HomeMy WebLinkAbout1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE (2)11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500
Austin, Texas 78759
Phone: (512) 451 -6334
Fax: (512) 459 -1459
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
INSPECIO
1501 TRUXTUN AVE.
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301
Test Date: 01/05/2012
Order Number: 3188937 .
Dear Regulator,
Date Printed and Mailed: 02/03/2012
Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility:
CIRCLE K 2708605
5600 AUBURN ST
@FAIRFAX RD.
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93306
Testing performed:
Leak detector tests
Monitor Certification
Secondary Containment -Spill Container
Sincerely,
Dawn Kohlmeyer
Manager, Field Reporting
dai TANKNOLOGY CERTIFICATE OF TESTINGJlpTJ3nk7x)k3gy 8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
TELEPHONE (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459
PURPOSE: COMPLIANCE TEST RESULT SUMMARY REPORT
TEST DATE: 01/05/12 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 3188937
CUSTOMER PO: Joel Lindquist
CLIENT: CIRCLE K STORES SITE: CIRCLE K 2708605
495 E. RINCON, STE. 150 5600 AUBURN ST
CORONA, CA 92879 @FAIRFAX RD.
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93306
TRISHA YAHNER SCOTT - MANAGER
951)270-5108 (661)871-6273
TEST TYPE: TLD-1
Dr^ehie4 Dinn Tinhfnacc Tact Pacidto
1 1*
LikEIR M_ 'k
LINEW
I
LINE'r I __ , M, oft 4.
T,,ECTOR? 2,, W,
N"
NE'', r a
VERY TEST,RES LT FINAL LEAK whf`,(6ph) VALVEIlDPRODUCT,," L, TYPE 4 FUNCTION
VRE
W. k7 q
T1 91 1
T1 91 1 PREMIUM DW FIBERG PRESSURE
T2 2 PLUS DW FIBERG PRESSURE
308118758 P
T3 3 REGULAR
I
DW FIBERG
I
PRESSURE
I I I I
9:viafinfi I inn I n2it notai-few Tact
Maw Danint-arnanf I inn I n2ie nafad•fnr Tact
N
EXISTINOILEAKrDETEC,,TOR
A CED LEAK'QE
l',W,y EXISTING"LEA T,,ECTOR? 2,, W,
NE'', r a
MANUFkd'TU F ER,
I 01' M 6D'E A IANUFACTURER MODEL4 SEIRIAL# •RESULT
VRE
T1 91 1 VEEDERROOT FX1V 105113034 P
T2 2 VEEDERROOT Fx1V 308118758 P
T3 3 VAPORLESS LD2000 09121223 P
Maw Danint-arnanf I inn I n2ie nafad•fnr Tact
N
A CED LEAK'QE
MANUFACTURER AESU_if-MA MODEL'4`SERIAL RESULDT
VRE
roT owner uetaiteu repon inrormation, visit www.tanKnoiogy.com ana seiect un-Line Keports-wKAv, or contact your jocai i anKnoiogy orrice.
Tester Name: EDWIN PINEDA Technician Certification Number: 8026748
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38 IVITUTTLE
INDIVIDUAL
TEST DATE:01 /05/12
CLIENT:CIRCLE K STORES
TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS
MOP Tar*nology
8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400 WORK ORDER NUMBER3188937
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 (512) 451 -6334 SITE:CIRCLE K 2708605
Q TANK ,'.INFORMATION
Tank ID: T1 91 1 Tank manifolded: No Bottom to top fill in inches: 92.0
Product: PREMIUM Vent manifolded: YES Bottom to grade in inches:
Capacity in gallons: 9,864 Vapor recovery manifolded: YES Fill pipe length in inches:
Diameter in inches: 92.00 Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0
Length in inches: 345 Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: DUAL
Material: DW FIBERG Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST
CP installed on:
COMMENTS
TANKTEST RESULTS LEAK,,DETECTORTESATRESULTS_ Test,;method F'rA7e5tMethodvacuTeot
Start (in) End (in)
Dipped Water Level: New /passed Failed /replaced New /passed Failed /replaced
L.D. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 L.D. #2
Dipped Product Level:
Probe Water Level: Make: VEEDERROOT
Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage Model: axle
Test time: S /N: 105113034
Open time in sec: 2.00
Inclinometer reading: Holding psi: 25
VacuTect Test Type: NOT
Resiliency cc: 110 NOT
TESTEDVacuTectProbeEnt , Point: Test leak rate ml /m: 189.0 TESTED
Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: 10
Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: 3.00
Water table depth in inches: Results: PASS
Determined by (method):
Result:
COMMENTS
COMMENTS
LINE typesiESTNExuLTA B Y,
Test
Material: DW FIBERG
Diameter (in): 2.0
Length (ft): 100.0
Test psi:
Bleedback cc:
Test time (min): NOT NOT NOT NOT
Start time: TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED
End time:
Final gph:
Result:
Pump type: PRESSURE
Pump make: RED JACKET
COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: UNKNOWN
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38
INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS
11110 TA3nknoilogy
TEST DATE:01 /05/12 8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400 WORK ORDER NUMBER3188937
CLIENT:CIRCLE K STORES AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 (512) 451 -6334 SITE:CIRCLE K 2708605
xd '.. , :'.Ti4NKNFORMAT.ION ...
Tank ID: T2 2 Tank manifolded: No Bottom to top fill in inches: 92.0
Product: PLUS Vent manifolded: YES Bottom to grade in inches:
Capacity in gallons: 9,864 Vapor recovery manifolded: YES Fill pipe length in inches:
Diameter in inches: 92.00 Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0
Length in inches: 345 Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: DUAL
Material: DW FIBERG Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST
CP installed on:
COMMENTS
TANK TEST RESULTS T- jit,Method —V ^'4-T- t LEAFC:DETECTOR TEST RESULTS `; = TeStafiiBthOC1 FTA z ° ;
Start (in) End (in)
Dipped Water Level: New /passed Failed /replaced New /passed Failed /replaced
L.D. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 L.D. #2
Dipped Product Level:
Probe Water Level: Make: VEEDERROOT
Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage Model: Fx1v
Test time: S /N: 308118758
Open time in sec: 3.00
Inclinometer reading: Holding psi: 18
VacuTect Test Type: NOT
Resiliency cc: 85 NOT
ry TESTEDVacuTectProbeEntPoint: Test leak rate ml /m: 189.0 TESTED
Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: 11
Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: 3.00
Water table depth in inches: Results: PASS
Determined by (method):
Result: COMMENTS
COMMENTS
4 Test`type .xr n 1
xaSNETESLINELTSArs .„ r B , C. A-
Material: DW FIBERG
Diameter (in): 2.0
Length (ft): 100.0
Test psi:
Bleedback cc:
Test time (min): NOT NOT NOT NOT
Start time: TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED
End time:
Final gph:
Result:
Pump type: PRESSURE
Pump make: RED JACKET
COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: UNKNOWN
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38
INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS
i 7anknoilogy
TEST DATE: 01 /05/12 8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400 WORK ORDER NUMBER3188937
CLIENT:CIRCLE K STORES AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 (512) 451 -6334 SITE:CIRCLE K 2708605
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38
TANK- INFORMATION ,
Tank ID: T3 3 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: 92.0
Product: REGULAR Vent manifolded: YES Bottom to grade in inches:
Capacity in gallons: 9,864 Vapor recovery manifolded: YES Fill pipe length in inches:
Diameter in inches: 92.00 Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0
Length in inches: 345 Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: DUAL.
Material: DW FIBERG Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST
CP installed on:
COMMENTS
TANK'TESTrR SULTS «Test MBthOd „.. 7t:EAK D,•E -T 6R TEST,RESULTSea_ VacuTeat SPYiP . <, y,;,,„ „h, ;T85i,rriethbd,
Start (in) End (in)
Dipped Water Level: New /passed Failed /replaced New /passed Failed /replaced
L.D. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 L.D. #2
Dipped Product Level:
Probe Water Level: Make: vAPoRLEss
Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage Model: LD2000
Test time: S /N: 09121223
Open time in sec: 4.00
Inclinometer reading: Holding psi: 27
VacuTect Test Type: NOT
Resiliency cc: 80 NOT
ry P TESTEDVacuTectProbeEntPoint: Test leak rate ml /m: 189.0 TESTED
Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: 17
Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: 3.00
Water table depth in inches: Results: PASS
Determined by (method):
Result:
COMMENTS
COMMENTS
33T Lh TEST`RESULTS a'St type
Material: DW FIBERG
Diameter (in): 2.0
Length (ft): 100.0
Test psi:
Bleedback cc:
Test time (min): NOT NOT NOT NOT
Start time: TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED
End time:
Final gph:
Result:
Pump type: PRESSURE
Pump make: RED JACKET
COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: UNKNOWN
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38
MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
For Use By All Jurisdictions Within the State of California
Authority Cited: Chapter 6.7, Health and Safety Code; Chapter 16, Division 3 Title 23, California Code of Regulations
This form must be used to document testing and servicing of monitoring equipment. If more than one monitoring system control panel is installed at the facility, a separate
certification or report must be prepared for each monitoring system control panel by the technician who performs the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank
system owner /operator. The owner /operator must submit a copy of this form to the local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date.
A. General Information
Facility Name: CIRCLE K 2708605
Site Address: 5600 AUBURN ST
City: BAKERSFIELD CA Zip: 93306
Contact Phone No: 871 -6273
@FAIRFAX RD. Date of Testing /Service: 01/05/2012
Facility Contact Person: SCOTT - MANAGER
Make /Model of Monitoring System:
B. Inventory of Equipment Tested /Certified
Check the appropriate boxes to indicate specific equipment inspected /serviced
Work Order Number: 3188937
Tank ID: T1 PREMIUM Tank ID: T2 MID
71 In -Tank Gauging probe. Model: MAG PROBE ZI In -Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG PLUS
X Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: VR-409 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: VR -409
X Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: VR -208 Piping SumprTrench Sensor(s). Model: VR -208
Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: Fill Sump Sensogs). Model:
X Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: VR -FX1 V X Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: VR -FX1 V
Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model:
X Tank Overfill /High -Level Sensor. Model: PROBE /FLAPPER Tank Overfill /High -Level Sensor. Model: PROBE /FLAPPER
Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2).
Tank ID: Tank ID:
In -Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG PROBE In -Tank Gauging Probe. Model:
X Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: VR-409 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model:
X Piping SumprTrench Sensogs). Model: VR -208 Piping Sump/Trench Sensogs). Model:
Fill Sump Sensors). Model: Fill Sump Sensogs). Model:
X Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: VL -LD 2000 Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model:
Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model:
Tank Overfill /High -Level Sensor. Model: PROBE /FLAPPER Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model:
Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2).
Dispenser : 1 -2 Dispenser D:
Dispenser Containment Sensors) Model: BE -406 Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model:
X Shear Valve(s). Shear Valve(s)
Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
Dispenser ID: 3-4 Dispenser ID:
Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: BE -406 Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model:
XD Shear Valve(s). Shear Valve(s).
Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chaln(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
Dispenser ID: Dispenser ID:
Dispenser Containment Sensors) Model: Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model:
ShearValve(s). Shear Valve(s).
Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s).
If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility.
C. Certification
I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected /serviced in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines.
Attached to this certification is information (e.g manufacturers' checklists) necessary to verify that this information is correct.
and a Site Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached
a copy of the (Check all that apply): r_j System set -up r-1 Alarm history report
Technician Name (print): EDWIN PINEDA Signature:
Certification No.: License. No.: 743160 (Class'A' General Enginering Contractor License)
Testing Company Name:Tanknology Phone No.: (800) 800 -4633
AVV '
Site Address: 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, suite 500, Austin, TX 78759 Date of Testing /Servicing: 01/05/2012
Monitoring System Certification Page 1 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/08
Site Address 5600 AUBURN ST
FAIRFAX RD.
D. Results of Testing /Servicing
Software Version Installed: 328.03
Complete the following checklist:
Monitoring System Certification
Date of Testing /Service: 01/05/2012
X Yes No ` Is the audible alarm operational?
a Yes No • Is the visual alarm operational?
O Yes No Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational?
Q Yes No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not
interfere with their proper operation?
Yes 7 No ` x N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational?
x YesQ No • N/A
For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment
monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive
shut -down? (check all that apply) Sump/Trench Sensors; X Dispenser Containment Sensors.
Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure /disconnection? X Yes No
FX Yes No' N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanicaloverfillpreventionvalveisinstalled), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating
property? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90 y/,
Yes* FE Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, Identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the
manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below.
Yes* Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) Product;
Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below.
X Yes Was monitoring system set -up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set -up reports, If applicable.
Yes Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications?
In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected.
E. Comments:
Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/08
Monitoring System Certification
Site Address: 5600 AUBURN ST
@FAIRFAX RD.
F. In -Tank Gauging / SIR Equipment
Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed.
Date of Testing /Service: 01/05/2012
0 Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control.
7 Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed.
This section must be completed if in -tank gauging equipment Is used to perform leak detection monitoring.
Complete the following checklist:
0 Yes No • Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults?
X Yes No • Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup?
EYes No • Was accuracy of system product level readings tested?
X Yes No • Was accuracy of system water level readings tested?
El Yes No • Were all probes reinstalled properly?
X Yes No • Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed?
In the Section H, below, describe how and when these defciencles were or w ll be Corrected.
G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD) : Check this box if LLDs are not installed.
Complete the following checklist:
O Yes No • N/A
For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance?
Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: X 3 g.p.h 0.1 g.p.h 00.2 g.p.h
X Yes No • Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements?
X Yes No • Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated?
X Yes No • N/A For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak?
Yes No • N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak?
Yes j No M N/A j For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system Is disabled or disconnected?
Yes No • M N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off If any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test?
Yes No • M N/A For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected?
EYes No* Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed?
In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected.
H. Comments:
L____
Page 3 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/08
S WRCB, January 2002
Secondary Containment Testing Report Form
Page 1.
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing of UST secondary containment systems. Use the
appropriatepages ofthis form to report results for all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: CIRCLE K 2708605 DateofTesting: 01/05/2012
Facility Address: 5600 AUBURN ST @FAIRFAX RD., BAKERSFIELD, CA, 93306
Facility Contact: SCOTT — MANAGER Phone: ( 661) 871 -6273
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): ESTHER DURAN
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: TANKNOLOGY, INC.
Pass Fail
Technician Conducting Test: EDWIN PINEDA
Component
Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor El SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: A- UT License Number: 743160-8026748
Manufacturer
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
OPW SPILL BUCKET 02/03/2013
E
Spill Box 2 PLU FILL
3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail
Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail
Not
Tested
Repairss
Made
Spill Box 1 PRE FILL E
Spill Box 2 PLU FILL X
Spill Box 3 REG FILL a E1
El El El El 7 E] D
7 El F-1 0 0 El El El
El 0 El El El El E
El 0 El El 0
El 1:1 El El F-1 0 El
El 1:1 El 1:1 El El El El-
El El El El 7 El El 0.
El El 0 0 E El
El El El El
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests:
WATER WAS PUT IN FIVE GALLON BUCKETS AND PLACE IN TRUCK FOR NEXT SITE
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
To the best of my knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: Date: 01/05/2012
SWRCB, January 2006
9. Spill Bucket Testing Report Form
This form is intendedfor use by contractors performing annual testing of UST spill containment structures. The completedform and
printouts from tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: CIRCLE K 2708605 DateofTesting: 01/05/2012
Facility Address: 5600 AUBURN ST @FAIRFAX RD., BAKERSFIELD, CA, 93306
Facility Contact: SCOTT - MANAGER Phone: ( 661) 871 -6273
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing:
Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): ESTHER DURAN
2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name: TANKNOLOGY, INC.
Technician Conducting Test: EDWIN PINEDA
Credentials I : a CSLB Contractor X ICC Service Tech. SWRCB Tank Tester Other (Specify) A -UT
License Number: 743160-8026748
3. SPILL BUCKET TESTING INFORMATION
Test Method Used: a Hydrostatic Vacuum Other
Test Equipment Used: TAPE MEASURE Equipment Resolution: VISUAL
Identify Spill Bucke By Tank
Number, Stored Prod
1 1 PRE FILL Z 2 PLU FILL 3 3 REG FILL 4
Bucket Installation Type: 0 Direct Bury
Contained in Sump
Q Direct Bury
Contained in Sump
0 Direct Bury
Contained in Sump
Direct Bury
Contained in Sump
Bucket Diameter: 1111 1111 ill,
Bucket Depth: 12" 12" 12"
Wait time between applying
vacuum /water and starting test:
10 min 10 min 10 min
Test Start Time (Tj ): 0900 0900 0900
Initial Reading (RI 91, 7 7
Test End Time (TF ): 1000 1000 1000
Final Reading (RF 911 7
Test Duration: 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr
Change in Reading (R F - RI ): 0 0 0
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria:
0 0 0
Test- :Result:
f Y X Pa's's YFatl X assi±ailt- X Pass Fail Pass .Fair
Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests)
CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
I hereby certify that all the information contained in this report is true, accurate, and in full compliance with legal requirements.
Technician's Signature: n A,V t?.Uc; Date: 01/05/2012
1 Q+. ft L...,.. —A A7 -^+ .,r.o tl., .o., ;— roof;.,.. +. 1— —f ....,0.7 1... ,.,,..1;r,.A ,M t U...., -- 1....,1
Work Order: 3188937
ESO) & (ESV) Testing Fonn - Version 1- 625/2007
Emergency Shut Off (ESO) &
Dispenser Emergency Shutoff Valve (ESV)
ANNUAL TEST RECORD LOCATIONS AND TEST DATA
Testing
Company: 1 Date: 5 1 Z
Location Name: rC Q, VA Store #:
N
Statc m #:
Address: S { City: State:
Emmency Shut 0. ff SO Tesfin2 Results
On 01 t in accordance with "ESO Vendor Letter (3- 21- 05).doc ", from Valero's Retail
Compliance Department, as a part of annual compliance testing, this representative tested the
Emergency Shut Off (ESO) switches indicated on this sketch. Findings listed below:
Emergency Shut Off (ESO) IfNo, Provide
Operational) N Maintenance Log # Date Called:
u
On o ti 2 in accordance with NFPA 30A this representative tested the automatic - closing feature
of the Dispenser Emergency Shutoff VALVE(S) (ESV) located in the supply lines at the base of each
individual island type dispenser indicated on the diagram below. Each device ( #) _ 6 in all,
would automatically close. Findings listed below:
Disp. Emergency Shut Off IfNo, Provide
Valve (ESV) Operational? y N Maintenance Log # Date Called
Tanknology Inc. 11000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78759
i Tan
8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
512) 451 -6334
FAX (512) 459 -1459
TEST DATE:01 /05/12 WORK ORDER NUMBER3188937
CLIENT:CIRCLE K STORES SITE:CIRCLE K 2708605
COMMENTS
Conduct the Witness Annual Monitor Certification Testing with Inspector Ernie Medina Bakersfield
Fire Dept.. Site contacted and e- mailed on 12/27/11 and confirmed with "JOHN ". veeder Root
light bulb was also replaced today as well. All tests passed.
PARTS REPLACED
r QUANTiTIf tW ' 41, ESCRIPTION ,,ffv
3 LAMP— TLS350
HELIUM PINPOINT TEST RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE)
d -
v d's T EIT _
gq y® S`y
n
PINPOINT`I.EAKT, 8ULTSE5TRHELIUM
yq,,
b k'll
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38 MTUTTLE
SITE DIAGRAM
JP' Tar*rtoll )gy
8501 N MOPAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 400
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
512) 451 -6334
FAX (512) 459 -1459
TEST DATE: 01/05/12 WORK ORDER NUMBER3188937
CLIENT:CIRCLE K STORES SITE: CIRCLE K 2708605
W
V/R DUMP-
S N C -STORE
STER
ATGs in STP sumps
ICE
L
SO
1 PROPANE
L3
L5
g O #1 #3
O F O A CANOPY
O
v V NTS #2 #4
on
1 F
4 q C nopy Dispensers contain CAS
R/ O beaudreau stand -
AIH20 alone sensors
Printed 02/03/2012 07:38 MTUTTLE