Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/27/2019 B A K E R S F I E L D Staff: Committee Members: Chris Huot, Assistant City Manager Councilmember, Andrae Gonzales – Chair Councilmember, Willie Rivera Councilmember, Ken Weir SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE of the City Council - City of Bakersfield Wednesday, February 27, 2019 12:00 p.m. City Hall North 1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 First Floor, Conference Room A AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. ADOPT MAY 30, 2017 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee Recommendation Regarding Annual Audit Reports ending FY 2018 – McKeegan B. Discussion and Committee Recommendation Regarding FY 2019-20 CDBG, HOME, ESG Action Plan – Tandy / Kitchen C. Discussion and Committee Recommendation Regarding Adoption of the 2019 Committee Meeting Schedule – Huot 5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 6. ADJOURNMENT B A K E R S F I E L D Committee Members Staff: Chris Huot Councilmember, Andrae Gonzales – Chair Assistant City Manager Councilmember, Willie Rivera Councilmember, Ken Weir SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:30 a.m. City Hall North – Conference Room A 1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 The meeting was called to order at 10:30 a.m. 1. ROLL CALL Committee members Present: Councilmember, Andrae Gonzales, Chair Councilmember, Ken Weir Councilmember, Willie Riviera City Staff Present: Alan Tandy, City Manager Chris Huot Assistant City Manager Caleb Blaschke, Management Assistant – City Manager’s Office Joshua Rudnick, Deputy City Attorney Nelson Smith, Finance Director Randy McKeegan, Finance Supervisor Additional Attendees Present: Members of the Bakersfield Association of Realtors Members of the PACE Program Members of the Media Members of the Public 2. ADOPT APRIL 27, 2017 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT The Report was adopted as submitted. 3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS There were a total of 7 public speakers who spoke in opposition to the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program. They were: Sherry Anthis, Bakersfield Association of Realtors; Michael Turnipseed; Nick Ortiz; Margaret Smith; Melissa Domeny; Scott Dick; and Gary Crabtree. /s/ Chris Huot ____________________________________________ Budget and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda Summary Report – May 30, 2017 Page 2 There were a total of 14 public speakers who spoke in support to the PACE Program. They were: Ray Mathers; Sharon Dickey; Kevin Harbor; Ken Greer; Mathew Martin; Lyn Rincon; Ben Dominguez; Chris Morgan; Paul Vince; Laura Booker; Bert Alton; Jose Augilar; Brian McCardy; and Fred Thomas. During a rebuttal period, additional statements were provided by: Sherri Anthis, Bakersfield Association of Realtors and Glen Porter who spoke in opposition to the PACE Program; followed by Jeremy Human; George Ygrene; and Dustin Reilich who spoke in support of the PACE Program. 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion and Committee Recommendation Regarding the PACE Program– Tandy City Manager Tandy provided a brief summarization of the PACE Program by means of a PowerPoint presentation. City Manager Tandy provided details regarding the history and recent developments related to the program. There was no staff recommendation presented to the Committee. Committee member Rivera expressed his appreciation to everyone who provided testimony regarding the PACE Program. He stated that the program was considered a great incentive for the community; in particular those who would not be able to otherwise afford energy efficient home improvements and a reason the City chose to allow it within city limits. He asked if research had been compiled regarding the effectiveness of the participation agreement in other jurisdictions and if it would address the issues being experienced locally. City Manager Tandy stated that the city authorized the program to be used locally through a joint powers agreement and that the program is regulated by the State. The City has no enforcement and compliance tools to monitor the program. City Attorney Gennaro agreed with City Manager Tandy’s comments. In addition she stated that she was unaware of any amendments being made to the joint powers agreement. The PACE Participation Agreement is only a sample agreement between the PACE provider and the property owner; without being physically present during the execution of the agreement there is no way to know exactly what is said or what takes place. Committee member Rivera asked if the City could withdraw from the joint powers agreement and cancel the PACE Program. City Attorney Gennaro stated that the Council could withdraw from the joint powers agreement by passage of a resolution. The termination would only have an effect on future consumer agreements; those previously signed would remain in place. ____________________________________________ Budget and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda Summary Report – May 30, 2017 Page 3 Committee member Rivera requested staff reach out to the City of Los Angeles, find out what changes they have made to make the program work in their jurisdiction. He also acknowledge the comments written by Mr. John Lifquist, Kern County Assessor, and stated it did not sway his current position. Committee member Weir also thanked those present for providing testimony and expressed concern regarding several statements made. He stated that the example participation agreement included in the packet only jeopardized the city further into responsibility. Committee member Weir stated the question regarding the matter being poor public policy needs to be address by the full City Council. He made a motion to direct the matter without a recommendation back to the full City Council on for discussion at an appropriate date. Committee Chair Gonzales reiterated and agreed with the comments made by Committee members Rivera and Weir. Given the program has been in effect since 2010 and there being over 2,700 projects completed to date, he requested staff gather additional information regarding the 26 cases provided by the Board of Realtors in order to have a better understanding of the current circumstances 5. COMMITTEE COMMENTS There were no Committee comments. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:27 p.m. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT MEETING DATE: 1/9/2019Consent – Miscellaneous af. TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM:Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director DATE:12/20/2018 WARD: SUBJECT:Audit Reports to be Referred to Budget and Finance Committee: 1.Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. 2.Agreed Upon Conditions Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. 3.Auditor Communication with Those Charged with Governance (SAS 114 Letter) for fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. 4.Independent Auditors Report – Compliance with Contractual Requirements relative to the Bakersfield Subregional Wastewater Management Plan for the year ended June 30, 2018. 5.Independent Auditors Report on Appropriations Limit Worksheet (GANN Limit) of the City of Bakersfield for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. 6.Independent Auditors Report – Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Bakersfield Ice Sports Center & Brighthouse Networks Amphitheatre for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. 7.Single Audit Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends referral to the Budget and Finance Committee. BACKGROUND: 1. The City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), commonly referred to as the Annual Audit Report, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 is attached. A hard copy of the report will also be on file in the City Clerk’s office for public review. The CAFR represents the City’s financial statements as of June 30, 2018, which are audited by the accounting firm of Brown Armstrong Accountancy Corporation. The current year audit opinion issued by the outside auditors was “unqualified,” which indicates that the City complied, in all material respects, with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America. 2. The Agreed Upon Conditions Report is designed to increase efficiency, internal controls and/or financial reporting and includes any reportable conditions noted during the Audit. A summary of reported conditions (if any) are included in the report. The report also addresses conditions identified in the prior year which have all been resolved to the auditors’ satisfaction. 3. The SAS 114 Letter provides information about our auditors’ responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of the audit. 4. Contract requirements contained in City of Bakersfield Agreement 76-153 as amended by Agreements 76-153(5), 76-153(4), 77- 44, 85-197 and 92-106 apply to operations of the Bakersfield Subregional Wastewater Management Plan. The City’s compliance with contract requirements is audited on an annual basis. 5. The Appropriations Limit Worksheet is prepared by the City in accordance with Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (GANN Limit). This annual review is performed by the auditors as part of their contract to provide auditing services to the City of Bakersfield. The agreed upon review procedures are substantially less in scope than an audit and therefore no audit opinion is expressed regarding the calculation. The letter from the auditors regarding this item is attached. 6. Attached is the independent audit report for the Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Bakersfield Ice Sports Center & Sprectrum Amphitheatre, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. This audit report presents the financial statements for this operational unit as of June 30, 2018. The management company (AEG) is required to submit an independent audit report of their operations to the City after the end of each fiscal year. This audit report was prepared by the accounting firm of Barbich, Hooper, King, Dill & Hoffman. 7. Attached is the Single Audit Report for the fiscal ended June 30, 2018. This audit report tests the City’s compliance for each major program and on internal control over compliance and report on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards required by the uniform guidance. The current audit report, issued by outside auditors, finds that the City has complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2018. Staff is recommending these reports be received and referred to the Budget and Finance Committee for review and discussion. The reports will come back to the full Council for acceptance at a future meeting after the Committee review process is completed. ATTACHMENTS: DescriptionType 2017-18 CAFR Backup Material Agreed Upon Conditions Report Backup Material SAS 114 Letter Backup Material Wastewater AUP Report Backup Material GANN Report Backup Material Arena Financial Statements Backup Material Single Audit Report Backup Material B A K E R S F I E L D Community Development Department Jacquelyn R. Kitchen, Community Development Director MEMORANDUM February 22, 2019 TO: Alan Tandy, City Manager FROM: Jacquelyn R. Kitchen, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Non-Profit & For-Profit Applications for HUD FY 2019/20 Funding Background. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has designated the City of Bakersfield as an Entitlement City. Therefore, HUD provides annual funding to improve low-income neighborhoods in the City pursuant to the federal programs noted below. The entitlements from FY 2018/19 are also noted for reference. Federal Program FY 2019/20 Allocation Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $3,646,234 Home Investment Partnership (HOME) $1,594,389 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) $293,680 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) $496,350 Total $6,030,653* * Includes an additional $8,000 in program income for CDBG and $100,000 for HOME Available Funds (FY 2019/20). As of the preparation of this Memo, HUD has not yet released the entitlement amount for FY 2019/20; however, there is an expectation that Congress will maintain previous year funding levels for all programs, with the exception HOME, which will experience a small decrease. The amount of decrease is unknown, therefore, Staff is using last year’s entitlement as our current projection. Applications Received. The deadline for the submission of CDBG, HOME, and ESG applications for FY 2019/20 funding was November 2, 2018. This year, the City received 13 applications from non-profit and private entities totaling $2,447,503, and 11 applications from City Departments totaling $4,844,345. The requested projects are intended to improve the quality of life and infrastructure for low- income persons and neighborhoods. Recommendation. Pursuant to federal requirements, Staff conducted a comprehensive review and evaluation of all applications for funding. Staff has prepared the attached Memorandum and recommended budget for consideration by the Budget and Finance Committee. Staff anticipates that the FY 2019/20 HUD Action Plan will be considered by the City Council on April 10, 2018. This is the fifth and final funding year of the Consolidated Plan 2015-2020. Attachments 1. Proposed CDBG Budget (FY 19/20) 2. Proposed HOME/ESG/HOPWA Budget (FY 19/20) 3. Memo – Overview of Applications Received S:\EDCD_Shared\ACTION PLANS\Action Plan 2019-20\ Funding Request Non Profit Memo.Docx Description FY 19/20 Requested FY 19/20 Proposed FY 18/19 Budget FY 17/18 Budget Ward CDBG Entitlement 3,638,234 3,638,234 3,638,234 3,262,290 Program Income (Projected for FY 18/19)8,000 8,000 7,000 7,000 Total Available Resources 3,646,234 3,646,234 3,645,234 3,269,290 Administration (not to exceed 20% or $729,047)729,047 729,047 729,047 653,858 Section 108 Loan Payment on $4.1M 301,383 301,383 292,758 282,692 Section 108 Loan Payment on $800K 55,922 55,922 54,711 53,244 Total Admin and Debt Payment 1,086,352 1,086,352 1,076,516 989,794 Total Resources minus Admin and Debt Payments 2,559,882 2,559,882 2,568,718 2,279,496 Fair Housing Program Services 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1 Bakersfield Senior Center 115,000 90,000 85,000 85,000 1 FY 18/19: Homeless Outreach Serivces (One Time Funds)0 0 71,072 Bakersfield Police Department (Community Relations Officers)400,000 322,785 290,713 305,394 1,2,7 Mission at Kern (Operations at new Facilities expaned by HEAP Grant)60,000 34,000 2 Total Public Service Projects 675,000 546,785 546,785 490,394 Home Access Rehabilitation 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Union Brundage: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage 726,300 600,000 1La France Area: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv.300,000 0 0 273,441 1 Oleander Area: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv.500,000 350,000 153,989 301,212 2Wilson Area: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv.500,000 350,000 0 1 Madison Area: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv.300,000 0 0 1Castro Area: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv.300,000 200,000 7 FY 17/18: Union-Brundage: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage 0 0 602,027 1FY 18/19: East Terrace: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv.0 300,000 0 1 Old Town Kern/Beale: Street Reconstruction 300,000 150,000 300,000 301,212 2FY 18/19: East California: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage, Accessibility Imprv 0 153,989 0 1 Beale Park Lighting Upgrade 419,750 323,097 2FY 18/19: Baker Street Neighborhood LED Lighting Improvements 0 61,000 0 2 FY 18/19: Oleander Neighborhood Street Lights Upgrade 0 179,955 0 2Beale Park Restrooom Replacement 450,000 350,000 2 McMurtrey Aquatic Center Improvements 450,000 316,000 0 2FY 17/18: Lowell Park Improvements 0 0 132,000 1 FY 17/18: Stiern Park Improvements 0 0 139,210 7 Boys and Girls Club 100,000 2 CAPK Food Bank Expansion 458,295 0 0 1 FY 18/19: BARC Tire Recycling Program 0 0 167,000 0 1 Total Public Facilities 4,844,345 2,013,097 1,854,933 1,789,102 Total Requests for Public Services + Projects 5,519,345 2,559,882 2,401,718 2,279,496 Total Available Resources Remaining -2,959,463 0 $167,000 $0 Note: Remainder of funds for Castro Area project will come from savings from other CDBG projects. DRAFT PROPOSED CDBG BUDGET FY 19-20 RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION AND DEBT SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES (MAX. 15% or $546,785) PROJECTS DRAFT PROPOSED HOME BUDGET FY 2019-20 HOME Entitlement 1,494,389$ 1,494,389$ 1,494,389$ Program Income (Projected for FY 19/20)100,000$ 100,000$ 30,000$ Total Available Resources 1,594,389$ 1,594,389$ 1,524,389$ Administration (not to exceed 10%)159,439$ 159,439$ 152,439$ Total Resources minus Admin 1,434,950$ 1,434,950$ 1,371,950$ CHDO Set Aside (15%)224,158$ 224,158$ 224,158$ Acquisition/Construction/Rehabiltation -$ 1,210,792$ -$ HACK - Eye St. Affordable Housing (Site Not Aquired)1,500,000$ -$ 147,792$ FY 18/19: HACK-Residences at East Hills -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Total (All Requests)1,724,158$ 1,434,950$ 1,371,950$ Total Available Resources Remaining (289,208)$ (0)$ -$ PROPOSED ESG BUDGET FY 2019-20 ESG Entitlement (Projected for FY 19/20)293,680$ 293,680$ 293,680$ Administration (not to exceed 7.5%)22,026$ 22,026$ 22,026$ Total Resources minus Admin 271,654$ 271,654$ 271,654$ Flood Ministries - Street Outreach 22,500$ 22,500$ 22,982$ Bakersfield Homeless Center - Shelter 144,208$ 64,550$ 63,363$ Bakersfield Homeless Center - Rapid Rehousing 95,000$ 95,454$ 95,446$ The Mission at Kern County - Shelter 80,500$ 62,650$ 63,363$ Alliance Against Family Violence - Shelter 32,000$ 26,500$ 26,500$ Total (All Requests)374,208$ 271,654$ 271,654$ Total Available Resources Remaining (102,554)$ -$ -$ PROPOSED HOPWA BUDGET FY 2019-20 HOPWA Entitlement (Projected for FY 19/20)496,350$ 496,350$ 438,169$ Administration (not to exceed 3%)14,891$ 14,891$ 13,145$ Total Resources minus Admin 481,460$ 481,460$ 425,024$ Kern County Public Health 481,460$ 481,460$ 425,024$ Total (All Requests)481,460$ 481,460$ 425,024$ Total Available Resources Remaining (1)$ (1)$ -$ PROJECTS Description FY 19/20 Requested FY 19/20 Proposed FY 18/19 Budget RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION AND DEBT SERVICE Description FY 19/20 Requested FY 19/20 Recommended FY 18/19 Budget RESOURCES RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION AND DEBT SERVICE HOPWA SPONSOR/PROVIDER ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS Description FY 19/20 Requested FY 19/20 Recommended FY 18/19 Budget Overall HUD Project Applications for FY 2019/20 Funding FY 2019/20 HOME APPLICATIONS HUD Category Applicant Ward Proposal Total Cost FY 18/19 Request HUD Eligible Staff Rating CD Recommendation and Notes Proposed for Budget HOME Affordable Housing New Construction HACK Eye Street Affordable Housing 2 60-unit affordable multi-family development at 21st and Eye Streets $22,970,875 $1,500,000 Yes 26 Qualified; however, staff was informed that the site is no longer available for the proposed project. $0 HOME Affordable Housing/New Construction TBD NA NA NA TBD TBD Staff will budget full HOME allocation for a future project to be determined. $1,371,950 E $224,158 CH Projected HOME Funding: $1,596,108 Requested Funding: $1.5 million Recommended Funding: $0 FY 2019/20 ESG APPLICATIONS HUD Category Applicant Ward Proposal Total Cost FY 18/19 Request HUD Eligible Staff Rating CD Recommendation and Notes Proposed for Budget Emergency Shelter Alliance Against Family Violence All Operating expenses for emergency shelter $32,000 Yes Staff recommends approval $26,500 Rapid Rehousing Bakersfield Homeless Center All Expenses to house homeless families and individuals. $95,000 Yes Staff recommends approval $95,454 Emergency Shelter Bakersfield Homeless Center All Operating expenses for emergency shelter $144,208 Yes Staff recommends approval $64,550 Emergency Shelter Mission of Kern County All Operating expenses for emergency shelter $80,500 Yes Staff recommends approval $62,650 Outreach Flood Ministries All Expenses to operate outreach efforts to homeless persons. $22,500 Yes Staff recommends approval $22,500 Projected ESG Funding: $293,680 Requested Funding: $374,208 Recommended Funding: $271,654 FY 2019/20 CDBG Applications – Public Services & Facilities HUD Category Applicant Ward Proposal Total Cost FY 18/19 Request HUD Eligible Staff Rating CD Recommendation and Notes Proposed for Budget CDBG Fair Housing GBLA All Fair housing services to low income persons throughout city limits. $100,000 $100,000 Yes 30 Approve. $100,000 CDBG BPD Officers City - BPD 1, 2 3, 7 Three officers to increase police presence, expand service area to include Wards 1, 2, 3, and 7. $400,000 $400,000 Yes 30 Approve $322,785 CDBG Senior services Bakersfield Senior Center 1 Services for low income seniors; add diabetes screening and language translation services. $150,000 $115,000 Yes Approve partial funding. Customary $85,000 and one-time $5,000 to implement language translation services. $90,000 CDBG Homeless Services Mission at Kern 2 Funds for operations costs to the homeless. $60,000 $60,000 Yes 30 Approve 56.67% of request, Mission to provide remainder by fundraising. $34,000 CDBG Section 108 City Na Annual Debt service for infrastructure loan. $301,383 $301,383 Yes 30 Approve. Annual Debt service infrastructure loan. $301,383 CDBG Section 108 City Na Annual Debt service for infrastructure loan. $55,922 $55,922 Yes 30 Approve. Annual Debt service infrastructure loan. $55,922 CDBG Home Access City - DS All Provide implements to assist with mobility in homes of low income disabled individuals. $40,000 $40,000 Yes 30 Approve at current funding level. $40,000 CDBG Economic Development Boys and Girls Club 2 Construct 2,160-sq.ft. facility for Workforce Development and ELS on parcels owned by Boys and Girls club. $486,150 $100,000 Yes 22 Not recommended. Application withdrawn by applicant. $0 CDBG Facility Expansion CAPK 1 Expand food bank facility from 20K-s.f. to 40K-s.f. $1.5 million $458,925 Yes 28 Not recommended. Full funding from other sources uncertain. C.O.B. recently participated in their solar roof project. $0 CDBG Funds Requested: $1,631,238 Recommended Funding: $944,090 FY 2019/20 CDBG Applications – Public Works & Recreation & Parks Departments HUD Category Applicant Ward Proposal Total Cost FY 18/19 Request HUD Eligible Staff Rating CD Recommendation and Notes Proposed for Budget CDBG CG&S City PWKS 1 Union-Brundage: curb , gutter, sidewalk, improvement $726,300 $726,300 Yes 25 Approve; completion of multi-year project. $600,000 CDBG CG&S City PWKS 1 Wilson area: curb, gutter and sidewalk, accessibility improvement. $500,000 $500,000 Yes 23 Not Recommended. Funded in FY18/19 $0 CDBG CG&S City PWKS 2 Beale Park: lighting upgrade of poles, wiring, conduit. $419,750 $419,750 Yes 23 Approve $323,097 CDBG CG&S City PWKS 1 La France Area curb, gutter and sidewalk, accessibility improvement. $300,000 $300,000 Yes 23 Not recommended per PW priority ranking. -0- CDBG CG&S City PWKS 7 Castro Area Curb, gutter, sidewalk $300,000 $300,000 Yes 23 Approve: make up the remainder with project savings from prior years. $200,000 CDBG CG&S City PWKS 2 Old Town Kern/Beale Asphalt $150,000 $150,000 Yes 23 Approve $150,000 CDBG CG&S City PWKS 1 Madison area: curb, gutter and sidewalk, accessibility improvement. $300,000 $300,000 Yes 23 Not recommended per PW priority ranking. -0- CDBG CG&S City PWKS 2 Oleander area: curb, gutter & sidewalk, accessibility improvement. $500,000 $500,000 Yes 25 Approve $350,000 CDBG Rec & Parks City Rec & Parks 2 Beale Park Restroom Replacement $450,000 $450,000 Yes NA Added 10% to past project estimate. Staff recommends $350,000 funding level. $350,000 CDBG Rec & Parks City Rec & Parks 2 McMurtrey Aquatic Center Pool Filter Replacement $450,000 $450,000 Yes NA Insufficient information for a funding recommendation. -0- Capital Improvement Projects Funding Requested: $4,096,050 Funding Recommended: $1,973,097 Notes: Projected HOPWA Funding: $496,350 Requested Funding: $496,350 Recommended Funding: $496,350 Projected CDBG Available for Funding: $2,917,187 Requested Funding: $5,577,288 Recommended Funding: $2,917,187 (Recommended funding amount is less 20% CDBG Admin. The amount includes Section 108 Loan /repayments*) All meetings will be held at City Hall North, First Floor, Conference Room A Approved: DRAFT Budget & Finance Committee Meetings 12:00 p.m.3:30 p.m. Closed Session 5:15 p.m. Public Session Budget Hearing on 06/05, Budget Adoption on 6/28 Holidays - City Hall Closed 12:00 p.m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eague of California Cities Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum - June 19 - 21, 2019 League of California Cities Annual Conference - October 16 - 18, 2019 OCTOBERNOVEMBERDECEMBER APRILMAYJUNE JULYAUGUSTSEPTEMBER Budget Departmental Workshop Budget & Finance Committee Calendar January 2019 Through December 2019 JANUARYFEBRUARY City Council Meetings MARCH Documents Presented At The Budget and Finance Committee February 27, 2019 Meeting CITY OF BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Prepared by the Department of Finance Nelson K. Smith, Finance Director On the Cover City of Bakersfield Sign Photo by Gilbert Vega CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................i Letter of Transmittal................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv GFOA Certificate of Achievement................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................viii Organizational Chart................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ix Elected and Administrative Officers................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................x FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information)................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Basic Financial Statements Statement of Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 Statement of Activities................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................22 Governmental Funds: Balance Sheet................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................26 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................28 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................30 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................32 Proprietary Funds: Statement of Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................34 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................36 Statements of Cash Flows................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................38 Fiduciary Funds: Statement of Fiduciary Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................44 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................45 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................47 i CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table of Contents Required Supplementary Information: Budgetary Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................103 Budgetary Comparison Schedule for the General Fund................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................104 Budgetary Comparison Schedule for the Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................105 Budgetary Comparison Schedule for the Community Development Block Grant Fund................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................105 Budgetary Comparison Schedule for the Gas Tax & Road Fund................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................106 Defined Pension Plan - Schedules of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios & Schedules of Plan Contributions................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................107 Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Plan - Schedule of Changes in City's Net OPEB Liability and Related Ratios................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................110 Supplementary Information: Balance Sheet - General Fund................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................116 Schedule of Revenues by Function - General Fund - Budget & Actual................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................117 Schedule of Expenditures by Division - General Fund - Budget & Actual................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................118 Special Revenue Funds: Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances -Budget and Actual................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................120 Debt Service Fund: Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................126 Capital Projects Fund: Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................128 Internal Service Funds: Combining Statement of Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................131 Combining Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................132 Combining Statement of Cash Flows................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................133 Fiduciary Funds: Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................134 Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position -Private Purpose Trust Funds................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................135 Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position -Pension & Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................136 Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position -Private Purpose Trust Funds................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................137 Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position -Pension & Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................138 Non-Major Governmental Funds: Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................140 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................142 Long-term Debt Recorded in Private Purpose Trust Fund................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................144 ii CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table of Contents STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................148 Change in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................150 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................154 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................156 Governmental Activities Tax Revenues By Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................158 Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................159 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................160 Property Tax Rates/Direct and Overlapping Governments - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................162 Property Taxes Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................164 Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................165 Taxable Sales by Market Groups - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................166 Sales Tax Revenue Payers By Industry -2017 and Nine Years Ago................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................168 Ratio of General Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................170 Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................172 Direct and Overlapping Debt as of June 30, 2018................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................174 Computation of Legal Debt Margin................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................175 Pledged-Revenue Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................176 Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................177 Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................178 Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................180 Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits - Last Ten Calendar Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................182 Operating Indicators by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................184 Capital Asset Statistics by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................186 Schedule of Insurance in Force................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................188 iii December 18, 2018 Honorable Mayor, City Council, City Manager and Citizens of Bakersfield: I am pleased to submit the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2018 in accordance with the requirements of our Municipal Code which states that a complete financial statement and report be prepared at the end of each fiscal year (Section 2.08.020F). This report was prepared by the City's Finance Department, which assumes responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material aspects and is reported in a manner that presents fairly the financial position and results of operations of the City. The accompanying financial statements of the City of Bakersfield (the “City”) have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). Brown Armstrong, a firm of licensed certified public accountants, performed the annual independent audit. The goal of the audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the basic financial statements of the City are free of material misstatement. The independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that the City’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP. The independent audit of the financial statements of the City was part of a broader, federally mandated Single Audit designed to meet the special needs of federal grantor agencies. The standards governing Single Audit engagements require the independent auditor to report not only on the fair representation of the financial statements, but also on the audited government’s internal controls and compliance with legal requirements, with special emphasis on internal controls and legal requirements involving the administration of federal awards. These reports are available in the City’s separately issued Single Audit Report and may be obtained from the City’s website. GAAP requires that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The City of Bakersfield’s MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors, which begins at page 1 of the financial section. GENERAL BACKGROUND The City of Bakersfield is located approximately one hundred miles north of Los Angeles in the southern San Joaquin Valley. The City maintains an incorporated area of 151 square miles and has an estimated iv population of 386,839 as of January 1, 2018. The City of Bakersfield is a Charter City that offers a full range of City services including: • Fire and Police Protection • Streets and Infrastructure Maintenance • Planning and Community Development • Parks and Recreation Services • Agricultural and Domestic Water Services • Municipal Airpark - General Aviation • Refuse Collection • Wastewater Treatment As such, this report includes the financial activities of the City of Bakersfield and the Bakersfield Successor Agency. A more detailed discussion of the reporting entity is provided in the notes to the financial statements. MAJOR INITIATIVES The transportation projects associated with Thomas Roads Improvement Program (TRIP) continue to progress through the various phases of environmental, design, land acquisition and construction. The TRIP program uses a combination of local funds, Transportation Impact Fees, and State and Federal road funds, which includes approximately $570 million of Federal earmark funds approved by Congress in 2005. The 2017-18 capital budget included over $41 million of funding for the TRIP projects as outlined below: Centennial Corridor (Construction)$ 35,356,000 Truxtun Widening (Right of Way)$ 3,355,000 The City had three major TRIP projects under construction during the fiscal year, including the Beltway Operational Improvements to State Routes 58 & 99, Kern River Bridge Improvements (Centennial Corridor Phase 1), and the Truxtun Avenue Operational Improvements project. There has been a significant amount of supplemental grant awards at both the State and Federal level which has resulted in the remaining projects planned to be constructed in the TRIP program to be fully funded, requiring no additional financing or borrowing. FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL CONDITION Local Economy and Local Budget Issues - The local economy for the City of Bakersfield continues to show positive signs of recovery in various areas, including the oil industry, but questions still remain on if that recovery can be sustained. General Fund property tax revenues grew by 2.4% in fiscal year 2017-18 and are estimated to increase by an additional 2.7% in fiscal year 2018-19. Fluctuations in oil prices and associated oil drilling activity had a positive effect on sales tax revenue this year which resulted in actual growth in that revenue source after multiple down years. Sales tax revenues increased by 10.7% in fiscal year 2017-18 and are expected to show a slight increase of 2.0% in the 2018-19 fiscal year. While these positive trends point to a recovery, it again needs to be emphasized that there still is a level of uncertainty in the local economy. The City Council (t he Council) continues to support a conservative approach in adopting our budget for 2018-19. The Council has maintained a $13,110,000 cash basis reserve fund along with a $3,010,000 facilities reserve fund to provide a level of protection for the City. The Council continued to fund the City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) costs for retiree medical benefits, maintaining the City of v Bakersfield’s position as one of the few entities in California that are making serious progress toward fully funding this long-term obligation. Retirement costs continue to escalate for all employee groups and over the next several years are expected to increase by 67% ($28.9 million) by fiscal year 2024-25. This dramatic rise is a result of California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s (CalPERS) changes to its actuarial methodology and its lower than projected earnings in previous years. CalPERS approved a multi-year smoothing method to spread the rate increases associated with moving from a rolling 30-year amortization period to a fixed 30- year amortization period. In December 2016 CalPERS changed the rate of return on projected earnings on its portfolio of investments from 7.50% to 7.0% per year with a three-year phase-in starting with the 2016 actuarial reports. These methodology changes and resulting rate increases will have a significant impact on retirement costs for the City. Actual CalPERS earnings over the past four years have been 2.4%, 0.6%, 11.2% and 8.6% respectively. While the recent improvement in returns is a positive sign, the effects of annual investment increases are smoothed over a 30-year period so significant reductions in costs are not expected in the near-term. CalPERS estimates the impact of the changes and returns will increase our annual retirement benefit costs by approximately $3.0 million to $5.0 million per year for the next six years. Long-Term Financial Planning - The City of Bakersfield continues to look forward in meeting our long-term financial and operating needs. The increasing costs of retirement are of particular concern and continue to be closely examined by the City. As the City grows both in population and in geographic area, there will be a continued need to evaluate opportunities to become more efficient and effective in our efforts to serve our community. Accounting System and Internal Controls - The City's accounting system is organized and operated on a fund basis with each fund treated as a distinct self-balancing accounting entity. Various funds utilized by the City of Bakersfield are fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. The City's accounting records for general governmental operations are maintained on a modified accrual basis of accounting, whereby revenues are recognized when measurable and available and expenditures are recognized when materials and services are received. Accounting records for the enterprise and internal service funds are recorded on an accrual basis of accounting, whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred. In developing and evaluating the City's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (a) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and (b ) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. Al l internal control evaluations occur within the framework described previously. The City Finance department believes that these internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. However, the City recognizes that even sound internal controls have inherent limitations. Internal controls must be reviewed to ensure that the City’s operating policies and procedures are being adhered to and that the controls are adequate to assure accurate and reliable financial reporting and to safeguard the City’s assets. Budgetary Controls - The objective of these budgetary controls is to ensure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City Council. Project length financial plans are adopted for the capital projects funds. The level of budgetary control is established at the fund level. The City also maintains an encumbrance accounting system as one technique of accomplishing budgetary control. Unencumbered amounts lapse at year-end. However, encumbrances and certain capital projects are re-appropriated as part of the following year's budget. The 2017-18 City vi of Bakersfield appropriation limit established as required by state statute was $388,695,397. Cash Management - The City maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds, except the Fire Pension Trust Fund. Each fund type's portion of this pool is displayed on the combined balance sheet as cash and short-term investments. The deposits and investments of the Fire Pension Trust Fund are held separately from other City funds. The City Council has adopted an investment policy in accordance with California Government Code Sections 53607 and 53646, with a goal to minimize credit and market risks while maintaining a competitive yield on its portfolio. The City is also governed by State statutes authorizing the City to invest in bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the U.S. Government or any of its agencies and instrumentalities, repurchase agreements and bankers’ acceptances. The pension trust investments are administered separately under Municipal Code Section 2.92, which is within state guidelines. OTHER INFORMATION Independent Audit - The City Charter requires an annual audit by independent certified public accountants. The City Council also adopted a policy regarding auditor rotation that encourages competitive bidding on a five-year cycle. The accounting firm of Brown Armstrong Ac countancy Corporation was selected by the City Council in 2017 to perform the annual audit for the 2016-17 fiscal year. This audit year (2017-18) is the second year of the five-year agreement with this firm. Awards - The Government Finance Officers As sociation of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Bakersfield for its Comprehensive An nual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, marking the thirty- seventh consecutive year Bakersfield has received the GFOA certificate. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. Additionally, the City received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017 from the GFOA. The Distinguished Budget Presentation Aw ard judges a government's budget document for compliance with the guidelines established by the National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting and best practices of the GFOA. Acknowledgments - The preparation of this report on a timely basis could not be accomplished without the efficient services of the entire staff of the Finance Department. I should like to express my appreciation to all members of the Department who assisted and contributed to its preparation. I should also like to thank the Mayor, City Council and the City Manager for their interest and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully, Nelson K. Smith Finance Director vii viii ix CITY OF BAKERSFIELD June 30, 2018 City Council Karen K. Goh .......................................................................................................................Mayor Willie Rivera ........................................................................................................Member/Ward 1 Andrae Gonzales ...................................................................................................Member/Ward 2 Ken Weir .............................................................................................................Member/Ward 3 Bob Smith ......................................................................................................Vice Mayor/Ward 4 Bruce Freeman ....................................................................................................Member/Ward 5 Jacquie Sullivan ....................................................................................................Member/Ward 6 Chris Parlier ..........................................................................................................Member/Ward 7 Administrative Personnel Alan Tandy ............................................................................................................City Manager Virginia Gennaro ...................................................................................................City Attorney Jacquelyn Kitchen .................................................................... Development Services Director Nelson K. Smith ...............................................................................................Finance Director Anthony Galagaza........................................................................................................Fire Chief Lyle Martin ..............................................................................................................Police Chief Nick Fidler ..............................................................................................Public Works Director Dianne Hoover ...............................................................................Director Recreation & Parks Art Chianello ....................................................................................Water Resources Manager x 1 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Bakersfield, California Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Bakersfield, California, (the City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2018, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 2 Emphasis of Matter As disclosed in the Note 1 to the financial statements, the City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other than Pension Plans; GASB Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split-Interest Agreements; GASB Statement No. 85, Omnibus 2017; and GASB Statement No. 86, Certain Debt Extinguishment Issues, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Our opinion is not modified with respect to the matter. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis and budgetary comparison information on pages 3 through 18 and 104 through 106, the City’s Retirement Plans’ Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios and the Schedule of Pension Contributions on pages 107 through 109, and the Other Postemployment Benefit (OPEB) Plan’s Schedules of Changes in the City’s Net OPEB Liability and Related Ratios as well as its Schedule of Contributions on pages 110 and 111 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by GASB, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual major and nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, schedules of long-term debt recorded in private purpose trust fund on pages 116 through 145, and statistical section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual major and nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules as well as schedules of long-term debt recorded in private purpose trust fund on pages 116 through 145 are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual major and nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules as well as schedules of long-term debt recorded in private purpose trust fund on pages 116 through 145 are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 18, 2018, on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. BROWN ARMSTRONG ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION Bakersfield, California December 18, 2018 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis This discussion and analysis of the City of Bakersfield’s (City) financial performance provides an overview of the City’s financial activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with the accompanying letter of transmittal, the basic financial statements, and the accompanying notes to those financial statements. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $2.0 billion (net position). The City’s total net position decreased by $43.4 million over the prior fiscal year. This decrease is attributable to a $0.1 million increase in restricted net position and a $69.4 million decrease in unrestricted net position, offset by a $26.0 million increase in capital assets investment. Prior year information presented in this section does not take into account restatements made to fiscal year 2016-17 balances for prior period adjustments (see Note 23). As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City's Governmental Funds reported combined ending fund balances of $175.9 million, a decrease of $2.1 million in comparison with the prior year. Amounts available for spending include restricted, committed, assigned and unassigned fund balances. Of this amount, $20.8 million is restricted by law or externally imposed requirements, $97.6 million is committed for specific purposes, $49.2 million is assigned and $7.1 million is unassigned and available. Available fund balance for the General Fund increased $0.3 million to $39.5 million, which equates to 19.9% of total General Fund expenditures for the year. The City's long-term debt showed a decrease of $11.3 million during the current fiscal year. 3 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City's basic financial statements are comprised of three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. The statements present the financial picture of the City from the economic resources measurement focus using the accrual basis of accounting. They present governmental activities and business-type activities separately. Additionally, certain eliminations have occurred as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) statements in regards to interfund activity, payables and receivables. The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities provide information about the City as a whole and its activities through the fiscal year. These statements include all assets, deferred outflows of resoruces, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources of the City using the accrual basis of accounting, which is similar to the accounting used by most private-sector companies. All of the current year's revenues and expenses are taken into account, regardless of when cash is received or paid. These two statements report the City's net position and changes in it. Net position is the difference between assets deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources providing a measurement of the City's financial health. Over time, increases or decreases in the City's net position can be an indicator of whether its overall financial health is improving or deteriorating. Other factors to consider are changes in the City's property tax base and sales tax base. The government-wide financial statements do not include the fiduciary funds, which comprise the private purpose trust funds, pension trust funds, and agency funds. Resources in the fiduciary funds are generally not available to support the City’s own programs. In the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities, we separate the City activities as follows: Governmental activities - Most of the City's basic services are reported in this category, including the General Government, Police, Fire, Public Works, Recreation & Parks and Development Services. These activities are generally financed by property and sales taxes, user fees, interest income, franchise fees, and state and federal shared revenues and grants. Business-Type activities - The City charges a fee to customers to cover all or most of the cost of certain services it provides. The City's Water, Wastewater, and Refuse Collection systems along with the Municipal Airport and Offstreet Parking activities are reported in this category. 4 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A fund is a specific grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities and objectives. The fund financial statements provide detailed information about the most significant funds, not the City as a whole. Some funds are required to be established by State law and by bond covenants. Management establishes many other funds to help control and manage financial resources for particular purposes, or to show that the City is meeting legal responsibilities when using certain taxes, grants, and other revenue. These financial statements include statements for each of the three categories of activities – governmental, proprietary and fiduciary. The governmental activities are prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus and modified accrual basis of accounting. The proprietary activities are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. The fiduciary activities are agency funds that also use the economic resources measurement focus but only report a balance sheet. Reconciliation of the Fund Financial Statements to the Government-Wide Financial Statements are provided to explain the differences created by the integrated approach. Governmental Funds - Most of the City's basic services are reported in governmental funds, which focus on the flow of resources into and out of those funds with the balances remaining at year-end available for appropriation. These funds are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting, which measures cash and all other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash. The Governmental Fund financial statements focus on near-term inflow and outflow of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements. To facilitate comparisons, the differences of results in the Governmental Fund financial statements to those in the Government-Wide financial statements are explained in a reconciliation schedule following the Governmental Fund financial statement. Proprietary Funds - Proprietary Funds are used to report services the City charges for, whether to external customers or units within the City. Proprietary Funds are reported in the same way that all activities are reported in the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities. The City's Enterprise Funds report the same functions as the business-type activities reported in the Government-Wide financial statements, but provide mo re detail and additional information, such as cash flows. The City uses Internal Service Funds (the second component of Proprietary Funds) to report activities that provide supplies and services for the City's other programs and activities. This includes the City's Self-Insurance and Equipment Management Funds. These services primarily benefit governmental rather that business-type functions so a majority of the related operation costs are included with the governmental activities in the Government-Wide financial statements. Fiduciary Funds - The City is the trustee, or fiduciary, for certain funds held on behalf of various third parties. The City's fiduciary activities are reported in separate Statements of Fiduciary Net Position. These activities are excluded from the City's other financial statements because these resources are not available to support he City's programs or operations. The City is responsible for ensuring that the assets reported in these funds are used for their intended purposes. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The notes to the financial statements provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the Government-Wide and Fund financial statements. The notes can be found starting on page 47 of this report. OTHER INFORMATION In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain “Required Supplementary Information” concerning the City's progress in funding its obligation to provide pension benefits and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) to its employees and budgetary comparison schedules for the General Fund and Special Revenue Major Funds. This information can be found starting on page 103 of this report. 5 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS As previously noted, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government’s financial position. In the current year, the City's assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $2.0 billion at the close of the reporting period, which is a $6.7 million decrease, or 0.3% decrease, in comparison with the prior year. The largest portion of the City’s net position (98.9% of the total) relates to its net investment in capital assets of $2.0 billion (e.g., land, buildings, machinery, infrastructure and equipment), less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. These capital assets are used to provide services to citizens; as such, these assets are not available for future expenditures. The City’s net investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, though it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources as the capital assets themselves cannot be used to service this debt. A small portion of the City’s net position, $40.8 million (2.0% of the total), represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. As in the prior year, the City is able to report positive balances in both categories of net position, whether for the City as a whole or for its separate Governmental and Business-type activities. The following table presents the components of the government-wide Statement of Net Position for at the end of the fiscal year for both 2017 and 2018. The governmental and business-type activities columns reflect amounts that have been restated in this financial report. Note 23 explains any prior period adjustments that changed net position. City of Bakersfield - Net Position (in thousands) Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Assets Current and other assets $303,581 $308,835 $153,314 $190,148 $456,895 $498,983 Capital assets (net)1,322,138 1,315,194 856,679 878,477 2,178,817 2,193,671 Total assets 1,625,719 1,624,029 1,009,993 1,068,625 2,635,712 2,692,654 Deferred Outflows of Resources 104,926 112,429 20,536 20,589 125,462 133,018 Liabilities Long-term liabilities outstanding 433,799 544,274 233,962 238,059 667,761 782,333 Other liabilities 41,258 44,493 16,484 19,666 57,742 64,159 Total liabilities 475,057 588,767 250,446 257,725 725,503 846,492 Deferred Inflows of Resources 38,331 26,311 3,920 2,809 42,251 29,120 Net Position Net investment in capital assets 1,305,415 1,301,335 670,724 700,725 1,976,139 2,002,060 Restricted 20,626 20,760 20,200 20,200 40,826 40,960 Unrestricted (108,784)(200,715)85,239 107,755 (23,545)(92,960) Total Net Position $1,217,257 $1,121,380 $776,163 $828,680 $1,993,420 $1,950,060 6 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis Governmental Activities – Total assets for governmental activities decreased by $1.7 million, with current and other assets in governmental activities increasing by $5.3 million and a capital assets decline of $6.9 million. Total liabilities increased by $113.7 million, with other liabilities increasing by $3.2 million and long-term liabilities increasing by $110.5 million. Of the $95.9 million decrease in governmental activities total net position, unrestricted net position decreased by $91.9 million, net investment in capital assets increased by $4.1 million and restricted net position increased by $0.1 million. The decrease in unrestricted net position stems primarily from the continued rise is pension liabilities as well as the addition of the other post- employment benefit liability as required by a new accounting pronouncement. Business-Type Activities – Total assets for business-type activities increased by $58.6 million, with current and other assets increasing by $36.8 million and a $21.8 million increase in capital assets. Total liabilities increased by $7.3 million, with other liabilities increasing by $3.2 million and long-term liabilities also increasing by $4.1 million. Total net position for business- type activities increased by $52.5 million. Of that amount, net investment in capital assets increased by $30.0 million. Restricted net position remained constant and unrestricted net position increased by $22.5 million. The overall increase in unrestricted net position is due to positive results in operations in the Wastewater, Refuse and Agriculture Water funds offset by the continued increases in pension related liabilities and the recording of other post-employment benefit liabilities. Change in Net Position of the City The following table presents the government-wide changes in net position for both 2017 and 2018. The City’s total revenues of $467.2 million were less than expenses of $480.4 million for a decrease in net position before transfers & other items of $13.2 million. The governmental and business-type activities columns reflect amounts that have been restated in this financial report. Note 23 explains any prior period adjustments that changed net position. City of Bakersfield - Changes in Net Position (in thousands) Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Revenues: Program revenues Charges for service $55,251 $55,401 $112,957 $119,148 $168,208 $174,549 Operating grants and contributions 12,641 9,166 7,173 9,047 19,814 18,213 Capital grants and contributions 100,956 85,533 9,742 4,914 110,698 90,447 Total program revenues 168,848 150,100 129,872 133,109 298,720 283,209 General revenues: Taxes: Property taxes 77,680 79,774 --77,680 79,774 Sales taxes 65,349 72,322 --65,349 72,322 Other taxes 1,212 1,309 --1,212 1,309 Intergovernmental: Intergovt, unrestricted 170 202 --170 202 Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs 24,828 25,141 --24,828 25,141 Investment earnings 284 1,296 1,113 1,879 1,397 3,175 Miscellaneous 1,708 1,754 --1,708 1,754 Gain/(loss) on sale of property 273 249 16 20 289 269 Total Revenues 340,352 332,147 131,001 135,008 471,353 467,155 7 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis City of Bakersfield - Changes in Net Position (in thousands) Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Expenses: Governmental General government 26,395 29,731 --26,395 29,731 Public safety - Police 95,723 105,006 --95,723 105,006 Public safety - Fire 41,365 44,561 --41,365 44,561 Public works 171,912 145,530 --171,912 145,530 Recreation and parks 26,889 22,614 --26,889 22,614 Development Services 12,160 8,534 --12,160 8,534 Interest on long-term debt 33 25 --33 25 Subtotal - Governmental 374,477 356,001 --374,477 356,001 Business-Type: Wastewater treatment --41,008 42,104 41,008 42,104 Refuse collection --46,301 47,971 46,301 47,971 Agricultural water --4,305 4,198 4,305 4,198 Domestic water --27,067 29,205 27,067 29,205 General aviation --813 671 813 671 Offstreet parking --227 234 227 234 Subtotal - Business-Type --119,721 124,383 119,721 124,383 Total expenses 374,477 356,001 119,721 124,383 494,198 480,384 Change in net position before transfers & other items (34,125)(23,854)11,280 10,625 (22,845)(13,229) Transfers 152 2,033 (152)(2,033)-- Extraordinary gain from litigation settlement ---54,231 -54,231 Changes in net position (33,973)(21,821)11,128 62,823 (22,845)41,002 Net Position - Beginning of Year (as restated)1,251,231 1,143,201 765,034 765,857 2,016,265 1,909,058 Net Position - End of Year $1,217,258 $1,121,380 $776,162 $828,680 $1,993,420 $1,950,060 Governmental Activities – The results in governmental activities caused a decrease in the City’s net position by $21.8 million during the year. In the table below, the difference between the program revenue and expenses by activity illustrates the amount each respective activity is supported by program revenues. Public Safety and Recreation and Parks service delivery costs exceeded program revenues by $135.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively. Public Safety programs rely heavily on taxes to support their operations whereas Recreation and Parks relies on both taxes and charges for services to support their operations. This fiscal year Public Works service delivery costs exceeded program revenues by $43.6 million because the majority of its services are also tax supported. 8 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis Total expenses in Governmental Activities had a net decrease of $18.5 million from the previous fiscal year for an overall (4.9)%decrease. The largest increases were in Public Safety – Police and Fire increased by $9.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and in General Government with an increase of $3.3 million. These increases are primarily connected to the new requirement to record the other post-employment liability and related expenses. The increases were also related to California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) rate increases in the current year. These changes were offset by a decrease of $26.4 million in Public Works which is primarily due to less expenditures incurred from capital improvement projects. 9 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis The taxes category is the largest revenue source for governmental activities, amounting to $153.4 million or 46.2% of total revenues. Capital grants and contributions is also a significant revenue source for the City’s governmental activities, amounting to $85.5 million or 25.8% of total revenues. The third most significant sources of revenue is charges for services, amounting to $55.4 million or 16.7% of total revenues. Governmental Activities Revenue decreased $8.2 million which is a 2.4% decrease compared to the previous fiscal year. This decrease is due primarily to a 6.1%, or $10.5 million, increase in General Revenues, offset by a 11.1%, or $18.7 million, decrease in Program Revenues. General Revenues - Sales tax revenues increased by 10.7%, or $7.0 million, while property taxes increased by 2.7%, or $2.1 million. There has been a slight recovery in sales tax revenue related to recent improvements in the oil industry and its related impacts on the local economy. Program Revenues - Capital Grants and Contributions decreased by $15.4 million due to a reduction in special projects funded in Public Works compared to the prior year. The most significant reduction is related to the TRIP projects which included less activity related to construction and property acquisition when compared to the previous year. Operating Grants and Contributions decreased $3.5 million with the majority of the decrease due to less entitlement funds received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the current year 10 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis Business-Type Activities – The City operates six Enterprise Funds that offer wastewater services, refuse collection, agricultural water, domestic water to City residents, downtown parking and a municipal airport. Business-type activities increased the City’s net position by $62.8 million during the current year. The chart above compares total program revenues and expenses. Program revenues exceeded program expenses in Wastewater Treatment by $3.1 million, Refuse Collection by only $35 thousand and Agriculture Water by $2.8 million. These increases were offset by program expenses exceeding program revenues in Domestic Water by $0.9 million. Total expenses increased by $4.7 million (3.9%) over the prior year. The following chart illustrates the distribution of business-type revenues by category. The City’s business-type activities rely heavily on charges for services to fund their operations, making up 88.3% of total revenues. Capital grants and contributions is the second largest revenue source at 3.6% of total revenues. 11 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis Business-Type activities program revenues increased by $3.2 million, 2.5%, over the prior year. The majority of this can be attributed to an increase in Refuse Collection of $1.4 million or 2.8% which was due to rate increases and additional residential service customers. There were also increases in revenue in the Domestic Water fund of $1.6 million. which was also connected to an increase in rates. These increases were offset by a decrease of capital contributions of $4.8 million from the prior year which was due to less development in the area and consequently less related infrastructure added in the current year. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY’S FUNDS As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. A fund is created and segregated for the purpose of carrying out specific activities or attaining specific objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. Activity not required to be reported in a separate fund is included in the General Fund. Governmental Funds - The focus of the City’s Governmental Funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of the City’s available resources as it represents the portion of fund balance which is not limited to use for a particular purpose by an external party, City management or City Council. As of the end of the current fiscal year, the City’s Governmental Funds reported combined ending fund balances of $175.9 million, a decrease of $2.1 million in comparison with the prior year. The components of total fund balance are as follows (for more information see Note 14 – Fund Balances): Nonspendable fund balance, $1.2 million are amounts that are not spendable in form, or are legally or contractually 12 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis required to be maintained intact, and are made up of prepaid expenses and deposits. Restricted fund balance, $20.8 million, consists of amounts with constraints put on their use by external creditors, grantors, contributions, laws, regulations or enabling legislation. Examples of restrictions on funds are those for (1) $15.2 million for the purpose of the fund (i.e., Gas Tax and Road projects), (2) $1.8 million from the Redevelopment Successor Agency Housing Fund for projects and (3) $2.9 million for traffic safety projects. Committed fund balance, $97.6 million, are amounts for specific purposes determined by the Bakersfield City Council, such as funds collected from fees paid to mitigate the traffic impacts to the regional circulation system of $52.4 million and $15.9 million for appropriations for next year’s budget. Assigned fund balance, $49.2 million, for funds set aside by management for specific purposes. Amounts include $44.5 million set aside for capital projects and $1.9 million for the fund purposes related to transient occupancy fees. Unassigned fund balance, $7.1 million, represents the residual classification for the City’s General Fund. General Fund: The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, the General Fund’s total fund balance increased by 0.6%, or $0.3 million from $39.2 million to $39.5 million. While this is a slight change in fund balance for the year, the following detail of changes from the prior year is provided: Total operating revenues increased by $11.3 million (6.1%). Property Tax revenue increased by $1.7 million due to continuation of higher assessed values within the City limits. Sales Tax revenue revealed that there was some level of recovery to the local economy after successive years of declines. Revenue from sales taxes increased by $6.7 million. All other revenue sources within the General Fund remained fairly consistent compared to the previous fiscal year. Total expenditures increased by $8.3 million (a 4.4% increase). This was due to increases in the Public Safety costs in both Police and Fire expenditures related to filling vacancies ($3.3 million and $1.7, million respectively). There was also an increase of $1.3 million in Recreation and Park is also related to filling staffing vacancies. Overall personnel expenditures also increased throughout all General Fund departments due to increases in pension costs. Other governmental funds: As compared with the prior year, the total fund balances of the remaining governmental funds increased by 1.4%, or $1.8 million, to $136.4 million with the following significant changes: The Gas Tax and Road Fund decreased by $0.8 million from $16.0 million to $15.2 million. Amounts in this fund are restricted by state and federal statute. The decrease is due to multiyear projects winding down and others in various stages of completion. The Capital Outlay Fund increased by $0.1 million from $56.0 million to $56.1 million. Of this amount, $6.6 million is committed for contractual obligations and $3.8 million is committed for facility replacement. The remaining amount of $44.5 million is assigned and available for use at management’s discretion. The resulting decrease shows that expenditures were in line with projected revenues. The Park Improvement Fund decreased by $2.1 million. Of this amount, $5.3 million is committed for contractual obligations. The decrease in fund balance is from increases in expenditures for phase III of the Sports Village Complex upgrades. The Transportation Development Fund increased by $3.7 million from $48.6 million to $52.4 million. The entire amount of $52.4 million is committed for contractual obligations and/or current projects. This change is the result of a decrease in expenditures on road construction projects. The amounts expended in the prior years were for acquisition and demolition costs which did not take place in the current year. As the projects move into the construction phases in the subsequent years, these capital costs are expected to increase. 13 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis Proprietary Funds - The City’s Proprietary Funds are shown in their entirety in the government-wide financial statements. All funds are being reported as major funds, so there is no need to report additional detail elsewhere in the document. The Wastewater Treatment Fund has total net position of $524.2 million at the end of the current year, an increase of $4.1 million over the prior year. Total net position includes $460.7 million net investment in capital assets and $20.2 million of restricted assets which are not available to cover current expenses. The remaining net position of $43.3 million is unrestricted and available to cover current operating and capital needs (including plant and equipment replacement) of the fund. The majority of the increase resulted from more development completed to infrastructure in the current year which was reflected in a $7.0 million addition in Capital Contributions. The Refuse Collection Fund has total net position of $1.0 million at the end of the current year, a decrease of $1.5 million from the prior year. The decrease is due to less revenue collected from residential services/rates than is necessary to cover the operating costs of the division. Further review of the rates charged to customers will occur to establish a rate sufficient to cover these costs in future years and to address the deficit in net position. The Agricultural Water Fund has total net position of $24.1 million at the end of the current year, an increase of $2.6 million over the prior year. Total net position includes $17.6 million net investment in capital assets, which is not available to cover current expenses. The remaining net position of $6.5 million is unrestricted and available to cover current operating and capital needs of the fund. As in the prior year, revenues were more than sufficient to cover the fund costs resulting in this continued increase in net position. The Domestic Water Fund has total net position of $265.0 million at the end of the current year, an increase of $53.5 million over the prior year. Total net position includes $206.7 million net investment in capital assets, which is not available to cover current expenses. The remaining net position of $58.2 million is unrestricted and available to cover current operating and capital needs of the fund. This increase in net position is connected to a litigation settlement for pollution remediation - see further explanation in Note 24. The General Aviation Fund has total net position of $11.5 million at the end of the current year, an increase of $475,540 compared to the prior year. Total net position includes $10.8 million net investment in capital assets, which is not available to cover current expenses. The remaining net position is unrestricted and available to cover current operating and capital needs of the fund. The Offstreet Parking Fund has total net position of $1.2 million at the end of the current year, a decrease of $110,942 compared to the prior year. Total net position includes $1.0 million net investment in capital assets, which is not available to cover current expenses. The remaining net position is unrestricted and available to cover current operating and capital needs of the fund. 14 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital Assets - The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities as of June 30 of the current fiscal year amounts to $2.2 billion (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes land, buildings and systems, improvements, machinery and equipment, park facilities, roads, highways, bridges and construction in progress. The total increase in the City’s investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was $14.9 million. Of this amount, a $6.9 million decrease relates to Governmental Activities which offsets a $21.8 million increase that relates to Business-Type Activities. Depreciation expense of $91 million exceeded additions to capital assets by this amount. These financial statements include infrastructure assets constructed or acquired through fiscal year 2017-17. Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following: A variety of street construction projects and rehabilitation of major arterial streets. Construction in progress for governmental activities as of the end of the current fiscal year is $104.7 million. This figure includes over $99.9 million towards major street construction, traffic signals, and resurfacing projects throughout the City. The City added over $24.8 million in new streets and roads primarily due to new residential developments completed in the current year. These newly constructed right of ways are transferred over to the City by the various developers when the work is finalized. City of Bakersfield - Capital Assets (in thousands) Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Land and water storage rights $444,525 $448,510 $23,621 $23,621 $468,146 $472,131 Depreciable buildings, property, equipment and infrastructure, net 776,239 761,971 794,872 779,943 1,571,111 1,541,914 Construction in progress 101,374 104,713 6,709 43,436 108,083 148,149 Non-amortizable intangible assets --31,477 31,477 31,477 31,477 Total Capital Assets $1,322,138 $1,315,194 $856,679 $878,477 $2,178,817 $2,193,671 15 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis City of Bakersfield - Outstanding Debt Balance Incurred Satisfied Balance June 30, 2017 or Issued or Matured June 30, 2018 Governmental Activities Loans payable $2,938,462 $173,910 $(528,132)$2,584,240 Certificates of Participation*13,785,000 -(2,510,000)11,275,000 Total governmental activities $16,723,462 $173,910 $(3,038,132)$13,859,240 Business-Type Activities Revenue Bonds Payable $174,647,913 $23,075,000 $(30,724,701)$166,998,212 Loans Payable 3,008,504 -(752,126)2,256,378 Total business-type activities $177,656,417 $23,075,000 $(31,476,827)$169,254,590 Total Debt $194,379,879 $23,248,910 $(34,514,959)$183,113,830 * Certificates of Participation in governmental activities are debt of the former Redevelopment Agency that is now reported as City debt. Long-Term Debt - At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had a total debt outstanding of $183.1 million. The City’s total debt decreased by a net amount of $11.3 million during the current fiscal year. This amount is the result of normal debt maturities. Certificates of Participation issued by the City via the former Redevelopment Agency in 2006 carry a Reserve Fund Surety from Ambac Assurance Company (Ambac). Moody’s Investor’s Service (Moody’s) rating on Ambac is currently “Baa1”. The current underlying rating on the Certificates of Participation has not been revised (currently “A1”). This rating on the Certificates of Participation reflects only the view of Moody’s, and any desired explanation of the significance of such rating should be obtained from Moody’s. There is no assurance that such rating will continue for any given period of time or that such rating will not be revised or withdrawn by Moody’s if, in the judgment of Moody’s, circumstances so warrant. The 2015 Wastewater Revenue Bonds – Series A issued by the City in 2015, which redeemed a majority of the 2007 Wastewater Revenue Bonds – Series A, has an “Aa2” rating from Moody’s and an "AA" rating from Standard & Poors. There is no assurance that such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that such ratings will not be revised or withdrawn by the rating agencies if, in their judgment, circumstances so warrant. More detailed information regarding capital asset and long-term debt activity can be found in the related notes to the financial statements. See Note 5 for capital assets, and Note 11 for long-term debt. 16 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS Differences between the original budget and the final amended budget reflect an increase in resources of $5.1 million and an increase in appropriations of $6.7 million. Significant budgetary amendments (changes) are summarized as follows: $0.6 million increase in various resources and appropriations due to revenues associated with open purchase orders at the end of the previous fiscal year. Also, $0.7 million increase in various resources due to revenues associated with prior year appropriations not spent and carried forward to this fiscal year. $1.4 million increase in resources and appropriations for reimbursement of personnel and equipment costs on state- wide master mutual aid assignments in the Fire Department. $1.1 million increase in resources and appropriations for grant related projects in the Police Department. The final amended revenue estimate budget figures in the General Fund were lower than actual revenue by $3.0 million and appropriations were higher than actual expenditures by $10.7 million. Significant differences between budget and actual amounts are as follows: $2.3 million positive variance in tax revenue. This is the result of an increase in property tax revenue offset by decreases in sales and use tax revenue. The City has continued to have uncertainty as to the level of revenues from sales taxes because of the impact of the oil industry on the local economy which resulted in $1.4 million less revenue than budgeted. This shortage was offset by higher property tax revenue than initially estimated. Projections for this revenue source we re conservative in nature and the actual revenue received was approximately $3.8 million more than projected due to higher assessed values than estimated. $1.5 million less than budgeted in intergovernmental revenue which is due primarily to this source of funds being based on reimbursement of expenditures incurred. Some of the project activity for these awards had not moved forward resulting in less revenue being recognized. $6.7 million variance of appropriations over actual expenditures in Public Safety. The savings are due primarily to salary and benefit savings from unfilled positions plus some grant funded projects that were budgeted but not started. $3.9 million variance of appropriations over actual expenditures in Departments other than Police are also due primarily to salary and benefit savings from unfilled positions. 17 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Management's Discussion and Analysis ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES The key assumptions in the General Fund revenue forecast for fiscal year 2018-19 were: 1.Property tax revenue is projected to grow at 4% compared to last year’s estimate of 5% as projected by Kern County. 2.Sales and use tax revenue is projected to show a slight increase of 2% in fiscal year 2018-19, which is higher than the estimate made for fiscal year 2017-18 which estimated zero growth in this revenue source. Sales and use tax revenues are difficult to project this year because for the past 3 years oil prices have remained depressed, both locally and globally, resulting in industry-wide layoffs, reduced spending and less industry related travel. 3.California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) approved new policies last year which have raised rates approximately 10% for next fiscal year. Similar increases are projected for the next five fiscal years. New items specifically addressed in the 2018-19 budget include the following: Police Department – The Police Department’s operating budget has increased from fiscal year 2017-18 by 5.1%, totaling $4.6 million. This increase is primarily attributable to increased rates for CalPERS, callback pay, and workers compensation costs. Fire Department – The Fire Department's operating budget had a 5.2% increase from fiscal year 2017-18 totaling $2.0 million. This increase is primarily due to the 10% increase in CalPERS rates resulting in higher benefit costs. The budget also included funding for one new position funded through special revenue sources. Public Works - The Public Works Department operating budget increased by $8.4 million, or 7.2%, from fiscal year 2017-18. The increase was also due to the CalPERS rate escalations as we ll as an increases in staffing in areas covered by non-General fund revenue, specifically in operations for refuse and fleet services. In addition there was a significant need for specific equipment to be replaced for non-General fund services that were well beyond their normal life cycle. Development Services – The Development Services Department’s operating budget has increased from fiscal year 2017-18 by 2.7%, totaling $0.2 million. CalPERS rates were again the cause of this increase and there are no staffing changes proposed. Recreation and Parks – The Recreation and Parks Department’s operating budget has increased from fiscal year 2017-18 by 14.7%, totaling $4.0 million. This increase is due to the 10% increase in CalPERS rates resulting in higher benefit costs and increases in water costs necessary in part to the full use of the City's spray park facilities. CONTACTING THE CITY'S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, customers, investors and creditors with a general overview of the City's finances and to show the City's accountability for the mo ney it receives. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information can be sent via e-mail to: finance@bakersfieldcity.us. Formal written requests should be addressed to: City of Bakersfield, Attn: Finance Department, 1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301. 18 Government-Wide Financial Statements 19 Statement of Net Position June 30, 2018 Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total Assets: Current assets: Cash and investments $211,850,387 $180,486,624 $392,337,011 Accounts receivable, net 23,631,901 5,278,725 28,910,626 Interest receivable 622,377 514,887 1,137,264 Notes/loans receivable - current 700,343 -700,343 Due from other governmental agencies 43,100,901 1,434,354 44,535,255 Internal balances (1,767,293)1,767,293 - Prepayments and inventories 2,318,351 -2,318,351 Total current assets 280,456,967 189,481,883 469,938,850 Noncurrent assets: Capital assets: Land 448,509,830 23,620,851 472,130,681 Depreciable capital assets, net 761,971,498 779,943,383 1,541,914,881 Construction in progress 104,712,586 43,435,606 148,148,192 Non-amortizable intangible assets -31,476,906 31,476,906 Land held for resale 1,266,016 -1,266,016 Notes/loans receivable 27,111,671 665,995 27,777,666 Total noncurrent assets 1,343,571,601 879,142,741 2,222,714,342 Total assets 1,624,028,568 1,068,624,624 2,692,653,192 Deferred Outflows of Resources: Deferred pensions (See Note 16)106,014,683 9,657,704 115,672,387 Deferred OPEB (See Note 17)6,413,948 1,113,500 7,527,448 Debt issuance -9,818,471 9,818,471 Total deferred outflows of resources 112,428,631 20,589,675 133,018,306 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 19,390,408 13,884,202 33,274,610 Customers' deposits -5,055,401 5,055,401 Advances from grantors and third parties 25,102,447 726,886 25,829,333 Total current liabilities 44,492,855 19,666,489 64,159,344 Noncurrent liabilities: Due within one year: Long-term debt 3,189,649 7,951,827 11,141,476 Capital leases payable -643,995 643,995 Kern River Levee District/Buena Vista -368,746 368,746 Claims and judgments payable 13,428,651 -13,428,651 Compensated absences payable 2,724,434 488,138 3,212,572 Due in more than one year: Long-term debt 10,669,591 161,302,763 171,972,354 Capital leases -17,671,298 17,671,298 Claims and judgments payable 34,136,000 -34,136,000 Net other post-employment benefits liability 69,307,834 9,100,508 78,408,342 Compensated absences payable 12,376,893 1,462,596 13,839,489 Net pension liability 398,440,673 39,068,738 437,509,411 Total noncurrent liabilities 544,273,725 238,058,609 782,332,334 Total liabilities 588,766,580 257,725,098 846,491,678 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Deferred pensions (See Note 16)18,328,487 1,760,427 20,088,914 Deferred OPEB (See Note 17)7,982,265 1,048,116 9,030,381 Total deferred inflows of resources 26,310,752 2,808,543 29,119,295 Net Position: Net investment in capital assets 1,301,334,674 700,725,335 2,002,060,009 Restricted: Capital improvements 20,759,775 20,200,000 40,959,775 Unrestricted (200,714,582)107,755,323 (92,959,259) Total net position $1,121,379,867 $828,680,658 $1,950,060,525 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 20 21 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Activities For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Program Revenues Functions/Programs Expenses Charges for Services Operating Grants and Contributions Capital Grants and Contributions Total Primary Government: Governmental activities: General government $29,731,416 $5,618,886 $676,123 $-$6,295,009 Public safety - Police 105,006,154 2,989,023 2,411,545 -5,400,568 Public safety - Fire 44,560,720 7,242,490 1,966,228 -9,208,718 Public works 145,529,290 17,159,857 1,266,514 83,459,843 101,886,214 Recreation & parks 22,613,830 16,481,750 43,565 2,011,649 18,536,964 Development services 8,533,656 5,909,456 2,801,618 61,818 8,772,892 Interest on long-term debt 25,060 ---- Total governmental activities 356,000,126 55,401,462 9,165,593 85,533,310 150,100,365 Business-type activities: Wastewater treatment 42,103,648 34,036,372 7,352,420 3,843,153 45,231,945 Refuse collection 47,971,215 51,119,909 200,441 -51,320,350 Agricultural water 4,198,037 7,039,283 -1,002 7,040,285 Domestic water 29,205,225 26,491,151 1,233,297 538,429 28,262,877 General aviation 671,124 347,315 260,969 530,956 1,139,240 Offstreet parking 233,746 114,261 --114,261 Total business-type activities 124,382,995 119,148,291 9,047,127 4,913,540 133,108,958 Total primary government $480,383,121 $174,549,753 $18,212,720 $90,446,850 $283,209,323 General Revenues: Taxes: Property taxes Sales and use tax Other taxes Intergovernmental, unrestricted Unrestricted grants and contributions Investment earnings Miscellaneous Gain on sale of property Transfers Total general revenues and transfers Change in net position before extraordinary gain Extraordinary gain on litigation settlement Change in net position Net Position - Beginning of Year, as restated Net Position - End of Year The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22 Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total $(23,436,407)$-$(23,436,407) (99,605,586)-(99,605,586) (35,352,002)-(35,352,002) (43,643,076)-(43,643,076) (4,076,866)-(4,076,866) 239,236 -239,236 (25,060)-(25,060) (205,899,761)-(205,899,761) -3,128,297 3,128,297 -3,349,135 3,349,135 -2,842,248 2,842,248 -(942,348)(942,348) -468,116 468,116 -(119,485)(119,485) -8,725,963 8,725,963 (205,899,761)8,725,963 (197,173,798) 79,774,412 -79,774,412 72,322,068 -72,322,068 1,308,842 -1,308,842 201,875 -201,875 25,140,642 -25,140,642 1,295,749 1,878,973 3,174,722 1,754,210 -1,754,210 248,579 20,370 268,949 2,032,654 (2,032,654)- 184,079,031 (133,311)183,945,720 (21,820,730)8,592,652 (13,228,078) -54,231,181 54,231,181 (21,820,730)62,823,833 41,003,103 1,143,200,597 765,856,825 1,909,057,422 $1,121,379,867 $828,680,658 $1,950,060,525 23 24 Governmental Fund Financial Statements 25 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Balance Sheet Governmental Funds June 30, 2018 General Fund Transient Occupancy Taxes Community Development Block Grant Gas Tax & Road Fund Assets: Cash and investments $28,189,169 $1,195,523 $54,840 $- Accounts receivable, net 1,117,928 677,591 14,754,567 22,031 Interest receivable 125,338 11,930 -50,419 Due from other governmental agencies 14,223,087 -1,216,773 27,042,763 Due from other funds 6,495,939 --- Notes/loans receivable --3,908,892 - Prepaid items 16,876 --- Total assets $50,168,337 $1,885,044 $19,935,072 $27,115,213 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances: Liabilities: Accounts payable $4,859,631 $22,389 $365,272 $5,823,805 Due to other governmental agencies 569,298 --- Due to other funds --402,450 6,081,535 Advances from grantors and third parties 1,992,091 --- Total liabilities 7,421,020 22,389 767,722 11,905,340 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Deferred revenue 3,248,829 -18,638,255 22,031 Fund Balances: Nonspendable 1,025 --- Restricted --529,095 15,187,842 Committed 29,505,463 7,078 -- Assigned 2,914,844 1,855,577 -- Unassigned 7,077,156 --- Total fund balances 39,498,488 1,862,655 529,095 15,187,842 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances $50,168,337 $1,885,044 $19,935,072 $27,115,213 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 26 Capital Outlay Park Improvement Transportation Development Other Governmental Funds Total Governmental Funds $55,973,197 $8,589,241 $53,727,053 $5,087,685 $152,816,708 143,984 --6,903,789 23,619,890 63,620 27,997 155,806 13,104 448,214 38,786 --540,015 43,061,424 ----6,495,939 ---22,791,933 26,700,825 1,212,183 ---1,229,059 $57,431,770 $8,617,238 $53,882,859 $35,336,526 $254,372,059 $1,293,042 $3,334,627 $1,525,246 $372,504 $17,596,516 ----569,298 ---11,954 6,495,939 ---23,110,356 25,102,447 1,293,042 3,334,627 1,525,246 23,494,814 49,764,200 46,606 --6,798,874 28,754,595 1,212,183 ---1,213,208 ---5,042,838 20,759,775 10,419,247 5,282,611 52,357,613 -97,572,012 44,460,692 ---49,231,113 ----7,077,156 56,092,122 5,282,611 52,357,613 5,042,838 175,853,264 $57,431,770 $8,617,238 $53,882,859 $35,336,526 $254,372,059 27 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position June 30, 2018 Total Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds $175,853,264 Amounts reported for Governmental Activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet. Capital assets allocated from Internal Service Funds are included in the Internal Service Funds adjustment below. Capital assets $2,470,583,271 Ending accumulated depreciation (1,155,389,357)1,315,193,914 Land held for resale is not a current financial resource and is not reported in the Governmental Funds.1,266,016 Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions are not a current financial resource and are not reported in the Governmental Funds 106,014,683 Deferred outflows of resources related to other post-employment benefits are not a current financial resource and are not reported in the Governmental Funds 6,413,948 Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions are not a current financial resource and are not reported in the Governmental Funds (18,328,487) Deferred inflows of resources related to other post-employment benefits are not a current financial resource and are not reported in the Governmental Funds (7,982,265) Interest payable on long-term debt does not require current financial resources. Therefore, interest payable is not reported as a liability in the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet.(147,498) Unearned revenue and other resources not available to liquidate liabilities of the current period are not recognized in the Governmental Funds.28,754,595 Internal Service Funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities, such as insurance and fleet management, to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the Internal Service Funds are included in governmental activities in the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position.10,472,564 Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore they are not reported in the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet. Noncurrent liabilities allocated from Internal Service Funds are included in the Internal Service Funds adjustment above. Notes/Contracts/Loans payable (13,859,240) Compensated absences payable (14,523,120) Unfunded post-employment benefits (69,307,834) Unfunded pension benefits (398,440,673)(496,130,867) Net Position of Governmental Activities $1,121,379,867 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 28 29 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Governmental Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 General Fund Transient Occupancy Taxes Community Development Block Grant Gas Tax & Road Fund Revenues: Taxes $162,701,286 $9,570,855 $-$- Licenses and permits 2,928,031 --- Intergovernmental 4,385,389 -3,127,264 81,940,188 Charges for services 24,787,096 7,496,900 -- Fines, forfeitures and assessments 667,440 --74,046 Interest income 938,990 43,161 235 148,727 Loan payments --213,804 - Contributions and donations 110,386 1,206,786 -- Other income 1,574,230 353,468 91,185 307 Total revenues 198,092,848 18,671,170 3,432,488 82,163,268 Expenditures: Current: General government 12,553,412 9,041,424 -- Public safety - Police 87,424,862 --- Public safety - Fire 38,021,932 --- Public works 24,658,307 --25,951 Recreation and parks 20,195,330 --- Development services 7,074,648 -1,907,534 - Non-departmental 8,291,680 3,132,400 -- Capital outlay --887,725 82,904,215 Debt service: Principal retirement ---- Interest and fiscal charges ---- Total expenditures 198,220,171 12,173,824 2,795,259 82,930,166 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (127,323)6,497,346 637,229 (766,898) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 550,000 --- Transfers out (168,377)(6,547,980)(500,324)- Total other financing sources (uses)381,623 (6,547,980)(500,324)- Net change in fund balances 254,300 (50,634)136,905 (766,898) Fund balances - beginning, as restated 39,244,188 1,913,289 392,190 15,954,740 Fund balances - ending $39,498,488 $1,862,655 $529,095 $15,187,842 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 30 Capital Outlay Park Improvement Transportation Development Other Governmental Funds Total Governmental Funds $5,707,943 $-$-$248,510 $178,228,594 ---340,103 3,268,134 267,943 --3,477,657 93,198,441 580,145 -121,465 1,418,771 34,404,377 52,907 1,970,565 14,534,290 1,588,082 18,887,330 76,687 48,753 499,973 35,454 1,791,980 ---46,128 259,932 ----1,317,172 250,799 -(238,152)993,065 3,024,902 6,936,424 2,019,318 14,917,576 8,147,770 334,380,862 --289,112 -21,883,948 ---1,784,257 89,209,119 ---1,277,573 39,299,505 --747,169 367,359 25,798,786 ---20,368 20,215,698 ---436,924 9,419,106 275,867 ---11,699,947 12,959,242 4,098,068 10,155,495 2,947,964 113,952,709 ---502,352 502,352 ---59,324 59,324 13,235,109 4,098,068 11,191,776 7,396,121 332,040,494 (6,298,685)(2,078,750)3,725,800 751,649 2,340,368 6,580,000 --561,676 7,691,676 (190,000)--(550,000)(7,956,681) 6,390,000 --11,676 (265,005) 91,315 (2,078,750)3,725,800 763,325 2,075,363 56,000,807 7,361,361 48,631,813 4,279,513 173,777,901 $56,092,122 $5,282,611 $52,357,613 $5,042,838 $175,853,264 31 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Net Change in Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds $2,075,363 Amounts reported for Governmental Activities in the Statement of Activities are different because: Governmental Funds report capital outlay as expenditures. However, in the Government-Wide Statement of Activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. Capital outlay expenditures are added back to fund balance.$9,071,670 Depreciation expense is deducted from fund balance (net of Internal Service Fund depreciation of $6,462,655 which has already been allocated to serviced funds).(59,668,838) Contributions of infrastructure and improvements by developers are capitalized in the Statement of Activities, but are not recorded in the Governmental Fund Financial Statements because no cash changed hands.40,244,018 (10,353,150) Certain expenses are reported in the Government-Wide Statement of Activities, but they do not require the use of current financial resources. Therefore, these expenses are not reported as expenditures in Governmental Funds. Net change in long-term compensated absences 57,029 Interest expense on long-term debt 34,264 Net pension liability (20,675,373) Other post-employment benefits 6,679,122 (13,904,958) Bond & loan proceeds provide current financial resources to Governmental Funds, but issuing debt increases long-term liabilities in the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position. Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in Governmental Funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position.2,815,222 Unearned revenue and other resources not available to liquidate liabilities of the current period are not recognized in Governmental Funds. Revenue in the Statement of Activities is not limited by availability, so certain revenues need to be reduced by the amounts that were unavailable at the end of the year. This adjustment records a net decrease in revenues - unavailable revenues at the beginning of the year exceed ending unavailable revenues by this amount.(820,209) Internal Service Funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities, such as insurance and fleet management, to individual funds. The net revenue of the Internal Service Funds is reported with Governmental Activities.(994,284) Loss on disposal of governmental capital assets is not recorded in fund activity but is included in Governmental Activities.(638,714) Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities $(21,820,730) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 32 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements These funds account for operations (a) that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of net income is appropriate for accountability purposes. Wastewater Treatment Fund is used to account for the provision of sewer service to the residents of the City and some residents of Kern County. This fund also accounts for the activities related to the debt issuance which provided for the Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Refuse Collection Fund is used to account for the collection and disposal of refuse within the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund. Agricultural Water Fund is used to account for the provision of water service restricted primarily for agricultural purposes to users within the City and some users within Kern County (some Kern River water is exchanged for State Aqueduct water for domestic water purposes). All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund. Domestic Water Fund is used to account for the provision of water service to some residents of the City and Kern County. All activities necessary to provide such service are accounted for in this fund. General Aviation Fund is used to account for the acquisition and operation of the Bakersfield Airpark. The majority of acquisition and improvement financing for the airport facility was provided by a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration. Offstreet Parking Fund is used to account for the operations of the parking garage at 18th and Eye Streets and various offstreet surface parking lots within the City. The parking garage was financed by the former Redevelopment Agency and the related debt was retired in August 1994. Subsequently, the title was transferred to the City. Internal Service Funds are used to provide goods and services by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the City on a cost reimbursement basis. 33 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds June 30, 2018 Wastewater Treatment Refuse Collection Agricultural Water Current assets: Cash and investments $80,941,694 $19,530,163 $10,447,051 Accounts receivable, net 1,064,089 1,132,604 526,040 Interest receivable 232,140 54,976 29,286 Notes/loans receivable --- Due from other governmental agencies 106,172 1,328,182 - Prepayments and inventories --- Total current assets 82,344,095 22,045,925 11,002,377 Noncurrent assets: Capital assets: Land 10,238,095 2,785,456 2,175,944 Depreciable buildings, property, equipment and infrastructure, net 598,790,408 974,754 7,371,835 Construction in progress 11,141,793 58,352 - Non-amortizable intangible assets --8,032,678 Notes/loans receivable --- Other long-term receivable 476,867 -33,450 Total noncurrent assets 620,647,163 3,818,562 17,613,907 Total assets 702,991,258 25,864,487 28,616,284 Deferred outflows of resources: Deferred pensions 2,859,414 5,288,345 735,632 Deferred other post-employment benefits 346,700 630,000 92,800 Debt issuance 9,818,471 -- Total deferred outflows of resources 13,024,585 5,918,345 828,432 Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,301,287 837,998 69,871 Claims payable --- Workers' compensation claims --- Compensated absences payable 144,474 261,349 27,567 Long-term debt - due within one year 7,951,827 -- Capital leases payable - due within one year --- Advances from grantors and third parties 476,867 130,695 - Total current liabilities 12,874,455 1,230,042 97,438 Noncurrent liabilities: Long-term debt - due in more than one year 161,302,763 -- Capital leases payable - due in more than one year --- Kern River Levee District/Buena Vista --368,746 Customers' deposits 2,481,830 453,855 - Workers' compensation claims --- Compensated absences payable 448,274 723,170 133,016 Net pension liability 11,903,460 21,184,698 3,265,191 Net other post-employment benefits liability 2,056,612 5,552,853 1,233,967 Total noncurrent liabilities 178,192,939 27,914,576 5,000,920 Total liabilities 191,067,394 29,144,618 5,098,358 Deferred inflows of resources: Deferred pensions 470,296 985,688 151,686 Deferred other post-employment benefits 236,862 639,529 142,117 Total deferred inflows of resources 707,158 1,625,217 293,803 Net position: Net investment in capital assets 460,734,177 3,818,562 17,580,457 Restricted for: Capital improvements 20,200,000 -- Unrestricted 43,307,114 (2,805,565)6,472,098 Total net position $524,241,291 $1,012,997 $24,052,555 Adjustments to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund activities related to proprietary funds Net position of business-type activities The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 34 Domestic Water General Aviation Offstreet Parking Totals Governmental Activities Internal Service Funds $68,643,482 $837,647 $86,587 $180,486,624 $59,033,679 2,561,395 (5,973)570 5,278,725 12,011 196,270 1,888 327 514,887 174,162 ----700,343 ---1,434,354 39,477 ----1,089,292 71,401,147 833,562 87,484 187,714,590 61,048,964 547,102 7,464,254 410,000 23,620,851 - 169,502,063 2,665,602 638,721 779,943,383 37,442,456 31,558,343 677,118 -43,435,606 - 23,444,228 --31,476,906 - ----410,846 119,324 -36,354 665,995 - 225,171,060 10,806,974 1,085,075 879,142,741 37,853,302 296,572,207 11,640,536 1,172,559 1,066,857,331 98,902,266 739,062 35,251 -9,657,704 2,468,778 44,000 --1,113,500 292,900 ---9,818,471 - 783,062 35,251 -20,589,675 2,761,678 8,626,512 38,694 9,840 13,884,202 1,077,095 ----6,555,651 ----6,873,000 54,748 --488,138 161,824 ---7,951,827 - 643,995 --643,995 - 119,324 --726,886 - 9,444,579 38,694 9,840 23,695,048 14,667,570 ---161,302,763 - 17,671,298 --17,671,298 - ---368,746 - 2,119,716 --5,055,401 - ----34,136,000 157,752 384 -1,462,596 416,383 2,574,160 141,229 -39,068,738 10,376,239 257,076 --9,100,508 2,622,181 22,780,002 141,613 -234,030,050 47,550,803 32,224,581 180,307 9,840 257,725,098 62,218,373 145,104 7,653 -1,760,427 505,281 29,608 --1,048,116 302,000 174,712 7,653 -2,808,543 807,281 206,736,443 10,806,975 1,048,721 700,725,335 37,442,456 ---20,200,000 - 58,219,533 680,852 113,998 105,988,030 1,195,834 $264,955,976 $11,487,827 $1,162,719 826,913,365 $38,638,290 1,767,293 $828,680,658 35 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position Proprietary Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Wastewater Treatment Refuse Collection Agricultural Water Operating revenues: Intergovernmental $-$200,441 $87,113 Charges for services 32,900,439 46,107,058 5,297,116 Cost recoveries 42,024 4,543,794 522,650 Rental income 377,469 -90,550 Other sales or services 304 62,749 1,041,853 Miscellaneous 716,135 406,309 - Total operating revenues 34,036,371 51,320,351 7,039,282 Operating expenses: General and administrative 15,726,245 48,222,115 3,772,934 Transmission and distribution 12,868 483,845 5,158 Workers' compensation payments --- Claims paid --- Depreciation and amortization 19,779,890 74,594 400,693 Compensated absences -13,751 12,510 Total operating expenses 35,519,003 48,794,305 4,191,295 Operating income (loss)(1,482,632)2,526,046 2,847,987 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Interest income 967,700 361,890 63,067 Connection fees 7,352,420 -- Interest expense (6,420,932)-- Gain/(loss) on sale of capital assets (1,032)14,686 - Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)1,898,156 376,576 63,067 Income (loss) before transfers and capital contributions 415,524 2,902,621 2,911,054 Capital contributions 3,843,153 -1,002 Transfers in --- Transfers out (132,310)(1,360,615)(278,614) Income (loss) before extraordinary item 4,126,367 1,542,006 2,633,442 Extraordinary item: Litigation Settlement --- Change in net position 4,126,367 1,542,006 2,633,442 Total Net Position - Beginning of Year - as restated 520,114,924 (529,009)21,419,113 Total Net Position-End of Year $524,241,291 $1,012,997 $24,052,555 Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service activity related to proprietary funds Change in net position of business-type activities The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 36 Domestic Water General Aviation Offstreet Parking Totals Governmental Activities Internal Service Funds $18,027 $260,969 $-$566,550 $- 24,273,969 324,425 114,261 109,017,268 35,413,796 25,786 1,270 -5,135,524 847,694 ---468,019 - 2,167,170 --3,272,076 - 6,200 21,620 -1,150,264 63,334 26,491,152 608,284 114,261 119,609,701 36,324,824 22,178,681 204,110 137,829 90,241,914 26,694,805 727,803 237,216 -1,466,890 - ----3,136,046 ----3,540,685 4,648,806 226,550 90,628 25,221,161 6,462,655 ---26,261 3,384 27,555,290 667,876 228,457 116,956,226 39,837,575 (1,064,138)(59,592)(114,196)2,653,475 (3,512,751) 478,887 4,176 3,253 1,878,973 496,231 1,233,297 --8,585,717 - (1,652,857)--(8,073,789)- 6,716 --20,370 278,968 66,043 4,176 3,253 2,411,271 775,199 (998,095)(55,416)(110,942)5,064,746 (2,737,552) 538,429 530,956 -4,913,540 92,629 ----2,540,403 (261,115)--(2,032,654)(242,744) (720,781)475,540 (110,942)7,945,632 (347,264) 54,231,181 --54,231,181 - 53,510,400 475,540 (110,942)62,176,813 (347,264) 211,445,576 11,012,287 1,273,661 38,985,554 $264,955,976 $11,487,827 $1,162,719 $38,638,290 647,020 $62,823,833 37 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Wastewater Treatment Refuse Collection Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from: Customers, including cash deposits $31,871,874 $51,048,694 Prior year reimbursements and cost recoveries 42,024 - Cash paid to: Suppliers (8,401,929)(38,407,409) Employees (6,373,717)(11,427,088) Cash deposits returned to customers -- Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 17,138,252 1,214,197 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Cash transferred from other funds -- Cash transferred to other funds (132,310)(1,360,615) Litigation settlement (see Note 24)-- County/developer project share -- Connection fees 7,352,420 - Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities 7,220,110 (1,360,615) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Principal payments: Notes/Loans/Bonds (6,727,126)- Capital lease payments -- Capital contributions -- Interest paid (7,564,866)- Purchase of capital assets -- Proceeds from sale of capital assets -14,686 Construction in progress (10,575,050)- Net cash provided (used) by capital and related financing activities (24,867,042)14,686 Cash flows from investing activities: Interest received 1,147,753 404,464 Net increase (decrease) in the fair value of investments (279,024)(67,644) Net cash provided by investing activities 868,729 336,820 Net increase (decrease) in cash and investments 360,049 205,088 Cash and investments - Beginning of year 80,581,645 19,325,075 Cash and investments - End of year $80,941,694 $19,530,163 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 38 Agriculture Water Domestic Water General Aviation Offstreet Parking Totals Governmental Activities Internal Service Funds $10,757,110 $26,111,454 $754,221 $118,351 $120,661,704 $36,192,558 --22,490 -64,514 847,694 (2,507,785)(14,012,590)(417,927)(134,075)(63,881,715)(22,415,858) (1,389,196)(1,494,452)--(20,684,453)(8,208,236) -(137,878)--(137,878)- 6,860,129 10,466,534 358,784 (15,724)36,022,172 6,416,158 -----2,540,403 (278,614)(261,115)--(2,032,654)(242,744) -54,231,181 --54,231,181 - 1,002 ---1,002 - -973,720 --8,326,140 - (277,612)54,943,786 --60,525,669 2,297,659 ----(6,727,126)- -(415,185)--(415,185)- --530,956 -530,956 - -(1,652,857)--(9,217,723)- --(614,443)(38,140)(652,583)(7,863,254) -6,716 -11,313 32,715 323,425 -(31,503,200)--(42,078,250)- -(33,564,526)(83,487)(26,827)(58,527,196)(7,539,829) 96,386 661,013 7,020 3,385 2,320,021 636,194 (54,523)(320,250)(3,660)(185)(725,286)(206,403) 41,863 340,763 3,360 3,200 1,594,735 429,791 6,624,380 32,186,557 278,657 (39,351)39,615,380 1,603,779 3,822,671 36,456,925 558,990 125,938 140,871,244 57,429,900 $10,447,051 $68,643,482 $837,647 $86,587 $180,486,624 $59,033,679 39 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Cash Flows (concluded) Proprietary Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Wastewater Treatment Refuse Collection Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities: Operating income (loss)$(1,482,632)$2,526,046 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Depreciation expense 19,779,890 74,594 (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (217,817)(263,366) (Increase) decrease in inventories -- (Increase) decrease in prepaid items -- Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 552,521 (1,506,513) Increase in workers' compensation claims -- Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue -(1,764) Increase (decrease) in customers' deposits (1,904,656)(6,527) Increase (decrease) in compensated absences (17,419)(58,997) Increase (decrease) in net pension liability 1,231,625 2,102,406 Increase (decrease) in deferred outflows/inflows of resources for pensions (516,964)(903,713) Increase (decrease) in net other post-employment benefits liability (176,458)(757,498) Increase (decrease) in deferred outflows/inflows of resources for OPEB (109,838)9,529 Net cash provided (used) by operating activities $17,138,252 $1,214,197 Noncash investing capital and financing activities: Contribution of equipment from other departments $-$- Contributions of infrastructure and improvements by developers $3,843,153 $- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 40 Agriculture Water Domestic Water General Aviation Offstreet Parking Totals Governmental Activities Internal Service Funds $2,847,987 $(1,064,138)$(59,592)$(114,196)$2,653,475 $(3,512,751) 400,693 4,648,806 226,550 90,628 25,221,161 6,462,655 3,668,481 (577,345)168,427 4,090 2,782,470 715,428 -----(35,423) -----8,669 (18,145)7,283,727 32,801 3,754 6,348,145 (150,399) -----2,940,259 ----(1,764)- 49,347 59,769 --(1,802,067)- (695)(18,832)(21,220)-(117,163)(75,552) 263,177 270,188 14,176 -3,881,572 907,796 (186,473)(104,288)(2,358)-(1,713,796)(522,849) (213,560)(16,421)--(1,163,937)(330,775) 49,317 (14,932)--(65,924)9,100 $6,860,129 $10,466,534 $358,784 $(15,724)$36,022,172 $6,416,158 $-$538,429 $-$-$538,429 $92,629 $-$-$-$-$3,843,153 $- 41 42 Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements Fiduciary funds account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individual private organizations, other governmental units and/or other funds. Detailed combining statements for Fiduciary Funds are located in the Supplementary Information section. Below are descriptions of the generic fund types within this category and specific funds within each fund type. Private Purpose Trust Funds Redevelopment Successor Agency - The Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency ceased activities in February 2012. All non- housing related assets, liabilities and activities have been transferred to the City and are accounted for in a trust fund. Planning Habitat Trust Fund - This fund is used to account for monies collected from developers to be used to purchase suitable land to provide habitat for endangered species. After the land is purchased it is transferred to the State Fish and Game Department for maintenance. Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds Fire Relief and Pension Trust Fund - This fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources to be used for retirement annuity payments at appropriate amounts and times in the future for Fire Department personnel who retired prior to June 2, 1972. Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Irrevocable Trust Fund - This fund is used to account for the City's postretirement medical benefit plan. The City provides medical insurance coverage through contributions to eligible retirees' insurance premiums. Agency Funds Special Deposits Fund - This fund is used to account for the collection by the City as agent for organizations operated under the auspices of the Recreation Division, security deposits for utility franchises, temporary deposits for construction permits and bid deposits. This fund is also used for the collection of police seized property, local Law Enforcement Block Grants, and other revenues held in trust pending disposition of contingencies. Improvement Districts Fund - This fund is used to account for the collection of liens for improvements benefiting private properties and payments to the holders of bonds issued pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1913 and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. The City is in no way liable for the payment of bonded indebtedness, but the City serves as agent to collect the principal and interest installments from the owners of the benefited properties. A trustee administers the periodic payment to the bondholders. In addition, Community Service Districts created for the West Ming and Old River Ranch developments are accounted for in this section. These funds are collected to be used to pay for public safety costs in the applicable communities. 43 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Fiduciary Net Position Fiduciary Funds June 30, 2018 Private Purpose Trust Funds Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds Agency Funds Assets: Current assets: Cash and investments $18,027,386 $66,511,576 $34,788,915 Retirement system investments -684,201 - Accounts receivable --84,752 Interest receivable 47,678 4,564 16,980 Due from other governmental agencies --184,145 Total current assets 18,075,064 67,200,341 35,074,792 Noncurrent assets: Land held for resale 414,092 -- Total noncurrent assets 414,092 -- Total assets 18,489,156 67,200,341 35,074,792 Liabilities: Payables: Advances from grantors and third parties 3,772,803 -- Deposits --29,224,609 Accrued bond interest --775,183 Bonds 2,525,000 -5,075,000 Notes 17,883,643 -- Total liabilities 24,181,446 -35,074,792 Net Position: Restricted for: Individuals, organizations and other governments (5,692,290)-- Pensions & other post-employment benefits -67,200,341 - $(5,692,290)$67,200,341 $- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 44 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Fiduciary Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Private Purpose Trust Funds Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds Additions Contributions to pooled investments $-$7,527,447 Developer fees 1,454,598 - Successor agency property tax deposits 3,528,124 - Charges for services/capital lease revenue 3,132,400 - Other income 3,589 - Interest income 133,383 2,058,530 Total additions 8,252,094 9,585,977 Deductions: Benefits -4,605,284 Purchase of uninhabited land 613,889 - Obligation retirement 3,826,700 - Administrative expenses -188,705 Total deductions 4,440,589 4,793,989 Change in net position 3,811,505 4,791,988 Net position - beginning of year (9,503,795)62,408,353 Net position - end of year $(5,692,290)$67,200,341 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 45 46 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The accompanying financial statements of the City of Bakersfield (the “City”) have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following summary of the City’s significant accounting policies is presented to assist the reader in interpreting the basic financial statements and other data in this report. These policies should be viewed as an integral part of the accompanying basic financial statements. A.Description of Reporting Entity The City of Bakersfield, California, is a California Charter City, incorporated on January 11, 1898, and serves as the county seat of the County of Kern, California (the “County”). The City is a full-service city and operates under a Council - Manager form of government, providing the following services as authorized by its Charter: General government; public safety; public wo rks; and development and conservation. As required by GAAP, these basic financial statements present the government and its component units, entities for which the government is considered to be financially accountable. Blended component units, although legally separate entities, are, in substance, part of the government's operations and so data from these units are combined with data of the primary government. Each blended and discretely presented component unit has a June 30 year-end. B.Basis of Presentation Government-Wide Financial Statements The Government-Wide financial statements (the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information of all of the non-fiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. For the most part, eliminations have been made to minimize the double counting on internal activities. Internal activities for services provided and used that are not eliminated include water, solid waste and sewer services provided to various other functions of the government. These statements distinguish between the governmental and business-type activities of the City. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and inter-governmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees charged to external parties. The statement of activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each segment of the business-type activities of the City and for each function of the City’s governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a program or function and, therefore, are clearly identifiable to a particular function. Some functions include expenses that are, in essence, indirect expenses of other functions resulting from charges among funds or programs for centralized services. Program revenues include: 1) charges paid by the recipients of goods or services offered by the programs and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular program. Revenues that are not classified as program revenues, including all taxes, are presented instead as general revenues. Net position is restricted when constraints placed on it are either externally imposed or are imposed by constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Internally imposed designations of resources are not presented as restricted net position. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, generally it is the City’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. 47 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) B.Basis of Presentation (continued) Governmental Fund Financial Statements The governmental fund financial statements provide information about the City’s funds, including fiduciary funds and the blended component unit. Separate statements for each fund category - governmental, proprietary and fiduciary - are presented. The emphasis of fund financial statements is on major governmental and enterprise funds, each displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental and enterprise funds are separately aggregated and reported as non-major funds. Proprietary fund operating revenues, such as charges for services, result from exchange transactions associated with the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions are those in which each party receives and gives up essentially equal values. Nonoperating revenues, such as subsidies and investment earnings, result from nonexchange transactions or ancillary activities. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation of capital assets. As used in this section, the term depreciation can include amortization of intangible assets. All expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating expenses. The City reports the following major governmental funds: General Fund - The General Fund is the principal operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. For the City, the General Fund includes basic governmental activities, such as general government, public safety, public works, and community services. Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund - The Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund is used to account for transient occupancy tax revenues (hotel tax) and expenditures funded by this revenue source. The Rabobank Arena and Convention Center and the Bakersfield Ice Sports Center operating revenues and expenditures are recorded in this fund. This fund is also used to account for the operations of the Visit Bakersfield division of the City. Community Development Block Grant Fund – The Community Development Block Grant Fund is used to account for resources provided by the Federal Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the elimination of slums and blight, housing conservation and improvements of community services. Gas Tax & Road Fund - The Gas Tax & Road Fund is used to account for the City’s share, based upon population, of state gasoline taxes. State law requires these gasoline taxes to be used to maintain streets or for major street construction. This fund also accounts for other State and Federal grant revenues related to street maintenance or construction, including the Federal earmark Thomas Roads funds. Capital Outlay Fund - The Capital Outlay Fund is used to account for the cost of capital projects financed by local revenues and various grant/loan proceeds for capital expenditures. This fund also accounts for the special Utility Franchise/Surcharge Fund created by the City Council to account for the specified local road project costs funded by the selected electricity and gas franchise surcharge fees. In addition, funds contributed by the County to be used to cover a portion of the costs of the local match needed for the Thomas Roads projects are accounted for in this fund. Park Improvement Fund - The Park Improvement Fund is used to account for funds collected for residential park development (Ordinance No. 3646). Fees are collected based on the development’s share of the cost to develop, improve, construct, or enhance a neighborhood park (Ordinance No. 3327). Transportation Development Fund - The Transportation Development Fund is used to account for funds collected from fees paid to mitigate the traffic impacts to the regional circulation system caused by a development project. The fees are paid when a building permit for the development project is obtained, and are based upon the amount of traffic the development will generate. The fee schedule wa s adopted with Ordinance No. 3513 and will be periodically evaluated by the City Council and revised to reflect updated costs and growth projections. 48 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) B.Basis of Presentation (continued) The City reports the following major proprietary (enterprise) funds: Wastewater Treatment Fund - The Wastewater Treatment Fund is used to account for the provision of sewer service to the residents of the City and some residents of the County. This fund also accounts for the activities related to the debt issuance, which provided for the Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Refuse Collection Fund - The Refuse Collection Fund is used to account for the collection and disposal of refuse within the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund. Agricultural Water Fund - The Agricultural Water Fund is used to account for the provision of water service restricted primarily for agricultural purposes to users within the City and some users within the County (some Kern River water is exchanged for State Aqueduct water for domestic wa ter purposes). All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund. Domestic Water Fund - The Domestic Water Fund is used to account for the provision of water service to some residents of the City and County. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund. General Aviation Fund - The General Aviation Fund is used to account for the acquisition and operation of the Bakersfield Airpark. The majority of acquisition and improvement financing for the airport facility was provided by a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration. Offstreet Parking Fund - The Offstreet Parking Fund is used to account for the operations of the parking garage at 18th and Eye Streets and various offstreet surface parking lots within the City. The parking garage was financed by the former Redevelopment Agency and the related debt was retired in August 1994, and subsequently, the title was transferred to the City. The City reports the following additional fund types: Internal Service Funds - The Internal Service Funds are used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the governmental unit on a cost-reimbursement basis. The City accounts for its self-insurance and equipment management activities as internal service funds. Private Purpose Trust Fund - The Planning Habitat Trust Fund is used to account for mo nies collected from developers to be used to purchase suitable land to provide habitat for endangered species. After the land is purchased, it is transferred to the State Fish and Game Department for maintenance. The City also records the assets, liabilities, and activities of the Redevelopment Successor Agency in a separate trust fund. Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds - The Fire Relief and Pension Trust Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources to be used for retirement annuity payments at appropriate amounts and times in the future for Fire Department personnel who retired prior to June 26, 1972. The Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Irrevocable Trust Fund is used to account for the City’s postretirement medical benefit plan in which the City provides medical insurance coverage through contributions to eligible retirees’ insurance premium. Agency Funds - The Agency Funds account for assets held by the City as an agent for various local governments or other entities. The Special Deposits Fund is used to account for the collection by the City as agent for organizations operated under the auspices of the Recreation Division, security deposits for utility franchises, temporary deposits for construction permits and bid deposits. This fund is also used for the collection of police seized property, local Law Enforcement Block Grants and other revenues held in trust pending disposition of contingencies. The Improvement Districts Fund is used to account for the collection of liens for improvements benefiting private properties and payments to the holders of bonds issued pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1913 and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. The City is in no way liable for the payment of bonded indebtedness, but the City serves as agent to collect the principal and interest installments from the owners of the benefited properties. A trustee provides the periodic payment to the bondholders. This fund also accounts for the special assessments and taxes collected within the boundaries of Community Service Districts within the City. 49 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) C.Basis of Accounting The government-wide, proprietary, private purpose trust, and pension and other employee benefit trust funds are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, regardless of when the related cash flows take place. Nonexchange transactions, in which the City gives (or receives) value without directly receiving (or giving) equal value in exchange, include property and sales taxes, grants, entitlements, and donations. On an accrual basis of accounting, revenue from property taxes is recognized in the fiscal year for which the taxes are levied. Revenues from sales tax are recognized when the underlying transactions take place. Revenues from grants, entitlements and donations are recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligible requirements have been satisfied. The agency funds utilize the accrual basis of accounting to report assets and liabilities but technically have no measurement focus. Governmental funds are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recognized when measurable and available. Property and sales taxes, interest, certain State and Federal grants and charges for services are accrued when their receipt occurs within sixty days after the end of the accounting period so as to be both measurable and available. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred, as under the accrual basis of accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. General capital assets acquisitions are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Proceeds of general long-term debt and capital leases are reported as other financing sources. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary funds' principal ongoing operations. Revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating. D.Assets, Liabilities, Net Position or Fund Balances, and Other Financial Statement Items Cash and Investments Cash balances of each of the City's funds, except for certain Trust and Agency Funds, are pooled and invested by the City. Income earned from pooled investments is allocated to each of the funds based on average pooled cash balances during the year. Deficit cash balances are classified as due to other funds and funded by the General Fund or related operating fund. The City applies GASB Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools. This statement generally requires that investments be reported at their fair value and that all changes in fair value be reflected as income of the period in which they occur. Statutes authorize the City to invest in obligations of the United States Treasury, agencies and instrumentalities, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, repurchase agreements, money market funds, and the State Treasurer's investment pool. The City's Pension Trust Fund is also authorized to invest in corporate bonds rated A or better by a national rating system generally recognized and used by banks and investment brokers in the United States. Investments are comprised of obligations of the United States Treasury, agencies and instrumentalities, cash, time certificates of deposit, mutual funds, bankers' acceptances, money market accounts, deposits in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), and California Asset Management Program (CAMP). Investments are stated at fair value. 50 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) D.Assets, Liabilities, Net Position or Fund Balances, and Other Financial Statement Items (continued) Interfund Transactions Interfund transactions are reflected as either loans, services provided, reimbursements or transfers. Loans are reported as receivables and payables as appropriate, are subject to elimination upon consolidation and are referred to as either “due to/from other funds” (i.e., the current portion of interfund loans) or “advances to/from other funds” (i.e., the noncurrent portion of interfund loans). Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and the business-type activities are reported in the government-wide financial statement as “internal balances.” Advances between funds, as reported in the fund financial statements, are offset by a fund balance reserve account in applicable governmental funds to indicate that they are not available for appropriation and are not available financial resources. Services provided, deemed to be at market or near market rates, are treated as revenues and expenditures/expenses. Reimbursements are when one fund incurs a cost, charges the appropriate benefiting fund, and reduces its related cost as a reimbursement. All other interfund transactions are treated as transfers. Transfers between governmental or proprietary funds are netted as part of the reconciliation to the government-wide presentation. Receivables All trade and property tax receivables are shown net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Trade accounts receivable in excess of 180 days comprise the trade accounts receivable allowance for uncollectible accounts. Inventory and Prepaid Items Inventory is valued at average cost applied on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. The reserve for prepaid expenses relates to certain payments to vendors for costs applicable to future accounting periods. The cost of both inventories and prepaid items are recorded as expenditures/expenses when consumed rather than when purchased. Capital Assets Capital outlays are recorded as expenditures of the General, Special Revenue, and Capital Projects Funds and as assets in the government-wide financial statements to the extent the City’s capitalization thresholds are met. Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible water rights are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an estimated useful life in excess of one year and an initial individual cost of more than $50,000 for infrastructure and $5,000 for all other capital assets. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at acquisition value at the date of donation in the majority of instances. When assets are donated in relation to a service concession arrangement they are reported at acquisition cost. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets' lives are not capitalized. Betterments and major improvements which significantly increase values, change capacities or extend useful lives are capitalized. Upon sale or retirement of capital assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations. 51 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) D.Assets, Liabilities, Net Position or Fund Balances, and Other Financial Statement Items (continued) Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. Property, plant, and equipment of the primary government, as well as the component units, are depreciated using the straight- line method over the following estimated useful lives: Infrastructure 10 to 70 years Buildings, structures and improvements 5 to 40 years Transmission and distribution equipment 5 to 50 years Rolling equipment 2 to 30 years Office equipment 3 to 10 years Long-Term Obligations In the government-wide financial statements, and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type Statement of Net Position. Debt principal payments of both governmental and business-type activities are reported as decreases in the balance of the liability on the Statement of Net Position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the effective interest method. In the fund financial statements, however, debt principal payments of governmental funds are recognized as expenditures when paid. Governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as we ll as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. Deferred Outflows and Inflows of Resources As required by GASB Statements No. 63 and No. 65, the City recognized applicable deferred outflows and inflows of resources in the government-wide, govenmental, and proprietary fund type financial statements. The Statements of Net Position and Balance Sheets will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources, as defined as a consumption of net position or fund balance by the City that is applicable to a future funding period, or deferred inflows of resources, as defined as an acquisition of net position or fund balance by the City that is applicable to a future funding period. The City has items that qualify for reporting in these categories and are detailed in a separate note disclosure. 52 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) D.Assets, Liabilities, Net Position or Fund Balances, and Other Financial Statement Items (continued) Net Position/Fund Balance The government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements utilize a net position presentation. Net position is categorized as net investment in capital assets, restricted and unrestricted. Net Investment in Capital Assets - This category groups all capital assets, including infrastructure, into one component of net position. Accumulated depreciation and the outstanding balances of debt that are attributable to the acquisition, construction or improvement of these assets reduce the balance in this category. Restricted Net Position - This category presents external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, laws, or regulations of other governments and restrictions imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Unrestricted Net Position - This category represents net position of the City, not restricted for any project or other purpose. As of June 30, 2018, net position is as follows: Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total Net investment in capital assets $1,301,334,674 $700,725,335 $2,002,060,009 Restricted 20,759,775 20,200,000 40,959,775 Unrestricted (200,714,582)107,755,323 (92,959,259) Total net position $1,121,379,867 $828,680,658 $1,950,060,525 Fund balances of the governmental funds are report using a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which a government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported. Fund balances for governmental funds are segregated as follows: Nonspendable Fund Balance – includes net resources that cannot be spent because of their form or because of legal or contractual limitations, and therefore must remain intact. Restricted Fund Balance – includes net resources that have externally enforceable limitations on their use. These limitations can be established by creditors, grantors, or by laws and regulations. Committed Fund Balance – includes amounts with self-imposed limitations and are set in place prior to the end of the fiscal year. Commitments are set forth by the formal action of the City’s highest level of decision-making authority, the City Council, and the limitations require that same level of authority to be removed. Assigned Fund Balance – includes amounts for which the intended use results in limitations but do not meet the requirements for either the “Restricted” or “Committed” classifications. Intended use can be established by the City Council, a governing committee or board, or by a City official designated as having that authority. Unassigned Fund Balance – is the residual balance of the General Fund not included in the other classifications. 53 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) D.Assets, Liabilities, Net Position or Fund Balances, and Other Financial Statement Items (continued) The City Council establishes, modifies or rescinds fund balance commitments though approval of contracts for services and supplies that require City Council authorization through resolution. Fund balance assignments are made by agreements entered into by department heads, and their designees, for specific purposes. The City Council also establishes fund balance assignments through the adoption of the budget and subsequent budget amendments. Assignments are generally temporary and as such, additional action is not usually needed for assignments to be removed. The City Council approved, through resolution, a Fund Balance policy that established these rules for fund balance commitments and assignments in the General Fund. It was not deemed necessary to include a policy to achieve and maintain a specific level of unrestricted fund balance in the General Fund. Fund Balance Flow Assumptions The City will sometimes fund outlays for a specific purpose from restricted and unrestricted resources (committed, assigned, and unassigned fund balance). A flow assumption must be made about the order of how these resources are will be applied to properly calculate the amounts reported as restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned. It is the City’s policy to consider restricted fund balance to be used completely before any components of unrestricted fund balance. When the components of unrestricted fund balance are used for the same purpose, the amount classified as committed is used first, followed by assigned, and unassigned is applied last. Property Taxes In 1978, a state constitutional amendment (Proposition 13) provided that the property tax rate is limited to 1% of market value. This property tax rate limitation may only be increased through voter approval. The County is the sole agency responsible for levying and collecting the property taxes and distributing them to taxing jurisdictions. Taxes are allocated and distributed based upon each taxing jurisdiction's assessed valuations and upon any voter-approved debt override on the tax rate. The property tax calendar for the City is as follows: Valuation date January 1 Lien date March 1 Levy dates July 1 through June 30 Due dates November 1; February 1 Collection dates December 10; April 10 54 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) D.Assets, Liabilities, Net Position or Fund Balances, and Other Financial Statement Items (continued) Pension Plan For purposes of measuring the net pension liability and deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the City's California Public Employee's Retirement System (CalPERS) plans (Plans) and additions to/deductions from the Plans' fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by CalPERS. For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) For purposes of measuring the net OPEB liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB, and OPEB expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the City's OPEB Plan (OPEB Plan) and additions to/deductions from the OPEB Plan's fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS). For this purpose, the OPEB Plan recognizes benefit payments when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments and participating interest-earning investment contracts that have a maturity at the time of purchase of one year or less, which are reported at cost. Cash Flow Statements For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits, short-term investments and cash and investments with fiscal agents. Cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash, and so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Generally, only investments with original maturities of three months or less meet this definition. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures/expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. E.Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The procedures established by the City Council in adopting the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements are as follows: 1.Prior to June 1, the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following July 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2.Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3.The City Council legally enacts the budget by resolution before July 1. The City Manager is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between departments within any fund and approve reductions of budgeted amounts. Since expenditures may not exceed budgeted appropriations at the fund level, any revisions that alter the total appropriations of any fund are to be approved by the City Council. Projects budgeted within the current fiscal year but not yet completed can be re-appropriated the following fiscal year with City Manager approval. All other unencumbered appropriations lapse at year-end. Encumbered amounts are re-appropriated in the ensuing fiscal year budget. 55 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) E.Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability (continued) Budgets are adopted for all governmental fund types and are prepared on a basis consistent with GAAP. Budgeted amounts are as originally adopted, or as amended by the City Council. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the City Council approved $80,194,478 of increases to the originally adopted budget, excluding carryovers of prior year encumbered balances and selected capital appropriations. Deficit Net Position The Self-Insurance Internal Service Fund reported a deficit in net position of $20,941,992 at the close of the fiscal year. The deficit was partially the result of a $2,100,000 increase in open claims payable. This liability reserve amount is an estimate of the City's open claims at the end of the fiscal year and can vary year to year. Additionally, the deficit was the result of a significant increase in the workers' compensation liability calculated in the City’s most recent actuarial study. Workers' compensation charges can fluctuate significantly from year to year and staff will continue to adjust departmental rates accordingly to maintain sufficient funding levels. Reclassification and Eliminations Interfund balances must generally be eliminated in the government-wide financial statements, except for net residual amounts due between governmental activities. Amounts involving fiduciary funds should be reported as external transactions. Any allocations must reduce the expenses of the function from which the expenses are being allocated, so that expenses are reported only once, in the function in which they are allocated. Excess of Expenditures Over Appropriations For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, expenditures exceeded appropriations in the Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund by $559,111. These over-expenditures relate to incorrect budget estimates related to anticipated costs for events in the Rabobank Arena and Convention Center facilities. These are technically considered budgetary violations and management will take steps to review periodic budget reports to ensure compliance in the future. F.New Accounting Pronouncements During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 the City implemented the following standards: GASB issued Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. The objective of this statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting by state and local governments for post-employment benefits other than pensions. See Note 17 for this statement's effects on the City's accounting and financial reporting. GASB issued Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split-Interest Agreements. This statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting for irrevocable split-interest agreements by providing recognition and measurement guidance for situations in which a government is a beneficiary of the agreement. Upon implementation, there was no effect on the City's accounting or financial reporting. GASB issued Statement No. 85, Omnibus 2017. The objective of this statement is to address practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements. This statement addresses a variety of topics including issues related to blending component units, goodwill, fair value measurement and application, and post-employment benefits. Upon implementation, there was no effect on the City's accounting or financial reporting. GASB issued Statement No. 86, Certain Debt Extinguishment Issues. The primary objective of this statement is to improve consistency in accounting and financial reporting for in-substance defeasance of debt by providing guidance for transactions in which cash and other mo netary assets acquired with only existing resources—resources other than the proceeds of refunding debt—are placed in an irrevocable trust for the sole purpose of extinguishing debt. Upon implementation, there was no effect on the City's accounting or financial reporting. 56 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) F.New Accounting Pronouncements (continued) Recently released standards by GASB affecting future years are as follows: In November 2016, GASB issued Statement No. 83, Certain Asset Retirement Obligations. This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations (AROs). An ARO is a legally enforceable liability associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset. A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability based on the guidance in this statement. The City has elected not to early implement GASB Statement No. 83 and has not determined its effects on the City’s financial statements. In January 2017, GASB issued Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities. The objective of this statement is to improve guidance regarding the identification of fiduciary activities for accounting and financial reporting purposes and how those activities should be reported. The City has elected not to early implement GASB Statement No. 84 and has not determined its effects on the City’s financial statements. In June 2017, GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases.The objective of this statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments. This statement increases the usefulness of governments’ financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. The City has elected not to early implement GASB Statement No. 87 and has not determined its effects on the City’s financial statements. In April 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 88, Certain Disclosures Related to Debt, including Direct Borrowings and Direct Placements. The primary objective of this statement is to improve the information that is disclosed in notes to government financial statements related to debt, including direct borrowings and direct placements. It also clarifies which liabilities governments should include when disclosing information related to debt. The City has elected not to early implement GASB Statement No. 88 and has not determined its effects on the City's financial statements. In June 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 89, Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred Before the End of a Construction Period. The objectives of this statement are to enhance the relevance and comparability of information about capital assets and the cost of borrowing for a reporting period and to simplify accounting for interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period. The City has elected not to early implement GASB Statement No. 89 and has not determined its effects on the City's financial statements. In August 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 90, Majority Equity Interests. The objectives of this statement are to improve the consistency and comparability of reporting a government’s majority equity interest in a legally separate organization and to improve the relevance of financial statement information for certain component units. The City has elected not to early implement GASB Statement No. 90 and has not determined its effects on the City's financial statements. 57 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 2 -CASH AND INVESTMENTS Cash and investments as of June 30, 2018, are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows: Statement of net position: Cash and investments $392,337,011 Fiduciary funds: Cash and investments 119,327,877 Retirement system investments 684,201 $512,349,089 Cash and investments as of June 30, 2018, consist of the following: Cash on hand $1,864,369 Deposits with financial institutions 1,552,884 Investments 511,691,965 GASB Stmt. No. 31 Market Value Adjustment (2,760,129) $512,349,089 Investment Authorized by the California Government Code and the City’s Investment Policy The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code, or the City’s investment policy, where more restrictive. The table also identifies the mo re restrictive provision of the California Government Code or the City’s investment policy that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. This table does not address investment of any debt proceeds held by bond trustee that are governed by the provisions of the City’s debt agreements, rather than the general provisions of either the California Government Code or the City’s investment policy. Maximum Percentage Maximum Authorized Investment Types of Portfolio Maturity U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds 0 to 100%5 Years U.S. Government Agency Obligations 20% per agency 5 Years Bankers' Acceptances 40%180 Days Commercial Paper 25%270 Days Repurchase Agreements 30%90 Days Local Agency Investment Fund 40%N/A Time Certificates of Deposit 40%5 Years Public Agency Demand Accounts 30%N/A Mutual Funds 20%N/A 58 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 2 -CASH AND INVESTMENTS (continued) Investment Authorized by Debt Agreements The City and its component units have $362,435 in investments held by bond trustees pledged to the payment or security of certain debt issues. These investments are held in direct obligations of, or obligations that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States Government or an agency thereof. The California Government Code provides that monies held by a bond trustee pledged to the payment or security of debt issues, in absence of specific statutory provisions governing the issuance of the debt, may be invested in accordance with the ordinances, resolutions, or indentures specifying the types of investments the respective bond issue’s trustee may make. The obligations described above are authorized per the investment agreements with the bond trustees and include, but are not limited to, Federal Land Bank Bonds, Federal Home Loan Bank notes and bonds, Export-Import Bank notes and guaranteed participation certificates, obligations of or fully guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association notes, debentures and guaranteed certificates of participation, obligations of the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation notes, debentures and guaranteed certificates of participation. Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in the market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. As part of the City’s investment policy, one of the ways that the City manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter term and longer term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturing evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City’s investments to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the City’s investments by maturity: Remaining Maturity (In Months) Investment Type Fair Value Cost 12 Months Or Less 13 - 24 Months 25-60 Months More Than 60 Months U.S. Government Agency Obligations: Federal Farm Credit Bank $54,634,240 $55,486,040 $2,997,840 $-$52,488,200 $- Federal Home Loan Bank 42,278,395 42,972,900 1,999,500 -40,973,400 - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.58,643,878 59,209,545 -8,000,000 51,209,545 - Federal National Mortgage Assn.47,314,721 47,905,679 -13,000,000 34,905,679 - PEFCO 678,402 678,402 --678,402 - Commercial Paper ------ Bankers' Acceptances ------ Time Certificates of Deposit 19,942,800 20,000,000 20,000,000 --- U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds ------ Local Agency Investment Fund 117,006,480 117,006,480 117,006,480 --- CAMP 83,438,680 83,438,680 83,438,680 --- Mutual Funds (1)84,631,804 84,631,804 84,631,804 --- Investment Contracts 362,435 362,435 ---362,435 Total $508,931,835 $511,691,965 $310,074,304 $21,000,000 $180,255,226 $362,435 (1) See Note 17 for Other Post-Employment Benefits 59 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 2 -CASH AND INVESTMENTS (continued) Investments with Fair Values Highly Sensitive to Interest Rate Fluctuations Except as inherent by their nature as disclosed above, the City’s investments (including those held by a bond trustee) are not highly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. Credit Risk Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligations to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by the California Government Code, the City’s investment policy, or debt agreements, and the actual rating as of year end for each investment type. On August 5, 2011, the rating agency of Standard & Poors (S&P) assigned a negative outlook to the credit rating of the United States government. On August 8, 2011, S&P then downgraded that credit rating to AA+ from AAA. Remaining as of the Year-End Investment Type Minimum Legal Rating AAA AA+ Not Rated U.S. Government Agency Obligations: Federal Farm Credit Bank $55,486,040 $-$55,486,040 $- Federal Home Loan Bank 42,972,900 -42,972,900 - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.59,209,545 -59,209,545 - Federal National Mortgage Assn.47,905,679 -47,905,679 - PEFCO 678,402 -678,402 - Commercial Paper ---- Bankers' Acceptances ---- Time Certificates of Deposit 20,000,000 --20,000,000 U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds ---- Local Agency Investment Fund 117,006,480 --117,006,480 CAMP 83,438,680 --83,438,680 Mutual Funds (1)84,631,804 84,631,804 -- Investment Contracts 362,435 --362,435 Total $511,691,965 $84,631,804 $206,252,566 $220,807,595 (1) See Note 17 for Other Post-Employment Benefits Concentration of Credit Risk The City’s investment policy does not limit the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond the limitations stipulated by the California Government Code. Investments in any one issuer (other than United States Treasury securities, mutual funds and external investment pools) that represent 5% or more of the City’s total investments are as follows. Issuer Investment Type Reported Amount Percentage Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Agency Securities $55,486,040 11% Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Agency Securities 42,972,900 8% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Federal Agency Securities 59,209,545 12% Federal National Mortgage Assn.Federal Agency Securities 47,905,679 9% 60 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 2 -CASH AND INVESTMENTS (continued) Custodial Credit Risk Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that the City will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities in the possession of an outside party if a depository institution fails. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that the City will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities held by another party if the counterparty (e.g., broker-dealer) to a transaction fails. The California Government Code and City’s investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision applicable to deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits. As of June 30, 2018, all of the City’s deposits with financial institutions in excess of federal depository insurance limits were held in fully collateralized accounts, as permitted by the California Government Code. As of June 30, 2018, all of the City’s investments were held by the City itself or by a broker-dealer (counterparty) other than the broker-dealer used by the City to purchase the securities in the City’s name. Investment in State Investment Pool Investments are stated at fair value. Fair value is established quarterly based on quoted market prices received from the securities custodian. Fair value of investments held fluctuates with interest rates. The fair value of participants’ position in the pool is the same as the value of the pool shares. The value of participants’ equity withdrawn is based on the book value of the participants’ percentage participation at the date of such withdrawal. The California State Treasurer’s Office operates the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The LAIF is available for investment of funds administered by California local governments and special districts and is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an investment company. The enabling legislation for the LAIF is Section 16429.1 et seq. of the California Government Code. California Asset Management Program (CAMP) is a California Joint Powers Authority established in 1989 to provide California public agencies with professional investment services. The CAMP Pool is a permitted investment for all local agencies under California Government Code Section 53601(p). The LAIF and CAMP operate and report to participants on an amortized cost basis. For both the LAIF and CAMP, the income, gains, and losses, net of administration fees, are allocated based upon the participant’s average daily balance. Deposits in the LAIF and CAMP are not insured or otherwise guaranteed by the State of California, and participants share proportionally in any realized gains or losses on investments. The fair value of the LAIF and CAMP investment pools are approximately equal to the value of the pool shares. Fair Value Measurement The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy used to measure the fair value of the asset is based on the following: Level 1 - unadjusted price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets or liabilities, that each fund has the ability to access. Level 2 - other observable inputs (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs). Level 3 - unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including each fund's own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments). The City has a reported fair value of investments of $508,931,835, of which $226,252,566 are valued using Level 1 inputs. These include all of the U.S Government Agency Obligations and Time Certificates of Deposit. The remaining investments are recorded at amortized costs. 61 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 3 -COMPOSITION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND PAYABLE BALANCES Accounts receivable at June 30, 2018 of the City's major individual funds and non-major and internal service funds in the aggregate, including the applicable allowance for uncollectible accounts, are as follows: Accounts Receivable - Governmental Funds: General Fund Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Gas Tax & Road Fund Capital Outlay Transportation Development Non-Major Governmental Funds Internal Service Funds Total Governmental Activities Taxes $-$677,591 $-$-$-$-$-$-$677,591 Accounts 1,117,928 -14,754,567 22,031 143,984 -6,903,789 166,079 23,108,378 Gross Receivables 1,117,928 677,591 14,754,567 22,031 143,984 -6,903,789 166,079 23,785,969 Less: Allowance for Uncollectible -------(154,068)(154,068) Total Accounts Receivable - Net $1,117,928 $677,591 $14,754,567 $22,031 $143,984 $-$6,903,789 $12,011 $23,631,901 Accounts Receivable - Proprietary Funds: Wastewater Treatment Fund Refuse Collection Fund Agricultural Water Fund Domestic Water Fund General Aviation Fund Offstreet Parking Fund Total Business-Type Activities Accounts $1,064,089 $1,132,604 $526,040 $2,561,395 $(5,973)$570 $5,278,725 Gross Receivables 1,064,089 1,132,604 526,040 2,561,395 (5,973)570 5,278,725 Total Accounts Receivable - Net $1,064,089 $1,132,604 $526,040 $2,561,395 $(5,973)$570 $5,278,725 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2018, are composed of the following: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities General Transient Occupancy Taxes Community Development Block Grant Gas Tax & Road Capital Outlay Park Improvement Transportation Development Governmental Activities:Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Accounts payable $4,859,631 $22,389 $365,272 $5,823,805 $1,293,042 $3,334,627 $1,525,246 Due to other governments 569,298 ------ Total Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $5,428,929 $22,389 $365,272 $5,823,805 $1,293,042 $3,334,627 $1,525,246 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Non-Major Governmental Internal Service Total Governmental Governmental Activities:Funds Funds Activities Accounts payable $372,504 $1,077,095 $18,673,611 Due to other governments --569,298 Total Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $372,504 $1,077,095 $19,242,909 62 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 3 -COMPOSITION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND PAYABLE BALANCES (continued) Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities - Wastewater Treatment Refuse Collection Agricultural Water Domestic Water General Aviation Offstreet Parking Total Business-Type Business-Type Activities:Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Activities Accounts payable $2,138,996 $837,998 $69,871 $8,626,512 $38,694 $9,840 $11,721,911 Accrued interest 2,162,291 -----2,162,291 Total Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $4,301,287 $837,998 $69,871 $8,626,512 $38,694 $9,840 $13,884,202 NOTE 4 -DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS Amounts due from other governments at June 30, 2018 are comprised of the following: Federal Government State of California County/City Agencies Total Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total Reporting Entity Senate Bill (SB) 90 Claims $-$3,042,454 $-$3,042,454 $-$3,042,454 Sales Tax -11,175,771 -11,175,771 -11,175,771 Property Tax ----182,479 182,479 Public Employee Retirement System -39,477 -39,477 -39,477 SB 1 - Road Maint & Rehab -812,849 -812,849 -812,849 High Speed Rail -16,815 -16,815 -16,815 Department of Fish & Game -38,786 -38,786 -38,786 Department of Transportation 26,229,914 --26,229,914 -26,229,914 Economic & Community Development 1,216,773 --1,216,773 -1,216,773 City of Shafter ----39,505 39,505 Kern Council of Governments --528,062 528,062 -528,062 Kern County Waste Management ----1,212,370 1,212,370 Totals $27,446,687 $15,126,152 $528,062 $43,100,901 $1,434,354 $44,535,255 63 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 5 -CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activities for the year ended June 30, 2018, were as follows: Balance Balance June 30, 2017 Adjustments Additions Retirements June 30, 2018 Governmental Activities Capital assets, not being depreciated Land $444,524,880 $-$3,984,950 $-$448,509,830 Construction in progress 101,373,988 1,616,195 27,405,372 25,682,969 104,712,586 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 545,898,868 1,616,195 31,390,322 25,682,969 553,222,416 Capital assets, being depreciated Buildings, structures and improvements 144,292,480 5,651 620,627 -144,918,758 Infrastructure 1,616,548,175 204,359 41,819,003 -1,658,571,537 Rolling equipment 86,217,949 -7,140,140 2,887,888 90,470,201 Furniture and other equipment 21,490,871 311,554 1,850,957 253,018 23,400,364 Total capital assets, being depreciated 1,868,549,475 521,564 51,430,727 3,140,906 1,917,360,860 Less accumulated depreciation for Buildings, structures and improvements (72,236,138)-(3,625,537)-(75,861,675) Infrastructure (953,905,465)-(55,359,771)-(1,009,265,236) Rolling equipment (51,172,574)-(6,310,432)(2,849,393)(54,633,613) Furniture and other equipment (14,996,093)83,602 (835,752)(119,405)(15,628,838) Total accumulated depreciation (1,092,310,270)83,602 (66,131,492)(2,968,798)(1,155,389,362) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 776,239,205 605,166 (14,700,765)172,108 761,971,498 Governmental activities capital assets, net $1,322,138,073 $2,221,361 $16,689,557 $25,855,077 $1,315,193,914 Business-Type Activities Capital assets, not being depreciated Land $23,620,851 $-$-$-$23,620,851 Water rights 31,476,906 ---31,476,906 Construction in progress 6,709,078 -38,825,288 2,098,760 43,435,606 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 61,806,835 -38,825,288 2,098,760 98,533,363 Capital assets, being depreciated Buildings, structures and improvements 324,861,912 -591,745 -325,453,657 Infrastructure 804,126,125 -7,536,632 -811,662,757 Equipment 76,004,803 -2,165,159 328,947 77,841,015 Total capital assets being depreciated 1,204,992,840 -10,293,536 328,947 1,214,957,429 Less accumulated depreciation for Buildings, structures and improvements (113,000,845)-(8,561,869)-(121,562,714) Infrastructure (264,520,632)-(12,563,097)-(277,083,729) Equipment (32,599,241)-(4,096,194)(327,832)(36,367,603) Total accumulated depreciation (410,120,718)-(25,221,160)(327,832)(435,014,046) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 794,872,122 -(14,927,624)1,115 779,943,383 Business-type activities capital assets, net $856,678,957 $-$23,897,664 $2,099,875 $878,476,746 64 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 5 -CAPITAL ASSETS (continued) Depreciation and amortization expense was charged in the following functions in the Statement of Activities: Governmental functions:Depreciation General government $1,379,927 Public safety - Police 390,491 Public safety - Fire 762,285 Public works 61,099,573 Recreation and parks 2,138,073 Development services 361,143 Total $66,131,492 Business-type functions: Wastewater treatment $19,779,890 Refuse collection 74,594 Agricultural water 400,694 Domestic water 4,648,805 General aviation 226,550 Offstreet parking 90,627 Total $25,221,160 NOTE 6 -LAND HELD FOR RESALE The City, as the Redevelopment Successor Agency, has been transferred real property to be held for a limited period that will be used for future development. The inventory for land held for resale is presented at the lower of cost or net realizable value though it is initially recorded at historical costs. Subsequently, the land could be adjusted to net realizable value if and when the City enters into agreements for development or sale of the property for less than its historical cost, when a property is impaired or when property value decreases due to market conditions. Balance at Balance at Redevelopment Successor Agency - Housing June 30, 2017 Additions Deletions June 30, 2018 Land Held for Resale $1,779,201 $-$513,185 $1,266,016 $1,779,201 $-$513,185 $1,266,016 65 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 7 -OTHER LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES Other long-term receivables consist of the following: Governmental Activities Loans receivable in the internal service funds due from the Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency's Southeast Project Area from the Mill Creek South mixed use development project. This loan has an interest rate tied to the LAIF rate (currently at .244% and an eight year payment period per Agreement 06-124).$1,111,189 Deferred loans receivable associated with the low and moderate income housing project. These loans bear 0-3% interest and are not due until ten years after the loan agreement date (also see deferred revenue at Note 9).3,908,892 Mercy Housing, Madison Place Apartments, 55 year term, with 1/55 to be forgiven each year of compliance to agreement.270,420 Amcal Santa Fe Apartments, 55 year term, repayment begins from residual receipts following the date that the housing project is put in service.134,691 Down payment assistance loans.1,966,496 19th Street Senior Plaza, LLC, a 55 year loan term upon recordation of Certificate of Completion.1,688,375 Park 20th Apartments, a 55 year loan term beginning upon recordation of the Certificate of Completion with an interest rate of 3.0%.2,732,783 Chelsea Investment Corp. - Mill Creek Village. 19th Street Senior Housing and Parking Structure. A 55 year loan term beginning upon recordation of the Certificate of Completion with an interest rate of 3.0%.6,506,184 Chelsea Investment Corp. - Mill Creek Village. 19th Street Senior Housing and Parking Structure. A 55 year loan term beginning upon recordation of the Certificate of Completion with an interest rate of 2.0%.4,487,149 CalHOME Downpayment Assistance for a grant from the State which provided downpayment and closing cost assistance to seventeen (17) families within the Metropolitan Bakersfield area. The assistance was provided to those families whose incomes were at or below 120% of area median income. The loans of up to $40,000 are forgiven at 1/15th per year.378,480 Golden Empire Housing, Park Place Apartments, 55 year loan term beginning July 12, 1999, ending on July 12, 2054, with the interest payment being deferred for first ten years, until year 2010, with an interest rate of 1.5%.807,355 Capital Vision Equities, City Center Senior Housing, 35 year loan term beginning on March 28, 2001, ending March 28, 2036, with an interest rate of 5.85%.990,000 Canyon Hills Assembly of God, Senior Housing Project 30 year loan term beginning July 30, 2001 ending July 30, 2031, with an interest rate of 0%.310,000 66 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 7 -OTHER LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES (continued) Mill Creek Courtyard CIC - SEPA - Senior Housing Project. A 55 year loan term beginning from the date of execution by the developer.2,520,000 Face value of loans $27,812,014 Current portion $700,343 Long-term portion 27,111,671 Total governmental activities receivable $27,812,014 Business-Type Activities Notes receivable in the Agricultural Water Fund are for the amounts due from various customers/vendors. These loans are non-interest bearing.$33,450 Long-term receivable under agreement 87-153(5) between the City and Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc. for additional flow and and treatment capacity in Wastewater Treatment Plant #3.476,867 Long-term receivable under agreement 14-042 between the City and a local citizen to purchase surplus land adjacent to their business. Property was held in the Offstreet Parking Fund.36,354 Various long-term receivables in the Domestic Water Fund relate to contracts under which the City has agreed to provide future water services to properties to be developed and the land owners have agreed to pay the receivable amounts upon filing of the tract maps. The amounts due are liens against the respective properties upon execution of the agreements. The revenues related to these contracts are deferred.119,324 Total business-type noncurrent receivables $665,995 67 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 8 -INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS Interfund transactions are comprised of loans, services provided, reimbursements, or transfers. Loans are reported as amounts “due to/due from” other funds or as “advances,” as appropriate, and are subject to elimination upon consolidation. Services provided, deemed to be at market or near market rates, are treated as revenues and expenditures/expenses. Reimbursements occur when one fund incurs a cost, charges the appropriate benefiting fund, and reduces its related cost as a reimbursement. All other interfund transactions are treated as transfers. Transfers between governmental activities and business-type activities are netted as part of the consolidation required to produce the government-wide financial statements. Interfund receivable and payable balances at June 30, 2018 were: Fund Due from Other Funds Due to Other Funds Governmental Funds: Major Funds: General Fund $6,495,939 $- Community Development Block Grant Fund -402,450 Gas Tax & Road Fund -6,081,535 Non-Major Fund: High Speed Rail Fund -11,954 $6,495,939 $6,495,939 These balances are a result of expenditures incurred prior to the receipt of the related special revenue source. Interfund transfers at June 30, 2018 consisted of the following: Transfers In Transfers Out Governmental Funds: Major Funds: General Fund $550,000 $168,377 Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund -6,547,980 Community Development Block Grant Fund -500,324 Capital Outlay Fund 6,580,000 190,000 Non-Major Funds: Traffic Safety Fund -550,000 General Obligation Debt Fund 561,676 - Proprietary Funds: Major Funds: Wastewater Treatment Fund -132,310 Refuse Collection Fund -1,360,615 Agricultural Water Fund -278,614 Domestic Water Fund -261,115 Internal Service Funds: Self-Insurance Fund -152,744 Equipment Management Fund 2,540,403 90,000 $10,232,079 $10,232,079 Additional details regarding transfers in and out of various funds are provided below: The $550,000 transfer in to the General Fund is from the Traffic Safety Fund that subsidized the cost of the traffic division of the police department for parking fine violations. 68 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 8 -INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS (continued) The $168,377 transfer from the General Fund includes a transfer to the Municipal Debt Fund of $45,877 for the repayment of a loan from PG&E for lighting improvement projects downtown as well as $122,500 to the Equipment Fund for equipment purchases related to additional staffing in Recreation and Parks. The $6,547,980 transfers from the Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund include: $6,300,000 transferred to the Capital Outlay Fund to fund a number of capital projects, $15,475 to the General Obligation Debt Fund for the repayment of a loan from PG&E for an energy efficiency retrofit at Rabobank Arena. The $500,324 transfer from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund to the General Obligation Debt Fund is for the repayment of a Section 108 loan. There were additional transfers to the Equipment Management Fund to purchase additional equipment for operations which include; the General Fund ($122,500), the Transient Occupancy Tax Fund ($232,505), the Sewer Fund ($132,310), the Refuse Fund ($1,360,615), the Domestic Water Fund ($261,115), the Agricultural Water Fund ($278,614) and the Self-Insurance Fund ($152,744). NOTE 9 -ADVANCES FROM GRANTORS AND THIRD PARTIES The government-wide Statement of Net Position as well as governmental and enterprise funds defer revenue recognition in connection with resources that have been received as of year-end but not yet earned because under both the accrual and modified accrual basis of accounting revenue may be recognized only when earned. Assets recognized in connection with a transaction before the earnings process is complete are offset by a corresponding liability for advances from grantors and third parties. The following table summarizes Advances from Grantors and third parties for the City at June 30, 2018: Balance at June 30, 2018 Governmental Activities: General Fund Dog License $93,366 Business License 1,898,725 General Fund Total 1,992,091 Non-Major Funds: State Transportation - Grants Advanced 318,423 Redevelopment Successor Agency - Housing 22,791,933 Total Governmental Activities $25,102,447 Business-Type Activities: Wastewater Treatment $476,867 Refuse Collection 130,695 Domestic Water 119,324 Total Business-Type Activities $726,886 69 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 10 -CAPITAL LEASE The City entered into a long-term lease agreement in September 2005 for the acquisition of water rights with the Kern County Water Agency (KCWA). The agreement entitles the City to receive 6,500 acre feet of water per year in exchange for annual payments tied to KCWA’s Water Revenue certificates of participation from 2006 and 2008, which were used for the expansion of its wa ter treatment facility. On March 1, 2016, KCWA issued Water Revenue Refunding Bonds. These new bonds refunded the previous debt that the City's lease payments were based upon. The City’s lease payments coincide with the amortization schedule for the related KCWA debt with the value of the related water rights at $18,315,293. The total lease obligation for the term of this agreement is as follows: Business-Type Activities Year ending Lease Interest Total 2019 $643,995 $703,637 $1,347,632 2020 670,701 679,306 1,350,007 2021 695,722 653,095 1,348,817 2022 678,991 668,624 1,347,615 2023 712,201 636,691 1,348,892 2024-2028 4,112,796 2,634,658 6,747,454 2029-2033 5,166,710 1,580,053 6,746,763 2034-2038 5,634,177 615,369 6,249,546 Totals $18,315,293 $8,171,433 $26,486,726 Balance at June 30, 2017 Additions Principal Retirement Balance at June 30, 2018 Business-Type Activities Capital Leases: Water rights $18,730,478 $-$415,185 $18,315,293 $18,730,478 $-$415,185 $18,315,293 70 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 11 -LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt transactions for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 are summarized below: Business-Type Activities Governmental Activities General Obligations Revenue Obligations Total Total Government Payable at June 30, 2017: Bonds $-$-$174,647,913 $174,647,913 $174,647,913 Certificates of Participation 13,785,000 ---13,785,000 Notes 2,938,462 3,008,504 -3,008,504 5,946,966 Contracts/Loans -319,400 -319,400 319,400 Claims and Judgments Payable 39,275,392 ---39,275,392 Compensated Absences 15,233,907 2,067,899 -2,067,899 17,301,806 Subtotal 71,232,761 5,395,803 174,647,913 180,043,716 251,276,477 New debt incurred: Bonds --23,075,000 23,075,000 23,075,000 Notes 173,910 ---173,910 Contracts/Loans -49,346 -49,346 49,346 Claims and Judgments Payable 8,289,259 ---8,289,259 Compensated Absences 9,647,846 1,146,240 -1,146,240 10,794,086 Subtotal 18,111,015 1,195,586 23,075,000 24,270,586 42,381,601 Principal reductions: Bonds --30,724,701 30,724,701 30,724,701 Certificates of Participation 2,510,000 ---2,510,000 Notes 528,132 752,126 -752,126 1,280,258 Compensated Absences 9,780,428 1,263,402 -1,263,402 11,043,830 Subtotal 12,818,560 2,015,528 30,724,701 32,740,229 45,558,789 Payable at June 30, 2018: Bonds --166,998,212 166,998,212 166,998,212 Certificates of Participation 11,275,000 ---11,275,000 Notes 2,584,240 2,256,378 -2,256,378 4,840,618 Contracts/Loans -368,746 -368,746 368,746 Claims and Judgments Payable 47,564,651 ---47,564,651 Compensated Absences 15,101,325 1,950,737 -1,950,737 17,052,062 Total Payables $76,525,216 $4,575,861 $166,998,212 $171,574,073 $248,099,289 71 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 11 -LONG-TERM DEBT (continued) Business-Type Activities Governmental Activities General Obligations Revenue Obligations Total Total Government Due Within One Year: Bonds $-$-$7,199,701 $7,199,701 $7,199,701 Certificates of Participation 2,640,000 ---2,640,000 Notes 549,649 752,126 -752,126 1,301,775 Total Long-term Debt 3,189,649 752,126 7,199,701 7,951,827 11,141,476 Contracts/Loans -368,746 -368,746 368,746 Claims and Judgments Payable 13,428,651 ---13,428,651 Compensated Absences 2,724,434 488,138 -488,138 3,212,572 Total Due Within One Year $19,342,734 $1,609,010 $7,199,701 $8,808,711 $28,151,445 Due in More Than One Year: Bonds $-$-$159,798,511 $159,798,511 $159,798,511 Certificates of Participation 8,635,000 ---8,635,000 Notes 2,034,591 1,504,252 -1,504,252 3,538,843 Total Long-term Debt 10,669,591 1,504,252 159,798,511 161,302,763 171,972,354 Claims and Judgments Payable 34,136,000 ---34,136,000 Compensated Absences 12,376,891 1,462,599 -1,462,599 13,839,490 Total Due in More Than One Year $57,182,482 $2,966,851 $159,798,511 $162,765,362 $219,947,844 The liability for pension-related debt, OPEB debt, and compensated absences for governmental activities is primarily liquidated by the General Fund with smaller portions charged to other funds in an amount proportional to the personnel costs incurred. The pension related debt and compensated absences for business-type activities will be paid by the respective proprietary funds. Long-term debt payable at June 30, 2018, was comprised of the following individual issues: Bonds General obligation bonds serviced by business-type activities: $145,500,000 Wastewater Revenue Bonds 2015 Series A - the 2007 Series A bonds were refunded in 2015 with a partial call of the outstanding principal amount of $156,750,000 as well as payment of the issuance costs. The proceeds of the original Series 2007A refunded bonds were used to finance a portion of certain capital improvements at the City's wastewater and sewage collection treatment and disposal system; interest rate of 5.00%. (This issue is serviced by the Wastewater Treatment Fund.)$145,500,000 Unamortized Bond Premium on Wastewater Revenue Bonds 21,498,212 Total Bonds $166,998,212 Certificates of Participation: Certificates of participation serviced by Transient Occupancy tax revenue via lease payments from the City to the Redevelopment Successor Agency: $25,335,000 - 2006 Refunding Certificates of Participation Series A assumed by the City as the successor agency of the former redevelopment agency. Certificates are due in annual principal installments of $900,000 to $2,170,000 commencing October 1, 2006 through 2022; interest ranging from 4.00% to 4.25%.$8,190,000 72 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 11 -LONG-TERM DEBT (continued) $9,470,000 - 2006 Refunding Certificates of Participation Series B assumed by the City as the successor agency of the former redevelopment agency. Certificates are due in annual principal installments of $345,000 to $830,000 commencing October 1, 2006 through 2022; interest ranging from 4.00% to 5.00%.3,085,000 Total Certificates of Participation $11,275,000 Notes/Loans: General obligation note serviced by Community Development Block Grant Fund (via the Municipal Debt Service Fund with Community Development Block Grant Entitlement): $4,100,000 Housing & Urban Development (HUD) Section 108 Loan 2003 - Due in annual principal installments of $137,000 to $320,000 commencing August 1, 2004 through August 2022; interest ranging from 1.75% to 4.76%.$1,459,000 General obligation note serviced by Community Development Block Grant Fund (via the Municipal Debt Service Fund with Community Development Block Grant Entitlement): $800,000 HUD Section 108 Loan 2003 - due in annual principal installments of $24,000 to $61,000 commencing August 1, 2005 through August 2023; interest ranging from 1.61% to 4.76%.324,000 General obligation note serviced by Community Development Block Grant Fund (via the Municipal Debt Service Fund with Community Development Block Grant Entitlement}, $1,800,000 HUD Section 108 Loan 009 - due in annual principal installments of $140,000 to $230,000 commencing August 2010 through August 2021; interest ranging from 0.56% to 3.73%.569,000 General obligation loan serviced by General Fund (via the Municipal Debt Service Fund): $237,033 PG&E loan used for an energy efficient lighting upgrade at in the Downtown area of the City. The payments will be made on PG&E bills starting March 2015. This loan contains no interest charges.84,109 General obligation loan serviced by General Fund (via the Municipal Debt Service Fund): $47,636 PG&E loan used for an energy efficient lighting upgrade at Police Headquarters. The payments will be made starting September 13, 2017 in 29 monthly payments of $1,642.62. This loan contains no interest charges.31,210 General obligation loan serviced by General Fund (via the Municipal Debt Service Fund): $126,274 PG&E loan used for an energy efficient lighting upgrade at Rabobank Theater. The payments will be made starting March 12, 2018 in 54 monthly payments of $2,338.40. This loan contains no interest charges. 116,921 General obligation notes serviced by Business-Type Activities: $14,263,555 note payable to California State Water Resources Control Board - Original advances of $14,954,054 payable without interest in twenty annual installments beginning in fiscal year 2004-05 by the Wastewater Treatment Fund.2,256,378 Total general obligation notes/loans payable $4,840,618 73 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 11 -LONG-TERM DEBT (continued) Compensated Absences: Government Activities $15,101,325 Business-Type Activities 1,950,737 Total Compensated Absences $17,052,062 A summary of the City's debt service requirements outstanding at June 30, 2018, is as follows: Total Government Principal: Governmental Activities $76,525,216 Business-Type Activities: General Obligations 4,575,861 Revenue Obligations 166,998,211 Subtotal - Principal 248,099,288 Less: Claims and Judgments Payable included above that bear no interest and have no schedule of repayment terms 47,564,651 Less: Kern River Levee District Payable included above that bears no interest and has no schedule of repayment terms 368,746 Less: Unamortized premium for Wastewater revenue bond 21,498,211 Less: Compensated Absences included above that bear no interest and have no schedule of repayment terms 17,052,062 Total Principal with Scheduled Repayment Terms 161,615,618 Interest on Obligations 65,165,153 Total Debt Service Requirements $226,780,771 74 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 11 -LONG-TERM DEBT (continued) The annual requirement to amortize the principal and interest on long-term debt at June 30, 2018 is as follows: Government-Type Activities Year ending Principal Interest Bonds/COP Notes/Loans Total Bonds Notes/Loans Total 2019 $2,640,000 $549,649 $3,189,649 $496,900 $51,546 $548,446 2020 2,760,000 548,791 3,308,791 374,526 41,791 416,317 2021 2,875,000 514,062 3,389,062 256,625 30,500 287,125 2022 3,000,000 528,062 3,528,062 133,724 17,811 151,535 2023 -443,676 443,676 -7,193 7,193 Totals $11,275,000 $2,584,240 $13,859,240 $1,261,775 $148,841 $1,410,616 Business-Type Activities Year ending Principal Interest Bonds/COP Notes/Loans Total Bonds Notes/Loans Total 2019 $5,525,000 $752,126 $6,277,126 $7,136,875 $150,429 $7,287,304 2020 5,955,000 752,126 6,707,126 6,849,875 150,429 7,000,304 2021 7,245,000 752,126 7,997,126 6,519,875 150,429 6,670,304 2022 7,670,000 -7,670,000 6,147,000 -6,147,000 2023 7,995,000 -7,995,000 5,755,375 -5,755,375 2024-2028 47,025,000 -47,025,000 22,143,125 -22,143,125 2029-2033 61,335,000 -61,335,000 8,682,375 -8,682,375 2034-2038 2,750,000 -2,750,000 68,750 -68,750 Totals $145,500,000 $2,256,378 $147,756,378 $63,303,250 $451,287 $63,754,537 Total Reporting Entity Year Ending Principal Interest Bonds/COP Notes/Loans Total Bonds/COP Notes/Loans Total 2019 $8,165,000 $1,301,775 $9,466,775 $7,633,775 $201,975 $7,835,750 2020 8,715,000 1,300,917 10,015,917 7,224,401 192,220 7,416,621 2021 10,120,000 1,266,188 11,386,188 6,776,500 180,929 6,957,429 2022 10,670,000 528,062 11,198,062 6,280,724 17,811 6,298,535 2023 7,995,000 443,676 8,438,676 5,755,375 7,193 5,762,568 2024-2028 47,025,000 -47,025,000 22,143,125 -22,143,125 2029-2033 61,335,000 -61,335,000 8,682,375 -8,682,375 2034-2038 2,750,000 -2,750,000 68,750 -68,750 Totals $156,775,000 $4,840,618 $161,615,618 $64,565,025 $600,128 $65,165,153 75 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 12 -PLEDGED REVENUES The City has pledged net revenues generated by the Wastewater Enterprise Fund to repay a total of $151.5 million in wastewater revenue bonds series 2007A and 2015A issued to finance a portion of the expansion and improvement of the City's wastewater and sewage collection and disposal system. Each fiscal year, net revenues means all revenues of the enterprise fund received during the fiscal year less operation and maintenance costs for that fiscal year. The pledge of net revenues does not constitute a lien upon any property of the City. Proceeds of the bonds provided financing for expansion and upgrade of Wastewater Treatment Plant #3, and improvements to Wastewater Treatment Plant #2. The bonds are payable through 2018 for 2007A bonds, 2017 and 2034 for 2015A bonds. The covenants of the ordinances authorizing the bonds include, among other things, an obligation of the City to fix, prescribe, revise, and collect rates, fees, and charges for the services and facilities of the system and revise the same whenever necessary, which will provide gross revenues in each fiscal year sufficient to pay the cost of operation and maintenance of the system; one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the bond service requirement becoming due in such fiscal year on the outstanding bonds; plus one hundred percent (100%) of all reserve and other payments required to be made pursuant to the ordinances authorizing the bonds. NOTE 13 -DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Pursuant to GASB Statement No. 63, Financial Reporting of Deferred Outflows of Resources, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position, and GASB Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities, the City recognized deferred inflows of resources in the governmental fund financial statements. These items are an acquisition of net fund balance by the City that is applicable to a future reporting period. Previous financial reporting standards do not include guidance for reporting those financial statement elements, which are distinct from assets and liabilities. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, it is not enough that revenue has been earned if it is to be recognized in the current period. Revenue must also be susceptible to accrual (i.e., measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period). Governmental funds report deferred revenues in connection with receivables for revenues not susceptible to accrual, as deferred inflows of resources. Deferred inflows of resources balances for the year ended June 30, 2018 were as follows: Balance at June 30, 2018 General Fund California Water Receivable $200,245 Code Enforcement Receivable 6,130 State Agencies (SB90)3,042,454 General Fund Total 3,248,829 CDBG - Deferred Loans 18,638,255 Gas Tax & Road Fund 22,031 Capital Outlay Fund 46,606 Non-Major Funds Neighborhood Stabilization 6,798,874 Total Governmental Funds $28,754,595 76 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 14 -FUND BALANCES Fund balances for all major and non-major governmental funds as of June 30, 2018 are as follows (see Note 1 for description of the categories used): General Fund Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Gas Tax & Road Fund Capital Outlay Fund Park Improvement Fund Transportation Development Fund Non-Major Governmental Funds Total Prepaids/Deposits $1,025 $-$-$-$1,212,183 $-$-$-$1,213,208 Subtotal 1,025 ---1,212,183 ---1,213,208 Development services grants --529,095 ----325,888 854,983 Community redevelopment projects -------1,817,384 1,817,384 Police services grants -------1,650,763 1,650,763 Fire services grants -------1,248,803 1,248,803 Assessment district projects --------- Public works grants ---15,187,842 ----15,187,842 Subtotal --529,095 15,187,842 ---5,042,838 20,759,775 Legal & Professional services 66,742 ---80,443 ---147,185 City facility construction & refurbishment projects ----6,040,325 ---6,040,325 Police service contracts 478,595 -------478,595 Fire service contracts ----17,388 ---17,388 Civil Engineering/Land Survey contracts 3,000 -------3,000 Public works improvement contracts ----445,519 -52,357,613 -52,803,132 Park improvement contracts -----5,282,611 --5,282,611 Tourism and promotional contracts -7,078 ------7,078 Community development contracts 2,400 -------2,400 Cash basis reserve 13,104,726 -------13,104,726 Facility replacement reserve ----3,835,573 ---3,835,573 Appropriation for next year's budget 15,850,000 -------15,850,000 Subtotal 29,505,463 7,078 --10,419,248 5,282,611 52,357,613 -97,572,013 77 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 14 -FUND BALANCES (continued) General Fund Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Gas Tax & Road Fund Capital Outlay Fund Park Improvement Fund Transportation Development Fund Non-Major Governmental Funds Total Legal & Professional services 74,188 -------74,188 Police operations 108,855 -------108,855 Fire operations 98,106 -------98,106 Public works - General Services department 49,494 -------49,494 Facility improvements ----5,122,655 ---5,122,655 Highway and road projects ----39,338,037 ---39,338,037 Tourism and promotional contracts 26,033 1,855,577 ------1,881,610 Park development projects 8,163 -------8,163 Community development projects 18,221 -------18,221 Other miscellaneous agreements 11,804 -------11,804 Petty Cash accounts 27,170 -------27,170 Compensated absences 2,492,809 -------2,492,809 Subtotal 2,914,843 1,855,577 --44,460,692 ---49,231,112 7,126,339 -------7,126,339 $39,547,670 $1,862,655 $529,095 $15,187,842 $56,092,123 $5,282,611 $52,357,613 $5,042,838 $175,902,447 NOTE 15 -REIMBURSABLE DEVELOPER COSTS Reimbursable developer costs of $2,024,679 at June 30, 2018 are included in customer deposits in the Domestic Water Fund which represent amounts due to developers for construction of water mainline extensions and certain other water facilities. For mainline extensions transferred to the City after June 30, 1982, the developers are to be reimbursed based on revenues generated from the water sales associated with these mainline extensions. The City is required to reimburse 2.5% of the cost of the extension on a yearly basis with the total amount to be reimbursed within 40 years. 78 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS General The City of Bakersfield provides pension benefits to eligible full-time employees in three separate plans: the Miscellaneous Plan, the Safety Fire Plan, and the Safety Police Plan, all of which are included in the Public Agency portion of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). Miscellaneous Plan Plan Description The City’s Miscellaneous Plan is a defined benefit pension plan that provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of- living adjustments (COLA), and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Miscellaneous Plan is an agent multiple-employer plan administered by CalPERS, which acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public employers within the State of California. A menu of benefit provisions as well as other requirements is established by State statutes within the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. The City selects optional benefit provisions from the benefit menu by contract with CalPERS and adopts those benefits through local ordinance. CalPERS issues a separate comprehensive annual financial report. Copies of the CalPERS' annual financial report may be obtained from their Executive Office - 400 P Street – Sacramento, CA 95814. Benefits Provided The benefits provided through the CalPERS Miscellaneous Plan include retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The City has three tiers through CalPERS under the Miscellaneous employee plan. Tier I is applicable to all employees hired before August 20, 2008 with a formula of 3% at age 60. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation based on 12 months at the highest rate of pay received. Tier II is applicable to employees hired after August 20, 2008 and before January 1, 2013 with a formula of 2.7% at age 55. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation based on 36 months at the highest rate of pay received. Tier III is applicable to employees hired after January 1, 2013 with a formula of 2% at age 62 which is a result of the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA). PEPRA also lowered the final compensation and contribution requirements. Earliest retirement age is 52 with final compensation, subject to the PEPRA limit of $145,666, based on 36 months at the highest rate of pay received. Contributions and Employees Covered Active plan members in the CalPERS Miscellaneous Plan may be required to contribute a particular percent of their annual pay depending on the applicable plan they fall under. Tier I and Tier II employees will pay 8% of their salary while those employees under PEPRA (Tier III) will pay 6.25% of their salary. In addition, employees in Tier I and Tier II have 7.5% of their contribution picked-up by the City after five years of service. Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CalPERS’ annual actuarial valuation process. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. It is the responsibility of the employer to make necessary accounting adjustments to reflect the impact due to any Employer Paid Member Contributions or situations where members are paying a portion of the employer contribution. As of June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), there are 920 active employees and 872 inactive employees or beneficiaries receiving benefits. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the employee contribution rate was 7.678 percent of annual pay, and the employer’s minimum contribution rate was 22.869 percent of annual payroll. Employer contribution rates may change if plan contracts are amended. 79 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Actuarial Methods and Assumptions For the measurement period ended June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), the total pension liability was determined by rolling forward the June 30, 2016 total pension liability. The June 30, 2016 and the June 30, 2017 total pension liabilities were based on the following actuarial methods and assumptions: Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Normal Asset Valuation Method Market Value Assets. For details, see June 30, 2014 Funding Valuation Report Inflation Rate 2.75% Salary Increases Varies by Entry Age and Service Payroll Growth 3.00% Investment Rate of Return 7.50% [a] Mortality [b] [a] Net of Pension Plan Investment and Administrative Expenses; included inflation. [b] Pre-retirement and Post-retirement mortality rates include 20 years of projected mortality improvements using Society of Actuaries Scale BB. For more details on this table, please refer to the 2014 experience study report. All other actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2017 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study dated January 2014 which was derived from data collected for the period from 1997 to 2011, including updates to salary increase, mo rtality and retirement rates. The 2014 Experience Study report can be obtained at CalPERS’ website under Forms and Publications. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.15 percent. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.15 percent discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long-term expected discount rate of 7.15 percent is applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund. The stress test results are presented in a detailed report called “GASB Crossover Testing Report” that can be obtained at CalPERS’ website under the GASB Statement No. 68 section. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, staff took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Such cash flows were developed assuming that both members and employers will make their required contributions on time and as scheduled in all future years. Using historical returns of all the funds’ asset classes, expected compound (geometric) returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long- term (11-60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent. 80 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) The table below reflects long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. The target allocation shown was adopted by the CalPERS' Board effective on July 1, 2015. Asset Class Current Target Allocation Real Return Years 1-10 [a] Real Return Years 11+ [b] Global Equity 47.0%4.90%5.38% Global Fixed Income 19.0%0.80%2.27% Inflation Sensitive 6.0%0.60%1.39% Private Equity 12.0%6.60%6.63% Real Estate 11.0%2.80%5.21% Infrastructure and Forestland 3.0%3.90%5.36% Liquidity 2.0%(0.40%)(0.90%) [a]An expected inflation of 2.5% used for this period. [b]An expected inflation of 3.0% used for this period. Changes in Net Pension Liability The change in the Net Pension Liability recognized over the measurement period is as follows: Increase (Decrease) MISCELLANEOUS PLAN Total Pension Liability [1] Plan Fiduciary Net Position [2] Net Pension Liability/(Asset) [3]=[1] - [2] Balance at June 30, 2016 [a]$506,658,167 $353,671,812 $152,986,355 Changes Recognized for the Measurement Period: -Service Cost 10,121,201 -10,121,201 -Interest on the Total Pension Liability 37,355,571 -37,355,571 -Changes of Benefit Terms --- - Differences between Expected and Actual Experience (8,386,592)-(8,386,592) -Changes of Assumptions 31,112,110 -31,112,110 -Plan to Plan Movement --- - Contributions - Employer -11,107,872 (11,107,872) -Contributions - Employees -4,188,806 (4,188,806) -Net Investment Income -39,138,502 (39,138,502) -Benefit Payments Including Refund of Employee Contributions (23,977,515)(23,977,515)- - Administrative Expenses -(522,173)522,173 Net Changes during 2016-17 46,224,775 29,935,492 16,289,283 Balance at June 30, 2017 [a]$552,882,942 $383,607,304 $169,275,638 [a]The fiduciary net position includes receivables for employee service buybacks, deficiency reserves, fiduciary, self-insurance and OPEB expense. This may be different from the plan assets reported in the funding actuarial valuation report. Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate MISCELLANEOUS PLAN Discount Rate - 1% (6.15%) Current Discount Rate (7.15 %) Discount Rate + 1% (8.15%) Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset)$244,466,989 $169,275,638 $107,191,756 81 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Recognition of Gains and Losses Under GASB Statement No. 68, gains and losses related to changes in total pension liability and fiduciary net position are recognized in pension expense systematically over time. The first amortized amounts are recognized in pension expense for the year the gain or loss occurs. The remaining amounts are categorized as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions and are to be recognized in future pension expense. The amortization period differs depending on the source of the gain or loss. The difference between projected and actual earnings is a five year straight-line amortization. All other amounts are amortized using straight-line amortization over the average expected remaining service lives of all members that are provided with benefits (active, inactive, and retired) as of the beginning of the measurement period. The expected average remaining service lifetime (EARSL) for the plan for the June 30, 2017 measurement date is 3.5 years, which is obtained by dividing the total service years of 9,224 (the sum of remaining lifetimes of active employees) by 2,631 (the total number of participants: active, inactive, and retired). Note that inactive employees and retirees have remaining service lifetimes equal to 0. Also note that total future service is based on the members’ probability of decrementing due to an event other than receiving a cash refund. Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions As of the start of the measurement period (July 1, 2016), the net pension liability/(asset) is $152,986,355. For the measurement period ending June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), the City incurred a pension expense/(income) of $22,224,792 for the plan. Note that no adjustments have been made for contributions subsequent to the measurement date. Adequate treatment of any contributions made after the measurement date is the responsibility of the employer. As of June 30, 2018, the City had deferred outflows of resources related to pensions of $16,345,282 for contributions made subsequent to the measurement date, $22,222,935 for changes of assumptions, and $5,209,586 for the net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments. Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions we re $1,798,233 for changes in assumptions and $7,143,587 for differences between expected and actual experiences. Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in future pension revenue and expense amortized annually as follows: Measurement Periods Ended June 30: Deferred Outflows/ (Inflows) of Resources 2018 $3,790,711 2019 $12,112,063 2020 $5,437,517 2021 $(2,849,590) Remaining $0 82 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Safety Fire Plan Plan Description The City’s Safety Fire Plan is a defined benefit pension plan that provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of- living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Safety Fire Plan is an agent multiple-employer plan administered by CalPERS, which acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public employers within the State of California. A menu of benefit provisions as well as other requirements is established by State statutes within the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. The City selects optional benefit provisions from the benefit menu by contract with CalPERS and adopts those benefits through local ordinance. CalPERS issues a separate comprehensive annual financial report. Copies of the CalPERS' annual financial report may be obtained from their Executive Office - 400 P Street – Sacramento, CA 95814. Benefits Provided The benefits provided through the CalPERS Safety Fire Plan include retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The City has three tiers through CalPERS under the Safety Fire employee plan. Tier I is applicable to all employees hired before January 1, 2011 with a formula of 3% at age 50. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation based on 12 mo nths at the highest rate of pay received. Tier II is applicable to employees hired after January 1, 2011 and before January 1, 2013 with a formula of 2.0% at age 50. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation based on 36 months at the highest rate of pay received. Tier III is applicable to employees hired after January 1, 2013 with a formula of 2% at age 57 which is a result of PEPRA. PEPRA also lowered the final compensation and contribution requirements. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation, subject to the PEPRA limit of $145,666, based on 36 months at the highest rate of pay received. Contributions and Employees Covered Active plan members in the CalPERS Safety Fire Plan may be required to contribute a particular percent of their annual pay depending on the applicable plan they fall under. Tier I and Tier II employees will pay 9% of their salary while those employees under PEPRA (Tier III) will pay 11.25% of their salary. In addition, employees in Tier I have 8% of their contribution picked-up by the City after five years of service. Section 20814(c) of the California PERL requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CalPERS’ annual actuarial valuation process. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. It is the responsibility of the employer to make necessary accounting adjustments to reflect the impact due to any Employer Paid Member Contributions or situations where members are paying a portion of the employer contribution. As of June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), there are 171 active employees and 216 inactive employees or beneficiaries receiving benefits. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the employee contribution rate was 9.161 percent of annual pay, and the employer’s minimum contribution rate was 37.221 percent of annual payroll. Employer contribution rates may change if plan contracts are amended. 83 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Actuarial Methods and Assumptions For the measurement period ended June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), the total pension liability was determined by rolling forward the June 30, 2016 total pension liability. The June 30, 2016 and the June 30, 2017 total pension liabilities were based on the following actuarial methods and assumptions: Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Normal Asset Valuation Method Market Value of Assets. For details, see June 30, 2014 Funding Valuation Report. Inflation Rate 2.75% Salary Increases Varies by Entry Age and Service Payroll Growth 3.00% Investment Rate of Return 7.50%[a] Mortality [b] [a] Net of Pension Plan Investment and Administrative Expenses; includes inflation. [b]Pre-retirement and Post-retirement mortality rates include 20 years of projected mortality improvements using Society of Actuaries Scale BB. For more details on this table, please refer to the 2014 experience study report. All other actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2017 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study dated January 2014 which was derived from data collected for the period from 1997 to 2011, including updates to salary increase, mo rtality and retirement rates. The 2014 Experience Study report can be obtained at CalPERS’ website under Forms and Publications. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.15 percent. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.15 percent discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long-term expected discount rate of 7.15 percent is applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund. The stress test results are presented in a detailed report called “GASB Crossover Testing Report” that can be obtained at CalPERS’ website under the GASB Statement No. 68 section. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, staff took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Such cash flows were developed assuming that both members and employers will make their required contributions on time and as scheduled in all future years. Using historical returns of all the funds’ asset classes, expected compound (geometric) returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long- term (11-60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent. 84 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) The table below reflects long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. The target allocation shown was adopted by the CalPERS Board effective on July 1, 2015. Asset Class Current Target Allocation Real Return Years 1-10 [a] Real Return Years 11+ [b] Global Equity 47.0%4.90%5.38% Global Fixed Income 19.0%0.80%2.27% Inflation Sensitive 6.0%0.60%1.39% Private Equity 12.0%6.60%6.63% Real Estate 11.0%2.80%5.21% Infrastructure & Forestland 3.0%3.90%5.36% Liquidity 2.0%(0.40%)(0.90%) [a]An expected inflation of 2.5% used for this period. [b]An expected inflation of 3.0% used for this period. Changes in Net Pension Liability The change in the Net Pension Liability recognized over the measurement period is as follows: Increase (Decrease) SAFETY FIRE PLAN Total Pension Liability [1] Plan Fiduciary Net Position [2] Net Pension Liability/(Asset) [3]=[1] - [2] Balance at June 30, 2016 [a]$261,361,174 $186,380,856 $74,980,318 Changes Recognized for the Measurement Period: -Service Cost 4,691,377 -4,691,377 -Interest on the Total Pension Liability 19,273,519 -19,273,519 -Changes of Benefit Terms --- - Differences between Expected and Actual Experience (3,292,736)-(3,292,736) -Changes of Assumptions 16,102,827 -16,102,827 -Plan to Plan Resource Movement --- - Contributions - Employer -5,766,115 (5,766,115) -Contributions - Employees -1,585,475 (1,585,475) -Net Investment Income -20,512,737 (20,512,737) -Benefit Payments Including Refund of Employee Contributions (13,914,493)(13,914,493)- - Administrative Expenses -(275,179)275,179 Net Changes during 2016-17 22,860,494 13,674,655 9,185,839 Balance at June 30, 2017 [a]$284,221,668 $200,055,511 $84,166,157 [a]The fiduciary net position includes receivables for employee service buybacks, deficiency reserves, fiduciary, self-insurance and OPEB expense. This may be different from the plan assets reported in the funding actuarial valuation report. 85 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate SAFETY FIRE PLAN Discount Rate - 1% (6.15%) Current Discount Rate (7.15%) Discount Rate + 1% (8.15%) Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset)$123,020,148 $84,166,157 $52,311,780 Recognition of Gains and Losses Under GASB Statement No. 68, gains and losses related to changes in total pension liability and fiduciary net position are recognized in pension expense systematically over time. The first amortized amounts are recognized in pension expense for the year the gain or loss occurs. The remaining amounts are categorized as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions and are to be recognized in future pension expense. The amortization period differs depending on the source of the gain or loss. The difference between projected and actual earnings is a five year straight-line amortization. All other amounts are amortized using straight-line amortization over the average expected remaining service lives of all members that are provided with benefits (active, inactive, and retired) as of the beginning of the measurement period. The expected average remaining service lifetime (EARSL) for the plan for the June 30, 2017 measurement date is 5.4 years, which is obtained by dividing the total service years of 2,307 (the sum of remaining lifetimes of active employees) by 424 (the total number of participants: active, inactive, and retired). Note that inactive employees and retirees have remaining service lifetimes equal to 0. Also note that total future service is based on the members’ probability of decrementing due to an event other than receiving a cash refund. Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions As of the start of the measurement period (July 1, 2016), the net pension liability/(asset) is $74,980,318. For the measurement period ending June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), the City incurred a pension expense/(income) of $11,127,453 for the plan. Note that no adjustments have been made for contributions subsequent to the measurement date. Adequate treatment of any contributions made after the measurement date is the responsibility of the employer. As of June 30, 2018, the City had deferred outflows of resources related to pensions of $7,504,238 for contributions made subsequent to the measurement date, $13,120,822 for changes of assumptions, $577,065 for the differences between expected and actual experiences and $2,892,687 for the net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments. Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions were $1,964,144 for changes in assumptions and $2,842,034 for differences between expected and actual experiences. Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in future pension revenue and expense amortized annually as follows: Measurement Periods Ended June 30: Deferred Outflows/ (Inflows) of Resources 2018 $1,547,524 2019 $4,897,225 2020 $3,384,637 2021 $1,006,114 2022 $948,896 Remaining $0 86 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Safety Police Plan Plan Description The City’s Safety Police Plan, is a defined benefit pension plan that provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of- living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Safety Police Plan is an agent multiple-employer plan administered by CalPERS, which acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public employers within the State of California. A menu of benefit provisions as well as other requirements is established by State statutes within the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. The City selects optional benefit provisions from the benefit menu by contract with CalPERS and adopts those benefits through local ordinance. CalPERS issues a separate comprehensive annual financial report. Copies of the CalPERS' annual financial report may be obtained from their Executive Office - 400 P Street – Sacramento, CA 95814. Benefits Provided The benefits provided through the CalPERS Safety Police Plan include retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The City has three tiers through CalPERS under the Safety Police employee plan. Tier I is applicable to all employees hired before January 1, 2011 with a formula of 3% at age 50. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation based on 12 months at the highest rate of pay received. Tier II is applicable to employees hired after January 1, 2011 and before January 1, 2013 with a formula of 2.0% at age 50. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation based on 36 months at the highest rate of pay received. Tier III is applicable to employees hired after January 1, 2013 with a formula of 2% at age 57 which is a result of the PEPRA. PEPRA also lowered the final compensation and contribution requirements. Earliest retirement age is 50 with final compensation, subject to the PEPRA limit of $145,666, based on 36 months at the highest rate of pay received. Contributions and Employees Covered Active plan members in the CalPERS Safety Police Plan may be required to contribute a particular percent of their annual pay depending on the applicable plan they fall under. Tier I and Tier II employees will pay 9% of their salary while those employees under PEPRA (Tier III) will pay 12.75% of their salary. In addition, employees in Tier I have 8% their contribution picked-up by the City after five years of service. Section 20814(c) of the California PERL requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CalPERS’ annual actuarial valuation process. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. As of June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), there are 370 active employees and 423 inactive employees or beneficiaries receiving benefits. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the employee contribution rate was 9.565 percent of annual pay, and the employer’s minimum contribution rate was 42.176 percent of annual payroll. Employer contribution rates may change if plan contracts are amended. 87 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Actuarial Methods and Assumptions For the measurement period ended June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), the total pension liability was determined by rolling forward the June 30, 2016 total pension liability. The June 30, 2016 and the June 30, 2017 total pension liabilities were based on the following actuarial methods and assumptions: Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Normal Asset Valuation Method Market Value Assets. For details, see June 30, 2014 Funding Valuation Report. Inflation Rate 2.75% Salary Increases Varies by Entry Age and Service Payroll Growth 3.00% Investment Rate of Return 7.50%[a] Mortality [b] [a] Net of Pension Plan Investment and Administrative Expenses; includes inflation. [b] Pre-retirement and Post-retirement mortality rates include 20 years of projected mortality improvements using Society of Actuaries Scale BB. For more details on this table, please refer to the 2014 experience study report. All other actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2017 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study dated January 2014 which was derived from data collected for the period from 1997 to 2011, including updates to salary increase, mo rtality and retirement rates. The 2014 Experience Study report can be obtained at CalPERS’ website under Forms and Publications. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.15 percent. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.15 percent discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long-term expected discount rate of 7.15 percent is applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund. The stress test results are presented in a detailed report called “GASB Crossover Testing Report” that can be obtained at CalPERS’ website under the GASB Statement No. 68 section. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, staff took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Such cash flows were developed assuming that both members and employers will make their required contributions on time and as scheduled in all future years. Using historical returns of all the funds’ asset classes, expected compound (geometric) returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long- term (11-60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent. 88 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) The table below reflects long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. The target allocation shown was adopted by the CalPERS Board effective on July 1, 2016. Asset Class New Strategic Allocation Real Return Years 1-10 [a] Real Return Years 11+ [b] Global Equity 47.0%4.9%5.38% Global Fixed Income 19.0%0.80%2.27% Inflation Sensitive 6.0%0.60%1.39% Private Equity 12.0%6.60%6.63% Real Estate 11.0%2.80%5.21% Infrastructure & Forestland 3.0%3.90%5.36% Liquidity 2.0%(0.40%)(0.90%) [a] An expected inflation of 2.5% used for this period. [b] An expected inflation of 3.0% used for this period. Changes in Net Pension Liability The change in the Net Pension Liability recognized over the measurement period is as follows: Increase (Decrease) SAFETY POLICE PLAN Total Pension Liability [1] Plan Fiduciary Net Position [2] Net Pension Liability/(Asset) [3]=[1] - [2] Balance at June 30, 2016 [a]$437,981,244 $274,471,222 $163,510,022 Changes Recognized for the Measurement Period: - Service Cost 10,633,847 -10,633,847 - Interest on the Total Pension Liability 32,733,299 -32,733,299 - Changes of Benefit Terms --- - Differences between Expected and Actual Experience (3,619,242)-(3,619,242) - Changes in Assumptions 29,167,825 -29,167,825 - Plan to Plan Resource Movement --- - Contributions - Employer -14,646,334 (14,646,334) - Contributions -Employees -3,426,099 (3,426,099) - Net Investment Income -30,690,940 (30,690,940) - Benefit Payments Including Refunds of Employee Contributions (22,076,716)(22,076,716)- - Administrative Expenses -(405,238)405,238 Net Changes during 2016-17 46,839,013 26,281,419 20,557,594 Balance at June 30, 2017 [a]$484,820,257 $300,752,641 $184,067,616 [a] The fiduciary net position includes receivables for employee service buybacks, deficiency reserves, fiduciary self-insurance and OPEB expense. This may be different from the plan assets reported in the funding actuarial valuation report. 89 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate SAFETY POLICE PLAN Discount Rate - 1% (6.15%) Current Discount Rate (7.15 %) Discount Rate + 1% (8.15%) Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset)$255,773,253 $ 184,067,616 $126,031,637 Recognition of Gains and Losses Under GASB Statement No. 68, gains and losses related to changes in total pension liability and fiduciary net position are recognized in pension expense systematically over time. The first amortized amounts are recognized in pension expense for the year the gain or loss occurs. The remaining amounts are categorized as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions and are to be recognized in future pension expense. The amortization period differs depending on the source of the gain or loss. The difference between projected and actual earnings is a five year straight-line amortization. All other amounts are amortized using straight-line amortization over the average expected remaining service lives of all members that are provided with benefits (active, inactive, and retired) as of the beginning of the measurement period. The expected average remaining service lifetime (EARSL) for the plan for the June 30, 2017 measurement date is 5.6 years, which is obtained by dividing the total service years of 5,005 (the sum of remaining lifetimes of active employees) by 891 (the total number of participants: active, inactive, and retired). Note that inactive employees and retirees have remaining service lifetimes equal to 0. Also note that total future service is based on the members’ probability of decrementing due to an event other than receiving a cash refund. Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions As of the start of the measurement period (July 1, 2016), the net pension liability/(asset) is $163,510,022. For the measurement period ending June 30, 2017 (the measurement date), the City incurred a pension expense/(income) of $24,723,191 for the plan. Note that no adjustments have been made for contributions subsequent to the measurement date. Adequate treatment of any contributions made after the measurement date is the responsibility of the employer. As of June 30, 2018, the City had deferred outflows of resources related to pensions of $16,917,316 for contributions made subsequent to the measurement date, $23,959,284 for changes of assumptions, $3,073,481 for differences between expected and actual experiences and $3,849,691 for the net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments. Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions were $3,367,966 for changes in assumptions and $2,972,950 for differences between expected and actual experiences. 90 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 16 -EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued) Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in future pension revenue and expense amortized annually as follows: Measurement Periods Ended June 30: Deferred Outflows/ (Inflows) of Resources 2018 $3,799,017 2019 $8,523,068 2020 $6,499,872 2021 $2,982,235 2022 $2,737,348 Remaining $0 CITYWIDE PENSION PLAN TOTALS Miscellaneous Plan Safety Fire Plan Safety Police Plan Citywide Total Net Pension Liability $169,275,638 $84,166,157 $184,067,616 $437,509,411 Deferred Outflows of Resources Contributions Made Subsequent to Measurement Date 16,345,282 7,504,238 16,917,316 40,766,836 Differences Between Expected and Actual Experiences -577,065 3,073,481 3,650,546 Differences Between Projected and Actual Earnings 5,209,586 2,892,687 3,849,691 11,951,964 Changes of Assumptions 22,222,935 13,120,822 23,959,284 59,303,041 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources $43,777,803 $24,094,812 $47,799,772 $115,672,387 Deferred Inflows of Resources Differences Between Expected and Actual Experience 7,143,587 2,842,034 -9,985,621 Differences Between Projected and Actual Earnings --2,972,950 2,972,950 Changes of Assumptions 1,798,233 1,964,144 3,367,966 7,130,343 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources $8,941,820 $4,806,178 $6,340,916 $20,088,914 91 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 17 -OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) Single Employer OPEB Plan description: In addition to the employee retirement benefits described in Note 16, the City provides a single-employer Post-Employment Retiree Medical Benefit Plan in accordance with a resolution approved by City Council. Two primary plans exist. All employees with a retirement date prior to January 1, 1985 were eligible for benefits upon retirement. Post-1985 employees must retire with fifteen years accumulated service upon retirement to participate. The service requirement is waived for safety employees who retire with a job-related disability. Employees hired after the dates listed below will not participate in either of the retiree health subsidy programs mentioned: Miscellaneous Employees February 22, 2006 Management and Supervisory March 22, 2006 Fire Safety May 5, 2006 Police Safety May 24, 2006 Benefits provided: For employees hired prior to the dates listed above, the City provides lifetime postretirement medical benefits for eligible retirees and qualified dependents with a choice of three medical options: Blue Shield PPO, Kaiser High Deductible Health Plan, and Kaiser Permanente HMO. Mental Health benefits are carved out and provided through Optum Behavioral Health. After reaching eligibility for Medicare, retirees are offered a choice of Blue Shield PPO, Blue Shield Medicare Advantage HMO or Kaiser Senior Advantage HMO. Retirees may also elect dental coverage but must self-pay the premiums for such coverage. Vision coverage is not offered to retirees. Retiree rates are unblended from employee rates. Employees covered by benefit terms: At June 30, 2018 the following employees were covered by the benefit terms: Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefit payments 754 Active employees 594 1,348 Contributions. The City contributes 3% of the lowest single-party rate per year of service to a maximum of 90%. If the dollar amount is greater than the premium for a retiree covered under one of the Medicare Advantage plans, the retiree receives a cash reimbursement of the difference to a maximum of $42.50 per month. The City also contributes 42% of the Blue Shield PPO for all retirees who elect the Blue Shield PPO plan, excluding Miscellaneous employees hired after April 1, 1996 and Safety employees hired after April 1, 1998. The City has approximately 594 active employees who are eligible for the same level of post-employment benefits and 754 retirees (and/or dependents) currently receiving benefits as of the actuarial dated June 30, 2018. There is not a separate, audited GAAP-basis pension report available for the Post-Employment Retiree Medical Benefit Plan. 92 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 17 -OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) (continued) Net OPEB Liability The City's net OPEB liability was measured as of June 30, 2017, and the total OPEB liability used to calculate the net OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. Actuarial assumptions. The total OPEB liability in the June 30, 2017 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise specified: Inflation N/A Salary increases Ranges from 11.55% to 3.75% based on years of service, including inflation Investment rate of return 5.00%, net of OPEB Plan investment expense, including inflation Other Assumptions Same as those used in June 30, 2017 actuarial valuation Healthcare cost trend rates City "Years of Service" Formula: 7.00% graded to 4.50% over 10 years; Special 42% Contribution Non- Medicare: 7.00% graded to 4.50% over 10 years; Special 42% Contribution Medicare: 6.50% graded to 7.50% over 8 years The long-term expected rate of return on OPEB plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of OPEB plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage, and by adding expected inflation and subtracting expected investment expenses and a risk margin. The target allocation and projected arithmetic real rates of return, after deducting inflation, but before deducting investment expenses, used in the derivation of the long-term expected rate of return assumption are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Target Allocation Long-Term (Arithmetic) Expected Real Rate of Return Domestic Equity 22.00%6.40% Developed International Equity 5.38 7.40 Emerging Markets Equity 2.02 9.80 Core Fixed Income 65.96 1.75 Real Estate 1.36 5.10 Short Term Money Market 3.45 1.10 Total 100 93 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 17 -OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) (continued) Net OPEB Liability (continued) Discount rate. The discount rate used to measure the total OPEB liability was 5.00% as of June 30, 2017 and 5.00% as of June 30, 2016. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that plan member contributions will be made at the current contribution rate and that City contributions will be made at the rates equal to the actuarially determined contribution rates. For this purpose, only City contributions that are intended to fund benefits of current plan members and their beneficiaries are included. Projected City contributions that are intended to fund the service costs of future plan members and their beneficiaries, as well as projected contributions from future plan members, are not included. Based on those assumptions, the OPEB plan's assets wa s projected to be sufficient to make all projected OPEB payments for current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on OPEB plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total OPEB liability as of both June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016. Changes in the Net OPEB Increase (Decrease) Total OPEB Liability Plan Fiduciary Net Position Net OPEB Liability (a)(b)(a) - (b) Beginning balances $146,958,802 $58,775,465 $88,183,337 Changes for the year:: Service cost 2,149,804 -2,149,804 Interest 7,329,180 -7,329,180 Differences between expected and actual experience (6,042,345)-(6,042,345) Changes of assumptions and methods (5,330,662)-(5,330,662) Employer contributions -5,050,000 (5,050,000) Net investment income -3,011,528 (3,011,528) Benefit payments (5,050,000)(5,050,000)- Administrative expense -(180,556)180,556 Net changes (6,944,023)2,830,972 (9,774,995) Ending balance $140,014,779 $61,606,437 $78,408,342 Sensitivity of the net OPEB liability to changes in the discount rate. The following presents the net OPEB liability of the City as of June 30, 2017, calculated using the discount rate of 5.00%, as well as what the City's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower (4.0 percent) or 1-percentage point higher (6.0 percent) than the current discount rate: 1% Decrease (4.0%) Discount Rate (5.0%) 1% Increase (6.0%) Net OPEB liability (asset) as of June 30, 2017 $101,607,924 $78,408,343 $59,906,105 Sensitivity of the net OPEB liability to changes in the healthcare cost trend rates. The following presents the net OPEB liability of the City as of June 30, 2017, calculated using the current healthcare cost trend rates as well as what the City's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1-percentage-point lower or 1-percentage-point higher than the current healthcare cost trend rates: 1% Decrease* Healthcare Cost Trend Rates*1% Increase* Net OPEB liability (asset) as of June 30, 2017 $59,226,573 $78,408,343 $102,519,787 94 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 17 -OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) (continued) Changes in the Net OPEB (continued) *Current trend rates: 7.00% graded to 4.50% over 10 year for City "Years of Service" Formula subsidy, 7.00% graded to 4.50% over 10 years for Special 42% Contribution Non-Medicare subsidy, and 6.50% graded to 4.50% over 8 years for Special 42% Contribution Medicare subsidy. OPEB plan fiduciary net position. Detailed information about the OPEB plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued actuarial report. OPEB Expense and Deferred of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB For the year ended June 30, 2018, the City recognized OPEB expense of $4,305,386. At June 30, 2018, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Governmental activities Business-type activities Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Changes of assumptions $-$3,715,770 $-$487,902 Net difference between projected and actual earnings on OPEB plan investments -4,266,494 -560,215 City contributions subsequent to the measurement date 6,413,948 -1,113,500 - Total $6,413,948 $7,982,264 $1,113,500 $1,048,117 The amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB are recognized in OPEB expenses as follows: Fiscal Year ended: Governmental activities Amount Business-type activities Amount 2019 $(2,139,028)$(280,867) 2020 (2,139,028)(280,867) 2021 (2,139,028)(280,867) 2022 (1,565,179)(205,517) Thereafter $-$- 95 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 18 -SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS In addition to the Long-Term Obligations discussed in Note 11, the following Long-Term Obligations have been issued in the name of Special Assessment Districts or Agencies of the City. Neither the City, nor its Agencies, are obligated in any manner for the repayment of these obligations. The City acts as an agent to property owners for the collection and repayment of Special Assessment Debt. Outstanding at June 30, 2018 Assessment District 98-1*(Brimhall IV/Stockdale Commercial/Gosford Industrial)$570,000 Assessment District 99-1*(Polo Greens/River Oaks)350,000 Assessment District 99-2*(Seven Oaks West)645,000 Assessment District 01-1*(Ming at Allen/Mountain Vista; Hampton Place)535,000 Assessment District 01-2*(Seven Oaks West II/Riverwalk/Southern Oaks)1,990,000 Assessment District 01-3*(Mountain Vista/San Lauren)1,430,000 Assessment District 02-1*(Avalon/Belsera/Montara/The Woods)560,000 Assessment District 03-1*(Brighton Place/Silver Creek II)1,095,000 Assessment District 03-2*(Buena Vista Ranch/Belsera II/Monstera II/Olive Park II)955,000 Assessment District 03-3*(Seven Oaks West III/Brighton Place)2,445,000 Assessment District 04-1**(Countryside/The Homestead)1,555,000 Assessment District 04-2**(BL/BV/ST@Allen Com)1,905,000 Assessment District 04-3**(Solera/Rio Vista)1,390,000 Assessment District 05-1 (City in the Hills)7,485,000 Assessment District 05-3**(Liberty II/Village Green/Tesoro/Encanto)3,460,000 Assessment District 06-1**(Etcheverry/Lin II/University Park)2,840,000 Assessment District 07-2 (Sydney Harbour)1,350,000 $30,560,000 *Note: These ten districts were refinanced into a consolidated district (12-01) with the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA). The City continues to account for the underlying obligation of each district to properly monitor the individual principal balances and various maturity dates. **Note: These five districts were refinanced into a consolidated district (15-01). The City continues to account for the underlying obligation of each district to properly monitor the individual principal balances and various maturity dates. 96 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 19 -RISK MANAGEMENT Self-Insurance The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City established a Self-Insurance Fund (an internal service fund) to account for and finance its uninsured risks of loss. Under this program, the Self-Insurance Fund provides coverage for up to $500,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and $1,000,000 for each liability claim. The City participates in a joint powers authority for workers’ compensation claims in excess of coverage provided by the fund up to statutory limits and participates in a joint powers authority for any excess liability claims. All funds of the City participate in the program and are charged for their share of claim expenditures. The claims liability of $47,564,651 at June 30, 2018 is based on the requirements of GASB Statement No. 10, which requires that a liability for claims be reported if information prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. An estimate of incurred but not reported claims has been included in the liability based on the various percentages of loss reserves. Changes in the fund's claims liability over the last three fiscal years is shown below: Liability at Beginning of Year Current Year Claims and Changes in Estimates Claims Payments Liability at End of Year 2015-2016 $34,679,231 $15,022,472 $10,210,169 $39,491,534 2016-2017 39,491,534 15,750,392 10,617,534 44,624,392 2017-2018 44,624,392 14,674,483 11,734,224 47,564,651 Joint Powers Authority The City has obtained excess liability coverage through the Authority for California Cities Excess Liability (ACCEL), a joint powers authority of medium-size California municipalities. ACCEL pools catastrophic general liability, automobile liability and public officials' errors and omissions losses, or purchases excess insurance, depending on market conditions. Each member's share of pooled costs will depend on the catastrophic losses of all the members. In addition, the cost to a member city will also depend on that member's own loss experience. Entities with a consistent record of costly claims will pay more than entities with a consistent record of less serious claims activity. In order to provide funds to pay claims, or purchase excess insurance, ACCEL collects a deposit from each member. The deposits will be credited with investment income at the rate earned on ACCEL's investments. Based on information received from ACCEL as of June 30, 2018, the City had $543,415 on deposit with ACCEL out of a total of approximately $6,723,862. The following municipalities are also members of ACCEL: Palo Alto, Santa Barbara, Visalia, Modesto, Ontario, Santa Monica, Anaheim, Santa Cruz, Mountain View, Burbank, Monterey, and Gardena. A representative from each member city, appointed to the position by their respective city councils, serves on the Board of Directors (Board) of ACCEL. The Board is responsible for deciding the risks ACCEL will underwrite, monitoring the costs of large claims and arranging financial programs. Each member of the Board has an equal vote in matters concerning ACCEL. As of June 30, 2018, ACCEL had no long-term debt. Included in total liabilities is an estimated retrospectively rated refund of $17,816,017. Complete financial statements of ACCEL can be obtained at the City’s Finance Department at 1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301. 97 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 19 -RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) A summary of the financial information for ACCEL at June 30, 2018 is as follows: Total assets $50,376,318 Total liabilities 46,085,770 Total members' net position $4,290,548 Total revenues $15,347,092 Total expenses 12,348,328 Net change in members' net position $2,998,764 NOTE 20 -COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Several claims and suits have been filed against the City in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management and the City Attorney, the potential liability of the City for such claims will not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the City. Also, the City has certain commitments under long-term construction projects which will be funded out of future revenues. The entire capacity of the former sanitary landfill has been used. The State has required environmental closure and capping of the City's former sanitary landfill and remediation of the adjacent burn dump. Although these two waste disposal areas are adjacent to each other, the City completed the remediation of the burn dump separately, through the State's Expedited Remedial Action Program, in 1998. The cost of remediation for the burn dump of $1.8 million was funded by the City's Refuse Service Fund and was expensed in prior fiscal years. The landfill closure was completed in May 2013 at a cost of $4.8 million. The City’s net share of this joint City/County project was approximately $3 million. Kern County reimbursed the City for the remaining $1.8 million. The City will be required to perform post-closure monitoring and maintenance of the landfill after it is closed and capped. This will result in an ongoing annual cost of approximately $150,000. The City will be responsible for about $125,000 of these annual charges because mo st of these costs will be for the landfill gas management system, which is the City's responsibility. Kern County will be responsible for reimbursing the City for the remainder. City management anticipates all closure and post- closure costs being covered by annual Refuse Service Fund revenues. These estimates of cost are subject to future adjustment for inflation or deflation, technology, or applicable laws or regulations. 98 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 21 -ENCUMBRANCES Under encumbrance accounting, purchase orders, contracts and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded as encumbrances in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation. Encumbrances outstanding as of June 30, 2018 consisted of the following: Governmental Funds: Major Funds: General Fund $945,602 Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund 7,078 Community Development Block Grant Fund 757,372 Gas Tax & Road Fund 47,799,752 Capital Outlay Fund 7,055,562 Park Improvement Fund 2,692,001 Transportation Development Fund 9,535,095 Non-Major Funds: High Speed Rail Fund - State (TDA) Transportation Fund 464,560 State Safety Fund 226,284 Proprietary Funds: Major Funds: Wastewater Treatment Fund 5,332,263 Refuse Collection Fund 8,441 Agriculture Water Fund 332,103 Domestic Water Fund 17,234,376 General Aviation Fund 11,136 Offstreet Parking Fund 6,730 Internal Service Funds: Self-Insurance Fund 465,474 Equipment Management Fund 6,171,089 Fiduciary Funds: Private Purpose Trust Funds: Redevelopment Successor Agency Fund - $99,044,917 99 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 22 -CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATIONS The City has been associated with the issuance of various health care, residential care, mortgage, commercial and industrial development debt issues. These debt obligations were issued under provisions of State and Federal laws that explicitly state that they do not constitute any indebtedness of the City. The City’s sole involvement with these bonds was their issuance under the City’s name or the City Council’s authorization. As such, the following conduit debt obligations are not reflected in the accompanying basic financial statements: Authorized and Issued Current Outstanding at June 30, 2018 City of Bakersfield - Cottonwood Village Housing Bond, Series 2004 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 City of Bakersfield - Cottonwood Court Housing Bond, Series 2004 1,950,000 1,950,000 City of Bakersfield - St. John Manor Housing Bond, Series 2006 3,867,794 2,773,002 City of Bakersfield - Coventry Apartments Housing Bond, Series 2007M 5,300,000 3,512,215 City of Bakersfield - Catholic Healthcare West 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Bond, Series A thru L 676,250,000 240,000,000 City of Bakersfield - Descanso Place Housing Bond, Series TT 13,000,000 1,400,000 City of Bakersfield - Bakersfield Family Apartments Housing Bond, Series 2008R 10,971,000 1,097,152 City of Bakersfield - Camellia Place Housing Bond, Series 2009R 619,138 619,118 City of Bakersfield - Eucalyptus Village I Housing Bond, Series 2012-E1 1,295,000 1,295,000 City of Bakersfield - Eucalyptus Village II Housing Bond, Series 2012-E2 4,275,000 4,275,000 City of Bakersfield - American Baptist Homes of The West 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Bond, Series 2015 52,080,000 52,080,000 TOTAL $314,001,487 100 Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 23 - PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENTS During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the City made the following prior period adjustments to restate the net position for governmental activities and related fund balance for: 1) Net Position for Governmental Activities was adjusted after review of capital assets by City departments, 2) Net Position for Governmental and Business-Type Activities were adjusted to reflect the prior period costs related to the implementation of GASB Statement No. 75 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, 3) Correction of Fund Balance in Transient Occupancy Fund for expenses incurred by the prior arena management company that were not recorded and carried over from previous years, and 4) Correction of fund balance in Transportation Development Fund to adjust prior year expenses that were determined to be allowable using federal funding. See corresponding changes in statements on p. 22, p.30, and p. 36. Net Position Accounts Activity July 1, 2017 as previously reported Adjustment July 1, 2017, as restated Net Position - Governmental Activities $1,217,257,293$(74,056,696)$1,143,200,597 Net Position - Business-Type Activities Wastewater Treatment Fund$522,430,967$(2,316,043)$520,114,924 Refuse Collection Fund$5,724,307$(6,253,316)$(529,009) Agricultural Water Fund $22,866,640$(1,447,527)$21,419,113 Domestic Water Fund $211,735,081$(289,505)$211,445,576 Equipment Fund $57,676,887$(2,779,252)$54,897,635 Self-Insurance Fund $(15,738,378)$(173,703)$(15,912,081) Fund Balance Accounts July 1, 2017 as previously reported Adjustment July 1, 2017, as restated Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund $2,336,386$(423,097)$1,913,289 Transportation Development Fund $47,450,417$1,181,396$48,631,813 NOTE 24 -EXTRAORDINARY ITEM Litigation Settlement In December 2017, monetary damages in the amount of $54,231,181 were awarded to the City of Bakersfield in connection with litigation proceedings initiated by the City and California Water Service Company against Dow Chemical Co. and Shell Oil Company for contamination of water wells within the City's domestic water service area. In February 2018, the proceeds of this settlement were used to defease the 2017 Domestic Water Revenue Bonds Series 2017A in the amount of $23,075,000 that had been issued to cover the cost of remediation of the contaminated wells. The remaining amount of the settlement will be used for the continued operation and maintenance of the affected wells. 101 102 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information BUDGETARY INFORMATION Through the budget process, the City Council sets the direction of the City, allocates its resources and establishes its priorities. The Annual Budget assures the efficient and effective use of the City's economic resources, as well as establishing that the highest priority objectives are accomplished. Budgets are adopted for all governmental fund types and are prepared on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Annual Budget serves from July 1 to June 30, and is a vehicle that accurately and openly communicates these priorities to the community, businesses, vendors, employees and other public agencies. Additionally, it establishes the foundation of effective financial planning by providing resource planning, performance measures and controls that permit the evaluation and adjustment of the City's performance. The City's budget is prepared and based on four expenditure categories: personnel, supplies and services, minor capital outlay and capital improvement programs. The first three listed are considered operational in nature and known as recurring costs. Capital improvement projects are asset acquisitions, facilities systems, and infrastructure improvements typically over $50,000, and/or those items "outside" of the normal operational budget. These are known as one-time costs. The City collects and records revenue and expenditures within the following categories: Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities The Governmental Funds include the General Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Projects funds. All funding sources are kept separate for both reporting and use of the money. The General Fund is where most City services are funded that are not required to be segregated. The budget process begins as a team effort in January of each year, starting with an annual strategic planning meeting. Then the individual departments use projected revenue assumptions to prioritize and recommend the next fiscal year's objectives. The City Manager's Office and the Finance Department review all budget proposals and revenues assumptions, as well as all current financial obligations before preparing the document that is proposed to the City Council. The City Council reviews the Proposed Budget through a series of workshops, and the final adoption of the budget is normally scheduled for the second City Council meeting each June. At the beginning of each fiscal year, certain appropriations are "carried forward" from the prior budget year. These items generally relate to either open encumbrances that exist at June 30, or capital projects that were budgeted in the prior fiscal year that did not progress to the encumbrance stage as of June 30. The City Manager's Office approves all carryovers that are not encumbered as of June 30 of each year. The amounts carried forward from fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 to fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 totaled $352,596,396. 103 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) BUDGETARY INFORMATION (continued) These following schedules represent budgetary comparisons for the General Fund and all major special revenue funds within the City. Budgetary Comparison Schedule, General Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Fund Balance, July 1 $39,244,188 $39,244,188 $39,244,188 $- Revenues: Taxes 152,341,600 152,341,600 162,701,286 10,359,686 Licenses and permits 3,181,560 3,181,560 2,928,031 (253,529) Intergovernmental 1,507,190 6,360,788 4,385,389 (1,975,399) Charges for services 22,758,095 22,758,095 24,787,096 2,029,001 Fines, forfeitures and assessments 796,000 796,000 667,440 (128,560) Interest income 202,500 202,500 938,990 736,490 Contributions and donations 45,000 216,269 110,386 (105,883) Other 963,055 1,013,055 1,574,230 561,175 Transfers from other funds 550,000 550,000 550,000 - Amount available for appropriation $182,345,000 $187,419,867 $198,642,848 $11,222,981 Expenditures: General government $13,343,826 $13,405,641 $12,553,412 $852,229 Public safety - Police 87,681,092 90,350,132 87,424,862 2,925,270 Public safety - Fire 37,531,526 39,644,052 38,021,932 1,622,120 Public works 26,401,419 26,703,981 24,658,307 2,045,674 Recreation and parks 19,030,677 19,839,238 20,195,330 (356,092) Development services 7,530,437 8,086,023 7,074,648 1,011,375 Non-departmental 9,855,146 9,927,546 8,291,680 1,635,866 Contingency 25,000 15,000 -15,000 Transfers to other funds 45,877 168,377 168,377 - Total charges to appropriations 201,445,000 208,139,990 198,388,548 9,751,442 Amount of resources over (under) charges to appropriations (19,100,000)(20,720,123)254,300 20,974,423 Fund balance, June 30 $20,144,188 $18,524,065 $39,498,488 $20,974,423 104 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) BUDGETARY INFORMATION (continued) Budgetary Comparison Schedule, Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Fund Balance, July 1 - as restated $1,913,289 $1,913,289 $1,913,289 $- Revenues: Taxes 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,570,855 570,855 Charges for services 7,130,000 7,130,000 7,496,900 366,900 Interest income 20,000 20,000 43,161 23,161 Contributions and donations 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,206,786 6,786 Other income --353,468 353,468 Amount available for appropriation $17,350,000 $17,350,000 $18,671,170 $1,321,170 Expenditures: General government $8,348,589 $8,482,313 $9,041,424 $(559,111) Non-departmental 3,132,400 3,132,400 3,132,400 - Transfers to other funds 6,547,980 6,547,980 6,547,980 - Total charges to appropriations 18,028,969 18,162,693 18,721,804 (559,111) Amount of resources over (under) charges to appropriations (678,969)(812,693)(50,634)762,059 Fund balance, June 30 $1,234,320 $1,100,596 $1,862,655 $762,059 Budgetary Comparison Schedule, Community Development Block Grant Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Fund Balance, July 1 $392,190 $392,190 $392,190 $- Revenues: Intergovernmental 5,012,729 9,083,905 3,127,264 (5,956,641) Interest income --235 235 Loan payments 205,868 205,868 213,804 7,936 Other income --91,185 91,185 Amount available for appropriation $5,218,597 $9,289,773 $3,432,488 $(5,857,285) Expenditures: Community development $2,969,540 $5,328,308 $1,907,534 $3,420,774 Capital outlay 1,755,690 2,530,053 887,725 1,642,328 Transfers to other funds 500,324 500,324 500,324 - Total charges to appropriations 5,225,554 8,358,685 3,295,583 5,063,102 Amount of resources over (under) charges to appropriations (6,957)931,088 136,905 (794,183) Fund balance, June 30 $385,233 $1,323,278 $529,095 $(794,183) 105 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) BUDGETARY INFORMATION (continued) Budgetary Comparison Schedule, Gas Tax & Road Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Fund Balance, July 1 $15,954,740 $15,954,740 $15,954,740 $- Revenues: Intergovernmental 33,474,296 228,176,632 81,940,188 (146,236,444) Fines, forfeitures and assessments 15,000 15,000 74,046 59,046 Interest income 50,000 50,000 148,727 98,727 Other income --307 307 Amount available for appropriation $33,539,296 $228,241,632 $82,163,268 $(146,078,364) Expenditures: Public works $-$-$25,951 $(25,951) Capital outlay 33,552,261 244,196,372 82,904,215 161,292,157 Total charges to appropriations 33,552,261 244,196,372 82,930,166 161,266,206 Amount of resources over (under) charges to appropriations (12,965)(15,954,740)(766,898)15,187,842 Fund balance, June 30 $15,941,775 $-$15,187,842 $15,187,842 106 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) DEFINED PENSION PLAN The Schedules of Changes in Net Pension Liability and related ratios as of the Measurement Period ending June 30, 2017 are below: MISCELLANEOUS PLAN [a] Measurement Period 2017 2016 2015 2014 Total Pension Liability Service Costs $10,121,201 $9,229,271 $9,371,317 $9,394,857 Interest on Total Pension Liability 37,355,571 36,457,017 34,880,653 33,174,032 Changes of Benefit Terms ---- Changes in Assumptions 31,112,110 -(8,541,600)- Difference Between Expected and Actual Experience (8,386,592)(2,271,125)(682,929)- Benefit Payments [b](23,977,515)(21,951,615)(20,655,868)(18,737,652) Net Change in Total Pension Liability $46,224,775 $21,463,548 $14,371,573 $23,831,237 Total Pension Liability - Beginning 506,658,167 485,194,619 470,823,046 446,991,809 Total Pension Liability - Ending [1]$552,882,942 $506,658,167 $485,194,619 $470,823,046 Plan Fiduciary Net Position Contributions - Employer 11,107,872 10,734,470 10,017,697 9,220,181 Contributions - Employee 4,188,806 4,400,305 4,653,169 4,566,671 Net Investment Income 39,138,504 1,891,631 7,966,951 53,513,763 Other Miscellaneous Income ---- Benefit Payments [b](23,977,515)(21,951,615)(20,655,868)(18,737,652) Plan to Resource Movement -(40,308)-- Administrative Expense (522,173)(218,704)(403,815)- Net Change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position $29,935,494 $(5,184,221)$1,578,134 $48,562,963 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Beginning $353,671,812 $358,856,033 $357,277,899 $308,714,936 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Ending [2]383,607,306 353,671,812 358,856,033 357,277,899 Plan Net Pension Liability / (Asset) - [1]-[2]$169,275,636 $152,986,355 $126,338,586 $113,545,147 Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %69.38 %69.80 %73.96 %75.88 Covered Employee Payroll 56,388,660 56,837,487 57,065,633 53,054,308 Plan Net Pension Liability / (Asset) as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %300.19 %269.16 %221.39 %214.02 Schedules of Plan Contributions Fiscal Year End 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Actuarially Determined Contribution [c]$11,028,673 $11,107,872 $10,734,470 $10,017,697 $9,220,181 Contributions in Relation to the Actuarially Determined Contribution [c]$(11,028,673)$(11,107,872)$(10,734,470)$(10,017,697)$(9,220,181) Contribution Deficiency (Excess)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Covered Employee Payroll [d]56,621,447 56,388,660 56,837,487 57,065,623 53,054,308 Contributions as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %19.48 %19.70 %18.89 %17.55 %17.38 [a] Historical information is required only for measurement periods for which GASB Statement No. 68 is applicable. These schedules are presented to illustrate the requirement to show that information. [b] Includes refunds of employee contributions. [c] Employers are assumed to make contributions equal to the actuarially determined contribution. However, some employers may choose to make additional contributions towards their unfunded liability. Employer contributions for such plans exceed the actuarially determined contribution. [d] Payroll from prior year was assumed to increase by the 3.00 percent payroll growth assumption. Notes to Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios: Benefit Changes: The figures above do not include any liability impact that may have resulted from plan changes which occurred after the June 30, 2015 valuation date. This applies for voluntary benefit changes as well as any offers of Two Years Additional Service Credit (a.k.a. Golden Handshakes). Changes of Assumptions: In 2017, the accounting discount rate reduced from 7.65 percent to 7.15 percent. In 2016, there were no changes. In 2015, amounts reported reflect an adjustment of the discount rate from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to 7.65 percent (without a reduction for pension plan administrative expense). In 2014, amounts reported were based on the 7.5 percent discount rate. 107 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) DEFINED PENSION PLAN (continued) SAFETY FIRE PLAN [a] Measurement Period 2017 2016 2015 2014 Total Pension Liability Service Costs $4,691,377 $3,982,592 $4,038,459 $4,022,753 Interest on Total Pension Liability 19,273,519 18,906,125 18,125,192 17,409,125 Changes of Benefit Terms ---- Changes in Assumptions 16,102,827 -(4,419,326)- Difference Between Expected and Actual Experience (3,292,736)880,783 (357,892)- Benefit Payments [b](13,914,493)(13,350,272)(12,266,190)(11,440,930) Net Change in Total Pension Liability $22,860,494 $10,419,228 $5,120,243 $9,990,948 Total Pension Liability - Beginning 261,361,174 250,941,946 245,821,703 235,830,755 Total Pension Liability - Ending [1]$284,221,668 $261,361,174 $250,941,946 $245,821,703 Plan Fiduciary Net Position Contributions - Employer 5,766,115 5,299,399 4,717,136 4,243,095 Contributions - Employee 1,585,475 1,575,291 1,496,855 1,485,484 Net Investment Income 20,512,738 920,604 4,369,856 29,300,590 Other Miscellaneous Income ---- Benefit Payments [b](13,914,493)(13,350,272)(12,266,190)(11,440,930) Plan to Resource Movement --(13)- Administrative Expense (275,179)(117,046)(216,134)- Net Change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position $13,674,656 $(5,672,024)$(1,898,490)$23,588,239 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Beginning $186,380,856 $192,052,880 $193,951,370 $170,363,131 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Ending [2]200,055,512 186,380,856 192,052,880 193,951,370 Plan Net Pension Liability / (Asset) - [1]-[2]$84,166,156 $74,980,318 $58,889,066 $51,870,333 Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %70.39 %71.31 %76.53 %78.90 Covered Employee Payroll 17,071,347 16,365,695 16,338,791 15,554,085 Plan Net Pension Liability / (Asset) as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %493.03 %458.16 %360.42 %333.48 Schedules of Plan Contributions Fiscal Year End 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Actuarially Determined Contribution [c]$5,732,613 $5,766,115 $5,299,399 $4,717,136 $4,243,095 Contributions in Relation to the Actuarially Determined Contribution [c]$(5,732,613)$(5,766,115)$(5,299,399)$(4,717,136)$(4,243,095) Contribution Deficiency (Excess)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Covered Employee Payroll [d]17,572,659 17,071,347 16,365,695 16,338,791 15,554,085 Contributions as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %32.62 %33.78 %32.38 %28.87 %27.28 [a] Historical information is required only for measurement periods for which GASB Statement No. 68 is applicable. These schedules are presented to illustrate the requirement to show that information. [b] Includes refunds of employee contributions. [c] Employers are assumed to make contributions equal to the actuarially determined contribution. However, some employers may choose to make additional contributions towards their unfunded liability. Employer contributions for such plans exceed the actuarially determined contribution. [d] Payroll from prior year was assumed to increase by the 3.00 percent payroll growth assumption. Notes to Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios: Benefit Changes: The figures above do not include any liability impact that may have resulted from plan changes which occurred after the June 30, 2015 valuation date. This applies for voluntary benefit changes as well as any offers of Two Years Additional Service Credit (a.k.a. Golden Handshakes). Changes of Assumptions: In 2017, the accounting discount rate reduced from 7.65 percent to 7.15 percent. In 2016, there were no changes. In 2015, amounts reported reflect an adjustment of the discount rate from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to 7.65 percent (without a reduction for pension plan administrative expense). In 2014, amounts reported were based on the 7.5 percent discount rate. 108 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) DEFINED PENSION PLAN (continued) SAFETY POLICE PLAN [a] Measurement Period 2017 2016 2015 2014 Total Pension Liability Service Costs $10,633,847 $9,484,234 $8,534,322 $8,823,744 Interest on Total Pension Liability 32,733,299 31,506,218 29,736,286 28,279,962 Changes of Benefit Terms ---- Changes in Assumptions 29,167,825 -(7,760,962)- Difference Between Expected and Actual Experience (3,619,242)4,042,528 872,107 - Benefit Payments [b](22,076,716)(20,226,151)(19,077,307)(17,776,028) Net Change in Total Pension Liability $46,839,013 $24,806,829 $12,304,446 $19,327,678 Total Pension Liability - Beginning 437,981,244 413,174,415 400,869,969 381,542,291 Total Pension Liability - Ending [1]$484,820,257 $437,981,244 $413,174,415 $400,869,969 Plan Fiduciary Net Position Contributions - Employer 14,646,334 13,792,487 12,287,267 10,750,572 Contributions - Employee 3,426,099 3,794,305 3,238,371 2,920,326 Net Investment Income 30,690,942 1,419,472 6,082,288 41,170,702 Other Miscellaneous Income ---- Benefit Payments [b](22,076,716)(20,226,151)(19,077,307)(17,776,028) Plan to Resource Movement -40,308 -- Administrative Expense (405,238)(168,097)(313,848)- Net Change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position $26,281,421 $(1,347,676)$2,216,771 $37,065,572 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Beginning $274,471,222 $275,818,898 $273,602,127 $236,536,555 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Ending [2]300,752,643 274,471,222 275,818,898 273,602,127 Plan Net Pension Liability / (Asset) - [1]-[2]$184,067,614 $163,510,022 $137,355,517 $127,267,842 Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %62.00 %62.67 %66.76 %68.25 Covered Employee Payroll 35,225,410 35,046,314 30,842,116 30,496,107 Plan Net Pension Liability / (Asset) as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %522.54 %466.55 %445.35 %417.32 Schedules of Plan Contributions Fiscal Year End 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Actuarially Determined Contribution [c]$12,694,273 $14,646,334 $13,792,487 $12,287,267 $10,750,572 Contributions in Relation to the Actuarially Determined Contribution [c]$(12,694,273)$(14,646,334)$(13,792,487)$(12,287,267)$(10,750,572) Contribution Deficiency (Excess)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Covered Employee Payroll [d]37,266,749 35,255,410 35,046,314 30,842,116 30,496,107 Contributions as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll %34.06 %41.54 %39.36 %39.84 %35.25 [a] Historical information is required only for measurement periods for which GASB Statement No. 68 is applicable. These schedules are presented to illustrate the requirement to show that information. [b] Includes refunds of employee contributions. [c] Employers are assumed to make contributions equal to the actuarially determined contribution. However, some employers may choose to make additional contributions towards their unfunded liability. Employer contributions for such plans exceed the actuarially determined contribution. [d] Payroll from prior year was assumed to increase by the 3.00 percent payroll growth assumption. Notes to Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios: Benefit Changes: The figures above do not include any liability impact that may have resulted from plan changes which occurred after the June 30, 2015 valuation date. This applies for voluntary benefit changes as well as any offers of Two Years Additional Service Credit (a.k.a. Golden Handshakes). Changes of Assumptions: In 2017, the accounting discount rate reduced from 7.65 percent to 7.15 percent. In 2016, there were no changes. In 2015, amounts reported reflect an adjustment of the discount rate from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to 7.65 percent (without a reduction for pension plan administrative expense). In 2014, amounts reported were based on the 7.5 percent discount rate. 109 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) PLAN - SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE CITY'S NET OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS Total OPEB liability 2018 Service Cost $2,149,804 Interest 7,329,180 Difference between expected and actual experience (6,042,345) Changes of assumptions and methods (5,330,662) Benefit payments (5,050,000) Net Change in Total OPEB Liability (6,944,023) Total OPEB Liability - beginning 146,958,802 Total OPEB Liability - ending (a)140,014,779 Plan Fiduciary Net Position Contributions - employer 5,050,000 Net investment income 3,011,528 Benefit payments (5,050,000) Administrative expense (180,556) Net change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position 2,830,972 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - beginning 58,775,464 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - ending (b)61,606,436 Plan's Net OPEB Liability - ending (a)-(b)78,408,343 Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a percentage of the Total OPEB Liability 44.00% Covered employee payroll $44,930,761 Plan Net OPEB Liability as percentage of covered employee payroll 174.51% 110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Required Supplementary Information (continued) SCHEDULE OF OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS Last Ten Fiscal Years Year Ended June 30 Actuarially Determined Contributions in Relation Contribution Deficiency Covered Contributions As a Percentage of Covered Date Contributions (ADC)To ADC (Excess)Payroll Payroll 2017 7,530,031 5,050,000 2,480,031 44,930,761 11.24% Notes to the Schedule of OPEB Contributions Methods and assumptions used to establish "actuarially determined contribution" (ADC) rates: Valuation date ADC rates are calculated as of June 30, two years prior to the end of the fiscal year in which contributions are reported Actuarial cost method Projected Unit Credit Amortization method 30-year closed, level dollar payment Remaining amortization period 20 years as of June 30, 2017 Asset valuation method Market value Actuarial assumptions: June 30, 2015 (for the year ended June 30, 2017) Investment rate of return 5.75% Inflation rate N/A Projected salary increases Ranges from 11.55% to 3.75% based on years of service Other assumptions Same as those used in the June 30, 2015 funding actuarial valuation 111 112 Supplementary Information Contents Pages(s) General Fund Balance Sheet 116 Schedule of Revenues by Function 117 Schedule of Expenditures by Division 118 Special Revenue Funds Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual 120 Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual 126 Capital Projects Funds Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual 128 Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Net Position 131 Combining Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position 132 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 133 Fiduciary Funds Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Fiduciary Funds (Agency)134 Combining Statements of Fiduciary Net Position 135 Combining Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 137 Non-Major Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet 140 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 142 Redevelopment Successor Agency Long-term Debt 144 113 114 General Fund This fund was established to account for the revenues and expenditures to carry out basic governmental activities of the City of Bakersfield such as general government, public safety, public works and community services. Revenues are recorded by source, i.e., taxes, licenses and permits, etc. Expenditures are made primarily on current day-to-day operations and are recorded by major functional classifications and by operating departments. This fund accounts for all financial transactions not accounted for in another fund. 115 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Balance Sheet General Fund June 30, 2018 General Fund Assets: Cash and investments $28,189,169 Accounts receivable, net 1,117,928 Interest receivable 125,338 Due from other governmental agencies 14,223,087 Due from other funds 6,495,939 Prepaid items 16,876 Total assets $50,168,337 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balance: Liabilities: Accounts payable $4,859,631 Due to other governmental agencies 569,298 Advances from grantors and third parties 1,992,091 Total liabilities 7,421,020 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Deferred revenue 3,248,829 Fund Balance: Nonspendable 1,025 Committed Cash basis reserve 13,104,726 Contractual obligations 550,737 Appropriations for new year budget 15,850,000 Assigned Petty cash 27,170 Non-contractual encumbrances 394,865 Compensated absences 2,492,809 Unassigned 7,077,156 Total fund balance 39,498,488 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources and fund balance $50,168,337 116 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Schedule of Revenues by Function - General Fund Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Revenues: Taxes: Property taxes $77,483,500 $79,525,902 $2,042,402 Sales and use taxes 63,708,100 72,322,068 8,613,968 Property transfer tax 900,000 1,308,842 408,842 Utility franchise tax 6,150,000 5,717,956 (432,044) Business license tax 4,100,000 3,826,518 (273,482) Total taxes 152,341,600 162,701,286 10,359,686 Licenses and permits: Building permits 1,854,000 1,704,714 (149,286) Planning permits 101,480 67,545 (33,935) Public works permits 613,500 675,725 62,225 Police permits 411,450 296,852 (114,598) Other licenses and permits 201,130 183,195 (17,935) Total licenses and permits 3,181,560 2,928,031 (253,529) Intergovernmental: Federal grants 3,192,520 1,770,122 (1,422,398) State of California 2,444,073 2,283,694 (160,379) Other grants 724,195 331,573 (392,622) Total intergovernmental 6,360,788 4,385,389 (1,975,399) Charges for services: Building 3,381,500 3,161,567 (219,933) Planning 435,755 418,575 (17,180) Public works 810,600 1,761,900 951,300 Police 716,040 816,001 99,961 Fire 5,800,000 5,825,157 25,157 Recreation and parks 807,200 952,768 145,568 Interfund charges 10,640,000 11,579,402 939,402 Other charges 167,000 271,726 104,726 Total charges for services 22,758,095 24,787,096 2,029,001 Fines, forfeitures, and assessments 796,000 667,440 (128,560) Miscellaneous: Interest income 202,500 1,233,749 1,031,249 Net increase (decrease) in the fair value of investments -(294,759)(294,759) Contributions and donations 216,269 110,386 (105,883) Other income 1,013,055 1,574,230 561,175 Total miscellaneous 1,431,824 2,623,606 1,191,782 Total revenues $186,869,867 $198,092,848 $11,222,981 117 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Schedule of Expenditures by Division - General Fund Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget General Government: Mayor & City council $419,171 $374,313 $44,858 City manager 1,119,314 1,044,506 74,808 City clerk 832,960 746,365 86,595 Human resources 1,285,606 1,240,882 44,724 Information technology 4,749,849 4,480,404 269,445 Financial services 2,968,614 2,920,512 48,102 City attorney 2,030,127 1,746,430 283,697 Total general government 13,405,641 12,553,412 852,229 Public Safety: Public safety - Police 90,350,132 87,424,862 2,925,270 Public safety - Fire 39,644,052 38,021,932 1,622,120 Total public safety 129,994,184 125,446,794 4,547,390 Public Works: Administration 520,677 512,027 8,650 Engineering 5,654,392 5,388,222 266,170 General services 12,402,861 12,008,944 393,917 Streets and roads 8,126,051 6,749,114 1,376,937 Total public works 26,703,981 24,658,307 2,045,674 Recreation and Parks: Administration 1,084,937 1,099,087 (14,150) Recreation 2,969,248 2,859,494 109,754 Parks 15,785,053 16,236,749 (451,696) Total recreation and parks 19,839,238 20,195,330 (356,092) Development Services: Planning 2,423,023 1,800,248 622,775 Building 5,663,000 5,274,400 388,600 Total development services 8,086,023 7,074,648 1,011,375 Non-departmental 9,927,546 8,291,680 1,635,866 Contingency 15,000 -15,000 Total General Fund Expenditures $207,971,613 $198,220,171 $9,751,442 118 Special Revenue Funds These funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. Transient Occupancy Taxes Fund is used to account for Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues (Hotel Tax) and expenditures funded by this revenue source. The Rabobank Arena and Convention Center and Bakersfield Ice Sports Center operating revenues and expenditures are recorded in this fund. This fund is also used to account for duties performed by Visit Bakersfield. Community Development Block Grant Fund is used to account for resources provided by the Federal Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the elimination of slums and blight, housing conservation and improvements of community services. Neighborhood Stabilization Fund is used to account for resources provided by the Federal Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 to address congressionally identified needs of abandoned and foreclosed homes in the City. These funds are used for down payment assistance, acquisition of Real Estate Owned (REO) lender assets properties that have been foreclosed upon for redevelopment, rehabilitation of acquired residential structures, and demolition of blighted structures. High Speed Rail Fund is used to account for resources provided by the California High Speed Rail Authority to enable the City to develop a Station Area Plan. These plans are intended to address planning, infrastructure, and economic development issues related to the selection of a high speed rail station in Bakersfield which will allow the City to take advantage of the benefits of this statewide transportation system once it is completed. Gas Tax & Road Fund is used to account for the City's share, based upon population, of state gasoline taxes. State law requires these gasoline taxes be used to maintain streets or for major street construction. This fund also accounts for the resources provided by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP21). Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds are used in the metropolitan Bakersfield area to fund transportation projects in the Transportation Improvement Program. The Regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) is funded by Federal aid functionally classified higher than local road or rural minor collector routes. The Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program projects have a direct relationship to the intermodal transportation system by function, proximity, or impact. Lastly, the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR) allows each local agency two bridge replacement projects and two miscellaneous projects per year. State (TDA) Transportation Fund is used to account for three Transportation Development Act (TDA) funding sources. Article 3 funds must be used to construct facilities that specifically benefit pedestrians and/or bicyclists. Article 4 funds are Local Transportation and State Transit Assistance Funds. These resources are used to cover the City's maintenance and operation costs of the Bakersfield Amtrak Railway Station. The City is the owner of the station and leases the facility to Amtrak, who operates the transit service. Article 4 funds may also be used for various improvements at bus stops throughout the City. Article 8 funds represent the City's allocation of the 1/4% of sales tax authorized by Senate Bill (SB) 325. State law requires these sales tax dollars be used for street purposes. These funds are received and expended by the City as lead agency servicing the local road network. All three revenue resources are accounted for individually as required by the State of California but are combined for financial reporting purposes. The City currently receives only Article 3 and Article 4 money. State Safety Fund is used to account for specific revenue received for certain Police and Fire related programs. The City Police Department has a share of traffic fine resources which are transferred to the General Fund to assist in funding the cost of traffic safety and control devices and State of California monies from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services grant. The Fire Department operates a local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) which is required for state and federal environmental regulation. These revenue sources are accounted for individually as required by the State, but combined for financial reporting purposes. Redevelopment Successor Agency Housing Fund was created on February 1, 2012, pursuant to the provisions of the Redevelopment Restructuring Act. The City has chosen to assume the housing functions and take over the housing assets of the former Redevelopment Agency. 119 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget and Actual - All Special Revenue Funds Year Ended June 30, 2018 Transient Occupancy Taxes Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Revenues Taxes $9,000,000 $9,570,855 $570,855 Licenses and permits --- Intergovernmental --- Charges for services 7,130,000 7,496,900 366,900 Fines, forfeitures, and assessments --- Interest income 20,000 43,161 23,161 Loan payments --- Contributions and donations 1,200,000 1,206,786 6,786 Other income -353,468 353,468 Total revenues 17,350,000 18,671,170 1,321,170 Expenditures Current: General government 8,482,313 9,041,424 (559,111) Public safety - Police --- Public safety - Fire --- Public works --- Recreation and parks --- Development services --- Non-departmental 3,132,400 3,132,400 - Capital outlay: Transportation: Traffic control --- Streets / Freeways --- Bridges --- Curbs, gutters and sidewalks --- Public facilities: Other improvements --- Total expenditures 11,614,713 12,173,824 (559,111) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 5,735,287 6,497,346 762,059 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers out (6,547,980)(6,547,980)- Total other financing sources (uses)(6,547,980)(6,547,980)- Net change in fund balances (812,693)(50,634)762,059 Fund balances - beginning 1,913,289 1,913,289 - Fund balances - ending $1,100,596 $1,862,655 $762,059 120 Community Development Block Grant Neighborhood Stabilization Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget $-$-$-$-$-$- ------ 9,083,905 3,127,264 (5,956,641)141,352 -(141,352) ------ ------ -235 235 --- 205,868 213,804 7,936 -46,128 46,128 ------ -91,185 91,185 --- 9,289,773 3,432,488 (5,857,285)141,352 46,128 (95,224) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 5,328,308 1,907,534 3,420,774 141,352 -141,352 ------ ------ ------ ------ 2,041,553 741,160 1,300,393 --- 488,500 146,565 341,935 --- 7,858,361 2,795,259 5,063,102 141,352 -141,352 1,431,412 637,229 (794,183)-46,128 46,128 (500,324)(500,324)---- (500,324)(500,324)---- 931,088 136,905 (794,183)-46,128 46,128 392,190 392,190 -279,760 279,760 - $1,323,278 $529,095 $(794,183)$279,760 $325,888 $46,128 121 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (continued) Budget and Actual - All Special Revenue Funds Year Ended June 30, 2018 High Speed Rail Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Revenues Taxes $-$-$- Licenses and permits --- Intergovernmental 148,615 148,615 - Charges for services --- Fines, forfeitures, and assessments --- Interest income --- Loan payments --- Contributions and donations --- Other income --- Total revenues 148,615 148,615 - Expenditures Current: General government --- Public safety - Police --- Public safety - Fire --- Public works --- Recreation and parks --- Development services 148,615 148,615 - Non-departmental --- Capital outlay: Transportation: Traffic control --- Streets / Freeways --- Bridges --- Curbs, gutters and sidewalks --- Public facilities: Other improvements --- Total expenditures 148,615 148,615 - Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures --- Other financing sources (uses): Transfers out --- Total other financing sources (uses)--- Net change in fund balances --- Fund balances - beginning --- Fund balances - ending $-$-$- 122 Gas Tax & Road Fund State (TDA) Transportation Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget $-$-$-$-$-$- ------ 228,176,632 81,940,188 (146,236,444)3,830,391 2,504,687 (1,325,704) ------ 15,000 74,046 59,046 --- 50,000 148,727 98,727 1,000 3,126 2,126 ------ ------ -307 307 --- 228,241,632 82,163,268 (146,078,364)3,831,391 2,507,813 (1,323,578) ------ ------ ------ -25,951 (25,951)522,468 367,358 155,110 ---38,400 20,368 18,032 ------ ------ 2,835,320 1,483,684 1,351,636 --- 231,892,709 81,315,883 150,576,826 --- 9,448,343 89,059 9,359,284 --- 20,000 15,589 4,411 125,000 -125,000 ---3,135,523 2,120,088 1,015,435 244,196,372 82,930,166 161,266,206 3,821,391 2,507,814 1,313,577 (15,954,740)(766,898)15,187,842 10,000 (1)(10,001) ------ ------ (15,954,740)(766,898)15,187,842 10,000 (1)(10,001) 15,954,740 15,954,740 ---- $-$15,187,842 $15,187,842 $10,000 $(1)$(10,001) 123 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (continued) Budget and Actual - All Special Revenue Funds Year Ended June 30, 2018 State Safety Fund Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Revenues Taxes $-$-$- Licenses and permits 324,340 340,103 15,763 Intergovernmental 819,656 824,355 4,699 Charges for services 1,243,500 1,235,920 (7,580) Fines, forfeitures, and assessments 1,200,000 1,588,082 388,082 Interest income 11,800 21,886 10,086 Loan payments --- Contributions and donations --- Other income --- Total revenues 3,599,296 4,010,346 411,050 Expenditures Current: General government --- Public safety - Police 1,912,255 1,784,256 127,999 Public safety - Fire 1,426,008 1,277,573 148,435 Public works --- Recreation and parks --- Development services --- Non-departmental --- Capital outlay: Transportation: Traffic control --- Streets / Freeways --- Bridges --- Curbs, gutters and sidewalks --- Public facilities: Other improvements --- Total expenditures 3,338,263 3,061,829 276,434 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 261,033 948,517 687,484 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers out (550,000)(550,000)- Total other financing sources (uses)(550,000)(550,000)- Net change in fund balances (288,967)398,517 687,484 Fund balances - beginning 2,501,050 2,501,050 - Fund balances - ending $2,212,083 $2,899,567 $687,484 124 Redevelopment Successor Agency - Housing Totals Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget $430,517 $248,510 $(182,007)$9,430,517 $9,819,365 $388,848 ---324,340 340,103 15,763 ---242,200,551 88,545,109 (153,655,442) -182,851 182,851 8,373,500 8,915,671 542,171 ---1,215,000 1,662,128 447,128 -10,440 10,440 82,800 227,575 144,775 ---205,868 259,932 54,064 ---1,200,000 1,206,786 6,786 -993,065 993,065 -1,438,025 1,438,025 430,517 1,434,866 1,004,349 263,032,576 112,414,694 (150,617,882) ---8,482,313 9,041,424 (559,111) ---1,912,255 1,784,256 127,999 ---1,426,008 1,277,573 148,435 ---522,468 393,309 129,159 ---38,400 20,368 18,032 716,604 288,311 428,293 6,334,879 2,344,460 3,990,419 ---3,132,400 3,132,400 - ---2,835,320 1,483,684 1,351,636 ---231,892,709 81,315,883 150,576,826 ---9,448,343 89,059 9,359,284 ---2,186,553 756,749 1,429,804 1,100,070 827,875 272,195 4,724,093 3,094,528 1,629,565 1,816,674 1,116,186 700,488 272,935,741 104,733,693 168,202,048 (1,386,157)318,680 1,704,837 (9,903,165)7,681,001 17,584,166 ---(7,598,304)(7,598,304)- ---(7,598,304)(7,598,304)- (1,386,157)318,680 1,704,837 (17,501,469)82,697 17,584,166 2,288,701 2,288,701 -23,329,730 23,329,730 - $902,544 $2,607,381 $1,704,837 $5,828,261 $23,412,427 $17,584,166 125 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual - Debt Service Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 General Obligation Debt Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Revenues: Interest income $-$-$- Total revenues --- Expenditures: Debt service: Principal retirement 560,352 502,352 58,000 Interest and fiscal charges 84,704 59,324 25,380 Total expenditures 645,056 561,676 83,380 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures (645,056)(561,676)83,380 Other financing sources: Transfers in 561,676 561,676 - Total other financing sources 561,676 561,676 - Net change in fund balance (83,380)-83,380 Fund balance - beginning (313,979)-313,979 Fund balance - ending $(397,359)$-$397,359 126 Capital Projects Funds These funds account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by Proprietary Funds and Trust Funds. Capital Outlay Fund is used to account for the cost of capital projects financed by general revenues and grant/loan proceeds for recreational facilities. Park Improvement Fund is used to account for funds collected for residential park development (Ordinance No. 3646). Fees are collected based on the development's share of the cost to develop, improve, construct or enhance a neighborhood park (Ordinance No. 3327). Transportation Development Fund is used to account for funds collected from fees paid to mitigate the traffic impacts to the regional circulation system caused by a development project. The fees are paid when a building permit for the development project is obtained, and are based upon the amount of traffic the development will generate. With these fees, the City constructs projects that have been identified as necessary to maintain the level of services required by the 2010 General Plan for the regional transportation network. This is a joint City and Kern County program which affects the entire metropolitan area. Fees are collected with the building permit and are based on the relative impact each land use has on the transportation network. The fee schedule was adopted with Ordinance No. 3513 and will be periodically evaluated by the City Council and revised to reflect updated costs and growth projections. Revenue from fees collected may also be used to service bonded debt incurred in Capital Improvement Construction. 127 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget and Actual - All Capital Projects Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Capital Outlay Park Improvement Fund Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Revenues: Taxes $5,550,000 $5,707,943 $157,943 $-$-$- Intergovernmental 945,587 267,943 (677,644)--- Charges for services -580,145 580,145 --- Fines, forfeitures, and assessments 400,000 52,907 (347,093)1,525,000 1,970,565 445,565 Interest income 39,000 76,687 37,687 50,000 48,753 (1,247) Other income 860,509 250,799 (609,710)--- Total revenues 7,795,096 6,936,424 (858,672)1,575,000 2,019,318 444,318 Expenditures: Current: General government ------ Public works ------ Non-departmental 2,001,410 275,867 1,725,543 --- Capital outlay: Transportation: Traffic control ------ Streets 5,056,362 1,774,329 3,282,033 --- Streets / Freeways 51,376,987 8,056,276 43,320,711 --- Public facilities: Buildings 4,065,904 1,086,007 2,979,897 --- Parks and landscaping 1,682,712 1,518,194 164,518 6,657,727 4,006,999 2,650,728 Land acquisition ---1,660,825 -1,660,825 Other improvements 1,774,135 515,431 1,258,704 185,385 91,069 94,316 Equipment: Computers 22,528 -22,528 --- Non-automotive 9,641 9,005 636 --- Total expenditures 65,989,679 13,235,109 52,754,570 8,503,937 4,098,068 4,405,869 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (58,194,583)(6,298,685)51,895,898 (6,928,937)(2,078,750)4,850,187 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 6,580,000 6,580,000 ---- Transfers out (190,000)(190,000)---- Total other financing sources (uses)6,390,000 6,390,000 ---- Net change in fund balances (51,804,583)91,315 51,895,898 (6,928,937)(2,078,750)4,850,187 Fund balances - beginning 56,000,807 56,000,807 -7,361,361 7,361,361 - Fund balances - ending $4,196,224 $56,092,122 $51,895,898 $432,424 $5,282,611 $4,850,187 128 Transportation Development Totals Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget $-$-$-$5,550,000 $5,707,943 $157,943 ---945,587 267,943 (677,644) -121,465 121,465 -701,610 701,610 13,000,000 14,534,290 1,534,290 14,925,000 16,557,762 1,632,762 140,200 499,973 359,773 229,200 625,413 396,213 23,474 (238,152)(261,626)883,983 12,647 (871,336) 13,163,674 14,917,576 1,753,902 22,533,770 23,873,318 1,339,548 291,500 289,115 2,385 291,500 289,115 2,385 836,000 747,169 88,831 836,000 747,169 88,831 52,342 -52,342 2,053,752 275,867 1,777,885 714,636 63,425 651,211 714,636 63,425 651,211 8,916,835 996,010 7,920,825 13,973,197 2,770,339 11,202,858 48,268,614 9,096,060 39,172,554 99,645,601 17,152,336 82,493,265 ---4,065,904 1,086,007 2,979,897 ---8,340,439 5,525,193 2,815,246 ---1,660,825 -1,660,825 ---1,959,520 606,500 1,353,020 ---22,528 -22,528 ---9,641 9,005 636 59,079,927 11,191,779 47,888,148 133,573,543 28,524,956 105,048,587 (45,916,253)3,725,797 49,642,050 (111,039,773)(4,651,638)106,388,135 13,061,905 -(13,061,905)19,641,905 6,580,000 (13,061,905) (13,061,905)-13,061,905 (13,251,905)(190,000)13,061,905 ---6,390,000 6,390,000 - (45,916,253)3,725,797 49,642,050 (104,649,773)1,738,362 106,388,135 48,631,813 48,631,813 -111,993,981 111,993,981 - $2,715,560 $52,357,610 $49,642,050 $7,344,208 $113,732,343 $106,388,135 129 Internal Service Funds These funds are used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the City on a cost-reimbursement basis. Self-Insurance Fund is used to account for the cost of operating a self-insurance program as follows: With regard to wo rkers' compensation, the City is self-insured for the first $500,000 of each injury or occurrence and is a member of California Public Entity Insurance Authority (CPEIA) which provides $5,000,000 of excess coverage to protect against catastrophic type losses. Funding for this program is provided by interdepartmental charges varying by employee classification and their industrial injury loss experience. With regard to general and auto liability, the City is self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of each accident or occurrence and is a member of the Authority for California Cities Excess Liability (ACCEL) which provides excess commercial insurance in the amount of $10,000,000. Funding for this program is provided by interdepartmental charges. Equipment Management Fund is used to account for the cost of operating and maintaining a maintenance facility for vehicular, telecommunications and computer equipment used by other City departments. Such costs are billed to other departments via established rates which are based upon actual cost. Actual costs include maintenance, repair, and replacement cost of shop and automotive equipment. 130 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Net Position All Internal Service Funds June 30, 2018 Self- Insurance Equipment Management Total Assets: Current assets: Cash and investments $27,089,093 $31,944,586 $59,033,679 Accounts receivable, net 820 11,191 12,011 Interest receivable 80,778 93,384 174,162 Notes/loans receivable 218,071 482,272 700,343 Due from other governmental agencies 39,477 -39,477 Prepayments and inventories 5,245 1,084,047 1,089,292 Total current assets 27,433,484 33,615,480 61,048,964 Noncurrent assets: Capital assets: Depreciable buildings, property, equipment and infrastructure, net -37,442,456 37,442,456 Notes/loans receivable 117,684 293,162 410,846 Total noncurrent assets 117,684 37,735,618 37,853,302 Total assets 27,551,168 71,351,098 98,902,266 Deferred Outflows of Resources: Deferred pensions 160,520 2,308,258 2,468,778 Deferred other post-employment benefits 14,600 278,300 292,900 Total deferred outflows of resources 175,120 2,586,558 2,761,678 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 274,439 802,656 1,077,095 Claims payable 6,555,651 -6,555,651 Workers' compensation claims 6,873,000 -6,873,000 Compensated absences payable -161,824 161,824 Total current liabilities 13,703,090 964,480 14,667,570 Noncurrent liabilities: Workers' compensation claims 34,136,000 -34,136,000 Compensated absences payable 47,572 368,811 416,383 Net pension liability 578,031 9,798,208 10,376,239 Net other post-employment benefits liability 154,246 2,467,935 2,622,181 Total noncurrent liabilities 34,915,849 12,634,954 47,550,803 Total liabilities 48,618,939 13,599,434 62,218,373 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Deferred pensions 31,576 473,705 505,281 Deferred other post-employment benefits 17,765 284,235 302,000 Total deferred inflows of resources 49,341 757,940 807,281 Net Position: Net investment in capital assets -37,442,456 37,442,456 Unrestricted (20,941,992)22,137,826 1,195,834 Total net position $(20,941,992)$59,580,282 $38,638,290 131 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position All Internal Service Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Self- Insurance Equipment Management Totals Operating revenues: Intergovernmental $-$-$- Charges for services 10,034,718 25,379,078 35,413,796 Cost recoveries 732,485 115,209 847,694 Miscellaneous 49,771 13,563 63,334 Total operating revenues 10,816,974 25,507,850 36,324,824 Operating expenses: General and administrative 9,252,055 17,442,750 26,694,805 Workers' compensation payments 3,136,046 -3,136,046 Claims paid 3,540,685 -3,540,685 Depreciation and amortization -6,462,655 6,462,655 Compensated absences 3,384 -3,384 Total operating expenses 15,932,170 23,905,405 39,837,575 Operating income (loss)(5,115,196)1,602,445 (3,512,751) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Interest income 238,029 258,202 496,231 Gain/(loss) on sale of capital assets -278,968 278,968 Income (loss) before transfers and capital contributions (4,877,167)2,139,615 (2,737,552) Capital contributions -92,629 92,629 Transfers in -2,540,403 2,540,403 Transfers out (152,744)(90,000)(242,744) Change in net position (5,029,911)4,682,647 (347,264) Total Net Position - Beginning of Year - as Restated (15,912,081)54,897,635 38,985,554 Total Net Position - End of Year $(20,941,992)$59,580,282 $38,638,290 132 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Cash Flows All Internal Service Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Self- Insurance Equipment Management Totals Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from: Customers $10,279,130 $25,913,428 $36,192,558 Prior year reimbursements and cost recoveries 732,485 115,209 847,694 Cash paid to: Suppliers (9,556,583)(12,859,275)(22,415,858) Employees (3,471,823)(4,736,413)(8,208,236) Net cash provided (used) by operating activities (2,016,791)8,432,949 6,416,158 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Cash transferred from other funds -2,540,403 2,540,403 Cash transferred to other funds (152,744)(90,000)(242,744) Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities (152,744)2,450,403 2,297,659 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Purchase of capital assets -(7,863,254)(7,863,254) Proceeds from sale of capital assets -323,425 323,425 Net cash (used) by capital and related financing activities -(7,539,829)(7,539,829) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest received 299,405 336,789 636,194 Net increase (decrease) in the fair value of investments (87,469)(118,934)(206,403) Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 211,936 217,855 429,791 Net increase (decrease) in cash and investments (1,957,599)3,561,378 1,603,779 Cash and investments - Beginning of year 29,046,692 28,383,208 57,429,900 Cash and investments - End of year $27,089,093 $31,944,586 $59,033,679 Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities: Operating income (loss)$(5,115,196)$1,602,445 $(3,512,751) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Depreciation expense -6,462,655 6,462,655 (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable 194,641 520,787 715,428 (Increase) decrease in inventories -(35,423)(35,423) Decrease in prepaid items 8,669 -8,669 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (61,465)(88,934)(150,399) Increase (decrease) in workers' compensation claims 2,940,259 -2,940,259 Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 3,384 (78,936)(75,552) Increase (decrease) in net pension liability 58,912 848,884 907,796 Increase (decrease) in deferred outflows/inflows of resources for pensions (29,700)(493,149)(522,849) Increase (decrease) in other post-employment benefits liability (19,460)(311,315)(330,775) Increase (decrease) in deferred outflows/inflows of resources for OPEB 3,165 5,935 9,100 Net cash provided (used) by operating activities $(2,016,791)$8,432,949 $6,416,158 Noncash investing, capital, and financing activities: Contribution of equipment from other departments $-$92,629 $92,629 133 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Fiduciary Funds (Agency) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Balance July 01, 2017AdditionsDeletions Balance June 30, 2018 Special Deposits Fund Assets: Cash and investments $21,034,594 $103,916,059 $101,193,942 $23,756,711 Interest receivable 4,040 1,896 4,040 1,896 Accounts receivable -4,025,004 3,940,252 84,752 Due from other governmental agencies 11,222 435,437 270,872 175,787 Total assets $21,049,856 $108,378,396 $105,409,106 $24,019,146 Liabilities: Payables: Deposits $21,049,856 $108,378,396 $105,409,105 $24,019,147 Total liabilities $21,049,856 $108,378,396 $105,409,105 $24,019,147 Improvement Districts Fund Assets: Cash and investments $11,055,453 $386,531 $409,780 $11,032,204 Interest receivable 6,185 9,049 150 15,084 Due from other governmental agencies 7,421 4,121 3,184 8,358 Total assets $11,069,059 $399,701 $413,114 $11,055,646 Liabilities: Payables: Deposits 6,206,871 462,943 1,464,352 5,205,462 Accrued bond interest 852,188 775,183 852,188 775,183 Bonds 4,010,000 5,075,000 4,010,000 5,075,000 Total liabilities $11,069,059 $6,313,126 $6,326,540 $11,055,645 Total - All Agency Funds Assets: Cash and investments $32,090,047 $104,302,590 $101,603,722 $34,788,915 Interest receivable 10,225 10,945 4,190 16,980 Accounts Receivable -4,025,004 3,940,252 84,752 Due from other governmental agencies 18,643 439,558 274,056 184,145 Total assets $32,118,915 $108,778,097 $105,822,220 $35,074,792 Liabilities: Payables: Deposits 27,256,727 108,841,339 106,873,457 29,224,609 Accrued bond interest 852,188 775,183 852,188 775,183 Bonds 4,010,000 5,075,000 4,010,000 5,075,000 Total liabilities $32,118,915 $114,691,522 $111,735,645 $35,074,792 134 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position Private Purpose Trust Funds June 30, 2018 Redevelopment Successor Agency - Trust Planning Habitat Trust Total Private Purpose Trust Funds Assets: Current assets: Cash and investments $4,128,252 $13,899,134 $18,027,386 Interest receivable 6,987 40,691 47,678 Total current assets 4,135,239 13,939,825 18,075,064 Noncurrent assets: Land held for resale 414,092 -414,092 Total noncurrent assets 414,092 -414,092 Total assets 4,549,331 13,939,825 18,489,156 Liabilities: Payables: Advances from grantors and third parties 3,772,803 -3,772,803 Bonds 2,525,000 -2,525,000 Notes 17,883,643 -17,883,643 Total liabilities 24,181,446 -24,181,446 Net Position: Held in trust for: Individuals, organizations, and other governments (19,632,115)13,939,825 (5,692,290) Total Net Position $(19,632,115)$13,939,825 $(5,692,290) 135 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds June 30, 2018 OPEB Irrevocable Trust Fire Relief and Pension Trust Total Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds Assets: Cash and investments $66,455,251 $56,325 $66,511,576 Retirement system investments - Federal agency coupons -684,201 684,201 Interest receivable -4,564 4,564 Total assets 66,455,251 745,090 67,200,341 Net Position: Held in trust for - Pension/other post-employment benefits 66,455,251 745,090 67,200,341 Total Net Position $66,455,251 $745,090 $67,200,341 136 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Private Purpose Trust Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Redevelopment Successor Agency - Trust Planning Habitat Trust Total Private Purpose Trust Funds Additions: Developer fees $-$1,454,597 $1,454,597 Successor agency property tax deposits 3,528,124 -3,528,124 Intergovernmental --- Charges for services 3,132,400 -3,132,400 Contribution from Successor Housing Agency --- Other income 3,590 -3,590 Interest income -133,383 133,383 Total additions 6,664,114 1,587,980 8,252,094 Deductions: Purchase of uninhabited land -613,889 613,889 Obligation retirement 3,826,700 -3,826,700 Total deductions 3,826,700 613,889 4,440,589 Change in net position 2,837,414 974,091 3,811,505 Net position - beginning of year (22,469,529)12,965,734 (9,503,795) Net position - end of year $(19,632,115)$13,939,825 $(5,692,290) 137 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 OPEB Irrevocable Trust Fire Relief and Pension Trust Total Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds Additions: Contributions to pooled investments $7,527,447 $-$7,527,447 Interest income 2,017,934 40,596 2,058,530 Total additions 9,545,381 40,596 9,585,977 Deductions: Benefits 4,507,862 97,422 4,605,284 Administrative expenses 188,705 -188,705 Total deductions 4,696,567 97,422 4,793,989 Change in net position 4,848,814 (56,826)4,791,988 Beginning of year 61,606,436 801,917 62,408,353 End of year $66,455,250 $745,091 $67,200,341 138 139 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Balance Sheet Non-Major Governmental Funds June 30, 2018 Special Revenue Funds Neighborhood Stabilization High Speed Rail State (TDA) Transportation Assets: Cash and investments $325,888 $-$39,188 Accounts receivable, net 6,798,874 -- Interest receivable --1,197 Due from other governmental agencies -11,954 528,061 Notes/loans receivable --- Total assets $7,124,762 $11,954 $568,446 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances: Liabilities: Accounts payable $-$-$250,023 Due to other funds -11,954 - Advances from grantors and third parties --318,423 Total liabilities -11,954 568,446 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Deferred revenue 6,798,874 -- Fund Balances: Restricted 325,888 -- Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances $7,124,762 $11,954 $568,446 140 Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund State Safety Redevelopment Successor Agency - Housing General Obligation Debt Total Non-Major Governmental Funds $2,908,430 $1,814,179 $-$5,087,685 104,708 207 -6,903,789 8,182 3,725 -13,104 ---540,015 -22,791,933 -22,791,933 $3,021,320 $24,610,044 $-$35,336,526 $121,754 $727 $-$372,504 ---11,954 -22,791,933 -23,110,356 121,754 22,792,660 -23,494,814 ---6,798,874 2,899,566 1,817,384 -5,042,838 $3,021,320 $24,610,044 $-$35,336,526 141 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Non-Major Governmental Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Special Revenue Funds Neighborhood Stabilization High Speed Rail State (TDA) Transportation Revenues: Taxes $-$-$- Licenses and permits --- Intergovernmental -148,615 2,504,687 Charges for services --- Fines, forfeitures and assessments --- Interest income --3,127 Loan payments 46,128 -- Other income --- Total revenues 46,128 148,615 2,507,814 Expenditures Current: Public safety - Police --- Public safety - Fire --- Public works --367,359 Recreation and parks --20,368 Development services -148,615 - Capital outlay --2,120,087 Debt service: Principal retirement --- Interest and fiscal charges --- Total expenditures -148,615 2,507,814 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 46,128 -- Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in --- Transfers out --- Total other financing sources (uses)--- Net change in fund balances 46,128 -- Fund balances - beginning - as restated 279,760 -- Fund balances - ending $325,888 $-$- 142 Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund State Safety Redevelopment Successor Agency - Housing General Obligation Debt Total Non-Major Governmental Funds $-$248,510 $-$248,510 340,103 --340,103 824,355 --3,477,657 1,235,920 182,851 -1,418,771 1,588,082 --1,588,082 21,886 10,441 -35,454 ---46,128 -993,065 -993,065 4,010,346 1,434,867 -8,147,770 1,784,257 --1,784,257 1,277,573 --1,277,573 ---367,359 ---20,368 -288,309 -436,924 -827,877 -2,947,964 --502,352 502,352 --59,324 59,324 3,061,830 1,116,186 561,676 7,396,121 948,516 318,681 (561,676)751,649 --561,676 561,676 (550,000)--(550,000) (550,000)-561,676 11,676 398,516 318,681 -763,325 2,501,050 1,498,703 -4,279,513 $2,899,566 $1,817,384 $-$5,042,838 143 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Long-term debt recorded in Private Purpose Trust Fund REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY $2,090,000 Tax Allocation Bond to be used for construction of public improvements for new developments on 18th and 19th Streets, and improvements to the Mill Creek Linear Park. The funds were dispersed in July 2009. The interest rate is 7.5%, with payments commencing August 2010 through August 2029.$1,585,000 $1,240,000 Tax Allocation Bond to be used for infrastructure improvements for the Mill Creek Linear Park Canal at South Millcreek. The funds were dispersed in July 2009. The interest rate is 7.25%, with payments commencing August 2010 through August 2029.940,000 Total Bonds $2,525,000 Loans/Contracts: $1,000,000 HUD Section 108 Loan, 2003 (Agency Agreement #RA 03-016) - due in annual principal installments of $27,000 to $82,000 commencing August 1, 2004; interest ranging from 1.61% to 4.76%.$429,000 $1,600,000 HUD Section 108 Loan, 2005 (Agency Agreement #RA 06-020) for construction of Fire Station No. 5 - due in annual principal installments of $58,000 to $137,000 commencing August 1, 2009; interest ranging from 4.96% to 5.77%.984,000 $3,750,000 HUD Section 108 Loan, 2007 (Agency Agreement # RA 06-022) Loan proceeds are dedicated to the Mill Creek South Mixed-Use project and will go toward the acquisition and clean-up of a six acre parcel. Due in annual principal installments of $136,000 to $321,000 commencing August 1, 2008; interest ranging from 2.62% to 5.42%.2,500,000 $10,000,000 Bakersfield Redevelopment Agency Loan with I-bank to help finance the Mill Creek Linear Park and Canal Refurbishment Project. Only $6,933,445 of the loan was dispersed through fiscal year 2009. Annual principal installments of $217,383 to $512,446 commencing on August 1, 2009 through August 2037; interest rate at 3.11%.7,781,656 $2,000,000 Loan with the City of Bakersfield Equipment Fund to provide construction assistance required for the 19th Street Senior Plaza Development. Funds were disbursed June 2009. The loan has a 5% interest rate and a seven year payment period commencing July 2013.635,356 $950,000 Loan with the City of Bakersfield Equipment Fund to pre-purchase an easement to facilitate the development of the Chelsea Housing project and the Southeast Mill Creek commercial area. The loan has a 3% interest rate and a five year payment period commencing July 2013.333,936 144 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Long-term debt recorded in Private Purpose Trust Fund $1,500,000 Loan with the City of Bakersfield Self-Insurance Fund to provide construction assistance required for the Courtyard Family Apartments located west of S Street, between 13th and 14th Streets at S. Mill Creek. Funds were disbursed in September 2009. The loan has a 5% interest rate and seven year payment period commencing July 2013.419,694 $17,000,000 Reimbursement to the City for (a) refunding of 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds, (b) 1987 COP Convention Improvement Project, and (c) the construction, equipping and furnishing of a multipurpose area (the Arena Project) per Agreement #97-2. Agreement is for two payments of $850,000 each year, from March 1997 to June 2022.4,800,000 Total Loans/Contracts Payable $17,883,642 Total Successor Agency $20,408,642 Annual requirements to amortize the principal and interest on long-term debt of Redevelopment Successor Agency at June 30, 2018 is as follows: Redevelopment Successor Agency (Private Purpose Trust Fund) Year ending Principal Interest Bonds Loans/Contracts Total Bonds Loans/Contracts Total 2019 $135,000 $2,701,803 $2,836,803 $182,024 $449,801 $631,825 2020 145,000 2,366,837 2,511,837 171,656 421,739 593,395 2021 160,000 1,882,463 2,042,463 160,363 391,977 552,340 2022 170,000 1,914,932 2,084,932 148,144 361,478 509,622 2023 1,075,000 3,837,326 4,912,326 521,313 1,318,808 1,840,121 2024-2028 840,000 2,328,333 3,168,333 96,300 673,491 769,791 2029-2033 -2,339,502 2,339,502 -337,700 337,700 2034-2038 -512,446 512,446 -31,633 31,633 Totals $2,525,000 $17,883,642 $20,408,642 $1,279,800 $3,986,627 $5,266,427 145 146 Statistical Section City of Bakersfield Statistical Section For the year ended June 30, 2018 The statistical section of the City of Bakersfield's (City) comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information presented in the financial statements, note disclosures and required supplementary information says about the City's overall financial health. Where less than 10 years of data is presented, the information was not available. Contents Pages Financial Trends These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial performance measures have changed over time 148 - 157 Revenue Capacity These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the factors affecting the City's ability to generate its property and sales tax revenues.158 - 169 Debt Capacity These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current level of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future.170 - 176 Demographic and Economic Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place.177 - 183 Operating Information These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. 184 - 189 147 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Net Position by Component (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2009 (2)2010 2011(2) 2012 Governmental Activities: Net investment in capital assets $1,412,593,899 $1,403,412,018 $1,307,753,604 $1,259,429,698 Restricted for: Current projects 4,646,968 --- Capital improvements 56,379,296 39,139,625 19,778,178 23,252,930 Unrestricted 127,843,285 135,621,596 155,889,382 165,661,544 Total governmental activities net position:1,601,463,448 1,578,173,239 1,483,421,164 1,448,344,172 % change from prior year 2.0 -1.0 -6.0 -2.0 Business-type Activities: Net investment in capital assets 588,467,081 634,479,891 632,719,226 650,440,273 Restricted for: Capital improvements 83,715,993 29,803,093 19,571,180 20,237,839 Sanitation districts 5,167,516 4,926,779 4,008,890 2,645,932 Unrestricted 73,947,580 104,096,319 115,321,423 100,529,044 Total business-type activities net position 751,298,170 773,306,082 771,620,719 773,853,088 % change from prior year 3.0 3.0 -0.2 0.3 Primary Government: Net investment in capital assets 2,001,060,980 2,037,891,909 1,940,472,830 1,909,869,971 Restricted for: Current projects 4,646,968 --- Capital improvements 140,095,289 68,942,718 39,348,358 43,490,769 Sanitation districts 5,167,516 4,926,779 4,008,890 2,645,932 Unrestricted 201,790,865 239,717,915 271,210,805 266,190,588 Total primary government net position $2,352,761,618 $2,351,479,321 $2,255,040,883 $2,222,197,260 Total primary government % change from prior year 2.0 -0.1 -4.0 -1.0 Notes: (1) This schedule reports using the accrual basis of accounting. (2) There was a prior period adjustment in Governmental and/or Business-type Activities for the 2008-09 and 2010-2011 fiscal years. Numbers have been changed to reflect the restatement. (3) There was a prior period adjustment in Governmental and/or Business-type Activities for the fiscal year. Numbers have been changed to reflect the restatement. Source: City Finance Department 148 Fiscal Year 2013 2014(3)2015(3)2016(3)2017 (3)2018 (3) $1,233,782,805 $1,279,657,792 $1,285,115,869 $1,304,906,456 $1,305,414,611 $1,301,334,674 ------ 16,246,571 21,015,837 22,112,200 21,988,624 20,626,443 20,759,775 172,822,236 213,670,245 (70,066,811)(86,460,007)(108,783,761)(200,714,582) 1,422,851,612 1,514,343,874 1,237,161,258 1,240,435,073 1,217,257,293 1,121,379,867 -2.0 6.0 -18.0 0.3 -1.9 -7.9% 642,190,608 647,105,639 648,359,633 665,588,574 670,724,189 700,725,335 20,216,599 20,209,227 20,201,556 20,201,947 20,200,000 20,200,000 ------ 107,431,948 109,292,512 78,904,795 79,243,784 85,239,027 107,755,323 769,839,155 776,607,378 747,465,984 765,034,305 776,163,216 828,680,658 -0.5 0.8 -4.0 2.0 1.5 6.8% 1,875,973,416 1,926,763,431 1,933,475,502 1,970,495,030 1,976,138,800 2,002,060,009 ------ 36,463,170 41,225,064 42,313,756 42,190,571 40,826,443 40,959,775 ------ 280,254,187 322,962,757 8,837,984 (7,216,223)(23,544,734)(92,959,259) $2,192,690,773 $2,290,951,252 $1,984,627,242 $2,005,469,378 $1,993,420,509 $1,950,060,525 -1.0 4.0 -13.0 1.0 -0.6 -2.2% 149 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Change in Net Position (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Expenses Governmental activities: General government $15,624,497 $13,169,300 $12,110,455 $12,388,099 Public safety: Police 68,830,802 66,819,611 70,381,783 72,574,972 Fire 32,844,159 32,901,818 31,657,823 33,319,982 Public works 98,187,688 138,345,249 137,057,195 142,228,353 Recreation & parks 31,186,962 32,640,571 34,682,672 31,737,121 Development services 10,111,034 8,231,893 6,862,213 5,856,850 Economic/Community development (2)6,930,730 12,935,695 9,303,951 28,228,468 Interest on long-term debt 252,743 201,442 233,606 215,411 Total governmental activities expenses 263,968,615 305,245,579 302,289,698 326,549,256 Business-type activities: Wastewater treatment 32,009,889 31,978,755 42,333,794 41,550,942 Refuse collection 37,590,048 35,237,306 38,469,544 39,340,795 Agricultural water 5,014,733 4,901,463 4,603,236 5,727,962 Domestic water 20,089,704 21,951,835 22,068,640 22,157,529 General aviation 296,653 372,089 407,687 404,648 Offstreet parking 192,011 177,485 165,935 128,070 Total business-type activities expenses 95,193,038 94,618,933 108,048,836 109,309,946 Total primary government expenses 359,161,653 399,864,512 410,338,534 435,859,202 Program Revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: General government 4,534,243 4,451,944 5,406,095 5,392,724 Public safety: Police 4,411,906 3,347,806 3,210,604 2,649,133 Fire 3,230,597 4,601,976 4,577,004 4,866,355 Public works 16,598,877 10,561,651 8,462,168 11,651,452 Recreation & parks 13,423,547 13,530,535 13,172,982 14,153,899 Development services 5,245,507 3,492,359 2,621,537 2,907,300 Economic/Community development (2)(76,449)85,180 1,101 870 Operating grants and contributions 18,940,149 26,063,320 22,993,743 20,178,085 Capital grants and contributions 75,921,404 76,021,617 82,831,043 68,415,443 Total governmental activities program revenues $142,229,781 $142,156,388 $143,276,277 $130,215,261 Notes: (1) This schedule reports using the accrual basis of accounting. (2) Economic/Community Development became a part of Development Services. 150 Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $12,919,972 $10,274,285 $21,956,276 $24,203,337 $26,395,470 $29,731,416 76,310,840 80,192,752 82,573,675 87,314,992 95,723,028 105,006,154 35,105,188 36,086,851 35,577,067 37,257,146 41,364,912 44,560,720 162,423,856 104,347,771 158,958,537 176,573,017 171,911,928 145,529,290 32,619,041 34,641,180 22,743,488 24,993,400 26,888,569 22,613,830 11,192,757 9,940,984 9,895,523 10,018,548 12,159,620 8,533,656 ------ 467,848 166,472 164,046 39,729 33,429 25,060 331,039,502 275,650,295 331,868,612 360,400,169 374,476,956 356,000,126 40,456,986 41,979,698 41,602,539 38,038,376 41,008,233 42,103,648 44,364,406 45,336,786 42,860,924 44,067,358 46,300,746 47,971,215 5,245,266 5,051,433 4,751,158 4,395,517 4,304,663 4,198,037 21,131,546 25,613,917 25,455,862 25,756,437 27,066,771 29,205,225 430,697 462,690 527,279 480,754 812,527 671,124 162,094 160,613 163,840 112,986 226,999 233,746 111,790,995 118,605,137 115,361,602 112,851,428 119,719,939 124,382,995 442,830,497 394,255,432 447,230,214 473,251,597 494,196,895 480,383,121 4,984,767 5,019,511 3,051,375 6,178,924 4,609,597 5,618,886 2,110,160 2,938,734 2,737,294 3,138,617 4,797,619 2,989,023 5,361,766 4,937,490 5,784,964 6,375,758 6,903,928 7,242,490 19,404,900 23,780,578 20,958,923 18,625,200 17,116,439 17,159,857 14,324,137 14,348,050 14,336,209 15,665,544 16,103,058 16,481,750 4,147,598 5,221,585 5,620,567 6,076,072 5,719,860 5,909,456 ------ 19,508,063 11,633,792 12,963,571 11,217,162 12,640,678 9,165,593 76,471,205 104,071,622 101,313,136 120,303,934 100,956,230 85,533,310 $146,312,596 $171,951,362 $166,766,039 $187,581,211 $168,847,409 $150,100,365 151 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Change in Net Position (1) continued Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Business-type activities: Charges for services Wastewater treatment $26,836,539 $29,617,486 $30,752,515 $30,743,840 Refuse collection 39,814,200 39,533,488 39,568,011 41,198,715 Agricultural water 6,619,487 5,206,010 6,891,203 4,162,253 Domestic water 21,160,388 21,773,880 22,223,640 23,140,865 General aviation 243,923 258,353 253,868 285,461 Offstreet parking 77,122 63,383 63,120 72,094 Operating grants and contributions 5,228,837 7,121,598 4,018,963 4,935,165 Capital grants and contributions 12,174,540 10,189,981 1,599,202 5,011,908 Total business-type activities program revenues 112,155,036 113,764,179 105,370,522 109,550,301 Total primary government program revenues 254,384,817 255,920,567 248,646,799 239,765,562 Net (Expenses) Revenues Governmental activities (121,738,834)(163,089,191)(159,013,421)(196,333,995) Business-type activities 16,961,998 19,145,246 (2,678,314)240,355 Total primary government Net (Expenses) Revenues (104,776,836)(143,943,945)(161,691,735)(196,093,640) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental activities: Taxes: Property taxes 70,869,285 63,923,865 62,889,341 60,717,716 Sales and use taxes 56,615,428 50,664,334 55,281,897 67,642,794 Other taxes 3,136,193 1,910,719 728,715 889,373 Intergovernmental, unrestricted 962,870 1,026,116 1,144,659 876,617 Unrestricted grants and contributions 16,767,713 19,229,234 20,701,642 21,793,292 Investment earnings (loss)2,879,700 1,103,532 73,834 282,170 Miscellaneous 1,408,497 1,776,536 1,567,489 4,223,807 Gain (loss) on sale of property 58,726 14,646 17,300 132,666 Transfers (3)47,000 150,000 1,998,260 34,000 Total Governmental Activities 152,745,412 139,798,982 144,403,137 156,592,435 Business-type activities: Investment earnings 3,757,651 3,012,666 2,136,427 1,988,022 Gain (loss) on sale of property ---38,992 Transfers (47,000)(150,000)(1,998,260)(34,000) Total business-type activities 3,710,651 2,862,666 138,167 1,993,014 Total primary government 156,456,063 142,661,648 144,541,304 158,585,449 Extraordinary gain (loss)---4,664,568 Change in Net Position Governmental activities 31,006,578 (23,290,209)(14,610,284)(39,741,560) Business-type activities 20,672,649 22,007,912 (2,540,147)2,233,369 Total primary government $51,679,227 $(1,282,297)$(17,150,431)$(37,508,191) 152 Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $30,825,384 $31,148,327 $31,437,669 $32,809,778 $33,037,996 $34,036,372 41,812,177 42,100,981 43,447,351 45,865,520 49,502,386 51,119,909 3,645,065 4,233,197 3,640,671 2,863,750 6,712,871 7,039,283 23,944,333 24,423,144 22,478,013 20,275,368 23,232,757 26,491,151 304,357 303,223 315,351 327,491 325,116 347,315 54,420 67,150 78,807 134,404 146,250 114,261 6,243,441 8,601,559 8,749,741 7,283,587 7,173,227 9,047,127 982,577 17,276,815 7,402,621 16,428,109 9,741,991 4,913,540 107,811,754 128,154,396 117,550,224 125,988,007 129,872,594 133,108,958 254,124,350 300,105,758 284,316,263 313,569,218 298,720,003 283,209,323 (184,726,906)(103,698,933)(165,102,573)(172,818,958)(205,629,547)(205,899,761) (3,979,241)9,549,259 2,188,622 13,136,579 10,152,655 8,725,963 (188,706,147)(94,149,674)(162,913,951)(159,682,379)(195,476,892)(197,173,798) 58,958,525 66,614,853 71,382,809 74,342,784 77,680,416 79,774,412 70,418,028 72,442,177 70,366,255 70,786,792 65,348,910 72,322,068 926,701 988,423 1,177,810 1,176,713 1,212,122 1,308,842 181,713 152,400 150,529 149,089 169,836 201,875 22,725,966 23,829,193 25,497,714 25,381,927 24,827,775 25,140,642 (99,546)948,629 487,532 2,295,536 283,544 1,295,749 5,187,294 1,683,631 2,173,532 1,613,591 1,707,873 1,754,210 192,354 36,039 (8,511,599)826,990 273,364 248,579 840,000 1,489,500 3,584,925 1,352,562 152,000 2,032,654 159,331,035 168,184,845 166,309,507 177,925,984 171,655,840 184,079,031 778,444 2,424,676 1,968,113 1,728,927 1,112,586 1,878,973 26,866 (4,439,038)390,791 17,545 15,670 20,370 (840,000)(1,489,500)(3,584,925)(1,352,562)(152,000)(2,032,654) (34,690)(3,503,862)(1,226,021)393,910 976,256 (133,311) 159,296,345 164,680,983 165,083,486 178,319,894 172,632,096 183,945,720 -(936,660)---54,231,181 (25,395,871)64,485,912 1,206,934 5,107,026 (33,973,707)(21,820,730) (4,013,931)6,045,397 962,601 13,530,489 11,128,911 8,592,652 $(29,409,802)$70,531,309 $2,169,535 $18,637,515 $(22,844,796)$(13,228,078) 153 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (1) Fiscal Year 2009 General Fund Reserved Inventory $22,620 Encumbrances 923,381 Cash basis 12,001,989 Unreserved Designated for current projects / contingency 4,646,968 Designated for compensated absences 6,714,368 Undesignated 26,765,142 Total general fund $51,074,468 All other governmental funds Reserved 81,360,385 Unreserved, reported in: Special revenue funds (52,326,452) Capital projects funds 30,294,286 Permanent funds 56,430,221 Total all other government funds $115,758,440 2010 2011 2012 General Fund (2) Nonspendable $-$-$13,000 $11,975 Restricted ---- Committed -28,408,926 36,613,273 37,639,359 Assigned -6,902,114 6,891,881 7,281,790 Unassigned -10,637,121 9,131,275 10,476,517 Subtotal general fund -45,948,161 52,649,429 55,409,641 All Other Governmental Funds Nonspendable ---- Restricted -8,253,366 10,051,183 23,252,930 Committed -61,058,527 58,304,744 57,014,597 Assigned -26,469,632 18,649,279 11,091,749 Unassigned ---- Subtotal all other governmental funds -95,781,525 87,005,206 91,359,276 Total governmental fund balance $-$141,729,686 $139,654,635 $146,768,917 Notes: (1) Includes all governmental funds as shown in the Fund Financial Statements. (2) In FY 2010-11, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 54 under which governmental fund balances are reported as nonspendable, restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned. FY 2009-10 fund balances have been recharacterized to comply with GASB Statement No. 54 in order to facilitate year-to-year comparisons. Source: City Finance Department 154 2013 2014 2015 Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 $3,372,390 $3,181 $1,000 $1,000 $1,025 $1,025 ------ 39,972,694 13,464,704 33,140,376 28,995,204 32,559,429 29,505,463 7,694,831 34,586,157 7,254,726 4,042,766 3,567,936 2,914,844 10,865,979 6,502,852 383,987 8,783,314 3,115,798 7,077,156 61,905,894 54,556,894 40,780,089 41,822,284 39,244,188 39,498,488 --944,356 44,508 7,675,326 1,212,183 16,246,571 21,015,837 22,112,200 21,988,624 20,626,443 20,759,775 56,799,759 62,344,103 80,565,806 64,661,547 67,725,705 68,066,549 15,840,236 58,935,265 51,017,356 51,026,114 37,747,940 46,316,269 ------ 88,886,566 142,295,205 154,639,718 137,720,793 133,775,414 136,354,776 $150,792,460 $196,852,099 $195,419,807 $179,543,077 $173,019,602 $175,853,264 155 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Revenues Taxes $147,153,335 $128,716,315 $139,250,878 $150,761,990 $159,530,114 Licenses and permits 2,576,755 2,192,594 1,757,045 2,321,093 2,757,307 Intergovernmental 82,994,989 90,926,017 87,577,120 83,597,649 85,698,254 Charges for services 26,850,501 24,488,013 23,982,350 34,518,514 26,237,278 Fines, forfeitures & assessments 18,207,527 13,601,153 14,359,150 4,034,565 20,697,866 Interest income 3,455,207 2,193,269 804,910 865,071 (266,411) Contributions and donations ----1,543,041 Miscellaneous 4,097,040 5,830,575 4,662,521 7,346,225 8,383,499 Total Revenues 285,335,354 267,947,936 272,393,974 283,445,107 304,580,948 Expenditures General government 11,509,310 11,070,305 9,944,217 10,383,512 11,186,274 Police 65,824,506 63,789,358 65,985,764 68,489,176 72,745,830 Fire 31,338,492 30,921,380 29,450,014 31,390,736 33,528,360 Public works 27,594,508 24,023,808 21,967,831 25,849,496 25,274,629 Recreation and parks 23,702,177 22,281,910 22,620,636 23,599,669 25,277,659 Development services 9,619,973 7,811,683 6,486,573 6,229,936 11,994,604 Economic/Community development(1)5,567,930 11,322,095 8,147,683 3,646,144 - Non-departmental 11,111,355 17,103,372 12,517,816 20,283,121 13,338,729 Capital outlay 104,472,583 107,556,933 97,915,227 94,567,093 105,808,610 Debt service Principal 3,509,000 203,000 444,000 366,000 378,000 Interest and fiscal charges 324,862 204,673 221,920 219,865 208,424 Total Expenditures 294,574,696 296,288,517 275,701,681 285,024,748 299,741,119 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (9,239,342)(28,340,581)(3,307,707)(1,579,641)4,839,829 Other financing sources (uses) Notes/certificate proceeds -1,800,000 --- Transfers in 12,740,413 8,813,765 9,580,944 11,587,495 18,164,310 Transfers out (12,752,513)(813,765)(8,358,944)(12,704,555)(18,898,910) Reserve transfer to agency funds --10,656 -- Extraordinary gain ---4,664,568 - Total other financing sources (uses)(12,100)9,800,000 1,232,656 3,547,508 (734,600) Net change in fund balances $(9,251,442)$(18,540,581)$(2,075,051)$1,967,867 $4,105,229 Debt service as a percentage of non-capital expenditures 1.8%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.2% Notes: (1) Economic/Community Development became a part of Development Services. Source: City Finance Department 156 Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $163,369,374 $168,047,259 $171,344,057 $168,758,632 $178,228,594 3,644,027 3,297,396 3,216,872 3,321,133 3,268,134 112,509,497 113,170,797 129,091,459 111,232,933 93,198,441 28,308,972 29,643,496 31,225,288 31,530,433 34,404,377 25,732,782 21,984,077 20,337,463 21,325,888 18,887,330 1,604,668 1,470,902 2,823,200 591,514 1,791,980 251,775 10,390 153,607 294,156 259,932 4,710,359 9,100,338 6,377,099 3,789,687 4,342,074 340,131,454 346,724,655 364,569,045 340,844,376 334,380,862 11,888,465 19,254,079 21,404,144 21,483,266 21,883,948 77,504,268 83,484,871 85,469,207 85,303,925 89,209,119 34,895,073 36,224,449 36,956,928 37,694,398 39,299,505 25,744,355 26,828,323 26,936,064 25,826,378 25,798,786 26,309,603 18,833,884 18,145,518 18,881,782 20,215,698 11,321,294 12,231,555 12,068,546 11,861,982 9,419,106 ----- 10,726,379 12,736,007 13,348,200 10,724,880 11,699,947 94,992,545 134,748,520 164,583,100 134,231,542 113,952,709 443,124 454,964 489,828 503,828 502,352 195,434 252,300 57,115 65,870 59,324 294,020,540 345,048,952 379,458,650 346,577,851 332,040,494 46,110,914 1,675,703 (14,889,605)(5,733,475)2,340,368 ----- 16,069,190 15,963,966 10,049,932 7,686,698 7,691,676 (16,334,090)(17,860,400)(10,158,904)(7,686,698)(7,956,681) ----- ----- (264,900)(1,896,434)(108,972)-(265,005) $45,846,014 $(220,731)$(14,998,577)$(5,733,475)$2,075,363 0.2%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.2% 157 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Governmental Activities Tax Revenues By Source Last Ten Fiscal Years (1) Fiscal Year General Property Taxes Sales and Use Taxes Transient Occupancy Taxes Business License Taxes Utility Franchise Taxes In-Lieu and Other Taxes Total Taxes 2009 $70,869,285 (2)$56,615,428 $7,144,718 $3,899,841 $5,487,871 $3,136,192 $147,153,335 2010 57,185,433 (2)50,664,333 6,493,702 3,173,514 9,288,614 (3)1,910,719 128,716,315 2011 62,889,341 (2)55,281,897 6,851,869 3,415,351 10,083,705 (3)728,715 139,250,878 2012 60,717,717 (2)67,642,795 7,827,792 3,312,485 10,371,830 (3)889,373 150,761,992 2013 65,696,957 (2)70,418,028 8,274,240 3,372,972 10,733,798 (3)1,034,119 159,530,114 2014 66,614,853 (2)72,442,178 8,826,003 3,607,558 10,890,359 (3)988,423 163,369,374 2015 71,382,809 (2)70,366,255 9,487,984 3,730,720 11,901,681 (3)1,177,810 168,047,259 2016 74,342,784 (2)70,786,793 9,450,710 3,904,569 11,682,488 (3)1,176,713 171,344,057 2017 77,680,416 (2)65,348,909 9,577,898 3,875,410 11,063,877 (3)1,212,122 168,758,632 2018 79,774,412 (2)72,322,068 9,570,855 3,826,518 11,425,899 (3)1,308,842 178,228,594 Notes: (1) Includes all governmental funds as shown in the Fund Financial Statements. (2) Includes Vehicle License Fee in Lieu revenue. (3) Includes additional taxes and Utility Surcharge revenues designated by ordinance for road purposes. Source: City Finance Department 158 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Principal Property Taxpayers Current Year and Nine Years Ago 2009 2018 Taxpayer Taxable Assessed Value Rank Percentage of Total Taxable Assessed Value Taxable Assessed Value Rank Percentage of Total Taxable Assessed Value Nestle Dreyers Ice Cream Company (formerly Nestle Holdings, Inc in 2009)$206,288,619 1 0.86%$161,892,465 2 0.58% Valley Plaza Mall LP (formerly Bakersfield Mall LLC in 2009)155,367,163 2 0.65%132,936,127 3 0.48% Chevron USA Inc.133,485,948 3 0.56%171,042,754 1 0.61% California Water Service Company 81,945,522 4 0.34%105,738,072 4 0.38% DS Properties 18 (formerly Donahue Schriber Realty Group LLP in 2009)80,039,167 5 0.33%76,410,816 8 0.27% WalMart Stores Inc/Sam's Club --%85,853,754 6 0.31% Castle & Cook CA Inc. 60,135,054 7 0.25%107,154,819 5 0.39% State Farm Insurance Company 57,700,000 8 0.24%--% Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc.54,127,855 9 0.23%71,843,359 7 0.26% GSF Edgewater Investors LP (formerly GSF Springs I Investors LP in 2009)--%67,852,803 9 0.24% Lennar Home of Cal INC 53,791,789 10 0.22%--% BLC Glenwood Gardens SNF LP 77,832,187 6 0.32%--% California RSRCS R and E Ventures --%57,618,184 10 0.21% Total taxable assessed value of ten (10) largest taxpayers 960,713,304 4.00%1,038,343,153 %3.73 Total taxable assessed value of other taxpayers 23,072,670,456 96.00%26,816,191,280 %96.27 Total taxable assessed value of all taxpayers $24,033,383,760 100.00%$27,854,534,433 %100.00 Note: Related parties grouped together on the original source document (County's list of assessed valuations) are included in the total assessed valuation amount for each taxpayer cited. Unitary and operating nonunitary are excluded as valuation by parcel is no longer available. Source: HDL Coren & Cone, Kern County Assessor 2017-18 Combined Tax Rolls 159 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years Amounts expressed in thousands Fiscal Year Secured Less: Ended June 30 Residential Property Commercial Property Other Unsecured Tax Exempt Real Property 2009 $17,705,933 $3,785,022 $3,495,239 $751,790 $957,674 2010 15,577,372 4,030,198 3,311,171 878,216 1,080,957 2011 14,950,744 4,053,184 3,134,829 834,158 1,063,302 2012 14,521,636 3,832,880 3,245,619 850,899 1,104,081 2013 14,698,137 3,904,832 3,268,227 912,300 1,097,928 2014 15,592,995 4,010,392 3,575,805 791,531 1,186,061 2015 17,297,625 4,111,192 3,607,361 819,306 1,230,972 2016 18,495,838 4,238,653 3,749,127 835,424 1,321,877 2017 19,571,365 4,497,923 3,971,042 801,607 1,414,164 2018 20,569,686 4,650,981 4,085,221 767,598 1,451,354 (1) In 1978 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 13 which limited taxes to a total maximum rate of 1% based upon the assessed value of the property being taxed. Each year, the assessed value of property may be increased by an "inflation factor" (limited to a maximum of 2%). With few exceptions, property is only reassessed as a result of new construction activity or at the time it is sold to a new owner. At that point, the property is reassessed based upon the added value of the construction or at the purchase price (market value) or economic value of the property sold. The assessed valuation data shown above represents the only data currently available with respect to the actual market value of taxable property and is subject to the limitations described above. Source: HDL Coren & Cone, Kern County Assessor 2017-18 Combined Tax Rolls. 160 Total Taxable Total Estimated Actual Assessed Value Direct Rate Taxable Value (1) $24,780,310 0.1961 Unavailable 22,716,000 0.1981 Unavailable 21,909,613 0.1969 Unavailable 21,346,953 0.1956 Unavailable 21,685,568 0.1924 Unavailable 22,784,662 0.1619 Unavailable 24,604,512 0.1623 Unavailable 25,997,165 0.1616 Unavailable 27,427,773 0.1613 Unavailable 28,622,132 0.1609 Unavailable 161 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Property Tax Rates Direct and Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 Basic County-Wide Levy (1)1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Overlapping Debt Bakersfield School 0.0568 0.0676 0.0663 0.0710 Beardsley School 0.0485 0.0548 0.0574 0.0599 Edison School Bond --0.0720 0.0664 Fairfax School 0.0296 0.0330 0.0401 0.0688 Fruitvale School Bonds 0.0537 0.0610 0.0695 0.0759 Greenfield School 0.0615 0.0835 0.0783 0.0804 Kern Community College District 0.0091 0.0094 0.0101 0.0091 Kern County Water Agency 0.0495 0.0601 0.0553 0.0748 Kern High School District 0.0358 0.0431 0.0447 0.0363 Lakeside School -0.0216 0.0188 0.0224 Lamont School 0.0466 0.0652 0.0694 0.0693 Norris School 0.0250 0.0330 0.0298 0.0327 Panama Buena Vista School 0.0088 0.0099 0.0116 0.0115 Rio Bravo-Greeley 0.0681 0.0690 0.0741 0.0737 Rosedale 0.0025 0.0046 -- Standard Bond ---- Standard Bond 2006A 0.0240 0.0258 0.0206 0.0191 Vineland School 07-A 0.0397 0.0424 0.0414 0.0423 Total Direct & Overlapping Tax Rates (2)1.5592 1.6840 1.7594 1.8136 City Share of 1% Levy (3)0.1847 0.1846 0.1852 0.1851 Total Direct Rate (4)0.1961 0.1981 0.1969 0.1956 (1) In 1978 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 13 which set the property tax rate at a 1.00% fixed amount. This 1.00% is shared by all taxing agencies for which the subject property resides within. In addition to the 1.00% fixed amount, property owners are charged taxes as a percentage of assessed property values for the payment of any voter approved bonds. (2) Overlapping rates are those of local and county governments that apply to property owners within the City. Not all overlapping rates apply to all City property owners. (3) City's share of 1.00% Levy is based on the City's share of the general fund tax rate area with the largest net taxable value within the City. Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) general fund tax shifts are not included in tax ratio figures. The effective City rate after ERAF is 9.9%. (4) Total Direct Rate is the weighted average of all individual direct rates applied by the City of Bakersfield. Source: HDL Coren & Cone (Kern County Auditor-Controller's Office) 162 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0681 0.0360 0.0186 0.0339 0.0204 0.0522 0.0499 0.0486 0.0406 0.0480 0.0723 0.0638 0.0694 0.0687 0.0678 0.0716 0.0706 0.0755 0.0686 0.0607 0.0692 0.0712 0.0631 0.1075 0.0614 0.0678 0.0595 0.0591 0.0516 0.0534 0.0826 0.0843 0.0544 0.0445 0.0438 0.0419 0.0085 0.0126 0.0105 0.0136 0.0132 0.0363 0.0540 0.0569 0.0525 0.0537 0.0585 0.0785 0.0437 0.0392 0.0361 0.0324 0.0260 0.0533 0.0227 0.0283 0.0254 0.0267 0.0236 0.0264 0.0615 0.0681 0.0630 0.0657 0.0681 0.0682 0.0580 0.0500 0.0489 0.0498 0.0565 0.0579 -0.0194 0.0294 0.0330 0.0243 0.0224 0.0535 0.0769 0.0649 0.0581 0.0629 0.0687 ------ -0.0208 0.0219 0.0403 0.0770 0.0185 0.0152 0.0110 0.0140 -- 0.0437 0.0418 0.0431 0.0456 0.0441 0.0453 1.7641 1.7745 1.7157 1.7428 1.7393 1.9283 0.1851 0.1839 0.1839 0.1839 0.1839 0.0184 0.1924 0.1619 0.1623 0.1616 0.1613 0.1609 163 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years (1) Collected within the Fiscal Year of the Levy Total Collections to Date Fiscal Year Ended June 30 Tax Levied for the Fiscal Year Amount Percentage of Levy Collections in Subsequent Years (2)Amount Percentage of Levy (3) 2009 $42,390,737 $41,627,252 98.20%$1,626,519 $43,253,771 102.04% 2010 37,878,353 36,683,727 96.85%2,308,846 38,992,573 102.94% 2011 38,752,737 38,136,143 98.41%437,340 38,573,483 99.54% 2012 37,333,785 36,574,775 97.97%417,383 36,992,158 99.08% 2013 38,448,465 37,544,318 97.65%159,495 37,703,813 98.06% 2014 39,887,750 39,344,783 98.64%375,679 39,720,462 99.58% 2015 42,153,405 41,301,939 97.98%166,794 41,468,733 98.38% 2016 44,309,063 43,455,549 98.07%254,923 43,710,472 98.65% 2017 47,433,693 46,803,045 98.67%4,914 46,807,959 98.68% 2018 47,385,467 46,768,741 98.70%345,147 47,113,888 99.43% Notes: (1) Excludes Redevelopment property tax increment. (2) Delinquent tax collections do not include interest or penalties. (3) Total collections to date may exceed 100% of annual levy. Delinquent tax collections are recorded in the current levy year as the County of Kern does not give detail as to the levy year for delinquent tax collections. This was confirmed with the County of Kern in 2014. Source: City Finance Department 164 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates Last Ten Fiscal Years Year State of California Total Rate 2009 %8.25 %8.00 2010 %8.25 %8.25 2011 %8.25 %8.25 2012 %7.25 %7.25 2013 %7.50 %7.50 2014 %7.50 %7.50 2015 %7.50 %7.50 2016 %7.50 %7.50 2017 %7.25 %7.25 2018 %7.25 %7.25 Note: The City's sales tax rate may be changed with voter approval. Source: California State Board of Equalization 165 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Taxable Sales By Market Groups Last Ten Fiscal Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Retail Trade Groups $40,426,683 $34,939,803 $36,129,898 $40,605,395 $44,051,820 Non-Store Retailers 991,106 728,190 714,709 922,257 961,178 Service Groups 3,149,366 2,809,311 3,279,903 4,056,208 4,396,783 Construction Contractor Groups 1,615,488 628,808 612,563 807,930 813,201 Producers, Manufacturers and Wholesalers Group 7,713,486 5,682,497 6,119,199 8,620,630 9,155,110 Total $53,896,129 $44,788,609 $46,856,272 $55,012,420 $59,378,092 Note: 2017 data is the most recent information available. Source: California State Board of Equalization 166 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $45,612,755 $47,515,688 $46,963,710 $46,705,531 $48,673,472 1,067,613 1,083,860 1,107,792 1,133,093 1,125,033 4,479,230 4,472,838 3,254,284 3,598,424 3,511,840 1,060,112 1,536,343 2,838,481 155,159 1,520,316 8,817,193 8,221,851 6,475,824 5,484,889 6,746,698 $61,036,903 $62,830,580 $60,640,091 $57,077,096 $61,577,359 167 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Sales Tax Revenue Payers By Industry 2017 and Ten Years Ago 2007 Number of Filers Percent of Total Tax Liability Paid Percent of Total $ New Car Dealers 23 %0.34 $8,633,934 %15.47 Department Stores 22 %0.33 6,142,323 %11.01 Service Stations 81 %1.20 3,838,334 %6.88 Eating/Drinking Places without Alcohol 438 %6.51 2,631,706 %4.72 Petroleum, Petrol Products, Oil Well Rfg & Serv Stn Equip 63 %0.94 2,567,128 %4.60 Building Material 35 %0.52 2,440,542 %4.37 General Stores 17 %0.25 1,887,652 %3.38 Contractors & Mfgs & Wholesalers of Building Material 195 %2.90 1,839,151 %3.30 Full Time Specialty Stores 1020 %15.16 1,530,523 %2.74 Eating/Drinking Place with General On-Sale Lic 193 %2.87 1,513,997 %2.70 Family Apparel -%--%- Grocery Stores with General Liquor Lic -%--%- Electronic & Electrical Equipment -%--%- All Other 4,641 %68.98 22,785,875 %40.83 Total 6,728 %100.00 $55,811,165 %100.00 Note: Due to confidentially issues, the names of the ten largest revenue payers are not available. The categories presented are intended to provide alternative information regarding the souces of the City's revenue. The amounts shown are gross collections prior to refunds and collections of amounts due from prior year. Source: California State Board of Equalization 168 2017 Number of Filers Percent of Total Tax Liability Paid Percent of Total $ 26 %0.35 $10,106,611 %16.41 49 %0.66 8,658,763 %14.06 97 %1.31 4,491,745 %7.30 422 %5.69 4,068,611 %6.61 -%--%- 14 %0.19 2,309,023 %3.75 -%--%- -%--%- 874 %11.79 1,770,300 %2.87 374 %5.04 3,614,637 %5.87 368 %4.96 2,203,816 %3.58 92 %1.24 1,837,616 %2.99 26 %0.35 1,233,085 %2.00 5,073 %68.42 21,283,153 %34.56 7,415 %100.00 $61,577,360 %100.00 169 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Ratio of General Bonded Debt Outstanding Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year General Obligations Bonds Net Bonded Debt Total Ratio of Net Bonded Debt to Assessed Value Population (1) Total Debt Per Capita 2009 $-$-$-%-327,650 $- 2010 ----333,847 0.00 2011 ----338,952 0.00 2012 ----354,480 0.00 2013 ----359,221 0.00 2014 ----367,315 0.00 2015 ----365,504 0.00 2016 ----379,110 0.00 2017 ----383,512 0.00 2018 ----386,839 0.00 Notes: Includes all long-term general obligation bonded debt. (1) State Department of Finance Source: City Finance Department 170 171 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type Last Ten Fiscal Years Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Revenue Bonds Notes Certificates of Participation Total Governmental Activities (3)Revenue Bonds Bonds 2009 $-$4,014,000 $30,230,000 $34,244,000 $242,701,570 $- 2010 -5,611,000 28,465,000 34,076,000 241,270,507 - 2011 -5,167,000 26,620,000 31,787,000 238,994,444 - 2012 -4,801,000 24,710,000 29,511,000 217,003,381 - 2013 -4,423,000 22,725,000 27,148,000 201,875,000 - 2014 -4,150,049 20,640,000 24,790,049 200,236,254 - 2015 -3,932,118 18,460,000 22,392,118 190,545,190 - 2016 -3,442,290 16,175,000 19,617,290 187,377,613 - 2017 -2,938,462 13,785,000 16,723,462 174,647,913 - 2018 -2,584,240 11,275,000 13,859,240 166,998,212 - Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the basic financial statements. (1) U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis. As available, figures and estimates should be used for general purposes only. Estimates are revised periodically to include data that may not have been available at the time. Personal income was used for the base of this calculation. Details can be found in the Demographic and Economic Statistics. (2) State Department of Finance. Estimates are revised periodically to include data that may not have been available at the time. Population was used for the base of this calculation. Details can be found in the Demographic and Economic Statistics. (3) Total Governmental Activities and Total Primary Government totals do not include Compensated Absences. (4) As restated. Source: City Finance Department 172 Business-Type Activities Deferred Bond Premium Notes Contracts/ Loans Capital Leases (4) Total Business-Type Activities Total Primary Government Percentage of Personal Income (1) (4) Per Capita (2) (4) $8,276,570 $10,614,878 $-$-$261,593,018 $295,837,018 %1.10 $796 7,945,507 8,991,701 --258,207,715 292,283,715 %1.06 778 7,614,444 7,521,262 -22,138,054 276,268,204 308,055,204 %4.02 801 7,283,381 6,769,136 -21,664,941 252,720,839 282,231,839 %3.69 796 6,621,255 6,017,009 -21,174,195 235,687,459 262,835,459 %3.34 732 -5,264,884 -20,664,937 226,166,075 250,956,124 %3.11 683 -4,512,759 246,131 20,135,757 215,439,837 237,831,955 %2.89 651 -3,760,631 292,503 19,091,567 210,522,314 230,139,604 %2.70 607 -3,008,504 319,400 18,730,478 196,706,295 213,429,757 %2.45 557 -2,256,378 368,746 18,315,293 187,938,629 201,797,869 %2.25 522 173 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Direct and Overlapping Debt (1) As of June 30, 2018 2017 - 18 Assessed Valuation $28,614,218,773 Adjusted Assessed Valuation $28,614,218,773 Debt Outstanding (2) Estimated Percentage Applicable (3) Estimated Share of Overlapping Debt Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt Kern Community College District Safety Repair and Improvement District $128,956,081 33.840%$43,638,738 Kern Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 40,225,000 33.634 13,529,277 Kern High School District 322,926,209 52.626 169,943,147 Bakersfield City School District 94,756,619 72.789 68,972,395 Beardsley School District 19,572,057 21.175 4,144,383 Edison School District 4,649,942 0.021 976 Fairfax School District 9,595,245 23.741 2,278,007 Fruitvale School District 25,539,942 78.173 19,965,339 Greenfield Union School District 11,258,406 86.007 9,683,017 Lakeside Union School District 12,593,307 39.507 4,975,238 Lamont School District 1,744,775 0.020 349 Norris School District 26,584,412 62.434 16,597,712 Panama-Buena Vista Union School District 64,375,000 97.112 62,515,850 Rio Bravo-Greeley Union School District 9,937,494 1.443 143,398 Standard School District 28,740,000 1.027 295,160 Vineland School District 3,914,574 0.0004 16 Kern Delta Water District 390,000 77.922 303,896 Greenfield Union School District CFD No. 1 & No. 3 6,880,025 100.000 6,880,025 RNR School Financing Authority 106,825,000 87.645 93,626,771 Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt $919,464,088 $517,493,694 Overlapping General Fund Debt Kern County Certificates of Participation $99,645,710 32.607 $32,491,477 Kern County Pension Obligations 231,489,315 32.607 75,481,721 Certificates of Participation: Kern County Board of Education 37,190,000 32.607 12,126,543 Kern County Community College District 30,115,000 30.414 9,159,176 Kern County Community College District Benefit 78,805,000 30.414 23,967,753 Kern High School District 99,665,000 52.626 52,449,703 Panama-Buena Vista Union School District 54,470,000 97.112 52,896,906 Fairfax School District General Fund Obligations 2,227,771 23.741 528,895 Rio Bravo-Greeley Union School District General Fund Obligations 490,000 1.443 7,071 Rosedale Union School District General Fund Obligations 9,995,000 56.349 5,632,083 Overlapping Tax Increment Debt (Successor Agency)2,525,000 100.000 2,525,000 Overlapping General Fund Debt $646,617,796 $267,266,328 Total Overlapping Debt $1,566,081,884 $784,760,022 Direct Debt City of Bakersfield City of Bakersfield General Fund Obligations $11,275,000 Long-term notes payable $2,584,240 Total Direct and Overlapping Debt $798,619,262 Notes: (1)Excluded from this schedule are: (a) all bonds which are not general obligation bonds of the City and (b) general obligation bonds issued for water utility purposes which are payable from Water Fund revenues. (2) Direct debt is reported net of debt service monies available. Overlapping debt is reported at gross values. (3) Percentage of overlapping agency's assessed valuation located within boundaries of the City. Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. and City Finance Department 174 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Computation of Legal Debt Margin June 30, 2018 Legislation does not mandate a debt limit for the City of Bakersfield. 175 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Pledged - Revenue Coverage Last Ten Fiscal Years Wastewater Revenue Bonds Fiscal Sewer Charges and Other Less: Operating Net Available Debt Service (3) Year Revenue (1)Expenses (2)Revenue Principal Interest Coverage (4) 2008-2009 $33,776,649 $11,447,963 $22,328,686 $-$10,361,705 2.15 2009-2010 38,115,751 11,928,571 26,187,180 1,100,000 9,597,489 2.45 2010-2011 36,073,819 14,144,051 21,929,768 1,945,000 9,597,489 1.90 2011-2012(5)36,769,858 12,913,038 23,856,820 2,930,000 (6)9,597,489 1.90 2012-2013 37,901,401 13,156,437 24,744,964 2,845,000 (7)9,451,151 2.01 2013- 2014 39,610,854 14,265,421 25,345,433 3,260,000 (7)9,959,591 1.92 2014-2015 40,386,623 14,195,887 26,190,736 4,360,000 (7)8,744,990 2.00 2015-2016(8)39,111,557 14,768,141 24,343,416 5,475,000 (7)3,694,732 2.65 2016-2017 39,078,787 14,796,170 24,282,617 6,055,000 (7)6,557,105 1.93 2017-2018 42,356,491 12,868 42,343,623 5,975,000 6,270,503 3.46 Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the basic financial statements. Operating expenses do not include interest or depreciation expenses. (1) Includes amounts for connection fees, interest funded in bond issue and principal portion of lease revenues. (2) Does not include the General Obligation Bonds reported in Enterprise Funds. Operating expenses exclude depreciation expense. (3) Issued Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A and 2007B in August of 2007. (4) Minimum coverage requirement on the Wastewater Revenue bonds is 1.25. (5) Previous report included arbitrage expenses. Revenue has been corrected. (6) In addition to the normal debt service amount referenced above, there was a partial bond call of $18,730,000 approved by the City Council to reduce the principal balance of the 2007B bond down to $25 million. Sewer revenue bonds 2007B were refunded in January 2012 (Series 2012A) to change the liquidity provider from Dexia to JP Morgan Chase. (7) In addition to the normal debt service referenced above, City Council approved partial bond calls of $5 million each year to reduce the principal balance of Sewer Revenue Bonds Series 2012A. (8) Partial refunding of Sewer Revenue Bonds Series 2007A in July 2015 (Series 2015A). Source: City Finance Department 176 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Population (1) Personal Income (2) (millions) Per Capita Personal Income (2) Median Age (3) Education Level as a % of Population having Formal Schooling (3) (4) Elementary School Enrollment Estimated Unemploymen t Rate (%) (5) 2008-2009 327,650 $7,085 $21,624 30.3 71.5 27,263 14.70% 2009-2010 333,847 7,034 21,071 30.8 78.1 27,267 15.80% 2010-2011 338,952 7,007 20,675 29.5 77.8 27,590 15.30% 2011-2012 354,480 7,640 21,553 29.5 78.1 21,411 10.50% 2012-2013 359,221 7,862 21,887 29.8 77.8 23,422 8.40% 2013-2014 367,315 8,074 21,980 30.0 78.2 24,012 7.90% 2014-2015 365,504 8,228 22,512 30.1 78.5 24,232 9.30% 2015-2016 379,110 8,532 22,505 30.2 79.7 24,267 9.10% 2016-2017 383,512 8,713 22,718 30.4 79.6 24,299 9.20% 2017-2018 386,839 8,965 23,175 30.4 79.6 24,375 7.80% Notes: (1) State Department of Finance. Estimates are revised periodically to include data that may not have been available at the time. (2) U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis. As available, figures and estimates should be used for general purposes only. Estimates are revised periodically to include data that may not have been available at the time. Information is for Bakersfield Metropolitan area. Effective 2008-2009 information now includes Delano area. (3) U.S. Census Bureau estimates as available for Bakersfield Metropolitan area. (4) This column shows the percent of the City population 25 years and older who are high school graduates or higher. (5) State of California Employment Development Department (Data shown is for Kern County). 177 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Principal Employers (1) Current Year and Nine Years Ago 2009 2018 Employer Employees Rank Percent of Total City Employment Employees Rank Percent of Total City Employment County of Kern (1)N/A -7,457 1 %4.53 Kern High School District (1)4,321 2 %2.63 Bakersfield City School District 3,917 3 %2.38 Dignity Health 3,417 4 %2.08 Panama-Buena Vista Union School District 2,388 5 %1.45 Bolthouse Farms 2,034 6 %1.24 Adventist Health Bakersfield 1,982 7 %1.20 Kern Medical Center 1,608 8 %0.98 Kern County Superintendent of Schools 1,546 9 %0.94 City of Bakersfield 1,470 10 %0.89 Others 134,360 %81.68 Total N/A -164,500 %100.00 (1) Not all employees are employed within the Bakersfield City Limits. Source: City Finance Department. Total number of employed persons in Bakersfield provided by EDD Labor Force Data. Note: Only current data is available. 178 179 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Function Governmental activities: General government 88 98 106 109 110 119 Public safety Police Officers 344 358 380 385 389 394 Civilians 127 127 123 131 137 143 Fire Firefighters and officers 181 179 176 177 177 177 Civilians 19 19 19 19 21 22 Public works 248 244 244 247 250 254 Community services 155 147 151 153 153 150 Community development ----65 63 Development services 91 69 57 55 -- Economic/Community dev.22 20 12 11 -- Business-type activities: Wastewater treatment 49 55 54 56 57 59 Refuse collection 102 102 102 103 106 107 Domestic/Agricultural water 26 28 28 28 28 28 General aviation ------ Offstreet parking ------ Total 1,452 1,446 1,452 1,474 1,493 1,516 Source: City Finance Department 180 2015 2016 2017 2018 126 123 123 124 404 404 407 407 148 148 148 151 177 177 177 177 22 22 22 23 248 244 243 247 150 146 146 148 65 63 63 63 ---- ---- 59 59 59 61 107 107 108 109 28 28 29 29 ---- ---- 1,534 1,521 1,525 1,539 181 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits (1) Last Ten Calendar Years Commercial Construction Residential Construction Other Construction No. of Units Value No. of Units Value Value 2008 95 $60,840 1,090 $237,091 $93,314 2009 83 62,088 1,097 232,275 86,668 2010 40 13,425 848 197,380 98,057 2011 40 41,482 422 92,313 81,984 2012 49 20,807 1,122 259,851 108,877 2013 69 15,710 1,336 312,569 157,024 2014 89 56,320 1,435 389,715 203,722 2015 70 49,806 1,391 384,819 377,510 2016 115 63,714 1,387 370,956 338,559 2017 59 61,034 1,132 332,652 312,316 Notes: (1) Property value and bank deposits reported in thousands. (2) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (3) Construction units and values are based on a 12 month calendar year. June 30, 2018 data reflects the 2017 calendar year. Source: City Finance Department 182 Total Construction No. of Units Value Bank Deposits (2) 1,185 $391,245 $4,485,261 1,180 381,031 4,728,745 888 308,862 5,172,880 462 215,779 5,280,515 1,171 389,535 5,626,755 1,405 485,303 6,069,764 1,524 649,757 6,421,302 1,461 812,135 6,759,961 1,502 773,229 7,141,426 1,191 706,002 7,515,635 183 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Function Public safety - Police Physical arrests 18,531 17,023 22,028 29,623 Parking violations 7,985 5,522 5,433 4,708 Traffic violations 11,365 12,018 10,043 9,172 Public safety - Fire Number of calls answered 28,605 26,885 27,392 28,870 Inspections 2,444 2,896 3,355 3,276 Public works Street resurfacing (lane miles)84 49 83 129 Refuse collection Refuse collected (tons/day)100,750 112,000 111,500 108,200 Recyclables collected (tons/day)39,200 42,000 47,000 48,215 Recreation & parks Athletic field permits issued 6,849 6,219 5,685 10,156 Community center, aquatics/sports admissions 323,661 379,286 440,101 473,530 Domestic/agricultural water New connections 1,293 954 493 301 Water main breaks 14 5 7 10 Average daily consumption 41,542 39,370 27,008 27,568 (thousands of gallons) Wastewater treatment Average daily sewage treatment 31.49 MGD 31.49 MGD 32.3 MGD 31.28 MGD (millions of gallons) Source: City Finance Department 184 Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 32,158 37,246 24,254 19,965 13,008 9,502 6,620 10,499 6,183 4,083 3,843 2,238 11,528 15,065 24,154 26,934 24,190 16,548 31,164 32,898 35,117 35,747 38,823 40,945 3,660 4,195 4,978 5,684 6,859 5,649 127 116 119 79 70 75 111,420 110,125 102,500 102,800 103,100 102,200 53,350 55,500 78,500 79,100 79,500 82,700 9,297 9,625 9,046 8,054 7,788 8,224 475,619 502,994 527,617 553,831 518,432 534,959 701 1,123 1,033 945 968 500 14 4 5 4 4 3 36,730 39,712 34,973 29,812 33,378 36,128 32.13 MGD 30.0 MGD 29.9 MGD 28.7 MGD 29.0 MGD 29.6 MGD 185 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Capital Asset Statistics by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Function Land (1) Area (2)143.46 144.40 149.75 149.80 Public safety Police stations/substations 4 4 4 4 Fire stations 13 14 14 14 Refuse collection Collection trucks 57 57 57 53 Public works Streets (miles) (3)1,242 1,379 1,394 1,409 Streetlights 15,809 15,923 16,092 16,160 Traffic signals 343 359 394 394 Recreation & parks Parks acreage 484 494 595 595 Parks 55 55 59 59 Swimming pools 6 4 4 4 Tennis courts 11 11 11 12 Community centers 3 3 3 3 Domestic/Agricultural water Water mains (miles) (3)491 493 501 502 Fire hydrants (3)10,041 10,220 10,301 10,441 Wastewater treatment Sanitary sewers (miles)1,059 1,059 1,061 1,061 Storm sewers (miles)261 262 263 263 Maximum daily treatment capacity 41 MGD 57 MGD 57 MGD 57 MGD (millions of gallons) Notes: (1) Reported in square miles. (2) Corrected number for 2008 for more accurate information provided. (3) Corrected numbers for all years with more accurate information provided. Source: City Finance Department 186 Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 150.01 150.18 150.18 150.97 151.10 151.10 4 3 3 3 3 3 14 14 14 14 14 14 55 57 57 57 57 57 1,424 1,441 1,441 1,553 1,596 1,505 16,602 16,388 16,486 16,781 17,042 18,632 402 410 419 420 426 428 595 623 769 769 776 810 59 59 59 59 59 59 4 4 4 4 4 4 12 12 12 12 12 12 3 3 3 3 3 3 503 505 515 525 535 589 10,581 10,723 10,853 11,117 11,130 11,396 1,061 1,063 1,072 1,076 1,077 1,077 263 265 268 269 270 270 57 MGD 57 MGD 57 MGD 57 MGD 57 MGD 57 MGD 187 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Schedule of Insurance in Force June 30, 2018 Excess Workers' Compensation Statutory Limit with a $500,000 self-insured retention. Excess Liability $75,000,000 Limit with a $1,000,000 self-insured retention. Combination Crime $3,000,000 Coverage limit, $25,000 deductible. Airport Operations $10,000,000 Coverage limit. Aircraft $10,000,000 Coverage limit. Fiduciary Liability $5,000,000 Physical Loss: All Risk Property and Boiler $600,000,000 Coverage on buildings and contents subject to $5,000 deductible with various sublimits. Machinery Auto-Physical Damage Coverage for high value vehicles over $100,000 subject to a $10,000 deductible. Life and Medical: Life and Accident $2,000 Supervisory & Management employees. Each employee (basic coverage) and additional insurance equal to annual salary to nearest $1,000. $12,000 Safety employees, each employee (basic coverage). $30,000 Miscellaneous employees, each employee (basic coverage). Medical and Dental Basic coverage plus (no lifetime maximum) extended benefits of 90% after $750 deductible for medical (Blue Shield) or Group dental ($50 deductible for United Concordia). Source: Liability and Physical Loss coverage is provided by the City's Risk Management. Department. Life and Medical coverage is provided by the City's Human Resource Department. 188 Insurance Company Policy Number Expiration Date Annual Premium CSAC-EIA WC1718 06/30/19 $907,331 ACCEL 06/30/19 980,069 National Union Fire 016060820 07/01/19 11,713 Pik West AAPN14413352001 07/01/19 3,175 Pik West NAC6009141 07/01/19 14,595 Hudson SFD31211205 10/01/19 11,583 CSAC PROPERTY1819 03/31/19 361,239 Voya Financial 0067794-4 12/31/19 $3.00 per thousand dollar of salary, management & supervisory $2,000 plus annual salary maximum benefit $100,000. Voya Financial 0067794-9 12/31/19 Safety-$27.30 each permanent employee for $12,000 coverage. Voya Financial 0067794-9 12/31/19 Blue/White Collar Units: $68.38 each permanent employee for $30,000 coverage. Blue Shield PPO Health W0054380 12/31/19 Bi-weekly rate range from $154.51 Blue Shield HMO Health W0054380 to $826.62 per employee for medical Blue Shield Trio Health W0054380 based upon individual's plan coverage Kaiser Permanente HMO 132733-1003 and plan combination and $9.58 to Kaiser Permanente DHMO 132733-0010 $56.90 for dental. $1.59 to $5.84 United Concordia DPPO Dental 920318-000 12/31/19 $1.59 to $5.84 per employee for United Concordia DHMO Dental 920318-001 vision coverage. Medical Eye Service HMO Vision 16269 12/31/19 Medical Eye Service PPO Vision 16270 189 190 Rabobank Arena, Theater,Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Centerof Bakersfield andSpectrumAmphitheatre ConsolidatedFinancial Statements June 30, 2018 C O N T E N T S Page(s) Independent Auditors’Report 1-2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information)3-8 Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated statement of net position 9 Consolidated statement of revenues, expensesand change in net position 10 Consolidated statement of cash flows 11-12 Notes to consolidated financial statements 13-19 Supplementary Information Consolidated schedule of operating expenses 20 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control overFinancial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed inAccordance withGovernment Auditing Standards 21-22 Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre Management’s Discussion and Analysis -3 - JULY 2017TO JUNE 2018 RABOBANK ARENA, THEATER, CONVENTION CENTER, VALLEY CHILDREN’SICE CENTEROF BAKERSFIELD AND SPECTRUMAMPHITHEATREMANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This section of Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre’s(the Facilities)annual financial report presents our discussion and analysis of the Facilities’financial performance during thefiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Please read it in conjunction with the Facilities’consolidated financial statements, which follow this section. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS !In FY 2017-2018 our top eight events were as follows: o Disney on Ice, Feld Entertainment, Net Income of $125K o CIF State Wrestling Championship, CIF, Net Income of $95K o Kevin Hart, Live Nation, Net Income of $81K o Monster Trucks, APEX Motorsports, Net Income of $60K o WWE, Event Services, Net Income of $52K o Gloria Trevi, Monterrey Promotions, Net Income of $42K o Banda MS, Monterrey Promotions, Net Income of $42k o Paw Patrol, VStar, Net Income of $42k !The Rabobank Arena was host for three rehearsals this fiscal year. One of the rehearsals resulted in a pop up show. The rehearsals resulted in net income ofmore than $71k. !The Broadway in Bakersfield Theater Series produced by JamTheatricals from Chicago held their 13th season of shows at Rabobank Theater with good results. There were four shows in the series, which resulted in a net income of $27K. !The Condors did not make the playoffs in 2017-2018, but their net income of over $260K was an improvement over the previous fiscal year. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The annual report includes this management’s discussion and analysis report, the independent auditors' report and the basic consolidated financial statements of the Facilities. REQUIRED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The financial statements of the Facilitiesreport information using accounting methods similar to those used by private sector companies. These statements offer short and long term financial information about its activities. The Statement of Net Positionincludes all of the Facilities’assets and liabilities and provides information about the nature and amounts of investments in resources (assets) and the Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre Management’s Discussion and Analysis -4 - obligations to the Facilities’creditors (liabilities). It also provides the basis for evaluating the Facilities’ capital structure as well asassessing the liquidity and financial flexibility of the Facilities. All of the current year’s revenues and expenses are accounted for in the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changein Net Position. This statement measures the success of the Facilities’ operations over the past year and can be used to determine whether the Facilitieshas successfully recovered all its costs through its user fees and other charges,profitability and credit worthiness. The final required financial statement is the Statement of Cash Flows. This statement reports cash receipts, cash payments, and net changes in cash resulting from operations, investing, and financing activities and provides answers to such questions as where did cash come from, what was cash used for, and what was the change in the cash balance during the reporting period. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE FACILITIES One of the most important questions asked about the Facilities’finances is, “Arethe Facilitiesas a whole better off or worse off as a result of this year’s activities?” The Statement of Net Position, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position report information about the Facilities’activities in a way that will help answer this question. These two statements report the net position of the Facilitiesand the changes in net position. One can think of the Facilities’net position - the difference between assets and liabilities -as one way to measure financial health or financial position. Over time, increases or decreases in the Facilities’net position is one indicator of whether its financial health is improving or deteriorating. However, one will need to consider other non-financial factors such as changes in economic conditions, population growth, and new or changed government legislation. Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre Management’s Discussion and Analysis -5 - Below is a summary of the Consolidated Statements of Net Position, Table A-1: $% 20182017ChangeChange Current assets2,790,631$ 3,074,106$ (283,475)$ -9% Noncurrent capital assets 5,446 6,703 (1,257) -19% 2,796,077$ 3,080,809$ (284,732)$ -9% Current liabilities 2,546,077$ 2,830,809$ (284,732)$ -10% Other liabilities 250,000 250,000 - 0% Total liabilities 2,796,077 3,080,809 (284,732) -9% Invested in capital assets 5,446 6,703 (1,257) -19% Unrestricted (5,446) (6,703) 1,257 -19% Total net position - - - 0% 2,796,077$ 3,080,809$ (284,732)$ -9% Table A-1 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Net Position Asset and liability balances for both years are very consistent. The slight change in current assets can be attributed to a lower receivables balance and the decrease in liabilities can be attributed to events that were on sale at the end of 2018 versus 2017. Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre Management’s Discussion and Analysis -6 - $% 20182017ChangeChange Operating revenues7,741,942$ 7,621,593$ 120,349$ 2% Less direct event expenses4,419,379 4,614,108 (194,729) -4% Gross profit3,322,563 3,007,485 315,078 10% Operating expenses4,091,749 3,856,239 235,510 6% Operating loss(769,186) (848,754) 79,568 -9% Nonoperating income353,468 433,036 (79,568) -18% Change in net position(415,718) (415,718) - 0% Net position, beginning of year- - - 0% Contributions 415,718 415,718 - 0% Net position, end of year-$ -$ -$ 0% Table A-2 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position Results from operations were $79k better than the prior year. Gross profit on the events this fiscal year improved over the prior year. The expenses for each event were scrutinized and staffing levels were controlled in order to keep the costs in line with the attendance levels. Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre Management’s Discussion and Analysis -7 - Over (Under)% Actual Budget Budgetof Budget Operating revenues7,741,942$ 8,435,413$ (693,471)$ -8% Less direct event expenses4,419,379 4,947,448 (528,069) -11% Gross profit 3,322,563 3,487,965 (165,402) -5% Operating expenses 4,091,749 4,162,541 (70,792) -2% Operating loss (769,186) (674,576) (94,610) 14% Nonoperating income 353,468 - 353,468 100% Change in net position(415,718)$ (674,576)$ 258,858$ -38% Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table A-3 Change in Net Position, Actual to Budget Gross operating revenue and direct event expenses for the year wereless than budgeted;this can be attributed to budgeted concerts that did not occur. Decreases were found across revenues in rent, parking, ticket rebates, facility fees and merchandise revenue. Operating expenses came in under budget overall, the mainfactor wasoverhead departments watching costs associated with their departments. $% June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017ChangeChange Small Equipment18,896$ 18,896$ -$ 0% Less accumulated depreciation13,45012,1931,257 10% Net property and equipment5,446$ 6,703$ (1,257)$ -19% Table A-4 Capital Assets Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre Management’s Discussion and Analysis -8 - ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT FISCAL YEAR Several key factors are expected to affect next fiscal year: !The economic climate in Bakersfield and Kern County continues to play a large part in the financial performance ofthe Facilities. The oil prices have stabilized, but have not bounced back to the levels they once were and the agriculture industry is still trying to bounce back after the drought years Kern County has had. We are still exploring different markets to combat the loss in the sponsorship revenues and suite lease agreements. We are continuing to actively seek new and different ways to advertise events, package new items into sponsorship entitlements, and are finding new ways to increase suite revenues. Additional growth in sponsorship revenues is expected, as we continue to pursue new relationships with sponsors. !In FY 2018-2019, the Condors will be playing their fourth season as the AHL affiliate to the Edmonton Oilers NHL hockey team. The higher caliber ofplay in the AHL is expected to continue to bring in higher attendance, which will result in higher ancillary revenues across the board. !We continue to work closely with Aramark management and staff to strive to maximize food and beverage commission revenues at every opportunity. !At the Valley Children’s Ice Center, the youth hockey program continues to grow with great success. A new club team at Cal State University Bakersfield has formed which will contribute to additional ice time rentals. !The event calendar for the first six months of the fiscal year is fairly full with a wide variety of events. The concert calendar is fuller at this time than previous years with eight concerts already confirmed for 18/19. The booking department continues to work hard in trying to secure additional events for the Facilities overall. CONTACTING RABOBANK ARENA This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the finances and accountability of Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre. If you have questions about this report contact Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre, 1001 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,California 93301, Attention Director of Finance. -9 - ASSETS Current Assets Cash 2,188,737$ Accounts receivable, net 239,753 Accounts receivable, other27,479 Net receivable from the City of Bakersfield294,445 Prepaid expenses40,217 2,790,631 Capital Assets , at cost 18,896 Less accumulated depreciation13,450 5,446 2,796,077$ LIABILITIES AND NET POSITION Current Liabilities Accounts payable, trade223,896$ Accounts payable, related party155,040 Accrued expenses426,251 Deferred revenues1,740,890 2,546,077 Other Liabilities 250,000 Net Position Invested in capital assets, net of related debt5,446 Unrestricted(5,446) - 2,796,077$ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, June 30, 2018 Consolidated Statement of Net Position and Spectrum Amphitheatre Valley Children's Ice Center of Bakersfield -10 - Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children's Ice Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre Consolidated Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Change in Net Position For the Year Ended June 30, 2018 Net revenues: Facilities rent1,289,167$ Suites 1,371,190 Signage and advertising994,427 Concession commissions804,400 Ice Sports Center, general admissions400,079 Ticketing fees344,297 Parking 269,376 Facility fees1,945,144 Ice Sports Center, other revenue267,327 Merchandise43,758 Other income12,777 7,741,942 Direct event expenses: Event labor1,162,266 Other direct event expenses3,257,113 4,419,379 Gross profit3,322,563 Operating expenses 4,091,749 Operating loss(769,186) Nonoperating income: Management reimbursement of operating loss353,468 Change in net position(415,718) Net position, beginning of year - Contributions received from the City of Bakersfield 415,718 Net position, end of year -$ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. -11 - Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children's Ice Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows For the Year Ended June 30, 2018 Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from customers1,521,762$ Cash received from contracts for services5,944,300 Cash payments to suppliers for goods and services(5,460,665) Cash payments to employees for services(2,352,891) Net cash used in operating activities(347,494) Cash flows from noncapital and related financing activities: Reimbursement from AEG for current year operating loss353,468 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 5,974 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 2,182,763 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 2,188,737$ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. -12 - Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash used in operating activities: Operating loss(769,186)$ Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation1,257 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable154,497 Prepaid expenses6,300 Accounts payable, trade14,081 Accounts payable, related party55,628 Advances from the City of Bakersfield502,687 Accrued expenses123,919 Deferred revenues(436,677) Net cash used in operating activities(347,494)$ Noncash investing and financing activities: Contribution to unrestricted net position of advances from the City of Bakersfield415,718$ Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’sIce Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -13 - Note 1.Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies Nature of business: The City of Bakersfield (the City) owns the Rabobank Arena, Theater,Convention Center, Valley Children’s Ice Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre(the Facilities). The Rabobank Arena was built by the City and began operations in October 1998. It is the only buildingof its kind in the Bakersfield area. In December 2003, the City opened the Valley Children’s Ice Center of Bakersfield (Ice Center). The Ice Center is used for public skating, hockey leagues, figure skating, and other community events. In February 2007, the City openedthe SpectrumAmphitheatre (the Amphitheatre), an outdoor theatre located in Bakersfield. The activities of the Arena, Theater,Convention Center, Ice Center and Amphitheatre (the Facilities) are recorded in a special revenue fund of the City’s accounting records. The City owns all the assets of the Facilities, and accordingly, all amounts related to the operation of the Facilities belong to the City. The management companyoperating the Facilitieshas a fiduciary responsibility under the management agreement to maintain and operate the Facilities in the best interests of the City and the community. In an agreement dated March 20, 2013, the City contracted with AEG Management Bakersfield, LLC and AEG Facilities, LLC (the Company or AEG) to begin overseeingthe operation and management of the Facilities for a term of ten years. The City, atits sole discretion, may terminate this agreement effective June 30, 2018, if the City provides the manager with notice of termination no later than six months before June 30, 2018. On mutual agreement between both parties, the term may be extended one five-year period. AEG washired by the City for its expertise in the management, operation and marketing of public assembly facilities. Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements of the Facilities include the accounts of the Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children’s Ice Center of Bakersfield and SpectrumAmphitheatre after elimination of all significant inter-company accounts and transactions. Basis ofaccounting: The Facilities’ basic financial statements are presented on the full accrual basis of accounting and conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Facilitiesutilize accrual basis accounting in which revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred or economic assets are used. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -14 - items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. Revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating. Revenue recognition: Suite contracts Revenues from suitesare recognized over the contract period per the contract terms. Contracts are billed throughout theyear. The suite payments are recorded as deferred revenue until earned andarerecognized over the contract period. Naming rights, signage and advertising contracts Revenues from naming rights, signage and advertising contracts are recognized over the contract period per the contract terms. Contracts are billed according to the contract terms. Payments are recorded as deferred revenue until earned and recognized over the contract period. Ticket sales The Facilities, through its contract with Outbox AXS, LLC, sells tickets to events as an agent of the event holder at the on-site box office location and through the telephone and internet. All proceedsfrom the sale of tickets belong to the event holder. The ticket sales are recorded as deferred revenue when sold. After the event has occurred, settlement with the event holder takes place. The net of total ticket sales less event expenses such as facility rent and reimbursement of direct event expenses is then paid to or received from the event holder. The event ticket proceedsare removed from the deferred revenue account in the month the event occurred. The Facilities earn a ticketing fee on the sale of event tickets that take place through the telephone andinternet. Revenues from these fees are recorded as deferred revenue at the time of sale and are recognized in the month the event occurred. Event revenues Revenues from the Facilities’ events such as facilities rent, direct event expense reimbursements, concession commissions, parking and merchandise are recognized in the month the event occurred. Net position: The Facilities utilize a net position presentation in accordance with GASB Statement 34, Basic Financial Statements -and Management’s Discussion and Analysis -for State and Local Governments, as amended by GASB 63, Financial Reporting of Deferred Outflows or Resources, Deferred Inflows ofResources, and Net Position. Net position is categorized as invested in capital assets, net of related debt, restricted components of net position and unrestricted components of net position. These categories are defined as follows: Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -15 - Invested in capital assets, net of related debt -This component of net position consists of capital assets, including restricted capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by the outstanding balances of any bonds, mortgages, notes, or other borrowings that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets. If there are significant unspent related debt proceeds at year-end, the portion of the debt attributable to the unspent proceeds are not included in the calculation of invested in capital assets, net of related debt. Rather, that portion of the debt is included in the same net position component as the unspent proceeds. Restricted components of net position -This component of net position consists of restricted assets reduced by liabilities and deferred inflows of resources related to those assets. Generally, a liability relates to restricted assets if the asset results from a resource flow that also results in the recognition of a liability or if the liability will be liquidated with the restricted assets reported. Unrestricted components of net position-This component of net position is the net amount of assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources that are not included in the determination of net investment in capital assets or the restricted component of net position. Use of estimates: The preparation of financialstatements in conformity withaccounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of Americarequires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during thereporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and cash equivalents: For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Facilitiesconsiders highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to becash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents also include cash on hand and amounts deposited with banks. Custodial creditrisk: The California Government Code and the Facilities’investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits and investments, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure the Facilities’deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -16 - Concentration of credit risk: Credit is extended, in the form of accounts receivable, to customers located primarily in the County of Kern, California. Trade accounts receivable: Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Managementprovides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to valuation allowance based on its assessments of the current status of individual accounts. Balances that are still outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to trade accounts receivable. Based on management’s assessment of the credit history with customers having outstanding balances and current relationships with them,it has concluded that realized losses on balances outstanding at June 30, 2018will be immaterial; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. Capital assets: The Facilities’ capital assetsare recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight line method overestimated useful lives of 3 -10years. Maintenance and repairs of capital assetsare charged to operations and major improvements are capitalized. Upon retirement, sale or other disposition of capital assets, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and gain or loss is included in the consolidated statement of revenues and expenses. The following is a summaryof changes in the Facilities’ capital assetsfor the year ended June 30, 2018: Balance Balance 6/30/17Acquisitions Retirements6/30/18 Small equipment18,896$ -$ -$ 18,896$ BalanceDepreciation Balance 6/30/17 Expense Retirements6/30/18 Small equipment12,193$ 1,257$ -$ 13,450$ Assets - At Cost Accumulated Depreciation Note 2. Advance from City of Bakersfield During the normal course of business, the City pays expenses that are allocated to the operation of the Facilities. These expenses include payroll and related expenses for the City employees and equipment rent. The amount of the advance fluctuates throughout the year depending on allocated monthly expenses and additional cash flow needs. The advance is an intercompany account that is eliminated in the consolidation for the preparation of the City's financial statements. The amount charged by the City to the Facilities was $502,687, for the year endedJune 30,2018. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -17 - Note 3. Deferred Revenue Deferred revenue at June 30, 2018consists of the following: Suite contracts 518,590$ Ticket sales, future events 581,397 Naming rights 269,934 Sponsorship agreements 173,664 Ticket rebates 57,871 Event deposits 139,434 1,740,890$ Note 4. Administrative Services Agreements AEGprovides administrative services to the City for the Facilities. Compensation for these services is a base fee of $400,000 for the first year, paid in equal monthly installments. The base fee will be adjusted annually (up or down) by the Consumer Price Index, but in no event will any increase or decrease exceed three percent. For the year ended June 30, 2018, AEG received$430,889in total management fees from the City for the three respective facilities. In addition to the base fee, AEGreceives anincentive equal to a percentage of the difference between the actual net operating profits or net operating losses for each facility and a benchmark. AEGreceives an incentive of: 1) 25% of the difference between the actual net operating profit (loss) and a $332,575 loss realized by the Arena, Theater and Convention Center; 2) 50% of the difference between the actual net operating profit (loss) and a $20,785 loss realized by the Ice Center and 3) 50% of the difference between the actual net operating profit (loss) and a $62,358 loss realized by the Amphitheater. The incentive fee was $-0-for the year ended June 30, 2018. The management agreement also includes a net loss guarantee whereif the net operating loss in any given fiscal year for all of the Facilities taken in the aggregate exceedsa base amount of $415,718, AEGwill reimburse the Facilities in the amount the net operating loss exceeds$415,718. For the year ended June 30, 2018, AEGreimbursed$353,468to the Facilities for net operating losses that exceeded the base amount. Per the management agreement, AEG was to make a one-time contribution of $250,000, from its own monies, to an event development accountand isto be utilized for future events. In the event of early termination, AEG is authorized to withdraw any amounts remaining in the event development account as of the date of the early termination. The City is entitled to any balance in the account upon the expiration of the management agreement. The contribution from AEG is included in other liabilities on theconsolidated statement of net position. ARAMARK The Facilitiesis currently operating under a contract with ARAMARK to operate concession and cateringservicesfor theArena, Theater andConvention Center (the Facilities),effective through June 30, 2023.On mutual agreement between both parties, the term may be extended one five-year period. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -18 - TheFacilitiesisentitled to receive 35% of the first $500,000 in gross concession receipts and40% of receipts in excess of $500,000but less than $2,000,000 and 45% of any amount exceeding $2,000,000annually. For the year ended June 30, 2018, the Facilitiesreceived $793,543in gross concession and catering receipts from ARAMARK. Note 5. Commitments The Facilities have entered into various long-term contracts and leases. At June 30, 2018, outstanding commitments consist of the following: Naming rights: The Cityand AEGhaveentered into licensingand naming rights agreementswith Rabobank N.A(Bank), Valley Children’s Healthcare (VCH), and Spectrum for the exclusive naming rights of the Facilities. The agreements callfor the Cityand AEGto use reasonable efforts to identify the Arena as the “Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center”, the Ice Center as the “Valley Children’s Ice Centerof Bakersfield”and the Amphitheatre as the “Spectrum Amphitheatre”in all official documents, press releases, advertising, announcements, answering of telephones, as well as all promotion and print material produced or disseminated by or for the account of the Facilities.During the year ended June 30, 2018, total revenue earnedfrom theseagreements amounted to $434,082. Ticket sales: The City and AEGhave entered into a licensed user agreement with Outbox AXS, LLC (AXS), a related party to AEG through common ownership, to be the exclusive provider for ticket sales for any eventpresented at the Facilities. Under the agreement,AXShas the authority to act as an agent for the Facilitiesfor ticket sales to the general public by any and all means including telephone and internet. AXSearns fees from the ticket sales such as inside ticket charges, customer convenience charges, credit card charges, handling charges and ticket sale royalties. AXScollects these fees as tickets are sold and the net amount is remitted to the Facilities weekly. Thisagreement beganin July2015andis effective through the date which the AEG management agreement expires. Hockey lease: The Cityand AEG haveentered into a lease agreement, which has been assigned to KG Oilers Corporation,for exclusive use of the Facilities for East Coast Hockey League (ECHL) games. KG Oilers Corporation has agreed to pay $3,500 for each Preseason home game played, $6,525 for each Regular Season home game played and $1,525 for each Post Season home game played. The fees will be subject to change at two-year intervals beginning on February 1, 2016. The change in payment will be based on the changes in the Consumer Price Index.No change in pricing was made during the current year. The KG Oiler Corp. (Tenant) receives $5,370 per luxury suite leased by the Arena or $145,000 if all twenty-seven suites are leased. In addition to the suite payment, on suite leases sold or renewed after the effective date, an advertising and promotional inventory package will be included that will be provided by the Tenant as part of each new sale or renewal of a suite lease. The suite lease pricing will be adjusted to incorporate the fair market value of the advertising and promotional inventory, which will be estimated to be Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -19 - 10% of the new suite lease price. Tenant will receive the entire amount of the portion of the advertising and promotional inventory package for each new sale or renewal of the suite lease after the effective date. In no case will Tenant receive a sum less than $6,500 when combining the suite lease payment and suite advertising package payment for each suite lease sold or renewed after the effective date. The $6,500 threshold will be subject to change at two-year intervals beginning February 1, 2016. The change in payment is to be based on the changes in the Consumer Price Index.No change in pricing was made in the current year. For the year ended June 30, 2018, KG Oiler Corp.received $152,000for the twenty foursuites leased. Concession and catering services: The City and AEGhasentered into an agreement with ESC Enterprises (ESC) to provide concession and catering services for the Ice Center. The Facilitieswill receive 15% of gross concession receipts throughout the term of the new contract.This agreement was renewed in March2016and is effective through June 30, 2019. For the year ended June 30, 2018, the Facilitiesreceived $10,976in concession commissions from ESC. Note 6. Insurance The Facility has insurance coverage for general liability, auto, crime and workers’ compensation. The general liability insurance has a $100,000 retentionlevel per occurrence for all claims with the maximum amount of coverage being $20,000,000. Workers compensation insurance has a $250,000 retention level per occurrence with the combined maximum amount of coverage being $1,000,000. The auto liability insurance has a $-0- retention level per accident for all claims with the maximum amount of coverage being $1,000,000. The crime insurance has a $250,000 retention level with the maximum amount of coverage being $10,000,000. The Facility also has an umbrella policywhich has a $25,000 retention level, which covers all claims up to a maximum amount of coverage of $25,000,000. All buildings are covered under the City’s insurance as the City owns all structures within the Facilities. -20 - Rabobank Arena, Theater, Convention Center, Valley Children's Ice Center of Bakersfield and Spectrum Amphitheatre Consolidated Schedule of Operating Expenses For the Year Ended June 30, 2018 Utilities1,239,775$ Salaries and wages947,785 Management fees430,889 General and administrative227,877 Employee benefits204,329 Equipment rental200,142 Hockey premium152,000 Insurance146,284 Supplies 85,364 Miscellaneous70,318 Payroll taxes69,029 Bank fees 46,606 Dues and subscriptions31,113 Professional fees30,000 Repairs and maintenance27,762 Travel 25,493 Marketing23,234 Office supplies 23,060 Computer expenses21,367 Training 20,475 Bad debt expense17,939 Telephone14,773 Security 13,302 Postage 7,738 Meals and entertainment5,071 Uniforms 5,035 Licenses and permits2,355 Depreciation1,257 Other taxes and licenses1,177 Contract labor200 4,091,749$ 2019-20 Draft Action Plan 1 •HUD’s Mission: Create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all. •Entitlement Community: Participating communities who are eligible to receive money through HUD’s funding formula. •Metropolitan cities with at least 50,000 people •Urban counties within MAs and have a population of 200,000 or more •Funding Sources: The City of Bakersfield receives funding annually through four sources: •Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) •HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) •Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) •Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) Program Overview – Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Five-Year Consolidated Plan (2015-2020) City required to adopt a “Con Plan” to receive federal HUD funds: CDBG – Community Development Block Grant HOME – HOME Investment Partnership Program ESG – Emergency Solutions Grant H OPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS Plan reviews community needs and sets priorities for future funds: Decent and Affordable Housing Invest in Economic & Community Development Provide Infrastructure improvements in low/mod income areas Provide Public Services & Facilities New plan every 5 Years; Current Plan Approved by Council in 2014 2 Implementation: Annual Action Plan Annual Action Plan to Implement the 5 Ye ar Consolidated Plan Currently in 5th year (FY2019/20) Actions Estimated FY 19/20 HUD Allocation: CDBG: $3,638,234 HOME: $1,494,389 ESG: $293,680 HOPWA: $496,350 TOTAL: $5,922,653 (consistent with FY 18/19 allocation) Milestone Dates: 11/2/18: Application Deadline (23 Applications; $6,951,488 requested) 02/27/19: Budget & Finance Committee 03/08/19: Draft Action Plan Circulation for Review 03/28/19: Action Plan Community Meeting 04/10/19: Draft Action Plan to City Council 05/16/19: Deadline to submit Final Action Plan to HUD 3 4 CDBG: Available Resources RESOURCES Projected FY19/20 CDBG Entitlement $ 3,638,234 Projected Program Income $ 8,000 Total Available Resources $ 3,646,234 ADMINISTRATION AND DEBT SERVICE Administration (not to exceed 20% or $729,047) $ 729,047 Section 108 Loan Payment on $4.1M $ 301,383 Section 108 Loan Payment on $800K $ 55,922 Total Admin and Debt Payment $ 1,086,352 Total Resources minus Admin and Debt Payments $ 2,559,882 •Admin (20%): Management, Oversight, Coordination $729,047 •Fair Housing Program Services - $100,000 •Section 108 Loan Payments: o Aquatic Improvements - $301,383 o Southeast Street Improvements - $55,922 5 CDBG: Fixed Allocations Example: Home Access Ramp McMurtrey Aquatic Center McMurtrey Aquatic Center 6 CDBG: Proposed Projects Total Resources minus Admin and Debt Payments $ 2,559,882 PUBLIC SERVICES (MAX. 15% or $546,785) Fair Housing Program Services $ 100,000 Bakersfield Senior Center $ 90,000 Bakersfield Police Department $ 322,785 Mission at Kern (Operations at HEAP Funded Expansion) $ 34,000 Total Public Service Projects $ 546,785 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Home Access Rehabilitation $ 40,000 Union Brundage Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage $ 600,000 Oleander Area Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Improvements $ 350,000 Castro Area Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Improvements $ 200,000 Baker/Old Town Kern Area Street Reconstruction $ 150,000 Beale Park Lighting Upgrades $ 323,097 Beale Park Restroom Replacement $ 350,000 Total Public Facilities Projects $ 2,013,097 Total CDBG Proposed $ 2,559,882 Proposed Projects Map 7 8 CDBG: Applications Not Proposed for Funding Applicant Summary Amount Community Action Partnership of Kern County Food Bank Warehouse Expansion $ 458,925 Boys and Girls Club Workforce Development and ELS Facility Expansion $ 100,000 Public Works Wilson Are Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk $ 500,000 Public Works Madison Area Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk $ 300,000 Public Works La France Area Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk $ 300,000 Recreation and Parks McMurtrey Aquatic Center Improvements $ 450,000 TOTAL $ 2,108,925 Bakersfield Senior Center (Ward 1) Public Services - $90,000 CDBG: Project Detail 9 11 CDBG: Project Detail Mission at Kern Operation Funds (Ward 2) - $34,000 10 11 CDBG: Project Detail Home Access: $40,000 (Community-wide) •Grants up to $3,500 for physically disabled residents for home accessibility improvements •Program includes: installation of handicap ramps, grab bars, handheld showerheads, handrails, and similar improvements b CDBG: Project Detail 12 Bakersfield Police Department Impact Team Officers (Ward 1 and 2) Public Services- $322,785 Service Area Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and Street Reconstruction Projects CDBG: Project Detail Before 13 After Union Brundage Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Drainage - $600,000 (Ward 1) CDBG: Project Detail 14 Oleander Area Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk - $350,000 (Ward 2) CDBG: Project Detail 15 Castro Area Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk- $200,000 (Ward 7) CDBG: Project Detail 16 CDBG: Project Detail Baker/Old Town Kern Area Street Reconstruction- $150,000 (Ward 2) 17 Beale Park Lighting Improvements–$323,097 (Ward 2) CDBG: Project Detail 18 20 CDBG: Project Detail Beale Park Lighting Improvements–$323,097 (Ward 2) 19 Beale Park Restroom Replacements–$350,000 (Ward 2) CDBG: Project Detail 20 HOME Investment Partnership Program 21 RESOURCES Projected FY19/20 HOME Entitlement $ 1,494,389 Projected Program Income $ 100,000 Total Available Resources $ 1,594,389 ADMINISTRATION Administration (10% maximum) $ 159,439 PROJECTS CHDO Set Aside (15% minimum) $ 224,158 New Construction Assistance $ 1,210,792 Proposed Total $ 1,594,989 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) 22 RESOURCES Projected FY19-20 ESG Entitlement $ 293,680 ADMINISTRATION Administration (7.5% maximum) $ 22,026 SHELTER & OUTREACH PROJECTS (MAX. $176,200) Flood Ministries - Street Outreach $ 22,500 Bakersfield Homeless Center - Shelter $ 64,550 Bakersfield Rescue Mission - Shelter $ 62,650 Alliance Against Family Violence - Shelter $ 26,500 HOMELESS PREVENTION & REHOUSING PROJECTS Bakersfield Homeless Center – Re-Housing $ 95,454 Projects Sub-Total $ 271,654 Proposed total $ 293,680 Emergency Solutions Grant 23 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) 24 RESOURCES FY18-19 HOPWA Entitlement $ 496,350 ADMINISTRATION Administration (3%) $ 14,891 Total Resources minus Admin $ 481,459 HOPWA SPONSOR/PROVIDER Kern County Public Health* $ 481,459 Proposed Total $ 481,459 * Funds Tenant-Based Rental Assistance, Case Management, and Emergency Rental Assistance for persons with HIV/AIDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES 25 Proposed Funding FY 19-20 Total Funding FY 18-19 CDBG $ 3,646,234 $ 3,646,234 HOME $ 1,594,389 $ 1,524,389 ESG $ 293,680 $ 293,680 HOPWA $ 496,350 $ 496,350 Total Resources $6,030,653 $5,960,653 2019-20 Draft Action Plan Questions?