Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.7-7237 As BuiltGENERAL NOTES 1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM WITH CHAPTER 33 - CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS PERTAINING THERETO. ALSO REFER TO SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 08/02/04. UPDATED BY KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED 10/21/2015. 2. ALL CUT AND/OR FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN TWO (2) HORIZONTAL TO ONE (1) VERTICLE 3. ALL FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT CUT WITHIN TWELEV (12) FEET HORIZONTALLY OF THE TOP OF EXISTING AND/OR PLANNED SLOPES. 4 ALL FILL AREAS TO BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOR A STRUCTURE FILL AND THE AREA SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF SIX (6) INCITES. 5. FILL AREAS SLOPING STEEPER THAN FIVE TO ONE (5:1) SHALL BE KEYED AND BENCHED TO SUPPORT FILL. 6. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING SIX (6) INCHES IN COMPACTED THICKNESS AND COMPACTED AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT BY AN APPROM MET". 7. ENGINEER/BUILDiNG OFFICIAL WILL BE NOTIFIED FORTY ©GHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING OF ANY FILL MATERIAL. 8. ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY (90%) PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINRD BY APPROVED METHOD PER CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE SECTION 3305 AND SO CERTIFIED BY TESTS AND REPORTS FROM SOILS ENGINEER. 9. ALL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF THREE (3) FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTROL AGAINST EROSION. 10. DIVERTER TERRACES (SWALES) WITH THREE (3) FEET MINIMUM WIDTH AND ONE (1) FOOT MINIMUM DEPTH ARE REQUIRED AT TOP OF CUT SLOPES WHEN EXISTING TERRAIN SLOPES TOWARD TOP OF CUT. 11. BERMS OR DRAINAGE DEVICES ARE REQUIRED AT TCI' OF ALL FILL SLOPES. 12. SURFACE DRAINAGE TO BE ONE (1%) PERCENT MINIMUM, EXCEPT AS WAIVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 13. GRADING WORK WILL BE SUPERVISED AS DANE00 GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 33 OF TINE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. 14. THE FACES OF ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A GROUND COVER INDIGDMS TO THE AREA. 15. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SMALL EMZCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISOR CONTROL DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS, SPECIFICATION AND CODE VATHIN MIS PURVIEW. 16. ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SMALL BE TUNED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS. 17. WORK CREWS SHALL SHUT OFF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WHEN NOT IN USE. 18. ANY WORK WITHIN EXISTING CITY RIGHT OF WAY WALL REQUIRE AN OPEN STREET PERMIT. 19. USA NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CALL U.S.A. ALERT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT (1-800-227-2600) OR (1-800-642-2444). 20. IF THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES), A 'NOTICE OF INTENT' (NOI) TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF T14E GD RAL FAIT Ri DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (SWRCB ORDER NO. 2009-009-DWQ AS AMENDED BY ORDER 2010-=4-DWQ AND ORDER 2012-0006-DWQ)) MUST BE FILED WITH STATE WAITER RESOURCES CONTROL BOAR IN SACRAMENTO BEFORE THE .BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT REWIRES THAT A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BE PREPARED, CONTINUOSLY CARRIED OUT, AND ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DURING NORMAL CONSTRUCTION HOURS. WASTE DMARGE IDRIFICAPON (WDID) NUMBER ,SF1�C _371-f-9-3 HAS BEEN !SSI!® BY TFE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD FOR THIS PROJECT. 21. AN OPEN STREET PERMIT MALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTTiAfNT FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING ACCEPTED STREET RIGHT OF WAY. UNLESS SECURED BY A SUBDIVISION AGREE- MENT, SECURITY BASED ON AN APPROVED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK PERFORMED WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY AND INSURANCE AS REWIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT. 22. ANY ITEMS IN PUBLIC RIGHT--OF-WAY THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DO NOT MEET CURRENT STANDARDS SET BY PUBLIC WORKS WALL REQUIRE REPAIRING AND/OR UPGRADING AS PER CITY ENGINEER. 23. UWURGROUND SERVICE ALERT SMALL BE 0100 ITACTI:U TWYO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSMICIZIN. (1-80D-642-2444) 24. 24 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION THE CITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SECTION SHALL BE GIVEN AT LEAST 24 HOUR NOTICE. THE SECTION MAY BE N011FIED AT (661) 326-3049. 25. COMPACTION TEST NOTE: COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER/C.O NTRACTOR. THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF REQUIRED TESTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 26. MAXIMUM SLOPE RATIO FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK TO FACE OF WALL OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE 4:1, EXCTT FOR 7WO FEET BEHIND THE SIDEWALK WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLGPE SHALL BE 2%. ALTERNATIVELY, THE CITY ENGINEER MAY APPROVE CURBING BEHIND THE SIDEWALK OR OTHER METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION ONTO THE SIDEWALK. NOTES: SIDEYARD SLOPE TO BE 2% FOR 10' OR TO PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN ALL LOTS TO BE GRADED ACCORDING TO THE TYPICAL DETAIL UNLESS OTHERWISE OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THESE PLANS FINISH GRADING & SWALES TO BE COMPLETED BY BUILDER AT TIME OF HOUSE REAR P.L. CONSTRUCTION. PADS TO BE GRADED FROM FRONT TO BACK AT .5% AT ROUGH GRADE �� vp,R• ��' ,,A° � Q ° / BUILDING Pte/ PAD A-, Q1-------------� �A �A VAR• /.,-FRONT P.L. TYPICAL LOT GRADING Drawing File: 72376RDFS 05/17/2017 A 2' PAD RE(FSNEV Mi. /_�,Y 17 CITY OFl,;t.3� EASEMENT NO -_=S UWClFJG ');=0,4?CITY (DF 'I N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 26, 29/26 M.D.M. 0 5' LANDSCAPE EAcEMENT TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIE1_D j �CALC. POSITION NOT FD. OR SET A' 1 CE ROSEDALE HIGHWAY. K.C.S. CONC. MON. E3 j AFD. 1.2' DN. 30' S. OF AK E -R �/ N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 26 29 Orkin TYPICAL STEP SECTION SIDE YARD AND BACKYARD 0 5' z 0 PAD °- R.O.W. B l 1= I VARIES 2:1 MAX. TYPICAL STEP SECTION SIDE YARD & FRONT YARD @ R. 0. W. C TRACT BNDY C' 6' WOOD FENCE __--i e- 1'- 2' RETAINING WALL PAD ADJACENT PROPERTY/ -- __-- PAD MAX. 1'-3' MIN. COVERAGE 6" TYPICAL STEP SEC TION SIDE YARD AND BACKYARD OWNER: KELLY BAILEY 9200 BRIDGET LEIGH WAY BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 SUBDIVIDER: KELLY BAILEY 9200 BRIDGET LEIGH WAY BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 ENGINEER: SMITHTECH/USA, INC. 1424 17TH STREET z BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 TRACT No. GRADING BENCH DARK USED: CHISELED n" TOP CURB NORTHEPLY CURB RETURN AT THE NA CORNER OF PALM RANCH AND COCO PALL. ELEVATION 358.03 U.S.G.S. DATUM LEGAL DESCRIPTION 72.37 PLAIN I - 90*OWmil U;clka� TOP OF CURB SOUTH BCR SOUTH EAST CORNER OF ALLEN ROAD AND PALM AVENUE ELEVATION 362'.06 U.S.G.S. DATUM LOT 12 OF TRACT 6036, UNIT THREE, IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 2006 IN BOOK 54, PAGE 137 OF MAPS, IN THE= OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. SIGN NUMBERS ARE FEDERAL CODES UNLESS OTHI-RWISE INDICATED BY (CA). (CA) INDICATES CALIFORNIA CODES. LEGEND -4- TYP. SEWER MAIN & MANf`OLE TYPE "A" PER COB STD SW -4 -0- RCP W/RGJ CL N & MANHOL7 TYPE "A" PER COB STD SW -4 .6 TYP TYPE "A" CATCH BASIN PER COB STD D"-14 - -- - - TYP. STORM DRAIN PIPE AS NOTED S7D. CITY MONUMENT EN0ISEMEN T PER COB 57D ST 13 (TO BE CONST. OR EXISTS AS N07ED) TELEPHONE POLE �= STREET SLOPE s CENTER LINE -- 6 GB GRADE BREAK ' BLOCK WALL CR CURB RETURNA' SLOPE SECTION DETAIL EP EXISTING PAYMENT 10 20 2C 10 STREET WIDTFI PRC PT OF REVERSE CURVE. LOT GRADING PIVC PT OF VERTICAL CURE TRANS TRANSITION �E0°00° FLOW LINE .0007---- SLOPE OF FLOW LINE PAD LOT PAD ELEVATION ADDITIONAL MOTES ON SHEET TWO EP r 23' N.T.S. .. -- AS/WITNESS COR. PER P.M. 7637, P.M.B. 32, PG. 89- a i t s 1 1 1 1 1 1,,,, N 89'39'04" E 443.05 ,, CITY HINAULT DRIVE CITY f qq; Bili r 1 2 3 4 5 0 $� z � o ; i Ni 89'41'17" E 214.33 F-1- :i - ill;.- - i IJ I 1_T 1 , C> { I SCALE: 1 " = 100' ITR KEY MAP I -- -- - CC1CO PALM COURT SILn C 1 ! 1 10 { 9 ! 8 SUMP - -- ... - - I I; A.P.N.: PTN. 495-460-13-00 I /® CTR. SEC. 26, 29/26 M.D.M.__ FD. 2" I.P. CONC. FILLED W/ PIN IN L.H. - PER F. vl. 7584, P.M.B. 32, PC. 1C7 PERMIT NUMBER: B15--40000076 -- � FL R/W 30' I 1 PAD ROUGH GRADE LINE-/ S BELOW FL HINAULT STREET _- CROSS SECTION PLATE 1-27 REV13 .20' A.C. OVER .40' C.A.B. OVER .50' OF 95% COMP. O.G. `OQROFES;iait, /„- �' _7 R -VALUE = 60 h�Q' ��T E s F T.I. = 4.5 "RE t o ^~ vOF,�i GFA'JV1 No. 35,,;'3 Exp. 9-3).19 - s�� civilg----- CITY RECORDS , /CIT E. s No. 35 773 ) Exp. 9.30-17 �F OF CALF o ep K) BASIS OF BEARINGS 'THE BEARING OF N 007743`1 ALOJ+IO THE CENTERLINE OF PALM RANCI' STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT 5278-UA'IT B RECORDED IN BOOK 42 AT P, KS 4 - 6 OF MAPS WAS TAKEN AS THE E'/IS'IS OF BEARINGS SHOWN HEREOV ROSEDALE I HWY. 0 HINAULT M PALM VE. z PROJECT z z SITE w LLJ Q /® CTR. SEC. 26, 29/26 M.D.M.__ FD. 2" I.P. CONC. FILLED W/ PIN IN L.H. - PER F. vl. 7584, P.M.B. 32, PC. 1C7 PERMIT NUMBER: B15--40000076 -- � FL R/W 30' I 1 PAD ROUGH GRADE LINE-/ S BELOW FL HINAULT STREET _- CROSS SECTION PLATE 1-27 REV13 .20' A.C. OVER .40' C.A.B. OVER .50' OF 95% COMP. O.G. `OQROFES;iait, /„- �' _7 R -VALUE = 60 h�Q' ��T E s F T.I. = 4.5 "RE t o ^~ vOF,�i GFA'JV1 No. 35,,;'3 Exp. 9-3).19 - s�� civilg----- CITY RECORDS , /CIT E. s No. 35 773 ) Exp. 9.30-17 �F OF CALF o ep K) BASIS OF BEARINGS 'THE BEARING OF N 007743`1 ALOJ+IO THE CENTERLINE OF PALM RANCI' STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT 5278-UA'IT B RECORDED IN BOOK 42 AT P, KS 4 - 6 OF MAPS WAS TAKEN AS THE E'/IS'IS OF BEARINGS SHOWN HEREOV ROSEDALE I HWY. 0 HINAULT CS PALM VE. z PROJECT z z SITE w LLJ Q BRIMHALL RD. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. TOTAL ACREAGE - TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED ONLY TOTAL ACREAGE: 2.82 Gross Acres TOTAL LOTS: 8 BUILDABLE SmithTechl-k USA INCORPORATED HABERFELDE BUILDING 1424 17TH STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 ( 661) 327-8492 FAX 327--8493 The GRADING PLAN as shown on this drawing is hereby approved, subject to any indicated corrections c r additions. Approval by the Public Works Department and Building Department indicates approval only as to design criteria used and conformance to City Standards, Codes and Ordinances. Engineer for the subdivider or developer shall be responsible for accuracy of calculations for this plan and shall submit a certified "as -graded" plan after completion of the grading. APPROVED BY: _ `7/1 Public W rtment ID e �h,7 Building De a t . t V _i Date F 7a 4: ? 7 Tl'zACT N0. 'i23� GRADING RIAN, J� ROBERT- E. SMITH RCE 3547.3 DATE JOB NO. -- 13-108 SHEET 1 OF y' SHEETS Recouieudattous for site preparation included in our previous report are as follows: gine Preurtration General site clearing should include removal' of vegetation; existing utilities; structures including foundations; basement walls and floors; existing stockpiled soil; trees and associated root systems; rabble; rubbish; =d amy lose and/or saturated materials. Site stripping should extend to a minimum depth 4i'2 to 4inph3es, or until all organics in excess of 3 percent by volume are removed. Deeper stripping may be required in localized areas. These materials will not be suitable for use as Engineered Fill. How%ver, stripped topsoil may be stockpiled and re -used in landscape ornon- structural areas. Up to 1'/a feet of fill material was encountered in the southeast portion of the site. In addition, end dump piles of fill soil and debris are located in the southeast portion of the site. The fill material predominately consists of silty sand, sandy silt and sand soil mixed 'with debris consisting of concrete, asphaltic concrete and weeds. The thickness and extent of fill material was determined . based on limited test borings: Thicker fill may be present at the site. The fill material should be ,completely remoyed so that the native soils may :be .prepared properly. The fill" soils will be suitable for re-uso as Engineered Fill" provided it is cleansed of excessive ofgatkt and debris. The debris consisting! -,of concrete, asphaltic conirete and weeds will not be' suitable for reuse as Engineered Fill apd should be removed from the site. Prior'to backfYllin ' Krazan & Associates, Inc. should inspegt the bottom of the excavatipn to verify no additional excavation is required. Following stripping and fill removal operatiops, it is recommended that tete exposed subgrade in building pad, extopor fl and pavement areas, be excavated/scarifigO to a depth of at least 12 inches, worked'until uniform and ficce from large clods, moisture-condiVoned as necessary, and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based T ASTM . Test Method D1557. Limits ofrecompaction should extend 5 feet beyond structural eleetyents. This compaction effort should stabilize thee surface soils and louated any unsuitable or pliant areas not found during our field" investigation. The site was previously utilized as agricultural land. Associated with the development may be buried strictures such as irrigation lines. Any buried structures encountered during construction should be properly removed and the resulting excavations backfilled. Expavatious, depressions, or soft and pliant areas. extending below planned finish subgrade level should be cleaned to firer undisturbed soil, and backfilled with" Engineered Fill. In general, any saptio tanks, debris pats, cesspools, or simile stractures should be"enthply removed. Water wells should be abandoned in accordance with =nty standards. Concrete footings should be"removed to air: equivalent depth of at least3 feet below proposed footing elevations or as: recommended by the Soils Engineer. Any other buried structures should be remov4d in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils EWneer. The resulting excavations should be backked with Engineered bill. The user soils, during `vet winter months, become very rsioist due to the absorptive characteristics of the soil. Earthwork operations performed during winter months may encounter very moist unstable soils, which may require removal to grade a stable building foundation. Project site wtr}ter*atirrn consisting of placement of. aggregate base and protecting exppsed soils tlprin91 tue construction phase should be performed. A representative of our firm should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to test and observe earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral part of our service as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction of the material and the stability of the material. The Soils Engineer may reject any material that does not meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations of this report are predicated upon the assumption that earthwork construction will colnfortn to recommendations set forth in this section and the Engineered Fill section. At the time of our recent site visit on October 20,. 2015, the undeveloped lot was vacant and void of vegetation. Based on the observations made duringour recent site visit, the recommendations presented in the pavious r rt shall remain aDDlicahle to the currentl . ro sed construction. Krazan and Associates should be contacted ur, to start of gradin operations acid the contractor should verifv the death of"isWW undocumented till- if any, at the site under observation by M-azan so that we MM verifv whether additional is wainanted. In addition to the above, lie following recommendat�pns are included to comply iib the 2013 CIBC and shall supersede the recogmendations of the previous f eport where applicable. Flodr Slabs an Exterior F'1 Concrete slab -ori de tapers should be underla:m by a water vapor retarder. 'lie water vapor retarder should be installed. in acgordanee with accepted engineering practice, The watt' vapor retarder should gravelof f: consist of a vapor:retarder"sheeting underlain by a miVimurn of 3 inches of compatjted, clean, gr inch r.aaximum size, To aid in concrete curing an o 'oral 2 to 4- inches of grmulkr fill may be placed on top of the vapor retarder. The granular fill should cost .of damp clean sand witMt least 10 to 30 percent of the sand passing the 100 sieve. The sand. should be free of clay, silt, or orgardc material: Rock dust Which is manufactured sapd from rock crushing operations is typically suitable f* the granular 0.. This granular fill material should be compacted. The, exterior floors should be poured.separately in order to act independently of tie walls and: foundation system.. All fills required, to bring the building pads tai grade should be Engineered Fills. moisture w1th1n the structure . may be derived from water vapors, which were transformed from the moisture within. the soils. This moisture vapor can travel through the vapor membrane and penetrate the slab -on -grade. Tfis moisture vapor penetration can kffect floor coverings and produce mold: and mildew iii. the structure. To mllnimize moisture vapor inAsion, it is recommended that a vapor retarder be installed: It is recommended that the utility trendies within the structure:be compacted, as specified in our report, to minim; the transmission of moisture through the utility trench ball. Special attention to the, immediate drainage and. irrigation around the bufiding is recommended". positive drainage should be established away from the structure and should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. funding of water should not be allowed adj acebt tm the Structure,, over -irrigation with landscaped areas adjacent to.the structure should not be performed. In addition, ventilation of the struottire (i.e. ventilation fans): is recommended to reduce the accumulation of interior moisture. File: Fr^3RD 7237 )15 4r0e.ancfscauan The ground" surface should slope away from building pad and pavement areas towa;-d appropriate drop inlets or other surface drainage devices. In accordance with Section 1804 of the 2013 California Building Code, it is recommended that the ground surface adjacent to foundations be sloped a mi nimum of 5 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet away from structures, or to an approved alternative means of drainage conveyance. Swales used for conveyance of drainage and located Within 10 feet of fai mdations should be sloped.a minimum of 2 percent. Impervious surfaces, such as pavement and exterior concrete flatwork, within 10 feet of building foundations should be sloped a minimum of 1 percent away from the structure. Drainage gradients should be maintained to carry all surface water to collection devil;es and/or facilities and. off-site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project. Seismic Paarameft rs -- L01i3 California &ia iatg Code The Site Class per Section 1613 of the 2013 California Building Code (2013 CBC) f nd Table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7-10 is based upon the site soil conditions. At is our opinion true Site Class T t is most consistent with the subject site soil conditions. For seismic design of the structures based on the seismic provisions of the 2013 CBC, we recommend the following paraix Fters: Sej#mic Item Value ('Be Reference Stte Class D Section 1613.3.E 4. Site.0pefficient Fa 1.084 Table 1613.3.3 SS 1.05(1 Section 1613.3.1~ Sys 1.13 Section 1613.3.1;: I SDs . 0.75, Section 1613.3.4 Site QDofficient 1µv 1.602 Table 1613.3.3 (V J SI 0.399 Section 1613.3.3 SMI 0.634 Section 1613.3.3_ SDr 0.426 Section 1613.3.4 �,imi�ti®ns Soils Engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch a: Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and unde*tanding of earth sciences ac s ice. Although your site was analyzed using then most appropriate and most current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition 4o a ivancements in the field'.of Soils Engineering, physical changes in the sik, either due to excavation br All placement, new agency regulations, or possible changes in the :proposdd sticture after the soils repor ; is completed may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. in light of :this, the Owner should be aware chat there. is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that 2 years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. Fouj} Oatipn and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculgtecrisk that soil app groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk ip derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretatioais and design conclusions or. limited sampling of the earth. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption tlat soil conditions do: not vary significantly from those disclosed during the field investigation. If goy variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the Soils Engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations may be made. The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this report .nay not be valid. The Soils Engineer should be notified of any changes so the recommendations may be reviewed and re- evaluated. This report is a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Update with the purpose of evaluating the soil conditions in teams of building foundation design and related site preparation. The scot )e of our services did not include any Environmental Site .Assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials in the soil, groupdwater, or atmosphere, or tJ e presence of wetlands. Any statements, or absence of statements, in this rqport or on any boring log regarding odors, unusual or Sus aicious items, or conditions observed, ark' strictly for descriptive pu oses and are not: intended to co Ivey engineering judgment regarding pote#tial hazardous and/or toxic assessment. The geotechnical engingering information present§d herein is based upon prgfessio aal interpretatiofi utilizing standard engi gring,practices and a degree pf conservatism deemed pr'er foi this project. It is not wanted that suck information and :interpretgion cannot be superseded by future geotechnical. engineering development t;. We emphasize that this r4port is valid for the project olatlined above and should not be used for any other sites. Recommendations and limitations pro'�Aded in our Ix-evious Report, dated July �, 200ii, which were n6t revised or superseded herein, .will apply to this :setter: If you have any questions, or if wt: can be of farth6t as please contact our office at (661) 837-9200. Respectfully p�submitted, ''TE9 INC ..- . A %� i :''s, P-mss,.{,.r 7py�p °�, n Ryan 11x. S rivett, L Proj;At Engineer RCE No. 59372 RKP:rp "t { �tiQo�ERT S�9<< w 2 `r No.35473 * EXP. 9-30-17 FI r V1t1FpP\ ■ mom. a.�.�:gam aec�ms: >: meesY+e�war�ex �a�.�sa:���� E. No 35473 EXp. 9-3(x-19 1 OREU -0 C;.AVONCY COC N �CF CM%iY�' IC ..�aFy -- r'ATE- ��-Z-/_---- ROBERT E. SMITH RCE 35473 DACE JOB NO. -- 13-108 SHEET 2 OF S_ " SFF---ETS EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING S.D. AND CATCH BASIN PER TRACT 6036 • r CTR. SEC. 261 29/26 M.D.M.-/ FD. 2" I.P. CONC. FILLED W/ PIN IN L.H. - PER P.M. 7584, P.M.B. 32, PG. 107 N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 26, 29/26 M.D.M. CALC. POSITION NOT FD. OR SET _E_H I AY-. i- 58 — NOTE HINAULT STREET TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER TRACT 7237 STREET PLANS. COURT- CITY RECORDS #.- EX PLS_ Y EX FL-__ — — SCALE: EASEMENT NOTES 1 " 50 5' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD TO BE DEDICATED WITH THE FINAL MAP E. Q' , cv Lu N0.35473 Exp. 9-30-17 s�gTF.OF CAS\F No. j473 Exp. 9-"-19 CF CA 1F 4RECORiD DRAWMIG" CORRECTMS BY:��_ DATE THIS SHEET IS TO BE USED FOR EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY'. THIS SHEET VICINITY MAP N.T.S. WILL NOT BE USED FOR GRADING PURPOSES. 58 58 58 -58 58 58� it ,;_,.. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL APPROVAL TO DO SO HAS BEAN RECEIVED BY GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. 2 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL STRICTLY ADHERE TO THE STS! WATER POLLUTION PREVDNiM PLAN (SO") DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. IF FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT IT, THE SWPPP MAY BE MODIFIED AS LONG AS THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS ARE MET. ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SWPPP MUST BE NOTED IN THE SWPPP BINDER KEPT ON STIE. 3. NO LAND CLEARING OR GRADING SHALL BEGIN UNTIL ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. 4. THIS PLAN SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ALL INCLUSIVE AS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS 10 PREVENT SOIL SEOU NT FROM LEAVING THE SITE AND BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES THAT APPLY. 6. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSTALLED IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE QUALIFIED SWPPP PRACTITIONER (QSP). 7. DRAIN INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT ,TIDE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. EXISTING DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL FINAL REMOVAL AND THE CONNECTS PIPE SHALL BE PROPERLY CAPPED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTfW THE STORM [RAIN S1kSTE11. 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO TAKE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION ON ANY EXPOSED AREAS WHEN THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE. WDID # - 5F15C379583 SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCT WORK EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREAS AS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PER THE CALIFORNIA BMP HACK. Z PROVIDE STANDARD STORM DRAIN INLET PROTEClIO N PER BMP STANDARD SE -10 OF THE CALIFORNIA BMP HANDBOOK. PROVIDE INLET PR07ECIION FOR EXISTING INLETS AT START OF CONSTRUCTION. AS PROPOSED INLETS ARE CONSTRUCTED INLET PR0IEC70 SHALL BE INSTALLED. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS DESIGNED TO REDUCE SOIL TRACK OFF INTO THE STREET. ONCE THE INTERIOR ROADS AND PARK LOTS ARE COMPLETE, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO REPLACE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WITH REGULAR STREET SWEEPING. THIS IS UP TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DI N RETM. 4. ALL DISTURBANCE OF LAND TO BE WITiM TRACT BOUNDARY INCLUDING STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND ANY STOCKPILE CITY RECORDS f. N.T.S. s No. 35473 E:€p. 9-30.17 SWPPP BMP LEGEND Q TC -1 ROSEDALE HWY. -1 - MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE SE -1 - SILT FENCE HINAULT 0STORM a Of rx� SILT FENCE PER SE -1 o PORTABLE TOILETS PALM AVE. oz PROJECT z z z SITE w CK u Q BRIMHALL RD. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. WILL NOT BE USED FOR GRADING PURPOSES. 58 58 58 -58 58 58� it ,;_,.. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL APPROVAL TO DO SO HAS BEAN RECEIVED BY GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. 2 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL STRICTLY ADHERE TO THE STS! WATER POLLUTION PREVDNiM PLAN (SO") DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. IF FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT IT, THE SWPPP MAY BE MODIFIED AS LONG AS THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS ARE MET. ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SWPPP MUST BE NOTED IN THE SWPPP BINDER KEPT ON STIE. 3. NO LAND CLEARING OR GRADING SHALL BEGIN UNTIL ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. 4. THIS PLAN SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ALL INCLUSIVE AS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS 10 PREVENT SOIL SEOU NT FROM LEAVING THE SITE AND BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES THAT APPLY. 6. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSTALLED IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE QUALIFIED SWPPP PRACTITIONER (QSP). 7. DRAIN INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT ,TIDE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. EXISTING DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL FINAL REMOVAL AND THE CONNECTS PIPE SHALL BE PROPERLY CAPPED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTfW THE STORM [RAIN S1kSTE11. 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO TAKE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION ON ANY EXPOSED AREAS WHEN THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE. WDID # - 5F15C379583 SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCT WORK EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREAS AS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PER THE CALIFORNIA BMP HACK. Z PROVIDE STANDARD STORM DRAIN INLET PROTEClIO N PER BMP STANDARD SE -10 OF THE CALIFORNIA BMP HANDBOOK. PROVIDE INLET PR07ECIION FOR EXISTING INLETS AT START OF CONSTRUCTION. AS PROPOSED INLETS ARE CONSTRUCTED INLET PR0IEC70 SHALL BE INSTALLED. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS DESIGNED TO REDUCE SOIL TRACK OFF INTO THE STREET. ONCE THE INTERIOR ROADS AND PARK LOTS ARE COMPLETE, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO REPLACE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WITH REGULAR STREET SWEEPING. THIS IS UP TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DI N RETM. 4. ALL DISTURBANCE OF LAND TO BE WITiM TRACT BOUNDARY INCLUDING STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND ANY STOCKPILE CITY RECORDS f. N.T.S. s No. 35473 E:€p. 9-30.17 SWPPP BMP LEGEND Q TC -1 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTI❑ ENTRANCE AVM -1 - MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE SE -1 - SILT FENCE �4 DISCHARGE LOCATION 0STORM DRAIN AND CATCH BASIN PROTECTION PER SE -10 SILT FENCE PER SE -1 PORTABLE TOILETS CONCRETE WASHOUT SITE STRAW WATTLE DETAIL N.T.S. KEEP SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING CATCH BASIN C GRAVEL BAG DETAIL N.T.S. S.c,�`v� l .r 'RECORD DF;AW11.1ta ° rao. 35473 i � CORRECTIONS 1 7� Exp. 9-30-19 1 DATE 'rte civot- TOTAL ACREAGE TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 3.4 DISTURBED TOTAL LOTS: 8 BUILDABLE LOTS GROSS AC. TOTAL NET DENSITY: 0.4 D.U./NET AC. MBHCP STATEMENT ALL. "UNDEVELOPED LANDS" THAT WILL BE USED TO GRUBBED, ALTERED, DRIVEN -OVER, OR USED TO DEVELOP THE IMPROVEMENS ON THIS GRADING PLAN TO USE ASID/OR DEVELOP THE PROPOSAL DEPICTED IN THIS GRADING PLAN, IS SHOWN WITHIN THE DELINEATED DASH -DOT -DOT BOUNDARY LINE. (NOTE: REFER TO PAGES 3-5, AND 25 OF THE AUGUST 2014 CALIFORNIA INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT (ITP) ISSUED TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD AND THE COUNTY OF KERN.) HCP STATEMENT "UNDEVELOPED LANDS" NOT SHOWN ON THIS GRADING PLAN - WILL NOT BE USED TO DEVELOP THE DEPICTED PROJECT. (NOTE: REFER TO BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.78.090. - VIOLATION PENALTY.) Drawing File: DEV FP 04/25/2017 DEVELOPHENT FOOTPRINT TRACT No. 723 % 101000" . PROPOSED TOTAL: DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT J.4 ACRES I CITY RECORDS #• I PERMIT # — 615-40000076 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. =E�t "V E. No. 35473 E -P. 9-30-19 CIV;+. aF caz�F` i c-� -7 -� 7 ECORi) C;AAWW CORP EM)NS EKY:— SmithTech*— ISA INCORPORATED HABERFELDE BUILDING 1424 17TH STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (661) 327-8492 FAX 327-8493 N. T. N.T.S. R!"'ICEIVED J0114 6 11 2T7 1�7 EZ. a5N dal 5-yF1 iii P The GRADING P( AN as shown on this drawing is hereby approved, subw-!!, idi meit co-rections or additions. Approial by the Pub[c WC;- - ;? <i;)t! I'milaing Pepaitmant indicat,s--,ppro4 on') as ; ,r, -t ­.,,& d ro io; mance to City S anaards Code: a"• 1'1,1 :i:r;: ::,'ver fol niF subdidider or or4eioper shall be r t, : a , A ca,..ulations for this plan, Ind shall submi' a rr­ r;;u 'ics-graded" plan after completion of the grading. APPROVED BY: Ql�,4A� 7 —7leii�t ubl c Works Department Die �[NrL'1_uf r 11 Bui ding AM DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT TRACT No. 7237` R03ERT E. SMITH RCE 35473 [SATE JOB NO. — 13-108 SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS ROSEDALE HWY. HINAULT czno PALM AVE. CD z PROJECT z z z SITE w � Q BRIMHALL RD. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. =E�t "V E. No. 35473 E -P. 9-30-19 CIV;+. aF caz�F` i c-� -7 -� 7 ECORi) C;AAWW CORP EM)NS EKY:— SmithTech*— ISA INCORPORATED HABERFELDE BUILDING 1424 17TH STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (661) 327-8492 FAX 327-8493 N. T. N.T.S. R!"'ICEIVED J0114 6 11 2T7 1�7 EZ. a5N dal 5-yF1 iii P The GRADING P( AN as shown on this drawing is hereby approved, subw-!!, idi meit co-rections or additions. Approial by the Pub[c WC;- - ;? <i;)t! I'milaing Pepaitmant indicat,s--,ppro4 on') as ; ,r, -t ­.,,& d ro io; mance to City S anaards Code: a"• 1'1,1 :i:r;: ::,'ver fol niF subdidider or or4eioper shall be r t, : a , A ca,..ulations for this plan, Ind shall submi' a rr­ r;;u 'ics-graded" plan after completion of the grading. APPROVED BY: Ql�,4A� 7 —7leii�t ubl c Works Department Die �[NrL'1_uf r 11 Bui ding AM DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT TRACT No. 7237` R03ERT E. SMITH RCE 35473 [SATE JOB NO. — 13-108 SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS