The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016 SB-989 RESULTSTesting and Inspection Certificate Tanknology Inc. 11000 North MoPac Expressway, Suite 500, Austin, TX 78759 800-800-4633 www.tanknology.com Page 1 of 1 Test Date 4/7/2016 Tanknology WO#SC1-3430333 Test Purpose COMPLIANCE Customer PO# Customer Location PENSKE TRUCK LEASING P.O. BOX 7635 READING, PA 19603 PENSKE CA-094 (CA-094/0198-10) 2929 E. BRUNDAGE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Attn: BRIAN YAZEMBOSKI Attn: JOE (610) 603-8450 (661) 322-2600 Test / Inspection Description Item Tested Date Tested Result Tank Interstitial T1 4/7/2016 Tank Interstitial T2 4/7/2016 Secondary Pipe (Interstitial) Product Pipe for UDC 1 Main to UDC 1 Satellite 4/7/2016 Pass Secondary Pipe (Interstitial) Product Pipe for UDC 2 Main to UDC 2 Satellite 4/7/2016 Pass Secondary Pipe (Interstitial) Other Pipe for OIL LINE A to OIL LINE B 4/7/2016 Fail Secondary Pipe (Interstitial) Product Pipe for T1 DIESEL STP to UDC 1 MAIN 4/7/2016 Pass Secondary Pipe (Interstitial) Product Pipe for T1 DIESEL STP to T2 DIESEL STP Manifold 4/7/2016 Fail Piping Containment Sump Tank T1 - STP Sump 1 Diesel 4/7/2016 Fail Piping Containment Sump Tank T2 - STP Sump 1 Diesel 4/7/2016 Fail Dispenser Containment (UDC) See test report for details 4/7/2016 Not Tested Tanknology Representative: Michelle Cleghorn Technician: Jeffrey Crisostomo Telephone: (800) 666-2176 Technician Certification: (See forms) SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: PENSKE CA-094 Date of Testing: 4/7/2016 Facility Address: 2929 E. BRUNDAGE , BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 Facility Contact: JOE Phone: 661-322-2600 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Not present 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: TANKNOLOGY INC. Technician Conducting Test: Jeffrey Crisostomo Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: A-UT License Number: 743160-8199847 Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s)Date Training Expires vplt/secondary contaiment Sump tester 3/6/2019 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Tank Annular# T1 X Tank Annular# T2 X Product Pipe for UDC 1 Main to UDC 1 Satellite X Product Pipe for UDC 2 Main to UDC 2 Satellite X Other Pipe for OIL LINE A to OIL LINE B X Product Pipe for T1 DIESEL STP to UDC 1 MAIN X Product Pipe for T1 DIESEL STP to T2 DIESEL STP Manifold X STP Containment for Tank T1 diesel - 1 X STP Containment for Tank T2 diesel - 1 X UDC # 1 Sat/ X UDC # 1/2 X UDC # 2 Sat/ X Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made UDC # 1 Sat/ X UDC # 1/2 X UDC # 2 Sat/ X If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature:Date:4/7/2016 WO: 3430333 SAT UDC #2 not tested due prove won't fit inside UDC. Diesel Main and Diesel syphon STP was not tested Hydrostatically and pressure due to damaged secondary boots.H20 pump out by Nieto and Sons. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Vacuum/Gauge Equipment Resolution: 0 Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Tank Capacity: Tank Material: Tank Manufacturer: Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Tank# T1 Yes No 11594 Fiberglass Diesel min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# T2 Yes No 11594 Fiberglass Diesel min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# Yes No min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Tank# Yes No min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) Wet annular with Vr-301 sensors. 1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 2 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: gauge 1-15psi Equipment Resolution: 0 Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: Length of Piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Product Pipe for UDC 1 Main to UDC 1 Satellite dwfrg dwfrg 2 in. 10 ft. boot 15 min 09:30:00 5.00000 PSI 10:30:00 5.00000 PSI 1 hr 0.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Pass Product Pipe for UDC 2 Main to UDC 2 Satellite dwfrg dwfrg 2 in. 10 ft. boot 15 min 09:30:00 5.00000 PSI 10:30:00 5.00000 PSI 1 hr 0.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Pass Other Pipe for OIL LINE A to OIL LINE B dwfrg dwfrg 2 in. 50 ft. boot 15 min 09:30:00 5.00000 PSI 10:30:00 0.00000 PSI 1 hr -5.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Fail Product Pipe for T1 DIESEL STP to UDC 1 MAIN dwfrg dwfrg 2 in. 30 ft. boot 15 min 09:30:00 5.00000 PSI 10:30:00 5.00000 PSI 1 hr 0.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Pass Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) WO: 3430333 Diesel syphon secondary line failed due to damaged boots on Diesel Main STP and Diesel Syphon Man-way. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 2 of 2 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: gauge 1-15psi Equipment Resolution: 0 Piping Material: Piping Manufacturer: Piping Diameter: Length of Piping Run: Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Product Pipe for T1 DIESEL STP to T2 DIESEL STP Manifold dwfrg dwfrg 2 in. 10 ft. boot 15 min 09:30:00 5.00000 PSI 10:30:00 0.00000 PSI 1 hr -5.00000 PSI +/- 0.00000 Fail in. ft. min +/- in. ft. min +/- in. ft. min +/- Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) WO: 3430333 Diesel syphon secondary line failed due to damaged boots on Diesel Main STP and Diesel Syphon Man-way. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 1 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. Sump Diameter/Dimensions: Sump Depth: Sump Material: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested1 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail-safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? STP Containment for Tank T1 Diesel - 1 in. in. Fiberglass Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Fail Yes No NA Yes No NA STP Containment for Tank T2 Diesel - 1 in. in. Fiberglass Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Fail Yes No NA Yes No NA in. in. Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA in. in. Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire sump must be tested. WO: 3430333 Diesel Main and Diesel syphon STP failed due to damaged secondary boots. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 2 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #1 Sat frg Fiberglass 32.00 12.00 8.00 good 2" ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:19:00 0.18950 in. H20 09:34:00 0.18960 in. H20 15 min 0.00010 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #1/2 frg Fiberglass 32.00 12.00 8.00 good 2" ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:19:00 0.74150 in. H20 09:34:00 0.74090 in. H20 15 min -0.00060 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #2 Sat frg Fiberglass 32.00 12.00 8.00 good 2" ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min +/- Not Tested Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #1 Sat frg Fiberglass 32.00 12.00 8.00 good 2" ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:36:00 0.18950 in. H20 09:41:00 0.19000 in. H20 15 min 0.00050 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3430333 VPLT prove won't fit inside the SAT 2 UDC. SWRCB, January 2002 Page 2 of 2 7. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used By: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: VPLT Equipment Resolution: 0.00001 in. UDC Manufacturer: UDC Material: UDC Depth: Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to testing: Portion of UDC Tested1 Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water)?* Turbine shutdown response time Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown?* Was fail-safe verified to be operational?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF-RI) : Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Was sensor removed for testing? Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? UDC #1/2 frg Fiberglass 32.00 12.00 8.00 good 2" ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min 09:36:00 0.74060 in. H20 09:41:00 0.74010 in. H20 15 min -0.00050 in. H20 +/- 0.00200 Pass Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC #2 Sat frg Fiberglass 32.00 12.00 8.00 good 2" ABOVE HIGHEST PIPING Yes No NA 00:00:00 sec Yes No NA Yes No NA 15 min +/- Not Tested Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC # Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA UDC # Yes No NA sec Yes No NA Yes No NA min +/- Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) 1 If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. WO: 3430333 VPLT prove won't fit inside the SAT 2 UDC. Site Diagram (This site diagram is for reference only and is not drawn to scale) Work Order:3430333 Site ID / Name:CA-094/0198-10 / PENSKE CA-094 Address:2929 E. BRUNDAGE City:BAKERSFIELD State:CA Zip:93307 W.O.# SC1-3430333 W.O.# SC1-3430333 W.O.# SC1-3430333 Ovf W.O.# SC1-3430333 Nieto and sons W.O.# SC1-3430333 Nieto and sons W.O.# SC1-3430333 W.O.# SC1-3430333 W.O.# SC1-3430333 W.O.# SC1-3430333 W.O.# SC1-3430333