The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About800 34TH STREET (4)SWRCB, January 2002 rz Page of Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performingperiodic testing ofUST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of thisform to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and printoutsfrom tests (if applicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Mobil I Date of Testing: 9/7/2011 Facility Address: 800 34`h Street Bakersfield CA, 93301 Facility Contact: Peter Cloven Phone: 925- 673 -5500 Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 8/24/2011 Name of Local Agency Inspector (fpresent during testing): Ernie Madenia 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Confidence UST Services Pass Fail Technician Conducting Test: Bryan A Self Repairs Made Component Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor x SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester Not Tested License Type: CSLB 87 STP License Number:804904 SWRCB Tank Tester # 11 -1756 Manufacturer Manufacturer Training Component(s) Date Training Expires Franklin Fueling TS -STS 1 -06 -2013 UST Service technician ICC 7 -5 -2013 Star. Smith. Fibercast Fiber Glass Systems N.A. 89 Vapor SB X 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made 87 STP X 87 Vapor SB X 89 STP X 89 Vapor SB X 91 STP X 91 Vapor SB X 87 Secondary Line X UDC 1 -2 X 89 Secondary Line X UDC 3 -4 X 91 Secondary Line X UDC 5 -6 X 87 Annular X UDC 7 -8 X 89 Annular X 91 Annular X 87 Fill SB X 89 Fill SB X 91 Fill SB X If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests: Water was put back into test trailer and waste drum CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate an4in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: S W RCB, January 2002 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Page of Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Spec) Test Method Used: Pressure x Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625" Tank # Regular UL Tank # Plus UL Tank # Super UL Tank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing ?' Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Tank Capacity: 10,000 10,000 10,000 Tank Material: FRP FRP FRP Tank Manufacturer: Unknown Unknown Unknown Product Stored: 87 Annular Plus Annular Super Annular Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 5 Minuets 5 Minuets 5 Minuets Test Start Time: 12:00 pm 12:00 pm 12:00 pm Initial Reading (Rj): 10 Hg 10 Hg 10 Hg Test End Time: 1:00 pm 1:00 pm 1:00 pm Final Reading (RF): 10 Hg 10 Hg 10 Hg Test Duration: 1 Hour I Hour I Hour Change in Reading (RF -Ri): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfor failed tests) Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) SWRCB, January 2002 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Page of Test Method Developed By: Piping Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: x Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Calibrated Gages Equipment Resolution:0.0625" Piping Run # 87 Piping Run # 89 Piping Run# 91 Piping Run # Piping Material: FRP FRP FRP Piping Manufacturer: Environ Environ Environ Piping Diameter: 3 .00" 3.00" 3.00" Length of Piping Run: 150' 155' 160' Product Stored: 87 Secondary 89 Secondary 91 Secondary Method and location of piping-run isolation: Clam Shell Clam Shell Clam Shell Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 5 Minuets 5 Minuets 5 Minuets Test Start Time: 1 1:10 am 1 1:10 am 1 1:10 am Initial Reading (R,): 5.00 "PSI 5.00 "PSI 5.00 "PSI Test End Time: 12:10 pin 12:10 pm 12:10 pm Final Reading (RF): 5.00 "PSI 5.00 "PSI 5.00 "PSI Test Duration: I Hour 1 Hour I Hour Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00" 0.00" 0.00" Test Result: X Pass Fail X Pass Fail X Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfarfailed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 6. PIPING SUMP TESTING Page of Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution: Sump # 87 Sump # 89 Sump # 91 Sump # Sump Diameter: 37.00" 37.00" 37.00" Sump Depth: 56.00" 51.00" 62.00" Sump Material: FRP FRP FRP Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 29.00" 28.00" 17.00" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 25.00" 27.00" 20.00" Condition of sump prior to testing: Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Portion ofSump Tested' Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration Pipe Penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water) ?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Turbine shutdown response time 8 Seconds 8 Seconds 8 Seconds Is system programmed for fail -safe shutdown ?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational?* X Yes No NA XYes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 5 Minutes 5 Minutes 5 Minuets Test Start Time: Initial Reading (Ri): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): INTestDuration: Resuits Change in Reading (RF -Rj): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing'? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests) If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk(*) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -l60) 9 y :i .x "•. M .r vl. ;,; r SWRCB, January 2002 7. UNDER- DISPENSER CONTAINMENT C TESTING Page of Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution: UDC # 1 -2 UDC # 3 -4 UDC # 5 -6 UDC # 7 -8 UDC Manufacturer: Bravow Box Bravow Box Bravow Box Bravow Box UDC Material: Plastic Plastic Plastic Plastic UDC Depth: 7.00" 7.50" 7.00" 7.00" Height from UDC Bottom to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: On Bottom On Bottom On Bottom On Bottom Height from UDC Bottom to Lowest Electrical Penetration: On Bottom On Bottom On Bottom On Bottom Condition of UDC prior to testing: Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Clean & Dry Portion of UDC Tested High Penetration High Penetration High Penetration High Penetration Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both product and water) ?* Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Turbine shutdown response time N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Is system programmed for fail- safe shutdown ?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational?* X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R,): See 1NTestEndTime: Final Reading (Rr): KO Test Duration: Change in Reading (Rr -R,): Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: X Pass Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail Pass X Fail Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Yes No X NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) Dispensers 5 -6 & 7 -8 were both Visual Fails. They were not tested with the Ts -sts eq uintment. If the entire depth of the UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any ofthe questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) AA l SWRCB, January 2002 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Page of Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps X Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specie) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: Sump Depth: Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material: Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (Rj): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF -Rj): Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor removed for testing? Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes No NA Yes []No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfor failed tests) SWRCB, January 2002 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES Page of Facility is Not Equipped With Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested X Test Method Developed By: Spill Bucket Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specie) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic Other (Spec) Test Equipment Used: Ts -sts Equipment Resolution: Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Spill Box # Bucket Diameter: Bucket Depth: Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: Test Start Time: Initial Reading (R,): Test End Time: Final Reading (RF): Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF -R,): Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: Test Result: Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfor failed tests) All Shill buckets were tested with annual Monitor Cert MWIL 800 34TH STREET BAKERSFIE:: CA d25. 673 -5506 278f? 09/07/2011 12:18 PM SUMP LEVEL REPORT SUMP 87 STP 1.714 IN SUMP 89 STP 2,656 IN SUMP 91 STP 3-658 IN MOBIL 34TH STREET A:;.RSFIELO CA 925473 -5500 27857 09107/2011 12:37 PM S 'T LEAK TEST REPORT 87 SIP TEST STARTED 12:21 PM TEST STARTED 09 /0712011 BEGIN LEVEL 1.7172 IN END TIME 12:37 PM END DATE 09 /0712011 END LEVEL 1.7168 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED 89 STP TEST STARTED 12:21-'PM TEST STARTED 09/07 ?N11 BEGIN LEVEL 2.55% IN ENO TIME 12:37 PM END DATE 09 /07/2011 END LEVEL 14091 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT FAILED 91 STP TEST STARTED 12:21 PM TEST STARTED 09107/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 3.6500 IN END TIME 12:37 PM END DATE 09 /07/2011 END LEVEL 3.8199 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT FAILED 0 MOBIL 8W 34TH STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 825- 673 -5540 27867 09/07/2011 12:42 PH SUMP LEVEL REPORT SUMP 87 STP 1.716 IN SUMP 89 STP 2,385 IN SUMP 91 STP 3.811 IN MOBIL 800 34TH STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 925 -673 -5500 27867 09/07/2011 2:52 PM SUMP LEVEL REPORT MP UDC 1 -2 0.413 IN SUMP UDC 3 -4 0,108 IN M08 L 800 34TH STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 925- 673 -5500 27867 09/07/2011 3:08 Ph SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT VOC 1 -2 TEST STARTED 2:53 PM TEST STARTED 09/07/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 0.4160 IN END TIME 3:08 PM END DATE 09/07/2011 END LEVEL 0,4164 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED VOC 3 -4 TEST STARTED 2:53 PM TEST STARTED 09/07/2011 BEGIN LEVEL 0,1083 IN END TIME 3:08 PM END DATE 08/07/2011 END LEVEL 0,0902 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT FAILED