Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4600 STINE ROAD (6)a SWRCB, January 2002 Page _r_ of 'y— Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Thisfirm is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing ofUST secondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages of'thisform to report results for all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operator for submittal to the local regidatay agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Metro Gas Date of Testing: 5/15/1.2 Facility Address: 4600 Stine Rd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 Facility Contact: Mike Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing : 5/8/12 Name of Local Agency Inspector (ifpresent during testing): Ernie Medina 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Kern County Construction, Inc. Technician Conducting Test: Josh Simmons Credentials: x CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: A, B, Flaz License Number:481053 Manufacturer Training Manufacturer Com onent (s) Date Training Expires 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail NotNot Repairs Made 87 West STP X 1_I CI CI CJ Cl CI CI D CI CI 11 CI u I I' hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: Water returned to test tank for re -use. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best ol'my knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirernents Technician's Signature: Da 16 SWRCB, January 2002 8. PIPPING SUMP TESTING Page of — Test Method Developed By: Sump Manufacturer x Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum x Hydrostatic Other ( Specifv) Test Equipment Used: Incon ts- stts Equipment Resolution:.00I nFk Sump #87 West Sump #` Sump # Sump # Sump Diameter: 48" Sump Depth: 55" Sump Material: FRP Height from `rank Top to Top of 1- 1ighest Piping Penetration: 22" Height from 'rank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 28" Condition of sump prior to testing: good Portion of Sump Tested' 1/2 Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both x Yes No NA Yes No Yes No x Yes No NA product and water)? NA NA Turbine shutdown response time 3 sec Is system programmed for fail -safe Shutdown? x Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was fail -safe verified to be operational'?* x Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting 15 min. test: Test Start Time: 9:04 9:20 Initial Reading (RI): 2.763 2.763 Test End Time: 9:19 9:35 Final Reading (R1:): 2.764 2.763 rest Duration: 15 min Change in Reading (Rr -Rl): 001 Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 Test Result: x Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? x Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? x Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Yes No NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow- up.forfailed tests) Fibery-lass Collar. If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160)