HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix D - Biota ReportWest Ming Specific Plan - Draft EIR
Michael Brandman Associates
H:\Client (PN-JN)\0216\02160029\DEIR 9-1\02160029_Appendices.doc
Appendix D: Biota Report
BIOTA REPORT
2,181+ ACRES, SECTIONS 10 (East Portion), 11, 13, 14,
& 15 (NE Corner) T30S, R26E, MDM
WEST MING SPECIFIC PLAN
KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PAUL PRUETT & ASSOCIATES
A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
OF VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE
2,181+ ACRES, SECS 10 (East Portion), 11, 13, 14 & 15 (NE Corner)
T30S, R26E, MDBM
WEST MING SPECIFIC PLAN
BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
by
PAUL PRUETT & ASSOCIATES
3616 View Street
Bakersfield, CA 93306-9775
(661) 872-5662
for
McIntosh and Associates
2001 Wheelan Court
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 834-4814
(Contact: Ms. Darcie Larman)
13 August 2006
Paul E. Pruett, MS, LLB, CWB
3616 View Street
Bakersfield, CA 93306-9775
(661) 872-5662
CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................….. 1
THE PROJECT SITE, West Ming Specific Plan
Legal Description .................................................................................. 3
Physical Description ............................................................................. 3
Land Use...............................................................................................… 3
Soil.......................................................................................................… 3
Vegetation.............................................................................................… 4
BIOTIC INVENTORY METHODS
Purpose.................................................................................................... 12
Literature Review..................................................................................... 12
Studies Required To Satisfy Endangered Species Law............................ 12
Consultations…………………………………………………………… 12
Vegetation Survey Methods...................................................................... 12
Animal Survey Methods........................................................................... 12
Factors Limiting or Influencing Results................................................... 13
BIOTIC SURVEY RESULTS
Vegetation.........................................................................................…... 16
Animals...........................................................................................…..... 16
Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizards…………………………………………. 17
Raptors………………………………………………………………… 17
San Joaquin Kit Fox…………………………………………………… 17
Tipton Kangaroo Rats……………………………………………………… 17
Migration Corridors and Nursery Sites………………………………… 17
Habitat Modification................................................................................ 17
DISCUSSION OF SENSITIVE SPECIES
Sensitive Plants......................................................................................... 20
Sensitive Vertebrates................................................................................ 20
PROJECT POTENTIAL IMPACTS.................................................................... 25
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES................................................ 26
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................. 27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map............................................................................................ 5
Figure 2. Aerial Photograph ……………………………………………………... 6
Figure 3. Site Topographical Map....................................................................... 6
Figure 4. Photograph of Project Site....................................................................... 7
Figure 5. Photograph of Project Site....................................................................... 7
Figure 6. Photograph of Project Site....................................................................... 8
Figure 7. Photograph of Project Site……………………………………………. 8
Figure 8. Photograph of Project Site....................................................................... 9
Figure 9. Photograph of Project Site....................................................................... 9
Figure 10. Photograph of Project Site....................................................................... 10
Figure 11. Photograph of Project Site……………………………………………. 10
Figure 12. Sensitive Species Approximate Location Map……………………….. 13
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. List of Sensitive Species............................................................................ 14
Table 2. Habitats and Flowering Times................................................................... 14
Table 3. List of Plants............................................................................................ 18
Table 4. List of Animals......................................................................................... 19
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A. List of Participants………………………………………………… 28
Appendix B. Field Surveys………………………………………………………. 29
1
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
2,181 + ACRES, SECTIONS 10, 11, 13, 14, AND 15, T30S, R26E, MDM
This biological assessment and report covers about 2,181 acres, west of Buena Vista Road
and south of Ming Avenue, in Sections11, 13, 14, and portions of Sections 10, and 15, T30S,
R26E, MDM, in southwest metropolitan Bakersfield, California, known as the West Ming
Specific Plan. The site is within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan
(MBHCP) boundaries. As such, any loss of habitat, or “incidental take” of a sensitive species,
other than Gambelia sila, the blunt-nosed leopard lizard (BNLL), or Athene cunicularia, the
burrowing owl, would be covered by previously established mitigation. The site is not
classified by the MBHCP as BNLL habitat.
The majority of the proposed project has been farmed since approximately 1970. The original
plant community of the site probably consisted of Non-Native Valley Grassland, element code
4220, and Valley Saltbush Scrub, element code 36220 (Holland 1986). None of this original
plant community now exists undisturbed within the proposed project boundaries. Sections 11,
13, and 14, constituting about 1,920 acres, or 88% of the proposed project, are currently under
agriculture, disced clean, or between crops and showing evidence of recent harvesting. The
remaining approximately 261 acres of the site, located within the northeast corner of Section
15 and the east half of Section 10, is comprised of degraded and disturbed, Non-Native
Grassland habitat, currently flooded and utilized for water recharge.
Representatives from The Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) stated that the agency
acquired those portions of Sections 10 and 15, currently used for water recharge, in about
1994. Prior to their acquisition, the land was entirely under agriculture similar to the vicinity.
The recharge basins where used annually between 1994 and 1998. No water recharge
occurred from 1999 to 2005, a six (06) year period. In about May 2005, the basins were again
placed in use. A visit to the site on 26 July 2006, showed a marked decrease in available
water and wildlife, as compared to June 2006. Some wetland indicator species (i.e. cattails,
poplars, bulrushes) are present in the recharge area, but only reflect growth commensurate
with the current recharge period.
Basin usage is affected by the agency’s annual entitlements from the California Aqueduct, as
well as flood water runoff, and water purchased from sources such as the Friant-Kern Canal
and Kern River. This year available water has been greatly impacted by discharge from Lake
Isabella due to the Army Corps of Engineers dam repair operations. As water available for
recharge is directly affected by wet and dry years, no accurate prediction can be made as to
duration of use. What can be stated is that a marginal marshland habitat will exist in those
basins, within the proposed project boundaries, during extended periods of water recharge.
Scattered oilfield operations also exist throughout Sections 13 and 14.
Fourteen (14) sensitive plant and animal species were listed on the California Natural
Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) report, RareFind3, Stevens Quadrangle; information dated 03
March 2006, or are known to occur in the vicinity of the project site.
Three (3) sensitive plant species known to occur in the area are: Caulanthus californicus,
California jewel-flower; Delphinium recurvatum, the recurved larkspur; and Monolopia
(Lembertia) congdonii, San Joaquin woollythreads. No evidence of any of these three
sensitive plant species was found on the project site.
2
Eleven (11) sensitive animal species known to exist near the project site are: Agelaius
tricolor, tricolored blackbird; Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl; Buteo swainsoni,
Swainson’s hawk; Emys (=Clemmys) marmorata pallida, southwestern pond turtle;
Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides, Tipton kangaroo rat; Gambelia sila, blunt-nosed leopard
lizard; Onychomys torridus tularensis, Tulare grasshopper mouse; Perognathus inornatus
inornatus, San Joaquin pocket mouse; Scaphiopus hammondii, Western Spadefoot; Sorex
ornatus relictus, Buena Vista Lake shrew; and Vulpes macrotis mutica, San Joaquin kit fox.
Evidence of two of these sensitive species, Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl, and Vulpes
macrotis mutica, San Joaquin kit fox, was observed within the project boundaries during field
reconnaissance. No evidence of the remaining nine sensitive animal species was found on the
project site.
No riparian habitat exists on the project site. No wetlands habitat exists on the project site.
Some trees suitable for raptor nests exist on the project site. No wildlife nursery sites were
identified on the project site. No wildlife migration corridors were identified on the project
site.
We conclude that development of this site will not result in the loss of any undisturbed native
habitat, any riparian habitat, or any wetlands habitat.
Because that portion of the site, intermittently under water recharge since 1994, was
previously farmed border to border for over 50 years, it is our opinion that no significant
adverse impacts, to any sensitive plant species, wildlife species, or wetlands habitat, will
result in the development of this project.
We conclude that no significant direct impacts to any endangered, threatened, candidate or
sensitive species will result if normal sensitive species avoidance techniques are observed in
accordance with the recommendation and the provisions of the MBHCP.
3
THE PROJECT SITE
Legal Description. This project encompasses approximately 2,181.46 acres located in the
eastern portion of Section10, all of Sections 11, 13, and 14, and the northeast corner of
Section15, T30S, R26E, MDM, west of Buena Vista Road and north of the Southern Pacific
Railroad tracks, in southwestern metropolitan Bakersfield, California (Figures 1-3). The
project is within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP)
boundaries.
Physical Description. The proposed project site is located in the middle of the southern end
of the San Joaquin Valley in Kern County. The majority of the site, along with the
surrounding vicinity, has been farmed for decades (Figures 4-11). No undisturbed native
habitat now exists on the site. No riparian or wetlands habitat exists on the project. Newer
home developments border the east side of Section 11 and the north side of Section 13. The
Kern River runs northeast to southwest just north of the project.
The project lies in the Lower Sonoran Life Zone of the San Joaquin Valley which is
characterized by hot, dry summers with daytime temperatures frequently above 100 degrees
Fahrenheit. Winters are cool and foggy with temperatures seldom below freezing. On
average there are between 250 and 300 frost-free days per year (USDA 1988). Rainfall
averages less than ten (10) inches per year with the heaviest rainfall between January and
March (Munz and Keck 1973). Seasonal rainfall to date has been above average.
Buena Vista Road, a paved, well-traveled road is the east border of the south half of the
project site. The Southern Pacific Railroad is the south border. The proposed West Side
Beltway is the west border of the site with the exception of the southwest corner of Section
14. Dirt farm roads cross most of the project in both east/west and north/south directions at
section and quarter section lines. Some farm buildings and scattered oil field operations exist
on the site. The Buena Vista Canal crosses the project site northeast to southwest in the north
part of the site.
Land Use. Historically, land in the vicinity of the project has been used for farming, grazing,
and some crude oil production. About 1,920 acres (88%) of the project site is either currently
under agriculture or between crops. The remaining about 261 acres (12%) is degraded and
disturbed non-native habitat currently used for water recharge as a result of excessive
discharge this year from Lake Isabella by the Corps of Engineers.
Soils. The soils of the project site as described in the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Soil Survey of Kern County, California, Northwestern Part, 1988, are
Cajon loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Cajon sandy loam, overblown, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
Excelsior sandy loam, and Kimberlina fine sandy loam 0 to 2 percent slopes.
Cajon loamy sand is a deep, somewhat excessively drained soil of alluvial fans and plains,
formed dominantly from granitic rock. Typically the surface is comprised of nine inches of a
brown, loamy sand. The next 35 inches is light gray sand and the lower part to about 60
inches, a brownish gray sandy loam. Permeability of this soil is rapid and available water
capacity high. Runoff is slow and the hazard of erosion slight.
Cajon sandy loam, overblown, 0 to 2 percent slope, is found on alluvial fans. It is a deep,
somewhat excessively drained soil formed primarily from granitic rock. The surface layer is
4
about 10 inches of pale brown sandy loam with the underlying material of about 30 inches,
light brownish gray loamy sand. The subsoil, to about 60 inches, is a light gray sand.
Permeability is rapid and available water capacity low to moderate with very slow runoff and
the hazard of erosion slight.
Excelsior sandy loam is a deep, well-drained soil of alluvial fans, derived from mixed rock
sources. The vegetation in areas not cultivated is mainly annual grasses and forbs. The
surface layer, to about 7 inches, is grayish brown sandy loam. The upper 25 inches of subsoil
is gray sandy loam with the lower part a light gray sandy loam and silt loam to about 60
inches. Permeability of this soil is slow and available water capacity low to moderate.
Kimberlina fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a deep, well-drained soil on alluvial fans
and plains derived from granitic and sedimentary rock. The original vegetation is primarily
grasses and forbs and a few scattered shrubs. The surface layer is brown fine sandy loam
about 9 inches thick and the upper sub layer to about 36 inches is a pale brown fine sandy
loam. The lower part, to about 71 inches, is a pale brown silt loam. Permeability is moderate,
available water capacity high, runoff slow, and hazard of erosion slight. Effective rooting
depth is about 60 inches.
Vegetation. The majority of the survey area is either currently under agriculture or between
crops. No undisturbed native habitat exists on the site. The existing plant community before
farming operations began was likely Non-Native Grassland, Element Code 42200 and Valley
Saltbush Scrub, Element Code 36220 (Holland, 1986). None of this plant community remains
on the site (Figures 4-7). The Non-Native Grassland is dominated by introduced species, such
as Avena barbata, Bromus sp., and Erodium sp. It is a sparse to dense cover of annual
grasses and forbs with flowering culms to 1 meter high. In years of favorable rainfall there
may be numerous species of showy, native annual forbs (wildflowers). The Valley Saltbush
Scrub is low to dense succulent scrubland dominated by Atriplex sp.
FIGURE 1. SITE VICINITY MAP
Printed from TOPO! 2001 National Geographic
5
FIGURE 2. SITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
http://www.co.kern.ca.us/gis/
6
FIGURE 3. SITE TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP
Printed from TOPO! 2001 National Geographic
7
Figure 4. Photograph of the proposed project taken from the northeast
corner of Section 13 facing southwest, showing typical terrain and vegetation
(30Jun06).
Figure 5. Photograph of the survey area taken from the southwest corner
of Section 13 facing north along Buena Vista Road (30Jun06).
8
Figure 6. Photograph of the survey area taken from the middle of the south
boundary facing north and showing facilities associated with oil production
located on the site (30Jun06).
Figure 7. Photograph of the project site taken along the west edge of
Section 14 facing east and showing land cleared and being prepared for
planting (30Jun06).
9
Figure 8. Photograph taken along the south edge of the site of a sump
typical of those occurring within the proposed project boundaries (30Jun06).
Figure 9. Photograph of the survey area taken from near the northwest corner
in Section 10 facing southeast (30Jun06).
10
Figure 10. Photograph taken along the west edge of Section 11 facing
northwest, and showing a portion of Section 10 currently utilized for
water recharge (30Jun06).
Figure 11. Photograph taken along the west edge of Section 14 facing east
showing recently harvested wheat and safflower (30Jun06).
11
12
BIOTIC INVENTORY METHODS
Purpose. The primary purpose of this biota inventory was to determine if any plants or
animals that are listed by state or federal agencies as endangered, rare, threatened, or depleted
and of special concern occur within the project site. Throughout the remainder of this report
the term “sensitive” will be used to mean any species considered by state or federal agencies
to be endangered, rare, threatened, or depleted and of special concern.
Literature Review. Both the scientific literature and the California Natural Diversity Data
Base (CNDDB), RareFind3 information dated 03 March 2006, were consulted to determine
which sensitive species occur in this habitat and near the project site. Fourteen sensitive plant
and animal species were reported in the CNDDB reports, or were known to our staff. Table 1
lists these species. Table 2 specifically addresses the habitats and flowering times of the
known sensitive plant species and Figure 11, the Sensitive Species Location Map, reflects the
nearest known occurrences of both the sensitive plants and animals.
Studies Required to Satisfy Endangered Species Law. This study is a biological
assessment of the status of fourteen state or federally listed, proposed, or sensitive plant and
animal species listed in Table 1. The study also sought to determine whether any sensitive
species not known to the CNDDB exists on or utilizes the project site.
Consultations. Mr. Dan Williams, Department of Biological Sciences, California State
University, Stanislaus has been contacted in the past concerning kangaroo rat location and
identification. Dr. David Germano, Department of Biological Sciences, California State
University, Bakersfield has also been contacted concerning location and identification of
Dipodomys sp.
Vegetation Survey Methods. Paul Pruett and Associates used two methods to survey the
plant community: random search and line transects. The entire project was surveyed by
qualified biologists walking the perimeter and internal roads and by walking the western
fallow land on approximately 100-foot intervals. Surveys were conducted on six different
days between August 28, 2003 and January 14, 2004. Additional visits to the site were made
on 30 June and 26 July 2006 to review changes in land use since the initial assessment was
prepared. Appendix A is the list of the project participants.
Animal Survey Methods. The project was surveyed for animals by qualified biologists on
six different days between August 28, 2004 and January 14, 2005. Additional visits to the site
were made on 30 June and 26 July 2006 to review changes in land use since the initial
assessment was prepared. The entire project site was surveyed by walking all perimeter and
internal roads and by walking the western fallow land on approximately 100-foot intervals.
All fieldwork followed the general guidelines established by the California Department of
Fish and Game, Region 4, dated 08 May 90. Special attention was given to the location of
potential kit fox den sites, possible kangaroo rat precincts, and to the possible presence of the
Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard.
Appendix A is a list of individuals who worked on the project and their responsibilities.
Appendix B is a list of the survey dates. Original field notes are available upon request from
the office of Paul Pruett and Associates. Field notes were used to record habitat features and
animal activity during the survey period. A photographic record was made of specific on-site
13
features and wildlife.
No small mammal live trapping was conducted because the site is within the Metropolitan
Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP).
Factors Limiting or Influencing Results. Seasonal rainfall to date has been above average
this year. Excessive discharge from Lake Isabella has resulted in about 12% of the proposed
project being utilized as a water recharge basin. No live trapping was conducted. Surveys
conducted in the spring undoubtedly would identify additional annual plants and birds but it is
doubtful if any additional sensitive species would be identified.
14
TABLE 1. SENSITIVE SPECIES KNOWN TO OCCUR
IN VICINITY OF PROJECT SITE, WEST MING SPECIFIC PLAN
(CNDDB, RareFind3, information dated 03Mar06)
SENSITIVE PLANTS COMMON NAME FED/CA LEGAL STATUS
Caulanthus californicus California jewel-flower Endangered/Endangered; CNPS 1B
Delphinium recurvatum recurved larkspur None/None; CNPS 1B
Monolopia (Lembertia) San Joaquin woollythreads Endangered/None; CNPS 1B
congdonii
SENSITIVE ANIMALS COMMON NAME FED/CA LEGAL STATUS
Agelaius tricolor tricolored blackbird None/None; CDFG SC
Athene cunicularia burrowing owl None/None; CDFG SC
Buteo swainsoni Swainson’s hawk None/Threatened
Emys (=Clemmys) marmorata Southwestern pond turtle None/None; CDFG SC
pallida
Dipodomys nitratoides Tipton kangaroo rat Endangered/Endangered
nitratoides
Gambelia sila blunt-nosed leopard Endangered/Endangered
lizard
Onychomys torridus tularensis Tulare grasshopper mouse None/None; CDFG SC
Scaphiopus hammondii western spadefoot None/None; CDFG SC
Sorex ornatus relictus Buena Vista Lake shrew Endangered/None; CDFG SC
Vulpes macrotis mutica San Joaquin kit fox Endangered/Threatened
TABLE 2. HABITATS AND FLOWERING TIMES (MUNZ AND KECK 1973)
SCIENTIFIC NAME FLOWERING HABITAT
Caulanthus californicus Mar-Apr <3000 ft, Chenopod Scrub, Valley &
Foothill Grassland, Pinyon-Juniper
Woodland
Delphinium recurvatum Mar-May Sub alkaline Soils, Alkali Sink & Valley
Grasslands
Monolopia (Lembertia) Mar-Apr <1200 ft, sandy or clayey, alkaline plains
congdonii
FIGURE 12. SENSITIVE SPECIES IN THE VICINTY OF THE PROJECT
Distribution of threatened, endangered, or sensitive species in the vicinity of the proposed project. Sources: CNDDB Report Stevens
Quadrangles, RareFind 3, information dtd 03 Mar 06; scientific literature, personal observations, and communications. Printed from TOPO!
2001 National Geographic.
ANIMALS PLANTS
AT – Agelaius tricolor GS – Gambelia sila CC – Caulanthus californicus
tricolored blackbird blunt-nosed leopard lizard Califonia jewel-flower
AC – Athene cunicularia OT – Onychomys t. tularensis DR – Delphinium recurvatum
burrowing owl Tulare grasshopper mouse recurved larkspur
BS – Buteo swainsoni PI – Perognathus inornatus. inornatus MC – Monolopia congdonii
Swainson’s hawk San Joaquin pocket mouse San Joaquin woollythreads
DN – D. n. nitratoides SO – Sorex ornatus relictus
Tipton kangaroo rat Buena Vista Lake shrew
EM – *Emys (Clemmys) m. pallida SH – Spea hammondii
southwestern pond turtle western spadefoot
VM – Vulpes macrotis mutica
San Joaquin kit fox
*Location information on Emys (=Clemmys) marmorata pallida, surpressed by CDFG.
15
16
BIOTIC SURVEY RESULTS
Vegetation. The project site is located in southwest metropolitan Bakersfield, California,
within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan.
The area is characterized by hot, dry summers with daytime temperatures occasionally above
100 degrees Fahrenheit, and cool winters, occasional snow, with temperatures sometimes
below freezing. Rainfall averages about six inches a year and was about average this past
year. Sections 11, 13, and 14 have been farmed border to border for decade and are currently
either under agriculture or between crops. The portion of the subject property in Sections 10
and 15 consists of degraded and disturbed non-native habitat currently utilized for water
recharge.
No wetlands habitat exists on the project site. No riparian habitat exists on the project site.
Some trees suitable for raptor nesting sites exist on the project site. All trees were inspected
and yielded no evidence of raptor nesting.
The original plant community of the project site before farming operations began was
probably Non-Native Grassland, Element Code 42200, and Valley Saltbush Scrub, Element
Code 36220 (Holland, 1986). No undisturbed, native habitat now exists on the project site.
The Non-Native Grassland is dominated by introduced species such as Bromus sp., and
Erodium sp., which, to a large extent, have replaced the native vegetation. The Valley
Saltbush Scrub is low to dense succulent scrubland dominated by Atriplex sp.
The CNDDB, RareFind 3, information dated 03 March 2006, lists three sensitive plants
known to exist in the area of the project site: Caulanthus californicus, the California jewel-
flower; Delphinium recurvatum, the recurved larkpur; and Monolopia congdonii, the San
Joaquin woollythreads.
No additional sensitive plant species are known by Paul Pruett & Associates staff to occur in
the vicinity of the area. No evidence of any of these three sensitive plants was found on the
project site.
Forty (40) plant species were found on the site. Eleven (11) plant species, twenty-eight (28)
percent, were introduced, non-native species. Twenty-nine (29) plants, seventy-two (72)
percent, were native species. A complete listing of all plants found on the project site is
contained in Table 3.
No evidence of any sensitive plant species was found on the project site. Additional annual
plant species probably would be identified during spring surveys, but it is doubtful that any
sensitive species would be identified.
Animals. A total of twenty (21) vertebrate species were observed on the project site. Five
(5) mammals, fifteen (15) birds, one (1) reptile, and no (0) amphibians were identified on the
project site. A complete listing of animals is found in Table 4.
Eleven sensitive animal species were reported by the CNDDB or are known to occur in the
vicinity of the project site: Agelaius tricolor; the tricolored blackbird; Athene cunicularia, the
burrowing owl; Buteo swainsoni, Swainson’s hawk; Clemmys marmorata, the southwestern
17
pond turtle; Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides, the Tipton kangaroo rat; Gambelia silus, the
blunt-nosed leopard lizard; Onychomys torridus tularensis, the Tulare grasshopper mouse;
Scaphiopus hammondii, the western spadefoot; Sorex ornatus relictus, the Buena Vista Lake
shrew; and Vulpes macrotis mutica, the San Joaquin kit fox.
Evidence of two of these sensitive species, Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl, and Vulpes
macrotis mutica, San Joaquin kit fox, was observed within the project boundaries during field
reconnaissance. No evidence of the remaining nine sensitive animal species was found on the
project site. No evidence of any other sensitive species was observed on the project.
Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard. Seventeen days of California Department of Fish and Game
protocol level blunt-nosed leopard lizard searches were not conducted. No suitable habitat for
the BNLL exists within the proposed project boundaries. The site is not listed in the
Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan Baseline Map Animal Species, dated
10/23/97, as being potential BNLL habitat.
Raptors. Some trees suitable for raptor nesting sites exist on the project site. Inspection of
trees suitable for raptor nesting yielded no potential nesting sites.
San Joaquin Kit Fox. Kit fox are known to exist in the general area. The Metropolitan
Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan, Known Kit Fox Dens Map, November 1, 2004, shows
dens along the east edge of Section 13. This area is regularly disced and maintained for
farming operations and no potential dens were observed there during field reconnaissance.
Typical kit fox scat and track were noted within the survey during field reconnaissance.
Tipton Kangaroo Rat. No live small mammal trapping was conducted. Kangaroo rat
burrows do exist on the project site throughout the disturbed habitat area. These burrow
openings are typical of D. heermanni, Heermann’s kangaroo rat, common in the area. The
burrows are not typical of the Tipton kangaroo rat, although the two species are known to
exist sympatrically. Two Tipton kangaroo rats were trapped by Paul Pruett & Associates in
1992 in Section 10, west of the site, along a levee bank. The Metropolitan Bakersfield
Conservation Plan Baseline Map for Animal Species, dated 10/23/97, does not list the project
site as Tipton Kangaroo Rat habitat.
Migration Corridors and Nursery Sites. No wildlife migration corridors were identified
on the project site. No wildlife nursery sites were identified on the project site. The project
site is bordered on three sites by similar degraded native habitat, regrown non-native habitat
and on one side, the east, by residential developments. The Kern River runs northeast to
southwest just north and west of the project.
Habitat Modification. The project site consists almost entirely of agriculture land which
has been farmed border to border for over fifty years. A few scattered oil field production
operations still exist on the project site. Some fallow land currently being used as a water
recharge basin exists along the west border of the site for the proposed West Side Beltway
Alignment. Numerous dirt farm roads border and cross the project site, primarily at the
section and quarter section lines. The Buena Vista Canal crosses the project site northeast to
southwest in the north part of the project site. Buena Vista Road, a well-traveled paved road
borders the southeast part of the project site.
18
TABLE 3. VASCULAR PLANTS
2,181 + ACRES, SECTIONS 10, 11, 13, 14, AND 15, T30S, R26E, MDM
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot Pigweed
Ambrosia dumosa White Bursage
Amsinckia menziesii Fiddleneck
Allium cepa Domestic Onion (Eu.)
Allium setivum Domestic Garlic (Eu.)
Baccharis emoryi Emory’s Baccharis
Brassica nigra Black Mustard
Bromus diadrus Ripgut Brome (Eu.)
Bromus madritensis ssp. Rubens Foxtail Chess (Eu.)
Chamomilla suaveolens Pineapple Weed
Chenopodium album Lambsquarter (Eu.)
Convolvulus arvensis Field Bindweed (Eu.)
Cucurbita palmate Coyote Melon
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda Grass
Cyperus esculentus Yellow Nutgrass
Daucus carota Domestic Carrot (Eu.)
Digitaria sanguinalis Crabgrass
Echinochloa crus-galli Barnyard Grass
Eremocarpus setigerus Turkey Mullein
Heliotropium curassavicum Salt Heliotrope
Hemizonia pallida Kern Tarweed
Helianthus annuus Common Sunflower
Heterotheca grandiflora Telegraph Weed
Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce (Eu.)
Malva parviflora Cheesewees (Eurasia)
Nicotiana quadrivalvis Indian Tobacco
Poa annua Annual Bluegrass
Polygonum arenastrum Common Knotweed
Portulaca oleracea Common Purslane
Salix goodingii Black Willow
Salsola tragus Russian Thistle (Eurasia)
Sisymbrium altisimum Tumble Mustard
Solanum parishii Purple Nightshade
Sorghum bicolor Sudan Grass
Sorghum halepense Johnson Grass
Stephanomeria exigua Wire Lettuce
Tamaix ramosissma Salt Cedar (Eurasia)
Tribulus terrestris Puncturevine
Trichostema lanceolatum Vinegar Weed
Zea mays Domestic Corn
19
TABLE 4. VERTEBRATE ANIMALS
2,181 + ACRES, SECTIONS 10, 11, 13, 14, AND 15, T30S, R26E, MDM
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME EVIDENCE
MAMMALS
Canis vulgaris domestic dog Scat / Track
Citellus beecheyi beechey (California) ground
squirrel Sighted
Dipodomys sp. kangaroo rat
Thomomys bottae pocket gopher Burrow
Sylvilagus audubonii cottontail Sighted
BIRDS
Athene cunicularia burrowing owl Sighted
Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk Sighted
Carpodacus mexicanus house finch Sighted
Cathartes aura turkey vulture Sighted
Charadrius vociferous killdeer Sighted
Columba livia rock dove Sighted
Corvus corax common raven Sighted
Eremophila alpestris horned lark Sighted
Euphagus cyanocephalus Brewer's blackbird Sighted
Falco sparverius American kestrel Sighted
Mimus polyglottis mockingbird Sighted
Sturnella neglecta western meadowlark Sighted
Tyrannus verticalis western kingbird Sighted
Zenaida macroura mourning dove Sighted
Zonotrichia leucophyrs white-crowned sparrow Sighted
REPTILES
Uta stansburiana Side-blotched Lizard Sighted
AMPHIBIANS
None Observed
20
DISCUSSION OF SENSITIVE SPECIES
Sensitive Plants. Three sensitive plant species were listed on the CNDDB reports or are
known by the author as occurring in the vicinity of the project site: Caulanthus californicus,
the California Jewel-Flower; Delphinium recurvatum, the Recurved Delphinium; and
Monolopia (Lembertia) congdonii, San Joaquin Woolly-Threads.
No evidence of any of these three sensitive plant species was found on the project site.
Extensive farming operations continue throughout approximately 88% of the proposed
project. The remaining roughly 12% of the site is greatly disturbed and degraded habitat
currently under water recharge. Consequently, no suitable habitat exists within the proposed
project boundaries likely to support any sensitive plant species.
Caulanthus californicus, the California Jewel Flower, is listed as endangered by both the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. The closest
report occurrence is about three miles northeast, seen in 1900. Taylor visited this site in 1986
and reported it extirpated at this site. No uncultivated land still exists at this site. This
unique flower is reported in the Paine Preserve about 15 miles northwest of this project. It
was transplanted there about 1975 by Jack Zaninovich. 13 plants were counted in 1986.
The California Jewel Flower is a decumbent to erect annual with leaves less than 11 cm that
are wavy-dentate to shallowly cut with a winged petiole. The flowers are white with purple
veins, wavy margins, and petals 6 to 11 mm. It is thought to exist originally in non-alkaline
grasslands below 3000 feet.
No evidence of the California Jewel Flower was found on this site.
Delphinium recurvatum, the Recurved Larkspur, is not listed as threatened or endangered by
either the federal or state agencies but is a federal Species of Concern and is tracked by the
NDDB as a CNPS 1B plant. The closest reported site is about six miles southwest of this
project site, west of James Canal, between State Route 119 and Panama Lane, reported in
1992 by the Depratment of Water Resources (DWR). It grows on alkaline soils below about
2000 feet. This beautiful member of the Ranunculaceae with light blue sepals and white
petals grows to 85 cm and is easily recognizable. It blooms during April and May. No
evidence of the Recurved Larkspur was found on the site.
Monolopia (Lembertia) congdonii, San Joaquin Woolly-Threads, is listed as Endangered by
the federal agencies and as threatened by the state. San Joaquin Wooly-Threads were
observed by botanist Ray Draper, botanist Randi McCormick, and the author in the spring of
2000 approximately three miles southeast of the project site, east of Hwy. 43. San Joaquin
Woolly-Threads is a yellow, 5-30 cm, loosely woolly annual with alternating leaves and heads
clustered at the branch tips. No Monolopia (Lembertia) was found on the project site.
Sensitive Vertebrates. Eleven sensitive animal species were reported by the CNDDB or are
known to occur in the vicinity of the project site: Agelaius tricolor, the tricolored blackbird;
Athene cunicularia, the burrowing owl; Buteo swainsoni, Swainson’s hawk; Clemmys
marmorata, the southwestern pond turtle; Dipodomys nitratoides nitrotoides, the Tipton
kangaroo rat; Gambelia sila, the blunt-nosed leopard lizard; Onychomys torridus tularensis,
the Tulare grasshopper mouse; Perognathus inornatus inornatus, San Joaquin pocket mouse;
Scaphiopus hammondii, the western spadefoot; Sorex ornatus relictus, the Buena Vista Lake
21
shrew; and Vulpes macrotis mutica, the San Joaquin kit fox.
Evidence of two of these sensitive species, Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl, and Vulpes
macrotis mutica, San Joaquin kit fox, was observed within the project boundaries during field
reconnaissance. No evidence of the remaining nine sensitive animal species was found on the
project site. No evidence of any other sensitive species was observed on the project.
Agelaius tricolor, the tricolored blackbird, is a federal Species of Concern and is not listed by
the state but is a Species of Concern and is tracked by the CNDDB. It is a medium sized
blackbird with a total length of 8 ½ to 9 inches and resembles the Red-Winged Blackbird but
the red wing patch of the male is bordered with a white bar. This blackbird is restricted to
California and is gregarious at all seasons and nests in dense colonies, usually in fresh water
marshes.
The exact location of this occurrence in the Stevens Quadrangle is considered “sensitive”
information and is suppressed by the CDFG. Not occurring on annual basis, approximately
261 acres of degraded, disturbed non-native habitat in Sections 10 and 15 is currently being
used for water recharge. Consequently, this portion of the project site currently exhibits some
characteristics of a marginal marsh habitat which could provide marginal nesting for the
tricolored blackbird. The closest suitable habitat regularly occurring is north of the project
site, within the riparian habitat of the Kern River. Because the marginal marsh habitat is
temporary based on annual and seasonal recharge, no suitable, permanent nesting habitat
exists within the proposed project boundaries for the tricolored blackbird. No tricolor
Blackbirds were observed during field reconnaissance.
The potential for occurrence of the tricolored blackbird is low considering the historically
infrequent water recharge, and lack of suitable, permanent nesting habitat.
Athene cunicularia, the burrowing owl, is an easily identifiable, small owl, active both night
and day, which lives in the ground in abandoned holes of other animals such as the California
ground squirrel. Burrowing owls are neither endangered nor threatened by either state or
federal agencies but have CDFG Special Concern status (SC) and are protected by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Burrowing Owls were seen by the author in the grasslands about
a mile east of the project site.
Two burrowing owls were observed in active burrows on the project site during the most
recent visit.
Buteo swainsoni, the Swainson’s hawk is listed federally as a Species of Concern and is listed
as threatened by the state. It is protected also by both the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act
and raptor laws. This large hawk, 19-22 inches, is recognized by its black bill and yellow
cere, uniformly dark brown upper parts, white wing linings and throat, wide chestnut band on
the chest, pale buff to white belly, and narrowly gray tail with a wide, dark, subterminal band.
These birds sometimes travel in huge flocks and migrate from North America to Argentina
but are monogamous and are solitary nesters. They nest in stands with few trees in juniper-
sage flats, riparian areas, and in oak savannahs. They require suitable adjacent foraging areas
such as grasslands or alfalfa and grain fields which support rodent populations. The closest
reported occurrence is on the Kern River in 1992, very near the project site. No Swainson’s
hawks were observed on the project site. Several large trees, suitable for raptor nesting, exist
22
within the project boundaries. No raptor nests were found during careful inspection of these
trees by qualified biologists.
The potential for species occurrence on site is low given the relatively small number of
potential nesting sites and migratory nature of this species. However, Swainson’s hawks may
forage on site during migratory periods. Consequently, indirect impacts through “take” of
potential foraging habitat of a sensitive species may result in the development of this project.
Clemmys marmorata, the Western pond turtle, has neither federal nor state listing but is a
federal Species of Concern animal and a CDFG Species of Concern. The location of the
Western Pond Turtle is considered “sensitive” information by the CNDDB and the location of
occurrences is therefore suppressed, but Western pond turtles are known to exist in the Kern
River. This is a thoroughly aquatic turtle, 9-19cm, has a low carapace and is dark olive,
brown, or blackish usually with a network of dark spots, lines, or dashes.
Since this turtle is thoroughly aquatic, no suitable habitat for it exists on the project site.
Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides, the Tipton Kangaroo Rat, is listed as endangered by both
the state and federal government. The D. nitratoides is diagnostically differentiated from
other Dipodomys by the absence of a fifth hind toe. Currently D. n. nitratoides cannot be
differentiated from D. n. brevinasus either physically, or by DNA comparison. Personal
communication with Dr. Dan Williams, California State University Stanislaus, and Dr. David
Germano, California State University Bakersfield, further concludes that individuals found
east of the California Aqueduct in Valley Sink Scrub conditions are generally accepted to be
D. n. nitratoides while populations west of the Aqueduct along the foothills are generally
accepted to be D. n. brevinasus. Kangaroo rat burrows exist on the project site. Positive
identification is impossible without close, in-hand inspection.
The closest reported Tipton kangaroo rat occurrence listed in the CNDDB is about four miles
northwest on the north side of the railroad tracks in Section 6. The author and Dr. George
Lawrence trapped two Tipton Kangaroo Rats in Section 10 west of the project site in 1992.
The site is not listed in the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan Baseline Map
Animal Species as Tipton Kangaroo Rat habitat.
The potential for occurrence is unlikely considering the extensive agricultural operations and
lack of suitable habitat.
Gambelia sila, the blunt-nosed leopard lizard, is listed as endangered by both the state and
federal agencies. The Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard is a large, easily identifiable reptile found
throughout the southern San Joaquin Valley and the surrounding foothills. Urbanization and
agriculture development have greatly reduced the best habitat for the species. This large
lizard, 12-15 inches long including the tail, has prominent leopard-like spots and lighter
colored cross bands or bars on its back and tail. It is often observed running bipedal. The
closest reported occurrence of the Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard is about five miles south of
the project site, about two miles east of the junction of I-5 and State Route 119, reported in
1974. No evidence of the Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard was found on the project.
The site is not listed in the MBHCP Baseline Map for Animal Species as BNLL habitat. Field
reconnaissance yielded no suitable habitat for the BNLL within the proposed project
23
boundaries. Because the site is not listed as potential BNLL habitat by the MBHCP Baseline
Map for Animal Species and no suitable habitat was determined to exist on the site, searches
for the BNLL were not conducted for the preparation of this report.
The potential for occurrence is unlikely considering the extensive agricultural operations and
lack of suitable habitat.
Onychomys torridus tularensis, the Tulare grasshopper mouse, has no state or federal listing.
It is tracked by the NDDB as a CDFG Species of Concern. This mouse is described as stout
bodied, with a body length of about 119 to 163 mm. Typically the coat is pale-brown to gray
or pinkish cinnamon with white underparts characteristically different. The Tulare
grasshopper mouse can be distinguished from coexisting white-footed mice by its shorter,
club-like tail, 33 -62 mm, and larger forefeet.
Some small mammal burrows were observed, generally in banks along raised roads within the
project site. The nearest reported occurrence is by Dr. David Germano about 6 miles
southwest of the project in section 36, about 0.8 miles north and west of where Highway 119
crosses Interstate 5. The potential for occurrence is unlikely given extensive farming
operations and lack of suitable habitat.
No mice were observed during the survey period. As a result of continued farming
operations, no suitable habitat for the Tulare grasshopper mouse exists within the proposed
project boundaries. Consequently, the potential for occurrence is unlikely given extensive
farming operations and lack of suitable habitat. Because the site is within the MBHCP
boundaries, no live trapping was conducted as a part of this biota report.
Perognathus inornatus inornatus, the San Joaquin pocket mouse, has no state or federal
listing. It is a CDFG Species of Concern. This member of the pocket mouse family is a
small, 15-18 gram, buff-orange mouse with an indistinct lateral line. It occurs in grasslands
and scrub between about 350 and 600m. The nearest recorded listing by the CNDDB is a
2003 occurrence reported by Dr. David Germano, about eight and a half miles northwest of
the project, south of the Pioneer Canal and north of the Kern River.
No mice were observed during the survey period. As a result of continued farming
operations, no suitable habitat for the San Joaquin pocket mouse exists within the proposed
project boundaries. Consequently, the potential for occurrence is unlikely given extensive
farming operations and lack of suitable habitat. Because the site is within the MBHCP
boundaries, no live trapping was conducted as a part of this biota report.
Scaphiopus hammondii, the western spadefoot is a federal Species of Concern and has no
state listing but is a CDFG Species of Concern and is tracked by the CNDDB. Members of
the genus Scaphiopus are found only in the Western Hemisphere and are distinguished from
true toads by their catlike eyes (vertical pupils), a single black, sharp-edged “spade” on each
hind foot, teeth in the upper jaw and a relatively smooth skin. The western spadefoot is a 1 ½
to 2 ½ inch animal, dusky gray or green above with four irregular light stripes down the back
and no cranial boss between the eyes. It ranges throughout the Central Valley and adjacent
foothills, below 4500 feet. It occurs primarily in grasslands but has been known to persist for
a few years in orchards. They are active at night during rains or high humidity. Adults stay
in underground burrows during most of the year. Breeding occurs in March. Tadpoles
24
transform in late spring and disperse after spending a few hours or days near the pond
margins.
Although a portion of the project is currently under water recharge, this condition is not
typical of the site on a regular basis and the site would not be considered suitable western
spade habitat because of the regular lack of water. The potential for occurrence of the western
spadefoot is unlikely given the lack of suitable, regular habitat.
Sorex ornatus relictus, the Buena Vista shrew, is listed as an endangered animal by the federal
agencies. It has no listing by the state but is a CDFG Species of Concern animal. Shrews are
easily distinguished from moles by the distinct and clearly visible eye and present ear pinna.
The ornate shrew is a rather small (TL 89-108) dull brown shrew with a faintly bicolored tail.
The Ornate Shrew, S. ornatus, is commonly found in the Central Valley, prefers moist soil, is
most abundant in riparian habitat and does not usually occur with other species. It feeds on
small-soil dwelling insects and other invertebrates. They are active yearlong and most
surface activity is nocturnal with two peaks, one at dusk and another later.
The subspecies S. o. relictus occurs in marshes and sloughs around the perimeter of Buena
Vista Lake and in marshes and riparian areas in the Tulare Basin. It prefers moist soil and
used stumps, logs, and litter for cover. Identification of the Buena Vista shrew, one of four
subspecies, currently depends upon location.
The closest reported known occurrence is just northwest of the project site in an area
originally proposed as critical habitat by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, know as Unit 3.
The USFWS chose not to include the site in the final designation. Similar habitat does not
exist on the project site. No Buena Vista Shrew was seen on the project site.
The potential for occurrence of the Buena Vista Lake shrew is unlikely considering the
extensive agricultural operations and lack of suitable habitat.
Vulpes macrotis mutica, the San Joaquin Kit Fox, is listed as endangered by the federal
agencies and as threatened by the state. This small dog relative is known to inhabit the
general area and is easily identified by its small size (cat size), bushy black tipped tail, and
extremely large ears. It is a nocturnal predator and can be identified by the typical green eye
shine. The closest known occurrence is immediately north at the intersection of Stockdale
Highway and Renfro Road. Scat from the kit fox is typically 10-15 mm in diameter, of
varying lengths, and almost always contains hair, and usually small fragments of prey bones
and insect parts.
Typical San Joaquin Kit Fox scat and tracks were observed on the project.
25
PROJECT POTENTIAL IMPACTS
Based on a detailed analysis by the authors of the biological resources present on the project
area, it is their professional judgment that the following potential impacts may result from the
proposed development of the project site:
1. Because no riparian habitat exists on the project site, development of the project will not
result in the loss of riparian habitat.
2. Because no wetlands habitat exists on the project site, in the form of a freshwater marsh,
development of this project will not result in the loss of any wetlands habitat.
3. Because no undisturbed native habitat exists on the project site, development of this
project will not result in any reduction of native habitat of the area.
4. Because no wildlife migration corridors exist on the project site, development of this
project is not expected to result in any adverse impact to wildlife migration corridors.
5. Because no wildlife nursery sites were identified on the project site, development of this
project site is not expected to result in any adverse impact to wildlife nursery sites.
6. Although no raptor nesting sites were identified within the proposed project boundaries,
because raptors were identified on the project and are known to exist in the within the riparian
area of the Kern River, just north of the site, development of this project may result in the
“take” of foraging habitat associated with animal species occurring in the vicinity of the
project.
7. Because evidence of, Athene cunicularia, the Burrowing Owl, was noted during field
reconnaissance, development of this project could result in adverse impact or “take” of a
threatened or endangered animal species or habitat associated with a threatened or endangered
species.
8. Because evidence in the form of scat and track of the San Joaquin kit fox was found on
the project site, and since San Joaquin kit fox are known to exist in the general area it is
concluded that development of the project could result in adverse impact or “take” of a
threatened or endangered animal species or habitat associated with a threatened or endangered
species.
26
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
Mitigation measures are used when it is impossible or unfeasible to avoid adverse impact to
the biological resources. Mitigation measures should reduce, offset, or compensate for
adverse impacts. The authors believe that the following measures will avoid, or reduce to less
than significant, adverse impact to the biological resources found on the project site. These
recommendations are not binding but represent the best biological judgment of the authors.
The final decisions on avoidance and mitigation measures rest with the permitting and
reviewing agencies: City of Bakersfield, Kern County, California Department of Fish and
Game, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
1. Because the site is entirely within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan
(MBHCP) boundaries, any loss of habitat, or “incidental take” of a sensitive species, other
than Gambelia sila, the blunt-nosed leopard lizard (BNLL), or Athene cunicularia, the
burrowing owl, would be covered under previously established mitigation. It is there
recommended that prior to grading plan approval, the applicant pay the habitat mitigation fee
in accordance with section 15.78.030 of the City of Bakersfield Municipal Code and the
MBHCP.
2. It is recommended that a preconstruction clearance survey be conducted within 30 days of
initial ground disturbance in accordance with the provisions of the MBHCP. It is
recommended that any potential, inactive, or active kit fox dens or burrowing owl sites
identified as unavoidable, be monitored, excavated, and backfilled in accordance with the
recommendations of the MBHCP, and all guidelines, protocols, and other provisions of the
CDFG, the USFWS, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, and California
Endangered Species Act.
3. It is recommended that prior to any tree removal, an inspection for potential raptor nests
be conducted by a qualified biologist. Any potential raptor nests identified during the survey
shall be monitored for activity according to applicable CDFG, USFWS, and Migratory Bird
Treaty Act regulations and guidelines.
4. It is recommended that a “tailgate” session for all construction personnel be conducted by
a qualified biologist, prior to initial ground disturbance, relative to all environmental federal,
state, and local law. It is recommended that all construction personnel be trained in sensitive
species identification and avoidance techniques and be instructed to be on the lookout for
sensitive species sign during earth disturbance phases of construction. A report summarizing
the date, time, and topics of the “tailgate” session, list of attendees and identification of the
qualified biologist conducting the session shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning
Director within 10 days of the “tailgate” session.
5. Any evidence, such as dens, burrows, or potential raptor nests, observed at any time
during construction, shall be promptly reported to the reviewing agencies for resolution.
6. It is recommended that all pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of four
inches or greater shall be kept capped to prevent entry of kit fox. All structures not capped or
otherwise covered, shall be inspected prior to burial or closure to ensure no kit fox, or other
protected species, become entrapped.
27
REFERENCES and BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alsop, Fred J. III, 2001, Birds of North America, Western Region, R. R. Donnelley & Sons,
New York, NY.
California Department of Fish and Game, 2005, "RareFind 3 Report, Stevens Quadrangle",
25Feb05, Sacramento, CA.
California Native Plant Society, 1994, The Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants Of
California. CNPS, Sacramento, CA.
Hickman, James C., Ed., 1994, The Jepson_Manual, Higher Plants of California, UC Press,
Berkeley, CA.
Holland, R. F., 1986, Preliminary Descriptions Of The Terrestrial Natural Communities Of
California, Calif. Dept. Fish & Game, Sacramento, CA.
Jameson, Jr., E. W., and Hans J. Peeters, 1988, California Mammals, UC Press, Berkeley, CA.
Munz, P.A. and D. Keck, 1973, A California Flora, with Supplement, UC Press, Berkeley,
CA.
Pruett, Paul E. and George E. Lawrence, 1992, “A Biological Assessment, McClung Ranch
Recharge Project, Kern County Water Agency”, Pruett, Lawrence & Associates,
unpub. Bakersfield, CA.
Stebbins, R. C., 1985, Reptiles and Amphibians, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA.
Taylor, Dean Wm. and William B. Davilla, 1986, Status Survey of Three Plants Endemic to
the San Joaquin Valley and Adjacent Areas, California, BioSystems Analysis, Inc.,
Santa Cruz, CA.
Williams, D. F., undated, "Distribution and Population Status of The San Joaquin Antelope
Squirrel and Giant Kangaroo Rat", 46 pp., unpublished, Calif. Dept. of Fish & Game,
Sacramento, CA.
Williams, D. F., 1985, "A Review of the Population Status of the Tipton Kangaroo Rat,
Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides", Final Report to USFWS, Endangered Species
Office, Sacramento, CA.
Williams, D. F. et al, 1998, Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley,
California, USFWS, Portland, OR.
Vanherweg, William J., 1995, Ltr Rosedale-Rio Bravo WSD, “Survey listed species N ½ Sec
31, T29S, R26E, and S ½ Sec 25, T29S, R25E”, unpub, Bakersfield, CA.
28
APPENDIX A. PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
2,181 + ACRES, SECTIONS 10, 11, 13, 14, AND 15, T30S, R26E, MDM
________________________________________________________________________
BIOLOGIST EDUCATION PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY
________________________________________________________________________
Chapman, William J. BS, Gen Sci Field Biologist
Adams State College Level II Researcher
M.Ed. University of LaVerne
________________________________________________________________________
Cluff, Greg BS, Botany, UNLV Plant Taxonomy
MS, Crop Science UN Reno Field Biologist
PhD, NM St. University, Level I Researcher
Agronomy
________________________________________________________________________
McFaddin, Joseph BS, Biology Field Biologist
CSU Bakersfield Level II Researcher
________________________________________________________________________
Pruett, Paul E. BA, UC Berkeley Project Manager
MS, NC State Wildlife Biologist
LLB, LaSalle Univ. Level II Researcher
CWB, TWS
________________________________________________________________________
Pruett, Steven P. BS, Business/Finance Field Biologist
CSU Bakersfield Office Manager
MEd, University of La Verne Level II Researcher
________________________________________________________________________
29
APPENDIX B. FIELD SURVEY DATES
DATE BIOLOGISTS SURVEYS
23 AUG 03 Steven Pruett Plant and Animal Surveys
William Chapman
26 AUG 03 Paul Pruett Plant and Animal Surveys
06 SEP 03 William Chapman Plant and Animal Surveys
Gregory Cluff
Paul Pruett
Steven Pruett
20 SEP 03 William Chapman Plant and Animal Surveys
Steven Pruett
01 OCT 03 Paul Pruett Plant and Animal Surveys
14 JAN 04 Paul Pruett Plant and Animal Surveys
30 JUN 06 Steven Pruett Land Use Change Confirmation
26 JUL 06 Joe McFaddin Land Use Change Confirmation
Steven Pruett