Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 017-17RESOLUTION NO. 017— 17 RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF THE METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATED At THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HOSKING AVENUE AND SOUTH UNION AVENUE. (GPA /ZC NO. 16- 0128). WHEREAS, Porter & Associates, Inc. for Floyd G. Hinesley & Loretta M. Hinesley, filed an application with the City of Bakersfield Community Development Department requesting an amendment to the land use map designation of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan from LR Low Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) on 7.58 acres and HR (High Density Residential) 4.13 acres and to change the zone district from A (Agriculture) to C -2 (Regional Commercial) 9.37 acres and R -3 (Multiple Family Dwelling) on 4.13 acres located at the southwest corner of Hosking Avenue and South Union Avenue (the "Project "): and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before the City Council to consider the proposed Negative Declaration as required by Government Code Section 65355, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the staff report, Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission's deliberation, and action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows: 1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 51 -16 are hereby adopted. 3. The Negative Declaration for the Project is hereby adopted subject to the mitigation measures in Exhibit A for the Project located on the map as shown in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein. Emmoff-T1T.� Page 1 of 2 okgAK,9q s F m U O ORIGINAL HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council YN 715 L011City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on , by the following vote: AYE' COUNCILMEMBER: ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ RIVERA, GONZALES, WEIR, SMITH, ✓ SULLIVAN. PARLIER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER'. Nax& ABSTAIN'. COUNCILMEMBER'. NT4. ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: NOx',Q. !_ rmA'VV��I �. �YI/ C6-���/� PAMELA MCCARTHY, MMC Interim City Clerk APPROVED JAN 2 5 7017 '�4"t440ll KAREN GOH MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: VIRGINIA GENNARO City Att y By: ANDREW HEGLUND Deputy City Attorney Exhibits: A Mitigation Measures B Location Map DC \S: \GPAs \GPA Ist 2017\1 6-01 28\Res Ord \CC Res Env I6 -0128 docx Page 2 of 2 o``e AKF9� s m 0 0 UIgINAL EXHIBIT A Mitigation Measures from Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment /Zone Change No. 16 -0128 Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures: I. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Planning Division that they will /have met all air quality control measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Mitigation for Air Quality Impacts. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: 2. Prior to recordation of each residential subdivision or prior to approval of each Site Plan Review for commercial /industrial uses within the project site, the project proponent shall submit to the Planning Director a focused Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Report, prepared by a qualified consultant. The report shall include the following and any additional information required by the Planning Director: a. An explanation that the project will comply with all current state and local applicable GHG emission control and reduction regulations, as they are adopted or amended over time. b. A signed statement by the project applicant that the project will construct and operate the project in accordance with factors /mitigation measures utilized in the calculation of CO2e (GHG) emissions and reductions as shown in the Air Quality Assessment, prepared by WZI Inc., 2016. C. Identification of the measures that the project will implement to reduce operational CO2e emissions by 29 percent over BAU; which would be the project's proportionate share of tons per the above - referenced Air Study. Reduction of 29 percent over BAU CO2e )GHG) emissions is the current threshold adopted by SJVACPD. These measures may include, but are not limited to: implementation of specific Best Performance Standards for GHG reduction, acquisition of offset credits, inclusion in an Emission Reduction Agreement approved by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), or other approved GHG reduction strategies. d. A copy of the ISR application submitted to the SJVAPCD listing the mitigation measures utilized to reduce the GHG emissions for the project. Any mitigation program reduction of GHG adopted by the SJVAPCD or the City of Bakersfield that can be implemented for the specific project site may be utilized as a replacement for the requirements of this mitigation measure, if it provides equal or more effective mitigation than this mitigation measure. Mitigation for Greenhouse Gas Impacts. Biological Impact Mitigation Measures: 3. Prior to ground disturbance, the developer shall have a CDFW approved biologist survey the location for species covered under the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan incidental take permit for urban development (Tipton kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, San Joaquin antelope squirrel, & Bakersfield cactus) and comply with the mitigation measures of the permit. Survey protocol shall be that recommended by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Developer shaloWKF9s m 0 a�rwn� GPA /ZC No. 16 -0128 Mitigation Measures Page 2 subject to additional mitigation measures recommended by the qualified biologist. A copy of the survey shall be provided to the Community Development Department and wildlife agencies no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance. The current MBHCP urban development incidental take permit expires on September 1, 2019. Projects may be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or building permit and pay fees prior to the September expiration date. As determined by the City of Bakersfield, only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval or building permit before the expiration date will be eligible to pay fees under the current MBHCP incidental take permit. Early payment or pre - payment of MBHCP fees shall not be allowed. The ability of the City to issue urban development permits is governed by the terms of the MBHCP incidental take permit. Urban development permits issued after the expiration date may be subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation Plan, if approved, or be required to comply directly with requests of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts 4. The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703 -7111. The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 C.F.R. 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws generally requires that project - related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of the nesting cycle March 1 - August 15, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and /or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and /or imprisonment. a. To avoid impacts to burrowing owl, prior to ground disturbance, a focused survey shall be submitted to California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) by the Project applicant of a subdivision or site plan review, following the survey methodology developed by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC, 1993). A copy of the survey shall also be submitted to the City of Bakersfield, Planning Division. b. If the survey results the presence of burrowing owl nests, prior to grading; including staging, clearing, and grubbing, surveys for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no more than 30 days prior to the start of the of the Project commencing and that the surveys be conducted in a sufficient area around the work site to identify any nests that are present and to determine their status. A sufficient area means any nest within an area that could potentially be affected by the Project. In addition to direct impacts, such as nest destruction, nests might be affected by noise, vibration, odors, arfjKk9q, movement of workers or equipment. If the Project applicant identifies adve m U � ORIGINAL GPA /ZC No. 16 -0128 Mitigation Measures Page 3 nests, the CDFW shall be notified and recommended protocols for mitigation shall be followed and a copy submitted to City of Bakersfield, Planning Division. C. If any ground disturbing activities will occur during the burrowing owl nesting season (approximately February 1 through August 31), and potential burrowing owl burrows are present within the Project footprint, implementation of avoidance measures are warranted. In the event that burrowing owls are found, the applicant must follow CDFW protocol for mitigation and comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703711). If the Project applicant proposes to evict burrowing owls that may be present, the CDFW recommends passive relocation during the non - breeding season. Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts 5. Prior to ground disturbance, the developer shall have a CDFW approved biologist survey the location for kit fox, and comply with the provisions of the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan ( MBHCP). Survey protocol shall be that recommended by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife. Developer shall be subject to the mitigation measures recommended by the consultant. A copy of the survey and results shall be provided to the Community Development Department - Planning Division and Wildlife agencies no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance. The current MBHCP expires in September 1, 2019. Projects may be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or building permit and pay fees prior to the September expiration date under the current MBHCP. As determined by the City of Bakersfield, only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval or building permit before the expiration date will be eligible to pay fees under the current MBHCP incidental take permit. Early payment or pre - payment of MBHCP fees shall not be allowed. The ability of the City to issue urban development permits is governed by the terms of the MBHCP incidental take permit. Urban development permits issued after the expiration date may be subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation Plan, if approved, or be required to comply directly with requests of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts Additional Mitigation Measures from the Biological Assessment: 6. The project shall continuously comply with and implement best practices to reduce potential for take and minimize effects to other potentially occurring listed species; including: a. Prior to the initiation of soil or vegetation disturbance activities, a biological clearance survey shall be conducted to confirm that the Site has not become occupied by special status species. b. If the Site becomes occupied by any special status species in the future or a the time of soil or vegetation disturbance activities, wildlife agency staff shall e9T consulted as to how to proceed. U O ORIGINAL GPA /ZC No. 16 -0128 Mitigation Measures Page 4 C. Take avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented throughout ground disturbance activities. Generally accepted practices may be taken from existing protocols and Agency coordination sought when take cannot be avoided. Mitigation for Biological Resource Impacts Cultural Impact Mitigation Measures: 7. Prior to ground - disturbance activities associated with this project, personnel associates with the grading effort shall be informed of the importance of the potential cultural and archaeological resources (i.e. archaeological sites, artifacts, features, burials, human remains, etc.) that may be encountered during site preparation activities, how to identify those resources in the field, and of the regulatory protections afforded to those resources. This training shall be conducted by representatives from the Tejon Indian Tribe or qualified archaeologist. The personnel shall be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of archaeological remains during grading activities and cautioned to avoid archaeological finds with equipment and not collect artifacts. The applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Community Development Department - Planning Division that they have met this requirement prior to commencement of ground- disturbance activities. This documentation should include information on the date(s) of training activities, the individual(s) that conducted the training, a description of the training, and a list of names of those who were trained. Should cultural remains be uncovered, the on -site supervisor shall immediately notify a qualified archaeologist and the Tejon Indian Tribe. The developer shall provide the Tejon Indian Tribe information on excavation depth of the construction site. Mitigation for Cultural Resource Impacts 8. The project shall continuously comply with the following throughout the life of the project: a. If cultural resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. The applicant /developer of the project site shall submit documentation to the Community Development Department - Planning Division that they have met this requirement prior to further commencement of ground- disturbance activities and construction. b. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, all work shall cease in the area of the find pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.94, 5097.98 and 5097.99 of the California Public Resource Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the remains) and the local Native American community shall 0�KF notified immediately. o� 9sT Mitigation for Cultural Resource Impacts m v 0 ORIGINAL GPA /ZC No. 16 -0128 Mitigation Measures Page 5 Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures: 9. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the developer shall pay into the adopted Regional Traffic Impact Fee program. Mitigation for Traffic Impacts DL \:S: \GPAS \GPA 1st 201]\16 -0128 \ExhibilA Mtgalion.doc o4OAKF9 T � o ORIGINAL H-5 q q § \S §Ja a © ®`§SjHdRE` ` R\ § � ! ` \`3 \I\ I h :\ � , ......2.. 3AV nmn s / o i =!! #§ !e e 0e ! i \ � _ ± - •m ! )/ \! ! } N §� ! k o§F ! D k §x