HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB989 RESULTS 2017DISPENSER SUMP TEST
LINE ANNULAR TEST
STP SUMP TEST
TANK ANNULAR TEST
11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500
Austin, Texas 78759
Phone: (512) 451-6334
Fax: (512) 459-1459 Date Printed and Mailed: 6/26/2017
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
INSPECTOR ERNIE MEDINA
1501 TRUXTUN AVE.
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
Test Date: 6/15/2017
Order Number: 3436368
Dear Regulator,
Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility:
7-ELEVEN 37942
3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
In an effort to keep all our record keeping and reporting requirements as current as possible,
Tanknology kindly requests you notify Dawn Kohlmeyer in writing at dkohlmeyer@tanknology.com
when your CUPA requires all records to be submitted electronically via the CERS database. Your
assistance in this endeavor is greatly appreciated.
Testing performed:
Sincerely,
Dawn Kohlmeyer
Manager, Field Reporting
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate
pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if
applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN 37942 Date of Testing: 6/15/2017
Facility Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58 , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
Facility Contact: Joel Phone: 661-325-0176
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Not present
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC.
Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo
Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: 743160-8199847 License Number: A_UT
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s)Date Training Expires
VPLT sump tester 3/6/2019
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
Tank Annular# T-4 X
Product Pipe for diesel to UDC X
STP Containment for Tank T-4 diesel - 1 X
STP Containment for Tank T-4 diesel - 1 X
UDC # 9/ X
UDC # 9 Sat/10 X
UDC # 10 Sat/11 X
UDC # 9/ X
UDC # 9 Sat/10 X
UDC # 10 Sat/11 X
UDC # 11 Sat/12 X
UDC # 12 Sat/13 X
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
UDC # 13 Sat/ X
UDC # 11 Sat/12 X
UDC # 12 Sat/13 X
UDC # 13 Sat/ X
UDC # 3/4 X
Fill Containment for Tank: T-4 diesel - 1 X
Fill Containment for Tank: T-4 diesel - 1 X
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature:Date:6/15/2017
WO: 3436368
15 (55 gallons) drums left onsite and only 8 drums was used.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: vacuum gauge Equipment Resolution:
Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1
Tank Capacity:
Tank Material:
Tank Manufacturer:
Product Stored:
Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting
test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing?
Tank# T-4
Yes No
20000
Steel
unknown
Diesel
15 min
10:30:00
10.00000 in. HG
12:30:00
10.00000 in. HG
2 hr
0.00000 in. HG
+/- 0.00000
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Tank#
Yes No
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Tank#
Yes No
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Tank#
Yes No
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems
that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: gauge Equipment Resolution: 0
Piping Material:
Piping Manufacturer:
Piping Diameter:
Length of Piping Run:
Product Stored:
Method and location of
piping-run isolation:
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI):
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
Test Result:
Product Pipe for diesel
to UDC
dwfrg
dwfrg
3 in.
150 ft.
boot
15 min
11:30:00
5.00000 PSI
12:30:00
5.00000 PSI
1 hr
0.00000 PSI
+/- 0.00000
Pass
in.
ft.
min
+/-
in.
ft.
min
+/-
in.
ft.
min
+/-
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
WO: 3436368
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
Sump Diameter/Dimensions:
Sump Depth:
Sump Material:
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to testing:
Portion of Sump Tested1
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-safe
shutdown?*
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting
test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
STP Containment for
Tank T-4 Diesel - 1
38 in.
70.00 in.
Fiberglass
20.00
30.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
09:40:00
0.40880 in. H20
10:55:00
0.40760 in. H20
15 min
-0.00120 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
STP Containment for
Tank T-4 Diesel - 1
38 in.
70.00 in.
Fiberglass
20.00
30.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
09:57:00
0.40750 in. H20
10:12:00
0.40740 in. H20
15 min
-0.00010 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
in.
in.
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
in.
in.
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested.
WO: 3436368
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 4
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
UDC Manufacturer:
UDC Material:
UDC Depth:
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Portion of UDC Tested1
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?*
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
UDC #9
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
10:45:00
0.47400 in. H20
11:00:00
0.47230 in. H20
15 min
-0.00170 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #9 Sat/10
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
10:45:00
0.72660 in. H20
11:00:00
0.72600 in. H20
15 min
-0.00060 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #10 Sat/11
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
10:45:00
0.40110 in. H20
11:00:00
0.40050 in. H20
15 min
-0.00060 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #9
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:01:00
0.47200 in. H20
11:16:00
0.47150 in. H20
15 min
-0.00050 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must
be tested.
WO: 3436368
UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 2 of 4
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
UDC Manufacturer:
UDC Material:
UDC Depth:
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Portion of UDC Tested1
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?*
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
UDC #9 Sat/10
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:01:00
0.72600 in. H20
11:16:00
0.72580 in. H20
15 min
-0.00020 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #10 Sat/11
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:01:00
0.40050 in. H20
11:16:00
0.40040 in. H20
15 min
-0.00010 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #11 Sat/12
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:29:00
0.45520 in. H20
11:44:00
0.45510 in. H20
15 min
-0.00010 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #12 Sat/13
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:29:00
0.18630 in. H20
11:44:00
0.18450 in. H20
15 min
-0.00180 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must
be tested.
WO: 3436368
UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 3 of 4
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
UDC Manufacturer:
UDC Material:
UDC Depth:
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Portion of UDC Tested1
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?*
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
UDC #13 Sat
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:29:00
0.35340 in. H20
11:44:00
0.35170 in. H20
15 min
-0.00170 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #11 Sat/12
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
00:00:00 sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:47:00
0.47490 in. H20
12:02:00
0.47440 in. H20
15 min
-0.00050 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #12 Sat/13
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:47:00
0.18440 in. H20
12:02:00
0.18410 in. H20
15 min
-0.00030 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #13 Sat
steel
Metallic
10.00
0.00
0.00
good
4" above
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
15 min
11:47:00
0.35170 in. H20
12:02:00
0.35160 in. H20
15 min
-0.00010 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must
be tested.
WO: 3436368
UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 4 of 4
7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
UDC Manufacturer:
UDC Material:
UDC Depth:
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Portion of UDC Tested1
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?*
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?*
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
UDC #3/4
Metallic
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
min
+/-
Fail
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
UDC #
Yes No NA
sec
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
min
+/-
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must
be tested.
WO: 3436368
UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1
8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in.
Sump Diameter:
Sump Depth:
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
Condition of sump prior to testing:
Portion of Sump Tested
Sump Material
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting
test
Test Start Time:
Initial Reading (RI):
Test End Time:
Final Reading (RF):
Test Duration:
Change in Reading (RF-RI) :
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:
Test Result:
Is there a sensor in the pump?
Does the sensor alarm when either
product or water is detected?
Was sensor removed for testing?
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing?
Fill Containment for
Tank T-4 Diesel - 1
38.00 in.
70.00 in.
18.00
16.00
good
4" above
Fiberglass
15 min
09:40:00
0.79410 in. H20
09:55:00
0.79590 in. H20
15 min
0.00180 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Fill Containment for
Tank T-4 Diesel - 1
38.00 in.
70.00 in.
18.00
16.00
good
4" above
Fiberglass
15 min
09:57:00
0.79600 in. H20
10:12:00
0.79650 in. H20
15 min
0.00050 in. H20
+/- 0.00200
Pass
Yes No
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
in.
in.
min
+/-
Yes No
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
in.
in.
min
+/-
Yes No
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Yes No NA
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
WO: 3436368
7-Eleven Test Water Log
Work Order:
Site Name/ID:
Address:
City:
3436368
7-ELEVEN 37942
3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY
99/HWY 58
BAKERSFIELD
Date: 6/15/2017
State: CA Zip: 93301
Work Performed:Disp Sump, Fill Sump, Line Interstitials, SB989 or Sumps, STP
Sump, Tank Interstitials
Was Test Water left on site?
Yes
Test Fluid Transported Off Site by Tanknology
Transported off Site by Other Company
No Water used
If Yes describe how much water and how contained? 15 (55galls) drums left on site and only 8 drums
was used.Jovita
If Yes who and when did you contact from site to report the water?
If Transported Off Site by Tanknology how much was hauled?
If Transported Off Site by Other Company what company and how much water?
Technician Signature: Date: 6/15/2017
WO: 3436368
Site Diagram
(This site diagram is for reference only and is not drawn to scale)
Work Order:3436368
Site ID / Name:37942 / 7-ELEVEN 37942
Address:3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58
City:BAKERSFIELD State:CA Zip:93301