J.2. 00 2:.,x 00 m -V C-0 CA) M CA) r 3> C5, im. --� ZZ, C/) r%o -,j r-O Oo Oo rQ W Oo 4c> <-- 00 CD Z Z J3 3 =