The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB989 RESULTS 2016SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1.FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Date of Testing: Facility Address: Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): 2.TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Technician Conducting Test: Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: License Number: Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Component(s)Date TrainingExpires 3.SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component PassFail Not Tested Repairs Made Component PassFail Not Tested Repairs Made If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date:_________________________ $POGJEFODF6454FSWJDFT *OD ")B[ $% 1 7 #7705/Fastrip#641 12/20/2016 1200CoffeeRoad Bakersfield,CA93308 OmeroGarcia (661)393-7000 11/15/2016 CameronMason ✔ ICC CAUSTServiceTechnician 10/07/2018 INCON TS-STS 10/14/2018 87-STP ✔Diesel-Vapor Secondary 87-Product Secondary ✔ 87-Fll Bucket ✔ 87-Vapor Bucket ✔ 87-Vapor Secondary ✔ 91-STP ✔ 91-Product Secondary ✔ 91-Fill Bucket ✔ 91-Vapor Bucket ✔ Diesel-STP ✔ Diesel-Product Seconday ✔ 91-Vapor Secondary ✔ ✔ Diesel-Fll Bucket ✔ Diesel-Vapor Bucket ✔ UDC 1-2 ✔ UDC 3-4 ✔ UDC 5-6 ✔ UDC 7-8 ✔ 12/20/2016 Test water was hauled off by CONFIDENCE UST SERVICES SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 4.TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Tank # Tank # Tank # Tank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: ProductStored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): TestDuration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)} 27 ✔ ✔ CalibratedGauges 0.00" 87-1 ✔ 12,000 Steel Joor Gasoline 5min 0.000" 1 hour -10.00hg 11:00 am -10.00hg 10:00 am 0.000" ✔ ✔ ✔ 91-2 ✔ 12,000 Steel Joor Gasoline 5min 10:00 am -10.00hg 11:00 am -10.00hg 1hour 0.000" 0.000" ✔ ✔ ✔ DIESEL ✔ 12,000 Steel Joor Gasoline 5min 10:00 am -10.00hg 11:00 am -10.00hg 1hour 0.000" 0.000" ✔ ✔ ✔ SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 5.SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # PipingMaterial: Piping Manufacturer: PipingDiameter: Length of Piping Run: ProductStored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): TestDuration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 37 ✔ ✔ CalibratedGauges 0.00" 87-product Fiberglass Smith 3.00" 100.00' Gasoline Test boot 5min 10:30am 5.00 psi 11:30am 5.00psi 1 hour 0.00psi 0.00psi ✔ 87-vapor Fiberglass Smith 4.00" 130.00' Gasoline Test boot 5min 10:30am 5.00psi 11:30am 5.00psi 1 hour 0.00psi 0.00psi ✔ 91-produc Fiberglass Smith 3.00" 110.00' Gasoline Test boot 5min 10:30am 5.00psi 11:30am 5.00psi 1 hour 0.00psi 0.00psi ✔ 91-vapor Fiberglass Smith 4.00" 150.00' Gasoline Test boot 5min 10:30am 5.00psi 11:30am 5.00psi 1 hour 0.00psi 0.00psi ✔ SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 5.SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # Piping Run # PipingMaterial: Piping Manufacturer: PipingDiameter: Length of Piping Run: ProductStored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): TestDuration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 47 ✔ ✔ CalibratedGauges 0.00" DIESEL-pro Fiberglass Smith 3.00" 150.00' DIESEL Test boot 5min 10:30am 5.00psi 11:30am 5.00psi 1hour 0.00psi 0.00psi ✔ DIESEL-va Fiberglass Smith 3.00" 150.00' DIESEL Test boot 5min 10:30am 5.00psi 11:30am 0.00psi 1 hour 5.00psi 0.00psi ✔ DIESEL vapor return line is cracked where test boot was installed pictures at end of work order . SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 6.PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Sump # Sump # Sump #Sump # Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: Sump Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested1 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) Please see Incon results: 5 7 ✔ ✔ TS-STS 0.002" 87 stp 48.00" 51.00" Fiberglass 18.00" 19.00" Clean/dry Highest penetration ✔ Automatic ✔ ✔ 5min ✔ ✔ ✔ 91 stp 48.00" 50.00" Fiberglass 19.00" 16.00" Clean/dry Highest penetration ✔✔ Automatic ✔ ✔ 5min ✔ ✔ ✔ DIESEL stp 48.00" Highest penetration Automatic 5min ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Clean/dry 17.00" 19.00" Fiberglass 50.00" Automatic ✔ ✔ ✔ DIESEL STP was a visual fail per vapor return secondary line being cracked could not install test boot SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 7.UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: UDC # UDC # UDC # UDC # UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160) Please see Incon results: 67 ✔ ✔ TS-STS 0.00" 1-2 Highest penetration Clean/dry 12.00" 13.00" 33.00" Fiberglass Unknown Automatic 5min ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 3-4 Automatic ✔ 5min ✔ ✔ ✔✔ Highest penetration Clean/dry 12.00" 13.00" 33.00" Fiberglass Unknown ✔ ✔ 5-6 7-8 Unknown Unknown Fiberglass Fiberglass 33.00"33.00" 13.00"13.00" 12.00"12.00" Clean/dry Clean/dry Highest penetration Highest penetration ✔✔ ✔✔ ✔✔✔ Automatic Automatic ✔✔ ✔✔ 5min 5min ✔✔ SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____ 9.SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # BucketDiameter: BucketDepth: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): TestDuration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 77 ✔ ✔ TS-STS 0.00" 87 ﬁll 87vapo 91 ﬁll 91vap 12.00"12.00"12.00"12.00" 14.00"14.00"14.00"14.00" 5min 5min 5min 5min 9.20" 10:00am 10:00am 10:00am 9.00"9.50" 0.00"1.00" 11:00am 11:00am 11:00am 11:00am 9.00"9.50"8.00" 1 hour 1hour 1 hour 1 hour 10:00am 9.00"9.20" 0.00"0.00" 0.00"0.00"0.00"0.00" ✔✔✔✔ 91 ﬁll bucket would not hold 5 gallons even included the sleeve above bucket leaks around top of Bucket.