Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.7-6352 Ph 1 - 5GRADING NOTES 1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM WP-/ APPENDIX J - CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS PERTAINING THEREOF AND PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT BY LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, PROJECT NO. 11513.001 DATED DECEMBER 21, 2016. 2. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL EXERCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISOR CONTROL DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS, SOILS REPORT, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CODE WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW. J. CIVIL ENGINEER, GE07ECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL BE N077FIED FORTY EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING ANY FILL MA 7FR/AL. 4. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE COND177ONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, • THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CON77N000SLY AND NOT BE LIM17ED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD 774E OWNER, ARCHITECT, AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION W1774 THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEP77NG FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR 774E ENGINEER. 5. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL COMPANIES WITH UNDERGROUND FACIL177ES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCT70N AND VERIFY THE LOCA77ON AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, WATER, SEWER, OIL AND GAS LINES 774E ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR BURIED LINES NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN OR FOR INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES. (USA 1-800-227-2600) 6. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING ALL AREAS TO + OR - 0.10 FOOT. 1F AN AREA SHOULD BE FOUND TO BE MORE THAN 0.10 FOOT OUT OF LEVEL AFTER COMPACTING AND ACCEPTANCE OF GRADING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN AND CORRECT THE GRADING AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 7. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER AS REQUIRED DURING THE GRADING OPERATIONS TO PREVENT THE OCCURRENCE OF A DUST NUISANCE AND SHALL PROTECT CURBS AND OTHER OBJECTS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. 8. EXCA VA 77ON - EXCA VA 77ON SHALL CONSIST OF ALL EXCA VA TION INVOLVED /N GRADING THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON 774E PLANS, EXCEPT ANY EXCA VA 77ON SEPARATELY DESIGNATED AND PAID FOR AS A SEPARATE ITEM. 9. THE WORK EMBRACED HEREIN SHALL BE /N ACCORDANCE W177-1 THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA77ON DATED JULY 1999, INSOFAR AS 774E SAME MAY APPLY /N ACCORDANCE WITH THE N07ES HEREON. IN CASE OF CONFLICT WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICA77ONS AND ANY N07ES HEREON, 774E NOTES HEREON SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER AND BE USED /N LIEU OF SUCH CONFLICTING PORTIONS. SAID SPECIFICA77ONS SHALL APPLY BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A) ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "B" AS /N ACCORDANCE WIN SEC77ON 90 AND SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 2500 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. B) ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SHALL BE TYPE "B", MEDIUM GRADED, 1/2" MAXIMUM AGGREGATE, AND INTIMATELY MIXED WITH 5-77. ASPHALT. 10. IN THE EVENT CONSTRUCTION STAKING BASED ON McINTOSH & ASSOCIATES' PLANS, DRAWINGS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS IS PERFORMED BY ANOTHER FIRM, McINTOSH & ASSOCIATES SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS AND RELEASED FROM ALL LIABILITY ARISING FROM 774E USE OF SAID PLANS, DRAWINGS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS 11. McINTOSH & ASSOCIATES SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO, OR USES OF, THESE PLANS ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED, IN WRITING, BY McINTOSH & ASSOCIATES. 12. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM WITH APPENDIX J - CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS PERTAINING THERE OF AND TO THE RECOMMENDA77ONS CONTAINED /N, AND MADE A PART HEREOF, THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT (NOTE 1), AND ALL ADDENDUMS THERETO. IN CASE OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE. 13. UPON COMPLE77ON OF GRADING AND BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, A FINAL SOILS REPORT SHALL BE PREPARED BY 774E SOIL ENGINEER. 14. THE SOIL ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW ALL EXCA VA 77ONS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING AND SHALL BE N077FIED OF ANY 17E -M ENCOUNTERED DURING THE GRADING OPERA77ONS THAT MIGHT AFFECT FOUNDA77ON STABILITY SO RECOMMENDATIONS CAN BE MADE BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. 15. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 2. 1. 16. ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN THREE (3) FEET /N VER 77CAL HEIGHT SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED TO PREVENT EROSION. IMPORTED FILL MATERIAL: REFER TO SPECIFIC EAR77-IWORK RECOMMENDAT70N FOR IMPORTED FILL MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS ON SHEET 5 HEREIN. 17. CLEARING AND GRUBBING. REFER TO SPECIFIC EARTHWORK RECOMMENDA77ON FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING REQUIREMENTS ON SHEET 5 HEREIN. 18. AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL (EXCEPT BUILDING PADS): REFER TO SPECIFIC EARTHWORK RECOMMENDAT70N FOR AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL REQUIREMENTS ON SHEET 5 HEREIN. 19. FILL MATERIAL: REFER TO SPECIFIC EAR7HWORK RECOMMENDA77ON FOR FILL MATERIALS LAYERING AND REQUIREMENTS ON SHEET 5 HEREIN. 20. ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY (90%) PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY APPROVAL METHOD PER APPENDIX J OF THE CURRENT CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND CER77FIED BY TESTS AND REPORT FROM SOILS ENGINEER. 21. ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED /N LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING SIX (6) INCHES IN COMPACTED THICKNESS BROUGHT TO NEAR THE OPTIMUM MOIS77JRE CONTENT OR TO A MOISTURE CONTENT COMMENSURATE- WI774 EFFECTIVE COMPAC77ON AND SOIL STABILITY, AND COMPACTED TO 907. OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D1557-78, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. COMPACTION SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY TESTS AND REPORT FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER. 22. FACES OF ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WI7H A GROUND COVER INDIGENOUS TO THE AREA AND MAINTAINED AGAINST EROSION. 23 EARTHWORK QUAN7777ES ARE BASED ON THE FREE FLOATING CONCRETE SLAB /N GRADE PER THE SOILS REPORT (NOTE 1). QUANT177ES FOR EARTHWORK CUT - CU. YD. 9,041 FILL - CU. YD, 7,146 EXPORT - AS REQUIRED TO FUTURE PADS SHRINKAGE FACTOR OF 157o WAS USED QUANT177ES ARE FOR GRADING PERMIT ONLY. THE ENGINEER MAKES NO WARRANTY OF THE ANTICIPATED SHRINKAGE FACTOR. IN CASE OF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER SO 774AT ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE MADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE THESE QUAN7777ES TO BASE HIS B/D ON. 24. BUILDING PAD PREPARATION - REFER SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION ON SHEET 5 HEREIN. 25. PAVEMENT PREPARATION - REFER SPECIFIC RECOMMENDA77ON ON SHEET 5 HEREIN. 26. AN OSHA PERMIT IS REQUIRED WHEN WORKERS MUST ENTER TRENCHES OR EXCA VA T70N FIVE (5) FEET OR DEEPER. 27. SUFFICIENT ACCESS TO THE EXIS77NG AND ABANDONED WELLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED /N ORDER FOR 774E DIVISION OF GAS, OILS AND GE07HERMAL RESOURCES (DIVISION) TO INVESTIGATE THE CONDITION OF THE WELL HEADS AND CHECK FOR LEAKAGE. IF ANY REABANDONMENTS ARE REQUIRED, THE DIVISION SHALL FURNISH THE NECESSARY SPECIFICA77ONS TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. 28. AT THE IN177AL CONSTRUC77ON MEETING PRIOR TO GRADING ACTT VI TIES, ALL CONSTRUC77ON WORKERS MUST BE INFORMED AS TO THE SYMPTOMS OF VALLEY FEVER. GRADING NOTES CONTINUED 27. 774E CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE GUIDE FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING AIR QUALITY IMPACTS (GAMAQI), JANUARY 10, 2002 REVISION, GU/DANCE DOCUMENT WHICH LISTS THE FOLLOWING MEASURES AS APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED FOR CONS77?UC770N ACTT 077ES WITHIN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AS FOLLOWS. A. MAINTAIN ALL CONSTRUC77ON EQUIPMENT AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER MANUALS B. SHUT DOWN EQUIPMENT WHEN NOT IN USE FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME. C. USE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION WHENEVER POSSIBLE IN LIEU OF DIESEL OR GASOLINE POWERED EQUIPMENT. D. CURTAIL USE OF HIGH -EMITTING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DURING PERIODS OF HIGH OR EXCESSIVE AMBIENT POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS "SPARE -THE -AIR" DAYS AS DECLARED BY 774E SJVAPCD. E. ENCOURAGE CONSTRUCT70N EMPLOYEES TO CARPOOL OR USE SHUTTLE TO RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS AT LUNCH. 28. PRIOR TO SITE GRADING, SUBDIVIDER SHALL HAVE A PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEY CONDUCTED TO SEARCH FOR NA77VE KIT FOX DENS, SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO GRADING. THE APPLICANT MAY BE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL N077FICA77ON REQUIREMENTS TO AGENCIES PRIOR TO GRADING LAND CONTAINING DENS. 29. PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF A GRADING PLAN, SUBDIVIDER /S SUBJECT TO THE MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT. INCLUDING THE SWANSON HAWK DURING THE RAPTOR NESTING SEASON (FEBRUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER). IF CONSTRUCTION IS TO OCCUR DURING RAPTOR NES77NG/BREEDING SEASON (FEBRUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER) NO CONSTRUC77ON ACTIVITY SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 500 FEET OF A AC77VE NEST. TREES TO BE REMOVED 774AT CONTAIN NESTS SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY DURING NON -BREEDING SEASON (OCTOBER THROUGH JANUARY) 30. 774E PRESENCE OF ANY PREVIOUSLY UNIDEN77F/ED PROTECTED SPECIES WHICH ARE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE MBHCP, INCLUDING THOSE PROTECTED UNDER 774E FEDERAL MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT, SHOULD BE AVOIDED AND EVALUATED BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST PRIOR TO CONS77?UCT/0N. THE FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME (CDFG) SHOULD BE N077FIED OF PREVIOUSLY UNREPORTED PROTECTED SPECIES ANY UNANTICIPATED TAKE OF PROTECTED IMLDLIFE SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE CDFG AND USFWS 31. IF ARCHEOLOGICAL OR PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING ACTIVITIES ON-SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP ALL WORK AND THE DEVELOPER SHALL RETAIN A QUALIFIED ARCHEOLOGIST TO EVALUATE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDING AND APPROPRIATE COURSE OF ACTION. SALVAGE OPERA77ON REQUIREMENTS /N APPENDIX K OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SHALL BE FOLLOWED AND THE TREA TMENT OF DISCOVERED NA 77VE AMERICAN REMAINS SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE CODES REGULA77ONS OF THE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION. 32. SHOULD HUMAN REMAINS BE DISCOVERED AT ANY 77ME ON ANY POR77ON OF THE PROJECT, WORK SHALL HALT AND THE CORONER BE NO77FIED IMMED/A TEL Y (SECTION 7050.5 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE). IN THE ABSENCE OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITOR, A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST AND THE LOCAL NA77VE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SHALL ALSO BE NOTIFIED. 33. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT (SJVAPCD) REGULA77ON VIII, DUST CONTROL MEASURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE SPECIFICALLY DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES 774E M177GA77ON MEASURES TO BE TAKEN ARE AS FOLLOWS: A. WATER EXPOSED SURFACES (SOIL) THREE- 77MES/DAY. B. WATER ALL HAUL ROADS AT A MINIMUM OF THREE 77MES PER DAY. C. REDUCE SPEED ON UNPAVED ROADS TO LESS THAN 15 MILES PER HOUR. D. STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING STORAGE PILES, WHICH ARE NOT BEING ACTIVELY UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES USING WATER OR BY COVERING WITH A TRAP, OTHER SUITABLE COVER OR VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER. E. CONTROL FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS DURING LAND CLEARING, GRUBBING, SCRAPING, EXCA VA TION, LEVELING, GRADING, OR CUT & FILL OPERATIONS WITH APPL/CA77ON OF WATER OR BY PRESOAKING. F. WHEN TRANSPOR77NG MATERIALS OFFS/7F MAINTAIN A FREEBOARD LIMIT OF AT LEAST SIX INCHES AND COVER OR EFFEC77VELY WET TO LIMIT VISIBLE DUST EMISSIONS G. LIMIT AND REMOVE THE ACCUMULATION OF MUD AND/OR DIRT FROM ADJACENT PUBLIC ROADWAYS AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY. (USE OF DRY ROTARY BRUSHES /S PROHIBITED EXCEPT WHEN PRECEDED OR ACCOMPANIED BY SUFFICIENT WETTING TO LIMIT VISIBLE DUST EMISSIONS AND USE OF BLOWERS /S EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN). H. STABILIZE THE SURFACE OF STORAGE PILES FOLLOWING 774E ADDITION OR REMOVAL OF MATERIALS USING WATER. I. REMOVE TRACKOUT WHEN /T EXTENDS 50 OR MORE FEET FROM THE SI TE A T THE END OF EACH WORKDA Y. J. CEASE GRADING ACTIO77ES DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WINDS (GREATER THAN 20 MPH OVER A ONE-HOUR PERIOD). K. ASPHALT -CONCRETE PAVING SHALL COMPLY WITH 774E SJVAPCD RULE 4641 AND RESTRICT USE OF OF CUTBACK, SLOW -CURE AND EMULSIFIED ASPHALT PA WNG MATERIALS. 34. GRADING WORK WILL BE SUPERVISED AS ENGINEERED GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX J OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. 35. IF THE PROJECT /S SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE NA 77ONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES), A NOTICE OF INTENT" (NOI) TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (SWRCB ORDER NO. 2009-009-DWO) MUST BE FILLED WI7H STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD IN SACRAMENTO BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION AC77WTY. COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT REQUIRES THAT A STORM WATER POLLU77ON PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BE PREPARED, CONTINUOUSLY CARRIED OUT, AND ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE FRO PUBLIC INSPECTION DURING NORMAL CONSTRUCTION HOURS. WASTE DISCHARGE IDENTIFICATION (WDID) NUMBER 5F15C378849 HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE STA 7E WATER RESOURCES BOARD FOR THIS PROJECT. 36. AN OPEN STREET PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM 774E CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING ACCEPTED STREET RIGHT OF WAY. UNLESS SECURED BY A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, SECURITY BASED ON AN APPROVED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND INSURANCE AS REQUIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT. 37. ALL ONS17E UNPAVED ROADS AND OFFSITE UNPAVED ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY STABIL/ZED OF DUST EMISSIONS US/NG WATER OR CHEMICAL STABILIZER/SUPPRESANT. 38. PAD /S GRADED FLAT AT ROUGH GRADING FINISHED GRADES IMLL INCORPORATE A 1% SWALE THAT WILL DIRECT DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AND TO THE STREET SEE TYPICAL LOT SWALE GRADING ON SHEET 1. 39. WASH OFF CONSTRUCTION AND HAUL TRUCKS TO MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF MUD AND DIRT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 40. DUST CONTROL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE DUST CONTROL PLAN (DCP) FOR THIS PROJECT FROM THE DEVELOPER, AND SHALL KEEP A COPY ON St 7E AT ALL TIMES. FOR THE DURA 77ON OF CONTRACTOR'S OCCUPANCY OF THE SITE, CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WIN THE PROVISIONS OF SAID PLAN. 41. STORM WATER POLLU77ON PREVEN77ON CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVEN77ON PLAN (SWPPP) FOR THIS PROJECT FROM THE DEVELOPER, AND SHALL KEEP A COPY ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. FOR THE DURAT70N OF CONTRACTORS OCCUPANCY OF 7HE SI7E; CONTRACTOR /S REQUIRED TO COMPLY W17H THE PROVISIONS OF SAID PLAN. 42. PALEONTOLOGICAL MON/TOR/NG SHALL TAKE PLACE DURING CONSTRUC77ON EXCA VA 77ON AC77W TIES THA T RESUL T IN EXCA VA TIONS OF SIX FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE OR GREATER WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. FOLLOWING ARE THE SPECIFIC MEASURES A) ASSIGN A PALEONTOLOGICAL MONITOR, TRAINED AND EQUIPPED TO ALLOW THE RAPID REMOVAL OF FOSSILS WI77-1 MINIMAL CONSTRUCTION DELAY, TO THE S17E FULL-TIME DURING THE INTERVAL OF EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES B) SHOULD FOSSILS BE FOUND WITHIN AN AREA BEING CLEARED OR GRADED, DIVERT EARTH-D/S77JRB/NG ACTIV177ES ELSEWHERE UN77L THE MONITOR HAS COMPLETED SALVAGE. IF CONS7RUC77ON PERSONNEL MAKE THE DISCOVERY, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHOULD IMMEDIATELY DIVERT CONSTRUCTION AND N077FY THE MONITOR OF THE FIND. GRADING NOTES CONTINUED C) PREPARE, IDENTIFY, AND CURATE ALL RECO.ERED FOSSILS FOR DOCUMENTATION IN THE SUMMARY REPORT AND TRANSFER TO AN APPROPRIATE DEPOSITORY. D) SUBMIT A SUMMARY REPORT TO THE CITY OF- BAKERSFIELD. TRANSFER COLLECTED SPECIMENS WITH A COPY OF REPORT TO THE REPOSITORY. PALEONTOLOGICAL MONITORING DURING CONS7RUC77ON ACTIVITIES THAT INVOLVE EXCAVA77ON AC7711771ES OF SIX FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE OR GREATER ON THE PROJECT SITE WOULD REDUCE THE P07EN77AL IMPACTS ON PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES TO Lt:SS THAN SIGNIFICANT. 43. THE LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND GRADED TO MINIMIZE EXCESS LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE ACROSS THE SIDEWALK FOR THOSE AREAS OVER 2Z 44. ALL WORK WILL STOP IMMEDIATELY IF ANY UNKNOWN ODOROUS OR DISCOLORED SOIL OR 07HER POSSIBLE HAZARDOLS MATERIALS ARISE DURING ANY PART OF THE TESTING, GRADING, OR CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT SITE. 45. THE HANDLING AND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS AND ACUTELY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO LESS THAN THRESHOLD PLANNING QUAN7777ES WITHIN 1,000 F=ET OF SENS1771E RECEPTORS WHICH INCLUDE RESIDEN77AL AREAS, >CHOOLS, DAYCARE CENTERS, HOSPITAL, CONVALESCENT HOMES AND OTHER LARGE IMMOBILE POPULATIONS. SENS177VE RECEPTORS Sh;'ALL NOT BE APPROVED WITHIN ZONES OF CANCER RISK IDENTIFIED BY A HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF GREATER THAN 10 IN 1, 000, 000. 46. CONSTRUCTION AC77077ES ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT SI7E WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE IN COIIFORMANCE WITH SECTION 9.22.050 OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH LIMITS CONSTRUCTION TO THE HOURS OF E' A.M. TO 9 P.M. ON WEEKDAYS, AND BETWEEN 8 A.M. AND 9 P.M. ON WEEKENDS, WHERE CONSTRUCTION OCCURS LESS THAN 1,000 FEET FROM RESIDENCES 47. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH MUFFLERS AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE K17H THE EQUIPMENTS' FACTORY SPECIFICATIONS. DURING CONSTRUC77ON AC77077ES 774E CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT MUFFLER AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS SHALL BE ONSI7F 48. 24 HOUR NOTICE. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECT70N SEC77ON SHALL BE GI VEN A T LEAST 24 HOUR NOTICE. THE SEC77ON MA Y BE NOTIFIED AT (661) 326-3049. 49. COMPAC77ON TESTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER/CONTRACTOR. THE NUMBER AND LOCA77ONS OF THE TESTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CTY ENGINEER. 50. MAXIMUM SLOPE RATIO FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK TO FACE OF WALL OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE 4: 1, EXCEPT FOR TWO FEET BEHIND THE SIDEWALK WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL BLS 2% AL TERNA TT VEL Y, THE CITY ENGINEER MAY APPROVE CURBING BEHIND THE SIDEWALK OR 07HER METHOD OF PREVENTING EROSION ON''0 THE SIDEWALK. 51. ANY 17EMS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DO NOT MEET THE CURRENT STANDARDS SET B1' PUBLIC WORKS WILL REQUIRE REPAIRING AND/OR UPGRADING AS PER 774E CITY ENGINEER. 52. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALTER SHALL BE CONTA, 7FD TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONS77?UC77ON. (1-800-612-2444) OWNER & SUBDIVIDER: TARINA HOMES, INC. 1401 19TH STREET, #215 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 CONTACT PERSON - CHRIS JOHNSTON (661) 487-5990 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 26074 AVENUE HALL, SUITE 21 SANTA CLARITA, CA 91355 CONTACT PERSON - RENEE MORALES 661-257-7434 PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT: FILE NO. 11513.001 DATED: DECEMBER 21, 2016 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, INC 26074 AVENUE HALL, SUITE 21 SANTA CLARITA, CA 91355 CONTACT PERSON - RENEE MORALES 661-257-7434 CIVIL ENGINEER: MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES 2001 WHEELAN COURT BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 CONTACT PERSON - ROGER MCINTOSH (661) 834-4814 BENCHMARK: U.S.G.S. Y-292, ELEVATION = 782.57 B.C. IN 9" CONC. PAD 14.5' N.W. OF STREET SIGN AND 51.50' FROM CENTERLINE OF HIGHWAY 178 AND LENE PLACE. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING OF N00'32'24"E, SHOWN FOF' THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1)182, FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 47 AT PAGES 120 AND 121 IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS HEREON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF E_, PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AND ALL OF PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10182, FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 74 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGES 120 AND 121, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER; ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF `SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, M.U.M., CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET TITLE 1. COVER SHEET 2. GRADING PLAN 3. GRADING PLAN (CONT.), 4. SECTIONS & DETAILS 5. SOILS REPORT SHEET 6. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7. EROSION CONTROL PLAN ;,CONT.) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD KERN COUNTY GRADING The (TRADING P`_AN as shown m this drawing is hereby approved, subject to any indicated correction,, or additions. Approval by the Public Works Department and Building department indicates approval only as to design criteria used and cor fonnance to City Standards, Codes and Ordinances. Engineer for tt e subdivider or oeveioper shall be respcnsible for accuracy of calculations for this plan and shall submit a certified "as -graded" plan after completion of the grading. APPROVED BY-. Buildir o -------------- Dat fa _10 Date PROPERTY UNE I � I 17G 1% 1 I7cbqt I PROPOSED HOUSE Ld �8 K 124. W W 9F ma I ICOMbINA1fION SIDE#ALK CURB do GUTTER TYPICAL LOT SWALE GRADING NO SCALE PROJECT AREA: 29.57 ACRES TOTAL. NO. OF LOTS = 116 INCLUDING HIGHLAND KNOLLS AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG BEDFORD GREEN DRIVE. EXCLUDING VINELAND ROAD & EXISTING PAVED AREAS ALONG BEDFORD GREENS DRIVE & HIGHLAND KNOLLS DRIVE. H.C.P. FEE'S PREVIOUSLY BEEN PAID WITH THE ORIGINAL TRACT 6352 APPROVED GRADING PLAN. NOTE: NO ADDITIONAL AREA WILL BE DISTURBED FOR GRADING OPERATIONS OR STAGING RIM 0 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE CALIFOR'P11,A-1-1 PLAN FOR REVISED VTTM 6352 PHASES 1 TO 5 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 533- 012- 41, 47 8 50 GRADING PERMIT #17- 40000007 WDID #5F15C378849 I i 1 1 1 I I PROJECT SITE I SCHOOL SITE NOT A PART PER GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT PER DOCUMENT NO. 0209142890, DATED 9/30/2009. O.R. KEY MAP SCALE: 1" = 200' ABBREVIATIONS � EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT FS FINISH SURFACE TC TOP OF CONCRETE OE OVER -EXCAVATION FL FLOWUNE FF FINISH FLOOR CL CENTERLINE FC FINISH CONCRETE ELEV. ELEVATION FP FINISH PAD EX. EXISTING E.P. EDGE OF PAVEMENT PL PROPERTY UNE TC TOP OF CURB R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY TP TOP OF PAVEMENT D.W.S. DESIGN WATER SURFACE GE GRADE BREAK `° EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR FP. 367.9 PROPOSED PAD ELEV. PROPOSED GUTTER FLOWUNE ELEV. EX. TOP OF CJRB ELEV. Z ILI LL z _' I EX. GUTTER FLOWUNE ELEV. J W Q� PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEV. 5.00% DIRECTION AND PERCENT OF SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE 'It NOTA PART PER GRANT D® DOCUMENT N I I RECORDED MAY 8, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 0210059820, O.R. I -I - - - --D- LOT D- LOT "A" z I PARK SITE W I a I e� 0 0 i W I AREA TO BE DISTURBED PER THIS GRADING PLAN (PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED WITH APPROVED TRACT 6532 GRADING PLAN) CURB AND GUTTER EX. CURB AND GUTTER - - - - CENTERLINE OF STREET -• -- -- -- - - - - - PROPERTY LINE / RIGHT--OF-WAY PAD COMPACTION LIMITS --- - - D STORM DRAIN TYPE "A" CATCH BASIN `IVITH 3.5' WIDE OPENING UNLESS OTHERVdSE NOTED EX. STORM DRAIN TRACT BOUNDARY PHASE BOUNDARY �s�es����s+�����®���������������• LIMITS OF GRADING OUTSIDE OF THE TRACT BOUNDAR" a SEC11ON DESIGNATION: SECTION LETTER 1 "a SHEET WHERE SECTION IS SHOWN Know what's beloyv. Call before Y g you di . CITY RECORDS NO: 'x 01 � 0j N I o r� 0 �t t- a1 U a: O �: ao o `° U (k 6 = Z ILI LL z _' I m J W Q� � o JLLI d �t to � W W L) 00 �ci: a0 t 0 r Lel co � 0 vi Z k� w m s a CD CNI Q � m N o L0 O 0 L0 O H Z w = Z ILI UJ IL J W C N to � W Z a0 a: 0 � Q Z U s a CD CNI Q � o H � a 0 a' lJJ I N jJJJ i� LL O ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT FS FINISH SURFACE TC TOP OF CONCRETE OE OVER -EXCAVATION FL FLOWLINE FF FINISH FLOOR CL CENTERLINE FC FINISH CONCRETE ELEV ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK m EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR FP, 367.9 PROPOSED PAD ELEV. ry PROPOSED GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEV. LwLI 000 EXIST. TOP OF CURB ELEV. C6 EXIST. GUTTER FLOWUNE ELEV. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEV. 5.00% DIRECTION AND PERCENT OF SLOPE z FOR DRAINAGE a. CURB AND GUTTER w m EXIST. CURB AND GUTTER - - - CENTERLINE OF STREET - - - - - - - - PROPERTY UNE / RIGHT-OF-WAY - - - - - - - - - - - PAD COMPACTION LIMITS - - o STORM DRAIN z TYPE 'A' CATCH BASIN WITH 3.5' WIDE -� OPENING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED i EXIST. STORM DRAIN - - - - - - TRACT BOUNDARY Z PHASE BOUNDARY 000000N*0000*e000NooN000000N*LIMITS OF GRADING OUTSIDE OF THE TRACT BOUNDARY SECTION DESIGNATION: P SECTION LETTER A -z �I I ' �______-(NOT16 - -- -- -- I I 34 30 30' i 1 i I� l r 12 15 _ ,! t �b, I �/ O 28 __ - I oI I F�' 1 � �o F) Pi -- -- - - I - _ ..... I I FP 690.6 I 0 0 o C) / 1 30 � `� (NOT A PARTS -=--- __�- _ - i� �_ �o o W PROPOSED 6' HIGH 19 ^ ,- �- x� 1 13 1 I I 1 I ., G I �o h I W BLOCK WALL PER ... i 29 \ xc y 1 4 , J i SEPARATE PLANS sg06 _ I \ \ - 1 ' 690 I I . x , fig. YaO ,r. I , �o o I I � I <> r� �-� o � FP 690 2 ? f'G 21 I o 690 / � ,,_ x s.,, � •� o � � � _ � � o _ 23 ;' FP 690.1 1 � II 1 .f Y" \ o 0 0' 22 ,''� \"'o I Di \ $ \ �t 1 ' 21 1 FP 692.5 I FP 691.0 / 4� I ice• / 0 5 30' 30' 20 .,_ 21 ►� ` ! ' 1 FP 694.0 11 , !=� _ - - - - _ - _ - �� - - - - ��/ 'Vf 1 20 LLJ -� > FUTURE \ 1 F 695.6 ► 8 _, _ E o 1 0.40% g7,65 6 X69 / FP 710.0 - - _ - `� 8 1 FP 697.0 _ _ - - `'�' 0.50% 6 16 -IF N ,1 -- - - --- - - 1 „ 1 -..- - 1 0.50 . - - ---i 0 1 g6 6 J \ 1 i { FP 698.9 _ - - ` FL - - - - sem I 1 - 0 ^ �1 i -� �6 4 r CC _ x . �:,.."., _, 1 \ ' � ,t � \ F .0 1 � - _ � o`' 6a 4 =- _ _- �--� �1 � � 20 FI- I 681.9 0.4 . 681.6 W P 700 '" 3LLJ FP 702.0 _ - _ _ - �._ 15 _ s `\ , ` _ 2.t36� 90 ,IVC 903 0.5 G � FP 703.5 `: \ _ \ N ��►�" - 9 . 901 6 31 14 F, -1111 Ar � .. \ FP 705.3: \ ,/� o _ a1 _� _-_-_ �,• og B.. o t 3 2.8 9554 w _ /S• I 13 \E 23 s - 0 0 - 2, / t FP 706. \ - �� _ _ _ _ _ 1 I 1 22 r..r FUTURES .. OS _ 691 Y o j (� 68677 - 22 � tom' I P 690 T 1 / I � , •` „.-•� \ , �D I I � � 6.91,O,rG � I f.I 9 � .., 2 0 0 6 N 1 -- _- -- I I ; I _ - FP 690.6 I / I _. ,__ FP 691.0 3 1 � I � I 17�i me _ 1 .` 4 1 1 FP 690.7 I I h I _ Y. I FP 691.6 , o j 6� I _ �6913I I .-'v 6 5 1 FP .6 H Ih� I 17 '' ► I I I il:r I ' 7 ' 1 FP 695.4 I 4 ,_.. 1- FG I ti I 1 1 v FP 696.7 { FP 691.0 _ �• ,� . l - \ FP 698.5 2.8 • - g2-9'5 -_- _ 0 6 4G 1dp - - 2 0• _ 6% 108.21 2.86% 105 k; _- ��� 03 6 t \ 0 { FP 700.4 - 5 T 1 SHEET WHERE SECTION IS SHOWN -' `a \ 9 { _ { G ... _ o� . ..... o .6 ' I >05 °h \ \ FP 701.4 1 { 2.8' , p8?,T °66> 68 F� 1 \ \ \ �1 T'N J ... fG Z ` `I� 05 4 1�• p/ 1 ^ {' 18' I 18' I 6 E 1� \ `'' \ Q 1 p .. , r\ 1 2 3 5' 1 30� 30' 20' - - - -"�- \ o S FP 691.7 4 10 Zo 4 0 1 1 , � 69 I \ \ 2p lL 5� 1 1 o I sol I - 1 1 0 FP 695.6 - - - - - \ 30 30 \ 705.5 FG 1 1 12 11 1. FP 700.6 I': FP 698.5 I I 11 \� \ ,2 1 I ti 5 26 I L \ FP 704.6 5 0 \\ ,�� � ,', 13 1 FP 704.5 � FP 702.6 1 � I I h � I 1 12 \ FP 706.5 \ ^ \ 1 FP 7.Q5:0 -Q W _ _ � I h� \' 15 1 _ _-- \ 1 4 -- - O• I �1 ----------------- FP 4 , 705.4 j Fi _ -11 - - -{L - FP 692.5 / 25 2 q FP 708.4 \ _ \` . , �. P 706 i 4 - / c� I FIXTURE ._ \ 1° � \ \ ` {: r 1 ----� _. � � _ - P FP 7103 ` ; ` \ 15 \ �- o _ 1 .,� / � � �, x` .,a., ► 1085 O \ r' 1 � J � - 5 FP 705.5 j -- _L _-� %. �'w �`'" JV .� ' 2 Ey - ^�. 777 ... w 4.22. 0 0 .o Fes_ C' I 4� 40' I ^1 ^1 LE_A _ - �3 0 «� �ti ,, P ° 1 Svc �� o �� i 14 6 M ( 4.229 696- ' 0 0 IV 4 �, R'v _ 81 r�-,,, �,h• � 93 g3.9 . �o G I I FP 692.9 48' I � � F� I '. 1� V '.. . 3$ � � \ _I' ' �-� - �JO 10Q• ;�_�,, 00 961 .3 X00 '", � I � I \`. - , K '�'�� lF I �� `� 22 - v� 4, ° B 1p2 �. - �° 9953 _ 6.;, ._�� �,o I PROPOSED 6' HIGH I I �c h \', FP 707.6 i' - 1 Fl. 10A - - 5 I BLOCK WALL PER \ 07-� 1°Z-�� - 6gC I i I 693° i f x i F 21 ` FP 708.5 _SEPARATE PLANS / / h c� 150 EG 15 Lc / ppp,\�'� 1 1, x 0�'6 90C6 '01 J t 1 FP 715.0 / s / h 20 FP 709.6 Q1 f ; 1 342 e 03°8 - \ - - - r 1 00• ( 13 \ � ....-.�" ,o X519• mac' °49-3q0� °• �W-- -__--_ �-__ 24 IO / ' �,� \ . h� 0 _ - - 7 I I 4 P 693.0 I --__ ^? / O ► 0 19 { FP 710.5 \ r 5 [._ r I 18 \ FP 711.5 \ - ?�� '- _ - 1 ' S I I FP 698.6 FP 696.4 I o I 1 _ --- 6933F0' X Ar ` _ I II I 14 /'' - / �� { FP 712.5 %_ - /,- 2 1 4 I FP 701.6 i I rh~ - 3 /, Z o 1 1 1 1 I h I FP 693.3 Ory I it I III- - -� { N. 1� / 1 >> _ -r 12 6 ' FG FP 715.0 f7 17 , J a :.. 1� -ev- 23 �` { i 3 { FP 704.5 1 I l oo I 16 C' r� _ p5 �, , 1 FP 705.0 1 G I I [ I FP 713.0 ,rid„ ° 1 i F I i► 11.� / A � 1�° ,/ 8 1 �\\co 2 ► G 6 00• I I I I I FP 705.0 I ► 6 F 688' 1FP 713.0N�����, 1 FG 1phyr0 �9� II - t I 4 L P� - _'---=m- ,\ 1 { FP 705.7 -P z o 6 FS E S H E , II \ \ y 1 ► 1 � P 56 � 01.x._ � .._ 105 , / -. <. � , / o ��., _. N A FP 705.7. { -- 9 1� \ � x _ _ _ � � \ G� -, 1.85 , / _ ... � - °, G ^_ � . r.,•-�--`. _ .._ � C� t h i ca 1 I o o� 1 �^ 95• Q III 1 3 I , _ - wR G 1 / OB. = o� \ { 4 1 .--- , i h , , ,1 £, o� 25 FP 714.5 I L , 0° a 0� \� ,� 1Z \. \� h 1 n 26 I ilk FG 1 - - Q ° 6 � \ \ \ 7 _._.___.. o i o6g FP 693.8 F L o a I I( 11 'L 1'`- �G 1 N __._ .\ i 05 1 2 7 I 1 cz M: a \q5 I I o 0 O6 �, Q\ 01 '' 0 2 , : FP 707.5 \ ;, \ ,fG --`_-� !� FP 695.8 I FP 694.5 I I G9 I \ € E cN°kg / 1 \ \2 _ o . _ -' g 28 ) FP 695.8 1 I 1 1 11 tI mow. o I 1 I - - - - - ---I I �1 p3 11 17 1 1,�°. 1 % ' 1 ` FP 708.5 \ \ _ -= 0 1 29 699 y I I z FI 0.60% 1 !� - �-j 1 \ : $"' ,� 1 FP 696.5 1 1 L - - - G I I _ _ - 710. \ 0 1� 0 13 FP 697.4 { 5 i - . I I I W ,� 71162 � _ 7iQ83 � / _.� \ � 30 ` I � , I I I I 98 �' 1 \ FP 709.5 \ ` 1;, 11 I I I 0 1 I ? I �- �, �' , ; 4 \ FG '�' \y 31 P_ 98.0, , _ _ _ _ + J 6g\ i X90 , I 12 CL' I 11.62 0.5 �.. / ► L I I �' g'I-. - 1 \ 1 108 EG FP 714.0 0 ' - - 5 \ FP 710.5 ► -_% ` \ 32 1. 1 -- I( I _T-' FP 711.5 1 10°� =" \ d 2 \ FP 700.3 , �� _-A-:77. ---- I11 FP 712.3 III I I 7 W III I U9 8 { FP 713.0 G ; `'.-• "k' � \ aq \ - : \ 4y..---..-- I � .�. �..- ..-• �.. > pF to I " I FP 713.0 \', FP 701.5 FP 714.0 1 Q I I I FP 713.0 1 1 3 FG h FP 702.521 v \ I 1 ` 7• y - - _ 18' 18 I 1 -P 30 F _ � �, \ FP 704.6 ox 5' FG 11 ,'tom -� 20 \ / - _ +F -r 10 1 cI) 11 4 I I FP 713.6 20' 30 30' 1 EG 1130 r I)�1� J e. I I I I I ?6 I 1`L ' 1 g ` FP 705.6 III 6 FG 1., I o o1 '` ` I 18 1 1 FP 707.5 1 I \3 ^Y 15 FP 711 16, 1 7 '' FP 709.6 I S E E II H E E T :3 Io , ;: i .4 E 1 41 I I FP 712.0 1 II FP 713.4 1 '' �': I FP 712.4 1 I I C II I 10 L - - -f SCALE: 1 " = 50' 50' 25' O' 50' 100' Know what's below. Call before you dig. 1z)-'S'­�_ f�I, -c- CITY RECORDS NO: rn L0 O y o � Q i Oz00 i aiF- to O to Z O I Q J J Q U m a o Z W LwLI 000 C6 i LU w co o LL_ cfl Q -� z oN " a. w m = Y Q o m o M M Z� z n -� ) i b� Q Z rh J a v � d' P 4L Q Ld 0 a 0 W W N I LL 0 L0 O I � m cv V_ G Z W CO) C6 i LU = Q -� z CL a. = tp o Q M Q z n � i Q Z 0 Q Ld I- o' o 0 a 0 W W N I LL 0 L0 O I � cv V_ Z W CO) C6 LU = Q -� CL a. = tp Z Q M Q z co � O Q Z 0 Q I- 0 a 0 W W N I LL 0 5 p f 15¢9 / ,�,�� \ \ a.. - 10 k J - _ 702 670 B� w ��_ _ - - �g i r - - - - - y \ 0 EG / / \ \ . \ \ � � 1py, �' _ f1 � - ©.._. _ _ _ _ - - - - - - gp B 6°' ' ^ I g� I C6 15 FP 715.0 / s 2� FP 709.6 \; � \ 3k2 -� 0308 j-� ---l= -- 6 'I � �' I I j 0 0 FP 710.5 \ °� 0 - _ . \ `$' FL p.5 - _ r 7 24 I . 1 4 P 693.0 FP 711.5 \ - ?� - I " d 1 8 \-�'" _ ► ti4� FP 696:4 I o 1 6g�3F FP 6986{ J r 4t �. 14 ti,:, � ! ,- - ,, r \ _ �_, - '" - 4 ► FP 701.6 1 I i - -- -- FP - _ I I I FP 712.5 t� /' 2� / ti o7 ! 1 y II 1 I - / ?�?�ry / ! 17 \ \ a- o _' �� 105' /'. , 1 �� \ I - 1 1 FP 693.3 EG FP 715.0 6' ! \ J �� - ,' / �.85%� - _ 3 1 FP 704.5 n I I E' I o 12 6� I I 1150 I / 16 1 FP 713.0 �r_ - 052• ' ! FP 705.0 FG IQ y `Oo ( 1 1 \ 1 1 `F l 4 1 .,,� �- ' YQOR'� 707 1 _ / �, �. ,.,,2 1 ' oo I I o o I I FP 713.0 ! N,cr4 0 Et , / ca -p6}5 ! o \ 1.. ! FP 705.0 I ! 1 FG 1p� 6 6g . I �o I E E S H E IE T 2 1 - -� '` \ 1 1� FP 705.7 , 1 ! FG 1`y bgk I FP 693.3 M7 I - o I �� I p8 _ / �, 0 _ \ \ N ! FP 705.7 ! 1 _ _ .. o I - g1. 4 P r-- - - - _ N ��' °° ,I , I •�. _ -� � N� G y. 1 / � o /' , , -, \ N � \ 1 H _ U .-" - -" � � � 6 r FG I U II 1 13 , ;----- ! ��� �� /- p56p \ \ZO ! 4 1FG r: ► , I o ' 1 gee ., O ._... FP 714.5 25 0 6 I \ o t I a I I k5 FG I I 111 g0 0 - _ 06� �,e\ p`1C p11 12 _ - o \ \ FP 707.5 \� ` \ \ \� 7p57F : _,-- '`�- . ^ I 27 26 FP 694.5 I 8g ( FP 693.8 I 1 I I 1 11 ` 3 1 1ti ,0 0 9 1 2 \ \ 2 G _rte ,� , i FP 695.8 I 1 C� I WI o a I - - - - - - I . I I ss ,0 110 1 6� 10 k , ,' / / / \ \ \ ' 2 8 FP 695.8 1 I 1 1 ti\ 0 1 a o I IF.. 1110 77 1� , - \ FP 708.5 CTI - o ! 29 1 1 1 66839 I v �, 62 FL 0.60% ilio erg - 3 \ \ . ` o ! 1 Fc , W I >,� 711 - 93 / - \ 1 FP 696.5 L - - - - - C� Q t I 1 _ �_ _ - - 71pg8 FL \\ FP 709.5 \ \ \ o 0 1 30 FP 697.4 1 00 1 1 �- * 11 i I ` i 62 0.5 11.,. / - , - \ 4 \ \ \ fG i� o \� 31 FP 898.0 ! 1 + - _ - G I , ,;� _. _ \ \ 108 \� \ 1 FP 698.7 !.. _ -- I I 1 0 3 f FP 714.0 o _� - 5 \ \ \ \ ` w 1 - - - L �?WW I I I 11k0 \ FP 710.5 G \ \ 32 \ C \ 1 �. _ _ �- _ _ . ov I / I FP 711 \'`. �,r `'� _ _ _ i I - - �.� 69147 f1 I w vo-i W FP 700.3 . ` �. 1 :� _ - -! _ - / FP 693.9 I �� -�- \ 6 w E Q11 = 2I r--- , 7 \ FP 712.3 H \ 105 FG \ 5\ `�' \\ C' ''! - vINEYAA_ 1� 4 - --� W I I i I 1 \ 2 3 \ ! \ 4 - �-�E G K_ C� I ae I I 9 i 8 I FP 713.0 \ 4 FG a \ \ \ \ OET Z II 11 I 1� I 9k - 8 FI 13 255 6g 09 60;' fG c 1 I ► FP 713.0 ! 111• ^ 22 \ - `\,.... ,8 j 6 _ 93 II k0 FP 714.0 1 Q I FP 713.0 I \ G' \` FP 701.5 g5 - fE 1V I I I 3 E ,� A , __ 9G 6 15 . W I \ �•; 1ti• > o \ FP 702.5 1.48 - g4. W GA III 1 18, 21 � $' ' I 1 = EG 113 \ FP 704.6 -- I G 1�0 /1� \ 4 _ - I*� 1 0 It � � 30''/ 30' S� 1 fG 1 11,�pF 1 0 _ r. I � J � 20 \ ` �'- � t `�20 I I FP 713.6 I 2- 1 �12 r- 1 9 \ o i `� � ! FP 705.6 � III FG I 0 1 ,� 1 1 FP 707.5 S E S 18 \ \ o 51 16, 17 ' FP 709.6 M' it I I �I 15 FP 711.4 ► \ ,,/ 0� �e69 e� c;a g69�1.9 11 14I I I FP 712.0 1 ! 1 ',_,,\ o / o�P p015 g r.\ II FP 713.4 t �cs9 I I FP 712.4 1 1 \ �y6 01 ,\' 3 _ T II - , >>0 7, i _!--_-- ! �_NEYA _, - ow /' OZk9 - �pA.e \ -1 5 24,X / � O5� `\ _ o_ 0 2 FP 701.5 \ z it 1`: \ . Lu 5 I I \! \ 7105, ,09 >� o >09 0 l> = - - 61 A 2. _ 3 FP 702.6 I 13 at 0.75% 10 99 ' p� °� _ i " - ' \ 110 110• Ok _ _ 01 , _ - V_ LLJx 8 a I I I '' - -moo- 5 9`>G 68 P! 22 E"" 2.3 O8 1 -ccs- 42� ' \ , - ' \" ' FP,704.0 a I I FP 713.4 / \ \ �0• 99B 1pg9 O9 g0 pg. - - =x= _ - - 4 \ \ ry 815 1 III f \ � ° o o• '2 ,.� ,., � � _ , ! \ \ �. 8 5 \ FP 705.5 Y FP 706.6 \ \ o 000 _ --- 6 \ 54' I 1 11 - - - I 7 ! FP 708.5 \ H \ w \ 19 60' 11 0 9 11 FP 709.5 i _ FP 712.7 i 11 10 1 / � FP 712.5 ► I FP 712.0 FP 711.5' 1 � !�h• � 10�' -�_ i 712.0 FP I v -r1 I_V) G I I � -P �. PROPOSED 6' HIGH I FG 1 0 1'` 1 LS _ - � - .� , � •v o ^ 1 BLOCK WALL PER I h 1,ry 1 L5 _ �_ - 2•55x ,y"? oti� ,�o -. _ _.. SEPARATE PLANS N�1 16.8 -- 255% I1� 00�� 9 t �pCR 8 2.55% ON cp ZRP - J C:) - .,.f.-■�-t N DRIVE ��B& ND K OLLS ?DEW" - ' _ H�GHLA - -\ .; t , ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND - - - - - - - - - - - FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT FS FINISH SURFACE O _ _ _ CENTERLINE OF STREET TC TOP OF CONCRETE OE OVER -EXCAVATION v, FL FLOWLINE FF FINISH FLOOR - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE / RIGHT-OF-WAY CL CENTERLINE FC FINISH CONCRETE Z - w as - - PAD COMPACTION LIMITS ELEV ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK � = J EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR - - D STORM DRAIN FP 367.9 PROPOSED PAD ELEV. TYPE 'A' CATCH BASIN WITH 3.5' WIDE o � OPENING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PROPOSED GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEV. _ EXIST. STORM DRAIN Z EXIST. TOP OF CURB ELEV. - - - - TRACT BOUNDARY C -A EXIST. GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEV. PHASE BOUNDARY z to NNNooN**N*eN**NesLIMITS OF GRADING OUTSIDE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEV. OF THE TRACT BOUNDARY 5.00% DIRECTION AND PERCENT OF SLOPE -am- FOR DRAINAGE SECTION DESIGNATION: H CURB AND GUTTER SECTION LETTER EXIST. CURB AND GUTTER SHEET WHERE SECTION IS SHOWN DETAIL A SCALE: 1'-20' cli9 F P i _ _ _ - 694 Q �o1k� t_./ 9815 �" 8 -I 7 FP 694.0 45 I � 6, \ � \ .9 1v� 34. I I PROPOSED 6' HIGH '��0�0 5 t v FP 694.3 c 6 FP 695.5 BLOCK WALL PER 4 \ FP 696.5 i SEPARATE PLANS o FP 697.0 F 697.52 F 6e9s 96h 9 90 0 S lS 688• .. , _ -. � � I FP 698.0 \ FO 6 L S FP 70050 V. 4 1h 'b%-\\3 9 4 L 1.94% -D -- c-4 _ 1 . - o A3 W -a t DRI V E �"70-T HLp,ND KNOLLS H I G 1 \\% rt3v` _- t.. _ ac"fir �' __... -"'-'"`-•~`` ` \} - _ _ _SCHOOL SITE (NOT A PART) PER GRANT DEED DOCUMENT NO. 0209.142890 DATED 9/30/2009. O.R. DETAIL B SCALE: 1'-20' DETAIL C SCALE: 1'-20' NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCT CASE B CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS 2010 RSP A88A SCALE: 1 " = 50' 50' 25' O' 50' 100' Know what's below. Call before you dig. 4 3 S '�- V'� \ - E, .- CITY RECORDS NO: m to I. O v, 1 �r Z - w as z m to I. O v, �r Z - w as z � � = J w IL 0 o � ('3 = Lc, Z oc C -A z to < ac ® 0 Z H � LA �I i M a N O O J 0 U O 7 0 to O �r Z - w as Z � � = J w IL o � ('3 = Lc, Z oc C -A z to < ac ® 0 Z H � M a N O O J 0 U O 7 PAD COMP LIMITS PAD COMPACTION LIMITS 20' 10' 20' 20' I I �I I W �I 5 --j I �I 1.5% MIN. 0 1.5% MIN. LUNMIL- 3.4% MAX. 3.4% MAX. PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER -J `-ROUGH GRADE LINE AT ROUGH GRADE LINE 0.70' BELOW FLOWLINE ELEVATION r1 SECTION 4 FRONT TO FRONT LOT ROUGH GRADING (40' WIDE FL TO FL STREET SECTIONS) SCALE 1"-10' R' Wck m mi I �I i W 1 5 19; ON I 1.5% MIN. 0 1,57. MIN. 2•0% 3.4% MAX. J 3.47o MAX. ROUGH GRADE LINE J -ROUGH GRADE LINE AT 0.70' BELOW FLOWLINE ELEVATION B SECTION 4 FRONT TO FRONT LOT ROUGH GRADING (36' WIDE FL TO FL STREET SECTIONS) SCALE 1"-10' R/W 10' 20' 20' 6' BUILDER FENCE) �-I i W F5 FINISHED PAD 21 2' 5' Ujj VARIES 0'-4' I 01 1.5% MIN. 1.5% MIN. RETAINING WALL 2.0% 3.4% MAX. 3.4% MAX. MAX PROPOSED 4.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER ROUGH GRADE LINE AT ROUGH GRADE LINE 0.70' BELOW FLOWLINE ELEVATION �c SECTION 4 SIDE TO SIDE LOT ROUGH GRADING (40' WIDE FL TO FL STREET SECTIONS) SCALE 1"-10' R/W 12' m rk m 10' 20' I I I 2' I 1� MIN 2.0% 15% MAX PROPOSED 4.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER R/W 12' 20' i I i I I 2' 1% MIN 2.0% 15% MAX PROPOSED 4.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK -PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER 6' BUILDER FENCES I i� W FINISHED PAD 2 � 5' VARIES 0' TO 1.5' 2 2' a 1.5% MIN. 0 1.57. MIN. RETAINING WALL 2 0 3.4% MAX. J 3.4% MAX. 2% MIN, 4:1 MAX PROPOSED 4.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER ROUGH GRADE LINE AT PRI 0.70' BELOW FLOWLINE LROUGH GRADE LINE ELEVATION D SECTION 4 FRONT TO SIDE LOT ROUGH GRADING (36' WIDE FL TO FL STREET SECTIONS) SCALE 1"-10' m 2' R/W 6' BUILDER FENCE 1/-2% MIN. 4:1 MAX )POSED 4.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER R/W 12' I 20' I I ( I I 1� MIN 157. M� 'OSED 4.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER PAD COMP LIMITS PAD COMP LIMITS PA L6' BLOCK WALL CL C-) w R VARIES za ¢ ' 0'-18' _ 3' 11' 34 34' FINISHED PAD-' W 2 1 VARIES 3'-`' i RETAINING WALL �iq� 2' 6' I 12.0% 2.0% 2.0% EX. 5.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK EX. CURB & GUTTER] EX. STREET IMPROVEMENTS PA R/W 3'+6 BLOCK WALL 1 11' EXISTING GROUND E SECTION 4 BEDFORD GREEN DRIVE SCALE 1"-10' „' R/W R/W 34'-50' I 34'-50' 11' I I i I I 1 2.0% 2.0% EX. STREET IMPROVEMENTS ROUGH GRADE LINE AT --J EX. CURB & GUTTER J X. 5.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK 1.40' BELOW FLOWUNE ROUGH GRADE LILA: ELEVATION F SECTICH 4,J HIGHLAND KNOLLS DRIVE SCALE 1 --10' 54' R/W P/L 6' 10' __j-6' BUILDERS FENCE LANDSCAPE ESMT. i 2 2' - - 2.0% 2.0%1 FINISH PAD � J I SAF FINISH PAD ROUGH GRADE LINE AT 0.6' BELOW FLOWLINE LROUGH GRADE LINE FUTURE 5.5° COMBINATION SIDEWALK ELEVATION FUTURE CURB & GUTTER G SECTION 4 FUTURE VINELAND ROAD SCALE 1"-10' 6' BUILDER FENCE 0.3' MIN. 5' MAX. TYPICAL FOR A ADJACENT LOTS WITH ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF 0.3 FT. OR GREATER. SEC11ON H SCALE: 1 =10 4 R 6' BUILDER FENCE EXISTING- GROUND L SECTION 4 SCALE: 1"=10 EXISTING GROUND J SECITON 4 SCALE- 1"=10 R IL - 6' BUILDERS FENCE 2' FUTURE PAD EXISTING N1= GROUND M 4 SECTION SCALE 11 N OTE: ALL RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THESE ARE TO BE APPROVED PER SEPARATE PERMIT. 'E R I_ r 6' BUILDERS FENCE -EXISTIt 0 GROUND I PAD ELI K SECTION \A,/SCALE: 1"=10 rn 0 M N to o I� H rn cy) \ O Z 00 O cfl U a st O z Z LL. I m _j 0 JLd Q LJ « V LJ (0 7) 0 N } o LJ m � � o Q m, 4,;�A Q y b N = \)A5 ej W I QZ I 0 0 W i w 2.0% MIN. FINISHED PAD J I 4:1 MAX VARIES 0'-4' I 2 z Im 2. •- 2.0% RETAINING WALL PROPOSED 5.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER EXISTING GROUND E SECTION 4 BEDFORD GREEN DRIVE SCALE 1"-10' „' R/W R/W 34'-50' I 34'-50' 11' I I i I I 1 2.0% 2.0% EX. STREET IMPROVEMENTS ROUGH GRADE LINE AT --J EX. CURB & GUTTER J X. 5.5' COMBINATION SIDEWALK 1.40' BELOW FLOWUNE ROUGH GRADE LILA: ELEVATION F SECTICH 4,J HIGHLAND KNOLLS DRIVE SCALE 1 --10' 54' R/W P/L 6' 10' __j-6' BUILDERS FENCE LANDSCAPE ESMT. i 2 2' - - 2.0% 2.0%1 FINISH PAD � J I SAF FINISH PAD ROUGH GRADE LINE AT 0.6' BELOW FLOWLINE LROUGH GRADE LINE FUTURE 5.5° COMBINATION SIDEWALK ELEVATION FUTURE CURB & GUTTER G SECTION 4 FUTURE VINELAND ROAD SCALE 1"-10' 6' BUILDER FENCE 0.3' MIN. 5' MAX. TYPICAL FOR A ADJACENT LOTS WITH ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF 0.3 FT. OR GREATER. SEC11ON H SCALE: 1 =10 4 R 6' BUILDER FENCE EXISTING- GROUND L SECTION 4 SCALE: 1"=10 EXISTING GROUND J SECITON 4 SCALE- 1"=10 R IL - 6' BUILDERS FENCE 2' FUTURE PAD EXISTING N1= GROUND M 4 SECTION SCALE 11 N OTE: ALL RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THESE ARE TO BE APPROVED PER SEPARATE PERMIT. 'E R I_ r 6' BUILDERS FENCE -EXISTIt 0 GROUND I PAD ELI K SECTION \A,/SCALE: 1"=10 rn 0 M N to o I� H rn cy) \ O Z 00 O cfl U a st O z Z LL. I m _j 0 JLd Q LJ « V LJ (0 7) 0 N } o LJ m � � o Q m, 4,;�A Q y b N = \)A5 ej L0 0 H- z Im J •- (f Z < W a t� tV od CD Z O :z CL �c 0 U ZZ W co a cli o I.q � a U a' Know what's below. W _ Cal I before you 'dig. CITY RECORDS NO: O i, lglton and S3 CI (6s, Inc. A Lcre�rON GROUP _-OWP�iNy December 21, 2016 Tarina Homes 1401 1e Street, Suite 215 Bakersfield, California 93301 Project No, 11513001 Attention: Mr. Chris Johnston, President Subject: As -Graded Geotechnical Report: Tract 6352, Phase 4, Lots 1-92 Eagle Meadows of Bakersfield 2 City of Bakersfield, California Introduction Leighton and Associates, Inc. (Leighton) provided geotechnical services to K. Hovnanian Cooperative, Inc. during rough grading of the Eagle Meadows Residential Development that was proposed within Tract 6352 in the City of Bakersfield, California. An as -graded report was not requested at the time, but has been recently requested by you to support site development for residential use. Rough grading of Phase 4 under Leighton's geotechnical observation and testing was performed between 2006 and 2007. Per your request, this report documents the services that were provided by Leighton during rough grading. Since rough grading was completed over ten years ago, we recently performed a site reconnaissance to observe the existing condition of the lots such that we could then provide recommendations for their restoration to the approximate conditions that existed at the completion of rough grading. 26074 Avenue Hall, Suite 21 - Santa Clarita, CA 91355 661.257.7434 = 661.257.7430 Fax - www.leighlongroup.com .com 11513.001 We recommend that the surficial soil on all lots be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned to 2 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content, and recompacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction as estimated by ASTM D 1557 standard test method (modified Proctor compaction curve). Recompacted material should be free of organic matter and other deleterious substances. Deeper scarification and / or overexcavation may be required in certain areas of the site, the need for which should be assessed during future earthwork operations under the observation of a licensed geotechnical engineer's representative. Any loose soils across the lots should be removed and replaced with compacted fill. Animal burrows should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted fill. Limitations The presence of our field representative at the site during the period of rough grading was originally intended to provide K. Hovnanian Cooperative, Inc. with professional advice, opinions, and recommendations based on observations of the contractor's work. Although the observations did not reveal obvious deficiencies or deviations from project specifications, Leighton does not guarantee the contractor's work, nor do Leighton's services relieve the contractor or its subcontractors of their responsibility if defects are subsequently discovered in their work. Leighton's responsibilities did not include any supervision or direction of the actual work procedures of the contractor, personnel, or subcontractors. Leighton is not responsible for line and grade. Leighton's geotechnical involvement for this project was limited to providing geotechnical observation and testing services during grading for Phase 4: Lots 1 through 92 of Tract 6352. The conclusions in this report are based on test results and observations of the grading and earthwork procedures used, and represent our engineering opinion as to the compliance of the results with the current standard of care. Leighton's work was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this report. 5 Leighton 11513.001 Summary of Gradinu Activities Rough grading of Lots 1 through 92, Phase 4, was conducted between November 7, 2006 and March 6, 2007, under the geotechnical observation and testing services of Leighton. At that time, rough grading to design configurations for the subject lots was performed in accordance with the rough grading plans prepared by Reeve and Associates (2006a, b) - Rough grading involved the stripping and removal of deleterious materials, the overexcavation of the upper 2 feet of the native soils, and the placement of compacted fills. The overexcavation and recompaction were limited to the buildable area of the lots. Deeper removals were performed at pre-existing, trash -filled drainage areas (along the southern site margin and in a drainage that extended through the site center) and where undocumented fills were encountered. Observation and handling of undocumented fills were not reported and discussed in the preliminary soils report by Soils Engineering (SEI, 2004b). However, undocumented fills, both buried and stockpiled, were encountered during rough grading generally at the northeastern portion of the site, and specifically during the rough grading of Lots 17, 18, 21 and 22. The undocumented soils were completely removed and reused as fill free of deleterious materials. The bottoms of the removal areas were observed by a representative of Leighton prior to placement of compacted fill. Following review of removal areas, the upper soils exposed at the removal bottom were scarified, moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). Fill consisting of soil types listed in Table 1 was placed in thin lifts, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted in place to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory derived maximum density (based on ASTM Test Methods D2922 and D3017). Areas that tested less than the required 90 percent relative compaction were reworked, moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted until the minimum 90 percent was obtained. Fill placement and compaction was accomplished with the use of heavy earthwork equipment. A summary of field density test results completed to date is presented in Appendix B; test number are not necessarily sequential because grading of Phase 4 was performed at the same time as other phases in the Eagle Meadows development. WO 2 Leiahton tl 11513.001 Closure We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to Tarina Homes on this project. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ether of the undersigned may be reached at (661) 257-7434. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. It Renee S. Morales, PE 82772 Project Engineer G reth I. Milds, PG, CEG 2034 Managing Director / Principal Geologist RSM/GIM/gv Attachments: Table 1 — Summary of Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Tests j Table 2 — Field Density Tests Appendix A — References Appendix B — Laboratory Test Results Plate 1 — Field Density Test Map Distribution: (3) Addressee (2 hard copies and 1 via e-mail) 6 941 11513.001 Based on the observation and testing that was performed, Leighton represents that the compaction of the fill under the subject lots that was observed and tested by Leighton was performed in accordance with the approved grading plans. The field density test locations are shown on Plate 1. The results of the laboratory and field density tests are shown on Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Laboratory Testin During rough grading, laboratory tests were performed on representative onsite soil samples to assess the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. Expansion index and soluble sulfate content tests were taken at a frequency of one test for every three or four lots. Results of expansion index and soluble content tests were previously reported by Leighton (2007a). A summary of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content test results are provided in Table 1. The results of the laboratory tests are presented in Appendix B. Site Reconnaissance Given that over ten years has passed since the completion of rough grading at the site, a site reconnaissance was performed on December 1, 2016 to observe and photo - document the existing condition of the Phase 4 site. Grass and shrubs up to 12 inches in height are sparsely distributed throughout the site. Based on our observations, most of the site appeared to consist of rough graded, unimproved lots and unpaved interior streets. The exception was at Old Wood Drive, Brandywine Way and Lot 1. At these locations, detention basins have been created, apparently in an effort to control surface water runoff. Stockpiled soil was located at Krista Vineyard Way, adjacent to the detention basin. A ditch and loose soil was located along the east and west sides of Brandywine Way. Animal burrows were observed at several lots across the site. We probed the surface soils at the site and across the lots. In general the lots probed firm and unyielding. The surficial soils appeared moist, which is likely due to recent rain. Minor desiccation cracks were observed on the slopes between lots, and on the lot -bounding slopes along Highland Knolls Drive. 410, 3 Leighton 4011 Leighton and Associates, Inc. A LEEGNTON GROUP COMPANY March 12, 2007 Project No. 14I904-001 To: K. Hovnanian Cooperative, Inc. 39959 Sierra Highway, Suite 170 Palmdale, California 93550 Attention: Ms. Jennifer Brown Subject: Geotechnical Foundaton Recommendations, Lots I through 92, Phase 4, and Lots 1 through 35, Phase 5, Eagle Meadows of Bakersfield, Tract 6352, City of Bakersfield, California Inirodu 'on In accordance with your request and authorization, Leighton and Associates. Inc. (Leighton) has prepared this letter to provide the geotechnica foundation recommendations for the planned single family residewial structures of Lots I through 92. Phase 4, and Lots i through 35, Phase 5. Tract 6352; Eagle Meadows of Bakersfield, located in the City, of Bakersfield, Dern County, California. Rough grading of the subject lots was conducted by Papich Construction Inc. under the geotechnical observation and testing of Leighton. Based on our geotechnical observations and testing during rough grading, the near surface soils consisted predon-driantly of clayey sands to sandy clays and ciays. Laboratory testing for expansion potential and sulfate of the finish grade soils were perftirne d at the conclusion of rough grading at a frequency of I test for every 3 or 4 lots to better evaluate the foundation soils. ~ Findinas Based on the results of the laboratory testing, the expansion potential of the underlying and finish grade soils of Lots 1 through 92 and Lots I through 35 of Phases 4 and 5, respectively, were from low to medium with the mostly higb lows to mediums. In addition, based on the results of laboratory testing and in accordance with Table 19-A4 of the 1997 UBC/CBC 2001, the concrete structures in contact with the onsite soils will be exposed to "negligible to severe" concentrations of soluble sulfates in the soil. Laboratory test results and procedures are presented in the Appendix B. 2809 Unicorn Road, Suite 103 Bakersfield, CA 93308 661.393,6036 a Fax 661.393.8078 ■ www.ieightongeo-com w�. -, r '�.`����x��^�r'ii �Yn4ii d 'A- �s �"srf9ii�°.�."tf,'$x".j�_Gi�'•.1 r �'$�'a�i�,��'`tT1F`�!�, , ^: .....,�-. �',� 11513.001 Conclusions Based on our review of the field density tests and daily field reports available to us at this time which were prepared by former Leighton personnel, it appears that rough grading performed under the observation and testing of Leighton between November 7, 2006 and March 6, 2007 was conducted in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations contained in the referenced reports. Given the preceding, we conclude that if the recommendations contained in this report are implemented (see next section), that the Phase 4 site will be suitable for its intended residential use We do not know if the site was graded such that the finish grades shown by Reeve and Associates (2006a, b) were achieved; such an assessment is outside our professional jurisdiction. Recommendations Recommendations presented in the preliminary soils report (SEI, 2004b) and for foundations in particular (Leighton, 2007a) may not be valid for continued site development. These recommendations should be reviewed and revised in accordance with the current version of the California Building Code. We recommend that the subject lots be restored to the condition that existed at the completion of rough grading, and which needs to exist if construction on the lots is planned. Based on our observations at the site we recommend the following earthwork for restoration of the lots: Prior to any grading, all vegetation should be stripped and removed from the site. Any miscellaneous debris and other deleterious materials (although not observed) should be removed. Lot 1 should be re-created to the design rough grade by placing compacted fill. The adjacent stockpiled soil may be used as fill. The existing subgrade should be scarified in accordance with the following recommendations prior to the placement of fill. 4 Project Number 1,11.904-€101 March 12, 2007 Based on our review of the preliminary soils report by Soils Engiineering, Inc., (SEI, 2004) and recent laboratory testing conducted during rough -grading, we recommend the tirllowing minimurn geotechnical design parameters. Foundation Recommendations The minimum foundation design recommendations in this letter supersede the recommendations of the preliminary soils report (SEI, 2004). All other pertinent recommendations provi( d. in the previous report remain applicable. The foundations for the residential buildings should be designed, as a minimum, based on the following expansion potential: Expansion Paitential Preliminary Lot Designations Lot Number j Expansion Potential 1 I through 9?, Phase 4 Medium I through 35, Phase 5 Medium We recon mend that the single-family structures be supported on post -tensioned fouridattor; sysTem s, as previously recommended in the preliminary soils report(SEI, 2004), founded inti medium expansive soils. Post -tensioned system should be designed with file following parameters zit addition to the minimum foundation design recommendation (Table 0: Allowable Bearing Capacity: 1,000 pounds per square feet (psf) at pad grade (no embedment) and 2,000 psf with a minimum depth of embedment. of 12 inches (per 1997 TIBC, capacities may be increased by 1/3 for short -tern loading conditions, i.e., wind, seismic) Sliding Coefficient: Settlement Potential: 0.35 Total: I inch Differential: 1 inch in 40 feet -2- Project Number 141904-001 March 12, 2007 (1) Depth of cxterio; footin, to be tneasured from lowest as acent finish grade or drainage Swale flowline elevation (less than 5'feet laterally, from Coning, per code). (2) Lining area slams should be tied to the footings as directec _)} the structural engineer. (3) Detailing of expan:,ion crack control joints for PT slabs pc'r structural engineer. (4) Underslab treatment sand should have a Sand Equivalent of 30 or greater. The proposcd foundations and slabs should he designed tri accordance with the structural consultants' design, the minimum geotechnical ree unendation3 presented herein (Text and Table 1), the City of Bakersfield requirements and the 199f UBC/2001 CIBC. Cement type for buried concrete structures should conform to the requirements of Table 19-A=4 of the Uniform Building Code. A minimum Type V concrete should be used for the foundation and slab-on-gtades. Ak Leighton Know what's below. CaII before you dig. } TABLE 1 Minitnum Post-`rensioncd Foundation Design Recommendations Expansion Potential Resign Criteria t Medium Edge Moisture Center Lift: 5.5 feet Edge Lift: 3.0 feet Variation. e,,, Differential Lift: 2 inches Edge Lint: �- 0.£= inches Svyell , Y„' Modulus of Subprade Reaction (k) 125 psihn — 1�iininrurl Perimeter Footing h E. inches Embedment D tb limb nt �. _._ Two inches of sand over a 10-rniI polyvinyl membrane (Visqueen or l polyvinyl Ilnderslab Treatment over an additional two inches G, sand. of the opt.raum moisture content — 1'resoal:in,ry upper 18 inches (1) Depth of cxterio; footin, to be tneasured from lowest as acent finish grade or drainage Swale flowline elevation (less than 5'feet laterally, from Coning, per code). (2) Lining area slams should be tied to the footings as directec _)} the structural engineer. (3) Detailing of expan:,ion crack control joints for PT slabs pc'r structural engineer. (4) Underslab treatment sand should have a Sand Equivalent of 30 or greater. The proposcd foundations and slabs should he designed tri accordance with the structural consultants' design, the minimum geotechnical ree unendation3 presented herein (Text and Table 1), the City of Bakersfield requirements and the 199f UBC/2001 CIBC. Cement type for buried concrete structures should conform to the requirements of Table 19-A=4 of the Uniform Building Code. A minimum Type V concrete should be used for the foundation and slab-on-gtades. Ak Leighton Know what's below. CaII before you dig. } M z 0 �n > W a 0 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MAY BE REMOVED WHEN APPROVED BY THE QUALIFIED SWPPP DEVELOPER (QSD) OR THE QUALIFIED SWPPP PRACTITIONER (QSP). 2. GRADED AREAS ADJACENT TO FILL SLOPES LOCATED AT THE SITE PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE TOP OF SLOPE AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKING DAY OR EROSION CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE. (EC1-EC13) 3. THE USE OF A GRAVEL BLANKET AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WITH PUBLIC ROADS IS REQUIRED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. (TC -1) 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT TRAFFIC AND POST 15 MPH SPEED LIMITS ON THE SITE TO REDUCE DUST. (WE -1) 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER THE SITE AS NEEDED TO ELIMINATE DUST. (MINIMUM OF 650 GALLONS/AC. AND ONCE DAILY, WE -1) 6. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PARKED, WHEN NOT IN USE AND FOR MAINTENANCE, IN DESIGNATED AREA (NS -8,10) . 7. SILT FENCING, STRAW BALES AND SANDBAGS WILL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE QSD/QSP, AS NEEDED. (SE-1,SE-5,SE-6,SE-8,SE-9) 8. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE QSD/QSP, ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY OR ON WEEKENDS WHEN THE 48-HOUR RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS 50X 9. ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS, WHICH MAY CREATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO OFFSITE PROPERTY, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE QSP. 10. THE PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE WITHIN THE SITE IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE QSP. 11. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE MODIFIED AS NEEDED AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES AND PLANS OF THESE CHANGES SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AS REQUIRED. 12. ALL SILT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL DEVICES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH RAINSTORM. 13. THIS PLAN HAS BEEN CREATED AS A BEGINNING CONCEPT ONLY. IF BMP'S SHOWN ARE DEEMED INEFFECTIVE OR UNNECESSARY, QSP IS TO REMOVE OR SELECT ALTERNATIVE BMP'S FROM CASQA'S HANDBOOK AND REDLINE THIS PLAN AS NEEDED. 14. WHILE NOT ALL THE LISTED BMP'S ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFIC TEXT OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, MANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE STILL NECESSARY TO ADDRESS SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES THE CONTRACTOR PLANS TO IMPLEMENT. THESE ITEMS SUCH AS REFUELING STATIONS, BATCH PLANTS, WASTE FACILITIES AND THE LIKE ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY SITED ON THE PLAN BUT STILL ARE REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE CONTRACTOR BASED ON THE CONTRACTORS PLANNED LOCATIONS. 15. ALL BMP'S MAY NOT BE LISTED ON THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE SWPPP DOCUMENT FOR THIS SITE, AS IT MAY INCLUDE ADDITIONAL NECESSARY BMP'S. DUST CONTROL NOTES: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT REQUIRES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROL MEASURES RECOMMENDED BY THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT THAT CAN REDUCE FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT: A. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING STORAGE PILES, WHICH ARE NOT BEING ACTIVELY UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES, SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY STABILIZED OF DUST EMISSIONS USING WATER, COVERED WITH A TARP OR OTHER SUITABLE COVER, OR VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER. B. ALL ONSITE UNPAVED ROADS AND OFFSITE UNPAVED ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY STABILIZED OF DUST EMISSIONS USING WATER. C. ALL LAND CLEARING, GRUBBING, SCRAPING, EXCAVATION, LAND LEVELING, GRADING, CUT & FILL, AND DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED OF FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS UTILIZING APPLICATION OF WATER OR BY PRESOAKING. D. WHEN MATERIALS ARE TRANSPORTED OFFSITE, ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED, OR EFFECTIVELY WETTED TO LIMIT VISIBLE DUST EMISSIONS, AND AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF FREEBOARD SPACE FROM TOP OF THE CONTAINER SHALL BE MAINTAINED. E. ALL OPERATIONS SHALL LIMIT OR EXPEDITIOUSLY REMOVE THE ACCUMULATION OF MUD OR TRACKOUT FROM ADJACENT PUBLIC STREETS AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY. (USING A PMIO-EFFICIENT METHOD, SE -7). F. FOLLOWING THE ADDITION OF MATERIALS TO, OR THE REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM, THE SURFACE OF OUTDOOR STORAGE PILES, SAID PILES SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY STABILIZED OF FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS UTILIZING SUFFICIENT WATER AND COVERING. G. ASPHALT -CONCRETE PAVING SHALL COMPLY WITH BMP THAT PREVENT INFILTRATION OF PAVING MATERIALS AND RUNOFF INTO STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS (NS -3). H. CEASE GRADING ACTIVITIES DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WINDS (GREATER THAN 20 MPH OVER A ONE-HOUR PERIOD). I. LIMIT CONSTRUCTION RELATED VEHICLE SPEEDS TO 15 MPH ON ALL UNPAVED AREAS AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. J. ALL DUST CONTROL MEASURES ARE NOT NECESSARILY LISTED HERE ON THIS PLAN, THE CONTRACTOR IS REFERRED TO THE DUST CONTROL PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT AND/OR SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULES TO CHECK COMPLIANCE. DISTURBED AREA: AREA DISTURBED - 27.79 ACRES (PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED) EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR TRACT 6352 PHASE 1 THROUGH 5 WDID# 5F15C378849 8 \7 1 NOT A PART PER GRANT DEED DOCUMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 6 0210059820, O.R. OWNER: I /' _ - 5 IITARINA HOMES, INC. s 1401 19TH STREET, #215 I 12 i� I g 1 8 1 7 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 i / 11 i 10 i 1 TEL.: (661) 487-5990 CONTACT PERSON: CHRIS JOHNSTON I i _�_-� AND K •� = ' QSD/QSP: BLAINE S. NEPTUNE, PE, QSD/P QSD CERT.: 20178 MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES 2001 WHEELAN COURT BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 SCHOOL SITE TEL.: (661) 834-4814 -- `� NOT A PART ' 1 liYjf ENGINEER: t PER GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF 1 BAKERSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT PER • MCINTOSH AND ASSOCIATES DOCUMENT NO. 0209142890, DATED 1 2001 WHEELAN COURT 9/30/2009. O.R. 1 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 1 TEL.: (661) 834-4814 CONTACT PERSON: BLAINE S. NEPTUNE GENERAL CONTRACTOR: LOT "A" PARK SITE -- D — W LEGEND 0 LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA & EQUIPMENT PARKING ®MATERIAL WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) / / 0) 50' LONG GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL E & WM-8) tO ul GRIZZLY/RUMBLE PLATE .. .. SITE BOUNDARY 0 PHASE BOUNDARY v: c z m FR — FIBER ROLLS (SE -5) — - - D PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE 0 FINISHED GROUND CONTOUR EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR z W v 00 z O C'4 Z O c r w co 7) 4 0 LLL 0 V) W O cv of a w m / I Y m YJ V U W < 10, fl G NOT A PART PER GRANT DEED DOCUMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 6 0210059820, O.R. OWNER: I /' _ - 5 IITARINA HOMES, INC. s 1401 19TH STREET, #215 I 12 i� I g 1 8 1 7 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 i / 11 i 10 i 1 TEL.: (661) 487-5990 CONTACT PERSON: CHRIS JOHNSTON I i _�_-� AND K •� = ' QSD/QSP: BLAINE S. NEPTUNE, PE, QSD/P QSD CERT.: 20178 MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES 2001 WHEELAN COURT BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 SCHOOL SITE TEL.: (661) 834-4814 -- `� NOT A PART ' 1 liYjf ENGINEER: t PER GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF 1 BAKERSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT PER • MCINTOSH AND ASSOCIATES DOCUMENT NO. 0209142890, DATED 1 2001 WHEELAN COURT 9/30/2009. O.R. 1 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 1 TEL.: (661) 834-4814 CONTACT PERSON: BLAINE S. NEPTUNE GENERAL CONTRACTOR: LOT "A" PARK SITE -- D — CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CPOST "NO TRESPASSING' SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCE(S) CPOST "CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC 15 MPH' SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCE(S) 3 ' MATERIAL LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA. (WM-1, WM-3) U44 EQUIPMENT PARKING WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (NS -9, NS -10) 0 GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 50' LONG (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) (6)INLET PROTECTION WITH GRAVEL BAGS. (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 0 STOCKPILE FOR ALL PHASES [PLACE FIBER ROLLS AT TOE OF SLOPE ALL THE WAY AROUND THE STOCKPILE] (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) C80 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL B & WM-8) . Ai •4U: Aux * ­mm 4.0- ,,, PROJECT SITE 11 , VICINITY EMAP NO SCALE I *N OTE: MOVE STAGING AREA AND GRAVEL ENTRANCE AS NEEDED TO ACCOMODATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING. ONLY ONE GRAVEL APRON IS REQUIRED AT A TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT VEHICLE TRAFFIC TO USING DESIGNATED ENTRANCE WITH GRAVEL APRON. SCALE: 1 " = 100' 100' 50' 0' 100' 200' Know what's below. Call before you dig. Lo X) P � I CITY RECORDS NO: 0 N O c� Z w w z cD z w a U CD Z LLJ r 0 Q W LEGEND 0 LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA & EQUIPMENT PARKING ®MATERIAL WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) GRATE INLET (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 0) 50' LONG GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL E & WM-8) tO ul GRIZZLY/RUMBLE PLATE .. .. SITE BOUNDARY 0 PHASE BOUNDARY v: c z m FR — FIBER ROLLS (SE -5) — - - D PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE 0 FINISHED GROUND CONTOUR EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR CONSTRUCTION NOTES: CPOST "NO TRESPASSING' SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCE(S) CPOST "CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC 15 MPH' SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCE(S) 3 ' MATERIAL LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA. (WM-1, WM-3) U44 EQUIPMENT PARKING WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (NS -9, NS -10) 0 GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 50' LONG (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) (6)INLET PROTECTION WITH GRAVEL BAGS. (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 0 STOCKPILE FOR ALL PHASES [PLACE FIBER ROLLS AT TOE OF SLOPE ALL THE WAY AROUND THE STOCKPILE] (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) C80 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL B & WM-8) . Ai •4U: Aux * ­mm 4.0- ,,, PROJECT SITE 11 , VICINITY EMAP NO SCALE I *N OTE: MOVE STAGING AREA AND GRAVEL ENTRANCE AS NEEDED TO ACCOMODATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING. ONLY ONE GRAVEL APRON IS REQUIRED AT A TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT VEHICLE TRAFFIC TO USING DESIGNATED ENTRANCE WITH GRAVEL APRON. SCALE: 1 " = 100' 100' 50' 0' 100' 200' Know what's below. Call before you dig. Lo X) P � I CITY RECORDS NO: 0 N O c� Z w w z cD z w a U CD Z LLJ r 0 Q W 0 o O r- 0) L0 �a� tO ul 0 IIS 0 d v: z LL- I z m a d J 4 0 J Q d CL z W v 00 z O C'4 Z O c r w co 7) 4 0 LLL 0 V) W O cv of a w m o Y m YJ W O m U Z z IIS J v: I IL C Lu Q J CL z O C'4 Z O c V 4 CO) z W O Lu V U W < Lu o n G 0 W O U Z z IIS J IL C Lu Q J CL O C'4 Z O V 4 CO) z W O Lu V U W < o n G PROFILE VIEW MIN 12 a P� PERMEABLE FIBER LINING—""CRUSHED AGGREGATE GREATER THAN 3' BUT SMALLER THAN 6". (SEE TC -1) PLAN VIEW 50' MIN DETAIL A GRAVEL APRON AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE 'CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE CASQA DETAIL TC -1 IN SITE SWPPP & DUST CONTROL PLAN FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS I e Tu G �NDBAG 15' MIN HOLE FOR CONCRETE WASH. SECTION A-1 NOT TO SCALE PLYWOOD 48" X 24" PAINTED I 00 CONCRETE O WASHOUT BLA:N LETTERS 6" HEIGHT 0.5" LAG SCREWS 3' WOOD POST 3" 3' X3"X 8' CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN DETAIL OR EQUIVALENT DETAIL B CONCRETE WASHOUT NOT TO SCALE 'CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE CASQA DETAIL WM-8 FIR- FR------ 7 Q i wu� w�LOw n e TOE OFiSPE 2' MIN 4' MAX 12' MIN FIBER ROLLS 8' MIN 3/4" x 3/4" WOOD STAKES MAX 4' SPACING SECTION A- A DETAIL C STOCKPILE WITH FIBER ROLLS NOT TO SCALE 'CONTRACTOR STALL REFERENCE CASQA DETAIL WM-3 & SE -5 SIDEWALK C) SIDEWALK CURB CURB INLE?' CURB FLOW FLOWGUTTER GUTTER LEGEND El GRAVEL BAG DETAIL D CURB INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE 'CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE CASQA DETAIL SE -10 LEGEND ®MATERIAL LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA & EQUIPMENT PARKING WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) CURB INLET (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 50 LONG GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL E & WM-8)' GRIZZLY/RUMBLE PLATE .. .. SITE BOUNDARY PHASE BOUNDARY R — FIBER ROLLS (SE -5) — - - o- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE -350' FINISHED GROUND CONTOUR EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 011 POST 'NO TRESPASSING" SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCE(S) CJ POST 'CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC 15 MPH" SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCES) �D MATERIAL LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA. (WM-1, WM-3) EQUIPMENT PARKING WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (NS -9, NS -10) C5)GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 50' LONG (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) INLET PROTECTION WITH GRAVEL BAGS. (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 0 STOCKPILE FOR ALL PHASES [PLACE FIBER ROLLS AT TOE OF SLOPE ALL THE WAY AROUND THE STOCKPILE] (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) �'8 ) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL B & WM-8) Know what's below. Call before you dig. CITY RECORDS NO: m 0 rn Q O Z 00 ai 0 Z Q J W U z 00 J r r Ld co co O N w Y m 6 z N r m 0501,03 0 0030541 VIVO 000120 i wu� w�LOw n e TOE OFiSPE 2' MIN 4' MAX 12' MIN FIBER ROLLS 8' MIN 3/4" x 3/4" WOOD STAKES MAX 4' SPACING SECTION A- A DETAIL C STOCKPILE WITH FIBER ROLLS NOT TO SCALE 'CONTRACTOR STALL REFERENCE CASQA DETAIL WM-3 & SE -5 SIDEWALK C) SIDEWALK CURB CURB INLE?' CURB FLOW FLOWGUTTER GUTTER LEGEND El GRAVEL BAG DETAIL D CURB INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE 'CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE CASQA DETAIL SE -10 LEGEND ®MATERIAL LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA & EQUIPMENT PARKING WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) CURB INLET (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 50 LONG GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL E & WM-8)' GRIZZLY/RUMBLE PLATE .. .. SITE BOUNDARY PHASE BOUNDARY R — FIBER ROLLS (SE -5) — - - o- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE -350' FINISHED GROUND CONTOUR EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 011 POST 'NO TRESPASSING" SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCE(S) CJ POST 'CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC 15 MPH" SIGN AT PROJECT ENTRANCES) �D MATERIAL LAY -DOWN AND STOCKPILE AREA. (WM-1, WM-3) EQUIPMENT PARKING WITH PROTECTIVE OIL PANS UNDER EQUIPMENT. (NS -9, NS -10) C5)GRAVEL PAD AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIN. 50' LONG (SEE DETAIL A & TC -1) INLET PROTECTION WITH GRAVEL BAGS. (SEE DETAIL D & SE -10) 0 STOCKPILE FOR ALL PHASES [PLACE FIBER ROLLS AT TOE OF SLOPE ALL THE WAY AROUND THE STOCKPILE] (SEE DETAIL C & WM-3) �'8 ) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WASHOUT (PER DETAIL B & WM-8) Know what's below. Call before you dig. CITY RECORDS NO: m 0 rn Q O Z 00 ai 0 Z Q J W U z 00 J r r Ld co co O N w Y m 6 z N r m L0 7- 0 0 L7 Li 0 kc n _11_11 i Lill 11 LO 0 T OU Z W V co v W J a IL _j 0 N O _ W a ch Z Z co O _ U oc 0 Z Q z O O U 1= Q W oc H 0 W 0 0, t2 to0 0 U O r 7 Q W W c LL 0