HomeMy WebLinkAbout[Untitled]_1-6' V
r s EDMUND G. BROWN RJR.
GOVERNOR
CALIFORNIA MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ
�� ]' SECRETARY FOR
VV ater Boards
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board)
20 September 2016
SEP 2 2O6
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
pLANINING DEPARTM'EN'T
Navdeep Grewal
US Citylink Corporation
1601 S. Union Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93307
CASE,CLOSURE, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, FORMER PHOENIX &
SON GARAGE & STORAGE, 1601 SOUTH UNION AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN
COUNTY, RB.CASE 6TIS000859
This letter confirms the completion of a site investigation and. corrective action for the
underground . storage tank systems formerly at the .above- described location. Thank you for
your cooperation throughout this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding
to our inquiries concerning the former underground tanks are greatly appreciated.
Based on the information in the above- referenced file and with the provision that the information
provided was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site
investigation and corrective action.carried out at your underground storage tank(s) site is in
compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25296.10 of the Health
and Safety Code and, with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.3 of
the Health and Safety Code and that no further action related to the petroleum release(s) at the
site is required. This notice is issued pursuant to subdivision (g) of .Section 25296.10 of the
Health and Safety- Code.
Claims for reimbursement of corrective action costs submitted to the. Underground Storage Tank
Cleanup Fund more than 365 days after the date of this letter.or issuance or activation of the
Fund's Letter of Commitment, whichever occurs later, will not be reimbursed unless,one of the
following exceptions applies:
1. Claims are submitted pursuant to Section 25299.57, subdivision (k) (reopened UST
case); or
2. Submission within the timeframe was beyond the claimant's reasonable control, ongoing
work is required for closure that will result in the submission of claims beyond that time
period, or that under the circumstances of the, case, it would be unreasonable or
inequitable to impose the 365 -day time period.
KARL E. LONGLEY SCD, P.E., CHAIR I PAMELA C. CREEDON P.E., SCEE, EXECUTIVE OFFICER
1585 E Street, Fresno, CA 93706 1 www. waterboards ,ca.gov /centralvalley
P„jP RECYCLED PAPER