HomeMy WebLinkAbout3333 UNION AVENUE (2)SWRCB, January 2002
Secondary Containment Testing Report, Form
P255 -, CID o
Page of l
Thisform is intendedfor use by contractors performingperiodic testing of USTsecondary containment systems. Use the
appropriate pages ofthisform to report resultsfor all components tested. The completedform, written testprocedures, and
printoutsfrom tests (ifapplicable), should be provided to thefacility owner /operatorfor submittal to the local regulatory agency.
1. FACILITY TNFORMATTON
Facility, Name: JOHNNY'S ARCO Date ofTesting: 6/9/11
Facility Address: 3333 UNION AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD
Facility.` Contact: Phone:
Date Local Agency Was Notified of Testing: 4/28/11
Name of Local Agency Inspector (rfpresera during testing):
2. TI.RWNG C'ONTRAC'TOR INFORMATION
Company Name: Rich Environmental
Pass
Technician Conducting Test: RICH PHILLIPS
Not
Tested
Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor 0 SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester
License Type: C61/1340 A HAZ
Manufacturer
License Number. 809850
Manufacturer Training
Component(s) Date Training Expires
INCON TS -STS 6/11/2012
89 ANNULAR X 89 FILL SUMP
3. SITMMARV OF TEST RESULTS
Component Pass Fail Not
Tested
Repairs
Made Component Pass Fail Not.
Tested
Repairs
Made
89 ANNULAR X 89 FILL SUMP X
87 MASTER ANNULAR X 87 MASTER FILL SUMP X
87 SLAVE ANNULAR X 0 87 SLAVE FILL SUMP X
91 ANNULAR X 91 FILL SUMP X1 1
89 SECONDARY X p 89 VPR BUCKET X
87 MASTER SECONDARY X 0 87 MASTER VPR BKT X 0
87 SLAVE SECONDARY X 87 SLAVE VPR BKT X 0.
91 SECONDARY X 0 91 VPR BUCKET X
DISP #1/2 X o 89 PIPING SUMP X
DISP #3/4 X 87 MASTER PIPE SUMP X
DISP #5/6 X 87 SLAVE PIPE SUMP X
DISP #7/8 X1 191 PIPING SUMP X
If hydrostatic testing was performed, describe what was done with the water after completion oftests:
CERTIFICATION OF 'I
To the best ofmy knowledge, thefacts
OttAN RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING THIS TESTING
in this document are accurate and infull compliance with legal requirements
Technician's Signature: // Date: 6/9/11
SWRCB, January 2002
4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING
Page —L of I
Test Method Developed By:. Tank Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: Pressure X Vacuum Hydrostatic
D Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: 4" DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution:
Tank #89 Tank 987 MASTER Tank #87 SLAVE Tank #91
is Tank Exempt From Testing ?' Yes X No Yes X No D Yes X No Yes X No
Tank Capacity: IOK IOK IOK IOK
Tank Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
Tank Manufacturer: UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
Product Stored: UNL89 UNL87 UNL87 UNL91
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
30MIN 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN
Test Start Time: 9:30 9:30 11:00 12:30
Initial Reading (R,): IOHG IOHG IOHG I0k,G
Test End Time: 10 :30 10:30 12:00 1:30
Final Reading (RF): lOHG IOHG 10HG IOHG
Test Duration: 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN 60MIN
Change in Reading (RrR,): 0 0 0 0
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
itX i; N 1 zN, - j., r _ ,:,Il cs:•;.'.k''
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No D NA " X Yes D No DNA X Yes No D NA X Yes No NA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testin ? X Yes No NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA XYes No NA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary
containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment
testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6))
SWRCB, January 2002
5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING
KZ523*
Page of)
J
C
Test Method Developed By: 0 Piping Manufacturer X Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: X Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic
Other (Sped)
Test Equipment Used: 4" DIAL GAUGE Equipment Resolution: .5%
Piping Material:
Piping Run #89 Piping Run #871
xW
Piping Run #87S Piping Run 491
FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
Piping Manufacturer. SMITH SMITH SMITH SMITH
Piping Diameter: 3" X' 3" 3"
Length ofPiping Run: 75' 75' 10' 75'
Product Stored: UNL89 UNL87M UNL87S UNL91
Method and location of
piping-ran isolation:
TEST BOOT TEST BOOT TEST BOOT TEST 900T
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN
Test Start Time: 9:45 9:45 11:30 9:45
Initial Reading (Rj): 6.0 6.0 5.5 6.2
Test End Time: 10:45 10:45 12:30 10:45
Final Reading (RF): 6.0 6.0 5:5 6.2
Test Duration: 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN 60 MIN
Change in Reading (RF -R4): 0 0 0 0
Pass/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI 0 PSI
T; Opp lip R.
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -yforfailed tests)
SWRCB, January 2002
6. PIPING SUMP TESTING
Page #_ of
Test Method Developed By: p Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
D Other (Specto)
Test Method Used: D Pressure, 0 Vacuum X Hydrostatic
0 Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution:
Sump Diameter.
Sump 989 Sump #87M Sump #87S Sump #91
36" 36" 36" 36"
Sump Depth: 72" 72" 72" 72"
Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Highest Piping Penetration: 25" 25" 25" 25"
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration: 24" 24" 24" 24"
Condition ofsump prior to testing: GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD
Portion of Sump Tested' 2T' 17 27" 2T'
Does turbine shut down when
sump Sens, or detects liquid (both
product and water)?'
0 Yes DNo XNA 0 Yes DNo XNA D Yes D No XNA Yes No XNA
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail safe
shutdown ?'
0 Yes DNo X NA D Yes No XNA D Yes 0 No XNA 0 Yes DNo XNA
Was fail-safe verified to be
o rational ?' 0 yes DNo XNA Yes DNo XNA 11 Yes DNo XNA 0 Yes DNo XNA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and starting
test:
30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN 30 MIN
Test Start Time: 1:24 1:56 1.09', 1:24. 1:07 1:24 2:23 2:40
Initial Reading (Rj): 2.753 8.082 3.784 3.784 3.875 3.875 4.615. 4.615
Test End Time: 1:40 2:11 1:22 1:40.. 1:22 1:40 2:39 2:55
Final Reading (RF): 2.753 8.802 3.784 3.784 3.875 3.875 4.615 4.615
Test Duration: 15MIN I5MIN 15M1N 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15M1N 15MIN
Change in Reading (RF -Ri): OOQ OQO 000 OQO 000 000 000 -.000
Pass/FailThreshold or Criteria 002 -.002 002 002 002 002 002 -.002
r ,t,/l$i. t:
1
fL
is
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes 0 No D NA X Yes DNo ONA X Yes DNo D NA X Yes 0No DNA
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes 0 No DNA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes DNo DNA X Yes 0No DNA
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
Ifthe entire depth ofthe sump is not tested, specify how much was tested. Ifthe answer to gay ofthe questions indicated with an
asterisk (*) is "NO" or "NA ", the entire sump must be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) .
U o
SWRCB,1January 2002 Page of
7_ ITN ER- i1ICPFNCF.R rnNTAINMF.NT amn TESTING.
Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer
D Other (Specify)
Test Method Used: D Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Specify)
Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution:
UDC #112 UDC #3/4 UDC #5/6 UDC #7/8
ufacturer: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
rial: 77D UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
he 10" 10" 10" 10"
Height from UDC Bottom to Top
ofHighest Piping Penetration:
0 0 0 0
Height from UDC Bottom to
Lowest Electrical Penetration:
0 0 0 0
Condition of UDC prior to
testing:
GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD
Portion ofUDC Tested 7" T' 7" T'
Does turbine shut down when
UDC sensor detects liquid (both
product and water )?`
Yes No X NA Yes DNo X NA D Yes No XNA Yes No X NA
Turbine shutdown response time
Is system programmed for fail-
safe shutdown? D Yes 11 No X NA Yes No X NA D Yes No XNA Yes No X NA
Was fail -safe verified to be
operational?*
Yes No X NA Yes D No X NA 11 Yes No X NA Yes No X NA
Wait time between applying
pressure/vacuum/water and
starting test
30MIN 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN
Test Start . Time: 3:35 3:52. 3:35 3:52 3:35 3:52 3:35 3:52
Initial Reading 4.216 4.216 2.641 2:642 2.858 2.859 3.590 3.591
Test End Time: 3:50 4:07.. 3:50 4:07. 3:50 4:07 3:50 4:07
Final Reading (RF): 4.217 4.216 2.642 2.642 2.858 2.859 3.391 3.591
Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN ISMIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN
Chan a in Readin RF -Rj): 001 -.000 001 000 000 000 001 000
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 002 -.002 002 1 .002 002 002 002 002
7r lIt T' . .;,`i .fi ., .•i.. t i 7 ., , ,ir 01131* 114 AN
No DNA
i• ; -:;;i
i::i•
X Yes No NAWassensorremovedfortesting? X Yes D No DNA X Yes No NA X Yes
Was sensor properly replaced and
verified functional after testing? X Yes No NA X Yes D No D NA X Yes No NA X Yes No NA
Comments - (include information on repairs madeprior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upfor ailed tests)
Ifthe entire depth ofthe UDC is not tested, specify how much was tested. If the_ answer to My ofthe questions indicated with an
asterisk (") is "NO" or "NA ", the entire UDC must be tested. (See SWRCB LG460)
SWRCB, January 2002
8. FH L RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING
e 4-u o U
Page __ of *r7 T
Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums 0
Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: D Sump Manufacturer X Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer
0 Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: D Pressure D Vacuum X Hydrostatic
0 Other (Spec)
Test Equipment. Used: INCON TS -STS
Fill Sump #89 Fill Sum #87M
Sump Diameter. 42" 42"
Equipment Resolution:
Fill Sump #87S Fill Sump #91
42" 42"
Sump Depth: 72" 72" 72" 72"
Height from Tank Top to Top of
Hi hest Piping Penetration:
0 0 0 0
Height from Tank Top to Lowest
Electrical Penetration:
0 0 0 0
Condition of sump prior to
testing:,
GOOD GOOD GOOD, GOOD
Portion: of Sump Tested 12" 12" 12" 12"
Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
Wait time between applying
pressure /vacuum/water and
starting test:
30MIN 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN
Test Start Time: 12:10 1229 10:43 11:13 10:43 11:13 12:29 1:07
Initial Reading 3.345 3.345 3.788 3.792 7.507 3.792 3.131 3.129
Test.End Time: 1225 12:44 10:58. 11 :28 10:58 11:28 12:44 1:22
Final Reading (RF ): 3.345 3.345 3.790 3.792 7.507 3.792 3.130 3.129
Test Duration: 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN
Chan a in Reading F-R,): 000 =.000 002 000 000 000 000
Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria:. 002 -.002 002 002 002. 002 0;02 002
M Iola ill, Oo
Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes 0 No X Yes D No X Yes D No X Yes D No
Does the sensor alarm when
either product or water is
detected?
D Yes 0 No XNA D Yes 0 No X NA 0 Yes D No X NA 0 Yes D No X NA
Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes D No 0 NA XYes 0 No DNA X Yes 0 No D NA X Yes D No 0 NA
Wassensor properly replaced
verified functional after testing? X Yes 0 No DNA. X.Yes ONO DNA X Yes D No DNA X Yes D No DNA
Comments —(include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommendedfollow -upforfailed testy)
SWRCB, January 2002
9. SPILIJOVERFILL CONTAINMENT BOXES
Page a of '
Facility,is Not Equipped With Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes 0
Spill/Overfill Containment Boxes are Present, but were Not Tested
Test Method Developed By: 0 Spill Bucket Manufacturer X.Industry Standard Professional Engineer
C Other (Spec)
Test Method Used: p Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic
Other (Spec)
Test Equipment Used: INCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution:
Spill Box #VPR 89 Spill Box #VPR 87M Spill Box #VPR 87S Spill Box #VPR 91TWaftiameter: 12" 12" 12" 12"
epth: 14" 14" 14" 14"
between applying
pressure/vacuum /water and
starting test:
30MIN 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN
Test Start Time: 10:02 10:20 10:02 10:20 10:02 10:20 10:20 10:43
Initial Reading (111): 3.588 3.587 5.159 5.158 7.449 7.507 7.212 4.810
Test End Time: 10:17 10:36 10:17 10:36 10:17 10:36 10:36 10:58
Final Reading (RF): 3.588 3.587 5.159. 5.158 7.450 7.507 7.213 4.810
Test Duration: 15MYN 15NUN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN
Change in Reading (RF -Ri): 000 -.000 000 000 001 000 00I 000
aGsDs/Fail Threshold or
Criteria: 00200,
0
2 00
J2
0,0en2 0'
i0'..
2 002 002 002P1 / 1 2Uu tt-f.. . . PFltr• WN t t.l ' # i•,. •.
n t
A' ',.
a y.
Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow -upforfailed tests)
QPw :BUCKETS
aONNYS ARCO
3 UNION .AVE
RAKERSFIELD CA
JONNYS ARCO
3333 UNION AVE 1,.36 AM
BAKERSFIELD CA 71 IMP LEAK TEST REPORT
06/09/2011 10:17 RM
89UPR
SUMP L AK TEST REPORT 7 GTARTED 10:20 AM
89UPR STARTED 05/09%20INLEVEL3.587$_,.tr +` "
TEST STARTED 10:.201MSTARTED06-'09
END TIME
END DATE i0:3 q
06i090II1NN1
ENDTEST
BEGIN LEVEL 3io.1
IN LEVEL
LEAK THRESHOLD 38.001 IN
END TIME
END DATE. 06/09i20 TEST RESULT PASSED
END LEVEL 3.5$81
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.00PA 87MUPR
TEST RESULT
TEST STARTED 10:2g p q
TEST STARTED 06r1109f20IIiMM1S7MUPRGIEL5105
TEST STARTED
1002
1A1M1
TEST 0S 9y IN
END TIME
06/ 1111
END
DATE .158 TN
ESIN LEVEL THRESHOLD 9.7
END TIME 06/09/201M EST
END DATE
END LEVEL 5,1 N6 sTHRSHOLDLEAKPASSED
TEST RESULT
87SUPR
TEST STARTED 10:20 AM
87SUPR TEST
BEGINLEVE
STARTED 06./09/
07
1
4 iN
TEST STARTED 10:0? Ah 06A 01
END TIME 10:3§
2 RtqENDDATE06/091 01,1.
TEST STARTED 7.449 N
BEGIN LEVEL 10.11 fiM
END LEVEL 7.50 rIN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN
END TIME 11
END DATE 07 0 IN
TFPT aF I.ILT PASSED
END LEVEL
4
2 LEAK THRESHOLD 0 •SS 91t)PR
TEST RESULT
TF?T 'STARTEb 26 q
9i2e11TESTSTARTED
06i1
BEGITIME EL 7101W.TANM
LEI DATE 06i09/2011
7.2133 IFIENDLEVEL
LEAK THRESHOLD 0. 5TESTRESULT
91FILS
TEST STARTED 12:29 P
TEST STARTED 009/201
BEGIN LEVEL 3113,10
ND TIME i1ENDDATE06/09/33
END LEVEL
PSSLEAKTHRESHOLD0• SSTESTRESULT
JONNYS ARCO
3333 UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD CA
06/09/2011 1:22 PM
LIMP LEAK. TEST REPORT
89STP
TEST STARTED 1:07 PM
TEST STARTED 06/09/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 2.71:2257 Ph
END TIME
END DATE 06/079 0
END LEVELLEAKTHRESHOLD 0.002
TEST RESULT
87MSTP
TEST STARTED i:07 PM
TEST STARTED 06/09
BEGIN LEVEL 3.784ENDTIME 1ENDDATE
END LEVEL
96/09/20
IN3.7845 INLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002
TEST RESULT PASSED
87SSTP-
TEST STARTED 1:07 PM
TEST STARTED 06/09/2011
BEGIN LEVEL 3.0752 IN
MiENDTIME
END DATE 030097520
END LEVEL yyOAKTHRESHOLD0.-002PASEOTESTRESULT
91FILS
TEST STARTED 1:07 PM
TEST STARTED 06/09/201, BEGIN LEVEL
END TIME
3.1295
MPI. ,jqENDDATE0
END LEVEL .2 I
LEAK THRESHOLD 30100 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED .,
JONNYS ARM
3333.UNION AVE
BAKER•SFIzLD: CA
06/09/2011 12:25 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
39FILS
TEST STARTED 12:10. PM
TEST STARTED 06/09/2011'
BEGIN LEVEL 3.3459 IN
END TIME 12 :25 PM
END DATE 06/09/20
END LEVEL 3.3459 INNLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002
TEST RESULT
fJONNYS ARCO
3333 UNION AVE
BAKERSFIELD CA
06/09/2011 12:45 PM
SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT
89FILS
TEST STARTED 12:29 PM
TEST STARTED 06/09/201111
BEGIN LEVEL 3.3459 IN
END TIME 12:44 Ph
END DATE 06/09/201
END LEVEL 3.3459 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN t
TEST RESULT PASSED
87MFILS
TEST STARTED 11:13 AI
TEST STARTED 06/09/201
BEGIN LEVEL 3.7925 IN
END TIME 11:28 AM
END ,DATE . 06/09/201111
END fiVEL 3.7928 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.00
TESTTEST RESULT PASSED
87SFILS
TEST STARTED 11 :13 AM
TEST STARTED 06/09/20 }11
BEGIN LEVEL 4.814 N
END TIME 11:28 AM
END DATE 06/09/2011
END LEVEL 4.8113 IN
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
S7MFILS,
TEST STARTED 10:43 AM
TEST STARTED 03$ INBEGINLEVEL
END LEVEL OLD $%J-SED0 • PLEAK
END TIME pM
09A01.1
END LEVEL 3.79gg IIN
LEAK THRESHOLD 8.00G IN
TEST RESULT I
7SFILS
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
1b :''
06/09/ 0
BEGIN LEVEL 7irENDTIME
END DATE 06/ b7. END LEVEL OLD $%J-SED0 • PLEAK
TEST RESLT
PASSED
91VPR
TEST STARTED
TEST STARTED
1043 AM
04 g160IN
BEGIN LEVEL
END TIME 100:95 110ENDDATE
END LEVEL.
0/ 09
4 8
r^" THRESHOLD
TEST.- RESULT
i,
PASSED
JONAyS ARCO
3333 UNION AVEBAKERSFIELDCA
06/09/2011 2:39 PM
SI 1Mr' ;EAK TEST REPORT
g9STP JONNYS ARCQ
3333 UNION HUE
ST STARTED 2:23 PP1 BAKERSFIELD CA
TEST STARTED 06/09/20}
5.0821 06/09/2011 2,11 Phi' JONNVS ARGO
LEVEL 3333 UNION AVEENDTIME9q
06/09/2011f1 SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT BAKERSFIELD CA
END DAE
END "L THRESHOLD $60 IN 89STR 06/09/2011 1.40 PM
TEST RESULT PASSED 1 ;S pTESTSTARTEDt
09A011
cis•• _ERK TEST REPORT
87MSTP
06TESTSTARTED /
BEGIN LEVEL 8.0811 Ph1 ggSTP
EST STARTED 2:23 PMM
END TIME 061ENDDATE0820I8• 0
TEST cTRP,TED 1:24 PM
TEST.STARTED 06/Qr9/ 01TESTSTARTED
TNT EVEL
06/09/2011
0. 39 I
P
ENp LEVEL IHLERKTHRESHOLD0• PASSED BFr_,TKI LEVEL 2. r5 I
END Tr{E 1.4gg
END TEST RESULT END DATE 06/09/20
ND SATE
r n EL
06/09/011
0.0000 IPA END 1FUEL 2.753?g NTHRESHOLD0.004 hJ
EPI' THRESHOLD 0.
TEST RESULT P SSU
87MSTP
56 PPi; TE' T RESULT PASSED
TEST STARTED 1-
TEST STARTED 06/09/0} 87MSTP
87SSTP BEGIN LEVEL 0.00011 MTIME
TEST STARTED 2:23 PM
END 06/09/2015ENDDATE0,00 Q
ST STARTED 1:211 PMV
TEST STARTED 06/09/ 2011
TFc STARTEDST _ ARTED 06/09/2011 THRESHOLD 0.0 1 BEGIN LEVEL 3.784 NM1:4BEGINLEVEL
END TIME
0.0000 IN
2:39 PM
LERK PASSEDTESTRESULT EN^ TIME
CND.naTF 06/09/2011.
END DATE 06/09/2011 END LEVEL 3.784
ND LEVEL
THRESHOLD
0.0000 IN
0.002 IN
6755TP LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002SBTESTRESULTPAEAK,
EST RESULT PASSED
TEST STARTED 1:56 PM
0f,/09/201NTESTSTARTED
LEVEL 0.01 PM
87S5TP
91STP BEGIN
END TIME 2'111
END DATE 0 900 TEST STARTED 1:24 PM
EST STARTED
TEST STARTED
2:23 PM
06/09/'L011 END LEVEL 0. PA25S } THRESHOLD ED
TEST STARTED 66/89/ 0
D.
ITIMEUEL 3.8
3EGIN LEVEL
ND TIME
4.6155 IN
2:39 PM
LEAK
TEST RESULT
Pppqq
END DATE 06/09011
ND DATE
ND LEVEL
06/09/2011
4.6153 IN
i END-LEVEL 3.87.8g
LENK.THRESHOLD 0.092 YIN
EAK THRESHOLD 0.082 INPASSED
TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST RESULT
91FILS
TEST STARTED 1:21 P
TEST STARTED Or-/09/7011
BEGIN LEVEL 3. 140 °MEND:_TIME g11END•.DATE 030925 INENDLEVEL
LEAK THRESHOLD 0.
TEEM RESULT
co3
JONNYS ARCO JFJNN4`S ARCO _. -- 3333 UNON
PAKERSFIELD
AVE 3333 UNION AVE' J ARCO
BAKERSFIELD,CA 33333
NYS
UNION AVE
06/091-11011 4:07 PM
BAKERSFIELD CA
06/09/2011 3 :- 5 PM
LEAK TEST REPORT 06/09/2011 2:55 PM
SUMS !_E SUMP LEAK TEST REPORT SUMP LEAK TEST REPORTDISP1-2 DISP1-2 8957P
TEST STARTED 3 :52 PM
TFST STARTED 06/09/ TEST STARTED 3:35 Pt9
r_ 8 TEST STARTED 06/09/2011 TEST STARTED 2 :40 PMEUEL4,215 BEGIN LEVEL 4.2168 IN I TEST STARTED 06/09/2011END ^TIME 4:07 PM END TIME 3 :50 PM BEGIN LEVEL 8.0825 IINEke^ 'TF 06/09/2011 END DATE 06109f20 11 END TIME 2 :55 PM
LEW THRESHOLD 4.2169 IN END LEVEL 4.2171
i
N END
END °EVE. 06,09/20 § T
TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
TEST
HRSEESTOLD 0.00A 1
DISPY -4 DISP3 -4 7MSTPTESTSTARTED3;52 PM TEST STARTED 3 :35 PMTESTSTARTED06/09/2011 TEST STARTED 06/09/ 8 i TEST STARTED 2:40 PMBEGINLEVEL2,6424 IN 8EGIN.LEVEL 2.641 I TEST STARTED 06/09/ END TIME 4 :0? PM END TIME 3:50 PMiTE
BEGIN LEVEL 0.000
END LEVEL 06''09/2011 END DATE 06/09/2011 END TIME
IN
2:5 P1
2.6425 IN END LEVEL 2.642,3 N END DATE. 06/09 01-
LEAK THRESHOLD 0,002 IN LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 N END LEVEL 0.0000 INTESTRESULTPASSEDTESTRESULTPASSEDLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN
TEST RESULT PASSED
DISPS -6 DISP5-6 87SSTP
TEST STARTED 352 PM Q TEST STARTED 335 PMTESTSTARTED06/09/2011 TEST STARTED 06/09/2011 TEST STARTED _ 2:40 PM
BEGIN LEVEL 2,8590 IN BEGIN LEVEL 2.85$2 IIN TEST STARTED 06/09/2011
END TIME 4:07 PM END TIME 3:.50 PM BEGIN
ILEVEL
0.020 PMENDDATEENDDATE06/09/2006/09/20// 1111 END DATE 06/0911ENDLEVEL2.8590 IN END LEVEL 2.8589
8
SIN
END LEVEL 0.000 IN
TEST RESULTOLD O.
PASSEO TEST RESULT
6. PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.00 IINN
TEST RESULT WS
DISP7 -8 DISP7 -8
91STP
TEST STARTED 3;52 TEST STARTED 3:35 PM _
TEST STARTED 06/09/2011 TEST STARTED 06/0901111 TEST STARTED 2 :40 PM
BEGIN LEVEL 3.5915 IN BEGIN LEVEL 3.590$— TEST STARTED 06/09/2011
END TIME 4:07 PM END TI 3:5 P q BEGIN LEVEL 4.6153 IN
END DATE 06/09/2011 END DA 06/09/2011 END.TIME 2:5. Pq
END LEVEL 3.5916 IN 3.5913 IN END DATE 06/09/2011
LEA '7 SHOLD 0.002 IN END LEVEL 4.6152 jNLEAKTHRESHOLD0.002 IN TEST RESULT PASSED LEAK THRESHOLD 0.002 NTESTRESULTPASSEDTESTRESULTPASSED
SB989 TESTING FAILURE REPORT
THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED /REPAIRED TO COMPLETE
TESTING.
REPAIRS:
LABOR:
PARTS INSTALLED:
NAME: TITLE:
SIGNATURE:
THE ABOVE NAMED PERSON TAKES FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING
THE APPROPRIATE PARTY TO HAVE CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO REPAIR
THE ABOVE LISTED PROBLEMS AND NOTIFYING RICH ENVIRONMANTAL FOR
ANY NEEDED RETESTING. THIS ALSO RELEASES RICH ENVIRONMENTAL OF
ANY FINES OR PENALTIES OCCURING FROM NON - COMPLIANCE.
A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN LEFT ON -SITE FOR YOUR
CONVIENENCE. .