The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUST REP. 11/7/2014November 10, 2014 Shane Gardner / Ernie Medina BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 SB989 POST REPAIR SECONDARY COMPLIANCE TEST SUBJECT: SB 989 POST REPAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING AT CHEVRON FUELING STATION — 6601 MING AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 — FACILITY NO. 201527 Below please find the post repair secondary containment testing results for the above - referenced site. These results are being sent to you per the requirement of SB 989. Repairs were made pursuant to Bakersfield Fire Permit 14- 10000419. Post repair compliance testing was held in the presence of Inspector Gardner on 10/31/14 and 11/7/2014 with passing results. Please see attached report for further details. CONTRACTOR: License No: Technician: Sincerely, Wayne Perry, Inc. Nary young Mary Young Program Coordinator Wayne Perry, Inc. 300345 Leonard Alan Evans — ICC #8221154 Attachments — Testing Results Cc: Andrea Vilchis — Chevron, Brea Chevron Site #201527 8281 Commonwealth Avenue Buena Park, California 90621 Phone (714) 826 -0352 Fax (714) 523 -9735 Page 1 of 3 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: CHEVRON #201527 Date of Testing: 10/31 & 11/07/14 Facility Address: 6601 MING AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 10/20/2014 Name of Local Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Shane Gardner 2_ TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Wayne Perry, Incorporated Technician Conducting Test: Leonard Alan Evans — ICC #8221154 Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor ❑ SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: A, HAZ, C21, C109 B , C61, D40 I License Number: 300345 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires Furnished on request 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component •/�0� 87 Fill' UMP C�L7� C�OL7 C��7L7 C�00 CM 00 CM00 Cw00 CW00 If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: No drums were left on site CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: Date: -10/31 & 11/07/2014 Page 2 of 3 1. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other (Specify) Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: See attached testing procedures Equipment Resolution: Sump # 89 Sump # 89 Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: 48" 48" Sump Depth: 55" 55" Sump Material & Manufacturer: Fiberglass Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 15" 15" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 18" 18" Condition of sump prior to testing: Fair Fair Portion of Sum Tested' P Above highest penetration Above highest penetration Above highest penetration Above highest penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)? * El Yes El No ® NA ❑Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑Yes ❑ No ® NA El Yes ❑ No ® NA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?* El El ® NA ❑Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑Yes ❑ No ® NA El ❑ No ® NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational ?* ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑Yes ❑ No Z NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes Test Start Time: 11:OOam 11:19am Initial Reading (R,): 2.7920 2.7870 Test End Time: 11:15am 11:34am Final Reading (RF): 2.7927 2.7885 Test Duration: 15 in 15 min 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.00066 0.00152 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 +(n nr s.w5 -,v mg S'`*' y ;,1 iyi . ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ka+',� Z r. _'.as7 •.� 3Yw` �S ' � - a. 1. , " i s.�' 2 ZYes ❑ No ❑ NA }�, w ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor removed for testing? ®Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Repairs were made pursuant to Permit 14- 10000419 —Inspector Shane Gardner present 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to M of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) Page 3 of 3 R I U .T , RTCFR CONTAINMFNT SUMP TFSTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other (Sped) Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: See attached testing procedures Equipment Resolution: Fill Sump # 87 Fill Sump # 87 Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: 48" 48" Sump Depth: 55" 55" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 16" 16" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 16" 16" Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested Fair Above highest penetration Fair Above highest penetration Above highest penetration Above highest penetration Sump Material & Manufacturer: Fiberglass Fiberglass Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes Test Start Time: 8:24am 8:40am Initial Reading (RI): 0.3915 0.3923 Test End Time: 8:39am 8:55am Final Reading (RF): 0.3922 0.3925 Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF -RI): 0.00077 0.00025 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: �,. ' ti '*�Rr`'�'�`•° a✓19 (� QQ q� to ty W °f.�y '1J♦ tafro �.fd�4 zk�-�'& . �. � 4.., .ri5"}�.H' »oW�, ��i�yi'. ?f T Y4#uu ..W "*�, �6`w_ 0.002 �--{.��` { 2 ., y,wR t, '�*'' � " �� '% .[k�; 5 k! 5ss....... %�+n"`n .d�aiAU"',.c '�'w.` '2i*. ® Yes ❑ No 0.002 tts 'e 9 • p� °va;r ��,.'4 . G" Y.'. . Ve .fb'a ! _� rA- "�.'�F.�ieu` 0.002 } ® Yes ❑ No 0.002 a x ..... ..a`i �® Yes ❑ No ,� Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? Was sensor removed for testing? ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? ®yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ®Yes [—]No []NA ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -up for failed tests) Repairs were made pursuant to Permit 14- 10000419 —Inspector Shane Gardner present � c rri `fib`✓" �ti?s°`z£,"� "a�n°s $ r°`" g,.'£", ��" ��""ryu-rc�m�''.s^�&,'°*"�`'yrT' - wOakr 89 t I^ • ..a ` f . . ..... . . . IV, 57 Chevron Saving '6601 Minq Ave -� 140 z g't r � �s gg r.. • sr z � E je