The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 RESULTS 2016SWRCB, January 2002 Page __1_ of __7_ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: American Gas Date of Testing: 12/07/16 Facility Address: 402 S. Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 91364 Facility Contact: Nick Nickakhtar Phone: (805) 479-8564 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : 12/05/16 @ 12:48pm via email Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Shane Gardner @ Bakersfield F.D. 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: CGRS, Inc. Technician Conducting Test: Richard Thomas Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: C61/D40/D64 803616 (CSLB Lic.) License Number: 803616 (CSLB Lic.) 06-1672 (SWRCB Lic.) Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires ICC CA UST SERVICE TECHNICIAN: #5254736 11/17/2018 ICC UST TANK TIGHTNESS TESTING: #5254736 03/08/2018 SCWRCB TANK TESTER LICENSE: #06-1672 06/30/2018 FRANKLIN FUELING INCON SUMP TESTER: #5012133701 02/02/2017 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made 87 Tank Annular UDC# 1-2 87 #1 Product Line UDC# 3-4 87 #2 Product Line 87 STP Sump 87 Fill Spill Bucket 87 VR Spill Bucket 91 Tank Annular 91 #1 Product Line 91 #2 Product Line 91 STP Sump 91 Fill Spill Bucket 91 VR Spill Bucket If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: TECHNICIAN CARRIES A 535 GALLON TANK FOR TESTING WATER CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date: 12/07/16 SWRCB, January 2002 Page __2_ of __7_ 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 15PSI-30” compound gauges Equipment Resolution: 0.002” Tank #87 Tank #91 Tank # Tank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Tank Capacity: 12,000 gal 8,000 gal Tank Material: Fiberglass/Steel Fiberglass/Steel Tank Manufacturer: Joor Joor Product Stored: 87 unleaded 91 Supreme Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 min. 19 min. Test Start Time: 2:30pm 3:30pm Initial Reading (RI): 2.0PSI 2.0PSI Test End Time: 3:30pm 4:30pm Final Reading (RF): 2.0PSI 2.0PSI Test Duration: 1hr 1hr Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0 PSI 0 PSI Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: NO LOSS NO LOSS NO LOSS NO LOSS Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1. 87 & 91 tank annulars would not equalize under vacuum performed pressure testing and passed. 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)} SWRCB, January 2002 Page __3_ of __7_ 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: 0 – 15 PSI GAUGES Equipment Resolution: 0.002” Piping Run #87 #1 Piping Run #87 #2 Piping Run #91 #1 Piping Run #91 #2 Piping Material: Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Piping Manufacturer: APT APT APT APT Piping Diameter: 2” 2” 2” 2” Length of Piping Run: 35’ 40’ 35’ 40’ Product Stored: 87 unleaded 87 unleaded 91 supreme 91 supreme Method and location of piping-run isolation: Test Boot @ STP Test Boot @ STP Test Boot @ STP Test Boot STP Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 min 10 min 10 min 10 min Test Start Time: 12:30pm 12:30pm 12:30pm 12:30pm Initial Reading (RI): 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI Test End Time: 1:30pm 1:30pm 1:30pm 1:30pm Final Reading (RF): 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI Test Duration: 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: NO LOSS NO LOSS NO LOSS NO LOSS Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1. 87 #1 & 91 #1 lines feed UDC #1-2 and 87 #2 & 91 #2 feed UDC #3-4. Communication confirmed at far ends of piping. SWRCB, January 2002 Page __4_ of __7_ 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON SUMP TESTER Equipment Resolution: 0.002” Sump #87 Sump #91 Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: 42” 42” Sump Depth: 61” 62” Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 12” 15” Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 28” 29” Condition of sump prior to testing: Dry Dry Portion of Sump Tested1 2”/Piping Penetrations 2”/ Piping Penetrations Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 min 10 min Test Start Time: 2:08pm 2:08pm Initial Reading (RI): 5.1353” 4.5408” Test End Time: 2:23pm 2:23pm Final Reading (RF): 5.1352” 4.5405” Test Duration: 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF-RI): -0.0001” -0.0003” Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002” Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page __5_ of __7_ 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON SUMP TESTER Equipment Resolution: 0.002” UDC #1-2 UDC #3-4 UDC # UDC # UDC Manufacturer: APT APT UDC Material: Polyethylene Polyethylene UDC Depth: 27” 27” Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 4” 4” Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 6” 6” Condition of UDC prior to testing: Dry Dry Portion of UDC Tested1 2”/ Penetrations 2”/Penetrations Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test 10 min 10 min Test Start Time: 2:39pm 2:08pm Initial Reading (RI): 3.9190” 4.5934” Test End Time: 2:54pm 2:23pm Final Reading (RF): 3.9178” 4.5922” Test Duration: 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF-RI): -0.0012” -0.0012” Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002”+/- 0.002”+/- 0.002” Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) SWRCB, January 2002 Page __6_ of __7_ 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: INCON SUMP TESTER Equipment Resolution: 0.002” Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002” +/- 0.002” Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 Page __7_ of __7_ 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: + or – 0.002” Spill Box #87 Fill Spill Box #87 VR Spill Box #91 Fill Spill Box #91 VR Bucket Diameter: 12” 12” 12” 12” Bucket Depth: 14” 14” 14” 14” Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 10 min 10 min 10 min 10 min Test Start Time: 3:19pm 3:19pm 2:39pm 2:39pm Initial Reading (RI): 4.9942” 6.0502” 6.5385” 7.3473” Test End Time: 3:34pm 3:34pm 2:54pm 2:54pm Final Reading (RF): 4.9941” 6.0494” 6.5381” 7.3475” Test Duration: 15 min 15 min 15 min 15 min Change in Reading (RF-RI): -0.0001” -0.0008” -0.0004” +0.0002” Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: + or – 0.002” + or – 0.002” + or – 0.002” + or – 0.002” Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)