Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.7-73040 o Q(tOFESSIq�� P��RT0 el $ NO 67602 u V "S OF CA%- PROJECT CONTACTS: 998 HOUSTON STREET, SUITE #C GROVER BEACH, CA 93433 (805) 481-4033 CML: DIVERSIFIED PROJECT SERVICES INTERNATIONIAt 1998 SANTA BARBARA STREET SUITE 200 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 PH: (805)250-2891 CONTACT: ALBERTO LOPEZ ALOPEZODPSIINC.COM SURVEY: DIVERSIFIED PROJECT SERVICES INTERNATIOf 5351 OLIVE DRIVE, SUITE 100 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 PH: (661)371-2800 CONTACT: ROLLAND VAN DE VALK RVANDEVALKODPSIINC. COM 2205 COY AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 PH: (661)837-9200 CONTACT: DAVID JAROSZ OSD: DIVERSIFIED PROJECT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL 1998 SANTA BARBARA STREET SUITE 200 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 PH: (805)250-2891 CONTACT: ALBERTO LOPEZ ALOPEZODPSIINC.COM EARTHWORK QUANTITIES - 47,800 CUT CUBIC YARDS -33,000 FILL CUBIC YARDS -14,800 EXPORT CUBIC YARDS EXPORT TO BE USED FOR DECORATIVE MOUNDS AT PARK. NOTES EARTHWORK NUMBERS DO NOT INCLUDE SHRINKAGE. ALL PHASES AND PARK TO BE GRADED SIMULTANEOUSLY. DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT AND THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE. THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, COMPLY WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER VIOLATIONS OF THOSE ORDINANCES, STANDARDS OR DESIGN CRITERIA ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CORRECTED AND SUCH CORRECTIONS REFLECTED ON CORRECTED PLANS. 2 ;r/;7 L:- ALBERTO LOPEZ R.C.E. 67602 W a THE DELIVERY OF THIS DRAWNG SHOULD NOT BE Sheet Title t CONSTRUED TO PROVIDE AN EXPRESS WARRANTY OR D D/ Lu i GUARANTEE TO ANYONE THAT ALL DIMENSIONS AND w [.tJ DETAILS ARE EXACT OR TO INDICATE THAT THE USE `;> > O OF THIS DRAWING IMPLIES THE REVIEW AND a L'L APPROVAL OF DPSI OF ANY FUTURE USE. ANY USE OF E.L ' THIS INFORMATION IS AT THE SOLE RISC OF THE USER DRAW Qf—RECORD L. ALBERTO LOPEZ 6-60 EXP. 6.30 ; `i CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN TRACT 7304 WDI D NO. 5F1 5C372120 �3 MEADOW FALLS DR 4 - RED ROCK CREEK W,4y The GRADING PLAN as shown on this drawin( s herabv approved, suh ect b, .env iros;i(•at(,-,t rt,, reckons or adddlons_ A voval try the Public Works --par r-o--nt and irr i ;att?s approval only a to dosK)n c^rdr'!Ia used at A t'^ vtntetice to C rd5, crx}es arI0 Orlitn;rlce5 Erk�,rK-nr �ry� tfze su:iiry er r r .r• ti,.,•q r shall t)e rl'srxm51tAe tot W"-UI<x v 1 d [ ih trlatf0n$ for INS I r� in aw shat SUbMft a cerLhe(i `as -graced' pian atter comptetron of d n r g;auu:g. APPROVED BY: V"4- 1) AF&L_ 2atg tr-.en1 D- e "t •ate MMITE LANE BLVD 4 ------_DISTRICT- - - - _? ,', _( HARRIS R01D PANAMA LAME -4-U.--- - - - - - - - PROJECT L CA4T- l0 ' 01 McICEE`ROADi t TAFT HIGHWAY I i VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. 211 14 LLJ rL i • IVi' Doti g � iiBFlt° D LU i w ' > £oma " N W J — � i' W ~ N Od; It r: LL ,D r LU ' S$ W owl 40 34 31 i LEGAL DESCRIPTION s TRACT 6359 ,�, R R� DO tr�b5 / �, 3>s BEING A MERGER AND RE -DIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 72-04, LOT "B' OF LOT a E RIVFrt DR/yE G / 66 30 LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 14-0385 AND LOTS 64 AND 65 OF TRACT 6678. ALSO BE-114GS A ON OF < a sEti� a_ s7 /W Nps► S.W. Y4 OF SEC. 29, T. 30S., R. 27E., M.D.M. IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.47 _ a s i MIDNIGHT CREEK WAY a` BERKSHIRE ROAD I - -- ' gERKswtRE `ROAD <� 0 � W i ..-��f i � ►- J ex U Ix F Z 0 Z U p CJt 0p \! 0 o r o = Ia II_ 0 le >r = oco 3 m SLEEPY HOLLOW UNE z at DROVERS RUN ROAD �- rn N 'c) f ' z 1230 ROSE CREEK WAY W t x W ' 10 IS 1 25 I 21 _! }t J �,,,,,,k - — MOUNTAIN PASS ROAD T R A CZ ` 7 SNOWY a e i -¢ _ - .- 267 RIVER DRIVE i at m i f f z `R iA&f 7243 - / ; t N LAJ v i ne Q = + AU fON1D .REEK DRIVE. >- ~ <. ALMOND CREEK DRIVE r` .S i4 - IS , to 17 r:At __ �' �-''°`-,-. •-•J 1, J , SHEET INDEX a Sheet Number Sheet Title t C TITLE SHEET Lu i G w [.tJ a- `;> > O '" 0 J !O L'L LU E.L ' 0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN i w ' > £oma " N W J — � i' W ~ N Od; It r: LL ,D r LU ' S$ W owl 40 34 31 i LEGAL DESCRIPTION s TRACT 6359 ,�, R R� DO tr�b5 / �, 3>s BEING A MERGER AND RE -DIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 72-04, LOT "B' OF LOT a E RIVFrt DR/yE G / 66 30 LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 14-0385 AND LOTS 64 AND 65 OF TRACT 6678. ALSO BE-114GS A ON OF < a sEti� a_ s7 /W Nps► S.W. Y4 OF SEC. 29, T. 30S., R. 27E., M.D.M. IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD.47 _ a s i MIDNIGHT CREEK WAY a` BERKSHIRE ROAD I - -- ' gERKswtRE `ROAD <� 0 � W i ..-��f i � ►- J ex U Ix F Z 0 Z U p CJt 0p \! 0 o r o = Ia II_ 0 le >r = oco 3 m SLEEPY HOLLOW UNE z at DROVERS RUN ROAD �- rn N 'c) f ' z 1230 ROSE CREEK WAY W t x W ' 10 IS 1 25 I 21 _! }t J �,,,,,,k - — MOUNTAIN PASS ROAD T R A CZ ` 7 SNOWY a e i -¢ _ - .- 267 RIVER DRIVE i at m i f f z `R iA&f 7243 - / ; t N LAJ v i ne Q = + AU fON1D .REEK DRIVE. >- ~ <. ALMOND CREEK DRIVE r` .S i4 - IS , to 17 r:At __ �' �-''°`-,-. •-•J 1, J , SHEET INDEX Sheet Number Sheet Number Sheet Title t C TITLE SHEET Lu i G NOTE SHEET 3 0 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 4 0 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT UPDATE 5 0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 6 0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 7 0 DETAIL SHEET 8 0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 9 0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN E BENCHMARK TOP OF CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF PINE FLAT DRIVE AND THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT MAP NO. 6359 PHASE 2. ELEVATION = 344.54 PER CITY OF BAKERSFIELD DATUM = USGS NAVD 88 DATUM. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF S 89'17'52" E FOR THE SOUTH UNE OF THE S.W. Y4 OF SECTION 29, T. 30S., R. 27E. M.D.M. (AND BEING THE CENTERLINE OF McCUTCHEN ROAD) PER TRACT NO 6359 WAS USED AS FOR THE BASIS OF BEARING SHOWN ON THIS MAP. SITE INFORMATION APN: 540-010-09, 54 540-082-21 540-092--01 NUMBER OF LOTS: 136 - 39.66 GROSS ACRES PHASE 1 - 88 LOTS PHASE 2 - 27 LOTS PHASE 3 - 23 LOTS ALL PHASES TO BE GRADED SIMULTANEOUSLY. UNDERGROUND UTILITY STATEMENT THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY SUCH INFORMATION OR DATA. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SHALL BE CONTACTED TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR '70 CONSTRUCTION BY CALLING 811. UTILITIES: CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET BAKERSFIELD. CA 93301 PH: (661)326-3911 WATER RESOURCES DEPT, 1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93311 PH: (661)326-3000 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS PH: (661)326-3724 ELECTRIC PH: (877)743-7782 RIIGM BRNOUSE NETWORKS PH: (661)323-4892 TELEPHONE TW TELECOM PH: (661)616-5500 ,N\ DIAL TOLL FREE 1�811 OR 1 (1-800-227-2600) i AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF CAL FORMA CITY RECORDS NO: L U) w w t- 2 w U) w w a w U 2 w Q N z f- w Lu i _ J 17i (%� CL Cf)i W r Uj O CL c LAJ --J 0 L J (� — �c►w Q �Jca < W F= -r T 7 •- z CIU 0- � C� Q z 0 t- 2 w U) w w a w U 2 w Q J- N w w f- w Lu i _ u �. )I (%� 4 c Cf)i W r 0 LL O CL c J- GRADING NOTES 1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM WITH APPENDIX J. OF THE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS PERTAINING THEREOF AND PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT BY KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES DATED JUNE 3, 2005 AND UPDATED MARCH 8, 2017 AND SOIL ABSORPTION EVALUATION BY KRAZEN & ASSOCIATES DATED MARCH 8, 2017 AND SIGNED BY RYAN PRIVETT (RCE 59372). 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF BAKERSFiELD. 3. THE ENGINEER HAS SHOWN EXISTING UNDERGROUND LINES ON THIS PLAN TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. THERE MAY BE OTHER LINES IN THE GROUND. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY LINES IN THE FiELD PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT U.S.A. (1-800-226-2700) FOR UTILITY LOCATION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING. 4. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THiS PROJECT. EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 5. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE REMOVED, DAMAGED OR UNDERCUT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY'S BUILDING OFFICIAL 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING OF ANY FiLL MATERIAL 7. COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTORS. 8. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING OF PAD AREA TO WITHIN t 0.1'. IF ELEVATION OF DESIGN ELEVATION PAD SHOULD BE FOUND TO BE MORE THAN t 0.1' OFF OF DESIGN ELEVATION AFTER COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF GRADING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN AND CORRECT THE GRADING AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL TERRACE ALL PADS WHEN ELEVATiON DIFFERENCE WARRANTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 11. ALL AREAS ON THE SITE ON WHICH STRUCTURES ARE TO BE PLACED MUST BE COMPACTED TO 90% DENSITY, FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5' IN ALL DIRECTIONS FROM THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE. THE REQUIRED AREA OF COMPACTION IS BOUNDED BY THE PAD LIMIT LINE, SIDE LOT LINES AND REAR LOT LINES. 12. ALL FILL SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR "ENGINEERED FiLL" AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT. 13, FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING SiX (6) INCHES IN COMPACTED THICKNESS AND COMPACTED AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT BY AN APPROVED METHOD. 14. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL EXERCISE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISORY CONTROL DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WiTH THE PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS. AND CODE WITHIN HIS PURVIEW. 15. COMPACTION IN PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREAS SHOULD BE TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY AS OBTAINED BY A.S.T.M. TEST METHOD D1557-78, METHOD A, AND SHOULD EXTEND TO A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 2' BEYOND THE OUTSIDE EDGES OF PAVEMENTS. 16. UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING AND BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, A FINAL SOILS REPORT COVERING THE SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 17- ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY (90%) PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY APPROVED METHOD PER CHAPTERS 18, 18A AND APPENDIX J OF THE CURRENT CBC AND CERTIFIED BY TESTS AND REPORT FROM SOILS ENGINEER. 18. ALL CUT SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL. 19- ALL FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL. 20. ALL FILL AREAS SHALL BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOR A STRUCTURAL FILL AND THE AREA SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 12". 21. ALL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 3' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTROL AGAINST EROSION. 22. SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE 1% MINIMUM EXCEPT AS WAIVED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL. 23. GRADING WORK WILL BE SUPERVISED AS ENGINEERED GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX J OF THE CBC. 24. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3.0' HIGH SHALL BE HYDRAULICALLY PLANTED (HYDROSEEDED) IN A UNIFORM MANNER. TYPE OF SEED SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 25. DPSI CORPORATION SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO, OR USES OF, THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DPSI CORPORATION. 26. DUST CONTROL: IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PREVENT A DUST NUISANCE FROM ORIGINATING FROM THE SITE OF WORK AS A RESULT OF HIS OPERATIONS DURING THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS CONTRACT. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES TO BE TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO. THE FOLLOWING: A. WATER SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL UNPAVED AREAS AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT THE SURFACES FROM BECOMING DRY ENOUGH TO PERMIT DUST FORMATION. B. PAVED SURFACES OVER WHICH VEHICULAR TRAFFIC iS PERMITTED TO TRAVEL SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF DIRT. 27. DURING GRADING, REASONABLE SEARCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR CONCEALED SUBSURFACE OBSTRUCTIONS. ALL ABANDONED SUBSURFACE OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED. IF THE TERMINUS OF ANY ABANDONED PIPING IS OUTSIDE THE PROJECT LIMITS, THE PIPING SHOULD BE REMOVED WITHIN THE PROJECT AND PROPERLY CAPPED AT THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. 28. THE STAKING AND MARKING OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE DONE ONLY ONCE BY THE OWNER AND ALL RE -STAKING OR REMARKING SHALL BE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 29, THE CUT AND FiLL QUANTITIES ARE CALCULATED USING A COMPACTION FACTOR OF 1.2. THE ENGINEER MAKES NO WARRANTY EITHER DIRECT OR IMPLIED THAT THIS WILL BE THE ACTUAL COMPACTION FACTOR. IF A DEFICIENCY OR AN EXCESS OF SOIL OCCURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER, WHO SHALL DETERMINE IF ADJUSTMENTS CAN BE MADE TO IMPROVE THE BALANCE BETWEEN CUT AND FILL. 30. THE CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AFTER EXAMINING THE PLAN, SOILS REPORT AND THE SITE TERRAIN, PREPARE HiS BID PRICE FOR THE PROJECT BASED ON HIS OWN ANALYSIS OF THE WORK REQUIRED. 31. CONTOURS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE AN ACCURACY OF PLUS OR MINUS ONE-HALF CONTOUR INTERVAL. 32. PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR ROUGH GRADING. AFTER COMPLETION OF BUILDINGS, ALL LOTS SHALL BE FiNE GRADED TO SLOPE TO THE STREETS OR DESIGNED DRAINAGE OUTLET WITH A MINIMUM GRADE OF 1%. 33. THE SOILS ENGINEER MUST APPROVE ALL SOIL COMPACTION INCLUDING THE STABILITY OF ALL SLOPES, BOTH THOSE THAT ARE CREATED BY, AND THOSE REMAINING AFTER. 34, THE ENGINEER MAY FURNISH REFERENCE LINES AND GRADE STAKES AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WORK TO ESTABLISH ALIGNMENT AND GRADE. ANY GRADE STAKES OR REFERENCE POINTS WHiCH MAY BE LOST OR DESTROYED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PROGRESS OF HIS WORK SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE FiELD CHECKS AT ANY STAGE OF THE WORK. THE COST OF THESE FIELD CHECKS SHALL BE BORNE BY THE OWNER, THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS SECTION WILL NOT APPLY IN THE CASE OF MALICIOUS DAMAGE BY OTHERS. 35. IF THE CONTRACTOR IS IN DOUBT AS TO THE MEANING OF ANY PART OF THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS OR FiNDS DISCREPANCIES IN OR OMISSIONS FROM THE DRAWING OR SPECIFICATIONS, HE SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR AN INTERPRETATION OR A CORRECTION THEREOF, PRIOR TO FILING HIS BID FOR THE PROJECT. 36. THE ENGINEER IS NOT CONTRACTED WITH THE OWNER TO PROVIDE SLOPE STAKING. IF THE CONTRACTOR WANTS THE ENGINEER TO PROVIDE SLOPE STAKING, HE SHALL HIRE THE ENGINEER TO PERFORM THIS SERVICE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 37. ENGINEERED FiLL SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR TRACT 7243, DATED MAY 21 2014, AND SIGNED BY RYAN K. PRIVETT, AND MUST BE COMPACTED TO 90% MAXIMUM RELATIVE DENSITY. 38. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. IF THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION, FiNDS HE HAS A DEFICIENCY OR EXCESS OF SOIL, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND THE OWNER, AND THE FOLLOWING MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER: DEFICIENCY: CONTACT THE ENGINEER WHO WILL DEFINE REMEDIATION. EXCESS: CONTACT THE ENGINEER WHO WILL DEFINE REMEDIATION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR THE WORK AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. 39. EXISTING ABANDONED IRRIGATION FACILITIES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. IRRIGATION PIPE, VENT PIPES, STAND PIPES, ETC. SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED, AND BACKFILLED WITH ENGINEERED FILL AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 40. MITIGATION MEASURES FROM GPA/ZC 06-1014: A. IN THE EVENT A PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED WELL IS UNCOVERED OR DISCOVERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE SUBDIVIDER IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION'S DIVISION OF OIL, GAS, AND GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES (DOGGR). THE SUBDIVIDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REMEDIAL OPERATIONS ON THE WELL REQUIRED BY DOGGR. SUBDIVIDER SHALL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO PROVISIONS OF BMC SECTION 15.66.080 (B). B. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPIED USE OF THE PROJECT SITE. UPON SUBMITTAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT OR SITE PLAN FOR APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER OF THE PROJECT SITE SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT THEY WILL/HAVE MET ALL AIR QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED BY THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. C. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT AIR QUALITY IMPACTS. D. ALTHOUGH NO CULTURAL RESOURCES WERE FOUND ON THE SITE, THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY THAT UNRECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES OR BURIED REMAINS COULD BE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION OR EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. SHOULD THE SUBSURFACE ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMAINS BE UNEARTHED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, WORK IN THE AREA WOULD STOP IMMEDIATELY AND A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. ANY MEASURES BY THE ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL BE COMPLIED WiTH AT THAT TIME. E. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL_ RESOURCE IMPACTS. F. IF HUMAN REMAINS ARE DISCOVERED DURING GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION ACTMTiES, WORK WOULD CEASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 7050.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE. IF HUMAN REMAINS ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE AT ANY TIME, WORK SHALL STOP AT THE LOCATION OF THE FIND AND THE KERN COUNTY CORONER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY (SECTION 7050.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE AND SECTION 5097.98 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE WHICH DETAILS THE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS NECESSARY FOR ADDRESSING THE REMAINS) AND THE LOCAL NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. G. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL RESOURCE IMPACTS. H. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF BAKERSFiELD NOISE STANDARDS AS TO ALLOWABLE HOURS OF OPERATION, USE OF ADEQUATE MUFFLERS ON ALL EQUIPMENT, AND PLACEMENT OF STOCKPILES, STAGING AREAS AND SEMI-PERMANENT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AS FAR FROM NOISE-SENSTTfVE RECEIVERS AS PRACTICAL. 1. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT NOISE IMPACTS. 42. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SECTION SHALL BE GIVEN AT LEAST 24 HOUR NOTICE. THE SECTION MAY BE NOTIFIED AT (661) 326-3049. MBHCP COMPLIANCE _STATEMENT: 43. THE LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND GRADED TO MINIMIZE EXCESS LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE ACROSS THE SIDEWALK FOR THE AREAS OVER 2%. 44. AN OPEN STREET PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF BAKERSFiELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE: EXISTING ACCEPTED STREET RIGHT OF WAY. UNLESS SE,,URED SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, SECURITY BASED ON AND APPROVED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK PERFORMED WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY AND INSUR kNCE AS REQUIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT. 45. IF THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIOKS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES), A -NOTICE OF INTENT" (NOI) TO COMPLY WiTH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WiTH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (SWRCB ORDER NO. 2009-003-DWQ AS AMENDED BY ORDER 2010-0014-DWQ AND ORDER 2012-0006-DWQ) MUST BE FILED WITH SATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOERD IN SACRAMENTO BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTiVITY. COMPL'ANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT REQUIRES THAT A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SINPPP) BE PREPARED, CONTINUOUSLY CARRIED OUT, AND AU VAYS BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DURING NORMAL CONSTRUCTION HOURS. WASTE DISCHARGE IDENTIFICATION (WDID) NUMBER 5F15C372120 HA3 BEEN ISSUED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD FOR THIS PROJECT. 46. COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER/CONTRACTOR. THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF R17QUIRED TESTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 47. ANY ITEMS IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DO NOT MEET CURRENT STANDARDS SET BY PUBLIC WORKS W'LL REQUIRE REPAIRING AND/OR UPGRADING AS PER CITY ENGINEER. 48. MAXIMUM SLOPE RATIO FORM BACK OF SIDEWALK TO FACE OF WALL OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE 4:1, EXCEPT FOR TWO FEET BEHIND THE SIDEWALK WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL BE 2%. ALTERNATIVELY, THE CiTY ENGINEER MAY APPROVE CURBING BEHIND THE SIDEWALK OR OTHER METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION ONTO THE SIDEWALK. r. "4 rFw ? t U -- x'%.- fiii! ,�� z n. o > ' Dce a W: ckc RED ROCK CRE -EK; y LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - h1. . .s WkIE RIVERAll DRIVE Lu z ApDN1GHT CREEK K 4 Y a M a f� 170( gfRKsk1RELIMITS OF--/ R`''4D'' DISTURBANCE 1 A�',,,,,.. LIMITS OF1111111110 K�\y P` 4 ;,w. • _ _ S 6 4 O �. .. V p 0 -► z < r x Im ,. z �r►_,�,. I 3 a arm" + �- + + a + + + -�" + + m + +IIp SLEEPY HOLLOW LANE t DROVERS RUN ROAD ui + + + Q + + + + + -I- f 31 w-- " . ,.. + + + + + + + + 1, + is+ + �- ROSE GREEK WAY '�`°� /� + + + -v + + + + + + s I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW, BASED ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF FORMED AFTER REASONABLE INQUIRY, THAT THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA AND THAT THE STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE. SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: L. ALBERTO LOPEZ RCE 67602 SIGNATURE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (HCP/ITP) N SCALD: 1"=200' ACREAGE, (FOR HCP FEE CALCULATION) FEES NOT PAID 28.10 ACRES (GROSS) W E FEES PREVIOUSLY PAID (WITH --RACT 7267) 50.10 ACRES (GROSS) TOTAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 78.20 ACRES (GROSS) 200' 0' � UO' 400' ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. NO GRADING, STAGING- CONSTRl1CTION TRAIT RS STORAGF OR VFHICLF MANFl1VFRING ' SCALE:1 20 3' LEGEND 100 - EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING UNDERGROUND MARKER EXISTING DOWN GUY EXISTING CONTOURS - NIJOR EXISTING CONTOURS - N I VOR EXISTING CHAINUNK FENCE: EXISTING BARB WIRE FENCE CONTOURS - MAJOR CONTOURS - MINOR GRADE BREAK LIMITS OF COMPACTION STORM DRAIN (SIZE AS NOTED) FLOW UNE EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING BLOCK WALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN NuWNHOLE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL EXISTING WHARF FIRE HYCRANT EXISTING SIGN EXISTING UTILITY BOX EXISTING UTILITY STUB EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWE=R UNE EXISTING SEINER UNE AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE BCR - BEGIN CURB RETURN CL - CENTERLINE ECR - END CURB RETURN EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT ESMT - EASEMENT EXIST - EXISTING FG - FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION FH - FIRE HYDRANT FL - FLOW LINE OF GUTTER ELEVATION FF - FININED FLOOR ELEVATION FS - FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK GP _ GRADING PLAN HDPE - HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HP - HIGH POINT INV - PIPE/DRAIN INVERT ELEVATION LF LINEAR FEET LP - LOW POINT LT - LEFT MH - MANHOLE PL - PROPERTY LINE POC - POINT OF CONNECTION PRC - POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE PVC - POLYVINYL- CHLORIDE R - RADIUS RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ROW RIGHT OF WAY RT RIGHT STA - STATION TF - TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION TG - TOPO OF GRATE TW - TOP OF WALL ELEVATION WL - WATER UNE WM - WATER METER WV - WATER VALVE (XX.XX) = EXISTING ELEVATION DRA INaOF REC',0RD /7 L. r LBE=c;70 LC. PE? A.C.E 6-60= F -AF. 6.3a 19 CiTY RECORDS NO: w w THL DcLIVERY OF THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE I CONSTRUED TO PROVIDE AN EXPRESS WARRANTY OR p GUARANTEE TO ANYONE THAT ALL DIMENSIONS AND j DETAILS ARE EXACT OR TO INDICATE THAT T HE USE 0 Of THIS DRAWING IMPLIES THE REVIEW AND V APPROVAL OF DPSI OF ANY FUTURE USE ANY USE OF m THIS INFORMATION IS AT THE SOLE RISK OF THE USER 30. THE CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AFTER EXAMINING THE PLAN, SOILS REPORT AND THE SITE TERRAIN, PREPARE HiS BID PRICE FOR THE PROJECT BASED ON HIS OWN ANALYSIS OF THE WORK REQUIRED. 31. CONTOURS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE AN ACCURACY OF PLUS OR MINUS ONE-HALF CONTOUR INTERVAL. 32. PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR ROUGH GRADING. AFTER COMPLETION OF BUILDINGS, ALL LOTS SHALL BE FiNE GRADED TO SLOPE TO THE STREETS OR DESIGNED DRAINAGE OUTLET WITH A MINIMUM GRADE OF 1%. 33. THE SOILS ENGINEER MUST APPROVE ALL SOIL COMPACTION INCLUDING THE STABILITY OF ALL SLOPES, BOTH THOSE THAT ARE CREATED BY, AND THOSE REMAINING AFTER. 34, THE ENGINEER MAY FURNISH REFERENCE LINES AND GRADE STAKES AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WORK TO ESTABLISH ALIGNMENT AND GRADE. ANY GRADE STAKES OR REFERENCE POINTS WHiCH MAY BE LOST OR DESTROYED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PROGRESS OF HIS WORK SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE FiELD CHECKS AT ANY STAGE OF THE WORK. THE COST OF THESE FIELD CHECKS SHALL BE BORNE BY THE OWNER, THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS SECTION WILL NOT APPLY IN THE CASE OF MALICIOUS DAMAGE BY OTHERS. 35. IF THE CONTRACTOR IS IN DOUBT AS TO THE MEANING OF ANY PART OF THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS OR FiNDS DISCREPANCIES IN OR OMISSIONS FROM THE DRAWING OR SPECIFICATIONS, HE SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR AN INTERPRETATION OR A CORRECTION THEREOF, PRIOR TO FILING HIS BID FOR THE PROJECT. 36. THE ENGINEER IS NOT CONTRACTED WITH THE OWNER TO PROVIDE SLOPE STAKING. IF THE CONTRACTOR WANTS THE ENGINEER TO PROVIDE SLOPE STAKING, HE SHALL HIRE THE ENGINEER TO PERFORM THIS SERVICE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 37. ENGINEERED FiLL SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR TRACT 7243, DATED MAY 21 2014, AND SIGNED BY RYAN K. PRIVETT, AND MUST BE COMPACTED TO 90% MAXIMUM RELATIVE DENSITY. 38. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. IF THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION, FiNDS HE HAS A DEFICIENCY OR EXCESS OF SOIL, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND THE OWNER, AND THE FOLLOWING MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER: DEFICIENCY: CONTACT THE ENGINEER WHO WILL DEFINE REMEDIATION. EXCESS: CONTACT THE ENGINEER WHO WILL DEFINE REMEDIATION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR THE WORK AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. 39. EXISTING ABANDONED IRRIGATION FACILITIES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. IRRIGATION PIPE, VENT PIPES, STAND PIPES, ETC. SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED, AND BACKFILLED WITH ENGINEERED FILL AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 40. MITIGATION MEASURES FROM GPA/ZC 06-1014: A. IN THE EVENT A PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED WELL IS UNCOVERED OR DISCOVERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE SUBDIVIDER IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION'S DIVISION OF OIL, GAS, AND GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES (DOGGR). THE SUBDIVIDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REMEDIAL OPERATIONS ON THE WELL REQUIRED BY DOGGR. SUBDIVIDER SHALL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO PROVISIONS OF BMC SECTION 15.66.080 (B). B. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPIED USE OF THE PROJECT SITE. UPON SUBMITTAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT OR SITE PLAN FOR APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER OF THE PROJECT SITE SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT THEY WILL/HAVE MET ALL AIR QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED BY THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. C. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT AIR QUALITY IMPACTS. D. ALTHOUGH NO CULTURAL RESOURCES WERE FOUND ON THE SITE, THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY THAT UNRECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES OR BURIED REMAINS COULD BE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION OR EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. SHOULD THE SUBSURFACE ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMAINS BE UNEARTHED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, WORK IN THE AREA WOULD STOP IMMEDIATELY AND A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. ANY MEASURES BY THE ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL BE COMPLIED WiTH AT THAT TIME. E. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL_ RESOURCE IMPACTS. F. IF HUMAN REMAINS ARE DISCOVERED DURING GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION ACTMTiES, WORK WOULD CEASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 7050.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE. IF HUMAN REMAINS ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE AT ANY TIME, WORK SHALL STOP AT THE LOCATION OF THE FIND AND THE KERN COUNTY CORONER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY (SECTION 7050.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE AND SECTION 5097.98 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE WHICH DETAILS THE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS NECESSARY FOR ADDRESSING THE REMAINS) AND THE LOCAL NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. G. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL RESOURCE IMPACTS. H. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF BAKERSFiELD NOISE STANDARDS AS TO ALLOWABLE HOURS OF OPERATION, USE OF ADEQUATE MUFFLERS ON ALL EQUIPMENT, AND PLACEMENT OF STOCKPILES, STAGING AREAS AND SEMI-PERMANENT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AS FAR FROM NOISE-SENSTTfVE RECEIVERS AS PRACTICAL. 1. MITIGATION FOR POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT NOISE IMPACTS. 42. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SECTION SHALL BE GIVEN AT LEAST 24 HOUR NOTICE. THE SECTION MAY BE NOTIFIED AT (661) 326-3049. MBHCP COMPLIANCE _STATEMENT: 43. THE LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND GRADED TO MINIMIZE EXCESS LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE ACROSS THE SIDEWALK FOR THE AREAS OVER 2%. 44. AN OPEN STREET PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF BAKERSFiELD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE: EXISTING ACCEPTED STREET RIGHT OF WAY. UNLESS SE,,URED SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, SECURITY BASED ON AND APPROVED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK PERFORMED WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY AND INSUR kNCE AS REQUIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT. 45. IF THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIOKS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES), A -NOTICE OF INTENT" (NOI) TO COMPLY WiTH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WiTH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (SWRCB ORDER NO. 2009-003-DWQ AS AMENDED BY ORDER 2010-0014-DWQ AND ORDER 2012-0006-DWQ) MUST BE FILED WITH SATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOERD IN SACRAMENTO BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTiVITY. COMPL'ANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT REQUIRES THAT A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SINPPP) BE PREPARED, CONTINUOUSLY CARRIED OUT, AND AU VAYS BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DURING NORMAL CONSTRUCTION HOURS. WASTE DISCHARGE IDENTIFICATION (WDID) NUMBER 5F15C372120 HA3 BEEN ISSUED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD FOR THIS PROJECT. 46. COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER/CONTRACTOR. THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF R17QUIRED TESTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 47. ANY ITEMS IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DO NOT MEET CURRENT STANDARDS SET BY PUBLIC WORKS W'LL REQUIRE REPAIRING AND/OR UPGRADING AS PER CITY ENGINEER. 48. MAXIMUM SLOPE RATIO FORM BACK OF SIDEWALK TO FACE OF WALL OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE 4:1, EXCEPT FOR TWO FEET BEHIND THE SIDEWALK WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL BE 2%. ALTERNATIVELY, THE CiTY ENGINEER MAY APPROVE CURBING BEHIND THE SIDEWALK OR OTHER METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION ONTO THE SIDEWALK. r. "4 rFw ? t U -- x'%.- fiii! ,�� z n. o > ' Dce a W: ckc RED ROCK CRE -EK; y LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - h1. . .s WkIE RIVERAll DRIVE Lu z ApDN1GHT CREEK K 4 Y a M a f� 170( gfRKsk1RELIMITS OF--/ R`''4D'' DISTURBANCE 1 A�',,,,,.. LIMITS OF1111111110 K�\y P` 4 ;,w. • _ _ S 6 4 O �. .. V p 0 -► z < r x Im ,. z �r►_,�,. I 3 a arm" + �- + + a + + + -�" + + m + +IIp SLEEPY HOLLOW LANE t DROVERS RUN ROAD ui + + + Q + + + + + -I- f 31 w-- " . ,.. + + + + + + + + 1, + is+ + �- ROSE GREEK WAY '�`°� /� + + + -v + + + + + + s I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW, BASED ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF FORMED AFTER REASONABLE INQUIRY, THAT THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA AND THAT THE STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE. SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: L. ALBERTO LOPEZ RCE 67602 SIGNATURE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (HCP/ITP) N SCALD: 1"=200' ACREAGE, (FOR HCP FEE CALCULATION) FEES NOT PAID 28.10 ACRES (GROSS) W E FEES PREVIOUSLY PAID (WITH --RACT 7267) 50.10 ACRES (GROSS) TOTAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 78.20 ACRES (GROSS) 200' 0' � UO' 400' ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE IS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. NO GRADING, STAGING- CONSTRl1CTION TRAIT RS STORAGF OR VFHICLF MANFl1VFRING ' SCALE:1 20 3' LEGEND 100 - EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING UNDERGROUND MARKER EXISTING DOWN GUY EXISTING CONTOURS - NIJOR EXISTING CONTOURS - N I VOR EXISTING CHAINUNK FENCE: EXISTING BARB WIRE FENCE CONTOURS - MAJOR CONTOURS - MINOR GRADE BREAK LIMITS OF COMPACTION STORM DRAIN (SIZE AS NOTED) FLOW UNE EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING BLOCK WALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN NuWNHOLE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL EXISTING WHARF FIRE HYCRANT EXISTING SIGN EXISTING UTILITY BOX EXISTING UTILITY STUB EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWE=R UNE EXISTING SEINER UNE AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE BCR - BEGIN CURB RETURN CL - CENTERLINE ECR - END CURB RETURN EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT ESMT - EASEMENT EXIST - EXISTING FG - FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION FH - FIRE HYDRANT FL - FLOW LINE OF GUTTER ELEVATION FF - FININED FLOOR ELEVATION FS - FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK GP _ GRADING PLAN HDPE - HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HP - HIGH POINT INV - PIPE/DRAIN INVERT ELEVATION LF LINEAR FEET LP - LOW POINT LT - LEFT MH - MANHOLE PL - PROPERTY LINE POC - POINT OF CONNECTION PRC - POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE PVC - POLYVINYL- CHLORIDE R - RADIUS RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ROW RIGHT OF WAY RT RIGHT STA - STATION TF - TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION TG - TOPO OF GRATE TW - TOP OF WALL ELEVATION WL - WATER UNE WM - WATER METER WV - WATER VALVE (XX.XX) = EXISTING ELEVATION DRA INaOF REC',0RD /7 L. r LBE=c;70 LC. PE? A.C.E 6-60= F -AF. 6.3a 19 CiTY RECORDS NO: w w a H Z 1 U. J !c i ,%cr C'J o w U IL a a z 0 w EY w Ix n a CL Tn a H Z 1 U. J / i ,%cr C'J w > a I I- < �.� _'ui ; W z Q V) LL 03w o Oj 0 r. 0 •p " w ( !: W .� . ..e..�. [1_ LU U z ��( <.` l )Q J w ZC) Q ~ •�. z C) L) Cl. ` 0 Z OQ w � cp > c, Odd \Q7 C:1 0 (n t s w S° 0 U m N > a� Q� �m w U) -J Z<ti WC)U<) c IN () a- m c;, 0 . UJ mo i) Z 8 j IL a a z 0 w EY w Ix n a n a H Z 1 U. J 14 i ,%cr C'J F-- a CA 0 Cil Ljj W WC) W _'ui Ca ct w Q V) LL n 0 o In c( IC) w r. 6 1:3 W .� . ..e..�. 0: m IO " � O ��_. ZC) ~ •�. z C) L) Cl. C:1 n a H LLI 1 U. LLI =�W 14 i ,%cr C'J (fl U a, u 0 w LL n 0 o c a 6 0 .� . ..e..�. IL PRELIMINARY GEOTECIINiCALENGtNEERiNG iNVPSTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVEI.OP%mw TENTATIVE TRACT 6359 OLD RIVER ROAD & PANAMA LAKE BAKERSFiELD, CALIFORNIA KA PROJECT NO. 022-05069 JUNE s', 2005 Prepared for: MR. DAN PIKE S & S Ho.m ES OF THE CENTRAL COAST, fNC. 1350 EAST GRAND AviiNUE ARRUyr) GRANDE, CALIFORNIA 93420 Prepared by: KRA"N & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTFCHNICAL ENGINEERING DtVIsioN 2205 Coy AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93307 (661)837-9200 VIOft. SMI Ill , as wow \Evi ssAW 711. Me �. , cm KA No. 022-05069 Page No. 6 After completion of the recommended site preparation, the site should be suitable for shallow footing supports. The proposed structure footings may be designed utilizing an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for dead -plus -live toads. Footings should have a minimum embedment of 12 inches. Groundwater Infloenee on Stractorea/Constnctioa Based on our findings and historical records, it is not anticipated that groundwater will rise within the zone of structural influence or affect the construction of foundations and pavements for the proJeu. I lowever, if earthwork is performed during or soon after periods of precipitation, the subgrade soils may become saturated, "pump." or not respond to densification techniques. Typical remedial measures include: discing and aerating the soil during dry weather; mixing the soil with dryer materials; removing and replacing the soil with an approved fill material; or mixing the soil with an approved lime or cement product Our firm should be- consulted prior to implementing remedial measures to observe the unstable subgrade conditions and pmvide appropriate recommendations. Site Preparation General site clearing should include removal of vegetation; existing utilities; structures meluding foundations, basement walls and floors: trees and associated root systems: nibble; rubbish. and any loose and/or saturated materials. She stripping should extend to a minimum depth or., to,t inches. or until all organics in excess of 3 percent by volume are removed. Deeper stripping may be required in localized areas. These materials will not be suitable for use as Engineered Fill. However. stripped topsoil may be stockpiled and reused in landscape or non-structural areas. The site is predominately utilized for agricultural purposes and partially occupied by a mobile home and out buildings in the central portion of the site. Associated with these developments are buried structures such as irrigation lines and septic systems that extend into the project site. Any buried structures encountered during construction should be properly removed and.'or relocated and the resulting excavations backfilled with Engineered Fill. Disturbed areas caused by demolition activities should be removed and/or recompacted. Excavations, depressioxls, or soft and pliant areas extending below planned finish subgrade level should be cleaned to firm undisturbed soil, and backfilled with Engineered Fill_ In general, any septic tanks. debris pits, cesspools, or similar structures should be entirely removed. Concrete footings should be removed to an equivalent depth of at least 3 feet below proposed footing elevations or as recommended by the Soils Engineer. If not utilized for the new development, water wells should be abandoned in accordance with the county standards. Any other buried structures should be removed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with Engineered Fill. Trees are located at the site. Tree removal should include mots greater than 1 -inch in diameter. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with Engineered Fill. A ditch and a sump are located at the site. If the ditch and sump will be abandoned, all deleterious materials should be removed front the ditch and sump prior tri backfilling. The resulting excavation should be cleaned to firm native ground and backfilled with Engineered Fill. Kramer & Associates, Inc. - With Offices Sen•ing The Westetn United States V W LU a �.L THE DELIVERY OF THIS DRAVVNG SHOULD NOTSE I _ CONSTRUED TO PROVIDE AN EXPRESS WARRANTY OR �' r ALBERtO LOP:5Zf GUARANTEE TO ANYONE THATALL ONENS10NS AND fy` W Ww co � DETAILS ARE EXACT OR TO INDICATE THAT THE USE N O L OF THIS DRAY MIG aMPLIES THE REVIEW AND Cr G APPROVAL OF OPSI OF ANY FUTURE USE ANY USE OF THIS IWORMATION W 0� JQ IS AT THE SOLE RISK OF THE USER KraZan& ASSOCIATES, INC. GEO!EC�4Nn CA: ENGINEERING • ENvfRONMEN.*At ENGMFERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING d INSPECTION June 3, 2005 KA Project No. 022-05069 Mr. Dan Pike S & S Homes of the Central Conal, inc. 1350 East Grand Avenue Arroyo Grande, California 93420 RE: Preliminary Geotechnical Esigimeering investigation Proposed Rodential Development Tentative Tract 6359 Old River Road & Panama Lane Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Pike: In accordance with your request, we have completed a Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the above -referenced site. The results of our investigation are presented in the attached report. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance. please do not hesitate to contact our office at (661) 837-9200. DRJ:da Ma. tlOtib * ElpYasJw>la. L s. Cwt ly submitted, & ASSOCIATES, INC. No. 00 185 r With Offices Serving The Western United States 2205 Coy Avenue • OaWrsftetd CA 93307 . (661)837-92M • Falx- (661) 937-9201 OaBb69ttw,W 4ymlTiw 41Ht KA No. 022-05069 Page No. 7 Following stripping, tree removal and demolition activities, the exposed subgrade within building pad. exterior ffatwork and pavement areas should be excaysted/scarifhed to a depth of at least 12 inches. mceisturr conditioned as necessary, and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557 Limits of recompaction should extend 5 feet beyond structural elements. The upper soils, during wet winter months, become very moist due to the absorptive characteristics of the soil. Earthwork operations performed during winter months may encounter very moist unstable soils, which may require removal to grade a stable building foundation. Project site winterization consisting of placement of aggregate base and protecting exposed soils during the construction phase should be performed. A representative of our firm should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to test and observe earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral part of our service as acceptance of earthwork construction s dependent upon compaction of the material and the stability of the material. the Soils Engineer may reject any material that does tux meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations of this report are predicated upon the assumption that earthwork construction will conform to recommendations ser forth in this section and the Engineered Fill section. Foundations The proposed structures may be supported on a shallow foundation system bearing on undisturbed native soils or Engineered Fill. Spread and continuous fcxxings can be designed for the following maximum allowable soil bearing pressures: Load Allowable Dead Load Only 1,500 psi Dead -Plus -Live Load 2,000 psf Total Load, including wind or seismic loads 2,650 psf Footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 12 inches measured from rough grade or exterior grade, whichever is lower. Footings should have a minimum with of 12 inches regardless of load. The total soil movement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential soil movement should be less than '% inch. Most of the settlement is expected to occur during construction as the loads are applied. However, additional post -construction settlement may occur if the foundation soils are flooded or saturated. Knexati A As iciates, Inc. With Offices Serving The Western United States c 4Y�K M-..HRq :,-nc Soto) KA No. 022.05069 Page No. 4 corrositivity of the soils to buried concrete. Details of the laboratory test program and results of the laboratory tests are summarized ;n Appendix A. This information, along with the field observations, was used to prepare the final boring logs in Appendix A. SOIL PROFILE AND SI)RSi'RFACE 02niDtPl-atr s Based on our findings, the subsurface conditions encountered appear typical of thaw found in due geologic region of the site. In general, due surface soils consisted of approxinmely 6 to 12 inches of very kris silty sand and sandy silt soils. Time soils are disturbed, have low strength characteristics. and are highly compressible when saturated. Below the very loose surface soils_ approximately 3 to I 1 feet of loose to medium dense silty sand, silty sand/sandy sift, sandy sih, and send were encountered. Field and laboratory tests suggest that these soils are moderately strong and shig fitly compressible. Penetration resistance ranged from 7 to 34 blows per foot. Dr; densities ranged from 97 to 125 pef. Representative soil samples consolidated approximately I to 24- percent wider a 2 ksf load when saturated. Representative soil samples had angles of internal friction of 30 to .t3 degrees. Below 4 to 12 feet. layers of predominately sand, silty sand, silty sand/sandy sift and sandy sift were encoun.ered. These soils lead sin-,ilar strength characteristics as the upper soils and extended to the termination depth of our borings. For additional information about lire soils encountered, please refer to the logs of test pits in Appendix A. GROVMWATER Boring locations were checked for the presence of groundwater during and immediately following the drilling operations. Free groundwater was not encountered. It should be recognized that water table elevations may fluctuate with time, being dependent upon seasons precipitation, irrigation, land use, and climatic conditions, as well as other factors. Therefore, water level observations at the time of the field investigation may vary from diose encotmtered during the construction phase of the projec!. The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. Soil Lionefaetion Soil liquefaction is it state of soil particle suspension, caused by a complete loss of strength when the effective stress drops to zero. Li(lnefaction normally occurs in soils, such as sands, in wbkh the strength is purely frictional. However, liquefaction has occurred in soils otter duan clean sands. Liquefaction usually occurs under i ibratory conditions, such as those induced by seismic events. Due to the depth to groundwater, the fx4ential for soil liquefaction is very low. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. Klan & Associates,Im With Offices Serving The Western United States 727c7te9 R�.nK Neer. rico 57�F1 KA No. 022-05069 Page No. 8 Resistance to lateral footing displatemem can be computed using an allowable friction factor of 0.4 acting between the base of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can alternatively be developed using an llowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 350 pounds per cubic foot acting against the appropriate t erticad footing faces. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. A'A increase in the above value may tie used for short duration, wind, or seismic loads. Engineered FRI The majority of the upper native soils within the project site are identified as silty sand, sandy silt, and sand. Thc-sc soils will be suitable as Engineered Fill, provided they are cleansed of excessive organics and debris. The preferred materials specified for 'engineered Fill is suitable for most applications with the exception of exposure to erosion. Project rite winterization and protection of exposed soils during the constructi+bi phase should be the sole responsibility of the Contractor, since he has Complete control of the project site at that time. imported Dill material should he predominately non -expansive granular material with a plasticity index less than .0 and a UBC Expansion Index less than 15. Imported Fill should be free from rocks and humps grader than 4 irches in diamcta•. All Imported Fill material should be submitted for approval to the Soils Fngineer at least 48 hours pr -or to delivery to the site. Fill soils should he placed in lifts approximately 6 inches thick. moisture -conditioned as necessary, and compacted to achieve at least 90 percent maximum density as determined by ASTM Test Method 01557. Additional lift% should not be placed if the previous lift did not meet the required dry density or if soil conditions arc not stable. The shrinkage on recompacted soil and fill placement are estimated at 12 to 20 percent_ A subsidence of approximately 0.2 feet may be assumed for the upper native soils. This estimate is based on compaction of the upper inils to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557 Over -compaction would result in additional shrinkage. These values are approximate and should be re-evaluated during grading operations. --- - Krazao & Associates, Inc. With Offtres Serving The Western t;euted States NA ret it"', rt7w «stir KA No. 022-05069 1'i ge No. 5 Seismic Settlement One of the most common phenomena during seismic shaking accompanying any earthquake is the induced settlement of loose unconsolidated soils. Based on site subsurface conditions, and the moderate to high seismicity of the region, any loose fill materials at the site could be vulnerable to this potential hazard. However, this hazard can be mitigated by following the design arid construction recommendations of our Geoiech nical Engineering investigation (over-eaccavatiat and rewort. of the loose soils and/or fill). Based on the moderate penetration resistance measured, rhe native deposes underlying, the site do not appear to be subject to significant seismic settlement. CONCLI:SIGNS AND RECUA4MlENDATiONS Based on the findings of our field and laboratory investigations. along with previous geottchnical experience in the protect area, the following is a summary of our evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations_ Administrative Somoaan In brie£, the subject site and soil conditions, %vith the e\ceptiun of the loose surface sails and existing development. appear to "x conducive to the development of the project. The surface soils are disturbed, have low strength characteristics, and are highly compressible when saturated. Accordinptly, it is recommended that the surface ,nil, be recompacted. This compaction effort should stabilize the surface soils and locate any unsuitable lr pliant areas not round during our field investigation. The majorin of the upper native souls within die project site are identified as silty sands, sandy :tilts, and sands. These snits trill be suitable as Engineered Fill. provided they are cleansed of excessive 3-ganics and debris. The site is ^redominat,:ly utilized for agricultural purposes and partially occupied by a :mobile ha me and outbuildings in the central portion of the site Associaied With these developments are buried strictures such as utility lines, irrigation lines, and septic systems. Any surface or buried structures encountered during construction should he properly removed and the resulting excavations backfill*/ with Engineered Fill it is suspected demolition activities will disturb the upper soils i)isturteml areas caused by demolition activities should be removed and/or re=ompacted. Trees are located at the site. Tree removal should include roots greater than 1 -inch in diameter. The resulting excavations shoulj be backfilled with Engineered Fill. A ditch and a sump are located 31 the site. If the ditch and sump will be abandoned, all deleterious materials should be removed from the ditch and sump prior to backfilling. lie resulting extavation should be cleaned to Finn native ground and backfilled with Engineered Fill. Sandy soil conditions were encountered at the site I hese eohesionless ;oils have a tendency to cave in trench wall excavations. Shorne o:- sloping trick trench sidewalls may be rcxluired within these sandy soils. tcruan & .Associates, Inc. •�'nh Ofttc_s Serving Ilii We -arm United Stafc:, d Landscanin *o'•: f".e R_ r -,C ply" KA No. 02-1-05069 Pabc No.9 The ground surface should ilope away from building pad and pavement areas toward appropriate• drop inlets or other surface drainage devices. It is recommended that adjacent exterior grades be sloped a minimum of : percent for a minimum distance of 5 fret away from structures. Subgrade soils in pavement areas s-iuuld he sloped a minimum of 1 percent and drainage gradients maintained to carry all surface water to collection facilities antl off-site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project. Roof drains should be installed with appiopriate downspout extensions out -falling on splash blocks so as to direct water a minimum of 5 feet away from die structures or be eennected to the dorm drain system for the development. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trenches should be excavated according to accepted engineering practices following OSHA (Occupational Safetyand 'le-iith ldmimitrat-or.) standards by a Contractor experienced in such work. The responsibilit- for the safety of' aper trenches should be borne by the Contrictor. 'rrafr( and vibration adjacent to trench walls Should be minimized: cyclic wetting and drying of excavation side slopes should be avoided. Depeoding upoah the location and depth of some utility trenches. groundwater flow into open excavations could Ix; experienced, especialty during or shortly following periods of precipitation. Sandy soil coiiditiau were encountered at the site. ihese cohesionless soils have a tendency to cave in trench wall evcacationc �lwring or sloping back Manch sidewalls may be required within these sandy and gravelly soils. Utility trench backfill placed In :ir adjacent to buildings and exterior slabs should be compacted to at least 90 percent of ma-Ntmuin density based ,in ASTM "icct Method D1557 Utility trench txukfrll placed in pa%cnnent areas sh•.iuld be :ornpactecd to at (east 90 percent of maximum density basad on ASTM Test Method DI157 ripe bedding should he in accordance with pip;: nianufactv-er's recommendations The Contractor is responsiale for removing all evater-sensitive soils from the trench regardless td'the backfill location and compaction reapuirements The Contractor should use appropriate equipment and methods to avoid damage to the utilities aTnd;or structures during fill placement and compaction. Floor Slabs and Exterior M7atwork Concrete slab -on -grade floor should be underlain by a water vapor retarder. The water vapor retarder should be installed in accordance with ASTM Specification E 1643-98. According to ASTM Guidelines, the water vapor retarder should consist of a vapor rerarfer sheeting underlain by a inininmm of 3 inches of compacted, clean, gravel of maximum sirs To eide in concrete curing an optional 2 to 4 inches of granular fill may be pulsed on top of the vapor retarder. The granular fill should ccrsist Krarmt & Aswchucs, Inc. -- With Otiicc% Senting The Western United States LU W LU a �.L Z _ o �' r ALBERtO LOP:5Zf fy` W Ww co � —i N O L Cr G W 0� JQ O O LU 1=1 U �,L r- r N p u.t CITY RECORDS NO: r 1 a W da D > 6- EEO C7 c (; o Z 0 (3 0a a 1� Z W W U3 >) ct- 0 w J 0 -p cc CL w ��L.IJ a.1 W � } U / Q w Q W L) O " t W r yy i cn --• :.. w << - -' O� 0- tr c. oLLI wZ co U.1 3 It a l 1 It a I i a I D iNtO�F W �.L Z _ l� �' r ALBERtO LOP:5Zf W Ww co � —i n! L Cr G W 0� JQ O O r' n 1=1 �,L r- r N p u.t CITY RECORDS NO: r 1 cc W da D > 6- EEO z c Z 0 (3 0a LJJ ® 0 Z cc ��L.IJ � D iNtO�F RECORD 1i 1 _ W �' r ALBERtO LOP:5Zf W Ww co � —i _3101 W 0) r' n �,L r- r N CITY RECORDS NO: 0 CL KA No. 022-05069 Page No. 10 of damp clean sand with at least 10 to 30 percent of the sand passing the 100 sieve. The sand should be free of clay, silt or organic material. Rock dust which is manufactured sand from rock crushing Operations is typica II suitable for the granular fill. This granular fill material should be compacted. The exterior Churn should be poured separately in order to act independently of the walls and foundation system. All fills required to bring the building pads to grade should be Engineered Fills. Moisture within the structure may be derived from water vapors, which were transformed from the moisture within the soils. This moisture vapor can travel through the vapor membrane and penetrate the slab -on -grade. This moisture vapor penetration can affect floor coverings and produce mold and mildew in the structure. To minimize moisture vapor intrusion, it is recommended that a vapor retarder he installed in accordance with ASTM guidelines. It is recommended that the utility trenches within the structure be compacted, as specified in our reflort. to minimize the transmission of moisture through the utility trench backfill. Special attention to the immediate drainage and irrigation around the building is recommended. Positive drainage should be established away front the structure and should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. Ponding of water should not be allowed adjacent to the structure. Over -irrigation c%ithin landscaped areas adjacent to the structure should not be performed. In addition, ventilation of the structure (i.e. ventilation fans) is recommended to reduce the accumulation of interior moisture. Lateral Earth Pressures and Retainine Walls Walls retaining horizontal backfill and capable of deflecting a minimum of 0.1 percent of its height at the top may be designed using an equivalent fluid active pressure of 35 pounds per square toot per foot of depth. Walls that are incapable of this deflection or walls that are fully constrained against deflection may be designed for an equivalent fluid at -rest pressure of 55 pounds per square foot per foot per depth. Expansive soils should not be used for backfill against walls. The wedge of non -expansive backfill material should extend from the bottom of each retaining wall outward and upward at a slope of 2:1 (horizoncrd to vertical) or flatter. The stated lateral earth pressures do not include the effects of hydrostatic water pressures generated by infiltrating surface water that may accumulate behind the retaining walls: or loads imposed by construction equipment, foundations, or roadways. During grading and backfilling operations adjacent to any walls, heavy equipment should not be allowed to operate within a lateral distance of 5 feet from alae wall, or within a lateral distance equal to the wall height, whichever is greater, to avoid developing excessive lateral pressures. Within this zone, only hand operated equipment ("whackers," vibrator% plates. or pneumatic compactors) should he used to compact the backfill soils. R -Value Test Results and Pavement Des'an Sixteen R -Value samples were obtained from the project site at the locations shown on the attached site plan. 'Me samples were tested in accordance with the State of California Materials Manual Test Designation 301. Results of the tests areas follows: Krazaa & Associates, Inc. With Offices Serving The Wesrcav United States (1Q.~- Rn Wd Rap- t r,st 61 %) wS-5-An Kxazan-1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. 'GEOT-CHN CAL ENGINEERING - ENv R014MENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCT,ON TLSI NG & INSPECTION March R, 2017 KA Projed No. 022-05069 Ms. Shannon McCabe S & S Homes of the Central Coast 998 Huston Street, Suite C Grover Beach, CA 93433 Aliannon.mccabe sshomes.net Re: Gewe'.chnical Engineering Investigation Update Tract No. 7-1(W (formerly a portion of Tract 6359) NW of Berkshire Road and Progress Road Bakersfield, California Dear Ms. McCabe: In accordance with your request, we arc providing this Gcotechuical Engineering Investigation Update f'or Tract No. 7304 (formerly a portion of Tract 6359), located northwest of the intersection of Berkshire Road and Progress Road, in Bakersfield, California. The purpose of this Update is to address any changed site conditions and subsequent modifications or additions to the recommendations of the original report, as well as to provide additional information to conform with seismic design requirements of the 2016 California Building Code (2016 CBC). A Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering investigation report was previously completed for a 77.5 acre area, which included the subject areas of this update, by Kmzan & Associates, Inc. (KA No. 022- 05069), dated June 3, 2005. The area studied encompassed the previously -identified Traci 6359. The portion which is the subject of this Update includes approximately 40 acres situated east of the current development and north of the proposed extension of Berkshire Road. In our previous report, we provided recommendations for foundation types and embedment depths, Site Preparation, Engineered Fill, Drainage and Iandscaping, Utility Trench Backfill, Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork, Lateral F.vtlt Pressures and Retaining Walls, Pavements, Site (seismic) Coefficient, Soil Cement Reactivity, Compacted Material Acceptance, and Testing and Inspection. Addendum I to the original report, dated February 25, 2008, was prepared to provide additional infottnatiaa to conform with seismic design requirements of the 2007 CBC, which is not applicable to the 2016 CBC. A site visit was conducted on March 7, 2017, to observe and document the existing site conditions and identify any changes to the applicable areas of the site from the time of our previous investigation. The southwestern approximately 't of the site was stripped of vegetation and appeared to have been previously graded, likely for excavation of fall soils for the adjacent subdivision to the south. This area was approximately 2 to 3 feet lower in elevation than the remainder of the site. The majority of the remainder of the site was coveredin dense native grasses and/or weeds. Numerous end -dump piles of fill soil, and sparse piles of landscape debris, boulders, construction debris, and some trash were with Offices Serving The Western United States - 4 2205 fay Avenue - Bakersfield, CA 93307. (661) 837.9200 - Fos (661) 837-9201 tR30S'669 TR naeo■ott�ertarrol�a.me: ane U De thDescri THE DELIVERY OF THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE R -Valve at ui r CONSTRUED TO NROWDE AN EXPRESS WARRANTY OR S 13 GUARANTEE TO ANYONE THAT ALL DIMENSIONS AND 12-24" Sandy Silt (MI.)34 DETA&S ARE EXACT OR TO INDICATE THAT THE USE 5.0 12-24" OF THIS DRAWING Wt IES THE REVIEW AND 55 4 APPROVAL OF OPSI OF ANY FUTURE USE ANY USE OF ® 55 THIS INFORMA"i ►oN IS AT THE SOLE RISK OF THE USER. 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 58 KA No. 022-05069 Page No. I i The majority of the test results are fair and indicate moderate to good subgrade support characteristics under dynamic traffic loads without using any aggregate subbase. The following table shows the recommended pavement sections for various traffic indices based on an R -value of 50. Traffic Index De thDescri tion R -Valve at ui r 12-24" Sandy Silt (ML) 13 4.5 12-24" Sandy Silt (MI.)34 121.011 5.0 12-24" Silly Sand/Sandy Silt (SM/ML) 55 4 12-24" Silty Sand/Sandy Silt (SM/Ml,) 55 5 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 58 6 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 46 7 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 58 7.5 4.0" Silty Sand (SM) 53 r1l12-24" 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 59 5.5 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 60 12.0" 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) 59 12 12-24" Silty Sand (SM) }9 13 12-24" Sandy Silt (ML) 21 14 12-24" Silty Sand/Sandy Silt (SM/ML) 55 15 12-24" Sandy Silt (ML) 51 16 12-24" Silly Sand (SM) 58 The majority of the test results are fair and indicate moderate to good subgrade support characteristics under dynamic traffic loads without using any aggregate subbase. The following table shows the recommended pavement sections for various traffic indices based on an R -value of 50. Traffic Index Asphaltic Concrete Class II Aggregate Base* Compacted Subgrade** 4.0 2.0" 4.0" 12.0" 4.5 2.5" 4.0" 121.011 5.0 2.5" 4.0" 12.0" 5.5 2.5" 4.0" 12 0" 6.0 3.0" 4.0" 12.0" 6.5 3.0" 4.0" 12.0" 7.0 3.5" 4.0" 12.0" 7.5 4.0" 4.0" 12.0" 95% cangacdon based on ASTM Teo Method 01557 or CAL 216 " 9971 compacrion based on A,STAf rest Method D1557 or CAL 216 Krazan & Associates, Ines With Offices Serving The Western United States n'aXo.. Rn,"d Rya. tTr-tt 61591 Project No. 022-05069 Page No. 2 observed throughout the site as well. Vegetation, trash and debris should not be used as fill and should be removed and disposed of off-site. The origin and nature of the end -dump soils is presently unknown Should it be desired that these soils be retained for use as fill, additional testing should be performed to verify its suitability for use as Engineered Fill material. Based on the observations made during wr recent site visit, the recommendations for Site Pre)lasation ;1reviotus r: Port sh Presented in our all remain applicable to the currend, ! posed construction. Previous recommendations for Foundations and Retaining Walls previously provided are included as well for reference. Foundations The proposed Mures may be supponed on a shallow foundation systems bearing on undisturbed native soils or Engineered Fill. Spread and continuous footings can be designed for the following maximum allowable soil bearing pressures: Load Allowable Loading ii t_., Dead Load Only 1,500 psf Dem -Plus -Live Load 2,000 psf t- �-- _. Total Load, including w.nd or seismic loads 2,650 par Footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 12 inches, measured from rough grade or exterior grade, whichever is lower. Footings should have a minimum with of 12 inches regardless of load. The total soil movement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential soil movement should be less than 1/2 inch. Most of the settlement is expected to occur during construction as the loads are applied. However, additional post -construction settlement may occur if the foundation soils are flooded or saturated. Resistance to lateral footing displacement can be computed using an allowable friction factor of 0.4 acting between the base of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can alternatively be developed using an allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 350 pounds per cubic foot acting against the appropriate vertical footing faces. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reductions in determining the total lateral resistance. A 1/3 increase in the above value may be used for short duration, wind, or seismic loads. Lateral Earth Pressures gad Retginin2 Wafts Walls retaining horizontal backfill and capable of deflecting a minimum of 0.1perl st of its height at the top may be designed using an equivalent fluid active pressure of 35 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. Walls that are incapable of this deflection or walls that are fully constrained against deflection may be designed for an equivalent fluid at -rest pressure of 55 pounds per square footper foot per depth. Expansive soils should not be used for backfill against walls. The wedge of non -expansive backfill material should extend from the bottom of each retaining wall outward and upward at a slope of 2:1 Krone & Associates, Inc. With gees Serving The WestcTa United States 6:ZR5069 T R t �V GcntaL l:�Ler 4�E.,S17 dw KA No. 022-05069 Page No. 12 However, there are areas where It-vahae test results (R1. R2, and R13) are low and indicate poor subgrade• suppon characteristics under dynamic traffic loads. These areas will require thicker pavement sections and an aggregate subbase may or may not be necessary for pavement support. The following table shows the recommended pavement sections for various traffic indices for theseareas based on an R -value of 13. Traffic Index Asphaltic Concrete Class II ate Base* C__ -lass III A to Subbase* Compacted So died 4.0 2.0" 8.5" -- 12.0" 4.0 2.0" 4.5" 4.5" 12.0„ 4.5 2.5' 9.0" _ 12.0, 4.52. 5 4.0" 5.5" 12.0" 5.0 ;" 10.5" -- 12.0» 5.0 ;" 5.0" 6.0" 1 2.0" �•� 3.0" 11.0" -- 12.0" 5.5 3.0" 5.0" 112.0" 6.5" 12.0" 6.0 3.0" 13.0" -- CBC Reference Sectiasn 1613.3.3 6.0 3.0" 6.5" 7.5" 12.0" 6.5 4.U" 14.0" -- 12.0, 6.5 4-0" 6.0" 8.5" 12.0" 7.0 4.0" 15.0" -- 12.0- 7.0 4.0" 6.5" 9.0" 12.0" 7.s 4 0" 16.5" -- 12.0" 7.5 4.0" ere. -a 7.5" 10.0" 12.0.. • ` 90% conrpacilon based on ASTM Teat Method DIS57 err G1 L 2/6 If traffic indices are not available, an estimated index of 4.5 may be used for light automobile traffic. and an index of 7.0 for fight stuck tea rite are typical values. Tile follow ing rec(fin niendations are for light duty and heavy duty Portland Cement Concrete pavement sections. PORTLAND CEMENT PAVEMENT Traffic Index Portland Cement _ _ Concrete**°' %Claw II Aggro gate Base* Compacted Snbgrade** 4.5 5.0" 4.0" 12.01, Kramn & Associates, inc. With Ot fices Serving The Westem United States �?:95■pA Re"xd Report tTrut -lwi Project No. 022-05069 Page No. 3 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. The stated lateral earth pressures do not include the effects of hydrostatic hater pressures generated by infiltrating surface water that may accumulate behind the retaining wal Is; or loads imposed by construction equipment, foundations, or roadways. During grading and backfilling operations adjacent to any walls, heavy equipment should not be allowed to operate within a lateral dist mee of 5 feet fiotn the wall, or within a lateral distance equal to the wall heigat, whichever is greater, to avoid developing excessive lateral pressures. Within this zone, only hand operated equipment ("whackers," vibratory plates, or pneumatic compactors) should be used to compact the backfill soils. In addition to the above, the following recommendations ane included to comply with the 2016 CBC and shall supersede the recommendations of our previous report where applicable. Floor Slabs and Exterior_-Flatwork Concrete slab -on -grade floors should be underlain by a water vapor retarder. The water vapor retarder should be installed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. The water vapor retarder should consist of a vapor retarder sheeting und:.rlain by a minimum of 3 inches of compacted, clean, gravel of '/--inch maximum size. To aid in concrete curing an ol,tional 2 to 4 inches of granular fill may be placod on top of the vapor retarder. The granular fill should consist of damp clean sand with at least 10 to 30 percent of the sand passing the 100 sieve. The sand should be free of clay, silt, or organic material. Rock dust which is manufactured sand from rock crushing operations is typically suitable for the granular fill. This granular fill material should be compacted. The exterior floors should be poured separately in order to act independently of the walls and foundation system. A Il fil Is required to bring the building pads to grade should be Engineered Fills. Moisture within the structure may be c:erived from water vapors, which were transformed from the moisture within the soils. Titis moisture vapor can travel through the vapor membrane and penetrate the slab -on -grade. This nsoisture vapor penetration can affect floor coverings and produce mold and mildew in the structure. To minimize moisture vapor intrusion, it is recommendedthat a vapor retarder he installed it is recommendLA that the utility trenches within the structure be compacted, as specified in our report, to minimize the transmission of moisture through the utility trench backfill. Special attention to the immediate drainage and irrigation around the building is recommended. positive drainage should be established away from the structure and should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. Ponding of water should n.x be allowed adjacent to the structure. Over -irrigation within landscaped areas adjacent to the structure should not be performed. In addition, ventilation of the structure (i.e. veattilation fans) is recommcaded to reduce the accumulation of interior moisture. Dlt•ainaZe and Latrdnga! nm The ground surface should slope away from building pad and pavement arras toward appropriate drop inlets or other surface drainage devices in accordance with Section 1804 of the 2016 California Building Code, it is recommended that the ground surface adjacent to foundations be sloped a minimum of 5 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet away from structures, or to an approved alternative K7ltzan & Associates„ Inc. with offices Serving The Westem United Stages 02.115069 rte : tM rw,t b tor* o.�,s.2ot 7 dM KA No. 022-05069 Fage No. 13 Traffic Index Portland Gement Concrete*{* - - Class 11 Aggregate Base* Compacted Suet grade** 0 (r. T.tT" 12." ...-•�••y.•„�•••••�„",,.�.,,", Ir,1"IC,fIOaLl7,)/ort.at.:ret ^ 917"i rumpaclinn based nn •15'7:.41 l cw tftthr7d U1557 or C: t L 216 `--,alinins7m /!neural strength of 650 psi Site Coefficient The site coefficient, ler i aole ; 6-S, 1 inifomi Buiidim, odc. is based upon the site soil conditions. It is our opinion that a site coefticicn1 0f wit type S•, 1199 i 1110 is appropriate for building design at this site. Soil Cement Reactivity Excessive sulfate in either the sot. or native water ma), result in an adv erse reaction betucen the cement in concrete (or stucco) and the ;ail. IMD/F11A and UBC have developed criteria for evaluation of sulfate levels and ho%% they relate to cement reactivity with soil and or water. Soil samples were obtained from ilio lite and tested in accordance with State of California Materials Manual Test Designation 417 fhe sDlfate concentrations detected from these soii samples we•te greater than 150 ppm and are abo%e be maxiinurn allowable values established by 11I RT11A and IJBC. Therefore. it is recommended a t :pe If cenarnt he utilized to compensate tier sulfate reactivity with the cement. Compacted Maletial Accentance Compaction specifications are not the only criteria fila acceptance ol" the site grading orother such activities. HaWvc er, the compaction tc�t is the most universally recognized test method for assessing the performance of the (trading Contractor. The numerical test results frons the compaction tt•St cannot be used to predict the engineering performance of the compacted material. Therefore, the accertance of compacted materials will also be dependent on the stability ofthat material. The Soils Engine,:!- has the option of rejectin" ani collipacted material regardless of the degree of compaction if that material is considered to he unstable or if tutu,e instability is suspected. A specific example of rcjecti.)n of fill material passing the required percent compaction is a fill which has heen compacted with n in situ moisture content significamly less than optimum moisture. This type of dry fill (britt!: fill) is susceptible to tiuure settlement if it becomes saturated or flooded. Testing and Inspection A representative of Krazaua & associate%. Inc. should be preseni at the site during the eithwork activities to confirm that rtc<ual subsurface conditions are consistent with the explordtory fieldwork. This activity is an integral part ,f our service, as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent Krazrm & Associates. itic. With Otticcs tiering Tlie Westem United States �-a: u in �vd Rq," ITr�n 61597 Project No. 01-1-05M hq.e No. 4 means of drainage conveyanc_. Swales used for conve)wce of drainage and located within 10 feet of foundations should he sloped a minimum of 2 percent. i,-rtpenious surfaces, such as pavement and exterior concrete flatwork, w?thin 10 feet of building foundations should he sloped a minimtun of 1 Percent away from the stnichve. Drainage gradients should be maintained to carryall surface,ater to collection devices and/or facilities and off-site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project- Seismic Parameter's - 2016 Catifornfs Buildin-, Code The Site Class ler Section 1613 of the 2016 California Building Code (2016 CBC) and Table 20.34 of ss ASCE 7-10 is basc a upon the site soil conditions. it is our opinion that a Site ClaD is most cot isttxst with the subject site soil conditions. For seismic design of the structures based on the i-nsmic Provisions of the 2016 CBC, we recommend the following parameters: LOCATION LAT (N) LONG (McL�Ass Fa Ss Slits Spa Fv 31 SM1 sot tVtAIC 35.292385 179.1051116 D 1.040 1.151 1 66 .197 0.798 1.5 0.432 0.678 0.452 SWC 35288882 119.105186 D 1 038 1.155 1.199 0.7W 1.$66 0 434 0.680 0.453 NEC 35292385 119.101618 D 1.039 1.152 1.197 0.796 Y 1566 0.432 0,678 0.432 SEC 35.289202 119.101646 D 1 038 1.156 1.199 0.800 ~ 1.566 0.434 0.679 0.453 Site ClassCBC Rvtaence Section 1613.3.2 Fv C8C Reference Table 1613.3.3 (2) t# Fa CBC Reference Table 1613.3.3 +1) o t q to S1 CBC Reference Section 1613.3.1 _ Set CBC Reference Section 1613.3.1 Sul CBC Reference Section 1613.3.3 o Sills CBC Reference Sectiasn 1613.3.3 M do SDI CBC Reference Secbx► 1613.3.4 SDs CSC Reference Serxien 1613 3.4 LOCATION NWC = Nortfnvest Comer The recommendations and limitations provided in our previous report and addendum, dated June 3, 2005, and February 25. 2008, respectively, which were not revised or superseded herein, will apply to this letter- If you have any questions, or if u c ean be of further assistance, please contact our of -ice at (661)837-9200. Respectfully submittexf, KRA7AN & ASS(N'tATH,S, INC. Ryan K. Privets, PE t x: q to 1, P'n,iect Engineer \� RCE No. 59372 \v� k;.1�.f RKP:rp -- Krawe & Associates, Joe- With netWith C);'ficec Serving ;lac W stem united Sffitec D .: ofrow 7t 7.- ck,ea r tin „t oca s rq.[ DR G,01f RECORD ALBERTO LOPE�j ExgE r 3C, , `1 CIT( RECORDS NO: �G�NEER * dna C i a� .' V d O�� • 1 /R;o �1T/038 % W f- 0 > 1- Z W W W Ix ICL LU X } U Z w Q 0 Lu tY J O W a CL Q at 0 0 W M 0 LLJ \p 7 a: '- Z . , 83o `6,� t7: Z fit u. w ;, a Q ■ Ct w -a 111 Z a 3 -ai13a ell -C7 ,S• 3 - Ca IW t# 0 Lu tY J O W a CL Q at 0 0 W M 0 LLJ Z Q c W Ca IW d a,a LLJ Q Z o t q to r 0:� _ ~ 4 W V cF ma o M do : Q Z U � /W V F• - CO W CO INt n W \o Lu 9-' W X ii LA uJ [. LL0 [� O a c; r 50' 2 c� I SCALE: 1 "= 50' W I 1 I EASEMENT NOTES 0 AS -BUILT SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO GATHER THE TEMPORARY SEWER EASEMENT TO REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP RECORDATION. CERTIFICATION DATA DUE TO CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE ON THE GRADING PLANS. O THERE AS -BUILT LEGEND U -�- THE DELIVERY OF THIS DRAWING SHOULD NOT BE i > Q CONSTRUED TO PROVIDE AN EXPRESS WARRANTY OR OGUARANTEE TO ANYONE THAT ALL DIMENSIONS AND 0 Z: DETAILS ARE EXACT OR TO INDICATE THAT THE USE 0'Q„= OF THIS DRAWING IMPLIES THE REVIEW AND i PAD ELEVATIONS. THE SECOND SURVEY AROUND THE RETAINING WALLS NEAR THE PG&E GAS LINE EASEMENT TOOK 2 a: CL APPROVAL OF DPS! OF ANY FUTURE USE ANY USE OF UJ �yv s` THIS INFORMATION IS AT THE SOLE RISK OF THE USER i o 3 J J 2 w � 40' PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PER DOC. NO. 0205195833, O.R. (E) TELCO PULLBOX (E) ELEC VLT (E) FIRE WTR VLV -- _ (E) FIRE HYD J (E) SITE WALL , (E) VTR IRR VLV I I I I I p° 70' RAILROAD EASEMENT PER BOOK 12, PAGE 114 OF DEEDS C -41 I 0 q N � CID I � I \ i I Ii I I P/L \ I ,4 I. r/, 70' RAILROAD EASEMENT PER BI4OK 12, PAGE 1141 OF DEEDS If E 354., 0 LL H Q Qa. I 1 I EASEMENT NOTES 0 AS -BUILT SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO GATHER THE TEMPORARY SEWER EASEMENT TO REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP RECORDATION. CERTIFICATION DATA DUE TO CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE ON THE GRADING PLANS. O THERE AS -BUILT LEGEND LIJ -�- 1' N > Q CL cp Q E oz o 0 Z: 0'Q„= (r z i PAD ELEVATIONS. THE SECOND SURVEY AROUND THE RETAINING WALLS NEAR THE PG&E GAS LINE EASEMENT TOOK 2 a: CL m UJ �yv s` I— ti r o 3 J J Q z ILL! W a. Lu } U z W c� Q to z 0 w W I 1 I EASEMENT NOTES 0 AS -BUILT SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO GATHER THE TEMPORARY SEWER EASEMENT TO REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP RECORDATION. CERTIFICATION DATA DUE TO CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE ON THE GRADING PLANS. O THERE AS -BUILT LEGEND U -�- 1' N > Q Q.I cp Q E oz o XXX.X DESIGN ELEVATION Z: 0'Q„= (r z i PAD ELEVATIONS. THE SECOND SURVEY AROUND THE RETAINING WALLS NEAR THE PG&E GAS LINE EASEMENT TOOK 2 a: CL UJ �yv s` I— ti r o 3 J J N w � Lu m -4 c r / 1..L. .% : ELEVATION DIFFERENCE to z 0 w W DRAW N O F RECORD I 1 I EASEMENT NOTES 0 AS -BUILT SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO GATHER THE TEMPORARY SEWER EASEMENT TO REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP RECORDATION. CERTIFICATION DATA DUE TO CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE ON THE GRADING PLANS. O THERE AS -BUILT LEGEND \ -�- Q.I cp ARE NO EXISTING SEWER _NES WITHIN THE EASEMENT. THE FIRST SURVEY WAS COMPLETED OVER THE COURSE OF MULTIPLE DAYS SPANNING 08/01/2018 - 08/06/2018 FOR THE PHASE XXX.X DESIGN ELEVATION Z: ' I i PAD ELEVATIONS. THE SECOND SURVEY AROUND THE RETAINING WALLS NEAR THE PG&E GAS LINE EASEMENT TOOK n s` o r (L J J C C w � � � -4 c r / 1..L. .% : ELEVATION DIFFERENCE •- C! Q CC L iO Q U cr m o c� a laJ mcr 1- °d ca .Z a; Z z 00 �g ( C j \� a o `_ Z . NO: 3 C � cr Q V DRAW N O F RECORD I 1 I EASEMENT NOTES 0 AS -BUILT SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED AT DIFFERENT TIMES TO GATHER THE TEMPORARY SEWER EASEMENT TO REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP RECORDATION. CERTIFICATION DATA DUE TO CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE ON THE GRADING PLANS. O THERE AS -BUILT LEGEND \ -�- ARE NO EXISTING SEWER _NES WITHIN THE EASEMENT. THE FIRST SURVEY WAS COMPLETED OVER THE COURSE OF MULTIPLE DAYS SPANNING 08/01/2018 - 08/06/2018 FOR THE PHASE XXX.X DESIGN ELEVATION ' I i PAD ELEVATIONS. THE SECOND SURVEY AROUND THE RETAINING WALLS NEAR THE PG&E GAS LINE EASEMENT TOOK n s` o L. Ai -PEP O LOPEZ` �.c.E 6.6d� PLACE ON 03/28/2019. (LXX) AS -BUILT ELEVATION w � � � w EXF. 6.30. i 1 .% : ELEVATION DIFFERENCE w 2 1) w v61 (XXX.XX) ORIGINAL SURVEY ELEVATION w c� 1- °d I —�3 FCr[TYORDS Il w w N /� G a o . NO: S 2 R R/W LANDSCAPE 12.52' LOT 5' 10' S• FL 6' MASONRY WALL PER SEPARATE PERMIT 0.5' 2% MIN. 4:1 MAX. �� 2R PAD S ~ 10' SIDEWALK - A BERKSHIRE ROAD N.T.S. P/L P/L I6'-7' SOUND WALL (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) 1' MIN. 1' MIN. RETAINING FINISHED PAD PER SERARATE PERMIT) F.F. SWALE I F.F. SWALE L EXISTING GROUND 4* MAX. D TYPICAL SIDE YARD GRADING E TRACT BOUNDARY/SOUND WALL/SCREEN WALL (:: NOTE: N.T.S. NOTE: WALL BY SEPARATE PERMIT N.T.S. FINAL LOT GRADING SHALL BE DONE BY HOME BUILDER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT. TYPICAL FOR SIDE YARD 10' PAD 2% MIN. 3:1 MAX TYPICAL SECTION - 60' R/W_ N.T.S. TYPICAL FOR R/W & P/L FRONT YARD 20' 10' 8' 12' PARK I 2% MIN. 3:1 MAX R/W & P/L TYPICAL FOR FRONT 60• OR SIDE YARD rt FL 10' 20' '40' 2' 8' 10' 20' I 20' SEE DETAIL 0.4' BELOW SEE DETAIL 1, TYPICAL GUTTER UP 1, TYPICAL ROUGH GRADE TYPICAL SECTION -PARK SITE - 60' R/W THE DELIVERY OF THIS DRAY MIG SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO PROVIDE AN EXPRESS WARRANTY OR GUARANTE E TO ANYONE THAT ALL D04ENSIONS AND DETAILS ARE EXACT OR TO INDICATE THAT THE USE OF THIS DRAWNG WRIES THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DPSI OF ANY FUTURE USE ANY USE OF THIS INFORMATION IS AT THE SOLE RISK OF THE USER N.T.S. T.I. = 4.5 R=55 0.20' TYPE 'B' AC 0.40' CLASS 11 AG BASE 0.50' COMPACTED NATIVE TO 95% MAX RELATIVE DENSITY I PAD 2% MIN. 3:1 MAX TRACT BOUNDARY -STORAGE FACILITY N.T.S. R/W & P/L TYPICAL FOR FRONT YARD 20' PAD 2% I � 71% MIN. 3:1 MAX PA B TYPICAL LOT -TO -LOT N.T.S. PA 2' SOUND WALL I (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) I TYPICAL FOR R/W & P/L FRONT I YARD F� ham-- 20' 2% MIN. 3:1 MAX 2:1 MAX. SLOPE' � L EXISTING GROUND FINISHED PAD / TRACT BOUNDARY/SOUNDWALL/SC_REENWALL EXISTING MINI STORAGE BUILDING 1' RETAINING WALL FINISHED PAD (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) L TRACT BOUNDARY N.T.S. TYPICAL FOR SIDE YARD 10' PARK 2% MIN. TYPICAL SECTION - 60' R/W NTYPICAL SECTION - 60' R/W N.T.S. N.T.S. P/L 6' CMU WALL I (PER SEPARATE PERMIT) 2' 2:1 MAX. SLOPE TYPICAL LOT -TO -LOT N.T.S. SEE DETAIL 1, TYPrA_ N.T.S. R/W & P/L TYPICAL FOR FRONT 60' OR SIDE YARD 10' 20' — FRONT 40 2' 8' 10' 20' 1 20' 0.4' BELOW GUTTER UP ROUGH GRADE n - TYPICAL SECTION - 60' R/W SEE DETAIL 1, TYPICAL v % N.T.S. � T.I. = 4.5 R=55 0.20' TYPE 'B' AC 0.40' CLASS II AG BASE 0.50' COMPACTED NATIVE TO 95% MAX RELATIVE DENSITY O r COMPACTION UMIT UNE - I PAD 2% MIN. 3:1 MAX c� r REAR SLOPE VARIES rye r � REAR SWALE P L N I z (GRADE BREAK) > BUILDING ENVELOPE Z Io � 46/ to -_ N1 (GRADE BREAK) COMPACTION LIMIT UNE FRONT SLOPE VARIES R/W 11- o jcc)i1 / PARKWAY SLOPE `- CURB FACE F,o` NOTES: FINAL LOT GRADING SHALL BE DONE BY HOME BUILDER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT. FINAL LOT GRADING TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. ("-n— �TYPICAL FINAL LOT GRADING N.T.S. 0.63' FL 2' 4.5' 2' 2X MAX 2'=- 2% MIN/ 5:1 MAX AT LANDSCAPING 4.5' SIDEWALK PER ST -8. 0.4' BELOW GUTTER FL -- TYPE "B' CURB AND GUTTER ROUGH GRADE TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER TYPICAL D!R IN -Of RECORD -L. ALBERTO L0,6E2 N.T.S. w W LU La H �a N > BUILDING ENVELOPE Z Io � 46/ to -_ N1 (GRADE BREAK) COMPACTION LIMIT UNE FRONT SLOPE VARIES R/W 11- o jcc)i1 / PARKWAY SLOPE `- CURB FACE F,o` NOTES: FINAL LOT GRADING SHALL BE DONE BY HOME BUILDER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT. FINAL LOT GRADING TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. ("-n— �TYPICAL FINAL LOT GRADING N.T.S. 0.63' FL 2' 4.5' 2' 2X MAX 2'=- 2% MIN/ 5:1 MAX AT LANDSCAPING 4.5' SIDEWALK PER ST -8. 0.4' BELOW GUTTER FL -- TYPE "B' CURB AND GUTTER ROUGH GRADE TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER TYPICAL D!R IN -Of RECORD -L. ALBERTO L0,6E2 N.T.S. w W LU La H z N ,� cV D i LU � w Q Ir r i3. I r G — x I,-7 3 o q >c3 tJ _ 0 ii Gf ILi M ta- w u a. > w a 0 � r o x C w �'.. 1 fD w >- o Z Z LU a ,= �. 0 o h W L7 z C) w �� o c 2 ((r (t N w - `� ~Q E w OZ `� 00 N �� U 1 0 ..c a Ixi^a awasc? w � ..; `�; u.z05 x Lu »w a. <1 TI Taq CITY RECORDS NO: I 1 19 IL IL W H z � w n1. i3. I— O G — w I,-7 3 o q tJ _ 0 w M cd Gl o x o a ,= o a LTJ z C) Z 0 COO CITY RECORDS NO: I 1 19 IL IL H W w w I— O I,-7 3 o q , N _ 0 w CITY RECORDS NO: I 1 19 IL IL