The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2700 OSWELL STREET (7)3S7 &Z-- SWRCB, January 2002 Page 1 of 7 Secondary Containment Testing Report Form This form is intendedfor use by contractors performing periodic testing ofUSTsecondary containment systems. Use the appropriate pages ofthisform to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedform, written test procedures, and printoutsfrom tests (fapplicable), should beprovided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency. 1. FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: OSWELL CHEVRON . Date of Testing: 10 -28 -10 Facility Address: 2700 OSWELL ST BAKERSFIELD, CA 93306 Facility Contact: Phone: Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: Name of Local Agency Inspector (fpresent during testing): ERNIE MEDINA 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Rich Environmental pass Technician Conducting Test: RYAN MASON ICC# 8029371 -UT Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor D SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type: C61/D40 A HAZ Manufacturer License Number: 809850 Manufacturer Training Com onen s ) Date Training Expires 1NCON TS -STS 8 -11 -11 Repairs Made UNL887 ANNULAR X 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Component pass Faii Not Tested Repairs Made Component Pass Fail Not Tested Repairs Made UNL887 ANNULAR X UDC 7 -8 X PREM91 ANNULAR X UNL87 FILL SUMP X DIESEL ANNULAR X PREM91 FILL SUMP X D. UNL87 SEC. PIPE X DIESEL FILL SUMP X PREM91 SEC. PIPE X UNL87 VAPOR BUCKET X DIESEL SEC. PIPE X PREM91 VAPOR BUCKET X UNL87 STP X DIESEL VAPOR BUCKET X PREM91 STP X DIESEL STP X UDC 1 -2 x UDC 3-4 x 0 UDC 5-6 X Ifhydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion of tests: RECYCLE AND REUSE CERTIFICATION OF TECHNICIAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts stated in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements Technician's Signature: Z,,--v Date: 10 -28 -10 0 0 SWRCB, January 2002 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING I el- Page - of _7 Test Method Developed By: i I Tank Manufacturer X Industry Standard I Professional Engineer l ' Other (Speck) Test Method Used: 1.1 Pressure X Vacuum i I t lydrostatic i.I Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Is Tank Exempt From Testing ?' Tank Capacity: Tank # 87 Tank # 91 Tank # DIESEL Tank X Yes I I No X Yes U No X Yes No SINGLE. I I Yes I I No SINGLE SINGLE Tank Material: WALL WALL WALI. Tank Manufacturer: TANK TANK TANK Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum/water and starting test: 30MINS 30MINS 30MINS 30MINS Test Start. Time: Initial Reading (R,): Test End Time: Final Reading, (R,:): Test Duration: 60 MINS 60 MINS 60 MINS 60MINS Change in Reading (R,, -R,): Pass. Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0" HG V HG 0" HG 0" HG Test Resin "t Q Piss : ;t3'I+1 Pstss =rCJ Fail,' 0 Pass;.. C]: Fail D I?ass: D V it Was sensor removed for testing ?. X Yes ! !No t I NA X Yes I! No ; 1NA X Yes I No ! iNA X Yes No I I NA Was sensor properly replaced and. verified functional after testing? X Yes `` =i No I NA X Yes 11 No 1.4 NA X Yes LNo I .NA X Yes !'No I NA Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests) NOT TESTED SINGLE WALL TANKS Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. (California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6); SWRCB, January 2002 5, SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Page. . 3 of- 7- Test Method Developed By: 1 Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard' I Professional Engineer 1'!. Other (Specify) Pest Method Used: X Pressure 1.1 Vacuum : I Hydrostatic i I Other (SpeciifY) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: _ Piping Material: Piping Run # 87 Piping Run # 91 Piping Run # DSL Piping Run # FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Piping Manufacturer: SMITH SMITH SMITH 4,; —•— 200' Piping Diameter: 4,. 4,. Length of Piping Run: 200' 200' Product Stored: Method and location of piping-run isolation: UNL87 BOOT IN.SUMP PREM91 BOOT IN SUMP DIESEL BOOT 1N SUMP BOOT IN SUMP Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 30 MINS 301MINS 30 MINS 30 MINS Test Start Time: 9:30AM 9:30AM 9:30AM Initial Reading (R,): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI . Test End Time: 10:30AM 10:30AM . 10:30AM Final Reading (R,:): 5 PSI 5 PSI 5 PSI Test Duration: 60 MINS 60 MINS 60 MINS 60 MINS Change in Reading (Ri -R,): 0 PSI . 0 PSI 0 PSI Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: O PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI U PSI Tlest Result: ' X P Ss QFa 1 X f' ss i t7 Fait :! X :::Pass Fail:. D. :Pass Et Fail Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended.jolloia, -up fi)rfailed tests) _ SWRC13,1anuary 2002 6. PIPING SUMP TESTINC 7S (LL Page. 4 of 7 Test Method Developed By: I I Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard i I Professional Engineer w 1 Other (Spec) Test Method Used: I i Pressure i I Vacuum X Hydrostatic I I Other (Specify) Test Equipment Used: iNCON Equipment Resolution: ,002" Sump Diameter: Sump # 87 Sump# 91 Sump # DSL Sump # 48" 48" 48" Sump Depth: 53" 53" 53" Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS. Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 24" . 24" 24" I leight from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 26" 26" 26" Condition of sump prior to testing: CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN Portion of Sump Tested' 2.6 26" 26" Does turbine shut down when sump sensor detects liquid (both product and water)? X Yes .,I No I .I NA X Yes L I No I: I NA X Yes I ; No U NA I I Yes I No I ' NA Turbine shutdown response time 5 SEC 5 SEC 5 SEC Is system programmed for:fail -safe shutdown?* . X Yes i 1 No t.! NA X Yes i. I No ! `NA X Yes I No I .I NA i Yes I ' No I ; NA Was fail -safe verified to he operational ? o X.Yes !.I No I I NA X Yes . t I No l .! NA X Yes I ! No i ! NA Yes I : No I I NA Wait time between applying pressureivacuum /water and starting test: 30 MINS. 30 MINS 30 MINS 30 MINS Test Start Time: 12:15P .M 12:31PM 11:21AM I I:39AN1 10:30AM 10 :47AM Initial Reading (R,): sA(AIN 5.4641N 4A341N 4.4341N 55071N 5.5071N Test End Time: 12:30PM 12:46PM 11:36AM 11:54AN1 10.45AM 11:03,%N1 Final Reading (R,:): 5.4651N 5.4641N 4.4331N 4.4331N 5.5081N. 5.508IN Test Duration: 15MINS . 15NIINS 15MINS 15MINS ISMINS 15MINS 15MINS 15NIINS C Change in Reading (R, : -R,): 001IN .0001N 0011N 0011N AIII IN 0011N Pass /Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0021N .0021N 0021N 0021N 0021±5 0021N 0021N 0021'N j Testesut 4X Isass ,Q,FiI`: 7{' Past :::, 0 iFali' X Pass:: L7Fai1 Pass U;ai.l Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes ' Il No f I NA X Yes ' ,)No f ' NA X Yes 1 !No i I NA X Yes ].!No , NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testin ? X Yes., I :1 No I NA X Yes '.'INo I I NA X Yes 11No : INA X Yes i 1No NA Comments — (include information can repairs made ,prior to !sling; and recommended Jallorr-up for fulled tests) If the entire depth ofthe sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) . SWRCB, January 2002 7. 11N1)FR= n1SPF.N1.9FR CONTAINMFNT (110CI TFCT(Nf: 66 Z Z-Z- Page _ 5 of - 7. test Method Developed By: I.1 UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard ': I Professional Engineer i-1 Other (Speci)) Test Method Used: I I Pressure l : vacuum X I lydrostatic I. i Other (.Spec) Test Equipment Used: INCON EEquipment Resolution: .002" UDC # 1 -2 UUDC # 3 -4 UU DC # 5 -6 UUDC # 7 -8 UNKNOWN UUNKNOWN UUNKNOWN UUNKNOWNJOCManufacturer: U UDC Material: FFIBERGLASS FFIBERGLASS FFIBERGLASS FFIBERGLASS UDC Depth: 228" . 228" 228" 228" Height from UDC Bottom to Top . 8;, 88„ 88" 88 ' of Highest Piping Penetration :. 6" . Ileight from UDC Bottom to 6 b - Lowest Electrical Penetration: 6" 66' b Condition of UDC prior to CCLEAN CCLEAN CCLEAN CCLEAN testin,: Portion of U DC "Tested 110" 110" 110" 110" Does turbine shut down when UDC sensor detects liquid (both XX Yes .I No L.1 NA XX Yes :J No t NA XX Yes : i No ' ; NA XX Yes : INo I.± AN roduct and water)"` - Turbine shutdown response time 55 SEC 55 SEC S 5 SEC; Is system programmed for fail- Comments - (include: information on repairs made prior to leslii g, and recommended follow -upforfailed le_ts} _V , If the entire depth ofthe UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the answer to any of the. questions indicated with an asterisk ( *) is "NO" or "NA", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) SWRCB, January 2002 R_ F'11,1,11IRVR CONTAINMENT SIIMP TF'CTINC: t)b k cz_: 1Page, G_ of - 7 Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums LI Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ; Test Method Developed By: 1.? Sump. Manufacturer X Industry Standard I Professional Engineer 1 i I Other (Specify) Test Method Used: 1 Pressure t I Vacuum X Hydrostatic I Other. (Specif ) _ test Equipment Used: INCON. Equipment Resolution: .002" Fill Sump # 87 Fill Sum # 91 Fill Sump # DSL Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: 42" 42" 42" Sump Depth: 52" 52" 52" Height from Tank Top to Top of, 24" 24" 24" Hi hest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank lop to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 28" 28" 28" Condition of sump prior to CLEAN CLEAN CLEANtesting: Portion of Sump Tested 26" 26" 26" Sump Material: FIBERGLASS . FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Wait time between applying pressurervacuum /water and. 30MINS . 30MINS 30MINS 30MINS starting test: Test Start Time: 11:214M 11:39AM 10 :30AM 10:47AM 9e-42AM 9:57AM Initial Reading, (R,): 3.986IN 3.989IN . 3.0031N 3.0031N 4.1751N 4.1751N Test End Time: 11:36AM 11:54AM 10:45AM 11:03AM 9:57AM I0:12AM Final Reading R +): 3.9871N 3.990IN 3.0031N 3.0031N 4.175IN 4.1751N Test Duration: 15MINS 15MINS 15MINS 15MINS 15MINS IWINS I NINS 15MINS Change in Reading (R1 -111): 0011N 0011N. 0001N MOIN 0001N 0001N Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0021N 0021N 002IN 0021N 0021N 0021N ot121N oo21N Test 12esult Ofat] Kass :: Fail :. Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes I No X Yes l.; No X Yes 1 ! No X Yes No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is X Yes I1 No F1 NA' X Yes PNo ! !NA X Yes ' 1 No ;NA X Yes i I No !:NA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes CI No L.I NA X Yes I "INo t. NA X Yes ; INo I tNA X Yes i INo !'NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? X Yes t.. No P NA X Yes .INo L:: ?NA X Yes ! 'No I INA X Yes '. No I!NA Comments — (include irrfortnation on repairs made prior to lesling, and recommendedfollow -terpalled 1cst,S% SWRCB, January 2002. 9. SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES j f LL Page _ 7_ of 7_ Facility is Not Equipped With Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes Spill /Overfill Containment Boxes are.Present, but were Not Tested Test Method Developed By: r; Spill Bucket Manufacturer . I I Industry Standard .1 Professional Engineer I. I Other ( Specif}) Pest Method Used: ;" I Pressure I : Vacuum i Hydrostatic I I Other (.Specify) Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: Bucket Diameter: Spill. Box # 87 VPR Spill Box #91 VPR Spilt Box # DSL VPR Spill Box # 12" 12" 12" Bucket Depth: 16" 16" I6" Wait time between applying pressure /vacuum /water and starting test: 30MINS 30MINS 30MINS 30MINS test Start Time: 10:30AM 10:47AM 9 :42AM 9 :57AM 9:42AM 9:57AM Initial Reading (R,): 5.6801N .5.6801N 4.7481N 4.7471N 6.2431N 6.2431N Test End Time: 1.0:45AM 1 1:03AM 9;57AM 10:12AM 9:571M 10:12AM Final Reading (110. 5.680IN 5.680IN 4.747IN 4.7461N 6.2431N 6.2431N Test Duration: ISMINS ISMINS ISMINS 15MINS 15MINS 15MINS 15MINS 1541I N5 Change in Reading (R,wR,): 001 IN .0001N 0011.N oonN AOOIN 000114 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0021N 0021N 0021N A021N 0021N O(121N 102IN .0021N Test Resr,li X Pass ail X P9SS 0:2i V Pas$ ' :El Fail 63 pass. ' 11 Fail Comments -- (include information on repairs madeprior io testing, and recommended follow -upfqrfailed tests) t2iZ.' OSWELL CHEVRON O8WELL CHEVRON 2700 OSWELL 2700 OSWELL BAKERSFIELD BAKERSFIELD 10.282010 1h: i3 AM 10/28/25i0 9:57 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT SUMP LEA!{ TEST REPORT' GSLkiPR DSLVPR TEST STARTED 9:57 AM TEST STARTED 9:42 AM TEST STARTED 10/28/2010 TEST STARTED 10282010 BEGIN LEVEL 6.2436 IN LEVEL 6. 9438 AM END TIME 101-12 AM, END TIMEEND END DATE 10/28/2010 ENV) DATE 10/292010 END LEVEL 6.2434 IN END LEVEL 6.2435 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED 91VPR 91VPR TEST STARTED 9:57 AM TEST STARTED 9:42 AM TEST STARTED 10/28/2010 TEST STARTED 10/28/2010 BEGIN LEVEL__. 4.7475_IN _ BEGIN LEVEL 4.7481 IN END TIME 10:12 AM END TIME 9- 57 AM END DATE 10/28/2010 END DATE 10/28/2010 END LEVEL 4.7468 IN END LEVEL 4.7475 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED 87VPR 8?UPR TEST STARTED 9:57 AM T TARTER 9. TEST STARTED 19/28/2010 T RTED 1 10 BEGIN LEVEL 4.9422 IN BEG 46 IN END TIME 10:12 AM END TIME 9:57 AM END DATE 10/28/2010 END DAM 010 END LEVEL 4.9418 IN END 4• LEAK THRESHOLD 0.862 IN LE .RESHOLD 0.062 TEST RESULT PASSED RESULT INCREASED DSLFSMP DSLFSMP TEST STARTED 9:57 AM TEST STARTED 9:42 AM TEST STARTED 10/28/2010 TEST STARTED 10/28/2010 BEGIN LEVEL 4.1753 IN BEGIN LEVEL 4.1755 IN END TIME 10:12 AM END TIME 9'57 AM END DATE 10/28/2010 END DATE 10/28/20.10 END LEVEL 4.1751 IN END LEVEL 4.1753 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.602 IN TEST RESULT PASSED TEST RESULT PASSED OSWELL CHEVRON 2700 OSWELL 86KERSF IELD 1 w1"28120 10 11:36 Atn SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 91STP TEST STARTED 11:21 AMTESTSTARTED16/28/2610BEGINLEVEL4.434/ .INENDTIME11:36 AMENDDATE10/28/2010ENDLEVEL4.4339 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED 87FSNP TEST STARTED 11121 AM TEST STARTED 16/28/2010 BEGIN LEVEL 3. %65 IN END TIME 11:35 AM END DATE 16/28/2010 END LEVEL 319874 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 61.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED OSWELL CHEVRON 2700 OSWELL BAKERSFIELD 10/28/2010. 11:54 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 91STP TEST STARTED 11:39 AMTEST .STARTED 16120/2010 BEGIN LEVEL 4.4334 INENDTIME11:54 Ali END DATE 16/28/2010 END LEVEL 4.4,'031 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.802 INTESTRESULTPASSED 87FSMP TEST STARTED 11:39 AMTESTSTARTED10/28/2010 BEGIN LEVEL. 3.9893 INENDTIME11:54 AMENDDATE28/28!2010ENDLEVEL3.5901 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 INTESTRESULT ' PASSED. OSWELL CHEURC0 2700 OSWELL BAKERSFIELD 10/28/2010 i1:03 AM SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT DSLSTP TEST STARTED 10:47 AM TEST STARTED 16/28/2010 BEGIN LEUEL 5.5081 IN END TIME 11:03 Ali 6D DATE to/28/2610 END LEVEL 5.5081 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED 91FSMP TEST STARTED 10 :47 AM TEST STARTED 101281"1010 BEGIN LEVEL 3.0036 IN END TIME 11:03 AM END DATE 10/28/2010 END LEVEL 3.0037 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.00: IN TEST RESULT PASSED 87UPR TEST STARTED 10:47 AM TEST STARTED 10/28/2016 BEGIN LEVEL x.6886 IN END TIME 11:03 AM END GATE 10/28/2010 END LEVEL 5.6508 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 9,002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED SWELL CHEVRON2700OSWELL 9AKERSFIELD 10/28/201)-4 1@:46 AN. SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT DSLsTF' TEST STARTED 10:30 AMTESTSTARTED10/20/2010BEGINLEVEL5.5078 INENDTIME10:4` AmENDDATE10/23/2020ENDLEVEL5.5080 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED 91FSMP TEST STARTED TEST STARTED 10:36 AM 18/28/2010BEGINLEVEL DID TIME 3.0034 IN END DATE 10;45 AM 10/28/2010ENDLEVEL LEAK THRESHOLD 3.0035 IN 6.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED 87UPR TEST STARTED 10 :36 AMTESTSTARTED BEGIN LEVEL 1012EV2010 5.6818 INENDTI.Me. END DATE 10:45 Am 10128/2010ENDLEVEL LEAK THRESHOLD 5.6807 IN 0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED TEST STARTED 2:53 PM TEST STARTED 16/28/2010 3-4 SWELL +.HEVRON BEGIN LEVEL . END TIME 3.6290 IN 3:08 PM 276E DSIELD TEST STARTED OSWELL CHEVRON i AKERSFIcLO 16/28/2010 2700 OSWELL TEST STARTEDBENIN 16/28/2010 BAKERSFIELD 10/28/2010 1:57 PM IDSWEiL CHEVRON, LEVEL END TIME 3.6658 IN OSWELL CHEVRON 0/28/20le 3 :88 Pm SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 2790 05WELL. 12 :30 PM TEST RESULT BRKERSFIELD SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 2 16/28 ./2816 TEST STARTED 10/26/20lq 12: 30 PPt 5 -6 TEST STARTED 1:42 PM TEST UMP LEAK TEST REPORT TEST STARTED 2:53 PM BEGIN 5.9642 IN TEST RESULT TEST STARTED 16/28/2010 c'OEL END TIME 1:57 PM 8?STP BEGIN LEVEL 4.1461 IN END DATE 10/28/2610 TEST STARTEDENDTIME3:08 PP1 END LEVEL 5.9631 IN 22:15 PMTESTSTARTEDENDDATE10/28/2019 LEAK THRESHOLD 9.602 10/28/2610BEGINLEVELENDLEVEL4.1445 IN EESTRESULTPASSED 5, END TIME 4640 INLEAKTHRESHOLD8.002 IN END DATE 12:36 PMTESTRESULTPASSED END LEVEL 16/28/2010 70,T STARTED 16/28/2010 5.4654 INLZAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN7 -8 ST RESULTTEST PASSED TEST STARTED 2:53 PM TEST STARTED 16/28/2010 3-4 END DATE 10/28/2019 BEGIN LEVEL . END TIME 3.6290 IN 3:08 PM 50.002 TEST STARTED 12:15 PNi END DATE 16/28/2010 16/28/2610 3 :27 PM TEST STARTEDBENIN 16/28/2010ENDLEVEL3.6272 IN IDSWEiL CHEVRON, LEVEL END TIME 3.6658 INLEAKTHRESHOLD6.002 IN 2706 OSWELL END DATE 12 :30 PM TEST RESULT PASSED BAKERSFIELD END LEVEL 102616 TEST STARTED 10/26/20lq 18/28/201 -0 2:32 Ph LEAK THRESHOLD 3.6844 IN 0.802 IN TEST STARTED TEST RESULT PASSED 16/28/2616BEGINLEVEL SUMP L >_AK. TEST REPORT 5.4646 INENDTIME 1 -2 TEST STARTED 2:1.7 P(M TEST STARTED 10/28/2010 BEGIN LEVEL 5.5604 IN OSWELL CHEVRON END TIME 2:32 PM 2760 OSWELi END DATE 10/28/2019 BAKERSFIELD 50.002 LEAKGLEVEL HRES,HOLD IN OSWELL CHEURON 16/28/2610 3 :27 PM TEST RESULT PASSED 2790 OSWELLSAKERSFIELD SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT 10/28/2010 0L:4E PM 5-6 SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT EST STARTED 3 :11 PM TEST STARTED 10/26/20lq 87STP BEGIN LEVEL 4.1432 IN TEST STARTEDENDTIME3:27 PM 12:31 PMTESTSTARTEDENDDATE16/28./2018 16/28/2616BEGINLEVELENDLEVEL4.1426 IN 5.4646 INENDTIMELEAKTHRESHOLD0.602 IN 12:46 PMENDDATETESTRESULTPASSED18/28/2816ENDLEVEL5.4649 INLEAKTHRESHOLD 8 0.002 INTESTRESULTPASSED TEST STARTED 3:11 Ptl 70,T STARTED 16/28/2010 3 -4 r3E01K LEVEL 3.6272 IN TEST STARTED END DATE 10/2R/2010 TEST STARTED 160604181 BEGININ +_EUfI. 3.6268 IN LEVEL 1 3.6044 IHENDTIMELEAKTHRESHOLD9.002 IN END DATE 12'46 PM TEST RESULT PASSED END LEVEL 10/28 /2010 LEAK THRESHOLD 3.8035 IN 8'82 INTESTRESULTPASSED SB989 TESTING FAILURE REPORT A SITE NAME: OSWELL CHEVRON DATE: 10 -28 -10 ADDRESS: 2700 OSWELL ST TECHNICIAN: aYAN MA ON CITY: BAKERSFIELD SIGNATURE: 1&4 REPAIRS: NONE PARTS INSTALLED: NONE NAME: TITLE: SIGNATURE: THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON TAKES FULL RESPONSIBILITY .OF NOTIFYING THE APPROPRIATE PARTY TO HAVE CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO REPAIR THE ABOVE LISTED PROBLEMS AND NOTIFYING RICH ENVIRONMANTA.L FOR ANY NEEDED RETESTING. THIS ALSO RELEASES RICH ENVIRONMENTAL OF ANY FINES OR PENALTIES OCCURING.FROMNON- COMPLIANCE. A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN LEFT ON-SITE FOR YOUR CONVIENENCE.