HomeMy WebLinkAbout2051 TAFT HWY SB-989 '134 3 (QS
HOODS ALARMS SPRINKLER SYSTEMS .F", V WCo) v H, AST UST
Permit No. Permit No. Permit No. Permit No. Permit No. Permit No.
13-/31 /
File Number: 7-76 Address: C;;2C) / (m. 4-7 y
Bakersfield, CA 933
Date Received: - z 7 - ( 72
Business Name: ,sdrea
SYSTEM: BUILDING SQUARE FEET: ONSPECTM LOG
New Mod.
minor
modification
removal
Commercial Hood System
Fire Alarm System
Fire Sprinkler System
Aboveground Storage Tank
Underground Storage Tank
Underground Storage Tank
Underground Storage Tank
17,-' Other: — g'
Building Sq. Feet:
Calculation Bldg. Sq. Ft:
FoAr
Date Time
Signature
13
BAKERSFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT -- INSPECTION RECORD
Post this Card at the Job Site and DO NOT Remove for Duration of Work
Inspection Request Phone No. (661) 326 -3979
UST NEW INSTALL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
BACKFILL
PRIMARY PIPE
SECONDARY PIPE
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
SENSORS
AUTHORIZATION FOR FUEL
ELECTRICAL SEAK -OFF
TANKTESTING
A
UST REMOVAL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
AST NEW INSTALL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
MODIFICATIONS MINOR / MAJOR
AST REMOVAL
DESCRIPTION DATE SIGNATURE
EVR UPGRADE
PRIORTO ^OPE RATION -OF ANY SYSTEM,)
ALLUST A_ND /OR AST SYSTEMS_ SHALL BE
INSTALL, COMPLETE.AND_ACCEP_TED -BYI
MISC. ACTIVITY (THE BAKERS FIELD- CITY- FIRE_DEPARIM NT.
FIRE_ DEPARTMENT (FINAL)
REMARKS:
BUILDING ADDRESS: o?0 5-
JOB DESCRIPTION: -1::4 C_._ OCCUPANCY TYPE:
OWNER: PERMIT NO.
CONTRACTOR: A vr. c_ c PHONE #
FD 1743
UNU,RGROUND STORAGE TANKS
APPLICATION
TO PERFORM ELD / LINE TESTING
SB989 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TESTING
TANK TIGHTNESS TEST AND TO PERFORM
FUEL MONITORING CERTIFICATION
PERMIT NO.
ENHANCED LEAK DETECTION LINE TESTING
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPT.
B s P Prevention Servicess
ARrpigN Ir 2101 H Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Tel.: (66 1) 326 -3979
Fax: (661) 852 -2171
Page 1 of 1
X SB-989 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TESTING
TANK TIGHTNESS TEST TO PERFORM FUEL MONITORING CERTIFICATION Cathodic Protection Testing
SITE INFORMATION
FACILITY ARCO NAME & PHONE NUMBER OF CONTACT PERSON
ADDRESS 2051 Taft Hwy. Bakersfield, Ca.
OWNERS NAME Same
OPERATORS NAME Same PERMIT TO OPERATE NO.
NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED? YES NO
TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS
1 87 UL
2 87 UL
3 91 UL
TANK TESTING COMPANY
NAME OF TESTING COMPANY Advanced Compliance Bruce W. Hinsley 661- 706 -4321
MAILING ADDRESS 3704 Littlefalls Ct. Bakersfield, Ca. 93312
Bruce W. Hinsley 661 -706 -4321 CERTIFICATION #: A25212
DATE & TIME TEST TO BE CONDUCTED Icc #: 8032698
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE 6/26/2013
APPROVED BY DATE %•2
FD 2095 (Rev. 09/05)
BILLING & PERMIT STATEMENT
PERMIT # FIRB
A PTN'
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Prevention Services
2101 H Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Phone: 661- 326 -34179 • Fax- 661 -R52 -2171
INFORMATIONSITE
LOCATION OF PROJECT
ARCO
PROPERTY OWNER
Same
STARTING DATE COMPLETION DATE NAME
PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PHONE #
PROJECT ADDRESS
2051 Taft Hwy. cm g 41_ER.S IEI A STATE aA ZIP CODE
INFORMATION
CONTRACTOR NAME CA LICENSE tAdvancedCompliance971259
TYPE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE
C61 D40 3/31/2014
PHONE t
661- 706 -4321
CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME
Advanced Compliance
FAX S
661- 589 - 9329,
ADDRESS
3704 Littlefalls Ct.
CIIY
Bakersfield
ZIP CODE
93312
All permits must be reviewed, stamped, and approved PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.
Alarm - New & Modification (minimum charge) $280
Over 10,000 sq ft 0.028 x sq ft
Sprinkler - New & Modification (minimum charge) 280
Over 10,000 sq ft 0.028 x sq ft
Minor Sprinkler Modification ( <10 heads) 96 (Inspection only)
commercial Hood (Neva & Modification) 470
Additional hood 58
Spray Booth (New & Modification) 470
98
Aboveground Storage Tank (1 Inspection per installation) AST 180 /tank 82
Additional Tank ATI 96/tank 82
Aboveground Storage Tank (Removal, Mod,or Inspect'n) ATR 109 /tank 82
Underground Storage Tank (Installation/Inspection) NI 878 /tank 82
Underground Storage Tank (Modification) MOD 878 /site 82
Underground Storage Tank (Minor Modification) MTM 167 /site 82
Underground Storage Tank (Removal) TR 573 /tank 84
III Mandated Leak Detection (test) /Fuel Mont Cert/SB989
NOTE: $96 /hr for each type of test/per site even If
scheduled at the same time TT
96/hr (2 hrs minimum) =$192 82
Oil well (Installation, Inspection, or re- inspection) X 96 /hr 82
Tent # 96 /tent 84
After -hours inspection fee 121 /hr (2 hrs minimum) =$242
Pyrotechnic (1 permit per event, plus an inspection fee of
96/hr during business hours) Py
NOTE: After hours Pyrotechnic event Inspection Is @ 121 /hr
96 /hr + (5 hrs min standby fee/Insp) =$576
5 hrs min stand fee Ins = 605
84
Re- Inspection /Follow -up Inspection 96 /hr 84
Portable LPG (Propane): # of Cages? _ 96/hr 84
Explosive Storage 266 84
Copying & File Research (File Research fee $50 /hr) 0.25 /page 84
13 Miscellaneous 84
021 (gird 641101
0'.
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages ofthis form to report results for all components tested. The completedform, written testprocedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (fapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: ARCO Date of jesting: 7/24/2013
Facility Address: 2501 Taft Hwy. Bakersfield, Ca.
Facility Contact: Phone: 661- 397 -1497
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name ofLocal Agency Inspector (fpresent during testing):
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Advanced Compliance
Pass
Technician Conducting Test: Bruce W. Hinsley
Not
Tested
Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: C61/1340 License Number: 971259
Manufacturer Training
Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires
Incon TS -STS 9/17/2014
X 87 UL Annular Space X
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail
Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
Tank # 1 STP Sump X 87 UL Annular Space X
Tank #2 STP Sump X 87/91 UL Annular Space X
Tank #3 STP Sump X UDC #1-2 X
Tank #1 Fill Sump X UDC #3 -4 X
Tank #2 Fill Sump X UDC #5 -6 X
Tank #3 Fill Sump X UDC #7 -8 X
87 UL Product Line X UDC #9 -10 X
91 UL Product Line X UDC #11-12 X
Tank #1 Fill Bucket X UDC #13 -14 X
Tank #1 Fill Bucket X UDC #15 -16 X
Tank #2 Fill Bucket X
Tank #3 Fill Bucket X 1
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests:
Containments were clean, water was removed from site and be used in future testing.
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated In this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: Date: 7/24/2013
f.
SWRCB, January 2002
4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure X Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Used: Equipment Resolution: iEquipment
Tank # 1 Tank # 2/3 Tank # Tank #
Is Tank Exempt From Testing ?' Yes x No Yes x No Yes No Yes No
Tank Capacity: 19,951 11,873/10,306
Tank Material: FRP FRP
Tank Manufacturer: Xerxes Xerxes
Product Stored: 87 UL 87/91 UL
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 13:00 13:00
Initial Reading (R,): 10" Hg. 10" Hg.
Test End Time: 14:00 14:00
Final Reading (RF): 10" Hg. 10" Hg.
Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr.
Change in Reading (RF -Rj): 0" Hg. 0" Hg.
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 2.0" Hg. 2.0" Hg.
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6))
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: X Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
I Test Equipment Used: Nitrogen / Pressure Gauge I Equipment Resolution: 11
Piping Run # 87 UL Piping Run # 91 UL Piping Run # Piping Run #
Piping Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass
Piping Manufacturer: A/O Smith A/O Smith
Piping Diameter: 3" 3"
Length of Piping Run: 70' 70'
Product Stored: 87 UL 91 UL
Method and location of
piping-run isolation:
Test Boot Test Boot
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 12:30 12:30
Initial Reading (111): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi.
Test End Time: 13:30 13:30
Final Reading (RF): 5.0 Psi. 5.0 Psi.
Test Duration: 1 Hr. 1 Hr.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.0 Psi. 0.0 Psi.
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0.2 Psi. 0.2 Psi.
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfor failed tests)
I
i
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
7. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
Sump # l Sump # 2 Sump # 3 Sump #
Sump Diameter: 48" 48" 48"
Sump Depth: 65" 65" 68"
Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
22„ 21" 19„
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 14" 15" 17"
Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean Clean Clean
Portion of Sump Tested' 35% 35% 35%
Does turbine shut down when
sump sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time 3 Sec. 3 Sec. 3 Sec.
Is system programmed for fail -safe
shutdown ?'
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and starting
test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 12:15/12:31 11:04/11:21 11:04/11:21
Initial Reading (Rj): 5.2845/5.2842 6.8460/6.8458 6.6831/6.6828
Test End Time: 12:30/12:47 11:20/11:36 11:20/11:36
Final Reading (RF): 5.2838/5.2831 6.8460/6.8459 6.6829/6.6829
Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.0007/0.0009 0.0000 /0.0001 0.0002/0.0001
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfor failed tests)
1 Ifthe entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to aM ofthe questions indicated with an
asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)
r
SWRCB, January 2002
8. UNDER- DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
UDC # 1-2 UDC # 3 -4 UDC # 5 -6 UDC # 7 -8
UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
UDC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 29" 29" 29" 29"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
10" 10" 10" 10"
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
6" 6" 6" 6"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean Clean
Portion of UDC Tested 50% 50% 50% 50%
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water)?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown ?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 10:40/10:58 10:40/10:58 11:34/11:53 11:34/11:53
Initial Reading (Rj): 3.4085/3.1006 5. 9906/5.9888 7.6328/7.6330 1.6187/1.1604
Test End Time: 10:55/11:13 10:55/11:13 11:49/12:08 11:49/12:08
Final Reading (RF): 3.1680/2.8718 5. 9893/5. 9880 7.6328/7.6318 1.2835/0.8585
Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min, 30 Min. 30 Min.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.2405/0.2288 0.0013/0.0008 0.0000/0.0012 0.3352/0.3019
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: Pass X Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass X Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002
9. UNDER- DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specie)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
UDC # 9 -10 UDC # 11 -12 UDC # 13 -14 UDC # 15 -16
UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
UDC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 29" 29" 29" 29"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
10" 10" 10" 10"
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
6" 6" 6" 6"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean Clean
Portion of UDC Tested 50% 50% 50% 50%
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?'
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail -
safe shutdown ?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 14:59/15:16 15:16/15:16 14:59/15:16 14:59/15:34
Initial Reading (R,): 3.5834/1.3441 6.8062/6.8112 6.7569/6.7570 7.3095/7.2068
Test End Time: 15:14/15:31 15:31/15:31 15:14/15:31 15:14/15:51
Final Reading (RF): 1.7192/0.3331 6.8051/6.8112 6.7570/6.7564 7.2803/7.1538
Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 1.8642/1.0110 0.0011 /0.0000 0.0001/0.0006 0.0292/0.0530
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: Pass X Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass X Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests
J
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
Fill Sump # 1 Fill Sump # 2 Fill Sump # 3 Fill Sum # 4
Sum Diameter: 36" 36" 36"
Sum Depth: 63" 62" 58"
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration:
N/A N/A N/A
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
41" 41" 41"
Condition of sump prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean
Portion of Sump Tested 50% 50% 50%
Material: FRP FRP FRPSump
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
starting
Test Start Time: 11:04/11:21 14:59/15:16 11:04/11:21
Initial Reading (R,): 5.7126/5.7128 3.5834/1.3441 4.8178/4.8192
Test End Time: 11:20/11:36 15:14/15:31 11:20/11:36
Final Reading (RF): 5.7128/5.7123 1.7192/0.3331 4.8189/4.8179
Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.0002/0.0005 1.8642/1.0110 0.0011/0.0013
Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail
Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No Yes No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is
detected?
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002
10. SPILL /OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
Page of
Facility is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes
Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
Spill Box # 1 Spill Box # l Spill Box # 2 Spill Box # 3
Bucket Diameter: 11" 11" 11" 11"
Bucket Depth: 15" 15" 15" 15"
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 14:20/14:36 14:20/14:36 12:15/12:31 14:20/14:36
Initial Reading (Rj): 4.7629/4.7630 4.3408/4.3412 5.9765/5.9776 3.9691/3.9681
Test End Time: 14:35/14:51 14:35/14:51 12:30/11:47 14:35/14:51
Final Reading (RF): 4.7629/4.7636 4.3410/4.3413 5.9772/5.9778 3.9681/3.9684
Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min, 30 Min. 30 Min.
Change in Reading (RF -Ri): 0.0000/0.0006 0.0002/0.0001 0.0017/0.0002 0.0010/0.0003
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
ARCO I
2501 TAFT HWY
2.36 PM
BAKERSFIELD CA
07/24/2013
07/24/2013 11:36 Aret 250 "R1 -O
TAR- HWY
BEGIN LEVEL
3MKERSFIELD CASLUMPLEAKTESTREPORT
07/24/2013
END TIME
07/24/2013 2:35 Prv. 87W FS
2:20 P` -) .' END DATE
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORTTESTSTARTED11:21 AM
07/24/2013: j
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013 87E= =BBEGINLEVEL5.7128 IN
4.3408 IN
END TIME 11:36 AM TEST STARTED 2:20 PMENDDATE07/24/2013 TEST STARTED 07/24/2013ENDLEVEL5.7123 IN BEGIN LEVEL 4.7629 IN . LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END TIME 2:35 PriTESTRESULTPASSEDENDDATE07/24/2013
ND LEVEL
END LEVEL . ?629 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 I tv '. 87W :ATP TESTTEST RESULT PASSED
TEST STARTED i1:21 AM
TEST STARTED 2.36 PM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013 87E2 F8BEGINLEVEL6.8458 IN
END DATE 07/24/2013
END TIME 11 :36 AM TES- STARTED 2:20 P` -) .' END DATE 07/24/2013 T*ST STARTED 07/24/2013: j
END LEVEL 6.8459 IN BEGIt:' LEVEL 4.3408 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN END TIME 2:35 PM. TEST RESULT PASSED END DATE 07/24/2013
ND LEVEL 4.3410 IN:
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN91PSTESTRESULTPASSED 1
TEST STARTED 11:21 AM,:
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 4.8192 IN j
END TIME 11:36 Ali rFST STARTED tENDDATE07/24/2013 T STARTED iENDLEVEL4.8179 IN BEG VELLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN END TIM tTESTRESULTPASSED1DDATF
0.N,'
END LEL
31 STP LE iRESH
T RESULT
TEST STARTED 11:21 AM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013 1 i_BBEGIN' LEVEL 6.6828 IN
END TIME 11:36 AM TEST STARTED 2:20 PN
END DATE 07/24/2013 TEST STARTED 07/24/2013• END LEVEL 6.6829 IN BEGIN LEVEL 3.96911 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN 5 PMTESTRESULTPASSEDENDDATE07/24/2013 ..
END LEVEL 3.9681 i N
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 It' .
TEST :RESULT PASSED„
k
ARCO
250! TAFT HWY
BAKERSFIELD CA
07/24/2013 2:56 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
87E! FS
TEST STARTED 2.36 PMTESTSTARTED07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 4.7630 INENDTIME2:51 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013ENDLEVEL4.7636 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87E2 FB
TEST STARTED 236 PM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 4.3412 IN
END TIME 2:51 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013
END LEVEL 4.3413 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91 FE:
TEST STARTED 2:36 PM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3.7365 IN
END TIME 2:51 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013
END LEVEL 3.7372 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91 FB
TEST STARTED 2 :36 PM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3.9681 IN
END TIME 1 2 :51 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013
END LEVEL 3.9684 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
ARCO
2501 TAFT H6)Y
AKER:;FIELD CA
07/24.2013 12:30 Pni
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
7W FS
TEST STARTED 12:15 PMTESTSTARTED07/24/2013BEGINLEVEL4.5616 INENDTIME12:30 PhiENDDATE07/24/2013ENDLEVEL4.5633 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED
87E STP
TEST STARTED 12:15 PhiTESTSTARTED07/24/2013BEGINLEVEL5.2845 INTIME12:30 PMENDDATE07/24/2013ENDLEVEL5.2838 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0,002 INTESTRESULTPASSED
gwwft
ST STARTED 12;15TETARTED07/2' BEG UEL .>6 I; END TI 2:30 pP' END DAT 7/24/2013ENDLE7INLERESHOLD0. NTRESULT
7W FS
TEST STARTED 12 :15 PMTESTSTARTED07/24/28138EGINLEVEL5.9765 INENDTIME12:30 FroENDDATE07/24/2013ENDLEVEL5.9772 INLEAK. THRESHOLD 0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED
a
ARCO
2501 TAFT HWY
AKERSF!ELD CA
07x24/2013 12:47 Pm
SUMP =AK "TEST REPORT
87W FB
EST STARTED 12:31 PM
TEST STARTED', 07/24/2013
j BEGIN LEVEL 4.5639 IN
END TIME 112 :47 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013
END LEVEL 4.5649 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87E STP
TEST STARTED 12:31 Pm
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5.2842 IN
END TIME 12:47 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013
END LEVEL 5.2831 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
BEGIN
END TIME
END DATE
END LEUW
87W FS
TEST STARTED 12:31 PM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN? LEVEL 5.9776 IN
END TIME 12:47 PM
END DATE 07/24/2013
END LEVEL 5.9778 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT` PASSED
ARCO
2501 TAFT HWY
SAKERSFIELD CA
07/24/2013 ).1 :20 AM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
87W FS
TEST STARTED 11:04 AM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 5.7126 INENDTIME11 :20 AM
END DATE 07/24/2013ENDLEVEL5.7128 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
87W STP
TEST STARTED 11:04 AM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013BEGINLEVEL6.8460 IN
END TIME 11:20 AMENDDATE07/24/2013
END LEVEL 6.8460 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
91 FS
TEST STARTED 11:04 AM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 4.8178 INENDTIME11 :20 AM
END DATE .07/24/2013ENDLEVEL4.8189 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT " PASSED
91 STP
TEST STARTED 11:04 AM
TEST STARTED 07/24/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 6.6331 IN
END TIME 11:20 AMENDDATE07/24/2013
END LEVEL 6.6829 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
l !
07/25/2017 10.55 AM
2501 TAF D
HWV
SFIELD CA f SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
i
2501 RFT8AKERSFIELDWABAKER
11:49 AM 4` 1 -2 UDC 0 ?r25i201.,
07/25/2013
EST REPORT TEST STARTED 10:40 Atl 1Y:13 AMSUMPLEAK7-E,37- SUMP LEAK TEST STARTED 07/25/2013 REPORTR7.
g -6 UDC LEVEL
END TIME
3.4085 IN
10:55 AM 1 -2 UD8
TEST STARTED
11:34 Ate
STARTED 07/V,/201328IN
END DATE
END LEVEL
LEAK THRESHOLD
07/25/2013
3.1680 IN
0.002 IN
EST STARTEDSTART 10:58SEINLEVELD /
25/2813TEST
BEGIN LEVEL 11.49 AA TEST RESULT FAILED 3ENDTIME3.100, INDATEENDTIME07/25/201DATE7..
00
3 AMEND _EVE 0"ZS/2013LEAKTHRESHOLD2.8i1
ND
END
LEAK£
L 0,002 INTHRESHOLDPASSED
3 -4 UDC ITESTRESULT0.002 IN
TEST RESULT TEST STARTED 10:40 AM FAILED
TEST STARTED 07/25/2013 1
UDC BEGIN LEVEL 5.9906 IN 3 -4 1DC
STAR
11;34 AM
TEST TED 07/25/2013
f END TIME
i END DATE
END LEVELt
10:55 AM
07/25/2013
5.9893 IN
TEST
TES STARTED
9EGINSTARTED 97i 9.58 AMLEVEL25/ TEST START 1,6187BEGINL£UEL 11;49 AM
LEAP, THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED END TIME 5'8S$INDATE11:13ENDTIME07/252013
END DATE IN END LEVEL 07125120130131.2835
END LEVEL 0.002 INTHRESHOLDFAILED
LEAK THR 5.98g ESHO INTESTRESULTLD8.002 INLEAK
TEST RESULT PASSED
25 KERI
D 4Cfl
R.A 12:0` Pt+
07 2`7/
201z
TESS
REPdR
BUMP LEAK
5-6 UDC
TARiED 1j5520
Srt STflRTED 077,6330 PM
TGIN LEU£L 1 5/2013
END TDI E 47.631$ 11
1
END
LS4 RE'dLD
0'p ED
g7 RESULT
11:53 AWSO /25'20ItA
TESL SSARZf3> 01.1604 PO
GIN
LEUEL' 12'213
6
DDA£
07/7S1B5IS
END ASH SHdLD g' fA1L
L REgULT-
f
ARCO
2501 TAFT HWYBAKERSFIELDCA
07/25/2013 3 :31 PM
SUMP i_EAK TEST REPORT
9 -10UDC
TEST STARTED 3:16 PM
TEST STARTED 0,1/25/2013
0BGINLEVEL3;31 PMENDTIME07/25/2013ENDDATE0ENDLEVEL ,3331 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD O'OILED
TEST RESULT
1112UDC
TEST STARTED 3 :16 PM
TEST STARTED 07/25/201'3
BEGIN LEVEL 3;31 PMENDTIME07/25/2013ENDDATE6ENDLEUEL .
8051 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
1314UDC
TEST STARTED 3:16 PM
TEST STARTED '07/ 257013
BEGIN LEVEL . 6.757
PM
END TIME 07/25/2013ENDDATE6ENDLEVEL .7564 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002
SEDTESTRESULT
l
ARCO
2501 TAFT HWY
BAKERSFIELD CA ARCO
2501 TAFT HWY07/25/2013 3 :14 PM BAKERSFIELD CA
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT i 07/25/2013 3 :51 PM
9 -10UDC SUMP LEAK -TEST REPORT
1
TEST STARTED 259 PM 1112UDC
TEST STARTED 07/25/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 3.5834 IN TEST STARTED 3 :35 PMENDTIME3:14 PM TEST STARTED 07/25/2013ENDDATE07/25/2013 BEGIN LEVEL 5.3374 IN
END LEVEL 1.7192 IN END TIME 3 :51 PM
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN I QVEND DATE 07/25/2013
TEST RESULT FAILED END LEVEL 5.3376 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
1112UDC
TEST STARTED 2 :59 PM 11.12UDC
TEST STARTED 07/25/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 6.8007 IN TEST STARTED 3:35 PM
END TIME 3:14 PM TEST STARTED 07/25/2013
END DATE 07/25/2013 BEGIN LEVEL 6.8112 IN
END LEUEL 6.8060 IN END TIME 3:51 PM
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN END DATE 07/15/2013TESTRESULTINCREASEDENDLEUEL6.8112 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
1314UDC
TEST STARTED 2:59 PM 1516UDC
TEST STARTED 07/25/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 6.7569 IN TEST STARTED 3:35 PM
END TIME 3 :14 PM TEST STARTED 07/25/2013ENDDATE07/25/2013 BEGIN LEVEL 3.2914 INENDLEVEL6.7570 IN END TIME 3:51 PM
LEAK THRESHOLD, 0.002 IN END DATE +7/25/2013TESTRESULTPASSEDENDLEVEL3.2614 IN
f LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
j TEST RESULT FAILED
1516UDC 1
TEST STARTED 2:59 PM i 1516UDCTESTSTARTED07/25/2013
BEGIN LEVEL 7.3095 IN f
TEST STARTED 3:35 PM
END TIME 3:14 PM TEST STARTED 07/25/2013
END DATE 07/25/2013 BEGIN LEVEL ' ,,, 7.2086 IN
END LEVEL 7.2803 IN END.TIME.• 3:51 PM
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN f END DATE •07/25/2013TESTRESULTFAILEDENDLEVEL7.1538 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT FAILED
WA
SWRCB, January 2002 Page of
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
This form is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages ofthisform to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (fapplicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: ARCO Date of Testing: 8/19/2013
Facility Address: 2501 Taft Hwy. Bakersfield, Ca.
Facility Contact: Phone: 661- 397 -1497
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency Inspector (rfpresent during testing):
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Advanced Compliance
Pass
Technician Conducting Test: Bruce W. Hinsley
Not
Tested
Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: C61 /1340 License Number: 971259
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
Incon TS -STS 9/17/2014
X
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made
UDC #1 -2 X X
UDC #7 -8 X X
UDC #9 -10 X X 1 1
UDC #15 -16 X X
1 1 1
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
Containments were clean, water was removed from site and be used in future testing.
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: , -, ti' Gi/ 1Z ,,/ Date: 8/19/2013
000 .-
SWRCB, January 2002
UNDER- DISPENSER CONTAINMENT (UDC) TESTING
Page of
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.0002
UDC # 1 -2 UDC # 7 -8 UDC#9_10 UDC # 15 -16
UDC Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
UDC Material: FRP FRP FRP FRP
UDC Depth: 29" 29" 29" 29"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
of Highest Piping Penetration:
10" 10" 10" 10"
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
6" 6" 6" 6"
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
Clean Clean Clean Clean
Portion of UDC Tested 50% 50% 50% 50%
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water) ?'
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown ?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes D No NA X Yes No NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum /water and
starting test
10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min. 10 Min.
Test Start Time: 10:23/10:39 10:23/10:39 12:28/12:44 12:28/12:44
Initial Reading (R,): 7.2733/7.2733 7.4403/7.4407 7.9503/7.9504 7.3969/7.3946
Test End Time: 10:38/10:55 10:38/10:55 12:43/13:00 12:43/13:00
Final Reading (RF): 7.2735/7.2740 7.4405/7.4407 7.9503/7.9503 7.3954/7.3929
Test Duration: 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min. 30 Min.
Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.0002/0.0007 0.0003/0.0000 0.0000 /0.0001 0.0015/0.0017
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
r