HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 018-18RESOLUTION NO. 0 18
18
RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSHELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO
THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF THE METROPOLITAN
BAKERSHELD GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAFr HIGHWAY (SR 119) AND ASHE
ROAD. (GPA/ZC NO. 17-0212).
WHEREAS, McIntosh and Associates for Gurmehar Enterprises, Inc./Dr. Matab
Singh, fled an application with the City of Bakersfield Community Development
Department requesting an amendment to the land use map designation of the
Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan from LMR (Low Medium Density Residential) to
GC (General Commercial) and to change the zone district from R-2 (Limited Multiple
Family Dwelling) to C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) on 5.68 acres located at the
southeast corner of Taft Highway (SR 119) and Ashe Road (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council upheld the appeal for GPA/ZC 17-0212 on February
21, 2018 approving the General Plan Amendment, thus necessitating the adoption of
the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 5:15
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California,
as the time and place for a public hearing before the City Council to consider the
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by Government Code Section
65355, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of
the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, during the hearing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony,
and evidence concerning the staff report, Mitigated Negative Declaration and the
Planning Commission's deliberation, and action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:
1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.
2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is hereby adopted subject
to the mitigation measures in Exhibit A for the Project located on the map as
shown in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein.
Page 1 of 2
U
r9RIGINA6
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the
Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting held on
MAR 0 7 2018 , by the folloWng vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: f3hV�E�iA, GONZALES. WEIR, SMITH,GREEENN, SULLIVAN, PARLIER
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:nIL'
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: NON¢
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
CHRISTOPHER URRY
ACTING CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED MAR 0 7 2018 (/
n
KAREN GOH
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
RICHARD ICER
Deputy City Attorney
Exhibits: A Mitigation Measures
B Location Map
DLS:\GPA,\GPA 4th 2017\17-0212\Res Ord\CC ENV Resolution.doex
Page 2 of 2
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT A
Mitigation Measures from Negative Declaration
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change No. 17-0212
Air Quality Impact MBigaBon Measures
1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project proponent of the project site shall submit
documentation to the Planning Division that they will/have met all air quality control measures
and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD).
The project proponent shall continuously comply with all applicable SJVAPCD Regulations;
including but not limited to:
A. Regulation VII.
1. Water previously exposed surfaces (soil) whenever visible dust is capable of drifting from
the site or approaches 20% opacity.
2. Water all unpaved haul roads a minimum of three-times/day or whenever visible dust from
such roads is capable of drifting from the site or approaches 20% opacity.
3. Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 miles per hour.
4. Install and maintain a track out control device that meets the specifications of SJVAPCD
Rule 8041 if the site exceeds 150 vehicle trips per day or more than 20 vehicle trips per day
by vehicles with three or more axles.
5. Stabilize all disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for
production purposes using wafer, chemical stabilizers, or by covering with a tarp or other
suitable cover.
6. Control fugitive dust emissions during land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation,
leveling, grading, or cut and fill operations with application of wafer or by presoaking.
7. When transporting materials offsite, maintain a freeboard limit of at least 6 inches and
cover or effectively wet to limit visible dust emissions.
8. Limit and remove the accumulation of mud and/or dirt from adjacent public roadways at
the end of each workday. (Use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited except when preceded
or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit visible dust emissions and use of blowers is
expressly forbidden).
9. Stabilize the surface of storage piles following the addition or removal of materials using
water or chemical stabilizer/suppressants.
10. Remove visible track -out from the site at the end of eac h workday.
11. Cease grading or other activities that cause excessive (greater than 20% opacity) dust
formation during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph over a one-hour period).
The Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) guidance document
lists
the following measures as approved and recommended for construction activities:
I.
Maintain all construction equipment as recommended by manufacturer manuals.
2.
Shut down equipment when not in use for extended periods.
3
Construction equipment shall operate no longer than eight (8) cumulative hours per day.
4.
Use electric equipment for construction whenever possible in lieu of diesel or gasoline
powered equipment.
5.
Curtail use of high -emitting construction equipment during periods of high or excessive
ambient pollutant concentrations.
6.
All construction vehicles shall be equipped with proper emissions control equipment and
kept in good and proper running order to substantially reduce NOx emissions.
7.
On -Road and Off -Road diesel equipment shall use diesel particulate filters if permitted
under manufacturer's guidelines.
8.
On -Road and Off -Road diesel equipment shall use cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)
if permitted under manufacturer's guidelines.
9.
All construction workers shall be encouraged to shuffle (car-pool) to retail establishments or
0�KF
9u�,
to remain on-site during lunch breaks.
0
� m
U p
ORIQINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 2
10. All construction activities within the project area shall be discontinued during the first stage
smog alerts.
11. Construction and grading activities shall not be allowed during first stage ozone alerts. First
stage ozone alerts are declared when the ozone level exceeds 0.20 parts per million (ppm)
(1 -hour average(.
C. The following measures are required to further reduce the potential for long-term emissions from
the project. These measures are required as a matter of regulatory compliance:
I. The project design shall comply with applicable standards set forth in Title 24 of the Uniform
Building Code to minimize total consumption of energy.
2. The project proponent shall be required to comply with applicable mitigation measures in
the Air Quality Attainment Plan, District Rules, Traffic Control Measures, Regulation VIII and
Indirect Source Rules for the SJVAPCD.
3. The project proponent shall comply with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 4601 during the
construction of all buildings and facilities. Application of architectural coatings shall be
completed in a manner that poses the least emissions impacts whenever such application
is deemed proficient.
4. The project proponent shall comply with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 4641 during the
construction and pavement of all roads and parking areas within the project area.
Specifically, the project proponent shall not allow the use of:
I. Rapid cure cutback asphalt;
ii. Medium cure cutback asphalt;
iii. Slow cure cutback asphalt (as specified in SJVAPCD Rule 4641, Section 5.1.3); or
V. Emulsified asphalt (as specified in SJVAPCD Rule 4641, Section 5.1.4).
5. The project proponent shall comply with applicable provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 9510
(Indirect Source Review).
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures
3. The project shall comply with the requirements of state and/or federal legislation and/or
regulation to reduce or eliminate production of Greenhouse Gases,
Biological Impact Mitigation Measures
Prior to ground disturbance, the project proponent shall have a California Department of Fish &
Wildlife (CDFW) approved qualified wildlife biologist ("biologist") survey the location for species
covered under the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP) incidental take
permit for urban development (Tipton kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, San Joaquin antelope
squirrel, and Bakersfield cactus) and comply with the mitigation measures of the permit. Survey
protocol shall be that recommended by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The project
proponent shall be subject to additional mitigation measures recommended by the qualified
biologist. A copy of the survey shall be provided to the Community Development Department and
wildlife agencies no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance.
The current MBHCP urban development incidental take permit expires on September 1, 2019.
Projects may be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or building permit
and pay fees prior to the September expiration date. As determined by the City of Bakersfield,
only projects ready to be issued an urban development permit, grading plan approval, or
building permit before the expiration date will be eligible to pay fees under the current MBHCP
incidental take permit. Early payment or pre -payment of MBHCP fees shall not be allowed. The
ability of the City to issue urban development permits is governed by the terms of the MBHCP
incidental take permit. Urban development permits issued after the expiration date may be OAKF
subject to a new or revised Habitat Conservation Plan, if approved, or be required to comply Q q
directly with requests of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency and the California Department of Fish `T
and Wildlife. �-
U c
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 3
The burrowing owl is a migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (META) of 1918 (16 U.S Code [U.S.C.] 703-711). The MBTA makes it unlawful to take,
possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R. Part 10, including
feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations
(50 Code of Federal Regulations [C.F.R.] 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California
Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their
nests or eggs. To avoid violation of the take provisions of these laws generally requires that project -
related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of
the nesting cycle (March 1 - August 15, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment
and/or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be
considered "taking" and is potentially punishable by fines and/or imprisonment.
a. To avoid impacts to burrowing owl, prior to ground disturbance, a focused survey shall be
submitted to California Department of Fish and Wildlife )CDFW) by the project proponent of a
subdivision or site plan review, following the survey methodology developed by the California
Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC, 1993). A copy of the survey shall also be submitted to the
City of Bakersfield, Planning Division.
b. If the survey results the presence of burrowing owl nests, prior to grading; including staging,
clearing, and grubbing, surveys for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife
biologist no more than 30 days prior to the start of the of the project commencing and that
the surveys be conducted in a sufficient area around the work site to identify any nests that
are present and to determine their status. A sufficient area means any nest within an area
that could potentially be affected by the project. In addition to direct impacts, such as nest
destruction, nests might be affected by noise, vibration, odors, and movement of workers or
equipment. If the project proponent identifies active nests, the CDFW shall be notified and
recommended protocols for mitigation shall be followed and a copy submitted to City of
Bakersfield, Planning Division.
c. If any ground disturbing activities will occur during the burrowing owl nesting season
)approximately February 1 through August 31), and potential burrowing owl burrows are
present within the project footprint, implementation of avoidance measures are warranted.
In the event that burrowing owls are found, the project proponent must follow CDFW
protocol for mitigation and comply with the provisions of the MBTA. If the project proponent
proposes to evict burrowing owls that may be present, the CDFW recommends passive
relocation during the non -breeding season.
Cultural Impact MBigafion Measures
6. Prior to ground -disturbance activities associated with this project, personnel associates with the
grading effort shall be informed of the importance of the potential cultural and archaeological
resources (i.e. archaeological sites, artifacts, features, burials, human remains, etc.) that may be
encountered during site preparation activities, how to identify those resources in the field, and of
the regulatory protections afforded to those resources. This training shall be conducted by
representatives from the Tejon Indian Tribe or qualified archaeologist. The personnel shall be
informed of procedures relating to the discovery of archaeological remains during grading
activities and cautioned to avoid archaeological finds with equipment and not collect artifacts.
The project proponent of the project site shall submit documentation to the Community
Development Department - Planning Division that they have met this requirement prior to
commencement of ground -disturbance activities. This documentation should include information
on the date(s) of training activities, the individual(s) that conducted the training, a description of
the training, and a list of names of those who were trained. Should cultural remains be uncovered, o_1 � 9u,
the on-site supervisor shall immediately notify a qualified archaeologist and the Tejon Indian Tribe.
v O
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 4
The project proponent shall provide the Tejon Indian Tribe information on excavation depth of the
construction site.
7. The project shall continuously comply with the following throughout the life of the project:
a. If cultural resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified
archaeologist shall be consulted for further evaluation. The project proponent of the project
site shall submit documentation to the Community Development Department Planning Division
that they have met this requirement prior to further commencement of ground -disturbance
activities and construction.
b. If human remains are discovered during grading or construction activities, all work shall cease
in the area of the find pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. If
human remains are identified on the site at any time, work shall stop at the location of the find
and the Kern County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7050.5 of the California
Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.94, 5097.98 and 5097.99 of the California Public
Resource Code which details the appropriate actions necessary for addressing the remains)
and the local Native American community shall be notified immediately.
Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures:
Intersection and roadway segment improvements which were identified in the Traffic Study as
necessary to maintain acceptable Levels of Service are listed in Table 6 (shown below). The
project's share of the costs for improvements to mitigate their impacts to the transportation
facilities included within the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program (RTIFj shall be paid by
the project through its contribution to the fee program. Required future improvements to local
facilities not included in the regional fee program shall be paid for by the project proponent
based on the pro -rate share of project related traffic identified in the Traffic Study for this project.
Both the "local" and "regional" fees will be paid at time of issuance of the various related building
permits for the project.
Table 6: Intersection Imorovements/Mtiaation/Pro-Rata Share
ORIGINAL
Existing
Total Year
Improvements
Commercial 2035
Project Traffic Future
Covered by
@ Year 2035 Traffic
RTIF
Intersection/Mitigation'
+
or
Project
other
funding
sources
PHV
PHV
1.2?% PHV
Ponamolu BAshe RdAM Peak
2020:No improvements required for future 2020 traffic
increases
972
0
0.00% 2854
-
M20+Pro: No mitigation required due to addition of
project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035 traffic
increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of
project traffic
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 5
Panama Peak
improvements
No improvements requiretlfor future iaD ha(fic
Increases
increases
1301
23
0.61%
3765
-
2020 * Prof; No mitigation required due to addition of
project traffic
20No improvements available for future 2035 traffic
2035M Proj: No mitigation required due to addition of
project lfpfFlc
Berkshire Rd & Ashe Rd -AM Peak 5
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
833
0
0.00%
649
-
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Project
Berkshire Rd & AsnRd-PMPeak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
848
43
2.69%
709
-
2020+Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Project
Berkshire Rd & Mountain Ridge Rd -AM Peak 5
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
682
0
0.00%
678
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Pro ect
Berkshire Rd & Mountain Ridge Rd -PM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
421
23
1.44%
420
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Project
Berkshire Rd & Stine Rd- AM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1559
0
0.00%
2326
-
2020+Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Provide Signal. Add ST
2035+Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied W 2035
without Project
eAxF
O gNr,
m
U p
ORIGINAk
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 6
Berkshire Rd & Stine Rd -PM Peak'
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1430
21
0.97%
2165
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Provide Signal
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied Q 2035 without
Project
Berksbjre Rd&Akers Rd-AMPeak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1316
0
0.00%
1602
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of Droiect traffic
Berksh're Rd & Akers Rd- PM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
925
12
0.75%
1069
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Berkshire Rd & Wible Rd -AM Peak'
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1401
0
0.00%
2534
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add ST
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Berkshire Rd & Wible Rd- PM Peak'
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1931
6
0.18%
3349
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add ST
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
McCutchen Rd & Old River Road- AM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
739
0
0.00%
1265
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of Droiect traffic
McCutchen Rd &Old River Road -PM Peak 5
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
400
8
0.50%
720
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
oR
>
m
U O
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 7
MCC. tche Rd BG f dRd-AMPeak 51
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
705
4
0.25%
1317
-
2020+ Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add EL, WR & SR
2035+Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied ® 2035
without Project
MCCutchen Rd 8 Gosford Rd -PM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
619
25
1.56%
1073
-
2020+ Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035
without Project
McCutchen Rd 8 sh Rd-AMPeak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1032
8
0.50%
1149
-
2020 + Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: 1 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
McCutchen Rd 8 sh Rd-PMPeak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
887
59
3.69%
1025
-
2020+Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Project
McCutchen Rd&Mountain Riede DrAMPeaks
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1020
0
0.00%
992
2020+Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I Satisfied ® 2035 without
Project
McCutchen Rd & Mountain R'dae Dr- PM Peaks
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
720
31
1.94%
741
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Pro': No mitigation re uired due to
o�eAlfep
� m
v pr
AFIOINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 8
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @ 2035 with
Project
MCCufchen RdlHoskina Rd8 Sf Rd- AM P k7
2020: Add WT
2020+ Prot: No mitigation required due to
2126
0
0.00%
3491
-
addition of project traffic
2035: Add EL, ET, WL, NT & ST
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
M C 1 h Rd/Hoskina Rd & StiRd-PMP k7
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1384
32
1.40%
2289
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add EL WT & NT
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Hoskina Rd &Akers Rcl-AM Peak?
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1288
0
0.00%
3705
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add EL, EL WT, NT & ST
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
Hoskina Rd&AkersRd-PM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
894
18
0.72%
2497
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of proiect traffic
Hoskina Rd & Wible Rd -AM Peak?
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1638
0
0.00%
3426
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add EL, ER, WL, NL, NT, SL & ST
2035 + Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Hoskina Rd & Wible Rd -PM Peak 7
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1636
9
0.28%
3262
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add EL, ER, WL, NL, NT, SL & ST
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
McKee Rd & Aft Rd - AM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
477
15
0.94%
444
-
2020 + prat: No improvements due to addition of
project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
o� AKF�N
T
U P
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 9
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @ 2035 with
7
Protect
MCKft Rd &Ash Rd -PM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
608
91
5.69%
678
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
.. Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @ 2035 with
Project
M K Rd &Mountain RidDr -AM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
595
8
0.507.
375
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @
Existing/2035 with Project
McKee Rd &Mountain R'dae Dr -PM Peaks
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
479
60
3.75%
362
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @
Existing/2035 with Project
McKee Rd&Sf Rtl-AMPeak 1
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1337
6
0.34%
1755
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
project traffic
2035: Provide Signal, Add NT. NR, SL, ST & SR
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
McKee Rd & Stine Rd -PM Peaks
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
900
51
3.19%
1218
-
traffic increases
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
F 0AKF9
U
O
ORIGiNAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 10
McKee Rd & Akers Rd -AM Peak 5
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
962
0
0.00%
1253
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035
without Project
McKee Rd &Akers Rd -PM Peak 5
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
309
21
1.31%
453
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfed @ 2035 with
Project
McKee Rd & Wble Rd -AM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1252
0
0.00%
1690
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Provide Signal, Add NT, NR & ST
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
McKee Rd & Wible Rd- PM Peak 5.
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1063
10
0.63%
1449
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
additionof project traffic
2035: Provide Signal
2035+Prot No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
Taft Hwv (SRI 191 & Old River Rd (North Lea) -AM
Peaks
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
692
0
0.00%
1169
-
traffic increases
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035
without Project
Taft Hwv(SR719)
Old River Rd (North Led]- PMPeak'
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
984
7
1.03%
1665
-
2020+ Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Improvements required at the South Leg of
this intersection requiring realignment to create a
single, signalized intersection
o� AKF9�
m
v
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 11
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035
without Project
Taft H(SRI 19)&Old River RdfSo ihL )AM Peaks
_
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
768
0
0.00%
1325
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
Taft H ISR119j& Old River Rd fSouth L gIPM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1054
9
1.20%
1806
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Improvements required at the South Leg of
this intersection requiring realignment to create a
single, signalized intersection
Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
Taft Hwv ISM 19)&Old River Rd ( Real'g d/
Comb'ned)-PM Peak
2020: N/A
1103
9
1.13%
1902
-
2020+Proj: N/A
2035: Realign North & South Approaches, Provide
Signal
2035 + Prof No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
Taft Hwv ISR 119) & GosfordRd-AMPeaks
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
817
7
0.89%
1195
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Taft Hwv (SRI 191 & Gosford Rd- PM Peak'
2020: Add ET & WT
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
1172
39
6.69%
1755
of project traffic
2035: Add EL & ST
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Taff Hwv (SRI 191 & Ashe Rd- AM Peak 1
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
836
58
7.59%
1275
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add ET, WT, NL & SL
2035 + Prof: No mitigation required due to
addition of pro'ect traffic
Taft Hwv !SR 1191 & Ashe Rd -PM Peakr
2020: Add ET & WT
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
1083
293
34.96%1921
-
addition of project traffic
2035: Add NL&SL
0 KFq
o %P
PRIOIMIIF
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 12
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of i traffic
Taff HwvISR 1191 & Mountain Ridge Dr- AM Peak s
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
788
23
2.83%
1273
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: I & 3 Satisfied @ 2035 without
Project
I911H ISR 1191&M to R'd Dr -Pm Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1000
121
16.31%
1742
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @ 2035 with
Project
TQft HwvjSR 1191 & Stine Rd- AM Peak e
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
930
8
1.19%
1491
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Taff Hwy ISR1191&Sfne Rd -PM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1132
46
6.78%
1810
-
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Iafi Hwy (SR 1191&Ak Rd -AM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
863
3
0.24%
2109
2020 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035 + Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied; 1 & 3 Satisfied @ 2035
Without Project
Taff Hwv(SR 1191 & Akers Rd -PM Peak
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
haffic increases
1042
16
0.98%
2675
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to
0ARF9
NT
v
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 13
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfed: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Project
loft H (SR 11918 Wb1 Rd-AMPeak 7
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
972
0
0.00%
1908
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
2035: Add ET & WT
2035 +Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
pro ect traffic
T ff H ISRI19)8 W'bl Rtl-PMP k7
2020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
1301
10
0.77%
2600
-
2020+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: Add ET & WT
2035+Proj: No mitigation required due to addition
of project traffic
Houahton Rd & Ashe- AM Peaks
020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
215
8
0.50%
263
-
2020+Prot: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied @ 2035 with
Project
Houahton Rd & Ashe - PM Peaks
020: No improvements required for future 2020
traffic increases
261
39
2.44%
353
-
2020+Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
2035: No improvements required for future 2035
traffic increases
2035+ Proj: No mitigation required due to
addition of project traffic
Warrants Satisfied: None Satisfied ® 2035 with
Project
Notes:
PHV = Peak Hour Volume
NL = Northbound Left Lane, NT = Northbound Through Lane,
NR= Northbound Right Lane EL = Eastbound Left Lane. ET=
Eastbound Through Lane, ER = Eastbound Right Lane SL =
Southbound Leff Lane, ST = Southbound Through Lane, SR =
Southbound Right Lane WL = Westbound Leff Lane, WT=
Westbound Through Lane, WR = Westbound Right Lane LOS =
Level of Service, ll Std. = Beyond City of Bakersfield
Standard Detail T-4
RTIf = Regional Transportation Impact Fee, s/v= seconds per vehicle in delay
t Percentages Based on Cal -Trans Formula: Project Volumeffuture Volume -Existing Volume)
2 For all non -Caltrans Facilities, Percentages Based on COB Formula: Project Volumeffuture Volume)
s Project percentage of future traffic is shown in this column regardless of mitigation requirements. OF0AKF9
sT
m
� r
u o
ORIGINAL
Mitigation Measures
GPA/ZC 17-0212
Page 14
4 Additional lanes required as shown are with reference to existing lanes at time of study survey.
Since loneage configurations may have changed since time of survey, intersection analysis
printouts contained in the appendix should be referred to for actual total laneage configurations
required for mitigation.
is Percentage share at this intersection is based on the project's contribution to the minimum threshold
for signalization at this intersection (I280vph for I lane by I lane Approaches, 1440vph for 2 lane by I
lane Approaches, and 1600vph for 2lane by 2lane Approaches).
s Project created intersection. Developer shall be responsible for all improvement costs related to this
intersection.
z Improvements to this intersection are included in the Phase IV Metropolitan Bakersfield Regional
Transportation Impact Fee Program and therefore paid for by project's contribution to that fee
program.
DLS:\GPAs\GPA 4th 2017\17-0212\EXHIBIT A mitigation measures.docx
o`` gAKF9N
ti m
J p
ORIGINAL
F
A
0
n
A II "I A lfAIII
A c A l l A II A III
� � h'NY MS/NiMV RO NMVOXE di
� � �92`a92a"a ?gSFg8�3�Yea,��frggE f'am����a.'ge&Y3zP�a?a3 m
a€c3�U3ea�=�s sag��l�gs$H3�as�€$�¢ [�$ Rzxc
ge
3 D m
5;'S3 5Ea ¢B o aaS cg€' Hn5 a m r
m
� o ' 9 dig. 59 yoz
"M'UINAL
c�
K
D
s
n
o
m
m
N
m
r
�
V
0
N
�
N
A II "I A lfAIII
A c A l l A II A III
� � h'NY MS/NiMV RO NMVOXE di
� � �92`a92a"a ?gSFg8�3�Yea,��frggE f'am����a.'ge&Y3zP�a?a3 m
a€c3�U3ea�=�s sag��l�gs$H3�as�€$�¢ [�$ Rzxc
ge
3 D m
5;'S3 5Ea ¢B o aaS cg€' Hn5 a m r
m
� o ' 9 dig. 59 yoz
"M'UINAL