HomeMy WebLinkAboutSB-989 RESULTS 2017SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and
printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: ARCO Date of Testing: 6/21/2017
Facility Address: 4203 Ming Ave Bakersfield, Ca.
Facility Contact: Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing :
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing):
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Advanced Compliance
Technician Conducting Test: Bradley Hinsley
Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: C61/D40 License Number: 971259
Manufacturer Training
Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires
Incon TS-STS
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
871 STP Sump X 871 Annular Space X
872 STP Sump X 872 Annular Space X
873 STP Sump X 873 Annular Space X
91 STP Sump X 91 Annular Space X
871 Fill Sump X UDC #1-2 X
872 Fill Sump X UDC #3-4 X
873 Fill Sump X UDC #5-6 X
91 Fill Sump X UDC #7-8 X
871 Fill Bucket X UDC #9-10 X
872 Fill Bucket X UDC #11-12 X
873 Fill Bucket X 871 Vapor Bucket X
91 Fill Bucket X 872 Vapor Bucket X
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Containments were clean, water was removed from site and be used in future testing.
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date: 6/21/2017
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intended for use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and
printouts from tests (if applicable), should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
4. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: ARCO Date of Testing: 6/21/2017
Facility Address: 4203 Ming Ave Bakersfield, Ca.
Facility Contact: Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing :
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing):
5. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Advanced Compliance
Technician Conducting Test: Bradley Hinsley
Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: C61/D40 License Number: 971259
Manufacturer Training
Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires
Incon TS-STS
6. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
873 Vapor Bucket X
91 Vapor Bucket X
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Containments were clean, water was removed from site and be used in future testing.
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge, the facts stated in this document are accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements
Technician’s Signature:________________________________________________ Date: 6/21/2017
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
7. TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure X Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution:
Tank # 1 Tank # 2 Tank # 3 Tank # 4
Is Tank Exempt From Testing?1 Yes x No Yes x No Yes x No Yes No
Tank Capacity: 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Tank Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Tank Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
Product Stored: 87 UL 87 UL 87 UL 91 UL
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. N/A
Test Start Time: 10:00 10:00 12:00 N/A
Initial Reading (RI): 10” Hg. 10” Hg. 10” Hg. N/A
Test End Time: 11:00 11:00 13:00 N/A
Final Reading (RF): 10” Hg. 10” Hg. 10” Hg. N/A
Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr. N/A
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0” Hg. 0” Hg. 0” Hg. N/A
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 2.0” Hg. 2.0” Hg. 2.0” Hg. 2.0” Hg.
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
91 Annular could not be tested due to junction box cap. Could not remove sensor to test.
1 Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)}
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
8. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: X Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen / Pressure Gauge Equipment Resolution:
Piping Run # 87 1 Piping Run # 87 2 Piping Run # 87 3 Piping Run # 91
Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
Piping Manufacturer: A/O Smith A/O Smith A/O Smith A/O Smith
Piping Diameter: 3” 3” 3” 3”
Length of Piping Run: 200’ 200’ 200’ 200’
Product Stored: 87 UL 87 UL 87 UL 91
Method and location of
piping-run isolation: Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: N/A 11:30 N/A 11:30
Initial Reading (RI): N/A 5.0 Psi. N/A 5.0 Psi.
Test End Time: N/A 12:30 N/A 12:30
Final Reading (RF): N/A 5.0 Psi. N/A 5.0 Psi.
Test Duration: N/A 1 Hr. N/A 1 Hr.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): N/A 0.0 Psi. N/A 0.0 Psi.
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi.
Test Result: Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
87-1 & 87-3 Lines could not be tested due to torn boot.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
9. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: X Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen / Pressure Gauge Equipment Resolution:
Piping Run # 1 Piping Run # 2 Piping Run # 87M to 91 Piping Run # 87M to Dsl
Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass
Piping Manufacturer: A/O Smith A/O Smith A/O Smith A/O Smith
Piping Diameter: 3” 3” 3” 3”
Length of Piping Run: 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’
Product Stored: 87 UL Future Line Future Line Future Line
Method and location of
piping-run isolation: Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot Test Boot
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min
Test Start Time: 13:30 13:30 13:30 13:30
Initial Reading (RI): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi.
Test End Time: 14:30 14:30 14:30 14:30
Final Reading (RF): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi.
Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr. 1 Hr.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi.
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi.
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
C – Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
10. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
87 1 UL 87 2 UL 87 3 UL 91 UL
Sump Diameter: 42” 42” 42” 42”
Sump Depth: 63” 63” 63” 63”
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration: 30” 43” 30” 28”
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 31” 20” 31” 31”
Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean Clean
Portion of Sump Tested1 50% 70% 50% 50%
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 3 Sec. 3 Sec. 3 Sec. 3 Sec.
Is system programmed for fail-safe
shutdown?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting
test:
10 Min. 10 Min.
10 Min.
10 Min.
Test Start Time: 14:56 16:03 11:31 15:41
Initial Reading (RI): 5.1134 3.5477 2.2329 4.1451
Test End Time: 15:11 16:18 11:46 15:57
Final Reading (RF): 5.1141 3.5489 2.2327 4.1450
Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0007 0.0012 0.0002 0.0001
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
1 If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an
asterisk (*) is “NO” or “NA”, the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG-160)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
11. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
UDC # 1-2 UDC # 3-4 UDC # 5-6 UDC # 7-8
UDC Manufacturer: Bravo Bravo Bravo Bravo
UDC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 15” 15” 15” 15”
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
12” 12” 12” 12”
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean Clean
Portion of UDC Tested1 50% 50% 50% 50%
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 3 Seconds 3 Seconds 3 Seconds 3 Seconds
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
10 Min.
10 Min.
10 Min.
10 Min.
Test Start Time: 05:44 05:44 05:44 05:44
Initial Reading (RI): 0.8569 0.9854 1.1676 1.5440
Test End Time: 05:59 05:59 05:59 05:59
Final Reading (RF): 0.8568 0.9849 1.1669 1.5434
Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. 150 Min.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0001 0.0005 0.0007 0.0006
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
12. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
UDC # 9-10 UDC # 11-12
UDC Manufacturer: Bravo Bravo
UDC Material: FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 26” 26”
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
12” 12”
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
N/A N/A
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean
Portion of UDC Tested1 50% 50%
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 3 Seconds 3 Seconds
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was fail-safe verified to be
operational?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
10 Min.
10 Min.
Test Start Time: 06:38 06:38
Initial Reading (RI): 1.0922 1.1037
Test End Time: 06:53 06:53
Final Reading (RF): 1.0913 1.1038
Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0009 0.0001
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
87 1 UL 87 2 UL 87 3 UL 91 UL
Sump Diameter: 42” 42” 42” 42”
Sump Depth: 62” 62” 62” 62”
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Condition of sump prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean Clean
Portion of Sump Tested 35% 35% 35% 35%
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min.
10 Min.
10 Min.
10 Min.
Test Start Time: 14:26 13:19 14:04 14:04
Initial Reading (RI): 4.2444 1.2448 3.3257 3.0192
Test End Time: 14:41 13:35 14:20 14:20
Final Reading (RF): 4.2446 1.2458 3.3260 3.0196
Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0002 0.001 0.0003 0.0004
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is
detected?
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
13. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes
Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
87 1 FB 87 2 FB 87 3 FB 91 FB
Bucket Diameter: 12” 12” 12” 12”
Bucket Depth: 12” 12” 12” 12”
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 17:00 17:43 16:24 N/A
Initial Reading (RI): 6.7286 2.3767 5.0716 N/A
Test End Time: 17:15 17:58 16:39 N/A
Final Reading (RF): 6.7285 2.3776 5.0715 N/A
Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. N/A
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0001 0.0009 0.0001 N/A
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass X Fail
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
91 Fill Bucket would not hold water.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page ____ of ____
1. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes
Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
87 1 VB 87 2 VB 87 3 VB 91 VB
Bucket Diameter: 12” 12” 12” 12”
Bucket Depth: 12” 12” 12” 12”
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 16:24 13:42 17:00 13:19
Initial Reading (RI): 5.4768 3.6743 3.8588 5.0136
Test End Time: 16:39 13:58 17:15 13:35
Final Reading (RF): 5.4765 3.6726 3.8586 5.0128
Test Duration: 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min. 15 Min.
Change in Reading (RF-RI): 0.0004 0.0017 0.0002 0.0008
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)