Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB989 RESULTS 2017DISPENSER SUMP TEST LINE ANNULAR TEST STP SUMP TEST TANK ANNULAR TEST 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 Date Printed and Mailed: 6/26/2017 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR ERNIE MEDINA 1501 TRUXTUN AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Test Date: 6/15/2017 Order Number: 3436368 Dear Regulator, Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: 7-ELEVEN 37942 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 In an effort to keep all our record keeping and reporting requirements as current as possible, Tanknology kindly requests you notify Dawn Kohlmeyer in writing at dkohlmeyer@tanknology.com when your CUPA requires all records to be submitted electronically via the CERS database. Your assistance in this endeavor is greatly appreciated. Testing performed: Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN 37942 Date of Testing: 6/15/2017 Facility Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58 , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Facility Contact: Joel Phone: 661-325-0176 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Not present 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: 743160-8199847 License Number: A_UT Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s)Date Training Expires VPLT sump tester 3/6/2019 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Tank Annular# T-4 X Product Pipe for diesel to UDC X STP Containment for Tank T-4 diesel - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T-4 diesel - 1 X UDC # 9/ X UDC # 9 Sat/10 X UDC # 10 Sat/11 X UDC # 9/ X UDC # 9 Sat/10 X UDC # 10 Sat/11 X UDC # 11 Sat/12 X UDC # 12 Sat/13 X Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made UDC # 13 Sat/ X UDC # 11 Sat/12 X UDC # 12 Sat/13 X UDC # 13 Sat/ X UDC # 3/4 X Fill Containment for Tank: T-4 diesel - 1 X Fill Containment for Tank: T-4 diesel - 1 X If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature:Date:6/15/2017 WO: 3436368 15 (55 gallons) drums left onsite and only 8 drums was used. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: vacuum gauge Equipment Resolution: Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Tank# T-4 Yes No 20000 Steel unknown Diesel 15 min 10:30:00 10.00000 in. HG 12:30:00 10.00000 in. HG 2 hr 0.00000 in. HG +/- 0.00000 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# Yes No min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# Yes No min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# Yes No min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: gauge Equipment Resolution: 0 Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: Length of Piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Product Pipe for diesel to UDC dwfrg dwfrg 3 in. 150 ft. boot 15 min 11:30:00 5.00000 PSI 12:30:00 5.00000 PSI 1 hr 0.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Pass in. ft. min +/- in. ft. min +/- in. ft. min +/- Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) WO: 3436368 SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Sump Diameter/Dimensions: Sump Depth: Sump Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested1 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? STP Containment for Tank T-4 Diesel - 1 38 in. 70.00 in. Fiberglass 20.00 30.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:40:00 0.40880 in. H20 10:55:00 0.40760 in. H20 15 min -0.00120 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T-4 Diesel - 1 38 in. 70.00 in. Fiberglass 20.00 30.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:57:00 0.40750 in. H20 10:12:00 0.40740 in. H20 15 min -0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA in. in. Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA in. in. Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. WO: 3436368 SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 4 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #9 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:45:00 0.47400 in. H20 11:00:00 0.47230 in. H20 15 min -0.00170 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #9 Sat/10 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:45:00 0.72660 in. H20 11:00:00 0.72600 in. H20 15 min -0.00060 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #10 Sat/11 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 10:45:00 0.40110 in. H20 11:00:00 0.40050 in. H20 15 min -0.00060 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #9 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:01:00 0.47200 in. H20 11:16:00 0.47150 in. H20 15 min -0.00050 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3436368 UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 2 of 4 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #9 Sat/10 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:01:00 0.72600 in. H20 11:16:00 0.72580 in. H20 15 min -0.00020 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #10 Sat/11 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:01:00 0.40050 in. H20 11:16:00 0.40040 in. H20 15 min -0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #11 Sat/12 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:29:00 0.45520 in. H20 11:44:00 0.45510 in. H20 15 min -0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #12 Sat/13 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:29:00 0.18630 in. H20 11:44:00 0.18450 in. H20 15 min -0.00180 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3436368 UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 3 of 4 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #13 Sat steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:29:00 0.35340 in. H20 11:44:00 0.35170 in. H20 15 min -0.00170 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #11 Sat/12 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:47:00 0.47490 in. H20 12:02:00 0.47440 in. H20 15 min -0.00050 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #12 Sat/13 steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:47:00 0.18440 in. H20 12:02:00 0.18410 in. H20 15 min -0.00030 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #13 Sat steel Metallic 10.00 0.00 0.00 good 4" above Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 11:47:00 0.35170 in. H20 12:02:00 0.35160 in. H20 15 min -0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3436368 UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 4 of 4 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #3/4 Metallic Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Fail Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC # Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC # Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC # Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3436368 UDC 3-4 hydrostatic test failed, Massive dropped and over range the float during testing no test reading. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Is there a sensor in the pump? Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Fill Containment for Tank T-4 Diesel - 1 38.00 in. 70.00 in. 18.00 16.00 good 4" above Fiberglass 15 min 09:40:00 0.79410 in. H20 09:55:00 0.79590 in. H20 15 min 0.00180 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Fill Containment for Tank T-4 Diesel - 1 38.00 in. 70.00 in. 18.00 16.00 good 4" above Fiberglass 15 min 09:57:00 0.79600 in. H20 10:12:00 0.79650 in. H20 15 min 0.00050 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA in. in. min +/- Yes No Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA in. in. min +/- Yes No Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) WO: 3436368 7-Eleven Test Water Log Work Order: Site Name/ID: Address: City: 3436368 7-ELEVEN 37942 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58 BAKERSFIELD Date: 6/15/2017 State: CA Zip: 93301 Work Performed:Disp Sump, Fill Sump, Line Interstitials, SB989 or Sumps, STP Sump, Tank Interstitials Was Test Water left on site? Yes Test Fluid Transported Off Site by Tanknology Transported off Site by Other Company No Water used If Yes describe how much water and how contained? 15 (55galls) drums left on site and only 8 drums was used.Jovita If Yes who and when did you contact from site to report the water? If Transported Off Site by Tanknology how much was hauled? If Transported Off Site by Other Company what company and how much water? Technician Signature: Date: 6/15/2017 WO: 3436368 Site Diagram (This site diagram is for reference only and is not drawn to scale) Work Order:3436368 Site ID / Name:37942 / 7-ELEVEN 37942 Address:3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD., HWY 99/HWY 58 City:BAKERSFIELD State:CA Zip:93301