The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1520 20TH STREET (11)TAlT RIti1NG 1'[NL (:NnlllN Gk p: 7141560!8222 ..,—. i .00- July 3, 2012 VIA FED EX 7985 8202 1504 Bakersfield Fire Department 2101 H Street Bakersfield CA 93301 Re: Secondary Containment Testing AT&T Corporation 1520 20th STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA GEOPAR: CAK010 To Whom it May Concern: 2' >... Dt,po,0 r.;::... An,h,,im, CA 92x:6 Enclosed are the results for the following tests completed on June 29, 2012: Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Program Manager CA I+co 588098 ± AZ Ilc? 095984 ; NV I c 0049666 ! 7X hc4 CR0000041. Secondary Containment Testing Report Form Thisfornt is intendedforusehy contractors perfortningperiodic testing ofUSTsecondarycontaintnetit systems. Use the appropriate pages ofthis form to report resultsfor all components tested The completedform, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to the facility owner /operatorforsubmittal to the local regulatory agency. I. FACILITY INFnRMAT1(1N Farilitv In• CA i<nio Facil it Name: AT&TCorporation Date of Testin : 6/29/2012 Facility Address: 152020TH ST, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Facility Contact: Grant Armstrong Phone: (661) 327 -6903 r Initial r Repair Test Date Local Agency Was Notified Of Testing: 6/18/2012 F 6 Month r Other Name of Local Agency Inspector (if present during testing): Ernie Medina Triennial 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Tait Environmental Services Pass Technician Conducting Test: Adolfo Aguilar Not Tested Credentials: CSLB Licensed Contractor f— SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester r, ICC UST Service Technician License Type: A B AS C -10 HAZ I License Number: 588098 Not Tested Man ufactu rer Training Annular #CAKOI OU00I Manufacturer Component(s) r Date Training Expires ICC Technician 5238610 -UT r 2/7/2013 Incon TS -STS 1732573702 i 8/4/2012 Blueline CA -1870 8/4/2013 _ j— r— F— Piping Sump #CAK0100001 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made Annular #CAKOI OU00I f7 r r r r r r Fill Swap #CAKO10U001 i r- r— r r— j— r— F— Piping Sump #CAK0100001 i— r- f- I f- r Trans. Sump #CAKO10U001 r F F F r r r r Sply Sec. Line #CAKO10U001 17 r— F fv j` f— F- f- Ret. Sec. Line #CAKO10U001 f7 f— r F7 f— f— r r Vent Sec. Line #CAKOl0U00I f f" C" F f— F f— F- r r f— r r F- f— r r f- r f- r If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: ITook Non -Haz. Test Water To Tait Shop. For any equipment capable ofgenerating a print out of test results, you must attach a copy of the test report to this certification f System printout attached. CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated in this documen tare accurate and in full compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: f,,,,r%, Date: 6/29/2012 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: r Tank Manufacturer r Industry Standard r Professional Engineer F Other(Specify) Test Method Used: F Pressure Vacuum r Hydrostatic F Other(Specify) Test Eciuinment Used: 4" Dial Gauee Eauinment Resolution: .2 ikl, L - A a ®' Tank Annular#ICAKOIOUDOI Tank Tank Tank Is Tank Exempt From Testing? 0) r Yes F No r Yes r No r Yes r No r Yes r No Tank Capacity: 8,000 Gallons Tank Material: Steel / Clad Tank Manufacturer. Joor Product Stored: Diesel Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/waterand starting test: 1 Hour Test Start Time: 10:00 AM Initial Reading (Rt): 10 HG Test End Time: 11:00 AM Final Reading (RF): 10 HG Test Duration: 1 Hour Change in Reading (RF -R,): 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 Test Result: 1 Pass r Fail r Pass r Fail r Pass r Fail r Pass r Fail Was sensor removed for testing'? I' 1g r No 1 NA r Y. I I N° r NA r Y. 1 1 N° r NA vg r N° r NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing'? r– rYaNO Nn r r rYesNo NA r rrYaNo NA r r rYesN° NA Comments – (include information on repairs made prior to testing, mid recommendedfollow -tipforfailed tests) Reinstalled Sensor To Lowest Point But Not'l'ested. 1) Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. { Cali forniaCode of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)1 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: r Piping Manufacturer F Industry Standard r Professional Engineer F Other(Specify) Test Method Used: F Pressure r Vacuum r Hydrostatic F Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: 4" Dial Gauge Equipment Resolution: X' Piping Run Supply #CAKOIOU00I Piping Run Return #CAKOIOU00I Piping Run Vent #CAK0100001 Piping Run Piping Material: Poly Poly Fiberglass Piping Manufacturer: Western Fiberglass Western Fiberglass Ameron Piping Diameter: 1" 1.50" 2" Length of Piping Run: 120' 120' 35' Product Stored: Diesel Diesel Diesel Method and location ofpiping -run isolation: rest Boot Test Boot Test Boot Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/waterand starting test: 15 Minutes 15 Minutes 15 Minutes Test State Time: 1:10 PM 1:10 PM 9:25 AM Initial Reading (R1): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI Test End Time: 2: 10 PM 2:10 PM 10:25 AM Final Reading (R1): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI Test Duration: I Hour 1 I -lour I Hour Change in Reading (RF"R1): 0 0 0 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0 0 0 Fest Result: rv—' Pass r Fail F Pass r Fail F Pass r Fail r Pass r Fail Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up forfailed tests) lReplaced Supply Sec. Line Test Boot & Return Sec. Line Test Boot In The Transition Piping Sump, Re- tested & Passed. 6. PIPING SUM PTESTING Test Method Developed By: r Sump Manufacturer F Industry Standard r Professional Engineer r Other(S eci ) Test Method Used: F Pressure r Vacuum Hydrostatic r Other(Specify) test Equipment Used: In -font "fS -STS Equipment Resolution: .0006 Sump ump Sump umpx--, ` F ' Piping #CAK0100001 Trans. #CAK0100001 Sump Diameter: 42" 30" X 24" Sump Depth: 34" 33" Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Height li•om Tank Top to "fop of Highest Piping Penetration: 17 16" Height from Tank "fop to Lowest 20" N/AElectricalPenetration: Condition ofsump prior to Good Good testing : Portion ofSump Tested (1) 2" above penetration 2" above penetration Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both r Ya r r No I- NA r rr 1 Ya 1 No I- NA r1 Ya No NA r r Ya I No 1 NA product and water) ?* Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A Is system programmed for fail- r Ya r No IV NA r r r1YesINoI_ NA r r rIYa1NoI NA r- f Yes I No F NAsafeshutdown ?* Was fail -safe verified to be Ya r No NA r Ya r r No 1V NA Ir Ya 1r No I NA f Ya f No 1r NAoperational ?* Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 15 Minutes 15 Minutes starting test: Test Start Time: 1:33 PM 1:56 PM 1:56 PM 2:13 PM Initial Reading (RI): 5.2121 5.2115 5.1153 5.1150 Test End Time: 1:48 PM 2:12 PM 2:12 PM 2:28 PM Final Reading (RI): 5.2116 5.2113 5.1 150 5.1150 Test Duration: 15 Min. 115 Min. 15 Min. 115 Min. Change in Reading (RF"Rt): 0005 0002 0003 0000 Pass/Fai I "Threshold or Criteria: 002 1.002 002 1.002 Test Result: r rPass Fail r' rPass Fail rrPass Fail rrPass Fail Was sensor removed for testing? F Ya r No r NA r Ys r Nor NA r Ya r No r NA r Yes r Nor NA Was sensor properly replaced and r 1'a I "o r "A rr1'a P "o r "A r Yes r "o r "A r 1'a r "of r NAverifiedfunctionalaftertesting? Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to Re testing, and recommendedfollow -rip for failed tests) talledins Sensor To Lowest Point But Not Tested. mm ..._.___ A t 1) Ifthe entire depth of the sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. Ifthe answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA', the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps r Fil I Riser Containment Sumps are resent, but were Not Tested r Test Method Developed By: (— Sump Manufacturer r--' Industry Standard r Professional Engineer F Other(Specify) test Method Used: (— Pressure r Vacuum F-00 Hydrostatic r Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS E ui ment Resolution: .0006 e Fill Sum p Fill KAK010000I Fill Sum p Fill Sum p Fill Sump Sump Diameter: 42" Sump Depth: 36" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: N/A Height from Tank Top to Lowest 13lectrical Penetration: 24„ Condition of sump prior to testing : Fair Portion of Sump Tested: 2" Above Colllar Sump Material: Fiberglass Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 15 Minutes Test Start Time: 12:01 PM 12:16 PM Initial Reading (R1): 3.1731 3.1733 Test End Time: 12:16 PM 12:31 PM Final Reading (RF): 3.1733 3.1736 Test Duration: 15 Min. 115 Min. Change in Reading (RF"R1): 0002 0003 Pass/Fai I Threshold or Criteria: 002 1.002 Test Result: r Pass r Fail r Pass r Fail r Pass r— Fail r Pass r Fail Is there a sensor in the sump'? r Ym No F Ym F No F Y. (— No F Y. No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? F Yes '- No F NA F Y. F No F NA F Yes f— No r- NA F Yes j No F- NA Was sensor removed for testing? I- Y. I No I NA rI Y. r- No F NA r r rIYg1NoIr NA rI Yes No NA Was sensor properly replaced and veri tied functional after testing? r 'g "° NAFF F F No r NAYes r Yes r No I NA r- rF F Yes I No 1 NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -up forfailed tests) sorTrip In Alarm During Testing, Reinstalled Sensor To Lowest Point. ATT CAKO10 1520 20TH ST, BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL 06/29/2012 1:48 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT PIPING TEST STARTED 1:33 PM TEST STARTED 06/29/2012 BEGIN LEVEL 5,2121 IN END TIME 1:48 PM END DATE 05/29/2012 END LEVEL 5,2116 IN LEAK. THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TRANSTN TEST STARTED ' 1:56 PM TEST STARTED 06/29/2012 BEGIN LEVEL 5,1153 IN END TIME 2:12 PM END DATE 06/29/2012 END LEVEL 5.1150 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED ATT CAK010 1520 20TH ST, BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL 06/29/2012 2:12 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT PIPING TEST STARTED 1:56 PM TEST STARTED 06/29/2012 BEGIN LEVEL 5,2115 IN END TIME 2:12 PM END DATE 06/29/2012 END LEVEL 5,2113 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TRANSTN TEST STARTED 2:13 PM TEST STARTED 06/29/2012 BEGIN LEVEL 5,1150 IN END TIME 2:28 PM END DATE 06/29/2012 END LEVEL 5.1150 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED I TEST DATE: 6/29/2012 CLIENT: AT &T GEOPAR: CAKO10 PAGE J- OF P- ATT CAKO10 1520 20TH ST, ATT CAKO10 1520 20TH ST, BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA BAKERSFIELD I TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL CALIFORNIA TAIT ENVIRONMENTAL 06/29/2012 12:16 PM 06/29/2012 12:31 PM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT i FILL r FILL TEST STARTED 12:01 PM TEST STARTED 06/29/2012 '" TEST STARTED 12:16 PM BEGIN LEVEL 3,1731 IN TEST STARTED 06/29/2012 END TIME 12:16 PM BEGIN LEVEL 3,1733 IN END DATE 06/29/2012 E.ND,TIME 12:31 PM END LEVEL 3,1733 IN END DATE 06/29/2012 LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN END LEVEL 3,1736 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IPJ TEST RESULT PASSED TEST DATE: 6/29/2012 CLIENT: AT &T GEOPAR: CAK010 PAGE cv?- OF '