HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.7-6444 Ph 13 As-BuiltGRADING PLANS IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
1. ALL GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION SHALL CONFORM TO THIS PLAN AND SHALL CONFORM WITH APPENDIX CHAPTER
35. ALL AREAS ON THE SITE ON WHICH STRUCTURES ARE TO BE PLACED MUST BE COMPACTED TO NINETY PERCENT
K.
HOVNANIAN"S FOfJR SEASONS
33 OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS PERTAINING THERETO AND THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
(90%) DENSITY FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF FIVE FEET
(5') BEYOND THE OUTSIDE EDGES OF THE FOUNDATIONS OF
38. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 6" IN COMPACTED THICKNESS AND COMPACTED AT
REPORT BY SOIL'S ENGINEERING, INC. DATED JUNE 9, 2005.
INVESTIGATION PREPARED BY SOILS ENGINEER, INC., DATED JUNE 9, 2005 AND SIGNED BY BRIAN MARIER SHALL BE
MADE A PART HEREON.
THE STRUCTURES.
2. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL EXERCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISOR CONTROL DURING GRADI'\G AND CONSTRUCT ON TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT BY THE SOILS
39. ANY FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY C.B.C. APPENDIX
PLANS, S01_S REPORT, SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE WITHIN HIS PURVIEW.
THE DEPTH OF ON
FOOTBELOW
PADSLLSBELATBLEAST
3. �;_
GRADING WORK WILL BE SUPERVISED AS ENGINEERED GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX J OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.
TRA C T NOx 6444., PHASE 13
2. ALL DESIGN ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE TO FINISH GRADE.
EXISTING GROUNDVELEVATIONS. E ACOMPACTIIONTIOF OV R
CEX AVATANDIEOD MATERIAL S AIN
NINNETYONE
PERCENT
LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO, OR USES OF, THESE PLANS. ANY AND ALL. CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUST
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING THE PAD AND PAVING AREAS TO WITHIN 0.1 FOOT OF
(90%) OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY.
5. CIVIL ENGINEER, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL BE NOTIFIED FORT" EIGHT (48) HOURS TO PLACING OF ANY FILL MATERIAL.
OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL EXERCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISORY CONTROL DURING
ROUGH GRADING PLAN
SUBGRADE. IF SUCH AREAS SHOULD BE FOUND TO BE MORE THAN 0.1 FOOT FROM THE DESIGN SUBGRADE ELEVATION
36. ALL FILL AREAS TO BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION
AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOR A STRUCTURAL FILL
6. ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY (90%) PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSIT" AS DETERMINED BY APPROVED METHOD PER APPENDIX J
AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN AND CORRECT HE GRADING AT NO COST TO THE
AND THE AREA SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 6'
8. DUST CONTROL:
COMPETENCE FOR APPROVAL UPON COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERMITTEE TO NOTIFY
OWNER.
GRADING NOTES
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. A PERMIT SHALL BE
37. FILL AREA SLOPING STEEPER THAN 5:1 SHALL BE KEYED AND BENCHED TO SUPPORT FILL.
1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM WITH APPENDIX J - CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS PERTAINING THEREOF AND PRELIMINARY SOILS
OBTAINED FROM CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FOR WORK TO BE DONE IN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
38. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 6" IN COMPACTED THICKNESS AND COMPACTED AT
REPORT BY SOIL'S ENGINEERING, INC. DATED JUNE 9, 2005.
5. UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING AND BEFORE TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, A FINAL SOILS REPORT COVERING THE
OPTIMUM MOISTER CONTENET BY APPROVED METHOD.
2. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL EXERCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISOR CONTROL DURING GRADI'\G AND CONSTRUCT ON TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT BY THE SOILS
39. ANY FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY C.B.C. APPENDIX
PLANS, S01_S REPORT, SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE WITHIN HIS PURVIEW.
ENGINEER.
CHAPTER 33 AND SO CERTIFIED BY TESTS AND REPORTS FORM SOILS ENGINEER.
3. �;_
GRADING WORK WILL BE SUPERVISED AS ENGINEERED GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX J OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.
6. IF A PROBLEM OR CONFLICT SHOULD ARISE DURING THE COURSE OF THIS PROJECT, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
'THE OWNER OR THE GRADING CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE
40. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES OR USES: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR
4. SURFACE DRAINAGE TO BE ONE (1%) PERCENT MINIMUM TO APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITIES, EXCEPT AS WAIVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO ANY FURTHER WORK.
LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO, OR USES OF, THESE PLANS. ANY AND ALL. CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUST
7. ALL GRADING WORK SHALL BE SUPERVISED AS "ENGINEERED GRADING'IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX CHAPTER 33
BE APPROVED BY PINNACLE CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
5. CIVIL ENGINEER, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL BE NOTIFIED FORT" EIGHT (48) HOURS TO PLACING OF ANY FILL MATERIAL.
OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL EXERCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISORY CONTROL DURING
41. PURSUANT TO SECTION 3317.8 OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, IF THE CIVIL_ ENGINEER, THE SOILS ENGINEER,
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE WITHIN HIS PURVIEW.
OR THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD IS CHANGED DURING GRADING, THE WCRK SHALL BE STOPPED UNTIL THE
6. ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY (90%) PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSIT" AS DETERMINED BY APPROVED METHOD PER APPENDIX J
REPLACEMENT HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THEIR AREA OF TECHNICAL
OF THE CURRENT CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND CERTIFIED BY TESTS AND REPORT FROM SOILS ENGINEER.
8. DUST CONTROL:
COMPETENCE FOR APPROVAL UPON COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERMITTEE TO NOTIFY
IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO PREVENT A DUST NUISANCE FORM ORIGINATING FROM THE SITE OF
THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN WRITING OF SUCH CHANGE PRIOR TO THE RECOMMENCEMENT 0 OF SUCH GRADING.
7. FILL MA-ERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING SIX (6) INCHES IN COMPACTED THICKNESS AND COMPACTED AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE
WORK AS A RESULT OF HIS OPERATIONS DURING THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONTENT BY AN APPROVED METHOD.
OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR MITIGATION OF DUST FROM THE SAN JOAQUIN UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
42. IF THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF SAID PERMIT. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES TO BE TAKEN BY THE
(NPDES), A 'NOTICE OF INTENT° (NOI) TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM
8. ALL FILL AREAS TO BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOR A STRUCTURE FILL AND THE AREA SCARIFIED TO A
CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FILED WITH STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD IN SACRAMENTO
DEPTH OF SIX (6) INCHES.
A. WATER SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL UNPAVED AREAS AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT THE SURFACES FROM BECOMING DRY
BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT REQUIRES THAT A
ENOUGH TO PERMIT DUST FORMATION.
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BE PREPARED CONTINUOUSLY CARRIED OUT, AND BE
9. FACES OF ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES TO BE PLANTED WITH A GROUND COVER INDIGENOUS TO THE AREA AND MAINTAINED AGAINST EROSION.
B. PAVED SURFACES OVER WHICH VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS PERMITTED TO TRAVEL SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF DIRT.
,ALWAYS
AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DURING NORMAL CONSTRUCTION HOURS.
10. ALL CUT AND/OR FILL SLOPE SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN TWO (2) HORIZONTAL TO ONE (1) VERTICAL.
9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO BEGINNING OF ANY WORK. CALL U.S.A. (1-800-277-2600) PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION.
43. ANY OPEN STREET PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FORM THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
11. BERMS OR DRAINAGE DEVICES ARE REQUIRED AT TOP OF ALL FILL SLOPES.
ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING ACCEPTED STREET RIGHT OF WAY, UNLESS SECURED BY A SUBDIVISION
10. THE SOIL ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INSPECTIONS DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE NATURAL GROUND
AGREEMENT, SECURITY BASED ON AN APPROVED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK PERFORMED WITHIN RIGHT OF
WAY AND INSURANCE AS REQUIRED
12. ER TERRACES (SWALES) WITH THREE (3) FEET MINIMUM WIDTH AND ONE (1) F00� MINIMUM DEPTH ARE REQUIRED AT TOP OF CUT AND FILL_
SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT.
AND THE PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF THE FILL TO BE SATISFIED THAT THE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN
SLOPEESS W WF EN EXISTING TERRAIN SLOPES TOWARD TOP OF CUT.
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAN AND APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE STATEMENT:
13. FILL AREAS SLOPING STEEPER THAN FIVE TO ONE(5:1) SHALL BE KEYED AND BENCHED TO SUPPORT FILL.
11. EXISTING UNDERGROUND LINES HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORDS. THE
ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR POSSIBLE ERRORS OR OMISSIONS AND IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
THIS PLAN AND SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
14. ALL FILL SLOPES HSALL NOT CUT WITHIN TWELVE (12) FEET HORIZONTAL OF THE TOP OF EXISTING AND/OR PLANNED SLOPES.
RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
AND BELIEF COMPLY WITH CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ORDINANCES, STANDARDS AND DESIGN CRITERIA AND THAT THEY INCLUDE
12. DURING GRADING, REASONABLE SEARCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR CONCEALED SUBSURFACE OBSTRUCTIONS.
ALL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE ADVISORY AGENCY OR OTHER REVIEW BOARD. ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR
15. ALL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF THREE (3) FEET MINIMUM WIDTH AND ONE (1) FOOT MINIMUM DEPTH ARE REQUIRED AT TOP OF CUT SLOPES WHEN
ALL ABANDONED SUBSURFACE OBSTRUCTIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED. IF THE TERMINUS OF ANY ABANDONED PIPING IS
VIOLATIONS OF THOSE ORDINANCES, STANDARDS AND DESIGN CRITERIA ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
EXISTING TERRAIN SLOPES TOWARD TOP OF CUT.
CORRECTED AND SUCH CORRECTIONS REFLECTED ON CORRECTED PLANS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER.
OUTSIDE THE PROJECT LIMITS, THE PIPING SHOULD BE REMOVED WITHIN THE PROJECT AND PROPERLY CAPPED AT THE
ALL ITEMS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DO NOT MEET THE CURRENT
PROJECT BOUNDARY.
STANDARDS SET BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WILL REQUIRE REPAIRING 0,R UPGRADING TO THE
13. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS
-------------------
PHILIP D. DOWTY,
SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.
DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY THIS REQUIREMENT
ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INCUDING STAGING SHALL BE WITHIN THE LIF ITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN
I�
18 17
7.29 9•, R.29 E. 7.29 3., R.29 E.
- -- - PRO✓ECT
S/ TE -
I I
I
MW HMMY IN
19 1 20
7.29 3., R.29 E. I T.29 9., R.29 E.
VICINITY MAP
f�
•c�I
NOT TO SCALE
SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE RCE No. 42038, EXPIRES: 03/31/2016 LEGEND OF ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN �A COPY OF THE BIOLOGICAL CLEARANCE SURVEY FOR THIS PROJECT.
CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLEY LIABLE AND RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF T.C. TOP OF CURB (100) EXIST. CONTOUR
LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, WITH THE SEE SHEET 2 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.THE BIOLOGICAL CLEARANCE SURVEY. NO STAGING, STREET IMPROVEMENTS., GRADING, OR OTHEREXCEPTION OF LIABILITY ARISING FORM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.F.L. FLOWLINE ELEV. �100-_ PROP. CO\TOUR
DISTURBANCE SHALL OCCUR OUTSIDE THE LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. T.G. TOP OF GRATE PROPERTY LINE
14. THE STAKING AND MARKING OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE DONE ONLY ONCE BY THE OWNER AND ALL RESTAKING OR
REMARKING SHALL BE DONE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. I - KI GS PLAE `' 1 537 1 � � �° 81 � � � � G.B. GRADE BREAK 7 �- DAYLIGHT _INE
10 CT NO. 168
4 --2 00 50 F.G. FINISH GRADE 2% SHEET FLON RATE
15. ALL ONSITE OR OFFSITE OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. R.G. ROUGH GRADE - GRADED SHALE
M1T OF BITAT
fy ,
16. ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENT OR UTILITY REMOVED, DAMAGED OR UNDERCUT BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS I _ ONSERV TION P1 4N49 F.S. FINISH SURFACE -°ti CENTERLINE
SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AT '` �.�*8 �° g
TRAC NO. 64 4-3 - 48 INV. INVERT OF DRAIN - - SWALE HICH POINT
THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. UMIT OF HA AT - CT N �+ m - , %`_, P. PAD ELEVATION - -- FLOWLINE
CON ERVA710 PLAN O. 644 8
17. FALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL. - - - - - ,� f ,40 47
F.F. FINISH FLOOR ELEV. SUBDRAIN
41 G.F.F. GARAGE FINISH FLOOR _ _ _ - AREA DRA N
18. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS 1 . # �. -� r�,�,-� !,% `
ENGINEER, DESIGN ENGINEER, AND BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING OF ' °a` _�� ' B.V.C. BEGIN VERTICAL CURVEJTOP OF S_OPE
ANY FILL MATERIAL. _
CT NO. 6 12 -- - --'` E.V.C. END VERTICAL CURVE TOE OF S_OPE
P.I. POINT OF INTERSECTION RETAINING WALL
19. THE SITE SHALL BE CLEARED OR GRUBBED OF ALL VEGETATION, INCLUDING ROOTS, LOOSE FILL, TRASH AND OTHER , ) MrK ;e r '." , ,,' f
DELETERIOUS MATERIALS ANY HOLES OR VOIDS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL{ �•%`r� s° / E.P. EDGE OF PAVEMENT O+ FIRE HYDFANT
OF TREES ROOTS SEPTIC TANKS ABANDONED PETERSBU
RG PLACE _ Y.
FOUNDATIONS, PIPELINES OR THE LIKE, SHALL BE FILLED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 1
CONSERVATIONLAN f %.
20. FILL- MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE SOILS ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. _
7 %
21. ALL FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT TOE CUT WITHIN 12 FEET HORIZONTALLY OF THE TOP OR EXISTING OR PLANNED CUT 2 COURT
_ 16
SLOPES. 7a 5 \ \
1
22. THE CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES ARE CALCULATED USING A COMPACTION FACTOR OF 1.15. THE ENGINEER MAKES NO
WARRANTY EITHER DIRECT OR IMPLIED THAT THIS WILL BE THE ACTUAL COMPACTION FACTOR. IF A DEFICIENCY OR AN
EXCESS OF SOILS ARISES, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER, WHO SHALL, �'
DETERMINE IF ADJUSTMENTS CAN BE MADE TO IMPROVE THE BALANCE BETWEEN THE CUT AND FILL. 1 • � 1 X,� 1 p} 5` 16 1 7 1
O � "' I � I a°. y { ��d p� '"i" 1 iw,r B ? 6 w.✓ ' .P
23. THE CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL p No. 6444 11 TR NO. 644 -
AFTER EXAMINING THE PLAN, SOILS REPORT AND THE SITE TERRAIN, PREPARE HIS BID PRICE FOR THE PROJECT, BASED cc / � - - � -#
ON HIS OWN EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS. 4 Q TALLIN PLACE _ - 13 10
24. EXPORT MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED SITE COORDINATED WITH THE INSPECTOR AT THE TIME
OF GRADING. W - -- - 2
25. IF THE CONTRACTOR IS IN DOUBT AS TO THE REMAINING OF ANY PART OF THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS OR w
FINDS DISCREPANCIES IN OR OMISSIONS FROM THE DRAWINGS, HE SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUIRES FOR AN 3- 8 7 6 5, 4 r r
INTERPRETATION OR A CORRECTION THEREOF, PRIOR TO FILING HIS BID PRICE FOR THE PROJECT. 10 '� \
10
T' N 6 4-2\
12
20 \ 1
3 7
19 \ 6
18 1
UM SERVA PLAN
17
II T.W. TOP OF WALL ELEV, C�__ STREET LI,.,HT
T.F. TOP OF FOOTING ELEV. SOUND OF' SCREEN WALL
�i D.F. DEEPENED FOOTING o S DEEPENED FOOTING
Q L. LENGTH °oF °oF WATER METER
v
cn DWY. DRIVEWAY CATCH BAIN & LOCAL. DEP"RESSION
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE x A/C UNIT
T.R.W. TOP OF RETAINING WALL CONCRETE
ELEV. X X WOOD FENCE
LIMITS OF HABITAT CONSERVATION
EARTH QUANTITY ESTIMATES:
CUT. 1Z730 C. Y.
FILL: 16,360 C.Y.
IMPORT 3,630 C. Y.
26. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE INSPECTOR AND THE ENGINEER THE LOCATION OF THE BORROW 12/ 9 1 \ G 1 i
AREAS (IF REQUIRED) PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. I / i EARTHWORK NOTES
8 9 10 11 12 13 10/ THE PROPOSED GRADING WILL NOT REQUIRE ANY
27. IN THE EVENT CONSTRUCTION STAKING BASED ON CONSULTANT'S PLANS DRAWINGS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS IS T �o ..x :,
' C NO 6 10 � � ��m ,� ;� 444- 5 �J� � DIRT IMPORT AND THE IMPORT QUANTITIES SHOWN
ACCOMPLISHED BY OTHER THAN THE CONSULTANT, CLIENT AGREES TO HOLD CONSULTANT HARMLESS AND RELEASE _ s�e� 9,s r J Q�
CONSULTANT FROM ALL LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE USE OF SAID PLANS, DRAWINGS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. / 7-< f� �Q� HEREON IS THE APPROXIMATE DIRT REQUIRED TO R
�A COMPLETE THE GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE w
28. ANY TRENCHING TO BE DONE WITHIN THIS PROJECT SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RICHLAND HILLS LANE \p m PCO ELEVATIONS SHOWN. Q
THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL S-22. S OF HABITAT
CONI PLAN 1 Q /q� r •�,
CL
29. SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE 1% MINIMUM, EXCEPT AS WAIVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. \ - �cF / THE SPOIL DIRT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
2� �� / R HOMES WILL BE USED TO CCMPLETE THE GRADING. Nt
30. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER AND HIS GRADING CONTRACTOR TO: `� 3 i ,. "� / �
A. FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE FOREGOING RECOMMENDATIONS. yf \ / SHEET INDEX
B. NOTTY THE ENGINEER WHEN SITE PREPARATION BEGINS AND BEFORE THE PLACEMENT OF FILLS. / DESCRIPTION ►�,= .1 z
C. INFORM THE ENGINEER IF ITEMS WHICH MIGHT EFFECT FOUNDATION STABILITY ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING EARTHWORK /
OPERATIONS SO THAT THEY MAY BE TREATED UNDER HIS DIRECTION (THESE MIGHT INCLUDE BURIED TRASH OR LIMIT OF HABITAT i f TOTAL AREA: 3.8 ACRES TITLE SHEET, KEY VAP I v
VEGETATION, PIPELINES, ABANDONED WELLS, OLD FILLS, ETC.). CONSERVATION PLAN _ i� CONSTRUCTION NOTES, STREET SECTIONS & DETAILS 2
GRADING PLAN 3
31. FLOODING, JETTING OR SIMILAR CONSOLIDATION METHODS OF COMPACTION SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.SOILS REPORT RE�'OMMENDATIONS 4 i
K� Y 11 SAP 12o so 0 120 24o SOILS REPORT RE�'OMMENDATIONS 5 z • .
32. ANY ABANDONED WELLS ON THE PROPERTY DISCOVERED DURING GRADING SHALL BE ADEQUATELY CAPPED IN GRAPHIC SCA E: 1"-120' o
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE ORDINANCES. SCALE. 1"=�20' WDID# 5F15C338418 -' RISK LEVEL i o
33. A BERM OR DRAINAGE SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE TOP OF ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES TO PREVENT PROJECT NO. o
RUNOFF FROM GOING OVER THE SLOPE. THE FACE OF ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A GROUND Q�OFESS�ON PREPARED BY: TRACT N0. 6444 PHASE 13 k---
�P o PERMIT NC.
COVER INDIGENOUS TO HEA o D. q
�� o� Fti HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES
Q� �'� ; , R V I N E I N ROUGH GRADING PLAN 1314-40000C92 Q
34. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION, GROUND SURFACES TO RECEIVE - - � rt -
CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHOULD BE SCARIFIED AND COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF DATE w NO. 42038 rn PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING SHEET
TWELVE INCHES (12") BELOW THE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE IN AREAS TO BE FILLED.
DRAWN BY: AO 3/14 or Exp. 3/31/ Three Hughes ■ Irvine, CA92618 ■ PH:(949)583-1010 FX:(949)583-0759 cfl
DATE s+ I
COMPACTION IN PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREAS SHOULD BE TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY-FIVE PERCENT (95%) OF THE DESIGNED BY: AD 3/14 9TF C/V 0 o���Q �J _ I 17 Lo
03/16 REVISED PAD ELEVATIONS LOTS 1-15 (LOWERED BY 0.5) o� CA F _ l,�
MAXIMUM DENSITY AS OBTAINED BY ASTM TEST METHOD D1557-78, METHOD A, AND SHOULD EXTEND TO A MINIMUM 10 _ _
DISTANCE OF TWO FEET 2' BEYOND THE OUTSIDE EDGES OF PAVEMENTS. NO. DATE REVISIONS ENGR. APPROV. DATE CHECKED BY: BE 3/14 PHILIP . DOWTYM.E.42038 EXP. 3/31 /j�' OF o 0
O i crrY RE ORDS pro. - � - c� �a , : �5 . o
PLOTTED B": Ben Etemadi DATE: Jul. 12, 2016 08:57:01 AM FILE: F:\0679\Engineering\TR_6444-13\Grd-_RoL, gh\SHT01.dwg
1/10/11'17
CONDITION OF APPROVAL NOTES:
48.2 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT REQUIRES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROL MEASURES SET FORTH UNDER REGULATION VIII, FUGITIVE PM10
PROHIBITIONS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. THE FOLLOWING MITIGATION MEASURES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE
REQUIRED UNDER REGULATION VIII, CAN REDUCE FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE PROJECTS:
ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING STORAGE PILES, WHICH ARE NOT BEING ACTIVELY UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES, SHALL BE
EFFECTIVELY STABILIZED OF DUST EMISSIONS USING WATER, CHEMICAL STABILIZER/SUPPRESSANT, COVERED WITH A TARP OR OTHER SUITABLE
COVER, OR VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER.
ALL ONSITE UNPAVED ROADS AND OFFSITE UNPAVED ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY STABILIZED OF DUST EMISSIONS USING WATER OR
CHEMICAL STABILIZER/SUPPRESSANT.
ALL LAND CLEARING, GRUBBING, SCRAPING, EXCAVATION, LAND LEVELING, GRADING, CUT & FILL, AND DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED OF FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS UTILIZING APPLICATION OF WATER OR BY PRESOAKING.
WHEN MATERIALS ARE TRANSPORTED OFFSITE, ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED, OR EFFECTIVELY WETTED TO LIMIT VISIBLE DUST EMISSIONS,
AND AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF FREEBOARD SPACE FROM THE TOP OF THE CONTAINER SHALL BE MAINTAINED.
AL_ OPERATIONS SHALL LIMIT OR EXPEDITIOUSLY REMOVE THE ACCUMULATION OF MUD OR DIRT FROM ADJACENT PUBLIC STREETS AT THE
END OF EACH WORKDAY. (THE USE OF DRY ROTARY BRUSHES IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED EXCEPT WHERE PRECEDED OR ACCOMPANIED BY
SUFFICIENT WETTING TO LIMIT THE VISIBLE DUST EMISSIONS. USE OF BLOWER DEVICES IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN).
FOLLOWING THE ADDITION OF MATERIALS TO, OR THE REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM, THE SURFACE OF OUTDOOR STORAGE PILES, SAID PILES
SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY STABILIZED OF FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS UTILIZING SUFFICIENT WATER OR CHEMICAL STABILIZER/ SUPPRESSANT.
WITHIN URBAN AREAS, TRACKOUT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED WHEN IT EXTENDS 50 OR MORE FEET FROM THE SITE AND AT THE END
OF EACH WORKDAY.
ANY SITE WITH 150 OR MORE VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY SHALL PREVENT CARRYOUT AND TRACKOUT.
ASPHALT -CONCRETE PAVING SHALL COMPLY WITH SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULE 4641 AND RESTRICT THE USE
OF CUTBACK, SLOW -CURE AND EMULSIFIED ASPHALT PAVING MATERIALS.
CEASE GRADING ACTIVITIES DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WINDS (GREATER THAN 20 MPH OVER A ONE-HOUR PERIOD).
LIMIT CONSTRUCTION -RELATED VEHICLE SPEEDS TO 15 MPH ON ALL UNPAVED AREAS AT THE CONSTRUCTIONS SITE.
IMPLEMENTATION OF CARRYOUT/TRACKOUT MITIGATION MEASURES, SUCH AS GRAVEL PADS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
SJVUAPCD REGULATION VIII.
49.2 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE PROJECT PROPONENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL
APPROPRIATE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE MBHCP. THE MBHCP REQUIRES CERTAIN TAKE AVOIDANCE MEASURES FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN
KIT FOX. MBHCP GUIDELINES REGARDING TRACKING AND EXCAVATION SHALL BE FOLLOWED TO PREVENT ENTRAPMENT OF KIT FOX IN DENS,
SPECIFIC MEASURES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
A) A PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEY SHALL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO SITE GRADING TO SEARCH FOR ACTIVE KIT FOX DENS. THE SURVEY SHALL
BE CONDUCTED NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN AREAS SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT TO
DETERMINE THE NECESSITY OF DEN EXCAVATION.
B) MONITORING AND EXCAVATION OF EACH KNOWN SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX DEN WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
SHALL OCCUR.
C) NOTIFICATION OF WILDLIFE AGENCIES OF RELOCATION OPPORTUNITY PRIOR TO GROUND DISTURBANCE IN AREAS OF KNOWN KIT FOX DENS
SHALL BE PROVIDED.
D) EXCAVATIONS SHALL EITHER BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ESCAPE RAMPS OR COVERED TO PREVENT KIT FOX ENTRAPMENT. ALL TRENCHES OR
STEEP -WALLED EXCAVATIONS GREATER THAN THREE FEET SHALL INCLUDE ESCAPE RAMPS TO ALLOW WILDLIFE TO ESCAPE. EACH EXCAVATION
SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE RAMP, WITH LONG TRENCHES CONTAINING AT LEAST ONE RAMP EVERY % MILE. SLOPE OF RAMPS SHALL BE
NO STEEPER THAN 1:1.
E) ALL PIPES, CULVERTS OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES WITH A DIAMETER OF FOUR INCHES OR GREATER SHALL BE KEPT CAPPED TO PREVENT
ENTRY OF KIT FOX. IF THEY ARE NOT CAPPED OR OTHERWISE COVERED, THEY WILL BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO BURIAL OR CLOSURE TO
ENSURE NO KIT FOXES, OR OTHER PROTECTED SPECIES, BECOME ENTRAPPED.
F) ALL EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, OR OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT SHALL ATTEND A "TAILGATE"
SESSION INFORMING THEM OF THE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE PROJECT. THE
ORIENTATION SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST AND SHALL INCLUDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE
PROTECTED SPECIES, REASONS FOR SPECIAL STATUS, A SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, AND MEASURES INTENDED TO
REDUCE IMPACTS.
G) ALL FOOD, GARBAGE, AND PLASTIC SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN CLOSED CONTAINERS AND REGULARLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE TO
MINIMIZE ATTRACTING KIT FOX OR OTHER ANIMALS.
49.3 BECAUSE "TAKE" OF BLUNT -NOSED LEOPARD LIZARDS IS ALSO CURRENTLY PROHIBITED BY SECTION 5050 OF THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND
GAME CODE, ADDITIONAL MITIGATIONS ARE NECESSARY IN ADDITION TO THOSE REQUIRED BY THE MBHCP. THE FOLLOWING MEASURES ARE
RECOMMENDED TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION 5050:
A) SURVEYS FOR BLUNT -NOSED LEOPARD LIZARDS SHALL BE CONDUCTED FOLLOWING CDFG PROTOCOLS. THESE SURVEYS SHOULD BE
CONDUCTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JUNE 30 UNDER THE SPECIFIED TIME AND TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS. THIS SURVEY IS NECESSARY TO
DETERMINE THE CURRENT STATUS OF BLUNT -NOSED LEOPARD LIZARDS ON THE PROJECT SITE.
B) IF BLUNT -NOSED LEOPARD LIZARDS ARE DETECTED, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT METHODS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FISH AND GAME
CODE SECTION 5050 TO CDFG FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
NOTE: STUDIES FOR BLUNT -NOSED LEOPARD LIZARD ARE VALID FOR ONE YEAR.
RAPTOR NEST DISTURBANCE
49.4 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT, THE PROJECT APPLICANT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING RAPTOR NEST
MITIGATION:
A) IF SITE GRADING IS PROPOSED DURING THE RAPTOR NESTING SEASON (FEBRUARY -SEPTEMBER), A FOCUSED SURVEY FOR RAPTOR NESTS
SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED RAPTOR BIOLOGIST PRIOR TO GRADING ACTIVITIES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ACTIVE NESTS IN AREAS
POTENTIALLY IMPACTED BY PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.
B) IF CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED TO TAKE PLACE DURING THE RAPTOR NESTING/ BREEDING SEASON (FEBRUARY- SEPTEMBER), NO
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 500 FEET OF AN ACTIVE NEST UNTIL THE YOUNG HAVE FLEDGED (AS DETERMINED BY A
QUALIFIED RAPTOR BIOLOGIST). ANY NESTS THAT MUST BE REMOVED AS A RESULT OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SHALL BE REMOVED DURING
THE NON -BREEDING SEASON (OCTOBER -JANUARY).
C) PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEYS SHALL INCLUDE A SURVEY FOR BURROWING OWL. IF ACTIVE BURROWING OWL BURROWS ARE DETECTED
OUTSIDE OF BREEDING SEASON (SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH JANUARY 31), PASSIVE AND/OR ACTIVE RELOCATION EFFORTS MAY BE UNDERTAKEN
IF APPROVED BY CDFG AND USFWS. IF ACTIVE BURROWING OWL BURROWS ARE DETECTED DURING BREEDING SEASON (FEBRUARY 1 THROUGH
AUGUST 31), NO DISTURBANCE TO THESE BURROWS SHALL OCCUR WITHOUT OBTAINING APPROPRIATE PERMITTING THROUGH THE MIGRATORY
BIRD TREATY ACT.
49.7 DURING CONSTRUCTION, SITE BOUNDARIES SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH FLAGGING, FENCING, OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL TO
PREVENT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES FROM IMPACTING ADJACENT HABITAT AREAS POTENTIALLY OCCUPIED BY SPECIAL STATUS
SPECIES.
50. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL:
IF CULTURAL RESOURCES ARE UNEARTHED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ALL WORK SHALL BE HALTED IN THE AREA OF THE FIND. A
QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL BE CALLED IN TO EVALUATE THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMEND ANY NECESSARY MITIGATION MEASURES. PROOF
OF COMPLIANCE WITH ANY RECOMMENDATIONS RESULTING FROM SUCH EVALUATION, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SOUTHERN
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION CENTER (AIC) AT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD, AND TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BEARING OF N89024'09"W SHOWN FOR THE CENTERLINE OF
PALADINO DRIVE AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 11013, RECORDED IN
BOOK 53, PAGES 130 THROUGH 146, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS IN
THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER, WAS USED AS THE
BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP.
BENCH MARK
BRONZE CAP IN 9" CONCRETE PAD 14.5' N.W. OF STREET SIGN AND
51.50' FROM CENTERLINE OF HIGHWAY 178 AND LENE PLACE. Al 03/16
U.S.G.S. Y-292, ELEV. 540.247
NO. DATE
CONDITION OF APPROVAL NOTES (CONTINUE):
SOUTH / WEST NORTH / EAST
51. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES: R/W R/W
PROPOSED MASONRY A
75' _
51.1 A PALEONTOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO REDUCE BLOCK WALL 31' 44'
POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON THE SHARKTOOTH HILL BONEBED. - -
PAD 11 ' 20' _��� 20' _ 24'
A) PRIOR TO GRADING, A PALEONTOLOGIST SHALL BE RETAINED, ATTEND A PRE -GRADING MEETING, AND SET FORTH THE PROCEDURES2 2% MAX.
TO BE FOLLOWED DURING THE MONITORING PROGRAM. 1
_
B) ONE PALEONTOLOGICAL MONITOR THAT IS TRAINED AND EQUIPPED TO ALLOW RAPID REMOVAL OF FOSSILS WITH MINIMAL 2 29' 1 MAX. _ ?�
27. 29'
_-r
CONSTRUCTION DELAY IS EXPECTED TO BE SUFFICIENT. FULL-TIME MONITORING OF THE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT SITE THAT HAVE 29 MIN. - _-_
EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT ELEVATIONS BETWEEN 600 FEET AND 700 FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED.
SIDEWALK MEANDERING
2% SIDEWALK
C) IF FOSSILS ARE FOUND WITHIN AN AREA BEING CLEARED OR GRADED, EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DIVERTED ( MAX.) (27. MAX.)
ELSEWHERE UNTIL THE MONITOR HAS COMPLETED SALVAGE OF THE FOSSILS. IF CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL MAKE THE DISCOVERY, 6" CURB & GUTr=R-6" CURB & GUTTER
THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY DIVERT CONSTRUCTION AND CALL THE MONITOR TO THE SITE. MAJOR SALVAGE TIME TOSCANA DRIVE, SHELBURNE DRIVE
MAY BE SHORTENED BY GRADING CONTRACTOR'S ASSISTANCE (E.G., REMOVAL OF OVERBURDEN, LIFTING AND REMOVING LARGE AND
HEAVY FOSSILS). SECTION E -E -PRIVATE STREET NOT TO SCALE
D) THE PROJECT PALEONTOLOGIST SHALL PREPARE, IDENTIFY, AND CURATE ALL RECOVERED FOSSILS. JPON COMPLETION OF GRADING, R/W R/W
THE PROJECT PALEONTOLOGIST SHALL PREPARE A SUMMARY REPORT DOCUMENTING MITIGATION AND RESULTS, WITH ITEMIZED
INVENTORY OF COLLECTED SPECIMENS. THE PALEONTOLOGIST SHALL SUBMIT THE REPORT TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, DESIGNATION _ 30' _ 30'
DEPOSITORY, AND ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE AGENCY, AND TRANSFER FOSSIL COLLECTION TO A DEPOSITORY WITHIN THE CITY OF 1 p' 20' ; . 20' 10'
BAKERSFIELD OR COUNTY OF KERN. THE SUMMARY REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. THIS SUBMITTAL WILL SIGNIFY -
COMPLETION OF THE PROGRAM TO MITIGATE IMPACTS ON PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
SPECIAL NOTES PAD27. MAX. 5' N co % 12" 5, 27. MAX. PAD
24-HOUR INSPECTION NOTICE - PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
SECTION SHALL BE GIVEN AT LEAST 24 HOURS NOTICE. THE SECTION MAY BE NOTIFIED AT (661) 326-3049. SIDEWALK C_
SIDE�I'ALK
COMPACTION TEST NOTE - COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER/CONTRACTOR. (27. MAX.) `� (27. MAX.)
THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF REQUIRED TE=STS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 6" CURB & GUTTER - I
ROUGH GRADE LINE 6" CURB & GUTTER J
AN OPEN SPACE PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ANY WORK
PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING ACCEPTED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. JNLESS SECURED BY AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, APPROVED
INSURANCE AND SECURITY BASED ON AN APFROVED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY STOCKHOLM PLACE, TRAFFORD PLACE
SHALL BE POSTED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF TdE PERMIT.
AND TORIN COURT
THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SHALL BE: CONTACTED TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. (1-800-642-2444) --
SECTION F -F -PRIVATE STREET -NOT TO SCALE
THE LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND GRADED TO MINIMIZE EXCESS LANDSCAPE DRAINAi;E ACROSS THE SIDEWALK FOR
THOSE AREAS OVER 2%.
R/W R/W
IF THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES), A "NOTICE PROPOSED MASONRY _ 60'
OF INTENT" (NOI) TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL. PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH BLOCK WALL 30' 30'
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (SWRCD ORDER NO. 2009-009-DWQ AS AMENDED BY ORDER 2010-0014-DWQ AND ORDER -
20' 20' 10'
2012-0006-DWQ) MUST BE FILED WITH STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD IN SACRAMENTO BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF ANY PAD 2 ,
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT REQUIRES THAT A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN -- 2-
(SWPPP) BE PREPARED, CONTINUOUSLY CARRIED OUT, AND ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DURING NORMAL 1 5' N 27. MAX'
5
CONSTRUCTION HOURS. 12" 2% FAD
2:1 MAX. 29y _ �2% 2_3 _ - - -
WASTE DISCHARGE IDENTIFICATION (WDID) NUMBER 5F15C338418 HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 27. MIN.
BOARD FOR THIS PROJECT. SIDEWALK i SIDEWALK
REAR PROPERTY LINE ALL ITEMS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT(27. MAX.) \� (27. MAX.)
ARE DAMAGED OR DO NOT MEET THE CURRENT 6" CURB & GUTTER j I
2' EXISTING 2:1 MAX. SLOPE P'� STANDARDS SET BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WILL ROUGH GRADE LINES 6 CURB &GUTTER -
BENCH -TOPXF BERM PER PHASE 2 GRADING_ REQUIRE REPAIRING OR UPGRADING TO THE
sFlowN PER PLA SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. STOCKHOLM PLACE, TRAFFORD PLACE
TOP OF
REMO ALSLOPE OF BERMER N 19 AND TORIN COURT
2 MIN SECTION G -G - PRIVATE STREET - NOT TO SCALE
2:1 MAX. SLOPE 1
PAD , C THE SECTIONS SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES AND THEY
SECTION "I -l» MAY OR MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS TRACT HOWEVER THEY ARE A CORRECT
LOT REPRESENTATION OF ADJACENT AREAS THAT ARE BEING OR WILL BE GRADED.
TYPICAL RE�4PYARD GRADING AT LOTS 5-9 PHASE 13 Fc2 N \`o�r No.
t Q
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE 15' nom. 10' MIN.) P;TOPERTY LINE
TOP/TOE OF SLOPE PER PLAN N� \=
5 MIN. 20 MIN. 5 MIN. TOP/TOE OF SLOPE PER PMN
OPEN SPACE LOT F.L.5 M/N. �� a �� Z 12 5' MIN. _
73' F. L. 12 F.L.12 �, 3 MIN. F L. W1MIN. ENC ENC F. L. , ? F.F. ELEV. z -- z
2 MIN F. MIN. -� J ENC'_I F.L.
z 2' MIN. PAD ELEV. 3 MIN.
c; A A B
Q, * 27.MIN. $ m 27.MIN. ? 2 0
R A 2:1 MAX A m °o *2:1 MAX. * - �� m
m ao co co w r % co1 co
�`v� PAG
PAD - PAD a PAD G. F. F. ELEV. -
_ - B.S.L. # PAD _
2:1 MAX. Z 2:17MA:X.�2:1 MAX. SIDDEWALK N 27. MIN. 1207. MAX. � F�N27. MIN./207. MA. Z
: 27. MIN./207. MAX. a ^, t
N� N a. ° ° o SIDEWALK. ° N
*EXCEPT BERMS LESS THAN 1' HIGH :'NAY BE CONSTRUCTED AT 1%2:1 CURB FACE
SECTION H -H DIRECTION OF FLOW -� *EXCEPT BERMS LESS THAN I' ,-1IGH MAY BE CONSTRUCTED AT 1%2:1
og
�' SECTION A -A
o PROPERTY LINE
Lu
~ =PROPERTY LINE REAR PROPERTY LIRE
o Z 5' MIN.
5' MIN. �o -
TOP OF BERM
ZFzz 3' MIN. F L. 1 F L. 3' MIN. TOP OF BERM SHOWN z SHOWN PER PLAN
a o z PER PLAN. SEE TYPICAL 15' TYP. '' 2 3'
o Z j DETAIL HEREON. 2 F.L. 10' MIN. �' BENCH
W W EN o
0 6„ _, z (SECTION D -D) m
UK o -_j27.M/N. �o '' TOP OF SLOPE AFTER
W m m *2:1 MAX. % ? 11 REMOVAL OF BERM N
Z NI o TOP OF SLOPE L 19
PAD _ ao m 2:1 MAX. PAD PAD 2 - _ �VfIN.
2:1 MAX. SLOPE
27. MIN. - 1
PAD PAD 2 Z PAD
72Z.MIN./20� MAX. Z
j 1
-i MIN./57. MAX. °p » ss
2X MIN./2. I MAX. SEC] -ION D -D
WetN
27. MIN.1207. MAX.- SECTION C -C TYPICAL REARYARD GRADING
Nb U L
a
*EXCEPT BERMS LESS THAN 1' HIGH MAY BE CONSTRUCTED AT 1%2:1
SECTION B -B_ WDID# 5F15C338418 --• RISK LEVEL 1
TRACT N0. 6444, PHASE 13
ROUGH GRADING PLAN
R40
1/ 1 0/2(_ 1"
:�� ki; .1 .1 —
I �" , I 11 ... . k I .1. '
, , i i I , , , . . �/<�� i i ;i . I : I ' 11
. ; I I — '_ ' ; I I - . i j v ; I I s", �'_ I I I - I I .."
% .. ... .......... f , , ; ( I : i : I i ;p ii 1 i - " 11
" I ;,.I , . I . . , F� - _ _ . - - - _'_ "�___ - , ..... .. _.: .11 . . . , - . \ . , . J I , .
' �' , ; ... _ , .' F:1 '_:':'11.__: - ___ . ' - -1 ..... . I _1_1----1- .... ....... ____ ' _J_... _ . , . " ,
-E I E _'_ -11- . ". '_____ __ ---L - ; ___ - '_ _... ".
. i; .' , �\:'27 �_ ` ___774 , - I ,
I t . I __'.1. ,,, ..=='._ ,4 1 _'�. ,. ____ - * -"-,- __ __ "-.:..:-.--l--------..-.--------- . . ..... .. I ___._-- - -I------ - 11 '
-- .."____--1._ _., . 11�,,.I.
L_ , 11 .1 I . 17'7_-1-._.'_ _1 I . -'L,-----*-*-***'-*------ ---2�_- - :' 1:� _' " i, I
.11 ' � I z /_ 4 -1) .. �"_-__D -------,--\ I bkl 7 . .1
I - 1.20' � ["�' i" '�-----/ (' 3 . i w - " ,
i . , .1. V 1 I . I 11 _�_ - i : H - \ k , . \ �'"'I - -
I I I I � . C� _i�15 �
i P=733.2 cX__1j'__'_____\�: '
I - ' z " "A -1-1,H -41.4- 1 ' . -4. 1 / 11 - 4%
I I .1 I .
z I'l 7 11 I P=734 0 c . : o I . -11".., 11, '; I 1,
.1.1 - ___ __1 I F3 I- I \'I' I - .
� _1 ___'. _..'____*__ 'k I , ,t, ; . I
. �v i I : 11 t! 9 ,I . . 733.1 ", " I , 11 \1/
11 i b ;: 11 I " C1* 7"*" ___r __ - -1- ':
I I I ---- I ----------- , If , I .! , I 4 """ i 1-1 I I I 1. 11
I I - - \---.---- I 5 "�j:4) �"' '_' _'::.�� ,I\\, -
k � _ � (r, . ", , . �'
11,
� LYD f -11 -1 ( L �'::' _
PETER iBURG' I z z 11/ -:, \_ "I : j I % I ::� , ,"', L", I I
____ z � ' 11 ;' : j. _111 I _ _... 729.0 ; '': , ., lu,"', ' _J3, 7,TJ 6 / 5 ' 7JJ 7 i 11. I i , ,,',-V' #_ 1 -_ 12 ,)
')'7-. 4 i " 4 "`; - ___ -T I - 1. ,('FG. -7 TG \ X1 7FG. , . . - 1 733.6 '.. r 7JJ 6 'x, '�! '\ _\ Nk D
I I k j . : I Vt - ( _F._G7__1 _____� \1\ V \ Y� ( ?_-) ," I
I , 9 I I 1 . '/J�: z �' ". � 0�. I - — N I � ! 11'_ "
[ :' I ; : i I --_111 _�_ I '-, ''
AI i I : ' z I 1 15z. 1 \ I '�" '" "__ I
LU i . : I , V" � , ,
! 11 11 /-7--1-"-- ,_------ z , \ _ V " 1z 'o 5 , , " /
— I., 1 i — __ , \
11 ., I (I'__A' _')" ' CK , ��__( I -�','q '_:'- ` L- '" , I I 11 L I
I 'I ". / I- x 729,1"P=, I k . I -9., " ' _ "' _ ___.. L' '. '__� -D � '. L -
� , i c$ , . . 5z'_3�1� - '__ /
. 11 -,-- I 11 7'1'6 1 \""'' -�\ \X� L I .. L I I ' - I I 'I-'�
I qc% - - ". 1, I . , 'N's ts . - -" -0 ? 47 _,-n'_-' , " I 11,
L" ... ,L�' � I '� k \ 1/ I 7 - 3' 1 1 ' . I I
I I k � 1\ , I a , . i -1, " � t I / 135.,5--- r - �\ ': I I \'L .... 11 .'i(� k � \ , ' I I ,
-' 1, " '11� . , ,_ x /0 _ '_ -- "___4 "" - . - . \ \
\ - I y' ) -1 >L - I . 11 .
11.1
. , L- I I -11 I ' I , ' As - .;, - .. _
l', - I 'X� L =6 =
Z 11
\ " ' , . , ; . _"" __.., kc . "" I I ' 1__' 'd " I L : �z` ' �
/ . �/ \ \ "\\\ ' .;",\\ I . , :1 ''
/ /// � '. ") WDID# 5F15C338418 --- RISK LEVEL I - _.. ..-.
I I I mm" I DATE �? ROUGH GRADING PLAN __ "
___ -1 k6o 1:4-1 11 - H:)__ ,
R-!7 7—
i I 'XG.
T) \ \i ._
- ,�� 0JI16 REVISED PAD ELEVATIONS LOTS 1-15 (LOWERED BY 0.5') — . DATE 0 AQV pe'll ��' -oti'll /- a, I-) - - - -_
NO. DATE , REVISIONS , ENGR. , APPROV. , DATE I CHECKED BY: BE 3/14 1 PHILIP U. DOWTY .E. 42038 EXP. 3/31 1 OF
- — mmmmmammmommmillimmm � � W, lie, fl I CITY RECORDS NO. - )1_) - ('CML� I - 0 11-7- 4�_ 5 1
PLOT -FED BY: Ben Etemadi DATE: Jul. 12, 2016 08:51:29 AM FILE: F:\0679\Eng*ineering\TR-6444-13\Grd-Rouqh\SHT03.dwo
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELiMINARYSOILS INVESTIGATION File No. 05--11231
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St June 9, 2003
Bakersfield, C4 Page T
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. EARTHWORK
Guide Specifications For Earthwork are attached in Appendix A for general guidance in preparing
g
siteradii plans. Where the earthworks n
g g p specifications differ from the special provisions given in
this report, the special provisions shall apply.
1. Compaction
Unless otherwise specified herein, the terms, "Compaction," or "Compacts" wherever
used or implied within this report should be interpreted as compaction to 90 percent of the
maximum density obtainable by ASTM Test Method D1557, Method A
B. Optimum Moisture
The term, "Optimum Moisture," wherever used or implied within this report, should be
interpreted as that obtained by the above described test method.
C. Stripping
Pnorto soil compaction, existing ground surfaces should be stripped of surface vegetation.
A stripping depth of one inch should be adequate. In no instance should material which has
been stripped be used as engineered fill or blended with and compacted in original ground.
D. Ground Surface Preparation
Earthwork shall consist of the following operations:
• Stripping;
Ground Surface Compaction;
• Fill Placement;
• Importing Fill Materials;
• Placing and compacting fill materials;
• Excavating and replacing or upgrading expansive soils;
CMOs SOILS ENGINEBRING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION File No. 03-11231
Tract 6444 , SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St June 9, 2605
Bakersfield, CA Page 12
L. Slope Construction
Fill slopes should be constructed no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical (2:1)
Site-specific slopes may be made steeper provided that sections and details showing the
plan and profile views and limits of the earthwork, signed and seated by the Geotechnical
Engineer, are submitted and approved prior to the start of the work.
Fill slope construction on sloping ground shall be subject to benching requirements in
accordance with "Benching,' described above,
M. Drainage
Finished ground grades adjacent to the proposed buildings should be sloped to provide
positive free drainage away from the foundations. No areas -should be constructed that
would allow drainage generated on the site, or water impinging upon the site from outside
sources, to pond near footings and slabs or behind curbs. In areas where adverse surface
grades exist, area -drains or catch -basins and subsurface piping should be installed to
convey water to the adjacent street system.
N. Canyon Sub -drains
Areas where fills are to be placed in sites occupied by drainages and ravines, canyon
subdrains will be required. Canyon sub -drains will consist of 3/4 inch drain -rock wrapped
in geotextiie fabric SUPAC 4N or equal. The sub -drains shall have a cross-sectional area
equal to 9 square feet.
TABLE C
LIMITS OF EARTHWORK
STRUCTURE TYPE
COMPACTION LIMITS
REFERENCE POINT
ResidentialOutside
Edge of Exterior Footings
Structures
51
including isolated canopy columns,
Area
Above Top
contiguous exterior columns, etc;
Concrete Pavements
2'
Outside Edges of Flatwork
and Flatworik
Finished Sutsade
Residential Structures
Retaining Wall
2'
Outside Edges of "roe and Heel
Footings
Pavements
95%
Engineered Fill
01
Toe of Engineered Fill
Over -excavation
2 times 'A" where "A" is the
Edge of improvement: footings,
zone or sub -cut
greatest depth of sub -cut.
pavement, stab.
Swimming Pool I Spa
2'
Edge of decking
C 2005 SOILS ENGLNMUNG, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARYSOILS INVESTIGATION Fite No. 05-11231
Tract"M, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St June 9, 2005
Bakersfield, CA Page 8
E. Ground Surface Preparation
After the site has been stripped, and prior to placing engineered fill, the exposed existing
ground should be compacted. The depth of compaction shall be a minimum of two (2) feet
unless othenaise directed by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative in the field;
and shall be based on his review of soils exposed at the excavation bottoms. Areas of the
site on each side of drainages are expected to require the deepest excavation and
compaction to remove loose colluvial soils that have collected in the bottoms of drainages.
In areas of the site where cuts exceeds two (2) feet below existing ground, compaction of
the near surface soils shall consist of the top one (1) foot of exposed soil.
F. Excavating or Upgrading Expansive Soils or Foundation Design For
Expansive Soils
Earthwork operations can be expected to encounter expansivesoillswith expansion indexes
in the range of low to high. This wide variation in expansion potential suggests that lots be
subdivided into groups and identified by expansion potential. Foundation design and / or
subgrade preparation schemes should be developed for each group. We suggest the
following grouping:
TABLE A
FOUNDATION PREPARATION SCHEDULE
Ex ansion Index Group Foundation Alternative
0 to 50 A Post -Tensioned Slats Type I
50 to 90 B Post -Tensioned Slab Type iI
We recommend that a foundation design or subgrade preparation scheme be prepared for
each group.
Mass grading of the site is expected to result in a homogenous blend of all of the above
categories of material where foundations are to rest on compacted fill. On the other hand,
out sections may expose soils comprising one or more of the above sal classifications.
After the completion of site rough grading, additional expansion index tests shalt be
performed. Testing should be combined with a visual review of materials exposed on the
lots and shallow borings, 7 feet maximum depth, to classify the materials. The lots should
then be grouped as shown above.
02005 SOILS ENGINEERING, Ir
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARY SOILS INYESTIGA TION File No. 0.'~11231
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St June 9, 2005
Bakersfleld, CA Page 18
VII. LIMITATIONS, OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING
Conclusions and recommendations in this report are given for Tract 6444 at the southeast comer
of Paladino Drive & Vineland Street, in Bakersfield, California, and are based on the following:
a. The information retrieved from twenty (20) exploratory borings drilled at the
subject site to a maximum depth of 15 feet below the existing ground
surface.
b. Our laboratory testing program results.
C. Our engineering analysis based on the information defined in this report.
d. Our experience in the Kern County area.
Variations in soil type, strength and consistency may exist between specific boring locations.
These variations may not become evident until after the start of construction. If such variations
appear, a re-evaluation of the soils test data and recommendations may be necessary.
Unless a Geotechnical Engineer of this frim is afforded the opportunity to review plans and
specifications, we accept no responsibility for compliance with design concepts or interpretations
made by others with regard to foundation support, fill selection, fill placement or other
recommendations presented in this report.
Changes in conditions of the subject property can occur with time because of natural processes
or the works of man on the subject site or on adjacent properties. Changes in applicable
engineering and construction standards can also occur as the result of legislation or from the
broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the finding of this repot may be invalidated, wholly or in
part, by changes beyond our conirot. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be
relied upon without review after a period of two years or after any modifications to the site,
Review of Earthwork Operations
Review of earthwork operations relating to site Gearing, ground stabilization, placement and
compaction of fill materials, and finished .grading is critical to the structural integrity of building
foundation and floor systems. While the preliminary Geotechnical investigation and report provide
guidelines which are used by the design team, i.e., architects, grading engineers, structural
engineers, landscape engineers, etc., in completing their respective tasks, review of plans and site
review and testing during earthwork operations are vital adjuncts to the completion of the
Geotechnical engineer's tasks.
The most prevalent cause of failure of a structure foundation system is lack of adequate review and
testing during the earthwork phase of the project. Projects rarely reach completion without some
alteration being required such as may result from a change in subsurface conditions, an
amendment in the size and scope of the project, a revision of the grading plans or a variation in
structural details. Occasionally, even minor changes can significantly affect the performance of
foundations.
r�
0 ZWS SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMIAr.4RYSOILS INVESTIGATION File No. 05-11231
Tract 6444 , SE Corner Patadtn Dr & Vineland St June 9, 2005
Balrers}7eld, CA Page 9
G. Retaining Wall Backfill
Retaining walls should be backfilled with free -draining soil consisting of clean sand or silty
sand with less than 100k passing the #200 US Standard Sieve. All backfill shall be
compacted to 90% of the density standard referenced above. Retaining walls shall bg
furnished with gravel drains consisting of 314 inch gravel and 4 inch diameter perforated
pipe. Drain materials shall be have minimum cross-sectional area of 9 square feet. Pipes
shall be graded to drain.
H. Review of Excavation Bottoms
Excavation and compaction of existing soils in cut areas are designed to provide a minimum
thickness of two (2) feet of compacted soil below the bottom of proposed slabs Prior to
placement of backfill, excavation bottoms should be reviewed and tested in accordance with
the following procedures:
1. In-place density tests shall be performed. 'rhe results of these tests shall be
compared with the results of tube density determinations made .daring the
Preliminary Soils Investigation in materials determined to be stable by laboratory
testing procedures.
2. Where test results indicate lower densities than those described above, excavation
shall be made deeper as directed by the GeoteGtnical Engineer's representative on
the site.
3. At least two expansion index tests should be taken for each building pad to
determine soil expansion potential. The resu is of expansion index tests shall be
used to categorize each lot for use with the "FOUNDATION PREPARATION
SCHEDULE."
4. The Geotechnical Ergineer's representative shall be notified at least one (1)
working day in advance of placement of engineered ft on any excavation bottom.
Pavement Areas:
1
Ground surfaces to receive concrete driveway and bituminous pavements should be
scarified and compacted to a minimum depth of 12 inches below the grading plane in cut
areas or to 12 inches in areas to receive fill. Engineered fill placed in proposed pavement
areas should conform to the requirements of Section 5.4, "Placing, Spreading and
Compacting Fill Materials," of Appendix A.
C 2005 SO.'r.S ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMIAARYSOILS INVESTIGATION Fite ;Vo. 05-11231
Tract 6444 . SE Corner Paladho Dr & Vineland by June 9, 2885
Bakersfield.. C,4 Page 19
The most prevalent secondary cause for foundation failure is inadequate implementation of
Geotechnical recommendations during the formulation of foundation designs and grading plans_
The error n a foundation design or an omission of a key element from a grading plan occurs most
often as a result of inadequate communication between the various project consultants and -- when
a change in consultants occurs — improper transfer of authority and responsibility".
It is imperative, therefore, that any revisions to the project scope, any change in structural detail,
or change in consultant, be brought to the attention of Soils Engineering, Inc. to allow for timely
review and revision of recommendations and for an orderly transfer of responsibility and approval.
It is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that a representative of our firm
is present at all times during earthwork operations relating to site preparation and grading, so that
relative ccmpaction tests can be performed, earthwork operations can be observed and i;ompliance
with the recommendations provided herein can be established.
This engineering report has been prepared within the limits prescribed to us by the client or his
representative, in accordance with the generally accepted principles and practices of Geotechnical
engineering. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included or intended in this report.
Respecdit.Hy submitted,
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
3 1997 Uniform Building Code, Section, 3317, "Grading Inspection,"
paragraph (8), " Transfer of Responsibility " as follows:
"If the civil engineer, the soils engineer, cr the engineering
geologist of record is changed during grading, the work shall be
stopped until the replacement has agreed in writing to accept
their responsibility within the area of technical competence for
approval upon �,,ompleticn of the work. It shall be the duty of the
permittee to notify the building official in writing of such damage
prior to the recommencement of such grading"
C 2005 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
QRpI- CSS i0\
�O �P D. Q q�
DATE NO. 42038
DRAWN BY: AO 3/14 U.1
Exp, 3/31/, pr
DATE u+�
DESIGNED BY: AO 3/14 9T C i V t
03/16 REVISED PAD ELEVATIONS LOTS 1-15 (LOWERED BY 0.5) F OF CA L t F O�
DATE
NO. DATE REVISIONS ENGR. APPROV. DATE CHECKED BY: BE 3/14
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELiMINARYSOILS INYESTIGA17ON Fife No. 05-11131
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr A Vineland St June 9, 2005
SakersiW CA _ Page 10
Compaction in proposed pavement areas should be a minimum of 95 percent of the
maximum density as obtained by ASTM Test Method D1557, Me hod A, and should extend
to a minimum of two feet beyond the outside edges of pavements.
Utility Lines:
Backfill for utility lines traversing areas proposed for facilities, pavements, concrete slabs -
on -grade, or areas to receive engineered fill for future construction should be compacted
in accordance with the same requirements for adjacent and/or overlying fill materials.
Compaction should include haunch area, spring line and from top of pipe to finished
subgrade. The haunch area up to one foot above the top of the lupe should be backfilled
with "eohesionless" material.
Cohesionless native materials shall be used for trench and p --pe or conduit backfill for
backfill within the pipe -zone. The term "cehesionless," as u:4ed herein, is defined as
material which when dry, will flow readily in the haunch areas of the pipe trench and which
have less than 5% passing US Standard #200 Sieve.
Pipe backfill materials should not contain rocks larger than two inches in, maximum
dimension. Where adjacent native materials exposed on the: trench bottoms contain
protruding rock fragments larger than two inches in maximum dimension, conduits and
pipelines should be laid on a bedding consisting of dean, cohesionless sand (SP), in the
Unified Soils Classification System.
Compaction Requirements - where not otherwise specified in our plans or in these
recommendations, the following compaction requirements are applicable to all electrical,
gas or water conduits:
40 Z00S SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARY SOILS INVFSTIGATiON Fife No. 05- 1123 1
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladbre Dr A Vineland St June 9, 2805
Bakersfield, CA Page A-1
APPENDIX A
GENERAL GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTHWORK
1. GENERAL
1.1 Scolae
These specifications and plans include all eartfiworic pertaining to site rough
grading including, but not limited to furnishiig all labor and equipment
necessary for clearing and grubbing; stripping; preparation of ground
surfaces to receive fill; excavation; placement and compaction of structural
and non-structural fill; disposal of excess materials and products of clearing,
grubbing, and stripping; and any other work .necessary to bring ground
elevations to the lines and grades shown on the project plans.
1.2 Performance:
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all earthwork in
accordance with project plans and specifications. No variance from plans
and specifications shall be permitted without written approval of the
Engineer -of -Record, hereinafter referred to as the "engineer" or his
designated representative, hereinafter referrers to as the "Soils Engineer."
Earthwork shall not be considered complete until the "Engineer" has issued
a written statement confirming substantial compliance of earthwork
operations to these specifications and to project plans.
The Contractor shall assume sole responsibility 'or job site conditions during
the course of earthwork operations on the project, including safety of all
persons and preservation of all property; this requirement shall apply
continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. The Contractor
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARYSOILS INVESTIGATION FUe A6•. 05-111.11
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St &we 9, 200S
Bakersfield, CA „ Page .'1
1. Engineered Fill
Earth materials obtained on site and classified SM, SP, SW and SC and CL, with :xpansion
indices <20, are acceptable for use as ergineered fill provided that all grasses, tweeds and
other deleterious debris are first removed and provided that foundations, -dabs, ar•d:
pavement are designed to resist the effects of expansive soils utilizing ng cr eof tl-e
procedures details above in Paragraph F.
Engineered fill materials should be placed in thin layers (less than ten inches un -compacted
thickness), brought to near the optimum moisture content or to a moistwe content
commensurate with effective compaction and soil stability, and compacted to s minimu•�n
of 90 percent of the maximum density obtainable by ASTM Test Method D1557, Method
A, "Placing, Spreading and Compacting Fill Materials," in Appendix A.
In pavement areas compaction should tie to a minimum of 95% of the maximum density
obtainable by ASTM Test Method D15!1 to a depth of 12 inches below the gracing plane.
J. Imported Fill
If it becomes necessary to import mater als from off-site to complete site grading, imported
soils should consist of essentially granular, siltysands wittl low expansion potential and free
of grasses, weeds, debris, rocks larger than six inches in maximum dimension, and soluble
sulfates in excess of 200 parts per millrrl. Imported fill should contain sufficient silt and
Gay binder to render them stable in foo:i 1g trenches and capable of maintainincl specified
elevation tolerances during paving operations.
Imported soils to be used as engineerec fill should also meet the following gradation and
quality criteria:
Maximum Percent Passing #200 Sieve ..... 50
Maximum Liquid Limit .......................... .
.. .. ..40
Maximum Plasticity Index ..... ............................. ..... 14
Minimum R -Value .......... ..... 50
Maximum Expansion Index (Tame 18 -A -1-B UBC, 1997) ..... ..... 20
K. Benching
I,
Earthwork operations performed on sloping ground should be benched whenover slope
gradients exceed five horizontal to one vertical. Bench widths should accommodate the
equipment used The minimum depth of each bench below original ground surfsxc a shou d
be equal to the over -excavation depth, "r," as specified in Section[, Paragraph[,, "Grourd
Surface Compaction."
02M S4)[LS ENGINIERING, 142.
SOILS ENGINEERING,. INC.
PRELIMINA R Y SOILS iA'VESTIGATION File Ivo. 05-1:731
Tract 6444, SE Corner Patadino Dr & Vinelami St lune 9, A)05
Bakerstleld, CA _ Page A-22
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Excavations:
Excavation shall be defined within the content of these Specifications as;
earth material excavated for the purpose of constructing Ell embankri-ont;
grading the site to elevations shown on project plans; or placing undergroi 1 rid
pipelines, conduits, or other subsurface utilities or minor structures.
Excavations shall be made true to the lines shown on project plans arca to
within plus or minus one-tenth (0.1) of a foot, of grades shown on the
accepted site grading glans.
2.2 €naineered Filled:
Engineered fill shall be ;onstrued within the body of these :specifications as
earth conforming to spccthcations provided in the soils or geotechnical report
placed to raise the grace of the site, to backfill excavation -s, or to constrict
asphaltic concrete or Portland cement concrete pavement and upon wt ich
the Soils Engineer has performed sufficient tests and ha:l made suffic Bent
observation during placement and compaction to enabki him to issue. a
written statement confirming substantial conformance of tt a work to pro. oct
earthwork specification,,.
2.3 On -Site Material:
On-site material is earth material obtained in excavation mzde on the pro sect
site.
2.4 Imported Material:
Imported materials are: earth materials obtained offthe site, hauled in, :and
placed as fill.
2.5 "CompaC#ian" OP "CCjrTipaCtAd":
shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Owners, Engineer, and Soils Wherever expressed or implied within the context of these specificati:ns n
Engineer from any and all liability and claims, ~foal or alleged, arising out of shall be interpreted as compaction to ninety (90) percent of the rmaxirrtlm W
performance, of earthwork on this project, except from liability incurred density obtainable by ASTM Test Method D-1557(Methoc A). co
through sole negligence of the Owner, Engineers, or Soils Engineers. _
2.6 Grading Plane: CL.
I
The Grading Plane is the surface of the basement materia upon whictl the
lowest layer of subbase, base, asphaltic or Portland cement conk -ate,
surfacing, or other spE Ofied layer, is placed.
02005 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. ® 2005 SOILS EN.3 iIJEERA'C1, INC.
Z
U
Z
WDID# 5F15C338418 - RISK LEVEL 1, CL
U
PROJECT NO.
. ?
PREPARED BY: TRACT NO. 6444, PHASE 1 1 -RrtilJ.
0Qc
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES IT 140. Q
z R N E INC 1:'14PEPERMIT
UGH GRADING NG PLAN-----�
PLANNING ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING C':-IEET
a Three Hughes • Irvine, CA 92618 • PH: (949) 583-1010 FX: (949) 583-0759 Cp
:� r7
PHILIP U. DOWTY R. .E. 42038 EXP. 3/31/1Q CITY RECORDS NO. -1_ -� ��,� j'� ■OF 66 3 L.J c
PLOTTED BY: Ben Etemadi DATE: Jul. 12, 2016 08:56:33 AM FILE: F:\06%9\Engineering\TR_6444-13\Grd_Rough`,SHT)4.dwg
1.'10"?017
TABLE B
COMPACTION DEPTH
Haunch to i ft
t fL Above Top
Y'6•' Below
Area
Above Top
of P� 2611
FinishedGrade to
of Pipe
Finished Grade ow
Finished Sutsade
Residential Structures
90%
90%
90%
Pavements
95%
-
95bk
95%
Non -Structural
90%
90%
90%ix
40 Z00S SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARY SOILS INVFSTIGATiON Fife No. 05- 1123 1
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladbre Dr A Vineland St June 9, 2805
Bakersfield, CA Page A-1
APPENDIX A
GENERAL GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARTHWORK
1. GENERAL
1.1 Scolae
These specifications and plans include all eartfiworic pertaining to site rough
grading including, but not limited to furnishiig all labor and equipment
necessary for clearing and grubbing; stripping; preparation of ground
surfaces to receive fill; excavation; placement and compaction of structural
and non-structural fill; disposal of excess materials and products of clearing,
grubbing, and stripping; and any other work .necessary to bring ground
elevations to the lines and grades shown on the project plans.
1.2 Performance:
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all earthwork in
accordance with project plans and specifications. No variance from plans
and specifications shall be permitted without written approval of the
Engineer -of -Record, hereinafter referred to as the "engineer" or his
designated representative, hereinafter referrers to as the "Soils Engineer."
Earthwork shall not be considered complete until the "Engineer" has issued
a written statement confirming substantial compliance of earthwork
operations to these specifications and to project plans.
The Contractor shall assume sole responsibility 'or job site conditions during
the course of earthwork operations on the project, including safety of all
persons and preservation of all property; this requirement shall apply
continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. The Contractor
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARYSOILS INVESTIGATION FUe A6•. 05-111.11
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St &we 9, 200S
Bakersfield, CA „ Page .'1
1. Engineered Fill
Earth materials obtained on site and classified SM, SP, SW and SC and CL, with :xpansion
indices <20, are acceptable for use as ergineered fill provided that all grasses, tweeds and
other deleterious debris are first removed and provided that foundations, -dabs, ar•d:
pavement are designed to resist the effects of expansive soils utilizing ng cr eof tl-e
procedures details above in Paragraph F.
Engineered fill materials should be placed in thin layers (less than ten inches un -compacted
thickness), brought to near the optimum moisture content or to a moistwe content
commensurate with effective compaction and soil stability, and compacted to s minimu•�n
of 90 percent of the maximum density obtainable by ASTM Test Method D1557, Method
A, "Placing, Spreading and Compacting Fill Materials," in Appendix A.
In pavement areas compaction should tie to a minimum of 95% of the maximum density
obtainable by ASTM Test Method D15!1 to a depth of 12 inches below the gracing plane.
J. Imported Fill
If it becomes necessary to import mater als from off-site to complete site grading, imported
soils should consist of essentially granular, siltysands wittl low expansion potential and free
of grasses, weeds, debris, rocks larger than six inches in maximum dimension, and soluble
sulfates in excess of 200 parts per millrrl. Imported fill should contain sufficient silt and
Gay binder to render them stable in foo:i 1g trenches and capable of maintainincl specified
elevation tolerances during paving operations.
Imported soils to be used as engineerec fill should also meet the following gradation and
quality criteria:
Maximum Percent Passing #200 Sieve ..... 50
Maximum Liquid Limit .......................... .
.. .. ..40
Maximum Plasticity Index ..... ............................. ..... 14
Minimum R -Value .......... ..... 50
Maximum Expansion Index (Tame 18 -A -1-B UBC, 1997) ..... ..... 20
K. Benching
I,
Earthwork operations performed on sloping ground should be benched whenover slope
gradients exceed five horizontal to one vertical. Bench widths should accommodate the
equipment used The minimum depth of each bench below original ground surfsxc a shou d
be equal to the over -excavation depth, "r," as specified in Section[, Paragraph[,, "Grourd
Surface Compaction."
02M S4)[LS ENGINIERING, 142.
SOILS ENGINEERING,. INC.
PRELIMINA R Y SOILS iA'VESTIGATION File Ivo. 05-1:731
Tract 6444, SE Corner Patadino Dr & Vinelami St lune 9, A)05
Bakerstleld, CA _ Page A-22
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Excavations:
Excavation shall be defined within the content of these Specifications as;
earth material excavated for the purpose of constructing Ell embankri-ont;
grading the site to elevations shown on project plans; or placing undergroi 1 rid
pipelines, conduits, or other subsurface utilities or minor structures.
Excavations shall be made true to the lines shown on project plans arca to
within plus or minus one-tenth (0.1) of a foot, of grades shown on the
accepted site grading glans.
2.2 €naineered Filled:
Engineered fill shall be ;onstrued within the body of these :specifications as
earth conforming to spccthcations provided in the soils or geotechnical report
placed to raise the grace of the site, to backfill excavation -s, or to constrict
asphaltic concrete or Portland cement concrete pavement and upon wt ich
the Soils Engineer has performed sufficient tests and ha:l made suffic Bent
observation during placement and compaction to enabki him to issue. a
written statement confirming substantial conformance of tt a work to pro. oct
earthwork specification,,.
2.3 On -Site Material:
On-site material is earth material obtained in excavation mzde on the pro sect
site.
2.4 Imported Material:
Imported materials are: earth materials obtained offthe site, hauled in, :and
placed as fill.
2.5 "CompaC#ian" OP "CCjrTipaCtAd":
shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Owners, Engineer, and Soils Wherever expressed or implied within the context of these specificati:ns n
Engineer from any and all liability and claims, ~foal or alleged, arising out of shall be interpreted as compaction to ninety (90) percent of the rmaxirrtlm W
performance, of earthwork on this project, except from liability incurred density obtainable by ASTM Test Method D-1557(Methoc A). co
through sole negligence of the Owner, Engineers, or Soils Engineers. _
2.6 Grading Plane: CL.
I
The Grading Plane is the surface of the basement materia upon whictl the
lowest layer of subbase, base, asphaltic or Portland cement conk -ate,
surfacing, or other spE Ofied layer, is placed.
02005 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. ® 2005 SOILS EN.3 iIJEERA'C1, INC.
Z
U
Z
WDID# 5F15C338418 - RISK LEVEL 1, CL
U
PROJECT NO.
. ?
PREPARED BY: TRACT NO. 6444, PHASE 1 1 -RrtilJ.
0Qc
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES IT 140. Q
z R N E INC 1:'14PEPERMIT
UGH GRADING NG PLAN-----�
PLANNING ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING C':-IEET
a Three Hughes • Irvine, CA 92618 • PH: (949) 583-1010 FX: (949) 583-0759 Cp
:� r7
PHILIP U. DOWTY R. .E. 42038 EXP. 3/31/1Q CITY RECORDS NO. -1_ -� ��,� j'� ■OF 66 3 L.J c
PLOTTED BY: Ben Etemadi DATE: Jul. 12, 2016 08:56:33 AM FILE: F:\06%9\Engineering\TR_6444-13\Grd_Rough`,SHT)4.dwg
1.'10"?017
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION File No. 05-11231
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St June 9, 2005
Bakersfield, CA Page A-3
3. SITE CONDITIONS
The Contractor shall visit the site, prior to bid submittal, to determine existing soil
and topographic conditions, and the nature of materials that may be encountered,
during the course of the work under this contract, and make his own interpretation
of the contents of the Preliminary Soils Report, as they pertain to said conditions.
The Contractor shall assume all liability under the contract for any loss sustained
as a result of variations which may exist between specific soil boring locations or
changed conditions resulting from natural or man-made circumstances occurring
after the date of the Preliminary Field Investigations.
4. CLEARING AND GRUBBING
4.1 Clearina and Grubbin
Clearing and grubbing shall consist of removing all debris such as metal,
broken concrete, trash, vegetation growth and other biodegradable
substances, from all areas to be graded. Existing obstructions below shall
be removed in accordance with the following procedures:
4.1.1 Slabs and Pavements - Shall be completely removed. Asphaltic or
Portland cement, concrete fragments may be used in engineered fills
provided they are broken down to a maximum dimension of six (6A)
inches and thoroughly dispersed within a friable soil matrix. Engi-
neered fill containing said fragments should not be placed above the
elevation of the bottom of the lowest structure footing.
4.1.2 Foundations - existing at the time of grading shall be removed to a
depth not less than two (2.0) feet below the bottom of the lowest
structure footing.
4.1.3 Basements. Septic Tanks buried concrete containers of similar
construction located within areas destined to receive pavements,
structures, or engineered fills should be completely removed and
disposed of off the site. Basements, septic tanks, etc., situated
outside structures, or structural fill areas shall be disposed of by
breaking an opening in bottoms to permit drainage, and by breaking
walls down to not less than two (2.0) feet below finished subgrade.
0 2805 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARYSOILS INVESTIGATION File No. 05-11231
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladins Dr do Vineland St June 9, 2005
Bakersfield, CA Page A-4
4.1.4 Buried Utilities - such as sewer, water and gas lines or electrical
conduits to remain in service shall be re-routed to pass no closer than
four (4.0) feet to the outside edge of proposed exterior footings of
structures. Lines to be abandoned shall be completely removed to a
minimum depth of two (2.0) feet below finished building pad grade..,
Concrete lines deeper than two (2.0) feet below finished building pad
grade and having diameters less than six (6.0) inches can be crushed
in placed_
4.1.5 Root ftaterns - shall be completely removed to a minimum depth of
two (2.0) feet below the bottom of the lowest proposed structure foot-
ing or to two (2.0) feet below finished subgrade, whichever depth is
lower. Root systems deeper than the elevation indicated above shall
be excavated to allow no roots larger than two (2.0) inches in
diameter.
4.1.6 Cavities - resulting from clearing and grubbing or cavities existing on
the site as a result of man-made or natural activity shall be backfilled
with earth materials placed and compacted in accordance with
Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of these specifications.
4.1.7 Preservation of Monuments. Construction Stakes, Propgr ( Corner
Stakes, or other temporary or permanent horizontal or vertical control
reference points shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Where
these markers are disturbed, they shall be replaced at the contractor's
expense.
xe a-11111 i t�
Site grading shall consist of excavation and placement of fills to lines and grades shown
on the project plans and in accordance with project specifications and recommendations
of the Preliminary Soils Report, whichever .is more stringent. The following are
recommendations issued in this report.
5.1 Areas to Receive Fill:
5.1.1 Surfaces to receive fill shall be scarified to a depth of at least six (6.0)
inches, or as recommended in this report, whichever is greater, until
the surface is free from ruts, hummocks or other uneven features
which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to
be used.
3911785 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENG3INEERING, INC.
W41MINARYSOILSINVESTIGATION Flle No. 05-t 1531
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St June 9, 205
Baker M CA Pape A-5
5.1.2 After the area to receive fill has been cleared and scarified, it shall be
moistened and compacted to a depth of at least six (6.0) inches in
accordance with specifications for compacting fil material in
paragraph 5.4, below.
5.2 Excavation:
5.2.1 Excavations shall be cut to elevations plus or minus 0.1 foot of the
grades shown on the accepted plans.
5.2.2 When excavated materials are to be used in engineered fill, the
excavation shall be made in a manner to produce as much mixing of
the excavated materials as practicable.
5.2.3 When excavations are to be backfilled, and where surfaces exposed
by excavation are to support structures or concrete tloor slabs, the
exposed surfaces shall be scarified, moistened and compacted, as
stated above for areas to receive fill. Over excavation below specified
depths will not eliminate the requirement for exposed surface
compaction.
5.3 Fill Materials
5.3.1 Materials obtained from on-site excavations will oe considered
satisfactory for construction of on-site engineered fills unless
otherwise stated in the Soils Report or Foundation Investigation. If
unexpected pockets of poor or weak materials are encountered in
excavations, and they cannot be up -graded by mixing with other
materials or by other means, they may be rejected by the Soils
Engineer for use in engineered fill.
5,3.2 When imported fill materials are necessary to bring the site up to
planned grades, no materia( shall be imported priorto its approval and
acceptance by the Soils Engineer.
5.3.3 The Soils Engineer shall be given notice of the proposed source of
imported materials with adequate time allowance for his testing of the
proposed materials. The time required for testing will vary with
different types of materials, job conditions, and ultimate function of
filled a-eas. tinder best conditions the time requirement will not be
less than 48 hours.
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
03/16 REVISED PAD ELEVATIONS LOTS 1-15 (LOWERED BY 0.5)
NO. DATE REVISIONS ENGR. APPROV. DATE CHECKED BY:
DATE
AO 3/14
DATE
AO 3/14-
DATE
/14DATE
BE 3/14
P 2005 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC,
;I a'� ���_
w NO. 42038
Exp. 3/31/16 7;(�9T CiVIL ��t'�P
F�FCALIFV
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
I R V I N E I N C .
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
Three Hughes • Irvine, CA 92618 • PH: (949) 583-1010 FX: (949) 583-0759
PHILIP
0
:fie'^•, "_ —4 .— ... ... nm_ Q)
I
z
WDID# 5F15038418 - RISK LEVEL 1
TRA c r No.
ROUGH
DOWTY R.J 42038 EXP. 3/31
PLOTTED BY: Ben Etemadi DATE: Jul. 12, 2016
='ROSE=CT NO. o
6444, PHASE 13 -- X
PERMIT N0.
GRADING PLAN E=- °°°=`092
�h
cc
OF
CITY RECORDS=' NO. - I.1
08:55:59 AM FILE: F:\06-79\Engineering\TR_6444 3\GrJ—R,>.ugh\,SH105.dwg
L"10:i-017
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
PRELIMINARYSOILS
INVESTIGATION Me No. 05-11231
PRELIMINARYSOILSINVESTIGATIO;v Fite No, 05-11231
Tract 6444, SE Corner Poladiko Dr A Vintand St June 9, 2005
Tract 6444, SE Corner Paladin Dr & Vineland St Ju rte 9,2695
BakemfkJ4 C4
_ EggeA_-6
SakersJietd, CA _ Pape <_7
5.4 Placing, Spreading. and Compacting Fill Material:
material below tha disturbed surface. When tests ind cate the dens ty
of any layer of f. 1; or portion thereof is below the regiilred ninety (9;)
5.4.1
The fill material shall be placed in layers which, when compacted,
percent density, the particular layerorportion shall bo re -worked urtil
shall not exceed six (6.0) inches in tiickness. Each layer shall be
the required den. -pity has been obtained.
spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading tck
4
insure uniformity of material in each layer. Increased thickness of
5.4.8 When the Soils Engineer specifies compaction to other standards r
layers may be approved by the Soils Engineer when conditions
to percentages otherthan ninety (90) percent, such specification, wi 1i
warrant.
respect to the particular items shall supersede these. specifirationi.
5.4.2
All fills shall be placed in level layers; layers shall be continuous over
5.4.9 The fill operation shall be continued in six (6.0) inches compav:ed
the area of any structural unit, and all portions of the fill shall be
layers, as specinf3d above, until the fill has been brOL ght to within 13,11
brought up simultaneously within the area of any structural unit,
foot, plus or minas ofthefrnished slopes and grades, :s shown on, I itq
When imported material is used, it must be placed so that its
accepted pians. The finished surface of fill areas stall be graded r
thickness is as uniform as possible wit.hin the area of any structural
bladed to a smooth and uniform surface and no bore matelai shill
unit.
be left on the surface.
5.4.3
When materials are to be excavated and replaced in a compacted
5.4.10 Nofill material spall be placed, spread, or compacted while it is fra.:; an
condition, segmented, or leap -frogging of cut -fill operation within the
or thawing or during unfavorable weather condition.. When work is
area of any structural unit will not be l7Nrmitted unless the method is
interrupted by weather conditions, fill operations shal not be resumed
specifically described by the Soils Emjl neer.
until the Soils Engineer indicates that moisture conte -1t and densitycif
previously placed fill are satisfactory -
5.4.4
When the moisture content of fill material is below the lower limit
specified by the Soils Engineer, water shall be added until the mois-
ture content is as specked; and when it is above the upper limit
5.5 Observations and Testing:
specified, the material shall be aerated by blading or other satisfactory
methods until the moisture content is as specified.
The Soils Engineer shal be provided with a 48 hour advanco notice; in ord e!r
that he may be present at the site during all earthwork act vities R.-latecc to
5.4.5
After each layer has been placed, min:ed, and spread evenly, it shall
excavation, tree root removal, stripping, backfill, and compaction aid fithIg
be thoroughly compacted to not less than ninety (90) percent of
of the site and to perform periodic compaction tests so that substantal
maximum density in accordance with ASTM Density Test Method
conformance to these recommendations can be established.
D1557. Compaction shall be by equipment of such design that it will
be able to compact the fill to specified density. When the Soils
Engineer specifies a specific type of compaction equipment to be
used, such equipment shall be used as specified.
5.4.6
Compaction of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and
the equipment shall make sufficient tr=ps to insure that the desired
density has been obtained.
5.4.7
Field density tests shalt be made ---)y the Soils Engineer. The
compaction of each layer of fill shall be subject to testing. Where
sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil riay be disturbed to a depth of
several inches. Density tests shall be taken in the compacted
92005 SOILS ENGINEERING, NC
v:!2005 SOILS ENGI%EERING. INC.
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
I R V I N E I N C .
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
Three Hughes • Irvine, CA 92618 • PH: (949) 583-1010 FX: (949) 583-0759
PHILIP
0
:fie'^•, "_ —4 .— ... ... nm_ Q)
I
z
WDID# 5F15038418 - RISK LEVEL 1
TRA c r No.
ROUGH
DOWTY R.J 42038 EXP. 3/31
PLOTTED BY: Ben Etemadi DATE: Jul. 12, 2016
='ROSE=CT NO. o
6444, PHASE 13 -- X
PERMIT N0.
GRADING PLAN E=- °°°=`092
�h
cc
OF
CITY RECORDS=' NO. - I.1
08:55:59 AM FILE: F:\06-79\Engineering\TR_6444 3\GrJ—R,>.ugh\,SH105.dwg
L"10:i-017